TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Rager_YMN_6 Archive

View 1 post and 600 comments by Rager_YMN_6 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Yup. Much more reliable to look at something like antidepressant data than ‘I’m happy’ self reported surveys that yield positive responses because women are especially inclined to keep up social appearances (so they’re less likely to admit they’re depressed).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 03:07 AM
1

Well, the actual sexual desire for that guy is how you prove it to guys, so you’re proving the point. The BP tells guys the majority of guys that can’t get what they want (sex) a bunch of shit that doesn’t work to get them what they want, so even if you consider that ‘validating’ as a female, that isn’t what’s validating him. You don’t have to fuck a dude you’re not attracted to, but the whole point is that proves you’re not truly validating him by actually desiring him. You’re just telling him …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 07:45 AM
2

Soooo you do get attention, just not attention you want. You proved the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 04:11 AM
7

Woke white women on this sub can’t help but display their subtle racism
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 03:43 AM
–

Being choked and slapped by dangerous men is how you feel cherished by men? Lmao women can’t make this stuff up
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/21 10:31 PM
3

“Emotional labor“ Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 07:42 AM
2

But why do you consume media containing to taboo sexual content? Why is 50 Shades the best selling book of last decade? Why do men watch all types of porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 07:23 AM
–

93% of women dont orgasm but they’re with average dudes…. so women with average dudes doesnt work, and their hypergamous filter makes them crave for better or nothing at all Just because women are with average dudes doesn’t mean they want them. They want the best, and since it’s so rare they have to settle
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:40 AM
–

Modern women are strong, independent and smarter human beings but can’t take accountability for consenting to have sex with guys they think are ‘emotionally unintelligent’. You can’t make this up. It’s 100% your responsibility and your fault for being ‘manipulated’ by a guy with an emotional intelligence of a child into sex. You’re basically admitting you’re falling for 12 year old brains. This goes to show that women, when they feel regret for having consensual sex with a guy, will do anything …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 09:52 PM
–

Soooo ‘TRP is whatever I say it is at any given time’
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 09:46 PM
1

All these people claim reddit is not representative of reality on all other posts to paint Redpillers as insane social outcasts while being antiwork leftist communist sympathizers… the irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 08:03 PM
0

All this word vomit to excuse yourself from consenting to be with this obvious red flag guy in the first place. Take some accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 07:50 PM
-1

Model modern woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 07:48 PM
3

This is c*pe; guys just don’t give a fuck about giving it… at least not the guys you wanna casually fuck. I’ve only even tried with girls I actually have care about & are worth it, and not most casual experiences where these girls aren’t puttin any value/effort in. A faithful beta is the type of guy who would take the time to make sure you cum, but he isn’t the type of guy you’d wanna fuck in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 07:47 PM
10

This is a common lie that we know is not true. Unless there’s a tiny chance she got abducted or whatever, she likely didn’t get into a major accident that would prevent her from sending a 2 second text She ghosted; women are just more flaky, and will come up with excuses in order to keep up appearances. She either had a better option to pursue or got bored or she didn’t wanna put the effort in because she’s not as interested. It’s best for the guy to have an abundance mindset & just move onto th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 07:41 PM
3

Yet women still fuck the same guys who won’t take time to make them orgasm. Women getting off all the way themselves is irrelevant to whether or not guys will actually get sex; the same dudes are already fuckin her without gettin her off all the way anyway… and she consents anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 07:33 PM
7

And you just wanted to use those guys as emotional & financial rocks that can cater to your needs. You claim you didn’t need them but gladly accepted their support anyway; not necessarily your fault for accepting what’s offered, but you knew you were subtly leading them on until you got tired of dealing with them and then you directly told them they are never having a chance with you. Guys, this is why you never let yourself get friendzoned by a woman. She’s not your actual friend, and since you…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 07:25 PM
1

Perhaps not happily with how much hurt is seeping through your comments Every guy you met tries to get at you for sex, so perhaps this includes the guy you’re happily married to. Or maybe the guys you really wanted pumped & dumped you or tried to get sex up front so you felt ‘manipulated’ and settled for a faithful beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 07:23 PM
7

Who, who pumps and dumps women like they’re disposable, acts like a ‘small child’? I’ve heard this insult used against actual incels, but not against dudes who get play Maybe you’re an idiot for getting outwitted by someone with the emotional intelligence of a child?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 07:20 PM
-1

‘TRP is whatever I say it is at that given time so I can easily strawman it’
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 07:18 PM
1

Why would I need to save face? I’ve kept the same argument; women are a big reason for stagnant wages. Your personal opinion of it is up to you, but that’s the fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 05:15 AM
3

Naw, men find a majority of women attractive, even though 70% of women are overweight Just because you discount sexual intimacy as not a part of dating that should count, that’s still way more than the average fat guy will get. Your anecdotes are slanted because a DJ Khaled will sure get a lot more play than the average fat guy, but the average fat guy will have less LTR & casual dating luck than the average girl
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 01:56 AM
1

When men consider most women attractive, despite 70% being overweight, while women find less and less men attractive at all the more options they have available (as this has become a global dating market with a smaller percentage of men being found attractive & being able to casually date over time), it’s pretty obvious female attraction is very relative. OLD studies show that a smaller number of men are even found attractive and over time way more men have became more sexless & unable to casual…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 01:46 AM
0

Mhm, I’m sure, FDS girl. It’s ironic you project this narrative of arguments I make not falling in line with reality yet all you do is say shit that doesn’t fall in line with reality. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/odwe7x/fds_womens_overlap_with_mental_health_subreddits/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf The probability of your argument being the case is pretty slim as the likelihood of you being an outlier among most of society & being not well adjusted is …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 01:39 AM
3

Enlighten me as to why this is the case then, because even if you support women in the workforce and think it’s a good thing…. It’s pretty obvious why half a population flooding the workforce market suddenly compounds with a lot of other factors to make for stagnating wages. Other reasons include globalizing markets, more nations turning to free market capitalism and free trade with the US, immigration, the changes in the way we measure workforce productivity (which shows that the wage stagnatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 01:32 AM
2

A guy can choose a 10/10 girl over a 7 and still think even though the 10 is hotter, the 7 is hot A woman will choose a 10/10 guy who just walked in the room and the 7 will become invisible to her, because women’s way of rating attraction is relative. The guy is either attractive or he’s not
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 10:32 PM
2

And society will collapse, and even the leaders of this gynocentrist society know. They have to keep the struggling guys who do all the dirty work & heavy lifting in jobs women won’t do/can’t do as well to keep working for some kinda incentive… otherwise we keep going down this dark path.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 10:13 PM
2

Women & feminist ideals directed this modern society this way. Ever since the US prioritized the female sexual strategy in the 60s. Women will claim the parts they like & wanna take credit for as part of the progressive, feminist movement, but will push all the parts that hurt their argument onto men. A lot of this can be tracked back to the time of the pill & sexual revolution, which led to things like the welfare state allowing women to disregard their children’s fathers to have kids out of we…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 10:12 PM
0

Because women are only fuckin the dudes they find most attractive and not the faithful stepdad cucks who would do anything to feel useful, including raising another man’s child It’s just that those guys are invisible to women until they need that provider because the fucbois left them while they were pregnant
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 10:04 PM
1

This purely subjective anecdote means nothing to me, especially when women on reddit (especially this sub) have life experiences that don’t fall in line with reality the most. The men with the most options tend to be the men that have the most sex. There may be some small exceptions of that guy who’s top tier in everything and is monogamous to you, but projecting what you (as a reddit girl) think makes a man onto men & their biological drives as a whole is c*pe. And I bet your current partner is…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 10:01 PM
0

This is c*pe. You’re gonna have to share a man who’s HV. It’s male human nature
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 09:17 PM
8

Privilege is invisible to the gender that has it; women don’t recognize anything that goes against their feminine victim-mindset based arguments. They really argue that men have the leverage when it comes to birthing kids here in the US, lmaooo
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 09:08 PM
-1

Deflection. Your the selective sex. Opening yourself to get fucked by all types with no selection measurements makes you a less worthy female on the dating market because you are easier & less valuable Also, more bodies leads to more risks for disease, lesser likelihood with her ability to bond with mates, more likelihood for mental disease & antidepressants… the more slutty a woman is, the more damaged she will likely be.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 08:56 PM
0

And she’s a mod, so she’s a complete social outlier by that marker
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 07:02 AM
0

Your worth as a woman is tied to your sexuality. Your purity is part of what makes you a woman. Just gonna be blunt about it. Women know this truth too, deep down.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 07:01 AM
2

Makes a lot of sense
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 04:56 AM
8

Women are insecure because they hate to realize their purity is one of the most important things about them
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 04:55 AM
15

Funny how women claim incels are a major threat to their wellbeing while at the same time scoffing at the thought of society changing if the amount of sexless men increases. One of the biggest logical consistency among the many common, illogical female arguments here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 07:31 PM
0

Crooked corporate Neolib like the rest of them, but he wasn’t the worst
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 04:50 AM
4

It’s a Lillith post
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 04:49 AM
3

Why do you guys even entertain Lilith anymore? You know her MO
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 04:48 AM
1

Pretty based
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 03:45 AM
5

That’s because you attract and fuck losers
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 03:28 AM
15

True, reddit is a bluepill, leftwing cesspit that is especially a waste of time if a dude’s lost in his life
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 03:18 AM
2

Jesus, this is literally top comment on the top post https://www.reddit.com/r/SexLifeShow/comments/o8locg/season_1_discussion/h36r0q2/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 08:44 PM
2

Some sex sells more than others. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 07:26 AM
1

So porn? I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 07:25 AM
1

Yep, this is obvious. The government & welfare state of the 60s was the first entity to replace more & more men as the ‘beta bux’ side of hypergamy. Advents like birth control, abortion, no fault and other protections was security provided by the government that covered that side of hypergamy. Then it was women making their own money in typical careers, and now it’s also women making money of a small number of simp men who dole out all their pockets for women (easier than ever thanks to OF, cash…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 02:17 AM
7

That’s part of hypergamy. AF/BB. Cooper is her security. Brad is her hot passion. It’s why so many dead bedrooms are dead bedrooms; these good dads can’t negotiate attraction with their wives. A lot more women settle, as more sexual partners & even more options (worldwide options) early on leads to a higher likelihood that women will settle for someone who is not the best she ever had… like Billie here settled for Cooper. And like the real life actress Sarah Shahi herself just left her nice husb…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 12:01 AM
3

But they still give sex to dudes who spit game, are hot and give them tingles, even though it doesn’t leave them longterm fulfilled afterwards
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 11:54 PM
3

They can’t choose whether or to be hypergamous or not; the main choice is whether to maximize it or not, and to what degree. Billie here is an example of someone who maximizes it to the near fullest. She’s got the Beta need and the Alpha seed, and was able to go back and get the Alpha seed. The choice she made has torn up her family though, so there’s costs… but the costs aren’t as great today as they were back then. Lotta modern women try to maximize it within modern social conventions as much …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 11:46 PM
1

Fair point. I thinn people who read TRP need to always allow for some leeway in these concepts as people use ‘alpha, beta’ as catch all terms that aren’t supposed to be entirely rigid. To facilitate easier discussion when talking casually we have to just use those simple yet generalizing terms so we don’t have to meander about & talk about every single exception, but in specific debate like this we can talk specifics. Cooper isn’t a stereotypical beta, but in this context compared to Brad, he is…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 11:12 PM
2

True, point for that. You did the work so I concede you are right about the total they grossed. I have other discussion points though because I have more questions about it. The original point I made when accounting for the differences in how a book is measured in the 2010s vs a movie in the 80s has to do with how people consumed media. Even the least watched movies make a lot more than best read books/movie today, and the differences in total viewers, viewers compared to the rest of the market,…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 11:07 PM
6

It’s not either or, it’s more of a mixture. She has biological urges to maximize hypergamy, and she has the conscious choice to or not. The subconscious biology has a huge influence on the conscious choice she makes though, and nowadays more women are making that choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 10:56 PM
2

Of course, in all other contexts, I wouldn’t care about this….. but this is a debate sub centered around asking uncomfortable yet thought provoking questions that make you question why such a phenomena is happening. It doesn’t just happen just because. That’s what this thread is for figuring out.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 10:52 PM
5

The movie was high grossing, but did it sell more than 50 Shades like you said, especially considering context and adjusting for a movie in the 80s’ sales to a book from last decade? Never changed the goalposts, and I knew you’d imply that; BP women here are easy to debate. I specifically highlighted that I’m reiterating the point from the OP in my last comment and asking you how your point counters mine… because I knew the whole point of your commenting is to obfuscate, make strawmen arguments,…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 10:43 PM
5

Naw, but a lotta dudes wanna fuck her, and Emilia Clarke in general. Why do men watch all types of porn, from ones with weird fetishes to ones with women who cosplay as their favorite show/anime character?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 10:18 PM
5

So the media forms you provide that has to do with sexual strategy either don’t back up what was originally argued (about men consuming media about sexual strategy containing men cheating & getting it all) or some partially do and you support my point. Men want unlimited access to unlimited sexuality. 2 and a Half Men is a sitcom, not a show primarily about sexual strategy. But, since there’s some elements to it surrounding sex, there is a small aspect of Charlie’s lifestyle resonating with what…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 10:16 PM
8

50 Shades was best selling last decade and one of the best selling books ever (also did crazy worldwide); does Fatal Attraction beat it within the same context? Hard to compare a movie from the 80s to a book from a decade ago in a one-to-one comparison and even then I bet 50 Shades beats it. I also wonder about viewership results if you compare male consumption (as a percentage & of total volume) of FA to female consumption of 50 Shades? And, like mentioned in my OG comment, how does Fatal Attra…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 10:11 PM
5

Here I think you’re both arguing similar things while trying to find points to disagree with. Porn reveals men’s sexual strategy like this type of media reveals women’s. For men, it’s unlimited access, unlimited sexuality. Men don’t have one person they’re aiming for sexually the same way women do; it’s just that men want variety. All types of women, even if they have a preference. Men don’t have the same ideal sexual strategy realization that women do, and don’t cause as much social chaos as wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:58 PM
11

If that’s what you wanna call it, go ahead. I’m just calling it ‘trying to stay on topic, because we were talking about trends that displays ideal sexual strategy’. So no media that shows men sexual strategy being cheating & being rewarded for it? Any? I’m not even asking you to find one that matches 50 Shades in sales here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:54 PM
5

And people do settle in this post civilization Western world with socially enforced monogamy (mainly for men nowadays), but I think you finally agree that true sexual strategy is shown in observing these trends and not what people have to settle for.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:51 PM
12

Actually agree with you here. All these different types of porn shows men’s sexual strategy completely realized is unlimited sexual access to unlimited sexuality. Women’s form of porn is media about sex, romance, etc… it’s about AF/BB, finding sexual satisfaction, etc. After all, don’t women here always use that study that 93% of female sex ends in no orgasm to lament about how unsatisfied they are sexually? Weird how none of these points about women’s potential sexual strategy aren’t considered…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:47 PM
0

Yea. Men do like some career women more than others, but for the expectations that follow the specific career. Specifically…….. There’s a reason that the main (and probably only) occupation that’s a fantasy to men is a nurse. There are other niches, but any woman who’s a nurse complains on some level of how they’re sexualized by some degree because of it… in a typically more feminine field, it’s more attractive. Women’s career can really only add to their sexual market value if they exhibit typi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:41 PM
0

Any media you watch that’s strictly about sex, sexual strategy, and sexuality? Ever read 50 Shades? I’m gonna assume probably.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:36 PM
2

Fair points, but I find it interesting you go on to elaborate it’s a turn on, even if it may not be exactly practical/realistic to reenact those fantasies in real life. Some people here keep fighting me on the point that media like 50 Shades sell for no real explainable reason that tells us something about that audience. Well, it seems to be something the audience can resonate with, be enticed with and be turned on by.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:35 PM
10

She’s attractive for a middle aged mom of a couple, and I think her casting is a choice by writers for a reason; to resonate with all types of women. She’s diverse, middle aged but also flexible enough looks wise to fit with enough women from 24 to 45 in order for these women to project themselves on to that character. The pretty enough post-wall woman living out her lifestyle from her 20s she still craves for, even though she’s more mature now
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:31 PM
4

Why are they so titillating? Why is 50 Shades so titillating?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:28 PM
1

So you agree that even though this current state of affairs prevents men from acting out their sexual strategy, fuckin all types of girls is the ideal, right? And I never said or implied we treat all/most/any women with ‘distrust and disdain’. You should never hate women for what they’re not.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:26 PM
3

No, because there are the most consequences for rape (way more severe than any other consequence in this MeToo er), so men don’t go around fucking 50 different women a day without consent, yes. Most men don’t even cold approach in the past few years due to the potential consequences being so more drastic than years ago. But this is a weird analogy because I thought the prevailing thought by women on PPD is that most men would perv on all types of women if they could, and a lot do, because men ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:24 PM
7

Which one of those is about men cheating and getting it all in terms of their sexual strategy?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:20 PM
4

I never said it was about cheating; I’m just waiting for your stories about ‘men cheating’ or whatever that you said you had plenty of. Especially ones that outsell 50 Shades. And I’m ‘losing my shit’ over making a cordial discussion post about something on a debate sub? Seems like projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:20 PM
6

What does that media have to do with people’s sexual strategy, which is a more grounded & realistic feature of human nature than turning into a shark? Sure, watching Shark shows isn’t something people emulate because they can’t be sharks, but our biological wiring contains our sexual strategy. That strategy is something we do try to fulfill and what people consume in relation to their sexual strategy has some validity because that’s what they resonate with. 50 Shades didn’t outsell the bible jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:17 PM
4

It isn’t a reflection of how life works out, but in terms of sexual strategy, media like these shows & 50 Shades that are consumed the most are better indicators of women’s true sexual strategy than most other indicators used when looking through a BP lens. Of course, a lot of people settle, but the point is that a lot of women resonate with what the main character wants (sexual satisfaction from a hotter guy). Similar to how most guys can’t end up fuckin all types of women, they would still def…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:10 PM
11

Sure. I don’t know how this relates to the point, but you go ahead. I wonder though… can you find even one story that has outsold 50 Shades in the past decade?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 08:50 PM
9

If you think these trends based on observing what people do is simply coincidental and not worth paying attention to, I can’t convince you. Men may not be able to have unlimited sex with different types of women, but that’s what they want and their sexual needs drives their thoughts & actions, just like women with their sexual strategy. 50 Shades of Grey didn’t outsell the Bible just cuz women like ‘drama’ or whatever. Sure, they do, but ask deeper questions; some ‘drama’ outsells other for a re…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 08:48 PM
0

Of course, they are not realistic fantasies due to multiple reasons (logistics, STDs, inability for most men to get casual sex)… but they are still things men try to prioritize in their sexual strategy even if most can’t end up getting it. Similar with women. They want the hot guys in their younger years, then prioritize safety in the later years… then after a while if they’ve settled for their faithful husband theyll crave that sexual satisfaction again, because the same guys they were most att…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 08:38 PM
43

Also, I find it funny how the main actress, Sarah Shadi, kinda lives out her AF/BB strategy in real life. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hellomagazine.com/brides/20210709117163/sex-life-sarah-shahi-marriage-divorce-relationship/%3fviewas=amp She divorced her longtime good husband a few months ago and got with a new hot guy that gives her tingles, Adam Demos… who is the same guy on the show who plays ‘Brad’! Lmao Kinda interesting how life does imitate art here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 08:34 PM
10

What does Tiger King have to do with sexual strategy? A better analogy would be the variety of porn we have today. Complete fantasy for men, right? Well, even if it is a fantasy, it shows what men’s sexual strategy is: unlimited access to unlimited sexuality… just like media based around female sexual strategy that is the highest consumed appeals to women. AF/BB
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 08:30 PM
10

No, but porn is the best indication of how men’s sexual strategy works because it’s based on unlimited access to unlimited sexuality***. All types of women and all types of genres; men like variety Similar to how the media consumed most by women that they can relate to contains concepts like AF/BB, chasin guys with dark triad traits, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 08:25 PM
1

Peak mod behavior here, braindead arguments from their female solipsistic mindframes “You have as many options! Just be gay!!”
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 07:55 PM
1

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/can-american-men-ever-be-happy-if-their-wives-earn-more-than-they-do-2019-04-29
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 06:58 PM
2

I don’t know, are they? That’s the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 06:56 PM
3

Ah, so your loose experiences is also why this confirms your bias and your deadset on shouting at the red pill clouds to make your points.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 06:55 PM
2

So ironic coming from the crazed reddit girl posting literally every 2 minutes on the most anti social platform there is lmao This is all massive projection. The fact you yourself claim you spend a lotta time making these comments on posts with flawed, subjective studies that confirm your bias goes to show a loy
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 06:53 PM
9

Goalposts, shifted.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 06:49 PM
5

If r/science is ripping it apart, that’s saying something
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 06:48 PM
-2

Did you still fuck the dudes you met on OLD and the like?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 06:48 PM
2

Because there’s also a difference between “friends, not looking at you sexually whatsoever now” and “friends, maybe something will happen down the line ;)”
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 06:47 PM
11

And these studies about ‘friends’ all posted by BPers aren’t really profound because the definition of ‘friend’ among these different studies is very subjective & varied.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 06:44 PM
3

Cool
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 04:04 AM
2

Why young women are the most slutty they’ve been in Western civilized history
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 04:03 AM
1

Many more animals will also disregard or outright kill offspring of a female they’re looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 03:58 AM
3

We are animals at the end of day, still primarily beholden biological urges. It’s nice that he stepped up from your perspective, but we are not above our biological wiring by any means.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 04:27 AM
1

He still went against his biological imperative by not carrying on his genetic legacy, but he’s a nice guy from the sound of it. Assuming it was beneficial for you at least to have a father figure instead of none.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 03:50 AM
1

Someone from Germany who posts on anti work’s input is worthless to me in this context
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 07:38 PM
3

No one legit says men peak at 50. This is a prime example of strawmanning. Some BP troll claiming men say men peak in their 60s which is obviously untrue but women here ran with this narrative Plenty of evidence shows men overall are in their prime in their early 30s and peak at 35-36. It’s more dependent on men working hard to hit it and that prime is a wide range (from late 20s to late 30s) where almost all women peak at 22, 23 This isn’t just looks based; it’s looks, status, education, wealth…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:46 AM
6

Vast majority of reddit is male, yet is very liberal
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:39 AM
8

Mrs_Degree and the GriderXX mods are two frequent jannies who assert their dominance is the most. There were a couple others but any mods that are non-blue pilled/non-female are rarely active from what I see
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:38 AM
2

Ad hominem attack to c*pe with the fact that you have no actual facts. Everyone has life experience they can use to support their argument… but for a claim as sweeping as yours, which asserts the overwhelming divorce rate by women is ACKSHUALLY the fault of men, you need to bring something else Why do all you broken old women on this subreddit specifically cover up your lack of actual substance in your arguments with all this… hurt? I’m genuinely worried for you; this isn’t how normal people beh…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:34 AM
2

Society would collapse then obviously, because even at their least incentivized men have still built this world and still maintain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:30 AM
4

I think the one about sex slaves got deleted because I legit can’t find it https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/oit25k/postmodern_feminism_has_failed_society/h4yevc1/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3 This was the one where the mod asserted men of this sub wanna reinstate slavery. I asked for proof of this phenomenon and she just basically said she knows it’s true, so meh The mods are, like in all parts of reddit, entirely biased and that’s no surprise. …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:29 AM
8

She deleted some of my comments from the thread days ago so I’ll have to look I think I can find the one about race though https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/oit25k/postmodern_feminism_has_failed_society/h4yevc1/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3 Here’s one about race. She agrees the men of this sub believe slavery from the 1800s was a good thing and that men here wanna reinstate it… which is funny because I’m black and I doubt that’s something I’d hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:19 AM
10

A little blue pilled to prevent some of the more unpopular Reddit opinions from getting out, but not this blatant
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 01:22 AM
2

It still is. Men don’t want affirmative action back, most who realize what it is just wanna end and make everyone play on an equal opportunity playing field, like feminists claim. This further proves feminism is and has always been about power, not equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 01:08 AM
13

One mod removed my comment responses to her ridiculous argument calling men sex slavers and pedophiles. Another mod claimed I was being delusional and that there’s no bias whatsoever. Next time she comments on the thread she says the men of this sub are unironic white supremacists and I have to implicitly believe her because… she’s a mod or her feminine intuition or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 01:06 AM
1

https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/4884132/affirmative-action-civil-rights-white-women/%3famp=true White women, overall, are the biggest beneficiaries regardless. Makes sense; the ones controlling social narratives are especially (woke) white women, who ironically preach about all this inequality stuff but benefit from actual inequality the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 01:01 AM
1

https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/4884132/affirmative-action-civil-rights-white-women/%3famp=true White women, overall, are the biggest beneficiaries regardless. Makes sense; the ones controlling social narratives are especially (woke) white women, who ironically preach about all this inequality stuff but benefit from actual inequality the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 01:00 AM
5

Did I say it was? I’m responding to your comment above
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 12:36 AM
0

Well then let’s get rid of all these unnecessary programs like AA since you seem to be doing so well without that help Women are at the same time bragging about all they’ve achieved as a strong independent woman, while at the same time claiming victimhood in another comment (even in the modern day).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 12:36 AM
7

Women are way more common in pockets of the Internet regarding Hollywood and use some feel good psychoanalyst bullshit terms like ‘toxic masculinity’ Doesn’t mean they’re truly sticking up for men. They stick up for men in the way they want to, without knowledge of how men truly work or what they truly want. Talking like pop psychoanalysts is a main hobby for women; it’s like sports. It’s something that entertains them; it’s not something they do altruistically. Instead of allowing guys to have …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 12:26 AM
8

And when BPers have a post with sources it’s very subjective and doesn’t back the subjective conclusions they’re making. Like the one on ‘friends’ in dating the other day. So many women gloating in the comments basically screaming “YAAAAS QUEEEN” when the rare pro-BP post with studies comes up. A little later when it’s proven to not support their general sweeping argument, they don’t have a response but the thread full of misinformation stays up. You just hear “Mhm yes, this completely confirms …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 12:11 AM
4

They were valuable, but the point was that they are not as necessary towards survival. You just wanna always play victim so you’ll always make up some argument to rail against. Victimhood is an ingrained feature in yall
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 12:05 AM
3

Ironically, wages have stagnated since a certain sex flooded the workforce in mass, so all this rhetoric that ‘men can’t provide enough for a big family anymore’ is ironic considering the trends since the 60s. It’s not the main reason, but it contributes to the wage stagnation. Globalism & the growth in other nations, the rise of businesses incorporating, the change from the gold standard and the quality of life from the things we spend money on (which isn’t necessarily a bad thing) are all poss…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 12:03 AM
2

Notice no response to this one
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 11:57 PM
5

Because men today are also more feminine than they were unfortunately. A lot of men will lower their standards to get that physical intimacy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 11:50 PM
23

“Mods are not biased against men or women” Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 11:42 PM
1

I’d agree generally that’s true on the last part; women typically look at these things in a simpler light while men, especially those who don’t get it growing up, are more technical. They use these terms, even if it may be a turn off for a woman to hear it up front, because it’s easier to put it in a term like this for men to understand. That’s why dudes don’t and never should talk about RP stuff in public, and I never do. Women hate the PUA side of things especially because the tactics they use…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 11:39 PM
0

I’m just following your logic. I didn’t even need to call you one of these ‘losers’; you did it for me
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 07:38 PM
1

Most men don’t naturally get it; apex fallacy. That’s the point. You have confirmed literally everything and are raging out at me in every comment ironically. At least 80% of dudes can’t casually date, and a small number of those dudes use the RP as a toolbox. Most dudes will still never reach top tier level, but most guys are better off with that knowledge alone before they even level up than they are being blue pilled. I personally was moderately physically attractive & somewhat capable with g…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 07:37 PM
1

Any evidence on that first point? Data or studies or relevant info? Other than your feminine intuition?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 07:21 PM
1

None of this was relevant to any points I made, so your point is irrelevant. You getting fucked by top tier guys, assuming that’s true, isn’t valuable to us… because a lotta women do and every woman can. Most girls are fuckin those few guys; you’re not unique, you’re just another rider And you mischaracterize what the RP is about. Even if we’re just talking about dating casually, listening to female advice while make you one of those blue pilled losers. That’s why men seek TRP and level up in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 07:20 PM
0

And you’re deciding for that guy what he truly values and should value. Case in point Poor guy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 07:16 PM
7

Female solipsism.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 07:11 PM
7

Brainwashing
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 07:09 PM
3

No, that’s c*pe women tell themselves to get over the fact the guy they really craved isn’t gonna commit to them. Most women want commitment from that hot guy ideally. Biologically. You don’t wanna open yourself up, based on your biological evolution, unless you’re attracted to that guy and he stays after. Unfortunately they don’t stay typically so it feels really uncomfortable for her when he leaves after, but women sell themselves on hope that top tier guy will commit. When he doesn’t, the nic…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 07:08 PM
1

The point is that the predominant common case in the current gynocentric society is that women decide what women value and women decide what men (should) value. The whole point is that you keep fighting this point, but men know you’re more attracted to the hot guy you fuck sooner than them, who is more safe & reliable. When you argue this point it’s your filter trying to reason with itself and us that’s not the case when your arguments make no sense on how female attraction works. Watchin what t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 07:03 PM
0

I’m going by your criteria; regarding the ‘pill stuff’, you said ‘the losers in society care’. As one of the frequent users of Purple Pill Debate, I’m assuming you’re one of those losers?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 07:00 PM
2

Because ‘today’s world’ is built and maintained primarily by men. Ignoring all the work done to build & maintain this world that you don’t see with your solipsistic point of view, sure, you can be sorta independent. But snap men out of existence and women can’t maintain it with the vast majority dying in a few weeks, months.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:56 PM
–

But but but men!! 😡 On a post about “what do you genuinely not understand about women?”
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:52 PM
1

Jesus, lady. Here, lemme explain it for you again so you can understand. You can give your experience, but it’s just that; your experience. It gives no insight on men as a whole because your experience with a couple men outside of the norm is not in line with most other experiences and that is also backed by statistics. A few men you knew dating around is indicative of men in general, or vital to the initial conversation? How? Especially when that isn’t the norm for men. Apex fallacy. Just becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:49 PM
–

Based and redpilled. Summed it up well
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:45 PM
–

You don’t get to decide what men value, and it makes more sense why men would think a woman wants them less if they’re less sexually into him and fuck him after she fucks everyone else. Proving The Red Pill right. I love this sub
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:45 PM
6

Guys, look at this, women will try to claim not fucking you is giving her best self while she gives it up to some dude they claim to not care about When they try to lie about why they fuck Chad before you, listen to how their arguments make less sense. The earlier she fucks, the more attracted she is. Simple. This is the hypergamous filter at work. This is how she’ll tell you that even though she gave it all to someone first, she ‘really loves you more’ because she made you wait and invest it al…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:43 PM
–

That’s a lie you tell the faithful beta; you respect the guy you’re attracted to and fuck first more than the beta you dangle pussy in front of by making him commit everything first. Guys, don’t believe it when girls say they respect you more but don’t prove it with actions; this is how they make you beta bux This is hypergamy at work fellas
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:38 PM
–

This is like saying not ALL human beings have 5 fingers, so we can’t generalize anyone out of fear they might have 6 fingers. No. Men have dicks. Women have vaginas.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:36 PM
–

Based for honesty Men look to qualify, women look to disqualify. It’s how they’re wired
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:32 PM
1

Would you say, as one of the most frequent users here, you’re one of those losers?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:21 PM
1

A study or general argument about men is more useful than your personal experience with a few, especially when your personal experience is probably rare
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:19 PM
-1

That point is literally useless. How many men is that? A couple? In comparison to the millions of others in the US alone who can’t even casually date? You were gonna date around regardless, so this false narrative you concocted was a justification when confronted about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 05:47 AM
9

Not to mention the mods (unsurprisingly) being very blue pilled, so they help curate discussion towards the BP side without looking too guilty.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 09:49 PM
0

She’s been on a role with making entire claims with faulty, unrelated studies on this. The one about women dating ‘friends’ was probably the worst one yet. Such subjective variables involved and a subjective conclusion drawn from it; whenever BPers actually have studies to share they end up being real shaky based on what they try to disprove.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 09:23 PM
4

Are those 65% of women not having casual sex, if true, doing so out of choice or out of lack options? Are they still having a bunch of attention & offers their way? Interested in seeing deeper specifics of the type of relationships these women are in that count towards the study; whether they are casual or long term relationships and what not. I haven’t read the entire source (busy rn) but I’ll have to look more into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 09:19 PM
3

Fuckin them with no strings, sure, but not dating them. That’s what men should do instead if they still wanna have their options open to a wider pool
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 09:15 PM
8

I think men in general should work to be their best selves regardless too, and that’s what things like the TRP preaches (not just crying about it), but this is a debate sub… so what do you mean by ‘move on’? The same topics are bound to be rehashed, especially when the majority of this sub is BP and still tries to argue against these facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 09:12 PM
14

Cause or effect? It’s way more likely these guys opt out because it’s way harder of an uphill battle, leading them to play more of those evil vidya games, which leads to even less opportunities of course… But it seems more like it started with the sexual revolution of the 60s and has accelerated since around 08 due to social media & OLD. If the game was the same as it’s always been, guys wouldn’t opt out of experience with women for sex; the game has changed. PPD knows this, but they wanna find …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 09:10 PM
9

She’s not gonna see this bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 09:05 PM
1

**Only marry a virgin guy who was wanted by women & capable of having sex but just refrained from it The typical virgin is entirely unattractive to you. The ideal virgin, which is a top tier attractive guy with everything goin for him except he (for some reason) remained a virgin for you, is attractive to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 09:01 PM
6

Nope, it’s biology. Men (and women, not in sexual contexts) are disgusted by promiscuity by women. It’s a biological trait that has remained with us forever; it has to do with securing paternity primarily (and a few other things). You’re never gonna be able to successfully brainwash men into accepting promiscuity, even if you suppress them from sharing it openly with shaming tactic, because it’s biological. If you’re a whore, you’ll be considered a whore.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 08:57 PM
3

Would you use that to describe your experience dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 02:49 AM
1

It’s not rational if we apply it to the 1st world we live in now, but people are still biologically wired to have these feelings, so this is a moot point. At the end of the day, you still prefer these things. Attraction is not rational whatsoever, especially female attraction, and it’s something the BP can’t grasp.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 10:01 PM
4

AWALT. All are hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 07:07 PM
7

And a large part of that enthusiasm is checking how fast she’s willing to do it. The sooner, the more enthusiastic
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 07:04 PM
-2

If that was the case women are attracted to just not feeling like they’re in danger from the guy himself would be into stick figure men under 5 feet and with a soft, feminine personality because you’ll be safest from him if he’s that measurement…. but that’s the exact opposite of what women are turned on by obviously Women are biological animals and haven’t changed their wiring much in thousands of years. You are still wired to look for strong men who can protect you from threats, even though in…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 06:48 PM
1

What’s the point of a debate sub if discussing relevant points you don’t like to address bothers you? Might as well leave if it’s too repetitive or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 06:38 PM
1

Right… but I think you should be reminding yourself that because all you’ve done is project & avoid engaging the actual argument logically.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 06:11 AM
1

For someone who purports to be a well adjusted, mature adult you seem to be acting awfully… immature. Projecting about a ‘rage boner’ is sorta ironic, don’t ya think? You made a statement that you intended to make a stronger impact when you first commented, but since I called you out on it, you backpedaled and now claim you never were trying to make a claim. You also seem to be generally agreeing with me on a lotta points now, like about male & female dating strategies (you’re starting to sound …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 12:00 AM
2

I’ll give you a billion valid sources when you give me them on the initial claim you made that you never backed up on your OP comment
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 11:50 PM
13

I think the BP side relies more on emotional arguments than logical ones, and Lilith is a writer who knows how to get her side riled up in support of her illogical arguments. Who cares if she makes any sense when she can make people swoon. Every BPers then responds to her illogical posts essentially saying “YAAAAS THIS IS FAX QUEEEN” and reinstating that the things that happen in this crazy dating market happen because essentially a moral failing on men that things out of their authority happens…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 11:49 PM
1

You soapboxed as if the stuff you said was anything more than a virtue signal to guys who have little hope getting what they’re looking for (sex), so I took at as a failed attempt to give shit advice. It kinda was, even though you’re backtracking. At least you acknowledge male and female’s sexual strategies, when successful, are adversarial. BPers never get this and guys end up following female advice that is subtly meant to work for women and not for men, so that’s exactly why the RP exists in …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 08:38 PM
3

The point is the top guys who get sex from women, which are pretty much all the guys getting sex from women, have leverage after that
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 08:34 PM
1

Social media decreases men SMV because of hypergamy. Women date up and now have more access than ever to do that. Making more contributes to that race to find the top guy, but social media definitely does Men find most women attractive despite 70% of them being overweight, and even when comparing girls on social media any girl of a healthy weight can look good on social media anyway. It’s very easy. Just one quick search yields graphs like these that shows how the dating landscape has changed mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 08:33 PM
7

Thank you for further proving hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 08:18 PM
1

Hopefully no man who wants to be successful with women takes this advice, and thankfully more and more men are waking up to it. This is the hypergamous filter trying to tell guys she doesn’t want (the betas) to stay in their lane & cater to her. This women saying they want men to cater to them, their needs, their whim, which only breeds beta bux men and brings them to her doorstep with this advice… Which won’t get him what men wants, which is sex, in the best way possible. He’ll be a dancing mon…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 08:15 PM
1

But since the definition of the term the data is based on is so subjective, this one time ‘study’ is damn near useless to surround your entire post around like you did yesterday.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 08:08 PM
–

Seems about right. Most men can’t get casual sex, and a lotta these dudes are average dudes. Women on Reddit are more likely to be outliers than men, and are more likely to be… well, not normal. Especially impressive because most women are found attractive regardless, so it’s impressive for you to be this ugly. A lotta women here on are on IncelTears too, lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 08:07 PM
5

Yea, the distinction isn’t ‘women gatekeep sex, men relationships’ It really is ‘women gatekeep sex, men gatekeep relationships after he’s gotten sex’. It’s weird to put this down and speak so directly about how there’s different leverages and what not, but that’s how the saying should be. It’s like a timeline, where the woman typically (not always) has leverage until she has sex with a man, then the man (typically) has leverage because he’s gotten what he’s been gaming for and now doesn’t need …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:59 PM
1

Of course, the definition of ‘friend’ is so loose it’s useless to base this otherwise airtight argument on. A lot of subjectivity used to define terms and reach conclusions. A lotta BP people post studies act as ‘gotchas’ when they don’t conclusively say anything. It’s just to confirm preconceived notions & biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:35 PM
5

No, the acceleration of dating changes can be marked as a trend that started in 08, around the time of social media and OLD getting mainstream. Obviously the sexual revolution all started in the 60s, but a lot can be attributed to social media as something that creates new trends itself. And the thing is, the more women have made and have access to, the less happy they’ve become. Antidepressant rates skyrocket, especially among older women who make more money, as they price themselves out of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:33 PM
5

Whenever one particular side of PPD actually produces studies or data (which is rare in the first place) to confirm their biases, that few studies posted usually are built upon a shaky foundation with unscientific processes like this. Weird sample sizes, very subjective questions (like the one about ‘friends’ yesterday that people just ate up), even more subjective conclusions based on limited data, survey data that is easily influenced by face-to-face interaction that can cause a change in peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:24 PM
–

Link to the picture and post, that sounds hilarious if true It’s funny because women on reddit in particular go through all these ways to handwave away men’s problems with their bad looks because all it takes is a little hard work… But ironically they’re most likely the ugliest demographic in comparison (because women on reddit are a significant outlier) yet they still likely get more sexual attention than the average guy. Female solipsism; all a woman has to do to be attractive, even the uglies…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:13 PM
–

Lilith will respond with some sort of incoherent argument or shaming tactics/personal insult because she has no argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:06 PM
1

That’s a valid hobby and part of something you may bring to the table, yeah. I’m not much of a gardener but I think it’s neat and think it’s neat my girl would be genuinely into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 06:21 AM
1

Genuine desire isn’t just sex and sex alone; if you have genuine desire, you’ll be more likely to work alongside that person healthily because that is the person you wanna be with most of all. You & a lotta people, intentionally & or not, misconstrue genuine desire as just monkey sex when it’s way more than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 05:00 AM
2

Hypergamy
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 04:57 AM
1

So much confirmation bias in the comments of this sub whenever a rare pro-blue pill study like this is made and the BPers of PPD can circlejerk about it It’s inherently flawed (because of the entirely subject definition of ‘friend’) and doesn’t support the premises it supports, but the BP women here don’t operate from a logical basis first, so whenever they see a flawed study that confirms their bias the comments all say “HA, TOLD YA SO!”
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 04:51 AM
1

Fair. At least you acknowledge there’s a lot more effort you have to put in as individual to be on top of your game, but I just disagree that a lotta problems are from growing apart (if you both are on top of things) because genuine desire will keep you guys attached. The only inexplicable explanation where this would happen (even if there’s a genuine desire) would be if a person thought they were too good now to be together entirely or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 04:35 AM
1

I’m not writing this as opposition to your entire post, I was just going off one of the parts in your comment. When I say relationships should be effortless, the effort should come from the people in the relationship in their own personal lives and not the relationship. Specifically men, but both people should maximize their potential individually, find a good match for their goals and work on themselves to maintain their level of attraction, which is where the effort is. Once you get officially…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 04:04 AM
1

We’re not talking jobs, we’re talking femininity, ability to match sense of humor, emotional intelligence, interest in trying genuine active hobbies (not consuming Amazon products or Netflix while you make fun of men for playing videogames), etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 03:24 AM
7

Men are the romantic sex
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 03:02 AM
0

Interesting how women of this sub get most irrationally angry when they hear of a successful traditional relationship. “YOU JUST WANT A SLAVE!!” If the women of this sub are bothered by you doin something, you’re probably doing something right. After all, women on reddit are especially… unique and are not reflective of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 02:56 AM
2

Your experience is valid so I’m not addressing you, but I wanted to piggyback off your relevant comment and share an unpopular opinion here: The best relationships shouldn’t need hard work; they should be effortless. Or at least should take the least effort. Relationships shouldn’t need much work and something that woke me up to a different reality was realizing the common sentiments that successful relationships are “hard work” is not really true. A lot of relationships I saw that had a lot of …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 02:48 AM
1

Because you might just provide no value to him outside of sex if men leave you immediately after sex, even men who genuinely seem like they wouldn’t be the type.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 02:31 AM
1

I never said that. I said actions China were taking include both those things (squashing feminist movements & encouraging birthrate rises) and were actions taken independent of each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 10:08 PM
2

What Reddit moderators think about what people should be allowed to talk about, or even how mods frame actions they take, has no validity on anything. It’s plausible that there have been past threads on race that have had a few out of hand comments; I could see that for sure. But the picture mods paint about threads regarding the actions they take like that never are truthful, so I take what you say with a grain of salt. I just find it funny because I’m black & live in the US but I never posited…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 10:04 PM
2

No, it shows exactly why RP men understand how women work more and why women are pissed that more and more men (that they don’t want understanding it) understand it better. Women say they like one thing, but are aroused by other things. That in-congruency can range from a straight girl being turned on by lesbians to being turned on by monkeys banging (study measured this, I’ll need to look for it). You’re wired to not be direct about things regarding your sexuality, and that includes things like…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 09:54 PM
1

The rise of feminism/gynocentrism has correlated with the decline of birth rates in the West. There’s a relation. After all, don’t feminists pride themselves on their independence from men, and part of that is choosing to not have kids/less kids? Now you guys don’t wanna own certain parts of feminism? Or just the ones you don’t like?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 09:50 PM
4

What reason do you have to believe that men of the sub you moderate believe in old school 1800s slavery? What evidence do you have, as an objective voice of reason, Ms. Internet jannie?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 09:47 PM
1

What do you mean ‘what does that have to do with’? The point of debate that I’m arguing is comparing ability for men and women to casually date. The study you mentioned doesn’t disprove a thing about pre established rules like 80/20, as one person a year (that could likely include prostitution) doesn’t mean that person can get casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 09:45 PM
2

Right, because you have no proof for the shit you say, ‘academic.’
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:58 PM
2

I’m not the guy who you were talking to above. I responded to your comment about this rise being due to awareness or something like that. I’m waiting, ‘academic.’ Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:49 PM
1

You go out of your way to convince others you’re content, so I’ll take your word for it. I think you were the person who got mad at me on the thread about last names when I asked you specifically about it. Besides, you have no rebuttal for the societal level argument, just your own claimed experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:48 PM
1

So you’re an ‘academic’, made the first claim that mental illness rates rising (especially because of women) was because of ‘social awareness’ or whatever, yet demand me to hold your hand? Nice try. Fork up your proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:43 PM
2

Source on slavery being better off for the economy? Last I checked the South’s economy was way weaker as they relied on slavery too much and it wasn’t even economically viable to sustain, let alone morally viable.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:41 PM
6

Are you implying men here believe slavery was a good thing and want to reinstate it?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:39 PM
0

Good question. Why should you? You have more freedom than ever? Doesnt mean you’re more happy, and it definitely doesn’t mean society is better off. Women leading society has shown women to be self destructive, as even if they have more freedoms they make choices that end up with unhappiness (rising rates of mental illness, which correlates with singleness, which correlates with even more unhappiness).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:37 PM
1

Again, you can read it up there. You haven’t provided any backup on your assertion that all of what Meghan says is true, because even she doesn’t have any sort of backing. Women will support each other burning everything in a man’s life before her and isolatin him from everything else. Even if you believe it’s a good thing, isnt it funny how women believe cutting out everyone else in someone else’s life and labeling them as toxic is something that can be done just like that? No more title, no mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:35 PM
3

Most women are having more casual sex than men, and most guys will likely end up being a guy who waited longer than someone else for his turn at her the more casual sexual partners women have.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:29 PM
1

I didn’t make the claim first. The arguments supporting the link between what’s happening now instead of your theory can be found by looking at the millions of threads talking about all the events in the 60s that sparked the sexual revolution. I’m not gonna handhold you to find the data you can google since I’m highlighting some of them. There’s a spike in growth in things like out of wedlock births that all happened around this time. Where are any of your sources?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:28 PM
1

You take an awful lot of time to convince us strangers on reddit, as a woman on reddit, that your life is a win.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:17 PM
2

They did before the 60s where out of wedlock births skyrocketed. What changed then? Any data on men suddenly turning off the paternal instinct switch?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:16 PM
1

And what are places like China, that is one of the few places least affected by this Western influence, doing in response? Shutting down feminist movements and increasing birth rate increases after generations of the opposite policy
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:15 PM
2

This is always the common response, which always sounds like an NPC is listing off these reasons with how often this line of debate is shut down by this, but do you have actual proof this is the reason why? Doesn’t have to be hard proof, just any link showing correlation between these things. Because there’s a stronger correlation between the events that happened in the 60s (the pill, no fault, sexual liberation, welfare state, broken households, absence of male fathers, etc).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:13 PM
2

Women secretly gettin off to lesbian porn despite claiming to be straight supports the RP anyway. What you claim to like and are aroused by are two separate things
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:09 PM
4

80%+ of men are considered unattractive by women, so it’s very plausible women treat these men differently to the men they were attracted to The good boyfriend who she settled for is treated differently than the hot guy she got with at 21
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:07 PM
3

Ironic because the girl up above said Chris Evans was very average for a while when she saw him lmao Anyways, men don’t have remotely higher standards. Men find most women generally attractive despite 70% of women being overweight, which is a good bet for women. Women only find a small subset of men attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 07:04 PM
1

Already explained above. You took 0 time to look over anything. You have 0 interest in changing your mind whatsoever and had no proof of anything. It’s literally ‘men bad, woman good’.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:50 PM
3

You are not a man, so the ‘double standards’ virtue signal has no basis. Men who know their self worth wanna ensure they’re getting the best, so when you fuck a guy in comparison to others demonstrates how aroused you are by him to some degree and is the best indicator of measuring interest. Guys, no matter how much women gaslight men, her actions spell out clearly how much she wants you, not her words. If she’s been around the block while you’re taking her on 7 dates just to get into the door (…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:44 PM
0

How specifically were you ‘pressured’? Because that implies some sort of abuse or coercing. Language can be manipulated by people trying to paint others in a bad light & shirk responsibility for their own actions. The connotations you give off makes it seem like you were forced against your will, which is such a disgusting way women frame them willingly having sex with a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:40 PM
1

It’s just that your priorities change, mainly as you get older. You talk less and less to fuckbois you’re aroused by and more to guys who are more secure & dependable. It’s what a woman really means when she says “I’ve had my fun”, “I’ve finally matured”, “It’s time to settle down”. It’s typically when women are done having their fill of the dick they really like and settle for guys who don’t turn em on as much. Then they signal shit like this to guys who have no clue they’re not getting her bes…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:37 PM
1

Ah, so you believe everything Meghan says while nothing anyone else says. This conversation is going nowhere; the logic circuit in your brain isn’t running You’re an example of the type of person who’d support this garbage. Just wait for a few years till it’s undeniable that he ruined his life entertaining this low class woman
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:23 PM
1

But it doesn’t, because one survey that measures people having sex once a year literally tells us nothing. Your guys’ logic circuits are messed up. How many casual opportunities does a guy have per month and a woman have per month? That includes actual sex, but also the attention leading up to that on Instagram, other OLD, and offers to have sex that a woman declined. Then compare.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:20 PM
-3

Because she torpedoed the entire royal family into more drama from one newly wed than ever imaginable. He literally has lost his royal title in just a couple years of marrying this crazy girl. She displays traits akin to BPD or narcissism (not that she is one). Reports from her poor royal staff claim she’s the worst to work for & be under. She’s now dragged him to move away from his home to the US and the most toxic industry in the world - Hollywood. She’s led the relationship the entire time, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:29 AM
3

Treat them well = ugly, not as successful enough, isn’t smoove enough
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:15 AM
-3

To be fair, Prince Harry is absolutely cucked and it’s clear to anyone who’s observed how he’s changed in the time we’ve seen him since before marrying historian wife to now. I never try to be an armchair psychologist but this is clear as day During that Oprah interview he looked like a disparaged son at a parent-teacher conference with the way Markle was holding his hand and letting him speak when it was turn. Then they cut to Oprah & Markle continuing to talk all about him & his family while h…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:13 AM
2

To be fair, Prince Harry is absolutely cucked and it’s clear to anyone who’s observed how he’s changed in the time we’ve seen him since before marrying his wife to now. I never try to be an armchair psychologist but this is clear as day During that Oprah interview he looked like a disparaged son at a parent-teacher conference with the way Markle was holding his hand and letting him speak when it was turn. Then they cut to Oprah & Markle continuing to talk all about him & his family while he’s in…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:13 AM
6

To be fair, Prince Harry is absolutely cucked and it’s clear to anyone who’s observed how he’s changed in the time we’ve seen him since before marrying his wife to now. I never try to be an armchair psychologist but this is clear as day During that Oprah interview he looked like a disparaged son at a parent-teacher conference with the way Markle was holding his hand and letting him speak when it was turn. Then they cut to Oprah & Markle continuing to talk all about him & his family while he’s in…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:13 AM
0

Interesting, my mistake then. But even if I was off, you are more of an exception when it comes to this topic so that’s why my arguments resonate differently within you than it may with others. You’re exceptionally more physically capable than the average woman, but not quite as much as the average man. Even if you may be an outlier assuming all your personal details are true, it doesn’t really disprove the rule. Interesting perspective though, appreciate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 10:27 PM
0

You sound exceptional then. More powet to you. But exception != rule. Even if you identify as a woman now, were you born as a biological male or female? Because even if you’ve transitioned that can still play a huge role in all sorts of things you do, particularly physically.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 10:02 PM
5

Oh, so you don’t disagree with my rebuttal to your nonsensical assertion that a survey that says most dudes somehow finding sex once a year (which could easily include prostitution if it’s once a year) doesn’t disprove the 80/20 rule? Nice job trying to get me off topic with whatever you’re talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 09:46 PM
2

Yes, because it’s a catch all term for a type of person that encapsulates a lot of features. Money is a part of it, but there are others. And even if you make your own money you ideally want someone who makes as much as you or more. You wouldn’t want a no good scrote you have to take care of! You’re a high value, independent woman!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 09:44 PM
0

I’ll address the specific points I take umbrage with. First, even if it’s a small increase in efficiency between sexes (and it’s not as small as your examples imply) it behooves businesses to do look at that. Even the most simple tasks see a huge difference in male & female output, especiallyover time. Second, a lot of this lends to your personal experience as someone who can do these jobs better than the average woman (but not as much as the average man). I don’t like to pry into people’s perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 09:43 PM
2

Never said that’s what security means alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 09:26 PM
1

Is that where I should let you know that you’re breaking this sub’s rules, like ‘no downvoting’?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 09:26 PM
1

I gotcha; the thing is, even if you backtrack on the snark now starting every comment with that level of snark is common here and doesn’t get anything started on the right foot And to the last point, all women are hypergamous. You still ideally wanted a guy who met standards that at least were at your level or usually higher (taller, stronger, has game, attractive). You use his current job is proof that hypergamy as a whole is disproven, but you still say ideally he has way more potential that y…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 09:25 PM
1

Of course that sounds sensible on its face… but the whole point is that men today don’t have the authority to vet and find the right girl who meets very simple standards even if they assume all the responsibility. Can’t have responsibility without authority.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 09:16 PM
1

It was also more common in human history during those times for women to be raped. Should I have fit that into my hypothetical scenario? What you’re talking about is a non sequitur that has no bearing on the actual hypothetical. 25 & 23 is a realistic age for when men and women would get together, and even 50 years ago men and women could realistically get together at that age as low n count individuals (not 14-16 years old). 20 is even younger and works too, and most men would agree to have the…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 09:15 PM
0

We could move that date back to 20 years old and most men would still agree if they knew what was ahead of them. Your comment is loaded with so many other common snuck premises & strawmen that it’s not worth addressing. You seem bothered by men simply qualifying women as conventional partners. Itd be interesting to see the type of person behind the screen Astonishing that you’re a mod, but it makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 09:00 PM
0

Is that one task the only task in the role, or all? Because even if we just look at simply one task, yes, even if women can do a certain task men can typically do that task better on average due to their natural physical/physiological capabilities. That small improvement between sexes on performance may look small but for a business trying to maximize efficiency, they’re gonna look at that. A lot of women don’t include other tasks or other factors into this though. Sure, on its face picking up s…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 08:56 PM
5

The biggest fear for women is the feeling of having their sexual selection choice taken away, and an example of that is consensually opening up for a guy she thought was better than he turned out to be after. It’s why you hear more rumblings of women trying to say sex they consented to but later regretted is rape. It’s a disconnect in their perception of a guy; she thought he was a natural alpha but really was a beta. He isn’t as rich or successful or connected or smooth as she thought, so even …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 08:48 PM
5

No, it’s not lmao. One person a year does not mean a man is able to casually date whatsoever. It’s pathetic that this sub sets that bar for men and says “see, this survey says most of you got to fuck once out of 365 days!! How could 80% of you not able to casually date be true? Red Pill destroyed by FACTS and LOGIC!!” No logic whatsoever employed by you people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 08:44 PM
0

It’s probably because they understand on average men are more capable of doing those jobs, and it would be more efficient to vet for the best man than a woman to do that job. And you know what? If so, they’re probably not wrong, because as a business they gotta do what they can to ensure maximum efficiency. There’s no proof that they ‘don’t like’ women; it could be that they think men on average are better for the job and it’s easier to vet for that… because it’s true.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 08:42 PM
3

Guys, this is what women say to you to gaslight you into staying as her betabux security provider. Lotta dudes in deadbedrooms or desire lacking relationships have girls who gaslight them into not worrying about that. Don’t fall for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 08:31 PM
0

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 08:25 PM
3

I like all the snark in asking simple questions? It’s like women here squirm when you ask for direct details about the personal life experience they volunteered to give. So you’ve been an engineer and own your own company? You were also raised in a wealthy background in a more traditional household in a nuclear family? Makes sense why your standards are much higher. If all true, more power to you, but you and a lot of women’s experience here validates hypergamy and can’t really relate to male’s …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 08:21 PM
8

This should be a bannable offense, fuckin ridiculous how PPD women act and literally compare people to pedos.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 08:11 PM
-1

If every man at age 25 could chose to commit to an actual feminine, pretty, low N girl, 23 yo girl who she had genuine desire for (while they were responsible for being a good husband) or try their luck down the line, basically every man would take the former. If men had these choices, they would take it. Almost all men don’t, as the vast majority of women today who are willing to marry aren’t low N, aren’t feminine, aren’t young, have a lot more baggage than women used to, etc. So all these mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 08:07 PM
1

Need more specifics, women on here who describe their perfect lives never give enough specifics for anyone to go off of for it to be useful as a part of debate. How much money did you make? What was your education level? Location? Where did you look for men? What kinda upbringing did you have? What specifically do you mean by ambitious & intelligent? Your first comment implies you had a tough dry spell without any dates but it’s likely more because you had increasingly higher standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 08:00 PM
13

The change happened in the 60s, long before before porn became widespread. The pill, no fault divorce, welfare state, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 06:43 AM
1

On the 80/20 rule? It’s everywhere, why do people need to me to google things for them that take 10 seconds? https://www.keltonglobal.com/perspectives/big-data-and-big-dating-the-algorithm-of-attraction-2/ I don’t know the specifics if they narrowed down men’s ratings of black women, but I guarantee it would be higher than women’s ratings of men. It’s just how male-female attractions works. Your experience also could be that you find 80% of men invisible too, so the pool of guys you even notice …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 06:30 AM
1

I never denied black women are viewed as the least attractive, but even so the gap between the variety of men women find attractive and women find men attractive is still huge. Black women still are probably found more attractive on average than the average man, considering 80% of men are viewed unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 06:00 AM
1

Source? Because plenty of OLD data shows men find the vast majority of women attractive, including women who go against universal features of attraction (weight). Even if people have preferences, I doubt the data shows that percentage makes up for the gap between men & women
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 05:34 AM
1

Studies show men are way more attracted to a wide variety of women than men are Obviously there are a small percentage of women who are unattractive to men, but again, they have a way better chance to become attractive enough because men don’t rate attractiveness relative to other women (as much as women do with men) and women can do simple things like lose weight (70% of women overweight, 80% of men found attractive).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 05:03 AM
0

Says the female on Reddit Who also browses anti work, lmao, that’s precious
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 04:06 AM
0

You can do whatever you want, but how many females do you think are on reddit vs males? What percentage? You’re more of an outlier. An outcast. And then try to insult someone else? Also, notice how you never responded to any of the actual points.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 12:04 AM
5

Here’s just one based on one quick google search https://thefederalist.com/2015/07/14/guess-which-mass-murderers-came-from-a-fatherless-home/
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 12:02 AM
0

This is ironic coming from a female on reddit, specifically on purple pill. Being on reddit is much more damning of a look for you than it is for me. You’re an outlier, and not in a good way
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 10:21 PM
3

And the ratio of men compared to women as a percentage out of 100%?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 09:34 PM
-1

A mixture of real world experience, biology and common sense. A lotta guys don’t know women well enough, but the minority of guys who do understand know because in order to deal with women you have to understand what makes em tic. Women also have an incentive to not be straightforward about what turns them on a subconscious level, because why would you want the guys you don’t want to know that? Google brought up some of these https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2739403/ https://pubmed.n…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 09:34 PM
4

So the percentage of men who enter college has decreased. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 09:25 PM
8

And the most violent men were raised by strong, independent moms. What good feminine guidance did those toxically masculine school shooters. Perhaps women leading men leads to self destructive outcomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 09:22 PM
9

Not a fan of PUA guys really, but the biggest problem women have with PUAs is that teaching guys who to get past women’s hypergamous filter is the number one danger to women. The biggest fear women have is having their sexual selection choice removed from them, so an example of that is someone who would before be considered a beta making a girl think he’s more alpha and then her giving it to to him Ever wondered why we here more and more rumblings about rape expanding definition to include women…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 09:19 PM
0

Genius rebuttal. Case in point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 09:15 PM
2

Yup. If there’s no genuine desire, she sees you as beta bux, and it ends up with a dead bedroom… which is more tolerable for her. Women can be better off without sex moreso than men, so that’s why PPD women speak with so much privilege and are clowning men in this comment section for it. Women also can have these males provide something else if there’s no sexual attraction from her, which is security and protection. While if a man is not getting sex he’s not getting anything genuine from her. Wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 09:11 PM
2

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 09:00 PM
-1

Women don’t know themselves well, so some guys do know women better. A lotta biology & subconscious processes going on that you’re not cognitively aware of; you don’t choose who you are attracted to. If women get offended by pointing out truths, he’s probably doing something right. Your hypergamous filter is subconscious and is trying to make it as easy as possible to find the best, so people informing others of how things work makes it harder for you. Your subconscious filter doesn’t want all t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 08:51 PM
3

Today’s technology has made it so easy to simp only .1% of guys have to do it in order to maintain it Think of whales in videogames with microtransactions, if you need another example. Only .01% of the user base is funding the whole damn industry with them buying bundles of shit, so even if guys could take more responsibility they have little authority too when they do and .01% still simp enough & buy thousands worth of OnlyFans anyway. You can’t have responsibility without authority.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 08:40 PM
5

Men find the vast majority of women attractive, and that’s even with a majority of women being overweight or even flat out fat. So there are easily fixable things women can do, like lose weight and apply basic makeup, to the point where she won’t be invisible by men. It’s way easier to level up as a girl in that sense. Only a minuscule percentage of women are invisible to guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 08:37 PM
1

You’re letting your lunacy seep through the keyboard and onto your answers. Where is all this hurt coming from? From facing simple reality? To address your only actual point, show me where I said men would be ‘better off’ if women never existed. I simply informed you that men are more capable of survival than women, which there aren’t any facts to deny. It’s basic biology; men had to evolve to be more able to hunt, build, and protect (primarily protect women, the more vulnerable sex, because the…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 08:26 PM
1

Because I’m not wasting my time reading all of that; sorry you wasted your time. You never directly addressed the actual point; are men or women more capable of barebones survival? The answer is men. Women here being so offended by that fact is unfortunate.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 06:27 AM
1

Just like what the person above said
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 03:41 AM
0

That’s a lot of word vomit to avoid admitting you know men are more capable of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 03:40 AM
0

You’re so incapable of staying on topic it’s cute You really said Rosie the Riveter and got disproven, so now you’re shifting goalposts. Without men during WW2 there would be nothing for women to even work towards helping (the US would be captured the moment the war started if led by women), and even when they did they try to contribute they weren’t be nearly as productive as men. You haven’t proved that episode of Dutch Survivor was scripted as it’s the closest representation of what happened b…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 02:19 AM
1

On average, men are more able. It’s biology Even the weakest men are more able than the strongest women to hunt, build shelter and protect what’s theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 02:04 AM
1

No, I’m simply asking you to clarify your source on whether it’s actually about survival or moreso just politics
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 12:17 AM
1

It’s the most annoying part of debating here. I don’t try to convince the women I’m talking to, just point out facts in case anyone else more objective is reading it A lotta women here especially just can’t help but be right, so even in the face of logic she will never negotiate from a standpoint of logic or reason first; it will be emotional. It’s also about their hypergamous filter being triggered by men pointing out their sexual strategy, as guys who follow the red pill make it harder to filt…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:47 PM
1

Rosie the Riveter is your only piece of evidence? The same women who quit her job after two weeks out of fear of how physically hard it was on her already while all the men were out at war? Lmaooo
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:44 PM
1

Similar to society now, the top guys were not upstanding fathers who provided their wives with everything they needed. Men evolved to ejaculate & evacuate based on biological past. It would be vital to their survival to have sex with a girl, ejaculate and leave so they could be out quickly (while the girl is a vulnerable situation), while the only guys who would take care of their wives would be betas. Only a minority of guys procreated back then, so it would be Kenghis Khan’s seed spread out in…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:36 PM
–

Women who want open relationships are straight up telling you you’re beta bux, she’s gonna go fulfill her alpha fux side of hypergamy
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:32 PM
2

Ignore her, she always does this. She replies to every comment that counters her with “source?? Source?” When you provide it, she finds any way to dismiss and demand you find another one until you find an undeniable amount and she stops replying. It’s ridiculous how these BPers can post nothing to back up their views and then refuse to engage in honest debate when you back up yours… all the while they continue to participate in this sub unabated.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:22 PM
0

Ah, so you have nothing to disprove men being more capable of women. Ignoring the evidence of it actually playing out, do you believe men or women have biologically evolved to be more physically capable, faster, stronger, more resourceful, less vulnerable due to their reproductive organs (pregnancy was a death wish without men back then), etc?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:14 PM
1

And your source?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:07 PM
1

And was this modern American version of Survivor about actual prolonged survival? Or more about politics & voting people off rather than pure survival? Did they actually strand people with no food, water, shelter for a long period of time with no assistance to see who would thrive better, which was my original point?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:06 PM
2

Most women can’t survive in nature as well as men can. Vast majority Your second point is a non sequitur. Women aren’t as productive as men in the jobs necessary to uphold society as women don’t like to do dirty work.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:03 PM
1

And your source?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:02 PM
0

And what’s your source for anything you’ve said?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:02 PM
0

No, women provided their sexuality in exchange for things needed from men to survive back then. Otherwise, they died brutally in nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:00 PM
1

You said a lot without saying anything. Evidence shows that when push comes to shove, women can’t actually survive better than men. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/3cswfp/in_one_season_of_the_dutch_version_of_survivor/
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 09:13 AM
0

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/3cswfp/in_one_season_of_the_dutch_version_of_survivor/ Completely backwards lmao. Men work better together while women can’t survive by themselves so they pit themselves against each other naturally. And this is pure projection about men; men don’t do work that’s beneath them? Who is doing almost all the dirty work at the pits of society? Construction, sewage, etc? Who created the device that allows you to even spew all this projectio…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 09:12 AM
2

There has never been a successful matriarchy that lasted; even if women tried to build something without any help from men or their existence it wouldn’t survive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 09:08 AM
-1

Fair. I’d sum it up by saying men can survive without women better, but women can serve as invaluable complements to men’s lives, and I mean that with all sincerity.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 09:07 AM
3

All infrastructure and tech that allows you to live a privileged life is created and maintained by men, so men would survive far better without women than vice versa. Think of supply lines, food, construction, sewage, protection (from police to military), etc, etc… all predominantly men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 08:34 AM
1

Goalposts shifted. You argued men can’t survive without women, now you’re saying men can’t be created without women. I already addressed it in my comment; women are part of creating men, but if you snapped all women out of existence, existing men would survive far better than women if men were gone. That was the original scenario, then you shifted it. If you’re the typical unfit, fat modern woman you stand no chance in nature compared to even the least fit men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 08:32 AM
-4

Then that says a lot about you considering almost all men are more capable at survival in nature than all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 08:29 AM
0

Repeating something to yourself to convince yourself it’s somehow true doesn’t make it not true. Men have biologically evolved to survive better and longer than women. You are not necessary to survival by any means outside of procreation; you are a complement to life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 07:48 AM
-1

This doesn’t disprove basic biological evolution that has made men to be stronger, faster, more capable of rougher living conditions, more motivated to protect, less vulnerable to situations that put them in dangerous positions (pregnancy and a lot of female functions that need more maintenance, etc).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 07:46 AM
1

Ah, I saw your post the other day and remember a comment specifically that succinctly addresses all the gish galloping you do in this comment. Most of this stuff is irrelevant to the point that women find 80% unattractive based on that study, but here’s the comment (since I’ll be honest; right now I’m too tired to respond to this on my phone). https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/odr5dx/hypergamy_is_just_an_excuse_red_pillers_use_to/h441g4u/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 07:44 AM
1

Mhm, mhm. Good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 06:47 AM
0

But if all women had to take up all of these jobs, they wouldn’t be nearly as productive to the point where it would eventually collapse much quicker. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/3cswfp/in_one_season_of_the_dutch_version_of_survivor/
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 06:39 AM
1

And I disproved that claim, because having sex once a year does not make you sexually active, let alone be capable of casually dating, unless our definitions of ‘sexually active’ are very different. Your entire premise was flawed from the get go. The end.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 06:37 AM
1

It’s both: your communication style is not appealing but a lot of men will put up with that because they’re hoping to fuck you. They don’t care to have a genuine friendship with you even if there was no sexual wiring that made them wanna fuck you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 06:34 AM
2

But the difference is men can be emotional tampons for women and maintain their ‘friendship’ while women will never put up with men being remotely emotional with them - let alone being emotional tampons. All this talk about women being woke and wanting men to be emotionally open is only under her self serving terms (his emotional openness needs to fit what she imagined it would be, otherwise it’s a complete repulsive shock), because women aren’t aroused by emotionally open men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 06:29 AM
1

I will when you back up your original claim, which is the claim where the author of it bears the burden of proof. You proved my point; this is the response of the average redditor. All of this snarky backtalk to compensate for the fact that you came out swinging and then fell flat by arguing against a point that wasn’t even remotely the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 06:26 AM
2

The burden of proof was on you to disprove the theory that’s had countless posts in this sub alone over the years back it up. All you have to do is start by looking at comprehensive OLD (OKC, Tinder) data with massive sample sizes to find, when men & women are most honest about attraction due to anonymity, women find 20% of guys sexually attractive & 80% not. That’s a good starting point, but there’s more if you’re genuinely interested in reading more independently. This is one of the countless …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 06:09 AM
5

Why should they care about how that makes you feel? Why do women try to assert their offended feelings as what men should prioritize rather than their own selves? The most successful men are those who care least about how women might be offended by their words/actions; they just do whatever will be best for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 06:00 AM
3

The RP teaches you to never blame women for something she’ll never be… just accept it and be your best self in order to deal with that reality. Do your best to make hypergamy work for you. You’re not gonna change women’s hypergamy and society on a large scale level, but if you focus on yourself first and channel that anger properly you’ll be much better off.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:56 AM
2

That’s not profound in any way. The 80/20 rule isn’t about men being virgins; it’s about casual sex. Having sex once or twice a year puts you in the bottom 80% or so because you can’t casually date/get casual sex. Yet again on this sub, another smug comment dismantling the RP with FACTS & LOGIC without actually understanding the original argument that they’re disproving. Debate is pointless when almost all the BPers factual arguments are attacking strawmen.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:53 AM
2

If women built society all by themselves in their direction we wouldn’t be here lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:45 AM
0

Exception != rule. The vast majority of mechanics are what sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:39 AM
-2

It’s better than “women would just, idk, figure it out” That’s what those women in that situation thought of too until they realized they were on track to die without the assistance of men
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:36 AM
0

Women with the seed in her of a man, who would be dead along with the baby inside her if not for men. Biological evolution How do you think women survived back then before modern civilization in the most vulnerable state imaginable? Do you think women fought off threats & brought home the bacon (literally) while pregnant themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:34 AM
2

Men who fought in WW2 would probably be more likely to vote Trump than modern D. This is like saying WW2 soldiers who stormed the beaches in the 40s would be proud of modern Antifascists lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:30 AM
1

The point is men would be far more able by themselves removing all other variables than women. Men have evolved to be more able in that sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:29 AM
4

No, they don’t. Women can be complement to men, but they’re not needed for survival. If you put men on a stranded island alone and women on a stranded island alone, removing all other variables, men would survive far, far longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:27 AM
2

Nice snuck premise; I never asserted they did prove personality is of greater variance, but there’s evidence there is in other things, like in intelligence. Your intelligence & brain having variability has a downstream effect on personality make up. People who are smarter and dumber than others by virtues have different personalities and there’s a butterfly effect on people’s path in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 01:57 AM
2

80% of men are unable to casual date.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 10:51 PM
6

Right, because back then male sexual strategy was prioritized… because it led to more cohesive social structure in intersexual relations. Prioritizing female sexual strategy has led to more destructive and chaotic outcomes. Broken homes, children outta wedlock, dependence on the state, more uneven outcomes in dating, unfulfilled career women in the long term, massive economic landscape change, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 10:42 PM
2

Again, google. You know these links are right there but you want me to take the time outta my day to do your work. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variability_hypothesis First thing that popped up is a wiki on this widely studied theory that shows there is a level of variability. Of course, some try to argue against, this but overall there’s more evidence for there being a variability in intelligence (among other traits), which lends credence to there being more variability among men overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 10:39 PM
6

I’m gonna say it: by default a woman on Reddit is more of an outlier than men so there is honestly something more likely to be wrong with a lot of women on Reddit compared to normal women. A lot of women here especially are on some sort of mental illness sub, display symptoms of trauma, are more likely to be angrily feminist, are more likely to browse subs like r/childfree to where there are entire cultures to circlejerk & hate on something normal people don’t. By default a woman on reddit is mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 09:35 PM
4

There’s no scientific evidence that sexual harassment is why women make less on a significant scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 09:31 PM
1

Because that’s stuff that’s been widely accepted as pretty truthful by even the most ardent of deniers. You can google and find the bajillion sourced about men & women IQ differences mapped out on the curve.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 09:23 PM
1

Pretty much all actual open relationships are based on a hopeful lie to guys that they get to have a girl but also have girls on the side, but men don’t get sex like women do. It’s a losing proposition for loser guys that women maintain because it gives them all the leverage. Unless you’re with absolute Chads who can get casual sex as easy as you, it’s not working out for them whatsoever… and if they could, no actual guy who could would put himself in such a detrimental situation and be in a ope…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 09:20 PM
1

But you implied the popularity is tied directly to the effectiveness of OLD for successful LTRs, which was your argument against the post. I added on to point out popularity != effectiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 09:16 PM
1

But are you actually holding these same standards to have an equal relationship? Do you make as much money, for example?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 09:14 PM
2

You might as well not have responded if you ignored my comment. That was a complete non sequitur that doesn’t argue against any of what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 09:35 AM
2

No, he doesn’t, because that girl will still always wanna date up. She won’t wanna be with that poor loser of a guy; she deserves someone better.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 08:45 AM
2

You aren’t owed anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 08:41 AM
13

Obviously, but I’d argue women are slightly more similar to each other than men. Women have an in group bias and agree with each other (saw OKC study I think that showed women highly rate each others’ opinions in dating), women are more likely female IQ rates are more in line with each other at the center of the curve while men are spread out a bit more, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 08:39 AM
1

Most popular way to do thing != most successful way to do said thing We have the lowest marriage rates ever, high divorce rates within those marriages and a lot of marriages that stay together still aren’t necessarily happy themselves. I’d be interested in a study comparing marriages with minimal technology use, including how they met and also how much technology they use day 2 day within that relationship (specifically social media, and marriages with maximum technology use. Of course my idea i…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 08:35 AM
3

Because most men are invisible to you. You don’t even see guys who aren’t attractive as sexually viable potential candidates so they don’t even register on your subconscious radar.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 08:22 AM
1

That’s harder to believe than OP’s story based on what I’ve already gathered from you, lmaoo
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 08:18 AM
1

Basically. It’s explained well by the candy store analogy well.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 08:14 AM
9

I refuse to believe the women/BPers of this sub are this inable to make coherent logical arguments. Comments like these are further proof that men begin debate from a more logical/rational mindframe while females are more emotional… because there is nothing logical about braindead arguments like these. Most of these female arguments are ones using shaming language or ones based in emotion (“who hurt you”).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 08:11 AM
-1

Aaaah… that makes much more sense now. Alpha seed, beta need Women are the primary drivers of open relationships for a reason… they get all the leverage. So when a guy has a relationship where he has some leverage from that aspect it’s a huge shock to you to the point where you employ a lot of shaming language.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 08:01 AM
1

You’re over 30 years old, browse subs like FDS and say you can easily get ‘high value men’?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 07:57 AM
0

Where did he ever imply he’s controlling women? Because the only way he would ‘control’ women is through actual force. You implying he’s beating or raping women to be monogamous with him?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 07:54 AM
-2

Equal in the exact way, so that way it’s entirely fair? Because OP is unfair in the way he’s putting different standards on the man than he is the woman in his relationship, right? In order to be equal, you’ll make as much money as him? Provide for him as much as he will? Be the same height as him? Have as much muscle & strength as him? Be as confident & charismatic as him? Because these are all bare minimum standards modern women typically set on guys that aren’t the same as the standards men t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 07:53 AM
2

There is no actual real evidence other than feminist BS backing up this narrative that men being more emotional & feminine is what will solve the problems that have been created & worsened in a gynocentric society.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 07:43 AM
4

Easy to act so oblivious to the point when you’re able to live this easy life because peace is held together due to men needing to kill other threats. If you live in the US or any country where it has full control of its own protection, take away the men from your country and it’s taken over by someone else in hours. Take away the threat of violence, even if the killing isn’t directly taking place now, and it all crumbles. Men aren’t held responsible to be ready to kill because of whatever socia…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 07:35 AM
–

It might as well be, because people who honestly believe & invest in this Meyers Briggs shit (similar to horoscopes) might have something wrong with em
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 07:23 AM
–

Post a picture of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 07:12 AM
–

Gee, I don't know because I literally never said any of those things. You have a tendency to make genius rebuttals against arguments that no one here was making. I find it funny how the replies under this post are trying to explain away these discoveries. But if you can discover the science behind how this post relates to TRP men and their suicide rates or whatever you're talking, more power to ya
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 04:39 AM
2

Because you won't fuck him literally every 10 minutes lmao. Most girls won't fuck their husbands once a day, or any frequent, consistent level that the guy sexually needs. Again, this is something out of the scope of your female mindframe. Men are biologically evolved to get their nut off quickly, frequently and be done without investment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 04:14 AM
15

Exactly. The whole point of FDS is to be essentially a LVM in order to get a HVM to not only fuck you but keep you around... which won't actually work in actuality. Their strategy repels HVM; it does the exact opposite of the intended goal. LVM will stick around if you don't fuck them and use them as a piggy bank for a year, not HVM. The TRP when applied actually works based on their intended goal, even if you hate it for whatever reason. FDS doesn't work, so it just seems to be a circlejerk for…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 04:08 AM
9

When women only deal with the 10-20% of men who are most likely to harbor dark triad traits and the like, not surprising that you would feel that way. It's like "ALL MEN ARE PIGS" because you only associate see the small number of guys actually getting all this sex. The female frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 03:58 AM
–

By any chance, do you have any mental health issues? Honest question. Something like Schizoid, BPD, etc?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 03:49 AM
–

It's crazy. Some of the more active women on here are girls who can be explained by their post history. There have been so many times I've been attacked by a girl on here with a bunch of angry strawmen comments with her taking offense to my posts and I see the shit she posts validates my argument. On a post about sexual strategies between men and women and how my explanation of the male sexual strategy that women don't like to here, a girl angrily replied about how that's BS, I don't have valid …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 03:47 AM
–

This is the most cogent explanation for why women on here seem to be so different to average real life women, based on the answers they give at least, in comparison to men & their real life counterparts. It makes so much fucking sense. The average girl on this corner of Reddit, or reddit in general, lives in a damn bizarro world based on how they come off in their posts, comments, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 03:43 AM
–

Bingo, you made a point that I think highlights the biggest difference between men and women on Reddit that I've wondered about for a while. Men on reddit are more likely to be aligned with the average guy than woman on reddit with the average female. Way more. Women this active on Reddit, on these particular subs, likely means they're social fucking outcasts. And it fucking shows. The shit women argue on here is so far out of the reality of what actually happens in real life that I feel like I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 03:40 AM
0

No, he didn't. Allergic to common sense, logic or reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 02:22 AM
0

And I elaborated on what OP said because you have a really hard time reading and picking up even the most easiest-to-understand implied meanings.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 01:34 AM
0

You blame men for being raised by women who instilled toxic masculinity in them ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 11:56 PM
0

Single fathers earn more, live in poverty less and their children are less likely to end up in jail & commit crimes. There are studies that prove this all over with one simple google search on the topic. I’m not gonna do your homework for you when you know how simple it is to look up the data.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 11:48 PM
-1

Tell that to yourself. I literally couldn’t have dumbed it down more than I did for ya. It’s not saying 20 yo men aren’t as physically attractive as their 30 yo counterparts; it’s saying they aren’t attractive enough… followed by they ‘don’t make enough money.’ That implies these 20 yo, even if they may be physically attractive, don’t make as much as 30 yo do which allows 30 yo to outpace the 20 yo in sexual market value overall. It never said 30 yo > 20 yo in terms of physical attraction; it’s …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 05:30 AM
0

No, that means men under 30 are less attractive compared to men over 30 because they have way less affluence to compensate despite their looks being slightly better than the 30 year olds (considering all other factors are consistent). Think of it like this; the 20 year old version may be a bit more physically attractive than the 35 year old guy, but the 35 year old guys is considerably more wealthy to the point where his wealth outweighs the slight disadvantage he has in looks compared to the 20…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 04:43 AM
0

They do. Single fathers raise better children than women
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 04:33 AM
3

Fun fact: the vast majority of the last 30 or so mass shooters have been raised in households with single mothers. Men raised by mothers tend to be the most violent. Seems like women raise the most violent, least intelligent and toxicly masculine men, wouldn’t you say?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 11:01 PM
1

A lotta women on this sub like to use crime statistics to show a specific subset of people engage in more violent crimes. Not necessarily saying it’s wrong to use data if it proves the point, but why do you think statistics show men are more likely to commit certain violent crimes? Is there something innate within men that makes it so? Biological? Or do you think there societal factors?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 10:58 PM
1

Ironic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 10:53 PM
2

Any data & evidence outside of your slanted anecdote for this confident claim that men peak in high school and college?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 10:52 PM
5

It’s also because the likelihood of people to approach you now and try to game you in person is lower than it was back then 20 years ago due to OLD. The more likely to be attractive guys are the ones approaching you in person (in that small sample size) rather than the wide pool of guys ranging from unattractive to attractive. So the average attraction rate of guys who approach nowadays on average is higher than the guys who you see & who message you on Tinder, Instagram (all those dudes from li…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 10:50 PM
1

The sexual attraction is part of the emotional bond. That’s the whole point. You’re gonna owe a part of yourself forever to the best you ever had. Your emotional bonds in large part deteriorate because you become less sexually attracted to them or never were that sexually attracted and you get tired of putting up with him. You can have an emotional bond with a friends and still not be sexually attracted to them, and that’s what the situation is basically with a lotta women who settled for men in…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 08:15 PM
1

BP men end up in relationships where they were settled for, their women are never truly satisfied and it ends up in a depressing resentful breakup/divorce by accepting these terms. It’s best for them to level up and vet real hard for a girl where the likelihood that they’re not being settled for is best, or just not marry at all. You’re sending guys into war unprepared if we’re talking marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 08:12 PM
0

No one cares
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 08:02 PM
1

Ugly = rude or violent. Your disproportionate reaction trying to paint me as a violent creep who’s rejected by women is probably because you’re mad I pointed out the truth. Your messaging here is your hypergamous filter at work telling the guys you don’t want that they’re fucking creeps for even trying to approach you. Only the ones you want are the ones you break these rules for, and they can afford to be ‘creepy’ without actually being creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 07:53 PM
1

Yeah, and that’s because of the trend of making men like women & vice versa. That’s the consequence of trying to push something unnatural & biologically incongruent.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 07:39 PM
1

Approached by the 80-90% of betas you don’t want? Yeah, that’s creepy
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 07:30 PM
2

That has been the trend in the past 50 years, with men becoming more feminine and women more masculine, so no.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 07:28 PM
0

In the face of actual science and facts, the typical female BP response is “lol whatever helps you sleep at night”
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 07:17 PM
1

Here’s just one comment https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/oag6wu/for_men_who_want_to_be_a_womans_best_isnt_this/h3ha60o/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3 Now prove men and women have the same sexual strategies. If you claim that’s what you didnt say, you admit that men & women are different
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 03:58 AM
0

I did last time we had this argument and you didn’t respond. You just want me to waste time arguing endlessly. Provide one source to anything you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 03:56 AM
18

Dead bedrooms are mostly due to women being less attracted to their men over time, or never being sexually attracted to him in the first place. He’s not as sexy as the best she he has or she thinks she can do, so to even get sex he has to put more effort. Problem is, eventually it’s not enough because you can’t negotiate attraction. Women aren’t sexually horny for the man they settled for, and the men foolishly thinks washing more dishes or buying her more gifts is gonna make her want them. Depr…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 10:25 PM
0

Our comment thread from the other day where you asserted both men & women are hypergamous and have the same sexual strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 10:20 PM
2

The wife is the one with the problem with the cheating, meaning she sees it as a problem and has a problem with cheating; not that she is the problem herself. There’s a reason I said it was understandable. Calm yourself and reread it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:37 PM
0

You made the initial claim that men and women sexual strategies are the same without any backing. Burden of proof is on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:36 PM
4

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:28 PM
1

Ah yes, Tony Parker, the 4x NBA Champ and Finals MVP, is the perfect example to disprove female hypergamy. Not like he’s one of the wealthiest & highest status men in the world despite his height being the only exception. You females here crack me up, holy shit, yall really believe logic and theories backed by evidence can be disproved by the dumbest exceptions every time without fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:21 PM
2

Where’s your source then that male and females are both hypergamous? The last time I had this debate with you, you slithered out the debate by trying to demand sources when you don’t have sources yourself. Female hypergamy has more backing behind it than your theory that men & women sexual strategies are the same. Prove any of the shit you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:18 PM
0

Obviously a solipsistic female who’s feminist leaning would feel that way. That doesn’t counter what I’ve said; it only supports it. You automatically imply the female way = right way.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:11 PM
3

Never said any of what you said on what should happen next. Just pointing out nuance behind what hypothetically happens and the differences between male & female sexual strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:10 PM
1

Says the sex that holds a majority of debt.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:26 AM
1

‘Men’
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:25 AM
1

Why are you acting like you and people who use these terms are? The problems are caused by a gynocentric social order that has made a manipulative term like to be so commonly used. The problem is men’s conventional masculinity being attacked, while conventional femininity being considered the ‘right way’ to run things on a personal and societal level. Sexual revolution, more female teachers, single motherhood rates, the narrative control women have in social debates, inventions that prioritize f…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:25 AM
3

No, but it’s usually not worth censoring yourself from saying what something that you should be casually able to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:09 AM
2

You can’t negotiate attraction. Doing all that work will likely lead to even more work down the line until libidos drop and it doesn’t matter or it’s unsustainable & someone cheats/leaves/blows up. A man has to make himself more attractive because women typically are the ones to cut off sex because they aren’t attracted to him anymore or never were
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:07 AM
3

It’s not as hard comparable to the 80% of men, but it’s still hard. It’s not that hard to connect the dots.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 06:59 AM
8

Men aren’t hypergamous; men and women sexual strategies are not the same so “men do it too!” doesn’t work here. Men won’t typically leave their wives for hot models, they just wanna fuck them and still love their wife the same; the wife is the one with the problem (understandably) and leaves him (80% of divorces initiated by women). Men want variety, women want the one who’s the best. There isn’t, for every action, an equal and opposite reaction. There aren’t equivalent dating stategies
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 06:57 AM
1

Ah, that’s interesting. Thanks for being open to sharing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 04:54 AM
3

You have no ‘communities.’ You have like 2 people active on your little subreddit lady.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 11:53 PM
1

Curious, could you describe how you came to develop some feelings for that person? How it came about that you were on that situation before you withdrew and squashed it? Because I’d say most people would have those urges too despite all the moral virtue signaling that they would never do such a thing; the key is to withdraw yourself from that situation entirely if you wanna prevent yourself from actually acting on that urge. No obligation to tell if it’s personal; I just found it interesting you…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 11:45 PM
1

Fuckin psychos over here. Imagine getting the nanny state to mass collect all records in case someone cheats because your urge to mate guard is that strong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 11:37 PM
0

I think every guy should be up front and set the boundaries from the start (that he’s gonna fuck others on the side too), but most guys are too scared to be up front mainly because they don’t have the options.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 11:23 PM
0

Yes. Men are animals. Women are animals. We’re all beholden to our biological urges. It’s just that in this specific instance the urge to fuck a variety of women doesn’t typically diminish the love for the main woman. A woman who comes to the decision to cheat on a man is absolutely done with that man, and does not love and respect him like she used to. At best she may stay with you for a while because she ‘still loves you’, but as a friend she sorta pitied and is turned off by sexually. A man c…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 10:56 PM
1

Source for that statistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 10:22 PM
3

Yeah, guess what? In a lotta instances, you don’t. I know this is a hard pill for women to swallow but you are animals, just like the rest of us, beholden to your biology and subconscious, hindbrain wirings.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 10:18 PM
3

No one cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 10:16 PM
1

It’s prevalent on this sub too, which has a BP/female/politically correct slant on this corner of reddit. It’s the most annoying thing about debating on here; since people take offense to every slight generalization you have to take more time to cover all the bases. “Well, men do it too! And not all women! Everyone’s unique, ya know?” Generalizations, even if some may be harmful, are usually useful to use for the context of conversation. Think of it as a placeholder. Exception vs the rule is som…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 10:16 PM
4

This projection. Women will have to take more into account when fuckin men than just the pure physical, even if you may not realize. The hind brain is looking at a lot of other factors that make you wanna open yourself up for him because it’s a big investment for a woman to let a man he doesn’t know fuck. Women don’t fuck men with the sole purpose of just fucking one night and nothing else at least implied. That’s not how your biology works; only other possibility is that you’re a rare exception…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 10:01 PM
1

Hey, we actually agree here! It’s definitely a male specific thing to disregard literally useless advice because a woman can’t read a basic, simple question in the title. Useless advice is something females care for. “Just work on your emotions” is enough for women because women don’t need real advice anyway. Women don’t need to become, they just are and get privilege from existing. And there is no magic formula; you were the one who implied that when you said that below average men just need to…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 08:53 PM
2

This is just a roundabout way of reiterating the same pointless thing you said at the start because you don’t wanna give an answer on more specific, tangible goals/ideas on what a guy can work on because advice that is effective to men is more straightforward, simple and more tangible. Since you weren’t specific, now I have to try to interpret it… Telling him to get a gym on this program, telling him to dress more in this specific, clear way, telling him to go make more friends & build status by…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 08:38 PM
2

Well he gave you the general specifics of the person. 5’5”, average build, average face, struggling to have any options. Now, what would you do? For example… Hit the gym and what program? Increase your status, and how? Get surgery? Try to make more money? How? Try which career path? Why are women here incapable of just reading? It’s literally in the title.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 07:57 PM
0

Good thing I’ve never said women who submit to a man & are SAHM are gold diggers, or even said women in general are gold diggers, so this comment doesn’t apply.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 07:54 PM
2

The part where you didn’t answer the question with anything remotely specific. That was such a waste of time. Women here seem to have a hard time answering questions directly & honestly; instead they take offense to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 07:53 PM
2

I didn’t see your answer in the OP or anywhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 07:42 PM
3

But that’s the point… she’s not fucking you daily (or anywhere close) and staying faithful if you’re a beta chump. You still don’t fully understand the problem with being billy Beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 07:21 PM
4

So what would you do? Answer the question in good faith please.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 07:20 PM
5

Everything is transactional; you have the privilege of not seeing it that way
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 07:17 PM
0

Not for the kid. On average, Dad > no dad
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 07:14 PM
2

I wonder why 20 year olds are always less open to marriage than 30 year old women?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 07:14 PM
6

Women are more okay being single today nowadays, they are certainly not more okay with being alone. Even then, the rise in which single, older women (who typically make more mon y too) are turning to things like antidepressants shows it’s not as rosy as women claim. Women are wired to keep up social appearances better than guys so I wager it’s more likely for them to claim dating & relationships for them are going better than they may be. Of course, I don’t have a scientific source on hand to pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 06:58 PM
13

Sounds like sexual assault
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 06:43 PM
29

The first is a message to the 80-90% of guys she’s trying to filter out the betas she’s disgusted by from approaching her. The guys she ever gives signals too and is mad he can’t pick up on them/doesn’t want to are the 10-20%. Women saying “DONT APPROACH ME ANYWHERE” and shit like that are shitting you; there’s speaking to an audience who would be deterred by it and they want to be deterred by it. Took a while for me to realize that; women do all these things without much malicious intent; it’s …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 06:42 PM
1

Men are the gatekeepers of relationships after sex. It’s all dependent on the first time she gives up her leverage (pussy) to him, to put in a way pepper understand. Up until sex, women have the overwhelming leverage. After, it’s the man, because typically men that women want to ideally keep after are men they would let fuck. Women typically have to build more than just a pure physical attraction to let a man fuck, and they’re typically urged by their biology to keep that top tier guy if possibl…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 06:38 PM
5

Chose to be single = can’t get the man they wanted and doesn’t wanna settle
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 06:34 PM
3

The same women preferring short term now will likely change their tune and hunt for something long term. That’s the vast majority of women once they’re done having their fun and the clock ticks.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 06:30 PM
2

There are men like willing to be sole providers, but again, a majority of men are invisible to women nowadays, especially career women. You want them to pay you for free because the thought of giving up something in return (sex, your ‘independence’) to these guys makes you feel icky.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 06:27 PM
4

It’s very fitting that you can’t see them because 80-90% of men are essentially invisible in the dating market nowadays, especially to career women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 06:24 PM
–

It’s impressive how women can seamlessly slip some snuck premises and shaming language in a simple reply while acting as if they’re being cordial. Men should never jump through those types of hopes. It’s only worth reciprocating if she’s a girl worth it long term and she’s actually someone you wanna please without it being conditional, which is exceedingly rare. Maybe you’re not just worth pleasing💯
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 06:37 AM
1

Fair point, I use midwest as a placeholder for ‘LCOL area’ and to make the point that a lotta people grimace at the word ‘midwest’. You have a valid point but I wanted to challenge people and see if they’re gonna make the changes in their life they always complain about.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 06:11 AM
–

It doesn’t happen in your female mindframe because men and women are different, yes, just like how your sexual pleasure doesn’t occur to a lot of men (and isn’t even required as the top tier guys probably put the least effort into pleasing girls sexually). You help support my argument. Women can’t even comprehend much outside of your female mindframe and the solipsistic nature is off the charts. Men’s ideal goal isn’t and shouldn’t be to fucking bow to your wishes, wait that long and jump throug…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 06:10 AM
–

No. This is BP shit that guys are fuxkin lied to about all the time. I’ve heard this a lot on a lot of places. There’s a difference between what you like and what you’re aroused by. Women fuck the Chads the earliest who don’t care about a lot of these things like foreplay while the betas have to use foreplay, court and essentially dance like a monkey for a girl to fuck him. Fuck that, men don’t realize this but their goal should be a guy women wanna fuck without having to take months. Why do you…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 05:52 AM
6

Apex fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 05:31 AM
31

Men are much more willing to fuck fat women than the other way around. Physical looks may be a bigger part of the equation for men’s attraction compared to women’s but men have way lower standards than women, even among men who have options. Even Chads will fuck a lot of these overweight girls considering that’s like 70% of the population. Of course average guys even more so. Then you have a small number of fetishists who prefer it. If you’re fat as a girl, you still probably have more privilege…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 05:30 AM
–

The problem with FDS is that their goal of makes no sense with their strategy. They want a top tier HVM man while being in their masculine frame, bossy, unattractive and engaging in tactics that will only attract lowly betas they’ll have to settle for. Leveraging sex & making a guy wait for long periods of time on purpose, demeaning him for being beneath you status-wise, being in a combative masculine frame and doing a lot of the things they’ll do won’t get them the HVM they wanna keep. It’ll ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 05:28 AM
2

True, a lot of people on Reddit championing remote work didn’t realize it would speed up outsourcing faster. Still, on an individual level you should take advantage of that type of opportunity if you can and go live out in a LCOL as long as you’re not outsourced
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 05:22 AM
-1

I’m not actually arguing against what you said entirely. We agree these are problems, so I wanted to build on this point because what I always see on reddit is complaints about these without realistic solutions. I was adding on to the points you made by pointing out some reasons why it’s the case and what we can do right now from an economical sound perspective. Because attempts made by these HCOL like rent control, NIMBY zoning laws and more government intervention that only stifles supply are …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 12:56 AM
2

The claim that men and women’s sexual strategies are the same & they’re both hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 12:42 AM
7

Moving to places that are less saturated and voting against policies like rent control & zoning laws would greatly help diminish the rising housing costs. It isn’t a silver bullet, but it’ll help. And don’t give the “but that’s where all the jobs are, in LA and SF and NYC” excuse as to why people can’t move. So many people have the goddamn capability to do remote work yet still choose to live in HCOL areas. Move to the gahdamn midwest if you can get remote work in a HCOL and you’ll be living lar…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 12:39 AM
2

When you’ll link the evidence in your original claim, sure. Because I went out of my way to give you a genuine response but you intentionally tried to weasel your way out of standing by the point you originally made. Now you want me to jump through hoops to prove shit I said after you didn’t even prove what you said. Real slick. No, I’m not doing your homework for you so you can give another non answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 12:34 AM
1

Almost every girl I’ve hit up on tinder who specifically said “No hookups” acted real indignant about it… up until we smashed after a date or two. This isn’t to brag or to act petty or whatever; it’s just to make the point that women who go out of their way to say that shit typically do the opposite. Of course that’s just my experience, but I’ve observed it from other guys who get more matches than me. I wonder why though… maybe she’s saying it to filter out the guys she doesn’t want? Because th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 12:30 AM
3

Pretty much. Men don’t really settle. Guys who have few/no options takes what he can get. The girls are the ones settling for them because those girls typically have had better in the past, while the guys marrying them are usually getting the best that they’ve ever got/will get. Men with all the options/ top tier guys will have their pick from the buffet. It’s extremely rare that a Chad will settle for a 3 with a bad personality, a bunch of baggage, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 12:20 AM
1

Great counterargument. This isn’t the sign of someone who realizes they’re the ones who can’t back up the claims they made. Nice try projecting. The evidence behind female sexual strategies, female sexual history impact and all these things has been well documented on this sub. You women keep dismissing it because you don’t wanna accept the reality that you are not above your biological imperative.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 12:13 AM
-1

You gave a lot of ‘advice’ that doesn’t apply to me or anyone who’s making the argument that I was. The salient point was that all women are hypergamous and only a few unicorns nowadays are truly virtuous enough to even fight that very strong biological wiring that’s ingrained in them. The main disagreement is that BPers act as if these biological imperatives are something simple to overcome if you’re ‘a mature adult’ when these biological imperatives are ingrained into women so deeply as if the…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 12:11 AM
–

Yea, women will tell themselves that it’s just a guy realizing he missed out but with me I just sometimes hit her up just cuz. To be modest, I’d say I do well for myself but at the same time it’s still a numbers game. If I wanna hit her up and I get a response then Imma exercise that option.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 11:52 PM
0

No, you intentionally miss nuance as BPers here typically try to argue that men & women are exactly the same, when they’re not. Their sexual strategies are not only different, but adversarial. Men want sex with a variety of sexual options while women want the absolute best. Because men like variety, they’ll definitely be able to love a girl even below his SMV or standards and feel like she’s her best due to other traits she has outside of looks. Even if he wants variety and may eventually try to…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 11:46 PM
0

All women are hypergamous, so this PC stuff about finding someone who essentially is unaffected by biological wiring is not realistically helpful to literally anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 11:34 PM
3

You can say that because that’s nice and all, but your biological wiring is attracted to something different.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 11:32 PM
0

So what’s the point of your irrelevant comment here; You didn’t disprove women are hypergamous so now you make this ‘point’?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 11:30 PM
3

Even if you call him an asshole he is the guy who is typically women’s best from her hypergamous viewpoint, so all this moralistic shit about him not being a nice guy is irrelevant. Men’s sexual strategy is based on unlimited access to unlimited sexuality, so a guy who’s the best doesn’t care, because why tf should he? It’s not gonna benefit him.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 11:27 PM
–

Something something apex fallacy something something exception to the rule You never seem to provide any actual scientific backing to any of the broad claims you make here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 11:25 PM
1

Well, ‘Manipulation’ works. 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:51 PM
3

Since you claim to be 1 n count, that is an increasingly rare exception. The more she sleeps around, the more likely she’s to be imprinted by someone that ends up being the best she can get and she has to settle later on when her sexual strategy shifts and she has less sexual leverage. It’s not always, but I’d wager women settle for a guy who’s not the best she’s had, or at least the guy she’s not the most attracted to, most of the time nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:46 PM
2

What’s your n count?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:41 PM
1

Since 10-20% of men are fuckin all these women in Western society, there’s literally nothing the average chump can do to prevent a sexually liberated boss babe from gettin railed by whoever she wants. You’re out of your depth here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:38 PM
2

They do even more than the most RP guys, they just won’t say it over fear of personal/social backlash. For these guys, that 30 n count thot at the end of her finish line that settled for him is the only girl he’s gonna get to marry so she’s the fuckin world to him. Because men have less bonds & social circles nowadays, it’s even more dire for men and a lotta these guys have to put up with shit that makes them sick to their stomach… because if they don’t, they’re literally gonna be all alone. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:37 PM
5

Yeah, he’s just a fucking weirdo.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:31 PM
1

No, I gave you a short response here because you didn’t make any point for me to respond to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:27 PM
2

So you’re fat and were just offended by it? Lol, figures that the mask came off here
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:23 PM
4

Maybe, but there are way more men who never inquired because they’re scared of personal & social backlash of holding standards for women. It’d be better for men to inquire smartly, and if that causes a problem then it’s best to throw her away
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:20 PM
2

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:18 PM
5

No, because this is a specific conversation point that can’t be studied. How would you study something like this specifically? What you have to go off of is general observations of female sexual strategy (AF/BB), observations of times where this has happened (dead bedrooms, finding out about her sexual past, etc) and basic logic about it. Women being less sexually open with the guy she settled for is because she’s not as sexually attracted for.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:18 PM
1

Source for that? Because a conclusion based on this study about a game is unscientific & irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 04:04 PM
5

YMMV because apparently you’re only one 1 n The point is that women’s liking if certain sexual things and openess abour them is highly dependent on the guy. They’re not like men where men will typically like the same thing they always have, and will want variety of girls. Women’s liking of it will be more dependent on the guy; the better the guy, the more open & the more she likes it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 03:52 PM
6

Yea actually, but sexual standards for me and a girl are different because the way girls decide and have sex is different. Your point is almost a non sequitur; why would my experience doing something disprove why girls’ do it when there are entirely different dynamics?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 03:49 PM
7

Lotta dumb beta guys before hand don’t realize it or are scared to ask for her sexual past. Women’s sexual strategy is to be more wild at their peaks (early 20s) and slow that in favor of security later on. You have to read her properly to see if she’s that type of girl in the first place. Read her body language when talking about anything related to her open sexuality, ask about her background and take note of what she really means but won’t outright say (things like “I use to have fun but now …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 03:45 PM
2

Such loaded language to describe someone simply saying “yea sure i could see a future together bby” before smashing and dipping.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 03:34 PM
1

Are you a white woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 09:01 AM
3

“Schizoid”? Makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:56 AM
3

Why does appoiting blame matter? Why do women rush to point out who to blame when people simply explain a problem exists when no one yet even blamed women, or anyone? I find it interesting. It’s a common trend… and it’s because women aren’t built to handle male problems like a lot of society gaslights men into thinking when they tell them to be open about feelingz nd shit. They can only understand emotions acceptable under their female mindframe. If he agrees with her about toxic masculinity is …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:53 AM
3

Because you’re gonna be fuckin dudes no matter what nowadays, so now if a man wants to win he has to make sure he’s the best and is getting it the earliest before everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 07:42 AM
8

Women tell on themselves if you’re shape enough to catch basic hints unlike most guys nowadays, lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 07:30 AM
12

This is the common defense but it never seems happens in actuality. A girl who does certain things sexually for one guy who won’t do it for the guy she settled it doesn’t do it because 9/10 times she doesn’t wanna do it… with him. The female response to be more PC and easy on men is to make that excuse, but it never happens in actuality based on what I’ve observed (ofc, this could just be my experience). It sounds sensible that if you tried something once and didn’t like it, you’d be averse to i…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 07:28 AM
31

It’s crazy realizing that dead bedrooms all along are mainly due to women simply just not being attracted to the guys they marry… or at least not as attracted as she should be, as she could do better. In order for her to give up that sex, the guy has to put more effort & take her on all these dates and shit. The common response is to put blame on the guy and make him have to put in waaay more work to woo her endlessly to even get sex, but the moment these guys have to jump through hoops & dance …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 07:22 AM
32

Especially when she did those things for other guys in her past
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 07:16 AM
1

OP you were complaining that you were never challenged on this point but here you have a response that you chose to ignore and not reply to. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 08:53 PM
3

Notice how OP didn’t respond to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 08:53 PM
3

“Do my research for me so I have an excuse to duck out of the conversation!!” Literally all it takes is googling something like “single mothers raise criminals” and you can find multiple statistics that will help support the correlation between single motherhood & violence, incarceration, less success, etc. But you knew that, because you know you made a point you can’t back up.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:51 AM
6

Why are you on a date with a guy you know is just using as a cumbucket? You might just have some low self worth then.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:43 AM
6

You have, but have dismissed any of it. You just wanted to circlejerk in bad faith. We’re all guilty of wanting to do it, but making a whole post feigning objectivity is just a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:37 AM
3

No, it’s not irrelevant, even if you don’t want it to be relevant. Nuclear family households with two parents on produce better outcomes for a reason, and studies find even single fathers produce better outcomes on average than single mothers. Women ironically raise toxicly masculine men yet get held less accountable for the consequences of their choices. Maybe that’s why they get ‘hate’, justifiable or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:28 AM
3

So you just wanted to confirm your preconceived notions and not have any of your snuck premises challenged?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:23 AM
7

This sub allows people to literally make up shit. In the US it is not illegal for you to get an abortion (early on) and that hasn’t been the case for a while. If necessary you can drive across state lines and get one even cheaper. And the man has no say. Removing accountability from women. Women can do no wrong. Women are victims. It’s men’s fault women are shitty single mothers when they had 100% unilateral power on who gets born.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:22 AM
2

And the worshipping of single mothers is why society is going down the shitter in that aspect. The most violent, disparaged and least successful men/people in general are raised by single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:12 AM
2

Ah yes, the person who has to go out of his way to mention his supposed credentials on the internet isn’t the one here who’s “playing on the internet” Mhm, You keep telling yourself that
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 01:35 AM
3

Okay, so you have nothing. Coulda saved us time by saying that outright.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 01:22 AM
3

The burden of proof is on you to prove this shit
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 10:36 PM
6

Just putting in more effort into girls doesn’t strongly correlate with getting girls. Girls is the the facet in life where men putting in more effort into them correlates the weakest with results. Doesn’t mean men shouldn’t strive to be their best selves, but even if all men magically strove to be their best selves it wouldn’t move the needle much at all. You’d still have close to 80/20 as attraction is relative.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 08:12 PM
3

Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 07:54 PM
5

Tell that homeless and broke people who complain that they live a shit lifestyle. I find the people who say shit like this typically are the more left leaning types when it comes to politics overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 07:54 PM
2

We’re talking socioeconomic status & affluence, not looks or overall ratings. Women have much higher standards and will always aim to date up in status (all things being equal), even if she has to spurn her current partner in order to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 07:05 AM
-1

Then I and every other man who fits the bill is a fuckin predator, oh well
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 07:03 AM
1

No, they aren’t, primarily because ugly dudes don’t have that option.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 06:33 PM
5

The only men who fall in line with their teachings are the betas with the lowest self worth. That’s why FDS just doesn’t work, it doesn’t work towards the target goal stated by them (HVM) but only repulses them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 06:32 PM
1

A positive for men. The goal is to improve men’s chances, not women’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 06:30 PM
24

To counter one point. Most young men are not having casual sex, and the sexlessness rate is increasing so it only makes sense as to why it’s reaching a larger target audience over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 06:27 PM
–

That might just be one of those exceptions. This could make sense though if those 9s and 10s are more (self perceived) higher status women who have insane standards for men who are good LTRs for her. In order to get any sex, or good sex, she may fuck below her level here or there but will put herself through a journey to find the best man for an LTR that may be impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 06:20 PM
–

That doesn’t happen on any significant scale. Men essentially never even get the chance to fuck 10s unless they’re capable of actually getting that consistently, and guys who can get 10s for sex can certainly get them to commit to relationships. Getting commitment from women is typically easier than getting casual sex from them. Male and female dating strategies are different; there’s no equal and opposite reaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 06:10 PM
1

You should call in to his show and give him a piece of your mind!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 05:54 PM
0

If that’s what we’re calling misogynist, then oh well.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 05:53 PM
12

Women are a majority of the electorate. Women are the majority of the consumer base. Women spend & control a majority of the wealth. Also, you don’t need to be female to be a feminist/someone advocating with a gynocentric mindframe.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 05:40 PM
1

I’ve only seen it used by BPers here as a sort of opposite term to ‘Chad’, so I assumed what I assumed in my original comment. If I’m genuinely off, my mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 02:16 AM
5

Yea, this is the definition of a strawman bait post by BPers here. No one actually argues men peak in their 60s by any chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 02:10 AM
0

Is ‘Stacy’ a term BP women or FDS made up as a sort of ‘no u’ to try to claim men are chasing the perfect ‘Stacy’ even though that’s not evidently a thing? I’m outta the loop there but im assuming this is some sort of term rooted in projection to claim ‘men do the same women do!!’ If so, lmao. There’s no equal and opposite reaction when it comes to men & women sexual strategies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 02:08 AM
1

Dating strategies are mostly adversarial if the goal is to maximize them for yourself, so that makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 01:53 AM
0

I think this may be what is called projection. After all, you wrote this long winded self serving post that is essentially you lashing out in frustration at comments you see from RP men. If it bothers you so much that RP men, keep it moving. You’re probably just hunting out comments & posts that will infuriate you and wanna soapbox because it bothers you that these men have a voice.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 01:45 AM
3

So you’re getting the scraps when they’re all used up and “done having their fun”
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/21 08:38 PM
2

As long as she does that, cool, but it doesn’t always play out that way. Women will always question if they have the best, and no matter what age looks & physical attraction are a component in that. Even if women prioritize security more over time, a significant portion is based on physical attraction still. It’s probably why a lot of stories of a man figures out his wife isn’t as attracted to him as she was with someone in her past, is open to less sexually with him, is more resentful with him,…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/21 08:36 PM
2

It isn’t my experience that women respond to general rules with personal experience; it observable happens on this sub alone multiple times every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/21 04:41 AM
5

Lived experience that is one instance of 3.5 billion guys vs the general rule. This is the millionth time a woman responds to a post about general rules with their personal experience because, again, you can’t step out of your female mindframe. Part of that frame is over weighing personal anecdotes and under-weighing general rules
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 11:16 PM
11

Doesn’t matter what you claim you want; the female imperative is the same among all women (AF/BB), with only a few possible, minor differences between women’s taste. You jumping to the conclusion that men who accurately point this out are literally brainwashed evil misogynists whose minds have been infested further proves my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 09:33 PM
11

Doubtful. Most women get a chance out at their prince but miss out and have to settle for a frog. There’s a reason half of marriages end in divorce (with a lot of ones that don’t not necessarily being truly happy marriages) with women initiating a majority of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 09:22 PM
2

The cost to become before even meeting you in the first place, and the cost to maintain a high level of attraction after meeting you. Examples may be all the time & money (thousands) he has to spend going to school, then building a career, holding investments, becoming not only independent but ideally attractive from a wealth perspective (to become a top tier earner), working on his personal image (fashion, looks, online presence), taking the time to master his social skills & status, setting up…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 09:08 PM
8

Women’s sexual strategy being highly, highly prioritized in the last 50 years, far more than male’s. The advent of social media/OLD accelerated it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 09:01 PM
2

No, you are all the same in the vast majority of ways. This misconception that women are all unique snowflakes is a lie women tell each other because it’s uncomfortable to face the reality that you are all simple animals, just like the rest of us, and are wired to follow a similar pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 08:54 PM
1

Jesus Christ, this is a prime example of why debating with women here is pointless. It’s just easier to ignore what you have to say and just focus on the truth. You can lead her to water by directly telling her how men think but she will continue to say “I disagree” because she simply cannot step out of her female mindframe, confidently asserting her personal experience is the ideal male experience. You can’t make this up. Younger women > older women. There’s a reason the most wanted age group o…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 08:51 PM
3

You have never been with a man where the relationship is actually free. There are always costs he has to incur long before he even meets you to get into the door, let alone costs he has to deal with after he meets you. Of course these costs are invisible to you and someone within your mindframe.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 08:34 PM
3

Because you’re a woman who can’t step out of her own frame. Men don’t prefer used up old women with baggage. This “building a connection with someone mature” is code for woman to try to gaslight poor suckers into takin them at their lowest points and it’s why so many men get fuckin hosed in marriage Men don’t give a FUCK about ‘deep connection with someone mature’ like you women imply. Men want beauty, purity, youth, fitness and a calm feminine personality. Younger girls > older girls by default…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 08:22 PM
1

I wonder why your guy is repulsed when you talk about your sexual past. The worst feeling a guy has is that his girl belongs to the streets, which you probably do. He may not leave and tell you directly because he doesn’t wanna lose you, and it’s obviously a problem you’ve observed too because you’re now trying to hide it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 08:05 PM
3

You try to paint a nicer picture with sweeter language, but you again prove AWALT. You longing for those past guys when you’re with the supposed one you love is a prime example of this. By default you longing for that is, whether you consciously mean to or not, comparing your current to your past. What you can’t comprehend is that you may not be fully aware of your subconscious, but based on what you’re admitting now, you’ve compared them. Holy shit, you made the argument for me. If your current…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 06:27 AM
1

No, it was about women’s inability to take accountability for their faults and it always was that; you’re the one who shifted goalposts and projected. This is ironically an example of lack of accountability because you shifted the blame of which sex takes less accountability at the start of the argument… then shifted the blame of who was the one derailing the argument to be about what we’re talking about now. Essentially, AWALT. This is a pointless back and forth that you’ll keep going, so I’m g…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 06:21 AM
3

Nope. You’re not above your biological wiring to be hypergamous. You’re not some special virtuous snowflake who’s above doing this, and typically I find the women who are most angry about having their sexual selection strategy being pointed out are the ones who are the most nasty. Watch what they do, not what they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 06:09 AM
5

And my point is that I’ve been pretty clear in my points, and it’s pointless to get into an argument with someone in an entirely different BP’d reality than you. You’re only confirming my pre conceived notions of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 06:07 AM
4

Source that backs up all of this?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 06:03 AM
6

I don’t need to be held accountable for telling the truth. Don’t know what else to tell ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 05:46 AM
6

No, that’s comparing. What you’re doing is painting it in a sweeter picture that doesn’t make it sound like women compare because it’s an unflattering truth to men. Women are wired to compare. It’s in their nature to do so and question if she has the best she can get, so she will always (even if it’s the last thing she’ll admit) compare. You just have to be lucky to be the best guy so the comparison works out in your favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 05:45 AM
3

Why are women homeless?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 05:39 AM
1

Yes… and did I disagree with you and say that women shouldn’t be most fearful of rape? I don’t get the point of why you commented unless you got the implication that I said women shouldn’t have rape as the worst fear from a intersexual dynamic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 05:36 AM
10

Fair point; women on this reddit are more likely to be the unattractive, older and bitter kind. But to some degree, women in general are more likely to shift accountability away from themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 05:33 AM
3

Yes, so she will compare them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 05:32 AM
6

So you admit it? That your hypergamous filter will do the job & compare to your best regardless?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 02:49 AM
16

Bingo. PPD women show full and well the harsh realities of how women operate, and it is that they a lot of them take no accountability. They are wired to do so If I have to make one sweeping generalization, it’s that one. Every argument that sees actual evidence sourced by men/RPers it gets spun and spun and spun by the other side who just can’t debate it honestly. Just a convo I had here yesterday went like that, and the person I responded to kept spinning and spinning and shifting goalposts. H…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 02:47 AM
2

Doubtful
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 02:43 AM
2

I’ve been harassed by women technically (groping, unwanted advances, etc), but I just don’t care as much a woman probably would. Women naturally are more able to initiate touch with men without it coming off as harassment. Sometimes, it can be a good problem to have. I don’t have data on hand, but I bet the rate of men being harassed is just as high/higher at times, but men don’t experience the feeling harassment the same as women do so it’s not as reported. Women’s worst fear is having their se…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 02:41 AM
1

A lot more nowadays do as more women settle on the people they marry as women marry later
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 03:34 PM
2

Explains a lot
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 04:07 AM
1

I’m addressing the part where you mischaracterized the problem in the first place. You misunderstood what ‘sexless’ meant; likely doing so intentionally. Don’t shift goalposts because you realized you were intentionally wrong and don’t wanna admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 04:00 AM
1

I never said it was; I was responding to the point that you mischaracterized the problem in the first place with the misleading info
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 02:45 AM
1

That’s not far off from what I was saying. In general = vast majority, at least 80% or so It’s just that OP’s assumption about MGTOW is not close to accurate, even if we assume she meant 80%.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 11:00 PM
1

Good question; I don’t have a generally agreed upon scientific definition on hand. Think of it like this; single men on the dating market who are getting casual sex frequently qualify. How frequent is the main question, but I think being able to get it at least once or twice a month or qualifies. Again, I don’t have a definite rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 10:58 PM
1

Sure, but let’s not play dumb; they’re very close to meaning the same thing. Even if she just meant ‘in general’, OP’s implication that men in general are MGTOW is way off base.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 10:54 PM
1

So not ‘men’ or men in general or all men; just a small minority. Good on correcting yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 10:53 PM
1

Again, you dodged my points about hours worked, type of job, OT, danger of jobs, experience, negotiation, etc. It’s obvious why you keep dodging them. When women are entering these higher paying fields slightly more the wage gap shrinks… yes, that’s how it works. When you account for relevant variables and stabilize them the gap shrinks. Seems like you agree with me. The 2nd point about sexual assault is a non sequitur. I’m not addressing shit that has nothing to do with the original point that …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 10:52 PM
3

You heavily implied it, yes. ‘Men’ means men in general; essentially all men. Let’s not play dumb and pretend we didn’t say things we said.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 08:11 PM
1

Typically, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 08:07 PM
2

All men are MGTOW now? Or even most? A significant part? News to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 07:56 PM
3

You obviously know virginity and marriage isn’t the point people have been arguing. Ability & frequency to get casual sex is the question, and it’s on the rapid rise. A guy who got lucky once when he was 20 and can’t get sex for months, years on end may not be a virgin but is sexless.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 07:50 PM
0

People here are going off what they observe women do and not what they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 07:40 PM
2

The majors that are higher paying tend to have more males in them. This is an objective fact. Comp Sci, Engineering, and what not are mostly men. Your links don’t disprove that and you keep dodging the other factors I’ve brought up multiple times.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 07:37 PM
2

And types of jobs, work hours, OT, danger of jobs, experience, ability to negotiate? Why filter on only education? Women can have more Bachelors on average but it doesn’t mean shit if it’s primarily in Psych compared to men having theirs primarily in Comp Sci, Engineering and Accounting.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:51 PM
1

I never went through your history; just observed your countless comments that I’ve naturally sene here and the indignant rants you go on. Again, you specifically can do whatever you want (I don’t care), but your reactions here help paint a clearer picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:49 PM
2

Based on your comments and history, you help prove the point that a lot of this stems from being intentionally hostile to tradition (even when it’s something so minor), proving a point and standing up to oppressive patriarchal norms. You then obfuscate the point by being intentionally hostile and saying “well YOU change it!”, strawmanning, etc… but it’s easy to see right through it. The women here try their hardest to hide what they truly mean with their behavior but if you talk long enough a cl…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:30 PM
1

Interesting. I can tell you’re being a bit short on these questions so it’s pointless to keep asking, but based on some of your comments I think you’ve helped paint a clearer picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:19 PM
2

Keep trying to pivot your way out of arguments instead of addressing the main points. Your body, your choice, your money, right? If you need others to fund to rid yourself of your bad decisions then people will get involved and get all up in your business.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:17 PM
2

Education is just one part that you addressed, and even if women on average now go to college more than men if you really control for that variable when you do a specific study you’ll find the gap narrows. Also, source? About women being paid less for sexism rather than other variables?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:15 PM
1

No source for your bold assertions? Thought so. That makes no sense anyway. It’s just as plausible that a small percentage of the women who settled are the ones who didn’t take the name, and the more a woman settled for someone further below her perceived worth the more likely it is she didn’t take his name. After all, the more ambivalent a woman is to taking that man’s name the more likely she is to divorce him because she can do better. She doesn’t have to submit to a guy she doesn’t think is …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 07:19 AM
1

source for this pretty confident claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:54 AM
0

I think this answer helps explain why modern women are less likely to take the name of men they settle for well. Thanks for the perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:47 AM
3

The first one doesn’t verifiably happen, the second one probably plays a significant part. The wage gap thing has been debunked for forever, so you probably already realize for when you control for all variables (type of job, education, experience, hours worked, overtime, etc) there’s maybe a 1 cent difference. That small difference could be accounted for the fact that men are more likely & better negotiators than women on average. When you look more closely at women earning potential they choos…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:43 AM
2

And you decided so on a whim? Or did you because you truly did not care for his last name, or liked your father’s too much? Did the paperwork of changing it on a few records not make it worth the quick hassle? Genuinely curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:40 AM
0

Men and women are different. The name just by itself is a red herring and again is an attempt by you to gaslight and play dumb about a woman being so opposed to simply taking a man’s last name & legacy. She’s carrying on her man’s legacy so if she was invested him as much as she could be invested in a man she would have no qualms. After all, where did her last name before that come from? A man or a woman? Think hard if you need to.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:38 AM
2

But if you want everyone else to have absolutely no say then you should have no qualms about using your money. You’re strong and independent enough. Your body, your money.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:32 AM
0

There’s no need to prove anything. If she believed the man she was marrying was the best she could do she wouldn’t even bring it up and make it an issue. That’s the point you BPers here intentionally miss as you try to obfuscate with all the typical shaming language & non sequiturs as you make this out to be something crazier than it really is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:28 AM
0

Good boy pats
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 04:15 AM
3

You being so disproportionately defensive about it says a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 04:00 AM
0

If a woman loved a man and thought he was the best she could do, she would willingly and enthusiastically fully submit to that guy, take on his last name and take on his legacy. Taking a bit of time to file some paperwork is some mundane shit that is an excuse. A woman getting angry about taking a last name says a lot about the deep biological inter workings there. It’s similar to how she would do anything for Chad she really wanted in her younger years but do the bare minimum for the loving bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 03:52 AM
0

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 03:48 AM
-1

If a woman won’t take your name & your lineage, you’re not the best she can do and she subconsciously is leaving even the tiniest crack in the door open. Women who believe they have the best will fully submit to a man, take his name, his sperm, his legacy, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 03:47 AM
5

If you go by biological meaning the whole “babies are parasites” argument doesn’t work in your favor. A baby is not a hostile, different species that had the agency to force it’s way in. It’s something that is put there by choice of the mother 99% of the time and is a natural product of reproduction. If it wasn’t something that was supposed to naturally the body would be wired to try to kill it rather than nurture it. They actually strengthen the mother’s reproductive fitness and drives women (t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 03:42 AM
4

Then stay out of people’s tax dollars to pay for it/subsidize it. That makes sense, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 03:29 AM
0

Right when the epiphany phase starts, right on.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 03:22 AM
1

What does this even mean? Answer the person above’s question without pivoting to some point that makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 02:22 AM
–

No response to any posts linking data and denial of everything conflicting world view. Mods should take this post down, this has become a ridiculous circlejerk by OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 12:24 AM
1

Tell that to women. They’re the ones with unilateral 100% decision making on if a guy gets to fuck her and if she carries the child to term. The guy has zero decision making. It’s 100% a woman’s responsibility
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 08:12 AM
0

True. Education especially is where women can get really high on their own selves as they really view having a piece of paper as something automatically making you smarter, more successful and wealthier. Obviously there’s a correlation between income & a degree, but even men who make more than a girl with a shitty degree that has them working at Starbucks will be dumped by women. Their hypergamous nature really values education especially, as they’ll feel like a guy is beneath being worth being …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 08:10 AM
-4

If you’re a guy then it’s not
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:49 AM
4

Of course a single mom says this.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:46 AM
2

Abortion is the female dating strategy’s last resort to get rid of a guy & his seed that’s disgusting. That’s why the abortion debate is so heated on that side to the point where a lot of people who aren’t interested in it are surprised why women are so passionate in maintaining the right to off their kids Take away abortion & the pill and they actually have to be held mostly responsible for their actions
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:19 AM
2

Interested in those sources. Don’t doubt you, but i bet it’s true that a lot more marriages end in satisfaction even if they don’t end in divorce for a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:16 AM
3

Prime example of women do not wanna hear about men problems. They’re not built to actually handle talking about things outside of their female mindset; it’s like they need to wipe their hands clean of it as if it was an annoying bug. Don’t take serious advice for any woman/BPers on these matters in general; that demographic of this sub in general is vehemently against discussing in good faith. As a man there’s nothing a woman can say that will be helpful that a man can’t tell you. Just watch wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:14 AM
3

For a prenup to actually work you need to have the best lawyers on top of everything months before the wedding. Need to film it, record it, have your lawyer confirm she’s able to consent to it (she’s not ‘pressured’), probably have to buy her a lawyer too, disclose all assets and hope your lawyers are trying to do good by you to have a chance that the prenup works Because otherwise you’re fucked
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:08 AM
0

I wonder about how happy each are when the women make as much/more than the man
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 06:53 AM
2

reddit gone is an extra bonus. It would warm my heart ❤️
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 06:38 AM
3

They don’t wanna be caught by the vast majority of fisherman
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 06:36 AM
2

Never ask a fish how to catch a fish. The fisherman, the hunter who has to learn how to catch his prey, knows better than the prey
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 06:24 AM
2

Never said any of the accusations you keep slinging. Maybe if you put that lil noggin to use you’ll land one and actually make an honest argument that I can actually respond to... But all you’ve done is bitch for someone replying to your comment on a discussion board designed for... discussion. It seems like a lotta BPers here just lash out at logical arguments & don’t wanna feel accountable for the shit they say🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 06:21 AM
2

Case in point. Why you can’t debate women on this sub, or in general, because you continue to strawman, use shaming language (which claiming you’re not) and ad absurdum arguments. No one’s asking you to do shit. I’m simply explaining why someone who has a lack of social experience with certain people have a harder time gaining experience when they’re prevented from doing so by being shamed as creeps. No one wants any type of empathetical response from someone who obviously has none.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 05:55 AM
2

This further proves my point. Instead of actually trying to have a conversation it’s ad hominem attacks & shaming language (ie “WHO HURT YOU?”) to make your baseless point. A feature of PPD women. The salient point is that these experiences for men can cause them to be socially stunted for life when it happens in their developmental years especially. Social rejection & shame only needs to happen a few times before it kicks a person back into his place considering this is something men will work …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 11:46 PM
0

Children check out your ass & gawk at you? You’re popular with children?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 11:30 PM
1

Good question
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 11:29 PM
6

“Clearly busy” is a filter women use for guys they don’t want to talk to You’ll always be able to make time depending on who it is
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 11:24 PM
10

It happens all the time. She will subconsciously think he’s a creep but won’t feel the need to say it/demonstrate it till that weirdo who asked her how her day is going decides to finally work up the courage to talk to her. That one experience is enough to condemn a lot of guys to never doing it again. Most guys are flat out invisible to women due to being filtered out of their consideration due to being low value from the get go. So when one of those low value guys steps out of his place & into…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 11:23 PM
6

When that stupid thing said is commonly said to a lot of guys who try to simply talk to girls to the point where they check out of the game completely. There’s also plenty of social risk for being considered a creep to the point where it’s not worth it even if it’s one time where it happens. If a guy isn’t attractive, he’ll be considered creepy no matter what. Women also take the ‘stupid shit’ an even smaller minority men have done to them personally even more seriously and apply it to a large m…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 11:13 PM
2

The same Halle Berry who famously complains even she can’t find any good men at her age despite being one of the finest women of her time? Yeah, not good examples and this is proof that we’re probably talkin about different things
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 10:28 PM
1

Even the ugliest women will have better luck on today’s market than almost all men Especially if you just stay thin enough and use a decent amount of makeup
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 02:34 PM
2

And again, I agree that there are exceptions, but we may just have different ideas of what those exceptions are. Even the few widows out there aren’t high value just because they dated a perfect guy and he just happened to die of no fault of her own... that kid is still weighing down her value regardless. She’d have to be perfect in every other aspect to be objectively high value as a woman, because agreeing to a kid and then re entering the market when you’re older for any reason by default def…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 02:32 PM
8

A kid, especially a kid from a bum father she chose to be knocked up, negates pretty much all of that
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 02:12 PM
4

What’s yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 02:09 PM
10

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 02:08 PM
-2

Yea, your boyfriend definitely isn’t HV if you leveraged sex against him for that long and he still waited, especially if you woulda made other dudes wait way shorter (which is likely true)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 02:04 PM
11

No disrespect, but by default a single mom on the dating market can’t be high value, unless there’s some very exceptional exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 02:00 PM
1

Naw, in general nowadays
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 11:37 AM
1

Again, all these strawman arguments (no one said or implied you should have a detailed log; people keep track of a simple number at least unless it’s so high they genuinely can’t keep track) to not say anything. All your arguments are based on YOUR one personal experience which is an anecdote compared to generalizations that apply the vast majority of males and females. All the things I said above still hold true even if you may be an exception if you what you said is true, but even then you’re …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 11:02 AM
1

Tough shit. That’s how the dating world women dominate works, as men are lied to a lot more before sex (which they never get despite more investment) than girls are lied to after sex. Girls also know what type of guys they’re fuckin on these ONS. Go for safe beta who’ll be desperate to keep you instead of Chad who you implicitly know beforehand is gonna smash & pass you along... but that’s not how hypergamy works 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 10:52 AM
2

A lot of guys will never be up front about that type of stuff, mainly due to personal and societal level shame of being honest to women about their shortcomings but also due to men just being wired to be more empathetic up front to women in these situations. It’s unfortunate, because women are more likely to believe what these guys say and end up thinking it’s somethin with the guy why he left out of nowhere. A lot of other occurrences where men aren’t honest to girls because they either don’t w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 10:19 AM
5

How guys feel when they invest time, attention, money and appreciation in a girl before sex and realize she never had true attraction for him in the first place, and he never gets what he invested in. Game for the typical guy is getting sex from the girl he invested so much in. Game for the typical girl is gettin committment from the high value guy after she let him smash. At least girls have it easier in their department as time has gone on in the modern dating world, while the vast majority of…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 10:11 AM
1

You typed out all that to strawman men’s wiring. The main focus isn’t the ‘magic number’ itself despite you trying to frame it that way; the number is just a metric but the main focus is the full sexual history in context. Your husband could be a special snowflake, but he also could be like a lotta other guys who would care but swallow the urge to ask because he definitely knows it would be unpleasant to him. Every man who ends up knowing her sexual past would feel worse off in some way, or even…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 10:03 AM
3

Most people don’t. Life isn’t a Disney Fairytale. People who carry more baggage are more likely to continue to be damaged in the longrun. Thing is, women who have a higher body count are more likely to go spiral further, carry more trauma, be more mentally ill in some way, be more likely to be on drugs, be more likely to cheat, be less likely to pairbond, less likely to be happy settling for lesser guys, etc, etc. Life works the opposite way more often than not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 09:36 AM
3

This. As a guy who used to hate the idea of paying for dates all the time (I’m real frugal in general), being more of the leader, which includes paying, is in a guy’s best interest. The best advice for guys who have a question about this is to take her out to a simple low stakes (and more affordable) coffee date on the first time (no serious dinner date), be assured and confident in your frame throughout the date, playfully escalate, and when the check comes assure her by taking care of it. Payi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 09:18 AM
1

The cope is massive in all your comments. Is this response because you don’t feel comfortable with the thought that these guys truly don’t see it the way you do? Because if so, don’t take it personal; I say the same to whiny guys who don’t wanna accept the fact that women look at these things different than men do. I’m sorry if you thought the hot guys who fuck you do so because they love to connect with your soul and personality or something; they just wanna fuck because that’s how men are wire…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 09:09 AM
2

That’s most men. Men can fuck women they don’t respect, she just has to look good enough and be open to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 09:04 AM
10

This, to continue... A lot of people are saying “well guys end up marrying stereotypical modern women and not the ideal virgins they claim, so checkmate. Men prefer promiscuous, masculine modern women!” don’t realize men don’t have the options to pick what they want. The whole point of TRP is to understand and accept the reality of things, and the reality is there are almost no ‘good girls’ out there anymore. Thus, a lot of typical guys end up taking what they can get, and that usually is the bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 09:01 AM
1

The quieter plain girls end up being the freakiest ones regardless nowdays, so it’s kind of a moot point
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 08:50 AM
1

Gettin fucked by men you don’t really know at parties is not a feminine trait; being sociable is. Before you say “well I don’t go to parties to do this”, let’s not play dumb; we all know what most people who go to college parties are there for.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 08:49 AM
3

All of what you typed out is irrelevant. The salient point is that in order for men to understand women they have to simply not just listen to what they say, but observe what they do. Women are not special snowflakes who truly are as unique as they claim despite how many paragraphs they type out to gaslight others. That’s why the guys who have success with women treat them as they are: people. People who are very flawed and very similar & predictable if you observe their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 08:15 AM
9

I wonder why those men felt the need to have their own kids? Why they weren’t fulfilled with raising the wonderful existing kids of the mother that he came to do? Maybe men feel more of a drive to spread their seed and slave away for their own kin rather than someone else’s rather than care as much for other kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 08:08 AM
2

Men != women Females aren’t biologically wired like males when it comes to investing & slaving away for children that aren’t theirs & securing paternity. Not saying women should date single dads or whatever, but women of some significant value are more likely than men of some significant value to date single parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 08:04 AM
19

“High value single moms” is a thing? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 08:03 AM
1

No, no matter how much you gaslight men into being okay with it, it matters. Men are wired biologically to be repulsed by promiscuous women, especially in long term relationships, and there are almost no exceptions (except for .1% genuine cucks who enjoy their girl gettin fucked by other dudes). Every man cares; they just won’t tell you due to Attempts to shame men for having standards on a personal & societal level A lot of guys have no other options and would rather suffer in silence with a gi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 07:57 AM
1

Most men aren’t happy. The only guys who’ll tolerate it are beta guys who don’t wanna have to cope with the fact he was her last option after she’s been open to 30 other guys before as a lot of guys nowadays simply have no other options (and would rather suffer in silence than be all alone).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 07:53 AM
2

Naw, your past is the best predictor of who you are in the future. Women deep down understand this too, as otherwise they wouldn’t fight so hard to control the narrative about this topic & shame men who speak up about it. Men are naturally wired to be repulsed by promiscuity and higher body counts when it comes to long term partners especially. Guys who claim they don’t really mind it are coping because they have no choice but to accept the girl they settled down with is promiscuous or be alone …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 07:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter