TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Rahms Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by Rahms on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's not really about whether you can or can't. If you openly flirt with other people it's disrespectful. She's not going to think "oh he can get other girls! How attractive he is now!" She's going to either get upset, pissed or just do it back to you. Inciting jealousy is a terrible way of making her attracted.
/r/seduction14/09/12 04:28 PM
8

Strike up conversations with attractive women, when you're with your girlfriend. Fuck this in the face. If she did it to you, it wouldn't be a good move, or make you appreciate her more. It would make you think "wow, way to be a dick" and if it continually happened you'd either end up resenting her or always thinking about it when you're out. She should know that you can get other women because she should be attracted to you.
/r/seduction13/09/12 11:31 PM
7

Yeah this is lame. It's a really passive-aggressive move and making her jealous is just going to piss her off.
/r/seduction13/09/12 11:26 PM
8

Indeed.
/r/seduction30/04/12 11:26 PM
3

Bitches love respect.
/r/seduction12/04/12 10:03 PM
1

Idk man, I really can't see myself doing this and it never resulting in a fight Are these the words you meant to say? And yeah, space invading (repeatedly touching someone....) is a pretty surefire way to piss someone off. I'm pretty small but if someone kept stroking my arm while trying to take the piss out of me, I'd certainly atleast shove his arm away.
/r/seduction09/04/12 11:33 PM
1

I'm not saying I agree with his point, but do you really not see what he's saying? It's very very simple. He goes out to pick up random girls, and finds it very easy to pick up, even when they are in relationships. Hence, he would worry about his (future) relationships because he presumes it would be just as easy for someone else to pick up his partner.
/r/seduction08/04/12 09:48 PM
2

Ever paid one of your friends a compliment? You manipulative fuck.
/r/seduction24/03/12 03:32 PM
1

Being called friendly-looking is a compliment; if you question compliments whenever you receive them, you aren't exactly reinforcing a positive image of yourself.
/r/seduction15/03/12 04:29 PM
2

I agree with most of the post: but the the reason a lot of "nice guys" never get laid is not because they aren't actually nice, it's usually more because they're too nice (early boyfriend) i.e. far too too willing to do favours or meet at a moments notice. The reason why not caring works is because it naturally leads to you doing things that increase attraction; talking to other girls, not being too try hard, not being a doormat and not being as available. TL;DR I agree with the benefits of fema…
/r/seduction19/02/12 02:32 AM
1

I don't think that analogy works: we're talking about more intricate parts of interacting, a more accurate one would be more like reading a guide on mountain biking or BMXing or something once you can already ride, which is pretty common. Also, riding a bike is a solo thing that you can do forever. You can keep sucking at it as long as you want and the outcome is the same. With social skills, people prefer to avoid striking out as much as possible (obviously, you're still destined to look dumb a…
/r/seduction18/02/12 10:21 PM
1

This will lead to makeouts or a questioning "what?" from your girl I had this recently, every time I made eye contact and looked at her she giggled then asked "what?" It actually got a little annoying and I stopped giving answers :<
/r/seduction18/02/12 10:15 PM
6

I think you've completely missed the tone of my post: it's meant to help. This is natural and if you exact the same way with the next girl, it will happen again.
/r/seduction24/01/12 03:39 AM
7

No matter how nice I am to her, or how often I'm there to care for her, after 5 years of friend zone she still says I'm just "not her type" and just wants us to be best friends. Actually, this is your problem. You are providing everything a boyfriend does, but for free. There is no need for her to invest any more in you than she already has, because she gets the full package for 0 effort (I'm assuming that she's getting laid elsewhere). 5 years is a long time, so it's not too likely you can fix …
/r/seduction24/01/12 01:13 AM
6

Aha, I've actually seen that video a long while ago (think it was frontpaged in r/videos at some point). Yeah, it's interesting... but doesn't really show anything useful.
/r/seduction24/01/12 12:56 AM
38

Well since you seem to be female.... I also think it's to do with the fact that females are just a lot more intimate with their friends. At the start, they really are just friends with the guy (as in, he sees them as a friend too), but then he misreads the odd spooning session or extended hug and starts to like her. In her head this is just what closer friends do, whereas in his head it's time to change the sheets. She may realise, but by this point she has the guy in her head as a good friend, …
/r/seduction24/01/12 12:00 AM
5

And I sort of resent the idea that just because I'd bang some of my friends in the right circumstances, we aren't somehow really friends. I didn't watch the video, not going to lie.... But the whole friendzone thing is to do with balance. If you're running to her whenever she needs a favour, then you're obviously not on an equal footing with her; your position doesn't really sound like it meets my definition of 'the zone.' And as you said, you aren't pining for them: having female friends who yo…
/r/seduction23/01/12 11:57 PM
1

I really can't be bothered anymore, you clearly aren't reading what I'm actually typing (gone back to directly asking) and are 100% convinced you are correct. It's like religious people: decide what is true first, apply (approximate) logic second. Yes he would, assuming that he is a decent person. What, he'd carry on chatting and pretend you weren't lying on a beach getting hot and heavy? You could call that manipulative too (and be equally wrong). I really want to [somewhat detailed description…
/r/seduction23/01/12 01:21 PM
1

It's pointless. I've "lost" arguments with a group of people who were saying "would of" is grammatically correct. People in groups are pretty much impossible to argue sensibly with, they just back up each others insane theories and proceed with the circlejerk. They really believe that it's possible to rape someone by ignoring them. I mean.... what the fuck. If a girl ever gives a blunt "no" or "stop" then nowhere in seddit will you find advice telling you to push further. It's sad that some of t…
/r/seduction22/01/12 09:02 PM
2

They're so tedious to deal with..... Complete victim mode; start an argument then crown themselves champions because their cronies blindly upvote/downvote accordingly. It'd make sense if we were in the 50s...
/r/seduction22/01/12 07:10 PM
1

First off, you're drifting away from one night stands and towards courtship. And saying I'm not thinking about them as individual women is a very strange point to make when talking about generalisations. Obviously in each situation you have to gauge it by the girl, but we're talking about likelihoods here. But my point is that the kiss is not the same at all. If that happened to me, I would not in a million years count it as LMR, because it's nowhere near last minute. If you'd whisked him away t…
/r/seduction22/01/12 07:02 PM
-9

How am I, exactly? It's talking about meeting women from a male perspective because the OP is male. How is that at all equal to treating them as subhuman? (I'm guessing that's what you're trying to imply). Please follow surssurs' example and provide some sort of reasoning or specificity, instead of just making empty statements without any actual meaning.
/r/seduction22/01/12 04:36 AM
-10

I've noticed that this has happened a lot recently: someone says a generalisation that is, for the most part, true.... and then someone comes and provides a single bit of anecdotal evidence that apparently completely discounts it. I'm sure that was great for the guy. But that was asking for a kiss, not for sex. And the fact that you had sex with him after that (not immediately) makes it irrelevant. Basically what you just described was being on a date (or meeting him on a night, I guess), him as…
/r/seduction22/01/12 04:15 AM
-7

Because everything has to be subtext, you can't just say it, no matter what stage you're at. You can find a girl in a club, chat, get to know her, take her home and both of you have a great time. But if you walked up to her in the club and said "hey, let's chat, get to know eachother, then go back to mine and have a great time" it will not work. This doesn't mean that girl doesn't want exactly that, it's just not the done thing. It's all social norms. The reason this LMR crops up (in most cases,…
/r/seduction22/01/12 03:53 AM
1

Strangely enough, me too. Get help.
/r/seduction19/01/12 10:43 PM
2

Lol, discussion. This has been an education, here's a quick transcript: You: WRONG RAWRGWRGW RAPE Me: No, here is why it applies. Care to elaborate on why you disagree? You: WRONG RAWRGWRGW RAPE Me: Now you just sound like a retard, here's some more reasons why I am right. Still waiting on you to make a point. You: WRONGWRONG LALALALALA NOT LISTENING
/r/seduction19/01/12 10:34 PM
3

So whereas I pointed out why you are wrong, you just repeated yourself. I am not claiming to know your thoughts better than you, which is not the same as predicting generalised women's thoughts but judging from your posts you really aren't a normal woman; you're a charged up, sensationalist pseudo-feminist (pseudo- because, you know, you aren't actually helping women at all here). The idea that the woman is a victim during sex and that women aren't enjoying themselves when they do this is such a…
/r/seduction19/01/12 10:27 PM
19

so to speak oho!
/r/seduction19/01/12 12:52 PM
2

Pretty sure I addressed this pre-emptively in my post: Furthermore, LMR isn't something that pops up as you enter the doorway, so it's not like you can say "they felt safe in the bar." LMR isn't as you enter the threshold, it's literally as you're right about to climb that final hurdle. The fact that you're making out/fooling about to the point that you reached it tells you that they're definitely not scared (no-one thinks "well he does scare me, but I'll make out with him all alone for a bit").
/r/seduction19/01/12 11:37 AM
1

The "I am a woman therefore I know the thoughts of every other woman better than any other man" argument is one of the most stupid and often-repeated ones around reddit. You are an individual, as am I (and the countless others who have put in far more time studying this than either of us), and both are pretty much equally qualified to talk in such vast generalisations. So yeah, if you want to disagree you're going to have to, you know... actually make a point. edit: after wondering why such reta…
/r/seduction19/01/12 11:33 AM
1

Oh yes I forgot I was on reddit, people will argue the details instead of the actual point. Here you go: some things require confidence to do. However, not doing them (whether not wanting to or afraid) does not infer lack of confidence, although it can.
/r/seduction19/01/12 01:19 AM
2

Comment Karma: 15049 Look at the posts, they're clearly serious. I find this little gem quite ironic actually: If a person meets a person they find attractive, their best bet is to make the first move FTFY
/r/seduction18/01/12 02:24 AM
4

That's not confidence.... Sure you need to be confident to do it, but that doesn't make it the definition. You have to be confident to challenge someone to a fight or rob a store, that doesn't mean you aren't confident if you don't do those things. Confidence is being 100% comfortable with who you are and willing to put yourself out there for people to see. You say you don't like shit-tests as a definition of confidence (and go as far as calling people dicks for replying in that way).... but sur…
/r/seduction17/01/12 08:28 PM
10

You've caught my eye, care to talk a bit and see if we have anything in common If you made it sound less like a job interview this would probably work... "I saw you from over there and just had to come say hello"
/r/seduction17/01/12 08:21 PM
2

What is ego-fed or arrogant about talking to women?
/r/seduction17/01/12 08:06 PM
26

This happens whenever someone makes a generalisation; some woman comes and goes "I DONT LIKE THAT THEREFORE ITS GARBAGE RAWRGAWGRAG." The fact is that the vast majority of women do wait to be approached instead of approach, no matter what it is that you do personally. Also, your actual argument of "this isn't what I want" doesn't really contradict the guy's post, unless you're saying you actively pursue the guy who is least outgoing? tl;dr the more a man person approaches the higher his their ch…
/r/seduction17/01/12 08:04 PM
6

First off, I'm not agreeing with the OP here. Just saying that alot of people seem to define spam this archaic way, when clearly it has other well recognised connotations. Things all being from the same source, for example, can correctly be called "spam from <x>." I've been pestered by someone through PMs before and when I asked them to stop spamming me they said "it's not spam, I've been sending you a different message each time." -_-
/r/MensRights14/01/12 03:29 AM
1

Me too... The statement isn't meant to allude to some magical list of things women want, the point he's making is about women not being fully able to fully identify their own requirements.
/r/seduction12/01/12 03:42 AM
4

I believe that's the joke here. pats head
/r/seduction11/01/12 03:02 PM
5

we're in seduction already....
/r/seduction10/01/12 03:07 PM
7

Pretty much yeah, it's alot of the "inner game" type stuff in the sidebar. Basically, get everything else in your life sorted and then the women will sort themselves out.
/r/seduction10/01/12 03:06 PM
3

Non-needy, assertive, popular and any of the hundreds of physical characteristics a person can have that this specific woman likes.
/r/seduction10/01/12 03:04 PM
6

A lot of guys seem to think girls just care about their face, or only mean the face when they're talking about attractiveness. Girls are a lot like guys.... You must have seen hundreds of girls with average faces and awesome bodies and thought they were super hot. So many people get bummed out about silly details. TL;DR: there's too many people who think it's all about luck when really they should just work out a bit.
/r/seduction10/01/12 02:57 PM
1

You know you could have typed all that without starting with "moron" and you would have looked like a nice helpful person, instead of a douche.
/r/seduction08/01/12 04:04 PM
1

Maybe not a prude, but a bit old fashioned. If she's open to seeing other people then she's going to whether it's this guy or not. Whatever issues she or her bf may have, this guy isn't creating them.
/r/seduction04/01/12 05:10 PM
26

I think it's the old "jerk it before you work it"
/r/seduction03/01/12 10:53 PM
4

But they aren't arguing with anyone; they're just spewing this rubbish on private forums with other feminists who aren't planning on disagreeing with them. It's similar to racism: blatantly obvious that it's wrong to the vast majority of people. Yet still, there will be places on the internet where people spew that kind of garbage. The problem isn't that they're convincing others or anything like that, it's that they are people who have important jobs who actually believe this rubbish.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 02:23 AM
4

What? Posting their info is indeed one of the lamest things I've ever seen, but the idea that the stuff in that link (can't find the comment it's from, but tab is still open) is presenting clear and logical arguments is just retarded. Basically, they're batshit insane feminists. Posting their stuff online is a terrible move, but don't imply that they actually have a point. And to clarify, I mean these feminists in that link, not all feminists (just like not all christians are westboro baptist ps…
/r/MensRights17/12/11 03:33 PM
2

Try lightening the mood with a joke, I'd recommend this one: "What's the difference between a joke and two dicks? You can't take a joke" But seriously, unless you'd been saying things like that all the time, it's not overstepping any bounds.
/r/seduction01/12/11 05:08 PM
1

oh, I read the initial post (that's my reply up there ^ ), he then replied to me but deleted it before I saw it. Scumbag move!
/r/seduction30/11/11 04:20 PM
2

I never got to see what he said :<
/r/seduction29/11/11 08:29 PM
1

To start: you keep saying "what did I do wrong (except the kino)." It seems you underestimate the power of it: the whole point is that it builds physical comfort and also gives the girl a hint at your intentions. After all this time with nothing happening she's obviously started seeing you as a friend (but you're nowhere near deep enough in the friendzone for this to be a lost cause). Basically she gets along fine with you and likes to hang out. She may well be up for more, but you'll never find…
/r/seduction29/11/11 06:51 PM
2

They're all 0 days old, I think it might actually all be the same person. Poor guy.
/r/seduction27/11/11 03:53 PM
3

careful, he plays WoW (ret pala being a class, I haven't stalked him or anything :<)
/r/seduction27/11/11 03:51 PM
2

Well I wouldn't have got it :( So I guess this is where most people would make a 1% joke? Well I won't. And that makes me the 0.01%.
/r/seduction27/11/11 03:49 PM
2

This is such a disney film response. Not saying it's bad or anything, just..... awwww
/r/seduction27/11/11 03:45 PM
1

They probably were noticed, it's just that loads of guys are scared shitless of acting on it. Especially if it's something innocent like a glance: self-doubt will turn this into "well she's just looking around."
/r/seduction27/11/11 03:38 PM
4

Read through some of the sidebar stuff. The main thing is you don't need to wait for an obvious indicator, just go find out if she's interested. You may be given very obvious signals sometimes (holding eye contact or a smile), but if you wait for just this before you make a move, you'll be missing out on alot of girls who would otherwise love to meet you.
/r/seduction25/11/11 12:51 AM
1

"being your best self" is a never-ending process, there's no time where you'll go "ah, done, let's go nail some women." Not sure what you mean by moving on? As in, giving up on this internet-person?
/r/seduction18/11/11 02:01 PM
12

I'll be back again tomorrow, OH GOD PLEASE BE HERE Way clearer! :d
/r/seduction09/11/11 03:51 PM
28

It's actually better if she's a bad cook, because then your skills will impress her and you get to lead.... Atleast that's my take on it.
/r/seduction08/11/11 01:04 PM
3

A downvote with an explanation is far more helpful than one without.
/r/seduction04/11/11 08:15 PM
1

yes, perpendicular means facing 90 degrees from the way she is, so either to her left or right
/r/seduction17/10/11 05:57 PM
3

Well a point alot of people make is that anything works, as long as you're confident in it and enjoy yourself. And cards seem great because you can create loads of opportunity for them being focused on you (eye contact hoooo) and light kino (obviously depends on your tricks, but I'm guessing you have a fair few where you could atleast touch their hands for a few seconds?). Go forth and entertain!
/r/seduction08/10/11 11:59 PM
1

What I want to know is how the people on this subreddit have managed to become completely detached, emotionally, from their partners. That's what I want to know. They aren't, but there's a difference between being attached to someone and being hugely needy. It's done now, the whole point is that you enjoyed the 3 weeks... That's what you're missing. The bit afterwards doesn't happen every time, because you learn how to move on and stop dwelling. As far as avoiding social situations for your care…
/r/seduction15/09/11 02:42 PM
1

the gift was her giving him a chance to raise comfort and, well, if he saw her again it would have been a fun little inside joke type thing.
/r/seduction14/09/11 12:42 AM
1

Also a big factor is that you are just back at uni. When everyone comes back after the break they are fresh and happy and more open to meeting new people. Take advantage of it! Obviously alot of people remain this way, but some seem to settle down and go back to their glum ways :<
/r/seduction13/09/11 12:39 PM
2

Alright, so one friend, let's call him Jay and all was going well. Jordan was chatting up with Oops?
/r/seduction11/09/11 01:50 AM
1

I imagine there is no magic answer: they probably spend the same amount of time as you do, just spread over more girls (i.e. larger gaps between seeing the same girl twice).
/r/seduction10/09/11 09:30 PM
1

At no point did I say confront her... I said something similar to your "palatable version", except instead of completely dropping communication, just drop most of it and avoid meeting her one-on-one as chums (the only way he can avoid). It sounds like they are within the same social circles, so he can't completely cut her out. Obviously busy yourself with other girls; didn't realise that had to be spelt out!
/r/seduction10/09/11 06:27 PM
1

Explanation: No, you didn't make your move, and now you're her gay friend. This, but I wouldn't say give up straight away. Just stop being so nice, tell her you're busy when she asks favours, tell her you're not her therapist when she's talking about this guy. Be more touchy feely if you see her out. If you make it obvious she'll either let something happen or make it clear she isn't interested, then you can ditch her.
/r/seduction10/09/11 05:57 PM
2

Personally I think it's a lot better to start a friendship then try to dive into trying to have a relationship but that's just me The rest of the post is good but this could kill you. Don't invest too much time in being a friend, you'll just end up friend-zoned which is pretty much like being her boyfriend but without the proper intimacy. Also avoid this, the textbook sharing is an example of investing in her early (although a relatively minor one that isn't likely to be a problem). edit: how to…
/r/seduction03/09/11 01:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter