~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Sarah Silverman admits she made up wage gap story even after she called out specific employer. (X post /r/nottheonion)We should give her the Anita Sarkeesian Award for Cuntery. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 16/04/15 01:47 PM |
| 2 | Result! (They said "no" the first time I reported it)Got the same email! Great to see that Facebook didn't just brush this off as harmless. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/14 02:59 PM |
| 5 | Nice comeback from my FB feed on circumcisionHere's a website that cites a journal that concluded that over 100 boys die per year due to complications with circumcision. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/14 05:48 PM |
| 8 | Nice comeback from my FB feed on circumcisionIf a function of a penis is stimulation, then it most certainly does degrade it. The foreskin protects the head from chafing with clothing worn over years and years. An uncircumcised penis is much more sensitive than a circumcised penis that has chafed for years. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/14 05:34 PM |
| 3 | Essentially how it goes.Who decides what is beneficial to the country? If I think it's beneficial to the country to kill someone I don't like, can I? If it's beneficial to the country to silence protesters, should we? It doesn't matter what monetarily benefits the country. The Constitution was written for a reason. You brush our Constitutional rights off as if they don't matter, so long as the majority of people agree with you. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/13 12:36 AM |
| 1 | Essentially how it goes.That's not the point. It is not my responsibility to support sexually active people. It's not. In fact, it is against many people's religious beliefs and forcing them to pay for it is unconstitutional. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/13 10:27 PM |
| 0 | Essentially how it goes.My point wasn't to debate which is more effective or not. My point is that forcing morally opposed people to fund a specific act is certainly not something that the United States should be doing. It is borderline unconstitutional based on freedom of Religion to force people to go against their religious beliefs by funding subsidies on birth control. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/13 10:17 PM |
| 4 | Essentially how it goes.Exactly. Apparently we should have to pay for everyone because nobody has any self control or personal responsibility. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/13 08:15 PM |
| 3 | Essentially how it goes.Here's the point. If the government spent tax dollars to fund an abstinence-only education class for those who wanted to take it, and it was religiously motivated, would there not be an outcry? Why should atheists have to pay for religious abstinence-only education? And why should religious conservatives have to pay for something that is completely against their moral and religious beliefs? | /r/MensRights | 11/11/13 08:08 PM |
| 8 | Essentially how it goes.That point is absolutely lost on people, and it's very risky to even voice that opinion now a days. It amazes me when people talk about how this "needs" to happen to prevent "unwanted pregnancies." Apparently the government and insurance companies need to control us because our society has zero self control. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/13 08:01 PM |
| 1 | "Father Jailed For Allegedly Hiding Daughter From Mom" ... my uncle's story is finally getting media attention!How dare people not believe what you believe! Are you serious? This is why atheism can't be taken seriously outside of reddit. Reddit atheists alienate people for their own beliefs more than anyone. This website was not setup so you could down vote ever single person that believes in God. Keep your opinion to yourself. Believing in God does not make a person a "religious nut." Goodness this place is crap sometimes. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/13 04:50 PM |
| 7 | Definition of rape in OS X's (10.8.3) DictionaryYou are so ridiculously ignorant, that it almost isn't worth giving you the time of day. ALMOST. Erections are not always caused by sexual satisfaction or consent. Stimulation causes erections. You can be sexually stimulated against your will. Please, PLEASE, educate yourself and stop walking blind in this world to your ignorance. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/13 06:27 PM |
| 1 | Why judges think women are better parentsThis is a very good example of an open and shut custody case. It is clear that you were in the right to have custody, and it wasn't very hard to judge that. The largest problem with this is that your type of case is used as the stereotype for the belief that the mothers are almost always the better caretaker. That kind of thing is where the bias lies. I certainly do not believe fathers should get custody. Child custody is a case by case type of thing because every single family is different, but… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/13 01:04 AM |
| 35 | Why judges think women are better parentsAmerica can. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/13 02:23 PM |
| 3 | Why judges think women are better parentsTo implement your idea, it would have to basically be explicitly worded to give the child to the lower earning parent, which would pretty hard to defend. My statement was against exactly that. What you just said is what this post is about. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/13 02:19 PM |
| 110 | Why judges think women are better parentsThe logical problem I see here is that every family is different. Wives who make more money than their husbands are still more likely to get custody. If this was true, there wouldn't be gender bias in family court, but rather class bias based on earnings. There is a huge gender bias, so I see flaws in this argument. On another note, the government receiving a percentage of child support screams conflict of interest. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/13 03:24 AM |
| 5 | Yep, "ALL" victims...Thanks, MSNBC; I shouldn't need to think for myself anyway. Thank you for thinking for me! | /r/MensRights | 02/03/13 03:29 AM |
| 2 | I... I don't even...This is who you dealt with. Also, a nice pie chart. Looking at this mess, I am not one bit surprised if/that she truly believes that we are the new nazis. I guess all I have to say is: HEIL FAIRNESS; HEIL EQUALITY! | /r/MensRights | 23/01/13 04:41 AM |
| 5 | I... I don't even...Completely different saying all together when you go with Nietzsche's übermensch. Very interesting to think about. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/13 04:27 AM |
| 1 | Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk?I said in my original comment that the only real way to get charged with anything is if one party is not drunk. He did not agree with this, which implies that even if both are drunk they should be charged with rape. People seem to think that saying I am stupid or illogical is alright, but all I am doing is explaining the fucking law in the United States. I did not create the law. If you disagree with it, fine, but it is not MY opinion. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/13 07:59 PM |
| 1 | Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk?I'm not agreeing with how it is, at all. This whole comment thread I've just been trying to explain the law. It's different because you are putting yourself in a situation where you can harm others. Sure there is a risk of danger in everything anyone does ever, but if you have HIV and willingly put yourself in a situation where others can be harmed by you, there is a greater chance of responsibility for that. In the eyes of the law, putting yourself in harms way is not nearly as serious as putti… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/13 07:08 PM |
| 3 | Hello people, I never thought I would be the one to post a story of my own here, but today I realize I want to share this painful truth.Unfortunately, this kind of thing is not at all unusual. Because the mother is much more likely to get a child in any custody case, they are also given the shelter, and month support. It really is a shitty thing, but your father seems like a great man. I hope he learns that no matter how much you think you love someone, they can always rip your heart out and legally rip your life off it's foundation. The whole belief that the mother is more necessary for a child as they grow up makes me more sic… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/13 06:58 PM |
| 1 | Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk?HIV is a whole different ballgame. Depending on where you are, you can definitely be held liable for any sexual contact if you have a deadly disease. That is not what I was defining. I was looking at casual drunk encounters, not serious deadly encounters. If I spent the time typing out every single exception, I wouldn't be able to have a life. That's how it works in America. Every rule has a list of exceptions longer than the rule itself. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/13 06:40 PM |
| 1 | Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk?I would say that you either don't understand what I'm saying, or you are just terrible at wording your thoughts. It is a different level of drunkenness in the eyes of the law that show decision making ability based on situation. The same drunkenness that causes a sexual encounter to not be consensual is not the same level that excuses drunk driving. I don't care if you think it doesn't make sense, because it's the law. You can argue with me as much as you want and call me dumb, but the fucking l… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/13 06:36 PM |
| 4 | Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk?That's the kind of answer that makes it hard for us to be taken seriously. We can't constantly play the victim with this. I understand that in many cases the male is more likely to be charged with a crime relating to drunken sex, but saying having a penis means you will be charged is something I've seen far too often on this sub that just isn't true. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/13 12:22 PM |
| 0 | Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk?So what you are saying is that if two drunk people engage in sex, they both get charged with rape, legally? I'm fairly certain that is false. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/13 12:19 PM |
| -2 | Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk?There is not nearly the risk of hurting people while drinking at a place where sex could occur as there is with the chance to drive. Besides, the government has no right to force you to not have sex if you drink. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/13 11:59 AM |
| 4 | Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk?You have a pre-drinking responsibility to make sure you won't drive. By engaging in the drink, you waive any excuse if you leave yourself opportunities to drive. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/13 11:19 AM |
| 2 | Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk?If both parties are intoxicated and there is still a crime, then the person being charged has a really shitty lawyer. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/13 10:33 AM |
| 19 | Why are people responsible for driving drunk, but not for having sexual relations while drunk?Legally, when you get behind the wheel of a car, you are held responsible because you know that what you are engaging in is reckless behavior; which is why, often times, death by a drunk driver is charged as manslaughter. You are expected to know that driving a car while drunk is dangerous, and you are held liable for this knowledge. In the matter of sexual issues pertaining to drunkenness, it all varies. I see many people are saying that men are always held responsible, while women are not. I u… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/13 08:30 AM |
| 6 | chivalry when they like it, sexism when they dont.I would like to agree with several of the comments in this thread. This comic does not represent what Men's rights is about or any of the gender issues of today. This comic merely makes us look childish and without-evidence in what we are trying to bring to light. There is no thoughtful conversation brought out because of this garbage. People need to focus on real issues instead of posting comics that make us look like anti-equality fools. We are here to fight for equality, not justify any forme… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/13 08:18 AM |
| 3 | Discrimination in the legal system - men or women? V2The whole time I read the stats, all I thought was "this has to be the most ridiculous, inaccurate, misleading piece of garbage I've ever seen." Then I saw the text at the bottom and realized I was correct the whole time. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/13 07:15 AM |
| 2 | 13-year-old boy subjected to six months of horror after being falsely accused of rapeVery interesting. I see your point. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/12 11:25 PM |
| 2 | 13-year-old boy subjected to six months of horror after being falsely accused of rapePlain and simple, it's (attempted) false imprisonment. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/12 11:12 PM |
| 3 | 13-year-old boy subjected to six months of horror after being falsely accused of rapeMy apologies for misunderstanding you. I still believe that, although you are correct that guilty until proven innocent crimes must be changed, the fact that false accusations are taken lightly is one major problem. Until people fear repercussions for crying wolf, it won't matter if the alleged rapist is guilty or not. The situation that is really bothersome is when a woman is actually raped and accuses someone else because they are ashamed or what have you, then after the false accusation comes… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/12 10:50 PM |
| 6 | 13-year-old boy subjected to six months of horror after being falsely accused of rapeWhy should they not be held accountable for what they did? That is saying that falsely accusing somebody of stalking and falsely accusing somebody of murder should result in the same punishment. The punishment should fit the nature of the crime, because the result of a false accusation and conviction varies drastically depending on the crime alleged. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/12 08:47 PM |
| 6 | 13-year-old boy subjected to six months of horror after being falsely accused of rapeTrouble with that is that you don't have to be a rapist to go to prison for rape. This kid would've been in a juvenile detention center possibly until 21 had the girl not gone too far with the story. She easily could've falsely imprisoned him, which is just as serious a crime as rape in my opinion. That kid would've been subject to some very awful things if he was sent away. I just think if the punishment fit the falsely accused crime, less false accusations would occur. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/12 06:16 PM |
| 7 | 13-year-old boy subjected to six months of horror after being falsely accused of rapeThere's no "probably" to the sex offenders database. It sickens me to imagine how many men are on that database, for life, that were also falsely accused. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/12 05:52 PM |
| 8 | 13-year-old boy subjected to six months of horror after being falsely accused of rapeI understand your argument, but think about it. A false accusation of rape could take away decades of a person's freedom. With that kind of power to restrict freedom, don't you think the accuser should be sent to prison for an equal amount for attempted false imprisonment? I know it seems harsh, but imagine how many fewer false accusations would occur if there were actual repercussions for the lies. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/12 05:49 PM |
| 11 | Thank You.Wow, very similar story on my side. I'm a 20 year old guy who's parents divorced when I was 2. My dad paid a lot in child support for myself and my brother, but she didn't use too much of that for us. She spent most on cigarettes; which made me absolutely livid. Anyway, we all hope divorce and custody laws change asap. Nice to see that you're close with our father. Good luck to you. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/12 02:20 PM |
| 2 | It's stuff like this that really pisses me off... the petition writer admits that there is no proof, but look at how many signatures this petition already has. It doesn't matter what the facts are, only that she's a woman that killed a man.I don't know that I believe she isn't a threat. Even just through her words, if she is advocating for women to kill men that abuse them without going to police and reporting it, first, then that wouldn't be a very good thing. This, of course, is not on the same level, but I don't see Charles Manson ever getting a compassionate release because he is dangerous through his words. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/12 01:07 AM |
| 2 | It's stuff like this that really pisses me off... the petition writer admits that there is no proof, but look at how many signatures this petition already has. It doesn't matter what the facts are, only that she's a woman that killed a man.It's not about forcing her to die alone in prison, if that's even true. It's the simple fact that if the genders were reversed, there wouldn't even be consideration for parole. These people are signing this petition because she's a woman that killed a man. A man that killed a woman would be fried, no matter the domestic abuse. I don't think it's a huge deal to let somebody out through compassionate release if they aren't a danger to anyone, but that's not what this is about. This woman murdered … | /r/MensRights | 25/11/12 11:55 PM |
| 1 | It's stuff like this that really pisses me off... the petition writer admits that there is no proof, but look at how many signatures this petition already has. It doesn't matter what the facts are, only that she's a woman that killed a man.I totally forgot to add this, and now realize that the petition doesn't include all of the details. I received this email explaining why I should sign this petition: Jacob - My name is Dixie and I'm 19 years old. A few weeks ago, my grandmother, Glenda Virgil, was diagnosed with an aggressive form of lung cancer and told she may have only 3 months to live. I'm ready to rearrange my life so I can spend as much time as possible with my grandmother in the time we have left. The problem is that my g… | /r/MensRights | 25/11/12 09:12 AM |
| 3 | It's stuff like this that really pisses me off... the petition writer admits that there is no proof, but look at how many signatures this petition already has. It doesn't matter what the facts are, only that she's a woman that killed a man.How so? 'Admissible evidence' implies that there is evidence, it just cannot be used in court during trial. What evidence did this woman have? The only evidence this woman's granddaughter says there is are two "expert" testimonies that her "abuse" led to the crime. No medical reports were stated in the petition, no police reports, nothing. If there were such things, I'm certain the granddaughter would've included that in the petition. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/12 09:07 AM |
| 3 | It's stuff like this that really pisses me off... the petition writer admits that there is no proof, but look at how many signatures this petition already has. It doesn't matter what the facts are, only that she's a woman that killed a man.If this guy truly did abuse her and make those threats, then he got what he deserved; but in America, you are innocent until proven guilty. This woman took that right away from him when she killed him. When I first read this, to be completely honest, I was shocked she even got locked up to begin with. The support this woman has with no evidence is clearly based on the fact that men abuse women, not the other way around. Sorry, I'm all fired up now. Time to go run a few miles and release some ang… | /r/MensRights | 25/11/12 06:16 AM |
| 8 | Circumcision is good for men, because their partners will enjoy sex more.I guess my parents didn't want me to last as long in bed. In all seriousness, though, today's culture is so one-sided. If you search Female Circumcision in Google, it brings up the Wikipedia for "Female genital mutilation." Searching Male circumcision brings up the Wikipedia for "Circumcision." Why is it not genital mutilation all around? Mutilation: "an injury that causes disfigurement or that deprives you of a limb or other important body part." Society says male circumcision is normal and oka… | /r/MensRights | 25/11/12 06:10 AM |
| 7 | I just want to thank this subreddit, and all of its participants, for opening my eyes.Thank you for the warning, for sure. I will definitely present the information in a way as to not make it seem like I'm attacking them. However, much like my religion, I will not intentionally restrain myself just because I have "friends" that could be offended by what I see as the truth. But, again, I will heed your warning as much as I can! | /r/MensRights | 20/11/12 03:08 AM |
| 13 | I just want to thank this subreddit, and all of its participants, for opening my eyes.Glad to know I'm not the only one that got rid of their societal veil of ignorance. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/12 02:58 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter