TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Raileyx Archive

View 0 posts and 469 comments by Raileyx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

well they called me single and recommended some shit that would definitely keep me single if I was single, so I let them know that I'm very much not single and don't need their counterproductive redpill program. “Haha— I have a partner. You don’t have a partner? Well you just suck.” Who even does that? I only do it to redpillers, never fails to entertain because it always hits. Don't you think it's funny that the people who claim to be so wise and enlightened about the human condition and the na…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:03 PM
-2

well, you're the one who was upset that feminists don't fight for men. So I explained the wild concept of activists not fighting for everything, but instead just for the cause that the movement was founded for. Blows your mind that one, I get it, real complex concept to wrap your head around. Let's check that link, which leads to more links, so I'll just do the first three because if those are shit then the rest won't be better. 1) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9178359/Children-allowe…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 03:54 PM
-2

Not failing the vibe check with you guys is a failed vibe check in itself, so I consider that a win. Doesn't lack clarity to people who can read. Things tend to be unclear when you're only used to dealing with the most base shit you can find, and avoid nuanced discussion at all cost. That's why you're here, buddy.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 02:11 PM
-8

Cool story bro. Blocked.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:56 PM
-1

The same way that driving injured civilians to the hospital is an afterthought for firefighters, yes. I believe we have ambulances for that. Feminism isn't an "everything-movement". Activists usually have a defined area of interest. Animal rights activists don't usually fight for human rights. Doctors without borders don't usually fight against climate change. And so on. The idea that feminism is lesser for not having men's rights as a focus is utterly laughable. They're FEMINISTS. Want a moveme…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:52 PM
-14

I can and do back them up with data, but I'm not going to bother effortposting on a sub where the average user can't read. You already proved to me that you don't read, so why would I take my time to share something that you can't process? If that's all, then I wish you a good day, and may you wallow in self-inflicted loneliness until realization sets in. Turns out, "actually equality is bad for women and we should return to the old times", is not exactly a view that endears you to most women. H…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:43 PM
-18

1) That first one is funny cause you really didn't understand what I was saying at all. Moving on indeed, probably better that way. 2) I'll explain when you get past that stage in life where you don't look at a chart with two diverging lines and think that you're a genius for drawing the most simple conclusion. If you're curious about the Yale study that you linked to me and evidently didn't read, feel free to check their discussion on page 24 to 26. In summary: It's much more complicated than "…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:29 PM
-6

OP is all about beating on strawmen, as is the rest of the sub. Feminism is about women's issues, equality is achieved in this context by alleviating problems that cause women to lag behind men. This is plain, obvious, and known. Feminists may care about men's issues, but it's not their focus, it was never their focus, and if the lives of men improve due to feminism it's because by lifting up women we lift up society, not because we specifically focused on men. In that sense it IS a movement for…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:13 PM
0

You're talking to someone who can't even spell properly, don't take this interaction too seriously. "No true Scott's man". Who is Scott? Lmao. If you look at their history, all their comments are like that. Just a totally illiterate trainwreck, completely embarrassing. If they can't write properly, they probably can't read properly either, which goes a long way to explain why they think how they think. Waste of time.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 12:12 PM
-11

I know this is true because my unbiased redpill influencers tell me it's true. Everyone I talk to has never had a fulfilling relationship with a woman, and yet they claim to be experts on gender relations anyways, including me. Sounds about right?
/r/MensRights02/06/25 12:07 PM
0

Here's one nice little test for you that I recommend you conduct. Whenever you're on this sub, ask yourself one question about what you're reading: Does the post boil down to "woman bad" (feminism as it is so strongly associated with and assumed to be run by women counts btw), instead of providing useful, constructive advice for men that doesn't loop back to "woman bad"? This post already fails this test, as do really most others. If you find that most posts in a community are like that, you're …
/r/MensRights02/06/25 11:21 AM
-3

I've looked at plenty of redpill shit over the years, the vast majority is bad faith engagement where the primary motive is externalizing blame because that's easier than doing the hard work of becoming an emotionally mature adult that can build lasting, meaningful relationships with the other gender. I don't think men's rights activists are evil. I think they're awesome. But you're not gonna find them here. What you'll find here is a congregation of whiny bitches, who think that shouting "women…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 11:07 AM
1

For the people here that aren't well versed in statistics, statistical significance alone doesn't really mean much. It just means that the results are legit - like you're certain that the bias is there. You can easily get rock-solid levels of certainty by, for example, having a VERY large sample size. I suspect that this is what produced these p-values, they just prompted the AI a fuckton, which means that in the end they're pretty certain that the bias exists, and that it's not just coincidence…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 11:00 AM
-6

Are you telling me that a redpill subreddit has an anti feminist bias and will provide countless examples of women being shitty in one way or another? Say it isn't so. Newsflash: People are shitty. If you're looking for it, you'll find it, and if you're looking for it in a place where people are already primed to blame their problems on women, you'll DEFINITELY find it. Also. There's, not theirs. Discriminating, not descriminating. Examples, not example. Three mistakes in a single sentence, pret…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 10:49 AM
-30

Feminism fights for equality by putting out fires on the female side of things, primarily. It's kind of in the name. Not sure why you would expect otherwise. If it makes your life as a man better, it will be indirectly. For example, one assumption is that equal relationships are more healthy and fulfilling for both partners. I think this is true, and I'd be pretty bummed out if my partner was kept down by society and couldn't engage with me without a perverse imbalance of power being in the way.…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 10:42 AM
-5

How is it true in essence? This is just your standard, run-of-the-mill, women bad, sexist nonsense. Zero engagement with feminism, its goals, the history of the movement, or anything. My guy probably saw one tiktok of some dipshit woman saying horrible things, which obviously results in them getting recommended more of that because that's how social media works, then they decided that therefore this is totally representative of feminism as a whole, and that's where their engagement with it ends.…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 10:30 AM
1

you don't understand the difference between a fringe opinion and a population-wide trend? Yeah. Checks out.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:37 PM
1

guys sending dickpics to women without any prompting whatsoever or just being generally weird and creepy is FAR more common than you think. That aside, there's TONS of opportunities to call out other men when they air their regressive views on women. Take those opportunities and be a pull into the other direction. Nothing will change in a day or two, and some assholes will always be assholes regardless, but holding other men accountable when they're being dicks already goes a long way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:36 PM

"women as a whole a mistrusting men because men tend to be pretty dangerous to them, so now my feefees are hurt (because I'm one of the good ones!) and I will no longer support them, serves you right feminists!" you're one of the good ones for sure. But hey, you love your mom. Here's what a sensible reaction would look like: "Oh, women mistrust men before they get to know them, which includes me. That sucks, but it's kinda understandable given the history of how men treat women" See how that was…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:30 PM
1

There's a bunch of guys in here who say dumb shit about country wide government funded forced paternity testing after birth. Those guys all get hit with the "you're dumb as a bag of rocks" are they not? That's an insane fringe opinion. I mean really, FORCED government-mandated paternity testing? Is that comparable to women as a whole mistrusting men? Like really, run that through your head one more time and tell me if that makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:27 PM
3

you keep missing the point, I agree that the bear is the wrong choice. I'd pick the man over the bear any day. I'm saying that the fact that women want to take their chances with the bear should be a wakeup call for men, not an invitation to put them down further and reinforce their opinion on men that way. I don't think it should take much emotional intelligence to comprehend this, am I really asking for too much?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:10 PM
1

yep you're doing it, absolute masterclass.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:07 PM
4

If a guy was saying dumb shit about Women how many feminists would take it as an opportunity to reflect where Women are going wrong in society to lead to that. well there's a difference between women as a whole being scared and mistrustful of men - aaaand singular sexists saying dumb shit and getting called out for it. Unless you're saying that men as a whole are as sexist as women as a whole are mistrusting men. Single dipshits existing isn't really a cause for women to reflect on their behavio…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 08:39 PM
4

I didn't say that you in particular said this, I'm saying that this is the general response of men - you said "lying to themselves and others", which does fit the general tone of "hehe women bad" instead of "i guess things really are fucked when women say this, let's see what we can do to improve things". How about you actually try reading and understanding the point being made, how about that
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 07:14 PM
4

I like how the reaction of men to this whole question isn't "oh my, I guess something really IS wrong when women feel compelled to answer that way, whether or not I agree with them on it, it's probably time to reflect on how men as a whole are acting towards women and I should question if there's something I can contribute in a positive way" but "lol women are stupid, lying to themselves, delusional, bears are more dangerous xd how dumb do you have to be" Like yeah, really helping your case.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 06:53 PM

The point was, much like spanking kids, repeated low level violence can cause psychological harm because it can be more of a chronic problem. wow really. I couldn't tell. You've got that "Woman" flair so the rules of this sub don't apply! I'm insulted by these braindead responses, really just responding in kind and giving you the sort of attention you deserve.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:47 AM

I'm getting really sick of these low IQ bottom feeders on this sub that try to nail you on shit you don't believe with the most transparent cpt. obvious dipshit arguments you could ever conceive of. This is playing in your head right now: me: "no, spanking children is bad even when you don't cause injury" you: "oh but then why do you think beating men is ok when it doesn't cause injuries - feminist owned" thanks, that was a great conversation. I'm the biggest supporter of violence that doesn't c…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:21 AM
2

You're swinging at shadows right now, but you're so insecure and so dead set on building me up as the big bad who hates men that you can't even see it. In the same vein as your first response really. Welp. I knew it was gonna go this way then. Good to see you sticking with it. So yes, you got me dead to rights. I definitely think women are entitled to hurt men, and I also think that there should be zero accountability. And I dismiss the seriousness of it all. You are very smart and absolutely he…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 03:41 AM
0

how can I not condescend someone who can't even bother to read properly and instantly throws one of the dumbest strawman arguments that I've ever seen at me? Yeah dude, totally, I was arguing that women are entitled to assault men because they're weaker. Oh yeah, you're so smart, you really broke me down right there, good job on defending men! You came at me pretending that I am somehow trying to excuse domestically abusive women, despite me making it pretty clear that I don't condone that shit …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:26 AM
2

If a short skinny dude starts a fight with a fight with a much bigger guy, and gets clocked, few people would be sympathetic to him. your 70% stat is in the context of non-reciprocal IPV, so that's not the equivalent of getting wrecked after attacking someone. It's just attacking someone, without getting hit back. Regardless, I'm not really scared to bite that bullet either - short scrawny dudes attacking people is a smaller problem than bulky roided out of their minds guys doing the same thing.…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:15 AM
3

Never said they were, I'm discussing prevalence here, which is far easier to quantify than "severity". no you aren't just discussing prevalence, you started making general points about "feminists" and "the case they make for gendered IPV", so obviously severity has to be part of that conversation. If you can't be honest about what you're talking about here, why should I entertain you further? I even read the study you brought in here, don't give me that. Also, as I said before, just looking at p…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:44 AM
7

You being weak does not ENTITILE you to be violent against men. who are you arguing with right now? I already said that none of it is acceptable. Hospitalization is the bare minimum of what women who do that deserve. I'd say that they deserve to be left + possibly be sued if the affected person wants to press charges, but go off. Seems like you have some things to work through yourself, with an attitude like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:22 AM
3

One study involving a sample of over 10k adolescents and young adults(Whitaker et al.) found that women are the perpetrator in 70% of relationships with unidirectional IPV(roughly 35% of all relationships with IPV). the same study also says that male on female IPV is much more likely to result in injury. Let's not pretend that all domestic violence is created equal. While none of it is okay, slapping someone who is stronger than you is not in the same ballpark as beating someone up who is weaker…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:38 PM

further proof that this is an incel subreddit
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:08 PM
1

the usual upper, middle and lower class distinctions work well enough. There are more groups at the very top and the very bottom, but they're pretty small by virtue of being outliers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:09 PM
7

I think even this is giving them too much credit. They see a woman that's out of their league, they feel very insecure, and to process that they need to put that woman down. Successful women are masculine and unattractive. Pretty women are whores and whatnot. Smart women are upstuck bitches. It's in part about hierarchy, sure, but honestly the biggest factor here is that the men in question are just insecure losers who can't handle their own emotions properly and make it everyone else's problem.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 12:25 AM
6

that's nice for you, but the statistics don't lie. One oddball doesn't change the overall picture. People date within their own social class. Rich people date other rich people. You don't know this because you're not in that social class, but that's how it is. Even the rich people who stereotypically only go for young and beautiful women, say like Leonardo Di Caprio, only date rich and successful women. Every single last one of these women has walked the red carpet up and down and sideways befor…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 12:00 AM
6

Adapting to a new social class is a strange experience for sure, especially when you make a big leap. Most people just stay in their social class for life. I don't know if I agree that upper middle class people are snobby assholes, but they can be extremely clueless about what life is like for people who can't throw money around without a worry in the world. So a lot of the things they say sounds like they just lack of empathy, but is probably better described as them simply not understanding th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 11:36 PM
14

He unironically positioned a combo of "money, dream job, beautiful, smart, and funny" as "too masculine" and thus not attractive. I think that's the excuse, not the real reason. People date within their own social class. Smart, successful people date other smart, successful people. Not just because they're attracted to that sort of person, but because that's who they're around in their day-to-day. They're in their own social bubbles, which is why you almost never interact with them when you're p…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 11:04 PM
0

I'm sorry, where's the gotcha? This is real data. Do the numbers scare you? You could've looked the data up yourself, maybe then I wouldn't have to quote it at you. But I get it, women lie and rape isn't real, or if it's real it's so rare that we surely don't have to pay attention to it. Survey's also aren't a legit way of learning things about large populations, let's ignore the fact that they're a super established method used by scientists all around the globe. Actually whenever a survey give…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 06:56 PM
2

your feelings really did get hurt, didn't they. Always so quick to lose it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 06:47 PM
0

and if you survey women if they've been raped you frequently you find out that it's 1 in 7 - and that's in a developed nation where I'd say that men are generally more respectful of women, which doesn't say much because the bar is in hell. And this isn't even counting the women who were raped but don't recognise that's what it is, because society taught them that it's just normal when men ignore a no, or when a husband ignores you after you told him that you don't want sex. So what's going on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 06:46 PM
0

You create a narrative and generalization that a lot of men rape that's not a narrative, that's just a statistical fact. Did the facts hurt your feelings? Take it up with the rapists. Besides, saying "a lot of men rape" isn't just true, it's also very relevant in the context of a discussion about the danger that men represent to women, and where the man I am talking to is very comfortable exhibiting the exact behavior that makes women (justifiably) feel unsafe. Maybe take a moment to self reflec…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 06:33 PM
7

It demonstrates that women don't think. It's an exercise in humiliation lol. Immediately saying gross sexist shit definitely doesn't do a lot to disabuse women of the notion that men are dangerous to them. Wouldn't want to meet you in a forest. A lot of men rape. Especially the kind that hates women, and treats them like they're dumb unthinking creatures.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 06:21 PM

Sure you can be upset, that's understandable. They did have the rule after all. But imagine calling off a wedding and breaking it off because "now all trust has been broken forever and you can't even imagine ever reconciling". If you think that this is a reasonable reaction, you need to go out, touch some grass, talk to some real people, etc. Unhinged behavior by the guy. I agree, he's a complete loser. If it's even real, which I doubt just because of how absurd it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 11:11 AM
0

There's no need to make passport bros look bad, they look horrible enough to the average person already. You're making men look bad by equating them with passport bros.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 07:53 PM
13

A lot of the redpillers on here have aspd or are at least aspd-adjacent. This does not surprise me in the least. These people are essentially unfit to even be around other human beings.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:17 PM
28

The whole point of calling them illogical is to dismiss their perspective entirely, so you don't have to think about what could possibly motivate them. That's the answer to your question. It's not about thinking that there's no rationale. It's about not wanting to think about possible rationales at all. The process stops a step before an opinion on the particulars of their thought process is formed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:55 PM
5

I love passport bros. What everyone has to understand about them is that most of them aren't going through with it. It's essentially limited to a pathetic fantasy that they talk about online. The reality is, if you're not mentally resilient enough to have a normal conversation with a woman in your own country, you're not likely to be able to do that in a foreign country either.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:48 PM
3

Yeah, cause you're a sexist. As I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:31 PM
6

Look at yourself, even now you refuse to see people as individuals, and instead describe them as biological automata, slaves to their supposed survival instinct. Their actions predetermined by an evolutionary imperative. Your refusal to view women as people whose lives and experiences are just as vibrant and rich as your own is on full display, and again... I promise you that women can tell when engaging with you, be that online or in real life. Nobody enjoys admitting mistakes, men or women. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:31 PM
9

I have heard plenty of women admitting to mistakes. The reason you don't hear it is because you don't have a single normal relationship with a woman. Women know who you are, I bet you're plenty obvious about it irl too. Why the fuck would they show any vulnerability in the face of you? You reap what you sow. As one calls into the canyon, so it echoes back.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:23 PM
5

Yeah not sexist at all, you just have the basic expectation that women are creatures who are incapable of self reflection and won't own up to mistakes, which is why you're surprised when it does happen! But sure you're not sexist because you haven't personally harmed a woman yet. Wow. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:20 PM
13

It's not weird at all, you just can't have normal conversations with women where you meet them on neutral ground. Turns out that women act like people when you treat them like people. Big surprise, but if you signal with all your might that you're a sexist piece of shit before you even introduced yourself, guess what's gonna happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:31 PM
25

You said what needed to be said. The unbearable irony of incels accusing women of not taking responsibility when their entire ideology is about externalizing blame. How anyone can engage in that sort of behavior and not see it, is frankly beyond me. But it sure is interesting to watch.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:32 PM
1

Of all the takes this is the most insane one. If there's a profit to be made it'll eventually be rolled out to the largest possible base of consumers for the largest possible amount of profit. It might take a while but it will happen. I don't know how anyone can live under capitalism and yet not understand something this basic. Incredible.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:36 PM

Most men put zero effort into their looks. They don't use skincare products, they don't dress well, their hygiene is lacking, the list goes on. Do you even know how many men need to be told that they need to wash their ass? It's unbelievable. The median woman probably puts as much care into her looks/hygiene as a 95th percentile man. You say it's a high standard, but women are really.just holding men to the same standard that they hold themselves and other women to. The bar for men is just so lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 12:32 PM

cheating is cowardly behavior that people who aren't emotionally mature enough to try for resolution through communication engage in. Or alternatively, people who aren't mature enough to do the right thing and just break up when things can't be resolved. I don't know if this is a real quote or if you cooked it up in your mind, but it reflects the kind of immaturity that I'd never want to see in my partner. Just no.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 10:47 PM
0

right, as I said this is a waste of time. I'm glad you're not part of my life. Good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 10:43 PM
1

right, so the very easy explanation is that there's certain basic rules of treating each other that most people will follow and also expect from others in turn - such as "don't use and manipulate other people for your own ends". These are axiomatic, very very basic things, that most people recognise you should not do. Because if people do them to each other frequently, life becomes very unenjoyable for everyone. They exist, because they're the very ground rules that are needed for people to live…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 10:29 PM

you realise that being open about your aspd diagnosis in your tag just means that any sensible person knows right off the bat that engaging with you is a waste of my time? It's literally THE "turn around and walk the other way immediately"-disorder. Thanks for the warning I guess, but what's actually the point, I mean why would you of all people spend your time in a subreddit discussing relationships? You don't give a fuck. Your conception of normal would be inacceptable to 99% of the population…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 10:11 PM
12

you're shaming other men by pretending that this is what they're all like, but great that you're telling on yourself. This place really is crawling with the lowest of the low isn't it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 08:51 PM
2

ah sure, all good.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 06:30 PM
7

yeah I'm sure someone with OPs priorities really makes sure that this happens, let's trust them on that one! Hypothetically what you say may be true and I'm happy to entertain absurd thought experiments, but let's return to reality for a second here. These cluster B types aren't exactly known to leave a trail of happy people who have enjoyed mutually beneficial relationships behind them. Someone who sees sex as a mere "return on investment" isn't going to be a sweet and thoughtful partner who ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 06:12 PM
10

But why do you automatically assume that it's at somebody's else expense? because look at that OP? He's not exactly subtle about it. I mean if the redpill tag doesn't give it away already then the post should, and if that doesn't do it then the responses that he gave are more than sufficient. If you still can't figure it out after that then I can't help you. This is a freaking manosphere subreddit, mixed with quite a bit of incel-shit. Adjust your expectations accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 05:45 PM
20

it's not evil, if that's your takeaway you should maybe read a bit more carefully. What I'm saying is that it's bad to pursue that desire at the expense of others, through underhanded means that treat real people as nothing but means to an end. I thought that was pretty clear. The desire itself is fine, most people have it, men and women both, as biology dictates. What's important is how you pursue it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 05:25 PM
23

You aren't a sociopath because you disagree with me, you are a sociopath because the concept of having basic consideration for other people appears to be foreign to you, and seems to be supplanted by a view that treats other people as nothing but a variable in an equation that you solve for your own benefit only. I do want to debate, but a debate about human interaction requires a common basis, such as "maybe we should treat people like people". If something that simple reads like hieroglyphs to…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 03:25 PM
34

If a paragraph on basic human decency feels like emotional blackmail to you, then what else is there to say? Good luck in life, you'll need it?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 03:03 PM
73

It's wrong to treat another person as a means to an end, to fake emotional connection, interest or an entire character when you truly don't give a shit about that and just act out a role that you expect will lead to an outcome you desire - without regard for the other person involved in the process. You're dealing with another human being, who has a life that is just as vivid as your life. Treat them with respect. Viewing sex as a "return on investment" as opposed to the result of a genuine conn…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:53 PM

So I'm not responding to you anymore because I've given up on that one, but for anyone still reading here's a particularly pertinent example. In Germany raping your wife used to be quasi-legal until 1997, when the parliament finally decided to pass a law to make marital rape an offense under the penal code of the BRD. A number of conservative politicians naturally voted against this in 1997 - as we know, making your wife do her duty is a classic conservative value whether she likes it or not. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:24 PM

I give up, it seems like you're completely unable to grasp the concept. I can't describe it more clearly to you. If anyone else wants to try their luck, feel free.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 01:50 PM

I did in my first comment here, that's all that comment was about. The men who made or supported the law that women can't have a bank account didn't all magically change their minds. They lived on, propagated their values and affected the world around them still. The hard rules may change, but the underlying perspectives and attitudes may linger for much longer. I'd say that you only need to look at this sub to get that, but since you likely embody these attitudes yourself I'm sure you can't tel…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 01:37 PM

The past is relevant to the present. If women have been second class citizens for thousands of years, then maybe that explains some of the problems they're still facing today, yes? It's not that difficult to understand, try to use your brain a little please.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 01:29 PM

It's pointed out because systemic oppression doesn't just go away the second a law is made that technically bans the most overt manifestations of it. Oppression persists in the minds of the population, in the culture, in social conventions and informal rules for long after that. Therefore it's a valid thing to bring up when discussing which gender still holds the keys to power. It contextualizes the system we're confronted with in our daily lives, in the present.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 01:22 PM
-3

I can't decide if this guy is engaging in bad faith or if he's just delusional, one of the two for sure lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 02:29 PM
1

Jesus Christ man. Take care of yourself, #1 priority should be never returning to this place, because it's not good for you. Forget everything about gender issues, delete all preconceptions from your mind and just talk to people, genuinely trying to get to know them. You'll get 100x further doing that than doing whatever this is. Gl
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 10:16 PM
3

meaningful discussion? With someone who thinks it makes sense to infer that a .1% genetic variation would somehow yield predictable behavior across the board? Even though what actually produces our behavior happens to be an insanely complex biological system with over 80,000,000,000 neurons? That's the funny part, even if there was no genetic variation, we still have brains that are influenced by their environments, so behavior would still be utterly unpredictable. Monozygotic twins share 100% o…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 09:45 PM
1

Our DNA is 99.9% similar (0.1% variation). That’s closer than Chimpamzees which have like a 0.6% variation, and we are still 98.8% similar to them! So in theory it’s easier to explain Human behavior than Chimpanzee. the mother of all non-sequiturs. I'm not even going to read any further, this person just can't think.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 09:16 PM
31

Yes? It's a horrible and unfair dynamic. Unfair to both genders, and the consequences are still felt today. And the dipshits on here think it's amazing, because they think that's the only way they'll ever get to hit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 03:58 PM
67

But your grandpa's position is exactly what they want. Minus the children perhaps. Just take a look around this community. It's all about blaming women for exercising their freedom to not choose men like them. That's at the core of this gross little place.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 01:45 PM
6

I would hope that stuff like that is beneath you as well, if it's not then I'm sorry for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 01:39 PM
5

I've only started being hostile after this guy started wasting my time with arguments that are beneath me. Yes, "do you think lonely men are bad people :(((" is a stupid question. It's pretty obviously leading, and it's also obvious where he's going with it. If he's going to talk to me like I'm an 8 year old, I'll treat him accordingly. I told him, if he has a point he should just make it instead of doing this shit. Instead he wants to ask a dumb question, wants me to give the only possible answ…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 01:16 PM
4

Because that's such a hard question to answer, right? Answer is no. Wooow
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 10:33 AM
10

If you have a point to make you should just make it instead of leading me on a low IQ chase where you ask stupid questions that have obvious answers. To respond to the point that you didn't make yet but that I know is coming anyways, no, it's not always your fault if you're single, and there are a lot of people (both men and women), who by all rights should be in happy relationships but aren't. But that's beside the point. The truth is that generations of men were taught that their wants come be…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 10:21 AM
13

Turns out that a lot of men don't give a fuck. Women, who now for one of the first times in history have the freedom to choose, act accordingly. Of course the number of singles goes up, that's just basic economics. If demand doesn't get forced, and the supply is shit, what happens? Fewer people buy. Big surprise. It's not a bug, it's a feature.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 10:03 AM
18

Work 10 times harder -> actually see her as a person and give a fuck about her needs and wants Women that are 10 times worse -> women who actually stand up for themselves and don't just accept shitty behavior Yes. Times have changed. The people who frame it like this deserve to be single.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:45 AM
12

Because they're children that have never been in a relationship and who get their knowledge from dysfunctional echo-chambers online.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 08:06 PM
7

I'm certainly more statistically literate than you are sure you are buddy. Here's the actual figure from the 2010 study. It's not 50%. The top5% (men, since that's who we care about here!!!!!!) has 26.1% of the sex - I put a nice red circle around the figure because I know you'd be completely unable to find it on your own. <image> but that's without removing outliers and they're also including an unknown number of 15 year old virgins in the data, which further skews the results. Once you sort th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:43 AM
19

This makes my head hurt. 1) the top 5% having more sex than the bottom 50% =/= the top 5% having 50% of all sex. The study claims the former, not the latter. 2) you can't conclude anything from comparing gini-coefficients like that. The Lorenz-curves can look vastly different even for identical gini-coefficients. I might make a post about this later, but I'm not sure if you're all too statistically illiterate to deserve that much of my time anymore. If anyone here is interested, let me know. I m…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 07:39 AM
6

reducing a man to his genitalia is pretty objectifying and tasteless, so yes I'm not a fan. Especially in a supposedly professional setting, lol. The issue there isn't that they're open about their sexuality. The issue is that they're open in a problematic way. Bit strange that you try to frame the openness itself as a problem. Are you doing this on purpose?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 05:00 PM
11

Women of all ages can be desirable, but seeking validation from internet strangers (and specifically such an incel infested community as this one) is not a good starting point. Besides, worrying about this isn't productive. Take care of yourself emotionally and mentally, be open to new experiences, and put yourself out there. That's all anyone can do. Whatever happens, happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 03:41 PM
4

Yes, I think that's the only context in which the question of whether or not something is natural is somewhat relevant. But even then, it's at best a proxy for the thing you really care about, which is how and to what degree people will resist change. Some natural things are changed easily and without resistance, others are borderline impossible to change. It's easy to get people to wear glasses, and it's hard to get people to lose their tribal mindsets. It all depends on the specifics. Merely f…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 03:04 PM
107

Appeals to nature are silly. A lot of things we do aren't natural. Wearing glasses isn't natural. Modern medicine isn't natural. Living in a society with 330 million members isn't natural. Anyone who asks themselves if something is natural is asking the wrong question. Instead, ask: Is monogamy useful? Should it be incentivised? Should social norms encourage monogamy? These questions are much more productive. And also much more interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:18 PM
9

That title is already so dumb, I'm not even going to waste my time reading the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:31 PM
7

The people who have the negative revelations are socially incompetent or immature or both. Take one look at this sub and you'll know. It's not really a secret.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:10 AM
2

Thanks man. The sociological perspective is incredibly powerful, anyone who doesn't get that isn't really worth talking to in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 03:39 PM
2

See, I would argue that this man could've achieved a WAY better outcome for himself by staying with one highly compatible woman instead of pursuing multiple. That's not to say that he can't have a good time with the strategy he picked. I'm not saying it's bad. Just that it's inferior. There's something to be said for having a slutty phase as a means of gaining experience, it might even be a good idea if you're just starting out. But beyond that it's just not optimal for the reasons I listed befo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 03:38 PM

This subreddit in a nutshell
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 11:50 AM

Opinion founded on a misunderstanding of what a Mama's boy is. A Mama's boy is a man that can not stand up to their parent or stand in for their own and their partners interest in front of them. In other words, a dependent, unattractive pushover, a manchild.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 11:48 AM
38

A lot of guys with high libido prefer staying with the same person. The sex tends to be better that way, as you and your partner know each other really well, and know what exactly the other person likes. At the end of the day most people are monogamic, including high libido men. Sleeping with an ever growing number of strangers and acquaintances isn't even a good strategy if you seek sexual satisfaction. You have less sex that way too - statistically. So why do it? I suspect that for men it's mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/23 10:15 AM
1

I play it too, occasionally. That doesn't mean that it's so present in my mind that my first go-to for analogies is Minecraft. I hope you're wise enough at 40 to appreciate the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 12:20 PM
17

OPs first go-to for analogies is Minecraft, needless to say they're probably too young to date, and MUCH too young to have opinions on it. This community was a mistake. Now OP thinks he's onto something because they got upvoted. Tragedy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/23 04:54 PM
2

found it -> https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/20/us/ryan-last-suicide-sextortion-california/index.html oh well.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 08:20 PM
6

It's a pretty common scam, usually run on Facebook. Hot girl writes to you, you start doing shit on webcam, oops she has been recording everything and will send it to everyone you know unless you pay up. Recently there was a story about some guy who killed himself because of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 06:04 PM
-1

If you look at numbers like that and your conclusion is anything but "this is bad data/insane sampling bias", you are officially unqualified to have opinions on complex issues. No, some women dating older men isn't enough to explain a 70/30 discrepancy. Neither is people lying in surveys. These numbers aren't real. Please take a statistics course or be silent forever. This nonsense doesn't pass the most basic sanity-check.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 09:38 AM

The only uses left is sex and money? In what kind of unhinged world do you live? Lmao Reminder to everyone to never take advice from this sub. People on here are too sociopathic to understand that emotional needs and general support are desired things in a relationship (then they're surprised why nobody wants them).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 03:49 PM

it's still wrong for the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 02:55 AM
1

isn't this just the niceguys™ finish last talkingpoint? ​ women contribute to situations where only the more insensitive and aggressive men in dating are able to get a chance and then are surprised to encounter that maladjustment. I just wonder about takes like this. What do you even mean when you say that only insensitive men get a chance? Like at that point what can I even say to that? Sure, you need to shoot your shot to have a chance in the first place, but easily possible to do so respectfu…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 11:45 PM

Since the 1960s, women have been encouraged to throw off the shackles of home and dive into careers. The regnant wisdom has been that a career is far more satisfying than homemaking. but that's already bullshit and makes me not trust whatever else this person is saying at all. The feminist claim isn't that a woman will necessarily be more satisfied if she chooses a career over family. It's that women are more satisfied and also safe in a world where they get to make that choice in the first plac…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 09:31 PM
1

Main point 👉 As a woman, if you care about your husband respecting you as an equal, your likelihood of stumbling across that type of guy is highest in a western country. I mean isn't that just a nobrainer with how socially conservative the rest of the world is? I can't imagine anyone thinking otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 07:55 PM
4

The common denominator in all of your relationships is you
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 03:39 PM
1

it's a mistake to look at this as a space for healthy discussion. Healthy discussion requires that you know something first, and the overwhelming majority here don't know anything, really. This is a space where people come to cope, poorly attempting to rationalise their lack of happiness through an utterly confused view on society, relationships and psychology. OP is really the best example for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 03:26 PM
2

Men are less loyal than women. Men are 6 times more likely to leave a seriously ill partner than the other way around. (20.8% to 2%). I've looked at this claim before in detail, and found that current research doesn't really support this view. You most likely got this claim from an article, which got it from this study -> (Glantz et al. 2009) However, there are some problems with this study. there have been 3 further studies that are all qualitatively better and yielded different results (K.Carl…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 01:06 PM
12

If you're gonna believe in a fantasy, why pick one this depressing? Goddamn. 8/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/23 11:20 AM
1

oh 100%. I wouldnt want to date anyone who falls for that shit. Seems pretty pathetic to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/23 12:43 PM
8

TRP is not a moral guide to anything but a tool box for men who wants to have sex. in other words, you're 100% agreeing with OP. TRP does nothing to help you cultivate a meaningful relationship. It helps you get laid, which is a very different thing. Honestly, your post just seems like you didn't understand a word that OP was saying. How else would you think that your post was a refutation? Meh.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/23 05:50 AM
8

Yes, it is reasonable for a man to want his partner to remain physically fit, as long as the expectations are reasonable and both partners feel comfortable with the arrangement. It is important to remember that physical fitness and health should be a priority for both partners and should be discussed openly with respect and understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/23 05:47 AM
19

the number of users on this sub who can't correctly interpret this survey is staggering, and further reinforcing my view that for many people it'd be much better if they stayed away from data, research, any of that and simply returned to quiet life without any strong opinions about anything. I mean if you read "disagrees with the statement cheating is ALWAYS wrong" as "thinks cheating is morally fine", then I don't know how to help you. You're just someone who should not have opinions, straight …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 04:29 AM
0

a 30 year old trying to show off with his supposed material possessions on r/ppd, now I've really seen it all. "but I have money" are you not embarrassed? I sure am, just from reading this.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 06:55 PM
0

I even gave you another example where it happened organically. Is it really that hard to believe that extreme groups that call themselves something eventually take over said word in the eye of the public? Nah. Must be an idpol strategy. But it's alright, I've just seen your tag and it says that you're 30 years old. You must be quite the specimen to have so much time and opportunity to learn, and yet still think like this. The average redpiller on this sub is probably half your age, and that's be…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 06:18 PM
-2

it's not an idpol strategy, it's simply what happens to a word when an EXTREMELY radical or otherwise noteworthy group becomes associated with it and replaces all other associations. I know you like to tell yourself gigabrain stories of elaborate strategies and conspiracy theories where shadowy councils plot to redefine and weaponize words to make YOUR life harder, but really you've just stumbled upon a basic feature of language that can just as well be seen elsewhere. Similarly, the term "proud…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 06:00 PM
1

Just another reason why I don't trust this editorial. First the dude talks about the top 5% in terms of "number of sexual partners", and then he completely switches it to "number of vaginal sex acts" without any mention of how those may relate, or what that really means. I'd bet that the overlap between these two different top 5%s isn't even that large. This whole thing seems extremely meaningless to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 01:48 PM
0

no shit it's not the original, the original was made up in the 90s by a woman who ran a community to discuss her own sexless life. The culture has shifted rather dramatically since then. She even said this herself: "Like a scientist who invented something that ended up being a weapon of war, I can't uninvent this word, nor restrict it to the nicer people who need it". Do you think she would still use the word incel to describe her past self? Words and their meanings change. This sub is weirdly h…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 01:42 PM
-3

Alexander From date psychology went through 2021's GSS study broke it down and found out that only 23% of men aged 18 - 30 are incels. That's not what incel means. Why do users of this sub keep getting it wrong? The term incel specifically refers to members of the inceldom subculture, which is defined by ideas like the blackpill. When the media reports on incels, they're not merely talking about sexless teens. They're usually talking about sexless teens that shot up their local university. Likew…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 01:32 PM
3

Some people should just stay away from data, because they will always manage to draw the wrong conclusions. The top 5% having more sex doesn't mean that people in the lower percentiles have less sex. This is not a sum-zero game, where an increase in the top-group means that they're taking sex away from everyone else. It could be the same group of people fucking each other more (hint: hookup culture), while everyone outside of that bubble is unaffected. It could be the entire population fucking m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 01:24 PM

I have taken classes on statistics. I can say with utter confidence that you haven't, though. Otherwise you'd know that extrapolating from data like this is extremely dumb. You can't look at data from homosexual relationships and apply it to heterosexual ones as if the dynamic is the same. Give me a break, lmao. This is actually one of the most hilarious replies I've ever gotten on this sub. The utter confidence with which you said something this stupid. Please for the love of god just get off t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 09:10 PM
1

by and large, I think things are fine now. Sometimes people lack respect for each other, and men in particular sometimes lack respect for women. By respect I don't mean any sort of deep reverence, but just the understanding that the other person is a fully autonomous being with complex feelings, desires etc. just like yourself, and should be treated with dignity. Some guys just didn't get the memo that all of that applies to women and they still treat women as if they're lesser in a way. That's …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 06:30 PM
2

What I'm saying there is that dating apps are a sub-culture within dating, and that whatever happens in these apps isn't necessarily relevant for dating-culture overall. Like, it's the user stats on tinder aren't terribly relevant for whether or not Becky, the friend of your classmate, will date you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/23 12:40 AM
3

why are you assuming that I don't understand the importance of dating apps? They're clearly important to everyone who wants to participate in hook-up culture, and they're important to anyone who has an insufficient extended social circle to pick dates from. The use for them plainly obvious. I'm merely clarifying that this is not all of dating, because that's what OP made it sound like.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/23 12:24 AM
21

Stop having sex with those men. but that's what they're doing. Why do you think that the participation of women in modern dating markets has been less than enthusiastic, why far more women than men are happy being single, and why men are crying about not being able to find a date in places like this one? Arguably, many women are taking your advice to heart - and rightfully so.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 11:58 PM
3

Actually way more balanced than I thought it'd be. I have a few ideas for why this is the case, but none of them will be popular on this sub. The way it impacts online dating culture is well known, I think. It makes things a lot harder for men, since their value on these dating apps is correspondingly lower. Simple supply and demand logic. Let's not pretend it affects dating culture overall, though. It specifically affects a sub-culture within dating, which is online dating apps. It should not e…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 11:36 PM
1

dude, self awareness is based
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 06:44 PM
14

zero experience with that. If I was ever with someone who even thought of trying infantile nonsense like that, I'd be pretty ashamed of myself for being so blind to the character of my partner. I'm not the best with people, but I hope that I'm at least smart enough to weed out the maniacs before they (predictably) act like maniacs. Anyone who plays mindgames with their partner isn't worth the ground they stand on. This is some highschool-drama level bullshit. Aint nobody got time for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 05:52 PM
1

Here let me google it for you: https://www.google.com/search?q=biological+sex+is+a+human+construct&rlz=1C1CHBF_frFR893FR894&oq=biological+sex+is+a+human+construct&aqs=chrome..69i57.4553j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 ok, let's take a look at that quote then -> "The American Psychiatric Association states that sex is often described as a biological construct, "defined on an anatomical, hormonal, or genetic basis", and assigned at birth based on external genitalia." I was wondering what you meant wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 04:35 PM
-6

"women can bare children, men cannot" talks of sex, not gender. actually it doesn't, it talks of a very limited social construction of sex, since there are many who are biologically women that either can't bear children yet, not anymore, or never could. But sure, go off. And before you accuse me of being pedantic here, I'm not. These differences do matter. Some general awareness of the nuance is pretty important for trans discourse. ​ It's only a recent cringe and fringe fashion to consider that…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 03:45 PM
1

I mean it's not my problem. I enjoy this sort of thing. I'm just sad for people who actually want to have a discussion, because radicals make this pretty impossible. Constructive discussion implies that both sides have at least some knowledge, but that's not true for redpillers. You can't discuss anything with them - they're too ignorant for that. You could teach or instruct them if they listened to you, but they don't. So whatever is left is what we're doing on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 03:02 PM
0

they rightfully ban you, because if you're this ignorant then you have no place in the conversation. It's like walking into a maths subreddit and starting out with "alright guys, I've figured it out. 2+2 is 5.", then expecting people to entertain your delusion. You can't walk into a trans subreddit, proudly proclaim that you don't know the difference between sex and gender, and then expect to be taken seriously. Get real. You're missing the very basics to even start talking. Some basic knowledge…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 02:49 PM
5

I'm just arguing that most people probably have an intrinsic sense of morality that hurts them when they violate it, as proven by society currently not being up in flames. So if you're thinking "economically", you should probably consider this a pretty important factor. Regardless of your own predisposition.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 08:39 AM
5

I'm still not sure that behaving "well" helps you in dating though. it might help you if all you want to do is fuck. If you want long-term happiness with a partner that is your equal, then I can't imagine that it'll help you. Because the women you get with that sort of strategy likely aren't desireable in the first place. I have no respect for manipulators and fuckboys. I have no respect for anyone who falls for these types either. But ey, someone with incredibly low standards might find their p…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 08:36 AM
4

society benefits the indiviudal. Unless you're part of the "sitting alone in a bush in the middle of a desert"-gang
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 08:11 AM
3

I've looked into this briefly in the past, and the last time I checked the research was pretty firmly on the side of prosocial behavior -> happiness antisocial behavior -> sad lives, and also often much shorter lives to me that didn't really come to a surprise so I didn't go super deep at the time, but if you find more on this feel free to let me know. It makes sense from an evolutionary perspective too. Humans are reliant on groups. If there are too many antisocial actors, we'd probably just al…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 08:07 AM
5

you should include an intrinsic sense of morality into your economic calculus, because it's something that most people demonstrably have. Otherwise society would have probably fallen apart ages ago. Maybe consider that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 08:02 AM
2

As someone who is on the shadowy strategic language redefinition council, it is my pleasure to inform you that you have now officially been identified as an incel. Your group was added to the category to systematically undermine you. It is how it is, incel. This has been your personal steering of the discourse.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 08:01 AM
2

If being a shitty person was not an advantage in life, then no-one would do it. it's absolutely a disadvantage to be an asshole. Assholes tend to be pretty unhappy people for it, and lead miserable lives. It's all short-term benefits and then being shafted in the long run, if there are even short-term benefits. Some are smart and get away with it, but overall shitty people don't tend to win at life. Really questioning the accuracy of your mental models here, but what else is new on this sub. ​ G…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 07:46 AM
7

acting like a fuckboy helps you get women that are receptive to fuckboys. Most self-respecting women that have any shred of intelligence aren't receptive to fuckboys, whether they enjoy casual sex or not. And this is especially true as you get older. Besides, the women who complain about fuckboys are often not the same women that are going for fuckboys. ​ Basically, the incentive is not there for men to behave like you want them to I don't enjoy the insinuation that men have no agency and will i…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 07:30 AM
2

incels are a super fringe group of frustrated teens or young adults that enter the media cycle only when one of them goes on a killing spree, but beyond that they're utterly irrelevant and uninteresting to wider society. There is no gigabrain language-redefinition-game being played by "those in power" or "those steering the discourse", where people are purposely defined or not defined as incels to harm your silly little group. You're not that important. The vast majority of people have never eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 07:17 AM
1

Why can’t a 14 year old be sexually active? because I defined the situation that way as an example for why your definition of incel is wrong and nonsensical, and now that you've missed that this was obviously where I was going with it you try to launch into a stupid fucking discussion about what 14 year olds can and can not do, completely missing the point and further demonstrating that it's a waste of time to talk to you. That's why a 14 year old can't be sexually active. I'll have you know tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 06:57 AM
1

it literally is just “someone who is involuntarily celibate oh yeah, so a 14 year old who just learned what sex is and wants to have it now but obviously can't is an incel. A 87 year old who wants to go for a last round but can't because he's too old, is an incel. Makes total sense, that's definitely how that word is used. The real meaning can be seen here, and oh would you look at that, being an incel actually requires you to be part of the incel subculture? Huh, who could have guessed. So it's…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 06:37 AM
1

bro I'm sorry it won't happen again
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 06:19 AM
0

oh don't worry, I know more about incels than 99.9% of the people on this sub. Don't try to test me. The number of people here who think that incel merely means "someone who is involuntarily celibate" is astounding. I've already had 3 separate people come to me and insist on the wrong definition. You people never learn. As for redpiller, I'm familiar as well. Spent more than enough time "discussing" things with them than is strictly healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 06:13 AM
6

No, you don't know whether I'm married or not, since I didn't tell you. Just clarifying. You're not smart enough to be a smart-ass. Don't even try it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 06:00 AM
5

Do you like asking irrelevant questions? I already tried to pre-empt this, and you're still going to hit me with this? Seriously now
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 05:58 AM
4

No reasonable person will get upset over someones sexual history. Most adults realise that other adults had a life before you started getting involved with them, and sometimes these lives include phases where these people experimented and explored their sexuality. And that is okay. Sometimes these phases last a bit longer and the person had a particularly high value in the sexual marketplace and so their n-count is correspondingly high. And that's okay too. Then there are other people who are im…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 05:55 AM
2

So, basically, you... because you're going for grammar/spelling/vocabulary when you apparently know what I was saying but are trying some weird flex... This isn't my grad paper ya know? yeesh. I just dislike it when people spell like shit and confuse words, it truly annoys me. Like their and they're, or bear and bare, stuff like that. Obviously I still understand you, but that's beside the point. It's an annoyance, so I point it out. ​ So I guess we're all a bunch of losers yes ​ but not you, ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 05:41 AM
7

Person A (into the Bailey): "Trans-women are women," Person B: "But women can bare children, men cannot" Person A (retreating into the Motte): "i just want everyone to be treated like human beings" First of, it's bear children not bare children. Secondly, no self-respecting trans-issue debater would retreat into any sort of motte after the response that person B gave. That aside, motte-and-bailey actually IS a great fallacy to know and expose when you see it, but from my experience it's far from…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 04:36 AM
3

it is, you just have a sad perspective on life.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 09:54 PM
1

give it some time~
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 09:26 PM
4

when a normal human experience seems like a brag to you, then that's on you. Literally nothing OP said is special in any way. Your life is just that bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 09:17 PM
1

presumption of innocence is what courts of law do, it does not need to extend to one human judging another. As for me, I don't feel it necessary to suspend my judgement until he gets sentenced. He bragged about his crimes, there's an audiotape where he admits to raping someone, he even has a website where he openly describes running a loverboy sex trafficking scheme. He's openly misogynistic and carries his hatred for women like a badge of honor. And now when there are multiple allegations that …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 09:14 PM
5

What I've gathered over the years of my life is that genuine physical attraction is an instant friendblocker to any kind of friendship between men and women. I don't think it is. I'm attracted to many people, but there's a difference between being slightly attracted to someone, and being attracted to someone so much that it starts to affect how you think about them. The former is fine. The latter is indeed a friendship blocker. But on the whole spectrum of positive attraction, there is still a g…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 08:59 PM
0

no but that's exactly it, you need to fucking ban all these sexist blackpill losers the second they reveal who they are. Clearly this is not being done properly, regardless of what the rules say.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 02:32 PM
1

it's not just a tiny detail, though. It's an insane leap in logic, you're connecting things in a way that fundamentally doesn't work. This kind of broken thought just means you're not capable of seriously thinking about these issues at all. It's like someone trying to explain how planes fly, just to go on a tangent about how you grow corn, then trying to convince the audience that this is somehow relevant to planes. It's not. And the fact that you're not able to see that means you're not equippe…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 04:07 AM
1

Also, some studies have found that those with psychopathy and autism tend to have lower oxytocin levels, and both disorders are linked to a lack of empathy. Both disorders are also much more common in men. both of which are SUPER atypical conditions that have no bearing on how neurotypical people operate and could easily be caused by something else entirely / have many more facets to them. The fact that you even start to include this to make a point immediately shows anyone that you're not to be…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 03:37 AM
6

I mean damn good to hear you've changed your mind, but I seriously question your thought process here. If you meet some shitty women again, will you just swing back completely? Lol. Either way, all the best to you buddy. Gl -
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 02:16 AM
0

I wouldn't be surprised if there is a name for it. I asked GPT-3 and it gave some cool suggestions, although I'm pretty sure none of those are the "real" name (if it exists). "polarization cascade" "echo chamber effect" or "echo chambering" "toxic spiral" or the "polarization spiral" "radicalization loop" good enough for me!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 02:14 AM
8

When the problem becomes this bad, it's usually too late for change unless extremely drastic measures are taken, such as permabanning the majority of active users. It's the old problem of community-radicalisation where a feedback-loop takes place. Looks like this: Radical users join and aren't removed effectively Some moderate users leave as a result of this, because they're unwilling to deal with the nonsense of the radicals The whole community becomes more radical as the ratio between radical …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/23 09:39 PM
0

You said it yourself: They get new boyfriends every year. That implies there's some instability in their love lives. And I would suggest that the high body count is a factor in that. wouldn't it be much more reasonable to say that the count is a result of it, and not a cause? Their relationships were likely already unstable even when they only started out having them, and didn't just start being unstable once they got to a high enough number. Get real. It might be a factor to some men, but it's …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/23 05:07 PM
0

If you think that it's a grave insult to call you a loner when your very username suggests that you're a loner, then you need some thicker skin my dude. As for unhappiness, that's just my base assumption for anyone that posts here and aligns themselves with broad mgtow-points. People with an ideology like that are known to be unhappy, so it's not really big of a stretch. Thread is already closed anyways, so who cares at this point. As for what I'm doing here? I'm here for you :)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/23 03:46 PM
7

it already went off the rails when they concluded that a higher divorce rate for lesbian couples proves anything about the dynamics for heterosexual couples, where the dynamics are obviously completely different. -> "However, lesbian marriages prove that women are more likely to divorce overall" No, it doesn't. Lesbian marriages prove that lesbians are more likely to get divorced. People like this are actually incapable of having a coherent thought process. Two sentences in and it's already a co…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/23 03:40 PM
2

You understand them incredibly well, which is why you're here on a sub for unhappy loners that can't find anyone, and why your name is "alwaysaloneforever97". I'd expect someone who understands others to have good people skills, but maybe you're just special? Like a supposed long distance runner who breaks down after running a single mile and then brags about how great they are? Amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/23 03:30 PM
3

I've peeped a lot of these women's profiles and they post in leftist communities like anti-work about "everyone deserves a living wage!" And "universal Healthcare for all!" but as soon as a man has an issue it's social dariwinism kicking in and "the world owes you nothing!!!!" the difference is that living wages and healthcare are things that can easily be funded/forced through tax schemes, and universal insurance and economic regulations, while healthy relationships will always be something tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/23 03:05 PM
5

You're a woman. So you conclude that because I dislike sexist losers, it's likely I'm a woman, because that's apparently an exclusively (or close to exclusive) female character trait? Man you're smart. Incredible analysis. ​ So you're a liar now too, really building up credibility fast. The fact that I may or may not have lied in my tag to fuck with "low IQ" people who can't see beyond the tag has nothing to do with the quality of my posts. Besides, why do I need credibility here? Why should any…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 07:38 PM
4

oh so you are still reading? Interesting. I think I'll continue not giving a shit about your silly woman "points" and "misunderstanding as a debate tactic" and carry on. Also, I'm not a woman. I just have this tag to fuck with sexist dipshit losers and because it's honestly entertaining to get a bit of hatred that's incredibly off-base every once in a while. Never ceases to amuse me when some dumbass goes all "ouhuouh you're a WOMAN, no wonder", so you're giving me exactly what I'm looking for. …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 07:27 PM
2

You’re right to say that understanding and judgement aren’t mutually exclusive but the reason why I used the nazi example is because on mass scale of which incels are more represented by as opposed to isolated fringe incidents. but inceldom is a fringe phenomenon, just like uxoricide. The largest incel forum has 20k members, and not even all of them are incels. Quite a few of them are probably already cured, or they were never incels to begin with and only joined because of an interest. How many…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 07:21 PM
0

looool peak comedy. Amazing. No wonder you're like this, and trust me when I say that the knowledge that you'll stay trapped in this developmental dead end gives me the greatest satisfaction. Have fun~ edit: oh shit you changed your post, haha. For anyone looking at this it originally said "yes I know what a priori is, and I'm not reading the rest". You snake :v Nice try, but you can't weasel your way out of this one. You didn't know what a priori rights were. What now, are you gonna edit the ot…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 06:55 PM
5

a priori rights that aren't inherent in anything. do you know what a priori rights are? Let me give you a hint then, it's pretty much the opposite of "aren't inherent in anything". The whole idea of a priori rights is that they are inherent, genius. Stop using terms that are too complicated for you. A priori rights are those rights that are assumed to exist independently of society and the law, such as the right to life, the right to freedom of speech, the right to freedom of religion, the right…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 06:49 PM
5

There is no equality in nature. good thing we don't live in caves anymore and have this thing called society where we consciously impose rules and build structures that are explicitly unnatural to improve our own lives. I believe there are no cellphones in nature either. ​ They have simply chosen, en masse, to be destroyers of civilization because it makes them feel powerful. Ah yes, as proven by the fact that we live in the time where we are the most technologically advanced, most functioning, …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 05:56 PM
2

I'm not denying that broad sociocultural trends can push people in certain directions. Hell, I even agree with you that the primer for incels is often rejection and bullying. I've read the study where they surveyed incel.me. I've read the Elliot Rodgers manifesto. Bullying and rejection are pretty obviously causes for inceldom. But that doesn't change the fact that inceldom as a whole is still a fringe movement and a particular radical response to these primers, which in turn makes it valid to a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 05:44 PM
0

Those men are in that misogynistic mindset due to being pushed away like this. I disagree with this strongly. Inceldom is at its core a dysfunctional coping strategy that people employ because it is easier than accepting responsibility for your own situation. The two core tenets are "I am a victim" and "women are at fault", which are repeated ad nauseum to avoid any personal growth and the difficulties associated with said growth. I'm not going to deny that the initial push in this direction is …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 05:03 PM
6

But it's pretty clearly nonsense because the resentment of women in this sub is pretty direct and obvious in most cases. Just take one look at what happened during purge week. Even outside of purge week, half of the posts here contain incel lingo or are blatantly biased against women in particular, not just the structures that underpin the hated dynamics but actually women, the people themselves. I don't doubt that some people on here are capable of more nuanced views, but I expect those to leav…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 03:51 PM
3

no offense but I barely consider anyone below 25 an adult. I don't really care as much about anyone younger than that? They'll figure it out in time as they grow up. I'm not here to talk about teens and late adolescents. What that article tells me is that women have options and standards now, which they're more than entitled to of course. If the result of that is that a number of men fall off, then that's a success not a failure of the dating market. It's not a bug, it's a feature. The article i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 09:37 AM
2

I think you'd always want to go with someone who isn't a loner if you have the choice. Being a loner is kind of a red flag in itself, and it has the distinct disadvantage that the loner has less of a safety net that they (and you) could also on. It's not a dealbreaker though. Loners can be wonderful, interesting and very lovely people. It might be that they just have less of a preference and need for social interaction and consciously choose to be by themselves more than with others, which is fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 09:21 AM
2

The median signifies the 50% mark. And the median for men is >6, actually. source In other words, lots of sex is had by a large part of the population, which refutes the idea that you need to be a Chad to have many sexual partners. This is simply not true. Average guys do it. It's not the top 10% getting everything while the rest is left out.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 08:48 AM
2

uuuh okay alright then
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 07:49 AM
1

that's why I brought up the median, not the average. Your 80/20 pareto principle stuff doesn't work against the median, that's actually exactly why I said what I said. Feel free to try again, but I'd rather you not. In any case, this whole line of reasoning is failing from the start, because even if I grant you that you need to be a Chad to have lots of sexual partners (obviously wrong), that still doesn't make women finding success in the sexual marketplace a reprehensible thing that you should…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 07:40 AM
2

Then you're either in the wrong circles, not really trying to date, or there's something else going on with you that I obviously can't identify because I don't know you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 07:36 AM
0

not at all, lots of guys out there having lots of sex and partying enjoying their lives in their 20s. You don't need to be a Chad at all for that, you just need to be in the right circles, not be super socially awkward, not be super bad looking, and be somewhat fit. That's it. Is there some imbalance for how much effort you have to spend to get laid as a guy, compared to as a woman? Sure. But the idea that you need to "be a Chad" to have a lot of sexual partners is laughable. Look at the median …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 07:11 AM
20

I'm guessing legit, given how many incels are on this sub. This one is incredibly deluded though, even by incel standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 07:03 AM
6

to address substance, there needs to be substance first. The lunatic ramblings of some left behind blackpilled moron online don't count. I think I've addressed OP's comment rather well and given it the consideration it deserves, which is not a lot. Do you disagree? Do you honestly believe OP has a point here? Lmao. Edit: haha, clearly the answer here is yes. Guy got so upset he blocked me!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 06:42 AM
12

that's funny, because the flair is a lie to lure out the dipshits that can't address the substance of the comment itself and only focus on superficial bullshit since that's all they're ever capable of. I've had the flair during purge week and it was a riot, let me tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 06:36 AM
14

No, I didn't think one was needed. When the OP is so patently insane that it beggars belief, properly refuting it is honestly a waste of time. If you want to learn about the topic, feel free to read up on it yourself. Seriously spending time on imbeciles like that is beneath me, and it should be beneath you too.-> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Taliban_offensive#Key_factors There's your rebuttal. Ever heard of the bullshit asymmetry? If someone says that the earth is 6000 years old and throw…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 06:22 AM
1

It's not a valid outlook to reject them as long as the same behavior is celebrated in men. Pure hypocrisy, that's all it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 05:36 AM
34

these men found no motivation to fight against them, society didn't owe them anything, so why would they owe anything to society? They remembered how women treated them so badly, how they were made fun, how they were refused a family, so they saw no motive to fight for the modern Afghan society and they started surrendering en masse. "Afghanistan fell because women treated men poorly, if only women were nicer it wouldn't have come to this" this is one of the most insane things I've read on here,…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/23 05:21 AM
1

the idea that women are shallow creatures who aren't worth the air they breathe. And don't give me this "but everyone is shallow, it's true!". Incels obviously don't view women the way they view themselves. They believe women are so superficial and vapid, that no interesting thought passes through their minds for weeks at a time. I disagree with incels on just about anything. They're severely mentally ill, completely removed from reality and all that is normal and healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 05:34 PM
0

who is denying that looks are important? They obviously are, everyone knows that. One of the first pieces of advice given to anyone who asks for dating advice is that they should be clean looking, get a haircut, dress well, take care of their hygiene etc. You are hallucinating. You can't not engage with strawmans.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 05:28 PM
12

Like, it sounds legit childish. because you made it up. If you want to actually engage with other beliefs, you've got to stop strawmanning them. I know it lets you feel smart when you cook up dumber versions of what people actually believe just so you can refute them in your own head, but trust me when I say that it doesn't actually make you intelligent. And anyone with a shred of brains can tell. Your points about unconditional love and loyalty are already only believed by very few. Most adults…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 04:38 PM
2

Of course I'm not here to help incels. I don't give a flying fuck about them. As far as I'm concerned, they are truly disgusting and worthless people, and the world would be better off without them. Incels would have everything to gain by embracing feminism as well. Everyone does. But they just won't get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 01:11 PM
3

I can be, if I want to be. Sometimes it's just fun to do a little shittalking too, and it's not like those exclude each other. Regardless, I feel like I gained a couple of decent insights from this event, as I managed to have a few productive arguments with incels. All it takes is changing your tag to "woman" and they're more than eager to go off at you, which was actually pretty helpful this time around. At the end of the day, the blackpill is just a fantastically perverse coping mechanism that…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 03:28 AM
9

I'm interested in the ways in which people self-sabotage, ruin their own lives and push themselves to the fringes of society simply by holding pathological worldviews that aren't only insane but also wholly incompatible with the most commonly held values and beliefs. Inceldom definitely qualifies, so I'm spending some time here for now. Call it an academic interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 01:45 AM
30

When we’re allowed to go hard the bluepill guys just don’t stand a chance. Where’s all the blue pill memes? the thing is that bluepilled people are absent, because they're busy touching grass and just living their lives. The fact that there are so many miserable fucks here sharing their hateful nonsense without getting pushback truly isn't the burn that you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 08:44 PM
11

And we've now arrived at the not so veiled rape threats. Anyone surprised? I'm not. "you know what we'll do if you don't let us hit it, right? Right?" Super classy, OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 11:09 AM
60

Engaging with blackpillers is pretty pointless because they will outright reject anything you say in favor of a blatantly biased view. Them not being opposed much here isn't a sign that their arguments are better, it's a sign that they are largely viewed as lost causes who are hopelessly mentally broken and not worth the time and energy to engage with. When I see comments about how women are all shallow insects and not worth the air they breathe, then what is there left to say for me? Sure, I ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 10:47 AM
1

I work for the government, not gonna get too specific on here but it's a decent job at a major agency and I'm quite happy with it. For hobbies I do gaming (rhythm games mainly, which i am pretty good at. But also some apex legends on the side) and I like to cook.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:59 AM
1

I want to further my career, want to keep supporting my fiancé, and want to keep enjoying my hobbies and get even better at them! I'm grateful to be alive and healthy, and I'm grateful for my loving family, for my relationship and just the overall state of my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:55 AM
2

lol, look at this thread and look at the responses here. These people are clearly believing it. Why lie?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:54 PM
3

these people will eat anything up if it supports their worldview. I'm almost hoping that whoever posted this is checking how ridiculous they can make their claims before these people catch on, and they've discovered that there's truly no limit. I mean seriously 14 vs. 310? Do they think that many women read bios, notice one word and then consciously move on? This so obviously fails the common sense check. And 310 messages after a DAY? as a guy? And don't get me started on the format of this imag…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:09 AM
-4

which, just to be clear, would take you from a 1% risk to a 1.5% risk over a lifetime in the US. Tall men being at a .75% chance. So by no means is this the norm. More common? Yes. But this incelposter is painting a very different picture here, selling it as a foregone conclusion when it's anything but. A shred of media literacy, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 10:18 PM
2

the fact that he's still online roaming blackpill communities, which are known to be decidedly unhelpful and actually worsen all the problems you could ever have, is really proof enough that he's ignoring any and all valid advice that has ever been given to him. Case closed. 10 years, absolutely nothing learned.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:38 PM
1

ok i have no clue what that is. They also don't always test for herpes, cause it's just so common it's not really worth the test. It is how it is. Good thing you're clean now.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:29 PM
3

another glimpse at the highly disturbing, mentally ill and wildly inaccurate headcanon of incels. You guys construe entire realities from thin air just to convince yourselves that being a worthless, negative person that nobody wants in their lives is not your fault at all, but the collective fault of women. Really fun, honestly, you're gonna go far with that. 10/10 for self-sabotage.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:23 PM
-1

now this is all extra based, but you should really know what your own STD was called, buddy. Just sayin lmao. And 23 isn't even that high, honestly. I'd say it's at the upper bound, but you're definitely still within reason with that. Anyone who parties for a few years can honestly get that far, and especially women. I'd say 23 is fair for 30. Mid to high.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:14 PM
3

Let's not glance over the fact that you didn't even know what political representation was, and that you now you have the audacity to speak with confidence about it again. What is wrong with you? No, seriously? How are you so confident about things you know nothing about? Is that how you got your worldview too? A bunch of cobbled together maybe's, not based on knowledge but on the smoke and mirrors that are apparently in your head where the knowledge usually goes? What the fuck man. How old are …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:08 PM
2

that one's about political representation. Do you know what political representation is? Cause it sounds like you don't. Cue: Not voting power. In the Senate they hold 24% of the seats. Presidents, nobody. In the House of Representatives? 28%. In the Supreme Court it's actually 3/7 right now, but historically it's 4/113. Times are changing. Overall, it's still grim. Minority in every single of the most important parts of the political system, except the voterbase. Sources: https://www.representw…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 08:19 PM
1

I take that as a no. Why don't you pick one at random and I can do the work for you, since you're so lazy/incapable.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:27 PM
1

what gives it away for me is the complete inability to understand implication. That's something to see often in them, they really only communicate directly and mean/understand everything literally. So not only is it difficulty with understanding, it's also difficulty understanding for the exact same reason that autistic people struggle with communication. Like being a dumbass and not knowing a word is one thing why you could not understand, but this dude is just missing an entire layer of commun…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:12 PM
1

you know what, these were good responses. You aight. Except for the part where you're being a blatantly biased dipshit. Can't you do better with what you got? You're already more witty than the hoardes of losers that have insulted me in more and more sexist ways because I changed my tag to say "woman" for the day. Is that really the company you choose? Come on dude, you're better than that. I see it in you, I really do.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:05 PM
1

oh no, I wasn't empirical about all of these well-known facts that have been sourced hundreds of times and are openly available for everyone to read, oh no no no that can't be. Your standard of evidence when you just throw out random, biased shit: amazing meme Your standard of evidence when I say shit that you should really already know if you care about gender-differences in society, as you proclaim you do (hint: you don't): "where muh empiricism". Funny shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:03 PM
2

you said "go fuck yourself", which is an arguably stronger "screw you". Screw you is about as mild as it gets, you should see my other comments on here. But I get it, this is pointless. Was from the start. Purge day is the best day, these interactions are all hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:58 PM
1

wow. Look at your comment. Look at mine. Look at yours again. Are you fucking lost? Let me help you then, little man: You're irrelevant. I talk to people like you because it's fun to me, not because I think I can gain anything from the interaction. That's your entire purpose here, to be entertainment to someone who is 10x smarter than you. It's hilarious to see in what kind of absurd of a shape you bent your own mind to maintain one of the most harmful (to you, that is) worldviews that I'm aware…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:54 PM
-2

baby's first Halo-effect. Doesn't mean you'll get to have a happy relationship with someone you love by the end of the dating process. In fact, if you're the type to harrass others, I'd almost bet that you won't. Is that what successful dating looks like for you? not that you care.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:49 PM
1

oh my oh my, you've got rather strong feelings about this, don't you? If you already get stuck on a simple sentence like "most poor people aren't homeless", then I really don't see much hope for you, no I don't. By the way.. I didn't read the rest. Teehee :p are you mad yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:46 PM
1

I disagree, honestly. If you ask me, when looking at all of society across the board, women have it better than men, except in the bottom 5% or so, where men have it much worse. Because again, most things that affect men are very specific things that only happen to specific groups (extreme violence, substance abuse, prison, war....) For a more specific break-down, I think it's different for men between ages 50 - 65, where there's a real difference in disability rates (which I forgot to mention l…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:45 PM
0

feel free to fact-check every single one of these yourself. You're super interested in the topic, aren't you? I've done the work. Have you?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:35 PM
3

Most homeless are men tho? As far as elderly poverty, women live longer because they have easier lives. yes, most poor people aren't homeless. Difference in life expectancy isn't difference might also be largely due to smoking -> lung-cancer released deaths, and drinking and suicide (which is a whole nother topic in itself because the gender difference there is much more complex than you think.) I've thought about including it at first, and then decided against it. Had enough points in the first…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:33 PM
0

first off, you're a completely lost cause with how you talk here and in other comments. Clearly an incel, so I'll just leave you now and move on, because there's absolutely zero value in wasting my time on someone who thinks and acts like you. Don't bother responding. You are in all respects incapable of having a conversation about this topic and you'll simply always pick the POV that suits your rotten ideology, and that's on top of being too stupid to properly research something like this in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:23 PM
1

Getting a date =/= dating. Getting the date is about how you sell yourself when they don't know you. Dating is convincing them of yourself by letting them get to know you. I'd say these are VERY different. Dating is all that follows after they says yes to the date.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:25 PM
0

See my other responses on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:23 PM
0

but people get their foot in the door, even if they aren't the best-looking. This narrative that's being presented on here, that you need to be a top 10%er or you're fucked, simply isn't true. Most people are in committed relationships. Singles are in the minority. Many people who are dating aren't good-looking. Again, looks definitely are the most important factor for getting your foot in the door, I won't deny that. But to say that they're most important for dating itself (aka - the process th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:22 PM
0

you can still get your foot in the door in other ways / other factors matter for that as well Most men do get their foot in the door. Like, the vast vast majority. Pretending otherwise is a dead giveaway for a worldview that doesn't survive a basic clash with the lived experience of really almost all men I don't care if you care or anyone cares. I'm saying that it's not the most important factor for dating, which is objectively true. Again, you equate "getting a date" with "dating". These are no…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:19 PM
1

blanket things can be the bare minimum, how does that not make sense? Take a shower at least every two days is a blanket statement, and also a bare minimum.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:28 PM
1

you join a clique or form your own. They're not freakin diamond-hard unbreachable social units that can never leave anyone in or out. Are you sure that you're fine on step 3? Cause I am no longer convinced.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:05 PM
6

that's what you took from it? Can you read? That's not what I said at all. I said that I do believe that lots (not all) of the issues where men are systemically disadvantaged are a lot more contained (as in, affecting a rather small minority) than the most of the issues that affect women. Like the issue with homelessness, while severe, doesn't affect that many men. Same as dying in a war, dying to gang-related violence, or going to prison. Meanwhile, the issues that women face tend to be more om…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:04 PM
2

No, if a woman hasn’t given it up for anyone then her supply is close to 0, thus demand would be much higher. hahahahaha. Yeah, you really don't understand what these terms mean, do you? Demand is high because the supply is low? Great one, a true masterclass in economics. I knew you were talking out of your ass. Please just stop and pick up a book, I guarantee you'll learn something.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:59 PM
1

ah it's fine. It'll be over soon and then these fucks are back to getting banned. I take solace in the fact that all of them are miserable losers who haven't felt the touch of a woman who loved them ever since their mothers first learned of what they do in their free time. They might be disgusting assholes, but there's a great cosmic justice in how life treats them in return. All is good! :)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:28 PM
1

aw, you can't do it, no? You're just talking shit, aren't you? Awww. Here, I'll give it to you again, short and concise. I wouldn't want you to overexert your meagre intellect and dry up that 3 second attention span, so here goes: Getting a date =/= dating someone successfully (=moving on from that stage). Looks are great for GETTING a date. But to date successfully, you need to bring a little bit more to the table than that. Thus, looks aren't the most important factor for dating. I'll leave it…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:22 PM
1

If it was just an "American" thing, then why are men so much more liekly to abandon their women than the other way around? By a factor of 600%? Think about it. No, really. Think about it. 600%-
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:19 PM
1

Men more likely than women to leave partner with cancer ​ Women are six times more likely to end up separated or divorced if they are diagnosed with cancer or multiple sclerosis than if their male partners were facing the same illness, according to a U.S. study. The study confirmed earlier research of a divorce or separation rate among cancer patients of 11.6 percent, similar to the general population, but found the rate jumped to 20.8 percent when the woman was sick versus 2.9 percent when the …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:14 PM
-2

why don't you explain to me where the contradiction is? If you're so smart. Should be easy for you!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:09 PM
-4

do you know the difference between successfully dating someone and getting flings on tinder? Because what I wrote would only seem like a contradiction if you don't. Dating someone successfully means that you actually get to move beyond that stage, finding someone who you can be togehter for a little longer than just a single might or a week. Although I guess I can't blame you for not knowing that, given what your history with dating almost certainly looks like. ​ It's always nice to see a woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:05 PM
1

Tell me exactly which location to go to. any space that's not incel/blackpill-y. Seriously, even if you don't go anywhere, just getting out is already a massive improvement that will pay dividends eventually. If you're serious about it, maybe try a sports club. Anything will do, just join as a beginner, meet people, get healthy at the same time because you're working out. It's a win all around. I can't give the perfect advice to you because I don't know you. The things I listed are just common s…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:59 PM
12

The truth is of course that there are areas where women are disavantaged and areas where men are disavantaged, but when you hate women and yourself as much as this guy then obviously you're going to be incapable of having a balanced view on the world we live in. Just a few examples where women are disadvantaged as follows: much more threatened by poverty, especially poverty among the elderly. disproportionately affected by domestic violence. still underrepresented in many industries and sectors,…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:50 PM
-5

They're not the most important factor in dating. They're the most important factor for getting your foot in the door, which is important but not nearly the most important key ingredient for a long-term happy relationship at all. Looks are the most important factor for getting flings on tinder, but that's about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:13 PM
4

Sure. Step 1 is getting off the internet and especially getting out of any incel/black pill infested spaces, such as this one. Step 2 is likely putting some work into your appearance. Most guys don't really do that, so it's an easy way to set yourself apart. Get a proper haircut, get some proper fashionable stuff to wear, get a skincare routine, be hygienic. Almost ALL women do this by the way, so this is really the minimum you can do. Step 3 is working on your social skills, and don't tell me y…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:08 PM
2

epic idea that YOU've built in your head, where all progress is impossible because you're just too undesireable no matter what, and women are to blame for your situation. Really great self-sabotage buddy I'm sure you'll go far with it. Stay miserable! edit: Loool I got blocked. Good luck in life bro you'll need it!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:01 PM
4

another day of choosing to be a miserable person with no prospects of being romantically fulfilled ever? More power to you, son.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 12:52 PM
-4

oh now I get it. I had no idea tbh, I read it as if you're one of them lmao. My bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:08 AM
-7

what does that even mean? The week where Incels post their shit on mainstream sites to once again prove to everyone how pathetic they are? You guys are way better when you're sequestered in your ugly little corners of the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 10:26 AM
2

>implying they'd late you date them
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:57 AM
1

supply and demand have nothing to do with the point made in this shitty meme. If anything, according to people like you, the supply of sex readily offered by women is sparse while demand is high, which would drive up the "market value" of women who are willing to "supply" and allow them to have active sexual histories in the first place. Therefore your demand and supply argument here disagrees with the post. So don't pretend to know anything about economics after falling for incredibly stupid ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:46 AM
1

what is the point being made here? If you needed to put it into words, seriously what are you even trying to say?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:41 AM
6

Ikr? "oh no everyone in my social environment is vapid". I wonder why. You already know that guy isn't any different, I mean for gods sake, he posts on 4chan.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:15 AM
1

"but I [insert obvious exception] and [obvious exception], so it doesn't apply to me!" wow, really? Damn. You learn something new every day!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:05 AM
-1

Okay. I’ll bite. don't bother. This user has been spamposting incel/blackpill content for hours now and has never meaningfully engaged with anyone who disagrees with him. He knows he'll get torn apart if he takes it to the comments. Just report for violation of subreddit rules, select "incel/blackpill content" and move on, he'll get banned soon enough. In the future, if you want to destroy the pathetic narrative of failed men like OP, all you need is 3 facts. men have more sexual partners over t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:01 AM
4

what you obviously failed to mention is that This data is skewed by COVID The trend is heavily influenced by 18-24 year olds. It's no surprise that 18 year old live with their parents. Once you look at 25-30 year olds, the percentage quickly gets halved and levels off at ~25%, and again these are the higher figures caused by COVID. So really, we're looking at 1 in 5 (not 1 in 4, again you need to adjust for COVID) instead of 1 in 2 for proper adults (25+). And I'm sure at least some of them coha…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 08:55 AM
1

someone might feel when they have literally 0 matches is very different from the loneliness that someone might feel when they have 6000 matches. Sure, if you just want to fuck then it's great being a woman, but what if that's not what you're about? And trust me, many women aren't about that at all. What about the loneliness you feel when you have 6000 matches but know that none of these give a fuck about you as a person and only want to use you for sex? Sex that isn't only dangerous but also ext…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 08:49 AM
1

Incorrect. It implies that it's an exception when they aren't hypocritical. the mental acrobatics required to get to that conclusion, I'm actually astonished. You people are mad. Believing that saying shit like "women are so [bad quality]" on an incel-infested subreddit means anything less than "all women" is some advanced brainrot.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 08:38 AM
0

oh really?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 08:09 AM
-2

How can I be hypocritical? I'm just informing the guy about the implication of his own words, since he appears to be too dense to understand something as basic as that. Can you point out the place where I said something equivalent about men then, that would make me hypocritical? Get outta here you absolute clown.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 08:09 AM
4

I don't believe that useful discussion is possible with the type that posts nonsense like that. Better to just shit on them and move on. Trying to have any sort of constructive exchange with people like that is a waste of your time, honestly. This particular user has just been spam posting incel content for the last few hours without meaningfully engaging with anyone. These are worthless, miserable people.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 08:04 AM
0

oh really? Tell me more. What kind of person am I, what do you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:49 AM
1

having negative experiences is part of growing up. Intensely negative experiences as well. It happens. The difference is, some learn from them and grow, others don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:42 AM
4

some of them probably lived normal lives, had some insanely negative experience and then fell off. It's possible. And some of them, I'm sure, genuinely have all the disadvantages. But they're really not the majority, not even on there. I'm not gonna justify these spaces. They're spaces of concentrated mental illness, acted out and intensified in the worst way. Nothing good comes from that ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:16 AM
-2

I seriously doubt that they did. I've talked to incels before and spent some time in their communities like incel.me when it was still around and then incel.co which is apparently now gone too. Most of them have never seriously worked at anything. In fact, most of them got recruited at a somewhat young age, like 16 to 20 - way before they ever properly entered society and had a chance to really live up to any potential they might've had.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:10 AM
10

It's funny how lots of these things on the right are basically just signs of being a normal member of society and yet are played up as things that require serious committment. have a job have a car (in the US) be good at something have some confidence have an apartment don't be a complete dumbass how telling is it these things are then represented by this insanely buff guy, as if they're some earth-shattering achievement? Sorry to burst your bubble, but these things aren't difficult to achieve. …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 07:05 AM
9

being that way is to some degree a choice they make every day. In a tragically self-destructive way, the bitterness and seething hatred they have for the other gender is an "easier" alternative than putting in real work and improving yourself. It's easier for them to just give up, pretend they've never had a chance, and blame women for their failures. So what made them that way? I genuinely think it's, in large parts, laziness and personal weakness. But that's basically what inceldom is. It's th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:58 AM
-4

get a hang of it then.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:53 AM
2

Are you autistic or socially incompetent or something? Genuine question, not trying to clown on you. But the inability to understand the implications of your own language is a sign of these things. What you said absolutely implied all women, especially with the context and place you said it in. Whether you read it like that yourself or not. General maxime for the future: If you want to be annoyed about a subset of people and identify them based on gender, always qualify your statements with word…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:31 AM
8

that's not what the stats show at all. There are still plenty of white men that have a positive response to black women, among which there will be plenty (like you) who have an explicit preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:23 AM
6

Women are so extremely hypocritical. implies all women. Otherwise you'd have said "some women", or you'd have brought up the fact that men do it too and that it's not exclusive to one gender. It's pretty clear you have a hateboner for women, don't even pretend otherwise. Especially with the sub we're on and its ongoing incel infestation. Obviously any reasonable person would assume that you just mean women in general when you talk like that. Why lie? Either own it or stop saying shit like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:19 AM
3

Only because you say I'm emotional doesn't make it so. I'm putting that guy down, but not because I'm "emotional". I just think he's dangerously deluded and will stay miserable for his entire early adult life if he doesn't get a grip. ​ please shed some light on the issues women struggle with huh? What do you think women struggle with? Women are just people, they struggle with most of the shit that men struggle with too. What do you think they struggle with? Here's a list then. - Family problems…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:14 AM
8

is this just an incel subreddit now?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:08 AM
12

If you want to be taken seriously, maybe don't categorically deny other peoples pain. Pretending that an entire gender isn't really suffering and that it's all "for attention" is some of the most hilariously unempathetic shit I've ever seen. Grow the fuck up, will you?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:04 AM
19

I have studied women and am familiar with their thought patterns and mannerisms I understand women are largely impulsive and still rely on their evolutionary desires in picking a mate speaks of women like they're a different species ​ We've let women have their freedom and are seeing the effects of it in a decaying society ah yes, government-mandated rape is the solution then. Makes sense. Who is instinct-driven again? Because that guy acts more like an animal than any of the women that he hates…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 05:48 AM
1

Oh no I've lost the respect of a moronic sexist, whatever shall I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 01:53 PM
1

It would indeed have been a waste of time, but not the way you think it is. Respect is earned and in your case lost, sometimes very quickly. Be a better person.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 01:49 PM
3

Your assertion was that there might be something biological between the two genders specifically that led to these breakups. That was your assertion. I'm informing you that no, it's just people being complex and not being able to resolve their differences or being unable to navigate complicated social situations successfully, such as keeping up with each other and the ever shifting dynamic that is your marriage when it's being tested by various stressors over decades. In short, you don't need to…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 12:47 AM
8

People often don't get along, it's really not that deep.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 10:07 PM
1

The weather is not the same category of news, obviously. Holy shit you're insane. You actually believe if something is on the news it must be common and normal? Have you lost it? Where are your parents, do you talk to them ever? Have them slap some sense into you please, this is just sad to look at. You're so lost...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 08:31 PM
2

They probably mean 25% of men and 13% of women. The wording is wrong here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 05:50 PM
1

Those clearly aren't normal people. Helping a serial killer escape? You're trying to convince me that that's normal? Did you ever consider that these stories might be on the news because they aren't normal? This is one of the dumbest exchanges I've had on this sub. Got anything else to say or was that it? For your sake, I hope that it was. Like goddamn how ignorant do you have to be to buy into the idea that whatever is shown on the news is the default or is a common occurrence. You're so unbeli…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 04:40 PM
2

Undesirable* *to normal people with good judgment, like the ones from the pre-election studies that OP is talking about. You should learn to read between the lines, it's kinda obvious that this is what I was saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 10:40 PM
-1

Elaborate
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 05:18 PM
5

I hope you realise that this rapper is a fantastically poor example for the point you're trying to make. Having children with 10 different women is social proof for something very different than what being in one stable relationship is proof for. Your status goes from "taken and desirable" to "unreliable and undesirable". So the social proof works against you there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 05:15 PM
1

As a man, I couldn't disagree more. I hope someone would have the mercy to put me down if I ever even started thinking like that. I personally find it disgraceful.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 05:04 PM
5

You gotta think like a redpiller. They believe that modern dating is fundamentally broken and benefits women to an insane degree, that men are discriminated against and taken advantage of. Lots of them believe this because all the dating they do is through tinder, a site with an extreme gender imbalance which predictably leads to a certain dating economy in that isolated space. On top of that their relationships tend to be poor, because they don't really respect women - which they'll promptly bl…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 04:49 PM
2

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 04:29 PM
2

There's a nice study about this actually - Stepping Out of the Caveman’s Shadow: Nations’ Gender Gap Predicts Degree of Sex Differentiation in Mate Preferences gender differences in mate preferences with presumed evolutionary roots decline proportionally to increases in nations’ gender parity. So basically, it is true that women want to date up concerning wealth and men want to date up concerning looks, but these trends are disappearing with increasing gender parity. I just really dislike OP's f…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 03:21 PM
15

it's nothing so deep. Men still earn more than women due to a variety of factors, most significantly the parenthood and motherhood penalty that women incur and men picking different industries to work in that tend to pay more. Most women will end up dating a man that earns more than them for that reason alone, just statistically this HAS to be true. Women aren't any more shallow than men are. Better lay that assumption to rest. Alternatively: What do you think of the fact that men tend to date d…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 02:45 PM
1

no surprise there. He's probably just too socially incompetent, selfish and lazy to have a real relationship. Pretty sad for him, but it warms my heart to know that there's some justice in all of this and that he'll never get to spend his life with someone he truly loves. Sucks to be him!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 01:05 PM
1

So you're telling me "If B, then A. Not B. Therefore not A." Some real "when it rains, the road is wet. -> it's not raining, therefore the road must be dry"-energy, then again I'm probably asking for too much when I expect someone who takes this moron of a coach seriously to be able to wrap their head around a basic logical argument. Shame. Before you think about looking into the future, maybe try understanding the present. They say you should learn to walk before you run. You're trying to sprin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 03:24 AM
5

I've just watched one video to check this guy out and couldn't make it past the 5-minute mark. It's just your typical sexist horseshit packaged as "life advice" for men. Let me quote this dude: "Men who have vision, which is one of our greatest gifts, we have the ability to look years into the future and realize that what I'm doing today matters years from now. Women don't have that ability. They only think about what happens today, and they face the repercussions of it three years later and the…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 10:35 PM
2

I don't expect anything. Go into it with good intentions and see where it goes. Whatever happens, happens. Starting out with expectations one way or another seems counterproductive when there are so many unknowns.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 03:15 PM
-1

....but I still don’t think it’s near enough for men to outweigh the negatives of dealing with women. Change my mind There's no changing your mind here. You're a sad, bitter misogynist. Imagine discarding 50% of the population and deciding that they're simply not worth dealign with because you're too busy sniffing your own farts and believing these mindless generalizations. ​ our conversations together are most always pretty dull & a waste of time Have you considered that you might just be fucki…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 12:35 PM
1

You argue about video games imagine having hobbies. This is not the sort of burn that you think it is. ​ I have seen the whole world and you tell me to get out of the internet if you're not lying here (which I doubt) then I really feel sorry for you. Imagine being an adult and still being like that. Grow up. And if what you claim about yourself is true then.. holy shit. GROW UP. ​ I'm not gonna spend much more time on you here. It is funny, but it gets pretty stale after a while. If I want a poo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 12:27 PM

McCartney clearly wins here, I think the other three are tied. John Lennon was a famously a dickhead though, so he gets last place.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 12:08 PM
1

oh god you're so wrong hahahahaha- Holy shit you're embarrassing. This is honestly the funniest thing to me, when idiots apply their shitty hilariously limited worldview, fail completely, and still believe they've got it figured out. Goddamn, thanks for the laugh. I'll say the same to you as to the other guy, except for you it's most likely too late already. Get off the internet. Seriously, get off and interact more with people your age. I don't know what kind of things you're reading here, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 11:58 AM
2

just more freely available so there is more frequency ​ what I said isn't based on increased availability but frequency ooookay. What does "there is more frequency" even mean? There's only higher or lower frequency, "more frequency" is meaningless. That aside, say there is an increased availability (of what?), which leads to "more frequency" (?) snf more "attraction". That's your theory. And the first example you made is of a starving person, but where's the "more frequency" in that example? The…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 03:39 PM
3

you say it's a result of increased availability, then make an example where the cause is a severe lack of availability. I dunno man. The issue isn't that my train of thought is different here. I just always wonder when I see stuff like this. What does it feel like for you to have thoughts like this? When you read it back, do you not feel a slight sense of confusion, or feel like the claims you make don't really follow from one another? Like when I read your OP, I immediately get the feeling that…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 01:50 PM
4

Another way to think of it would be that what causes men to be horny is just more freely available so there is more frequency. Like a good example would be hunger, we are not naturally hungry all the time we are only hungry in response to starvation or mental health. immediately disagreeing with yourself there. First you argue it's due to increased availability. Then you say an example of that is hunger in response to starvation, which is decidedly the opposite of "caused by increased availabili…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 01:11 PM
2

wow you're still going
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 12:36 PM
2

this sub is full of morons who seriously overestimate themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 12:25 PM
2

Right now I'm thinking that none of what you wrote had anything to do with what I said, and that I'm wasting my time. You just want to ramble on about unrelated stuff. Go and do that somewhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 12:00 PM
2

I usually don't argue with people like you because I think it's beneath me. I know what it's like to be you, because I was you 10 yeras ago. Anyways, the proper argument is that the social back and forth would get a lot more harder if everyone was constantly sharing "their darkest side" with everyone publicly, even though that stuff doesn't really end up mattering in reality. So we don't. And that's it, and that's fine. It's not significant information. I'm going to block you now because I'm abs…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 04:56 PM
5

following normal social conventions and not laying it onto everyone I meet doesn't make me untrustworthy, no matter what you think. You sound a bit like you're a 16 year old who thinks that they've uncovered some grande hypocrisy at the centre of all social interaction. You haven't. You're not special, you're not insightful, and most of all you don't have any unique insight into the ins and outs of human interaction. Don't flatter yourself. Your brand of "honesty" IS social incompetence. And the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 04:30 PM
6

Why would I tell them? It's not for them to know. I am not obliged to be utterly open about every dark thought I have. Nobody is. There's a tacit understanding between adults that there are some things that we don't necessarily talk about until we're very close. Doing otherwise is a sign of jarring social incompetence. And sure, I don't know what they do in secret. But most people are normal, so I'm sure that it can't be too bad. And if it is then I am confident that my basic social skills will …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 03:20 PM
12

Men who do that are caught between their own desires and the compulsion to mindlessly reinforce outdated gender-stereotypes, because that's all they know and accept for themselves. There's really no sense to it at all. But what can you expect from someone who is simply drifting along in the stream of culture and ideas, without ever being able to critically examine anything for himself? Not much, honestly. Of course they don't have coherent views. It'd be a surprise if they did.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 03:10 PM
20

I would trust myself. Everyone has dark, fucked-up thoughts sometimes, that's just what it means to be human. If everything was laid bare, then sure it'd scare people off. But again, I think that's true for most people. But they still lead normal, well-adjusted lives and it never matters. I know who I am deep down, and I'm comfortable with it. Because I'm human, and I trust that everyone else is too. It's not a big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 02:47 PM
1

have you considered that you might just be socially incompetent
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/22 03:12 PM
19

"Yikes men will literally cosplay friendship in the hopes of being able to ram their dick in someone." yeah, they can generally tell the difference between someone actually trying to get to know them, and someone only pretending that they want to get to know them because it hopefully increases their chances of getting laid. Just look at how you're framing this: "Go the friends route", the fact that you see it as a "route" that leads to your actual goal (getting your dick wet), proves that you ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/22 02:54 PM
1

"Yikes men will literally cosplay friendship in the hopes of being able to ram their dick in someone." yeah, they can generally tell the difference between someone actually trying to get to know them, and someone only pretending that they want to get to know them because it hopefully increases their chances of getting laid. Just look at how you're framing this: "Go the friends route", the fact that you see it as a "route" that leads to your actual goal (getting your dick wet), proves that you ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/22 02:33 PM
13

normal people who form normal relationships with other normal people. If you ever think that these aren't the vast majority of any given population then you live in a bubble that's so absurd, you're honestly not worth talking or listening to.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 02:06 AM
2

I'm not saying that humans are magical, I'm saying they're markedly different from other animals in ways that make a purely instinct-based view on humans both nonsensical and problematic. Of course my view seems naive if you're only willing to engage with an extreme caricature of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 10:39 PM
5

if you got nothing to say, maybe don't post on here in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 10:19 PM
8

I really don't like your perspective. It's true that humans, like animals, are driven by their biological programming. But to view people as animals controlled by their instinctual drives is a hugely misguided and damaging perspective. First of all, it ignores the fact that humans have the power of choice and free will. We are not blind to our biological programming, and we are free to make decisions that defy our biological programming. For example, we may have an instinct to fight when threate…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 09:39 PM
1

likely due to a combination of factors. One is the increasing visibility of queer relationships in media, including books, movies, and television shows. This has given straight women more exposure to gay relationships, allowing them to explore them in a safe, non-threatening way. Another factor is that many straight women find gay relationships more relatable than straight relationships. In a heteronormative society, there can be a lot of pressure for straight relationships to be a certain way, …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/22 08:47 PM
2

you didn't even understand the point I was making. Holy shit, if that's the best you can do then it's really all over. Just going to block you now. Truly one of the dumbest people I've ever had the displeasure of chatting with.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/22 12:44 AM
1

You can't make people ashamed, they already feel shame, you're just holding up a mirror. I don't know how to even begin talking to people who would deny something like the fact that shaming people works. Humans are social animals. Obviously they cave to social pressure. Shaming others works. It's called social stigmatization, and society has done this since forever - sometimes for good reasons and sometimes for shitty and unnecessary reasons. Like holy damn are you clueless to deny something lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 11:45 PM
1

try not contradicting yourself next time bro. Also I'm a guy lmao, but the condescension that seeps in when ppl like you think they've identified a female ("honey", "baby") never ceases to amuse me. Have a nice day and try to be a bit more logical going forward, because this was pretty fucking bad. Just in short, so you can learn from your mistakes: "it's the same thing" ⇒⇐ "most want both" you'll figure it out one day.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/22 07:20 PM
1

I don't trust someone who doesn't understand very straightforward implications of their own opinions to have coherent points. Also sweet of you to call me baby, you gonna buy me dinner next then? Keep it up.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/22 04:23 PM
1

"Majority of them want both kind of attentions" -> implication = some of the don't. You clearly don't know what you're saying. Pointless conversation.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/22 02:25 PM
1

Meeeh, it is same shit only branded differently ​ Majority of them want both kind of attentions so is it the same shit then, or not? You admit that some will want only one kind and not the other, but then you say that it's the same? Make up your mind. Not going to have much faith in some random guys psychoanalysis when you can't even go two paragraphs without a blatant contradiction.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/22 12:54 PM
0

think of attention-seekers what you will, but this is clearly a dumb point. The type of attention that an unwanted suitor personally gives you is clearly very different from the attention that the anonymous crowd on social media gives you. It's perfectly understandable that some would want one but not the other kind of attention, so there's no hypocrisy there. Only because you refer to it with the same word, doesn't mean it's the same thing. Use your brain.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/22 11:54 AM
2

Maybe I wasn’t clear but I’m not “judging” hoes, I just don’t want to wife one. eeeeeh if you say so. It's been my experience that people who subscribe to the RP overwhelmingly judge promiscuous women. If you say that you're the rare exception then I believe you, but I think we both know what the common opinion of "hoes" is around those parts. And even you as someone who isn't judging them appears to see it as a negative quality in women (since you wouldn't want to marry one), but apparently as …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 03:58 PM
2

The truth is these women would still sleep around whether I contributed or not so I don’t see my conduct as a problem. everyone can argue that, including the women. By the same token they could say "I can just sleep around, the other women will still sleep around anyways, so I don't see my conduct as a problem". See how that works? You made an argument that can be used to justify pretty much anything. "individual behavior X is okay because it does not affect society at large". Cool. But then you…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 03:27 PM
5

Even if I grant you that, I'm not accusing you of being a hoe. I'm accusing you of perpetuating hoe-culture by being a willing and enthusiastic participant. If you think that hoe-culture is bad for society and the modern state of dating, then you still have to admit that you're guilty of contributing to it. Hoe culture could not exist without a steady supply of men like you who are enabling the hoes by having sex with them. So why is it fine for you to judge women for being hoes when you are wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 12:30 PM
4

Do you acknowledge the hypocrisy of valuing the rejection of hoe culture in her while you wholeheartedly accepted hoe culture yourself and happily participated in it beforehand? Happy it worked out for the both of you tho, all the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 10:40 AM
-3

Men losing their jobs greatly increases divorce chances too. this is only meaningful when you compare it to chance of divorce when women lose their jobs. No shit something that greatly increases stress in a relationship will lead to divorce, everyone already knows that. Pointless thing to bring up without a frame of reference. ​ no matter how you spin it Women are usually the ones filing for divorce and things like abuse, medical issues, cheating aren’t high on the list. also completely irreleva…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 05:18 AM
2

You could make sure that what they did is known in their social circle. Publicly branding someone as a cheater can ruin someones social standing. Apart from that, the best revenge is moving on and living your best life. I don't think it's a smart idea to have laws against infidelity, unless you're a fan of the government trying to insert itself into the most private part of your life. Adults have the liberty to be huge assholes to each other, and that includes betraying their partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 11:58 AM
1

hey, did you know that your experience isn't representative of everyone's experience, and that extrapolating from it so hard and giving advice like this is invalid?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 05:38 PM
3

I think deep down everyone has been hurt badly by members of the opposite sex that you’re drawn to stances that vilify them. personally, I think a lot of this redpill shit isn't really the result of one bad experience with the opposite sex. Instead, it's the result of a longer process of alienation, not fitting in with your peer group and then the desperate grasping for a worldview that explains why you're such a loser, but explains it in a way that also lets you maintain your ego; i.e. somethin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 10:31 AM
1

First off, having trauma is not an "error." Secondly, people can decide themselves whether or not they're ready to date, and they might very well be even with trauma. Thirdly, don't be such a fucking loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 10:25 AM
1

There are many men who have complained about the inequalities of the casual sex market and there are many women who have complained about being pumped and dumped, plated or otherwise used by guys for sex. I don't think that it's just a "me issue". and there are many who don't complain and are having a blast. Your point? Assholes who don't give a fuck about anyone but themselves have always existed and will always exist. This means nothing. ​ First article: Paywall. Second article: Some catholic …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 12:36 AM
5

here's the thing, in the minds of the men who slutshame, women can only do wrong either way. You don't wait? "Slut." You wait? "Why aren't you putting out you stupid bitch, you're wasting my time." The type of person that slutshames never had any respect for women in the first place. They don't have a coherent ideology, you can tell because they don't even apply the same logic to themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:18 PM
1

you've literally read nothing I said if you think that this is a solid rebuttal. It's a wrap then.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:05 PM
1

"Machiavellians and success." women prefer assholes is a bit different from "sociopaths might be able to manipulate some people into staying with them and also sometimes make a lot of money" While this is true that the resources of a sociopathic CEO might attract potential partners (the same way that a really pretty woman with a shitty personality might attract men), their victims will also most likely be utterly miserable. So this isn't exactly something to strive for. Also, while it's true tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:01 PM
1

assholes provide more security? You mean selfish people who might drop you at any point in time or fuck you over if they see a benefit in it? Heh. Ok, give me your data then let's go. Better lead with your definition of asshole then.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:25 PM
1

To which my dad rebutted. “Well no I’m talking from experience” ok, and there's a million of people who say the opposite and who are also talking from experience. So what now? Fact of the matter: Nobody gives a fuck about anecdotes. They're worthless. There's a million different people out there, who experience a million different things, and have their experiences and perceptions changed by a million different biases. Why the fuck would anyone care about someones ultra biased anecdotes? So we g…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:20 PM
1

we didn't evolve to seek partners that would provide security? Money might not have been there, but thankfully we have brains that let us extrapolate and identify which traits might be indicative of security, and there's also social norms that mold our behavior. You're just grasping at straws here. Whenever people make an argument from evolution on here, it's usually some dumb fucking shit so I'm not surprised at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:13 PM
13

tfw "someone hot trying to fuck you doesn't cure trauma" is now a bluepilled take. I've read some insane shit on this sub, but this is a new low.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:05 PM
8

oh yeah that's definitely how it works bro, for sure. lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 08:55 PM
-1

glad you're having fun, person who thinks that "X should not be done because it harms countless people" is a morally neutral statement merely discussing a personal view with no implication for what policies that person might like to see whatsoever. lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 08:30 PM
0

I don't get how you're missing basic implications, and yet here we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 08:27 PM
-2

"people should only have sex with people they love" "not doing this harms countless men, including me!" oh yeah, totally neutral statements bro, definitely not heavily hinting at a moral prescription, nothing to see here! Fuck me, I guess. My bad. I shouldn't talk to someone with lacking comprehension and who will only ever see stuff that's literally written, completely missing implications and subtext. Why would I even bother? My fault, seriously. I'm so sorry to have inflicted anything beyond …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 08:21 PM
1

I think it's fine to have different views, but it becomes a problem when you start projecting them onto everyone else and demand that they should live like you do. This may only be done with very, VERY basic things such as human rights, where I think we can agree that this is something that ought to be upheld by everyone. So for example, if it's his opinion that he should only have sex with someone he loves, then I take no issue with that. Sure, I think it's a bit silly but if that is what he wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 08:17 PM
-1

That was not a fit. I'm putting him down because he's acting like a manchild who pretends that his mental issues are everyone's responsibility, when in reality they're noones responsibility but his own. ​ Yes. Personal values are personal. He never said no one should ever do it because muh feelings. That's absolutely what he's saying, you're just lacking reading comprehension. He pretty clearly said that "lots of people" are being hurt by it and that it's something that should not be done, so th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 08:05 PM
2

I used to do the “lie back and think of England” thing. oh no.. well I'm glad you found a way that works better for you. And maybe it's not too bad either that some men aren't willing to adjust their expectations for you, because in the process they may reveal that they care a little bit too much about themselves, and a wee bit too little about you!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 07:09 PM
5

Yes, "you are a member of X population group, therefore I assess the risk of cheating to be Y", is a very human and not autistic way to think about people that you date. Personally I'd go with my personal judgement based on social skills, prior experiences and general knowledge about how people work, but I guess if you wanna whip out the statistics and judge people based on a slight disparity between the averages of two populations, then knock yourself out. Are you roleplaying as an insurance co…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 07:01 PM
6

giving a timeframe may help, so they don't need to think that they might be waiting for a year. But at some point you should also consider that someone who is straight up leaving over this, might also not be the sort of person you'd want to be with. I mean think about it. If they leave it's either beacuse don't trust your explanation, or because they don't care for your explanation. Either is bad. I'd hope that a good partner would be able to accept you as you are and be willing to wait until th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 06:58 PM
5

Are you telling them why you want to wait or are you just not being very clear about it? Because again, "It's something very intimate for me and I only enjoy it with someone I know really well and get along with great." sounds like a valid reason to me that any man who cares about your pleasure should be able to accept. On the other hand, if you're not being clear about it they might assume something different about you, like that it's just a simple issue of missing chemistry and that you're not…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 06:46 PM
3

but the same logic applies there, while a segment of the population might have a higher number of average partners, the individual doesn't. So why even judge the individual by what group they belong to? Acting like that would only make sense if you have no way to gain information about them otherwise, which is obviously wrong because if you're planning to fuck them I hope you're also planning to get to know them a little first. Unless we're talking only one-night-stands here. But we're not, are …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 06:41 PM
5

that's fair and I think that's a valid reason, that reasonable partners should be able to accept. Personally, I think in these cases the limit will probably depend on how much time you spend with each other, as you'll get to know them a lot quicker if you spend more time.I think if you go on a lot of dates, you can get to know someone reasonably well within a month, and then diminishing returns start kicking in hard. Everything beyond that would require a lot more investment, so at that point I …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 06:39 PM
-4

no offense, but that sounds like a you-problem. Basically saying "I will make MY OWN mental issues YOUR problem and tell YOU that YOU'RE not allowed to have fun now or else I will feel bad!!". uuuh no. Grow up. Other adults aren't responsible for your own mental hang-ups and insecurities. You're describing the mentality of a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 06:34 PM
1

and what is your reasoning? Also just so you know, your response just now had nothing to do with what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 06:26 PM
4

but it's not riskier, because you're not dating an entire segment of the population. You're just dating one guy. This is like when you have one woman and one man in a room, you just say that "this particular man" must be a worse driver because men on average have more traffic accidents than women. Invalid. The average across a huge population doesn't allow you to determine how an individual ranks. So even if I accept the premise that bisexual men cheat more (which I don't), that still says nothi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 06:25 PM
4

why do people need to be in love to have sex? It's also just a fun and pleasurable physical activity, so why does love need to be a factor? I'm not denying that love can and usually does enhance the activity, but it's by no means necessary for sex to be enjoyable and healthy. So why pretend that it's a prerequisite? Makes no sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 06:19 PM
62

If it doesn't feel like you're waiting to be comfortable and it starts feeling like a mindgame or a "strategy" instead, you've passed that point. There may be good reasons to wait longer. Maybe you're a virgin, maybe you have trauma, maybe you've just had a really bad breakup and aren't emotionally ready, maybe your ex died, maybe there's a medical issue, maybe you're just the sort of person for who sex is so extremely intimate that you're only willing to share it with someone you know extremely…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 06:14 PM
4

I think there's a difference between not letting something get to you and deciding to ignore it completely, pretending that there's nothing wrong with it. I don't let it get to me either, but I still have it in me to say "hey, this is kinda an asshole opinion get fucked". I think we can (and maybe even should) do both. Dating and sex is one area where I think people can be as discriminatory as they want I guess. I believe it very much depends on their reasoning. Basing it off merely physical stu…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 06:08 PM
13

For those couples at least it can kind of come from nowhere, I guess, so it’s not as hurtful. Bisexual people are basically saying up front this is a possibility. Too much energy expended for too little effort. That’s as risky as banging Chad or Tyrone. anyone can cheat on you. This is the most blatant grasping at straws I've ever seen. ​ If he’s bisexual that means you AREN’T on a level playing field with the competition. You might as well be competing with God! and the competition isn't at a l…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 06:05 PM
6

I wouldn't expect any bi man to be upset if a random loser online who is most likely undesireable in the first place doesn't want to date them, but I would expect them to be upset about unfair and irrational prejudices against them. Prejudices suck, do they not? It's okay to be upset when you come across them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 05:51 PM
1

Just Google how to block people on reddit, it's very simple to do and does not require you to report anyone. Glad to help.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 12:38 AM
1

Obviously wrong since children can also be described as kind when interacting with adults, even though they have zero power in that dynamic. If a child gives me a cookie then that is still an act of kindness. Conversely, someone in a position of power can obviously still be nice to me as well. In other words, it has nothing to do with power dynamics. You're just inventing shit on the fly here. Your other definition is absolute ass too, like kindness is being nice when you could not have been. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 12:36 AM
1

If a single flair disturbs you that much, there's always the block function. Always funny to see the reactions to it though. I like it better when there's more indignation though, this one was quite boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 12:25 AM
0

You said "exactly" as if you understood what I said and then immediately went on to do the opposite of what I suggested, which is to go for an anecdote-based narrative instead of going with data. Good luck with that strategy, and prepare to reliably be wrong about most things in life. Again, 2/3 of all people are in relationships and the average number of sexual partners is like 10. You either live in an extremely weird bubble, or (more likely) you're just dead wrong and need to rethink a couple…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 11:26 PM
-1

I don't give a shit about anecdotes. For every anecdote like yours there's one that says the opposite, so... The data tells the clearest picture. Most aren't struggling, period.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 09:50 PM
2

threesomes, homosexual relationships, sampling bias, false reporting...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 09:46 PM
1

Depends on the country. I believe it's 7 in the US, slightly higher for men than for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 06:06 PM
3

because there's more to a relationship than sex? Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 04:15 PM
31

the best way is to get off this sub and mingle with real people
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 04:03 PM
1

thanks for your insightful comment, you seem like the sort of person that has a lot to say
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 03:59 PM
2

my partner knows that I'm a degenerate shitposter so I'm not very concerned. Everyone else probably doesn't speak english well enough to understand what I'm posting about, so who cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 02:28 PM
26

posting the same thread multiple times doesn't make your premise any less wrong. The majority of all people are in committed relationships, and are therefore not struggling at all (since they've already succeeded). The average number of sexual partners is pretty high, and no this isn't just because gigachads fuck 500 women a night and skew the average that way. Stop it. 6-9 guys aren't struggling. Get out of your bubble. This is fucking weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 02:27 PM
3

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 12:26 PM
3

accept not except
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 12:22 PM
4

Yeah I mean his premise is just wrong. Idk how to talk to people who start off their argument with "ok, so we agree that the sky is green and now let me tell you what this says about modern dating". At that point there's just nothing left to say, haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 12:22 PM
9

they don't struggle, you're just living in a bubble. In what world does a 9/10 struggle? What, you think everyone but the top 5% just stopped having sex now? Lmao. This sub is fucking weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 12:15 PM
46

ambition is attractive when it's backed by a realistic chance at results. Baseless ambition that will pretty obviously result in nothing is not attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 10:57 PM
20

spends an ungodly amount of time thinking about the bar that others need to clear so he can avoid thinking about the trainwreck that his own existence is
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 10:11 PM
1

He just responded to you with "that's very true but" and then didn't change his mind at all. Further proof that types like that simply can not process information at all. You nuked his entire premise, he admits that you did, and then he just moves on like nothing happened. I don't get how people like that operate. Actual NPC, just saying his lines. Zero reflection going on. This is why talking to redpillers is a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:09 PM
1

not really fair. Super fucking pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 02:54 PM
1

ah yes, women were super equal in the 60s too, I love me some historical revisionism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marital_rape_in_the_United_States#1970s:_change_begins Read. A. Book.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 07:23 AM
1

yeah pretty much. Remember when women didn't have equal rights and were second after the husband? Time to read a book my dude, learn a little bit about history.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 06:59 AM
1

that's fair, and like most proponents of social justice I throw the term around extremely loosely. I just remember skimming this article a few years ago and thinking to myself that most of these ideas on there really aren't all that stupid. So now I just run with it. I generally get along with liberals too, unless they've dipped their toes into libertarian territory where they start saying things like "capitalism works best without ANY regulations whatsoever reeeeeee" But we're extremely off-top…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 06:38 AM
1

the sjw tag is mostly just to fuck with people and because it gets me funny reactions. I don't really vibe with the stereotypical sjw, but I do think that social justify is a worthy goal. I mean what's not to like about social justice? Sounds pretty based to me. It gets me everytime when people go "hurrr ur an sjw hurr durr", never ceases to amuse me really.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 06:16 AM
1

Can also be said as “ex falso quodlibet” or “from falsehood, anything follows.” You can prove anything “true” logically if you start from false premises. The way you phrase it implies that you can sometimes still get the correct answer from incorrect assumptions. In reality, they didn’t come to the right conclusion, reality just happened to aligned with the predictive model rather than it being a consequences of the model. That was the point you were making but it’s better to describe it in term…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 05:28 AM
1

I would, if these were stats that weren't very well known already. If it's something obscure and yet relevant to the discussion, or something brand new. But these stats are very well known already, plus we're on a sub where you I expect you should be familiar with them in the first place also supported by everyones lived experience unless you never leave your basement EXTREMELY easy to find on your own Thus, I didn't consider it necessary, and I think it's also kind of telling that they were pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 04:19 AM
2

copium
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 04:09 AM
3

fucks sake, you guys are actually too lazy. For sexual partners: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n-keystat.htm https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/average-number-of-sexual-partners For single/not single: https://www.statista.com/statistics/242254/number-of-us-households-by-type/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/242022/number-of-single-person-households-in-the-us/ https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/a-profile-of-single-americans/ you guys are actually so…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 03:32 AM
1

jesus man, fucking truuue. You just know how much they'd show off if their strats were actually working. They don't. So they're not working. Q.E.D., fucking got em.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 02:57 AM
3

"I think the idea of giving women something they haven’t exactly earned or done anything to get that thing will make them maybe like you more, but respect you less." I think this probably depends a lot on the circumstances of the present, the person you give it to, what kind of present it is, how your relationship was with them before the first date, how you give the present... like I'm not sure if a generalization is useful here. If the present feels cheap and uncalled for, they will probably v…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 02:56 AM
3

The reason why I believe that you don't know jack about statistics are as follows: ​ Also I hope you are aware 50% of all people is ~4 billion humans. almost no study like that like that will collect data globally. Cultural differences between countries are too big, so numbers will differ by a lot to a point where they have no bearing on what you're trying to study. Also, the work you'd have to do to sample every single country is so completely out of proportion, this is pretty much never done. …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 02:42 AM
3

source: google it. And obviously babies won't be counted in that statistic, if that's what you're wondering. And they will also only look at one country, USUALLY. I'm curious if you know how these statistics work? These are extremely strange points to make for you. I'm guessing you don't know then.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 11:29 PM
8

I feel sorry for your daughter, if what you say is true (which I doubt)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 11:25 PM
3

You're getting off-track and not even responding to what I said. You argued that women are only attracted to a small subset of men. Real world data obviously disproves that. If what you said was true, a huge percentage of men would actually struggle hard to get relationships. They don't. Like not at all. Please respond to what I say and don't give me irrelevant shit about power in the sexual marketplace. I never mentioned any of that, and it's not relevant to what I was saying. Did you even unde…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 11:00 PM
11

if TRP actually tipped the scales back into the favour of men, it wouldn't be filled with people that couldn't land a date to save their lives. And besides, what on earth is that framing. "Tip the scales in their favour"? What do you think dating is? A game men play AGAINST women? Like you're trying to trick her so you can fuck her? And you win when you have sex? Rhethorical question because I already know the answer, but goddamn way to tell on yourself. Notlikethis.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 10:43 PM
5

I'm curious, what do you think are "classically RP"-views that are NOT shared by BP-communities but are also not sexist/misogynyst? This is not a trick-question, I'm just genuinely curious if there are some, because you seem like a reasonable person to me that also seems to have a somewhat positive opinion of the RP-community. I'm definitely not opposed to taking ideas from communities that I otherwise disagree with. If the ideas are good.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 10:40 PM
-1

The most obvious point is that you're only looking at a very particular subset of women on dating apps. And you're looking at them in a VERY particular environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 10:23 PM
9

while it's maybe not encouraged, I think it's easy to see how any redpill-space would naturally attract people like that. There's a lot of misogynyst undertones in redpill messaging, so the step from there to whatever the fuck is going on with OP isn't that large.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 09:45 PM
0

i feel sorry for your partner. Hopefully they can move on soon. Provided that what you say is true, which I honestly don't really believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 08:31 PM
2

you're included in "you people", so of course you don't. I'm commenting on your disturbing thought-process and what it implies for your chances on the dating-market.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 08:22 PM
17

or maybe it's because you're a sociopath and any self-respecting woman senses that from a mile away. I mean just look at this post of yours lmao. Holy moly.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 08:20 PM
13

yeah me too, you can just tell that these redpillers are profoundly unhappy
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 08:11 PM
1

well sure, if you're willing to employ unethical means then I guess it's worth talking about it to you. Suit yourself though, cause I'm not gonna be part of that conversation. And neither will anyone else who still has a shred of sanity left.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 08:09 PM
35

you're not thinking like a sociopath
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 08:00 PM
1

What is that pivot? not a pivot, it's the main fucking point. That's what I started out with. Not gonna read the rest because you're clearly not understanding anything I'm saying there. Don't be so stupid. ​ Talking about averages is pointless when a vastly unequal distribution is at play. I even brought up the bottom percentiles because I knew that you were gonna say it otherwise. And then you did it anyways. Either you don't know what percentiles are, or you didn't read. ​ Is that your knock-o…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:57 PM
28

and you people wonder why you're single
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:48 PM
9

You already have these sorts of policies were men are seen as better material to be sacrificed in wars, it didn't tear apart society when it was deemed acceptable that 6% of men between the age of 18-30 got killed in WW2 vs 0% of women. not exactly ethical, is it? ​ Besides, this isn't even about making men "less desirable", if anything it's an effort to make both men and women equally desirable. men are already desireable enough. Most men have no issues finding a partner. The average number of …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:24 PM
1

only ridiculous if you live in a bubble
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:20 PM
2

stay single and unhappy. You've made your choice. gl in the redpill community, I bet it's going to be a very constructive and helpful time that will totally not create a bitter and utterly unsuccessful individual :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:10 PM
12

If you look at that in vacuum then maybe it'd be alright, but you have to see that policies like this will inevitably affect peoples perceptions and change their value judgements. When the government decides that an entire gender is less desireable than the other and implements policies to reflect that, you're in for a very very bad time. Sexism is already bad enough as is, no reason to pour oil on the fire. I'd rather live in a society where things are equitable. Also, there aren't enough IVF p…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:06 PM
1

the average women doesn't either, stop being a misogynyst POS. Or alternatively, keep going and stay single and unhappy. Remember point #4.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 07:00 PM
24

There's no way to achieve this with ethical means, so this entire conversation is utterly pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 06:47 PM
2

failing hard on #4
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 06:25 PM
5

1 in 250 males, mind you. I'd say that's pretty rare. Probably the 1 odd filipino immigrant. I'm guessing if you're going into the "white" ethnicity, the percentage will be MUCH lower than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 06:01 PM
1

nah dude, I just reserve the high quality shit for people that actually got something to say
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:56 PM
3

based and loner pilled
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:55 PM
2

you're doing it wrong then, gg.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:45 PM
1

the real reason I have this tag is because it let's me filter out everyone who simply judges people at face value, without reading what they're saying. If people have an extremely negative response based on a tag, I know they're not worth talking to. But keep it a secret, ok? Else it'll stop working! jk, it'll never stop working. If there's one thing I can rely on, it's the existence of superficial morons that would rather judge someone based on how they present themselves than on the content of…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:43 PM
3

first off, if you're that short as a guy you're in the bottom .4%. Not exactly representative, and you can always make it difficult by picking examples of people that are far out of the norm. You're more likely to miss a limb than being that short as a guy in the US (yes, I checked). That aside, I suppose you'd just date shorter women. Of those, there are still plenty. And even women that are taller than you might still be attracted to you if you're a cool dude. Improvise, adapt, overcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:42 PM
3

I mean I was just making fun of a loser fuck, but you can call it that too if you want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:37 PM
34

"The debate then shifts to women then saying words to the effect of "So what? Sorry. I can't make myself attracted to what I'm not attracted to. Yes, maybe we are only attracted to a fairly small subset of men and yes, this does mean a lot of genuinely good, kind and honest men among the male population will end up disappointed*, but attraction isn't something that can be controlled. Sorry. I understand its tough but well....? sorry..." (This is a reasonable response by the way)."* The most inco…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:15 PM
6

Since you're still here, point 1 definitely applies to you. Point 2 and 4 are universal and apply always. For point 3 just skip the haircut and then it applies as well. Unless you're already fashionable as fuck. Are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:05 PM
3

I was talking about people with shitty haircuts and messy hair, which tends to be most guys. Doesn't really apply to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 04:58 PM
3

I enjoy challenging peoples perspectives on shit that they believe they know
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 04:54 PM
14

the last one might be hard if you're a misogynyst piece of shit, but normal people would find it remarkably easy. I can personally attest to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 04:53 PM
6

this is very true. More generally "get your fucking life in order", and having a decent job is 100% part of that. Great addition, I'll try to think of this when this question comes up the next time, thanks buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 04:40 PM
14

can't help you then. Chances are there's something else you're doing wrong, but it could be any number of things so it's impossible to say without knowing you personally. But this is the best general advice I can give, and it should work for the vast majority of people, provided you're not a complete weirdo. Most likely is that you're actually not doing what I specified properly but are in denial about it. You're already at least ignoring point 1, since you're still here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 03:57 PM
2

I calmly explained how it's a platitude, and how it's wrong. I've even used a counterexample to demonstrate it. Seems pretty logical to me. Or maybe if you're so smart you could point out the part that wasn't logical, so we can have a logical discussion about it like logical people usually do. How on earth you got "emotion over logic" from my post is honestly beyond me. Seems to me like this is something you just want to believe about my post rather than it being something that you actually dedu…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 03:19 PM
1

"no u"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 03:13 PM
1

not really, this "extreme situations require extreme solutions" is just one of these platitudes that people thoughtlessly say because it sounds nice, even though it's not remotely true. There's lots of those. "What doesn't kill you makes you stronger" is another one, completely thoughtless nonsense but it does sound nice and can even seem true if you don't think about it. Whenever people base their views or actions on one of these, you know you're talking to an NPC.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 02:57 PM
167

for the love of god, get off this subreddit. The advice on here is AWFUL and if you listen to it too much you will absolutely end up in a self-defeating cycle that will ruin your chances of ever being with someone for a long time. Get out while you can interact more with real people irl, go to social gatherings, get to networking put work into your physical appearance, get a haircut, change your wardrobe etc. be genuinely interested in other people and treat women like you treat everyone else
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 02:47 PM
6

first off, it's not an extreme situation. You can't find a partner because you're undesireable. That's not an extreme situation. It's a pretty ordinary situation. Secondly, not all extreme situations require extreme solutions. If a plane is going down then that's an extreme situation, but the solution might be something completely ordinary like turning the engine back on. So this platitude isn't only completely wrong, it's also transparently wrong, like anyone with a functioning brain could imme…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 02:39 PM
76

I wonder why people don't move to a country with a completely different culture, where you don't speak the language, giving up everything you have in your country of birth, come on it's easy! "just move to a different continent" is one of the most stereotypically naive 15-year old opinions you could possibly have, completely ignoring the reality of most peoples lives. It's not that easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 01:46 PM
3

oMg Ur jUsT tRigGerEd haha
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 12:47 PM
2

That's one of the most cringe adages I've ever heard of, it's just the correct mix of desperation and disrespect. If your mother could read this, she'd be fucking ashamed of you. Why don't you show her? See what she thinks.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 02:03 AM
2

you're REALLY slow on the uptake, aren't you
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 12:24 AM
7

This is something that's so particular and "out there", I'm pretty certain you're just gonna have to pay for it. But this isn't a fetish-subreddit. So I suggest you take this somewhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 10:08 PM
6

the only takeaway here is that apparently a few mean comments on IG by deranged people that don't have a life counts as a news story. They must really be starving for stuff to fill their slot with. Now the even better question is why you believe that a throwaway newsstory is evidence for some huge cultural shift, especially when all they're basing their story on is a few mean comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 09:23 PM
1

I'm not trying to argue with you, I'm just making fun of you because you're a socially incompetent moron. You even gave me the cringe psychoanalysis to boot. Just look at yourself, you know nothing about me, and the only "argument" I gave you is that you're an idiot because you clearly can't read between the lines and understand what "women aren't animals" means. Then in response you give me all this talk about my ego, etc. How can I not laugh at you? You're ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 06:08 PM
0

Of course I know enough taxonomy to realise that homo sapiens belongs to the Kingdom animalia, I'm not a dumbass like you. At the same time, that's CLEARLY not what I meant when I said that "women aren't animals". What I was actually saying, which everyone with minimal social skills understands, is that you shouldn't treat women like you treat (not-human) animals. That's what people generally mean when they say "women aren't animals", or when they make similar statements. The hilarity of social …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 05:30 PM
3

amazing insightful comment
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 05:19 PM
73

I've noticed that I started reading this sub for comedy, anyone else feel the same way lately? This guy really describes people as if he's David Attenborough on national geographics, sitting in a bush while watching a fucking gazelle jump around or something. ​ Through observing, I've noticed the alpha male gaze is addictive for women. In exchange for the alpha male gaze, women will preen or extenuate their curves, stretch their feminine figure. At times they will do this shamelessly, perhaps ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 02:54 PM
3

women aren't animals, get a clue. Someone ought to slap you in the face. "Mating preference" "proliferate phase" what the fuck dude. You're actually insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 10:15 AM
13

the real question is how do people honestly buy this alpha beta nonsense without feeling stupid? How can they propose a model that's so blatantly black and white and claim that it's accurately describing the way people enter relationships? I'm dumbfounded every time I come across this nonsense, like I just can't take it seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 11:57 PM
4

\citation needed])
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 01:32 AM
1

Get a life
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 04:18 PM
4

I'm not saying that all generalisations are bad, some can be very useful. But to say that your particular brand of insecurity must necessarily apply to all men is a very telling kind of generalisation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 03:06 PM
5

Knowing that someone cheated on you isn't quite the same as knowing they had a life before you came along. But once again, whatever fancy explanation you imagine to justify your belief that everyone thinks the way you do (and everyone who doesn't lives in denial), the fact remains that people are different. And not everyone's ego is so fragile that it feels critically challenged by the thought of a woman having sexual experiences before they came to know you. Sorry you feel that way, but not eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 02:18 PM
4

This is the only correct answer. Just work on yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 01:51 PM
5

Wanting it to be so doesn't make it so, buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 01:43 PM
6

But you're not talking about a general rule, else you would have agreed with the 1% in the OP. Who is lying now? Anyway, not interested in talking with extremists. Your lack of imagination and empathy is extremely boring to me. You assume everyone thinks and feels like you, and if they don't they must be lying. No wonder you're never able to develop. An honest exchange of ideas is impossible for you. Seek help. Blocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 01:10 PM
3

I've called you an extremist because extremists such as you tend to deal on absolutes, where you generalise entire swathes of the population. Aka "all men, all women" etc. It's a pretty damning giveaway. People are more complicated than that, but your views don't allow for nuance, so in your mind everyone is the same. Hallmark of extremism. Apparently you can not conceive of men that have more liberal views and genuinely don't mind someone's sexual past. You can't conceive of a man that doesn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 12:54 PM
4

Extremist detected
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 12:38 PM
0

Who is throwing a tantrum? There are a few women in there saying that some men care because they're insecure or controlling, and that men shouldn't care because someone's sexual past isn't their business. That's it. That's your basis for this post? Seriously? Unbelievable.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 10:49 AM
-1

I'm not twisting anything, you just don't have a clue about what you're saying. When you're contradicting yourself one post down, we know things are bad. Lots of men care about the sexual past of women (some due to insecurities, some because they're controlling), and obviously women are aware of this. I have no clue why you'd ever want to pretend otherwise. Trying really hard to make them look irrational, aren't you? This whole thread is just dumb as fuck. You're wasting your own and everyone's …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 10:20 AM
0

You literally admitted just now that women acknowledge that men often do care, and that women view it very negatively when they do. Does that sound more like a shouldn't or like a don't? Think fast now, you got this. You're so close!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 10:12 AM
1

The only thing that can enlighten people like you is months of therapy and an intervention that forces you to get back in touch with the real world and real people. All beyond the scope of a reddit comment. Your understanding of how normal people operate is so twisted, there's literally no way for me to untangle it. I understand the psychology behind it, but again.. It doesn't matter. Seek help.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 10:09 AM
24

Women don't claim this. Women claim that men shouldn't care, not that they don't care. False premise, false conclusion, bad post. There's no contradiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 10:06 AM
2

This sub is really just dating advice by unsuccessful dumbfucks for unsuccessful dumbfucks. I have no idea why anyone would listen to this shit. It's so patently obvious that OP has zero experience with women, same as the people who listen to this crap. Enjoy your toxic relationships, or more realistically your lack of relationships. Jesus Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 09:58 AM
13

"how I met ur mom ruined dating culture - find out everything that's wrong with it" Could be one of these shitty clickbait articles, and when you click it you get a virus. Alternatively: "How I met ur mom" is just a standard romcom, and like all romcoms that run for too long they eventually need to find new pairings to keep things interesting. But I guess you can always overthink it and chalk it up to undue shady cultural influencing. Also funny how you single out the women in the show for "hopp…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 01:41 PM
5

You said that wars are started because society needs to get rid of excess men. In your OP. It's right there. You say that this is the prime cause and the other stuff is made up excuses. Then you changed it just now to "men fight for resources". I can read. Just admit that you changed your story without realising it. Come on you can do it. Can we get a little bit of intellectual honesty in here! And maybe if you wanna go real hard, you can think on what this implies about your thought process! Al…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 06:53 AM
5

I honestly believe that half of these redpill coaches are genuinely insane themselves. It's just an all around sad situation that results in a lot of unnecessary loneliness, lots of young men being stuck with a mindset that prevents self-improvement and only places blame externally... And the occasional mass-shooting. I mean just look at OP. Poor guy is so confused he changed his own theory in the comments and didn't even realise it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 06:49 AM
2

Sick burn bro, you really got me there. Not sure if I'll recover.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 06:46 AM
1

The guy who makes up random crackpot theories on why wars are started because he read one statistic about how there are men are born than women is above being a random online dumbfuck? You guys have zero concept of what a reasonable opinion looks like. Its half hilarious half sad to see. The only saving grace is that you're probably 17 years old. You'll grow out of it. I hope. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 06:45 AM
2

I only take feedback from people who don't believe random online dumbfucks. Having standards is important.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 06:35 AM
2

Some random moron online reading one statistic and immediately starting to connect it to everything isn't a perspective, it's nonsensical drivel. There's a saying. "Have an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out." If you're honestly entertaining the thought of listening to someone like OP and taking them serious on an intellectual level, your brain is probably somewhere on the sidewalk already. So I recommend you find it and put it back in. I don't know everything. Not by a long sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 06:13 AM
2

If you agree a little with his side then you might wanna get checked as well, because nothing he said is rational in the least. Guy saw one statistic and then frantically tried to integrate it into his teenage doomer-worldview, no fucks given. And to hilarious effect, I mean how absorbed in your own thinking do you have to be that absurd statements like "homelessness is a neglected issue because of a 5% male excess" seem reasonable to you? Or that whole theory of everything - wars are started be…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 05:34 AM
22

That's why wars are started? OP is reaching so hard, it's almost painful. If you needed proof that 95% of redpill theory is a clusterfuck of just-so-stories and made up drivel, look no further than this post. This is why wars are started, something something 80/20, also apparently society has an innate sense for a 5% excess and that's why we don't care about homeless people ooh yes it's all coming together I'm such a genius. Please for the love of God, touch some grass.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 04:42 AM
1

They're both important, obviously. And according to your needs and preferences, one may be more important to you than the other. Hard to call a general trend here, as every couple is different. If I were to claim one thing, I'd say at the start of a relationship, the physical connection is more important. The emotional connection grows more important over time and eventually becomes more important than the physical one. Tendentially.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 03:29 AM
10

"ban divorces, chain women down in the kitchen, make life go back to how it was in the 50s REEEEE" always what it's about at the end with people like OP
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 03:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter