TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Raju1461 Archive

View 1 post and 370 comments by Raju1461 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Power: This is the assumption that men must work toward obtaining power and status (social and financial) so they can gain the respect of others.” If this is part of toxic masculinity, we all should strive to be more and more toxic and more masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 03:55 PM
2

Simps and white knights will crawl buck naked on broken glass to help them out.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 08:31 AM
1

He and his daughter were being a dick but the punishment was too harsh.
/r/PussyPass18/03/22 06:59 AM
70

I sorta agree but not completely. This is a case of standards. Men don't usually have any such requirements as long as you are not obese or anorexic. Women do have higher expectations. You mention dating profiles. Take a guess who is usually supposed to not only message first but open it with an impressive opening line to get her attention? Just a hey from men would be seen as not putting enough efforts. A woman sending just a hi isn't that big of a deal apparently. I have never used any dating …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 12:15 PM
9

Using new Census data and the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, this brief finds that black and white children from intact homes are significantly more likely to be flourishing economically, educationally, and socially on the three outcomes examined here: child poverty, education, and incarceration. Source.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 08:06 AM
5

Yes. It won't be the driving factor but will be a significant factor for sure. Hedonism will always lead to societal decline. More Casual sex, leads to higher divorce rates, single moms and children not being raised in stable households with strong values. Single moms are one of the leading reasons for many of the problems plaguing African-American culture. Yes, we can have a fulfilling life without relationships & family if you have goals and pursue them. But a vast majority of people are not l…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 07:56 AM
9

You wanna know if TBP Believes in Dual-Mating? Find any non-TRP or even anti-TRP dating related subs. Take r/relationship_advice. Fina a popular post that is kinda indicative of Dual-Mating strategy. Take a look at the comments. It is filled with TBP and they vehemently deny it. The guy is usually called insecure and that he needs to deal with it. Anyone suggesting Dual-Mating is downvoted. The only time they will not do that is when it's extremely obvious that it's dual mating and they can't pu…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 06:18 PM
6

Aaaand how is the guy supposed to know that they're unwanted without approaching her in some way first? Simple. Be Charles Xavier.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 06:04 PM
5

There is a net benefit to society that you seem to be missing. Women will really start crying if we start making decisions based on what is a net benefit to society. Women are historically the ones taking care of children But that was all because tyrannical patriarchal men were oppressing women. We want to bring that back now? but putting women on the front lines will risk the future of your country in a way that putting the men won't. I agree. However, if forcing men on the front lines is accep…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 08:39 PM
14

Benefits or downfalls outside of that are subjective True. Some people do really think Women who fled Ukraine and are staying in Poland now are having it worse than men fighting in Ukraine.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 04:06 PM
18

Maybe 1 person. Doesn't matter. This idea that men are being forced to stay to protect their women and children is ridiculous. Think about where you are right now and imagine it's being attacked and taken from you. I will stay & fight or help in anyway I can but if I wasn't interested in fighting but was forced to stay because I am a man, you bet I would expect a preferential treatment for men, in their favor btw, once the war is over.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 04:02 PM
7

War doesn't help but defending your country does help during invasion.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 03:59 PM
13

If Ukraine wins: Many men were forced to die protecting women. So Ukrainian women did benefit more than Ukrainian men. If Ukraine loses: All the men forced behind to stay are now either dead or POW along with those who volunteered while many women have escaped and living safely in a different country. Seems to me, women benefit more but whatever. Make of that what you will. LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 03:54 PM
2

Men are more capable than woman but given that the ones who are invading/murdering also mostly men, it's not an easy win. If not for men, Ukraine would be lost in a day.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 03:48 PM
3

Why does this rule even exist? I mean, sometimes we just want to agree with OP. What is the reason behind such a rule?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 03:47 PM
27

Men without any female relatives or children are also being forced to stay and fight. For them, all women in Ukraine are random.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 03:44 PM
11

While Ukraine may not uphold those western standards, west does right? Feminists who want equal rights do uphold those western standards? Why are they not trying to raise awareness about this sexist practice? All I have heard and even believed at some point is that Feminists fight for both genders and are against all sexist practices.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 03:43 PM
18

So you want equal rights but you don't want equality when its time to fight to defend those rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 03:41 PM
23

So equality when it benefits women but not when it benefits men? LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 03:33 PM
2

You do have some idea of male loneliness then. I was wrong about that. I still disagree that it is on the same level. Male Loneliness vs Female loneliness. Women have a lot of support structures that men don't. The very few spaces that men have are banned and termed toxic sexist bs and men are reinforced with toxic masculinity bs. That support structure is what prevents women from going full on femcel and develop a hatred for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:19 AM
1

Good to know. I didn't make any claim specific to you & simply asked because I understand there are incidents where women might sleep with someone who they aren't initially attracted to but find them attractive later due to variety of reasons. I disagree that it is as frequent as sleeping with someone based on initial attraction though. What I was trying to say earlier was that the people that I slept with based off looks were never the good ones. That's your personal experience. I hope you all …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 05:44 AM
6

And I stand by it. Unless you are telling me you face similar level of contempt and mockery for craving meaningful attention from men as men do when they are starved for the same from women. Even if not directly targeted at one such lonely guy, he is frequently reminded of how much of a loser he is. Women aren't. If that is the case, then I will agree that you do understand male loneliness.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 05:08 PM
2

Women do not care about looks anywhere near as much as men And yet that is usually a requirement to get the interview. They will notice and even become aroused by an attractive man, but all that does is get him the interview. If looks alone are enough to get an Interview, they are pretty high on the priority list, if not the top. It takes absolutely nothing at all for that interest to go out the window when one of the other boxes isn’t checked. Only one box. Game. If he is even decent at it, tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 05:04 PM
1

Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 02:47 PM
1

Gee. I wonder why incels didn't think of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 02:41 PM
0

There's just a better way of going about having fuck buddies than to put a virgin girl on the spot about it. I think we all know those intentions weren't selfless. I agree their intentions were just sex but unless they were pressuring you, I wouldn't say they were bad intentions, at-least from the perspective of a modern hook-up culture. I don't really see this much IRL. Well, then your experience is different than vast majority of men in west. And both men and women make fun of guys for being a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 01:59 PM
1

Okay. Maybe wrong choice of words. But you did have many choices. Ranging from bad to atleast okay. (I don't believe everyone had a bad intention like you claim). The problem was people trying to convince me otherwise, especially when the consequences of changing my mind would have been prletty serious. That's mostly on women and male feminists. They are the ones set out to liberate every women sexually. Even if by force. 😂 I never mocked men for that Good to know. Doesn't change the fact that m…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 01:29 PM
10

Exception doesn't disprove the rule. For every one women who is attention starved, there are probably a few dozen men equally attention starved.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 01:25 PM
6

I experienced social pressure both to be a virgin and to no be a virgin. See, the thing is, women can't win. Not even remotely comparable. You stay a virgin, one section praises you and other may call you a prude at worst. Men stay a virgin, only mockery from pretty much every section. Men are, in fact, privileged that they don't have people coming at them with malicious offers. LMFAO. We all have our privileges and struggles. Being overwhelmed with choices isn't even on the same plane of strugg…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 01:20 PM
3

That's a sweet story. Good luck to both of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 07:53 AM
3

I think, you should maybe slightly rephrase the question. Most answers here are considering Chad = Someone who is considered a 9/10 guy with conventional good looks and personality. AFBB, doesn't necessarily mean that kind of Alpha. While there are certain traits that can be considered alpha in general, women have varied perspective on what is alpha. AFBB usually means a girl will fuck the guys who she finds attractive/hot without a care about his other aspects but when it comes to marriage, her…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 07:53 AM
0

You have never met anyone who told you that they care. You realize people you meet in real life are also the ones on Social Media. And unlike real life, they get to say their honest thoughts with no consequences, thanks to the anonymity.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 07:35 AM
12

According to her other comment: I mean my husband is hot AND has a personality I get along with. So she had a husband who is hot, her friend since 8th grade and a personality that she gets along with but he was considered for a romantic partner after she slept with 30+ guys. LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 07:31 AM
3

How many people did you have booty calls with because they had great personalities but average looks?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 07:27 AM
19

When I see men through the internet, it's hard to tell why they're bitter. I waited 20 years to lose my virginity, even though I had offers. For incels, that's the difference. There is a social pressure to not be a virgin and they don't have offers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 06:48 AM
20

I've been there and know how it feels. I'm upset at how hateful some men can get towards women. I agree that getting hateful towards women is bad, you have no idea how it feels. I don't know you but a woman having a dry spell still, usually, gets a lot of attention compared to men. And most of the times, it's not involuntary. Take a look at this post I saw yesterday to see how much men crave any meaningful attention and affection. They are starved.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 06:45 AM
6

Remember the 3x rule. And many times, things like BJ are excluded in that count.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 06:19 AM
2

I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 06:05 AM
1

This tracks with everything I would expect from a redpiller. Yes. We expect people to do the job they are paid for. It's called taking responsibility. Something you all seem unaware of. There was no practical reason to prevent women from owning and inheriting property. There was no practical reason for preventing them from seeking higher education. Are you intentionally being daft? Where did I say practical reason? I said practical CONSEQUENCE. Read again. Practical reason was there for why wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:56 PM
1

No idea, but if I’m falling for someone you’d better believe I plan to ruin him for all other women and make sure I’m the best he’s ever had. Good to know. I appreciate that. We aren't talking about women like you then. Some people try it once and realize it’s not for them. And what do you have to say about those who tried with one of their old exes, liked it. Continued it with a few other exes but wouldn't do the same for current bf? Let me guess, she suddenly dislikes anal? LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 02:39 PM
3

Nope. Get lost with your strawman arguments. If you treat a guy worse than you did your ex, he will judge you. Whine all you want. Call it a red-flag, inceldom, insecurity. I don't give a damn.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 02:37 PM
2

I agree that you shouldn't give them a chance to tell their side. But that is not the way to punish cheaters. The way to punish cheaters is by actually making them suffer. Breakup or no-fault divorce is no way making them suffer. They will try to keep you only for selfish reasons. After you leave them, they will just move on to the next target with no real consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 12:24 PM
5

How do you interpret her waiting for sex as being treated worse? Simple. She wanted to fuck the ex but not the current bf. Atleast not as much as her ex. Otherwise, she wouldn't make him wait when she didn't do the same for her ex. Why is your worth based on someone else having sex with you? It isn't. But how much she values me as a date is definitely dependent on multiple factors one of which is how much she wants to fuck me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 08:52 AM
1

On the fact that no amount of emotional labor from a wife to a husband is worth a billion. Even compounded over decades. Let alone 35 Billion USD.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:17 AM
2

LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:15 AM
2

Completely agreed. Imagine waiting to have sex with her and later find out she went on another date between your 1st two dates and fucked the guy. OOF.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:15 AM
3

All that nuance is for very specific scenarios. Neither me, nor most in TRP would say "She gave anal to that older guy but doesn't with me." if she was indeed pressured. We are talking about what a woman did willingly and happily for her ex but not doing the same for her current bf. And as a person, giving her an ultimatum to let you do the same thing or leave is kind of nonsensical way to view her past. There should be no ultimatum. Even if she does that thing after ultimatum, it's forced. Not …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:12 AM
2

Yeah, it's the man who is being treated worse than her ex who has issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:06 AM
2

People change, maybe she realized she prefers more romance or getting to know a person first before jumping into bed. That would be a valid if there is enough time between when she would fuck on 1st date and has over time changed to not fuck on the 1st date and prefer romance. Usually it's, I have had my fun and now I want to find someone nice to settle down. If he is really nice, let me shit test him by making him wait. I want someone to explain why some men are so concerned about what a woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:05 AM
4

Perhaps the person learned the error of quick hook ups and realized that the way to get a quality LTR is to take it slow. Makes zero sense. Fuck the guy on 1st date, if he measures up in other areas, continue towards a LTR or dump him. Alternatively, he may also dump you right after because he got sex which is a good thing because you had fun with the sex and you can now move one. Or Make the guy wait and then risk him dumping you when he gets sex after making 2 months wait. Wasted 2 months and …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:56 AM
1

This is big I don't put my cart back at the grocery because that's "work" and they have "people" for that energy. If you are paid to work and putting cart back at the grocery is one of those jobs, you should be doing it. Not expecting others to do it for you. Firstly, the men who decided to lock women out of the economic system were tyrants. Men didn't hold a global discussion and decide "Women should be out of the economic system." It was a practical consequence of biological differences betwee…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:48 AM
2

Traditional gender roles isn't being taken advantage of. Because both will be contributing towards the house in their own way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 06:47 PM
1

Agreed. However, Spouse who loves Me > roommate who likes me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 01:53 PM
1

Marriages without Raw Lust are worse. You’re not going to be attracted to the 70 yr old version of your spouse as you were at 25. You will still love the person if one of the reasons you loved your spouse at the beginning was raw lust. Not the only reason but one of the reasons. Without that, you won't. It will be just 2 roommates who like each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 11:24 AM
2

That has not been my experience in general. I am from India with pretty much every single person I know being a conservative. Indian conservatives are more old-fashioned than in west and I can say with confidence that not just people from my gen but from my aunts & uncles, many of them (not all obviously) have done whatever they can to provide for their wives & children. Their family has always been the priority. Some of them are very sexists and selfish but many aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 10:59 AM
5

It's rude as fuck to create more work for anyone just because someone wants to be an entitled, lazy asshole. Nobody is creating more work. Keeping things where they belong is already a work. Since household work are her share, she is expected to do it. Another redpill adjacent sub just ran a moderator written post about how women should lose their right to consent within marriage because sex is a necessary provision on her part. TRP is vast and has many ideas. Doesn't mean every post is supporte…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 10:58 AM
4

Not even close. She now has to handle the domestic duties of a dead weight who believes his career exempts him from lifting a pinky around the house. So while she may, for example, make sure she sorts and tidies her laundry while waiting for laundry day, he's may decide to leave his shit everywhere so she has to go hunting for it. You ae just proving my point. Yes, he shouldn't leave shit everywhere and do his half if she wasn't a SAHM. Since she is, it's on her to take care of household burden …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 09:41 AM
10

Post about women having too much expectation from men. One of the reasons women end marriages first: Their expectations from men aren't met. Do you see why that would be relevant now?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 08:43 AM
5

for the low price of feeding and clothing Feeding, clothing, sheltering and in a way that matches his lifestyle. If he earns 100K per month, whatever is spent is usually equally shared between both. She gets far more than basic necessities. tidy, clean and detailed home that he never needs to help with, grocery shopping completed with his favorite foods stocked, homemade meals, laundry done, domestic management items wrangled, out of sight and mind She will be doing this for both of them not jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 08:37 AM
2

How they relate to each other personally shouldn't matter into how much she deserves after the divorce. What kinda logic is that? "Oh I loved him so much and did so much emotional labor for him. Give me 1 Billion for that". LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 07:37 AM
3

Agreed. If you are a rich person, while you are working to make even more for yourself and you family, the wife is most probably not doing anything for the family. She will have people to do everything at home and for raising kids. If she is doing a job, it is for herself, not for her family. Bu the day divorce happens, he has to give up half of what he earned. Bezos is a good example. Yes, she helped but was her contribution really anywhere close to 50 Billion USD?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 05:34 AM
4

Yeah, I should have removed the children. I simply added the "who aren't taking advantage of them" to your sentence. Let me correct that: Men instinctually want to provide for women who aren't taking advantage of them. Providing for children is not a gendered issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 05:29 AM
3

What about the guys nowadays that think they are the prize and want women to Persue them and do for them like men should be with women? Where are they? Except maybe top 5%, none do so. It's the women who most think they are the prize and that her husband should thank his stars she chose him.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 04:59 AM
3

There are a lot of single women who cannot find men who earn more than they do and would rather stay single. Thanks for acknowledging that and confirming OPs point. LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 04:54 AM
5

Men instinctually want to provide for women and children who aren't taking advantage of them. I would think that part is obvious and didn't need being spelled out.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 04:53 AM
18

A study in Sweden, which is at the top among egalitarian countries in regards to gender, revealed that divorce rates increase as women are promoted more. Unsurpisingly, they didn't bother to ask which party is initiating the divorce and try to blame men as being unable to deal with a higher earning spouse. While Rickne’s research did not measure which party initiated divorce in each case, one theory is that the husbands of top managers who got promoted found the situation harder to deal with tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 04:51 AM
3

If he is the beta, she wouldn't like to have sex with him. Exception if she has certain kinks for weak men. She might give him star-fish sex or a BJ to make him happy as long he provides for her. a lot of replies say that women don't enjoy sex with their LTR partners, if that's the case, don't marry her. Good advise in theory. But many men don't know that. Most men who were chosen as a last resort settling, really think their wives love them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 06:53 PM
0

Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 12:33 PM
0

but abortion isn’t legal everywhere Everywhere that is paper abortion is legal, abortion is also legal. The same can't be said vice-versa. The hypocrisy in those places is my point. You’re just saying things that most reasonable people agree with it’s like saying racism bad and thinking you’ve done something More like saying "if white people aren't allowed to says slurs against black people, black people should also be not allowed to say slurs against white people". Saying "racism is bad" is far…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 12:18 PM
3

That is not universal. In some places you can, in some places you can't. I am aware of that. And in many cases, it has to be approved by court unlike abortion. In abortion, she doesn't even have to ask the father. Dubay v. Wells.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:46 AM
2

If abortion is legal, men should have the right to a financial abortion. No Obligation towards the child. No rights over the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 09:47 AM
1

My question is, if A) sex work is considered work. B) unemployment benefits are only to those who are unable to get work and C) all women can get sex work and make livable income, why should any woman be eligible for unemployment benefits? Why is there an exception for sex work?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 02:55 PM
1

Believe it or not they do exist. I do believe they exist. There is no limit for human degeneracy. But if that is legalized, you must also legalize it when they do it because their only other option is homelessness. And given that is a job in such high demand, no women would ever be unemployed except by choice. NON-PIMPED Why? What's wrong is a service-provider is pimped? All the pimp does is help the sale of service between 2 consenting adults. You want to make that illegal? NON-COERCED Again. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 01:54 PM
1

Yes, the government should not intervene in what two consenting adults (that are not coerced or pimped) want to do. I would say being forced to blow a guy because you need money to buy food is coercing. Wouldn't you? Pimps just facilitate the exchange of service for money between 2 consenting adults. Just like many people in many services do. My father's job for a long time was facilitating the exchange of service (transporting goods) for money between 2 consenting parties. Should they all be il…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 01:26 PM
2

Charisma, Money, shared hobbies, traits that make him attractive to his gf, sheer luck, the girl having unconventional preferences like a kink for dad bods and balding men, the guy let go after he landed her.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 05:17 AM
1

I agree it is indeed demeaning and glad they are atleast some men with self-respect enough to not date such women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 04:46 AM
1

Not you as in individually but the group of people who want sex work to be treated the same as other works.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 04:45 AM
1

People in general are not pushed towards professions with high risk of bodily harm to the worker. What's the bodily harm in Phone Sex services? None. So what reason do people have to not push women towards that profession when they are struggling? As the inherent higher risk nature of them makes it different. Legalizing it would reduce risk of body harm to the sex worker and bring it to average. Right? As such, by you own logic, there would be no reason for people to not push women towards these…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 01:19 PM
21

We would. Here's what we won't do: Claim we have now matured. We go for personality and not looks. That we truly love the women when we chose her only because we couldn't lock down the 10/10 or because she would be a good wife and a mother. Those who do are fuckboys and manwhores equally deserving of criticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 08:13 AM
2

Sex work is already legal. It’s prostitution that isn’t. What's the difference? Prostitution can have the same protections as stripping, adult film acting, phone sex services etc Which are usually not the same as usual services. Unemployed women are not encouraged to do those roles either. Why not? It's just work right? Just providing a service. Your predictions of what it would mean are way off. My Predictions are what it SHOULD mean if the people who want to treat sex work the same as other se…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 07:36 AM
5

Why would you expect a 29 year old woman not to have sexual experience ? There is a difference between having sexual experience and being a slut.. The fact that she's seeked it is a sign of healthy person with a normal sex drive. Being a slut is a sign of a person with a STD or a abnormally high sex drive or low self esteem or all three. The only reason to care about this is if : 1) You're religious. 2) Insecurity 3rd reason: Some people disagree with the whole concept of casual sex and wouldn't…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 07:31 AM
1

When people want to legalize sex work, are they also okay with treating sex as nothing more than a service similar to other services? Would you feel equally bad for a guy who had to get a job at McD to avoid going homeless as you would if a girl had to become an escort to avoid going homeless? I wouldn't. I would feel worse for the girl and not much for the guy. If fucking for money is legal, Sex-work manage should also be legal right? What about unemployment benefits? No Job will no longer be a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 06:54 AM
3

No. Not if they are 18-22. At that age, income, character, LTR compatibility etc are irrelevant. Older woman, Late 20s or later would pick the older brother only if the can't find a rich version of the younger brother. Dual-Mating = Being subtle about being a gold digger.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 07:39 PM
-15

But you do desire to act on them. That is disturbing enough.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 09:16 AM
-1

WTF. Why would women find that shit arousing? Even men shouldn't find it arousing.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 09:16 AM
5

Fucking hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 03:17 AM
1

You won't have any problem finding broke ones for Casual Sex or Short-term dating. But for LTR, you may have to date down and lower your standards from Bruce Wayne to an average guy. Good luck though.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 07:18 PM
1

You wanted examples from outside certain subreddits. I gave you a subreddit that has evidence of women doing so outside reddit itself. And now you simply claim it's a fantasy. BTW, that isn't the idea. The idea is that the majority of post-wall single women are ‘where are all the good men’-ing. You don't know Red Pill Points. You deny evidence when provided. Literally women themselves admitting but nope, it's a fantasy. Classic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 07:16 PM
3

I am guessing you will consider Tinder profiles as "outside of certain subreddits". Right? Well, then you are in luck. As it happens, Many men have seen 1000s of tinder profiles saying that. For future reference, we have saved them all in that subreddit, you know in case someone asks where are such women. Take a look. And your analogies suck. Let me offer you better versions. If I go to r/professors and see professors posting 1000s of video evidence of some bad shit done by students and say "so …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 07:10 PM
3

Both can be true. Not gonna date down because when you want to raise a family & have kids, you want someone equal or better. But attraction and lust? That doesn't work on logic. So for short-term dating or Casual sex, dark triad assholes are the more successful ones. For long-term dating & marriage, you go for the nice dude who is you equal or better.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 06:40 PM
4

r/whereareallthegoodmen 😂😁
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 06:37 PM
6

I think it's not just being a toxic asshole but someone who gives the bad boy vibes and exhibits the dark triad. There is excitement and thrill in that. I have read a few studies about this so I thought I will link them and tried to google. The 1st result is an attempt to refute this idea and it's hilariously bad. This is the article. They are trying to refute this article which says woman want to fuck bad boys and has a scientific explanation based on a study. This study explores the possibilit…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 06:29 PM
4

Online Dating is Broken. Tinder algorithms works fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 10:39 AM
8

I maybe wrong because I haven't given it much thought or even tried to look it up but I feel the issue is simply that what works for women in terms of therapy doesn't necessarily work for men and that is something that most people don't take into account when telling people to open up and be vulnerable. I am a guy and I have only once been vulnerable to my friend. I had long heard this open up bs and I did hoping it might ease it. He was very comforting/understanding but that didn't do anything …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 05:10 AM
11

Our agreement established that she got one mistake like that free of charge for every two years that we spend together. That was the one she got. The next one would end the relationship. Bruh. That's some next level assertiveness. Keep it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 05:01 AM
2

Yeah right. TRP is wrong on custody & divorce topics. Have heard of 1000s of stories were men were taken to cleaners. Barely any where women were. But sure, you definitely are right and men don't suffer with alimony and custody cases at all. 125 Million+ kids are born every year. Even being conservative at 1% fraud rate, that's million+ fathers each year and yet you don't find it a boogeyman. Guess millions of men being victims of paternity fraud every year isn't a big deal for you. Of course lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:59 PM
2

I can attest to that. In 2016, I was pretty much woke SJW and far-left. All my info on red pill came from left spaces. Hated that shit so much. Discovered it later in around 2018 and while I don't agree with all of it, it has it's merits.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 12:58 PM
1

What makes you think they have luck in dating? There is no evidence either way but given the general trends, they probably don't have any success.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 12:56 PM
4

“wow that shit is dumb.” You could point out some of the actual TRP shit that is dumb. Not what you heard from someone who hates TRP. IS AF/BB a myth? is 20/80 not a reality? Is it a myth that woman hold the upper hand in dating & Sex? Is Dual Mating a Myth? Are paternity frauds impossible? Looks don't matter? Is it a myth that women are favored in custody battles? That men get burned far more in divorces than woman? Which of these are dumb shits? Are all the profiles on r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 12:55 PM
1

that instead of taking the time to work on themselves to authentically present themselves as desirable And you think that is so easy that you don't need any kind of guidance? TRP is that guidance. Laugh at us all you want. The normal living ones who laugh at us are the ones to join us when they got burned in a relationship or divorce or false rape accusation or paternity fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 12:45 PM
3

men are disadvantaged in most walks of life vs. women In what walks are women being disadvantaged? I can list many where men are: Custody Battles, Alimony, leniency for crimes, education etc. women’s sexual agency and choices having a moral component (aka: slut-shaming is acceptable) And men are shamed for not being able to get laid. alpha/beta male hierarchy Exists. Whether we like it or not. Most people wouldn't fall neatly into either categories but there is certainly a hierarchy. A good look…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 12:41 PM
1

Women engage in AF/BB. You will be called a mysoginyst incel. When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairness and expects or, even bett…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 12:23 PM
1

Both can be true. You are stupid if you follow only tingles but at the same time, you shouldn't be in a relationship with someone who you don't have tingles for. Chase someone with tingles and also has LTR qualities. Nobody is gonna hate you for that. Honestly, nobody hates women (except maybe some toxic incels) for being a chad-chaser who just follows tingles. What most hate is how they pretend that's not what they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 11:13 AM
2

Don't lower you standards. Find someone you are attracted to or stay single. But if you do because you found someone who is lower than your standard but has other things to offer, then be honest about it. Be open that I am with you for the things you can provide and the day you lose that ability is the day I dump you and drag you to the courts if possible. Honestly, it seems your rationalization hamster is on full gears. FYI, Average man usually have more to offer than average woman (except in C…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 05:25 AM
1

Yes. Many are saying that but as much are also saying her to continue the relationship with her fiancé. Not to leave him so he can find someone who feels the spark with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 05:16 AM
1

And yet 1000s of people suggesting her to stay with him despite her not liking him all because he is a good guy. That goes in complete contradiction to what you said: I disagree that this is something that most women here say.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 04:54 AM
2

You: I'm not unnecessarily mean Also you: low-value and unworthy men. Yep. Checks out.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 03:56 AM
1

Random woman and many other 1000s of random woman who think that is perfectly fine. PPD Women are at least aware that this is something men consider as an issue. They are exposed to the idea of dual mating even if they don't agree. For the random women, settling is perfectly normal to the point they actively encourage it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 03:51 AM
3

Apparently that guy is still new and exciting. Not the fiancé though. LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:42 PM
4

its that this girl is getting an adreneline rush from a flirting with a new and exciting guy who’s not her fiancé. Seems she already felt that rush years ago in high school even though she didn't have a fiancé then. I felt a spark of passion that I haven’t felt since I was about 17 years old.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:32 PM
1

Or the ex and fiancé are both good looking but she feels tingles for only one and that isn't her fiancé. That's the more probable version based on the post. Rationalization hamster never stops.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:45 PM
2

Sure, they have to say it in a way she'll actually listen. You know what would be a dumb decision? Cheating and staying with your fiancé. Seems they are trying to help her TO MAKE the dumb decision. Rationalize that shit further and further.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:33 PM
7

she’s running into an old ex. She felt more butterflies from him than she did with her fiance. It sounds like that OP doesn’t really like her bf that much. And yet how many people suggested to stay with him because he is an amazing guy? Way too many.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:26 PM
1

K.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:22 PM
3

Well, then my fellow Indians are lucky. Not me though. I am 6'0. FML.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:18 PM
3

Looks like you got a great thing going. I sincerely every relationship had that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:06 PM
7

men have with being the most physically attractive person their partner has ever been with. No. We are not obsessed about that. Men are more concerned with whether their gf finds them physically attractive. And believe it or not, saying “My bf isn’t the biggest or most attractive guy but he’s so sweet loving and caring and makes me feel heard” doesn't make one think she is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:01 PM
13

Apparently wanting to be desired by your gf is the same as "She should think I am the hottest man on earth".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:59 PM
3

Amen brother.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:57 PM
3

The problem is women don’t have the variety in taste that men have. Shit. Men are then so seriously fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:44 PM
43

I disagree that this is something that most women here say. That is definitely something women say a lot. A recent post that was linked here from relationship_advice sub. I (26f) am engaged to an amazing guy (28m) that I love. Last night I ran into my high school ex (26m) and felt the spark of “young passion.” Pretty much every top comment is suggesting her to go with the fiancé and forget the ex because fiancé is the stable one. Top comment: The person who gives you stability isn’t going to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:43 PM
3

I am an asexual person. But I am very neutral about this. I don't feel pride or shame about this. But I swear after reading all the TRP & FDS & relationship dynamics, I am so fucking glad I am one. I will never ever have to worry about any of this stuff. I can't imagine how crushing it must be to love someone and then find out all this shit. It's not even TRP/FDS that makes me sad because many a times they exaggerate stuff. It's the people who aren't attached to these movements. The ones you fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:34 PM
2

Yeah, nobody is saying we are like Heny Cavill and you should drop your panties the moment you see us. Simply don't be in a relationship in which you don't find your partner attractive and lust after. Attraction is subjective, while vast majority of women would find Chris Hemsworth attractive, there are also those who don't. Individual preferences vary. We mature and accept normal and practical and mundane. Its not settling or beta buxing, its reality, its still a legitimate relationship and its…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 12:06 PM
2

RP or incel guys absolutely freak the fuck out when a guy gets insecure about his partner's dating history. Maybe because when it happens to men, morons like you try to minimize it somehow and still put the blame on Men. And yea his girlfriend is the one being gaslit No. constructed some transactional self victimizing narrative for their relationship Figured it out and she proved he is indeed a victim of a transactional relationship. was in actual lovey dovey love with this guy Newsflash: She is…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 11:39 AM
3

I suggested breaking up. I really wanted him to fight for me and he didn't. He bloody didn't. Would she say the same if it wasn't a gorgeous & stunning guy? Or would he call him a creep?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/22 07:00 AM
5

I used to. I had seen porn only once until I was near 22and then slowly started watching it occasionally. And then in Pandemic, got addicted to it. With WFH I used to get 7 hours more time than usual which I would spend with watching Movies, Series & Porn. Thankfully, that's in the past. I am now porn-free nearing 6 months.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:56 AM
1

I am from Karnataka. I honestly don't think there is a way to stop it. Because it always comes under the guise of freedom & choice and rights. You can't oppose that or you will be labelled a fascist sexist incel who wants to oppress women. A far fetched option would be men going MGTOW in bulk. Not just the bottom 80 but the top 20 as well. And that is near impossible. That's why TRP doesn't care to stop it. Just to use the decline to our advantage and better optimize your benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:36 AM
3

It seems like the incels are the ones losing their shit over it and sympathizing with the whiny bitch who needs to get over himself. More like people with self-respect who wouldn't want to be chosen for material reasons. Instead of leaving the relationship, she starts negging and being intentionally emotionally abusive and trying to make her husband miserable. This guy didn't do that. He mentioned his feelings once over 1.5 years. If the girl who settled down with him can't even deal with that, …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:30 AM
1

Because it's just so common and cliche. I just found it funny how that's the go to response in many cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 07:12 PM
5

I’ve worked with a lawyer who also has the drive Uber all night to barely pay his bills because of a high alimony payment scheduled for the next 10 years. Fuck man. Shit like this is just sad to hear.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 06:59 PM
2

AWALT doesn't mean all women engage in Casual Sex. It means, if all the restrictions, taboo, social guilt, embarrassment, social pressure to not be a slut etc were not present, all women will engage in Casual Sex. I am from India and know women in very conservative parts and in very progressive parts and in between. In conservative parts, they don't have as much freedom as do progressive women. And as expected, conservative women have less casual sex than progressive women. The more progressive …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 06:57 PM
2

I do agree it's very important.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 06:30 PM
2

Those are all fine and good. That should happen in a relationship along with having butterflies for him. If you don't feel that spark or the butterflies, then all of those mean little in a relationship. How about being valued for the way you make her laugh? loled so hard at that. The number of times i have heard women say this, it's borderline cliche.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 06:26 PM
3

Yeah. Being valued for all the comfort and stability you can provide instead for how attractive you are (to her) is really a good thing. LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 06:08 PM
1

Sure, you may not be the most attractive to him but are you attractive to him? If yes, then he isn't settling.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 06:07 PM
2

What you're describing sounds more like the dynamics of an arranged marriage - a man and a woman want a family unit, find someone they can get a long with well enough and voila, My Parents and many marriages here in India are arranged and I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 06:03 PM
1

If a woman is only sexually attracted to the guy, that is for temporary flings. If sexually & romantically attracted to a responsible guy, that is for LTR or marriage. Neither sexually nor romantically attracted but married/LTR with a responsible guy is for settling with a high chance of dead bedrooms.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 05:59 PM
1

Imagine a guy who is always attracted to party going, very progressive, career-focused girl. All his dates were that type. He doesn't ever date an prude introverted conservative SAHM type girl. But then one day he wants to marry and have a family and decides to go for the latter type of girl because he wants someone who will not only be a good wife but a good mother to his children. Is he settling? Yes. Because what he wanted vs what he chose is different.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 05:56 PM
5

I have lurked TRP a lot more than this sub but these CMV questions are gonna radicalize me more towards TRP than any manosphere subreddit did. What more proof do I need that TRP is correct when people who oppose TRP parrot it's ideas but sugarcoat it as practical and rational. This is like the 3rd post on settling in a few days. Do you girls really don't see the problem with this and think this is how genuinely it should be OR just intentionally push this shit to blue pill men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 05:50 PM
10

That's just not how it is for the vast majority of relationships. That's just fucking sad. As unless you are having a marriage and child with your celebrity crush, the ultimate fantasy, how arent you settling? By being with someone you are in-love with. The point is, at least with the women I know, a time comes where you grow up and get into a long term relationship that's feasible, sustainable and practical. But if you don't love the person you are having a feasible, sustainable & practical rel…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 05:45 PM
5

Except in relationship, it is not a job but a person who also has expectations. Your job only wants you to fulfill your responsibilities. It doesn't care if you love it. Your partner on the other hand does.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 05:40 PM
2

How can you know this, unless you grew up and stayed in a small town in which everyone has known everyone else since high school:? You cannot know this with 100% certainty but there are ways to make a good guess. One way is her dating history would give a good guess if she would have. If all she ever dated was Jocks and players who are really good looking, then you can say with 99% certainty she wouldn't have found you attractive. Also, the guy may have objectively improved in the interim. In th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 10:42 AM
2

Oh, I mentioned that because a lot of the RP guys say otherwise and say the only reason you interact with the opposite sex is for...well sex. I think that's less TRP and more the general idea that a boy and a girl can never be friends. Somehow, many people can't imagine a guy & a girl being friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 10:39 AM
3

FDS don't want trad men either, they want hypeasculine men who can support himself and won't be a burden. LMAO. They want someone who can support himself, her and treat her like a queen.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 10:34 AM
8

Red Pillers are not that. They are interested in sleeping around and "plate spinning" (cheating?) and not getting married or having a family. Seemed extremely hypocritical. Hard disagree. There are different parts of Manosphere like PUAs (Plate Spinning), MGTOW (Not getting married) etc. But overall, TRP doesn't encourage sleeping around, be it men or women. It doesn't discourage either. All I have seen are the best ways to improve your chances. Whatever the goal be: Casual Sex or Serious Relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 10:31 AM
3

You'll have to define that one, you guys don't really think men and women can be around each other unless sex is involved. Here's a fun fact: I am an asexual TRP guy. If anything, I don't even think of sex irrespective of who I am around. I am the opposite that. That aside, I understand why you think so but that isn't the case. TRP is all about dating, sex & relationships. So when we talk about guys and girls, the topic is usually about these. You sure can be friends with those of opposite gende…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 08:48 AM
2

Is he THAT awesome? Loss of passion is partly symptom of LTRs and familiarity between 2 people, not only because s Losing spark after being in LTR with someone for a long time is not an issue. If there was indeed spark and it was a healthy relationship, you will most likely form an attachment with the person and will continue to love them irrespective of if the spark remains. Honestly, in most such case, the love itself will keep the spark. Now, if she never had a spark with the guy she settled …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 07:05 AM
2

Men are not entitled to our politeness if they are going to badger us after we've tried giving a polite no. I literally said that's how it should be. Maybe you would move on, but hundreds of others have pushed it and we're frankly tired of being told to be polite and then men pushing our boundaries. Hope you would be okay if men started generalizing in the same way. Imagine a guy started treating women as rude bitches because many of them rejected him rudely instead of a polite no. You would be …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 06:53 AM
2

Sure. If that's the thing that's not a problem. But that's not the case many times. We are talking about scenarios where the girl wouldn't have given him a second look in her prime but now pursues. Why she didn't give him a second look? Coz he is unattractive to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 06:49 AM
2

Because she would much rather prefer to be happy with someone hot than with someone who isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 06:47 AM
6

Not trying to be rude, it's just weird hearing you say this with the flair you have. It's weird anytime I see a Red Piller acknowledge anyone as human. You need to interact more with TRPs. We are not the monsters you think we are. 😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 06:46 AM
3

intentionally trying to make her feel miserable. One comment in almost 2 years while being chosen for material reasons and you all are losing your shit over this. Hell, he only talked further after she asked him for a discussion and he was polite and just stated facts. if this was a woman who looked at her husbands old photos and noticed he was "wasting his best years" on hot surfer girls while she was in med school Wrong attempt. A better reversal would be: if this was a woman who looked at her…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 10:06 PM
4

No they do not. Unless they are living under a rock, most people are aware that men have a higher chances of rejection than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 10:01 PM
4

This Chad is hot to fuck but that is not enough to make me happy. Here is this beta who is not hot to fuck but will make me happy. Let me choose that. That's called settling.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:57 PM
7

Got em. Using their own spells against them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:55 PM
8

All this explanation does is prove those conspiracies. 😂 If your own explanation proves the opponent points, maybe the opponent has a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:53 PM
17

This analogy sucks on multiple levels: A) We are talking about a human being and not an object. One has a feeling. B) You still prefer the apartment if it didn't have all the disadvantages you mentioned. You chose the shabby house only for the conveniences it provides. C) You still find the mansion stunningly beautiful which you enjoy enjoy looking at it from the curb. And think of the one you chose later as: nice (or even a bit shabby), decent house with "good bones". D) You priorities have cha…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:50 PM
11

This is not the norm. That girl literally admitted that she doesn't feel the sexual excitement with her current partner. Pretty much every comment suggests her to stay in that relationship. All of them ae highly upvoted. And you still claim that is the norm? Now don't say it's just a few thousand people out of billion woman. The sample size itself is in 1000s here and 1000s of people fully support that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:49 PM
18

I hate that entire comment section. Pretty much every single comment is suggesting her to remain with the stable guy. But ask them what they think about AF/BB and they would call you incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:44 PM
5

Because there is another factor: Chances of Rejection. A shy guy has a far higher chances of rejection than a shy girl and they both know this. So shy girls take a chance relatively more than shy guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:13 PM
-2

Most of us have dealt with men who don’t take a polite no for an answer and it’s very uncomfortable. How about first polite no and then a mean response? Why is that the go to response? I am assuming you won't follow the same principle of generalization in other instances.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:08 PM
4

They hated him because he told them the truth. The OP is saying that Chads also got rejected. Sure, happens but rarely. Exceptions prove the rule. The more of a Chad you are, the lower chances of rejection. Everything else is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:07 PM
2

Copying from another comment of mine: Think of yourself. If your spouse said for the 1st time after being with him for 2 years, "Guys like me don't get girls when in college but when we get good jobs and they want someone to settle with, we get girls." And then through a series of questions, you also admit that you wouldn't be into him then, what would you next say? "I would you have liked you for your personality?" Or "I may not have found you attractive then but I do now because what I find at…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 08:57 PM
1

it's recognizing that some guys you are attracted to are a bad bargain (because they have character flaws or issues you don't want to deal with) and steering clear of them. Once again, the goal is to find an attractive man who also checks the boxes for things like integrity, kindness and other positive traits See now this poses a question makes me wonder, did you knew that those guys had character flaws and still chose them earlier but later decided to not chose them? Or you didn't know those gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 07:58 PM
1

To them, a woman is either physically attractive or she isn’t. If she is then she is a potential sexual partner. Women also work the exact same. You think they are fucking guys they don't find attractive? they think If she didn’t want to tear off his clothes the first time she laid eyes on him that means she is not attracted to him and never will be. LMAO. Nobody said women should be with only those who they wanted to fuck immediately after seeing. But at the very least she should find them attr…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 04:35 PM
1

If you anticipate women being adverse to admitting that money and/or high social status turns them on, it didn't occur to you that this would benefit YOUR argument? But that isn't what we are asking. We are asking if a woman didn't find a guy attractive but if later, after knowing that he has money and a high social status, they claim they found the guy attractive, is their attraction genuine or not? If they admit Yes, it is genuine, they can spin some justification like you did and put a positi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 04:16 PM
1

I am too tired with that shit now. So I will keep it short. In summary, in her update post, she admitted she didn't find him attractive. And you can't love someone you aren't attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 03:07 PM
1

Nope. You can read or ignore. Not my problem. Now regarding asking in the women, I know better than to ask women a question where one response puts them in a positive light & another in a negative light (shallow) and trust them to be honest about it. LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 02:40 PM
4

Do you not see people you would consider unattractive in relationships every single day? Yes but that doesn't mean they don't find each other attractive. They might find each other attractive while you find the guy unattractive. The idea that only attractive people can be in or be happy in relationships is a narrative peddled by incels and black pillers who want yet another excuse to never try. You have to be attracted to you partner & vice-versa for the relationship to be healthy. Unless you th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 02:35 PM
2

I said Nope but anyway, exceptions don't disprove the rule. Yes, there are very rare possibilities that a girl finds someone's personality & character so amazing that it enhances his physical features in her pov and she genuinely is attracted to him. Not the norm though. But just out of curiosity since you seem such an exception, I took a look at you profile. Look at what I found: Oddly enough, my first two serious relationships involved domestic violence. None since. The only thing I changed wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 12:58 PM
1

Yes it does. Nope. She said she would've liked his personality at minimum then. No. She said she would have only liked his personality. Not his face or looks. We know she didn't find him especially GOOD-LOOKING, but if you have beyond a teenager's understanding of women you know that's only part of the equation for them. Whatever the equation may be, he wouldn't have solved as she clearly stated. And while the equation may contain many variables, physical attraction is a critical variable. I've …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 12:48 PM
1

Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 12:11 PM
1

That's in good part routine for post-college cis het relationships. Agreed. But that disproves that she is invested IN HIM. That was your claim. You didn't back up your opinion that she doesn't love him. Here's my evidence: She didn't find him attractive earlier. Does she find him attractive now? Possible if her preferences changed. And if her preferences have changed, she would have made that point either to him or at-least in the post. Instead of "I would you have liked you for your personalit…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 11:08 AM
1

based on the time frame she gave, they started dating when he was already a physician or about to become one. That's the evidence she is invested for what he can do. As a physician, he pretty much guarantees a stable job, family & marital status. Dude, if you could read minds like that, you'd have better things to do than hang around here Didn't know reading minds is the only way to interpret someone's intentions. Not at all possible to extrapolate intentions from actions right? Secondly, you're…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:50 AM
3

It's not just that. It's also her being into the type of guys that were completely different than him. It's also the fact that she didn't object when he said she would have casual sex with a player but not with him. These things indicate 20 year old wouldn't have found him attractive if they met them. I am guessing you will now ask "Maybe she finds him attractive now? How do you know she doesn't?" Preferences change far less frequently than priorities. And if her preferences have changed, she wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:42 AM
3

Loving someone requires you to be physically attracted. If you don't find them physically attractive, you won't fall in love with them. You may love them as a good friend and a good human being but not as a lover.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:22 AM
2

Her updated post says that. The same user posted an update where she had a talk with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:19 AM
1

Her updated post is all the foundation I need for my claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 08:05 AM
2

What you think of a person’s personality can greatly affect the way you perceive them physically. Yes. But again not usually. Very rarely does a person' personality enhances his physical features to the point she is physically attracted to him. When the average woman could easily hook up with a millionaire supermodel, why would they ever want to choose an average joe? Nobody said she shouldn't have to. But if she didn't chose the average joe then and is now choosing an average Joe, what does tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 08:00 AM
13

You are comparing woman who cant tied down a HVM with men who can't even tie down LVW. Do you see the difference? Former can get sex and relationship if they want as long as they are willing to compromise with a LVM. The latter can't even do that with a LVW.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 07:07 AM
8

It seems to me that women that can't find a high value man to settle down with are just fine living alone with their cats and the occasional girls night out. Because most women have had their fair share of hookups & relationships. Most men on the other hand don't. Find a girl who is a virgin involuntarily when she is 25 and you will find she is probably as much into misandry and despair as a incel who is 25. Men may be more aggressive in expressing that. I would wager a femcel at 25 would be eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 07:03 AM
2

Nope. Those fine qualities can enhance the physical attraction but not make you attractive on their own. No woman is getting the hots for a short avg looking dude because he has some good characteristics.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 05:43 AM
2

am turned off. Agreed. The spaces are usually very toxic as it is filled with angry men who are failures in dating market and those spaces are one of the only places where they can vent. And due to that toxic perception, it can indeed make one less attractive if it is known they frequent those spaces. There is so much more to life than just dating and there is only so much you can put your energy into. While I personally agree with this, I also can't discount how much sex & relationships mean to…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 05:38 AM
1

if you're a woman and you don't branchswing upward from your next partner that means you're settling Nope. We don't say that. Settling is choosing someone you aren't even in love with but like them for material reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 05:12 AM
2

throughout her posts she seems pretty invested in the guy She is invested alright. But not in the guy but for what the guy can do for her. the man is a physician -- arguably the highest-esteemed profession in the world. Exactly. Chosen because working in high-esteemed profession making good money, financially stable etc. Not because she is in love with him. I think you're assuming settling too quickly. I think her update post quite clearly implies she settled. If she didnt settle and found him a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 05:09 AM
4

Most women find their ideal mate after trial and error and after a long search if she wanted this ball player she would have married him LMAO. Nope. Just because she loves the ball player who is a good bf doesn't mean he would be a good husband and a good father to her future kids. So they won't marry him and find someone who can be and marry them even if they aren't in love with the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 05:02 AM
4

You missed the point by a fucking light year. Her being hot earlier is tangential to my post. This is about her not finding him hot & attractive earlier but now she suddenly finds people like him attractive for material reasons. She doesn't actually find him attractive and wouldn't be with him for material reasons. That's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 04:58 AM
4

It is indeed possible but low chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 04:53 AM
5

Maybe his gf would've preferred to date him when he was younger She literally stated she wouldn't have dated him when he was younger. LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 04:53 AM
3

You have to be physically and romantically attracted to someone to be in-love with someone. She clearly isn't physically attracted to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:55 PM
5

If you find someone’s personality attractive, you still find them attractive. But not physically attractive. Finding basketball players more physically attractive is not the same as not finding other people attractive too. But clearly stating you wouldn't have swiped right on them, would have dated them only for personality or not objecting when her bf says you would have casual sex with basketball players but not with me is definitely the same as not finding him physically attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:53 PM
3

No. I define settling as being with someone for material reasons and not being in-love with them. No, I wouldn't argue that men aren't doing this but I would certainly argue that men are less frequent to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:48 PM
3

The part where she said she wouldn't have swiped right or the part where she didn't object to him saying that she wouldn't fuck him without promise of commitment but would fuck a basketball player or she would date him only if she knew his personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:38 PM
6

We are not talking about profession here. We are talking about looks, personality etc. She answered him assuming these features remained same and that she wouldn't have liked him then. So why does she like him now? Either her preferences changed and she genuinely finds him attractive. Or her priorities changed and she still doesn't find him attractive. It's mostly the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:08 PM
6

to make the best out of their situation. They can't do that unless they are aware of their situation. If aware that there options are either find someone who wants them or marry this girl who is settling with him, they can choose what is best for them. Without being aware of it, they will live the rest of their lives under a delusion. So they need to know about the Strategy. conspiracy theories about “dual mating strategy.” Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:04 PM
6

Just don’t blame women (or they men they were with for that matter) for sexing it up in their youths. Nobody is blaming them for that bruh. Do you even understand what AF/BB is? The blame is that you fucked the hot guys, then find the avg dude and lie to them that you love them and find them attractive now because you have matured or some shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:59 PM
3

Any guy who is so upset that he wasn’t hot when he was young can ragequit society today TRPs: You should marry someone who finds you hot not for money. You: Any guy who is so upset that he wasn’t hot when he was young can ragequit society today. WTF are you even on about?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:57 PM
6

A 5/10 white could come to India and he would be treated as if he is Henry Cavill. White worshipping is quite popular here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:55 PM
7

TRP pats itself on the back for making men “aware” of AF/BB but what good does it do if you’re either an ugly 20 year old or a 40 year old without access to a time machine? For a Ugly 20 year old, it would teach them not to waste their time simping and that the only chance they will have is by happenstance where a girl might them attractive with time but not at the first meet. For 40 year old's, it helps them avoid being ripped off by a woman who doesn't love them. Some might be okay with it but…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:54 PM
5

You think the type of woman who would deceive a man for her personal gain would only exploit the betas? She would attempt to exploit the alphas as well. She will just not be as successful. It’s up to him to either find someone who doesn’t consider him settling Agreed. That's why it's important to let them know about AF/BB so they know if they are chosen for settling and make a decision on whether they will be a beta or find someone who considers them the alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:44 PM
3

All of those qualities mean absolutely nothing if you don't desire each other. If you dont find each other hot & attractive. You really telling me that this girl suddenly finds guys like her bf attractive and not the Jocks she earlier dated? That if he suddenly dumped her and she wanted some casual sex and goes to a bar, she will look for the type of guy like her current bf to fuck? Or will she look for the type of guy she used to fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:35 PM
4

And I am President of America.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:30 PM
9

It's like they intentionally miss the point to make their own point. He literally admits that he could have gotten a 20 year old when he was single before meeting her but didn't and does find her attractive otherwise wouldn't be with her. And what do they make out of it? Men literally tells his girlfriend that she’s second rate and he’d much rather be dating a 20 year old skinny girl in college than her. Hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:26 PM
2

Not only that, it’s out of reach for many people to not wind up in a relationship where one or both parties have settled. Settling for something like I want a guy who earns 7 figures but then marrying someone who earns 6 figures isn't a big deal. Settling when you aren't even in love with the guy but with him for other reasons sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:22 PM
6

Notice how she doesn’t bring that up. Bringing that up would only prove his point. LMAO. That's why she doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:20 PM
3

Bruh.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:19 PM
2

TRP never says "We all Settle". If anything when TRPs point out scenarios like this where the girl settled, Blue-Pillers talk about how we all settle and it shouldn't be a big deal. They are the ones who will say "Well, all girls want to fuck Jason Mamoa and all guys want to fuck Emilia Clarke but we can't so we all have to settle". TRP specifically encourages never to be with someone who settled for you. Except if you don't care and just want a trophy wife to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 05:41 PM
3

How do we know this? Was it stated explicitly that she has told him she finds him unattractive? Yes. Read the update. I have linked it as well. She literally states that she wouldn't date him in her younger days. No for casual sex the looks bar is high as it’s the only metric being used. For a LTR the looks bar isn’t low but it’s not sky high as looks alone cannot support a LTR. Nope. If you found someone attractive enough to have a LTR, you also find him attractive enough to fuck. That and look…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 05:37 PM
4

A care free college girl isn’t looking for a stable person, she’s looking for someone equally as care free. Doesn't mean she is suddenly gonna find the guy she thought was avg as hot. He most probably is still avg for her and she isn't attracted but since she wants someone with a stable job, she chooses him. And that was just maturing and changing priorities over the span of a few years. We are both incredibly different people now If you wouldn't have dated him earlier and he remains the same in…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 05:33 PM
10

Well, yeah, people can want what they want. But at the end of the day, usually will buy what they can afford. Except the other person has a right to be upset if he is the best they could afford. All that implies is that the day they can afford something better, he is gonna be dumped. People might "think" they want the flashy car, but realize they can't sustain it's upkeep and it's not reliable. But if you are a millionaire who can afford to sustain upkeep and buy a new one as soon as it's out, y…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 05:28 PM
8

Being poor for the win. LMAO. That's one advantage I guess. You know for sure she is with you because she wants to be with you. Not because you are rich or have a stable job etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 05:24 PM
3

Seeing this as her 'settling' because she was hotter at 20 is incredibly shallow and honestly makes no sense. What? Who said that. He sees this as her settling because she isn't attracted to him. She used to date guys way different then him. And then she admitted that she wouldn't have found him attractive when she was young. At 27 would she rather be with a former college basketball player who runs a car dealership or a doctor? Probably a doctor. Priorities change as people mature. She can be w…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 05:22 PM
4

The comments from TRP and non-TRPs in this case speak for themselves which are correct & which aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 05:15 PM
5

But when speculation of Group-A is overwhelmingly correct, speculations of Group-B are overwhelmingly wrong and Group-B laugher at the speculations of Group-A as absurd, I know which Group I should listen to more.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 04:59 PM
1

Sexual attraction is not only a component in total attraction, but it also changes in response to things that aren't in-your-face bodily features. She might feel sexually attracted to him for reasons that are different for those reasons that made her 20 year old self attracted to a basket ball player. This part I agree. If you meet someone, you may not be immediately attracted to them but with time due to many reasons (personality, characteristic, ethics, shared interests, hobbies), you may star…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 04:57 PM
2

I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 04:47 PM
2

Because she did. See it from her POV Imagine your husband asked you "Would you have dated me if we met in college?" You would either 1) Assume he changed since college. You don't know how he was in college and so you can't say if the college you would have liked him or not. So you won't say Yes or No. Or 2) If you assumed he didn't change, you know for sure if the college you would have liked him or not. So You will either say Yes or No. Which option did the girl in post choose? 2nd one. So her …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 04:44 PM
4

Yes, emotional pain is a possible goal. If she’s fucking him and attracted to him what does it matter that she fucked other men previously? She ISN'T attracted to him. If she participated in casual sex the looks bar is much higher than for a relationship And that's a problem. The looks bar should be similar while character bar should be higher for relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 04:29 PM
9

You want a woman to fuck you in her prime, because you're just as shallow and getting sex with an attractive younger woman is validating to you as a man... Yes, most people want women to fuck them in their prime. Nothing wrong with that. But even if she didn't fuck her husband in her prime, it wouldn't even be problematic or dual mating if she was dating the same type of guy when she was in her prime as she is now. That indicates that you have always been found guys like me attractive. If you we…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 04:27 PM
14

they think high SMV "Stacy" should've committed to an average looking dude in her peak. Why? What sense does that make? They don't though. You can commit to anyone you want. They literally agree that given her choices, why would she choose the avg looking guy? She won't. What they do say is that Stacy's want commitment from avg looking dude after they had their fun with Chad's. She was hotter back then, so she was with her looksmatch. She's less hot now, and still with her looksmatch. If only wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 03:32 PM
4

he should have tried harder when he was younger to attract hotter young women If only success in attracting hot young women was proportional to the effort made. LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 03:22 PM
7

Not a comparable situation. You wouldn't have liked younger version of your husband because he was different then. The girl wouldn't have liked younger version of her husband because he was the same as now and her type was different then.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 03:20 PM
4

Preferences change. Not as frequently as priorities. Why would you call pure physical sexual attraction the only form of "truely wanting" someone, and anything else being a "safety net"? No. I don't say that. But if you truly love someone, it should include both romantic & sexual attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 03:15 PM
7

The honest truth that she would not have given the dude a chance is just going to harm their relationship quality. Only if he wasn't aware of it from the beginning. But since this guy is, he is at peace with it. All she has to do is not bring it up and they could potentially go on like earlier. This is wrong, she loves him, just not in the same way she loved chad. You can want to be a chad you reject it. But her feeings is not "he is a safety net". Everything in her post contradicts it. how many…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 03:10 PM
23

My type had never changed. That's the difference between you and the girl in the post. Her type has changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:56 PM
0

Yeah, you wont die without sex but sex is a very basic need for anyone who isn't asexual. Yes, it is their responsibility. Doesn't mean you just dismiss it as deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:55 PM
2

Alright. Will send you a pm.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:51 PM
2

Well yeah. But as long as he’s getting hot sex, then he shouldn’t be bothered by it. That’s what I’m arguing here. He literally isn't. He is been in a relationship for more than a year and only once has he expressed his thoughts. And even then he isn't complaining or being a victim or anything. He mentioned that he is jealous of those guys once and that's it. After that, the only time he talked about it is when she asked him and even then he was calm and said he had made his peace with it. I don…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:50 PM
8

Because he has made his peace with it but then since it came up, he spoke about it. He can speak his feelings right? He is probably happy about the way she is treating him. He can leave but since he is okay with this situation, he stays. The goal? Not necessary that there must be a goal. Sometimes you just say what you feel. It doesnt need to have any goal. If there was any, I don't know what. Probably to let her know he knows. Probably to hurt her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:46 PM
15

I find it patronizing that TRP thinks that men can’t figure this out The comments on both the subs are a live example that those who arent aware of these TRP ideas, many will remain unaware. That's like the whole point of the post. 1st post was enough for many in this sub to claim that she is settling but everyone in the other 2 subs needed an update where she clearly states she doesn't find him attractive to figure out she is settling. They literally needed to be told that. You still think men …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:43 PM
10

If he isn't happy that her ex was hotter than him He is not unhappy about that. He is unhappy that she doesn't find him attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:36 PM
2

You are getting confused. The statement "doesn't imply he doesn't find you attractive" is in regards to the bf of the commenter I replied to. Not to the couple in the post. I agree with your pov.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:35 PM
3

Yes. My thoughts too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:33 PM
7

Again, no, I didn't make a single edit to the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:33 PM
2

What? BS. I linked all 5 pics and the entire post once. Not a single edit made after I posted it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:32 PM
1

Online dating sucks, most people here also agree that it doesn't show true beauty. She also said she wouldn't have date him if not for his personality even if they met offline. So as far as looks are considered, she doesn't think he is attractive. She doesn't object cause she realised that it would be no point arguing. Possible but she would have atleast mentioned it in the post that that is not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:29 PM
7

That's a possibility. But you would think if that was the possibility, she would atleast let him know that she would have found him slightly attractive. Or if her preferences have changed, she would tell him she finds him more attractive than a basketball player. She said nothing. Not even in the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:26 PM
1

yes but if you’re in love with them you shouldn’t prefer anyone else. I sorta agree??? I guess I am contradicting myself. Changing my mind on a different topic on my own CMV post. LMAO. I think it should be seen as 2 different types of settling. One where you are chosen purely for material reasons but not because you are in-love. Second is where you do love someone and want to be with them but would dump them in in a heartbeat for someone else. Maybe a celeb or some long lost lover. The girl see…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:24 PM
10

Why do you assume she doesn't find him attractive, if anything it seems the opposite. The part where she said she wouldn't have found him attractive enough to swipe right or the part where she didn't object to him saying that she wouldn't fuck him without promise of commitment but would fuck a basketball player. Your bf gets benefit of doubt because neither you nor your bf has posted anything like this. By default, I assume both are in-love in a relationship unless I see anything that indicates …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:14 PM
4

Oh, I do agree with all of that. She is definitely settling. But given he knows that she settled for him and is fine with it, I think he also sees this relationship from a transactional point. If that is the case, he is gonna dump her as soon as they hit the dead bedroom scene.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:12 PM
7

If so, then she is being truthful about what she is attracted to now changing. That's always a possibility that now she finds guys like him Hot and her aesthetic preferences did change. However, I think there is a higher chance of priorities changing with age than that of aesthetic preferences. be happy that she eventually decided that he’s the right type of guy for the older her. Yeah, this seems classic blue pill crap where he should be grateful she chose her. LMAO. Nope. He should be as grate…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:08 PM
0

Agree to disagree. Personally, it's not settling if you are in love with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 02:02 PM
1

Eh I disagree. By that logic, everyone is settling. Everyone wants an ideal partner but nobody gets it. So everyone's settling?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:54 PM
10

You bf may not date you if you were younger but is he in love with you now? Probably yes. Yes, you appreciate different things with age but that doesn't mean you will date someone you don't find attractive because you appreciate stability & security more than love. And guys who were chosen for being a provider will obviously be upset. The guy is upset because he thinks and I agree that she doesn't love him. Honestly, he isn't even upset. He knows it and makes the best of it by fucking someone he…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:51 PM
5

I have linked the update as well. Take a look.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:47 PM
4

Settling doesn't mean he isn't the best. Just that he is someone you aren't attracted to but are together with for some other reason. She may not be the best he prefers but as long as he truly is truly attracted to her, he isn't settling. Same would be the case if he isn't her best but still found him attractive. She said she doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:44 PM
23

He is a Shallow guy. He did say he finds her attractive and wouldn't be with her if he wasn't. He never said she is unappealing. Just less appealing today then she was when she was 9 (not 5) years younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:40 PM
11

The only thing that he should be upset at is the universe for making it that he couldn’t meet her at age 20 She said she wouldn't have found him attractive enough if he met her when she was 20. Dual mating strategy would be if she were having meaningless sex with a guy like that When he said she wouldn't have casual sex him without the promise of commitment but would have had it with the basketball player, she didn't object. Neither to the husband. Nor in the post. Furthermore, as long as physic…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:37 PM
12

Where did she say she settled for him? The part where she said she wouldn't have found him attractive enough to swipe right or the part where she didn't object to him saying that she wouldn't fuck him without promise of commitment but would fuck a basketball player. I’ve dated a guy who had a better looking ex wife than me. Doesn't imply he doesn't find you attractive. Statements of the OP do.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:32 PM
3

This. As long as they are honest and the guy knows he is chosen for reasons other that attraction, it's fine. He is okay with it. She is okay with it. Win-Win for all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:29 PM
14

I doubt it. There is a difference between "I want to fuck someone 20 years older" vs "I wish I had a chance to fuck you at your peak". Also, he did say he is attracted to her and the convo seems very honest. But yeah, there is a possibility he couldn't lock down any hot 20 year old and so settled with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:27 PM
6

They think if you're settling for something, you can't love it That's like the whole point of settling. If you love someone, you aren't settling. Settling in this sense doesn't mean getting married and having family with someone you love. Settling, in this context, means you want to marry/LTR, have kids and so will find someone you aren't in-love with but will be a good husband and father. I'm a physical education teacher. Is that my dream job? Hell no, but I'm very happy with it anyways. Active…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:21 PM
3

Can you read? All men were forced and MANY men it supported. Or do you think every single man currently in Ukraine supports it and doesn't want to leave Ukraine.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:00 PM
2

A bit too vague& broad but reasonable. I would add: - Be honest about your Sexual history, STDs and don't manipulate people. - Don't expect others to share your view of the sex and to treat you the way they treat someone with whom they share a similar view.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 10:05 AM
4

is teaching men to attract women based on what other men believe is “high value.” Or, what other men have observed is considered high value by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:53 AM
1

You talk as if sex isn't one of the basic needs of human beings. We aren't talking about being rejected in an interview to deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 06:40 AM
2

LMAO. Good job painting 80% of men as monsters The reason only 10-20% of men get what they want, is because overcoming the base level instincts natural to humans is HARD WORK. HAHAHAHA.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 06:35 AM
6

strong, powerful leaders When it comes to non-sex related matters. weak pathetic losers When it comes to sex and simping.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 06:33 AM
5

Yes. Also, No rape. So women won't rape men in a matriarchal society? Almost no stealing. What even is the logic behind it?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 06:30 AM
9

In Ukraine, they literally had to force men to stay to avoid the collapse. They can only do so because many men are fine with it. They want women and children to be saved. Imagine if men said they aren't going to fight to save women and children and most men indeed supported that and fought against this conscription, how long before Ukraine falls?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 06:27 AM
9

I haven't looked into it deeply but just one way I think it is related: Lack of father figures. Honestly don't know how valid this is or if I am reaching but this is what first came to my mind after reading your post. And this might even be very offensive to some here. Take America for example. Promiscuity -> single parents > lacking a father figure. As you might have heard many times the higher crime rate in African-American culture is blamed on poverty which is in-turn blamed on racism. And I …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 06:23 AM
8

On one hand, they claim men are unable to get laid because they lack social etiquettes and don't have any game. On the other hand, they also claim men are so good at conning women that they not only get laid but father kids with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 06:22 AM
6

Run by women where all the low level and heavy-labor jobs were still done by men. At least in patriarchy men were rewarded for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 06:07 AM
4

More like men are more motivated to work harder and be better to provide for the family.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 06:05 AM
6

Depends. I am from India. Living with parents is the norm and I do want to live with them even though I can afford to live on my own. The financial benefits are just the bonus. But if you are someone who prefer to live away from your parents but living with them for financial reasons, not a good indicator of success.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 05:55 AM
1

Eh. It's an analogy. I am not comparing people to apple. I am comparing the "choice available for a guy who wants an iPhone but has a budget of iPhone 12" with the "choice available for a girl who wants someone she is in love with but can't be with him"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 04:41 AM
6

😁😁 Seriously though do you really think if there didn't exist a culture where women mock men for not getting laid or for their size etc, men would be reinforcing those ideas as much as they do now?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 03:32 PM
7

Your mistake is assuming I am American or even from western hemisphere. I am from India. I agree that in American culture it is very common. I just don't agree that men are solely responsible for those beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 03:27 PM
11

I am not saying it's solely women's fault. It's both men and women's fault. Both have contributed to this problem. You really think if there didn't exist a culture where women mock men for not getting laid or for their size etc, men would be reinforce those ideas as much as they do now? I am a guy, take a guess how many men have ever said anything like that about me in my life? Zero. Not in real life or Online. Women? 2 women in last 2 days on this very sub. And many more times for not being fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 03:16 PM
1

I agree that is what we all should strive for. However, saying "I wish I was still with Fred" literally means she knows what's out there, wanted to choose that but for reasons other than attraction/love, chose someone else. Her choice was indeed taken away from her. A rough example but think of a guy who had a low budget & brought an iPhone 12 and says "I wish I had brought iPhone 13". Sure, he knows what's out there and chose iPhone 12 but did he really have a choice between iPhone 12 or iPhone…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 03:14 PM
7

I am all for it. I think the first step would be discouraging the trend where men are shamed for being a virgin and how m The men you are talking about believe this "real men are those who fuck a lot of women" precisely because that has been preached by women many many times. Think of it from the perspective of a guy: It is a very common knowledge that your chances of being attractive to a woman increases if you are already committed to someone. Men are shamed for being a virgin. Mocking virgini…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 03:08 PM
0

Yes. It should be. You want equal rights, well you have to shoulder equal responsibilities.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 11:29 AM
61

My favorite example is: When Men promote masculine stereotypes that harm them: Toxic Masculinity. When Women promote feminine stereotypes that harm them: Toxic Femininity Internal Misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 10:36 AM
12

It's funny to see how dildos or vibrators are not a big deal but god forbit some guy has a fleshlight, he would be an incel. Hypocrisy is all too common. Personally, I despise masturbation, sex toys & kinks irrespective of the gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 10:32 AM
14

Just because most of them are not Redditer doesn't mean that they don't speak out on this issues on other social media Oh please. Reddit is filled with feminists who whine about how drafts are bad and what not. Now that the draft is being actively used to conscript men in Ukraine, they are just silent and defending it as a necessity. To prove me wrong, can you show me some feminists who have called out the current conscriptions in Ukraine which is only for men? Any feminist page, magazine, subre…
/r/MensRights27/02/22 10:30 AM
20

They are anti-conscription but only when women are being drafted. Now that men are being conscripted in Ukraine, it's necessary. Saw quite a few people who are all about equality and feminism defend the blatant discrimination in the conscriptions. They wants 50% representation for CEO and high paying executive positions. Not here.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 10:26 AM
4

Polygamy and open relationships: Choice. Rape: Forced. Conscription: Forced.
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 10:14 AM
1

No. If someone cheats, they don't love their spouse/lover. They can claim all they want. They might even delude themselves into thinking so but they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 09:34 AM
0

Existence of condoms doesn't in anyway disprove the fact that main purpose of sex is indeed reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 09:33 AM
1

Are the benefits & compensation for them same or different under that bill? If Same, would you be okay if women are forced to do something and men are given choice but equally compensated. Does it apply only after the war or to those who have enlisted but haven't served yet. For 3rd point, take the example of Ukranian men who are conscripted now. 1000s of them will die. Will they receive any benefit for that? Not after they have been killed. But since their group is expandable every-time there i…
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 09:18 AM
10

I’ve been insulted multiple times the moment women saw my dick. F
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 07:57 AM
3

Agreed. I got into porn very late (22 years old) but with time it just grew into an obsession. Once pandemic started, With WFH I could get my job done in like 3 hours so had plenty of time. If I felt bored, I would just start watching porn. Instant gratification. I started hoarding porn. I can honestly say it got to the point where I would spend more time downloading, seeding, organizing and backing it up than actually watching the stuff. It was like I am trying to complete a collection. One day…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 07:56 AM
1

I don't know. Maybe Monetary compensation. Maybe quotas in jobs or other fields. I am not sure what would be appropriate. All I know is there should be something appropriate.
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 07:06 AM
1

Sure. If you say so. Pay gap myth is parroted by a very fringe minority of feminist right?. Not worlds leaders (like Obama), most corporation and majority of feminists. I guess US doesn't have a day dedicated to Pay Gap.
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 07:01 AM
1

Not what I was referring to. I said the group deserves to be compensated. When you place restrictions based on group identity, the group deserves to be compensated. If men are expendable every-time there is a war, men gets extra privileges' by default. Before War & After War. Also, I don't think you would be okay if something similar was done to woman. Imagine every woman in Ukraine is forced to give birth to increase population and then compensated for it. Would be chaos. Moreover, does GI Bill…
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 05:21 AM
2

You are going on a rant about men being more efficient and practical in battlefield is something I agree with. I just wish that people who talk about merit, efficiency and practicality etc in war times do the same during normal times instead of demanding 50% representation for women in highly sought after fields, mythical pay gap and maybe show some respect to the group who literally saved your asses instead of whining about how that group is oppressing women.
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 04:46 AM
5

Again, having a war doesn't mean you abandon you beliefs of equality. You can. Just don't expect people with a backbone to take you seriously when you want equality after the war ends.
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 04:21 AM
3

No, I don't never said I want forced equality in wars. What I want is for it to be voluntary for both men and women. And if any group is forced to share undue responsibilities during a crisis (because equality won't be practical), then that group deserves to be compensated with either certain rights or privileges after the crisis.
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 04:19 AM
3

Im all for equal rights but war is not about equality is whos more fit to do the job Got it. Equality only when it is convenient. Not when it isn't. Agree with the rest btw.
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 04:12 AM
11

And how does that justify forcing people to do something? Do you apply that principle to other scenarios or only those that suit your narrative? Women are more qualified at child-rearing. Should that be forced? Men are more qualified at fighting, so should they be forced to be cops? That's stupid.
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 04:09 AM
6

Granted I am not familiar with the language but my point remains. If the country is being invaded, the whole point of forcing men is that they must fight. So why are only men being forced for this? Are they granted any extra privileges for taking these responsibilities, after the over is over?
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 03:50 AM
4

So do I. But don't you think it's a bit hypocritical that some people are all about equal opportunity during peace times but the moment shit hits the fan they demand only one group take the responsibility while the other is given shelter? If you want equal rights, you should also bear equal responsibilities.
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 03:48 AM
0

So manipulate and teach a woman men can’t be trusted and that honesty isn’t part of a relationship with one. Then be mad women aren’t forthcoming. You have got it reversed. Men have to resort to manipulation because women aren't forthcoming.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 01:23 AM
12

So we are now using shaming tactics for not going to war?
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 01:21 AM
9

men can stay But that isn't what's happening. It's men MUST stay.
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 01:19 AM
67

Personally, I agree that men are more capable and it is more practical to have men fight the wars. But they shouldn't be forced and feminists should stfu about equality during non-conflict situations just like they are now.
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 01:18 AM
29

Those children could also leave with their father and the mother can fight? Women can be drafted but when the country is being invaded it is different, the women and children SHOULD leave. What? The whole point of draft is that when invaded, you must fight.
/r/PussyPass27/02/22 01:18 AM
0

The difference here is men are far far less likely to call you an insecure bitch for asking that. On the other hand, if men followed you advice and just asked, a lot of them will be labelled as insecure misogynists.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 12:54 AM
8

If you care we're going to have a chat about why. One possible reason: Some men just don't like Casual sex. They have never engaged in casual sex and want to find a partner whose values on sex & love are compatible. High n-count only means 2 possibilities: Engaged in Casual Sex or Frequently in & out of relationships. Former is red-flag for men who don't like casual sex. Latter is a red-flag for pretty much everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 12:52 AM
45

That's just a shaming trick. It will never make any logical sense. One should have absolutely no problem revealing sexual history to a person who wants to commit to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 12:43 AM
4

I wish I was still with Fred literally means she couldn't be with Fred but wishes to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 12:40 AM
2

I would say certain things like loved, cared for, desired, respected etc are things people deserve in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 01:25 PM
–

In that case, he seem to have practiced what he preached.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 12:38 PM
–

I am confused. I am not gonna bother with watching those vids but did he say leave Ukraine or move to Ukraine? If former, shouldn't you be hopeful that people listened to him? If latter, doesn't that mean he did practice what he preached?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 10:24 AM
–

Nope. Hard disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 04:15 AM
–

Okay and? Yes, there are actual insecure men & women. What you said applies to them. How does any of that is relevant to my statement that the sub using insecurity as a label for any act they dislike from men and mock them?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 10:10 PM
1

Very few people feel the need to fix other people's problems for them. not mocking insecurity of insecure people =/= fixing other people's problems. If you go to an advice sub and ask for genuine advice you are likely to get some Relationship_advice and similar subs would disagree. They love calling every little thing as insecurity but only when it's a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 09:41 PM
1

Wanting someone with a lower count because you're wary of impulse control issues or stds is pretty valid, wanting one because you are terrified they will compare your dick size or skills is screaming "i have major insecurity issues". I agree. I do see lots of insecure or misogynistic guys talking about it on this forum. Maybe but I haven't seen many. But I have joined recently so who knows. I think a lot of people do have major insecurity issues and that's not necessarily something to be ashamed…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 08:39 PM
0

Sure. Any post or comment that puts women in a negative light is just men playing 4D chess to make woman look bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 07:22 PM
5

"muh biology" is just a excuse for men with no self-control. And calling men insecure or misogynistic is just woman seething that men don't respect women with high n-counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 04:51 PM
1

Yes, says and means take things slow, obviously. You said periods is one of the reasons why a woman would say she wants take things slowly. But that implies, in the absence of periods, she wouldn't take things slowly. So she says but doesn't mean to take things slow. You admitted it yourself earlier that that phrase is used as an excuse many times even though they don't mean it. And now you are backtracking it. Anyway, one file attempt before I give up. Say a girl named Gina goes on 2 dates. A d…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 04:46 PM
1

My argument: SAYS & WANTS to take it slow = Not attracted. Scenario 1: A woman SAYS "I want to take things slow" and MEANS she wants to take things slow. Your argument: SAYS she wants to take it slow = Many reasons. Scenario 2: A woman can say "I want to take things slow" when she means "I am depressed because my dog died" or "I am on period" or some other reasonable reason. In those case she doesn't actually want to take things slow. She wants to take it at the same pace as she did with other g…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 03:50 PM
3

And then we have the "sex work is real work" cult. LMAO. TBF to that cult, most jobs are opted for because their choices are that work or homelessness. Doesn't mean sex work is in any way like real work.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 03:24 PM
1

Question: Is it at all possible that when a girl says "I want to take things slow and see where it goes", what she actually means is that "I want a relationship with a decent guy, so I will see if you are sincere about a relationship before I give you the chance to fuck me even though I am not attracted to you"? A simple YES or NO. At all possible or absolutely impossible?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 02:53 PM
1

Me: This is how some women act. Here is a pattern I observed. So this assumption is a possibility. You: yOu tHiNk yOu kNoW WhAt wOmEn tHiNk bEtTeR ThAn wOmAn.. hUrR DuR.. 😁 Also she doesn’t want to get naked with you especially if she barely knows you. Ironic given we are talking about girls who have not only got naked but also fucked and possibly ate the ass of men they barely know. 🤣🤣 This got a good laugh from me, honestly. Kinda refreshing after all the back & forth.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 09:22 PM
1

Unless she says that she doesn’t want to have sex with you because she isn’t attracted to you. How could you possibly know that is the case? Right. Human's have a reputation of being forthcoming and honest in relationships and never using someone for material gains. No woman has ever settled for a man she doesn't find attractive. So men need not worry. Right? In fact, all of them are absolutely reasons why a woman would use the “slow” line. That's on her for not being honest. Not a guy's fault t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 08:48 PM
0

I have never even participated in the game stacy and has absolutely no interest but nice attempt at juvenile insults. If she wasn't a little interested she wouldnt' be on a date with you in the first place. Yeah right. No woman has ever settled down and married someone for reasons other than love. All the ladies in this thread are just men larping as ladies to make woman look bad. Right? Same for this thread right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 08:29 PM
2

I am asexual and aromantic who doesn't even watch porn or masturbate. So those insults are not gonna work for me. But just to piss you off, despite me being aroace, being part of the 80 and an introverted anti-social guy, I have been hit on by girls. Only 4 but that is something. Seethe. 😁😁
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 08:24 PM
1

At this point, I am convinced you are intentionally missing the point We are talking about women who doesn't want to have sex with a guy because she wants to take it slow and see where it goes. Not because of periods, depression, hoping for the guy to make 1st move, bad day, hard time in life, big meal, already planning babies... blah blah blah. Nobody is talking about those scenarios. Let me repeat it for you: We are talking about women: 1) who has engaged in casual sex earlier 2) doesn't want …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 08:20 PM
1

Sure, she may have just formed an emotional attachment with the guy she just met at a bar and therefore went to sleep with him. Very low chance, but if she did, that isn't casual sex (Kinda wonky logic but let it be). And what does that prove your point? My argument still works: If a woman had casual sex with people before you but wouldn't with you after a first date because she wants to take it slow, she isn't attracted to you. If I was the guy and all your previous encounters are non-casual se…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 06:39 PM
1

my main point is that for the men that are not genetically gifted the answer to this will always be no because of how much choice women have. That's not how choices work. Just because you have choices doesn't mean you can be attracted to only 1 of those choices at a time. You can be attracted to multiple of those choices. You could like some of them (genetically gifted) and you could dislike some of them (not genetically gifted ones) but having choices has fuck all to do with it. A guy with a ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 06:31 PM
3

Oh, really didn't know that. That's for enlightening me. Now, if only men could figure out telepathy, they will know the girl who hooked-up with many random people earlier but is taking it slow with you, actually wants to have sex with you and is horny af for you. She is just exercising her self-control. 😁😁😁 Couldn't resist this one. Bye again.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 06:15 PM
3

Me: Men want to be desired. You: hurr durr men who prioritize sex are insecure. It's like poetry how predictable you all are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 06:13 PM
1

If a woman has sex on the first date or even just goes home with a stranger, that necessarily doesn’t mean that it’s casual. Casual sex is sexual activity that takes place outside a romantic relationship and implies an absence of commitment, emotional attachment, or familiarity between sexual partners By definition, going home with a stranger is casual sex. You don’t like the person enough to form an ongoing relationship and have no interest in them as anything other than a sexual partner. Doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 06:11 PM
0

If you're defining desire as quick sex Lol. Never did that but carry on. It maybe shocking to you but people usually want to have sex with people they desire. Wanting to have sex is a great indicator of being desired. Anyway, this is getting boring now. Bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 06:00 PM
3

If it works for you, good for you. Just if & when men question if you truly desire them (as much you desired an ex or a ONS) when your actions seem to indicate the opposite, don't resort to calling it insecurity or toxic masculinity or "men using woman as a scoreboard" or whatever bullshit you can come up with.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:57 PM
4

If you want quick sex, don't ask for a relationship. Just be honest about wanting sex. It's not that hard. Men: We want to be desired. You: You just want quick sex. LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:52 PM
2

men fail to realize is that very early on, women are taught that men will do or say anything for sex. If that is true, it seems women didn't actually learn what they were taught. You were taught that men will do or say anything for sex and your genius solution is make them wait for sex to see if they are sincere about relationship? Does it not occur to your genius mind that men can pretend to be sincere about relationship for a few dates in order to get sex? You are not avoiding that. You are ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:49 PM
6

I mean yeah. They are definitely not fucking me. 80/20 rule and I am under no delusion I belong to 20. 😁😁
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:12 PM
7

If it was so easy for women to be sexually successful by extension most guys would be sexually successful at all because women would just want to fuck as much they can. What? That makes no sense. Women wanting to fuck as much as they can doesn't imply they want to fuck just anyone. Those who they want to fuck is not most guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:07 PM
2

Like <1%. Well, it's those <1% women who are being called "bad" for not sleeping with a guy on a 1st date. So why you are you losing your marbles over this? Nearly every woman is going to be super pissed if you have sex and don’t call her the next day. It’s almost always with the intent of forming a relationship. So nearly every woman who sleeps with a man does so with the intent of forming a relationship but then when she goes on a date with a guy she wants to form a relationship with, she want…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:03 PM
12

Why do some women find this simple concept so unfathomable, I will never know. Men want to be desired. And knowing that you desired other men enough to fuck them on 1st dates but not me is not something anyone wants to hear. Women themselves wouldn't like it that ever happened but given low chances, relative to men, of that happening, they don't experience it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 04:04 PM
5

Nobody is asking you to sleep with every single 1st date. Good lord, it's like you are intentionally missing the point. Here's the thing: If I know a girl who has had multiple casual hook-ups and I went on a date with her, I would expect her to be attracted to me. So question is, why would a girl who is attracted to me and also has no qualms about casual sex is not interested in sleeping with me after our date? There is no reasonable justification. She wants to take it slow with me to make sure …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 04:00 PM
7

For a hook-up? Yes. For relationship? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 03:50 PM
44

BS. Many men just don't want to be with promiscuous women. A lot of men are also those who despise casual sex and as such prefer their girl to be someone who hasn't engaged in casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 03:16 PM
2

Casual Sex is bad. Engaging in casual sex but when on a date, pretending like you aren't one to have casual sex and instead shit-testing the guy by making the guy wait to see if she really wants your or some ridiculous justification is also bad. Here are scenarios when she is right: Not engaging in Casual Sex. Not having sex on first date and wanting to take it slow because she doesn't engage in Casual sex. When she does above 2 and then after getting serious with him, sleeps with him and he dum…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 01:21 PM
1

No. You need to have a good personality (from their pov) for someone to be interested in a short-term dating with you. For just FWB or ONS where they don't give a damn about you other than for sex, personality is skipped.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 01:15 PM
2

I am not a woman but: Most woman do engage in casual sex or hook-up or FWB. There is no refutation for that. A research article: The most recent data suggest that between 60% and 80% of North American college students have had some sort of hookup experience. \)Source\) A survey: The report analyzed the responses of 2,000 unattached women between the ages of 18 and 63, and found that 82 percent of them have engaged in casual sex.\)Source\) You can find many more on google. 2) Women do choose a ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 01:10 PM
1

the characteristics people look for in a long term relationship and a short term are different. Not different. More. ONS: Attractive & confident. Short-term: Attractive, confident, a good personality. LTR: All the above plus stability, security, good husband and parenting characteristics.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 12:38 PM
2

It's like woman here are intentionally missing the point of your 3rd question.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 12:36 PM
2

You are really being obtuse by choosing examples of superstars. Yes, most woman would choose Jason Mamoa over their husbands for hook-up. Most men would also choose Emilia Clarke over their wives for hook-up. That is irrelevant. Point is, if your husband approached you for hook-up during your hook-up phase, would you have found him attractive and considered it? Or would you have straight-up said no? That is the point. No man is saying they want to be the person to whom their wife is MOST attract…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 12:33 PM
-1

The red pill narrative is that you will never experience mutual attraction or love. No, it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 12:24 PM
1

Look up chadfishing experiments of profiles of nazis and pedos. Look up Hybristophilia. Look Up Jeremy Meeks. Lookup Boston bombing suspect who had many female defenders because he was cute. Ted Bundy is another famous example.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:51 PM
1

LMAO. Not even close to true on TRP. As far as relationship & sex goes, woman hold the upper hand. TRP just tries to teach men to level up and be better at the game. There are men who swipe right constantly on Tinder and wouldn't get a match and then there are pedophiles & abusers who get more matches in a day than an ugly guy gets in his lifetime.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:18 PM
1

So basically he can’t read basic social cues Unless, you have never talked to a stranger who was busy otherwise, stfu. doesn’t respect that this woman is there to do her job TIL Talking to someone about the book they are reading is disrespecting them and stopping them from doing their Job. not to entertain him all day. Yeah right. He was there hoping she would entertain him. Such an MCP right? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:03 PM
1

Lol.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 05:02 AM
1

Well, those feminist seem to not have learned the core values, which as you agree, are misandrist and falsely believe feminism is about equality,
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 05:01 AM
46

Thinks him being short, dark and ugly means he deserves the life he got? That they are his fault? Still an incel but also a white knight.
/r/AntiFeminists22/02/22 08:28 PM
3

> I never shared my story to make 3.5 billion men creeps. You did share it to justify a woman who generalized men. > the man was talking loudly Bloody hell. How dare he talk loudly. What an utter piece of shit right? > the girl looked visibly uncomfortable. A girl is uncomfortable? Definitely because the guy with her is a creep. > Why is doing a kind gesture bad? I would be doing a similar gesture as well in the example about calling cops from my previous comment. Bet you think that gesture is b…
/r/MensRights22/02/22 07:18 PM
4

> im not generalizing. The barista did and you are defending her. > Also why the fuck are you getting racial? it's like you want to generalize more than I ever would. You did already. I wanted to see if you would apply the same generalization to race, religion and country. Guess now, because that isn't allowed. Only men can be generalized. > The barista did not make the sitituion worse or the man uncomfortable Yeah. I bet he would be ecstatic to know that the barista and everyone in her team tho…
/r/MensRights22/02/22 06:44 PM
7

Oh. So because some men you met misbehaved, it is now acceptable to generalize it to the entire population, and treat them as if they are potential creeps, rapists and stalkers? Do you apply this logic to Just men or are you consistent and do the same with Women, Muslims, Black People, Indians, Chinese etc?
/r/MensRights22/02/22 06:02 PM
15

There was a post on r/trashy sometime ago about a tinder profile of a chad looking guy with great biceps but a very douchy bio and being misogynistic. Could be a chad fishing account. That sub isn't TRP or FDS leaning but the comments were revealing a lot. Basically every negative comment about the guy was termed as insecurity from incels and most comments from women seemed to agree they would be down to sleep with him. Some comments even went so far as to describe what they would like to do wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 05:24 PM
19

"Men command respect" is just horseshit. I have been respected at every place I have worked if and only after I proved myself as someone worth it. Until then, I could literally take leave and most wouldn't notice it for days.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 05:02 PM
4

We know her actions. Not her intentions. Multiple possibilities. And we can say which of those possibilities have a higher chance based on observed trends. My observation is AF/BB is significantly common. This is based on what I have seen in real life, on Social Media and most importantly by women in their youth themselves. Not TRP or some manosphere. I wasn't even aware of Manosphere when I first made the observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 02:03 PM
3

There is nothing that says that she's not attracted to him. It is possible that there is trauma there or maybe she's changed her mind about sex or she had a pregnancy scare and it's made her reluctant. All possibilities. Yes. But low probability that any of them is true and high probability she isn't just attracted to him or at-least not as attracted to him as she was to others. She has every right to not want to have sex with him even if she is attracted. Yeah. Nobody disagrees with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:57 PM
3

Saw the thread. I feel sad for the guy. He is in for a rude awakening.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:54 PM
6

She values sex alright. Just not with this dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:54 PM
2

chances are she's just as attracted to him as all the other men she fucked on the first date There are chances alright. Just very low chances. that he isn't simply "using her for sex". She won't know he is using her for sex until after she has sex with him. Redpill provides just about the worst response to it. And bluepillers always make woman the victim with insecurities and if he expresses any disappointment that she slept with others easily but not him, he is the monster who needs to deal wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:38 PM
2

The party that pretends to be in love and attracted to but isn't actually attracted to is definitely wrong. And that seems to be the case here. If it isn't, she isn't wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:29 PM
5

Yeah, She won't fall in love with you if you treat a woman with respect but maybe the society should stop telling guys that she is in love with you and therefore isn't having sex with you because she wants to wait and all that bs? It's naive but it is something that has been fed to men for long enough many actually believe it. And many women themselves espouse this bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:26 PM
12

The problem is that most men have such a sense of duty inculcated in them from a young age that they feel they should sacrifice their own happiness for a woman they have recently met. This shit is what fucked up my friend's life. His life was becoming hell because of his gf. I suggested many times to not proceed with the marriage if this is his life. Even if he loves her, it's not worth it. He said that it his responsibility as he has promised to marry her and she wants to.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 12:33 PM
2

This is completely anecdotal: Only 1 colleague has shown interest in me and she explicitly said she found me attractive when I was rude to her while correcting her mistakes. She did ask me not to do in presence of others though.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 09:16 AM
2

This is next level mental gymnastics. Why don't those high value women fuck the "someone better" and get into a relationship? And instead choose to fuck and dump others? Maybe because they aren't actually attracted to that "someone better" but with him for other reasons and are truly attracted to their casual fuck buddy (who they will probably fuck even while being in a LTR). So much respect for the one she is in a LTR with.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 09:06 AM
1

using those instincts to be protectors and providers. LMAO. If you’re not doing your job to be a man I believe that's called toxic masculinity or internalized misogyny nowadays. Either way, blame the men. Lulz.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 08:58 AM
1

I am an asexual. So this has minimal affect in my life. But I do see relationships in my close circles very differently. But the biggest is movies. I can't watch movies now without realizing how blue pilled they are. Just an example: Crazy Stupid Love. I love love love that film. But ever since I got into TRP, I can't help but realize how everyone treats Cal. His wife cheats on him and he has to win her over. His own son hates him even though it isn't his fault his son's crush has a crush on him…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 08:57 AM
2

Duh. Men who aren't masculine are mocked by many men and women. Women being masculine is praised by most men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 08:22 AM
4

Alpha male is a title bestowed upon you by others. Not by yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 05:49 PM
7

You are a woman? Sorry, I didn't know. It is very rude to assume someone's gender. Did you assume I am a man? Are you asking this question because of that? PS: Not gonna work on TERFs.
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 05:37 PM
6

I lurk in Manosphere quite frequently and this seems to be a decent explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 05:19 PM
4

> they're trying to do you a favor Polite rejections are a favor? I can understand if they are rejected because of some creepy ass behavior but majority of them are just simply not interested or think you aren't attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 09:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter