TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RandomUser8467 Archive

View 0 posts and 190 comments by RandomUser8467 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

You’re ignoring the risks around rape and sexual assault for women seeking any kind of relationship whether casual or serious. Men may face rejection, but in a choice between “Sorry, not interested” and “Rape” I’d go with “Sorry, not interested every time.
/r/ExRedPill01/09/21 12:26 AM
–

Nothing screams insecurity like a dude judging what women who won’t give him the time of day might have done with their bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/21 05:12 AM
1

There are 74m surplus men thanks to sex-selective abortion and infanticide against baby girls, so unless lacking an option for a woman turns those men toward same sex partners there are at least 74m men who will be left uncoupled. Add to that men having multiple wives in war torn countries puts pressure on unmarried men to win glory in battle (to win a wife) or die in the process before marrying. And then there are just people, men and women, who prefer being single. The whole idea that ‘there’s…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 08:35 AM
2

You seem to think that the primary question for the guy that makes him ‘Average’ are his looks. So sure... if he’s average looking by whatever means he’s operating in neither a deficit nor an advantage. Which means other aspects of his personality will be a bigger issue for him in terms of his success with women. Is he average in terms of his relationship skill set? Is he average in terms of being a good housemate? Is he average in the sack? If he’s average on all of those fronts, he’s probably …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 11:49 AM
1

I’ve seen both men and women enforce the idea that a man should not date anyone taller than he is. And a number of my tall women friends have complained that men they’re interested in who are shorter than they are won’t date them because they don’t like the idea of not being taller. Two of them have also been knocked back by very tall men who don’t want to date them because he likes to ‘be able to tower over’ his girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 10:04 PM
1

Three of the strongest heterosexual relationships I’m aware of are between a short man and a tall woman. In one case, he’s 5’6” and she’s 6’2. In another, he’s 5’6” and I’m 5’7”. I’m not sure how tall the other couple is exactly but he’s shorter than her by a good 5 or 6 inches. The idea that men should always be taller than the women they date is frankly stupid and absurdly patriarchal.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 09:14 AM
4

The professional penalty extends to things like salary increases that come with experience. One can have a ‘job’ rather than a ‘career’ and still suffer financially by making the frankly bad decision to marry young and procreate early just because some douchebag on the internet claimed you were wasting your 20s by not doing that. Marrying and procreating young is a path to a seriously shittier life than what that same woman could have had for the vast majority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 11:36 AM
14

Women who marry young face a substantial professional penalty for it. Women who have a child young also face a substantial professional penalty for it. So if a woman wants any chance at financial solvency, it is in her interest to hold off on marriage and kids. And the creepy older men who are hoping to tie down a 20something woman are giving that advice to the 20something women out of self-interest, not generosity...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 12:54 AM
37

Seriously. Its also true in the USA, Canada and the UK that the majority are of homeless people are women and it’s driven by domestic violence. The post is playing on a stereotype of homelessness being mostly an issue for men. It’s not simply not true.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy30/07/21 12:34 PM
1

“Societies where women don’t date before marriage have men protecting women from bad men.” No. Societies where women don’t date before marriage are just silenced by the men who rape them who are supposedly the men who ‘protect’ them. Statistically women in rigidly patriarchal communities are more likely to be victims of domestic violence, rape, and other forms of abuse both by their supposed ‘protectors’ and by men in the wider community. These fathers and brothers you’re talking about? They mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 11:09 PM
8

Oh, honey, you should know better by now. Every woman in the world shares a single hivemind which is dedicated to the hope of snaring a Chad by riding the cock carousel. We’re also really stupid so we don’t actually know what a Chad is which is how creepy old dudes who want to bang a near child woman manage to get through. You need to learn to listen to the menz so you’ll know what you’re thinking. It’s much better once you substitute RedPiller idiocy for the Cock Carousel Hivemind. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 06:49 AM
8

Women who don’t date before marriage and marry as virgins tend to come from heavily patriarchal religious communities where divorce is heavily condemned. That alone puts the women at risk for abuse. The woman in that situation has already been fed a bunch of ‘women are subservient to men’ bullshit before she got stuck with her creep spouse. Then, once she’s in that hell, she risks her whole social circle if she splits from her abuser, and communities like that often ban together to undermine her…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 03:07 AM
22

I think you’re misreading this forum. When men “go fuck” women by manipulating them, lying to them, and otherwise treating them poorly, many women on the forum say they’re disgusting. When men “go fuck” women who are keen to be fucked most women here don’t have an issue with it. But the fact that you think women who want sex sometimes are “whores” suggests you have a lot of contempt for women which is also why a lot of women hesitate and ghost you rather than banging you. Men who hate us are nea…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 11:55 PM
5

They also get it from selling data on their participants. Those OKC questions? Yeah, a lot of them are aimed at helping advertisers target you better.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 05:48 AM
6

I find this all so amusing. So many men are obsessed with big boobs but somehow decided the women who the big boobs are most frequently attached to are unfuckable? You know ya’ll are setting yourselves up for failure right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 03:28 AM
2

He knows of them through a support group for toxic men who blame their ex-s for ruining their lives when really they were already train wrecks before the divorce and their spouse chose divorce because being with them was unbearable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 02:50 AM
6

There is also research showing that more affluent heterosexual couples are able to outsource many of the sources of conflict around chores and household management that less affluent heterosexual couples struggle with. If you’re able to hire a maid to come twice a week, you’re probably not going to get upset that you spouse isn’t doing half of the dishes. If your nanny manages your children, you don’t need to stress about one party always having to be the one to be there for the kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 11:16 AM
5

None of ya’ll are objecting to the term “capture her mind”? Like he really seems to be telling men that if you don’t enact some horrible mind control bullshit on the woman you stuck your dick into, you have lost because she will still have free will so she’s not your personal fuck doll.
/r/ExRedPill16/07/21 05:47 AM
2

Out earning one’s husband is a risk factor for domestic violence. Men who feel threatened by his wife’s income try to beat her until she can stand his pathetic ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 05:22 AM
1

That’s also not really true. Women not wanting relationships where their life expectancy is shortened and they are miserable is not the same thing as women not wanting relationships. Men wanting a mommy-fuck-wife is not wanting a relationship, it’s wanting a servant.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 03:14 AM
1

Everything I’ve said is backed up by statistics. Marrying a man shortens a woman’s life expectancy and lengthens his. Marrying a man reduces a woman’s self-rating of happiness and raises his. Propaganda and facts are not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 02:32 AM
1

I think you’re confusing some ‘make the best of it’ issues here. For a lot of heterosexual women, a FWB style relationship is the best of the available options. For heterosexual women who enjoy sex, FWB is often a better option than a more traditional Relationship Escalator style LTR. She can find someone who is fun to be with, and good in bed, but not have to screen him out over having to live with the dude and all the shit that comes with that. And while I generally believe the vast majority o…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 02:04 AM
1

What I mean by that is that researchers have found a lot of straight women say they would prefer an LTR / marriage, but have not found a man who makes that prospect seem like a positive outcome. They have also found women who wanted kids, but did not want to be a sole caretaker for the kid and who therefore opted out of having children because she could not find a partner who would carry his share. So perhaps it’s more accurate to say that there are a lot of heterosexual women who would prefer a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 11:53 PM
5

Men get more from relationships than women in the form of longer life expectancy, greater happiness, orgasms, etc. Women used to get more from relationships in that it was the only path most of us had to anything other than destitution. Now we have other paths to avoiding destitution available to us and so we’re sizing up relationships very differently. A lot of the discrepancy is that heterosexual relationships have not caught up with women having other options. Many men still want relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 01:03 AM
4

Oh, bless. “Men are frustrated because wives stoped fucking then, get fat, complain, cheat on them and more.” But ya’ll still live longer and rate yourself as happier if you can land one of those dead bedroom, fat cheating wives. Forming a partnership requires both parties to bring something to the table. Any partnership where one party is bringing the vast majority of the benefit is going to fail as a partnership because that person knows they’re not in a partnership and would do better without…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 10:53 PM
-3

Oh, honey... women treat their partners like they’re disposable because most men suck as partners. Tying ourselves to one of ya’ll literally shortens are life expectancy - and so just like throwing out that bra that’s super uncomfortable? We’re better off without you. And so you get met with trash heap.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 09:36 PM
2

You’re confusing ‘swipe left’ with unfuckable. Most men’s dating profiles suck. They demonstrate absolutely nothing that would make any woman think “this guy is worth taking the risk of stalking, rape, sexual assault, and general douchebaggery” and swipe left. That isn’t quite the same thing as men 80% of men being unfuckable. It’s that 80% of men on dating apps have shitty profiles. Their photos suck - like for real, do not take a selfie in your filthy bathroom, make sure your photo is in focus…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 09:31 PM
28

You’re spot on about the cognitive dissonance. The RP types create specific rules to justify their failures and then claim that they’re societal norms that cannot be violated. Any time one of those rules is ‘violated’ the guy’s self-esteem falls apart. The house of cards on which he’s built his ego is at risk. So TRP guys will say that divorced women and single moms are undatable because that’s a great excuse for writing off a whole huge group of women who will likely reject them. And really, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 03:34 AM
1

Fair - the reason that young men who stand no chance to have what’s considered a normal adult life fall into violence and awfulness is because of patriarchal bullshit and toxic masculinity. It’s not strictly the competition. But since the question was would women be better if we had to compete for dates - A frankly ridiculous question (many women do compete with other women for dates and many men do not, competition for dates has nothing to do with morality etc. etc. etc.) - and so a reasonable …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 01:48 AM
2

I mean duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 10:08 PM
2

Men competing for women makes men terrible. Especially the men who will forever fail in their quest for a wife-mommy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 12:21 PM
0

The OP’s question is, in essence, does competition make men better and would women be better with male style competition. The answer is obviously no.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 11:33 AM
1

Nearly all of that 10% of people responsible for violent crime are men. And yes, China and India are trying to find ways to get rid of their surplus men…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 09:17 AM
18

Also a side effect? For every 1% increase in the ratio of males to females, one has a 5% increase in violent crime. This issue persists in India, and South Korea and other countries with a male skewed birth ratio. And those 74 million surplus men? They’re not exactly great. They’re paralysed man-children who will likely die not long after their mothers die because they’re too useless to take care of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 12:31 AM
–

I should add: She said it really gave her more confidence when she started banging men she didn’t pay. I think in practice her gigolo acted a lot like the way a sex therapist works. I believe she had several sessions with him and worked through some of her fears about reengaging in sex. She’s now in her 60’s and is very pro-sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 12:19 AM
–

I met a woman once who hired a male prostitute after her divorce. She hadn’t had sex in close to 10 years (dead bedroom) and wanted to re-engage with someone who understood the mechanics, wouldn’t argue with her about wearing a condom, wouldn’t demand she go down on him or do anal, and would understand that the encounter was not a relationship. She said it was a great decision and recommends it to a lot of middle aged divorcing women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 11:05 PM
1

I’m not denying that women sometimes fuck men who we shouldn’t fuck. I’m just saying that the men who are truly unfuckable are unfuckable for a reason and it isn’t their ‘looks.’ It’s their personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 04:02 AM
24

Internalised misogyny is very real and a huge force driving a lot of women.
/r/ExRedPill07/07/21 10:32 PM
1

I did not say that every manhating piece of shit in a skinsuit can’t get laid. I said that nearly all of the men who cannot get laid by 22 are misogynist pieces of shit in a skinsuit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 10:31 PM
1

Men really think looks are the deciding factor. The realty is that any decent guy who bothers with basic grooming can get laid. If a guy can’t he either has failed at personality or grooming or both.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 10:29 PM
-1

True, just hating women does not prevent some men from getting married and laid (though I strongly suspect the majority end up in dead bedrooms), but the men who cannot get laid are largely unfuckable because of their attitude toward women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 07:02 AM
1

Psst... We do feel repulsed by you...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 06:22 AM
1

Oh, bless. You’re so ignorant of the concept of research, much less sex research specifically, that you think there will be a single reference for things that sex researchers don’t think exist. You know that’s not how research works, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 02:26 AM
0

Sex researchers do not believe there is such thing as a sex drive making it even more unlikely that they would have drawn the bullshit conclusion that you drew...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 02:07 AM
-2

The real reason virginity in a man isn’t prized is because a man who isn’t terrible will usually end up with a girlfriend by the end of his college years and those girlfriends will also want sex. So if a guy is past about 22 and hasn’t gotten laid, he’s probably got some issues that make him unfuckable - the most common of those issues is him deeply hating women. It may, occasionally, happen that a guy fails to pair off and is still not terrible, but the longer he goes, the more likely it is tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 11:31 PM
1

Bwah ha ha ha ha! Have you seen that guy? He’s distinctly unfuckable....
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 05:20 AM
0

Ask Mitch McConnell. He married an heiress as a political strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 10:53 AM
4

Red Pillers’ concept of Hypergamy is entirely a self-comfort thing. They have little success with women and therefore blame women for their lack of success. We cannot possibly have sized them up and seen them unworthy for reasons like, well, them hating us is a good start. And so instead of us having sized them up individually and finding them wanting, they comfort themselves with the idea that we chose our partners (in as much as we are allowed choices) for the wrong reasons - money, height, mu…
/r/ExRedPill30/06/21 02:14 AM
1

Honest feedback can be a gift. One you seem not to want to take...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 11:17 AM
3

You know a lot of women fake it to get guys to finish and go away right? The only reason men prefer virgins is because they’re terrible in bed and think someone who has no one to compare him to won’t realise that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:36 AM
5

Oh! Poor you! Your partners kept saying you were terrible and you couldn’t take it! You know you can work on improving your technique and at some point, your ‘virgin’ is probably going to cheat on you because you’re unsatisfying...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:04 AM
3

So you prefer low NCount because they wont’ be able to tell how bad you are in bed? I mean... that kinda makes sense. Also, when you pay to get laid, it doesn’t really count as winning someone over who was willing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 06:52 AM
1

The only context in which this matters is in the cases where one’s partner’s family is seeking to ban their partner from the sick bed. It was a huge deal with gay couples because many homophobic families barred their same sex partners from visiting their sick and death beds out of creepy homophobic assholery. But if your partner’s family isn’t a toxic waste dump masquerading as people, it’s essentially irrelevant. There are some legit issues around inheritance, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 06:12 AM
0

The only men who care about N Count are the kind of men who cannot actually get laid with anyone and resent the idea that there are women who have gotten laid when they haven’t. It’s got nothing to do with virginity, or how women view relationships or even glorification of virginity. Though the glorification of virginity is mostly because these dudes are terrible in bed and don’t want their partner to have any ability to compare his terrible performance to the possibly better performance of, say…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 06:08 AM
1

Doing 50% of household chores and child care = being a manservant. You understand why no one wants to settle with you, right? It’s because you’re a terrible partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 05:44 AM
3

Typically when one scratches the surface of the relationship you’re describing, one finds that at some point, she was attracted to the guy and then lost the attraction because the relationship soured. It’s not that she wasn’t attracted to him - it’s that the fact that he’s a manchild has left her unable to put all the things hitting her sexual breaks out of her mind enough to want to have sex with him. If he adulted, he’d still be in a happy relationship. But instead, he’s going to blame her for…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 03:13 AM
1

Oh... bless... it’s so cute that that’s what they think has happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 02:35 AM
3

How does one even define settling? And why is it bad? Are you asking because you’re worried that a woman sees your flaws and is going out with you anyway? Or is it that you’re worried about dead bedroom? Or that she’ll leave? The reality is that what makes women leave relationships is s typically stuff like “I am sick to death of having to BEG him to help around the house,” or “He doesn’t listen to me, and generally treats me like an unpaid servant and then is surprised when I’m not in the mood …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 01:27 AM
1

Here ya go. The author has since repeated the study with similar results in multiple populations. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11991158/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/21 01:39 AM
7

You’re spot on with the element of fear playing a role - this is why in some cases the same behaviour can be ‘abuse’ or ‘fine’ depending on the situation. Domestic Violence researchers draw the line with fear - if one party is using their actions to control the other with fear, then the behaviour is abusive whether or not it’s violent. So someone who comes from a culture where yelling is normal in an argument may not be abusive - as long as their partner is from a similar culture and does not be…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 04:22 AM
2

There are currently 73m surplus men in the world thanks to sex selective abortion and infanticide. But those 73 million surplus men are concentrated in specific areas - namely China, Vietnam, India, and South Korea. Though South Korea has shifted their ratio significantly back toward normal. Those surplus men have zero chance for a heterosexual relationship because these are also firmly monogamous cultures. But if one is not in a region where one has a huge surplus of men, the only reason a man …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 11:08 PM
3

This may explain part of why so many men think they can be unattractive, and generally terrible and still pull a woman who is conventionally attractive, emotionally supportive, and who won’t complain that he basically just sucks. It’s all the TV couples where the woman is at least an 8 and she’s with a guy who’s barely a 3 and she still does all the housework, child rearing, and adulting while he sabotages her efforts and her life. I like to think all those TV wives are secretly contemplating di…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 10:26 PM
–

It’s so cute how angry ya’ll get when someone points out you blokes are undatable because you’ll make a woman’s life worse and she’s not willing to settle that low. What proof is there of that? Married women are less happy and die younger than their single counterparts. That means most women are still settling for men who make our lives materially worse, and yet many of ya’ll still can’t find someone willing to suffer with your company. Sucks to be ya’ll...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 06:00 AM
–

But dude, if you managed to snag nearly any woman, including those you consider unworthy, your life would be better. You’d rate yourself as happier and your life expectancy would increase. The opposite is true for her. So ‘perhaps [you’re] just unlucky’ but more likely you’re just yet another man who doesn’t have enough to make it worth while. Or you pick badly. Best case you just have terrible taste.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 11:44 PM
–

100% of the straight men who complain they cannot find a woman to date are unworthy of dating. Statistically speaking, when women marry, we rate ourselves as less happy than our single counterparts and our life expectancy is shortened. Which is, of course, why many women are opting out of marriage. But many are opting out not because they oppose marriage, but because the vast majority of men bring no benefits to a relationship or marriage. They would happily settle into a relationship with a guy…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 10:14 PM
–

Where (and when) did you study? Because while women have made up between 20 and 40% of STEM for decades in the USA, Europe, and Canada.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 10:10 PM
0

Any guy who thinks women are people and who can functionally take care of himself will have no trouble dating women if women are the sex to which he is attracted. Those are both things parents should teach their sons, so sure... If a guy doesn’t think women are people, no amount of dating coaching will help him. If a guy fails to self-groom and lives in squalor, no amount of dating coaching will win him a girl. The bar is so low for you blokes and yet so many of you still can’t get over it...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 10:06 PM
1

Condoms are 1) not terribly reliable in the best of times; and 2) require the cooperation of one’s male parter to work. Male partners are very frequently resistant to condoms. Also, you’re aware that condoms aren’t free, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 11:10 PM
11

Try getting birth control in Syria. Try getting it as a refugee. Try getting it in the USA without health insurance. Try getting something like an IUD with health insurance in the USA. And then just shut the fuck up because you seriously have no fucking clue.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 07:57 AM
13

Also, it’s difficult to get reliable birth control when one is poor. And being poor is also a barrier to getting an abortion. So there’s that too...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/21 02:46 AM
2

Oh, bless. Sadly abortions are not paid for with taxpayer money because of fuckwit anti-abortionist bullshit which created the Hyde amendment. But thank you for playing. Now try again with information…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 01:33 PM
5

So you’re pro-stealing children. You know that’s terrible, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 11:17 AM
9

It’s really easy when one realises that if one has a living child, that kid will ether end up financially the burden of taxpayers or the baby daddy. I’d prefer the baby daddy suffer that burden than taxpayers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 10:19 AM
6

And he’ll brag to his other douchebag friends that he’s got a bastard running around proving he once stuck his penis in a vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 10:17 AM
2

For real. If I invite someone into my home, that doesn’t mean they get to move in. Why are men so completely stupid about this?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 09:44 AM
0

Oh! That’s adorable! I bet you’re also one of the men who champions the incorrect claims that women rape as often as men while also calming that only men get sanctioned for problem dating behaviour. Have you ever actually spoken to a woman? I mean without paying for The Girlfriend Experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 09:44 AM
1

You should get a vasectomy. You would make a seriously shit sperm donor / father.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 09:42 AM
1

You understand a lot of women would like to date, right? How can you possibly not think a ‘no dating policy’ would not effect women?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:29 AM
2

You know the rule applies to both sexes. Some single sex meet ups have no dating rules. Are you so determined to cry ‘way! Mens are wronged!’ At every turn that you can’t actually think things through, or are you so blinded to the idea that women have agency that you just don’t think a no-dating policy might effect women?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 04:09 AM
2

A few key tips for meet ups: - Go to several meets for the group before you start asking anyone out - Get to know the person you’re thinking of flirting with before you ask them out or obviously demonstrate that you’re after them - Read the responses of the person you are thinking of trying to date and see if they’re potentially interested in you before you ask them out - are they seeking you out when you show up? Does she try to sit near you? Did she strike up a conversation? Or Does she make a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 03:38 AM
2

It’s a perfect example of FDS following patriarchal bullshit as their default. There are some really lovely short men in terms of both looks and personality out there. But FDS would tell women they’re stupid to ‘settle’ for those men because they buy into the idea that ‘men should be taller’ no matter what. As though any reasonably sane person is going to meet someone, have a good enough time to decide to do it again, have sex, get involved, fall in love, invest in a relationship, but always thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 02:54 AM
1

It really depends on the sex worker’s autonomy. If a guy has paid an abused teenager to give him a blowjob because her pimp is after her to give him cash, that’s a totally different situation from a woman who has a variety of career prospects who has decided sex work is a good path for her without pressure from others. So if a guy has had sex with the sex worker who lacks autonomy, there is no equivalent number of consensual sex experiences a woman can have had to make up for that on moral groun…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 12:47 AM
5

Historic death records historically are surprisingly well documented. What they have not been, until more recently, is put into databases, and indexed which made them difficult to distil information from. But the information was there if one was willing to go and dig. So your grasp of how history and data work are failing you here, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 11:12 AM
5

The reasons China has managed to raise ½ a billion people out of poverty is definitely not because they have surplus men. China’s (and India’s) surplus men are essentially wasting around sitting on their asses. A man is not considered mature enough to do anything (hold a living wage job, run for office, etc.) while one is still unmarried. And the bonus of those men being around is that for every 1% imbalance in the population toward surplus men there is a corresponding 5% increase in violent cri…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 06:24 AM
10

“Therefore, this data is more up-to-date and accurate.” Except it’s not. This data does not cover the period in which the plague changed the course of history. It’s from a period when the plague effectively did nothing important and is therefore, essentially irrelevant to this discussion because: Behaviour and prevalence played and play an enormous role in the behaviour of the pandemic. The CDC suggests men currently get The Plague more often because they spend more time outdoors - reasons peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 06:20 AM
–

True that population growth was not the main cause of food shortages. But now that climate change is here, arable land that used to support crops is starting to fail to support crops and the next several years will make this far worse. Because humans did fuck all about climate change, in 10 years there will be a huge loss of total food available for human consumption. https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 02:45 AM
10

Can I ask about your evidence that the plague killed more men than women? What I’ve seen says the exact opposite - women were more likely to die of plague than men, likely because they played a role in assisting their sick loved ones. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajpa.23266
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 12:01 AM
3

This seems an illogical conclusion to draw from the presented evidence. A more reliable conclusion to draw would be: Society benefits when there are less men and suffers when there are more men. Which raises the issue of the 73m surplus men globally and the reality that they’re just sucking up resources and offer zero benefit. I suppose the good news is that they won’t reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 11:59 PM
13

It rebooted better.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 11:47 PM
2

It’s a shame there’s no eye roll reaction here. Oh, bless, you think your ex using you for sex means she wants you back. No, it means she wants the only ok thing she got in your relationship - the sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 09:36 AM
2

The bar, you poor almost certainly single man, is that your presence in a woman’s life needs to make our life better and not worse. Why would any sane person- male or female - settle for less than that? Why would you think women should saddle ourselves with men who suck the life out of us? None of the things you’ve mentioned is necessary to being the kind of partner who makes their partner’s life better and not worse. So yes, most men fail to clear the ‘at worst net neutral’ threshold. But that …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 07:35 AM
-2

Because humans are destroying the planet and every new baby is a nail in the coffin.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 07:31 AM
4

There are a bunch of theories around the fact that married women don’t live as long as single women or rate themselves as being as happy. They range from things like: Living with even a non-abusive man adds stress to women’s lives and stress has detrimental impacts on human health. Men tend to sabotage health efforts, like diet changes, and in couples, his demand to not make the change is likely to win dragging her health down. Men commit the lion’s share of domestic abuse that results in their …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 07:29 AM
3

I said nothing about survival of the fittest. I said survival of the species. We should drastically reduce our numbers as a species.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 05:13 AM
2

What I find so fascinating here is that all a guy has to do for a woman to be willing to put up with him is to have at worst net neutral impact on her life. More realistically, because so many women still buy into the idea that they need to marry to be ‘whole’ or, socially successful, or whatever, in reality all he has to be is be at worst only mildly net negative in her life. And yet, men think that’s way too much to ask of them while complaining bitterly that women won’t put up with their shit…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 05:11 AM
0

The reason I point out that men don’t need sex is because rapists often justify their actions by saying that they needed sex. If you’re a lonely dude, you can work on yourself until you can make actual friends. No one owes you companionship - even if it shortens your life to be lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 04:34 AM
10

Dude, you want women to want you because if you can land any woman you’ll be happier and your life expectancy will increase. But we don’t get that if we land one of you. Instead, we get the opposite - we rate ourselves as less happy, and our life expectancy shrinks. You need us. We not only don’t need you, you’re actively bad for us.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 04:29 AM
0

No one has ever suffered tissue damage from not getting laid. Men do not need sex - they just want it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 04:16 AM
-8

Seriously, why is you wanting to have a fucking baby more important than the ability of this planet to sustain life? Just don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 04:13 AM
5

Take a long look at the droughts and the impact they will have on food supplies. If you think that’s not going to effect your children, you’re either stupid or incredibly wealthy. For a model on what hungry armed people look like when there is a drought, take a look at the territories controlled by ISIS and Boka Haram. And then think: Do I really need to have a fucking baby and make climate change happen just that much faster? And then get a goddamned vasectomy, or (because permanent birth contr…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 03:34 AM
1

What the studies actually show is that most women who marry rate themselves as less happy, and live less long than their unmarried counterparts. So those men might be ‘nice’ but the vast majority of them still actively make women’s lives worse. Why should women marry men who make our lives worse? I mean we can get all the benefits of marriage though things other than marrying some life sucking leach-man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 03:29 AM
2

The guys who blame women for them not getting a date are misogynists who just want to blame women for everything. They also blame women for things like the dating consequences of there being 73m surplus men in the world even though the reason there are 73m surplus men in the world is sex selective abortion and infanticide.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 12:20 AM
3

You’re seriously like talking to a wall. It’s unfair in that 1) dude lies; 2) he uses greater power to mislead and manipulate someone; 3) he has targeted a much younger woman explicitly because she lacks the experience to see through his bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 01:34 AM
2

No one is saying women are children who need to be chaperoned. What people are saying is that there is a dynamic where older men with more experience and power use that experience and power unfairly in their dating lives. The victims are not exclusively women, but because heterosexuality remains more prevalent than homosexuality, the bulk of victims are men. Are there women who do this to? Yes, but this is also far less common. And the consequences are typically far less dire.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 12:51 AM
2

The creepy men also tend to pick a young woman who will be vulnerable for various reasons like the girl who is new in town and hasn’t made friends yet, or who feels isolated from her peers because she has gone through something they haven’t (like losing a parent or being in foster care, etc.), or who is starved for affection, or who has already experienced sexual abuse from an adult man and who therefore is more prone to seeing the abuse as ‘normal.’ They also focus on women who are financially …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 12:43 AM
1

“Men aren’t ‘fucking losers’ for trying their absolute best to understand women.” It’s not trying to understand women that makes them ‘fucking losers.’ It’s trying to understand women by ignoring anything women say or do and instead relying on a bunch of men who can’t get laid if their lives depended on it for information about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 10:40 PM
1

In the interest of changing your view... You’re right that it’s an elaborate ritual to gain self esteem, but it’s not a placebo - it’s a poison. It actively makes those men feel worse about themselves, damages their prospects, and fuels them into being people who will fail and being close to anyone...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 10:34 PM
1

Right. So the common element in women’s unhappiness from the 60’s to now seems to be men sucking, but not in a good way.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 10:13 PM
1

You can? Awesome. Cite them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 08:49 AM
1

Your parents were born before the 1870’s because that’s when people started widely using condoms to lower the birth rate. Are you a vampire? And hormonal birth control? 1930s.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 08:33 AM
1

Every credible researcher on the subject says you’re incorrect. Unless you’re taking specifically about hook up culture and the orgasm gap. The thing is, the orgasm gap doesn’t get better with marriage to a dudebro.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 08:29 AM
3

It’s so telling that TRP claims women are unhappy because we’ve not married when any credible information says exactly the opposite. What they mean is that they’re unhappy with women because we’ve become less complaint because we are less dependent on their sorry asses...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 06:14 AM
3

“No you’re not opting out of marriage. Marriage is opting out of you.” Oh bless. You’re ignorant of the wide body of research into the causes of falling marriage rates. It’s us women, dude. We’re (increasingly) done with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 11:10 PM
1

Um dude? You might want to look into when birth control became widely available. It’s not as recent as you think... Also, some of those 11 kids would have died, and many would have been contributing to the family finances.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 11:08 PM
2

I find it hilarious that you start by saying “men under 30 can’t offer much” and then in your next statement say you aren’t “sure how [the fact that men don’t offer women benefits in marriage] is the case.” If one looks at the stats, single women rate ourselves as happier than married women while married men are happier than married women, and single women live longer while married men live longer. You may not know how “this is the case” but it’s a fact. Marriage is, generally speaking, not in a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 11:05 PM
22

I think there are a bunch of reasons (more on that below) people find the high standards frustrating, but a key element I see in the complains of men abut women’s standards is that they feel like we’re changing the rules of the game in a way that reduces the enormous advantages men have had in dating and marriage. Women are now more likely to opt out of marriage simply on the threshold of deciding she does not want marriage if the result will make her life net worse - as will be the case with th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 12:30 AM
22

We are, but we also recognise that we bear nearly all of the consequences for sex, and are far less likely to climax during it than our male partners. Why would we risk pregnancy, an STI (easier to transmit form M to F, and the consequences to F are much worse), rape, and social sanction for a guy who won’t even bring us to orgasm?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/21 10:06 PM
1

We should really encourage eye-makeup on men. How can anyone who has seen David Bowie not recognise it as really sexxxxy?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/21 01:02 AM
2

Um... there are actually 65 million more men than women in the world thanks to sex selective abortion and infanticide.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 01:56 AM
13

To a lot of men, women exist as items on a shelf waiting for someone to pluck us off. When you’re buying a sex toy, you don’t worry about the sex toy’s feelings about the purchase. You just tell yourself that the sex toy is yours now and better live up to the advertising that led you to buy it. In that model, women are not supposed to have standards because we’re not supposed to have a choice in who plucks us off the shelf.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 01:22 AM
5

What bothers the men who are bothered about women having standards is that us having standards rules them out. Our standards could not be low enough to include those guys because everyone would want a partner that Is a net positive in my life.” These guys are all net negatives, so... What I find really cute are all the comments saying things like “this is why women will die alone.” That’s not why we’ll die alone. Even if we have a life partner, most of us will die without a partner because we li…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 11:33 PM
1

1) Blaming women who are victimised by the patriarchal culture which was created by men is an interesting choice. 2) Women are not turned off by male insecurity. We are turned off by pathetic men - the kind who never quite mature past the child stage despite growing into adult male bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 10:39 PM
3

The thing I find funniest about all of this is that at least half the time the dude complaining that a woman ‘friendzoned’ him is also complaining to her (or other women) about his life problems and especially how no women will have him.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 10:36 PM
1

A lot of men who are physically attractive find their partner’s libido crash when she realises he’s a shitty partner and / or mediocre in bed. And again, there’s a lot of research supporting that notion. But sure, keep pretending it’s all about how a guy looks and his personal traits have nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 12:03 AM
2

I don’t disagree that people will try harder to make it work with an attractive partner. But when someone is fundamentally incapable of being a good partner, it’s going to be a shitty relationship no matter how hard one tries to make it work. And at some point, it’s just not worth it to keep trying no matter how ‘attractive’ they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/21 12:01 AM
4

It’s not a gross generalisation when it’s backed up with a host of sociological research. Straight men have shallower friendships than straight women and tend to dump everything onto their female partners - assuming they can get one.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 11:31 PM
0

Any man who does not have genuine friendships with women fundamentally does not think women are people. I(F) have a number of male friends. Some have been attracted to me at some point and I’ve been attracted to some of them at some point and we’ve gotten past it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 09:54 PM
1

And the reasons a lot of women experience a drop in sex drive in long term relationships is because of problem partners. Like dudes? If your wife stopped putting out when you moved in together, it could be because she’s so annoyed with your shitty housekeeping skills that she can’t see past it to get in the mood. Step it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 09:46 PM
0

Oh, bless. Because you don’t actually know anything about the subject you think it’s unknowable. Everything you have mentioned has been accounted for in the research. Men rape commit 99% of all rapes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 09:39 PM
0

Anyone who thinks that being ‘nice and considerate’ is a hinderance to dating is a douche.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 09:38 PM
0

I’m saying that at the point when women are guilty 50% of murders and 50% of rapes, then men and women will be a hell of a lot closer to having equal downsides in a heterosexual relationship. Right now the stat is 90% of murders are committed by men, and 99% of rapes. Either men need to pull their shit together and stop that, or... Well, since I’m really not pro rape, I’m gonna say it’s just something women continue to weigh when we decide whether men are worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 09:37 PM
1

And people wonder why women are opting out of marriage...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 09:31 PM
1

Case in point: Dude? I bet you’re single and you’re kind of a douche. But sure, blame the ladies for not wanting what you think of as ‘nice.’
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 07:26 AM
1

1:16 men is literally a serial rapist. And just ‘not a serial rapist’ is such a low bar leaving a whole lot of assholes uncovered by the 1:16 stat. Men are socialised differently from women and in ways that make them more shitty as partners and as humans. When women rape and murder as often as men, you can tell me that it’s sexist to recognise that men are socialised in shitty ways. Until then, it’s just a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 07:25 AM
6

Being a good person makes people overlook a lot of other faults. But what a lot of men think are ‘good people’ aren’t really good people. To be a good person means more than just not raping anyone in an alleyway. It means being kind and considerate. And men are overwhelmingly taught not to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 02:56 AM
2

Have you ever met a shitty person who has a good relationship? Like ever? Not like ‘they’re banging someone out of their league’ like a relationship where they genuinely love each other and support one another through difficulty?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 02:02 AM
5

Being kind is a mandatory trait one must have to be able to love someone. People who lack kindness are incapable of forming a genuinely loving relationship. Someone might temporarily love them, but that love goes away because the unkind person is fundamentally incapable of love.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 01:53 AM
6

I should clarify - a lot of ordinary looking kind men have happy, fulfilling marriages. Men who suck overall do not have happy or fulfilling marriages. It’s the sucking that makes them incapable of a good marriage and the kindness that makes the other men capable.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 01:17 AM
2

I don’t think it’s that those men want it to be simple in reality. What those men want is to be able to ‘win’ sexual access to, and emotional support from a woman they deem ‘hot’ while offering her little in return. Those guys often think of that as ‘simple’ because they’ve been taught not to think of women as people and to think of the things they associate with women (like housework, childcare, emotional labour, ect.) as unimportant. That doesn’t mean they actually want things to be simple. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 12:23 AM
14

I think people attribute cause when it’s not necessarily merited. A friend of mine is this stunning man - 6’3, physically fit, strong jawline, these totally adorable dimples when he smiles, great hair. He’s also one of the genuinely kindest people I have ever met. When I started working with him, he went out of his way to help me and I saw him do that with every other newcomer. He even helped me understand the area where I lived because I was new to town. He organised team lunches to make sure w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 09:19 PM
27

It is telling that OP thinks the ‘truest form of love’ is when a woman eliminates her personality to please a man and then compares her to a ‘puppy dog.’ I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say this dude has never felt love for his female partners and they eventually dumped him for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 09:04 PM
5

The orgasm gap is real and there are far more consequences (pregnancy, STI transmission, STI severity, slut shaming, risk of sexual assault and rape, etc.) for sex for women, but I have seen few people here suggesting women do not enjoy sex. But there are a lot of men in here who are clearly people with whom no woman would benefit from having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 11:55 PM
–

| I think you and most women severely overestimate the importance of "quality time" for men. Dude, that’s because those men don’t think women are people. They do spend ‘quality time’ with their male friends. They don’t want to spend quality time with the women they supposedly love because they aren’t actually capable of loving women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 11:46 PM
–

You’re telling me to use men like an ATM in exchange for a relationship. As far as I’m concerned, dude, that’s sex work. I typoed because I typed on a phone. Edited. But really, you couldn’t figure that one out? Bless...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 07:44 AM
1

Um... who do you think I’m dating? Because... Also, like with absolutely full respect to sex workers, I really don’t want to trade emotional labour for food. To make it worth my while, my rates would be so much higher than just paying my bills.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 05:36 AM
1

I am financially self supporting, so no, a man returning the emotional support I give him by... what? Taking me out to dinner? Contributing to his half of the bills? No, that is not remotely close to equivalent to the benefits he’s getting. I would prefer to just earn the money at my, um... I think it’s called my job...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 04:55 AM
12

“Maybe the quality time is important to the woman, and in return for the quality time of them bonding while eating the potato soup, the woman cooks the potato soup and cleans the dishes?” Oh, that’s so cute! you think him not giving a shit about spending time connecting with her is a symptom of him loving her... Oh bless...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 04:17 AM
13

| Truth be told you get a lot in return, the problem is you don't value what you get because... Study after study after study says your statement is inaccurate. Or perhaps the key word here is ‘value.’ If what we get back from men in exchange for being personal servants is, well, a pile of non-compost friendly shit, we probably do not value that. But seriously, even most men wouldn’t value a pile of garbage...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 03:44 AM
15

One can, but that is not the trade off you gave. You gave a trade off where either a) she cooks him a dinner and he eats that dinner in whatever manner he sees fit provided he is still in the house; or b) they both go out to dinner and eat together with someone else doing the cooking and cleanup.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 03:39 AM
23

Typically, a big part of what makes people want to eat in a public place where someone else cooks with their loved one is that they want to spend quality time with that person in a setting that takes them out of their day to day drudgery. You might note that restaurants are often described as ‘intimate’ and couples typically face one another and speak with each other. The couple are encouraged to linger over the meal so they have a longer period in which to talk with one another and emotionally …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 12:55 AM
9

Your comment here seems like a non sequitur.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/21 12:52 AM
50

Following up on Sage_Planter’s excellent comment, OP, I think you’re missing some key points. 1) When women complain that men expect us to do a bunch of stuff for them, we’re not complaining that they see that as ‘love language’ - we’re complaining that we’re expected to be servants with nothing remotely equivalent in return. That has nothing to do with ‘love languages’ and everything to do with equality and being taken for granted. 2) Love languages are about how one understands and expresses l…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 11:59 PM
12

Adding to this: Because India has 37 million surplus men thanks to sex selective abortion and infanticide, nothing is going to get a large number men into marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 09:43 PM
1

Me: “Are you familiar with...” You: “Not really” Thanks for acknowledging that you really have absolutely zero grasp on what you’re blathering. I mean it was pretty obvious from everything you said, but... Good on you for recognising it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 01:18 AM
1

How will societies deal with the ‘demographic implosion’? Easy. Automation, immigration, and adaptation. BFD. Societies have done this before and will do it again. Are you familiar with the huge advances that came when ⅓ of Europe died out thanks to The Plague? The huge population drop ended the Dark Ages. Besides, women not carrying dead weight men is a service to our species. We have a moral imperative not to enable a bunch of pathetic losers and, in doing so, weaken the species. I get it dude…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 01:08 AM
1

Credible demographers believe that the human species will die out in our generation because women have decided not to shackle ourselves with dead weight? Bwah ha ha ha ha ha! I mean it would be great for climate change, but sadly, it’s just wildly not likely.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 07:10 AM
1

I’m terribly sorry. I’m afraid I sprained my eyes rolling them at your comment dude. Do you really believe women owe it to humanity to make our lives suck because the alternative is to return to the Stone Age? Are you actually serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 03:27 AM
1

Yeah, it’s so terrible that women are opting to be single instead of popping out babies when the world only has 7 billion people... Totally tragic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 02:47 AM
1

Deciding not to date someone because he will make your life materially worse is not the same as having ‘inflated expectations.’ It’s having realistic expectations of one’s options and deciding that being single is preferable to carrying dead weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 01:12 AM
6

Statistically speaking, the vast majority of men don’t have much to offer as partners - marrying a man reduces a woman’s life expectancy and her happiness. So it is not even a little surprising that women struggle to find a man who isn’t just dead weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 09:43 PM
1

So basically you found something that is not a refutation of what I posted and you tried to pretend it’s a refutation. How does that make any sense to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 10:09 PM
2

Not the same study. You might note that by um... reading who the authors are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 01:29 PM
3

It’s so cute that you can’t tell the difference between ‘shown’ (made visible) and ‘shorn’ (sheered a sheep) but you think you grasp research. Bless.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 01:28 PM
12

The claim that men stay with women who are depressed but women leave men requires a citation. It seems implausible. For some relevant data about sickness (not depression): When a woman married to a man is diagnosed with a potentially life threatening disease requiring serious care, she stands a 1:5 chance of her husband leaving her. By contrast, when the sick party in the heterosexual marriage is the man, the wife stays with him 97% of the time. This said, heteronormative dynamics do play a role…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/21 04:00 AM
12

Posting booty pics is not consent to sex, or even an indication that she likes sex. Women often post booty picks because it’s what we’ve been told it shows us at our best.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 10:22 PM
1

Oh bless. Please go your own way.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/21 11:22 PM
10

Average guys haven’t caught up. See also: The orgasm gap, the household chore gap, the parenting gap, and the different trajectories of life expectancy for men (longer) vs. women (shorter) in a LTR. Why should women fuck men when they’re not bringing anything to the table?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 10:37 PM
6

Thank you for clarifying that duh, it is not Pareto!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 01:41 AM
3

Many men and women want commitment. Despite this, women still tend to be the gatekeepers of commitment. The reason for this is pretty simple: If a heterosexual man manages to land nearly any woman, his life expectancy increases and he will rate himself as happier. The opposite is true for women - if we land nearly any man, our life expectancy decreases and we rate ourselves as less happy. Essentially, men have more drawbacks than women. Women want commitment, but we want commitment that will mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/21 10:25 PM
6

As the case above illustrates remarkably well. Imagine being so determined that feminists can’t do something that you reattribute the achievements of a group call ‘The Feminist Majority’ to ‘liberals’ because you can’t accept that feminists did it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 04:07 AM
6

? There are groups that are all sorts of things. The Feminist Majority is a group that identifies as feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 12:14 AM
9

Are you being deliberately dense? This change came about because the Feminist Majority lobbied for it. If the Business Bureau lobbied for it, we could credit the Business Bureau for the change, but they didn’t. The change came because of feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 11:40 PM
10

That identifies as feminist. They identify as feminist so much that they named themselves with the word ‘Feminist.’
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 11:20 PM
12

Because the move to make the legal definition of rape gender neutral was pushed by a group called The Feminist Majority you want to take the victory away from feminists and give it to liberals? Why does that make any sense to you at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 10:50 PM
8

“What do men mean when they say they want sympathy for their dating issues?” They mean they feel entitled to your time, attention, emotional support, and body, but will offer little to nothing to offer in return. In return for your attention, they will not pay attention to you. In return for your emotional support, they will not provide you with emotional support. In return for access to sex with you, they will not be attentive enough to help you reach orgasm. They resent that other women aren’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 11:59 PM
3

For real... It’s like no woman has ever orgasmed with them so they can’t imagine that some of us just enjoy sex with a reasonably talented sex partner...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 10:31 AM
8

Oh, bless, OP. You seem to be assuming that the women you’re shagging want a serious relationship from you and aren’t just scratching an itch. You may not cross their ‘relationship threshold.’
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 11:59 PM
-1

But by your own description you are utterly unclear on how to attract a woman. Why would you be able to raise someone who can attract women when you don’t know how to do that? It’s like me saying “I’m going to raise someone to be a better cook than I am by... showing them videos about how awful people who eat food are.”
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 03:16 AM
-1

The vast majority of women do not want to have a relationship or sex with a man who clearly and obviously despises women. It sounds like the lies and manipulation you’re trying to use aren’t proving effective. Why do you think it would be more effective in someone with half your genetics?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 03:08 AM
1

A lot of men over 6’ with high testosterone will tell you otherwise. And your socialisation strategy will almost guarantee he lands in the incel zone. You’re going to make him hate women while also feeling entitled to us. We can smell that, you know...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 03:02 AM
2

If you have a kid, he’s just as likely to become an incel if you raise him the way you’re describing. I mean sure, get your kids medical care and dental that they need - it’s a health issue - but if you think that will ensure your son becomes desirable to women? Yeah, that’s unlikely.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 02:49 AM
1

A few things: There is a difference between ‘creepy’ a perceived trait, and ‘dangerous,’ the actual risk potential. People who do not conform to social norms around things like hygiene, or who are extremely socially awkward are often deemed to be ‘creepy’ without actually being dangerous. There are a lot of reasons men can be deemed attractive or unattractive, many of which relate to personal style, grooming, fitness, etc. These are proxies for class. Unfairly, class is a proxy for determining w…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/21 01:24 AM
1

I’m in the same boat as you, Fuego213 - I’m a woman with a healthy libido. If a guy turned me down the way OP describes, I’d move on right quick.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 12:49 AM
291

He can see her network and contact people in it. He could contact her employer and make up lies about her that would be unsettling to an employer. She would do well to identify his employer and report him to their HR. If it’s a company with a public facing image, it would be good to associate him and that message with teh company on Twitter to pressure them into firing him because... He’s almost certainly like that with the women he works with too...
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy11/04/21 08:51 AM
12

I mean, duh. Of course they don’t expect men to support women. Their big issue is that they believe women have no purpose other than satisfying their whims.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 05:28 AM
3

I doubt every woman he knows is actually a gold digger. I suspect he sees every woman he knows as a gold digger because he is so convinced that’s the way women are he cannot imagine any other possibilities. He also probably tries to date exclusively on the basis of a woman’s appearance ignoring all compatibility indicators like shared values and then complains about her. Assuming, of course, that he’s managed to date at all..
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 09:17 PM
1

It’s possible the women you’re “friends” with don’t do anything for you because 1) don’t recognise what they are doing for you - like providing you with emotional support and companionship; or 2) They’re leery of being your friend because ultimately you seem only to want to figure out how to get your dick into them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 09:13 PM
2

Seriously, I (also a woman) have, and have always had, a lot of male friends. And near as I can tell, my relationship to these guy friends is pretty similar to their relationships with men - we go to the pub sometimes and drink and talk. Sometimes we come together to do stuff like helping with a big project. I don’t think my vagina has ever once played into those interactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 09:11 PM
10

While I see why you want them to talk to women, I don’t want to talk to them. I’ve done it enough. I know that never helps. Men who see women as fundamentally not human are never going to see us as human. I’d rather they go to some island where they can battle with other misogynists to become the alpha misogynist for the entertainment of women who will then reward them by throwing them back into the battle...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 09:06 PM
1

He may care about relationships and family, but he cares about those things in as much as they provide him with a cook, house keeper, therapist, and sex doll. He might even take a lot of care in picking his future feature rich sex doll. But he will never care about the actual person he is in a relationship with because he sees her as existing only to support him.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 09:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter