TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Random_Fandom Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by Random_Fandom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Still going: high tenacity stupid. Protip for the future: when you're trying to be funny, don't get angry when you realize you missed the mark. Hone your humor for next time! Can tell you don't understand Reddit. Now that really hurts. <sad face> You mean it's pointless to add "understands Reddit" to my credentials‽
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:43 AM
0

I don't give a fuck what you say. Your replies show otherwise, my dude. Nothing you've said has been intelligent yet I can differentiate between 'your' and 'you're.' So I have that going on for me... ...which is nice :) Anyway, have a good day / evening! This was eye-opening in a way unique only to interactions on reddit. Interesting stuff!
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:00 AM
1

Okay, you're angry that your initial joke failed, so you keep spilling out ad hominems after realizing you're not funny. Not my fault, dude. Be clear, or be funny, or have both qualities. Don't shoot the messenger. P.S. "If you don't want to be assumed your chastising in a dumb way" If you're going to keep tossing around the "dumb" comment - it's "YOU'RE."
/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:50 AM
-1

You took my comments as chastising you simply because I said it was strange? Why is that? for dumb people Take a moment to consider that if you have to resort to using insults to justify your lack of clarity, perhaps the problem isn't with the reader. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights10/03/18 12:48 AM
0

...if you can detect it's a joke. No sensible person would think... First, your rationale assumes that one's sense of humor is universally understood. Concerning what a "sensible person would think", this is reddit. People have written your exact train of thought in all seriousness, and without a stitch of irony.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 12:35 AM
0

"Finally?" Strange comment in /r/MENSRights...
/r/MensRights09/03/18 10:48 PM
17

He still got three months in prison for "disturbing the peace" with his toy gun; not simply probation (for that supposed offense) like the other person in this article.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:11 AM
5

but when I first saw her I was all "Wait, she's actually being nice about white men?" Lol. :p Same for me, except my surprise was finally seeing positive comments on reddit about a black woman. This thread needs to be archived. :D
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:35 AM
3

Terry Crews didn't get any "pass"; he's simply popular enough that people listened. The problem is that unless men and boys possess some degree of power or popularity, they're* their voices are usually unheard. Pulling out the race card (especially when it's just a guess on your part) is divisive, not supportive of all men. *e: horrible typo - [Doesn't matter; nobody read it anyway!]
/r/MensRights19/10/17 10:34 PM
2

Just to say, the form requires a bit more than that: http://i.imgur.com/dVG0Zs7.png You can't finish without including your full name, street address, city, state, and zip.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 02:12 AM
5

Since Google ranks at #1 - http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/google.com, it's still far more reflective of a larger worldwide userbase than Tumblr. On this topic, I've seen more references to tumblr on this sub than all my combined subscriptions. That alone makes me consider that we can neither determine who performs specific searches, nor do we know the motivation behind their keywords.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 05:50 AM
1

Haha! That's especially funny because I've always believed in sharing. :) I've tagged you now, so I can remember to break you off a piece when that momentous moment arrives. :D
/r/MensRights23/01/14 11:27 PM
2

Would make me happy to see a ban. ...aaannnnd he's gone. I am now a little nervous about your ability to wish things into existence. (⊙﹏⊙)
/r/MensRights23/01/14 11:07 PM
1

I always wondered why only the officer's face was blurred. The guy who was being frisked was let go since nothing incriminating was found on him— yet his face isn't obscured. Very odd.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 09:52 PM
6

Thank you so much. Hopefully, your comment will keep the topic from being further derailed. On that note, what happened to that young man is disgraceful and sickening. I can't imagine the humiliation and pain, let alone understand how that brutality may affect him for the rest of his life. :(
/r/MensRights23/01/14 01:14 AM
4

I think FallingSnow is referring to the last part of OP's title, "Kimmel, feminists, screech misogyny."
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:26 PM
1

Concerning lifestyle being a factor, a case I saw years ago involved the former spouse receiving $20,000 monthly. I can't imagine needing 5K every week. As for how people would react if the genders were reversed, I believe that has to do with antiquated views when it comes to equality under the law. Modern alimony practices stem from the time when many women didn't work outside the home, and were financially dependent upon their husbands. Times have changed, and society definitely needs to catch…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 07:36 PM
2

alimony payment should only be considered if the other spouse has been incapacitated Completely agree with all your points. In my previous comment, I forgot to specify that when I said 'situations,' I was referring to similar conditions you mentioned. If a person can support him/herself, no alimony should be required. I also don't believe one partner should have to pay the other so they can continue eating Grade A steak instead of hamburger.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 06:26 PM
2

I'm pretty sure all they're doing is pushing for reformation to the guidelines regardless of gender. Yes, that's precisely it: "They say men and women should be treated equally..." The Family Law Reform group also wants a bill passed "that will include a "fair" alimony payment that averages incomes for both divorcing spouses." Great all around, imho. I've long thought that payments to an ex-spouse should be determined after considering both parties' incomes and situations. Gender should not be a…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:44 PM
1

Based on the comments, it seems some aren't aware that she quoted a male author (who doesn't list any qualifications beyond his own experiences). On Gaskin's twitter, he describes himself as "Purpose Coach. PhD from Mistakes University." If I were OP, I'd consider have a discussion with the friend not only about the topic, but the validity of the author's philosophies.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:03 AM
3

In the video of her speaking to Brian about it, she said she didn't want to have to pay back the money, "because that would take a long time." It's around 2:20 into the video. I saw that last year, but I'm still flabbergasted by the lack of remorse. No concern for him whatsoever.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 03:10 AM
1

We need to progress beyond such titles and perceptions. In an ideal world, human beings would drop all systems that support inequality, and work together for fairness across the board, full stop. If one parent has been proven to be more suitable than another during a custody dispute, the child should be placed with that parent, period. In reality, this is not the case. Children are often 'rewarded' to unfit parents based on gender. I've worked with kids in various programs, and I could tell you …
/r/MensRights30/07/13 11:03 PM
4

First, I hope everything goes well with you, and that you're okay, OP. Secondly, after searching, I came across a site that helps U.S. residents find health centers that give free checks, along with their proximity to your location according to zip code. (Link) I truly hope this helps.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 09:20 PM
2

It's twisted humor and things you see in cheesy gore and horror movies It's true, a lot of people have become desensitized to graphic descriptions and/or images. We see it in our films, reading materials, and other wide-reaching media. Still, I'd have hoped that people would be able to react differently to what they've seen/read in fiction from an event that damaged a human being for life.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 02:51 PM
6

Good lord, imagine the backlash for a segment like that. Those guys would never find work in the industry again.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 02:40 PM
2

Putting disclaimers before an apology like, ...but it's not easy doing a live show 5 days a week; and we wish we can say the right thing all the time —makes it seem as if that segment was made to save ratings/viewers, not make amends. Imho, apologies should focus on those whom were affected by the mistake; not seek to lessen the blame by essentially saying, life isn't easy, and we're all human.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 02:37 PM
41

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muuFygvXPAM&t=1m21s e: Btw, when I first came across that clip, my jaw dropped. One of the host's expressions mirrored mine... looked like she was in shock. The others... wow. I just can't describe how horrible it feels listening to and watching them laugh about mutilation. P.S. Sharon made a recorded apology, which is also on youtube. I didn't bother watching it.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:32 AM
6

my company couldn't give a shit what sex you are as long as you're working I've had a variety of jobs ranging between menial, minimum wage positions to those in a professional capacity, and that was true in my case as well. My bosses' concerns were about the quality of the workers' performance. so often they can be absolutely fucking toxic in the workplace Well, you've just voiced an observation I've had since childhood. The 'Mean Girls' comparison you made is spot on (at least in my personal ex…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 09:31 PM
1

You can see how she told him in the video on the huffingtonpost page (around 2:25). http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/08/brian-banks-accuser-caugh_n_1581605.html For someone who lied and ruined a good chunk of a man's life, she was infuriatingly flippant about it. As I said last year, she should serve time for that.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:51 AM
2

everyone else thinks we are crazy pigs. :( Only those who want to remain ignorant, and who never bother to branch out from circles that reinforce their beliefs. You can only lead a horse to the water. It may not drink it, but plenty of thirsty ones will. :)
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:41 AM
1

I thought the attitudes in the MGTOW forum post were just venting about the lady's profile, so I browsed through other sections. In the several threads I read, every comment about women was deeply negative. Other sites dedicated to men's issues that I've visited were more balanced and enlightening.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:34 AM
1

You might be able to help me find the source for this: I recall reading a similar thing along the lines of the White Feather Campaign, but it took place during both World War I and II. Namely, soldiers with foot or hand injuries were sometimes treated with disdain by nurses, because they suspected them of harming themselves in the hopes of being removed from battle. As for the feather campaign, I always thought "The Four Feathers" films (there are several based on British writer A. E. W. Mason's…
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter