TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RandomePerson Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by RandomePerson on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Then he says that, and returns her to where he picked her up. The issue isn't that they don't align on wants or intentions, it's that he agreed to give someone a ride, and then left them in some random place at night because he has the emotional maturity of a middle schooler and can't handle a difference of goals.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/21 01:03 AM
8

LOL, you're not red pill bro. You're either a socially retarded (i.e. unsuccessful) sociopath or straight autistic.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/21 11:48 PM
6

Fucking mega beta move. End the date, fine, but don't leave someone at a random place. That wasn't a display of confidence or dominance, that's just the kind of sad rheee shit you'd expect a butthurt and insecure 13-year old to pull.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/21 11:46 PM
12

Maybe just leave it at "I guess you are a little too puritan for my tastes then" but if some girl told me straight up "I do not want sex" while we are out on a (assumed?) romantic date I'd probably feel a bit offended. Date would be over for sure. Begs the question why the fuck are you here then? Because there's a difference between, "I don't want sex with some dude I've known all of one hour and have no connection with or trust in" and "I never want sex at all". I find it disingenuous how many …
/r/TheRedPill14/05/21 11:44 PM
9

He didn't just walk away from a date, he left her in a random parking lot. If she's in his car, that means he either picked her up or met her, with the mutual understanding that he would be providing transportation for the date. If you don't want to continue the date, that's fine, but leaving someone in some random place with no notice when the only "foul" they made was to want something different is just an irredeemably asshole move. He could have just driven her back to wherever he picked her …
/r/TheRedPill14/05/21 11:39 PM
1

U mAd bRo? FOH with your whiny shit.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/21 11:51 PM
3

LOL, this is the most bitch-made thing I've read on Reddit this entire week, and that's saying something. OP, are you 12? If the person is directly behind, hold the fucking door, irrespective of gender, age, or attractiveness. Letting the door slam in someone's face isn't alpha; it's the kinda of rude man-child display that you expect from beta little incels.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/21 11:05 PM
1

What point do you think I am missing?
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 08:12 PM
2

But some people enjoy traveling with both their partners and friends. I love traveling with my husband, but sometimes I'll take a weekend getaway by myself because I'm a natural introvert and have hobbies my husband doesn't care about, and vice versa (he doesn't want to spend all weekend bird watching, I don't want to spend all weekend trying new cocktails). And occasionally I'll take a small trip with a friend because we share a hobby and I enjoy their company. It boggles the mind that "woman w…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 02:58 PM
3

Actually, it seems more like TRP is trying to create this reality rather than accurately telling it like it is. Among men who don't even know what TRP is, no one seems to think that a man with a less attractive wife is a failure, or that a woman with a less attractive husband is just using his beta bux. There's that rare exception where a woman will be a solid 8 and a man is a 4, where the joke is he must have a huge dick to score her, but mostly this sort of thinking only seems to be present in…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/18 12:17 AM
5

I'm right at the wall, but I have been out if the dating market and happily married for several years, so it makes no matter to me which side of the wall I find myself on. Incidentally, when I was dating I had no problem finding "good men" to choose from, because I didn't have ridiculous criteria like "must look like Brad Pitt and make 250k and commit to me immediately and cater to my every whom but also somehow be a bad boy". I dated a lot of mild mannered and geeky engineers and programmers wh…
/r/TheRedPill27/04/18 10:17 PM
2

That makes sense, but it doesn't explain the hypocrisy of how men with less physically attractive wives are viewed compared to women with less physically attractive husbands. Here is a trend I see with men who subscribe TRP: a male who appears to have a wife of lower SMV is a failure, while a woman who appears to have a husband of lower SMV is just a gold-digging whore who is only with him for the money and probably rides the CC in secret. The man is expected to do better, because a successful m…
/r/TheRedPill27/04/18 09:33 PM
6

Yes, some women do play games (like men who spin plates). Yet some women don't. If you have no interest or patience in finding out the difference that's fine, but it is a logical fallacy to then say that your anecdotal experience in which you exclude non-promiscuous women is proof that women are untrustworthy sluts. I don't understand how a philosophy that stresses personal responsibility does not also stress owning the reality of your choices. If a woman puts herself in a box by refusing to dat…
/r/TheRedPill27/04/18 09:24 PM
2

By that reasoning, a man who wants to create a happy and stable family should go for the money-grubbing HB9 who brings nothing to the table except her soon to diminish looks and penchant for infidelity, versus the solid HB6.5 who is smart, educated, easy to get along with, and would be a good wife and mother. After all. When given the choice, most men would choose the HB9, yes?
/r/TheRedPill27/04/18 03:06 PM
1

Here's another thing I don't get about TRP: women who want tall, cocky men with money are seen as being gold-diggers, but a woman who actually goes for personality and other traits are seen as having settled for a beta. Let's say you have Chuck, who is only 5'6 and is a solid 5 on the face/body scale (discounting height) and an introvert who doesn't feel the need to dominate social settings; however Chuck is smart and funny, has interesting hobbies, is independent, and would be a faithful partne…
/r/TheRedPill27/04/18 12:31 PM
7

This is one thing I don't get about TRP. I notice the same trend with women and sexual favors. The thinking goes all women are whores (secretly or otherwise), yet TRP philosophy appears to encourage men to not bother with a woman who does not almost immediately commit to sex. So "a woman who won't have sex with me quickly is not worth my time. Incidentally, all the women I know are untrustworthy little sluts just prowling for cock." Well yeah, if you're excluding any woman who won''t immediately…
/r/TheRedPill27/04/18 12:06 PM
2

Sounds like you're hamstering to rationalize the fact that it is the same.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/18 05:13 AM
1

Jesus Christ. Sounds like you have self selected the most fucked up women to be in your life. Where are you going where the majority of women you meet would rather be abused than bored. Seriously, I want to know so that I can stay far the hell away from that den of train wrecks and daddy issues.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/18 05:05 AM
3

, I claim it based on how brain works. Citation? But if she don't have another high value guy with her, then all her believes become secondary compared to super high value guy before her. That assumes that she won't do what TRP dictates for men: walk away.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/18 07:40 AM
4

But this still seems circular. The point of AWALT is that all women have preconceived thought patterns and behaviors, and from what I've seen in here, that includes not being able to form principles to the same extent as men. So if a woman sticks by her principles of not having casual sex but waiting for a real and meaningful relationship, she is not worth forming a relationship for. If you are discounting these women, then your strategy only works for women who will give it us easily. Which is …
/r/TheRedPill13/02/18 07:32 PM
5

I think more correct would be to say "she either interested and it's fast, or not interested and then it is long". What about the women who may have genuine interest in you but aren't interested in hopping into bed at the drop of a hat. It gets confusing here sometimes, because the prevailing train of thought is that women ride the cock carousel, and this devalues them. However, if a woman shows signs of not riding the CC, then she's not worth the effort. It seems circular: all women secretly wa…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/18 08:16 PM
4

The answer I came out with, thanks to this sub, was this consideration: when a girl is really into you, she'll travel to get to see you, put on stockings, stay up till 4 a.m. and never look at the watch. She'll literally do everything for you. It just seems a bit hypocritical. The TRP thought seems to be to never expend more effort or energy on a woman than is strictly necessary to procure sex. Am I interpreting TRP thought incorrectly when I say it seems that the general idea is that a man shou…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/18 12:43 AM
9

Let us consider this scenario: your plate has a migraine headache, or worked a 12 hour day and is just too tired for sex at the moment. Do you feel that withdrawing attention in these scenarios is a form of emotional abuse? I suppose the answer depends on whether or not you see this person as good for nothing than sticking your penis inside of.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/18 07:16 PM
5

What would your response have been if she just didn't seem to notice or care? Is the assumption here that any denial if sex at any time is a shit test?
/r/TheRedPill10/02/18 09:11 AM
5

A sentiment I see a lot around here is that all women are secretly sluts who want to bone all the time. That a "unicorn" would not give it up so easily. So it's confusing. If she has sex easily she's not wife material (if you would ever entertain the thought of putting yourself in the position to be married and/or have kids). However, if she's not so easy then you're wasting your time. Which is it? I guess it depends on whether you are dating strictly for casual sex, or if you would be open to a…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 09:12 AM
1

Is it possible that looks are subjective and her criteria for attraction don't match what you assume it would be? Also, even if you were objectively better looking physically, do you think it's possible that these other men are more attractive from a personality/mentality level? Have you also considered that maybe this woman feels like she is forced to be talkative and bubbly in public, and the fact that she is more quiet around you means she is just more comfortable and feels like she doesn't h…
/r/askTRP26/01/18 02:18 AM
7

Do you believe it is impossible for males and females to form platonic bonds over shared interests? Is it unthinkable that if a woman has a genuine interest in philosophy/gourmet cooking/a particular sport/whatever, that she only wants attention and validation, and not exchange of ideas and camaraderie?
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 01:40 AM
4

But that doesn't invalidate the question. They are analogous situations. I'm genuinely curious: do you see men's reactions as equally lacking objectivity, or is there some reason why men would be exempt from this?
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 01:35 AM
5

So if a man finds a woman more attractive after she dyes her hair blonde or red, does that mean his attraction to the woman was all in his mind and not based in anything objective?
/r/TheRedPill25/01/18 07:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter