TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Randommorningkiller Archive

View 0 posts and 636 comments by Randommorningkiller on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

There must be proof of a threat being made.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 03:35 PM
10

Legitimate fear for life or relative's life beyond reasonable doubt of course. No. No. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 07:48 AM
3

The first set is better for resource acquisition. Why is this even a question?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 03:34 AM
2

After extensive study After politically approved study. When you're talking about populations of this size, 1-2% is actually quite significant. And no, acting on a mere 1-2% of people's whims is both impractical and fruitless. It doesn't obey needs of the many and it's probably as effective for the few as encouraging a schizophrenic by entertaining the idea that they're actually right.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 11:32 PM
1

And there's no direct correlation between having XY chromosomes and identifying as male. There is an almost perfect correlation with an irrelevant margin of error of about 1-2%. A majority of white people identify as Christian. A majority of people with XY chromosomes identify as male. A majority of white people identify as Christian. Nearly all people with XY chromosomes identify as male and the exceptions are due to mental illness at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 01:22 PM
3

There's no direct correlation between being white and being christian.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 05:04 PM
1

They came up with basically the same way as feminists do it more than thousands of years ago. So feminism is that far behind? Anyway, 98% correlation between sex and gender. No further explanation required.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 04:59 PM
1

She made me laugh once. "Look away." Boy would that be a hilarious day.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/17 01:36 AM
1

Cooperation/deference to a capable leader and conformity for the sake of appearance are different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 03:19 PM
1

Biological determinism is observably hard to argue against. women invite the refugees because their reproductive strategy is to get raped by foreigners Women invite refugees because they're biologically driven to think collectively and weigh their ideas against the herd to figure out which ideas are the best to have. Government/Corporate interest in globalism both require migration and multiculturalism, so the ideas pushed by media will encourage ideas that link up with that and demonize ideas t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 07:59 AM
2

This is like asking a crying child, "Are you actually not hurt?" Kid's not going to say yes, asking the question is just stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 05:23 PM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 04:03 PM
1

Shit collectivists ask #126
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 12:17 PM
1

You never initiated anything with her for whatever reason (e.g. different cultures, not your 'type', she never gave you IOIs, etc). You’ve gotten to know her a bit and you figure she’ll find a man eventually. Why am I still talking to her in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 06:21 PM
1

This will be amusing. It's not like "regret-rape" isn't already a thing everywhere-else though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/17 03:27 PM
1

Proximity attraction and opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/17 03:24 PM
1

That's called courtesy. It means I acknowledge you're a person with potential value and I will treat you as if you are capable of reaching that value, but I will not treat you as an equal yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 12:33 AM
2

Nobody initially deserves respect. It's earned over a very long period of time or a few very impressive feats.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/17 08:52 PM
1

? You use legal methods to evade tax, milk the system and teach others how to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 03:01 AM
1

Does this mean no kids, though? Generally, that appears to be the case. What do you mean by this? Legal tax evasion to the highest possible extents, which a gender equal and social benefit-heavy society can't handle without mass-importing taxpayers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 02:11 AM
1

It will still be on easy mode. RP exists to teach being old-fashioned so that women will respond in kind. Rather than take for nothing in return, they'll give you some control and faithfulness which isn't really great payment for all the guy has to do to continue receiving that treatment. Going their own way on the other hand, which is seemingly more popular is a threat to women's easy mode. Because rather than improve to provide for a woman who plays her part, it's improvement for self satisfac…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 12:29 AM
1

They have a point...
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/17 09:40 PM
3

Women often don't face legal consequences or they receive greatly reduced legal consequences. "this woman is facing consequences" Is the institutional pussy pass being denied.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/17 09:30 PM
1

Assuming you're approaching this on behalf of "I'm not like other" girls, bias makes the anecdotes useless. If you're trying to prove you aren't something, you can't really give any valuable data.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/17 09:44 PM
1

Hypergamy is the most rational course of action in humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/17 03:52 AM
2

Sith. The Rebels are just disturbing a well-functioning system and the Jedi are religious fanatics.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 10:01 PM
1

Oh no, I wasn't volunteering. I just have no issue with the experiment taking place.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 09:55 PM
2

Feel free then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 08:18 PM
1

You're so special.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 07:54 PM
1

Pill Orientation None Age 21 Gender Medical Helicopter Religion or Lack Thereof Not religious, but understand that religious society is a better long-term plan than secular society. I'd say a capitalist take on Islam would be the ideal. Christianity is too easy to secularize from and eventually throw away the necessary rules and values it instills. How important are your religious beliefs to you on a scale from 1-10 My religious "beliefs" are purely law-based grocery shopping. I'd say 1, as I am…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 07:53 PM
3

Is there lube involved?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 07:40 PM
1

Both, simultaneously.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/17 08:45 PM
1

Silencing people is cowardly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/17 07:31 PM
2

I don't know a nice way to ask "Are you fucking retarded?", so I'll refrain. they could become an enormous movement with millions of members globally. Why the hell would any man in his right mind want to globalize his techniques? Jesus christ, this is dumb. Sure, RP is public but aside from being the reason it exists, the reason it works so well is because most western men are effeminate. If every man is RP, every man is equal competition and you're putting more effort into getting women than yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/17 07:15 PM
1

Innately no, but generally the personality is a turn off.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/17 08:27 AM
2

Is it really still out of their league? I mean, I wouldn't want any of my old shit back. It's "damaged goods" for a reason. Like if a dealer says "You can't afford this car." and then a poor guy buys it off the used lot later, is he driving an expensive car?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/17 12:35 AM
1

It's not a fault. Men shouldn't be monogamous in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/17 12:32 AM
2

That's how I always understood it before I knew about the chemicals of love. All is conditional and everyone is interchangeable. Though guys tend to project a divinity onto a girl. While the interchangeability is still present, the guy has tricked himself into believing she is a unique combination of wonderful traits. Of course, he'll project this onto every girl until he learns better or keeps one till death.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/17 12:06 AM
2

Brock Turner and the Girl in question both made a series of really poor decisions that night. Have you read her statement? It's basically a very long, "I dindu nuffin'" essay about how much of monster he is. It's disgusting and she'll probably fuck herself over again with her lack of agency.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 11:54 PM
3

Brazil Done with that half. Brock Turner Didn't really commit a hideous crime. It's the equivalent of two drunks getting into a fight and one drunk winning. Two drunk people interacted with each other and one happened to get a bad deal out of it. The most that should have happened there is the two of them getting a light sentence for disorderly conduct in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 11:51 PM
3

If Brazil isn't third world, Canada is a shining heaven on earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 11:47 PM
4

I don't care about morals, your move.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 03:16 AM
2

I wouldn't trade for the sexual attention. I'd trade for the freedom to do whatever I want without consequences. However, it depends if I keep a male brain or not. I don't have any use for freedom if I'm less creative and can't really grasp politics. I wouldn't be me without over-analyzing and trying to rework things. I very often hear women frustrated with life and unsure why the world or their relationship history is the way it is and if you explain, they just blame it on evil forces at work o…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 02:42 AM
6

The way I define it At zero effort, women have it far better/easier than men. At minimal effort, women have it even better/easier, because effort is a cost and women have the advantage when the cost is minimal. At moderate effort, women start to equalize due to biological differences. The world is basically "No woman left behind" so the advantages start to fall of when giving women a leg up is a cost to an individual, rather than dispersed among the society. At full effort, men have an advantage…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 02:35 AM
0

Yes yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 02:23 AM
0

This gave me a laugh. ow so? Dogs who aren't starving won't kill and eat children. Domesticated dogs don't have an instinct to kill and eat children, we bred it out of them. Wild animals who are treated well by humans and well fed have been known to overcome their instinct to run away from them. They're just choosing the easiest available method of obtaining food. If every time you learn that a threat isn't a threat is overcoming instinct, your standards are very low.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 02:15 AM
1

Most MGTOW I've observed fall into the Sexually retired investor category. The burned and building resources to only have casual relationships category. or The currently doing casual relationships only category. Then there's the not-really-MGTOWs. The guys that you can tell would declare the first girl they click with as a NAWALT and blow their time and money.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 01:11 AM
6

I must note, these studies are certainly valuable. But the idea that we need them for things that have been obvious facts of life before modern, western society is rather funny. Especially considering the "primitive" people around the world today don't need these studies to be aware of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 01:02 AM
1

Looking at it mathematically, there's far more simple-minded men out there. This is true on paper but doesn't seem to apply in practice. Likely due to emotion/stress management. In the case of "Dark Triad" women, it seems they only outplay other women, but they get put in their place once they get the man they want or get near their career goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 09:09 PM
0

A parent may say they can't afford a gift and get it anyway, because they want to make the child happy. We'd be where we are today if feminism never happened, it'd just be slightly less imbalanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 03:45 PM
1

Very few men are naturally dark triad, where most women are, or at the very least have the capability to be. I highly doubt it. When analyzing the habits and methods of cunning women, it's usually just down to the apathy that comes from not having responsibility. Ever hear of affluenza? People let women get away with things because people like women. Guys manipulate themselves constantly when they love/are attracted to a woman. If you've ever seen a video where a girl repeatedly beats on a guy a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 03:38 PM
2

Explain how any feminist "accomplishment" can be attributed to anything but men wanting to please women/men lobbying to influence public opinion and law, using the inherent bias towards pleasing women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 03:22 PM
0

Feminism has been an extraordinarily successful movement... You say this as if the "movement" did any of the work.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 03:14 PM
9

men's issues from a feminist framework. "We're winning, good job girls."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 03:13 PM
2

Due to the equal vote and biologically ingrained bias, pursuing anything to do with men's issues is a futile effort and no time should be wasted on such a venture.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 03:11 PM
1

Makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 02:18 AM
5

Him: wanna come over (intentional RP-style lack of punctuation) Her: lol what? Him: bring the movies (RP-advocated line meant to project "alpha & confident") Her: OMG you're soo weird Him: fine wanna get coffee instead Her: you are absolutely insane I'll admit, I'm very vaguely familiar with TRP's advice on this subject. But I imagine it'd be similar to mine. The first line is already a huge misstep. There's a lack of capitalization and punctuation and I assume they aren't on good terms yet. Mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 01:45 AM
1

The point is vaguely telling someone to do obvious things without outlining the methods, including the less elegant methods is empty advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 11:38 PM
1

Not seeing the point the first time. Who dropped you as an infant?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 10:54 PM
5

Pointless thread. This isn't a view, it's a measurable fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 10:07 PM
2

Give me some general life advice. "Exercise in a healthy manner, go outside and be social, be confident and have a healthy self-esteem" Vague advice that will never help someone get their life on track.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 09:52 PM
1

no women are ever loyal past the point where they're getting nothing out of the relationship- even when people are cutting ties to avoid her SO? It's only contributing to the problem. Sounds like he's an "asshole" and she's getting exactly what she wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 07:01 PM
4

How to become attractive. "Exercise in a healthy manner, go outside and be social, be confident and have a healthy self-esteem" Vague advice that will never help someone become attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:54 PM
3

Nothing would change from the current situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:52 PM
6

How to become wealthy. "Earn more money, invest the money, network." Vague advice that will never help someone become wealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:49 PM
1

I don't think a Nazi soldier executed a doctor thinking the doctor was an inferior being. It's just a justification to maintain their conscience.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:47 PM
0

you get a majority of girls following the red pill, you wont get any girl. Fixed for accuracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:43 PM
2

Well, yeah. TRP is an effect in a long cause/effect chain. The western media is part of that chain.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:39 PM
1

The assertive intro/extro and the submissive intro/extro. The type I immediately write off is assertive extro, the other 3 go through my revolving doors.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 12:35 AM
2

Not RP/BP, but lemme tell you something from my point of view. The women are absolutely irrelevant. I have witnessed four types of women, though it's more like 2 types with intro/extro variants. There is barely any difference from one girl to the next despite these four types. I've essentially been with the same 3 girls since my teen years. You're absolutely right that the problem isn't the women, but nobody with an understanding of women cares about losing one specific woman. Oh there's one mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 11:19 PM
1

In terms of innate aptitude, yes of course. The average man compared to the average woman is just more useful in all things but giving birth. But you need to create more men to replace the ones that eventually die or become a net loss. After a certain number of boys, the average woman has made an equal contribution to 1 average man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 08:00 PM
2

Depends on how much you value society. If you don't care about preserving your culture by reproducing enough to discourage importing a working class, then women are significantly less valuable. If you care about raising the next generation and preserving culture, then women are just about equal until science reaches the point where a natural womb isn't required.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 06:26 PM
1

ISIS is a profitable business. And people who are swayed towards terrorism are generally the worst Muslims. They treat Islam like Christianity essentially. They aim to make up for their drinking, smoking, sexual adventures, not memorizing verses, etc. by essentially being "Born again Muslims". Groups like ISIS are essentially organized crime groups that recruit via preaching a tailored concept of Islam to Muslims that don't know better or by force. Now, perhaps they could actually be purely ideo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 05:46 PM
1

Someone made a good point recently that people who stray towards that end of the spectrum are trying to simulate empathy. They overcompensate because they don't feel real empathy for people. It's not confirmed or studied afaik, but it explains it pretty well. Like feminists tend to throw women under the bus if they aren't being equal as dictated by the ideology or white guiltists treating black people as children. BP/SJWs tend to simulate the outrage aspect of empathy and attempt to outdo each o…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 05:29 PM
4

women and men should be equal Implying this isn't toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 05:18 PM
4

Do you understand probability?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 05:14 PM
2

How old are you man? Drake wasn't the first to do this. Hell, he isn't even the first in recent years, which would be extremely hard considering it's standard fare. Rather than spend a day listing the ones who have done it, I'll request that you find me the ones that you think haven't.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 05:05 PM
0

Ask for it be explained in the form of a story so you can understand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 02:30 PM
2

White men aren't even in the top 3 in the west. In fact, with single mothers out of the equation, they're on par with the supposedly, least advantaged black men. As for men specifically being the most successful. That's a case of life choices and women still enjoy the bulk of the benefits of that success without most of the consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 02:20 PM
3

Not sure where you're getting this. Don't you realize, pretty much every mainstream rapper has at least one song where he's fallen hard for a girl that didn't treat him right or he's promising the world to some girl. 1st case is to provoke the care instinct. The women see the chink in his armour that allows them to tame him by being the one to treat him right. 2nd case is just blatantly displaying that his thug heart has a sweet spot for one special girl. Which means a special girl can tame him.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 10:19 AM
1

they know how to be professional trolls and not cross the line Why do you consistently cross the line then?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 10:08 AM
1

Virtue signalling.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 10:06 AM
1

Citation needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 09:54 AM
1

Win a debate with Doctor Peterson? Hah!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 09:51 AM
1

Are you a parody?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 07:39 AM
2

Postmodernism is the idea that the goalposts are constructs of the mind and not subject to being nailed down to the earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 12:33 AM
3

If your demographic is favoured, why isn't it the most successful?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 12:25 AM
1

The problem is men aren't dying because men aren't dying. If men aren't dying, then they continue to produce more above necessity, which means even more men won't die. In short, peace and prosperity is a bubble that self inflates until an absolute rubber band. If you can think of a method of removing large numbers of men other than war, by all means keep thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 12:02 AM
1

You're over-complicating a problem that we figured out how to address as cavemen. We aren't going to come together on any enlightened plane of existence, seeking out an almighty, intellectual goal. Everything will be fine again when the next war begins and ends.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 11:24 PM
1

How would men feel about a subreddit dedicated to teaching women how to lock down a beta bucks and divorce rape him? It would be fine and not only because of its sheer stupidity. Women who are inept at securing a man need that kind of advice. I've given that kind of advice to women, minus the divorce rape since raising a shitty kid as a single mother doesn't bring any long term happiness. A man's sexual strategy... I'd rather not see the future of this species be driven into the ground by this o…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 10:38 PM
1

So in that regard I disagree with trp concepts as a whole as they are self serving to a man's individual sexual strategy You can't really see past your nose.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 08:01 PM
1

Saying I'd like to be on a high level ain't arrogance - it's simply the truth. It's arrogance because it's a fool assumption. Men can openly compete for who is more confident, has had more women, gives less in sexual transactions. While it isn't necessarily visible, it's plausible that they can easily outdo each other. The assumption that you think on a higher level or that what you see as a higher level is anything less than primitive drive, is a fool's assumption. Who says even though trp may …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 06:28 PM
1

Sweetie. That's called being male. RP is just not being effeminate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 08:42 AM
2

I've literally explained stuff like abundance mentality and dread game in normal people speak to friends casually when they've asked me for advice. And there's terps here who won't believe me but I've also received some pretty RP advice from female friends. A lot of it is not actually too controversial or weird when you take the autistic edginess away. Same here. RP didn't even exist afaik at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 08:40 AM
1

You're still not getting to it. Your thinking is too self-absorbed, likely due to the arrogance. I see myself as a davinci or Newton. Or wanna be davinci or Newton. In any case advertising doesn't seem to me to be something I'd typically like to discuss because it caters to the bottom echelon of people. I'd rather discuss higher pursuits. This is the way a teenager who just took an IQ test on facebook speaks. Solipsism and arrogance. Trp does a good job but they just stop deducing at where they …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 07:52 AM
1

Gravity works 100% of the time. I'm afraid trp doesn't do a convincing job at proving me about their conclusions. Exceptions disprove the idea there even is a rule. You seem to be the type to challenge advertising because you don't feel an urge to buy the products. Perhaps you are "uniquely balanced"/a snowflake, but it seems to be a case of "Jack of all trades, master of none."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 05:35 AM
1

I Thank you for the exception's manifesto. I'm not some autistic who can't talk to people. But I prefer thinking about concepts and using tools slightly more than I do interacting with people. Slightly? Well, that explains everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 03:56 AM
1

rare = impossible Rare The Red Pill's detractors dislike/hate/oppose the users of r/TheRedPill more than they do The Red Pill itself. Is true in the majority of cases. The detractors are generally women, who are people oriented except in rare cases. And you still seem people oriented.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 01:42 AM
1

If you are honestly among the exceptions that happen to be tool/concept oriented, you should have a bit more lean towards abstract thought. This would allow you to understand that exceptions are just that. While being a woman and actively engaging with this subject online does put you into a small subset, I don't think you're actually among the exceptions that are tool/concept oriented.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 11:24 PM
3

You are less rational, I've observed this. As for romantic, that's a meaningless word for women. Romantic is a word women use to describe something a man does as caring and charming. It doesn't have meaning for men, since anything a girl they like does is instantly the cutest thing, even if it negatively affects them. Loyalty and virtue aren't biological, they're cultural. Culture doesn't demand those traits of women. If men could get away with disloyalty on average, they would. However, we do k…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 12:13 AM
1

I'm not the OP of this comment chain.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 11:25 PM
1

I'm aware that there's a right and wrong way to use makeup. The right way is very uncommon.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 10:37 PM
1

Wealthy liberals aren't really interesting past pleasantries, so progressing into serious discussion is far too much of a chore.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 01:19 PM
1

Yeah, cause women are people oriented and men are tool/concept oriented.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 01:03 PM
3

It's not even restricted to feminism. If 51% of a population were Islamic and perhaps half of the remaining people were wired to please the Islamic population, then naturally Islamic views would drive the society once the Islamic people could vote. Feminism is a political ideology and political ideologies can do nothing but seek to further relevance and power. The issue is that feminism can't be removed from women. Every woman with very few exceptions is a feminist to some degree. The lowest deg…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 12:45 PM
1

Meh. It's good in the moment, mundane in hindsight. The difference between love and lust based interaction is honestly forgettable.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 12:26 PM
1

1st and 2nd wave feminism - totally cool. 3rd wave is the natural progression. You can't stop at the 1st wave's success. It's no wave or every wave until total collapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 12:16 PM
1

This can be summed up as failure of understanding men, the internet or both. That aside... in reality the steep decline in attractiveness occurs sometime in the mid to late thirties There are about a handful of girls I went to HS with that still look good today and I'm in my early twenties. As I see it, the wall around 25(Perhaps 35 with African or Asian genes) is just the point where the lucky ones start the descent. Hell, I know an Asian that took a huge dive at 21, so even they aren't safe at…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 12:10 PM
1

Understanding innate flaws and strengths is the best way to excel. A mathematical genius trying to convince himself he can lead the football team's defensive line is just a fool.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 11:54 AM
2

This argument is pretty stale. Prosperity leads to the state being able to take on the burden of women, rather than individual men. This means the individual man is no longer required for sustenance, which leads to equality and then gynocentrism.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 11:48 AM
1

Anyone with conservative views will probably land there at some point. Most conservative guys are "red-pilled" whether they're extremely attractive or fat fucks. They land there cause they already agree with human nature as is, because we never denied it before and they're more old-fashioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 11:09 PM
3

This kills the smurf.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 11:06 PM
1

It's really just for the sake of accuracy in description. A meltdown is a contained tantrum, something you can probably just ignore or handle with a "blanket'. Rage is violent and chaotic. You have to get out of its way or meet it with equal force to stop it. "Hey, we need you in Room B, Joe is having a meltdown." Doesn't really imply the same urgency as Joe being in a rage.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 02:25 AM
1

Its not really outside of normal male behavior This is pretty much the key to this whole thing. If I didn't need to pay financially or with my freedom for destroying something or starting a fight, I'd do these things for fun. It gets the blood pumping and it's very therapeutic to stop suppressing the urge to be aggressive. On the other hand, women are generally passive aggressive and you'll often find teenage girls are high in verbal abuse when someone has been deemed an outsider. But on the reg…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 12:32 AM
3

Those who are very optimistic and eager usually win small and lose big. These are your romantic types who fall in love easily and usually get played. Those who are neutral usually win small and lose small. These are your average types who honeymoon phase, then either ride it out till the right calamity allows them to move on, or settle down with what they've got. Those who are somewhat pessimistic/are realistic usually win big and lose small. These are your players who honeymoon/fwb. They either…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/17 03:30 AM
2

You're implying equal is good.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/17 01:13 AM
3

Women slut-shame other women due to competition and men in general having an aversion towards promiscuous females. Correction. Sluts lower the price of sex, men don't have an aversion to sluts unless it's for the long term. So don't men beta-shame other men as well due to competition and women having an aversion towards weak men? Yes. Women determine what makes a man and men tend to eliminate whatever women don't want.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/17 01:11 AM
-1

If you understood feminism, you wouldn't ask this question.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/17 01:03 AM
1

I don't want to go into what's next, just watch it. after those initial interactions there's really no doubt she's really an outlier in the sense that's she not an average chick. Didn't want to give too much away but gave too little. Simply not being interested in someone's pick up moves doesn't necessarily make you an outlier. That's right. But it can make you seem like someone who could be. Possibly worth changing strategy over. Starting a discussion with intentionally vague details. Spewing a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 09:23 PM
1

Because they aren't normally encountered. Next time something makes me think of PPD I'll remember there's no reason to share it. If you're going to go about it as lazily as this, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 07:43 PM
1

Lazy post, lazy reply. No, outliers aren't relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 08:33 AM
1

I've seen many people say that the methods that TRP espouses are too extreme, hurt women, are sociopathic etc. Success first, morals never.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 08:15 AM
1

Marry That's stupid in any case. Date Less stupid in any case, but flat stupid to date the mentally ill. Have sex with Probably not. I don't drink.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 08:07 AM
1

Yeah... based on whatever trait indicates high chances of survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 07:25 AM
1

I ask this not as an insult, but how old are you? This kind of stuff is covered to some extent in high school. 1: For example, why aren't we all super hot? Why isn't everyone like 2 or 3 points hotter (or more) on the 1-10 scale? (You can ask the same thing about intelligence or any trait, I guess.) 5 is the average. If everyone is 2 or 3 points higher, nobody is 2 or 3 points higher. The average has now changed. 2: And why aren't orgasms like 2 or 3 (or more) times more powerful than they are f…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 07:23 AM
1

Not sure where you live, but officers travel in pairs and female officers always have a male officer with them. Additionally, female officers are often very rude, dismissive and prone to get rough to make up for the lack of authority. This may apply to fat/short male officers as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 12:48 AM
1

Until there is sufficient evidence against it, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 11:12 PM
2

Barring physical/mental disability, you pretty much can't get a man to submit without the threat of another man/men's force.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 08:32 PM
2

Henchmen.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 04:46 PM
1

"Authority" is gender neutral. Authority is power. Power is physical force or the threat of physical force. Authority over men requires men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 08:54 AM
1

You're projecting logic onto ideology. Feminism is a marxism-based, political ideology that defines women as an oppressed class. This is the first step. You're assuming feminism has anything to do with what it says it's all about. Now, you'll probably continue to apply logic here. Don't. You'd naturally assume that they've solved their issues now and maybe they should realize that or whatever. Remember, this is an ideology and one with political power. The goal of politics isn't solving problems…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 08:43 AM
2

I agree, I think it's nearly impossible for men to hate women without serious trauma. Even then, it's probably just low trust.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 04:26 AM
3

Well, in hindsight she wasn't even close. But she had a large amount of support with no other "merits". Assuming she was slightly less corrupt and not running against someone far smarter, she'd have won on vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 06:19 PM
2

The equal vote is one of the consequences of prosperity, not the causes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 06:06 PM
2

Nobody should have been let in anyway. Deport/execute any that come in based on their actions after entering. As in the ones who get past what should be a very strict border patrol.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 06:01 PM
1

Not really. Though you could say she didn't get elected, in part because she banked so hard on women voting for her because she's a woman without presenting any other reasons. Which isn't that illogical to bank on and might have worked if it weren't for the paper trails.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 06:00 PM
2

All women are biologically like that. The culture you're in improves the amount of protection you have if you lose a job, go through a tough emotional period or some really handsome guy is on radar. A NAWALT is someone who doesn't act on biological urge, despite the culture permitting or encouraging it. You can only declare NAWALT once she outlives you in the western world after going through thick and thin.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 05:10 PM
2

Trump is better than the standard, but he isn't a full-fledged leader like the great ones of the past. He does play nice with words sometimes. The fuck do you do when you find thousands of dislocated people at the gates of Europe? Allow charity to provide the "refugees" with some assistance outside the border. Deport/execute any that come in based on their actions after entering.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 05:00 PM
2

Clinton almost got elected for being a woman. Trudeau got elected for his hair. Angela Merkel got elected despite being anti-Germany. Sweden is a thing. too hysterical and emotional to vote before the suffragettes came along. There's been a clear pattern of societal degradation since the equal vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 04:46 PM
2

One of the various reasons hiring women is a net loss in most cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 04:37 PM
1

Yes, but a male politician who was as corrupt as her and running for president would probably be much more covert. I don't think Hilary is the most corrupt there's ever been, but she was so terrible at hiding it. So terrible in fact, that her campaign opponent actually paid her corrupt organization, because he knew he could buy their word.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 06:50 AM
1

Hypothetical for reference. Sorry, I was thinking of another comment chain. 1: Which "advantages" do you mean? Gender quotas and school system bias. 2: What do you mean? I didn't follow. Was referring to Alimony can't exist, except for when the higher earner initiates a divorce with insufficient grounds or when abuse is provable beyond reasonable doubt. Sufficient grounds would include adultery/infidelity and Marriage contracts should allow for a spouse to have as many partners as they can finan…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 04:53 AM
1

Contraception makes sex and reproduction different things. In terms of sex, the instinct is to fuck every hot mate that you're attracted to, and that will always be the value, and for attractive/rich/alpha men that's attainable regardless of their familial situation. Sex without commitment being easy is a result of feminism. Without all the advantages, women would have incentive to secure their livelihood before giving sex to these men. (1) 5 kids with 5 different women, financed partly by you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 02:56 AM
1

Not really. We're essentially the same in that regard. People have always been open to health sciences, like nutrition and medicine. As information increases, people adopt new and better methods to stay alive. The same goes for space related discoveries. Essentially, areas of science that don't really affect anyone's views. An exception being the safety of eating pork, where the verdict varies based on belief, regardless of the merit of researchers. When it comes to psychology, behaviour, geneti…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/17 12:21 AM
2

Ah, what's the key difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 10:46 PM
1

I think molesting your siblings socially disqualifies you. But then... she is a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 10:23 PM
4

Well, that was expected. But the thing is, if the genders were reversed, two things could happen. Male Hilary wouldn't have been so shortsighted in his corruption and there'd be no paper trail. Male Hilary would be in jail at best or absolutely destroyed in terms of public opinion for the blatant corruption, with no room for benefit of the doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 10:17 PM
1

It's what is currently observable. Perhaps future societies will follow different patterns, but it is doubtful. Human nature doesn't seem likely to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 10:12 PM
1

Variety in sexual partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 10:10 PM
1

That's not how it works. When societies do a good job, they abandon the practices that got them to where they are and then they die. It's complacency, it's part of human nature. It's a cycle that will repeat until the last man breathes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 07:37 PM
1

On the contrary, it did too good a job. The times it produced were so luxurious that people abandoned it. Unfortunately, the void had to be filled and it's been quite ugly since the new "religion" entered full force.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 05:59 PM
1

Religion hasn't done a good job
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 08:23 AM
1

I assume you say this while sitting comfortably in a western country?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 04:31 AM
1

It's pretty simple. You wouldn't want someone to hurt you. It's called paying it forward. This is the case for when the potential victim can retaliate. It's not paying it forward, it's avoiding an action with a consequence. Faith is based on religion which is also created by HUMAN Religion is based on innate faith in a higher purpose. Religion channels that faith into a unified goal by providing the higher purpose, rather than allowing society to be divided into groups with varying purposes. Any…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 03:57 AM
1

Why shouldn't one do things that intentionally hurt people? Assuming there's a benefit and low risk of being caught, nothing says you shouldn't unless there's a moral system that everyone agrees on. Science doesn't provide anything to most people. A large amount of people won't act on the available information, especially if there's a lot of conflicting data. The remaining portion of people will use science to determine how to act in their best interest without any morality involved. That's only…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/17 02:28 AM
1

Faith is the glue for a system of moral, political and philosophical unity. When you lack glue, you get division and morality doesn't apply to enemies. Without faith, there is nothing that says, "I dislike this guy, but he is one of us." because it's very easy to define someone as an outsider. For example, freedom of speech is part of American philosophy. Infringing on someone's freedom of speech is morally wrong. But, some agree that it is ok to infringe on an enemy's freedom of speech. This wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 11:30 PM
2

Just hang out with religious girls, feminist girls, liberal girls, weed girls or gamer girls. The trick is to find the ones who define themselves like a man, but with a slight variation. Men tend to define themselves by profession. Girls with low self esteem tend to define themselves by the hobby/belief of their core social group. There are more in-depth signs, but that's the easiest one. Another one that's high on the list is over-defining themselves. This one is more common with online profile…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 10:50 PM
1

Golden rule dies without faith. Golden rule applies to the in-group. Unclear in-group sets a precedent to break the rule frequently and it cycles until the rule is a suggestion.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 10:34 PM
1

She attributes finding him to God and feels a need to defend her choices on social media. To the untrained eye, this is a massive abnormality. In reality, she just has low self esteem. Girls with low self esteem can be very attractive but unaware of it and you'll find them with a track record of ugly dudes who are really good at getting people to open up.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 10:24 PM
1

It's not too surprising that people show their true sentiments in an abnormal situation. It's like attitudes towards gay people. Sure, people are all "tolerant" and shit, but if you have a gay son, it's not so great anymore. Or when the white guilt brigade girl gets angry and says, "That fucking nigger." about some other girl who pissed her off. All in all, after the shock passes it's back to the comfortable dream world.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 10:20 PM
1

With math as morals, if I have a high probability of killing someone without getting caught and they have a very large sum of money in their house, nothing says I shouldn't kill them. With science as morals, there's a lot of genocide to be done to preserve resources and this should be racially motivated, as some groups are near retard level IQ. Fortunately, people don't really abandon faith in its absence, they just create a new God. Hence why inequality is a sin and you should abandon morality …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 05:53 PM
1

If you need religion to tell you that murder is wrong It's less about murder being wrong and more about who you shouldn't harm. Christianity as is, afaik isn't that good with this aspect, but Islam is pretty apt at instilling the in-group preference. helping others is good Same here. It's not about helping others, but helping the in-group. But we could also teach them empathy and morals without having to tell them that there is a magical entity Empathy is innate. How far one should extend that e…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 05:47 PM
1

Religion is a political, moral and philosophical system. It can be used to control people, but it's core goal is to provide a structure to optimize human nature for society. Religion worked because the political, moral and philosophical aspects were inseparable and backed by divinity. We already have a post-religion strategy, which is equality. The issue with equality is that it doesn't have any clear philosophy behind it and it doesn't have any clear moral behind it. It also lacks divinity. Wes…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 06:37 AM
1

There's a lot more to it than sex and the sex part of religion itself is barely about sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 06:00 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/5xtl70/you_are_everything_thats_wrong_with_your_life_ya/dekq4ap/ Judging by this post by /u/RedPillDetox and its number of upvotes, I don't think they read the contents of the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 05:34 AM
1

You need way more than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 04:14 AM
1

She's definitely right. The ladders that elevate humanity are on the same path as all those pitfalls. There are many pitfalls. But they're equally important. Not everyone should see tomorrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 03:42 AM
1

Education!??? Explain how education can cover all the necessary aspects of culture that religion does.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 03:37 AM
2

Let's be honest, you can't prepare for anything. But more importantly, there's nothing to prepare for in your lifetime. There's a fair amount of resources left before we can't afford to not have a hard patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 03:05 AM
1

I love sluts and western culture. But I understand why its harmful. Just as I am agnostic and amoral, but understand that nothing can replace religion in managing society.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 03:02 AM
2

The need for trying to operate outside the system wasn't really there. "Feminism" is a naturally occurring thing. When society has no issues to worry about, they start to invent some and equalizing the women is a normal part in the cycle before collapse. But the problem is that times are too peaceful. We shouldn't even have as many men as we do. Assisting so many people who should otherwise die is very unnatural for the progression of the cycle. We have a very absurd culture in the west as a res…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 02:56 AM
1

Women don't really adapt. Adaptation implies taking some sort of new action in response to a change in the environment. Over the course of history, women have just picked the men who adapted best and adopted their behaviours and creations. succeeding and creating in your environment Is adaptation. Picking the perceived best possible men is not adaptation, even if the best perceived option is the government. This is why some groups of people are permanently stuck in bad conditions. If the perceiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 02:42 AM
1

Women don't really adapt. Adaptation implies taking some sort of new action in response to a change in the environment. Over the course of history, women have just picked the men who adapted best and adopted their behaviours and creations. succeeding and creating in your environment Is adaptation. Picking the perceived, best possible men is not adaptation, even if the best perceived option is the government. This is why some groups of people are permanently stuck in bad conditions. If the percei…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 02:42 AM
13

Feminism is the biggest social and political threat to men. RP/Being a man is largely about adapting to your environment. RP wouldn't exist without feminism's effects on western culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 12:30 AM
1

real emotion and genuine human interaction. real intimacy. There are three levels to understanding of human nature. Not understanding it and mistakenly categorizing genuine and fake. Nihilistic understanding that all actions are just part of a long chain of very predictable reactions and there is no "genuine" interaction. Fully understanding the reactions and their triggers and enjoying the benefit of minimizing unwanted reactions in those you interact with. What people often report when "taking…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 12:19 AM
2

Female nature isn't illogical, it's just inherently bad with abstract thinking. Feminism doesn't account for its effects on men or society as a whole down the line, because it's focused on advocating for women, solely based on the viewpoint of women in the present and very immediate future.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 11:49 PM
1

It's not different at all. Women require certain securities and they're willing to give away their agency to obtain them. Men give the securities that women require by means that generally do require taking agency away. What securities and agencies get traded are dictated by what the women are willing to accept. A man isn't wired to be antagonistic to women, so the group is never going to take agency from women if they don't feel that it leads to security. Our nature is structured for this, as m…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 10:10 PM
1

It's not that they influenced the men. Women just naturally give away their agency in return for security and men naturally protect women. Giving away agency for security benefits women and harms men. Harming men degrades a society. Simply put, people who gain more from increasing security than increasing agency, will destroy their society. How much they can destroy society is down to how much power they have. Women and men who can't compete with other men are those who gain more from security. …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 09:39 PM
1

The worst life in the best societies is the average and sometimes the best life in less capable societies.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 09:31 PM
1

Because they have the freedom to function outside the standard laws of the system. Take Islam, for example. Adultery is forbidden, but a wealthy man can have more than one wife. Or taxes. Tax evasion is forbidden, but a wealthy man can effectively "earn" almost nothing in the country he would've paid taxes in. Feminism is a 1st world phenomenon for this reason. At a certain point, you don't need to have any sort of standardized strategy to achieve success. As long as enough of the men bring in m…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 09:28 PM
3

Women generally don't vote for things that benefit them in the long term. They tend to vote for things that eventually end society and leave them at the mercy of the next men to takeover. Things that make them feel safer physically, emotionally and financially in the moment, but reduce their safety down the line. Imagine you're a kid and you can only have a limited amount of candy. Your primary concern if you can vote as a kid, would be to remove the unfair rule that limits what you can do. If y…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 09:13 PM
1

All the best societies rose to power on enforcing a unified culture, with the threat of physical force or exclusion from the benefits of the society.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 07:26 PM
1

Patriarchy was awesome for upper class women. This is completely opposite to reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 07:20 PM
1

Tell that to the black family that got ravaged by feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 07:19 PM
5

"drunk sex can be rape" = "every incident of drunk sex is potentially rape after the fact"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 07:15 PM
1

Considering that men are basically wired to shape society for women's best interest as dictated by the women, of course. Smarter men took advantage of this aspect of male biology by starting feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 07:11 PM
0

Feminism is female nature unchecked and politicized. It's just advocacy for the best possible deal with society's men. Getting all the benefits of male presence without having to give anything in return. But you're correct, that does mean shedding all the self-imposed restrictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 07:08 PM
1

Irrelevant. You can't get into power in a gynocentric system if your policies would negatively affect women or even seemingly, slightly disadvantage women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 05:35 AM
1

The heavily babied, liberal members of generations that probably can't afford and won't want to settle down for a long time, are not behaving with the long-term in mind? The same ones that try to shape the political climate of their campuses as if they'll be spending the rest of their lives there? The same ones who have some level of mandatory, liberal-washing in their courses? You won't see girls policing sexual behaviour in those conditions. Not overtly at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 02:28 AM
1

(i) State that they would message a load of women who are mediocre looking. I would. (ii) If they incredibly claim that they would do (i), state that they would do this for any other reason than blanket messaging anyone remotely presentable because they're desperate for sex. I value obedience and compatible fetishes far more than appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 01:43 AM
1

17, Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 01:38 AM
1

Total women in US 9,364,117 % of population 2.8979634435839996%
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 05:18 AM
2

I have a rather large penis. She'd have to shop around to go bigger twice.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/17 04:06 AM
3

This is quite simple. Socialism isn't about redistributing the wealth of the ruling elite. It's about redistributing the wealth of everyone who isn't in power. Also, the socialist European countries don't work independently. There are outside factors that allow them to exist. The US covering their defense and their lack of multiculturalism being among the more prominent ones. They also aren't efficient for the long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 06:50 PM
1

Bias in the analysis. For objective grasp on the subject, just reply to this comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 06:45 PM
1

1: But obviously no man wants to have multiple wives->kids that they financially support and give heavily divided attention, right? Preferably it's just one wife, right? What world do you live in? Not only are men designed with an incentive and capability to have multiple partners, many men with the luxury to do so are heavily promiscuous. 2: Does monogamy provide the "structure to optimally raise children?" And if so then doesn't it make sense for a man (if he wants children) to settle down at …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 05:20 AM
1

Modern western society is sad indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 02:27 AM
1

This is a bit out there, but for fun... Do you think that machines won't be exclusively owned by the elites? You'll just replace the people who take control with the most mentally intimidating men and maybe some sociopath women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 12:01 AM
1

Beta. I don't like alphas because they intimidate me. I identify with betas. I'm definitely not omega. I do carry some alpha traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 11:30 PM
3

Generally, studies that have any deviation from the religion of equality come with a heavy dump of excuses and apologies.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 11:26 PM
1

Equality means that nobody has any advantages or disadvantages other than their innate capabilities. But that's irrelevant. Any form of governance requires men to uphold the agreed upon laws. If they don't see reason to uphold them or worse, wish to go against them, then everyone is at mercy of the strongest and most organized men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 11:14 PM
1

Law depends on what men want to uphold. See, Brazil, Sweden, Germany, France, Somalia, Chicago, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 10:41 PM
1

Society treats us differently and women are on average naturally more inclined to have certain traits than others, but we would be just fine if all things became truly equal and we'd lose the dead weight. In reality, if things are as equal as possible, you just get traditional, patriarchal society again. If we drop dead weight instead of supporting them, we get too many males fighting over a right to breed. That's how you reach middle-east levels of patriarchal society.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 10:06 PM
1

Careers inherently mean you get "help" someway - a mentor, someone extending you a job offer, being trained, etc. Yes. It's a luxurious form a "self-sufficiency" where you have to rely on several other people to have the bread reach your table. The moment something goes very wrong along the chain, you're screwed. Not like women don't give back once they're trained like everyone else. On average, they don't. It IS hateful to say women are inherently inferior to men, because it's not even true. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 09:09 PM
2

I bet you spent a very long time researching for this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 08:06 PM
1

It's not hateful. Saying what he's doing won't convert what he did to being hateful. I work hard, and I clearly am not inferior to any of my male peers. People really need to consider the luxury of their situations. This isn't necessarily women-specific. Most people today wouldn't be able to play career without the assistance of men/other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 08:01 PM
1

Unless your definition of importance is literally about being integral to the survival of the species It certainly is. Because there are people who had men that did not "fuck the world up". They're either dead/dying, primitive or alcoholic wrecks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 07:38 PM
1

I'm glad you've come around to the nature-runs-its-course method of natural selection, rather than eugenics.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 07:34 PM
2

A kid with average genes can become successful with a good upbringing. A good upbringing requires the father to be present and active. A kid with exceptional genes may be just as good with less fatherly presence. Exceptional men can have multiple wives->kids that they financially support, but give heavily divided attention and you'll probably still have a good turnout. Average men need to focus on maybe 1-2 kids in finance and attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 07:32 PM
1

1: CAN monogamy work? Yes. 2: Doesn't monogamy (when it works) offer a special intimacy/companionship that you can't get even from the closest male/female friends? Who cares? The point is family creation and structure to optimally raise children. Though I have to say, no relationship can outdo brotherhood. 3: Isn't monogamy the only way to have kids and therefore crucial in life? If you spin plates forever then you will not have kids, right? You don't have to raise the kids you have, nor do you …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 09:40 AM
3

Stop applying logic to feminism. It is a political self interest group, not a movement. The "movement" is just the PR team for the political side. I'm not even talking third wave specifically. It has never been about what it claims to be and to apply its PR as a standard for its actions is an absolute waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 09:30 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/5rxx32/do_you_fake_flirt_if_so_why/ddeutma/ It's fun to make someone think you think they're important, then be brutally honest and then shift back again. Really throws them off. They lose the ability to separate joke and serious talk, so they fall back on what they want to be the truth. You really like them and you just joke around a lot. At that point, you can do whatever you want. You can say "I'm being very serious." then give them a complim…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 05:28 AM
1

If you're very inquisitive with someone, they tend to project the stuff they don't know onto you. If someone tells you about their childhood, their personal relationships, their mood and all that, then in the short term, as long as you continue to focus on learning about them and their thoughts, they're likely to just fill in what they don't know about you in whatever subjects you asked them about. For example, I'm more of a cold logic type, but the extent isn't known. Often, it's assumed that I…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 05:03 AM
1

How would you know it's not their real name? It's not like my nickname is Yung dolla$ign or something. Also, you know the little rule of having someone know far less about you than you know about them? Well, it works. If you're very inquisitive with someone, they tend to project the stuff they don't know onto you. Sometimes I get, "I know nothing about you." as a passive comment and I tell people to ask. That's when they forget most of what they want to know. Which is good, because a "plate" is …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 04:34 AM
2

It's like saying my name is Toff when my name is Kristoffsen.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 04:19 AM
1

Because of my race, my nickname doesn't seem like a nickname.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 03:54 AM
0

So you like the boot on the neck where it matters, but you don't care where it doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 03:49 AM
1

Inappropriate sexualization of jobs, i.e. some jobs being "woman" jobs and some being "man" jobs, which is increasingly irrelevant in a high tech world. Human nature always wins out. Men will excel at certain jobs and people will start to categorize again. Media having a realistic portrayal of relationships/people. One thing that I have gotten from PPD is a sympathy for TRP over this issue; it's very true that movies/tv portray awful and stupid relationships/dynamics, which young people learn fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 03:47 AM
1

If over the course of history, someone very important died, then humanity wouldn't exist today. Since we're here today, we can say that anyone who died along the way was part of the process and didn't need to live longer than they had.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 03:03 AM
2

How would you know it's not their real name? It's not like my nickname is Yung dolla$ign or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 03:01 AM
0

but I don't support limiting anybody's freedom in any way. You strike me as more socialist leaning, are you sure?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 02:41 AM
1

Assuming you have the luxury of being war immune, your society would be made up of mediocre people, with shitty laws that take many many years to change. Assuming you don't have that luxury, you'd see population replacement, slow military takeover or total takeover.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 02:39 AM
1

IMO, the best world is a "you do you" world None of your proposed changes lead to your goal, seeing as they'd last as long as the generation you managed to influence.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 02:34 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/5xczb4/for_men_who_want_regulations_in_society_to/deh8l2z/
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 02:32 AM
1

He probably goes by a nickname. Yep.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 02:25 AM
2

13
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 12:52 AM
2

No need to one up now. Just admit that not only moral men get fucked and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 12:42 AM
5

If you aren't official, do they need to know? You need to at least know my given first name before you get to know who I spend time with.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 12:37 AM
1

I only find cats, dolphins, jumping spiders and girls cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 12:34 AM
4

You're autistic though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 12:32 AM
2

If women only fucked moral men Except they do. TIL I'm moral. TIL Hitler was moral. TIL Crimelords are moral.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 12:31 AM
2

There's a negative side to every positive. You could have primitive shitholes like aboriginal societies or you can have the peak of male drive for dominance, crimelords and Bill Gates alike. Not like anyone important fell victim to history anyway, otherwise we wouldn't be here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 12:26 AM
1

You're cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 12:18 AM
2

Not sure if I made the edit quick enough, but "Abuse" within the definition of alimony would include taking on additional spouses without sufficient means.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 11:25 PM
1

Your guides won't beat a group of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 11:21 PM
0

For the record, this world would lead to just as many people fucking outside of marriage or without the means to provide a child, and then just being stuck with kids they don't want. This is alright, they'll feel the consequences eventually, whether it be death or living uncomfortably. People tend to fall in line when things go bad. Even without quotas and affirmative action, women would still be successful (not all, but enough that very few of them would "need" to rely on a man for money.) It's…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 11:21 PM
1

And you'll be protected by what? Your sheer force of soulpower?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 11:09 PM
0

Too narrow. Several steps are required to fix modern western society. They're not all regulations. Welfare can't exist, except for cases where people are physically incapable of living without assistance. Gender quotas and affirmative action in general can't exist in the workforce and in education. Alimony can't exist, except for when the higher earner initiates a divorce with insufficient grounds or when abuse is provable beyond reasonable doubt. Marriage should not be a contract between one ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 10:52 PM
1

Yeah, the fact that he lost his job is bad enough, but the fake care for "diversity"? I bet they don't even know a thing about the company.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 10:01 PM
1

This is honestly chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 09:58 PM
1

The meme is nice. Idealist/Reactionary/Sociopath
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 09:12 PM
3

I'm saying misogynist is a term as meaningful as racist, sexist, homophobic, islamophobic, etc. It's been diluted. With misandrist, it's pretty clear cut. Probably cause guys don't overuse words as shaming language.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 08:14 PM
4

Hmm
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 08:11 PM
2

You're too edgy and idealistic. No one's a slave to society. I don't and refuse to accept it and internalize society's bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 08:06 PM
1

Women passively/unintentionally created gender roles if you want to entertain the idea that any gender alone could do it. Women chose the men that got to reproduce and their choices required submission, because the men they chose were capable of easily harming them if they were disruptive to survival. In return for being well cared for, they had to provide value to the men they chose and they would have to instruct their daughters to be the type that can provide value to a similar man, as well a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 07:59 PM
1

Forcing a lot of what you call female nature on me would cause me to act unnaturally. You do understand that if you are how you say you are, you'd be dead without society? Being a snowflake without fixing it is a luxury.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 07:45 PM
1

A woman debating on reddit doesn't need to tell anyone they're crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 07:43 PM
2

Like Tupac.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 07:42 PM
3

It seems satirical, but... There is actually no hate there. I have a close-friend who I know is inferior in every way. I just make sure to take the lead when we're hanging out.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 07:37 PM
5

This gave me a good laugh.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 07:32 PM
3

The most logical people in the world are also the most prejudice.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 07:14 PM
1

You realize that's true right? Acknowledging the fact doesn't mean you have to hunt Jews or anything. It's just good business strategy to monopolize information. Edit - It's not even hard information to come by. You can just run through the MSM on wikipedia really quick.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/17 08:51 AM
13

Attack of the Killer Whale
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/17 08:08 AM
1

I wouldn't fuck her because someone with that much investment in their looks can't possibly be someone that meets my conditions. The time I spend trying to fuck her is not more than a fuck is worth. The time I spend trying to fuck her isn't amplified by displeasure. I'd fuck a 5 who is a 6 with makeup or a 4 who is a 5 with makeup if I don't need to put any excess time into the task.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 03:05 AM
1

That makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 02:10 AM
1

Is average, but there's makeup, which knocks off a point. I can see the wear and tear she's covering up. I call it the "Hollywood's polished corpse" look. She'd be a 6, but it's with makeup and her tits are fake, so she drops to a 4. Kinda looks trans and a point off to account for makeup. What the fuck is this thing? She's cute. The makeup is either very light or not present. Eyeliner is acceptable. I expect the parts are real. So only a point off to account for makeup. Jaw is too hard, somewha…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 02:04 AM
1

4 4 4 3 1 6 6 4
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 12:38 AM
1

The Red Pill does indeed teach it is alright to harass and abuse women. You are right. Now explain how it's a problem to anyone but the victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 12:26 AM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 12:25 AM
2

You lack an understanding of men. I can't speak for the ones you're basing this on, but it's not a serious grievance. We'll discuss the politics of a video game/movie's society with absolute seriousness. Often to women and autistic men as well as to regular men because of the internet barrier, this is seen as legitimate rage and eventual altercation. But, we don't care. "Why is this guy with that fat bitch?!" is never relevant for more than a minute. The stuff that really bothers a man, isn't th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 12:22 AM
0

I am sorry, but it has not been apparent.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 12:19 AM
1

she works as a runway model - ONS she has a PhD/working on one - FWB she has a really good job, making more money than you probably ever will - FWB she is an accomplished artist (for example, a concert pianist or a painter exhibiting her works at major museums) - FWB she has an average job and no particular aspirations in life - FWB
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 11:58 PM
0

You lack an understanding of men. I can't speak for the ones you're basing this on, but it's not a serious grievance. We'll discuss the politics of a video game/movie's society with absolute seriousness. Often to women and autistic men as well as to regular men because of the internet barrier, this is seen as legitimate rage and eventual altercation. But, we don't care. "Why is this guy with that fat bitch?!" is never relevant for more than a minute. The stuff that really bothers a man, isn't th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 11:52 PM
1

/u/SetConsumes answered pretty well. But I'd word it differently. Rather than amplify, I'd use "Polish." We aren't working from a ten to compare with. We're working from a 5, which has an average number of flaws. Naturally, a 6 has less flaws than a 5. An 8 has very few flaws. If you eliminate flaws from an 8 till there are none left, you'd get a 10. Flawlessness(10) is rare and so is only having 1 or 2 flaws(9).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 11:37 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 07:59 PM
2

I don't categorize them, nature does. Women with substance are usually physically unattractive, borderline asexual and have a lot of masculine behaviours. Women with sexually attractive traits and feminine behaviours are usually promiscuous. Both are still women and bring excitement. Substance women are exciting in limited doses over long periods of time, which makes them hard to get bored of. General women give you everything you can ever get from them over a short period of time, which causes …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 07:53 PM
0

1 = Beyond repair. 5 = Average 10 = Absolute Perfection There is no such thing as 10, how can there be an 11? That aside, your choice is definitely a high 6/7, with makeup taken into account. The highest ever achieved to date, is an 8.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 07:15 PM
1

These complaints are all essentially coming from the same basis. Ignorance of observable patterns in past and present. Applying the concept of good/bad/fair/unfair to these things is the only reason they're uncomfortable truths.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 07:01 AM
1

Asking women to use abstract thought Good luck!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 06:36 AM
1

It's not possible. You'll just get war.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 06:30 AM
1

I'm biracial. i don't feel a connection with all black or biracial people. I want to explain this to you, but c'mon man. Seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 06:18 AM
1

Me and a friend discussed how the girl you know and love tends to vanish when she's around other people. It's very frustrating to witness, but when things are going strong, you can just appreciate how she is with you. It depends somewhat on her social groups too. We're pretty serious people, so we uphold a certain standard of conversation, not to say there's no time for fun of course. Anyway, when she shows the side that can be serious with you, then behaves like a complete child to fit in with …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 06:09 AM
4

Anything fake on a person drops their value by generally 1 point. This includes makeup, boobs, lips, nose, ass, personality/interests, attraction, etc. For examples This is a 7 that drops to a 5 due to makeup and personality. This is a 7 that drops to a 6 for makeup. This is a 6 Of course, it's a general rule. Excessive makeup will drop much more than 1 point, excessive chameleon behaviour will drop extreme points.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 01:42 AM
1

Performance once you agree to tie down someone who will probably have urges to return to old habits and has no possible consequences for doing so, assuming you're in the west and don't roll in the same social circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 07:00 PM
1

Can't cheat when we aren't exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 05:03 PM
1

You lose more in committing and breaking the commitment than she does. You know deep down that the only thing to keep her tied down is your performance.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 09:37 AM
1

Looks are almost irrelevant to me. I thought I'd really get a rise out of legitimate crazy. But disorders of the schizo variety are actually kind of annoying to deal with. Most red flags don't matter when going official is off the table. Absolute no zone would be legitimate belief in feminism. Not really due to caring that she's like that, but rather that hiding a superiority complex becomes much harder when you're not just strongly assuming you're superior. It's a self inflicted no, because I'd…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 09:32 AM
1

They don't want anonymous attention. Get them one on one, then get them in a group with their/your friends and they're very happy to assume the role of princess. Actually, just get them one on one, then go back into the anons as a duo and they're somewhat fine with anon attention too. The best "prizes" come from the gender neutral named ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 09:05 AM
-1

they're not telling me, "I have a boyfriend" so that I could back off. "My boyfriend and I...", or if we start talking about a sport, they say, "My boyfriend plays the sport on occasion." This is a test. Every girl is single. Yes, every girl. If you can't get anything out of her, you lack game or resources. If she's being very direct with you about her relationship status, then you're not an option. Anything but a declaration means you just need to pass a few qualifiers. I am a very firm believe…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 08:58 AM
1

unwanted attention Rarely do the average ones not enjoy being the center of attention and recipient of free shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 08:46 AM
1

It's all fun and free games till the rape accusations roll in.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 05:43 AM
1

That's not a beta orbiter. It's an omega stalker. While there is some overlap, a beta orbiter is an on-call emotional support, meal ticket, trade-up from a less financially stable man, etc. They have at least enough self respect to wait for you to request their white knightery.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 05:41 AM
1

When you basically have an entourage to entertain you, reddit isn't an interest. Same reason you will rarely see attractive girls in gaming unless it's for twitch money.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 04:13 AM
2

Varies from guy to guy. Observation of girls' choices. Being an asshole and being very successful. Having a girl(s) taken by an asshole. Can be all of the above, combinations or just one.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 03:59 AM
0

Let's be honest. Girls worth an investment don't know what reddit is unless they're using it to sell sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 01:37 AM
1

Beta societies are the best for human kind Assuming they're the only societies in existence, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 06:44 PM
0

Matrilineal. Religious and political affairs are the responsibility of men. Strongly Islamic. They're matrilineal because the men tend to leave indefinitely to obtain the resources. They also don't have a nation to defend and instead seek to advance in other established nations. You can kinda call them the Jews of Asia.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 06:41 PM
0

but they're worse for women. Not by any reasonable measure.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 06:26 PM
1

In the past, masculine societies could be considered more derisable mainly because they would otherwise be more vulnerable and have a weaker military. Masculine societies are always more desirable because male authority is cultural preservation. Military is just one method of preserving culture. You can become divided and replaced without ever entering war. See, the entire western world, Israel excluded. Even people who lived in more masculine societies seem to want to come to more feminine soci…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 06:25 PM
1

*Working as intended
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 05:54 PM
2

Exactly this. Talking to women is one of the most thrilling puzzle games.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 08:51 AM
1

Laci Green/Male privilege You're a very dedicated troll. Q4Men: What's the best or most important piece of dating/relationship advice you've ever gotten from a woman? Women don't speak plainly. But you can press for elaboration if they're already yours. Overall, the best advice is to ignore them sometimes. When they want to talk, complain, just be around you, etc. Just prioritize yourself. Be a good listener when you do engage, but don't be available often when it doesn't benefit you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 08:45 AM
1

girl 1 5/10 Rank 2 girl 2 5/10 Face looks fake. Rank 4 girl 3 5/10 Face looks fake. Rank 5 girl 4 5/10 Face looks fake. Rank 6 girl 5 5/10 Fake brows. Rank 3 girl 6 5/10 Rank 7 girl 7 4/10 Face looks manly. Rank 1
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 08:15 AM
1

Robyn Pennacchia is a brilliant, fabulously talented and visually stunning angel of a human being, who shrugged off what she is pretty sure would have been a Tony Award-winning career in musical theater in order to write about politics on the internet. Also, she is very modest and truthful always. And she lives in Chicago. I don't know if it'd be worse if she wrote that or her employer/best friend did. Anyway... She'd have less to bitch about if she had some kids and a man who gave her jewelry b…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 08:03 AM
1

Would recommend. Gay. Would recommend. Rape threat. Would recommend. Crossfire related death threat. Would recommend both. Probably an artsy type, no future. Do not recommend.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 07:46 AM
1

You could just take the majority of non-liberal death camp country's men. Asia, Eastern Europe, Middle East. Add that to the unaffected men in the death camps. Especially Germany. You could add a fair amount of the women there too. With modern liberalism, comes gross dishonesty, but older women and very attractive women tend to agree with AWALT as it's meant to be used. Which is that enough women are like that, so you should probably be equipped for that, rather than searching for the outlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 05:08 AM
1

Nature doesn't care about the bad side of optimal behaviours. The goal is survival and reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 05:01 AM
1

We support the laws because an eye for an eye is nature's way. If we agree that murder is okay so we can take out an enemy, we open the door to revenge being taken out on us. If we agree that theft is okay because some dumbass doesn't lock his doors and we want his stuff, then we open the door to people looting us the moment we leave. Small societies can work in peace for mutual benefit without laws, but as you expand, mix sects, add other cultures, etc. you need laws. Laws dictate that we uphol…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 04:57 AM
1

I don't give emotional support/act on a complaint unless I determine a problem to be serious by my standards. I find this is only an issue after the honeymoon phase, rather than prior to the relationship. It's something I won't change because I don't lose anything if I lose a partner after the honeymoon phase and if I don't lose them because of it, they're conditioned not to repeat the behaviour I ignore.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 12:57 AM
2

I highly doubt you'll get an honest answer on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 07:16 PM
0

It's not an argument. No points worth debating have been made. I merely noticed a very personal tone and am led to believe there's a sense of guilt/desire for justification fueling the rage.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/17 11:51 AM
1

I'm fond of legal all around. But with a few conditions. Being post-welfare, other than the necessary covers for sudden circumstances, like disabilities. A streamlined process with additional legal fees as the weeks increase. The cost can be passed on to the patient to avoid a loss, covered in an attempt to get more customers or covered by charity. Allowing people to suffer consequences while providing incentives is always the best form of management.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/17 11:27 AM
0

You seem quite defensive? Killed a kid in your day?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/17 11:18 AM
1

I don't think you're thinking this through. If you're settling down with someone to receive their love and get some tingles out of it, you're not necessarily stupid, but you're... pretty stupid. If you don't have a plan to start a family when you settle down with a woman, you may as well be buying a farm with no plans to grow crops. Sure you may have some bullshit dream of owning a farm/having a loving wife with nothing further in mind, but that's shortsighted. That said, do you want to start a …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/17 01:59 AM
2

She's not fat. But that tranny face.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 08:14 AM
1

Yes, holy shit. If you ever hear someone say "Objectified", you've probably heard a massive hypocrite. Much like with friends, our lovers are the greatest people you'll ever meet. He's rude? Nah he's just a little rough in speech. She's fat? Nah, she's perfect for me. Rating strangers happens, but it has no bearing on whether we'll give them the time of day.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 08:12 AM
3

Men are more likely to be violent to other men. Even Islamic terrorists spare the lives of women/girls. In fact, Islamic ruled places execute men for crimes that women are lashed for. You could actually just pick a time and place in history and observe this in any case, to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 07:52 AM
2

just that I don't relate to women as well as I relate to other men Unless you're gay or very feminine, this is normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 07:46 AM
1

Are you an extrovert?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 07:40 AM
2

Platonic? No. Value? No. I am not extroverted. The people I define as friends and the people who define me as a friend don't fully overlap. Women have much higher networking value than men, so it's good to have many female acquaintances, but they can't understand a man, so there isn't any value to platonic, long-term, highly personal interaction. It's like having a child. You can get joy from taking care of them and seeing them happy, but you can't discuss certain things because they can't relat…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 07:36 AM
3

I do a curiosity run-through a few of the gonewild subs a few times a day. Being turned on is pretty rare. Now, the common idea I hear is that it's desensitization. But I think it's more that quantity gives a better sense of quality. What was high quality is now average and something far better is required to get a spark.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 07:07 AM
1

Perhaps in twenty years there will be a backlash the other way. Why? We'll still be human in twenty years.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/17 10:17 PM
1

A girl would be easier, but a boy would be more fulfilling. Bride vs. Heir. Easy, but swallowed by the culture after you pass on or tough but an extension of your legacy. Alternatively, I'd just have a huge family in the east and not worry about a shitty culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/17 10:10 PM
2

You forgot to mention the best part of Sweden's "culture". Anarchist territories where police won't come to help.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/17 09:55 PM
1

I'm well aware of the studies. It's common sense in convoluted form. Nearly as pointless as philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/17 08:29 PM
1

Putting the innately obvious into words isn't really a study of high value. Humans have understood human interaction since the first organized religion was made to address some of the potential consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/17 06:01 PM
1

Time is a resource. Simply measure based on the estimated resources that were missed out on.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/17 04:13 AM
1

You can quite easily measure resource gain/loss, projected total resources before/after an interaction, effort input, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 11:14 PM
1

or at least doesn't speak falsehood
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 10:43 PM
1

Nothing to do with approval. It's a media figure who isn't dishonest, or at least doesn't speak falsehood. Whether she believes what she says or not is up for debate. But, she's not really relevant. Mainstream media is a waste of attention. It's kind of like Milo. Don't really agree with what everything he says or his lifestyle/methods, but he's saying a lot of good stuff, so there's no sense making fun of him.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 09:30 PM
1

Why use a lens when can you just objectively measure who gains more from an interaction. Don't over-complicate simple things that we've understood since caveman days.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 09:27 PM
1

The easy remedy to that is not being an easy target. People go after people who show weakness. Women in my family don't encounter this shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 09:24 PM
3

Well there goes your shred of credibility if there was any.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 09:20 PM
6

Fascinating, but empty. Venting without really addressing anything said. Attacking a group while saying some of them aren't so bad is the reason for the analogy. No problem here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 09:18 PM
1

I'm not too sure you'e being serious anymore, so I'll have to get off the ride.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 06:45 AM
1

No they couldn't. Women could not vote until 1920 I believe. It appears they could if they owned property, but it was removed for shady reasons. What? Why would this be true at all? That doesn't make any sense, women are the ones excelling in school and higher paying jobs. Men might have an innate advantage in parts of the workforce such as labor jobs, but thats about it. Quotas, school system bias, etc. Men still go further across the board. That is the goal....... What year did we become equal…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 06:11 AM
1

It actually was pioneered by a woman, in 1991. Look it up. Her name was Ana something. A woman contributed heavily in 1932. If you were dying and had to pick a doctor, would you rather have 50 to choose from or 100? Probably 100 so that you could have the best of the 100 rather than the best from 50. That's how women having equal opportunities helps our society. We get the best workers, the best ideas, etc. Your point? Equal opportunities are fine. If achieving that was honestly the goal of anyo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 05:30 AM
1

The base risk is static. It can increase with human error. More arguments on either end because of jealousy that was promised wouldn't happen, higher chance of stds, higher chance of a baby with someone else that one partner wouldn't want, All human error. Now, if it works for you till death, it wasn't a waste of time. But it will always be a waste of time on paper and not the best option unless you bank on hope.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 04:45 AM
1

You worded that nicely, I can see the lawyer there.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 04:38 AM
1

Remind me why outliers are important.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 04:26 AM
1

I'd say effort into something with a higher risk than reward when a low risk, same reward option is available is universally a waste of time. And here's the thing. You could say the reward is higher for someone who wants the commitment, but then the risk increases just as much because of the increased emotional investment. Whereas the reward may be lower with non-monogamy, but the risk is static.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 04:12 AM
1

So by that logic, men shouldn't be allowed to vote because they don't vote for the interests of women and dilute women's votes. Not exactly. Weak men shouldn't be allowed to vote either. The voting interests of women are advantageous to women and weak men in the short term, but they're a huge detriment in the long term. Men should also not be allowed to have equal education because, like you said, opportunities are limited. So they are taking away positions women could have. No. The opportunitie…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 03:33 AM
2

If you want examples on the basis of logical conclusion... Extreme femininity is Stalin. Extreme masculinity is the founding fathers. if you want equally negative examples Extreme femininity is Sweden Extreme masculinity is Somalia Funny cause I think some Somalians are invading and raping Swedes. If you want equally positive or as close to positive as possible... Extreme femininity is Canada Extreme masculinity is pre-feminist USA
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 02:03 AM
2

i've had enough laughs today What...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 01:57 AM
1

Does this mean she shows emotional attachment to an ex or other male? Cause there's a perfect system for that kind of thing in Muslim nations.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 12:43 AM
1

Richer. I could play baby and milk her for investment income. The idea of smarter doesn't really seem possible to me. But, when a girl happens to be kind of... autistic or antisocial and capable of entertaining abstract concepts, I can't help but see them as another guy. Note - Usually because they look kinda like guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 12:39 AM
2

You're working from a weird perspective. Men's sexuality and women's sexuality aren't equivalent resources. Men's resources and projected ability to obtain them is equivalent to women's sexuality. Men don't need standards in who they have sex with, they need standards in who they give their resources to. Men can't do that when the government forces men to give women their resources. So men have to use game. They signal that they can give even more resources than a woman has access to innately. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 12:28 AM
1

Movement or not, TRP describes sexual interactions from their own perspective and holds a set of beliefs from which it judges the world. In this sense they are similar to feminists who use gender and female oppression to explain what's around them. Feminism is a movement that seeks to amass support by portraying a viewpoint. RP is just adapting to a climate. There's a lack of strong male role models, so RP makes the eastern/old culture man into a role model and uses what that man knew as facts o…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 11:59 PM
2

It seems that people don't differentiate feminism as a social group for girls and feminism as a political movement funded by men. Whether this differentiation is intentional or not is arguable. Anyway, the casual guy/girl who is in the feminist club may believe that girls should have the right to do x and y. They are part of the problem but they're just useful idiots. They passively support the laws, the quotas, etc. Most of the time, because none of it sounds bad on paper to the average person.…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:56 PM
1

Full blown cancer? Mild cancer? Either way it's cancer. One is just more noticeably cancerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:32 PM
1

One of them even has feminist in their name. It's not that hard to spot.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 09:31 PM
1

My issue with TRP, as with feminism and any movement you can think of, is that movements see things from a narrow perspective. It's not a movement. It's a set of strategies used to diminish loss by not repeating past mistakes. They always have some truth to them but that truth is exaggerated. Strategy is meant to focus on the extreme, so you can handle the norm with ease. Like high level mathematics that you'll never practically use. Yes, men and women are different on average, but there is a hu…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 09:03 PM
1

Women tend to support more socialist values. Women are half the people, a fair share of men will go along with what women want. Socialist values are anti-men, because they punish competition. Punishing competition destroys the strength of nations. Women voting skews the nation's goals towards making women and weak men feel better about their position, instead of strengthening those men to progress the nation. How does giving women the same educational opportunities hurt men? It doesn't. Giving t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 06:14 PM
1

Explain why the statement is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 06:08 PM
1

It's rare to have the luxury of having nothing left to fix and inventing problems in perfectly functional systems. Generally, war prevents humanity from getting spoiled rotten. The west is unfortunately immune to threats. As for technology. You can only go so long borrowing everything from tomorrow in the name of equality. We have longer, but not forever. Maybe 1-1.5 lifetimes, 2 if war doesn't spark up. Maybe a civil war will fix things before that though. The left is definitely scrambling and …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 09:13 AM
1

Let me explain this to you. Equality isn't innate It has to be forced. The strongest available have to carry that burden no matter what method of force is used. When resources don't allow for equality, people have to die or inequality has to return. Best case scenario when equality is forced on society is times get tough after the attempt inevitably fails and men don't have to carry society as hard. Worst case, strife breaks out and men die to preserve the limited resources, then men have to reb…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 09:03 AM
1

Enjoy that idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:56 AM
1

Feminism in all it's forms is just part of a cycle. Empires are born from adversity, they overdose on comfort, they cater to their women and then they die.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:48 AM
1

Equality is anti-most men. See - Stalin.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:37 AM
1

But it does not necessarily mean that they were "adjusted" because of the women. It is about getting all children (both genders) on the same level. Conflicting statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:34 AM
2

Apparently, science is white supremacy as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:17 AM
1

Biology
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 08:08 AM
1

Nobody truly believes that statistic. It's accepted for ideological purposes and perhaps accepted because of lack of thinking. I doubt anyone is actually going to challenge you with any logical thought and say, "Yes, 1 in 5 women are raped in college." or that anyone actually thinks it over and concludes that it makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 05:33 AM
2

Neither. It's not a luxury cause anyone can get it whenever they want. It's not a psychological necessity because you can refocus the sex drive. If I'm designing, debating or competing, I can go without any thought of sex for as long as I'm performing the task. Could be days, could be weeks.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 05:13 AM
1

I guess I should note that I'm not a TRPer. I just naturally have tendencies that RP defines as good strategy and I tend to agree. My "fear" isn't being cheated on as I usually go the two-way open route. Rather, my "fear" is falsehoods. I don't like people who have any type of facade. If someone is inconsistent in their actions for the sake of acceptance, then I resent them. If it's tactical with a higher purpose, then I understand. I tend to tolerate when someone tries to chameleon into social …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:37 AM
1

Are you dominant or submissive? I don't desire intimacy, but I unintentionally end up with it and I've always had a pretty cold approach. It's more about push and pull than a steady flow of "love". Plus men and women love in different ways. Seeing through bullshit is pretty romantic in my experience. When a girl is caught hiding something or mincing words and you call her out, it's both the cutest thing and a bonding moment. For her, she has someone taking the lead and for the guy, his girl is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:04 AM
1

Let's say the threat is real and not real and analyze something. I, personally have caught people in lies and established a gameplan to screw them over tenfold before they can do anything. I enjoy it very much. Now if the skepticism is baseless, then I'm ready to catch any outliers when need be. If it's reasonable, then I have an all-encompassing gameplan. In either case, I still get the thrill of the moment I sense something is wrong and the safety if my perception and plan are adequate. Consid…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 03:43 AM
1

My needs to a fair degree of accuracy. but not if that fear is about yourself. Specifically if that fear is about yourself. For instance, there's strife in Africa all the time, that doesn't excite nor concern me. But Sweden is currently experiencing an epidemic in violent crime. That's exciting, because it could be the future for a country like mine, with similar "liberal" values and more importantly, attitude towards the migrants. There's also the financial outcome of western society's net tax …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 03:17 AM
1

That's the sort of thinking of men who have let themselves be duped into thinking they are qualified by having a woman. They're not duped. Their entire biology is centered around them competing with other men to mate. If you're reasonably above other men and you can't get a mate, then there's a conflict. At that point you either decide, "I haven't done enough." or "I've done enough, I'm not making concessions." I've heard these talking points one too many times. Because, while the human brain ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 02:59 AM
2

Social Construct™ man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 02:52 AM
2

but I can't imagine it allows for a very happy life for its followers, all things considered. My friend, men thrive in chaos and uncertainty. Fear is adrenaline, a reason to strategize, a reason to conquer, a reason to adapt and prove that your method is best. Not saying you're right about it being fear, but if you were, that allows for a very happy life. There's a reason we tend to discuss apocalyptic scenarios, war, how we would approach a fight, etc. It's exhilarating, it gives meaning to an …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 02:45 AM
0

Not really. Women's desires determine the market value of men's labour. No role models is how you get male feminists and genuine nice guys. Guys who try to address the diminished value of their labour with additional, free labour. Guys with role models understand that they have more value in the transaction and forego free labour. They have the desire but pride and logic outweighs it. Consider people selling product who both have a need to sell, but one is setting a high price and the other give…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 02:38 AM
2

Individual men can stand to learn relatability being able to explain the exact same idea in a way a woman can understand is how you fuck a lot of women who give you the more rare comfort based shit test This advice is bad for men who are new to game I definitely agree, but I think "the deal" is always applicable. Go extreme and the audience accepts the moderate. Go moderate and the audience wanders off to an extreme. There is "Yeah, that's pretty much what I do, let me refine it." "This is prett…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 02:27 AM
0

No they don't. Like most things in life, women are pretty static and men are at the extremes. Most women are desirable to most men. Some men are desirable to most women. Some men are desirable to almost no women. If you gathered all women, you'd probably get a huge pile in 4, 5, 6 rating if we're going by a more objective rating of 5 being the average, 4 being slightly below and 6 being slightly above, rather than whatever a guy wants to bang is 8-10 and whatever he doesn't but can see other guy…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 01:26 AM
4

Defining feminism like that is like defining the KKK as a group to help improve the lives of white people and so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 01:00 AM
3

that women don't mature past a teenage stage are all so emotional can't ever think logically This isn't a bad thing. As with all issues with humanity, they arise when culture tries to address human behaviour by trying to redirect it instead of limiting it. Women can relate to their children better than men, because they have a similar thought pattern. One example is the "Nail on the head". Sometimes kids just want to be comforted. Anyway, that thought pattern doesn't change, because there's neve…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 12:56 AM
3

Why would TRP have PR? There is no angle where it'd be useful. Looking good to anonymous critics? There's no money to be made, so that's a no. Looking good to women IRL? Nobody in their right mind is candid with women. If RP even comes up, the most one would say is, "Some of it makes sense, I guess." Looking good to the women/effeminate men that happen to stop by with curiosity? It's not a club, it's a bunch of individual men without any corporate goal, which means there's no basis for cooperati…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 12:17 AM
2

"feminism" (like all "isms" this is a broad term...in its broadest sense it means women should have the right to vote and so on, so opposition to that in that broadest sense would be legitimately offensive). Now why do you gotta go around telling lies? Being opposed to that isn't legitimately offensive anyway. It's uncomfortable to oppose in modern times, but so are a lot of stupid things.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 11:55 PM
1

I'm saying the western world has replaced Christianity with "Equalitism", a blind and baseless belief in equality, regardless of historical evidence to the outcomes of trying to reach equality.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/17 03:24 PM
1

Well about 80% of women are unattractive! No. First, the unattractive women and mothers still have the traits, they just aren't as apparent to the passerby. The boyfriend/boss/husband/orbiter knows they're there from extended interaction. Secondly, a girl can't just be conventionally unattractive to lose the privilege of men giving them attention and care. Even then, the government removes a lot of responsibility from women, regardless of their appearance. The woman who tend to not show the trai…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 03:21 PM
1

Equality is good why? Why replace Christianity with an equally blind belief? I know why people believe that, of course. But if you think about it, you eventually see how baseless the idea of achieving equality is.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/17 07:37 AM
5

Muslim faith women can't go out in public without their face covered, have acid thrown in their faces because a man gazed upon her ankles, and having the clitoris removed because sex is not to be enjoyable to women. I'm not saying Islam is all about equality, nor would I say equality is good, but none of that is part of muslim faith.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/17 07:32 AM
1

I say, sterilize all of the women and men who are below 8 and make sure the 8s and above are emotionally and psychologically fit to become parents. I assume you're a troll, but... A strong functional society and stable species progression are not highly compatible. You need a balance of the two, which would be a capitalist patriarchy. You want the men to have an incentive to be productive. Now, if you have unobstructed capitalism, men will naturally have some level of authority over women, since…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 09:23 PM
2

Men will be a net benefit by their mid forties. If they live well past their seventies, they will fall to even and eventually they'll use more than they pay in. That's not extremely relevant though, considering that they're propping up society in their best years. You can forgive lower contribution in old age.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 06:27 PM
3

You'll probably never break even with the tax you pay, so you're already getting overcompensated.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 06:11 PM
1

You're not really disproving my point. You're not making one. You're stating a fact as a view and stating a misconception. There's also two definitions of red pill which can fall under anti fem The other Redpill is an understanding of concepts with no requirement of action. It isn't even strategy or philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 06:10 PM
1

Male - Arrogant, Romantic, Distrusting, Aggressive/Violent Female - Insecure, Romantic, Trusting
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 08:56 AM
2

It looks like whichever man sparked feminism did it to stall socialism. More like, to achieve controlled socialism. If we had full socialism, what would happen? The guys that funded it "would get the bullet". If there was no socialism at all, they'd eventually succumb to competition. But with controlled socialism, you get all the benefits of being an unopposed ruling class with all the benefits of being at the top in capitalism. You profit off of consumerism, yet your competition can't capitaliz…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 07:19 AM
-1

Those aren't advantages, those are disadvantages written in the context of being eliminated. The advantages are Authority equivalent to the required responsibility. Guaranteed reproduction if duties are adequately fulfilled. Security of acquired assets.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 06:34 AM
6

You shouldn't. People aren't equal. Men aren't equal to men. Women aren't equal to women. Men aren't equal to women. X Race person isn't equal to Y race person. X ideology person isn't equal to y ideology person. People aren't even consistently at the same level of capability. There is no such thing as equality among people unless you specifically test and group people together. Even in that absurd scenario, someone would improve or someone would get complacent and there'd be inequality. The onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 06:27 AM
6

Men in the modern west still work to support women through taxes. They just get nothing in return now.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 06:10 AM
3

It normalizes the idea that the source of inequality is that there is an oppressor and an oppressed group, using gynocentrism. The idea wouldn't fly in the west as is, because people are aware of socialism/communism's end game. But you can do anything you want if you can frame it as a benefit to women. The only necessary action is breaking off the gendered issues from marxism and packaging them as their own ideology. From there, you can define any group as oppressed and justify equalizing them b…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 05:25 AM
3

While that does sound pretty tough, it's important to understand that feminism is/was repackaged marxism. The time to seriously criticize it has come and gone, since marxism is now widely accepted in the west without the label of feminism, but it's good to remember that feminism isn't just some disgruntled women making a fuss and getting their way.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 04:42 AM
1

How is this a view? This is nonsense. TRP is a strategy guide to the game of acquiring consistent sex. Anti-feminists are people who are against feminism. Neither of these are groups. One is an instruction manual and the other is a stance of opposition. You even clarify this As long as you oppose feminism, you're an anti feminist. This is a low quality shitpost. That said, anti-feminists are often pro-feminism but anti-modern feminism. They usually don't grasp that modern feminism is the natural…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 04:37 AM
1

Feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 02:52 AM
1

There's a group that loves that line.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 02:08 AM
1

many 19 years old girls are like this but our 50 years old moms not. Not really. Motherhood chemically adds traits. Emotional still applies, but the emotion is channeled primarily into worry and affection. Indecisive/hesitant still applies, which is why single mothers raise shit kids. They fail to instill discipline, both through example and punishment. Lack of honour and respect still applies. The father is meant to enforce these things. In the absence of a father, the primary goal on the basis…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 07:11 PM
2

That's pretty good. Marriage shouldn't be easily ended if the core aspects of the contract are upheld.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 08:19 AM
1

[Insert EU Nation's first letters]xit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 08:16 AM
2

Feminine and immature are the same insult. Emotional, indecisive, hesitant, lack of honour and respect. Find a guy with those traits and he'll be called effeminate by more conservative types and immature by other effeminate types.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 08:14 AM
2

Face, ass. 33 Aryan Deity The White Capital Cyanide Jewish Tier Wealth
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 08:11 AM
1

Lie to someone or be a bad mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 12:09 AM
1

There are some "innate tendencies" that RPers apply to women out of bitterness. Then there are innate tendencies that all women have. There are situations where she hates the taste of mint and an RPer will say she actually likes mint. Then there are situations where she hates the taste of mint and picked chocolate chip over mint chocolate chip and RPers will say it's because the chocolate chip doesn't have mint. To which she'll argue that she's had mint chocolate chip before, decided to choose c…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 08:19 PM
1

I prefer to call it, achieving perfection.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 10:04 AM
0

There's a difference between, "I heard that guy has to pay for sex." negative and "I hear that guy forced that girl to strip for rent money." negative. One makes girls fear the guy. Not hard, not worth anything. One can make other guys fear the guy. That leads to respect from men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 09:52 AM
1

Money has no real value. It isn't scarce enough. When you have big money, then it's different because large sums of money owned by an individual are scarce. We've established this, so... A woman can get money from any guy. A woman can get big money from a specific set of guys. A woman can get drugs from a specific set of guys. A woman can get her rent waived by a specific set of guys. A woman can get her car fixed by a specific set of guys. A woman can get her music career started by a very spec…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 09:47 AM
1

The nature of people is to act. And that's it. Even if they are intelligent. Questioning the chain that leads to each action shows roots that are very hard to deny. An unintelligent person will generally disregard any factors and say, "No I chose to do this." as if they put any forethought into their day to day actions, especially actions as important to let instinct handle as mating. It's the fool's arrogance of human > animal over human = animal. Intelligent women understand the nature and the…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 07:49 AM
2

No. To be honest, I wouldn't say women can even be rp/bp. If your life wouldn't change either way, you can't really apply or reject RP philosophy. But, moving on. Women who are smart enough to be aware of the amount of instinct that goes into their choices, tend to fall into two categories. Aware and honest about it. Unaware, but tend to agree that they're like that when it's brought up. Women who aren't smart enough tend to be unaware of the amount of instinct and aware of the outcome of the ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 07:31 AM
1

This is the worst kind of racism. The soft, under the radar racism that tries to come across as genuine care. At least when another black person does it, I can laugh at them, but this is vile.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 05:31 AM
8

Of course we believe that. Because its true. The ability to believe a lie and the truth simultaneously without any mental strain is a privilege that goes far beyond anything a man can ever gain from having a dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 05:28 AM
1

Traditional, yes. But modern western society isn't merit based. It's heavily based on achieving a standard dictated by the religion of equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 05:24 AM
1

That would matter if you imply assume intelligence is common on college campuses. edit-
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 05:20 AM
2

I've never seen an intelligent woman criticize RP logic. On the contrary, the smarter the woman, the more open she is about her nature. Likely cause intelligence and social fluency don't go hand and hand. Dumb girls are better at hiding it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 05:18 AM
1

Women don't literally have the same decision making skills as children. But they are far less capable at taking a leadership role than men. If she's equal in capability to her man, she's not getting a good deal. Like if you joined a company and your ability to run a business was equivalent to your boss, you'd be getting a shitty deal by working there when you could provide the services to a better employer and likely get a better pay for it. This is assuming you know that you can't compete with …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 03:57 AM
0

CMV: Parent/child ideology is just a polite way of saying I can't be happy in a relationship unless I have my way 100% of the time. I often see Mother/Father/"guardian' people describe their relationship as parent and child and not father/mother dominance. However as parent the father/mother has final say and therefor control over the dynamic/relationship. If a mother/father can't allow the offspring to have equal say/control in the relationship it seems to me as though they're saying they can't…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 03:10 AM
1

Is an engineered "reality" TV show really such a great example to cite here? Not really, since they can't actually let them kill each other or naturally die.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 08:10 AM
1

Do men still exist? If so, they'd survive until someone conquers them. If not, I'd say 25 years before near extinction. Edit - Didn't see "build". It wouldn't get off the ground. Or I guess you could look at the primitive natives for an example, but they still have men doing most of the essential work.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 08:02 AM
1

Cool, and?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 07:57 AM
1

Oh I get it now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 06:26 AM
2

lol. If you have to force other people to do something in order for your right to exist, it's not a right. The only "rights" you can somewhat legitimately claim are the ones you provide compensation for. But let's be honest, children don't understand compensation for protection.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 06:14 AM
2

Geez, you ended that "man"'s whole career.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 05:42 AM
2

Unless he suddenly goes full liberal, he has my enthusiastic and ongoing support.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 05:35 AM
1

outliers Ugly chicks shoot way above their league pretty often.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 02:02 AM
1

I thought she was quite alright! What the fuck is wrong with your eyes?!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 01:57 AM
1

Your "average" is not the average where I'm from. Your "attractive" is average where I'm from.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 01:56 AM
2

It's relative. A violent poor kid with no dad to reign him in is probably in the same frame of mind as a depressed rich kid with no dad to impart self esteem and self value.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 11:00 PM
1

Nah. You still need to be at least a 9.5 with your base looks as a man and then you need to captivate her. Exaggeration. If you're chasing "bitches", sure. You know who I mean. Instagram chicks with the surprised/angry eyebrows painted on, coloured boots, black or patterned tights, 25 bracelets, etc. But the average girl isn't that picky for a hookup.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 10:56 PM
1

Women who can't survive alone in a post quota/welfare system would be under the responsibility and authority of their husbands. Disabled people and seniors would be under the responsibility and authority of their family members who care for them. People who can't support themselves and have no one to depend on would perform community service in return for minimum food and shelter.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 06:14 AM
1

Not if they require other people's funds. People belong to whoever provides their living.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 05:37 AM
1

It doesn't. The minority of women who were as capable as men in those times had less power discrepancy. Of course, they still couldn't compete with the best of the men, but they were capable enough to enjoy most of the benefits. The rest had as much freedom as they had merit. Currently, power without responsibility applies to every individual woman because? Religious belief in equality over logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 04:41 AM
1

5 3 3 3 5 5.5 3 2 1 5
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 04:20 AM
0

It matters who you are because you're speaking from jealousy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 04:15 AM
1

Even tribal people react to death and they're far more primitive than the ghetto class. It's not to say that they'll all understand the situation. Just that some will die and the rest will evolve their behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 04:13 AM
2

The privilege to get a wife Privileges aren't things you have to pay for. And men still have to pay as a group but they don't get the wife anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 04:10 AM
1

That'd be hilarious. The day feminism leads the west to gift and ship rape slaves to their enemies.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 04:06 AM
1

He is the joint owner of the child and society has to pay for the abortion. So technically, society and the man have more right to a say than the individual woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 04:03 AM
1

Net tax too.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 03:54 AM
2

at this point It never was. It's the oppressor/oppressed dynamic that never ends.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 03:52 AM
1

if you do not want to state-fund lots of single mothers, then you have to state-fund contraceptives and abortions. You can do neither and add some responsibility to the sexual freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 03:49 AM
1

Back in the days of the patriarchy, men had an advantage over women Power = responsibility. Until the resource cost of women is not more than their resource consumption, men should have power. If you have dependents in your house and they have equal authority to you, there's a huge issue and your household will not be sustainable in the long term. That is western society.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 03:47 AM
1

Women can't really thrive as criminals if they have to compete with males. They'd opt to just rely on men, which solves the single mother issue. As for the outliers who still try to have kids with no resources. Trust me, they'll learn fast enough. Even stupid people wise up when their children starve to death or when they have to become prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 03:36 AM
2

It's not really something you need brains for. People with power have been removing men from the women since tribal days.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 03:32 AM
3

Is it a false perception of desirability, tho? Simply put, the desirability of a woman or the number of men willing to sleep with her has not changed, merely the ability and willingness of men to express their desire for said woman has. It is a false perception, because "May as well try this since it takes no effort." is being converted to "I'm really valuable." There's a level of time wasted to get her into bed that gets streamlined through text. A man can do a bunch of things that he would hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 03:20 AM
1

No, welfare must be removed as well, otherwise there's still no incentive to behave responsibly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 02:41 AM
1

that people are willing to pay for. Free market doesn't mean being fine with Sarah wanting candy and Jack, Martin and Ray paying for it. I'm against abortion, but I don't mind if it's legal as long as the person getting the abortion has to pay out of their own pocket. This and a lack of welfare for single mother would very quickly lower the spawning of criminals. Both through adding real consequences to the actions of impulsive people and making fathers a requirement to raise children again.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 02:25 AM
1

Single mothers, glorified gang culture and victim culture. Cancer.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 02:19 AM
3

Highly doubt that. We may only have hard science to back things up now, but we always knew from the early days that if you want to control a population, you separate/weaken/kill the men. The women are left incapable of producing any valuable men and they're forced to rely on whoever has the power to assist them. Or in simpler terms, a super-dependent voting block was created.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 02:17 AM
8

Children from affluent single mother homes are still just as disadvantaged. They just have a better starting point to be less successful from.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 02:07 AM
1

Most poverty is born out of single mother homes. A father breaks the cycle.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 02:05 AM
1

are you a TRPer? No. I'm red-pilled as in, I don't accept the mainstream narrative, but I don't use any TRP strategy intentionally. A lot of TRP is just stuff that everyday men and women will tell you 1-on-1 in intimate moments before disregarding it completely in their daily decisions. Men generally understand the skewed system, women generally understand their power/abuse of power, but you aren't supposed to talk about it casually. Honesty isn't the foundation of socializing in the west. Peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 09:16 PM
1

Slow down there. The first issue I have with the TRP community is that it's very cultish. Human nature. Deal with it, adapt, learn to identify in-groupers and debaters. Though this seems to be borderline concern-trolling. The fallacy of "beta" and "alpha" and "Chad Thundercock". This is equivalent to debating the legitimacy of stories in religious texts. It's not the important thing to take away, the point is understanding how to address situations with the basic understanding of the traits. AWA…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 08:53 AM
1

If a girl can't get a relationship despite trying, she probably has no value as a human being. If a girl can't get sex despite trying, she definitely has no value as a human being. A girl has to be nearly non-functional for no guy to even want her for sex. Even a genius, social recluse girl could get sex relatively easy with the most minimal of effort for example. If a guy can't get a relationship despite trying, he could be really smart, but lacking in social skills, horribly ugly but otherwise…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 06:06 AM
1

If you don't find her attractive after you've blown your load No woman on earth is attractive after blowing a load. -- if she can't consistently turn you on from a state of non-arousal An attractive woman is a catalyst for thoughts that lead to arousal, not the source of arousal.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 03:57 AM
1

Good enough for sex means they're attractive, but women come with a certain level of stress. There's a difference between attractive enough to add a burden to your life and just attractive enough to have sex with. They're still attractive in either case. Those aside, there are desperation girls that you forget about ever seeing and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 03:26 AM
1

Just pump and dump.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 03:16 AM
1

If a woman is just fuckable for one night, that's desperation rather than "good enough".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 02:58 AM
1

When you ask this question, you'll get guys answering it with who they would fuck and girls misinterpreting it and listing who they have fucked. It's a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 02:41 AM
1

I disagree that seeing someone as good enough to have sex with once means you find them genuinely attractive. Men aren't women. You can't apply your mindset to them and reach any sort of understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 02:38 AM
2

So you're a bi-sexual male.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 02:33 AM
1

You've probably mistaken attraction to and attraction despite.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 02:31 AM
1

All false equivalences. Men who have casual sex are not responsible for this disastrous sexual market-place, it is women who should be shamed because they're the ones supplying sex... The issue Sexual market-place is disastrous. The victims Low value to average value men in the short term and all women in the long term. The cause Women's freedom of choice leads to a unworkable sexual market-place. people who take drugs from strangers are not responsible for what could happen, it is dealers who s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/17 10:49 PM
1

Be specific.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/17 08:50 PM
0

If women did not need the assistance, the advice would likely cease to exist. Most advertising is done with the goal of selling women things they don't need, because they'll buy it anyway with the right stimulation. I don't think there's any case where you can say, if women didn't need it, the product wouldn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/17 08:49 PM
2

It's the implication.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/17 07:11 AM
1

If I don't have side options during the chase, then the friendship is over. If I have options, then it's kind of like a free lottery. Spin every now and then to see if I win, then get back to more important investments.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/17 08:08 PM
2

If you grow up normally as a man, you're likely to expect that men and women are pretty much the same, aside from some trivial differences. You'll also have a mother that loves you as much as you love her. It's highly likely that you'll project onto women, expecting that they'll love you the same way you love them, reinforced by memory of how your mother loved you. When you learn that all of this isn't true, you tend to get bitter. Love is a very strong emotion and is naturally a subject of focu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 07:37 AM
4

You answered your own question. The female equivalent of them would certainly always have one or two acquaintances around just because of their appearance along with a certain desirability that comes with being a young western middle class woman. And a woman can't be an incel. AFAIK Incel means involuntary celibate. "Incel" women just have standards above their value.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 06:16 PM
1

I doubt that. I'd agree because of my bias, but I doubt that due to reason. An average woman is attractive to most men, an average man is attractive to some women. One has to consider the amount of work required for the average woman to be appealing on a level that isn't just "I'd fuck that.". Whereas the average man doesn't really do anything to look average. Women are also non-threatening. An average woman can still trigger a desire to protect. An average man can always be seen as a threat. As…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 01:35 AM
2

university Cultures formed in well protected echo chambers don't really reflect the average person. I have met quite a few Nor do personal experiences, not to mention there's no way to confirm they're saying what they actually think/know/believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/17 10:42 PM
3

I based it on assuming I've seen 650 women in my life, which is probably far less than I've actually seen. I don't think mere appearance can turn someone on in most cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/17 04:16 PM
1

A girl is still a girl. I'm not sure what your ideal is, but if you don't want her to be like most western women, bring on some Islam and abuse or something. Of course, that's silly. Instead, raise her to max out on hypergamy. You can't raise her against the current, but you can give her a speedboat. Make sure she only gives sex to very high-status men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/17 05:43 AM
1

how many women are attractive enough to actually turn you (or guys in general) on when they aren't already turned on On sight and in reasonable attire? 0.5% As for good enough for sex, assuming no future contact that isn't purely sex. Anything goes unless red flags are present(Bright coloured hair, excessive makeup, ghetto clothing, etc.).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/17 02:11 AM
1

It's fun to make someone think you think they're important, then be brutally honest and then shift back again. Really throws them off. They lose the ability to separate joke and serious talk, so they fall back on what they want to be the truth. You really like them and you just joke around a lot. At that point, you can do whatever you want. You can say "I'm being very serious." then give them a compliment that "confirms" their belief. Or you can change their behaviour by again saying, "I'm being…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/17 08:03 PM
1

Those are both american girls. The further you get from America, the more attractive girls get. Both physically and in terms of personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/17 11:59 PM
1

american girls big leagues I sure hope you don't mean anything other than physical mass.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/17 11:03 PM
1

The issue is I'm pretty liberal Damn. You seemed cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/17 10:59 PM
1

Help me out. Give me ten samples.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/17 09:08 AM
1

the human addition of charity keeps the feels in check. Old USA is optimal.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/17 10:43 PM
0

Even successful entrepreneurs agree that luck is a large element of success. This is called being humble. Nothing happens without cause. "Luck" is the ability to capitalize on an effect before a less capable person does, either through prediction or being in the right position to make a play. You can attribute some things to luck, but it takes consistency to excel. Lottery winners have luck and then fumble their way into the poor house. Define your ideal world, we all wave flags and go behind ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/17 08:37 PM
2

Good post, just one correction. With women not NEEDING a man They still need men, but they can obtain the resources from the group instead of an individual. There's also the men passing and physically enforcing laws to "level the playing field". Marriage 1.0 is not coming back Also, it probably will once resources are too scarce to have men pay the cost of women pursuing careers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/17 07:18 PM
1

What's the end goal here? The strongest survive? Exactly, that should always be humanity's goal. The reality is that most people's wealth power and influence comes from luck. There is no such thing as luck. People who aren't capable, will quickly lose any power or wealth they stumble into. Life gives you as much as you put in. If we let people in power control people who don't have power and make decision one group of people will just keep voting in their own self interest - leading to a very sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/17 07:06 PM
1

Well democracy doesn't work if you get only one group voting. Democracy alone isn't that great. It needs to have limitations on who can have a say, like a corporation giving votes to investors. People should only be able to vote when they've invested a specified amount into the nation. Imperialism and wars are bad things, demilitarisation allows for greater social funding and stability in general is great for cross-national co-operation. This lets us achieve things like solving global famines. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/17 01:46 AM
1

Giving the working class and women the vote Not necessarily good. Neutral at best. reducing foreign wars War is necessary. ending imperialism Increasing your nation's power should be a goal. Penal reform Progressives don't tend to reform things for the better. ending conscription War is necessary, sometimes people won't volunteer. Need me to go on? Yes, still waiting for a good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/17 11:05 PM
1

To force two things to be equal if they aren't naturally equal, you need to bring one down. Similar to communism, feminism ceases power from the capable men and redistributes that power equally. While the performance isn't equal, the target goal is the same, so the burden has to fall on someone. Despite the pillosphere's best wishes, this is men and that is why they get snappy at complaints.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/17 02:03 PM
1

Like many things progressives do, they're not bad ideas I have never seen a good, progressive idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/17 01:25 PM
1

How is getting paid what my skills are worth for a job If you didn't negotiate your pay, you're probably being over/underpaid.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/17 01:18 PM
1

It's quite simple. Forced equality requires someone to pick up the slack. In the "pillosphere", men aren't too keen on any man condoning that continuing downward spiral by picking up the slack themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/17 01:12 PM
1

If there's any evidence that this is not true, provide it. You can use any time in history.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 07:59 AM
1

Not if a good old war breaks out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 06:02 AM
1

Objectively speaking, as a benefit to modern society? Far less than. But men and women aren't the same. They can't be equated. Men are responsible for keeping society running, women are responsible for ensuring that there are enough men and that the men aren't too heavily burdened. The idea of equality is just nonsense at the end of the day. Only a fool sees a square hole and a triangular hole and tries to shove the square and triangle into the same hole.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 06:01 AM
1

(Disclaimer that this will change soon as women being departmental heads, CEO's, managers becomes more commonplace. In fact due to the rate at which women are going to higher education compared to men, it will be a majority of women who have these positions.) Are you implying women will make risky hiring/promoting decisions? Because hiring/promoting women is a quota induced expense in most cases. Yahoo is technically an example of your prediction, but that would just lead to not having women in …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 05:48 AM
2

I think for both men and women who care about this, it's the same "logic" as we see used for catcalling. Unattractive women who don't get catcalled want to victimize women who get attention, because they're jealous and misery loves company. The same shaming/victimization is used for this scenario. Unattractive men who couldn't get a girl that age when they were that age/when they are that age/at their current age just mimic the shaming language to feel better about not being capable. Personally,…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 05:44 PM
1

grow to hate how little loyalty... when they later find out they have husbands or boyfriends Indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 08:43 AM
2

This is a seemingly autistic failure to separate internet discussion and real life shooting the shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 08:36 AM
1

What's with all these dumb ass questions popping up? Why don't women act like men? Why is it that women do this when a man would do this? Why does a gynocentric species ignore this man specific issue but care about this women specific issue? Would you fuck this ugly guy? Would a guy fuck this ugly girl? Is this "provoking discussion"? Asking questions with obvious answers?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 04:20 AM
1

When we get hot and heavy, please take charge. Please, please fuck me. Schrodinger's rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 05:24 AM
1

Of course. You can only get pregnant once, further sex doesn't benefit the society.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 09:26 PM
1

Sex is a commodity, religion regulates it to maximize the output of those who would otherwise not be able to get it and eventually stop contributing. Animals lack the logic to give up on an instinctual urge, so they can't stop being productive when they're out of the sexual market. Religion has very little to do with theistic dogma and a lot to do with addressing human nature in the most logical way possible via appeals to morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 09:09 PM
2

I've been in perfect Ok then.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 07:13 PM
1

Situation B Loyalty isn't permanent, diversified assets are a sure thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 02:02 PM
1

Why do you take what women say so seriously? Even they will tell you to just ignore them most of the time. Dumping is decided before reasons, the reasons are moral justifications. Complaints about desperation are just "Look how many guys want me." No girl actually cares about male sex drive. Any that did legitimately care, wouldn't care about the reasons anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 12:24 AM
3

That sounds awful, example please?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 10:52 PM
1

I don't. Often woman have shown me pics of Instagram models they think are attractive and I'm like lol she's alright and jaws hit the floor. Non-lesbian women and gay men have god awful ideas of beauty in women. It's on some other level of "What's wrong with your eyes?"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 10:48 PM
1

Despite this being a troll post, I can answer this. It's quite easy to abuse someone's attraction to you for benefits. And I guess I can also challenge your view with that. Women abuse men's attraction all the time, so sure it's an advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 10:36 PM
1

Germany/Angela Merkel Low quality trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 04:45 PM
1

Since when is being ethical important in building a powerful nation?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 04:39 PM
1

tldr - Strong men create good times, good times create weak men, weak men create gender equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 04:27 PM
2

there is no desire to escape from feminine traits in the company of eastern women. I mean to say, western women inspire men to seek out less feminine traits as an escape method and eastern women don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 07:20 AM
2

Those are some very ugly ladies. First face is cuter though. Second face looks trans. As for behaviours, western women are tolerable at best in platonic situations. While western and eastern women are still women and display the same feminine traits, there is no desire to escape from feminine traits in the company of eastern women. Femininity is great, but mix it with western culture and "not like other girls" becomes the most attractive thing imaginable. edit-Jesus that 2nd face is fucking disg…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 05:24 AM
2

I think they're attracted to the red flags, regardless of whether it's emotional or physical abuse. Looks probably don't matter much.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 05:00 AM
3

My definition of logical is "Outcome is provably positive." My definition of emotional is "Outcome feels positive."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 08:24 AM
1

I was thinking today that TRP is modern hero lore. Young men would be inspired to be like a great warrior or a philosopher by hearing extreme tales about him. In the vacuum, people started worshiping brave atheists and jocks, exaggerating their wisdom, strength and success with women to aspire to. While a man can't fight hundreds of men and smile at his army of five, he can sculpt himself into a formidable athlete. While a man can't realistically go without food, healing the sick and preaching t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 10:55 PM
2

Rational reason The emotional reasons you mention did and still do exist. But there is no logical reason to support feminism, unless you're a woman and shortsighted. Even then, there isn't much left to take from tomorrow anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 10:26 PM
2

There is no rational reason for a man to genuinely subscribe to feminism. Perhaps, back in the day, one could support feminism for the sake of making it easier to have women without investing any time/money. However, since that's been taken care of, the only remaining reason a man could genuinely support feminism is if his instinct to please women as a way to obtain sex guides him to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 10:41 AM
1

Much like you don't eat specifically to prevent yourself from dying of starvation, but you have an instinct to eat for that purpose, it's not that these men are actively thinking that their actions get them sex. Men have an innate desire to please women for the purpose of acquiring sex, which comes out in extreme ways with the right amount of poor culture and lack of positive female attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 10:33 AM
1

The prevailing expert opinion on this matter has been that you can't hypnotise somebody to do things he (or she) doesn't want to, Same goes for persuasion. Always fun to remind people of this fact when they say "I can't believe you made me do that." or similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 10:10 AM
1

I think it's a product of current Western culture. Same. Nobody puts them in their place day to day and they're told that would be wrong, so they crave it sexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 10:02 AM
1

For the sake of humour, what else can you receive?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/17 08:10 AM
1

Working as intended.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/17 12:01 AM
1

It's not really a smart move for the long term. Somewhat like the equality that brought the laws in the first place. It's preemptively attacking yourself for future enemies. If you wanted to win a war and your enemy already handled the important task of eliminating the men, you couldn't ask for a better gift. In other words, if women abuse laws that harm men, they plant a bomb that eventually removes the society they rely on men to maintain.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 10:40 PM
1

Anything that is possible is fair. Will it be beneficial for humanity? Probably not.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 10:24 PM
1

Like a single father?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 10:17 PM
-1

The children are damaged in the process, so the benefit is gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 08:27 PM
2

Any smart dating coach would recognize the importance of an initial impression, and thus focus their teaching to lean hard towards the blood red basics of TRP. Gotta smash that pedestal, focus on the self, and grow a fucking spine. You're wrong there. You want them to obtain enough to see results, but not enough to lose reliance.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/17 08:55 AM
1

I consider them equally shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 11:57 PM
3

BP is the default, so of course. That aside, successful BP men speak blue and behave red.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 06:24 PM
2

I wouldn't say BP men are successful.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 06:12 PM
1

It's a boring existence, but it appears to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 05:55 PM
1

Society can only reach toxic levels of gynocentrism in the first world. Everywhere else has actual issues to deal with, so they can't really waste time on equality. No equality means gynocentrism stays at a healthy level and there's little need for "game" for the bare minimum of sexual success.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 07:01 AM
43

RP - Your product is shit, learn what the consumers want. BP - Your product is fine, you just need to wait for the right consumer.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 06:56 AM
1

It's because women know most people think its current form is a bullshit, man-hating ideology.. so they distance themselves from it. fixed
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 06:50 AM
1

which happened primarily by raising women up (rather than bringing men down to our level). Actually laughed out loud.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 06:37 AM
5

Is it harder ugly -3 man -2 vs. beautiful +5 woman x2.5 in today's world? -5 vs. 12.5
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 08:40 PM
1

Anarchy doesn't lead to increased crime, but to increased expression of criminal desire
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/17 12:12 AM
2

It sounds like you don't really talk to girls platonically on a regular basis as much you do with guys Fair point, I guess. I don't really believe in ever being fully platonic though, seems pointless. Women are also groomed to be more submissive in their opinions, which can come off as "duality." That's more innate than grooming. Not fitting into a social group would be death in earlier times.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 06:47 PM
4

Duality is so heavy in girls. They'll laugh at someone with you and then say it's not nice and then laugh with you about what you did to them and etc. If me and another guy make fun of someone, there's no facade. "Fuck that guy." that's it. If I'm doing something illegal, widely considered immoral, etc. A girl will tell me it's wrong and proceed to laugh and enjoy the stories. Another guy will either make it clear he doesn't support it or he'll say you do what you gotta do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 07:01 AM
3

I can't say I've ever felt lied to in the sense that I had a world view and it was false. Rather, I always had a clear understanding of the nature of women/girls, as in since elementary. Life was really just a series of "So that's what they call it." moments. I knew what women/girls wanted from guys and I always laughed at attempts to mask intent 1-on-1 or when a girl was putting on an act in a group for sympathy or favours. What I did find interesting was that others weren't really aware of ult…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 06:52 AM
1

This post reeks of virtue signalling. What are you really trying to say/get people to say?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 10:06 PM
3

You give people way more credit than they deserve. Most people don't think much, some think a bit, very few analyze, even fewer care about their observations much, a tiny minority develops an understanding and about half of them find exploits and use them to their advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 09:57 PM
1

Don't underestimate side action and lust for conquest.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 12:46 AM
1

If I suspect someone is making/going to make me wait and thinks we'll go exclusive, I just make use of side girls and lie to them about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 12:41 AM
1

CMV - Objective Reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 12:36 AM
1

I don't think they realize that they stuff that is obvious is actually understood and recognized by a large number of people they meet every day. I can never grasp people who say things like this. A majority of guys treat and advocate treating women better than guys or as if they were another guy, expecting the treatment they'd get back from a guy. This is especially true with showing love and loyalty. I'm not too sure where the idea that everyday guys understand these things as anything more th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/17 06:24 AM
1

With great power comes great responsibility. It's common sense that you don't give equal power to someone and not give them equal responsibility. I'm not too sure why you feel opposed to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/17 03:40 AM
1

I wouldn't. Because I don't like investing money into sex. Edit-But if it's somehow free...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 06:51 PM
8

Pretty much all forms of feminism are about manipulating everyone into whatever fits the current needs of power players.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 04:38 PM
4

Is this is a serious question or venting frustration? We're a gynocentric species. If we were designed to treat women equally to men or less than men, we'd run out of them. It's a mere symptom of being the apex beings on earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 04:34 PM
2

Not exact quotes, but I've heard, "I've never done this." "This is so weird." "I don't know why I'm okay with this." and various forms of ongoing "No", including blaming roommates, boyfriends, parents, siblings, morality and shyness. I have not heard, "were not having sex tonight." specifically, but I think the No's are equivalent.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/17 06:41 AM
3

To stand out, to be noticed. It's like semi-unintentional trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/17 04:40 AM
1

Why do you try so hard?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/17 03:55 AM
1

I see then.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 06:46 PM
1

Body types include clothing then? Or are we going on the basis that brothels are where you pick women for relationships and not just sexual attraction? What is your angle here?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 06:30 PM
1

All fit with similar face shapes and different accessories. You seem to be applying their assumed lifestyles and personalities as a physical feature. A fit girl with a slightly above average face and decent waist/hip is still the same type as a fit girl with a slightly above average face, decent waist/hip and short hair/piercings/band shirt/a book in her hand/hippy accessories/formal attire/sweatpants/tattoos/etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 06:17 PM
1

They all look about the same type.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 05:53 PM
1

Sometimes you want something unusual and grotesque to get off with.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 05:49 PM
3

Most people have this unfortunate nagging thing in their heads that wants them to do what is considered right. It causes them to be concerned with how others view their actions, lest they be badly behaved before an audience.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 06:45 AM
3

Where are you from? You have a very unique way of expressing yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 06:41 AM
2

I'm not attracted to Stacey. They're interesting as eye candy, but that's about it. If they start talking, they're not even attractive as eye candy anymore. And yes, I judge books by their covers. Haven't been wrong yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 06:24 AM
1

I don't really care. I'd advise a friend not to strike anyone first unless it's preemptive. But if two men are arguing and one of them is acting like a bitch, I won't get on any "be the bigger man" high horse if a punch is thrown. Same goes for if a man and woman are arguing and the woman is being a bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/17 06:50 PM
1

It's beneficial to men and women, but more to women. Hence why any amount of movement towards equality is a large boost in gynocentrism.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/17 06:38 PM
3

Natural, non-marxist sexism is benevolent in almost every case.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/17 07:07 AM
1

You have a point I guess at misogyny. But how is sexism wrong? Why force equality?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/17 07:01 AM
2

Men are actually wired to fuck side girls and still love the "love of their life" just as much. It's why women are wired to care less about physical cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 03:57 PM
1

They tend to put their second face in their handbag and see you as god if they like you. Ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 03:49 PM
1

Quality entertainment, wisdom, a father, authority, emotional stability, dick, completion.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 09:17 PM
1

I see. I've always found poor people stay poor by blowing money on frivolous things like very stylish clothes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 07:37 AM
1

The rich 6 who wears expensive clothes and makeup is going to be more desirable than a 9 who looks like she dressed herself at Walmart and lives in low income housing. You think poor people wear brown/grey rags and jumpsuits or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 05:26 AM
4

Petty thread, but I'm bored. (i) It's completely hypocritical. You can't advocate men sleeping around as much as possible, but then shame women for doing the same. This really is completely obvious. Hypocrisy alone doesn't make something bad. Also, how is being hypocritical a reason that it's hypocritical? Is it also bad to slut-shame because slut-shaming is bad? (iv) It could be that the 'slut' in question wanted to settle down with the first guy that she slept with, but he wouldn't commit. So …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/17 12:31 AM
1

Video games are better for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 11:43 PM
3

A basic bitch who watches too much television.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 11:40 PM
2

Have your head planted firmly in one camp but stay neutral at all costs to reap the greatest rewards after everyone is done fighting? Nice read. I find that TRP, despite claiming to be amoral, ascribes morality to how women are wired to behave. Perhaps, at the core, it doesn't/shouldn't. But that is what I often observe. When /u/MorpheusGodOfDreams says They don't want TRP to provide information to men, due to "moral" reasons about "tricking women" that boil down to "know your place, beta bitch"…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 11:34 PM
1

You should probably ask women that. We only slut-shame behind closed doors. No guy with any sense is going to openly discourage a non-related girl to be chaste. But, we will discuss who's damaged goods and who's level-headed among ourselves and untouchable girls, for strategic/cautionary purposes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 10:58 PM
1

it is completely lacking in any form of logic and is quite simply abuse. Basic understanding of evolution shows how logical it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 10:51 PM
0

I see no reason to debate those points. Slut shaming is very good for society. One could say it doesn't even hurt the individual man who just wants to get some easy sex, as that eventually gets boring and unfulfilling. Slut shaming at it's best, maintains order and at it's worse denies a few opportunities to guys who probably have options anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 10:43 PM
1

Diversity keeps your testosterone and sperm count up.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 08:11 PM
1

With a fair amount of reason to it. If you cease to eat, you die. If you don't have monogamous relationships, you have health benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 07:17 PM
2

Technically yes, but on a scale where 1 is eating to sustain a subjectively valuable life and 10 is sacrificing a child to please God, sexual faithfulness is about an 8.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 07:09 PM
1

There's no objective value to sexual faithfulness.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 06:23 PM
1

There's no objective value in committing to one person.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 04:51 PM
2

I know that sexual strategy is amoral, but I just don't understand why all the people that you hurt on your way and the emotional damage you create are less important than the fact that you got a little bit closer to pussy. I have no feelings on this topic specifically, but... In-group = People Out-group = Things Actions with people are determined by considering your goal and the effect of your actions on them. Actions with things are determined by considering potential consequence to oneself. O…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 04:29 AM
3

About to watch it now.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 01:03 AM
1

Thank you for this scene.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 12:50 AM
1

As far I've seen, the kids aren't really being looked after in most cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 12:13 AM
1

Guessing that's in the US. That's pretty normal in Canada and apparently the UK from what I've heard. Women just have more and more kids to get more shopping or drug money, depending on their class.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/17 07:08 PM
3

Your examples are shit. Although Iskra is just a turn off due to the instagram model, amazon bod. If you want a couple decent examples, check out some of the gonewild subs. /u/_thick_throwaway_ is pretty good stuff. With that out of the way, I highly doubt anybody is saying they'll bang a thin, ugly woman over a curvy woman when they speak on the subject. They're referring to the amorphous beings you see on power scooters and such, the ones with the triangle or box shaped figure. One thing to ke…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/17 11:51 AM
2

You seem to be missing the point. I'll just leave at this last correction. Nobody enforces rights unilaterally -- not men or women. That being said, why do I need a man, specifically, to enforce my civil justice rights? Particularly when I'm more qualified than the vast vast majority of them? Your qualifications don't matter if the men don't carry out the verdict. Therefore, you need a man to enforce those rights. If there are no men that agree to the existence of your civil justice rights or if…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/17 05:47 AM
5

Ok policemen are male dominated, but they aren't doing this out of altruism, they get paid. Their reasons aren't relevant. The point is the respect is for them, not you. Those who aren't as physically skillful should know better than to start fights they can't win anyways, I'm no exception to that common sense rule. "Assault", sometimes people are just looking for trouble. This not so much. Why are you assuming I need to rely on men to enforce my civil justice rights? Your rights don't exist unl…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/17 05:03 AM
3

Why would people with mental illness be factored into theory that focuses on the majority? Especially when that mental illness affects an area of importance in the theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/17 04:02 AM
6

If someone wants to assault you for whatever reason, you have to rely on them fearing men retaliating in the form of police. You can't imprison them with your own power. If you happen to have a black belt or something, then fair enough. If someone wants to cheat you out of something, you have to rely on them fearing legal action that leads to men retaliating by forcing them to pay you or whatever is necessary. If men as a group weren't willing or weren't around to maintain law and order, the res…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/17 03:49 AM
6

He probably means this in a different way, but when you think about it a bit, men do earn their basic respect. Naturally, no person has an inherent amount of respect to be given. Society establishes that. Meaning, if someone felt it was reasonable to attack another person in the street, then they'd have to be held back by something to prevent this. If it's a man, then it would be respect for his ability to retaliate. If that respect hasn't been established in some way, then he's fair game. If it…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/17 03:20 AM
1

Largely because black women don't fit into the cute, submissive/exploited little sister role very well. Since I can't see a black woman in that way, it shatters the fantasy and it's just two related people having sex. This isn't actually isolated to incest. I'm only interested in black women when I'm with one and the idea of them being submissive is more accessible in my mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/17 10:48 PM
2

I like older brother/younger sister incest porn. No brothers or sisters here too. One condition. They can't be the same race as me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/17 09:13 PM
1

Anything violent and amateur is fine. Sometimes not even sexually. I wouldn't date anyone who isn't submissive and at least somewhat masochistic. Not that I do official relationships anyway, but hypothetically.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/17 09:09 PM
2

For me, anything to do with milfs is culturally based. It's hard to speak for porn, as professional porn disgusts me deeply, and milfs in homemade porn are usually just slightly overweight and post-wall. But with modern, western mothers and women in general often being inadequate at best, I do feel strong attraction to traditional motherly qualities in a woman. If you put two equally attractive women next to each other and one has kids, I'd have an immediate preference to the one with kids on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/17 08:55 PM
2

Assuming I never talk them again or only communicate with them for sex, 100%. Otherwise, 80%. The remaining 20% would be the severely underweight ofc, but also obviously politicized types. The purposely hideous goths, feminists, "career" women, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/17 08:52 PM
2

Is this really a view? That's just how human beings function. People blame other variables for their shortcomings in any area of life. Only a minority of people harshly critique themselves and improve.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/17 09:42 PM
2

I doubt there are stats for this subject, so all I can say is that from firsthand, tons of secondhand experience, along with observation of trends in media/social media, that is how it goes. And it's not even restricted to this specific subject. You can get away with almost anything and still be in good standing, provided you're at the top of the heap. The only thing I've found you can't get away with, is apologizing for what you've done. It humanizes you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/17 07:32 AM
3

IMO it depends more so on his approach and behavior. Barring some extreme behaviours, most approaches are perceived differently based on who's approaching. Says who? The "fond memories" don't suddenly turn into horror stories out of thin air or because he left "for something better" (LOL, yeah right). The horror stories come from looking back and feeling manipulated or mislead. It's kind of like when someone takes back consent after the fact. It's only manipulation or being mislead if the encoun…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/17 05:05 AM
1

I share with many men and fathers of my age the exact same dislike of creepy 30 year old men who go after my generation's teenage daughters If it's their daughter/niece/little sister/etc. But it's only an issue for a stranger if they're not capable of getting that action themselves. Or if they're really conformed to societal standards, to the point of believing in it's morality, rather than adhering to fit in. In which case, they're probably not capable of getting that action themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/17 07:42 PM
4

The guys who think this kind of behavior is acceptable but aren't getting positive results, need to look in the mirror or check their bank account. Fixed
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/17 07:39 PM
2

You make some decent points, but it seems to be more of a crab in the bucket/slave morality situation. You won't see any complaints if the guy shows the crab some attention to. In the case of celebrities, current relevance and attractiveness seems to matter. I say "In the case of celebrities...", because this kind of duality happens with regular people. Certain guys have illegal(Not just questionable by slave morality.) relationships, but if they're attractive enough or if they keep the potentia…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/17 07:33 PM
1

Being an attentive and nurturing mother isn't weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/17 07:09 PM
1

TRP's holes are mainly when it goes outside arguing the core guidelines in an objective sense. The guidelines have two core aspects. Objectively beneficial self improvement and objectively powerful psychological tactics. Now the first half can't really be debated, though some BP will try and some RP will take the bait. However, the second half falls apart if you care that the tactics are indistinguishable from abuse in some cases. Some try to defend these tactics as not abuse and my question is …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/16 06:37 PM
1

I find the attacks and defenses rather amusing at times. I'll often see something about morality, met with a justification for why it isn't hurting someone or whatever. Or something about misogyny, inequality, etc. And it makes me think, does BP have any argument that would work on someone who genuinely has no care for morals? Could they convince anyone who only acts on obtaining results, using the objectively best methods, regardless of who it hurts or what they're labeled as?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 09:05 PM
1

You sound like too much work to warrant taking an interest. That man doesn't have many better options. A regular guy with a sense of pride and self-worth does want a "first mate". That's perfectly healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 10:26 PM
1

Hypergamy is good, gender roles are good, discrimination is usually healthy, poverty and death are a small price to pay for advancement. I would never support regression or halting progress unless it's for the purpose of shedding all the BS we've added to culture and starting from scratch.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 10:21 PM
1

True, but their culture openly acknowledges the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 04:46 AM
1

You say these things as if equality is a good thing. It's good for you, maybe good for several individuals, but not for the group.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 01:59 AM
1

feminism has been hijacked People say this often, but it was founded on dishonest principles in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 01:53 AM
1

Feminism directly conflicts with capitalism. Capitalism directly encourages the evolution of men. The evolution of men leads to new technology, discoveries and amazing art inspired by the newfound knowledge. Anything that makes the world have less potential is pretty annoying, because the world is less entertaining. However, feminism does manage to make up for that loss in another form. It has devolved society in ways that provide an absurd spectacle that I don't think we'd ever have if we staye…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 01:46 AM
1

You see, that would be a decent argument, but then there's Asia. The women don't observably hit the wall till much later, yet the men and women are still aware of the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/16 11:32 PM
1

I don't believe awalt, but it's a possibility and western society enables it, so no need to gamble.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/16 09:39 PM
1

Are you sure you aren't still a teenager?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 05:16 AM
1

be like Hillary Clinton This is terrible advice to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 05:12 AM
2

I prefer the wad of cash analogy. Both are pretty good, but the wad of cash creates the image of some guy tossing money into a room, then confronting one of the people a few days later, screaming "You stole my money!"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 05:04 AM
1

As an introvert, I find Most women prefer extroverts to introverts But it balances out, at least in my case. I don't care for most women. As for the ones I pick out? Well introverts are just better at one on one conversation. We read little signals better, we have far better thought out ideas on the ready for most topics, we say the right things at the right moments, we're better listeners, etc. In short, most women prefer extroverts, but most dogs prefer another dog. I've never wanted a dog, wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 06:32 AM
1

This is very very true.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 06:14 AM
2

Damn this is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 05:44 PM
1

So he's saying, there are no dogs and cats. The real distinction is between felines and canines.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 11:41 PM
1

You know, I was gonna say it's on him. But if someone is threatening me by biting down on my dick, I'm probably going to go for the least life-ruining way out. I was also going to say "Bad example." to conclude that, but then the legal system is such a powerful tool to prevent a guy from saying no in a more equivalent situation. Like the girl is riding him and he wants her to stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/16 06:55 AM
1

Standards higher than own value or psychotic behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 02:49 AM
1

On paper, but the way the brains view the world makes the application for males better.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/16 04:55 AM
1

I would beg to differ. "I'm not like other girls." is a very powerful, self-defeating mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 10:41 PM
3

You seem to be using "average" and forgetting that you're talking about average at the same time. All of these things apply to the truly average western man. You can add a few things to the man to change things up. Men are more loyal to women Men put far more effort into relationships Men are less likely to cheat This may not apply to an above average man, because he may have as many viable relationship options as a woman. May also not apply to a poor man, who might not have any ability to bring…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 05:15 PM
3

Wants to feel unique.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:45 AM
3

I don't really read TRP, but here are my observations. Men sacrifice much more in a relationship Men lose more and stand to lose more by being tied down. They may not necessarily make sacrifices willingly, but they do inherently make some sacrifices. Men are more loyal to women Simple supply and demand. Men have to be more loyal. Men put far more effort into relationships See the previous. Men are less likely to cheat See the previous. Men are the victims, women are the perpetrators This is just…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:45 AM
2

And the power to both stand up for yourself, protect those you care about, and inspire the best in others? That's when you're really dealing from a position of strength. Very anime.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 07:52 PM
2

It's down to effort. My brain functions to search for objective truth Indeed, but you put in the effort of reaching the objective truth. I have so much more time to fuck up and figure out life. Because you have more innate capability, you just need to put in the effort. I can never get pregnant yet I still have at least two kids. I'm the fucker not the fuckee. Provided you put in the effort to be a viable mate. Hell yeah, it's great having the potential of a man. But women can have objective ben…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/16 06:08 AM
1

Too emotional, in that you try to understand the idea based on how you'd feel. Negative attitudes toward people, by default, is just mentally unhealthy. There is no negative attitude, that's just what you'd imagine you would have via looking at this with your personal feelings. I'm sure you tell yourself you're taking a 'rational' approach when you account for all the bad things in the world, and conclude that the worlds a bad place. That is how you feel you would be in that case. Think outside …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 09:54 AM
3

Ultimately, we're all responsible for the safety of everyone. We're all in it together, have some fucking empathy for the people around you. Hardcore. What will I do? I'll murder that fucking rapist, and continue fighting the rape culture that communities like TRP perpetuate. What won't I do? Tell my daughter it was her fault cause she lead him on. Chivalry.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 09:30 AM
1

You're essentially just saying (albeit in an incredibly pretentious way), that it's best to expect the worst out of everyone you meet, so you won't have your guard down if they try to fuck you around. It's not optimal to approach ideals with the sole intention to sway opinion. Is that really how you approach things in life? Choose the option which is easiest to convince others of? If you have trouble identifying manipulative people, you probably lack experience with people. You don't solve this …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 09:14 AM
1

Perhaps, but people are generally optimistic as opposed to realistic. With that in mind, it is always valuable to teach caution through exaggeration of the threat. It has been said that there is no value in arguing politics from a moderate perspective. I highly doubt that anyone within redpill practices what they preach to the extent that they preach it. Rather, it is simply a way of representing a method, knowing people will fall back to a more moderate but more rational position than the alter…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 05:24 AM
3

The complex in question, leads to attributing the traits of the immaculate mother to other women as a rule and marking any exceptions as extreme and rare cases. I should add, I'm not red pill. Just a cold logic type.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 12:32 AM
5

There's a term for the mother complex that gives guys rose coloured glasses. I can't remember it, but damn what a great display.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/16 12:10 AM
2

I'd say it's very important to maintain a level of detachment while interacting with those people. Compromise and ingenuine interaction are certainly just a means.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/16 06:24 AM
1

Pity. It's not surprising or angering. They don't affect my personal goals.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/16 06:03 AM
1

If it were stupid, advertising would be a futile venture.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/16 01:21 AM
0

You were doing well in the op, then sunk to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/16 11:36 PM
4

Pretty well summed up.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/16 12:31 PM
1

There's only one rational reason to change your view and you addressed it already. I've never once physically or sexually abused a girl. I've never not hired someone or charged them more because they are female. I've never ignored a person because they are a female, or vandalised their house. I've never committed a hate crime with women as my target. If you did do any of these things, it'd be valuable to change your views to improve your ability to network, but since you haven't, you're already …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/16 05:43 PM
1

I bring other stuff to the table but a guy won't even give me a chance unless he is physically attracted to me first. Jesus, that's bullshit. No offense, but your standards are likely way higher than they should be if that's been a legitimate problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 05:42 AM
3

Personally, I find that to be true, but not in that order. In this instance, a girl can offer you two things. A valuable prize, herself. The thrill of the chase, acquiring her. A slut that has already slept you negates both. She let you in with little effort, which indicates a low value prize and she has already slept with you, which means there's no chase. Once you've slept with a slut, then you don't want to see her again. Whereas, a girl who makes you wait still provides everything she can of…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 05:35 AM
2

That's honestly pretty mindless. We aren't equals, gender to gender or person to person. One should strive to be the best at what they do, not the best at what someone else is meant to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 05:36 PM
4

That's so salty.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/16 06:03 AM
1

Perfect response here. I'd love the ease of it, but would hate having the thoughts and feelings of a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/16 07:59 PM
2

It's a lack of understanding. They're not thinking of it from a rational POV. You can eat fast food, but you don't make it part of your diet.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/16 07:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter