TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RandomofEmbers Archive

View 0 posts and 73 comments by RandomofEmbers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Окей. Якщо такій розумний, чо не в армії?
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:32 PM
-21

Meh. We have an overflow of volunteers now.like 15 contract places and 450 applicants. They take mostly military professionals now. Heck, even I was denied, saying there are too much paramedics now. Bucha is not a country, and that was initial assault. Gunfights on the streets of capital city. Right now we need reserve for counterattack, and need to know how many people able to be this reserve we can mobilize. Seriously, you make too much ado about leaving ban. It mostly creates problems for sai…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:31 PM
6

Your Google translate is fucked up. As it alvays does with Cyrillic slavic languages. They mostly won't serve they will work instead of guys who serve. Because they, you know. Weaker physically on average. Though medics and such are drafted regardless of sex anyway.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:02 PM
0

It did not copied link into message? I do it again__https://www.google.com/amp/s/espreso.tv/mobilizatsiya-zhinok-v-ukraini-yak-vidbuvaetsya-vzyattya-na-oblik-i-prizov-na-viyskovu-sluzhbu%3famp
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:59 PM
-17

There is also such a thing in laws as Military State, wich is a type of Emergency State, wich allows you in case of emergency to hold up temporary part of citizens rights it it is needed to solve the emergency. Less russian propaganda,more law. Also,it excludes men under 18, and above 60, single fathers, fathers of two or more children, husbands with pregnant wifes, single caretakers of elderly or disabled and huge other list of exceprions.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:58 PM
4

https://www.google.com/amp/s/espreso.tv/mobilizatsiya-zhinok-v-ukraini-yak-vidbuvaetsya-vzyattya-na-oblik-i-prizov-na-viyskovu-sluzhbu%3famp Here you go. I suggest you use Google translate.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:51 PM
-3

Well, we do not have feminists running a mock...
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:48 PM
-44

Ukrainian here. We are not misandrist. We are under attack by an outnumbering enemy, so we need people fighting, working and such. And, by the way, we have female mobilization too. It starts from the 1st of August this year. So it is pretty equal within a common sence. Women, in most cases, are physically weaker, so they mostly will get to work in military idustry, be combat medics and such. Those, who pass standarts of combat will serve in army. So, please, do not pile up us with Russia and Bel…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:46 PM
1

Well, if you take out of this religious part, it looks like a solid social agreement, where guy does X and receives Y in exchange, and woman does Y and receives X. Like,you know. Normal society without any leftist bullshit. Besides I have not seen anything that is directly forbidden in that list. So what is wrong with it?
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:13 PM
1

Hmm, thanks, that was interesting input.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 11:34 AM
1

Absolutely. Muslim women are treated as queens as long as they uphold their responsibilities and respect the husband and obey him on things that the husband has a right to ask for. Well that looks fair to me. As far as I can see, western women expect to be treated like queens for....the sole fact of being women. Wich is moral brain-cancer I say. Respect should be earned. I only know 2 major branches: Shiaa and sunna. They're mostly the same in social values, but differ slightly in terms of praye…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 11:33 AM
2

Thanks for replies. I have heared also that while Muslim women are expected to be obedient,Muslim men are expected to be respectfull towards women. Atleast this is what Turkish peoples said, and what I have seen myself. But I know a bit about Isam, and I know that it is significant disparity in customs and laws between different branches of Islam. Would you mind giving a brief comparison of how it is in different branches? I mostly commute with Turkey people, Crimea Tatars and Ichkerian folk in …
/r/MensRights06/07/22 10:08 AM
2

Okay. So FGM ban is stupid hill to die for too. Who cares about female pleasure, right?) /s It is either both,or none. Also. No dick-no opinion.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:56 AM
1

I can't answer for all uncut men, but personally I have no problems with it. About beholder, we'll, there is medical condition that is called premature ejaculation. It is a rare thing, and mostly a result of nerve damage, other problems or chemicals. And it is Indeed premature. Like before full-on election in some cases. Thing that is called "premature ejaculation" in pop-culture is more in the eyes of beholder. Plus, it, mostly, has psychological roots. Like when you get nervous that you blast …
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:55 AM
2

I never understood all this discussion about abortions being "women's right to bodily autonomy". Because the most affected in case of abortion is an unborn child, wich is, essentially, killed. It is, probably, the biggest body harm, that can be done to a human being. Yes, child is unable to survive without being attached to women till it is around 5-6 month of pregnancy, I get it. But it changes absolutely nothing. The child is still a human being biologically, though it is unable to represent o…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 07:45 AM
2

If we should protect masculinity, we also should protect non-poststructuralist definition of masculinity. This. Even more. We should not project post-culturalist definition of masculinity, because, as most post-cultiralist things, including the world "post-culturalist", it is dysfunctional and meaningless.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 07:14 AM
1

Oh, thanks for the input. I have known most of it, because there are quite a lot of Muslim people in my country, but I still have some questions, if you be kind enough to answer them. How do Muslim women see this situation? I assume, it is taken as normal, wich is quite a contrast to western liberal say about it "terrible oppression and such". I have heard from one of my Muslim (sufist, precisely) friend, that while husband have a lot of say in families out-of-house affairs, he has very little s…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:32 AM
1

Aside that you have an indication that something is wrong, because you know what intact means. Well,there's no real answer for it. It is just plain stupid and cruel practice. It's strange for me, as slavic guy (obviously intact), that people in USA understand, that trimming dog's ear or tail for purely aesthetic reason is wrong, and, in the meantime, continuing "trim" people for purely aesthetic reasons. Granting modern attitude towards human rights, autonomy and such, logical decision would be …
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:05 AM
10

Mhm. And doctors should celebrate existence of illness, because they won't exist if there were no deiases.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:58 PM
4

Rare fetish is of course a reason for nation wide mutilation. Pathetic argument,really.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:01 PM
534

Let's pretend somebody cut off your ear. Technically, you can still hear, but a bit less than if that ain't done. And other people assure you that it is nothing wrong with it. It is easier to clean because ear shell or whatever you call it does not get dirty yadda yadda. Now ask yourself your own question. Are you actually get upset about somebody cut off your ear? Would you rather have a choice to not get it cut off? Jesus. Humanity and empathy is gone in the world now or what?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:59 PM
5

Nothing far-X is neither good nor reasonable, and mostly dysfunctional. You pretty much can be moderate-right, non- xenophobic nationalist with a dash of typical socialistic criticism over unchecked capitalism but be anti-woke, common sence pro-life and appreciate good things that are in religion without being a fanatic. All above in european terms of corse.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:51 PM
8

I just say, what it resonated with. More precisely, about constructs of a type "solution of a group_name problem". As if the very fact of existing of said group makes it problematic. I think people should really keep such organisations in check. My people have a saying, that can be roughly translated to English as "what is too much, is no good". And about trial and such. That was simple. In my country nazi-like and commie-like ideologies are both outlawed. Preaching them or spreading literature …
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:07 AM
-11

Well, incels are unlikely to go and shoot off whole feminist assemblage of local fem club,so they are safe to blame. Think about that. Pretend incels do not exist.Someone committed mass shooting. That someone is of certain group. Would you risk screeching about that group,knowing they probably have guns and prone to mass shooting? And probably living next door to you? I doubt that.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:25 AM
1

Eww, drunk sex. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 08:11 AM
36

simple solutions to the problem of boys’ "We should seek the final solution of jewish problem" (c) A. Hitler. Circa 1939. They shamelessly use literal NSDAP tropes in their article. Like. Literally. I think there should be something done about it. Huge lawsuits, public uproar, no? If some of such shit would be told by any public figure/organization about any social group in my country, those people would very fucking soon find themselves in a company of state security officer (not even policeman…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 08:09 AM
4

Because I am from a culture, that never had that practice, and people, who cut parts of infant penises, in the name of religion, are seen as somewhat upholding barbaric tradition. But people, who do without even religious reasons, are seen as, pardon me, sick fucks. Seriously, a lot of posts about botched curcumsitions or simply about this without medical need just make me wanna vomt. What's fucking wrong with you? You are western people, like we are. Why the hell you do it? For clarity, it is n…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 06:35 AM
-1

Because when safe and legal abortion is banned, there are way more little boys in the foster care system and not just more little girls. So, you prefere to kill those little boys before they are born, rather than put them into foster care? You are a henocide apologist, misandrist and overall horrible person.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 06:28 AM
6

You forgot about lowest limit time. It should be from 8th week for obvious reasons. And seroius development abnormalities. There are certain syndromes and defects, that have absolutely no hope for being alleviated in life, so it is more humane to put an embryo out of misery before it is born.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 06:21 AM
3

I am reporting you for racism, precisely for antisemitism.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 04:39 PM
1

Whe I see one of those pushed in West, I will tell you. Mostly I see online virture - signaling, and talks. As for my local situation, it is okayish, at given time and place. Things that are needed, probably several alterations to laws here and there, like I do not know, if we have gendered definition of rape, and I do not know the rate of fathers given child custody (though single fathers are not unheated of here, plus after 14 y.o child can choose on their own, with whom they wanna live). But …
/r/MensRights04/07/22 04:18 PM
2

He hints, that Marx had something to do with things, that are sometimes found in sea shells and grow from a grain of sand. If you got the idea. But I personally think, that it has nothing to do with Marx's origin. I would say quite contrary. Because writing opus Magnus on capital, while living off money of your friend's parents,is at least hilarious,at most pathetic and hypocritical.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 04:02 PM
1

Nope. Nothing I can think of. And, mind you, I have perfect relationships with her. In fact, when I suddenly think that I may sound like her in certain situations, I feel that it is wrong. Dunno why, nothing specific. many of whom had a missing dad and a generally inadequate mother. So they had nobody, used to break my damn heart. Sorry for them and cheers for you. You do good things.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 03:45 PM
0

Nope. Things like material world, biological sex, gender roles, etc, are like, you know, objective reality. Biological facts, and results of evolution, wich itself is a result of interaction between life and surroundings. Ideology is just a way of thinking about things, so it is social, more precisely, philosophical construct. Tldr. Objective reality is what is. Social construct is a way, you think about objective reality. (And reality pretty much does not give a fuck about what you think of it)…
/r/MensRights04/07/22 03:25 PM
3

Than she has to admit, that white women opinion is equally irrelevant, or she should be branded "Racist" with hot iron, got smeared with tar and feathers and thrown out of town.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 06:23 AM
1

Because they are handsome, that is the point. People are visual creatures after all.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 06:21 AM
2

They should, in theory, but they will give you leighty and detailed explanations, why they can't, why they are not allowed to, and such.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 06:12 AM
-9

I think that is inherit MRA problem. Sane as femz attract freakesses, this movement attracts freaks. Self policy is unavoidable, but part will still leak through. While on this subs,I have seen all flavors of guys, who have one or another problems in life. From bad breakup with one particular girl to just being low on the dating market and in life in general Yeap, they are relative minority. But they are loud.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 05:40 AM
3

As a guy, my mum is not a role model. You know, different sexes are different. Though mother, of course, has a huge impact on children's future well being
/r/MensRights04/07/22 05:35 AM
2

Most men do not fucking care, really.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 05:03 AM
1

Meh.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 05:01 AM
1

Objection. First off, woman also may do the same,how dare you say "man",Reeeeew! Second. You just talk self-hating bullshit, generalize, and project your own flaws onto others.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 04:59 AM
1

But it is really literally social construct, as all ideologies are.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 04:57 AM
1

As for Biden being straightforward! I call BS on that. Hunter Biden got appointments to positions his qualifications and experience clearly do not equip him for. His only “qualification” is who his father was. Has Biden ever been “straightforward” about that? And why defend a man who reappointed Lhamon? She’s not changed her tune. Well, that's American problem. I mean it is their inner buisness. Writing "straightforward" I was talking about outer politics, wich is the only thing that matters abo…
/r/MensRights04/07/22 04:29 AM
97

Why be feminist? If you care about equality and such, you are egalitarian. If you are thinking about people's problems, you are socialist. If you care about ecology, you are green. There is no need to adopt such a smeared and outdated label as "feminist". Feminism is just a social construct after all.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:27 PM
-3

I was talking about females in a comment above, if you did not get it.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 11:12 AM
-4

Hmm. Maybe it is just about time to actually be picky about who you sleep with, because you may end up raising a child with that person? You now, like being responsible. Like not acting like a spoiled horny teenager in your 30th anymore? Uh, probably not. I think that were just voices in my head.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:54 AM
1

Laws are laws, moral is moral. They intercept, and ideally, should be as same as possible, but putting everything that defines particular society from other societies only on law and government is kinda simplistic, wrong, and leads to systemic errors. It is quite possible, that it is a reason, why everything is like that now in West. Too one-dismentional approach, that gives government (wich should be basically head management of society) too much power and makes laws too detached. Think about w…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:50 AM
1

Nice video. I definitely agree with "side effects of female contraceptive pills not talked enough about". Atleast for guys. Aside from feminist screeching, there is a quite valid point in statement, "female pills are not as harmless as you think". Side effects are relatively rare, but include things, varying from dermatological problems, mood swings, and all the way up to infertility and cancer risk. That's why girls should use them with caution. You never fucking know, what surprise personally …
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:16 AM
26

That vasectomy stuff. From medical and practical perspective, it is much easier for women to just take birth control, wich is reversible, and mostly safe (I know about side effects but you should pick your pills under the guidance of gynecologist, no exceptions). But, looks like it is typical strain of though. "If something bothers you, just cut it off". Not unlike circumcision. Wich is absolutely idiotic mindset, if you ask me.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:57 AM
1

So, you mean, like, now you can write a bullshit book, riddled with prejudice and generalizations (and cherry picking, because lesbians leading DV stats), and it will be solid and gain attention? Wow. I think I conceived a plan. Write this kind of stuff. Publish it under some female name Get profit from feminist woke crowd Spend earned money to create men and boys shelter network in my country. Checkmate.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:32 AM
7

Working, watching news, donating for army, panicking about air raids (siren sound drives me crazy). That kind of stuff. Though it could be worse. Aside that, we'll, I am pretty much content with my life.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:18 AM
1

I think it is more not on government but on society. I can't say, that our own government is overty conservative or repressive, for that matter,but probably,it looks so from WE perspective. Nevertheless, they more or less go with what people think, and,mostly keep their noses out of family buisness. Of course it was that Istambul document not long ago, but it is really just a lip-service to allies.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:14 AM
2

As if nobody ever warned, that it will end up this way.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:10 AM
3

I feel like cheating used to be judged much more harshly when it was largely regarded as something only men did to women In old times women could be banished from town, if she sleeped around too much. So I suppose, it depends on time and age, but I hardly remember anywhere or anytime, when it was seen as badge of honor. I'm a rare leftist who believes that the commitment made upon marriage should be treated as something solemn. Leftists tried to deconstruct fidelity? Eww. It is some urge to brea…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:37 AM
2

And Biden’s dealings with Kiev are dodgy to say the least. I won't say so. He was pretty straightforward. Though his point of view was different in different times. We need a common front with the Russians, and to make them feel threatened was foolish. Pardon me, but why? Russia is pretty much a huge resource field. Nothing more. They were a prospective partner back in 90s, when for like 5-7 years there were aspirations to finally become something, atleast akin to old Europe countries, but their…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:49 AM
12

Hmm. You know what amusing here? I bet, that when that two cases happened, the most lod about "do something about that" were women. Frankly it is a case of "missing white girl" syndrome. So the ones, that call upon alleged discrimination now, are pretty much the ones that were discriminating back then. Such an amusing change of shoes, as my people say.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:36 AM
2

Ow come on. War with Russia was inevitable since like 2007, because putin wanted to see former USSR countries as his colonies. And you know, they are their own nations with their own cultures, opinions, and view of their own life. That is called sovereignty. And that pisses putin off, because he is russian supremacist. You know, that post-imperial desiase, wich is cured either by beating the shit out of "the patient" or by euthanasia. Thinking,that this all is only because some plot created by U…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:30 AM
14

Eww. Cheating in marriage? I think both persons involved are equally shitty. One for trying to break family. Other for infidelity. Marriage is a big deal. If you are not shure, you are okay with staying with the same person, potentially, for life, than you do not marry. That is simple.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:20 AM
1

Hmm. Interesting. Though, marriage after like 6 dates is kinda strange, and as far as I see from your summary, he is kinda overreacting. Though, that is probably because he is fairly young. And, while I do not like to justify her actions (because I do not know whole picture), you know, saving somebody from war, etc, does not make you entitled to be loved untill death by those who you saved and such.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:08 AM
13

Meh. She/He/It/They discriminates on a basis of being able to carry a baby. She is bigoted pregnatist and should be cancelled.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:22 PM
13

Oh, come on. That shit is pure political pun on putin, made in a way to appeal to "progressive" layers of society. There are now bigger things on a table than feminists vs mra squabble.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:14 PM
1

It was not "something". It was "Jews orchestrated their own holocaust and are the primary ones to blame for it". You can check it out on Google, but I do not know, if you are able to read it in original language, though I almost shure they tried to scrap that speech everywhere they can. I was not surprised. putin mostly re-mixes great nazi species and mental gymnastic to justify his actions. This time he had to apologize, because,frankly, Israel keeps neutrality in current war.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:11 PM
-20

Actually, he is known to care and get that very personal. I know, that sounds ridiculous, but so is putin.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:08 AM
1

M-hm. It is indeed a disturbing western trend last several years, atleast as I have seen it. I think it is what happens, when you first try to create overty puritan society, then get bored and swing way too far in the opposite direction. I mean culturally. Probably this will eventually stabilize itself in next 50-100 years, if nothing happens sooner. And of course, all that "I love her so, that can forgive her cheating" is bullshit, I agree with you.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:35 AM
1

Can somebody give a summary of the situation for those, who can not listen the video? Aside from "Woe is me, she is such a bitch".
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:28 AM
1

Well,she is kinda based. Not about ease, probably. But about mattress. Seriously, if you sleep with somebody now and then, or have several relationships in a row, that is perfectly fine. But sleeping around hardly ever done anything good to most of the participators. Than again, you have a horrid abomination of a hookup culture. Who the fuck decided, that sex is not a big deal? It is big deal. It is one of the most important spheres of life, if you just look on how many other parts of life it af…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:24 AM
11

So, female contraception pills, that are one of the staples of so-called "feminist freedom" were designed by a man. How amusing.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:16 AM
0

...and that they start screaming, that we do not support female bodily autonomy. It is your body your choice. And regarding T levels, we'll "no testicles - no opinion".
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:11 AM
2

Feminists upholding a debate, wich is not degrading to a simple scandal? I am afraid that sub will be brigades and banned in 60 seconds.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:09 AM
4

Well. Thank you for sharing. I do not see much of feminists, where I live, but this all was just as I imagined it to be.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:08 AM
-3

Single fathers are indeed underrepresented. But do they need normalization? I mean, I never heared anything bad toward them anywhere. Quite opposite, they are mostly seen as positive figures because, wow, he is a single father with two kids and alike.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:04 AM
11

Who are you to define, wich problems come first? It is almost like you discriminate people based on their gender or sexuality. What next? Racial discrimination? It is either all problems are addressed simultaneously, or none at all, you, sexist, phobic, bigoted, undercover racist.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter