TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Raquefel Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by Raquefel on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'm not sure where that came from or how it's relevant, but regardless of course I wouldn't. I would, however, hope that you lose custody of your kid because I consider circumcision child abuse.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 05:18 PM
3

I feel the same way. The difference is that you haven't expressed your intention to do either of those.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 05:12 PM
7

Jesus H. Christ learn to read. This decision is irreversible and it causes permanent damage. It's not in the same league as choosing his outfit or what food he eats. You have every right to make those decisions. This? This is for him to make. When he grows up, he can choose to be circumcised if he prefers it. Until then, you have no right to make that decision.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 05:08 PM
9

Because it causes permanent, irreversible damage and you as a father have NO. RIGHT. TO. DO. THAT. GET THE FUCK OUT OF THIS SUBREDDIT.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 05:04 PM
9

You should shut the fuck up and let him make his own decisions about his body. If you're happy with being circumcised, good for you, but you have absolutely no fucking right to make that decision for your son. Go to hell.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 05:02 PM
6

If you can't argue with people without unfoundedly insulting them, you don't know how to argue.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 01:56 PM
1

Take the word "weak" out of that sentence and you sound like a feminist.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:28 PM
34

Also could be argued to be the genetic fallacy. Dismissing information because of who presents it.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 04:54 PM
1

...no? If it wasn't clear, I was initially being downvoted before people seemingly came to their senses.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 11:27 PM
2

Yep. Being attracted to kids is obviously not alright, but a pedophile saying it is not what makes it that way. If no pedophile ever said it was okay, does that make it okay? Of course not. It's still disgusting and a sign of a mental illness. If someone other than a pedophile said it was okay, does their argument carry more weight? Of course not. They're still wrong, no more and no less so.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 11:24 PM
1

Jesus H. Christ on a Yamaha motorbike, learn to read. I'm not saying you can't question information based on its source. I'm saying you can't outright refute it based on its source. There's a difference between the two. And for the last time, the original comment was doing the latter.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 05:57 PM
0

Gr8 b8 m8
/r/MensRights03/04/17 04:24 PM
8

Again, it's okay to call their information suspect. To declare it incorrect or to dismiss it as the original commenter did is not okay. There's a difference and you don't seem to be grasping it.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 04:01 PM
4

To discredit the source of a claim is not illogical, but to discredit the claim itself by association is. That's what the original commenter was doing and that's what I'm arguing against. "CNN is biased, thus their information is suspect" -> fine. "CNN is biased, thus their information is incorrect/irrelevant" -> not fine.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 03:43 PM
7

See, this is what I call an actual argument. Calling something "the ramblings of a whore" and dismissing it as such is not an actual argument. Actually breaking down the implications of it and analyzing them is the way to go. That being said, I don't really appreciate your last little comment. For one, I'm a fairly experienced debater, for two I wasn't citing argumentum ad hominem, I was citing the genetic fallacy. There's a significant distinction to be made there, and the fact that you couldn'…
/r/MensRights03/04/17 03:40 PM
6

No biggie. I woke up too early this morning as well. Glad I'm not the only one, lol
/r/MensRights03/04/17 03:28 PM
24

None of that is relevant. Clearly she's an awful person, I never denied that. None of what I'm saying is implicitly in defense of her. My entire point was that the original comment is dismissing her argument based on the content of her character, which is a logical leap and ergo a badly formulated argument. "Not entirely fallacious" - no argument is, as you put it, "entirely fallacious". There's almost always a decent point to be made somewhere, what varies is how badly formulated the argument i…
/r/MensRights03/04/17 03:24 PM
45

No, it's not. The only thing he did was call it the "ramblings of a whore" and tell us that because it was such, it's not worth hearing. He didn't just make it crassly, he made it fallaciously. Just because a "whore" made the argument does not inherently make it false. If someone far more well-read made the same one, would you consider it more legitimate? No. It's the same argument being made by different people. For fucks sake, I'm trying to help here. I think that woman is a bitch and mentally…
/r/MensRights03/04/17 02:55 PM
40

Textbook genetic fallacy. Very common type of argument for SJWs to make. Don't stoop to their level. Edit: downvoting me doesn't make his argument legitimate. You can't call an argument incorrect based on the character of the one who made it. Right now you're just proving your own inability to have logical discourse.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 02:11 PM
6

Lol call me when we're literally being rounded up into concentration camps and mass-murdered. Just because a few extremists want that doesn't mean they all do. We use the term "feminazi" because the modern-day feminist acts to shut down discussion and wants superiority, not equality. Not because they're literally akin to nazis. Edit: Lol keep downvoting me fearmongerers. This shit is the reason politics is so polarized nowadays. People assume the absolute worst of the other side and blind themse…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:50 PM
14

Still, screaming in people's faces never solved anything. That's what sparked this whole mess in the first place. Liberals wanting change and thinking the best way to bring it was to attack and silence the other side. If you respond in kind you are no better than them. If you respond in kind you contribute to this political climate of polarization and hostility. If you respond in kind you aren't helping, and if anything you're making the problem worse.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:46 PM
20

The burden of proof falls upon the accuser, not the accused. Welcome to the way the American justice system SHOULD work.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 04:59 PM
38

Still, there is absolutely no reason that part needed to be included in the first place. ALL they needed to say was "discrimination or prejudice on the basis of gender". That's it. No need to specify which one.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 06:15 PM
2

Have you seen Mike Pence's stance on the LGBT community? Hillary would have to at least pretend to support LGBT rights by sheer virtue of being a democrat. The policies Pence would implement have the potential to shatter many lives. I don't fucking care, I will do anything in my power to prevent that from happening and if voting for Hillary is a part of that, so be it. NO ONE should have to live through conversion therapy (a.k.a. legal torture). Not. One. Person.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 06:09 AM
1

I am. It's mostly because the only thing that the president really has control over at the moment is the nominated supreme court justices. And I do **NOT** want Donald Trump to be in a position to potentially have control over 3 supreme court positions. That would spell disaster for LGBT rights, something I'm extremely concerned about.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 03:58 AM
1

Depends on the bisexual. I'm slightly more attracted to guys than to girls, but it varies a lot. Some people are perfectly split down the middle and others lean toward one side or the other. It's a bit of a spectrum, really. Look up the Kinsey Scale if you're still interested.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:43 PM
–

I'm bi, but I'm seriously doubting that I'll ever date a woman again because of this. It's ironically MUCH easier to get by without being harassed in college when people think you're gay than when people think you're straight, and like you said, straight dating is horribly unequal. It's kinda depressing.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:47 AM
1

In what way is the referendum related to feminism? The way I see it, it's a divide between the xenophobic older generation and the younger generation who want their country to actually have a stable economy, gender has literally nothing to do with it whatsoever.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 04:17 AM
14

Didn't you hear Hillary tho? Women have always been the primary victims of war!!! /s
/r/MensRights21/06/16 11:54 AM
0

It seems my memory of my high school history course is failing me considerably. That, or my textbook was just horribly inaccurate (which is also possible; wouldn't be the first time it happened). Regardless, thanks for the corrections, but my main point stands: first- and second-wave feminism was alright, and they were completely justified in their demands. I've actually never heard of the third wave you talk about, so I'll need to do some research on that. I think the difference between modern …
/r/MensRights13/01/16 08:39 PM
3

The first wave of feminism occurred during WWII. So many men were off fighting that there was a significant shortage of them back home, and the women needed to pick up the slack. Problem was, no one thought they were strong enough or smart enough to do "men's jobs". Including, but not limited to: Mechanical work, engineering work, and industrial work. The first wave of feminism was about emphasizing that women are strong enough to handle the work that their husbands usually did. It was actually …
/r/MensRights13/01/16 11:15 AM
5

What's funny is that the first wave of feminism was all about trying to disprove the idea of female frailty. Modern (third wave) feminism is about trying to abuse the fuck out of the concept of it.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 12:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter