TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Rare-Discipline3774 Archive

View 43 posts and 1,236 comments by Rare-Discipline3774 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
245

GeneralRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:51 AM
235

GeneralRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights14/02/26 08:09 AM
209

ProgressRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights14/11/25 07:04 AM
191

ProgressRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights31/10/25 07:35 PM
156

Legal RightsRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights15/03/26 09:03 PM
148

discussionRare-Discipline3774/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 06:25 AM
143

GeneralRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights18/04/26 04:20 PM
132

discussionRare-Discipline3774/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 07:21 AM
119

GeneralRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights28/11/25 04:14 PM
99

resourceRare-Discipline3774/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 09:09 PM
95

Activism/SupportRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights30/05/25 12:55 AM
94

Edu./Occu.Rare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights08/04/26 01:39 PM
86

social issuesRare-Discipline3774/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 08:38 PM
72

FeminismRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights01/07/25 02:15 AM
68

Anti-MRMRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights08/04/26 07:33 AM
65

Legal RightsRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights15/03/26 05:41 PM
63

FeminismRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights23/04/26 06:23 PM
61

Edu./Occu.Rare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights31/05/25 01:38 AM
59

resourceRare-Discipline3774/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 06:58 AM
59

resourceRare-Discipline3774/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/26 11:08 AM
59

discussionRare-Discipline3774/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/25 03:27 AM
59

Activism/SupportRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:21 PM
51

resourceRare-Discipline3774/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 04:37 PM
51

articleRare-Discipline3774/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/25 07:51 PM
48

GeneralRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights06/11/25 07:51 PM
46

GeneralRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights12/11/25 09:49 AM
45

resourceRare-Discipline3774/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 02:51 AM
43

GeneralRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights28/01/26 02:15 PM
41

GeneralRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights18/04/25 05:52 PM
40

FeminismRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights18/04/26 06:24 AM
35

GeneralRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights29/05/25 05:34 AM
33

Activism/SupportRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights22/04/25 04:36 PM
32

educationRare-Discipline3774/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 01:38 PM
29

GeneralRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights14/02/26 11:07 AM
28

resourceRare-Discipline3774/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 08:48 PM
27

Activism/SupportRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights18/04/26 06:57 AM
20

GeneralRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights29/06/25 04:30 PM
17

Marriage/ChildrenRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights06/06/25 06:59 AM
13

ProgressRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights17/04/26 06:56 PM
12

Activism/SupportRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights03/02/26 02:16 PM
12

Activism/SupportRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights27/06/25 03:09 PM
11

GeneralRare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights27/06/25 06:49 PM
1

Rare-Discipline3774/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:21 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,236 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

More of a civil suit as opposed to police, unless you think they're stalking you.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 10:16 AM
1

It is, by all definition, not rape. Genital mutilation and rape are 2 separate things.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:28 AM
1

States Following the Hermesmann Principle These states have explicitly upheld that a father’s status as a minor or a victim of statutory rape does not exempt him from child support. Kansas: The location of the landmark Hermesmann v. Seyer ruling, which established that a father's duty to support is not eliminated by his own minority or the mother's criminal conduct. Alabama: Courts have historically prioritized the state's interest in requiring support over the parental age. Arkansas: The Suprem…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:24 AM
4

Patriarchy does not and has never existed.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:03 AM
32

They prefer it because society has told boys, already lower than 2nd class citizens, that they are privileged, but also predators, and every interaction with the opposite sex can lead to permanent damage if even a single social que no matter how minor is made. Ai doesn't go gossip about how the male looked over his shoulder the wrong way, and doesn't post it on social media, or go to the administration office to file a formal complaint or have their parents do it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 05:45 AM
2

Depends on phrasing too, you can tell it to make your case, you asked it how the operation is any worse. It leans into all bias so it probably, "thought" you wanted what it said.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 03:02 AM
1

Public only
/r/MensRights25/04/26 12:26 AM
1

Can't tell ya why when you have your posts private.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 08:12 PM
6

Masculinity is everything regarding logos, the physical, and aesthetic. This wide umbrella accounts for historical variations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 04:27 PM
1

Oops
/r/MensRights24/04/26 03:51 PM
3

Nah I mean OP linking to girldinnerdiaries
/r/MensRights24/04/26 02:44 PM
5

You're not supposed to link to other subs either.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 02:17 PM
6

Especially
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:27 AM
1

Lack of Reproductive Consent The core of this argument is that while a woman has the absolute right to decide if she becomes a parent, a man’s consent ends at conception. If a woman chooses to carry a pregnancy to term, the state uses its power to force the man to fund that choice for 18 years through child support. Because he has no legal mechanism to "opt out" of parenthood (a "financial abortion"), his financial future is entirely dependent on a choice he does not own. State-Mandated Disposab…
/r/MensRights24/04/26 06:42 AM
1

Men are, by definition, oppressed The argument that men are effectively second-class citizens rests on the premise that they lack the fundamental legal protections, bodily autonomy, and reproductive rights afforded to women. Proponents of this view point to several explicit systemic inequities: 1. Lack of Reproductive Consent The core of this argument is that while a woman has the absolute right to decide if she becomes a parent, a man’s consent ends at conception. If a woman chooses to carry a …
/r/MensRights24/04/26 06:33 AM
2

YOU'RE ALLOWED TO SAY NO
/r/MensRights24/04/26 06:31 AM
1

Have they not done that for a hundred years? This is not new.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 06:27 AM
1

Great!!
/r/MensRights24/04/26 06:19 AM
14

It's a rape culture where men are victims, not women. They live in a world where a woman can rape a kid and sue him for child support years later, that's rape culture. Rape against woman is a crime that the public believes should be punished by death. They don't live in a rape culture, we do.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 04:58 AM
13

Yes
/r/MensRights23/04/26 11:06 AM
30

Women
/r/MensRights23/04/26 10:38 AM
3

Men are killed by who? Oh right by other men. So the problem is still male violence, yet somehow feminism is what you spend your time hating. You're the only person hating. Then why aren’t you fighting for broader access to contraception so you can control your own fertility? Oh right it’s more convenient to put the entire burden on women and then complain when you no longer have a say. We are, and control of fertility doesn't change the fact that the unilateral decisions of women can cause a ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 03:14 AM
19

The divorce rate would be 50/50 if automatic sharing of properties and finances was banned.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 05:07 PM
2

The question was what rights do women not have that men do? All your answers were things men don't have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 08:15 AM
7

That is far less than 62 million, and thousands watched cnc, or what is believed to be cnc is not the same as attending a "rape academy"
/r/MensRights22/04/26 06:49 AM
8

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/online-rape-academy-cnn/
/r/MensRights22/04/26 06:39 AM
-3

This is not as important as other issues imo, we can lose our voting rights based on the sole choices of women, and so long as a state retains the right to draft we dont even have the right to life.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 06:23 AM
2

No one said women don't have issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 06:13 AM
56

In general social anxiety has skyrocketed over the years since you were little.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 04:08 AM
1

Only 2 of those constitute one rights, and not a right men have. The rest are privileges, none of which men have. Additionally, 4 is completely incorrect, women are not turned away from mental health services, mental health services are largely centered around the female patients. For 3, the fact that fgm is a crime at all is its own right, men don't have it for mgm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 04:05 AM
4

What rights do women not have that men do?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 10:48 PM
24

The UK where it's legally impossible for a woman to rape a man?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 04:17 PM
26

Yo, that is a mod, they're literally asking you to prove you're not a bad actor and where exactly you saw your complaints, as they said, they will address it per sub rules. You're just being a provacateur.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 06:42 PM
12

is there something productive you can do with that energy? anyone can write their representatives. in my state regular ol' people can advocate to their state and city governments and even draft bills. if you have all this information about things that you feel are unjust, why not take that information to your local communities, people who agree with you IRL who can also give testimonies, make a petition... et cetera? We all do. materially what is continuing to complain on the internet doing for …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 06:37 PM
17

Are you going to address my comment, or continue to make a place for men and men's rights about women? Men don't even have the natural right to life. Women in the West can rape a child and charge that victim child support, but feminism says men are bourgeois and at fault! https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/crime/statutory-rape-victim-forced-to-pay-child-support/275-292857221
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 04:40 PM
1

Women's suffrage was already in the works, feminism didn't do anything
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 04:34 PM
33

Not speaking about oppression of women does not equal its denial. Though it is certainly overstated, in the west women are the most privileged sex, they have all rights and more privileges than men, and several over men. Not having the majority or equal number of one's gender in government does not change that they are the primary beneficiaries of society. Globally, men are the majority victims of violent crime, including 81% of homicides. In the U.S., they are 2.7 times more likely than women t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 03:47 PM
6

It disturbs me that patriarchy theory is now considered foundational philosophy when the current framework for it only became popular in the 80s with the rise of radical feminism. It makes it an inherently sexist institution and I was genuinely hoping over the last day that at least some would understand the hostility of the word "patriarchy." Unfortunately, every single bias was confirmed, Christina Hoff Sommers was correct in -Who Stole Feminism- They treated my posts like ragebait, using all …
/r/MensRights19/04/26 04:52 AM
4

Nah brah, I mean feminists have always believed it's all men
/r/MensRights18/04/26 09:24 PM
5

It's only been a core tenant since the 80s. Before it was mostly the dictionary definition of patriarchy, after it was the radical feminist theory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 08:42 PM
1

Id sign, but im not Australian, good luck
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:14 PM
2

https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/crime/statutory-rape-victim-forced-to-pay-child-support/275-292857221
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:13 PM
1

Yes, a woman can rape a child and still get child support even in America.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:12 PM
-4

It's always been all men
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:07 PM
1

Because you're bourgeois
/r/MensRights18/04/26 07:51 PM
1

Do they believe in the theory of patriarchy?
/r/MensRights18/04/26 07:47 PM
1

They like to name call.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 06:32 PM
1

Idk, they just like their ad hominems.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 06:29 PM
9

You can answer all of them, and give a proper, not half assed, answer to state mandated disposability, this is reddit you got all the time you need, and should the female warmonger also die in war? Why should anyone die? What's wrong with you! I especially want to hear your response to, the fear and safety gaps, the ones which you proclaimed men to be completely unaffected by.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 06:21 PM
12

Why are you only replying to people who you deem to confirm your bias?
/r/MensRights18/04/26 03:13 PM
16

Ma'am the manosphere is a word of propaganda, it lobs MRM groups in with pickup artists and terrorist sympathizers explicitly to prevent men's rights from going forward. The label is a work of feminist propaganda and no group under it chose it, nor are they related. Men are 2nd Class Citizens The argument that men are effectively second-class citizens rests on the premise that they lack the fundamental legal protections, bodily autonomy, and reproductive rights afforded to women. Proponents of t…
/r/MensRights18/04/26 03:00 PM
-8

Sperm donors are extremely vetted.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:57 PM
17

Not even that, it's literally a buzzword to allow hatespeech against men. Based on nothing but propaganda, bias, and cherry picked history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 02:45 PM
1

It's not allowed, you'll be sued.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:26 PM
1

Make one
/r/MensRights18/04/26 10:51 AM
1

They have a very vague law they've been talking about that is intended to stop femicide, revenge porn, and ai deepfake porn. But the law criminalizes misogyny including, "aversion to women" and "contempt to women" which can criminalize the equal rights men fight for in some contexts. It will largely leave the definition of misogyny open for debate and make it a crime.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 10:35 AM
1

You can be a dictionary definition feminist as most of us are, and criticize common feminism, they'll blame men for what happens. I'd suggest a therapy service such as talkspace or better help to be able to have more and easily changeable therapist options. I'd say speak, speak up man. They'll call you a incel either way so you may as well advocate for yourself and fellow males.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 10:23 AM
1

I think we should shit in the Potomac like the French did the Seine, they have style.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 09:52 AM
55

They call it a, "bad faith" argument to even question their patriarchy theory.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 06:47 AM
161

That's actually one of our arguments against feminism. It's anti-free-speech, you cannot talk about real equality in their subs, only things that support their victim narrative.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 06:23 AM
1

Only if they stop using it against men.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 05:45 AM
2

Watching the fascist way feminist organizations behave. Watching what happens to anyone who questions the feminist bourgeoisie vs proletariat narrative. Watching men get treated like monster by an institution which claimed to be for Equality. That's what turned me against modern feminism. Listening and reading Christina Hoff Sommers is what made me realize feminism is an institution like religion, and that it's not all bad but absolutely needs criticism. Listening and reading Christina Hoff Somm…
/r/MensRights18/04/26 04:57 AM
12

HoneyBadgerRadio
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:07 AM
7

80% of the perpetrators against male victims are women.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 05:24 PM
1

They've done that since Gloria Steinem became popular.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 05:16 PM
1

Patriarchy as defined by feminists does not and has never existed.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 01:51 PM
1

Depends on the culture mostly
/r/MensRights11/04/26 08:16 PM
1

Depends
/r/MensRights11/04/26 08:01 PM
1

Men collectively did not implement those. Men created everything that is peaceful. The system you're talking about was created by women, men, and various institutions all continuously evolving. You're repeating radical feminist propaganda, and neglecting any nuance. Women had just as much rights over men as men did over them, sometimes more, and just because men got government rights 1st doesn't mean men kept women down as a collective, in fact men fought for women's rights more than women did, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 03:13 AM
5

Agree, however, that is not related to men's rights
/r/MensRights10/04/26 05:47 PM
30

Yes, well past time
/r/MensRights10/04/26 11:47 AM
6

Tell them to stop making you conform to a gender role.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 10:04 AM
13

This is extremely misandrist and misinformed. Feminism is evil. Feminists groups and gender studies actively deny historical female powers and male oppression. Men have solved problems via violence, but mostly via dialog, diplomacy, and men created the very ideas of everything non violent, while violence exists in nature.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 09:52 AM
4

No one listens when conversation around men's issues come up, and when they have in the past it's been censored.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 07:06 AM
28

NOW YOU DONT EVEN GET THE CHOICE OF JAIL OVER DEATH
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/26 06:39 AM
1

This is not an issue of men's rights.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 04:20 AM
1

Women never fell behind, that's a feminist myth. The boys were falling behind even back in the 80s. The girls were doing perfectly fine and women's groups started a panic saying they werent.weren't. The key to solid ground is to retake the historical narrative, women were never slaves and did indeed hold system powers over men all throughout history. The difference now is that women hold the only systemic powers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 02:51 PM
2

You shouldn't believe anything, you should await evidence case by case as to not make yourself part of the mob.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 07:27 AM
5

These are 2 separate crimes, both are real victims.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 07:25 AM
1

It's a lie, there is no legal method out of child support aside from getting majority custody, losing all your income and having a judge acknowledge that and change the support, or going to jail-even then whatever you make there will be garnished. While it's possible he was a deadbeat father, there is still no way out of child support. As for the MRM, Elam has always been quite a provacateur.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 07:15 AM
2

They'll say you didn't read enough if you only read 5-7
/r/MensRights08/04/26 07:13 AM
2

No
/r/MensRights19/03/26 01:09 PM
179

It's not, and you can press charges for that.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 06:18 PM
3

Why dont you just give me your answer for any possible answer of mine. Because im curious as to why you think 2A and DBD are relevant to this topic, but you have provided no reason to make me think so, there's a strong implication that you're using this as a "gotcha" to derail the topic and conversation.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 04:24 PM
3

That is not an appropriate way to discuss things. Either these topics are relevant to the topic of men being 2nd class citizens, or they are not.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 04:16 PM
3

Why, they have nothing to do with the discussion. If you explain why you think they do, I might entertain your bs.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 01:51 PM
7

This is a sub for men's rights and the discussion of things that pertain to that subject.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 12:39 PM
3

Except 2 are not relevant to the discussion, at all, and again- if you actually read the 1st 2 paragraphs, you'd know my stance on abortion, so obviously didn't read it.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 08:12 AM
33

Definitely so, to the point where the majority genuinely believe women were slaves till the 1900s, and had no power whatsoever before that period. But, while men certainly had most power over women, it was much more complex, and men did not have the power to do anything they wanted, and women had the power to some truly heinous things to men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 07:14 AM
3

You can do mini ones on reddit and YouTube
/r/MensRights18/03/26 07:08 AM
5

The men's rights movement itself is mostly unknown, and Google searches automatically tell people that we're misogynistic, and some big civil rights groups have even put us near the same level as terrorists, labeling us a hate organization. All of which is due to institutionalized radical feminism, and propaganda from feminist groups against the MRM.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 07:07 AM
1

Unfortunately it's widely market driven. There just aren't enough men buying stuff for our own month and holidays to Garner more private interests in marketing more male stuff.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 07:04 AM
7

Where are they seeking equal treatment? They already have nearly everything over men, the wage gap will even be in favor of women once the 3 oldest generations die out. If they sought equality they'd recognize that patriarchy, which requires men to benefit from society, does not exist, they'd stop using the term. They'd be in favor of financial abortion and standardized 50/50 custody. They'd recognize that men are the majority victims of violent crimes instead of saying women should feel safe li…
/r/MensRights18/03/26 06:57 AM
3

What of abortion, 2A and drill baby drill do you agree with? 2 of those have literally nothing to do with what is said in this post, and asking what i agree with about abortion just shows you didn't read it.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 12:40 AM
2

The statements aren't specific at all. The draft one applies to literally all countries. Almost all of these apply to india. Though yes, the Duluth Model, for example, is exclusively western, most other nations have a similar enough model.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 08:16 PM
4

The majority of western countries follow these things. And every country follows one or more
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 07:48 PM
11

No, the fact that it is enforced by the system makes all males 2nd class citizens. It's not a thing of personal choices. Personal choices only mitigate the risks. You are a second class citizen because you are male, your choice to avoid the things that will put you in these situations don't change that you're not 1st class, you're just bending to it.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:03 PM
1

I'm a huge fan of Christina Hoff Sommers, the war against boys was very good.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:47 PM
3

People are individuals.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 01:50 PM
2

It's really just the US, middle east, and Africa, and a bit of Australia.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 01:39 PM
12

Yup, gotta call politicians, share on Facebook, go to local protests, organize, etc etc.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 01:23 PM
1

Yes, the more people who write and email and call politicians, go to local protests, share on social media, etc, the easier it will be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 11:08 AM
4

Maybe against a draft. But for the rest the main issue is a lack of fraternal camaraderie, cohesion, and general organization.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 10:52 AM
2

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CNpm7KSXE/ I am expanding my Social media presence.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 09:56 AM
1

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CNpm7KSXE/ I am expanding my Social media presence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 09:56 AM
0

I don't think the category and label is the issue, I think they're very important. But there are ranges, and it's not clear cut. A core of masculinity is aestheticism, so any girl who looks at something and says, "oooh pretty" is exhibiting masculinity, just as the competitive girl is also exhibiting masculinity. Likewise the boy with an expressionist masterpiece is exhibiting femininity, just as much as the male caregiver.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 09:19 AM
31

Blaming the victims now, are we?
/r/MensRights17/03/26 08:23 AM
16

I have no clue what you're on about. You're the one who has screamed in all caps.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 08:15 AM
1

These are systemic examples of sex discrimination, there is no behavioral problems mentioned.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 08:09 AM
20

Rape culture and rape are not the same thing. You can at least educate yourself before doing this trolling thing.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 08:08 AM
27

When a woman rapes a man or boy he can still be made to pay her child support, that's what real rape culture looks like.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 07:57 AM
30

Except men didn't. It's the culmination of a system set up by men, women, and various elites and institutions throughout history. Patriarchy cannot possibly exist where men are oppressed, and men cannot be oppressors when they are among the oppressed, Patriarchy requires that males as a gender benefit from the society. Additionally, even if you were right, which you're not, why would you say something that promotes this oppression further, and indicates that you enjoy it?
/r/MensRights17/03/26 07:24 AM
1

Patriarchy doesn't, nor has it ever existed. It requires that males benefit as a gender from society, but males have always been 2nd class citizens. Again, you are showing a very poor understanding of history. The 'patriarchy' as defined by feminists today, and that's the definition you're using, is nothing but a tool for propaganda against males, and to promote hatred of men, to keep males from gaining civil rights. Yes I see Americans, Israelis killing innocents at this very moment. The Britis…
/r/MensRights17/03/26 07:00 AM
5

There are men and boys who've been forced to penetrate, raped, and are made to pay child support because of their rapist's sole decision to bring the pregnancy to term. There are victims literally paying their rapist for the crime of rape. That doesn't even get into why a unilateral decision made by a woman should cost a man his property and potentially his suffrage rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 06:42 AM
3

That is completely untrue, have you only read machiovelli or something? Or Aristotle? Cause you're claim shows an obscenely shallow understanding of western philosophy and society and history.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:32 AM
1

Patriarchy doesn't exist, it requires men as a sex to benefit from society under the feminist definition, but men are second class citizens who dont even have the right to life. There is no patriarchy.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:29 AM
3

The level of technology NATO has negates the physical differences of our enemies, more than 100% That's not even getting into differences in doctrine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 04:45 AM
6

The argument that men are effectively second-class citizens rests on the premise that they lack the fundamental legal protections, bodily autonomy, and reproductive rights afforded to women. Proponents of this view point to several explicit systemic inequities: Lack of Reproductive Consent The core of this argument is that while a woman has the absolute right to decide if she becomes a parent, a man’s consent ends at conception. If a woman chooses to carry a pregnancy to term, the state uses its…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 12:51 AM
2

Why do you not have the attention capacity to read 1000 words? That's well below standard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 08:47 AM
3

International Men's Day is November 19th
/r/MensRights16/03/26 08:44 AM
22

Women do have the right to financial abortion, they're called safe haven laws, adoption, and abortion. Additionally women having the sole right to bring a child to term and force a male to pay for that choice under threat of a felony conviction which completely disenfranchises him, including his right to vote, that is the damage financial abortion would exist to prevent. A free woman making a free choice should not affect anyone else financially, and certainly shouldn't have such a power over an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 08:13 AM
12

If a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liable for 21 years of support. Or, put another way, autonomous women making independent decisions about their lives should not expect men to finance their choice. -Karen DeCrow That is what financial abortion is for. Because IT IS IMMORAL for any unilateral decision to so affect someone other than yourself, especially to the point where a ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 07:59 AM
21

You didn't even read my comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 07:57 AM
33

If a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liable for 21 years of support. Or, put another way, autonomous women making independent decisions about their lives should not expect men to finance their choice. -Karen DeCrow That is what financial abortion is for. Because IT IS IMMORAL for any unilateral decision to so affect someone other than yourself, especially to the point where a ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 07:50 AM
18

This article by Melanie G. McCulley, published in the Journal of Law and Policy in 1998, explores the legal and ethical concept of "financial abortion" or "male abortion." In the paper, McCulley argues that if a woman has the right to decide whether to become a parent after conception, a putative father should have a reciprocal right to terminate his legal interests and financial obligations to an unborn child. She suggests that allowing a man to "opt out" of parenthood during the early stages o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 06:33 AM
1

when you're the attacker and your enemies have better or equal tech. Additionally Russian doctrine does not prioritize minimization of casualties and fatalities like NATO does. Just like the Korean War, when china and NK counter-attacked, china sent wave after wave after wave, the US and S. Korea had not even 100k military fatalities, china and NK had around 1 million. It's a cultural and technological difference, if china were to invade Thailand right now you would see similar numbers, that's j…
/r/MensRights16/03/26 01:49 AM
13

Discussions around women and accountability often center on perceptions that some women struggle to take ownership of mistakes in relationships, a phenomenon sometimes attributed to socialization, social strategies focusing on cohesion over confrontation, and historically protected status. Key Perspectives on Accountability Differences: Socialization & Strategies: Men often gain status through accountability, whereas women may prioritize social cohesion and agreeableness. Women might use indirec…
/r/MensRights16/03/26 01:09 AM
1

That kind of difference is generally expected when you're the attacker and your enemies have better or equal tech.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 01:03 AM
1

Those are the CSIS estimates, for military fatalities.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 12:56 AM
23

Equality is supposed to be all or nothing. Either we all get drafted indiscriminately or nobody gets drafted. That's how Equality is supposed to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:51 AM
1

Ukraine is not just using drones, between 60k and over 140k are dead. Over 300k for Russia.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 12:35 AM
5

The US just sent men to war, the issue is happening in the moment, not something to be prevented in 60 years.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 12:18 AM
10

Government
/r/MensRights15/03/26 10:28 PM
14

Yes, she is a provacateur, as stated. Highly controversial.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 10:18 PM
1

They all criticize each other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 10:13 PM
16

We're pretty good at bureaucracy.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 10:12 PM
16

Yes
/r/MensRights15/03/26 09:46 PM
38

Terrible, she was andrea Dworkin, just more soft spoken. She was a radical and extremist misandrist. She supported the brainwashing of boys, and the feminization of them. She openly despised masculinity as a whole, and thought every boy who wasn't brainwashed would become her abusive father, and that every man was. Patriarchy doesn't exist, under the feminist definition it requires males as a gender to benefit, but we are second class citizens who dont even have a right to life in ANY country. A…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 08:52 PM
9

You should be upset, it's used to justify violence against and disenfranchisement of men.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 07:53 AM
2

It is not niche, it's part of the gyno-centric society that keeps men down. Feminists call it patriarchy and say they help men, but even in the act of calling it patriarchy they avoid accountability and demonize men.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 12:39 AM
7

I'm actually a nudist in my free time, I disagree.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 06:55 PM
5

I don't think so. https://www.menandboys.net/about-us/ It's an advocacy document.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/26 11:41 PM
1

Yes, intent matters. Infant circumcision has never been intended to hurt babies, male or female. It has been societies, parents, and medical professionals doing the best they can with the verifiable knowledge they have. Using fake news to argue against circumcision is more harmful to the goal of ending it than it is helpful.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 11:08 PM
-1

Humiliation through rape is inherently a sexual perversion, humiliation is a whole sex thing on its own. It's power based, circumcision is not.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:55 PM
-1

Circumcision is not sexual because it is considered a medical operation, as i said. Humiliation through rape is inherently a sexual perversion, humiliation is a whole sex thing on its own. It's power based, circumcision is not.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:42 PM
3

Virgin has returned to it's regular status, though it's still occasionally used as an insult. Incel has widely replaced it.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:29 PM
0

Sexual assault requires it to be sexual. This is an operation, and, you're all operating under the idea that something sexual is going on during these operations. Someone just tried to tell me doctors even attempt to Garner arousal from newborns to make it easier. This is completely false, specialized instruments are used, not stimulation.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:26 PM
5

Girl, virgin has been used as an insult for generations. Usually against men.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:12 PM
1

That is incorrect. They use mosquito hemostats and Gomco bells, then scissors. It was everybody's own emotional reactions that further proves my point. In a real debate you all would be called unstable fools who have no idea what you're talking about. It was never even implied that I supported mgm.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:06 PM
-1

You dont even know my position. Nothing I've said has justified child circumcision, I'm arguing semantics because they matter here. I never said it wasn't child abuse. It might be deemed regular assault, it is not sexual assault.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 07:54 PM
12

Wonder why. Most chemo is done like dialysis, pretty much out in the open, lucky if you get a cubicle.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 07:47 PM
-8

Nobody is justifying child abuse.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 07:20 PM
2

I think you're quite paranoid about this. Will you get playboy amounts of lovers, probably not. Will all that other stuff happen, extremely unlikely. At best I think you're just looking for excuses to avoid dating. If you wanna be alone just say it, no one's gonna judge.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 06:52 PM
-6

I didn't say otherwise, but it's not sexual assault
/r/MensRights14/02/26 06:45 PM
16

The international council for men and boys. https://www.menandboys.net/about-us/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/26 06:33 PM
-26

It's not sexual, it's not gentle. They do it quite fast. Downvote me all you want, but it's not sexual, go watch one, they're on YouTube. Making redundant and false claims doesn't help your goal.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 06:12 PM
2

No, men are an oppressed and underserved class. Those people making you feel guilty are literally part of that oppression. You don't even have the natural right to life as a man, it can be taken away with nothing but a penstroke, not even a trial.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 05:52 PM
8

Why would you not think it's offensive? It's literally the insult against men that replaced virgin.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 05:38 PM
55

Misandry is definitely physical abuse. Women are the Aggressor in half of all mutual DV, and they make up 70% of the perpetrators in non-mutual DV. Idk what you're on about with beastiality, that has nothing to do with misogyny and Misandry. It's a rare sexual deviation that's very old in all society's.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 02:07 PM
3

Incel is not short for imbecile.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 01:38 PM
1

When it comes up,yes, as are the benefits. It's pretty low on the radar overrall, social issues being prime concerns. Though testosterone requires a doctor's appointment and a script in most places. It's not readily available.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:46 PM
8

You literally used a hate term, and are operating from a clearly misandrist mindset. What did you expect?
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:34 AM
2

Firstly, incel is an offensive hate word that people like you appropriated from actual incels, the diseased,lame,and others who have nothing to do misogyny. You realize that "persons" in this case does not refer to a woman being a human being right? It refers to the definition of "persons" in the British North America Act, which federalized Canada. It's not about personhood, it was about the right to hold federal office. So, yes, your very premise is wrong. Lastly, no one says women owe men anyt…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:28 AM
1

There was like 20 years when people like Karen DeCrow represented common feminism, but that's it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/26 09:34 AM
1

No, they'll just add whatever you call it to the same list. The MRM did absolutely nothing to be stigmatized. It was propaganda and feminist control of institutions that lead to that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/26 09:31 AM
22

That goes beyond the scope of this topic.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 08:52 AM
28

That's off topic.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 08:45 AM
17

Id say 99% of all MRAs are dictionary definition feminists, and the rest are still egalitarian.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 08:40 AM
30

That 'largely white' is probably only 53%, it's extremely diverse, many non-whites. No post here has hated on women. You feeling personally attacked by posts calling out women and biased feminists statistics doesn't equal women-hate.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 08:37 AM
64

Men don't want to hate women, nothing here is about hating women. It's about truth, equality, and safety for men as an underserved class that gets falsely blamed for society's woes, particularly by radical feminists who are the majority of feminists. 99% of MRAs are dictionary definition feminists, or egalitarian, or both.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 08:28 AM
13

The offender was most often described as depressed and/or mentally ill. An open- ended question revealed that over half the offenders were viewed by the investigator, as emotionally unstable. This finding is consistent with other research studies. Investigators scored factors which they determined had an effect on the killings, These were as follows: angry with spouse or mate (43%); family discord (38%); frustrated living in an extended family situation (28%); and separation adjustment problems …
/r/MensRights14/02/26 08:26 AM
23

https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/201/301/rapport_situation_drogues/2008/pubs/omc-ned/kill-tuer-eng.htm?nodisclaimer=1 The average age of all children killed was 4 years. Mothers killed more children than fathers.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 08:22 AM
16

According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), almost 24% of all relationships experience some level of violence. 50% of domestic violence cases involve mutual violence. In the other 50% of domestic violence cases, the violence was non-mutual. In relationships where violence was non-mutual almost 70% of the violence was perpetrated by the woman. In other words, in almost 7 out of 10 cases of mutual violence, the batterer was a female. Is Female Domestic Violence Most Often In Self Defense? S…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 08:15 AM
18

Example: https://amp-9news-com-au.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.9news.com.au/article/15cd3086-7fe3-49b9-8d21-1d6674da8219?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17710554743810&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.9news.com.au%2Fworld%2Flesbian-couple-jailed-for-20-years-for-beating-son%2F15cd3086-7fe3-49b9-8d21-1d6674da8219
/r/MensRights14/02/26 07:56 AM
8

I don't think rapists should have bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 05:19 AM
13

If a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liable for 21 years of support... autonomous women making independent decisions about their lives should not expect men to finance their choice. -Karen DeCrow
/r/MensRights14/02/26 04:35 AM
5

Yes, and its mainly male victims and potential victims that have come out in the past, and been called crazy conspiracy theorists.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 04:08 AM
5

There are certainly those using it as platform for misandry. That shouldn't be the case, but it is. However, the main things at the moment are all the conspiracies coming true. And Epstein wasn't an American thing, he was global.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 04:06 AM
2

They didn't enable, they were a part of the whole thing. Several victims stated Maxwell herself participated in the sexual acts. Epstein and Maxwell used a tried and proven method from the Japanese empire to get their victims. 1.find potential victim 2.send female in to engratiate herself to the victim or their family 3.make offer, often money or vacation, or other opportunity 4.shanhai them
/r/MensRights13/02/26 04:20 PM
1

You click on the video on reddit, it works for me
/r/MensRights13/02/26 04:15 PM
1

Depends on how crazy you are, MGTOW involves people simply decentering women to people completely abandoning society.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 04:07 PM
3

So they're explicitly offering things that will put girls ahead and boys behind, and they refuse to admit it's discrimination? The article did not explicitly say it was girls only, but it's heavily implied.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 01:30 PM
3

Somewhere there was an estimate of about 30% Common estimates put it at between 10 and 30. Anyone putting at less than 20 is probably using biased feminist sources.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 08:08 PM
3

It would have to be law, and there's very similar laws on the books already, such as safe haven laws.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 07:28 PM
10

Financial/Paper Abortion -a man's legal right to opt out of financial responsibility for a child if he did not want the pregnancy There's never been a policy like it so there's no examples. But it could done by making a time frame for the father, once they are made aware of a child, to opt out of all rights and all financial responsibility. Right now financial responsibility is non optional if the mother goes for it. Regardless of parental rights. This creates a system wherein women have the uni…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 07:14 PM
3

Epstein ran a pedophile cabal and got victims the same way japan got their exported prostitutes, by having women engratiate and trap their victims, this is not a gender thing.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 07:02 PM
7

Not pro life policy, but financial abortion would.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 06:58 PM
1

https://youtube.com/@romaarmymensrights?si=xlBtxR2gj4o-AL_A
/r/MensRights08/02/26 06:43 PM
1

It's a lack of data due to combined misandry and misogyny, not a cover up. The interest in studying female perpetrators has only picked up recently.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 06:23 AM
1

Feminism uses very clear Marxist language, especially in the proletariat v bourgeoisie areas. Men are the bourgeoisie to them. Despite all data and conditions pointed to the contrary.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:14 AM
1

We have no more universal principles than them, that's why there's so many different groups here, less than feminists groups, but definitely more than 3.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:13 AM
2

They mean it had very similar ideals
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:11 AM
2

We shouldn't logically clash, we clash because the majority of feminists believe in patriarchy, an all encompassing man hate and male blame.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:10 AM
3

Patriarchy doesn't exist, never has, not the way feminists describe it.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:07 AM
1

Sommers is a feminist, she founded equality feminism, Relevant Books: Who Stole Feminism The War Against Boys
/r/MensRights07/02/26 11:07 AM
1

C sections dont cause narrow hips. There is a bare suggestion among few theorists that it may cause a group here or there to evolve narrow hips, but that is highly unlikely, and extremely fringe, like the orc Neanderthal hypothesis levels of fringe and absurd.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 10:44 AM
1

Depends on the therapist, most therapies dont say anything about the gender. Even among the ones that do, very few are more than dictionary definition feminist Look at the gottmans, 2 of the biggest names in therapy and psychology, they've done the biggest and most attested to relationship studies and discoveries, like the 5:1/20:1 ratio. It's used to predict a relationships stability and end. The ratio is the amount of positive/negative interactions. Nothing about patriarchy, and certainly not …
/r/MensRights07/02/26 09:30 AM
1

Like 51% women 49% men, or vice versa
/r/MensRights06/02/26 04:20 AM
2

See dr Ruth Westheimer
/r/MensRights05/02/26 03:05 PM
60

That's an odd state law. But also, they could've waited 90 days, or not admitted to sex within that 90 days.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 10:46 AM
53

Sweet sweet summer child. Wait till you learn about scat, bdsm, and r$pe play. I'm pro kink shaming btw, it was just such an odd post to see. Like, you just learned this? There's female ones too.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 04:18 PM
198

Everything is a fetish, that's why there's something called rule 34
/r/MensRights03/02/26 04:04 PM
2

Dont even need to record, texting about sex would have been enough record. https://eforms.com/consent/sexual/ Also, Netflix and chill is not a date
/r/MensRights03/02/26 03:08 PM
16

It's probably like 51/49%
/r/MensRights03/02/26 12:04 PM
8

BC and chemical castration are 2 different things.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 11:50 AM
3

There were alot of side effects, it didn't come out earlier because they weren't manageable.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 11:49 AM
1

Chemical BC doesn't protect from STDs. Only condoms, and some say PREP but that's only for like hiv.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 11:48 AM
1

Find a new one then
/r/MensRights03/02/26 11:43 AM
2

Throw him in with her, he's guilty!
/r/MensRights03/02/26 11:31 AM
12

Barriers for men are being put up, there's waaaay more discrimination against males in female dominated fields.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 11:29 AM
4

Internet was never a male space. It just had, and has, a high population of males. It never barred women. Proper male spaces bar non males
/r/MensRights03/02/26 11:27 AM
-2

Make one for men
/r/MensRights03/02/26 11:25 AM
6

Report it
/r/MensRights03/02/26 11:18 AM
2

"New Approach"
/r/MensRights28/01/26 02:17 PM
3

Pearl isn't really known for being good at debate in the 1st place.
/r/MensRights15/01/26 07:52 AM
7

Yes, the data on that is questionable. That's why so many post about women doing criminal stuff here.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 09:29 PM
14

Right to life, drafting alone proves that. Right to suffrage, because it's a felony if you dont sign up for Selective Service, which puts your name in the draw if there's a draft. And felonies come with forced disenfranchisement. This is exclusive to men. These also take away a right to liberty Right to due process in many cases, even then you often lose the presumption of innocence just for being male. This also brings into question the right to fair trials, which have recently been infringed o…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 08:59 PM
8

That's old news, the only requirement for radical feminism is the belief in their theory of patriarchy
/r/MensRights01/12/25 03:52 PM
1

I dont, but that's not what you originally said, and if that's what you meant, then im arguing semantics and argue that you be clearer next time.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 03:13 PM
1

Would you reccomend consent forms? Would that help in such a case or prevent such a case? Ie: https://eforms.com/consent/sexual/
/r/MensRights29/11/25 01:13 PM
1

Well the 1st thing to changing your own view is to see men as human beings. As for why your parents were the way they were, well idk enough about it to bring out my armchair psychologist, and that's likely out of reddit's pay grade, reccomend therapy. As for your romantic issues, ill tell you what I tell men and women everywhere, 'fool you once shame on them, twice shame on them, thrice...okay shame on them, 4 times- come on now you have a type." Id suggest you read and listen to dr Ruth Westhei…
/r/MensRights29/11/25 11:41 AM
3

You're sexist, like all feminists you are taking your personal beliefs and projecting it. You even admit that you dont want to stop being sexist, you just want a reason to validate your hate.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 11:26 AM
1

Feminism is the main promoter of misandry, not the result.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 08:31 AM
1

Well, it was only a matter of time before these things were actually needed. https://eforms.com/consent/sexual/
/r/MensRights29/11/25 06:27 AM
7

We need exposure to one another to see our condition as a whole.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 06:10 AM
5

No, the opposite
/r/MensRights29/11/25 06:06 AM
0

This is not a men's rights issue, and I do not care either way.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 10:21 PM
1

Technically yes, the states remaining with gendered laws are: Alaska Colorado Florida Georgia (the traditional rape statute is gender-specific, but other charges apply for female perpetrators) Hawaii Idaho Illinois Louisiana Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Nebraska New Hampshire New Jersey Rhode Island South Dakota Tennessee Texas
/r/MensRights28/11/25 10:05 PM
30

The FBI and USDoJ changed the definition in the US in 2011. https://www.justice.gov/archives/ovw/blog/updated-definition-rape the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Summary Reporting System (SRS). “Forcible rape” had been defined by the UCR SRS as “the carnal knowledge of a female, forcibly and against her will.” That definition, unchanged since 1927, was outdated and narrow. It only included forcible male penile penetration of a female vagina. The new definition is: “The penetration, no matter ho…
/r/MensRights28/11/25 09:51 PM
2

At face value, neither. I can't read the whole thing. I don't use Wattpad
/r/MensRights28/11/25 05:23 PM
1

You're in journalism, half the job is criticism and death threats. Yes, make it. It's not legally possible for a woman to rape a man in the UK, where an archaic definition of rape is used in law.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 05:14 PM
1

Become an open MRA then
/r/MensRights28/11/25 04:37 PM
1

Bro, you need to empty your shared bank accounts and cancel her card. If you cannot put it in an account in your name, take it all in cash. Make a go bag.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/25 04:18 PM
1

Misandry and other sexism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/25 04:16 PM
34

Is that really surprising from Canada though?
/r/MensRights28/11/25 03:44 PM
115

It's true in the UK women cannot be legally charged with rape. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 defines rape as requiring penile penetration, which a woman cannot perform.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 03:38 PM
3

Skill issue, if you cannot get it to support you and find sources to support, then it's you. Ai has no opinions, it's a fucking robot.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 03:32 PM
250

From a western country where it is legally impossible for a woman to be charged with rape.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 03:27 PM
1

Everyone, change your name to "Elara" trust me.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 10:09 PM
2

There's no such thing as patriarchy.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 10:05 PM
46

That was before the Anglican church, the article talks about a pastor of the Anglican church in Uganda using his power to tell men to avoid paternity tests. Under the catholic and Anglican churches, in earlier times, infidelity was one of few valid reasons to divorce. In the time of christ, yes, infidelity was a capital crime, however Joseph would have set marry aside, hence being merciful and just.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 08:04 PM
203

That's ridiculous, the Anglican church protecting cheaters. Back in the day, INFIDELITY, was grounds for divorce in a time where the church rarely, if ever, permitted it. Comparing the situation to the main biblical couple in Christianity is absurd. The Bible literally says Joseph was going to divorce Mary quietly because he was MERCIFUL and JUST, and only didn't due to divine intervention and being told that it was not another man's baby but a divine pregnancy.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 07:50 PM
1

Are we talking about gooning as in edging? Or exhibitionism?
/r/MensRights27/11/25 06:30 PM
12

Men https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_(2022_film)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 06:20 PM
1

That's called depression
/r/MensRights27/11/25 06:17 PM
7

I don't think many people have felt less of man when they cry.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 06:04 PM
1

It wouldn't be difficult at all to argue, it was sexual assault, and he defended himself.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 06:01 PM
2

back to the kitchen damn women… where you belong. Why are you telling women to get back in the kitchen? You're the only one saying that here.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 05:36 PM
1

Men have never had the natural right to life.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 05:34 PM
1

Ban alimony and shared property
/r/MensRights27/11/25 04:59 PM
1

Why would you want a database and requirement though? That goes oppressively beyond a right to paternity test.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 03:39 PM
6

I really hope that I don't offend the MRAs of this sub, but I dont care if I do at this point. You really care and you don't care. Off to a great start. But what I’m starting to see now is a sort of “oppression Olympics,” a competition over who has it worse, with each side trying to paint the other as the “bad guy.” How do you propose advocating for resolution to mens issues without talking about mens' issues? MRAs are tired of seeing the male gender constantly bashed, so they respond by doing t…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 03:33 PM
8

Cant work with people who name your gender for the entire planet's problems, and take no accountability whatsoever.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 03:30 PM
1

BRING BACK THE CHITON and EXOMIS! https://fashion-history.weebly.com/classical-greek.html
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/25 08:46 PM
1

You can be women's rights and not follow the doctrine of common feminisms.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 07:06 PM
1

Dating Rules for Men Always go Dutch on the first date. If she insists you pay, that's a red flag. Netflix and chill is not a date. Respect your own time and hers—do something real. If there's no smooth, mutual conversation, don't give a second chance. Forced effort isn't chemistry. Don't pedestalize anyone. Be respectful, but keep your standards and self-worth. No relationship with someone who mocks or disrespects you, even jokingly. Don't ignore red flags because you're physically attracted. A…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/25 07:01 PM
1

However , agreed that it is not a men's rights issue if there is no inheritance, estate involved** What you're talking about overrall goes beyond men's rights. The only thing you've mentioned that can be considered men's rights is, men get stuck of the financial bill most of the time?
/r/MensRights14/11/25 06:23 PM
1

Nobody, they are people. And also, bastard status doesn't matter to the law regarding property rights anymore.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 05:44 PM
1

That's what im telling you, this is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 05:29 PM
1

In the west, "legitimate heirs" just means they're not a bastard, and is not a gender conversation. Your bastards are still your children.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 01:43 PM
1

He can report her, HR exist to prevent lawsuits, he has to make it a concern for the company. However, this is not an HR issue. This is a personal disagreement between 2 colleagues, and at most the manager might be told.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 01:09 PM
3

No, it's working on my end. Maybe try that. https://m.youtube.com/shorts/ZpMt4miD59k
/r/MensRights14/11/25 07:57 AM
1

Men dont have it easy, that's why men dont go to the doctor as much. But those things are true for women as well, the thing is, they can just look for a new doctor like everyone else. Nor is this sexism, it's evolution, all conditions exist to keep the human population in check, healthcare exists to fight that. They're choosing to make it sexist instead of being egalitarian on healthcare price and quality.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 11:26 AM
5

https://dadsdivorce.com/
/r/MensRights10/11/25 12:23 PM
1

You do you
/r/MensRights10/11/25 12:08 PM
23

There is no such thing as patriarchy and toxic masculinity as feminists describe it doesn't exist. They catch alls to allow sexism against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/25 06:55 PM
18

Yes
/r/MensRights07/11/25 06:09 PM
1

She thinks you'll get stopped at the US-Switzerland border?!
/r/MensRights06/11/25 10:38 PM
1

Father's rights are a main point to men's rights!
/r/MensRights06/11/25 10:37 PM
1

He just hates everyone apparently.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 09:59 PM
11

It is research like this, to include literature like, “Abused Men: The Hidden Side of Domestic Violence” by Phillip Cook (2009) who on page 13, Table 1.3, references 10 other examples of the approximately 200 studies showing gender symmetry in assault, that should go to show anyone reading this blog post that our system has failed by allowing the pendulum to swing way too far to where the police by statistics are more than likely arresting thousands of men who are not guilty of Assault Family Vi…
/r/MensRights06/11/25 07:53 PM
6

It is research like this, to include literature like, “Abused Men: The Hidden Side of Domestic Violence” by Phillip Cook (2009) who on page 13, Table 1.3, references 10 other examples of the approximately 200 studies showing gender symmetry in assault, that should go to show anyone reading this blog post that our system has failed by allowing the pendulum to swing way too far to where the police by statistics are more than likely arresting thousands of men who are not guilty of Assault Family Vi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/25 07:52 PM
2

Do online services and organizations count? Isn't there a list?
/r/MensRights06/11/25 03:37 PM
3

Watching free speech and due process get trampled during the college rape crisis by feminists who hated men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/25 02:43 PM
2

It is when it harms people and causes damage. Especially damage that can lead to serious lawsuits, which is why Apple would remove these apps.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 02:06 PM
1

Tea literally means, "gossip"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 01:28 PM
6

Smart guy Sister, sister The nanny Fraiser Blossom My two dads Etc. https://www.themoviedb.org/keyword/33479-single-father/tv?language=en-US&sort_by=first_air_date.asc
/r/MensRights01/11/25 12:08 PM
7

In the 90s and 2000s there are multiple extremely popular TV shows featuring single fathers. Ie: Full House
/r/MensRights01/11/25 11:14 AM
0

Liberal feminists who dont believe in the sexist feminist theory of patriarchy are okay. Equality feminists like Christina Hoff Sommers are the gold standard for a good feminist ally. Men are the most disenfranchised and underprivileged population. We don't even have the natural right to life.
/r/MensRights01/11/25 01:16 AM
1

Like what holistic solutions?
/r/MensRights31/10/25 11:34 PM
1

Only if they are segregated properly and can only use the one tube, like Jim crow. Give them the back of the bus. /s
/r/MensRights31/10/25 11:30 PM
0

Depends on the issue.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 08:01 PM
6

Anyone who believes in the feminist theory of patriarchy is a misandrist and should be considered persona non grata.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 04:12 PM
1

No, I am offering a perspective OP has not likely heard given their post. What they have experienced is, while not unheard of, very uncommon, even unusual in most places and cultures.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 10:02 AM
0

I have not seen what you're describing, maybe get new friends.
/r/MensRights30/10/25 06:21 PM
1

RIP
/r/MensRights30/10/25 03:25 PM
4

There's no such thing as patriarchy, as a feminist theory, it's only backed by anecdote and revisions of history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 08:03 PM
2

Your first sentence starts off VERY strong with how ahistorical and untrue it is. Patriarchy, in the context of feminism, which is what we're talking about, is a system in which men put down women for their own benefit. It is indeed saying men are bourgeois. I don't know about you but I'm in the US, and we absolutely live in a patriarchy and that has always been the norm. Except it hasn't, there were a handful of questionable laws, none of which were there due to a system existing to lift up men…
/r/MensRights16/09/25 12:43 AM
2

Except it's not.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 10:50 PM
2

Patriarchy doesn't exist, it's a all encompassing evil used to promote hate against men and the victimization of women, it's only backed backed by anecdotes and revisions of history, it's barely even a theory. If the common feminist wants equality, then they should support the MRM and stop using the term "patriarchy," because it cannot be a patriarchy when men have it worse than women, and have always had it at least as bad women. That is the main definition of patriarchy, a system which benefit…
/r/MensRights14/09/25 12:35 AM
1

Oh it'll take many generations, but it's possible, MRAs need to get into the social degrees, schools men created. Arts, social sciences, languages, etc. Do what we want to do, not rigid degrees that, half the time, are for miserable careers. Support men's rights and men's studies without radical feminists ideals like patriarchy. Make a sub school for gender studies.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 12:31 AM
1

Like special EBT cards.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 12:27 AM
3

They did loosen it a bit this month, allowing males 18-22 to travel again.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 12:23 AM
1

Yes, I was once asked to go into an outhouse in a gas station while their women's restroom was under repair. I complained, no positive results. I stated it was sexist, and shall be taking my business elsewhere, and reported it to their corporate.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 12:08 AM
15

Yes, and unfortunately radical feminism is common feminism today. Women's history is not a holistic study of history, it's biased...obviously.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 12:04 AM
1

The book falsely claims that the Talmud discourages Jews from performing manual labour and encourages them to engage in trade instead; that it teaches Jews that non-Jews are meant to be slaves And the Talmud is patriarchy. Christina Hoff Sommers always did compare modern common feminism to fascism, using brown shirt and red guard tactics on university campuses.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 11:58 PM
1

If they don't want to date just say it, no need to be sexist about it. Like, damn, I'll give genuine advice on how to avoid those "poison skittles," and they be explaining it again anyway. It's the same advice to men, it's not rocket science.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 11:55 PM
2

Toxic feminism exists. Toxic masculinity and femininity do not.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 11:13 PM
2

Masculinity is everything forward in logos, practicality, the physical, and subtle expression. It cannot be positive or negative, it just exists, and changes vastly with the times, but the logos, practicality, preference for the physical, and subtle expression have been constant from what I've looked at in history.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 11:08 PM
2

Issues over penis size is actually body dysmorphia.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 05:03 PM
8

Why are you making that assumption? Maybe the movie just doesn't interest him.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 04:59 PM
71

There's no such thing as positive or negative masculinity, it's just masculinity- everything forward in logos, practicality, and the physical, with subtlety in expression.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 03:14 PM
2

What tone? He made a point, women are supposed to have standards according to men and women, but men are shamed for having any.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 09:31 PM
1

And? They didn't even say it was wrong.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 09:28 PM
1

And the only empathy is infantilization.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 06:39 AM
2

100% incorrect. Report it. Doesn't matter how long ago it was, report it. Post it publicly on all social media, name her and all. She's done told every boy she's been in contact with that they can't say no.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 03:55 AM
4

That's a good question, the answer is that I have no idea. In my opinion the system seen in Sweden might be considered the gold standard, but i have not done much research on the actual system. Wherein the actual focus is rehabilitation and reintegration, not punishment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/25 11:10 PM
2

That's an identity
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/25 11:03 PM
7

In terms of the wrongfully convicted, yes it would be absolutely inhumane. but as a male victim of abuse myself including SA I can't help but think that most of the prison system is cruel, inhuman and degrading, and SA itself is also cruel, inhuman and degrading. I honestly could be swayed either way on this issue. Even if one innocent person has this punishment placed on them, that is one too many. "It is more important that innocence be protected than it is that guilt be punished, for guilt an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/25 10:55 PM
5

No, follow policies. In this is event, it is inappropriate to speak out over the person being sexist. DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT File a report per school policy.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 06:33 PM
2

Report it to the school.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 06:31 PM
5

Your Nazi Germany example is the perfect example to support the case I made earlier, because if more people had spoken out more forcefully against the Nazis earlier, they wouldn’t have come to power. People dont know how they came into power. Speaking up wouldn't have happened or helped. People didn't realize they would do the things they did in power, they had feelings and felt heard. The nazi party wasn't even close to the actual popular parties, it was only the 6th-4th most popular overrall. …
/r/MensRights06/09/25 06:29 PM
0

Well, sometimes you have to trick it. I think it's a good tool, but a more effective thing for OP to do would be to double check and then post the comparison chart.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 06:00 PM
3

Feminists don't truly want men to be that, but they can't consolidate their own messages and theories with There's more than a few these days who want that.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 05:59 PM
3

And partook https://www.reuters.com/world/us/maxwell-sex-abuse-trial-resume-with-epstein-pilots-testimony-2021-11-30/
/r/MensRights05/09/25 11:26 PM
2

-Insisting that women have always been victims of men, and had no power throughout history. -Only using Cherry-picked examples to support that claim. -Only looking at history through a lens of female victim hood. When men had it just as bad and, except for a handful of decades, had no power whatsoever over women. They completely ignore any and all other factors which dont support the idea that men are and have always been bourgeois oppressors in their sexist hypothesis of patriarchy. At times, f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/25 06:33 PM
1

It does break at least 2 natural rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 11:36 PM
29

Not very many, radical feminism only requires belief in the feminist hypothesis of patriarchy. So, like 99.999% are radicals, promoting an idea based mostly in anti-male sexism, anecdotes, and revisions of history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 11:31 PM
35

Men have always fought with language before fists, you are promoting a feminist revisionism idea that men are toxic and violent.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 11:26 PM
18

Society sees the male, no matter the age, as a sex object.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 06:11 PM
2

Both of those could constitute sexual abuse or at least manipulation.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 06:08 PM
1

Good. That wasn't the question though.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 06:06 PM
1

Sex and drugs are like sand and dust, dont matter how much you have if a small wind will blow it all away.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 06:03 PM
0

So, you've never actually had a relationship buddy. You had a 7 year contract which, by your own admission, was built on sex and drugs, then you've had a bunch of hookups.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:57 PM
1

So you never actually knew your ex wife.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:53 PM
1

What did yall talk about when you went on dates?
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:52 PM
1

What all happened on the 1st few dates?
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:50 PM
1

How was your relationship with your ex wife before the 1st date?
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:49 PM
1

So you didn't think that before your marriage?
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:47 PM
1

Did you think that before your marriage or just after?
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:46 PM
1

I can 100% guarantee if you talk me through that marriage I can point out issues bigger than you losing a job.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:44 PM
1

You're telling me you aint never had an elder or relationship expert tell you, "dont fuck on the 1st date" or "dont build relationships on sex."
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:42 PM
3

Well you haven't told me what went on in your marriage yet, I can't say anything about that. For one: But I feel like you must have heard, "never fuck on the 1st date" from somebody. If all you're doing is hooking up, as a man, you're not even opening up enough to try to trust someone.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:39 PM
1

Maybe you're doing them wrong.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:32 PM
1

So why aren't you happy? If men only have a drive for sex for little? (Which is your other argument.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:31 PM
1

What else happened with that 7 year marriage? What happened on the last date?
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:30 PM
1

So, im just saying, women hooking up completely and utterly debunks your argument. If women only want men for resources (which is your argument), they wouldn't do that.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:28 PM
1

I wouldn't call that the top 10%, and no.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 03:12 AM
7

It's really not about friendship. It has always been about romantic lonliness. Men overall have less friends than women, but are known for closer bonds. What i have seen a lack of is, what i call, para-romantic friendship, aka platonic love, or philia. Which is something men largely had before feminism and the demonization of men and masculinity. While women, generally, seem to have quite taken to the idea. What conservatives and feminists call "traditional masculinity" only dates back to the 50…
/r/MensRights03/09/25 02:41 AM
0

Going further into that mythos (I am a Christian), it was a shared guilt. Eve because she did it 1st, Adam because he went along with it even though he was the one explicitly told not to do it.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 02:15 AM
7

We don't live in a patriarchy. The idea is only backed by anecdotes and revisions of history. It cannot be called a patriarchy when women have all natural rights and more, solely because they are women (as it should be for all), while men don't even have the natural right to life. This is your problem. You seek approval from women, you don't see yourself as an equal, but lesser.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 12:15 AM
1

https://ncfm.org/ National Coalition for Men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 12:12 AM
1

Don't dodge the question.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 06:21 PM
1

Have you been made to sign up for Selective Service under threat of felony conviction?
/r/MensRights02/09/25 06:11 PM
1

Those are privileges. Women have rights over men in reproduction, property, and family courts. Additionally Women, for example, have more right to live with no infringement whatsoever, while men don't.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 06:04 PM
2

https://www.womenslaw.org/about-abuse/abuse-specific-communities/male-victims/abuse-against-men/how-common-it-men-be-abused#:~:text=Abuse%20of%20men%20happens%20far,an%20impact%20from%20that%20victimization. 1 in 4 women, is common knowledge and regularly stated on all media sources.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 05:34 PM
1

Ie: Chivalry and social treatment: Many women report experiencing "chivalrous" treatment, such as doors being opened, receiving help with heavy lifting, and men paying on dates. Some view this as a form of respect and advantage, while others argue it stems from outdated and condescending beliefs about women's capabilities. Selective Service: In the United States, only men are required to register for the Selective Service (military draft), and women are exempt. Criminal justice system: Studies h…
/r/MensRights02/09/25 05:23 PM
1

Yes, women do get paid more in most cases. For example- https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/technology/google-gender-pay-gap.html Yes, men do get assaulted more. Males are the majority victims of violent crimes. Domestic violence has been 50/50 forever, only feminists sources say otherwise. Men have no rights to their own bodies whatsoever, not even the right to live.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 05:13 PM
2

I don't think psychologists should have a say in what is or is not masculine, or how it began. That is the job of philosophers and sociologists.sociologist. I have found it is both biological, or at least seems so given the behavior and that the reason we even call it masculinity is because it's mostly male stuff, and socially reactive. The common behaviors of the masculine can be boiled down to things that mostly men do, then everything forward in logos, the practical, and the physical. And spe…
/r/MensRights31/08/25 10:52 PM
10

For victims of sex crimes. The highest estimated statistic for women is 25% of the total female population will be victim of a sex crime in their life. The highest estimated statistic for men is 33%.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/25 10:44 PM
7

Nobody denies these things. We question the fear mongering, the biased research, and sexist statements from that biased research, and the victim-blaming anti-male narrative, the radical feminist hypothesis of patriarchy for example. While feminists, and by extension a great amount of women, will hear a man say he's been raped by a woman and then say, "who does the most rapes"(While using biased statistics). They will hear a man state that he was raped, then say, "you people are the problem." The…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/25 10:35 PM
1

To me, well, I just read a comment where a man's abuser found him, so like...aside from privacy issues which aught to be concern enough, there's your predator, abuser, or stalker keeping up with you too.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 10:32 PM
1

Men are not allowed on at all, and can see nothing. I am not sure their policy on trans women.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 10:30 PM
3

Ask the moderators if you can make this a post.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 10:21 PM
3

Female versions of pick-up-artists negatively affect them more than social or natural drives, I don't think I've met a single person irl who knows a proper sex and relationship expert, one or 2 may have heard of Sue Johanson, but all confuse her for Dr Ruth(who literally made the school of sex therapy) and only remember Johanson selling sex toys on late night TV. No, most are listening to female versions of Andrew Tate.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 10:16 PM
1

Men need an app like this more imo.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 10:10 PM
1

It was not every single user, it was around 70,000, and all were signed up before 2024.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 10:08 PM
3

It's been breached, they used it in favor of the radical feminist narrative "data breaches of dating safety app show why the app is needed" https://www-bbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce87rer52k3o.amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17566775128151&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.com%2Fnews%2Farticles%2Fce87rer52k3o https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2025/07/tea-app-dating-data-breac…
/r/MensRights31/08/25 10:05 PM
3

"Learn to value yourself, which means: fight for your happiness." -Ayn Rand
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/25 11:46 PM
1

"The man who does not value himself, cannot value anything or anyone."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/25 11:43 PM
1

There was never a concept of alphas, that's a hypothesis and the scientist who hypothesized it already disproved it, it doesn't exist in nature
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/25 07:46 AM
1

It still has leftism
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/25 07:44 AM
1

Must be simping for Valerie Solanas
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/25 07:43 AM
4

It's about equal, except the left supports a group which includes a sub group of people who openly support genocide against the male gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/25 03:14 AM
5

By your definition feminism isn’t needed, as women have more rights and privileges including all the ones men have, and some over men.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 12:46 AM
2

They don't talk about how it might make cis men feel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/25 10:24 PM
3

There is no system set up to reward men of any kind, the idea that there is, is what makes nearly every feminist a radical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 07:19 PM
1

The nature of this argument is political.
/r/MensRights07/07/25 09:50 PM
2

Getting 1000 women is not the difficult part, it's actually performing that physical feat. That's what im asking.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 01:46 AM
0

That's a very "toxicly" feminine statement from you. Entirely pathos and expression
/r/MensRights05/07/25 08:21 PM
3

Lily Philips and Bonnie Blue are pornstars. Regular women have repeatedly stated that is an unusual feat. I am asking you why you think mangione is capable of the feat, when any discussion of his sexual abilities has been entirely hypothetical.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 07:58 PM
-11

Why Luigi mangione? It would be a pornstar if anything. Edit: getting 1000 women to do it is the easy part, the actual physical feat is in question.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 07:47 PM
116

If you're single, man or woman, can it really be called, "swinging?"
/r/MensRights05/07/25 07:46 PM
19

Tell the immediate manager, and don't go there again.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 05:20 PM
2

No, that is still not usual, even below the poverty line. Especially unusual for teenagers. Most would rather sleep on a couch or floor in that situation. Strongly suggest you get a job and friends and move out ASAP, you are well below the poverty line in terms of living standards.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 05:16 PM
1

It's just a list bruh, it's not a dissertation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/25 05:12 PM
27

1st rule of the Modern Feminist playbook
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/25 05:10 PM
3

Sounds like you're really downplaying your trauma, and left it to fester as internalized misandry. Your mom is also creating a dependent relationship with your sister, it is not a sign of a healthy adult child to regularly sleep in the same bed as their parent. That's best case too, if it's not deeper abuse.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 04:40 PM
6

You are blaming a specific sex- despite the prevalence of females with the same deviancy. Considering this specific crime is something only men were considered capable of doing until the 80s (in the west, other countries still largely see it as impossible for a woman to do it), the data on the women is ever growing.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 08:15 PM
5

Those are all physical differences, you are blaming extremely rare psychological deviancy on sex.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 08:08 PM
9

The source of male bias is misandry, the sexist belief that women are superior to men. It is that simple. Conservatives and Radical feminists of the left have institutionalized misandry.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 07:59 PM
5

So you're just sexist, good to know.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 07:48 PM
2

Then they should be calling for affirmative action to get more men in education.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 04:48 PM
12

It's about gender, don't downplay the sexism, they're saying the same things the klan said about blacks and desegregation. The same things they used as excuses for lynchings. This is 100% sexism, the case that sparked this hasn't even been resolved in court yet.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 04:14 PM
0

Masculinity, as boiled down throughout history, can be described as everything that is forward in logos, practicality, the physical, and subtlety in emotion. Femininity is everything forward in ethos, pathos, expression, communication, and has no requirement of logos. These definitions provide ample space to explain the differences in men throughout history, and in women throughout history. Toxic femininity/masculinity, if it exists, should never be encouraged. It may include poor logic in the m…
/r/MensRights04/07/25 04:05 PM
7

I don't know you.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 06:41 AM
3

Ie: historical oppression of men and systemic power of women https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/sfJzjGBOEy But women were slaves according to feminists bs. Ie: historical oppression of men https://www.reddit.com/r/menandsociety/s/X9eyInYWsz
/r/MensRights04/07/25 06:10 AM
16

Yes
/r/MensRights04/07/25 04:48 AM
35

Where is the lack of empathy? No, I have not seen what you're describing, except from feminist trolls.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 04:45 AM
2

Conservatives don't hate Trans women.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 01:24 AM
4

Firstly, i don't support trump, I voted for jorgenson and encouraged people to. Secondly, why do you think he's a fascist? He has actually done very little that is historically fascist. On the other hand, What went down between kamala and Biden was deeply reminiscent of what happened between Hitler and Hindenburg.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 01:21 AM
14

Systemic oppression against men keeps them apart. You live in a world where society has deemed groups of men a threat, whether it's simple fraternization, or unionization. Where male groups cannot exist publicly without suspicion of of sexism, while female groups can openly discriminate. You live in a world where male oppression, both modern and historical, individual and systemic, are denied or ignored. We are not biologically predisposed to this, we are biologically predisposed to logos, and h…
/r/MensRights04/07/25 12:36 AM
2

Who said i was anti-war lmao. Idk where you read that, I didn't say your name in relation to that topic. There are different types of feminist, but the only thing we all agree on is the liberation of women, fighting for women’s rights and equality. Except the popular feminists, who are radicals, do not fight for equality, they encourage the idea that men as a population are benefactors of society and are oppressors of women who are perpetual victims. All of which is false, and backed only by eth…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 11:30 PM
37

It's discrimination, call it what it is, prejudice, fear mongering. Men are no more likely than women to abuse children, some statistics say they are more likely. Research focusing on the prevalence of gender differences among perpetrators demonstrates that mothers and females are generally more likely than fathers or males to commit CPA (Behl et al., 2003; Cui et al., 2016, Chung & Su, 2009; Locke & Newcomb, 2004; Park, 2020, Mulder et al., 2018). A literature meta-analysis by Behl and colleagu…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 08:47 PM
2

Women couldn’t even vote while men could a few decades ago With restrictions and depending on state standards, some allowed women to vote. We couldn’t own our own bank accounts, sign contracs if we were married becouse we didn’t have our own legal identity. That is false, it was because of property law tied to marriage, not because of gender, and men were similarly restricted. Still in many countries women have less rights than literal animals. Afganistan for example. Women can’t talk outside, g…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 07:52 PM
3

I'll also point out that nothing in that suggested policy is discriminatory against the opposite sex, whereas suggestion of male curfew is. The very fact that people suggest curfews for men, even as a thought experiment, shows a prejudice.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:26 PM
3

No politicians took to the podiums over testicular rights. It went beyond, "thought experiment."
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:19 PM
5

That is an opinion on your part, the fact a member of the house of lords suggested it, shows it is a call. Frankly, even if it were just a thought experiment, it still supports the discrimination argument.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:16 PM
11

https://www.sss.gov/faq/ Failure to register with Selective Service is a violation of the Military Selective Service Act. Conviction for such a violation may result in imprisonment for up to five years and/or a fine of not more than $250,000. So, technically, you can register to vote, but not signing up for Selective Service can end with a loss of suffrage, because it's a felony. So, yea, you really can't vote without registering for Selective Service, even though the registration processes are …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/25 05:12 PM
7

The point they make is that men should be discriminated against for women's safety, even though statistics say men are the primary victims of violent crimes.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:04 PM
7

You realize your only argument here, and in your last comment, is fallacious right?
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:59 PM
6

There's no other real take one can make from that. In the idea of sacrificing for women's safety, there are calls for male discrimination.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:51 PM
10

So you believe being an adult means sacrifice? That is evil, there is nothing wrong with selfishness, man should live for man's own happiness, decide for her or himself what is best, not sacrificing all day thinking about others. Have some self-esteem, there is nothing wrong with selfishness.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:48 PM
10

Yes, fortunately many called Everard crazy. But it is hardly the only call. Show supporting it. https://www-bbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bbc.com/news/articles/cnvdgl37qz3o.amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17515608631256&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.com%2Fnews%2Farticles%2Fcnvdgl37qz3o More Political calls in it's favor. https://www.smh.com.au/national/a-curfew-for-men-what-a-great-idea-20180709-p4zqev.h…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:46 PM
16

regular people: yeah i don't like to make strangers uncomfortable You have missed the point of this post entirely, which was to point out calls of discrimination. Curfew example: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/mar/13/men-curfew-sarah-everard-women-adapt-violence Calls for legal discrimination by a member of the UK's house of lords, under the guise of this topic. Hardly the only example either.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:33 PM
15

It all stems from this.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:30 PM
13

No, it is something that altruists might ask, and is clearly taking valuable time from your life. Have some self-esteem, selfishness is a virtue.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:25 PM
27

And, If it means workplace discrimination, that is not nothing. If it means segregation, that is not nothing. If it means government enforced male curfews, that is not nothing. There have been calls for all that, some are in effect, like hiring practices. It is not nothing, it is prejudice.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:21 PM
38

If it costs nothing and is logical, no. If it means taking a different route home because some woman started taking yours, that is not nothing. If it means changing your dogwalking schedule because society insists we be altruistic to women, that is not nothing. It is evil, it shows your lack of self-esteem, altruism is evil, be a little selfish.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:17 PM
2

Because the feminine (male or female) are predisposed to prefer arguments of ethos, and ethos in general over logos. ManvBear is sexist like calling a certain race primates, but to them it's only an emotional argument that demonstrates their sense of safety. Arguments against their ethos are seen as hostile, not anything else. They don't care about logos, which the masculine (female or male) are predisposed to prefer.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 03:42 PM
10

You have to sign up for selective service in the US, For example,before you are allowed to register to vote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/25 03:13 PM
1

It's mostly couples raising kids.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:17 AM
12

I think Indian feminist skipped all the other types and went straight for popular radical feminism. I don't think most modern feminists in the west know who Karen DeCrow was, she was pretty equalist, and really THE major feminist of the late 1900s. Certainly not them. But it seems to me that eastern feminism is basing in radical feminism, extreme radical feminism at that.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:14 AM
12

So what, of my statements, do you believe to be delusions? Because our history books definitely favor feminism, teaching that people like Elizabeth Cady Staunton were heroes, she wrote the declaration of sentiments; she also advocated for lesser Punishments against women who committed infanticide, not abortion, but actual infanticide. As former feminist Janice Fiamengo best describes with primary sources: https://youtu.be/FBhRxHn8LeQ?si=0hnocSK2YHfU6unx Additionally, you will never hear about ma…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:47 AM
5

You believe an op-ed promoting anecdotal evidence with a sexist ethos argument against men, with quotes from a single doctor known for bias, rather than believe several other doctors from respectable sources? Didn't you say you work in education?
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:46 AM
12

They are specifically written to hide the oppression of men and highlight the oppression of women while denying any historical rights or systemic powers they had, and show feminism solely in a favorable light. Did they teach you about Elizabeth Cady Staunton where you went to school? Being THE major American feminist, she's shown to be a hero through out school years. Edit: you gonna ignore the discussion now, after calling us all delusional?
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:23 AM
13

Oh yea? Go on, what are the delusions? You know school history books are mostly written through a feminist lens and revisionism, right?
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:12 AM
18

Mens rights are set backwards as a direct result of feminist institutions controlling historical and victim narratives, I bet you believe men were historical oppressors of women and benefactors of society as far back as history goes. It is the denial of historical male oppression, caused by the institution of radical feminism, that has stalled men's rights for over 100 years. Even in this sub, I had a post about a common instance of systemic male oppression in early medieval Europe, it was block…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 03:58 AM
30

You wouldn't know if you didn't see it, they are better at hiding, and have the societal privilege of being seen as less threatening.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 03:45 AM
32

That has nothing to do with my argument. The logic of this discrimination, itself, is the problem. Discriminating against a specific population in it's entirety, based on a percentage of a percentage is the same thing racists do. You, yourself, just said said you used nothing but emotional anecdotes, questionable statistics at best. However, In the case of this post, the resolution suggested would be acceptable if it were gender inclusive. Allowing students and parents to opt out of being taught…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 03:22 AM
58

Statistically women are more likely to abuse children, particularly small children, perhaps they should have parental privilege taken by policy; because that's exactly the logic they are using here to support systemic discrimination against men as a population.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 02:35 AM
18

That doesn't make you an expert on this subject, you are no more worthy of an AMA about this than anybody else here, and your history has shown a medium misandric bias.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 02:23 AM
78

When people ask why there's so many posts about female pedophiles allowed here, this is why.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 01:54 AM
6

I'm surprised that kid wasn't charged with rape, knowing Indian history of such cases.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 05:48 PM
8

Cause they are still traditionalists, but we have to take wins where they come.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 05:43 PM
7

The bigger problem is that they think it's all men do, that same hormone predisposes us to everything physical, including aestheticism as a philosophy and art, that's why I say anything forward in the physical is masculine, testosterone may be a biological component that predisposed men all throughout history to the physical. That's not to say women cannot take on such traits, but that men are predisposed to be attracted to anything that falls under the physical. People who complain about the ma…
/r/MensRights02/07/25 05:39 PM
25

Harassment is a crime, it is not an indication of privilege, and many men are harassed openly, and cannot speak about it without a feminist making it about hating men, or making it about women. Men cannot even vote without requirements specific to men, women can vote just for reaching adulthood. Men are the majority victims of all but one violent crime, and aren't allowed to discuss it as a systematic issue without feminists making it about hating men. Men do not have reproductive rights, or the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 05:27 PM
13

Why should there even be a percentage, women are majority voters, they participate in politics more than males, there's nothing stopping them from taking seats except themselves.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 01:50 PM
2

must engage in apologetics and polemics
/r/MensRights02/07/25 05:42 AM
20

Because they claim to be egalitarian, yet fight explicitly against men's issues. They do not fight for men's issues, they spend much time fighting to keep men's issues going. Why should we fight for women, particularly with feminists, when they keep us down.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 04:49 AM
27

If you believe in their theory of patriarchy, you are not a dictionary definition of a feminist, you're a radical feminist. That's literally the definition, and why modern feminism is problematic. Men are not bourgeoisie oppressors, we have always been oppressed, and have been less privileged than women for 100 years this decade.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 04:20 AM
23

It is true. Everyone has that right, that's why those things are crimes. Men are more discriminated against in hiring practices in the majority of fields, certainly in fields involving education amd health. Even in labor heavy fields female candidates are preferred over male candidates, there's just not many female candidates. No feminist is fighting for violent crime against men to end, and we're the majority victims of violent crimes, but when we speak it's always made about women, or about ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 04:11 AM
9

Feminism doesn't even handle women, it's mostly egalitarian groups, modern feminism is not egalitarian, if they were they'd admit historical oppression of men and the historical systemic power (women held), we just want them to leave men to men and to stop attacking men, and claiming that men are a privilege bourgeoisie class when we're the less privileged gender and don't benefit from the system at all. Patriarchy does not exist and has never existed under their definitions. Every MRA is a dict…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 03:56 AM
2

Why not?
/r/MensRights01/07/25 04:48 PM
3

Whatever you want to do, shave or don't.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 01:55 PM
2

They proved it from the start advocating for legal privileges over men.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 03:47 AM
1

That's not the definition of fascism, but i would say thay many feminists are fascist, yes.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 03:41 AM
1

These were more cultural than legal. There really were not many civilizations that barred either from managing the household finances. Athens might have banned women, but I am not familiar with Athenian legal codes.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 02:23 AM
0

That is an answer, you just aren't accepting that I gave you something more than a yes or no. But it is the answer to your question, and you are simply refusing to accept it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/25 01:21 AM
-1

The answer i gave you is the answer. You're the one refusing to accept it and refusing to continue debate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/25 01:13 AM
-2

It answers your question, you're just refusing to accept the answer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/25 12:58 AM
0

I believe that it's an intrinsic characteristic of femininity and women have a tendency to be more feminine than masculine. I do not believe that it's a bad or explicitly inferior thing. It is not correct to say that he believed them inferior, he believed they were bourgeoisie, literally called them so, because they had more privileges than men, and over men, just not the same legal privileges.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 11:59 PM
1

He's right for the most part. I've rarely met a woman who does not decide moral stances solely on ethos. Saying that truth is only as misogynist as women Saying men are emotionally stunted is misandry. The entire man v bear debate, for example, entirely ethos, little logic, and they deny the sexist nature of the whole hypothetical. As for opposing suffrage, these sources we've provided contradict one another. Nevertheless, feminist revisionism on the early MRM is still revisionism. They were not…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 11:33 PM
8

(1) So long as women possess sex privileges as against men, or so long as they are not prepared to accept the whole duties and responsibilities of life in an equal degree with men; (2) That it is undesirable they should be given the franchise at all so long as the acquirement of the vote by women would possibly mean the political subjection of man, owing to the excess of the female population. I contend that so long as women have special privileges at criminal law, special favouritism at civil l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 10:46 PM
1

It's an accurate word for how they feel about men.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 06:34 PM
-2

Wasn't it weed? Men are so oppressed they only hope for release via recreational drug. Legitimately asking, though, what was Sander's platform? I've agreed with many of his speeches, but I don't know his actual platform, except he was libertarian at some point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 05:47 PM
0

Terfs are not the issue with feminism. It's the theory of patriarchy. It is what states, "men are oppressors," nearly every feminist is a radical feminist today, the belief in that theory is the definition of radical feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 05:43 PM
5

Feminists set up the institutions that make it difficult for men to defend and gain rights. Their theory of patriarchy alone is an institution that caused people to feel men are so privileged we deserve, or so dangerous we should be arrested even as victims. Feminist revisionism saying women had no powers and men were a privileged population that oppressed women, is seen as common knowledge, despite historical proof of systemic oppression against males, all from primary and secondary sources in …
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:32 PM
1

Rarely face systemic racism (though even that depends on the situation), white people face open hate frequently and especially in media.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:26 PM
3

Because the feminist theory of patriarchy is an institution, and it says men are bourgeois to women. Being bourgeois, we cannot be harmed, and if we are- we deserve it. To them It is a proletariat destroying the bourgeoisie, not a human group facing discrimination.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:24 PM
2

What do you mean "by law?"
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:16 PM
5

"Hey, the system is not letting you live your best self and be happy, let me help lift you up and we can make a better world for ourselves and others!" Even the times it is that, it comes with blaming men, and denying historical systemic oppression, and historical systemic powers women had.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 05:12 PM
2

It's more about negative vs positive interaction ratios than it is transaction based. The Gottmans proved that.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 04:13 PM
3

"The locker room"
/r/MensRights30/06/25 04:06 PM
20

Patriarchy is a red herring, and modern feminists are mostly radicals (the definition of radical feminists=feminists who believe in their theory of patriarchy) Literally everything that says anything good about men, or has done anything bad at all is patriarchy to them. It's a theory that promotes the idea that men are bourgeois and the source of evil.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 04:04 PM
3

For example: There are multiple verses in the bible stating that wives manage the household, including its businesses.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 04:00 PM
6

Nearly all of them were like that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 03:23 PM
15

It wasn't reactionary at all, they were all more progressive than feminists, and bax, for example, was a full blown Marxist. They were egalitarian, and are falsely vilified with no historical information but feminist revisionism. You're defending feminists who threw everyone else, even other women, under the bus when they were getting rights either way. Feminism was not the main driver for women's rights. Many were terrorists. Men's Rights was older than feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 02:25 PM
3

It's pretty much tabled (to my knowledge) in the subcommittee on health, which means they're just ignoring it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 06:55 AM
39

Men's Rights is not just un-taught, it is falsely vilified. Largely called "anti suffrage" by feminist revisionism. But it was mostly an egalitarian movement, moreso than feminism at times. 1800s MRA E Belfort Bax, for example, openly criticized feminists for ignoring and undermining the issues of men and other groups and called for equal rights between the sexes. October 1887, Bax's closing statement to an accusation of misogyny from a reader of his articles known as, "Mrs. Besant" In stating t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 06:37 AM
2

Thanks
/r/MensRights30/06/25 02:46 AM
2

Can you re-cite the male dv victim arrest please, the site you gave is about end of life care.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 02:21 AM
-1

You are participating in historical revisionism, yes. You gave a misleading message regarding ties between the draft and suffrage, without enough historical context.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 08:56 PM
-1

Who wrote this for you?
/r/MensRights29/06/25 08:43 PM
16

At least her mom did her job.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 08:42 PM
-1

You just explained how people tied it to military service because they successfully argued the points I’m talking about. I further clarified your highly misleading message that was reminiscent of feminist revisionism, yes. No, citizenship is not tied to the draft, you are still a citizen if you commit a crime. Voting is tied to citizenship, but being a citizen is not the only requirement to vote. The problem with statements along your lines is that they're historically misleading. In a way, real…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 08:33 PM
1

You just explained how people tied it to military service because they successfully argued the points I’m talking about. I further explained your highly misleading message, yes.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 08:22 PM
20

The patriarchy is feminism's red herring. And an excuse to be sexist against men. You and the vast majority of feminists are radical feminists, that being ones who believe in the feminist theory of patriarchy. The fact that you believe your own gender to be bourgeoisie oppressors is exactly why modern feminism is unforgivably evil. That is what feminists mean by "patriarchy" a system wherein men are bourgeois benefactors who suppress a female proletariat, that is what feminists mean by, "patriar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 07:48 PM
-1

So you're rejecting that it is misandry. You are insisting that it's all about racism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 06:50 PM
5

So you just don't believe it's sexism? Even though it's explicitly discrimination against an entire gender. It basically says, No single men No groups of men even if accompanied by a woman
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 06:41 PM
2

They'll ban anything that doesn't outwardly and fully support a radical feminist narrative, even a slight questioning of their theory of patriarchy. It is not misogyny that they censor, they happily victimize women.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 05:51 PM
8

It's literally about gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 05:38 PM
5

Do they have any funding from the government? That might make it reportable somewhere, unless France actually doesn't have anti discrimination law.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 05:37 PM
6

Report it to reddit so that there's data
/r/MensRights29/06/25 05:25 PM
0

is it moral to give a child the right vote? Yes
/r/MensRights29/06/25 04:00 PM
4

A stay at home wife, traditionally, is to control household funds, including payment to maids.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 03:33 PM
-6

This argument is just as bad as all feminist revisionism. Neither your citizenship, nor your right to vote came from selective service. In the US it was only tied to the right to vote as an argument to give people under 21 universal suffrage. The right to vote was never tied to military service. All historical revisionism is evil.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 01:46 PM
4

Votes, generally for men. Also, voting had nothing to do with the modern romantic issues of people. Men were oppressed even before suffrage, and after suffrage, in the US for example, men under 21 still did not have the right to vote. It was not tied to selective service until the 1970s. Before the Jackson presidency you had to own property in most cases for the right to vote, and be over a certain age depending upon the state. The idea of universal suffrage was only talked about until then. Tha…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 01:43 PM
1

Votes, generally for men.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 01:35 PM
0

They'll be fine, they are barbarians who don't want freedom anyway, otherwise Iran would have had another violent revolution decades ago.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 08:31 PM
11

No, you are bourgeois under the feminist theory of patriarchy which is institutionalized.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 06:58 PM
59

Menslib is not known for discussion.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 02:52 PM
2

Follow workplace policy like one is supposed to do in the first place.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 01:16 PM
7

Hug
/r/MensRights28/06/25 03:42 AM
1

Feminists never make it about romance, their whole thing is literally to tell men, "make more friends." The lonliness epidemic is solely about romantic lonliness even among women. If it were just your population having trouble with friends it wouldn't even be called an epidemic. Romantic lonliness is the only lonliness that is rampant accross multiple populations.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 01:57 AM
2

It's tabled.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 01:34 AM
1

The lonliness epidemic is made up mostly of young, unmarried victims, not married couples. That's why all speech about the lonliness epidemic is one dating advice or another.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 01:11 AM
1

It's not about getting laid. I said it's a romantic lonliness epidemic, and that is exactly what the majority complain about in regards to lonliness.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 12:58 AM
33

saving for posterity
/r/MensRights27/06/25 06:54 PM
0

"Men’s competition tends to be direct, hierarchical, often physical or status-based (sports, war, business). • Women’s competition tends to be indirect, relational, or social (reputation, beauty, social access)" incorrect, men are only competitive when it is logical to do so, again as in sports, that is why male competition seems so physical. "Women's competitiveness being social is exactly what makes it hierarchical, and it comes from femininity's emotion forwardness." Again, this is not truly …
/r/MensRights27/06/25 05:27 PM
2

Strongly suggest you research the things chatgpt gives before posting. How do you believe this post sounds in tone and content?
/r/MensRights27/06/25 04:53 PM
6

Those are not things women are wired for. Men are not naturally competitive, women are more often competitive. Men only compete as a logical response to circumstances and rules (as in sports), women compete as a result of emotion. Nurturing is not the opposite of nihilism, nor are men naturally nihilistic, men are largely nurturing as a physical and logical response. Femininity often leads to fleeting connections and bonds,, and casual detachment/conquests. Masculinity is everything forward in l…
/r/MensRights27/06/25 04:49 PM
1

Wow, i take it back, you should not be teaching anyone. Firstly, that was not an error, those were not two separate clauses. Secondly, shame on you for stifling artistic difference. Don't be a grammar Nazi.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 04:39 PM
3

A radical feminist journalist who is very popular and controversial.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 04:26 PM
3

Gloria Steinem self reported working with the CIA; and later denied it. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP88-01315R000300380009-2.pdf#:\~:text=Steinem%20as%20acknowledging%20that%20she%20had%20worked,and%20open%20to%20an%20exchange%20of%20ideas. The biggest issues with her are the fact that she used sensationalist journalism to cause systemic harm to men and women, according to Christina Hoff Sommers, she had a major role in fabricating the anorexia epidemic, lying about statistics, an…
/r/MensRights27/06/25 04:24 PM
0

it happens though.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 04:15 PM
1

Ayn Rand said it decades ago and no one listened, just called her a capitalist nut job. https://youtu.be/nZdGNlgURBE?si=jIkUlk_umbd1f5bf https://youtube.com/shorts/IHQfI5vPDwU?si=6YeMV5yKnBWbXx6G https://youtu.be/wMNUdDC4tEc?si=vUhrk-YSLKC5xsbc
/r/MensRights27/06/25 03:33 PM
1

Ayn Rand said decades ago and no one listened, just called her a capitalist nut job.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 03:27 PM
1

Go teach him then, otherwise don't knock on him for utilizing ai to promote men's rights.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 03:23 PM
1

The male lonliness epidemic is specifically a romantic lonliness epidemic if you refuse to make small talk you will not make friends, all friends are acquaintances first. I think between feminist destruction of male exclusive places and the complete corruption of masculinity due to feminist revisionism, men have largely forgotten things like this. https://youtu.be/Uo-jCgWOQXo?si=wIyQ1NWFAfV02V0g
/r/MensRights27/06/25 03:17 PM
3

He's severely dyslexic, there is little capacity for improving, go look at his older posts that all got removed because it was completely disorganized word salad.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 03:12 PM
3

Good, we should share them on social media platforms more often.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 02:48 PM
31

According to those pictures, a little boy shoulder hugging a girl implies sexual abuse
/r/MensRights27/06/25 02:44 PM
7

It is possible, it is not zero-sum, but the feminist theory of patriarchy must be de-institutionalized. The vast majority of feminists today are radical feminists because they all believe in their theory of patriarchy and that institution basically gives people free reign to oppress men because it insists we are bourgeois.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 02:39 PM
6

Trojan Horse, okay in some ways, but mostly a Trojan Horse whom I believe is too afraid to criticize feminism for it's theory of patriarchy which is an institution that is a source of anti male oppression.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 02:36 PM
3

He needs ai, it's that bad and due to disability for him.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 02:34 PM
1

4/10 vs 1/5 is not a disparity worth talking about. It's only a difference of 1. 2/5 vs 1/5. It's a romantic lonliness epidemic, it has always been a romantic lonliness epidemic, and it is only propaganda to hurt men when people insist it's a lack of philia-because that's false. Romantic lonliness is an important issue, and you are dismissing it via red herring arguments.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 02:26 PM
1

As I said, nearly every feminist today is a radical feminist because nearly all of them believe in the feminist theory of patriarchy, it's a source of the man hate
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 02:23 PM
1

Losing safe spaces can certainly effect the time you spend with friends, but it doesn't remove the friends, not in male/male friendships. But the lonliness epidemic is a romantic lonliness epidemic, not a lack of philia.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 06:11 AM
1

How is that a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights27/06/25 04:55 AM
-14

To be a feminist one only need to support equality of rights for women. Which the majority of the planet does.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 04:51 AM
3

Nearly everyone is a dictionary definition feminist, but most people who call themselves feminist today are modern feminists who are Nearly all radicals, belief in the feminist theory of patriarchy is the only requirement for radical feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 04:30 AM
1

Men have very close friends, often closer than female/female friendships, but generally fewer. The lonliness epidemic has always been about romantic lonliness, and it is now accross genders, with governments like NY State declaring it officially.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 04:26 AM
3

"Conception cannot be deemed consent, when abortion is legal." Why? That doesn't logically follow at all. Someone else being able to undo something you did doesn't erase that fact that you still consented to do it? That's like saying I can't consent to a relationship if the other person is allowed to break up. Or I can't consent to plant a tree if someone else can dig it up? That's just dumb and does not follow. But let's pretend like it did follow. Does that mean conception is consent as long a…
/r/MensRights26/06/25 09:26 PM
0

You obviously know nothing of Iranian history. No western power has ever installed a government in Iran. The current regime is the only Bonified dictatorship ever in Iran and they overthrew a monarchy that had overthrown another older monarchy on their own.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 07:33 PM
2

Conception cannot be deemed consent, when abortion is legal. Women have the unilateral decision to terminate or birth, unless there are emergency circumstances where a doctor might abort under implied consent. It is unjust for one person to have such power over another that their decision can legally force another individual into 21 years of financial stress or ruin, or even jailtime.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 06:57 PM
1

Everyone has inherent value. The issue is people saying humans don't. Other people not caring about you does not change your own inherent value. "Man—every man—is an end in himself, not a means to the ends of others; he must live for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself; he must work for his rational self-interest, with the achievement of his own happiness as the highest moral purpose of his life."
/r/MensRights26/06/25 06:22 PM
-5

No, Iran was never colonized in the modern sense. The reality is that Iran needs to be colonized, it is a fascist regime that runs multiple insurgent and terrorists groups, they would 100% launch a nuke if they had one. Whether it be direct ownership or a restoration of the former Pahlavi Dynasty, Iran needs to end.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 06:16 PM
11

The male lonliness epidemic is specifically a romantic lonliness epidemic. Venting is not the problem, it's that there's so many Venting that they act like their own experts and instead of sharing expertise by actual doctors of relationships like Dr Ruth Westheimer and the Gottmans, they share PUA stuff, and mgtow/pill people statistics to discourage relationships and actually make the lonliness epidemic worse.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 06:11 PM
38

While men make up to 70% of Ontario's homeless population with not even a proper gender specific shelter, only 1-3 small homes that individuals set up from their own finances. That being said, this is not sexist, obstetric and pediatric specialized hospitals are set up for numerous reasons.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 05:55 PM
-14

Iran needs to surrender. They're an oppressive regime that hates male freedom and lives, and oppresses women under the misandric guise of protecting them against those men they hate. They'd absolutely nuke a western country if they had a nuke and, frankly, they aught to be colonized for the world's best interest.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 05:49 PM
1

That's the problem, she should be blamed for painting with a broad brush. That's exactly what she did. Here you are accusing that commenter of the same thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 05:46 PM
1

There might be something to the modern view of dating, alot of people don't want to date because they think dating itself is a goal and don't find that very valuable. I dislike mgtow because of the questionable reason behind checking out of society. Statistics should mean nothing regarding something like dating, it's too variable. But Ayn Rand's view comes to mind, humans only act in ways that benefit them as individuals, if an individual chooses not to date because of some statistic that is hig…
/r/MensRights26/06/25 05:38 PM
1

The first 2 are one thing, like there used to be nearly required timeliness for grieving, and they focus on the individual case. But it just devolves into misandrist man hate as usual.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 05:21 PM
1

That's not new
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 04:37 PM
8

Did you watch King of the Hill? It belongs in neutral.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 03:58 PM
3

if a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term which is what happens, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision which no male outside the middle east can, he should not be liable for 21 years of support. Or, put another way, autonomous women making independent decisions about their lives should not expect men to finance their choice.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 03:56 PM
3

Yes, like definition misandry, not just sexism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 03:53 PM
13

From the same streaming service that continues to platform a softcore child porn movie.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 03:49 PM
20

r/science r/psychology
/r/MensRights26/06/25 03:47 PM
1

r/science r/psychology
/r/MensRights26/06/25 03:46 PM
1

That is workplace violence and sexual harassment, yes, follow workplace policy. Search for a new job, you are normalizing the idea of your toxic workplace.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 03:39 PM
1

A world where little boys pay child support to their own rapists cannot be called a patriarchy. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/ https://www-psychologytoday-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support/amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17509515180980&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.co…
/r/MensRights26/06/25 03:35 PM
1

I mean it's really meant more of an insult and character attack That's what I said
/r/MensRights26/06/25 03:10 PM
-1

No, incel means involuntary celibate, and is used in modern slang as an ad hominem argument or insult, particularly against people promoting nihilistic or PUA pseudoscience, that's all it is.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 08:04 AM
1

Misandry is older than misogyny.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 02:01 AM
1

They are talking about its use as an ad hominem argument against people who are not, "pick me."
/r/MensRights26/06/25 02:00 AM
2

Biased statistics that tend to ignore historical facts, and tend to manipulate rhetoric in order to oppress the male population. Modern misandry is a pandemic that is enforced by feminist revisionism, and has lead to further death and enslavement men.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:58 AM
2

Define patriarchy
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 01:47 AM
6

You're just going to ignore the argument?
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:43 AM
5

"Justice therefore dictates that if a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liable for 21 years of support. Or, put another way, autonomous women making independent decisions about their lives should not expect men to finance their choice." -Karen DeCrow, feminist. This was written in a letter to the editor of the New York Times in 1982.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:35 AM
2

No, it's just a job, unless they're enslaved, then it's an unpaid job.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:32 AM
5

Since banks allowed personal bank accounts to regular citizens. It's literally feminist revisionism that women couldn't. Only married women needed a husband's signature, and it was not because she was a woman, but because the same laws that entitled her to her husband's property also entitled him to hers.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:26 AM
0

It is true that men are, and have always been, systemically oppressed. Men have been denied that fact, only to be called oppressors by people engaging in historical revisionism in order to oppress men further. The very idea of modern traditional masculinity is something completely made up by feminists, and began in the 50s, with the first usage of the term itself in the 80s. One cannot afford to be mindful of other groups when those other groups insist upon lies and gross manipulations of histor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 01:01 AM
1

I do not think either of you read anything but the tabloids the way you're both talking about it.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 12:40 AM
1

Yall sound perfect for each other, why leave at all?
/r/MensRights19/06/25 10:49 PM
1

It's literally the feminist theory of patriarchy
/r/MensRights19/06/25 05:03 PM
-7

I think you listen to too many pick up artists and pill people, and are being hyperbolic.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 01:48 AM
1

It is the same difference at the end of the day. And they do research early relationships and entering relationships Ie: https://youtu.be/YyrcsO55UDo?si=93smFWGd0BSDmFw1
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/25 08:51 AM
1

They're two married psychologists who are world-renowned for their work on relationship stability and divorce prediction. Not to mention people like Dr Ruth Westheimer, Dr Sue Johnson, and Sue Johanson.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/25 07:31 AM
2

Bring what up?
/r/MensRights16/06/25 04:34 AM
2

I do uplift men, nothing I've said is hateful to women.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 04:33 AM
2

Men generally have deeper friendships than women, to a point where many people, like CS Lewis, didn't really think women could even feel platonic love, the deep kind they called philia. So while it is true that men have less friends, we generally have more valuable and less toxic friends. Female on female friendships are quite easily forgotten or put aside for petty bs. While men in philia can not speak for months, then meet up can continue the exact conversation they ended. So the friendship pa…
/r/MensRights16/06/25 04:30 AM
1

It's not anybody's fault nobody knows who the Gottmans are. Or That there are actual doctors and other experts of sex and relationships, pick-up-artists just market better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/25 07:58 PM
2

Firstly, this is 18 days old. Get a life. Secondly, Those biblical passages are dependent upon the version of the Bible, as such it is shakey evidence heavily dependent on personal interpretation. There are feminists who interpret the attempted rape of Joseph as female empowerment, and defend the false allegation of Zuleikha, for example. Thirdly, Coverture was not ownership or slavery, and it oppressed men as much as women, nor did it take all legal rights or social rights of women.
/r/MensRights15/06/25 03:54 PM
14

They could follow workplace policy and not sexually harrass a guy.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 04:01 AM
3

You are revealing your youth in saying that advocacy became popular in 2020.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 03:41 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/Egalitarianism/s/ZQPOou5Yho
/r/MensRights13/06/25 10:49 PM
96

Your goal is not to convince the feminist, but everyone else who watches.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 02:20 AM
40

Radical feminism became institutionalized.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 02:17 AM
2

"MOSTLY"
/r/MensRights09/06/25 06:20 AM
4

I do.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 04:23 AM
1

It is objectively true that women had power over, it was not zero-sum. Women were no more property of men, than other men were, and it is historical fact that women could indeed hold property, what feminists say in these regards are outright lies not just historical revisionism. Men and women built the system, it is historically false, and sexist, to place the fault on men. Here is but one of example of female privilege over men in history, a system wherein any woman could have her husband gangb…
/r/MensRights09/06/25 02:25 AM
1

I am saying it cannot be a patriarchy when women have been given, and have always had the kind of systemic power over males that they have and had. Males being in powerful positions does not change that. The idea of the patriarchy, the one from feminist theory, is that women have been nothing but oppressed by the male. It comes out of denials of history, revisionism of history, the denial of male oppression, and female privilege, and it is used solely to victimize women and demonize males.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 02:10 AM
1

No, that is part of them, the definition of radical feminism is, a branch of feminism that advocates for a fundamental societal restructuring to eliminate male dominance and patriarchy. It views patriarchy as the primary source of women's oppression. It is correct to say that radical feminism is mainstream feminism.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 01:52 AM
1

Feminist advocacy oppressed men. Feminist advocate groups fought against policies that would improve boy's education needs. https://youtu.be/hj719mKBIB8?si=zhtSZ9BA5VbuPVwI As I showed you, we are fighting for men's rights, they NCFM is explicitly a MRM group, made by MRAs for men.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 04:56 PM
-5

Because November is busy. It would not get any attention at all. Pride month also pertains mostly to males. There's only 12 months. Month-Long Observances: June National Safety Month: A time to focus on workplace safety and health. Men's Health Month: Raises awareness about men's health issues and encourages preventative care. LGBTQ+ Pride Month: A month dedicated to celebrating LGBTQ+ history, culture, and achievements. African-American Music Appreciation Month: Honors the rich history and dive…
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:56 PM
10

What's sexist about that? It's true. Men are the lowest population in pro-life movements.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:31 PM
6

That defeatist attitude is why feminist lobbies will continue to make law around their false social narratives.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:23 PM
14

November is not any type of men's month in any place. The US specifically has a major national holiday in November with a month or more of celebration. Movember is just a group or hashtag that encourages male preventative medicine. June is- MEN'S HEALTH MONTH Ie: https://medicine.iu.edu/blogs/spirit-of-medicine/mens-health-month#:~:text=June%20is%20National%20Men's%20Health%20Month%2C%20a,do%20to%20take%20charge%20of%20their%20health. https://cms.illinois.gov/benefits/stateemployee/bewell/awaren…
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:21 PM
12

Voting red doesn't necessarily mean women would be treated worse. It was women who voted red that put abortion rights in state hands, men largely did not care. That's the only real argument that could be made on that line.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:17 PM
7

That's just feminist apologetics. Warren Farrell is a better choice.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:16 PM
5

You cannot make changes without voting, it takes no real time from your yourself.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:15 PM
8

Go to the feminist subs and say the same about women's struggles.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 02:47 PM
2

It's fine, most gays are men. The actual problem: It's not men's MENTAL health Month. It's, MEN'S HEALTH MONTH Ie: https://medicine.iu.edu/blogs/spirit-of-medicine/mens-health-month#:~:text=June%20is%20National%20Men's%20Health%20Month%2C%20a,do%20to%20take%20charge%20of%20their%20health. https://cms.illinois.gov/benefits/stateemployee/bewell/awarenessmatters/awareness-menshealth-june2021.html#:~:text=The%20month%20is%20dedicated%20to%20enriching%20men's,spectrum%20of%20national%20screening%20an…
/r/MensRights08/06/25 02:45 PM
2

Admit that feminism has a problem. There are multiple feminist organizations that literally fought against things that help men. Equity feminist Christina Hoff Sommers describes some examples in her books. Stop hating on MRAs, and oppressing men.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 02:39 PM
1

You cherry pick your interactions with less than a handful of people who aren't even MRAs. At least MRAs criticize radical feminist theory and accept non radical feminism, 99% are dictionary definition feminists. The fact that a draft is in most constitutions means that men do not even have the basic right to live.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 02:35 PM
2

For example, https://ncfm.org/
/r/MensRights08/06/25 02:23 PM
22

I'm not criticizing.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 02:14 PM
-14

No
/r/MensRights08/06/25 10:23 AM
161

You think unchallenged male bashing started at the Barbie movie?
/r/MensRights08/06/25 09:46 AM
8

I do not like the terms "traditional" in this sense, they are misnomers that imply, and have been used in recent history, to falsely victimize women and falsely demonize men throughout history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/25 09:32 AM
1

You clearly don't know what radical feminism is so please don't throw it around willy nilly Radical feminism is the feminism that created their theory of patriarchy which oppresses males, and is now institutionalized, it is the most common form of feminism, and belief in it is the only thing required to be called a radical feminist. Men disproportionately commit crimes which is a problem and probably why they are focused on more, and yes women do receive more lenient sentences, this is called ch…
/r/MensRights08/06/25 09:03 AM
9

Meh, it's not all their fault, radical feminism is just institutionalized.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 05:21 AM
15

https://www.reddit.com/r/Egalitarianism/s/ncHZp3rQ7H
/r/MensRights08/06/25 04:34 AM
2

Lawyer up Pull every bit of money from any shared accounts,.make sure you take her name off insurance or any retirement, and divorce.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 04:29 AM
1

Can you name this systematic oppression? And I'm not making it into the oppression Olympics I'm using facts I get the idea that the "facts" you are using are radical feminist claims. Women are really not disadvantaged due to sex, not as a result of sexism anyway. There is oppression of women, but they are not disadvantaged due to sex, and it doesn't mean men are not oppressed, we are on a men's rights sub to speak about men's rights and issues, you started this conversation with "whataboutism" M…
/r/MensRights08/06/25 04:11 AM
2

See the other comment, you might be wrong. Also, it's not an oppression Olympics.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:28 AM
1

Not really, men don't even have a right to life, nor do men have privileges over women. Women are not disadvantaged due to sex, even the current major complaint of the wage gap is in favor of women over men in many cases. Ie: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/03/04/google-asked-about-pay-equity-learned-it-was-mostly-underpaying-men/ Why were you so hostile at the slightest suggestion that women are not disadvantaged due to sex?
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:26 AM
3

Don't be obtuse.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:15 AM
14

It's not men's MENTAL health Month. It's, MEN'S HEALTH MONTH Ie: https://medicine.iu.edu/blogs/spirit-of-medicine/mens-health-month#:~:text=June%20is%20National%20Men's%20Health%20Month%2C%20a,do%20to%20take%20charge%20of%20their%20health. https://cms.illinois.gov/benefits/stateemployee/bewell/awarenessmatters/awareness-menshealth-june2021.html#:~:text=The%20month%20is%20dedicated%20to%20enriching%20men's,spectrum%20of%20national%20screening%20and%20educational%20campaigns. Adding "MENTAL" dimin…
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:04 AM
2

Lawyer up. Pull every bit of money from any shared accounts,.make sure you take her name off insurance or any retirement, if you want divorce. Why did you let her take your child?
/r/MensRights07/06/25 10:16 PM
32

That's what I've been saying. Why people gotta downplay men's health, then be like "wHy DoNt MeN gO tO tHe DoCtOr!"
/r/MensRights07/06/25 06:41 PM
5

Aight now, my post asking a question regarding the male condition gets booted, but this racist and sexist swill from some foreign passport bro talking about the US gets accepted. Really? My question was- What would you tell the man who holds the World? If you saw Atlas, the giant who holds the world on his shoulders, if you saw that he stood, blood running down his chest, his knees buckling, his arms trembling but still trying to hold the world aloft with the last of his strength, and the greate…
/r/MensRights07/06/25 05:26 PM
1

Something that pertains to the male condition implicitly. And doesn't bash women? Because that's what my post is, and that's what rule 1 covers. This post is the lowest of effort, clearly inflammatory, doesn't pertain to male issues at all, and still gets through.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 04:22 PM
-3

How is this allowed, literal women bashing? But my post gets removed for rule 1, when it clearly didn't break rule 1?! https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/8aOe0wQQpA
/r/MensRights07/06/25 09:38 AM
5

Once upon a time, and the occasional one today.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 07:08 AM
12

Radical feminists are generally just feminists who believe in the feminist theory of patriarchy. MGTOW and MRAs are completely separate groups with some overlap.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 06:24 AM
6

Did you report it?
/r/MensRights07/06/25 12:10 AM
2

Firstly, men as a population do not control the system, and women are at least 1/4-3/4 of the power group, depending upon region. Secondly, men being in the majority of people in power does not mean there is no systemic discrimination of men, or that other populations are not systemically privileged.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 08:31 PM
1

Because i recognize that women are privileged? Do you even know what "incel" means? Very "intellectual" of you utilizing logical fallacies, and improper grammar.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 08:26 PM
-1

That's not an MRA, OP's probably Redpill
/r/MensRights06/06/25 07:08 AM
1

Women are not disadvantaged due to their sex. Stop being misogynistic.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 04:27 AM
5

It's not anti-intellectualism on the part of men, it's systemic bias against and abandonment of males.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 04:24 AM
2

When you read something like, It's literally in the first 3 chapters of -the will to change- Hooks believed everything Dworkin did, she just acted nicer about it. She stated implicitly that any boy who wasn't feminized would become her abusive father. Her entire. The attitude proceeded throughout the book and her work. The very passages you quoted are examples of her misandry, she projects her feelings for her father amd exes upon all. Again, nothing but anecdotes to further hatred of a masculin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/25 02:05 AM
6

No, no, that is your skill issue. The difference is negligible. ChatGPT You said: What do you think of domestic violence against men ChatGPT said: Domestic violence against men is a serious and often under-recognized issue. While public awareness and services have historically focused more on female victims — who do experience domestic violence at higher reported rates — men can and do suffer abuse in intimate relationships as well. This abuse can be physical, emotional, psychological, sexual, o…
/r/MensRights05/06/25 10:01 PM
26

Chillout bruh, ai can be used for the MRM, this is just a skill issue. You're being insane.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 09:44 PM
3

It applies to the OC, directly. Why do you feel that fact promotes hatred of women? Get out of the gyno-centric worldview.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 09:39 PM
4

If you think that de Boivoir or Bell Hooks are in the business of creating an institution that activele oppresses the male gender idk what even to tell you man. Now that is losing the plot. Boivour can be problematic at times. Hooks encouraged active oppression of men, and was a Bonified misandrist, she believed any boy not brainwashed into her personal view of femininity would become her abusive father. I don't know much about butler, but ANYONE who promotes the feminist theory of patriarchy is…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 09:37 PM
5

English countries have this thing called "Common Law Marriage" so it doesn't matter if you don't register your marriage with the state. My answer is to actually date. Dating exists to make sure you know a person before entering into a committed relationship. Always date in public places like restaurants or bowling alleys, not parks, Netflix and chill is not a date, movie theaters are not good for early dates. Request separate checks if you want to go Dutch, do not split bills, either separate ch…
/r/MensRights05/06/25 06:34 PM
5

Androgyny is biological, it cannot be "liberation." The idea that men should be emotionless comes from a false idea of masculinity perpetrated by feminists, and which gained traction in the 50s. If liberation from that is what you wish, then liberation would mean properly defining masculinity as everything foreword in logos, practicality, the physical, and emotional subtlety. A large umbrella which encompasses masculinity throughout history.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 05:05 PM
11

That is not the case. There are multiple cases wherein a rapist woman got pregnant, and was still able to get child support from her victim.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 04:59 PM
8

Make content for it.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 04:56 PM
9

Learn how to date Is what should be said. Dating is not a good goal itself, we can compare it to gold panning, you're not doing because it's a goal, it is for the goal of marriage or a long-term relationship.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 04:55 PM
2

Academic feminists and intersectionalists are the ones who created the theory of patriarchy, and made it into a modern institution. They're active oppressors of the male gender. The theory's popularity makes it nearly impossible to Garner support for male rights, as it has institutionalized a dynamic where men are seen as a bourgeois class. Why did you choose those three feminists as examples? They literally all encouraged the feminist theory of patriarchy, as defined above.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 04:37 PM
0

I think that short time im talking is proof of concept.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 06:48 AM
2

Back in the ye olden days a a wife could have her husband gangbanged, by state sanction, to get a divorce. They were called bed, or impotance trials.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 06:05 AM
4

CS Lewis radio lecture on Philia https://youtu.be/Uo-jCgWOQXo?si=2oq2GwVvRCeALwVo As for other sources, there's just too many to provide, letters, speeches, books, etc. Jefferson's letters to his family members are often full of affection, for example, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/03-03-02-0518 Or Patrick Henry's fiery speech. It's nearly every primary and secondary source we have regarding personal correspondences.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 05:35 AM
7

To provide yes, with some nuance. But, for example, not the idea that males shouldn't cry, or be emotionally cold, not at all. We have primary and secondary sources showing the opposite, and sources even from the 50s of people talking about their concerns of changing men. CS Lewis, for example, discusses it a bit in a radio lecture related to his book-the four loves- the lecture about philia.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 05:25 AM
7

I'm saying those specific ideas are not historically accurate. They are a result of feminist historical revisionism that caught track in the 50s.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 05:20 AM
1

I believe it can, there was a short stint where feminists like Karen DeCrow were at the top of feminism in history. It's just a shame no feminist knows who she is, and feminists who kinda believe like her are waved off as conservative.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 05:17 AM
-1

Roles that never actually existed anyway.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 05:15 AM
3

Why do feminists insist that women were universally oppressed by the male population then? The system they call, "patriarchy," includes time periods wherein women could have the local government make their husbands have sex when the husband didn't want it, now he could do so as well, but we only ever hear about the female being oppressed by the male despite evidence implicitly stating that the wives were going to the priests to enforce sex schedules when their husbands said no. It includes a tim…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 05:13 AM
11

Thanksgiving is in November. At least pride month is largely male centered, and it's, Men's Health Month Not "Men's mental health Month," do not devalue it by falling for feminist word choice. Ie: https://medicine.iu.edu/blogs/spirit-of-medicine/mens-health-month#:~:text=June%20is%20National%20Men's%20Health%20Month%2C%20a,do%20to%20take%20charge%20of%20their%20health. https://cms.illinois.gov/benefits/stateemployee/bewell/awarenessmatters/awareness-menshealth-june2021.html#:~:text=The%20month%2…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 05:06 AM
11

Penis hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 05:03 AM
5

Few to no women's groups, usually run by feminists, do what you're saying. They often do the opposite.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 04:59 AM
6

Do what? OC said feminists fight against men's rights, you said, "they literally do," then called him a, "dumbass."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 04:56 AM
8

What is your problem, perhaps you are privileged, but men as a population are underserved in every walk of life. Why are you making this about women?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 04:50 AM
6

That is not what any definition of the feminist theory of patriarchy states. That is what feminist describe as "ToXiC mAsCuLiNiTy" which is also based on revisions of history and a completely false idea of masculinity. It takes toxic traits that are non-gendered, and makes it about men. The feminist theory of patriarchy explicitly states, in every scholarly definition, that it is a system that benefits men and where men oppress women. Society cannot be a patriarchy, and has never been a patriarc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 04:37 AM
45

I agree with ayn rand, couples who really love one another will support each other, because it is in their own interest that the other succeed.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 11:19 PM
11

That was never promised to man, men have always been disposable, the feminist idea that the male was always bourgeois is complete and utter myth. Masculinity is everything forward in logos, practicality, the physical, and subtle in emotion, once boiled down accross time periods.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 11:11 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/8uz91pLPtP
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 05:34 PM
-6

Background as in data and sources.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/25 05:52 PM
-6

A theory that no one says, and that has no reasonable background
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/25 05:12 PM
-18

I don't think that's a real theory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/25 08:38 AM
4

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLytTJqkSQqtr7BqC1Jf4nv3g2yDfu7Xmd&si=sDSa1RcECMRP4RM5 https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGFFi6pRCnCdQTe1iG3Tw4Td9jvhY2w74&si=Ego_Skl1I8alDwa- https://ncfm.org/
/r/MensRights03/06/25 02:55 AM
3

Christina Hoff Sommers- Throughout the boy's education crisis and college rape crisis Karen DeCrow- made mentions implying support for financial abortion Warren Farrell- still identifies as a feminist to my knowledge Richard Reeves
/r/MensRights03/06/25 02:50 AM
6

There is evidence of murder in every prison, that does not make it a death camp, no one is being marched into gas chambers or shot in basements by firing lines. I did not say USAID cuts came from you, i said the cuts are completely justified, it is not the job of the US to aid people who'd sooner blow us all up. Ffs, chill out, the US is not going to invade Canada, at worst Alberta will become a territory by choice.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 02:37 AM
8

Links to X are allowed to my knowledge, just not to other subreddits
/r/MensRights03/06/25 01:56 AM
6

Conflating MAGA with the wider right wing is fallacious. You are also grossly exaggerating the consequences of the policy choices you mention. No one has been sent to a death camp, they were sent to foreign prisons. Non-western prisons just suck more than US prisons. I do not make my entire identity around a globalist idea of the men's rights movement, the USAID that has been cut was cut to nations that don't need it. Or have fallen out of favor, if they weren't actively hostile. Unions are not …
/r/MensRights03/06/25 12:55 AM
8

No one says the right cares about men. They've just been more useful. And what you're talking about are labour issues, which the left has not focused on in favor of males.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 12:41 AM
7

This hatred of the right needs to stop. It was largely the right who supported and defended men in outright attacks encouraging oppression, like the early boy's education crisis and the college rape crisis. It cannot be said that the right only supports elite men. And it's the left that's only just realizing, after 40+ years, that perhaps men are not the bourgeois oppressors feminists say they are. After driving men to the only people who have listened.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 12:18 AM
14

There's no such thing as an "alpha"
/r/MensRights02/06/25 10:39 PM
25

This, this right here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/25 04:08 PM
63

That they hate men, their idea of patriarchy paints men as the bourgeoisie and women as the proletariat.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/25 04:06 PM
1

The biggest problem with garnering sympathy for males is the feminist revisionism, it is an institution. You can provide all the modern anecdotes you want, males will still be seen as bourgeois because of that institution.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/25 06:18 AM
1

Joseph, son of Jacob, and the Hellenic story of Bellerophon are what I was thinking specific.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 03:33 AM
11

Men's health Month is not November, the only governments and organizations that have mentioned a Men's Health Month put it in June. Ie: https://cms.illinois.gov/benefits/stateemployee/bewell/awarenessmatters/awareness-menshealth-june2021.html That's why adding "MENTAL" is problematic.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 11:55 PM
4

Gonna save this for posterity.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 09:40 PM
19

Happy Men's Health Month
/r/MensRights01/06/25 09:39 PM
2

it's actually meant for feminists who think men are at the top to actually see what men deal with. For it, itself, to be pro-male, it must deny that patriarchy as defined feminist theory exists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/25 09:15 PM
1

When we believe the oppressor is untouchable, we deny our own rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/25 09:11 PM
1

Start with antiquity and mythological archives. The oppression of men goes as far back as Joseph, son of Jacob, and Bellerophon. Feminist revisionism states that men have always benefited from their idea of false patriarchy, and that women were always oppressed by men, completely false. It's an institution which exists to oppress men by making us out to be bourgeoisie. Gather historical documents and make them free and easily accessible to us, like the trial of gilles de rais and other male witc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/25 09:09 PM
1

And then the feminists call it patriarchy, despite their definition requiring that the system benefit men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/25 08:56 PM
17

Institutionalized feminism. It has created a false pervasive thought of the male bourgeoisie and the female proletariat. Feminist revisionism is so Institutionalized that the average person genuinely believes that woman was slave to men at all times, and that men are exclusive beneficiaries of society. It has convinced the world that men have always been, "islands to themselves" completely false. That men are our own victims through false historical narratives, lies, and denial of historical opp…
/r/MensRights01/06/25 08:45 PM
8

Marxist, not all socialists, but quite a few Marxists throughout history have made the comparison. I'd say, overrall, it has been against men's rights. Marxism has never been for equality, but for creating and escalating perceived class conflicts.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 07:03 PM
4

November is more like men's cancer awareness month. June has always been MEN'S HEALTH MONTH, the "mental" is something new, and harmful. And NEITHER are globally recognized. Ie:https://cms.illinois.gov/benefits/stateemployee/bewell/awarenessmatters/awareness-menshealth-june2021.html
/r/MensRights01/06/25 06:27 PM
53

The realization that much of our history is taught through feminist revisionism, and that men have never been some Marxist patriarchal bourgeoisie, and have been historically and systematically oppressed as far back as antiquity.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 06:14 PM
1

Dating is like trying to find needles in haystacks for everyone.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 04:11 PM
11

June is Men's Health Month Ie: https://cms.illinois.gov/benefits/stateemployee/bewell/awarenessmatters/awareness-menshealth-june2021.html#:~:text=The%20month%20is%20dedicated%20to%20enriching%20men's,spectrum%20of%20national%20screening%20and%20educational%20campaigns. It's Not just Men's mental health Month, adding "mental" trivializes other health concerns.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 03:21 AM
2

That would depend on the ex, one would hope she'd recognize that you'd be the only father he's known, and maybe even let you adopt him if he wants, but I've read some real nasty divorces. It would require a friendly relationship with the ex, the biological parent.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 09:55 PM
9

My mom always told me to go Dutch for an equal partnership.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 09:52 PM
22

Lately?
/r/MensRights31/05/25 08:04 PM
-1

The cheapest middle class 1br apartments within 3 states of my parent's house is still not even 100 less than my parent's mortgage. I am very familiar with the way the housing market works, it's pretty much an unspoken requirement of traveling work contracts, which is the kind of job I did. The problem goes beyond luxury variables.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 07:39 PM
-1

That may be reasonable for house rentals and condos, but all my 1br apartments at complexes have cost as much or more than than my parent's mortgage on an acre and 3 br house with an inground pool. That's completely unreasonable.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 07:19 PM
10

https://ncfm.org/ The National Coalition for Men is a Men's Rights organization, founded by MRAs.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 06:17 PM
3

Did you call a lawyer, or try filing a FOIA request for the log where they told you they remove father's names all the time? It might cost money, but it's not usually more than 20$, I think the limit on FOIA information is 200$. The request is free though, some agencies just charge to actually get the information. I doubt That's necessary for your custody battle, but it's definitely evidence of an oppressive system.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 06:11 PM
3

What about women and girls? “I don’t see this as a zero-sum issue,” Moore told us. “I don’t see saying, ‘Okay, we need to put a greater focus on what’s happening in men and boys’ as meaning we should stop caring about women and girls.” In his address, he was careful to thread that needle. “I want to be clear: This administration remains steadfast in our support for all Marylanders, regardless of their gender or background,” he said, adding that, “I strongly believe our mission to uplift men and …
/r/MensRights31/05/25 06:08 PM
-17

I don't respect any nihilist, they're definitely nihilistic. Red pill isn't any better, it's mostly PUA's now, and the "alpha" thing is based on a loose theory since disproven by the very biologist who said it originally. However, "NEET," is a phenomenon due to the current human condition. Social lifestyles, employment gatekeeping, expensive ass higher education systems, a housing market where rent is more expensive than a mortgage and you can't get a good mortgage deal without proving you can p…
/r/MensRights31/05/25 05:52 PM
2

Well, children are, they're dumb kids.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 05:47 PM
1

Only modernists do that. Everyone else talks about it in historical context. They worked manual labor dawn to dusk That was not an average day for most farmers, it is more complicated than you insist.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 05:46 PM
0

I literally read first hand sources about that specific topic. Do you really think they all just raked fields 24/7? You're talking about part of the middle class in the times, and an increasingly educated and politically active population.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 05:19 PM
1

It kinda does, they evolved around it, they weren't modern people. You'd be bored af, but even you'd still have everything they did. They had time to socialize, they had news, they had celebrity gossip, they didn't just work 24/7 and spend free time in the outhouse.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 05:05 PM
5

Nobody had electricity or plumbing in 1820 dude, it was only 30 years after the American Revolution, you're talking about Georgian Times. Yes, what you're describing was as normal for royalty as it was for poor farmers.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 04:10 PM
2

1820 and 1985 ppp were extremely different. You could indeed live normally on 2$ a day in 1820, depending on the location.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 03:44 PM
13

Everyone needs to stop this notion that history was dark and dystopian. There was no handmaid's tale or reverse handmaid's tale. Medieval times, for example, Could women (in the know) essentially have their husbands legally sexually assaulted, yes. Were men expected to keep their wives "in line," yes; they were also punished if they didn't. Both men and women went to their priests if their sex lives sucked, we have penitentials describing sex schedules reccomended to priests, and we know women a…
/r/MensRights31/05/25 03:05 PM
3

No one's denying women the right to vote. And women didn't have to fight, women's suffrage was already in the works when feminism started, early MRAs fought for comprehensive rights, the idea that the MRM is anti-suffrage is nothing but feminist revisionism.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 01:59 PM
6

That's all we can do.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 06:28 AM
23

Why are you here exactly? What are your beliefs? The problem with believing all women, is that women are human. When doing so one must be careful, hasty judgements are precisely why the justice system exists, to prevent the kind of mob rule #believeallwomen encourages.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 04:22 AM
2

Oh, sweet summer child. While there are many good feminists, the last time the good ones had a great amount of influence was like, the 60s when Karen DeCrow was up on top, even then the extremists were popular enough to have influence. Even the earliest feminists like American leader Elizabeth Cady Staunton, who's claim to faim is the Declaration of Sentiments, wanted rights with no responsibilities and even argued that female perpetrated infanticide should be a lesser crime, if not completely f…
/r/MensRights31/05/25 04:15 AM
8

The fact that it's within nearly every nation's constitution that the nation have a right to conscript is a violation of human right to life, and liberty. There need not be an ongoing draft.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 04:13 AM
6

Sir... you are on reddit.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 04:09 AM
1

Most countries practice pre trial detention.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 03:57 AM
12

None. False accusations are as old as history, especially against men.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 03:35 AM
1

They'd need to do more than that imo. Men can work under slave conditions, but i hope we refuse to stand for being called "privileged bourgeois oppressors," especially under those slave conditions.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 03:16 AM
14

Tale as Old as Time, literally, like pre antiquity, in the bible and all. Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness. -Exodus 23:1
/r/MensRights31/05/25 03:14 AM
3

You can get around with any of them, it's a robot, trick it.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 02:21 AM
83

Affirmative Action and Gender Quotas Criticism: Policies intended to increase opportunities for women in education or employment may result in fewer opportunities for men, particularly white or Asian men. Example: College admissions or corporate diversity initiatives that set goals for female representation. Family Court Bias Criticism: Laws supported by many Democrats are said to perpetuate biases in family courts that favor women in custody and divorce proceedings. Example: A presumption of ma…
/r/MensRights30/05/25 11:15 PM
26

All it said is they're spending that, and then nothing, just a mention of ads in video games. They should put it to ending feminist revisionism, especially about the MRM. Give it to the NCFM.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 11:05 PM
23

Another reason why men are the ones who really need a go-bag. And they call us privileged.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 05:45 AM
12

It is more likely that being publically associated with Bettina Arndt (even just inviewed), was a serious enough anti-feminist act to warrant professional assement. Feminist academics exhibit an irrational venomous hatred Bettina Arndt, for her amazing bravery in speaking out when gender narratives follow fictions rather than facts. That thought crossed my mind, but the police also denounced her, so I think it's a combination.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 04:04 AM
9

We really do by brainwashing though. Positive manipulation is still manipulation. There is no biological component to this phenomenon.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 03:03 AM
17

Yes, there have been several cases already.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 01:14 AM
3

“the opinions stated by Dr Girkin are not in line with the principles Tasmania Police supports in dealing with family violence,” and that she would not be teaching police recruits until the investigation with the university was complete. Controversial data does mean erroneous data.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 12:48 AM
10

To me, again, case in point. Lack of situational awareness.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 06:21 AM
17

From your very first response.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 06:19 AM
25

No, like, your literal comments over this thread. Complete lack of self-awareness, you have gone Completely and utterly off topic.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 06:11 AM
30

Ma'am, your current actions are showing the lack of self-awareness, case in point.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 05:59 AM
31

I'll take that as a yes.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 05:39 AM
10

https://youtu.be/tNtFgdwTsbU?si=snNSNrRdaGp14Shl Not even true in the wild.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 04:45 AM
48

You have very little self-awareness don't you?
/r/MensRights29/05/25 04:44 AM
1

Why would your younger siblings have trouble if you divorce?
/r/MensRights29/05/25 12:54 AM
1

Do show, I have seen the opposite, even some defenses.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 11:28 PM
3

The MRM has only been demonized by feminists, i don't think you understand that the hostility to feminism is a direct result of feminist misandric revisionism, including complete lies about the early MRM and MRAs.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 11:16 PM
3

Where is the outrage? The feminists have made the feminist theory of patriarchy institution, you are bourgeois because you are male. You are oppressed because you, as a male, were born an oppressor. That is why anti-feminism is so popular here.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 10:25 PM
1

We don't have equal law in the US
/r/MensRights28/05/25 09:22 PM
1

No one is angry with women. The MRM simply recognizes that men are systemically oppressed and are not the bourgeoisie feminists say. This a political sub.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 06:11 PM
1

It's "good reading" for men's rights, they are not explicitly related to or need to explicitly mention men's rights. In Who Stole Feminism?, philosophy professor Christina Sommers has exposed how a group of zealots are promoting a dangerous new agenda that sets women against men in all spheres of life. In case after case, Sommers shows how these extremists have propped up their arguments with highly questionable but well-funded research, presenting inflammatory and often inaccurate information a…
/r/MensRights28/05/25 03:37 PM
1

He was groomed bruh, that lady had him at 15, she's a pedophile. https://nypost.com/2023/11/19/news/brigitte-macron-opens-up-about-dating-her-15-year-old-student-and-future-french-president/
/r/MensRights28/05/25 09:42 AM
1

Unwanted contact counts.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 09:40 AM
2

My guy, have you still not read a Camille Paglia book yet? I'm telling you, you'll love her. But Again, Masculinity, at its core, is everything forward in logos, practicality, and the physical.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 09:19 AM
1

My guy, have you still not read a Camille Paglia book yet? I'm telling you, you'll love her.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 09:16 AM
11

If they are not a Bonified doctor in relationships like the Gottmans, Ruth Westheimer, and Sue Johnson; or someone with many years experience in a similar profession such as Sue Johanson, then they are not experts. You have described a phenomenon on TikTok and called TikTokers, "experts." I believe you spend too much time at work and inside if you think dating apps are the only option to meet someone.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 08:58 AM
2

Personally I am for the current laws. You have personally advocated for legislation, and I'd advise not mentioning that you used ai, and to double check the ai's claims and sources if you do. But if you want to be more successful, contact a lobby group and see if they have any advice.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 08:48 AM
2

It's called TRAUMA, tell your message to all the women you know saying "men this, men that"
/r/MensRights28/05/25 08:36 AM
2

Follow workplace policy
/r/MensRights28/05/25 08:35 AM
1

No, terminations and write ups do not show up on background checks. Getting fired does not mean you cannot claim unemployment, it is usually the opposite, quitting negatively effects it more.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 08:32 AM
1

There was a short stint where Karen DeCrow was top feminist, but idrk how long that was. Even the average early feminists, it's not morally wrong to push for your groups rights while leaving the rest behind. What is wrong is the modern revisionism, Elizabeth Cady Staunton for example, seen as a paragon feminist today, but the woman defended the decriminalization of female perpetrated infanticide. Not to mention how modern feminist revisionism has painted early men's rights activists. I've not re…
/r/MensRights28/05/25 08:26 AM
1

Follow workplace policy
/r/MensRights28/05/25 08:18 AM
1

I'm sorry, everytime you mention Malta it shocks me that a tiny crusader island acts so seriously in its politics. My state is 130x the size of your country. Also, are no elections conducted for the extra women in that scenario you mention? Who would appoint them?
/r/MensRights28/05/25 08:11 AM
57

Because you're seen as the bourgeoisie to the proletariat women according to the institution that is the feminist theory of patriarchy. You are being dismissed as an oppressor according to them, you cannot be discriminated against.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 08:02 AM
2

https://nypost.com/2023/11/19/news/brigitte-macron-opens-up-about-dating-her-15-year-old-student-and-future-french-president/
/r/MensRights28/05/25 06:20 AM
14

That's also when the relationship started. She has a kid the same age as him. Her interviews are gross.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 06:20 AM
1

Venting is not for the public, one must learn to argue and have a wealth of information. People who see you as bourgeois will simply not believe you because you are the bourgeoisie to them.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 06:14 AM
-22

My argument was that one must debate to Garner empathy. You must understand men are seen as bourgeois due to feminist institutions and feminist revisionism. Ergo, we have too much privilege and lord it over others. So what, precisely, are you advocating for, because it sounds like you're advocating for men to leave the arguments which are absolutely necessary. It sounds like you're encouraging the, "stay silent" feminist ideal.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 06:12 AM
-33

Yes, i did, and what precisely are you advocating?
/r/MensRights28/05/25 06:08 AM
-40

It's called debate.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 06:05 AM
10

That woman's a predator.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 05:59 AM
23

France has a very low age of consent at 15, that woman is 100% a pervert. Her daughter is his age, they were classmates ffs. Like, they started when he was 15, her interviews about it are disturbing. Ie: https://nypost.com/2023/11/19/news/brigitte-macron-opens-up-about-dating-her-15-year-old-student-and-future-french-president/
/r/MensRights28/05/25 05:55 AM
1

Id put much of it on Forster-Nietzsche. Most of the aryan supremacy ideas of the nazis came from female philosophers in those times.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 05:37 AM
0

Because it's not Dating advice, it's political.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 04:46 AM
9

That's extremely racist and sexist of you. Why are you incapable of believing in love? Why are you demonizing white men and infantilizing Asian women?
/r/MensRights28/05/25 04:06 AM
6

Why can two people not simply enjoy each other's company? Why are you making all these absurd misandrist assumptions on men? Why do you insist men pay, much less something expensive, maybe he don't want no gold digging wench, but a nice lady who actually conversates? Why not enjoy shared time, my mother always told me to go Dutch explicitly to dodge sexists like yourself. Why do you see yourself as superior? How was your last relationship? Was it with a male?
/r/MensRights28/05/25 03:50 AM
4

Toxic femininity, they are all in, or exiled. Anyone who goes against the grain is kicked out.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 03:42 AM
3

Elaborate, I made multiple statements.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 03:10 AM
5

You realize a woman literally made nazi philosophy right? And that you are on a men's sub that exists to recognize men's oppression, rights, and issues. Also, MEN are at the Frontline of EVERY social movement. Including all the suffrage movements. AI is not a good source, it also regularly says i write like a woman.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 03:06 AM
1

I feel like that's a later date question, like 5th, probably before sex.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 02:30 AM
2

Did you get permission for this post from the mods? Are you feminist? If so, who is your favorite one? It matters as to discern your own biases against the population you're asking to survey.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 11:37 PM
3

Follow workplace policy
/r/MensRights27/05/25 11:32 PM
1

All countries everywhere are like that dude.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 11:26 PM
2

You didn't answer his question. Also, Wives were never the property of husbands, find me the first hand source. Men are systemically oppressed, and simultaneously called bourgois oppressors as to prevent men from becoming unoppressed.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 11:12 PM
10

Misogyny is technically the idea of male superiority, and misandry is technically the idea of female superiority, even though they're often used as catch-all terms. So, for example, the, "make me a sandwich," and, "get back in the kitchen," jokes and phrases come from the stereotype of a husband ordering his wife about.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 08:59 PM
-1

I hope so, nothing will change if your belief is that nothing can change.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 02:32 PM
3

They know, they just hate men even more than the average feminist.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 05:08 AM
1

Patriarchy doesn't exist. It cannot be a patriarchy if it doesn't benefit the said population. Feminists patriarchy is just a way of being sexist and calling men bourgeois to promote hate and misandry.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 04:37 PM
14

Patriarchy doesn't exist. It cannot be a patriarchy if it doesn't benefit the said population. Feminists patriarchy is just a way of being sexist and calling men bourgeois to promote hate and misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 04:34 PM
3

Masculinity is not an anti-male concept. The ideas of masculinity come from what men do, it does not tell men what to do, and is not confined to men, every human has masculinity. Boiled down, masculinity throughout all history, is everything forward in logic, practicality, and the physical. Demonizing masculinity is to demonize concepts like aestheticism, realism, and logos.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 04:12 PM
148

No one's castrating female predators, js.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 04:10 PM
1

Disagree. She made up a complete strawman of altruism (complete rejection of the self) and kept smacking it over and over again That is precisely what altruism is, it is not charity. Her ideal minarchist utopia would completely ignore negative externalities like pollution. Dumping toxic byproducts into American rivers? That’s OK even if it kills wildlife, livestock and humans; as long as I’m not encroaching on people’s property rights! Then we can pretend that the neighbors’ cows dying is an act…
/r/MensRights24/05/25 11:24 AM
6

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/roySA5te91
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 04:39 AM
5

I mean...I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. It's true that privilege isn't shared equally by all men. But there are absolutely no advantages that men have over women? Globally? For example, little is known about women's healthcare compared to men's healthcare because they are underrepresented in clinical trials and other medical research. Everyone is undeserved in healthcare, issues that pertain specifically to women get an unusually large amount of funding, breast cancer vs prostate ca…
/r/MensRights24/05/25 03:42 AM
1

Does that not defeat the purpose of the queue?
/r/MensRights24/05/25 02:40 AM
1

This was from 7 days ago. Never passed the queue
/r/MensRights24/05/25 02:32 AM
5

Men are not advantaged by gender in any way. We don't even have a right to life. We both agree that men's rights are important, but I'm trying to clarify what the alternative plan is, if it's not dismantling patriarchal views. The alternative plan would be to fight for comprehensive rights. Feminists, by institutionalizing their theory of patriarchy, have made men de facto bourgeoisie, placing males as the oppressors who have no systemic issues, and all right and privilege. Do you think medieval…
/r/MensRights24/05/25 01:33 AM
-8

Aight, so SOME people can completely break sub rules, but my excerpt of Atlas Shrugged still gets booted! https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/9HItBSOCwt
/r/MensRights23/05/25 11:33 PM
12

The feminist theory of patriarchy is the very institution that puts blame on men, as bourgeoisie.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 05:23 PM
7

Perhaps
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:47 PM
21

They're economically viable enough to put a singles tax on.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:13 PM
1

They got it before most black people in America. The early MRAs fought for comprehensive rights, feminists threw everyone else under the bus.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:39 PM
4

It wouldn't matter much, not every state in my country cares whether you're biological or not, just who's on the birth certificate.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:27 PM
3

No country forces paternity tests like that.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:25 PM
6

Men should be allowed financial abortion if women are allowed a choice. It is only just, one sex should not be able to make a unilateral decision that so effects the other. If a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liable for 21 years of support... autonomous women making independent decisions about their lives should not expect men to finance their choice. -feminist Karen DeCrow For…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:19 PM
9

That is false dilemma.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 07:23 AM
7

No one said there's no gender bruh. Are you sure you commented in the right conversation?
/r/MensRights23/05/25 07:20 AM
5

It should bother you because it was literally the worst representation of that character ever.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 06:35 AM
73

That author literally just said, "abandon the males."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 06:19 AM
11

There is nothing that exists or has existed which fits the definition of either, "entity." It will only further the gender war.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 06:06 AM
17

There is no, and has never been a patriarchy in all of known history. The idea only encourages the gender war and must be denounced full stop.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 05:56 AM
25

You can help resolve these issues by realizing that patriarchy doesn't and has never existed, and by denouncing the feminist theory of patriarchy. By its definition, for there to be a patriarchy, it must benefit men as a population, that has never in all known history existed. Men are not bourgeoisie and women are no proletariat. https://www.reddit.com/r/Egalitarianism/s/EDUjXg35Z1 You can help by listening to and reading egalitarian feminists like Karen DeCrow, and Christina Hoff Sommers, inste…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 05:50 AM
4

That might be part of it, I think that is a more complex issue than most credit it to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 04:36 AM
57

The only hate I've seen is from feminist brigadiers. This week i had extra attention for some reason. I usually don't see them.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 04:25 AM
1

Individualistic yes, competitive no.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 04:21 AM
16

We're not, just modern feminism that is lead by a majority of radical feminists, and has institutionalized the feminist theory of patriarchy which includes the vilification of men, feminist revisionism, and insists upon a patriarchy that does not and never has existed. 99.9% of MRAs are dictionary definition feminists, and would likely support feminism if it was not currently an extremist, authoritarian movement, which has, multiple times, utilized fascist tactics in living memory, like less tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 03:58 AM
1

My experience is my own. Our condition as a population is not necessarily related, injustice and oppression is still injustice and oppression, you don't have to go through the epiphanies i did, or the many other anecdotes of men to see the issues, just need to take off the modern feminist lens.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:46 AM
1

Specify.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:37 AM
1

Give it a shot. They use bots, go try commenting there. They make you delete everything you post and comment on here before letting you participate there.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:27 AM
1

The thing is, it's mostly joke subs, it's not even subs that you'd think would do it. At least feminist subs wait for you to comment before censoring.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:25 AM
1

What would you want to see change in society? Like if things were actually moving in a better direction, what would that look like to you? I’m trying to understand where guys’ heads are at, not just what they’re frustrated with. Societal recognition of current and historical male oppression. The end of the false idea that men are bourgeois. Including rhetoric that encourages the false idea that we live in a patriarchy. The end of feminist revisionism's popularity. Including the restoration of th…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:23 AM
1

You get automatically banned from several subs for posting or commenting here, the warning is in the sub description.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:54 AM
1

Why have dowry if you already alimony? There's no need for either in a modern society, but having both at any time is just extra. Also, I don't know where this idea that laws don't cause social change comes from, historically nearly every social change has begun with a law.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:07 AM
2

Disagree, it is dishonest to say any role restricts emotions. Modern men, and only Modern men, because male emotion suppression only began in the 50s, suppress emotions not because of any traditional masculinity, but because the Modern vilification of males has made it logical, logic being a core of masculinity, to hide male emotion as to prevent further vilification of the male. Men are discouraged from having emotions except happiness and anger because any other emotion directly opposes the fe…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:51 AM
2

Masculinity has never limited emotional freedom
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:17 AM
5

Watching the brown coat and red guard tactics of feminists during the college rape crisis brought to my attention that this feminist movement, we've always been taught was about equality, was not in fact for liberal ideas and fairness. It allowed me to take the feminist lens off and see that the majority are extremists. It's nearly impossible to meet a feminist who doesn't believe in the feminist theory of patriarchy. It drew me to many different first hand sources of history and made me questio…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:21 AM
3

But you did twist my words, in fact. 40% of women I've met expressed misandry,' it naturally raises the question of whether that observation is being used to support a broader generalization. No, it doesn't, especially not in that context, wherein it was literally answering your petsonal question.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 09:14 PM
2

I’ve asked you multiple times to clarify your position, responded directly to your claims You asked once, a couple minutes ago, and it was answered. Interpretation isn’t misquotation. If the way your argument lands to others sounds broad or hostile, that’s a reflection worth examining It is when the argument is clear, which it is, you, in fact, misquoted, and made it look like i stated something that was never indicated are stated.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 09:10 PM
3

But here’s where we disagree: If you say 40% of the women you’ve met have said something misandrist, it’s reasonable for people to ask if you’re drawing broader conclusions from that. That’s not twisting your words, that’s exploring their weight. That's not reasonable, that would be illogical, one person cannot meet 40% of women, it would be a strawman fallacy. It would be quoting something that was never said, which you did.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 09:07 PM
2

But I didn’t say you explicitly said “all women are misandrists,” That is also a strawman, you have twisted my words again. I said your framing sounds like a generalization, and I asked how you reconcile that. We are discussing this in another thread. A straw man would be if I invented a totally different position you never stated. That is not solely what strawman is, i have given you the definition twice. I quoted you You falsely quoted me. If your position is more nuanced than it sounds, great…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 09:02 PM
3

What exactly did you mean when you said “40% of women I've met have said something that indicates misandry”? That is literally just an answer to the question you asked right before that which was, Totally honest question: how many women are you actually talking to in real life who say this stuff? If you're saying it doesn't reflect on women more broadly, then explain how. But you can't keep making sweeping claims and then say everyone else is distorting you for pointing out the implications. Tha…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:59 PM
2

You're quoting the definition of a straw man but applying it in a way that doesn't match what actually happened. It's literally what happened, everyone can look at the discussion and see that you completely misquoted me, and made false assumptions of my arguments and proceeded to run with your strawman arguments instead of the actual arguments. A real straw man would be me making up something you never said at all, then attacking that. But I’ve been engaging directly with what you did say, askin…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:52 PM
2

The debate will be stalled until your fallacies stop, that is how debate works.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:43 PM
2

I asked how that doesn’t come across as a generalization. That’s not a strawman, it’s interpreting the direction of your argument and giving you a chance to clarify it. You didn't ask that though, you decided to completely twisted my and ran with it.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:40 PM
3

I’ve asked clarifying questions based on the implications of your words Except you didn't. You did, in fact, twist my words. You, actually, did claim i said, "40% of women are misandrists." For example. When I said, "40% of women I've met have said something that indicates misandry."
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:37 PM
3

No, that was a strawman, the way you said it was strawman, you made the claim that my arguments said something they didn't, then continued to argue with that assumption, literally per the definition of strawman, to make it easier to argue against me.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:33 PM
2

To clarify: I didn’t say you said “all women are ideologues.” I said you’re making it sound like that. There’s a difference between saying “this is your explicit argument” and “this is how your argument comes across.” I was challenging the implication, not putting words in your mouth. That counts as a strawman argument, when you make the claim that someone is arguing something they never argued, that counts as strawman.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:29 PM
2

It leads people to reasonably ask, “Are you implying women are the problem?” No, it doesn't, I trust that people listening to arguments have the abilities to distinguish between what might be 400 women, versus what would be billions of women. The fact that you don't is disturbing. That’s not a straw man. That’s someone tracking the logical conclusion of your words. No, you completely misquoted me and assumed arguments i never made, and proceeded to make arguments under that strawman fallacy. If …
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:27 PM
3

You keep calling my responses “fallacies,” but what I’ve actually done is quote your own words and ask you to clarify them. That’s not misrepresentation, it’s engagement. You cannot say that you quoted me, when you completely misquoted me. Saying that “40% of women you’ve met have said things that indicate misandry” is not the same as me claiming “you said 40% of all women are misandrists.” What I did was point out how that kind of language sounds and invited you to explain your intent, not accu…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:23 PM
9

In my observation, most women are extremely misogynistic to other women, experienced nurses refusing aid from female nursing students for example, then talking shit behind their backs, and refusing to train female nursing students. Male nursing students are expected to help with heavy lifting. Treat everyone equally.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:13 PM
3

You’re making it sound like all women are ideologues, but that’s just not reality. That is the strawman there, a misrepresentation of an argument. Those words were never stated and no such idea was indicated.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:06 PM
3

You keep saying I’m misquoting you, but I’ve quoted your words directly No you haven't. Ie: I said about 40% of women whom I've met have said something that indicates misandry. You quoted me, "40% of women are misandrists." I said, #"The feminist theory of patriarchy is institution" You quoted me as, "feminist theory is institution" as if i were arguing all theories of feminism and not a singular theory, and you proceed to falsly claim that i deny female struggles, that's all strawman, which i h…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:04 PM
2

I have explained your fallacies, you have been misquoting me throughout the discussion, and I have called you out every time. I have explained that your have committed ad hominem, when you have called multiple people here sexist for non sexist arguments.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:54 PM
3

Then stop using fallacious arguments and we can further the discussion. That is reasoned debate, it cannot continue when you're using fallacious argument.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:40 PM
2

You are not quoting my words, you are changing my words claiming I make arguments which were never made, strawman.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:36 PM
1

You do not know me, nor my beliefs.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:33 PM
2

It cannot be misogyny, it is genderless.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:30 PM
5

You literally used another strawman argument right here dude.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:22 PM
2

No, our discussion indicates that you are very likely a troll. I am not here to teach simple statistics and reasoning.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:19 PM
5

Historical oppression of women is well documented, and misrepresented by feminists. Historical documentation of male oppression overwhelmingly exists and is denied by society because the feminist theory of patriarchy is institution. You continue multiple logical fallacies, strawman, and tu quoque, and address hominem. You completely ignore the cores of discussion here.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:17 PM
5

You are insisting that i said 40% of women are sexists. That is the strawman.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:11 PM
3

You utilized a strawman argument against me, you insisted i said something I never said, you would be the one refusing Accountability there.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:06 PM
8

No one here frames every push for inclusion as misandry, though most are. Explain Accountability? All the ideas of Accountability you've given throughout this post only show that you only use the false history of feminist revisionism.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:05 PM
4

That is not misogynistic, that is anti-promiscuity.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:02 PM
9

I don't, criticism of feminism and even common behavior of women does not mean it's misogyny.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 07:00 PM
7

All are positions with the most responsibilities. No one is stopping women from taking them except the individual woman.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:50 PM
3

I did not say 40% of women, that is your strawman argument against me. “no one said women are the problem.” No one has said that, YOU asked how many women I've met exhibit anti-male behavior, that is all that was answered.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:46 PM
2

The comment you just made is literally the definition of the strawman fallacy. Those were not my words. A straw man argument is a type of logical fallacy where someone distorts or misrepresents their opponent's argument to make it easier to attack and refute. It's essentially arguing against a fake version of the original argument, like beating down a straw man instead of the real person.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:40 PM
16

As stated, society is anti male, you are the one insisting we are sexist for questioning its misandric gynocentricity.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:38 PM
4

I don't talk about politics outside of reddit, and I'd say about 40% of the women I've met have said something that indicates misandry. But that is strawman, no one has stated in this discussion that women are the problem, you are only insisting that's what's being said.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:34 PM
21

I don't talk about politics outside of reddit, and I'd say about 40% of the women I've met have said something that indicates misandry. But that is strawman, no one has stated in this discussion that women are the problem, you are only insisting that's what's being said.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:33 PM
8

But just because certain feminists have said harmful things doesn’t mean the whole movement is irredeemable, or that every woman agrees with those extremes It's the vast majority of feminists today, if you are a feminist and believe more like Karen DeCrow or Christina Hoff Sommers, then you should talk to them, tell them to stop promoting the theory of patriarchy that causes misandry, and to stop hating and generalizing males, it's not us who blame all issues on the other gender, that is feminis…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:18 PM
17

There’s space to acknowledge both: that men’s issues are real and worth fighting for and that feminism at its core was a push for basic human rights. If we keep painting everything as war, we miss the shared goal, dignity, agency, and fairness for everyone. You're talking to a choir, go tell it to feminists.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:03 PM
50

Even early feminists that we learned about in grade school, like Elizabeth Cady Staunton, fought against equal responsibility, Staunton specifically fought against equal punishment for female perpetrated infanticide.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:00 PM
8

But saying “no one is angry” while using language like “animals” and “bourgeoisie” shows that this is emotional, even if we’ve been taught not to admit it. That is not angry, that is the condition of men, as purported by the feminists. They say men are animals, and bourgois. If feminists like Karen DeCrow and Christina Hoff Sommers were the popular feminists, then we can talk about a MRM/Feminist coalition, but it is impossible in the current state of feminism. Masculinity doesn’t need to be aba…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 05:52 PM
38

It really was a hate group, otherwise there would just be the MRM. Early MRAs like E Belfort Bax, were usually socialists fighting for comprehensive rights, and only criticized feminism because it was, and did, commit terrorist acts, and threw everyone else under the proverbial bus. To this date feminist revisionism has convinced the world that the MRM was anti-woman, anti-egalitarian, and anti-suffrage, none of which was true, and was often the opposite.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 05:50 PM
13

No one but feminists are saying it's zero-sum. No one is hating women. That's a lie, pointing out female crime and deviancy in a world where feminist and women have created a narrative that portrays the male as an exclusively violent predator, is important for awareness that men are not what they say. Men cannot, "heal", or ensure our rights whilst the feminist theory of patriarchy is an institution, we will always be seen as animals and bourgeoisie while radical feminists are in power. And yeah…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 05:41 PM
22

Sir, people come to the MRM because they're hating on men, or they've realized that men are not, in fact, the bourgois oppressors that feminist say, they know men have been oppressed, not just in emotions by the gyno-centric society, but our very basic rights have been oppressed. The fact that the MRM is treated as it is is proof enough of the threat to male freedom of speech. Men have no right to life. Women are equal, yet males still lose their property and financial rights in divorce. Etc. It…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 05:22 PM
41

"Misandry doesn't kill"- literally every feminist who comes here and argues.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 03:57 PM
1

False dilemma You can speak out against misandry and about men's rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/25 10:13 AM
42

Call it what it is, MISANDRY!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/25 04:02 AM
41

Why not all people who commit minor crimes? They also do so for their poor situations, according to every answer to, "why does crime happen."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/25 04:02 AM
1

https://valdemar.fandom.com/wiki/Amberdrake https://valdemar.fandom.com/wiki/Skandranon
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/25 03:48 AM
43

The, "women are wonderful effect," is a soft way of saying MISANDRY
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/25 03:35 AM
1

As I said, you don't have to convince extremists. They're going to resort to ad hominem, non sequitur, and other logical fallacies to discredit you. It's the people watching and listening that are important.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 03:08 AM
2

Why?
/r/MensRights22/05/25 02:54 AM
1

You trust their biased evidence?
/r/MensRights22/05/25 02:38 AM
1

That's because you were speaking to someone who was likely an extremist. Like a presidential debate. Men cannot convince people who are hell bent on believing we are bourgeoisie, only the ones who look at the evidence.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 02:11 AM
1

Support groups, trauma bonding, legal coalitions, etc. It's common knowledge dude.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 02:10 AM
3

That's because victims batch together. Your friend group is not an accurate representation of the whole population.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:45 AM
1

https://youtu.be/TZrzCAuiw7w?si=-kuSHXpeXA0KI9JC https://youtu.be/Dq3Ju_sI_Ew?si=0DZzJRqxTdh7LDYa 👏 let us thank "based mom," Christina Hoff Sommers, for her advocacy and research in the last few major crises facing the male gender.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:42 AM
3

They wrote it like a reddit post.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:34 AM
2

My mom always told me to go Dutch.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:18 AM
4

I do what I want.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 11:13 PM
8

Are they? I am so privileged that I cannot vote without registering to be listed in a draft. I am so privileged that my female peers make more than me on average. I am so privileged that a woman is more likely to be employed over me, and this is encouraged by a sexist law that was based on propaganda vilifying men and victimizing women. Etc. Men are not bourgeoisie, you are being misandric.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 09:35 PM
10

Why does men having safe spaces like women mean, "turning back time," to you? This is a privilege women have over men. It is not zero sum. It would protect men from DV, as men could discuss the issue without an abuser present.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 07:11 PM
4

Events, owned and run clubs and businesses, etc.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 06:48 PM
15

Men need separate safe spaces. Without being called bourgeoisie and, "privileged."
/r/MensRights21/05/25 06:22 PM
4

How can he listen to the child he has no contact with ?
/r/MensRights21/05/25 06:03 PM
21

Toxic femininity 101- exile detractors.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 05:56 PM
2

They were not boy topics, that is feminist propaganda to promote misandry. Boys have needed pushing since the 80s, -The War Against Boys- by Christina Hoff Sommers is a good entry into the education crisis, she was an advocate from the beginning. There has yet to be adequate funding for it.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 05:28 PM
1

They have not been necessary since the late 80s.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 05:25 PM
1

Nothing, why would we?
/r/MensRights21/05/25 05:23 PM
4

Tate said the same thing about the MRM that Rogan did.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 05:22 PM
1

At least ayn rand said the same about feminism, she hated all advocacy groups equally. Rogan was just grifting feminists.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 05:20 PM
16

Patriarchy isn't that, and has never existed. Historically you weren't even allowed to be frustrated with your wife, it was practically illegal, as far back as the 700s. Or your neighbors. Also, "men who engaged in domestic violence historically " is a very confusing phrase that does not match the rest of the post; please elaborate who you are asking for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/25 05:13 AM
16

It doesn't. How many women were able to work those jobs and were they paid the same as men? The question is not about the wage gap. Is this just another incel sub where we do feelings over facts? Are you just another anti-equality feminist who thinks men are bourgeois oppressors and animals, instead of coming here to ask about the condition of men you have chosen to make it about women. You completely ignored over half the evidence in that single comment about feminist revisionism. Additionally,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/25 04:14 AM
14

That is all answered in the former comment. You will have to do your own research in non-feminists 3rd hand sources, and 2nd/1st hand sources, i am not writing a research paper for you on reddit. They didn't, "serve men" that is also feminist revisionism. How do your links prove this? Do you think some women being allowed to work the same manual labor jobs as men proves this? It proves that they did, indeed, serve themselves and were not kept in servitude as feminist propaganda would have people…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/25 03:46 AM
15

That is one issue, and really that map states that right wing states favor men more. New England above NY is not representative of the left, and they often lean quite right, they are like Hawaii, they lean right, but don't have a large red presence.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 09:07 PM
1

Sir, your example is a map in which the men's issue is handled favorably by more right wing states.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 09:03 PM
59

The right additionally acknowledges men's issues and provides solutions, they're just conservative solutions. The left sees men as bourgeois with only a select few having issues, and not male issues but issues of labour. They only recognize male issues, not men's rights, and then only the issues they can blame on men, they have institutionalized the feminist theory of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 08:31 PM
1

Yet.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:29 PM
2

It's not about convincing feminists, it's about convincing everyone else, and making the information easily accessible, and allowing conservatives information to fight the feminist theory of patriarchy for us. And giving good feminists information access to change their movement in the future generations.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:27 PM
1

Idk, they haven't contributed further.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:09 PM
2

And now what?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:02 PM
20

As stated to another feminist, Again, any (most) of the women you would talk to would gladly profess to working rather being serving a man. They didn't, "serve men" that is also feminist revisionism. https://alphahistory.com/worldwar1/west-munitions-factory-1916/ https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/factory-journal-simone-weil As seen in examples, they were making the same complaints the male workers made. As seen here, men did, in fact, encourage working women and girls, and did not …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 05:57 PM
6

That is a question for a lawyer.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:30 PM
3

This specific question denoted common behavior of the feminist and those who believe in the feminist theory of patriarchy, that men are bourgeois. The ones you're talking about behave in separate ways, and it's more often a result of the lonliness epidemic, not patriarchy, the definition of patriarchy states that it must explicitly benefit males.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:28 PM
4

The post shows how the feminist mocks male victims, not how "patriarchal beliefs" do, and none of those are patriarchal beliefs. They are feminist revisions of historic masculinity.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:23 PM
5

I don't think it's bad advice, it's just less about men's rights and issues than the post I'm referring to, I'm mainly talking about the sub mods.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:19 PM
6

That began in like, the 70s. And you can vote without registering, until you're arrested for not registering for the selective service.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:17 PM
4

That's the thing about FTP, it's institutionalized, it's not just feminists who believe men are bourgeois. It's a majority.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:12 PM
5

Christina Hoff Sommers Most center and center-right people. Anti-Feminists like Janice Fiamengo. There's nothing actually stopping you from going down the rabbit holes with a normal, non gyno-centric lens, to see patriarchy has never actually existed. But it won't matter the feminist theory of patriarchy simply holds males as the bourgeoisie, and patriarchy to most feminists is an all-encompassing satan that they blame literally everything bad in the world on. When arguing with a feminist on pat…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:02 PM
6

Aight, come on now, wtf does this, generic dating advice that is not even explicit to men, get passed? But my excerpt from Atlas Shrugged on the disrespected husband gets denied?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:01 PM
-1

That's ridiculous, no normal man sees men as such. They do this because FTP, the feminist theory of patriarchy, is an institution, they believe men are bourgeoisie and deserve it. If anything women see other women as competition, just look at toxic femininity, girls compete, and exile anyone who doesn't. Men are good at team play, and need no direction for teamwork to make sense, even as toddlers. Men accept each other even if we dislike one male or another, we do not compete like the women comp…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 03:56 PM
8

Feminist beliefs. they hold to the feminist theory of patriarchy, not patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 03:47 PM
3

Institutionalized FTP, feminist theory of patriarchy. You're bourgeois, you deserve it.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 03:46 PM
8

Again, any (most) of the women you would talk to would gladly profess to working rather being serving a man. They didn't, "serve men" that is also feminist revisionism. https://alphahistory.com/worldwar1/west-munitions-factory-1916/ https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/factory-journal-simone-weil As seen in examples, they were making the same complaints the male workers made. As seen here, men did, in fact, encourage working women and girls, and did not force them to be domestic. Cont…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 08:52 AM
11

The women did not love it, at all. We have ample journals about why they more often hated it as much as the men, written from their own hands. They all went on the same strikes. Everyone abused drugs, they were all legal, you had heroine in candies, this was not unique to the female condition. It was not stigma for women to voice opinions, that is false revisionism that completely ignores numerous first and second hand sources. History is only men v woman to the person who only reads feminist re…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 08:08 AM
2

They don't believe men have problems that aren't our own fault, they believe we are bourgeois because the feminist theory of patriarchy has been institutionalized. Under your definition of patriarchy, it never once existed in all of history. For example, medieval times, Women had power, even some political rights, but males were punished for anything their wives did, men were responsible for their wives, according to the Penitentials. Women could practically have their husbands gangbanged in bed…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 07:54 AM
1

Meh, different management style.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 07:41 AM
1

You don't think it's a bit facetious?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 07:37 AM
2

You cannot put all the blame on men, the lonliness epidemic isn't even a male lonliness epidemic anymore. Several nations and states like NY made the total lonliness epidemic official. No one denies male emotion here. Are you even familiar with the concept of philia? A true friend backs you up, talks about regular things, politics, philosophy, hobbies, shares them, go and tell the man-hating feminists that they should challenge one another's sexist views. Also, don't be a misogynist, women are n…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 07:29 AM
1

There is a lonliness epidemic, for example, NY state gave official recognition to it and named Dr Ruth Westheimer as the lonliness ambassador before she died.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 07:27 AM
1

Mmm kay, you are either a bot, or 100% using ai.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 07:20 AM
1

Do you understand the issue with your tone and this topic? Are you using AI?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 07:14 AM
1

It's disrespectful to the topic.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 07:13 AM
1

It's more about the tone.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:59 AM
1

No normal person writes like this.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:54 AM
10

Women were made to go to work because all the men were fighting a war. The population of women in hard labor prior to ww1 was small, and often relegated to single women, or women whose husbands had lost work.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:52 AM
1

Now I disagree with that person, but the right to vote was not tied to conscription until the late 1900s.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:50 AM
1

It's even less for men.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:45 AM
9

The real answer is that it's complicated, and doesn't have to do with discrimination except in the very rare criminal case. For example, some studies state that the wage gap is actually against males among peers. Ie: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/technology/google-gender-pay-gap.html Then there's personal choices: https://youtu.be/QcDrE5YvqTs?si=F5-9o7IfsERHrrve
/r/MensRights20/05/25 05:26 AM
3

I'd say second wave did that, first wave threw everyone else under the proverbial bus. Second wave being the one lead by people like Karen DeCrow. Of course, that second wave got complacent and now 90% of feminists are radicals who believe in the feminist theory of patriarchy and that men are bourgeois. I'd say, from reading, it was probably the mid 80s when radical feminism came out the woodwork as popular, Steinemists, Dworkinists and all. Hooks feminism is real popular rn for some reason, and…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 05:07 AM
94

Feminism is largely the enemy because 90% of feminists support the feminist theory of patriarchy, which has become institution and is the reason males are seen as the new bourgeoisie class, preventing men's rights and issues from being addressed. Feminism is the school of thought so pervasive that feminist revisions of history are taken as fact, despite being largely false, to the detriment of men. Gender Studies is gatekept by feminists, making it nearly impossible to have the concerns of the m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/25 04:44 AM
1

Firstly, stop using ChatGPT, it is easy to tell, and ChatGPT doesn't understand metaphysics. Secondly, You say, “All things that are, and have ever been deemed masculine, can be boiled down to those traits.” But must we conflate possibility with identity? Just because something can be reduced to a mechanical description does not mean it should be. One can describe Beethoven’s Ninth as a series of oscillating air pressures, but one misses the point, and the glory, entirely. We're defining a word.…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:24 AM
1

However, where I feel compelled to waltz away from your thesis is in your insistence that all things masculine must be reduced to these traits, regardless of their more ineffable or spiritual hues. You assert, for instance, that Rumi’s mysticism is logic in lyrical trousers. That Aurelius was a mere stoic calculator. And that a father comforting a child is performing a utilitarian operation, like replacing a printer cartridge or taking out the bins. No, all things that are, and have ever been de…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 03:57 AM
2

Logic, practicality, and the physical are indeed virtues traditionally associated with masculinity across many eras. I shan’t deny it. But if we say masculinity is only those things, do we not risk turning a richly woven identity into a three-button calculator? Where, then, do we place the poetic masculinity of Rumi, the introspective pensiveness of Marcus Aurelius, or the emotional devotion of a father soothing a child at 3 a.m. while simultaneously stepping on a Lego? Rumi did everything aesth…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 01:53 AM
155

That first example is dumb, like, legitimately pitiful. "I'm going to do the exact thing I'm supposed to do, just in a different order that absolutely no one will notice or care about. To fight the pAtRiArChY!"
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:53 PM
2

Fart in crowded spaces.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:51 PM
3

All non sport and defensive violence is feminine. It is emotional before anything else, and emotion forwardness is a core of feminity.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 04:56 AM
2

I was talking about the content.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 04:51 AM
5

Masculinity is everything forward in logic, practicality and the physical. That is what masculinity has always been at its core at all times in all periods, and it's why 1600s masculinity is different from masculinity in the 1700s, ect. It changes based on perception.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 04:36 AM
1

It's not about touching vs saying, it's about OP thinking something is some perverted double standard when it's completely normal and expected.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 03:09 AM
0

That is ridiculous, you haven't followed the conversation in the slightest.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 03:03 AM
1

It's close enough for the argument, you're being pedantic.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 02:56 AM
5

He's aight, he tries.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 02:44 AM
3

I don't understand how your stuff gets through, but when I post an excerpt from Atlas Shrugged on disrespected husbands, it sits in que.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 02:37 AM
1

They are the same issue, OP and friends are prudish, this is not an issue of discrimination. He would say it's weird for men to help with ties and collars, and to pat each other's shoulders, and simple side hugs, etc.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 01:43 AM
1

No, that was a genuine question, not an argumentative device, I doubt his friends would let him know his fly is down, they probably think it's weird.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 01:27 AM
1

We're not just talking about unzipped pants, it's any platonic touch. OP is insisting there is a double standard wherein women can platonically touch and men cannot. It is simply false, OP and his friends are just prudish. There is no discrimination here.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 01:16 AM
1

OP said ANY touch. Not just wardrobe malfunctions.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 01:11 AM
4

Yea, I was asking OP, because he said his friends wouldn't help him with a simple wardrobe malfunction. If platonic behavior is deemed "wierd," then they are sexualizing the behavior, at least being prudish, this is not an issue of double standards or discrimination.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 01:07 AM
2

Bruh, the topic was platonic touch, we were talking about fixing a wedgie, not fingering ass.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 12:31 AM
2

The statistics don't support that 1/10 claim. And it's not logical to use it for sexism, we just don't have the data for female perpetrators. Deviants and criminals exist, there would be no justice system at all if they didn't.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 12:27 AM
5

Are you drunk today? You're not acting like your usual reddit self.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 12:12 AM
9

You can't complain about not being able to platonically touch, when you're the one with the stick up your butt man.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 11:30 PM
6

Nobody plans for that. It just happens sometimes. It has nothing to do with welfare.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 11:17 PM
4

You wouldn't do that to fix a bro's wedgie, assuming he wasn't capable of it himself?
/r/MensRights18/05/25 11:16 PM
6

Men didn't make it, and women did have power. History is only MEN VS WOMEN, if you only read feminist revisions of history.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 11:07 PM
8

Stop being fallacious, you were talking about a mom fixing a daughter's wardrobe malfunction, not groping glutes.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 11:05 PM
5

The state will take kids for any reason, there's some cases where cps got involved because the family couldn't pay the electricity bill. It's not nearly as clear cut as you're talking.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 11:04 PM
6

It is debatable that men made it that way, but that is ever more reason for feminists to, at least, use Warren Farrell's term, "gyno-centric patriarchy," if they insist on using "patriarchy" at all.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 11:02 PM
3

CS Lewis, for example, describes some of it in his own living memory in this radio lecture. https://youtu.be/Uo-jCgWOQXo?si=r6LG4ThRjVshkTYs
/r/MensRights18/05/25 10:57 PM
5

That statistic is (Firstly exaggerated) because victims of men report more. We're seeing women get called out more and more. To catch female predators it requires the victims to come out and worse court cases, there are no reliable tests we can do on victims of women to prove that he/she resisted or that it happened at all. Men are less likely to even realize they were victims unless it was a particularly violent case, or it's been years and they realize it affected their relationships. Addition…
/r/MensRights18/05/25 10:52 PM
3

It's completely false, what yall are talking about is a new phenomenon that started in like, the 50s.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 10:46 PM
4

We didn't though, that started with feminism in the 1950s. Before that wave men were very friendly, had exclusive spaces, etc, you can hear old lectures about, CS Lewis did one on Philia. It's a very new phenomenon.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 10:44 PM
2

That sounds like an issue with your friends, would they at least tell you if your fly is down?
/r/MensRights18/05/25 10:42 PM
4

We're allowed to touch each other. As the mom did her kid.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 10:38 PM
1

Oh, yes. Sorry, I thought we talking about this sub.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 10:36 PM
0

Where?
/r/MensRights18/05/25 10:35 PM
0

They do? Case in point.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 10:33 PM
28

This happens because the feminist theory of patriarchy is an institution. It places males as the bourgeoisie. That institution is why it's popular to hate on men. Why the reaction to a call for men's rights is always, "what rights don't men have." It is because the feminist theory of patriarchy is institutionalized and much of the world sees men as the new bourgeoisie, a class marx said the proletariat would destroy.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 09:50 PM
6

I don't think you know what custody means, and that you're trying to go on a tirade about social security.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 09:26 PM
3

The MRM supports free speech.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 08:48 PM
1

No, man is man.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 08:35 PM
8

If the state had custody the kid would be in a foster or group home. Your post is nonsensical.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 08:29 PM
3

Grass is green.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 08:27 PM
1

From the very sub you are participating in: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/lNGwSTi5Eu https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/phVH179HNk Additionally the feminist revisions of history are also untrue. Medieval times, for example, we're told women were oppressed by the eViL male, or "mutated female," as Solanas called men. But in the Penitentials, for example, we see it was far more complicated. Men had all responsibilities, including over women. Women were not made to obey. He was responsib…
/r/MensRights18/05/25 07:33 PM
1

Exactly, you're blinded by the institution of the feminist theory of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 07:08 PM
1

Except that is false, men have no power over women. That is the bourgeoisie oppressors idea. Men are more oppressed than women, it's not a competition mind you, and the first thing you'll do after reading that is laugh, and deny it. Because the feminist theory of patriarchy has institutionalized the idea that males are bourgeoisie oppressors.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 07:07 PM
1

Your argument is that patriarchy is simply it's dictionary definition. That feminist usage doesn't pit men against women, that it doesn't say men are bourgeoisie oppressors. The feminist theory adds, in which men have power over women =men are bourgeoisie oppressors. That is precisely what marx stated about the merchant and noble class. It has become an institution, people believe in the feminist theory of patriarchy to a point where gross feminist revisionism is considered common knowledge, den…
/r/MensRights18/05/25 06:59 PM
1

Because they are not. Patriarchy, the word's definition, is simply males at the head of government or a household. The feminist theory of patriarchy insists that males oppress women, not simply that men rule.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 06:48 PM
1

You have told me the dictionary definition of patriarchy. You have ignored that this conversation is about the Feminist Theory of Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 06:45 PM
1

No, it's not. You have obviously not read much feminist literature. What they call 'Patriarchy,' goes beyond its definition.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 06:42 PM
1

That is the WORD patriarchy. Not THE FEMINIST THEORY OF PATRIARCHY.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 06:36 PM
1

Every feminist from Mary wallstoncraft to bell hooks said it in their writings. The few who didn't are feminist like Karen DeCrow, whom nobody remembers for some reason, and ones like Christina Hoff Sommers. And those are regular feminists, doesn't even get into the ones like Dworkin and Solanas.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 06:30 PM
1

That is literally the first thing that comes up when you Google it, and it's in the very metaphysics of feminism.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 06:27 PM
1

The Feminist Theory of Patriarchy What i said is the definition in every single feminist source, and most dictionaries. It states, explicitly, that males are the oppressors, in the same way marx talked about bourgeoisie, and that women are the victims, in the same way marx spoke about the proletariat. It is what the feminists theory of patriarchy insists.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 06:08 PM
2

That's because the gyno-centric society is being questioned. In most places MTP rape is still not considered rape. Just like 40 years ago, people were still debating whether forced oral was rape or not.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 06:07 PM
2

I'll be the Deny-er. There's always something deeper.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 06:04 PM
2

I would make that assumption, yes. It is also why the left rejects men's rights and issues. We are bourgeoisie, we have no issues that aren't our own fault, and we deserve to be disenfranchised.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 05:50 PM
2

The feminist theory of patriarchy is the connection. Specifically the belief that men are bourgois oppressors.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 05:37 PM
3

That's the thing, the feminist theory of patriarchy is such an institution that the revocation of Roe v Wade is blamed on Men, not the fact that it was controversial, not the conservatives, not the women, who do the majority of pro-life work; No, it's blamed mostly on the males. On a child free group, of course, those same people people would put everything on the males.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 05:13 PM
5

Well you commented here, so you're only allowed to watch there, interestingaasfuck has a bot that bans you for participating here.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 01:06 PM
1

That would undermine the MRM beliefs in freedom of speech and be very detrimental to the sub.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 12:45 PM
6

Interestingaf bans Subs have bots that automatically ban you just for participating here.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 12:41 PM
3

Same answer, acquaintances yes, a genuine philia no. Approach like sex, never on first date.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 12:46 PM
10

The Oregon State Senate
/r/MensRights16/05/25 12:40 PM
4

Then you'll be single forever, politics are not a first date topic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 07:25 AM
1

You gotta shop, like church hopping, 100/week church hopping. Unless you just go to church, they provide religious centered counseling for members, usually.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:16 AM
1

The issue with therapy is finding a therapist who's, compatible
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:10 AM
20

I do not believe more than 30% of men have this issue, difficulty admitting struggle. The issue with therapy is finding a therapist who's compatible and affordable.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 05:43 AM
58

I don't talk politics outside the internet except in specific situations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 05:20 AM
8

We've been over this. It's controversial because Vilar was vitriolic to the point where it seems like satire of the contemporary writings of feminist extremists. It is satirical(dictionary definition), it was literally a response to -The Manipulative Man- Vilar also made predictions that have failed to come true, especially in regards to the way feminism went. Like, the book is half a century old.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 04:54 AM
3

You may be able to contact CASA or your social worker if you have another family you can live with.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 03:47 AM
7

That kind of capitalistic love is especially amplified at those ages. Edit: You may also not be aware of Eptstein. Eptein is a very good person. It is very natural for 16 year old girls to move to extremely wealthy old men and have sex with them. Not rape. True love. [insert heart, rainbow, heart, unicorn emojis] you forget what middle and high school were like, sweet heart. Students. By definition by the very fact they willingly go to school. Are social climbers. You must not be aware of how Ep…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 02:23 AM
21

That's not how capitalism works, or what capitalism is. Under any other system you would be mandated to provide, as a man, by social pressure towards altruism, or by the laws themselves to force altruism as seen by the existence of alimony and dowry and even child support. Under capitalism man and woman may say, "i love you because it is in my own personal interest to love you. Because your interests interest me. Because your own success is in my interest." Capitalistic lovers help one another b…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 02:09 AM
7

Mercedes Lackey-The Black Gryphon-
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 12:22 AM
6

Wait until you read SCUM Manifesto.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 11:54 PM
16

Historically speaking, the church also demanded the husband be responsible for the wife, including any crime or deviacy. Your wife made a ruckus at the tavern? You're paying for damages and indecencies, both legally and spiritually. Couldn't get frustrated about it either, cause there was a pennance for anger too.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 11:52 PM
5

Estar Vilar was definitely anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 11:47 PM
-3

Atlas Shrugged has a crazy early scene many find relatable.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 11:45 PM
7

You can still get a good'ol chaperon and gabardine, might not even look that weird with the popularity of medieval fantasy. The World Wars really did men's fashion in. Like, 4 generations of nearly every man going to war in military uniform made the style popular, and it's practical.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 11:43 PM
3

They've always been like that, female criminal deviancy just isn't ever spoken about because of the gyno-centric pressure in society.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 11:36 PM
1

The state always gets its due, that's why you go to jail if you don't pay up, like avoiding taxes.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 04:50 AM
8

That is the biggest issue with child support, the government deserves no dues or taxes.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 04:48 AM
55

Unchecked Toxic femininity You're Outcast from the group at the slightest sign of dissent, very common among girls, just look at what youth, "girl drama" entails. It's also completely untrue that males form larger and looser friend groups, and women have smaller and closer friend groups. Female friendship to the male is just an acquaintanceship, female friendships have a tendency to be shallow, and it's uncommon for women to reach the Level of friendship that CS Lewis calls, "philia"
/r/MensRights15/05/25 04:32 AM
1

I keep telling OP he'd like Camille Paglia, but i don't think he's read her yet.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 03:27 AM
1

Follow workplace policy
/r/MensRights13/05/25 03:19 PM
4

Back then crude and suggestive humor was ok according the rating system. I don't think anyone under 13 watched it though, it came on at like 9 or 8pm. Even Samurai Jack was originally TV-Y7.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/25 02:45 PM
3

I am saying it's a boogeyman argument, and by differentiating the comman man from men, you're encouraging it. You allow them room to hate in the conversations.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:51 AM
52

Johnny Bravo was actually considered problematic, funny to normal people though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/25 04:48 AM
5

Toxic femininity. You cannot argue to change the group, they'll just kick you out.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:42 AM
1

Have you read anything by Camille Paglia yet? Also, why would we align with free Palestine? Palestine stands for literally everything the MRM is against, ACTUALLY EVERYTHING. They favor circumcision They're against religious freedom They're in favor of rigid gender roles, including the sacrifice of the male, like conscription. They are in favor of sharia laws against women and men. Etc.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:28 AM
6

There are. It's called, "influencing"
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:25 AM
5

Not COMMON MEN, MEN are not the source.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:24 AM
8

Pointing out the existence of female deviancy and crime, serves to end the, "patriarchy" or the gyno-centric part at least, it should be welcomed by feminists, and is not misogyny at all, or any kind of sexism.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:23 AM
6

It's difficult to police a group that effectively silences dissent.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:19 AM
2

It is important, however, to sub-label feminists, as to know who to promote in free time to increase the likelihood of reconciliation.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:17 AM
-2

The Men's rights movement was around before reddit buddy.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:13 AM
6

You also said both movements can work in tandem, even though one figuratively smothers the other.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:11 AM
12

It's not charitable to dismiss the MRM as a male supremacist and extremist movement because it's for men. Please contact the ADL and SPLC and tell them to stop doing that.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:00 AM
1

There probably is one, but you still need ones that specialize.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 03:58 AM
2

Now, being from a southern state, that governor should never have been openly strong armed and threatened by the president. But I ain't sad they're losing funds for unfair hiring policies.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 03:47 AM
1

FYI: Masculinity and Masculinism refer to two different things. The hard part is redefining masculinism to mean equality of the sexes, which it should, that's also how feminists get away with the man hating. Masculinity is everything forward in logic, pragmatism, and the physical.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 03:41 AM
2

You know this is a political sub though, right?
/r/MensRights13/05/25 03:28 AM
2

And what does that have to do with male rights and/or issues?
/r/MensRights13/05/25 03:25 AM
13

Beg to differ, domination and oppression have two separate meanings. Going further into the feminist theory of patriarchy, it states that men are the oppressors of women, in order to make the world favor males. Something that has never once happened in all of history, even among males of higher economic and religious classes. There are a few very specific events and conditions in history that might be seen as feminist patriarchal oppression when one doesn't look at feminists revisionism. However…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 03:10 AM
11

Yes, that is literally the definition in every place it's defined. That is the core statement of the feminist theory of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 02:56 AM
6

Yes, that is highly debatable, and highly dependent on specific situations.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 02:55 AM
18

That's not what the feminist theory of patriarchy holds. It holds that the male gender is the oppressor of the female.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 02:54 AM
5

That also depends on the historical context.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 02:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter