TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RatherPlayChess Archive

View 0 posts and 53 comments by RatherPlayChess on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

For the record I never advocated any moral duty, so you're just plain wrong there. I have nothing else to say to the rest of your empty rhetoric.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 02:00 AM
0

So clearly you don't believe in any action as necessarily good or bad based on a moral duty. But that doesn't actually resolve the problem of ethics in society. here is Dr. Sadler on Aristotle's Nicomachean ethics teaching it much better than I can.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 09:11 AM
1

Do you think having morals is good? Don't you have morals?
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 07:44 PM
2

There is a great deal of ethical inconsistency in your post. One minute you're berrating utilitarian ethics ("doesn't matter, had sex") The next minute you're criticizing master/slave ethics as a "metaphysical perspective." Followed quickly by more hedonist/utilitarian bashing “I have no commitment to that other guy, I don’t even know him, so if his girl wants my dick, I’m going to press that.” Then you rave about virtue or "the principle" of a choice as if that will save you after basically say…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 05:20 AM
2

It's only sexist because to them the brain is a mysterious black box. In reality, there is a vast difference between the brain matter of men and women and how it is used. Without considering the function of the forms, in sheer terms of content and volume, from WebMD Disparities in how certain brain substances are distributed may be more revealing. Notably, male brains contain about 6.5 times more gray matter -- sometimes called 'thinking matter" -- than women. Female brains have more than 9.5 ti…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 09:39 PM
3

But TRP is not "THE TRUTH." The red pill is a tiny slice of stoic philosophy, which is grand. The teachings of Seneca, Epictetus, and Aristotle should be required reading for every young man entering the age of reason. But just because this is a solid ethical, social, and political foundation for an individual to live his/her life don't think that makes it THE truth. Anyone claiming that theredpill is THE truth has a lot more reading to do. (A literal endless amount of reading. Nobody is exempt,…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/15 08:27 PM
165

See, THIS makes the entire ordeal make sense. I couldn't wrap my head around why a happily married man who finds out that his wife had a threesome would divorce her. It just doesn't seem like that big of a deal.... Finding out your wife had threesome(s) when she claimed to be a virgin is a huge fucking deal.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 06:39 PM
1

I was fortunate enough to grasp the heuristic of this post without reading it entirely. In response the answer like all other posts on TRP is the game of power.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 06:28 PM
2

this arrangement is just what the feminist says it is: ideal. There is nothing realistic here.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 06:16 PM
2

but a feisty side isn't bad either I was under the impression that is exactly what RPW is. A woman who knows the kind of life she wants to live and the kind of man she wants to take a leading role in that life.
/r/RedPillWomen14/03/15 05:07 PM
-5

Stefan is a textbook sophist. You're better off avoiding him entirely.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 05:18 PM
2

Guy lurker here. If we were dating and you had that type of judgmental friend, it might cause me to think less of you. I am really only attracted to someone who considers their own opinion of themself before considering others' opinions.
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/15 09:58 PM
5

People can only learn in one of two ways at a time. The easy way, or the hard way. If your friend listens to you, she'll have learned the easy way. If she has to figure it out herself, she'll have learned the hard way. I've come to realize that you can't protect people from their own ignorance. A person must WANT to learn in order for you to teach them. Trying to teach someone who doesn't see in themselves the need to be taught is hopeless. For this reason I think you shouldn't try to teach your…
/r/RedPillWomen25/02/15 06:01 AM
-1

If you can't imagine a time when saying the truth might not be in your best interest, I don't know how to make you understand.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 12:53 AM
-2

Self-confidence and self-directed action are redpill values. When an insult has no other use than your own satisfaction at the expense of someone else, it is cruel. Cruelty for it's own sake shows your own insecurity. The inability to see cruelty is pride. It's the bluest of blue pill values. The fact that you said "I'm out of your league" is cruel. The fact that you then tried to impress us with your cruel remark makes me glad I don't know you.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 04:04 PM
0

Good luck with your no money, no job life! This was an unnecessary jab on the manager's part. In other terms he publicly wished upon her an impoverished life without vocation. (suffering) To me, this makes the manager just as brutish as the girl in question.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 11:35 AM
2

in a term "fallacious thinking."
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 05:18 PM
2

He's right though. You don't have to be a Nazi or support the reich to recognize that public perception of a thing is frequently determined by the propaganda of that thing. I'm not saying the Nazis were good. I'm only saying that we view them through a thick lens of the 70 year old propaganda of the victors.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 05:14 PM
1

and someone wanted the right to yell like an idiot in there about the KKK, would anyone be against kicking him out? No. If the site owner decides that a specific person or a specific message are not welcome on his website, they have the right to remove those people and messages. i.e., you do not have the RIGHT to speak freely in a private forum. Of course all of this comes with the open admission of censorship. Reddit would need to be formally recognized as a place for SOME ideas. And thankfully…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 05:09 PM
0

no. Censorship is censorship.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 05:02 PM
1

What you have forgotten in the process of your reasoning is that there is no longer a difference between reddit™ and the state. For example, DARPA aka a branch of the goverment, funds DIGRA, who plans and funds things like Feminist Frequency. This example is FAR from an exhaustive list of examples of leaks and times when it has been shown that government force is behind a campaign for censorship or datamining. It wasn't long ago that I saw Reddit™ admins were actually trading information with go…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 04:57 PM
3

This is the same magazine that TWICE started petitions to ban the Front Nationale party. I had no idea... but I still support their right to free speech, even if they are using that speech to attempt to censor others. If I used my power to censor those who would censor those who would censor people, I have become the monster. Instead, it's necessary to become the stopgap and to say that even if CH was endorsing a detestable idea, it was still their right to support it. I'm sure all of this seems…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 04:50 PM
-3

not lately. If you go back to the OG shit like GURU, there's nothing but redpill. They rap about ENLIGHTENMENT. Modern 'radio rap' and everything post-tupac is just "niggerniggerniggernigger." It's distasteful.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 04:05 PM
1

To be prejudiced. i.e., to pre-judge someone or something before hearing testimony or being met with evidence. The opposite of which is postjudice. To judge after being met with evidence and testimony. By their own standard, if the social justice crowd are going to issue a site-wide rule banning prejudiced people, I say we start by banning those who consider themselves the ultimate authority in judging people as prejudiced without evidence or testimony.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 04:01 PM
2

In reading Othello I'm sure you'll find that a lie of omission is the wrongest sort of lie. It does a man good to have a little Columbo in him. Always be questioning the motives of the person you're speaking with. It's the good practice of any listener. I guarantee you Mrs. Columbo never goes to be unsatisfied!
/r/TheRedPill28/01/15 05:25 PM
1

You are in desperate need of an intro philosophy textbook.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 08:37 AM
2

I was never advocating a one way street. I only said that it would be a better anecdote if she was ready to dump him for loving many women and sleeping with few or none of them, when she suddenly discovers her mistake. He actually slept with many women, and loved very few of them. Writing it this way shows the reader very clearly that mating frequently and loving sparingly increases the value of his affection. I recognize that this is the same MORAL of the story, just differently written. my edi…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/14 07:39 AM
-17

Great parable. Poorly written though. I think the analogy should be reversed in the end of the story instead of TELLING the reader in the form of a moral. When it's told in narrative form, we can see that the value of love hinges on sex in some way. What if Lauren had her facts backwards, and was about to dump him when she discovers her mistake. It turns out Mark had sex with 30 women and only loved a couple of them. Suddenly it's obvious to the reader. It's less blatant, and it paints a more co…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/14 07:23 PM
18

It intersects with TRP because "The red pill" has always meant "the hard truth."
/r/TheRedPill24/12/14 02:15 PM
4

"Just another nail in the "girls really want nice guys!" myth. Nah. That myth will never die. This myth has existed since man stood up from the tall grass and sculpted the Woman of Willendorf. The spiritual worship of woman is an inescapable piece in the mythos of the human condition. Just look at this subreddit. You've made a clan centered around the virtues women REALLY desire, not the virtues society says women SHOULD desire. And adhering to the truths preached here has become a right of pass…
/r/TheRedPill24/12/14 02:01 PM
3

You come to reddit to avoid corporate spam and shitty opinions? That's the last straw! I'm going to spend the rest of my days combing through the waybackmachine just remembering the good ol' days of the internet before anonymity died and everyone was castrated into politically correct faggots and their sensitive opinions....
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 02:18 AM
3

Self hating Asian I have a little Bruce Lee action figure who stands next to my monitor. He's an example of a certain archetype; A kind of person who is forever in the process of mastering their own mind. And the paradox there is if you hate yourself, you deserve the hate. A person who hates themselves deserves to be hated. Hate is a much better than the alternative: someone who doesn't even care about themself.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 02:00 AM
24

lol great examples. Sometimes girls tell me a story about how she's super accepting of homosexual people. "Wow, you have gay friends in 2014? Wow!!" she tells me about how she loves hanging out with friends "Incredible! Do you also love food and music?" This sarcasm works, but you really need to be able to drop the act when it's appropriate.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 12:50 AM
2

In reading the laws, I have found Law 42 Strike the Shepherd and the Sheep will Scatter Trouble can often be traced to a single strong individual – the stirrer, the arrogant underling, the poisoned of goodwill. If you allow such people room to operate, others will succumb to their influence. Do not wait for the troubles they cause to multiply, do not try to negotiate with them – they are irredeemable. Neutralize their influence by isolating or banishing them. Strike at the source of the trouble …
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 10:19 AM
3

Status is the culmination of resources in your life. Physical resources: Property. Money. Time. Your body. Physical capital. Social resources: Access to other women. A good career. A general position of power over other men. Metaphysical resources: Knowledge. Self-Control. Virtues you have cultivated within yourself i.e., winning personality traits.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 09:23 AM
5

So why even say it? When a person realizes their own ignorance, they'll seek out a teacher. Only TIME can cure stupidity through education or death.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 09:09 AM
18

"Don't worry about it your project is shitty anyways, you don't need it" I'm going to go ahead and be the bad guy in this thread. You should not have said that. You should've quietly and politely picked up the piece of material she dropped and returned it. Lashing out at her in response to the gossip your mutual aquaintance shared with you is petty. And please, recognize that I'd rather not be telling you this; I'm not getting off on the downvotes. Don't see it as petty because it's what others …
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 08:39 AM
1

This is how girls think too. Ever asked a girl about why thinks aren't going to work out and got the answer "it just won't." or worse, a silent treatment. This is because women tend to think in holistic systems of immense complxity. They see every piston and gasket under the hood, and they know that all of the parts somehow add up to making the car drive, but they can't explain how it works. See, men are different. We tend to see causal relationships. We might know exactly how a specific aspect …
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 08:23 AM
1

Catharsis. And like you said "just for morbid curiosity." Because it's satisfying seeing a self-righteous woman taken down a peg.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 08:11 AM
-1

There are plenty of racist White/Asian girls who won't date white men because of "privilege" and something-er-other. I suggest you avoid them too.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 08:10 AM
4

I don't exactly know what you mean by "mate guarding" but I can infer that it involves telling her what she cannot desire. A woman will always want what you tell her she cannot have. That is why it is best to SHOW her you have self-respect, and back it up with your words. Show her that if she flirts with other men over a game of pool, that she cannot have you. It teaches her to act properly around you, and it uproots the weeds from the garden of your life. All of that may just be called "not mat…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 08:40 PM
29

I prefer "Be the gardener of your thoughts, not the soil in which they are grown."
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 08:34 PM
1

There is still a strong respect for matriarchs in modern Iroquois society, but most of the business on the nations are run by men. (casinos and such.)
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 01:41 PM
3

"Of course men have shown their superiority by dominating. We are fighting back now. That is what this whole movement is about. To dominate and subjugate men." Nailed it. That is the only pragmatic answer that can be approached with honesty. "Things are not equal, so I am going to make them unequal in my favor!"
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 10:01 AM
2

And you think there's no priest class in Jolly old England?
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 09:55 AM
1

Same with Iroquois society.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 09:40 AM
5

He's a Nietzsche scholar dude. Of course that means being a little bit of a wishy-washy mystic comes with the territory, but "priests" are simply those who wield metaphysical knowledge of the Platonic "forms." That is, the mythic story to which we are all subject and author. As to your discrimination charge... If it is true that men are superior in effort and will, then wouldn't we expect to see some bias on the part of both men and women toward the CVs of men? If we are biased to think a self-e…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 09:38 AM
1

(edited) I have followed this same line of inquiry, and found it only stands to make women angry. "If we are equal, whence cometh inequality?" Along the lines of Nietzsche, I think men more than women are lions destroying golden dragons which on each scale have the words inscribed "thou shalt." Secondly, Considering you understand that dictators always appeal to the women of a society, how terrifying is it that the government program DARPA funded DIGRA to disseminate this latest swath of feminin…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 09:19 AM
7

On whether or not to share the redpill with the unenlightened, I have two points. I. Only time can teach the ignorant and cure the stupid. Only when someone is willing to learn will they seek out knowledge. This is kind of like "When the student is ready, the master will make himself apparent." II. "The Redpill™" is not actually the REAL redpill. The redpill here is a simple program or an ideology that someone may adopt. Contained within the redpill ideology are many truths about courting women,…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/14 08:16 AM
1

lol whatever. I don't care about spelling.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 08:43 PM
0

I think you are almost right and everyone else just doesn't like your spelling. The problem as I see it is "define alpha." If you mean the componant within a human that will always seek to become the best and greatest it can be for himself and all of humanity, then I say sure. We're all built that way. If you mean to know what a good man aught to do, that is a different matter entirely. What is good behavior when a good person does it? What genetic guide is he following? And more importantly, if…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 08:29 PM
-3

They don't waste energy on things they can't control. This is a contradiction with everything you have said before it. As "not shying away from change" is just a fancy way of saying "divert your energy ito the most profitable direction." That does not mean there is no loss of power. A man can be physically beaten into the ground by the world around him. It is possible for a man to lose so poorly at life even against his best efforts, that he is crushed in spirit. The whole world is something you…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 07:50 PM
3

I support the devil's advocate. It's the only way to keep things in perspective.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/14 02:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter