TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Rationalization Archive

View 0 posts and 96 comments by Rationalization on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Looking for studies that already exist isn't pushing a feminist agenda. Of course women do bad things, but pointing it out every single time it happens makes us look like a bunch of children grasping at straws. Here are studies and institutional events that have already been done this stuff (DV and Conviction Rates): "95.3% of men felt domestic violence agencies were anti-male...40% reported being accused of perpetrating DV when seeking help at said agencies." Reddit Post, Actual Article "Judges…
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:50 AM
-2

That's a great takeaway. You will notice, however, that this is not how it is titled. The first attention grabbing detail is woman assaults man. The story is progressed by she tries to sue him. The subordinating detail is that the judge stops it. Stops what? Woman does bad thing. "Teacher grooms pupil and then has sex with him. Avoids prosecution and only has to wait two years before teaching again." is #4 on hot. What possible takeaway is there from such a title and link other than woman does b…
/r/MensRights22/11/13 03:32 AM
-11

You can't. The plural of anecdote is not data. Posting several instances of a woman doing a bad thing does not represent a trend or statistic. It's for the same reason that we denigrate individual stories about men. As the other poster notes, a study needs to be conducted.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 02:20 AM
-16

A single incident does not represent anything and posts like these are not healthy for the subreddit.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 12:57 AM
0

Campus Reform is a project of the Leadership Institute. The Leadership Institute provides training in campaigns, fundraising, grassroots organizing, youth politics, and communications. The Institute teaches conservatives of all ages how to succeed in politics, government, and the media. The Leadership Institute actively supports the entire conservative movement. The Institute doesn't analyze policy; it teaches conservative Americans how to influence policy through direct participation, activism,…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 12:44 AM
1

source? Lots of quotes, 0 links.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:24 AM
3

Male victims of sexual assault: phenomenology, psychology, physiology.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 03:13 AM
1

This needs to be hosted elsewhere. No one is going to give 2 shits about the facts presented as long as they have to visit paranoia/doxx central.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:16 PM
272

Homeless percentage is off and so the is the cancer stats. Men are 67.5% of the SINGLE homeless population, and it is this population that makes up 76% of the homeless populations. http://www.nationalhomeless.org/factsheets/who.html Death Rate is actually reversed. "About 39,620 women will die from breast cancer" http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/detailedguide/breast-cancer-key-statistics "About 29,720 men will die of prostate cancer" http://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostatecancer/detailedg…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:28 AM
0

Just like the jail time portion is also plenty weighted towards men?
/r/MensRights05/07/13 03:18 AM
-2

The problem with the men's rights movement is the same problem with the feminist movement. The ones that are the most bitter, most angry and frankly the dumbest are the loudest.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:41 PM
0

Really? You can't see it? Of course there aren't many women. It's an altruist politcal party that requires heavy tech skillz for participation. Implies that women wouldn't be involved in a party that involves altruism and requires tech skills. They specifically list two qualities that they believe the party has and links those two qualities as some kind of obvious factor to drive women away. Let's use the all too familiar gender swap. "Of course there aren't many men. It's an empathetic politica…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:15 PM
1

The entire linked article is just quoting the atlantic. Why not just post the atlantic article? http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/06/stop-penalizing-boys-for-not-being-able-to-sit-still-at-school/276976/ You know unless you want to advertise by pandering to a different community. /r/conservatives, /r/progun, /r/climateskeptics, /r/tea_party. woooow
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:04 AM
5

Please, unsubscribe from here and stick to /r/TheRedPill .
/r/MensRights25/06/13 11:05 PM
6

Here's something I printed our for my psychology class, you may find it useful/helpful too: Myth: Circumcision prevents HIV/AIDS. Reality check: Three studies in Africa several years ago that claimed that circumcision prevented AIDS and that circumcision was as effective as a 60% effective vaccine (Auvert 2005, 2006). These studies had many flaws, including that they were stopped before all the results came in. There have also been several studies that show that circumcision does not prevent HIV…
/r/MensRights22/06/13 06:20 PM
6

A South African group "tried". They studied one group of a single race of one tribe in Africa. They only looked at penis-vaginal intercourse and quit halfway through. After quitting they said that circumcision prevents the transmission of HIV and now African men who are circumcised don't think they need to wear a condom. This study is now cited as proof that circumcision helps prevent HIV transmission including my Sexual Psychology book. What we do know for a fact is that circumcision does not r…
/r/MensRights22/06/13 04:26 PM
15

Consent is verbal, continuous and active.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 03:25 PM
1

This article is about "participation rates". The "participation rate" for men ages 25 to 54 stood at 97.7% in early 1956, but drifted downward to a post-war record low of 88.4% at the end of 2012.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 04:17 AM
1

The source: http://www.lawtimesnews.com/201206042026/headline-news/lawyers-alarmed-at-criminal-charges-in-family-cases
/r/MensRights15/06/13 11:54 PM
4

You missed, "Faggoty-ass excuse." "This guy is a retard." "I know you were stupid but I didn't think you were ridiculously stupid." "too much of a pussy to enter a debate" The video is an hour and 20 minutes, wow. I only listened for 5 minutes and they can't stop the insults. They're averaging an insult a minute.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 08:59 PM
23

Wasn't sexist, it was homophobic and demeaning. Why should young girls and women politicians be protected and not the other sex?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:21 AM
0

Feminists opposed it.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:39 AM
5

Unfortunately, the FBI says differently. Which is why they said "some".
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:25 AM
2

Thank you. Something tells me citing an organization formerly known as " Foundation for Fathers and Families" who attacks the "violence against women act" wouldn't be seen as unbiased. No matter how legitimate.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:26 AM
4

My comment was more directed at the poster in the picture and not you. I was using your comment on "what else can we do" and the CNN portion as more of a jumping board. Sorry if it seemed I was targeting you.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 10:22 AM
6

1Men are at least 56% of those raped in the military. Did you notice the little quote between each guy? "Girl/she/she/girl/her/she" when talking about the victim. I say at least because of the 2massive stigma applied to men who are sexually assaulted. Do we try and rectify this by doing acceptance campaigns? NOPE ONLY GUYS RAPE AND ONLY GIRLS GET RAPED! http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/13/us/military-sexual-assault/index.html?hpt=hp_t3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21653264
/r/MensRights28/05/13 10:04 AM
8

http://i.imgur.com/7bDwvtk.png
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:33 PM
53

I agree. It should also be pointed out that Top left stats are from: 1989/1992/1988/1995/1991/1996. 20 year old studies are too old to be relevant. Here is the graphic without "LOL FEMALES" Here is the graphic focusing on children. Here is the graphic focusing on commitment. Edit: Removed the repeated information.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:14 PM
1

Yikes, one of the links goes here. That leads to here calling it the way to save marriage. So, how does this person propose to save marriage? Wives of alphas should learn to ignore their husbands’ affairs and mistresses Fire all the divorce lawyers Fathers of daughters have to take a stronger role in punishing and publicly humiliating male interlopers and their slutty daughters Think carefully about gay marriage Stop browbeating women to go on to higher education (especially law school) With the…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:39 AM
2

As they should. Gramma would want to burn the loot if her family was going to fight over it.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:32 PM
1

(not blood related) uncle No one was focusing on the relation. Otherwise they would have seen that important part.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:29 PM
26

How does this happen? Marriage laws dictate that spouses are entitled to the lifestyle they are accustomed to. Her lifestyle is stealing from him. The court just made that lifestyle continue.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:09 PM
3

Here's some more: http://imgur.com/a/pqxly and her talking about mansplaining: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXysCN62d7k
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:25 AM
0

Does that mean women with tech careers don't share the same choices as other women? Or do women with tech careers earn the same amount as men while traveling less, working less, driving to their job less, and having less stressful positions?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:09 AM
14

The police have not registered any case so far against the woman or her husband.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:19 PM
34

She is being charged with indecent exposure, simple assault, open lewdness and harassment.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:58 PM
6

Relevant statistics from divorcepeers. http://imgur.com/NFsesoE Final placement statistics. From divorcepeers.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 05:29 PM
5

"Sexual harassment exposed men's deep, unacknowledged sexual hatred of women and the censored fact that men are the agents of women's oppression." -- Marilyn French, The War Against Women Marilyn French was an English instructor at Hofstra from 1964 to 1968 and was an assistant professor of English at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts, from 1972 to 1976. "Women are systematically beaten in our homes by men with whom we are close. It is estimated that between one quarter a…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:09 AM
3

Where's the proof?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 12:52 AM
-6

all men != too many men. This is just status quo feminist doctrine of rape culture and patriarchy. I was actually interested in seeing if they did blame all men, but nope it's just the normal talking points.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 12:34 AM
2

If the truth doesn't get you anywhere, sell lies.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:03 AM
2

0 proof, anon user, community edited and organized website. Is yahoo answers also a legitimate source?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 05:42 AM
1

Well violence prevention for men is obviously meant to be interpreted as preventing men from being violent.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:16 AM
11

Except the male violence site asks, "Are you violent?" The woman's site does not. The woman's site has a red button to exit quickly in case the abuser might see. The men's site does not.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 06:45 AM
5

Reactionary means someone who holds a political viewpoint which cause them to wish for a previous state (status quo) in a society. Opposition to progress or liberalism; extremely conservative
/r/MensRights16/02/13 05:22 PM
14

So it would instead be: Hitler was a vegetarian if you are a vegetarian you support the holocaust.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:02 PM
5

It's the one in orange isn't it? That smug smirk gives it away.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 09:49 PM
38

Tired of seeing an image so you share it?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 04:21 AM
23

Although it would be pretty great if this happened every time. Each time a boxing match happens one of the fighters stops and complains how this is unfair and pulls out a cellphone in the ring to call the police. Yes, police? This is Joe Frazier and Muhammad Ali just punched me several times in the face. Where am I? I'm at Madison Square Garden for the boxing match between myself and Muhammad Ali. Edit: I once stubbed my toe and punched a baby. It's great that no one would directly equate to how…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:50 PM
3

I thought that was what reactionary meant for the longest time, unfortunately it's not true. A reactionary is an individual that holds political viewpoints which cause them to seek to return to a previous state (the status quo ante) in a society. So when people say we are reactionary, they don't mean we are reacting to feminists. They mean we wish to make women our slaves.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:43 PM
17

That quote is so odd. There was murder, there was torture, and the toast was burnt.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 01:36 AM
1

From left to right: The reddit alien is mourning the death of free speech. Killed by SJWs who don't care about doxxing and SRS for promoting it even if their name wasn't explicitly attached to it. They did leave the dox tumblr up for days longer than the admins were saying to take it down. Reddit users making jokes. Jokes that hurt SRS feelings. SRS think these people would claim that they're living in a post-racism post-sexism world. Circle jerk bacon. An idealization of the SRS as exemplified …
/r/MensRights09/01/13 08:27 AM
7

I'm not sure what community this is but I've seen this web format a lot lately. You should unsubscribe from that forum because it seems like that community all have the same ideas.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 11:23 AM
11

I like the post but, 2.We are just as smart as men, yet we need affirmative action programs in order to show it. Affirmative action does not exist because certain groups are not smart enough. You can both be just as smart and need affirmative action to stand on equal footing. 3 We are just as capable as men, yet we need feminist men to defend us and speak on our behalves. "You can clean up the chairs." My favorite SRS quote when a guy asked how they can help feminism. Also, that's called benefic…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 11:18 AM
24

Occasionally, this isn't one of them. Keep giving us a great name.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:36 AM
1

A lot of times we see what we want to see. We like to say, "think if the genders were reversed." What would you think with a man there and the text on top. Would you think the text should be interpreted as the woman refused to pay, the woman refused to go dutch, or what? You have already cemented the idea that society views men as ATMs so now something that could have multiple interpretations now has one.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 11:34 PM
3

I love you OP. Imgur screenshot instead of a link to the post. Very classy
/r/MensRights22/12/12 10:00 PM
1

I tried explaining it myself and was doing terribly. Here's a copy-paste from /r/subredditdrama A subreddit can display a certain stylesheet based on what kind of domain is used. In this case, linking to np.reddit.com instead of reddit.com will cause the subreddit to display the No Particpation stylesheet. It’s a read-only mode where users linked through the NP domain cannot vote or comment. This works only if the subreddit has installed the NP CSS. If not, linking to the subreddit with the NP d…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:18 PM
2

Invading is when one subreddit links to another subreddit and people go in and vote. The subreddit that is being linked to is then invaded by people that are not part of that community with upvotes and downvotes. This distorts the actual conversation, what is considered OK by that community, and is hurtful to reddit as a whole.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:59 PM
2

Some of it is good, but there is a lot of craziness sprinkled in: You were raised to be a slut, at least through your twenties... DO NOT, under any circumstances, repress your sexuality.... then give your leftovers to the guy you’ll promise to love, honor and cherish for the rest of your life. Wow, how lucky is he! Yes, even in the military; they had to lower the standards so more women could “serve.”....they know that their productivity is why employers can afford to hire you to sit at a desk a…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:48 PM
5

Please add np. to the beginning of reddit links. This should be: http://np.reddit.com/r/relationships/comments/153gis/i_24m_got_contacted_by_my_first_kiss_24f_she_has/ This discourages invading.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:08 PM
9

Don't teach your daughters to distrust strangers. Teach your sons that kidnapping is wrong. Don't teach your daughters to wear a helmet. Teach your bikes better. Don't teach your daughters not to play with fire. Teach fire better. Don't teach your daughters not to pet random animals. Teach animals better. Don't teach your daughters to get a flu shot. Teach virus' better. Don't teach your daughters to wear sunscreen. Teach the sun better.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 07:19 PM
5

CNN update that has the man appealing a Palestinian living in east Jerusalem who admitted pretending to be a single Jewish man before having sex with an Israeli woman. "There was a short foreplay a few minutes before; during the foreplay, the guy tells a few lies, the lady tells a few lies. They both have one goal, and that is to go to bed together. After the sexual intercourse, which was totally consensual, the lady decides to claim that the guy raped her brutally. She comes to court and testif…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:20 AM
2

Then I guess the argument would be over whether or not stealing sperm in order to get pregnant is an integral part of their identity. As far as character or lack thereof. Maybe all sexual intercourse should start with the question, "Are you going to steal my sperm?" In order to verify whether or not it would be rape by fraud.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 04:43 AM
11

In Israel a man was convicted of rape because he told a woman he was Jewish when he wasn't. She consented to sex under the assumption that he was Jewish.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 04:10 AM
15

lit·er·al·ly/ˈlitərəlē/ Adverb: In a literal manner or sense; exactly: "the driver took it literally when asked to go straight over the traffic circle". Used to acknowledge that something is not literally true but is used for emphasis or to express strong feeling. As this is happening close to home it literally hits close to home. As it happens in the literal sense of describing something as it is.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:00 AM
3

And this is why people say we're easy to troll....
/r/MensRights02/11/12 10:49 AM
2

The value of men, particularly as measured by women, is mostly determined by their status, not their looks. Your comment implied that women don't think looks hold much value the couples danced and talked for two and one-half hours... The more attractive the man was, the more the woman liked him and wanted to date him again. Common conversations include profession or major which gives a good indication of status.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 04:35 AM
3

Copy/paste from a previous comment. "Women respond to men's looks. In one ambitious study, Elain Hatfield and her co-workers (1966) matched 752 University of Minnesota first-year students for a "Welcome Week" matching dance. The researchers gave each student personality and aptitude tests but then matched the couples randomly. On the night of the dance, the couples danced and talked for two and one-half hours and then took a brief intermission to evaluate their dates... The researchers examined …
/r/MensRights29/10/12 04:24 AM
37

All military aged males are considered enemy combatants whereas women are considered civilians. Men are disposable and women need to be protected.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 12:13 AM
1

I may have misunderstood your comment. All I can tell you is that they are based out of Michigan so Michigan family court laws are probably your best bet to start from. I don't know the laws they are citing when saying "possession". As a lawyer you're better suited for this kind of thing than I am. I wish you luck in your pursuit of knowledge.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:25 AM
5

The link is under the image. Footnote 1: Child Custody Made Simple, ©1997-2000, Webster Watnik, pages 32-40 — source: "Dividing the Child," Eleanor Maccoby and Robert Mnookin, Harvard University Press, 1992 (study conducted in California). Watnik states that these results are very similar to those in a national study. Footnote 2: Out of Touch, ©1997, Geoffrey L. Greif, page 4 — source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1994. Here's a second one. http://www.divorcepeers.com/stats17.htm
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:43 AM
8

The most interesting thing to me is the breakdown on what the parents want. Feel free to use this in the future. http://www.divorcepeers.com/stats18.htm
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:23 AM
1

I thought so too. Their IAMA has me convinced otherwise, or maybe SRS is filled with really good actors. http://www.reddit.com/r/InternetAMA/comments/11gmbb/we_are_the_rbeatingwomen_mod_team_aua/
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:19 AM
4

SRS equates us with white supremacists, /r/beatingwomen and in the same league as VA. Saying men have rights = pushing the boundaries of free speech to them.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:49 AM
2

This is the same show that laughed at the man who called 911 when his girlfriend was biting and hitting him. They were handcuffed together and he couldn't get away.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:54 PM
5

Please don't post facebook / yahoo answers here. Lets try and concern ourselves with bigger issues not with crazies and internet trolls.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 03:47 AM
2

When told they should stop generalizing they said, "when women... a gender characteristic.... a man is...." All generalizations.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 06:57 PM
12

The male body has ways of shutting that whole thing down.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 07:51 AM
2

The main talker. The guy talking about historical reference in emotional arguments.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:35 AM
3

It will probably cease to be sexism against women when the people pulling these arguments don't want it to be. The notion of a boogeyman patriarchy will be in place for as long as these people want to feel victimized. Well see, it's not ironic. He's one of the GOOD men, who understands what the patriarchy is doing. Every other man is scum of the earth as well as any woman who defends men. Apparently any woman who believes in men's rights only really wants to go back to the 50s and backwards life…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 12:09 AM
8

To them censorship is free speech when they are protecting others from hate speech. It's vandalizing private property because the people who own that property don't completely understand what the posters mean. They also don't understand the trials and tribulations that women go through in this "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:44 PM
16

For those of you that need help with these massive logic jumps. They(the group) don't think the body of the posters are sexist. The whole you don't hate and fear etc. They think the groups at the bottom of them are hate groups and that promoting those groups is the hate speech. John the other hates women because he supports the groups at the bottom of the posters which they believe to hate women. Logical arguments are sexist because they believe that women are emotional creatures. His(main argue…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:28 PM
14

Not true. They aren't being doormats. They are white knighting using my namesake to tell themselves they aren't like the others. All men are terrible except them, they're special and truly understand the plight that women go through. They tell themselves they don't do it for the attention, they're not like those other guys. If they happen to fantasize about a woman swooning to them after the woman realizes they hate men too... Well that's just a happy side-effect. Classic scumbag "nice" guy.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:26 AM
1

Buttercuppitude is right this isn't SRS, feminism, or 2XC. This isn't a place to say, "What about the womenz?!" Let us try and place us above the circlejerks that ban or deride till expulsion anyone who disagrees in the slightest. Or even points out a single flaw or word of passion. I also agree that the implication was unnecessary.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 04:04 AM
2

The whole bill is terrible! Just like the damn car insurance laws. Illegal to not have insurance? This is like obama went back in time and already used his sneaky ways on the automotive industry. What? I gotta pay some big insurance company just because I MIGHT get in an accident and need coverage? What a racket. Ha, like I'd ever get in an accident while I'm staying in my cabin whittlin' the perfect means to assassinate FDR that ratty bastard. And if those damned aliens try and abduct me one mo…
/r/MensRights28/06/12 06:37 AM
4

$25
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:09 AM
8

The problem of averages comes up when one is practiced more than the other. FGM Number affected 135 million women and girls as of 1997 Circumcision estimates of the proportion of males that are circumcised worldwide vary from one-sixth to a third. The WHO has estimated that 664,500,000 males aged 15 and over are circumcised (30% global prevalence), with almost 70% of these being Muslim. Edit: In 2005, about 56 percent of male newborns were circumcised prior to release from the hospital according…
/r/MensRights15/06/12 01:23 AM
23

But it's female privilege granted by males. It is sexist against women but I am more likely to feel compelled to help a woman in distress than a man. However, that doesn't mean I won't help a man. This phenomenon is very common though. Men are more likely to help women then they are to help men. I subbed to feminism to try and get a more female perspective on sexism. Looks like the feminism subreddit is populated more by guys though. I'm glad I found a new subreddit to subscribe to.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 06:59 PM
5

I respectfully disagree. Your first post says, "funny video, but the "77%" joke at the end of the video is based on a wildly flawed statistic and merely perpetuates a myth." While it could have said, "81% is the real statistic and it only factors income not job choice according to the labor department. The income inequality is a myth" Same amount of text but not only does it lead with differing statistics it also gives them an in to debate with you. They could even reply with, "Income inequality…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 04:15 AM
1

It also would have been nice if he acknowledged that there is workplace sexism against women. It does not involve income levels but there are some old boys clubs in certain industries. This affects women by limiting promotions and even casual sexism like, "Can I speak to a man. As a woman you obviously don't know what I need." That happens most prominently in mechanical industries. Women also have a harder time wanting to be involved in certain travel positions that go to Asian and Middle Easter…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 03:08 AM
11

Sorry OP but you suck at arguing in a persuasive manner. You tell her there are studies and statistical data but don't provide them. See how I give reasons instead of just saying you suck and leaving? Edit: "There have been studies that say you could have handled this better. Reliable studies too by the government. No I can't tell you by whom the studies were by nor what they say you'll just have to trust me." You tell her to study up on things instead of telling her what studying would tell her…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 01:53 AM
8

"Women respond to men's looks. In one ambitious study, Elain Hatfield and her co-workers (1966) matched 752 University of Minnesota first-year students for a "Welcome Week" matching dance. The researchers gave each student personality and aptitude tests but then matched the couples randomly. On the night of the dance, the couples danced and talked for two and one-half hours and then took a brief intermission to evaluate their dates... The researchers examined a long list of possibilities. But so…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:49 PM
5

I agree with you babno. I was ready to get worked up about this, but the article is very tame. It seems extremely objective and they seem to be inferring "bizarre" to mean something other than what the author meant it to mean. If their one case of evidence about how it's downplayed is a single word they need to look further. ": strikingly out of the ordinary: as a : odd, extravagant, or eccentric in style or mode b : involving sensational contrasts or incongruities" The use of bizarre could mean…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 04:51 PM
2

According to What looks like a UK census Men travel 10.5 miles to work on average, 67% further than women (6.3 miles).
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:00 PM
8

I'm looking for some sources to back up the main articles findings. I'm willing to give benefit of the doubt, I just don't recognize that website. "men on average commute 36% farther to get to work, a fact that translates into about $1,500 in extra annual pay. Similarly, women are more inclined to pursue jobs that do not require geographic relocation—the result being that females make up only 18% of all workers who are transferred abroad by their employers." http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/a…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter