TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Raudskeggr Archive

View 18 posts and 669 comments by Raudskeggr on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
863

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:44 AM
732

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:00 PM
112

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:10 AM
84

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights20/04/13 10:24 PM
78

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights27/04/13 11:15 PM
38

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:06 PM
32

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:36 PM
18

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights28/10/14 07:11 PM
12

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:02 AM
11

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:34 AM
10

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:52 AM
8

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:34 AM
7

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights01/11/13 11:28 PM
6

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights09/05/13 07:25 AM
2

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:17 PM
0

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:38 AM
0

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights11/09/13 07:56 PM
0

Raudskeggr/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:07 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

More that being abusive justifies the vigilante action if murder. But it also seems that society will choose to believe accusations that a man was abusive, even to the distraction from an even worse crime. This irritates be about American society. Murder is bad, always! Yet we tolerate it so often.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:18 PM
12

Why is it that every time a woman murders a man, all she has to do is click her heels three times while crying "abuse" and she gets out of jail free?
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:28 AM
1

The name "Red Pill" predates that stupid subreddit by a lot; it is a reference to the matrix, where You take the Red pill or the blue pill; how looking into the world of Men's Issues can have you seeing things in a whole new way; understanding that what you've been taught growing up about gender roles, power, and sexism is only a small part of the real picture, from a very limited perspective. I think most in the MRM stopped using phrase once /r/theredpill gained in notoriety. Which is annoying,…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 10:54 PM
10

This is what feminism has become; and the more people hurt by this...stupidity, the fewer and fewer people who will affiliate themselves with these people. This is part of how political polarization in America is manifesting; it becomes more and more "Us" vs "them, and it's because of people like the university administrators pushing this agenda no matter who they hurt in the process.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:04 AM
2

Because it's the only way their ideology is justified.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 08:08 PM
1

I can imagine this poster making a few campus feminists heads explode. :p
/r/MensRights17/10/15 07:35 PM
14

And sexually pathetic men trying to ingratiate themselves to the Dworkinites.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 07:33 PM
3

Affirmative consent is a great example of good intentions, and how the road to help is paved with them.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 05:19 PM
2

It could be a good thing. Think of how many fewer wars we would have.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 07:04 PM
11

"The campus craze of banning outspoken women from university events and debates across the country is such a gift to the misogynistic “men’s rights” movement," she writes. "If I were a conspiracy theorist I would be insisting this is a global plot to end women’s liberation," she continues. So this craze that only exists in her head is definitely not a conspiracy theory? This woman is mentally ill.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 08:49 PM
1

For political reasons, they've been forced to hire a few liberal arts majors to produce bullshit like this.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 10:05 PM
3

And that's after she spent most of it while they were still married. Perhaps her name is Ruby.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 01:01 AM
7

She is true scum. And this headline understates it. She's trying to take his every last penny. Of the crippled veteran she's divorcing.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:46 PM
9

In the short term, it gives the radicals what they want. In the long term, the backlash will turn more and more people against them. So that law is stupid from both a cynical and ethical perspective.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 06:51 PM
1

Put a bullet in this things brain before it can breed anymore.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 07:58 PM
19

They're wrong, but they don't see it that way because "we have to protect the women!". The answer is to sue them into being rational. Sue the university. Sue the false accuser. Sue the bloggers and media outlets that publish accusations as fact. Sue the employers who fire the wrongly accused for gender discrimination. Make it so expensive to throw an innocent man under the bus to make a few radical feminists happy, that it becomes unthinkable. That's what it'll take.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 07:41 PM
1

It has to be trolling. I refuse to accept that someone could utter such stupid nonsense and not know how inane they sound.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 05:13 PM
4

It began by pointing out how women are at times dehumanized in their sexuality, treated as things, rather than people. However, it soon became a term misused as an avenue for demonizing male sexuality.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 06:24 PM
23

Are you receiving child support payments? How about food stamps/WIC/housing assistance? Alimony? Or do you actually have a husband suporting the child? Other family members like parents, grandparents and siblings helping? Even friends? A Boyfriend/grilfriend? If any of these things are true, it's not really accurate to say you're a "Single mother", is it? Because that would imply that you were handling child raising all on your own without anybody else. And almost literally nobody does that. So …
/r/MensRights06/09/15 10:24 PM
9

This is the Mary Sue. Par for the course.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 07:32 PM
29

Never waste an opportunity to hurt your political enemies. Even if they're the young minds you've been entrusted to educate .
/r/MensRights31/08/15 10:19 PM
9

Schlaffly was absolutely not a feminist. She was a horrifically conservative woman, who led numerous "moral crusades" during her career. Her son is the founder of Conservapedia. Though she did work with feminists on a handful of issues, such as trying to get porn banned.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:37 PM
2

This occurred back in like 99/2000. That child is in high school now. I wonder what he thinks about his mother and father? The father got screwed, yes. But the real victim of this woman's selfishness and greed is the child she brought in to the world through deception and betrayal.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 10:17 PM
1

Men's rights is aware of these problems with feminism so Men's rights should know better than to replicate the problems of feminism.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:20 AM
1

The problems with feminism.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:16 AM
1

The fact that it is uniquely sensitized to them should mean we can expect better.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 03:59 AM
0

The disagree button, you mean? :p. Yeah, this sub has kind of turned into a giant circle jerk over the last year or so, and it shows. Most of that posts I see here are silly whining posts about girls getting more fruitloops than boys. Honestly it's turning into bizarro-world srs in some ways.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 03:40 PM
-19

The Red Pill is leaking again.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 11:55 PM
11

It is difficult to call that mentality a straw man when it is so frequently expressed by people in relation to articles like this; when it accurately reflects the prevailing sentiment in such a group of people (though I strongly suspect the prevailing sentiment among feminists is actually more along the lines of "who gives a fuck about that?"), it isn't really a straw man.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 08:35 PM
-11

Yep, Problem solved. :p But I don't think it's an issue of "Men's Rights". The creepingly more adonis-like the expectations for male bodies are driven largely by media; which in turn sells that body image becuase its what people want. So these un-realistic expectations of body type are not created, either with men or women, by that media. We're already genetically programmed to be attracted to that archetype. Rather, it's acclimatizing people to thinking that that is the norm, rather than the ex…
/r/MensRights22/08/15 08:23 PM
2

While I'm not thin-skinned, if you start calling me a fag when you don't know me like that, I'm going to be annoyed with you...
/r/MensRights22/08/15 05:09 PM
-1

This is a pretty good example of toxic feminism.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 05:16 PM
7

One is an accident, twice is a coincidence, three times is enemy action?
/r/MensRights19/08/15 07:51 PM
1

A prosecutor says three young boys in Ohio died because their mother decided to suffocate them, not because children’s services or the legal system failed. These two things are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 07:47 PM
7

for people obsessed with prejudice and racism and sexism, it's amazing. It's like their whole reasoning revolves around their own ability to cast judgement on others, but immunize themselves from it at the same time...
/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:16 AM
12

Ah, no irrefutable evidence. In other words "lots of evidence exists, but I don't like its conclusion, therefore the evidence is wrong" Ironic, because many feminists will, with no awareness of the irony, suggest that women are better at multitasking, nurturing children, and navigating social situations. But of course gender is completely a societal construct because reasons.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 07:48 PM
7

I would expect a few feminists to pontificate on how graffiti is harmful to society now. Or better yet, how "street art culture" is fundamentally misogynistic, and harmful to women. Lol
/r/MensRights18/08/15 07:47 PM
1

The joke here, is that people on facebook have a tendency to upvote and repost inane, stupid bullshit, most of which is made up or unabashedly incorrect. It's an internet joke.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:44 AM
3

“We are seeing an overall gender imbalance (but) … we are still reluctant in higher education to think of men as an under-­represented group or a disadvantaged group,” Really? But isn't affirmative action about equality? I mean, it couldn't really be a cynical move by politicians to curry favor with certain demographics, could it?
/r/MensRights17/08/15 05:13 PM
1

Actually, you should mention the company. I want to know where not to bring my business in the future. Perhaps you could sue? I mean, this is no different from businesses refusing to serve gay people.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 07:43 PM
1

"How do we solve our social problems? I know, let's assault people who have race, gender, and sexually orientation we don't like! That'll fix it!"
/r/MensRights03/08/15 07:13 PM
3

There are real problems facing transgender people. But this shit here only makes everyone fighting that fight look bad. It would be good for these people to stop. :p
/r/MensRights03/08/15 07:12 PM
2

That famous clip from the view? Old repost.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 04:28 PM
2

The mental issues involved are called "being a teenager". It's fucked up that our society lets people get away with that shit, but lets not make that into something it's not. Newsflash: Teenagers are selfish and petty.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 06:08 AM
2

That's the right attitude. People who get fucked by things like this often end up angry and bitter; that leads to the circle-jerky whining posts we often see here. I'd look at it as just an important life lesson about your male privilege in a patriarchal society. Lol.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 06:05 AM
22

Well, hang on a second here though. There are a few problems with this. For one, what if one person changes their mind after recording their consent, but before or during sex? Second, who's to say that the person holding the camera in one hand isn't holding a gun in the other? I mean, it starts off as a nice idea, but practically, it won't stop either violent rapists, nor can it really stop false accusations.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 10:14 PM
8

For those interested, the University has responded: "As the chair/director of The University of Findlay Physician Assistant Program, I can assure everyone that we as a Program and a University certainly neither agree with nor condone the comments made by the student in question regarding the reviews of this page. I am viewing this situation very seriously as it is in direct opposition to the ethical and moral principles we strive to instill in our students as growing professionals. - Sincerely, …
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:59 AM
1

This person, whatever her feelings towards men, is also clearly mentally ill. She probably needs treatment, and probably shouldn't be trusted with sharp objects. What I fail to understand is why people keep incriminating themselves with shit like this in social media?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:54 AM
3

The Sex and the City star believes equal pay and paid sick leave are America’s most pressing political issues. A view of life inside the bubble...
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:33 PM
14

Ahhh yes, the inevitable dependapotamus.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 01:51 AM
2

Or at least choose at the outset. After the baby is born, you have to bed committed, but there should be a choice for men too.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 08:18 PM
2

I think more and more people are undergoing your transformation. There is still a lot to do for women... Especially in places like the middle East. But the nature of the discussion needs to shift to one of human rights and gender egalitarianism. Because half the population are being ignored. The problem with feminism is it became a doctrine. Almost like a religion, it has ideology and doctrine that people are indoctrinated with through our education system, and to question even part of that mean…
/r/MensRights06/07/15 05:44 PM
3

Marketing once again exploiting political bullshit. Whatever.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 10:14 PM
-5

Including Conan O'Brian.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 05:16 PM
8

IF it weren't for that cell phone footage, where would the innocent person be? I'm not seeing much male privilege here.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 07:05 AM
2

To beat publishing gender bias? Anyone have numbers on published living authors by gender? If be surprised if it wasn't pretty even... That said, this is marketing. This will only draw in the demographic they're targeting.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 07:20 PM
1

That's a good point, that might be true. But I was just making jokes regardless.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 05:12 PM
-3

Well, hopefully the ex wife wasn't the beneficiary of his life insurance, since she's the one that caused his death.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 03:16 PM
1

Right.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:47 PM
1

You are the reason people think this sub is full of misogynistic assholes. :p
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:19 PM
2

You've got a lot of anger and hostility there, buddy.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 05:17 PM
2

That is actually a real stretch. And completely misrepresents the history of the life of medieval peasants. It you really think that medieval peasants were better off, then go give it a try. There are places in the world where you can still live that lifestyle. That is an opinion article... It doesn't demonstrate anything.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 04:19 PM
4

Real change takes time. It took, what, 60-70 years from the beginnings of women's suffrage until women's suffrage was achieved. And here we are, 80 years after that, where things have swung to a more insane opposite extreme. But less extreme than before. It'll swing back, and back, but a careful message of sanity by dedicated and vocal moderate people will, in time, win out. At least that's the idea behind the long view. 100 years ago (well, a bit more than that now), factory workers would be lo…
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:15 AM
7

According to that one study done that one single time. :p It's only one study, and no social scientist in their right mind would publish a study saying that there was something men were better at than women; They'd ruin their careers.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 01:35 AM
9

The whole premise of feminism depends on the perception of women being the victims of men. To allow that premise to go away would sink the whole ship.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 01:33 AM
-1

Apparently you were trying to be a dick, since you downvoted everyone who disagreed with you. :p
/r/MensRights29/05/15 01:31 AM
1

If she really was as oppressed as she is pretending to be, some representative of the patriarchy would have put a bullet in her head by now. Honestly, worse things could happen. Her brand of radicalism is just as bad or worse than that of the far right. And it is dangerous. She has the freedom to say what she wants, but her calls to violence and genocide are probably illegal. And her preaching ethnic and gender hatred from her official capacity is irresponsible. She ought to be fired, and if the…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:13 PM
39

Black man vs women; sjws will be breaking their backs with the mental gymnastics to decide whose side to take. :p
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:35 PM
2

It's one thing when the little teenage shits on tumblr make this error; but someone who is supposed to be a professional should know better than to mistake institutional racism for individual racism, and definitely better than to apply the macro argument to the individual. Diversity. Hah.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 10:30 PM
2

Well, in England or the UK, at least, he could (and rightfully should) sue the fuck out of that bitch.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 07:06 AM
2

The target demographic of this article, if they vote at all , is already basically guaranteed to vote Clinton anyway.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 09:28 PM
2

Equality.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 02:34 AM
15

God damn it. Male:female as man:woman. It's not "women and males". You can anyways spot a misandrist by this language.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 05:50 AM
-32

Down votes don't make it untrue, pal.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 04:02 PM
-37

In this case, transgender people probably do need the help more than you. But if you can at night knowing you defrauded the university at the expense of a group with a 50% suicide rate...
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:54 PM
2

I hope it makes those on the left who are not insane fascists wake up and see what the people they keep electing have been doing. The rest left is starting to be even worse than the far right. Makes the party here in the US look rational.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 04:31 PM
2

These brown-shirt tactics the sjws employ is going to bigger them in the ass. Censorship and pitchfork-mob bullying will, inevitably, disenfranchise and offend more and more people, and as that happens, the payback against them will correspondingly increase, and their critics will have more and more credibility with the general public.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 10:11 PM
1

For a job interview? Yes. I've applied for jobs with multiple candidates, high competition. The qualifications were let God for several of us. Here on the left coast, ties are infrequently worn. But I wore a tie and jacket, like a professional, and that set me apart.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 05:48 PM
2

And British judges, too, apparently. "Oh dear, we wouldn't want to embarrass the pedophile serial rapist--she is a lady, after all."
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:15 AM
11

I am engaged. To another man. I have to tell you, I have enough reservations about marriage in that circumstance. If I was dating a woman...There's just no way I'd even be thinking about it yet. Way too much at risk if you marry a woman. You're basically voluntarily giving up your right to your own life. At least, without a solid prenup and a really good lawyer.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:20 AM
2

She ended up leaving him for one of her son's friends. I don't feel as sorry for Hogan as I do for the friend of the son, TBH. That kid had better have someone tasting his food once he starts to get a bit older.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:18 AM
3

You're being rational! It is about equality; it's just that their definition of equality means "more for me and the people I like".
/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:22 PM
13

I will enjoy reading about the lawsuits where Yale gets their asses handed back to them by male title nine defendants.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 09:51 AM
16

Benenson says they are planning a number of follow-up analyses to find out if men in psychology are underrepresented yet somehow still prevent women from cooperating more. This is a little irritating. It's an absurd supposition, but they have to follow up and rule that possibility out, because it's guaranteed that feminist academistas will suggest that as a reason. (I.e., the reason women treat other women badly is patriarchy).
/r/MensRights03/04/15 09:40 AM
6

I used to be pretty far left myself, but the crazier and more insane that left gets, the more I find myself in an alien world. It's disheartening to find myself agreeing (in part) with Breitbart. When you're such a whack job that Breitbart seems sensible by comparison, it's time for you to reevaluate some things.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:43 AM
3

You might be an actionable position to sue her for slander.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 07:54 PM
1

The trouble with the revolutionary model is that the revolutionaries tend to be worse than who they supplant.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:45 PM
1

Elections are one way of exerting political force, and views do matter; to their away an important tool is foolishness.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:12 PM
1

This should be simple for everyone. Strategy for getting laid? Trp Misogyny? Trp Gf is a bitch? Trp. Blah blah alpha male? Trp. Women, am I right? Trp. Family court discrimination against men? Mr. Gender discrimination in DV policy? Mr. Erosion of civil rights in rape accusations? Mr. Gendered income disparity? Mr Media ignoring male victims of disasters? Mr. The difference should be easy there.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:10 PM
16

BUT MEH VICTIMHOOD!!
/r/MensRights13/03/15 05:07 PM
3

Yeah, letting corrupt politicians continue without answering to voters, that will fix everything.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 03:26 PM
2

Ask Valerie Solanas.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 04:36 PM
1

She sounds like the kind of person who deserves to be exiled to a place like Syria.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 06:28 PM
2

Or just charge $500 an hour to spend eight months negotiating an out-of-court settlement. If there is such a surplus of God-damned lawyers around, why are they still so expensive?
/r/MensRights09/03/15 10:18 PM
10

Welcome to America, where his civil rights are trumped by her comfort and convenience. Feminism, this is why people don't like you anymore.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 10:07 PM
2

Rule number one of reddit: if someone tells an unbelievable story, it probably is.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:47 PM
4

This is really a religious case... Or another incident of a religious person demanding that the rest of humanity accommodate them, no matter how much it inconveniences them, because they believe they are entitled to it.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 11:31 PM
19

Last April, when Kenneth Dragseth, superintendent of schools in Edina, Minn., presented a paper describing his district's gender gap at the American Educational Research Association's annual meeting in Chicago, he says the reception ranged from chilly to hostile. Female education researchers in the audience questioned whether helping boys would mean hurting girls.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 04:19 PM
66

She was also not "indecently exposed", while he was nude. That could also make a difference.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 06:50 PM
8

They will. Just read the comments. "Gee, I wish my teacher had been like that!". Well, what if any of the boys didn't, but felt like he didn't have a choice? What if she got pregnant from one, and then extracted child support, as this society entities her to, even if she committed statutory rape during conception.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 08:07 PM
7

If being a feminist means that men don't deserve equal rights, then feminists fucking suck.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 09:02 PM
1

More like "why do you care about the environment so much when there are feminist issues you could care about instead?"
/r/MensRights04/02/15 09:04 PM
6

All men are probably guilty of something, right?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:19 PM
1

Well, it wouldn't do to let the riff Raff in. Then you might actually get conflicting points of view. And it's impossible to have an echo chamber then!
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:50 PM
9

Unfavorable to whom, if course. Tia has waaaaaaay more subscribers than any of the sjw leaning subs. To arbitrarily say "these are the users we want, and these are the ones we don't want" would be very, very stupid. Reddit is in theory supposed to find ways to make money; to arbitrarily censor would be a huge mistake. You need users to make money, and if those users aren't free to discuss what they want and express their views, they'll go elsewhere. They've done a little censorship in the past, …
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:45 PM
11

Never once does this bitch own her actions. Not once does she accept responsibility for making poor decisions. "No, I'm not abusive, my work is just really stressful right now." "No, she doesn't have an anger management problem, it's society's fault for reasons"
/r/MensRights25/01/15 06:10 PM
16

Friendly reminder: if mras agree with something, then it's probably bad, and therefore all true feminists must take the opposite stance or they would actually be siding with an MRA, which literally makes them anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 05:54 PM
1

Here's the kind of dickhead attitude i've come to expect from rand fans. You managed to get a degree and stay so stupid? I'd sue for my tuition money, 'cause you've been had.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 04:11 PM
0

Fucking Ayn Rand references? Leave that bitch out of this. :p
/r/MensRights24/01/15 02:03 PM
2

You have to make an example if people who don't play by the rules. Otherwise the whole extortion scheme falls apart. Just ask any organized crime expert.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 02:01 PM
3

Well, there's the manslamming that my BF and I get up to , I don't mind that so much. But this? Even actual feminists and most reasonable-minded people are (ahem) slamming this whole "experiment". I don't think that anything needs to be done about it, it's already become sort of a joke.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 01:01 AM
1

Of she's convicted of a crime like murder or manslaughter, she had to go to prison. Mandatory minimums.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 11:06 PM
1

Arrow. :p Whoops!
/r/MensRights10/01/15 08:47 AM
3

Well, if it was acknowledged that it worked both ways, that would be one less air in quiver right? And even upon being forced to acknowledge this, the goalpost would move, saying that women are more harmed psychologically by these unrealistic standards. There'd be a BS survey by some pseudo-scientist to back up the claim. Pointing out their own double standards and hypocrisy won't suddenly turn the SJW types and radicals into reasonable, fair-minded people.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 12:40 AM
3

Yeah that's pretty shit. The only thing that might actually be abuse on that list is the "makes you feel ugly and useless" part...and only if that's intentional. That does fit into a pattern of abuse. I guess shouting and smashing things too, if we're talking about rage events. But as to the rest of that? "never admits he is wrong"? I mean wtf, if that's the case than I personally have been abused by almost every woman I've ever known. :p And then the list of what a good man does? Essentially bo…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 12:03 AM
2

I'm sure it was a rational response, making use of well-sourced factual information in a reasoned and informed argument. And of course I'm sure they never used phrases like "Go kill yourself" or "fuck you" as a way of refuting your comment.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 10:47 AM
19

And anyone who points out that 1 in 10 homeless people being a woman menas 90% of homeless poeple are men is, apparently, "misogynistic". Which is somewhat baffling; if 90% of the people who are homeless are men, we as a society are obviously failing men far more than failing women.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 09:10 PM
11

Of course one of the top comments is about how much of a jerk this guy is... As if that meant he deserved it.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 06:43 PM
12

Now just wait for some "feminist" blogger or talking head to start in about how this is in some way offensive to women. :p
/r/MensRights01/01/15 07:28 PM
17

You don't have to imagine. There it is right in front of you.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 07:16 PM
6

Well, we know what number Madison @MadisonSN's weight starts with!
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:27 AM
8

Let's see... Horrible crime against humanity... All male victims... How can we make this about feminism?
/r/MensRights16/12/14 10:04 PM
1

Got to make room for more nonviolent offenders, drug addicts, and POCs.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 07:27 PM
17

Matriarchy harms women too? :p
/r/MensRights14/12/14 05:24 PM
1

At least some of this is satire/fake though. If that makes it better. And take note that the real ones are statistical out-liars.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 11:40 PM
13

Let's remember that it's not saying that women are more predisposed to violence than men. Rather, this is likely due to the fact that when women use violence against a domestic partner, they are more likely to evade negative consequences for their actions than men, thus the main deterrent against women hurting their partners is their level of human decency.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 07:24 PM
1

And that's not the case if they stay home three days every month? :p
/r/MensRights06/12/14 04:16 AM
3

Just mandate that menstration be a valid reason to use sick leave.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 12:24 AM
2

You know you've gone round the bend when Russian politicos are more rational and level-headed than you.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 07:13 PM
6

False accusers are hardly punished already. There have to be some consequences for making false claims that could land someone in prison. This is very reasonable. But these radical groups are not really about reason.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:05 PM
–

We have no way of knowing if he's lying or not. All I can say is, if it were a female actress saying that, the torches and pitchforks would already be on the march. But assuming it's true or false with no evidence makes you as bad as those brainless assholes throwing hatchets at Bill Cosby right now.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 07:59 AM
25

His only real selling point is that he's such a first class douchebag. Someone you love to hate.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 07:58 AM
5

Well they have. He's been getting accusations since the seventies.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 08:16 PM
-7

Yeah... Let's maybe not be so condescending in here? It's not SRS, being a sarcastic know it all doesn't score points.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:32 PM
9

There is a dilemma for the sjws. On the one hand, he's a POC. But on the other hand, he's guilty of the crime of being rich and a male. And that of course trumps all.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:30 PM
7

The fear is more useful than the reality. These people depend on the siege mentality to function. Add to the Cosby thing, whether he did it or not, no evidence exists that crimes were even committee, let alone that Cosby committed them. Unsubstantiated accusations years later so not represent evidence to convict. Or to put it this way: very reasonable doubts exist. The women accusing him know this. So what is their motivation? Vindication? Public recognition? The last time this happened, there w…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:28 PM
0

The fucking article that the thread is about.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 11:31 PM
20

I like how everyone is acting as if she's telling the truth when there is security footage proving that she lied.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:05 PM
5

Yes. And if the mother was arrested in this scenario, while the father was the abuser, the women's groups would be going crazy about such a terrible precedent.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 08:36 PM
-2

Yep, this is pretty stupid. But these people ate for sure a small minority at least. Wasn't it sundering like 55% of women voted Republican, even? Go patriarchy lol
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:13 PM
1

This is a bit this issues. The woman who was quoted in the article made it clear that she thought men were "muscling in" because they like bossing women around. Apparently. Of course that can't be a common view, but no. Anyone should be allowed to do whatever they want with their life If it's female-dominated simply because more women choose that career, fine. That's an organic thing, but everyone has freedom of choice. If it's because men are prohibited or shouldn't be allowed, then this is exa…
/r/MensRights03/11/14 08:22 PM
9

Center-left with left-libertarian leanings. I'd say that's the most common political outlook on Reddit.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 01:07 AM
3

People need to be more careful of who they add as mods to their subs. Not that One Y was that active anyway. sigh. It's not so much that I mind people appointing themselves as the thought police. I just wish that the thoughts they had were a bit more intelligent.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 10:47 AM
36

Basically, these moral hysteria victims always get it wrong. When ever the choice is between protecting innocent people, or punishing bad people, we always have to focus on protecting the innocent. There is no other felony where any a criminal court would ever consider reversing the burden of proof. Yet somehow with rape it is okay to send innocents to jail because it makes it "easier" to get convictions... “You are going to have decisions from jurors based on misperceptions about how victims sh…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:20 AM
55

Justice Susan Owens wrote the dissent, arguing that the majority’s opinion would reverse decades of progress in the handling of rape cases. It is bad. An actual state supreme court justice, the highest judicial authority on the State level, without irony, based their dissent on political ideology, and not legal principle and precedent. TIL that a supreme court justice would, because of political beliefs, actually side against "innocent until proven guilty" for infamous crimes, and think that app…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:15 AM
3

Uh?... The article is completely overblown. This is what is known as "clickbait". :p Yeah, there are few true facts in this article, properly verified, etc. The main reason that this story hasn't been reported on more widely is because it has largely been fabricated by its author.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:37 AM
3

How can she slap?
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:12 AM
2

But please, won't someone think of the children!
/r/MensRights28/10/14 10:09 PM
0

Fair enough. But the definition of "rape" in many jurisdictions and countries specifically refer to penetration. So that's a bit of an oversight in that comic.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:45 AM
1

It does forget a few of the lesser-known ones. Such as: If you were made to penetrate, you were not raped. At least according to the law.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:06 AM
2

The author of this article, as well as many commenters seem to have their own stupidity going on regarding their perception of just what being transgender means. Is find the author's position more credible if he himself weren't quite so prejudiced. That said, when a person's qualifications for a job are called into question because of their race and/or gender, this is the essence of discrimination, and almost comically ironic when that job is being a diversity coordinator.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 08:01 PM
5

The ÀCLU has always been aimed at pushing leftist politics. Once upon a time it was about protecting black people from discrimination, and combating the government's violations of constitutionally protected rights. Which was good. But now they are mainly focused on pushing an agenda that is less about equality, and more about ideological purity. Just like the political extremes. The rain why we're seeing all of these mean-spirited campaigns, is because Democrats, and the Obama administration in …
/r/MensRights20/10/14 08:01 PM
1

That would then at least be a verifiably true statement, which would probably be better; but libel precedents typically don't require that harmful statements made about someone necessarily be false.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 12:52 AM
0

When you look at policies like this, you have to ask yourself: What makes rape special? You have murder, violence, armed robbery, assault happening every day, and with far more prevalence than rape. These crimes are all life-shattering as well, and the victims (those who survive) are also traumatized. So what is it about rape that's special? Look at who wins and who loses. At the end of the day the people pushing these policies are self-serving, and amoral totalitarians who are cynically pursuin…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 08:52 AM
3

If the university sent out an email stating that someone was a rapist, they would rightfully open themselves up to a lawsuit that they would probably lose.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 08:42 AM
2

Swap the genders and this would be trashed as misogynistic victim blaming. Lol! But yeah... People like this would benefit from some soul-searching. To learn if their motivation is really pure, or if it is from a place of hate and self interest.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 07:12 PM
1

It's unfortunate, but it does sort of feel that way. It's too bad there's no middle ground. You have the assholes who hate on one side, and the assholes who hate on the other, and everyone who really just wants a better world where everyone gets along just tries not to pay too much attention to them while they ruin everything.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 07:16 PM
11

In all honesty, Threads like this which have a sort of "Women are entitled cunts" kind of theme do fit well in RedPills atomsphere. Men's Rights is about shedding light on areas where gender inequality negatively impacts men; areas largely ignored by the feminist movement, etc. It shouldn't really be a place to bitch about women, as if all women were like that because of a few "entitled cunts". Coming across as an angry man who directs his anger at women is exactly what your far-left feminist ty…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 06:27 AM
2

Every time they say things like that, just preface "man" with "Black". Sounds pretty bad then. Works for other ethnicity too.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 06:21 AM
1

This is good, but does nothing to address the glaring methodological problems with the CDC's survey. It's a political manipulation, and rather sickeningly undermines the CDC's credibility.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 11:20 PM
1

He's saying that the mods of 2xc are ideological extremists who are using censorship to push a political viewpoint while silencing alternative views.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:03 PM
8

There, it has finally happened. A feminist had criminalized being male.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 05:49 PM
16

This actually violates UN and EU established policy on censorship and free speech.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 05:41 PM
2

We have to keep bringing the ratio smaller in order to intensify the rape hysteria. :p
/r/MensRights01/10/14 05:06 PM
2

It's like they want false convictions of innocent men. But of course they don't want that, they just care about the epidemics of one on four women being raped. Or was it one on two yet?
/r/MensRights30/09/14 11:33 PM
2

You're dealing with the attitude of an English peasant. There is a reason that country's tabloids are so outrageous.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 07:49 PM
6

Especially after pointing out that 99% if taxi drivers are male. 99% of drivers, 80% of accidents? Mkay. Another point. Most cab drivers in NYC are ethnic minorities, being West Asian, Black, or Hispanic. So are they saying that it's the fact that they are men that makes them uncomfortable? Our that they are brown men? And why does our society think that either form of prejudicial discrimination is okay?
/r/MensRights27/09/14 07:20 PM
3

What in the hell. It's like the economist is trying to be gawker suddenly, publishing shitty click bait articles? I know economics are boring and readers can be hard to compete for these days... But being trashy and publishing shit is not the way to do it. That niche is already well-occupied.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 07:15 PM
9

You thought they wanted a debate. Everyone knows their first impulse is to censor anything that questions their gospel.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:02 PM
11

I'm sure they will open-mindedly examine you evidence and acknowledge that you have a fair point. Lol.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 07:51 PM
1

ClestestiUKate Dries Today 2:19pm EShare to Kinja jShare to Facebook iShare to Twitter rGo to permalink Given that there's only a 2% chance of any of those men being innocent, why haven't they been arrested yet?
/r/MensRights23/09/14 05:33 PM
4

They are accountable. Any person on that list could, quite easily, sue any group or individual who v either actively spreads the list around, or permits it to be posted. This would potentially include the university
/r/MensRights23/09/14 05:28 PM
2

I've been flat out called a sex traitor, if that says anything. To me, it sounds like you've been exposed to some TERFS.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 03:23 AM
5

I'm a little surprised to see a post like this in /r/mensrights! But it's a fascinating AMA, nonetheless. Thanks for sharing your experiences. Now, as a man, I am apparently not even allowed to voice my opinion on women's rights. Doesn't matter that I still have breasts, a vagina, and two X chromosomes - nope. Because I pass as male, I have suddenly lost my ability to understand the plight of poor womenfolk. So, do the people who don't accept your views know about your biological sex? Or are the…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 10:51 PM
6

They are afraid, like the guy on that panel; but they are afraid of being shouted down into submission by an estrogen-fueled rage from the bully pulpit.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 10:29 PM
15

Mostly miss. You see when men disagree with radfem or sjw types, they are misogynistic jerks; however when women do it, its because they are confused, or ignorant, or in some other way messed up.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 08:00 PM
5

“[Ms. Ruddy] has been wronged,” said Claire Carter, assistant professor of women’s and gender studies at the University of Regina. That tells you just about everything you need to know about this fabricated "controversy". Misguided feminists who believe that forcing this business to do women is somehow dismantling the patriarchy. That said, they really shouldn't, as a business, reject customers because of their gender. That is not the same thing as women forcing a gentleman's club to induct fema…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:18 PM
20

Camden’s population of 77,000 had long survived solely on Pathmark for groceries. How the heck can you have 77,000 customers all to yourself and not be able to stay profitable?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 10:40 AM
2

I was referring to the soft spot certain admins, like the former admin Intortus, have/had for certain sub's of an SJW bent. Like how one (admittedly bad) witch hunt here let to threats of deleting the sub, while SRS got away with doxing.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:17 PM
19

The rule is to prevent members of any subreddit from raiding another and manipulating the discussion, as well as the votes, to be in their favor. However, the way the rule is enforced by admins is rather selective, making it more favorable for the SJW types.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 08:14 AM
18

If she does any time at all. Whereas if she succeeded in framing her husband, he'd do 10-20 years and be a registered sex offender for life!
/r/MensRights22/08/14 05:05 AM
2

The article failed to mention that factoid. It also failed to mention that police brutality is tied to socioeconomic status of victims, which somewhat correlates with race. But a connection with race doesn't mean a direct causation in and of itself without looking at the big picture. Unfortunately, the demographic of mother Jones readers, privileged white women with far left values, tend to be very myopic in outlook.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 07:16 PM
1

Speaking of post-apocalyptic death squads. Most ISIS victims are men. Same is true of Boko Haram. All they do is commit acts of terrorism, loot, plunder, and kill the infidels of all genders. And they tend to spare women's lives once in awhile; the men are always dead. But of course, they're only really bad if they are also raping women. Because all that bad stuff like murder and genocide everything isn't nearly as horrible as rape. You know it's one thing being a male feminist. Believing in equ…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 09:59 AM
1

You are either an idiot, are replying to the wrong post, or a troll. Either way, You're wasting your time.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 09:36 AM
10

Essentially, you are looking at the same model as that of a religious organization. Their head-truth trumps all, even when objective facts outright contradict their views. Ideologues have no ability to rationally consider things related to their ideology. If they did, they wouldn't be so intensely ideological. The loudest and most emotional are usually the radicals. And they tend to be absolutist, and ferociously intolerant of anything which calls their ideals into question. So, the beloved femi…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 07:56 PM
0

A major societal collapse would see these social cockroaches quickly become irrelevant.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 07:46 PM
-14

That angry self-righteousness you're displaying right now? You're acting like an SRS-er. Just thought you should know.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 01:52 PM
3

Your ordeal sounds terrible... But I'm glad it turned out okay in the end.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 05:36 PM
6

That is what women are claiming they want, but they want only the benefits of equality not its downsides. This is an inherently contradictory statement. I think what you mean, really, is that feminists don't seek equality; rather they seek privilege. Which is of course human nature; most people are looking to one-up themselves over everybody else somehow. The annoying part comes when they pretend to be victims while they in reality hold most of the cards.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:20 AM
8

And of course, the underlying implication that "he must have done something to deserve it". Ah. Equality.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:18 AM
21

It was on the front page some time last year. SRS sided with her. FTFY
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:17 AM
2

Not university administrators, young people being "educated" by them, or the disciplinary tribunals that they hold for accused rapists. They're not a straw *person when they are doing real harm to people.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:23 AM
2

And if absolutist sex-negative "activists" were capable of making a distinction between being merely intoxicated and incapacitated by alcohol, then everybody would be in agreement on that issue.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:37 AM
3

Is about responsibility for one own choices. One can be raped while drunk. But having drunk sex that you later regret is not rape. I am absolutely certain that you can consent to sex while drunk, because I have personally done so on numerous occasions.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:46 PM
1

Since the cop is the one with all the power, it's hisfault that you shot him while drunk. As the poweless one, you lack agency.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:43 PM
7

There is a certain kind of spotlight you don't want. Best not to act like a tumblr sjw.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 05:21 PM
64

There are no pedophiles in that comic. They aren't sexualizing kids or indicating sexual attraction to them. Bathtub photos of babies is not by default "pornography", even when the law regards it as such. It was not so long ago that it was very common for parents to have "bathtub pictures" of their kids. I'm pretty sure that it was mainly done for the purpose of embarrassing them when they became teenagers. That is not pornography and those parents aren't pedophiles.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 07:50 AM
0

Tell me more about what most feminists want.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 02:56 AM
6

Not even close.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:18 PM
1

Now you're in the right head space!
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:58 PM
41

What's the big deal? She only killed a male. Not anyone that actually matters !
/r/MensRights07/07/14 10:20 PM
1

One in negative for women!
/r/MensRights30/06/14 10:18 PM
4

Won't be long before every woman is raped! Go Patriarchy!
/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:51 AM
1

While your scenario is hardly equivalent to what we're looking at in the OP, I can guarantee you one thing: however it might be downvoted, it would not be censored in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:49 AM
1

Most feminism is edging to the radical end of things these days.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:31 AM
12

It's very convenient to justify censorship by saying simply "this isn't the place for that", or "This is a 'safe space' for women". Safe from what? Uncomfortable truths? Discussion that might force them to question their self-serving ideological values? If "patriarchal oppression" or "misogyny" means to simply ask uncomfortable questions or question feminist values sincerely, then That place isn't "Safe"...it is purely ideological. Don't buy into that bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:31 AM
19

This judge has a history of coming down hard on men. She's also been known to put her socially conservative views ahead of what is legally correct, or ethically reasonable from a judicial standpoint. Oh...Texas, though. If Florida is America's cock, and Arizona is the asshole, then Texas is the country's Taint.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:18 AM
2

Don't tell me what to try and pretend! after all, it's only male sexuality that's gross and wrong. Womyns' sexuality is beautiful gift from the moon goddess.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 02:10 AM
1

Just wait until the feminist bloggers use some fallacious argument to explain why this study is bullshit(in their view). After all, men are the violent aggressors! The oppressors! This study is just patriarchal propaganda!
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:09 PM
1

Strictly speaking, it would have to be something like ad mulierem or ad feminam; but by Latin is very rusty
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:06 PM
-2

One can not make an ad hominem attack against a woman.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:55 PM
4

They're getting it on college campuses, but the lawsuits from the whole new class of Title IX defendants they've created out of that stupidity are proving that they're not getting their way in the legal system or society at large.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:47 PM
1

Tenure is a bitch, and so is she. Lol.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:45 PM
10

Check out her online persona. She describes herself as a "Totalitarian Liberal" as well as a Radical Feminist, with a capital R. She is a genuine grade A bigot, and one who uses an egotistical and inflated sense of moral rectitude to justify that bigotry, much like a religious extremist would. She's nothing, a nobody. Just another narcissistic idiot trying to capture their 15 minutes of fame. Once she has a book deal and regular highly-paid speaking engagements, she'll probably chill out on the …
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:44 PM
3

I think most people were rolling their eyes at it. :p
/r/MensRights14/06/14 01:27 AM
8

Seems pretty typical. Anything that doesn't toe their line=anti-feminist. Anything about men must automatically be against women. And since women=feminists, men=anti-feminist. SJW logic 101. It's a shame that these asinine clowns ruin it for the people who really are just interested in equality. The funniest thing is that they actually threatened violence; while these same people, at the slightest hint of some internet troll ineffectually saying something threatening, will thereafter and for alw…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:59 AM
10

Single because of her expectations. Can we please not stoop so low as to start acting like SRS?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 10:02 PM
14

Wait, fuck I thought this was tumblrinaction.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:52 PM
5

30+ year old single women, especially...
/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:51 PM
10

~women's ~ gender studies, sociology? Maybe psychology? One of the basket-weaving degrees anyway.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:35 PM
14

How dare you invade a womyn's space with your male concerns!
/r/MensRights03/06/14 05:11 PM
2

Title ix of the civil rights act. :p
/r/MensRights02/06/14 10:22 PM
6

In situations where it hinges on sexual assault, going with the courts is probably as fair as it gets. Otherwise the tribunals, or kangaroo Cory's as they're called, will never be fair. They only serve the purpose of lending legitimacy to the misandric policies that assume all accusations are true (who cares if a few innocent men's lives are ruined if a we can stop all rape forever, right?), and solely target men. A fair process would use the greater resources of the legal system to determine if…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 10:16 PM
51

Without field sobriety testing on the spot, or credible testimony as to the competency of the alleged victim, any such assessment would rely on supposition, and further more be highly subjective. This is why they essentially regard any level of intoxication to be too much for a woman to be responsible for her own choices. Never mind that consent is consent as long as the consentors are adults and no coercion or payment is involved. What really must be done is, rather than excuse a person's regre…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 07:39 PM
16

In other words, they essentially acted under the assumption that any accusation is automatically correct, without verification. Really, a wise university would base their disciplinary actions for actual crimes in the outcomes of actual criminal proceedings in the courts. I.e., allow the due process of law take is course, and only punish those found to be guilty. Yes, sometimes innocents are convicted and guilty go free, but that is a small percentage and in every way superior to "presumed guilty…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 07:32 PM
3

As a gay man, I am intensely conflicted by these images. lol.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:42 PM
10

Yep. I just don't hesitate to challenge the radical and hateful views when I encounter them. Most people find it hard to defend their bigotry outside of the echo chamber where it originated.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:32 PM
5

The presumption that all male status comes from sexual prowess is one of the biggest barriers to gender equality v that currently exists. It's not helpful to perpetuate those stereotypes. I am a bigger guy, a geek, and I don't have trouble getting laid, for one.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:18 PM
0

Well, yes, i know what you're saying. I've done open relationships myself. But I'm speaking from a moralistic perspective. If you make a vow to somebody, and you break that vow...what are you?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:47 AM
14

She does have a right to impose restrictions on who her husband can sleep with. Since, by definition, he made an oath of fidelity to her at some point.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:41 AM
10

Oh you foolish man. She just used the classic turnaround, trying to make you feel like you were wrong for saying so, as a way of deflecting. In realty, she probably deep down felt that what she was doing was not right either. Most likely, the girl has daddy issues and this is her way of acting out on them. You can't really help her by pointing out the imprudence of her behavior anyway. She needs therapy.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:39 AM
5

Guide for preventing false rape accusations: Don't stick your dick in crazy Don't talk or text crazy Have no interaction with crazy Don't interact with anyone ever Be Gay.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 07:37 AM
1

I don't think there's any need to pander to feminists, even in jest. Oh seriously, lighten up. If you can't laugh at something that is genuinely meant to be taken in jest, you're just as bad as the worst stony-faced TERF.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 07:38 AM
3

But sometimes that's something we only learn to late. What if, for example, one spouse was abusive? Or coercing the other into having sex? Or knowingly cheating? Things like this can protect someone from having a bad situation suddenly become even worse.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:56 PM
2

Bingo. But this isn't government. This is individual doctors who seem to have their own agenda.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:54 PM
6

But it's a demo that is exactly what you'd expect. Even if it is the most unlikely one in the history of ever, except perhaps the log cabin Republicans.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:18 PM
5

Solution to what ? Porn doesn't hurt people. Those who have problems can be treated as individuals. The feminists banned alcohol because they thought it made men abusive. They want to ban porn because they think it makes men rapists. Maybe most men are okay, and it's just a few people who have problems? But I'm sure that's too reasonable and non-absolutist for mainstream feminism to go for.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 07:38 PM
6

Their objection stems from a prudish distaste for male sexuality.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 07:33 PM
1

Look at the reporters other articles. She clearly is grinding her axe more than a bit with her "reporting".
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:36 AM
1

Men and women do tend to be different. Men can be good at PR, and women can be good at Finance. But in all seriousness, women and men tend to have different strengths and weaknesses in general. Furthermore, men and women tend to be drawn into different fields. Though there are female engineers and male HR directors, generally they are the minority in their respective fields. This is due not just to cultural influences, but inherent differences in the way that men and women relate to the world. T…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:07 AM
1

No harm. Well that's fortunate for you.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:05 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ncjGFIFPJI#t=137 Take a look at this too; it actually points out a lot of the problems with the way we look at sexual coercion and sexual violence.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 11:14 AM
2

Men's issues activists aren't "painting" anyone as rapists. The idea is to raise awareness that the problem is caused by both genders. Rape is viewed as a male only crime, but in reality it isn't. And if we speak of violence and abuse in general, it isn't even mostly caused by men, but actually is pretty evenly split between genders. I don't wish to distort facts, I want to do the opposite. Feminists seem to think it benefits them to say women are passive and men are aggressive. Which itself rep…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:59 PM
2

That is a second point that I covered also. But I'm sure you carefully read and understood my points. I am very sorry that reality doesn't confirm to your predetermined expectations. But that's not an acceptable reason to distort it.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 04:09 PM
-4

Yeah, because that's the point you should take away from what I said.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:03 AM
-5

Really? Well that comes as a surprise to me, since I'm as well-read on both counts as an anthropologist can be expected to be. Look, psychology is riddled with BS pseudoscience. Like the excrement we see in the OP image. Even if it's purely intended to indoctrinate freshman students in 101 courses, it's still being presented as legitimate knowledge, and that's perhaps one of the biggest problems with scientific education today.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:00 AM
2

Fair enough. It's just a pet-peeve of mine when people use that phrase. I think because of the pedantic tone, mostly.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:43 AM
6

I'm talking about passed out, incoherent. And to add to this, Yes...men can and do get hard, even when unconscious (in fact every time REM sleep is achieved, an erection will occur...this is the cause of "morning wood").
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:28 AM
20

What am I missing? Actual facts, rather than incorrect conventional attitudes about both male and female sexuality. For one: Erections are involuntary. Male rape victims become erect a significant percentage of the time when they are sexually assaulted. Ejaculation occurs during rape of men as well. This is because erections are involuntary reactions. They can occur for many reasons, and direct physical stimulation of the genitals is likely to achieve this response whether a man wants it to happ…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:25 AM
10

but it is a true statement to say more women than men do get raped We do call it like it is here most of the time. And the reason why we have an issue with the idea that more women than men get raped is because it is entirely incorrect. On the subject of prison rape, did you know that women are more likely to be sexually assualted by other inmates? And as to female perpetrators of rape.. Male victims are significantly less likely to report being assaulted? And while more perpetrators are probabl…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:16 AM
0

Inmates run the asylum, man. Womxn claim that misandry isn't a thing because men don't experience systemic discrimination and oppression. Um...hello. There it is plain as a red patch on a moon pad.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:04 AM
-3

Psychiatry is legitimate science. It takes patients neurological/psychological problems, and treats them in the most medically effective way known, according to the medical knowledge of the day. Psychiatrists are doctors. Legitimate professionals. Neuroscien Psychology, on the other hand, has a high degree of cases where there's a lot of made-up stuff. And of course their old standby: "Lets create a theory to explain these behavioral trends in people that I've subjectively noticed, but then not …
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:58 AM
-3

Citation needed. Don't be that guy srs-er. Seriously. Do you know how obnoxious it is when people do that just becuase they feel something someone said is "problematic"? IF you know it not to be true, say so. IF you can debunk it, do so. But don't just make some passive-aggressive snark comment. This isn't SRS. Though you are factually correct with the rest of your reply.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:53 AM
9

If you disagree with a feminist it's because misogyny.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 06:30 AM
1

The entitled and absolutely pure self-centeredness of these two in your story is sadly all-too-common nowadays.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 03:34 AM
2

Haven't we seen this before, just with different profile pics?
/r/MensRights29/03/14 09:48 AM
1

Sources? That is just my personal observation, based on my own knowledge of history and political attitudes.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 03:17 PM
2

Prepare for the backlash of rustled jimmies.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 07:40 AM
5

Yes, that's all well and good, but how does this help attract campaign donations for Clinton's 2015 White House run? In all seriousness, though, this is the indication of how things are shifting. Political zeitgeist is a bit like a pendulum, with the popular attitudes shifting from left to right over time. Things have for a period shifted very far left, to the point where the radical elements of feminism have had tremendous success in getting their ideas accepted by much of society; but the cons…
/r/MensRights21/03/14 07:29 AM
3

They hear what they want to hear. It validates them.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 03:25 AM
13

A person on the internet was purposefully lying in order to generate support for their hate-speech agenda. So fuck that, mild name-calling is fair enough. They rightfully should have scorn and ridicule heaped upon them. I mean what is the worst that could happen? We give then yet another excuse for self righteous outrage? That will only make them happy. Is doing then a favor.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:38 PM
3

I am left with one question, however: What does this have to do with men's issues?
/r/MensRights17/03/14 12:21 AM
1

Sometimes when my boyfriend gets a little rough, but not today honey.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:01 PM
3

Oh look, an SRS alt. Yes, I'll totally dignify this pathetic creature with a serious response.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 08:28 AM
0

Psychology is not science. Sorry to break it to you.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:57 AM
1

Don't be stupid. Obvious troll is obvious. Go away.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:53 AM
28

By the time I got to the egg's comparison to "Sleeping Beauty" I was sure that this was satire of "Feminist Science" lol
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:45 AM
2

Was coming in here to say just that. There are news articles about SRS and their own Doxing controversy, among many others. Go for it. If you care enough. But I never had much stomach for social engineering and the manipulation of educational materials. I'll leave that to the nutjobs like radical feminists and creationists.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:13 AM
1

Tumblr, people. Show me sanity there, and THAT will be something new.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:28 PM
3

The portrayal of men is a result of pandering to the general predominant female purchasing demographic and the narratives concerning their opinion of men and women. In short, belittling men is "empowering" for them, and making then feel good about themselves at other's expense also make them more likely to spend.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:11 PM
9

Essentially your mother taught you to be ashamed of your maleness. Which is her projecting her own hatred of men on you; your issues are being addressed in therapy. Hers are probably beyond help.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 06:29 AM
1

For his latest installation of the SCAR Project photographer David Jay has turned his lens toward male breast cancer survivors. The SCAR Project's mission is to put an "unflinching face" on the reality of early-onset cancer. For The SCAR Project: Men, Jay has brought attention to male breast cancer, a disease that affects approximately 2,240 men a year in the U.S., according to 2013 statistics from the National Cancer Institute. And while rare, a 2012 study suggests that breast cancer is more de…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:18 PM
0

"biologically designed?" Good god, you're as bad as the people who say that gender is 100% cultural.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 01:54 AM
2

As a gay guy I'm all for men trying to become more attractive. But here's the thing: TRP people are about trying to get laid first and foremost. And that certainly is a worthy cause, but they way they do it is a bit despicable. They both regard and treat their fellow human beings as inferior things to manipulate and control; as bad or worse than the typical radfem or tumblr SJW.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:00 AM
-2

Because they regard women as inferior beings to be played and/or manipulated; that is genuinely bigoted.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 10:58 AM
2

That is, in fact, an apt description of what it is. And I think most redpillers would objectively agree with that summary . Edit: Okay, Wannabe pua's. The ones who actually have success as pickup artists don't need to frequent forums of socially awkward losers. :p
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:56 AM
0

Things have been so much more interesting in here since SRS gave their got-nothin'-better-to-do bitches permission to touch the poop.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:55 AM
8

A passive-aggressive way to roll one's eyes at something someone said that you disagree with, but lack the intellectual capacity to actually refute.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:52 AM
2

Biology/facts don't real?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:51 AM
-2

Except TRP is actually terrible and unlike /r/MensRights, genuinely misogynistic. WE really really shouldn't be defending TRP.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:49 AM
4

Our media in general has gotten pretty shitty. Yellow journalism seems to be back.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:32 PM
1

Even in a country that's almost all white
/r/MensRights27/02/14 06:53 PM
36

It's getting to the point where people would be safer if we disarmed the police.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 06:00 PM
–

Is getting to the point where I am going to start celebrating every time a cop gets killed by some punk gangsta kid. At least that is evening the score a bit.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 05:29 PM
-4

. In India, men slogs it out day and night and no one cares a shit. So, they take it out on women and children. What in the hell are you talking about. That quote will show up on SRS soon enough.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 04:48 PM
4

This, a thousand times, this!
/r/MensRights24/02/14 04:46 PM
29

That's about the size of it. Oh, then she wrote an article about it, saying how men are awful because they didn't read her mind and fulfill her unexpressed desires.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 07:27 AM
16

Just take a look around. Hell yes, they won. Greed is the only god, and fear is its prophet.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 07:25 AM
1

It's really annoying to hear people say this. It makes them sound like intolerant radicals themselves. It's true. Not All Feminists Are Like That. It is fucking true; I fail to see why some trite acronym can somehow dispute the very reasonable assertion that different people have different views!
/r/MensRights24/02/14 05:11 AM
5

This article almost reads as satire ...
/r/MensRights19/02/14 09:23 PM
4

Combine that with a growing amount of institutional power--such as that power necessary to introduce Women'sGender studies courses into universities, and expel the menz based on anonymous allegations of sexual misconduct. But they're still claiming that women have no power; as if it were still 1870 and Queen Victoria was still ruling half the planet. Oh, wait... So yeah, these people really are living in an Orwellian fantasy. Or, if you prefer, Cardassian
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:25 AM
2

Fucking hell
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:38 AM
64

No. Don't call HR. They are not on your side. HR sides with women most of the time. Have your lawyer contact the company's HR person, strongly suggesting that they revise the way they handle these situations. At the smell of an actual lawsuit that they have a chance of losing, most businesses will buckle before you can even say "settlement".
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:19 AM
2

No true feminist argument! Man, the comments there... so much stupid.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 06:06 PM
4

Lets just go ahead and criminalize ownership of a penis. I mean, that's where we're headed here.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 10:52 PM
-1

Most important of all, this is not something that Marilyn Monroe actually said. :p
/r/MensRights08/02/14 01:59 PM
51

Old feminism: "women! You are strong, you have power, society can't function without you! You are smart and you are capable, so stand and be counted!" Contemporary feminism:"Womyn! You are oppressed by men! Every problem you have is because of patriarchy, you can't control it. You aren't really to blame for the bad things in your life, because you are an oppressed minority. Men are the problem and you should hate them. Even looking at you is rape. And if you disagree with me, are just a special …
/r/MensRights06/02/14 08:19 PM
2

These worthless cunts are like Nazis. This is an accurate description. It is not Goodwin's or hyoerboly. They believe their problems are caused by men, and that the only way to solve the problem is to subjugate and disenfranchise them. They are hateful Nazi cunts.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:46 AM
5

Which is sort of what happened to /r/subredditdrama
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:20 PM
4

That's why they do it in SRD now.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:20 PM
6

Yeah the comments really struck me too. How basically they were saying "yeah some women lie, but we don't talk about that in feminism. We only talk about ways that women are disadvantaged and deserve more, not about ways that women actually have power over men." One commenter even said that the fact that some people will scam and con had nothing to do with feminism; even if it's the reforms that feminist groups pushed through that make such abuses possible.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 01:35 AM
2

You're either a feminist, or an anti-feminist, right? THERE IS NO INBETWEEN!
/r/MensRights01/02/14 01:32 AM
4

The golden rule of any society: If, within a system, there exists a means whereby a person or group of people can manipulate the system to obtain an unfair advantage, that means will be exploited.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 01:31 AM
10

he's campaigning for Hillary now. Got to suck the cocks of NOW to get their sweet, sweet campain funding.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:36 AM
18

If you don't stand up for yourself, you don't have any to lose as it is.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 11:14 PM
5

It's pretty bad. LA Times Doesn't mention the handicap until paragraph 7; and then follows with this quote: The first half was hard, but by 19 miles, I felt I could win the race," Mose said. "I was feeling very good and fast." Not fast enough to catch Duliba, however. Mose said despite some conspiring by male runners earlier in the race to accelerate their pace, he found himself nearly three minutes behind at the 24-mile mark. "We tried, but we could not catch the ladies," Mose said. LA Daily ne…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 12:50 AM
8

Give a woman a 20 minute head start, that's the way "equality" is supposed to work. Duh. It's not about who is the best athlete, it's about who deserves it more, based on my completely subjective criteria.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 12:20 AM
32

Narcissistic personality + female privilege = ruined lives.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:20 AM
9

It's a shame that the article is... Really badly written. Perhaps it isn't the best example of changing attitudes as it is one of the awful state of literacy in Arkensas...
/r/MensRights16/01/14 04:37 PM
3

This article! What a joke. It's a bush-league hatchet job.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 08:53 PM
23

Not only that, but it is counter-productive. IT comes across as "See? womyn can do science too, I has facts for proof!" Their argument would be better-served if they featured one of the many actual women who have left their mark in scientific pursuits.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 07:30 PM
1

Forgot the /s! :p Someone wants to be quoted on SRS lol. Edit: Oh, were you serious? Surely, you are not one of the ones who think that any woman who disagrees with any part of feminist canon is indeed an "uncle tom"? As a side note: She sounds like she knows enough about here place: She knows who she is, how she feels, she knows her mind, and where she stands in relation to others and in this world. She knows where and who she wants to be and how to make that happen. And she does so without bei…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 10:01 AM
1

Now if only western feminists could spend a bit less time complaining about how far apart men's legs are on the bus, and instead try and get reforms made in those countries.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 11:19 PM
1

I'm hoping most people on this sub don't need the /s, though :p
/r/MensRights10/01/14 11:15 PM
3

Something milder, I would say. More equivalent to "Uncle Tom" in meaning.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 11:14 PM
1

Without once demonizing men or claiming to be an oppressed victim of patriarchal society, she still manages to be a strong, proud, independent woman! How about that.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 11:12 PM
2

Only Sith deal on absolutes!
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:31 PM
1

What I'm trying to say is where are you that society thinks either is acceptable? I can't imagine any decent person thinking either is OK. Ohh; yes I should have clarified. I went to university.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 09:39 PM
1

That's exactly the point, lol. By societies standards, only one of them is unacceptable. It is only when we look at the two statements objectively that we begin to realise that both are equally awful. By writing it out in the way the above poster did, this point is illustrated quite clearly. That is what the above poster was trying to say; I was just pointing it out to you. :p
/r/MensRights04/01/14 08:56 PM
1

Excellent, thank you
/r/MensRights04/01/14 08:53 PM
4

That's the point. One's somehow socially acceptable, the other will brand you as pro-rape.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 08:59 PM
6

And in the rare cases where women are violent, it's because of "masculine influence"
/r/MensRights03/01/14 08:53 PM
11

What studies?
/r/MensRights03/01/14 08:51 PM
53

Not likely; that argument too strongly illustrates their unidirectional standards. Therefore it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 08:49 PM
1

Wonder which one is the hate group, huh...
/r/MensRights03/01/14 03:13 AM
3

And yet the choir they're preaching, and the pseudo-intellectual academics who provide "citable" pap for them will continue seeing the reality that they want to.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 08:13 PM
2

This person needs to lose their internet privileges until they get some lessons in basic human physiology.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 03:59 PM
10

Did anyone miss the part where they refer to father's rights groups as male supremacist groups? Why do they think it's okay to lie and slander to get what they want?
/r/MensRights29/12/13 02:06 AM
10

Apparently pointing out her hypocritical bias is a "ruthless backlash".
/r/MensRights22/12/13 09:26 PM
7

It is so ironic that at some point in time, a parent chose to name that woman "Joy".
/r/MensRights22/12/13 08:50 PM
7

Ah, but you invaded a womxns space and made them feel "unsafe" with your patriarchal facts and disgustingly masculine sense of "logic". See how that works? Any amount of reality can completely be undone with sufficient feels.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 08:32 PM
-10

I'm not certain that's entirely true. Now if you said this of women born in the 90's, I'm going to be more inclined to agree with you.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 08:30 PM
2

It is tough to say, because it is hard to quantify where people stand on the political dividing board sometimes. I would say most are moderate leftists like me; there are some who are conservative. I also think that this attribute is independent of whether or not they are also assholes. A lot of people come across a bit...angry. Or whiny. I think that's because a lot of people come to Men's Rights after they've been hurt by the social inequalities that negatively impact men; such as the inherent…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:33 AM
2

This is the first truly funny anything like this I've seen from tumblr in quite some time. :p
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:20 AM
13

I was going to duck in here to say the same thing. Same Sex Marriage, actually; very few MRAs that I know of oppose this. The ones that do tend to be the asshole right-wing nutjobs who are basically an embarrassment to the rest of us anyway.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:15 AM
2

I just want to step in here and say, while I was sort of reporting this with tongue-in-cheek, I must agree with you that the sad part of this is that a young man died; that's why his widow mother was likely heartbroken; the sad part isn't that she's sad. Though that is also sad. Why do we always disregard the loss of male lives as only significant insofar as they affect women? Like Hillary Clinton's quote, the one that cost her my support in her presidential ambitions: "Women are the greatest vi…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:01 AM
5

Just because it's owned by news corp doesn't mean that it's some tabloid. They may be selective in what and how they report news, but they don't fabricate.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 08:47 PM
3

For the curious, his grave: http://www.cartoonbrew.com/wp-content/uploads/inkeraser.jpg
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:52 AM
8

The real kicker here is that campus officials are the ones who pushed this. First, she was drunk at the time and so according to their twisted logic that means she couldn't consent to sex (even though he was also drunk, somehow he still could). Then she text him multiple times saying it was all good, over a period of months, even inviting him for dinner. But school officials play this off as her being "confused" and "in shock". So they set up some kangarette court and railroad this guy out of th…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:19 AM
1

It is being reformed. Just look at the hard work the Obama Administration is doing to combat college rapes...no matter how many innocent lives are ruined in the process. Seriously, though; this problem is the result of the reforms enacted in the last couple years.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:14 AM
2

And enjoy suddenly being 100,000 in debt :p
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:13 AM
1

Well, If we got worked up about every idiot on the internet we'd be apoplectic 24/7.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 07:42 AM
-7

This has got to be an agent provocateur.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 02:37 AM
6

Feminist ideology is like a new religion for a lot of neurotic women. You can’t talk to them about anything. This right here. I'm glad to hear this sentiment voiced by a feminist. A lot of what she has to say is really intelligent and well thought out. She has her moments of bitterness of course, but overall her critiques of mainstream feminist thinking are pretty spot-on.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 09:02 PM
6

Right, materialism (in women) is part of the male system of domination, and not just a facet of human nature.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 08:31 PM
0

You need spell checking.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 08:30 PM
8

The fallacy here is that we assume that these feminist thinkers are altruistic. They are not, really. Their primary motivation is largely one of self interest. Don't kid yourself into thinking that feminism is about anything other than personal power and control.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 06:41 PM
19

Oooh, bingo! You've spotted the college undergrad in a "gender studies" course!
/r/MensRights19/11/13 06:37 PM
1

Ah, here we get into it. Where Even though the goal is health care for everyone, somehow President Obama couldn't help but play gender politics with it too...
/r/MensRights07/11/13 06:17 AM
1

The pacific northwest.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 01:21 AM
1

Okay, fair enough.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 01:16 AM
2

No, it's a local company, but I might say it is somewhat similar in function.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:04 AM
22

So in other words, in this case women are priveleged. Funny, that.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:02 AM
6

But if one were to have a child, it is most likely that the parent would then enroll the child in his/her healthcare plan...which is a boon for insurance, since young and healthy people are the ones who make it possible for everyone else to have health insurance.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:58 AM
56

a monogamous couple looking for a permanent birth control solution would find a vasectomy to be the safest and most reliable option imo. It is certainly preferable for a male to get a vasectomy than for a female to get a tubal ligation. While the first is usually an in-patient procedure followed by sitting on an icepack for a day or two, the second is major surgery that requires hospital stays and observation, and comes with all those associated risks. So yeah; if we wanted to encourage people t…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:55 AM
59

You may be right about that. But either way, you wonder why women's reproductive rights are so important that they are free; while men's almost don't matter...
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:06 AM
18

Which doesn't explain why it is free for women and at least $100 for men XD. IF it was based on risk, the lower-risk and less-complicated procedure would be the less expensive, right?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:27 AM
12

This is my HMO provided through my employer; it has little to do with the AFA.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:16 AM
4

You can't reason with idiots and fools. That includes most of the radical feminist "facts don't real": crowd.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 07:36 AM
3

Then the user, who is obviously some SRS sockpuppet (and one of two used in this, another was created to nominate that post in /r/bestof) got all butthurt for being downvoted...and accused this subreddit of being responsible. I rather doubt that. But even if it was, they couldn't hold it responsible and not SRS For its various brigades.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 02:07 AM
2

It actually thinks that it is funny. Okay, confirmed SRS troll.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:23 AM
2

Your argument is invalid You must be new to this logic thing. His premise is that traditional forms of male expression tend to be more physical. In the case of this little boy, his imagination is about a zombie apocalypse, and similar things. The expression of his fantasy in these drawings represents a physical, and the righteous warrior sort of action hero; like what he put in the drawings. This is in every way a masculine form of expression. And this is Unkleman's assertion. The fact that some…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:17 AM
2

If a little girl was kicked out of school for gossiping or name-calling, the Sisterhood would go to war about it. But little boys are habitually punished for harmless behaviors common to little boys, like roughhousing. Boys in school are treated like defective girls, and some ideological fools--like the headmaster of this school--seem to think that it is possible to socially engineer the masculinity out of men. This is more and more proving to be impossible...setting aside the ethical implicatio…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:10 AM
7

Some people do deserve to die. When they apathetically ruin lives like this, when they utterly fail in their duty which is to protect these children...yeah. But the worst one? The mother's lawyer. What a piece of shit. My god, what a beautiful place the world would be if every lawyer dropped dead tomorrow. You know, after we cleared out the millions of bodies.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:32 PM
21

WHAT. THE. FUCK. It's one thing demonizing the father, that's par for the course. But when children allege abuse, and actual experts agree, shouldn't we FUCKING BELIEVE THE CHILDREN!? Just another example of why Florida is the worst shithole state in America.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:28 PM
5

The prima-donnas, the whiney people, the ones with an axe to grind, etc. Are always the loudest. We see this in all radical movements. What bugs me is how these feminists get a free pass, with uncritical acceptance of even their obviously fallacious statements in the media at large. If we live in a patriarchal society I think I must have missed the meeting where they handed out the "male privilege" cards, because my whole life has been nothing but a struggle to keep my head above water.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 03:07 AM
18

Nailed it.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 12:52 AM
1

Never said it wasn't hard doing that. :p Children are a pain in the ass.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 06:53 AM
1

Well, to each as they see fit.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 06:51 AM
5

Above all, never mind the fact that this guy's premise is correct, how many married couples are single-income families anymore? only people in the top 5% earnings category can really afford to have one spouse not work. Pretty much everybody else needs both incomes just to make ends meet; especially if there are kids involved. So if permanent alimony is somehow compensation for ending some kind of business partnership, then how many people does this realistically affect? Furthermore, when a busin…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 10:59 AM
-3

Translation: Too stupid to get into business school, to undisciplined to get a job as a cop.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 10:45 AM
14

Indeed, if the man pursuing a carreer has the better deal, then why aren't there hoards of women looking for a man who'd be a good "house husband"?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 10:44 AM
2

How can she slap!?
/r/MensRights09/10/13 12:53 AM
3

So, if they're not helping women...and they're not improving society; they're not preventing crimes and they're not helping the greater good...What exactly do these feminist-oriented campaigns do, then?
/r/MensRights08/10/13 09:57 AM
2

Were there feminists in the 16th century? But no; if only what you imply here were true; but maybe "afraid" isn't the right word? But as the person quoted in the OP demonstrates (as well as the "if you have a penis, you're a potential rapist" types...), the attitude that penises are bad is alive and well among feminists (even if you personally don't feel that way).
/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:00 AM
-9

Why, oh why, are the feminists so terrified of penises?
/r/MensRights07/10/13 01:09 AM
3

http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/17618538/boy-11-fathers-child-with-friends-mother/ Hard to say. They may arrest her, but they wouldn't call it rape, and she wouldn't get the same sentence as a man who had done this to a child. Sometimes they do laugh, though.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 01:06 AM
5

No, it's not... Unless people feel the pain of injustice themselves, they're not likely to care. Do feminist groups care about men wrongfully convicted of rape? Hell no; they're okay with a few men's lives ruined in order to prevent a few rapes (but only rapes of women by men; the other kinds don't real). They don't care because the current system works in their favor; there's no incentive to be bothered with innocent casualties. Realpolitik, you see. People are, en masse, amoral. They are motiv…
/r/MensRights05/10/13 02:05 AM
6

I think this is a problem (having no association with either of the pills myself...I'm mainly an egalitarian with regard to equality) that we see on both sides of the isle here. We look at those standing over there and we say "They are everything that is wrong with <insert general thing here>." In many ways, people in TRP, misguided and sad as they are, must be viewed as merely reactionaries. That is not something I say to excuse their attitudes or actions, But merely to explain them. They are t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/13 01:51 AM
1

"If what I say is wrong (because it is illogical or lacks credible scientific evidence), then it is my problem. If what I say offends you, it is your problem." To be fair, this isn't an entirely irrelevant point. Ignore provocations, ignore sensational or vitriolic arguments. Be very very careful not to accept the premise of any argument using false logic (informal/formal fallacies are so common in these sorts of debates...). Strip away the emotional first. If you do that, then you'll always fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/13 01:07 AM
2

You know, I can't help but feel that these comments might be directed towards readers of Skepchick...
/r/MensRights24/09/13 06:03 AM
1

Are you sure you're not thinking of California? :p
/r/MensRights14/09/13 04:10 AM
1

Can I just say, THANK YOU. I see so much of what you're talking about around here, that I've become quite disillusioned with the MRM; and basically have been losing faith in humanity in general. I really hope that more rational people can win out in the end, no matter what they call themselves.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 04:09 AM
-2

Remember, Zimmerman was also released after posting bail; he was only locked up again after it was discovered he lied about his financial situation to avoid a higher bail. From the facts of the case, it is really possible her intention wasn't to kill him ; even if she was being a complete cunt it seems likely that it was a heat of the moment thing followed by a massive "oh, shit" realization of what just happened...leading to fear and panic and an attempt to hide what happened. Or she could have…
/r/MensRights14/09/13 04:05 AM
5

Somehow I just wonder where feminism went so wrong, that the mother's behavior is somehow being viewed as okay...
/r/MensRights08/09/13 06:09 PM
0

I was exaggerating a little; but in the grand scheme of things women serve on average half the time men do for the same crime.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:58 AM
-1

I don't know. He didn't really seem hurt, but even if his jaw was dislocated, she should be on the hook for medical expenses; but I think we as a society are a little too unforgiving of little things like this. Violence is wrong; we get that. I don't believe in witch-hunting or hanging people. I think people should be forgiven for small mistakes that don't really hurt anybody in the long run. The thing I hate about this is that if he hit her back, then suddenly he'd be this demonic woman-abuser;…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:38 AM
0

Most cops, but not all; plus if it comes to it, all she has to do is cry on the witness stand and claim that she was threatened or something to get off either Scott free, or with a minimal sentence; aka the "pussy pass".
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:35 AM
0

Not that you're wrong here; because a lot of people think that way (both men AND women). But my advice? Get to know some different men, then, because the ones you do know sound like idiots.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:31 AM
0

Nah, we only got hit with a couple comments overall; this troll account has been hitting a number of subreddits, most of which have nothing to do with MRM.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:29 AM
0

Try not to feed the trolls :p
/r/MensRights03/09/13 02:28 AM
30

Don't you love the victim-blaming here? It's the equivalent of saying that a woman was sexually assaulted because she dressed a certain way (the stereotypical example). "What do you expect? He/she had it coming!" As with many similar scenarios, remember that we can always spot the gender bias by simply reversing the genders. If she had been driving and the other driver's boyfriend had slapped her? All of North America would echo with the roars of outraged women.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:42 PM
2

I can just see the intro to the Wikipedia article on math now. "How do numbers make you feel?"
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:28 PM
2

I don't know how one can intend to edit articles to insert an ideological point of view and still claim to wish to follow Wikipedia's policies...
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:26 PM
0

Yeah, time to start taking the gender pronouns out of these "Scenarios". Fucking misandrist bitches; just using this as an excuse to spread their hate and bigotry around...and then they have the nerve to call it "education".
/r/MensRights01/09/13 05:22 AM
0

You have to prove that you had no idea what you were doing. And the burden of proof is on you. Having 3 beers before signing is not going to void a contract.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 04:16 AM
-1

Yeah, that's about how it would go. :p
/r/MensRights31/08/13 04:13 AM
0

I don't know why people think equal treatment means equal pay, anyway. A person's salary is not about what they "Deserve", it's about what they're able to get. It is tied directly to their negotiating position, and how much demand there is for their skills, experience, and prestige. It's going to relate quite closely to how well you market yourself to an employer. It's no coincidence that women who don't have children, or hire a caretaker for their children, tend to earn the same as men. And it …
/r/MensRights31/08/13 02:07 AM
0

SRS basically serves as proof that geeky girls can be just as hateful, trollish, abusive, and moronic as geeky boys. Gender equality at work: You humans all completely suck. :p
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:57 PM
0

Yeah :p
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:45 PM
5

Not likely; we would then merely see an unequal application of the law, based on the gender of the alleged perpetrator. This is already the case in most other areas of the criminal justice system, so it won't be anything new.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:15 PM
1

I feel that statutory rape should be treated the same way pedophilia is treated by the criminal justice system; "statutory" rape is, sometimes, not actual rape; such as in cases where a 20 year old dates a 16 year old. Though the guy is a creep for dating someone that young, it is entirely possible for sexual contact to be mutually agreed upon, and it may be in practical (though not legal) terms perfectly consensual. So while legally it is rape because minors below the age of consent cannot in f…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:08 PM
1

The problem I am pointing out is that in today's world, ALPHA MALE GAAAAAR is simply not as useful as it used to be. This is indeed true; which is why there are so many single mothers stuck caring for children themselves because the worthless fathers don't actually earn any money or live up to their parental responsibilities once she got pregnant. We live in a progressively more technological society where the old evolutionary pressures are greatly diminished. Intelligence creates more wealth th…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:18 AM
3

You have been found guilty of rape due to criminal possession of a penis.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:04 AM
3

I have met only a couple of Fillippina women in my life, but from the experiences I have with them, I think the very LAST word I would use to describe them would be "submissive" lol. But I mean it in a good way. They have a tendency to "mother" others, to take charge but in a good and caring way.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:02 AM
3

I have met only a couple of Fillippina women in my life, but from the experiences I have with them, I think the very LAST word I would use to describe them would be "submissive" lol. But I mean it in a good way. They have a tendency to "mother" others, to take charge but in a good and caring way.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:02 AM
1

I will not be silent, and I will not be silenced. Say it with me lol. Make it a mantra. Remember it. Politeness I can get behind. I firmly believe all people should be treated with respect. But I refuse to be made silent.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:33 AM
1

When I was a boy, my mama taught me this: Never argue with idiots or fools.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:30 AM
1

She's using evolutionary psychology to justify her behavior, yes. But that doesn't change the fact that her behavior is biologically driven! It is a common pattern among young women: Seek the "bad boy", i.e. the alpha male, to father children, but then look for the 'nice guy' to be their caregiver. They want the "best" genes (i.e. the genes most likely to produce offspring who in turn reproduce...which means attractiveness matters) but they also want the most stable and safe environment for prog…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:26 AM
2

I know, and many feminists don't even understand the academic basis of their school of thought. I recently saw a Wikipedia article that said (referencing elevatorgate) "Some members of the skeptical movement used patriarchal arguments". Obviously, that sentence must have meant something to whatever half-witted ideologue raped the website with its insertion. But they clearly also have no clue even what is meant by "patriarchy" in their own ideology.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:17 AM
1

Hi, just noticed that this links to a Salon article. Therefore this is nothing but moronic troll bait, and the only people getting sucked in are also moronic trolls. Don't be a moronic troll...just let this one go.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:08 AM
11

I think that's sort of the point that is being missed by people, especially the flame-throwers at Salon (who responsibly called it a "vile" tweet...). The only reason people could be getting upset is some assumption that when a woman is "Drunk" she is somehow either comatose or incapable of making decisions for herself. And that's bullshit. Drunk =/= unconscious.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:58 AM
1

If there is a bright center of the artistic world, then this is the project that is farthest from it. :p
/r/MensRights21/08/13 04:22 AM
2

Could just imagine her singing "Buenos Aires" from Evita While pushing the button...
/r/MensRights21/08/13 04:19 AM
1

Some explain "Patriarchy" as the traditional power structure; which is harmful to both men and women. While the majority of those in power are traditionally men, it is inaccurate to say that men have all the power. The average man is as powerless, or more powerless, than the average woman. In this context, "patriarchy" is a misnomer, but the insistence of feminist literature on clinging to the term does imply a desire to pin blame for societal problems on men, and not on women. It also reflects …
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:15 AM
-1

I just want to interject here. You're probably confused about which subreddit you're posting in. You seem to think this is /r/theredpill.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:10 AM
2

But there are always going to be people who live by hate, and people who live by hate always have aways to justify/rationalize their bigotry. (God says... Feminist theory says... It says in the Bible...)
/r/MensRights20/08/13 04:49 AM
3

A loud one though.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 04:48 AM
3

Undesired dick pics are a form of sexual harassment. Opposing them doesn't make one sex negative A pity, then, that that is not the subject matter of this exhibit. As to who says, well... lets look at how the word is defined: art /ärt/ Noun The expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture,...: "the art of the Renaissance" Works produced by such skill and imagination. Skill, and imagination. Otherwise all you're doing …
/r/MensRights20/08/13 04:04 AM
5

I would say the vast majority of your tumblr feminists do just that- graduate, live in the real world, and realize how idiotic they were as teenagers. The ones who remain in academia, or never attain a real emotional maturity are the problem, sadly.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:55 AM
3

Well, as art it's crass, fails to make a statement, and essentially constitutes a sex-nagative misandric rant on the part of some first-year art student who wants to make a splash but doesn't have any talent.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:50 AM
3

Oh it's not the drugs excuse; she got off because she's a woman, and all she did was accuse a man of rape...and who gives a fuck if a few mens' lives are completely ruined?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:29 AM
1

//Ineedfemninismbecause otherwise I would go to prison for lies like this.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:26 AM
3

I think the mother forgot the part where she collects half of this "child's" possessions, collects alimony for life, and child support payments (on penalty of imprisonment) And need not give one iota of personal responsibility or accountability in return for it.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:25 AM
5

And ironically doesn't seem to have one.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:21 AM
16

Moby is such a damned idiot. I can refute this theory with three words: Margaret fucking Thatcher.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:20 AM
1

Solution: Don't get Apple products.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:44 AM
0

I actually, while a pretty strong of feminism myself, agree with your views on removing rigid gender roles and deconstructing the power structure in our society. However, I think what you said about feminism believing in gender equality is a bit misunderstood. Feminism advocates for women, it seeks to promote women's interests and the welfare of women. It does not seek to promote gender equality. If it did that it would be called something like, oh I don't know, Egalitarianism. Feminism not only…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 02:14 AM
1

Even from a feminist or egalitarian standpoint, they do not make sense. I would point out that an egalitarian =/= feminist. And very much not. Feminists are interested in furthering the interests of women, not achieving gender equality. I consider myself an egalitarian: I believe that all people should have equal standing, equal rights, and equal protection under the law. I Don't know if that makes me an "egalitarian" by the standards of others, but A trip to the dictionary demonstrates that I a…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 01:20 AM
11

Well, the Sex Discrimination Commission surely has lived up to its name.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:53 AM
16

IF women are compensated for the day, you could have an actionable case arguing for discrimination based on gender. But few people would take it seriously, I'm afraid.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 03:00 AM
6

Yes, but only when the people discriminated against aren't white men.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:53 AM
2

You are a victim of sexual assault. And it doesn't matter whether or not you're gay in this situation. They majorly crossed the line, and they knew that; this is why they laughed. And you are right, if it had been them who were being propositioned into a threesome by a guy they would not have been amused. If I were you i'd maybe take a break from these friends. It's a shame you can't file charges against them; since you have no proof and the benefit of doubt is always given to the female in any …
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:33 AM
2

Hello, and welcome. And I see you've brought a date with you. Yes, Double Standards and I have met before.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:27 AM
1

Actually, I find that to be perfectly fine. Or at least, I really think it ought to be. And I'm saying this as a gay guy, so this sentiment is not coming from a place of voyeurism. But why is it wrong for women to go topless? I mean, the only reason women go around topless for the most part is to get attention, because it is shocking to us. But is there anything inherently dirty about it? Are breasts really that big a deal? I really don't think they need to be.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:23 AM
1

More accurately, they have made the assumption of a causational relationship when only a corollary relationship is indicated.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:20 AM
5

It's neither an "article" nor is it "Journalism". It is an Op-ed; which newspapers publish with the specific purpose of stirring up controversy and strong feelings. Because it helps sell copies.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:18 AM
1

Well, no big deal, there...they already have a final solution to the male problem. :p
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:16 AM
6

But that's in Britain, the country where anyone with a vagina who throws a tantrum will eventually get their way.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 02:55 AM
1

A lot of feminists are quick to disown Jezebel, though, to be fair to them. :p Which is shocking since Jezebel basically is Cosmo in Birkenstocks.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 02:26 AM
1

Woops, somehow managed to post this in the wrong sub. Deleted. :p
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:57 AM
3

WTF is a Register article being taken seriously for? Man, British tabloids are baaaad
/r/MensRights25/07/13 08:33 AM
1

Those are some interesting thoughts, and I think you make some very good points: Balance is by far the most important element of a stable society. And it is the tendency of radicals to rock the boat; so by neccessity they must have equal influence or we have problems.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:32 AM
1

based on looking at expressed opinions, yes. That particular mod definitely has issues with critics of feminism.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:30 AM
1

You missed the point: no, moderates do matter. Or they should. But they have to make themselves heard.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 06:49 AM
1

It was more that your comment had absolutely no relation to what I was saying. And was unnecessarily asshole-ish. So fuck you. :p
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:39 AM
0

What the fuck are you talking about now?
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:44 AM
0

I'm pretty sure the mod responsible was /u/illuminatedwax.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:58 AM
2

You don't combat radical extremists by being an even bigger idiot than they are. Get over yourself. The enemy are bigots, not "feminists". Many of those bigots are feminists...but then there others. You, for example. Or at least so it seems from the way you're behaving. Count to ten and go have a time out, and then maybe you can sit at the big-people table again for awhile.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:53 AM
3

It's always the radicals who screw things up. For any philosophical edifice that becomes even slightly ideological, the radical is something that will soon follow, like any weed will soon take over well-fertilized soil. The problem is that those who aren't radicals also tend not to be as angry and not as pugnacious, and so they are rendered silent by the extremists. And then the radicals are all that is heard by the outside world. And so you have the public opinion of feminism, the face of it, b…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:51 AM
8

Well then stop shouting at the people who are on your side and start shouting down those radicalized morons who are doing their best to destroy any hope that gender equality will become a reality. That's the problem, you see? Where are people like you in the universities, in the media? You are speaking up here, but the rest of the moderates tend to be shouted down by the misandric bigots who claim to be feminists nowadays. If your brand of feminism is relevant, then it's time for you and like-mi…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:41 AM
0

SISters tend to only sleep with other women though.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 08:04 PM
1

I didn't say that the false accuser wasn't too blame
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:51 PM
1

1) True equality for both sexes/genders. This is the goal of the MRM, in a nutshell. 2) Raise awareness of areas where men are disadvantaged compared to women. Many feminist groups talk as if it's all one-way, men oppress and women suffer. Feminist groups even go so far as to state that the suggestion that men may face issues is laughable, and that they are not worthy of consideration. 3) Serve as a counterpoint to the assertions held by feminist groups, such as the underlying precept of patriar…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:40 AM
2

It's important to remember that the feminist movement's origins were among what would now be referred to as 'priveleged' women. The first women's suffrage movement in Great Britain only sought the vote for upper-class women, not peasants. The feminist movement has, in recent years, sought very hard to appropriate the agendas of other groups, as a political tactic to make it more difficult to argue against them (gay rights, minority rights, etc). In other words, to criticize feminist organization…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:15 AM
2

You can't argue with idiots or fools
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:42 AM
2

|I have to admit, Jezebel is not the place to come for science. My favorite quote from the comments section!
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:33 AM
9

Prosecutors told those lies, and to an underage kid, to avoid the trial and get a conviction. That, for them, amounts to a 'point' on their scorecard. IMO they prosecutors who told the guy to do that should be imprisoned themselves for destroying someone's life to further their career.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:27 AM
8

OR try and turn the argument around and make you the bad guy...
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:23 AM
3

Would have been better without the "human embodiment of sloth" comment, maybe. That just took it a step too far imo. Sometimes less is more, and a touch of subtlety is not a bad thing.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:40 AM
1

You know, even though violence is wrong, those particular groups of women really deserve to get hit. Something about that younger generation, where it's all about selfishness and there is no longer any sense of decency or you know, considering the possibility that a false accusation could ruin someone's life.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:09 PM
1

I think this was the reaction most of us had, indeed! I am choosing to see this as a sign of hope that the gender-bias in the way we look at DV in our society will soon be coming to an end.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 04:05 AM
2

I am truly surprised.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 04:05 AM
1

That was not an MRA though. Manhood Academy is not a part of the Men's Rights movement. We don't want him, he doesn't want much to do with us. Whoever is behind that genuinely hates women. I don't think there's much of that here. There's a lot of resentment towards the hardcore feminists, especially those who hate men (you get what you give, right?). But not "women" in general.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 02:36 AM
-4

The fact that he's in Florida prevents a fair trial. For the victim.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:57 AM
0

I find this disturbing and upsetting on many levels. So kindly don't tell me how I feel.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:48 AM
1

Of course! It's not about how much money you have, it's about what you spend the money you have on.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:47 AM
1

Get this crazy tabloid shit out of here. :p
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:46 AM
1

I believe the saying is: "I will believe feminism stands for equality not when there are an equal number of female senators, but rather when there are an equal number of female trash collectors."
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:43 AM
1

That was not an MRA who made that comment. That was a batshit asshat.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:43 AM
1

And of course in Norway nothing will come of it; in other western countries , that statement basically would have amounted to the company handing a plaintiff the rope to hang them with. But in Scandinavia, men are second class citizens without recourse. Even thought he law mentions men and women, we all know they didn't REALLY mean men.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:37 AM
1

Men's Rights activists do acknowledge this; feminism does not. This is the primary difference! We don't blame all the world's problems on women. We are, however, highly critical of the sexist double-standard of feminism, as well of its inability to objectively examine itself. http://i.imgur.com/bffovLa.jpg
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:25 AM
1

While there are a few angry dicks, most people here don't care if you're a man or a woman; we're concerned with raising awareness about issues facing men. Intelligent discussion usually helps in that process! And as to your specific question, you would probably be surprised to learn how many women frequent this subreddit! It's quite common, and a very good thing; without the support of women the MRM will get nowhere.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:23 AM
1

This is surely intended to be as ironic as it is. :p
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:14 AM
1

Well, what do you expect? Our news media in this country is basically worthless shit nowadays.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 05:50 AM
7

Indeed. Though it's interesting to see the effect social media has had on the Zimmerman trial. Something that wasn't really in full swing yet during the Simpson murder trial. OJ got away with murder. I don't think we could accurately say that Zimmerman "Got away" with it. He'll have to hide for the rest of his life. Change his name. Good luck getting a job; I don't think the NRA is hiring.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 05:37 AM
6

To conflate tickling your child with rape is a bit of a leap, at best.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 04:25 AM
6

Nail, meet hammer! This is the essence of the problem in dealing with people like that. Basically: absolutely as little as possible.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 04:22 AM
8

Better make sure a witness is around if you do that, because next thing you know the police will be asking you why you assaulted a poor, innocent and obviously gentle lady.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 04:22 AM
8

Perhaps you are right, but in most circumstances, the term "rape culture" is basically a way of slandering men, somehow. As well as women who don't hate men enough.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 04:18 AM
26

Well, you have the right idea. The main thing is, there is no reasoning with a fanatic/fundamentalist/radical; and you will get nowhere arguing with idiots or fools. So mainly the trick is, clearly reject them, but do so without engaging them. Be as dismissive as possible, though only as rude as absolutely necessary to send that message. You want them to be clear about two things: 1) You absolutely don't take what they say seriously 2) They aren't even worth your time to bother engaging with the…
/r/MensRights09/07/13 04:11 AM
17

I never understood why this was a contentious issue. It doesn't bother me when I come across a toilet seat that's down. I take the .5 seconds required to move it to the desired position. Likewise, If a toilet seat is up and i'm doing a number two, again I will simply move it to the desired position with no fuss or need to be concerned. Why a few women (not sure how many, but I don't think it's even most women) think that it's somehow this grevious barbaric offense to leave the seat up is entirel…
/r/MensRights22/06/13 03:51 AM
1

I cannot disagree with you on this point. You are entirely correct. But at the same time, the statistical numbers of single mothers have been rising steadily since the turn of the century, approaching all-time highs. Not to mention that only 33% of single mothers with newborns are employed. I applaud anyone (man or woman) who can raise a child alone and do it without help. It takes a special kind of person to do that. But please don't misunderstand either. Child-raising shouldn't be a burden for…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:22 PM
6

On the plus side, she could easily be elected the Queen of Tumblr...
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:57 AM
1

That is, of course, assuming she has something to pay with right now...
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:53 AM
5

Indeed. Just to spell it out: wellfare, food stamps, subsidized housing, childcare assistance. Then when the kid reaches a certain age, we are significantly more likely to end up taking care of him/her too, either as another single mother or as a man in the prison system.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:47 AM
29

Funny though; it takes a few men paying taxes to give these women their food stamps, subsidized housing, childcare assistance, etc. So, you know. They didn't exactly do it without men.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:44 AM
3

Because the post is of a relatively petty and mildly humorous nature that does not significantly address issues pertinent to the MrM.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 06:58 PM
3

And here is an example of just such a person...
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:30 AM
1

Non-negotiable is a hyphenate. Your core values define you. You don't define me. I don't think any MRA will say patriarchy theory is anything other than bullshit, but I don't have to agree with you or what you think core values are. Sorry , but if you think that's the case, you're just as bad as the academic feminists who say "either you agree with everything i say or you're a bigot". And to people like that I just say: Fuck off and leave me out of your little world of hate.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:28 AM
4

IT would take the perspective of someone who wasn't human to truly be to pull it off, I think. There just aren't enough people who have the intellectual capacity to detach from their egos and their own feelings enough to be sufficiently objective.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 07:07 AM
4

And please take note that the vitriolic and hate-filled comments were quite fully downvoted. That should demonstrate the general attitudes of most here. We typically don't sensor here (with a handful of exceptions that are listed in the rules); but the up/down vote system usually works pretty well for us at the moment.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 06:52 AM
6

What we really need is a new movement that is independent of the toxicity of both the MRA and the Feminist movement. One that can objectively look at the gender politic and seek a truly equal balance between the two.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 06:47 AM
0

There are lots of feminists who are good people and don't hate men. I have a few friends who identify as this and tolerate my involvement with the MRM because they know me personally and realize that I am not a misogynist or someone who wants to subjugate women. Quite the contrary, I want true gender equality, as opposed to the "equality" that feminist groups seek...where equality means everyone should give them what they demand. Likewise I tolerate these men and women I know who are feminists b…
/r/MensRights02/06/13 06:39 AM
1

As you can plainly see, there's still a lot of animosity toward feminism. Honestly, it's justified. Don't confuse it with misogyny. This is what modern feminism has done: They have equated feminism with women and women's equality and used that to point at us and say "YOU'RE A MISOGYNIST!" I just wanted to reply to point out how much I couldn't agree with this more. Though it is said often enough here, there are still way too many people out there who buy into this false equivalency of Feminism=w…
/r/MensRights02/06/13 06:36 AM
2

Well, I know you're a dedicated MRA, and i applaud your passion. But first of all... take a look at my posting history. I come here often too. :p Second: Just cool it with the ranting and the extreme spewing of really vulgar language. We're supposed to be better than that, for one...and you're acting like the very worst kind of misandric feminist. Third: the tirades of hatred in response to SRS trolls (real or perceived...) is exactly what they're trying to provoke. Ignore downvote, and report t…
/r/MensRights02/06/13 06:30 AM
1

If they're really allies, then yes we do. Look at all your hate and anger. You know who you sound like? You sound exactly like the kind of feminists you're ranting against. Just stop that shit, it makes us all look bad.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 06:22 AM
1

No... A circle jerk as in something primarily composed of people complaining about things, then all agreeing with each other.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 06:17 AM
15

Don't let the stupid haters get you down! I guess that's the problem with any movement that raises awareness about social injustices; you will always have the angry and/or radical people who would rather push people further apart than find ways to bring everyone back together. I just hope we remember why the MRM exists in the first place, and not repeat the mistakes that academic and political feminist groups have made, in allowing their agendas to be co-opted by the radicals.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:54 AM
16

No true Scotsman... Or, the problem with political radicalism: "If you're not as radical as me, or pissed off as me, then you're the enemy!" There is nothing more stupid or detrimental to the cause than men who resent it when women lend their support to the issues we care about. Without the support of women, the MRM isn't going to accomplish anything. If you push off women, (or for that matter, people who disagree with the majority on a few issues) then all the outsider sees in /r/mensrights is …
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:49 AM
3

Don't hurt yourself trolling... Really.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:44 AM
3

I think you might be the one with hypocritical views here. You're acting just like one of the SRSers. Shame :p
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:44 AM
13

Ah, This lightens my heart a great deal! It is always good to see people thinking of one another like the equals they are, instead of obsessing over the politics of who's more vulnerable, powerful, victimized, or whatever. I always feel happy when someone realizes that this really is largely what the MRM is about; just opening people's minds to how they think about the relationship between the genders. Especially in feminism; by focusing on what women want and need, feminists can often fail to s…
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:43 AM
1

I think this is clearly satirical. If she's sincere, it's still satire.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 03:19 AM
0

/r/mensrights/ should really add a moratorium on Guardian articles to its ban on Gawker Media links. :p
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:15 AM
1

IF only jury selection processes actually selected intelligent people. But lawyers, and especially defense lawyers, want morons like these backbirths.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 08:05 AM
1

How exactly can someone be a rapist without having committed rape?
/r/MensRights26/05/13 03:36 AM
1

Lol! "Gay clubs are bad because (extreme and totally made up anecdote) is representative of all of them!" If you're going to use fabricated anecdotes to troll /r/mensrights and similar subs, you're going to have to work on plausibility. The first dead giveaway that you're misrepresenting yourself is the hatred of masculinity and all things male that drips from your every word and post. IF you're trying to present your views in a positive light, you need to first subvert your own intense biases/b…
/r/MensRights26/05/13 02:01 AM
1

Which is mainly the point...
/r/MensRights26/05/13 01:56 AM
8

a couple things derived from this: 1) Until she found out he wasn't interested in her, the gay avenger was "creepy" or even "almost predatory". 2) This was trumped by a guy who actually dared hit on her (doesn't he know she's a lesbian just by looking at her? Fucking shitlord...) 3) Gay men are apparently tolerable only because they are useful to women who wish to avoid contact with heterosexual men. All in all, a pretty good glimpse inside the mind of the typical misandrist.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 11:32 AM
7

I have, and this doesn't really read like an official reprimand either. Plain white paper, not company stationary, etc. So no.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 11:26 AM
77

This is full of spelling and grammatical errors. I call bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 11:07 AM
2

cannot "like" this enough!
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:07 AM
1

Euphemisms for men, by way of implying that they are BAD men. :p
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:20 AM
112

Amusing way to turn a story of a woman who eavesdropped on a private conversation, then publicly shamed the people she was listening to for a fairly tame and puerile joke into a story of a poor woman victimized at the hands of the mean, awful men-folk.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:42 AM
0

This is so silly. I don't think uniform protocol has anything to do with being ordered by the commander-in-chief to hold an umbrella over him. xD
/r/MensRights18/05/13 06:06 AM
2

Until found guilty, I think all people accused of serious crimes deserve a certain right to privacy. The court of public opinion can pass it's own sentence that follows a person for the rest of his/her life.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 06:03 AM
0

No, it's not sexist. In defining a word, dictionaries have to accurately maintain information based on the widespread usage. And it is accurate. "Sexist" is a word that women use against men most of the time. Whether they are justified in doing so or not, and without regard to hypocrisy...but nevertheless.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 01:49 AM
1

It takes time. But it does happen. People are starting to be more savvy to that kind of ignorant BS.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:07 AM
-1

But even if they're blind, they still have penises, and therefore rapists.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:04 AM
1

Why? Because of patriarchy, duh. It's all really very simple. Any idiot can see it.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:01 AM
1

Well, she clearly is a selfish, entitled woman who wants to use the boy as a weapon with which to hurt the father. Sounds like someone you want with sole custody, huh?
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:00 AM
3

God... this is off topic, but I found this so difficult to read. :( Not just your story, either, but all of these tragic cases that people talk about here are just so heart-wrenching I can hardly bear to read them.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:56 AM
102

He has a tape of the girls making false accusations, the police decide there isn't enough evidence. The feminists must be furious over this blatant case of gender discrimination!
/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:47 AM
2

It was ultimately determined that Alexander had been shot in the right brow with a .25-caliber gun -- the bullet was found lodged in his left cheek -- and that he had been stabbed 27 times. Someone had also cut his throat from ear to ear. So, how much of that was self-defense?
/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:39 AM
2

This is a bit like Yoko Ono selling tshirts that say "bros before hos".
/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:36 AM
-2

Gentlemen, gentlemen. This is why god invented the pre-nup. Friends don't let friends marry without one.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 08:21 AM
3

Based on this video, the three cunts present could still be charged with a crime. But he won't press charges.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 08:16 AM
1

Girl has issues, the boy has a right to sue.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 08:12 AM
1

I mean in light of the abuses that can be perpetrated against men with impunity by women, a part of me doesn't blame the men who choose to keep women at as far a distance as possible in their lives. If it leaves you open to this sort of thing, that's a lot of trust you're putting in someone, without a lot of cause for trust.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 02:46 AM
2

You know what occurs to me? Victim-blaming is more or less always a nasty thing. It's not the victim's fault that they were raped. Even if they did something foolish or stupid that left them vulnerable to the abuse, that does not excuse the fact that they were attacked. Feminists are not wrong about this. The problem is that they don't apply it reciprocally to male victims. Victim blaming is wrong when it's a male or a female who gets sexually abused.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:41 AM
3

Oh, I don't disagree. It's the nature of the beast. I'd hesitate to call the publication a tabloid, but they do have a few toes over the line between 'legitimate journalism' and 'tabloid'.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:40 AM
3

To be fair, it's Russia. This sort of due process is fairly normal for them in an historical context. The guy probably made a passing remark about Putin that didn't sit well with the state.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:32 AM
0

Honestly, as an adult male I would probably not be comfortable sitting next to an unaccompanied minor anyway, both because they are annoying little creatures AND because being in that position would instantly subject me to scrutiny from all the Mother Hens and White Knights who would diligently watch me for any sign of impending molestation/rape/murder. That said, saying it's okay for women but not men to sit next to unaccompanied minors is gender-based discrimination and it is categorically wro…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:26 AM
2

You only go to gitmo if you're you're a Muslim associated with millitant groups. Not that I approve of it at all, but lets not blow things out of proportion. There are only a couple hundred detainees there. If the US locked up everybody who was politically inconvenient there'd be a few million detainees.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:23 AM
3

Women like this are why the pick-up artist forums are getting more and more members these days. not that I agree with them, but if I were a heterosexual male I'd be pretty afraid of what a pissed-off woman could do to me if she really wanted. False rape charges are just the tip of the iceberg...
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:16 AM
2

To be fair, this is the Dailymail, a low-class British rag. Britain is even worse than the US for having lots of lazy, entitled women living on the government dole who have nothing better to do than read the internet and eat biscuits.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:11 AM
-1

I'm going to attribute this to french courts being really shit more than anything else.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 02:28 AM
-3

Meh, just a fucking troll, in this case an SRS one. Really when you link to them you're just encouraging them to be bigger cunts. When I come across that crap I usually just downvote and move on. I might stop to point out the obvious stupidity of the comment if I feel it is not an obvious enough troll that some might actually be influenced by it.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 02:06 AM
2

I remember that a psychological study at some point found out something interesting: That both women and men tend to respond more favorably to women than they do men, all else being equal. Or put another way, women have significant automatic own-group preference, and men do not. This could explain the internalized and subconscious misandry that is so common in feminist circles. Basically, few people see themselves as a bigot. They will go to great lengths to justify their prejudice internally, b…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 01:51 AM
1

I remember that a psychological study at some point found out something interesting: That both women and men tend to respond more favorably to women than they do men, all else being equal. Or put another way, women have significant automatic own-group preference, and men do not. This could explain the internalized and subconscious misandry that is so common in feminist circles.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 01:49 AM
1

It honestly still blows my mind that people can think that way and believe themselves to be enlightened or even egalitarian. :p Sometimes people don't even realize that they're thinking this way. One of the most brilliant shock-therapy tricks is to try the reversal or the substitution. For example, in the example you gave, repeat back what they said back to them, but substitute "blacks" for "men". That's how the "switch" works. The reversal would be to take an equivalent scenario but with the ge…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 01:34 AM
10

The gist of that video covers the topic in great detail, but let me share with you my take on the subject. The misconception (NAFALT) comes from this assertion of feminism: "We just believe that men and women should be equal in society". Many men and women accept this assertion as truth, and believe that to be a feminist simply means that you believe that it is simply about gender equality. The problem is that if we objectively examine feminism, we can see that despite feminists' claims to the c…
/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:18 AM
1

The anger and misandry of the feminist was heard by men who innately accepted their assertions, because it fits into our social and cultural narrative about what each gender is and/or should be like. After all, if men ruled the world, how on earth would feminist ideas gain traction without the complicity of the men who ostensibly run the whole show(and by extension cause all its problems...)?
/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:10 AM
23

Dear OP: I think it's fantastic that you can recognize the lack of self-awareness inherent in feminist doctrine; and that what academic feminism has created is essentially a framework through which it is socially acceptable to discriminate against and hate men in the name of social justice. I just would also like to remind you that (most) MRA's (unlike feminists) don't deny the problems women yet have to deal with in the world. Nor is the inherent inequality of traditional and rigid gender roles…
/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:03 AM
3

Pretty much. Basically human waste from the bottom of England's social cesspool.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 08:31 AM
2

You don't have PTSD, but still you can't just walk away from everything that happened over there and pretend that it isn't a part of you now. You'll never look at things the same, and you'll find reminders of what you'd like to forget in all kinds of places. You may not want to talk to a professional psychiatrist, but...well, nobody really does at first. But if you put some time into it, you might realize that it is doing some good. And don't confuse their being detached with their not caring. A…
/r/MensRights28/04/13 10:03 PM
1

Well, the way we tend to view it in the west and the way it is viewed in the East are two very different things. In truth it has always been a pretty dysfunctional and generally fucked-up subcontinent.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 09:36 PM
1

Because MRAs tend to want to talk about the kinds of rape they don't want to talk about, you see?
/r/MensRights28/04/13 09:26 PM
1

If you had some evidence documenting this, it would make for an interesting story. But to be honest that sounds rather far-fetched to me.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 09:19 PM
1

She lists her sources in the article. That 216,000 victim statistic comes from RAINN. Of course, Rainn also claims that 55% of rapes are unreported and 97% of rapists will go free; which are bold claims to make short of good data collection; the US federal statistics make that percent closer to 5% (but they also strictly define rape as forcible penetration, meaning that women can't rape without the help of prosthetics). Keep in mind those are also global numbers; the author was referring more sp…
/r/MensRights28/04/13 09:15 PM
2

Your best option in this regard is to install a browser app, perhaps a parental filter, that automatically screens out certain words that you specify, and replaces them either with an alternative word or some symbol indicating that the word has been filtered.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 08:43 PM
2

America's prisons continue to grow more and more full as we incarcerate more men than any other country on earth. Where sexual assault is not just a possibility but a way of life. I don't see much genuine concern about that. :p
/r/MensRights28/04/13 10:28 AM
1

Eloquently put; and yes...the irony is quite bitter.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 10:22 AM
13

I wish I could agree with you :( But you know it will be ignored or laughed away just like every other MRM issue ever.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 01:56 AM
7

And not only that, but feminists don't consider the sexual assault of a man to be as severe a violation as that of a woman.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 01:54 AM
2

I know it's been discussed around though. I've seen mention of it on AVfM and some of Girlwriteswhat's talks on Youtube have alluded to this problem as well.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 01:53 AM
5

Q.E.D.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 01:52 AM
6

I hadn't seen this report, thanks.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 01:50 AM
2

You're right about that; I did allude to the problem. BTW, I'm getting in some trouble for that comment now, I think my flippant remark caused my first ever reddit shitstorm :s. Oh well, lol.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 01:49 AM
16

IF true, this is absolutely inexcusable. Follow up report, please OP.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 01:47 AM
5

And the comments are more fact-based than the article itself (written basically with no knowledge whatsoever).
/r/MensRights28/04/13 12:44 AM
11

To be fair, the publisher of this is a wealthy and priveleged white girl from one of the most affluent left-leaning areas of the United States. And by "Girl" I mean still an undergraduate. In other words: She's freshly being indoctrinated as we speak, and so she's currently filled to the brim with her womanly outrage that there are people who Dare to disagree with the holy writ of feminism. :p
/r/MensRights27/04/13 11:59 PM
2

Feminist groups have tried very very hard to sort of co-opt the GLBT rights agenda, particularly in academia related to gender and sexual identity studies. As such, some feminist groups have advocated to a limited extent for gay rights. Though this is in my opinion largely incidental, since their primary intent in advocating same sex marriage, adoption, and similar rights for same sex couples is not specifically for gay men, but rather for lesbian women. As to MRA issues being actually specifica…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 11:29 PM
1

And there the crazy thing demonstrates the danger of the feminist insistence that gender is "a cultural construct". Which is utter bullshit, as evidenced by the existence of transgender people. If they could choose to have their physical sex and gender identity match, they surely would. Ethnicity is, by its very definition, a cultural construct. Race, of course, tends to be determined socially by physical appearance but ethnicity is about a shared culture, history, and a shared social environmen…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:17 AM
2

Except transgender people are real, and they have a legitimate dilemma. Their psychological gender doesn't match their biological. This is inherent to them and they can't change it (some can pretend to be cis-gendered). Otherkin, on the other hand, have let a game of make-believe get the better of them to the point where thy become genuinely delusional. This delusion comes from a deep-seated desire to be special that is present in everyone, of course. And why can i say that Transgenderedness is …
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:59 AM
5

I am the avatar of a trans-dimensional demon whose soul purpose is to devour the souls of the dead before they reach the afterlife. Stop oppressing me with your male privilege!
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:51 AM
5

In some cases, did you know that doctor-patient confidentiality (with the mother) actually extends to the paternity of children?
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:48 AM
1

I just...am so completely at a loss for words at the way this woman has rationalized her horrible behavior to the point where she believes herself to be some kind of living saint...disgusting.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:44 AM
4

I agree with the title of this thread. And I'm gay. :p
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:41 AM
3

Or maybe got the point? :p Who knows... :p
/r/MensRights26/04/13 06:03 PM
2

precisely...I didn't even even bring THAT up because of the predictable response (reading the other two replies to this show that...) from the SRS invaders, but that's even more troublesome.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:09 AM
4

OR convicted or coerced into signing a 'confession', being paraded through the media as 'rapist' with no evidence against you, having your life ruined, having your university career ruined, regardless of whether accusations were founded or not? Oh yes, false accusations are a matter to take lightly. And if you don't see that as problematic, go drink a gallon of bleach.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:08 AM
3

Look at the way university honor courts handle this. Look at the way the media handles it. Look at examples like the Duke Lacrosse team, or Brian Banks, who already had their lives ruined and/or spent time in prison with no evidence whatsoever.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:06 AM
25

Yeah it makes sense on the surface. The problem is, it makes it really easy for a person to decide retroactively that sex was rape; they don't just have to claim forcible penetration, they can claim that he didn't stop...Then it's a matter of her word vs. his, and we all know how that one usually goes in the courts... Then there's the question of 'where do you draw the line'? I mean, there's a point where consensual sex is bad, but just because it's bad, or the partner is not as responsive to yo…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:33 PM
54

It's also pretty hard to prove, so there's that.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:24 PM
2

What's more significant here is violence against whom people choose to care more about, and why. It's quite interesting. (For a very good explanation, check out GirlWritesWhat's video on The Disposable Male)
/r/MensRights25/04/13 02:15 AM
4

Because according to her only women are allowed to initiate sex.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:43 AM
3

Ain't nobody right when everybody's wrong.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:28 AM
1

Well then they'll just start saying all "PIV" is rape. Wait...they already have!
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:57 AM
1

You can be charged with a crime for filming someone in private without their knowledge. Especially if there is nakedness/sexual acts. And it's very important to remember that evidence obtained illegally is usually not admissible in court.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:00 AM
3

There's a word for people that leave hidden cameras facing their bed, and it's not a nice word. :p But you're right, I think if the act was done by a woman it wouldn't be seen as "that bad".
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:43 AM
8

Those aren't personalized results, however. But nice try.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:40 AM
3

Seems like a fair reform of alimony law. But of course it's being called " "one-sided, anti-woman and mean-spirited." Because it limits how much money a man can owe an ex-wife just because he's a man and she's a woman, and furthermore mandates equal custody of children. So where do feminist groups stand if to them a law that actually reduces gender-based discrimination is "anti-woman"?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:39 AM
8

Don't worry. There's already a consensus about Jezebel out there.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 11:01 PM
8

Won't happen in the US; public places are already considered fair game, and numerous court decisions uphold the rights of people to record.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:57 PM
1

Somehow MRAs are the villains, even though most of the nasty comments she got were from stupid internet trolls (not MRAs, sorry...), of which there are many. It would be silly to think that the threats were actually serious; but I can guarantee you she was overjoyed to see the death threats crop up, because the instant someone says something nasty to her she can point and and say "Help! Help! I'm being repressed!" One might even go so far as to say that this woman, who clearly is full of hate an…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:54 PM
1

Well I think to them, if you don't agree with their particular and narrow ideology, then that according to them means you support the subjugation and oppression of women. In other words, "You either agree with me and my views or you are against every woman everywhere." But you know if you read other articles by this author, you'll see that despite her allegedly being an 'enlightened' woman she has no qualms about mocking, dehumanizing, and engaging in a pretty pointed ad-hominem attack on, in th…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:47 PM
-1

Of course beign about 3000 years old, Galadrial is fully grown. :p
/r/MensRights21/04/13 10:05 PM
-2

The guys actions were sick and perverted, but in the case of the cartoons they are not criminal. Just really fucked up.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:56 PM
32

And there's the twisted logic of the whole bullshit academics of "social justice"; which is just a way of saying certain people are bad because of their race/gender/ethnicity. The sad thing is that colleges like Berkeley actually teach this shit to students, many of whom swallow it.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 06:04 PM
1

This is interesting, because there is a perception that men are the ones who are obsessed with and most harshly critical of female appearances, but this exercise tends to demonstrate that this is not so.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:39 AM
3

Aye; this study is old news now, and i have to downvote this reddit mainly because this source does NOT need to be linked on the front page.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:33 AM
0

Saw this one a while ago. It merely was another study that confirmed that women inherently favor other women; except this time it specifically looked at teachers.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:29 AM
2

No certainly not; it was just all that I felt a need to comment on. Everything else I more or less agree with. :p
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:13 AM
1

"But they do the same to us" is also the rationale behind the appalling behavior of SRS. And of course in that case the same argument applies: Two wrongs don't make a right. I think it can be useful as a way to help people see how their perceptions are off kilter about these things, but there's a point where you want to avoid being as bad or worse than what you're opposing.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 03:18 AM
3

A person's identified sex matches their biological gender almost all of the time. Though we aren't totally sure on statistics, a relatively small percentage of the population feel that who they are inside doesn't match who they are on the outside. Feminism, and radical feminism in particular, frequently denies that gender is something inherent to the individual, something that they are born with. In essence, the existence of transgender people represents an inconvenient truth for them. The fact …
/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:13 AM
-5

Case in point, this comment was down-voted. :p
/r/MensRights20/04/13 11:04 PM
7

I think you'll find, however, that many here will down-vote comments they see as "non-MRM", or that express ideas that they feel should not be held by men's rights advocates. I get a little nervous when that happens too, it reminds me of a certain other gender-inequality movement that gets talked about here a lot. And you know I'd agree with you that it is perfectly reasonable to have misgivings about registerher.com. I would have less of a problem with it if it focused ONLY on public figures; t…
/r/MensRights20/04/13 10:16 PM
13

This is pretty bad; if it weren't for the fact that that false accusation of rape could ruin his life forever, it would almost be funny.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 10:08 PM
2

in what jurisdiction is this? I always thought that the statutory rape didn't kick in until one person was over 18? At least in the US.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 10:05 PM
6

i.e. "The enemy" because their official SRS-endorsed "privelege scorecard" is significantly above the tolerated threshold. :p In warped SRS logic, this makes them an acceptable target for racial and gender-based ridicule and hate.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/13 09:13 PM
2

The problem is that the principle of "separate but equal" tends to fail at the "equal" part; in fact it's virtually impossible to offer separate facilities to two groups and have those facilities be equal...there will always be a best school, a best gym, and a better bathroom.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:40 AM
2

and this isn't even separate but equal. This is "No menz nao, u r be objectifying us". It's childish and petty.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:38 AM
4

This guy's position and point is entirely reasonable; I wonder what hypocritical, misandric double-think will be used to refute it?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:37 AM
2

The owner of Jezebel is a man IIRC. But all the gawker sites are silly tabloids really; it's a shame because i09 and kotaku occasionally show the potential to be interesting, albeit rarely.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:16 PM
1

Thank you for giving me a badly-needed "lol" today. :)
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:14 PM
2

Wouldn't work for me...I sort of like that song...
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:19 PM
1

As nasty and horrible as this woman's behavior was, the guy was a complete pushover/idiot/weakling for getting in that deep with such a worthless human being in the first place. Which I guess is the moral of the story...because a story it is.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/13 06:51 AM
26

Not only that, of course, but it would also be seen as inappropriate for a state representative to publicly refer to one of his male colleagues as a 'dick' anyway. So no, I don't really see a double standard here :p.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:19 AM
3

This is really cute. I love it.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 08:02 AM
7

It was a year ago she made this post, and if in all likelihood this was her criteria for processing admissions she would have been noticed and fired by administrators hoping to pro-actively avoid the potential lawsuit/shitstorm that she created for them.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 07:48 AM
77

This just HAS to be satire. Please tell me it's satire, because it's just too absurd and counter-intuitive to reflect an actual thinking human being's thought process.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 07:40 AM
1

The implication of what you're saying being that if it weren't for warfare we would not achieve these positive advances? This is simply not true. We might just take a little longer. Lets look at medical science; every major war has yielded major medical advances indeed. But would any scientist in good conscience choose to sacrifice millions of lives just to develop an improved vascular clamp, or vascular surgery technique?
/r/MensRights18/04/13 07:38 AM
0

Any parent who has had their kids taken from them would probably at least WANT to do something similar to that.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 07:33 AM
1

Men never had to fight for men's rights to vote, or own property, or be able to run in an election *solely because of gender-related issues. Men got the right to vote because they fought. They were forced to fight and died by the thousands before they were given the right to vote by the people (elites) forcing them to fight. Women got the right to vote basically by repeatedly saying they wanted it. That may not have been easy for the Suffragettes, but it was a damn sight easier than trench warfa…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 07:31 AM
1

I wouldn't say that; I would say he was more making a point about how if people just took a chill pill and recognize that when people are joking that means by definition that they aren't being serious. On both sides of any polarized issue.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:34 AM
2

Oh I agree, i'm not easily offended. At least, not by silly jokes. :p But I find hypocrisy to be a bit offensive; that's what I don't like. When one can dish it out but cannot take it.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:33 AM
6

Obviously she just passively went along with it, since as a woman she possesses no agency whatsoever.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:31 AM
1

It pisses me off so much that we can't take care of our veterans in this country. That there are homeless veterans, some missing limbs, out on the street and nobody gives a crap; at least, not if he's a man. We should just institute a special tax for companies that profit from war: Defense, resource extraction, private security, engineering. Make them pay out of pocket in perpetuity to support veterans who fought, and especially those who became disabled, for their benefit.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:34 PM
39

And yet if the joke was about forcing a wife to wear a chastity belt, that would be: CHAUVINISM! MISOGYNY! PATRIARCHAL OPPRESSION! And stuff like that. You can always do a quick test to see if the double-standard is still in place, and that's just by imagining what would happen in an equivalent, reversed scenario.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:20 PM
15

And yet so many people do nonetheless. :p
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:19 PM
18

And, apparently, when it is both the mother AND father taking the kids and leaving? Well, it's still the father's fault.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:17 PM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jhGRuSvWOc
/r/MensRights09/04/13 04:30 AM
1

Lord of the flies...
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:26 AM
11

Because a "real man" would not, according to the conventional wisdom, refuse the chance at sex no matter what; men aren't supposed to want to refuse...let alone have the option to. It's not so different than the female standard, where women aren't supposed to want sex. And equally problematic.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 02:52 AM
2

Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free, right?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 11:45 PM
2

Because when MRAs do that, they present THAT as misogyny. There is usually some recursive and asinine reason why pointing out problems with radical feminism is misogyny, but they do seem to sincerely believe that MRAs say those things because they hate women.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 09:28 PM
1

It seems to me that in cases taken to this ridiculous extreme, anyone who can understand what they're talking about falls into two categories: fellow Kool-aid drinkers and people who know they're basically full of it. In my experience the vast majority of people outside of a university women's or gender studies program fall into the latter category.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 09:26 PM
1

Femitheist is of course a special brand... a particularly emotionally troubled young woman. All that is known about her creates a clear profile for sociopathy. The attention-seeking behavior, the parasitic lifestyle, the superficial charm, the lack of empathy or ethical concern... It adds up.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 09:23 PM
12

Well, /feminism/ isn't the only place to go. Have you considered looking at /r/shitredditsays? That would give you more of a picture of the demographic that REALLY doesn't like MRAs.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:48 AM
8

On the contrary! looking at the discussion of the matter gives us a very good example of how male victims of domestic violence are treated, and how female perpetrators of it are treated in public perceptions. It is fascinating, really, how differently male and female victims of this type of crime are treated.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:40 AM
2

Aye; this is just intended as being in good fun. There's really no harm in it, either. Save the humorless intolerance of anything that could even stand the slightest chance of offending people for the people with master's degrees in women's studies out there.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:08 AM
1

Well i think most people could live rather comfortably of 30k a month; the only reason to want more would pure and simply be greed. :p
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:43 AM
2

Incidentally, the woman who said this was Vandana Shiva, during a discussion regarding international Women's day. http://www.democracynow.org/2013/3/8/vandana_shiva_on_intl_womens_day It really is a "because patriarchy" talk. :p
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:16 PM
3

And not unlike international coverage of the genocides in the former Sudan, as well as Rwanda. Any male of fighting age? Killed. But who cares about them when the women are being raped? (but also lets not talk about the fact that the men are also being raped) It just speaks to the cultural assumptions present; men are disposable.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:12 PM
7

It is hard to respect a person who obviously doesn't think much of you, isn't it? That was in my opinion the most awful thing she said in her entire career.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:08 PM
1

Lol; lets not take too seriously the words of an obvious moron. But it does take a high degree of educational indoctrination to get a person to this point, where they can see more or less everything as "because patriarchy" while at the same time ignoring the glaringly obvious due to this navel-gazing preoccupation.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:07 PM
1

To be fair, she may have been giving that advice not out of her own misandry, but rather because of good practice that exists because of the pragmatic reality of the situation...where many women will try to get out of actually doing their jobs by playing the harassment card; the simple solution to this problem is to have another woman do the coaching. I have had this happen myself in the work place. Where a young woman (all of 19 years old) was very much shirking her responsibilities unapologeti…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:16 AM
1

If you switched genders around, the company would be sued in the batting of an eyelash. So hit them hard; file a formal complaint.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:06 AM
5

"However, this culture has historically been very male dominated. The reasons for this are numerous, and generally stem from the longstanding misunderstanding in human societies that tinkering, thinking about hard problems and drinking copious amounts of beer is something that only men should do, and women have historically been marginalized in the hacker community, with associated misogyny and harassment. It’s a sad reflection that a group of intelligent people who spend their time fighting for…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:05 AM
1

Were you applying at Hooters, by chance?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:00 AM
2

I saw this quite some time back. It was pretty insane; she clearly has some substance abuse problems going on. Sad, really.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:57 AM
1

This is nothing new.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:31 AM
0

Well MOST atheistic people will tell you that atheists don't need such organizations such as the AHA; it is not a doctrine or a philosophy, or even a philosophical standpoint. For most people, it is just a lack thereof wrt religion. That is, no belief in a god or gods. People who are aggressive in pushing their views on others ARE possessing a 'belief'. They BELIEVE in no belief, and that certain principles necessarily spring from this also. They are evangelical and dogmatic in their belief in n…
/r/MensRights09/02/13 10:35 PM
2

Oh man, neato! This right here is concrete scientific data that demonstrates how female teachers treatment of male students is colored by gender bias; in female students' favor. Lets see if a study comes up correlating the results of this research with the finding that women have significant own-group bias with no supporting cause needed.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 07:13 AM
0

IF they were capable of objective self-examination or higher-order critical thinking they wouldn't be feminists.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 07:09 AM
1

Yeah you're right, I should probably redact that.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 07:01 AM
3

IDK, i remember a story that broke just recently of a billionaire in Quebec who split with his girlfriend; and aside from $30,000 A MONTH child support, he also hired a driver for her, two nannies, and gave her a $15 MILLION house. And this was still not enough for her, she sued him for more.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 06:59 AM
2

Because women having kids is how we keep the wealth flowing from men to lazy entitled women who don't know how to cross their legs.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 06:57 AM
2

Give the man a gold star for hitting the nail on its greedy, entitled little head!
/r/MensRights09/02/13 06:56 AM
2

This is nothing more than a reinstatement of Scarlet Letters. Why not force women who have kids they can't support to tell any man they talk to that she is on welfare and already collects child support and food stamps? The feminists would be up in arms...and yet they have no issue ruining a man's life. Deplorable.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 06:56 AM
1

Save that quote for the judge my friend, and bear that in mind when custody hearings come about.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 06:45 AM
4

And nobody paid attention to Ghandi until the British started killing his supporters. Passive resistance only works when facing direct, violent repression; not passive-aggressive endemic victimhood and a campaign of marginalization and censorship.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:51 AM
1

Not unless we have names of MRMs whom she supposedly got banned. If you can get them to step forward, then maybe there's a case to be made. Oh, also the name of the Admin in question would be useful.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:48 AM
1

That's why I decided to try and set the record straight, with your help: http://anthro-apologia.blogspot.com/2013/02/an-open-letter-to-american-humanist.html
/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:36 AM
0

They silenced me because I pointed out these problems and questioned their positions too.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:10 AM
1

Silence those who disagree with you, that is the tactic we have become all to bitterly familiar with in the MRM. And none who engage in such acts really see their actions as wrong. :/ You cannot win a victory in a moral debate simply by silencing those who disagree.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 10:24 AM
3

It is a direct example of the phenomenon described by Christina Hoff Summers in "The War on Boys" http://www.amazon.com/The-War-Against-Boys-Misguided/dp/0684849569
/r/MensRights06/02/13 10:22 AM
2

But people who don't directly participate in mlitary action assume or operate on the assumption that they don't indirectly benefit from wars, particularly against hostile threats or for the securing of resources. Since it is an ugly reality to think that war for profit might benefit them, the well-insulated elites in academia do their best to avoid facing that reality.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 10:19 AM
1

I wrote a lengthy comment in the talk section of the article, addressing my concerns about its content. IT seems that at least a couple people are at least bothering to give it the time of day, so that's a positive sign that it can be made more reflective of the reality of the MRM and not just the bogeyman of angry misogynists that certain people want to paint it as.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 09:00 AM
4

In other news, agenda-driven organization has ranked a place very friendly to their agenda highly.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:10 AM
4

If you can't get someone to attend in person locally, you could probably find a representative advocate willing to tele-attend via Skype or similar. I'm new to the community, but I know I'd be willing to do something like that no problem. It really would be best and most fair to the MRM's perspective on these issues if you ask someone who is both very well-respected and very well-spoken in the community, such as the two people AryoBarzan mentioned (GirlWritesWhat and JohntheOther).
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:34 AM
1

Well if you acknowledge even for a second that other people might have a point, then apparently they "win" and by consequence you "lose". :p I suppose it's also important to distance women from the reality that there are also female criminals, and even violent female criminals. The harshness of that reality might be too much for "sensitive" and "vulnerable" women to bear, right?
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:26 AM
10

What I find astonishing is how quick one is to shut down and silence the opposition, slandering those who disagree with you as "misogynist", as if the mere accusation of it is all the evidence of that accusation needed. In any debate about moral/ethical rectitude, if both sides engage in reasonable discourse, the truth will out. I think many feminists know this, and that is why it is very important for them to keep slinging the vitriol to prevent any adult rationality from entering the conversat…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:23 AM
6

Now what's needed is a high-profile lawsuit against the university to draw further attention to the issue. Though, since Canada doesn't actually have any real free speech protection, this could be a non-starter...
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:17 AM
21

Where would we be as a civilization without the thought police reminding us men that we are pigs and should be ashamed of ourselves?
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:10 AM
7

I think deserve is a word that might have been overused in that image.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 03:28 AM
2

I saw this; I find it rather shocking that anyone could consider MRM to be a hate group and NOT radicalhub, where genocide and forced sterilization are advocated. Not to mention the regular slander of masculinity as a matter of course, and further shutting out any opposing viewpoints.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 03:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter