TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ReaganSmashK Archive

View 2 posts and 58 comments by ReaganSmashK on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

No it's fucking not. When I was sexually assaulted by my ex and she got off the hook despite confessing to it via text message, it wasn't feminism that kept her our of jail, it was ignorant people who either believe men want sex from any source they can find it, don't see how it's anatomically possible, or believe women aren't violent enough to commit sexual offenses. Men's rights issues are issues about people not recognizing that men have the same rights as women, not because feminists are und…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:26 PM
1

He's not bashing Feminism. The winning contest entry used the Feminist Logo to compare what the MRM logo would look like. You're right, I jumped to conclusions about the comparison. He wasn't bashing feminism. Although how often feminism gets mentioned here is pretty annoying. you kinda jumped to a conclusion that nobody else was coming to. Ehhh, I'm not too sure about that, there's so many negative comparisons between feminism and men's rights around here that I'm sure a lot of people upvoted t…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:20 PM
5

Oh god fucking dammit, this is it. This is the post people see and unsubscribe. If this is what being a "reddit MRA" is about then I want nothing about it. If this sub spent half the energy it does bashing feminism on advocating men's rights then we may see slightly quicker progress in, at the very least, more online communities.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 07:06 PM
3

I feel the issue with people's views on relationships like these goes beyond gender. Really, people shouldn't think anything different when they see a relationship between two people in mixed weight classifications. While there are reasons they'd be physically attracted to each other, just like most other relationships, there's way, way more reasons. It's really unfair that people would assume the foundation of such a relationship is strictly physical.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:43 PM
2

She's clinically offended.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:36 PM
2

Debates on the internet and using the internet as a means of coordination and releasing news are two completely different things.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 02:10 AM
1

This post specifically refers to other redditors. Those people are keyboard badasses who use Tumblr social justice as their method of "destroying the men's rights movement" which in other words, is doing nothing to the men's rights movement. This post is about arguing with people on the internet, there's no other means of communication where such conversations would regularly occur that the post refers to. No social movement is threatened by internet debates.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 01:51 AM
4

"Enemy" is such a negative term though. You shouldn't view people with different and opposing opinions as your "enemy" but rather, your catalyst for change. Don't hate, persuade. Remember that wall of text post a while back complaining about the massive levels of negativity in this sub? This is what that MRA was talking about.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 08:55 PM
6

enemies Jesus christ, this sub sometimes.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:19 PM
0

I posted a link about the first gay player in the NFL to come out and it got shot down and I was told by a wannabe mod that it doesn't belong here, even though it was a huge step in the right direction for society's better understanding of the connection between masculinity and homosexuality. If it isn't hate, this sub doesn't seem to want any part of it.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:42 AM
5

IT'S FIVEHEADKIN, CIS SCUM
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:27 AM
5

Hey, I have a big forehead. I need to go to a big forehead only gym so that people don't judge my forehead when my bangs fly up while running on a treadmill.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:49 PM
37

What's best about this is that it isn't an "anti-feminist" picture that you often see on this subreddit when you see a screenshot of an MRA in a feminist sub. This is just a "Your logic is bad and you should feel bad." post. You could post this to r/funny, r/subredditdrama, lots of subs, this is just gold. This is also really the only screenshot of a MRA in a feminist sub that wasn't just annoying anti-feminism that takes attention from posts more directly about Men's rights. Kudos to you.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 06:01 PM
5

it's bullshit that gay men feel subject to letting go their masculinity so that society accepts them as gay
/r/MensRights31/03/13 02:00 AM
5

It's really more about significance here to dispel the myth that all gay men are feminine and lack masculinity then it is about homosexuality. Regardless of your opinion on homosexuality, it's bullshit that gay men feel subject to letting go their masculinity so that society accepts them as gay.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:59 PM
3

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/Careers/06/13/dads.work/index.html Men spend much more time at work than women. According to Statistics Canada, men in 2005 spent on average 6.3 hours per day doing paid work as opposed to 4.4 for women. Yes, they did less unpaid work on average per day (2.5 hours per day versus 4.3), but it evens out. On average, men spent 8.8 hours and women did 8.7 hours per day of paid and unpaid work! This is what I was looking for, I one day hope to be a reddit search engine jedi…
/r/MensRights24/03/13 07:50 PM
1

Looks like whoever edited this photo spent too much time between the alt keys on her eyes.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 12:22 PM
2

Just so everyone knows, any family member or caregiver can sign up for this service, even people who are simply planning to adopt, it's just the name that throws me off.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 01:27 AM
8

Can you tell us the general area of where you live? Because right now I'm getting this vibe that you're just being hyperbolic. Does it happen to be the Amazon rain forest?
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:20 PM
1

Monks...Ritualists...
/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:06 AM
1

On Guild Wars I was a Dervish...self healing for slicing and dicing.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 07:53 PM
6

This is from her book, by the way: Feminism is for Everybody
/r/MensRights27/10/12 05:41 PM
1

Most of what I'm speaking of is a reply to a comment.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:41 AM
1

But I'm not getting hostile responses, where did that come from? All I said was that I was getting downvoted despite contributing to the discussion. Where in any of my comments did I say people were acting hostile towards me? Another conclusion you're jumping too. It's getting a little old now, friend, just stop. I don't know if you're replying to the wrong comments or what but you're saying that I'm saying things that I didn't say. I never said people were acting hostile towards me. I never sai…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:05 PM
1

Because you read this "I think part of the problem is the lack of reddiquette, whereas if I don't agree with the general beliefs of those in a discussion, I get downvoted, despite contributing to the discussion. Then I get told that by not agreeing with the general beliefs of those in the discussion, that I shouldn't BE in the discussion because I'm not contributing to it by not agreeing with them. Therefore, it's become slightly circlejerky around here, which reminds me of r/srs." and immediate…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:44 PM
2

Nononono. You're jumping to way too many conclusions, so just take a step back and think about what I've said as opposed to what you're assuming I'm talking about. It's not disagreement on male rights just in general. It's just issue specific things that really aren't even male rights issues. For example, I probably racked up -30 comment karma from saying that I'm against circumcision at birth, but if a man wants to get it done later on in his life for any reason, that's his choice. I cited a pe…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:16 PM
2

...How is me disagreeing with something someone says mean I'm not acknowledging that they have already decided to agree upon?
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:00 PM
2

Right, so I'm not changing anything, it's an issue with those on the receiving end of what I'm talking about, not me. I'm not being disrespectful or anything, some people around here just can't handle disagreement and downvote, and if someone really immediately assumes that disagreement=troll then I really don't want to discuss anything with them anyways.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:50 PM
3

I do that. I cite my sources, everything. I'm not gonna act anymore polite to someone that I disagree with then I would someone I agree with just so they don't get all defensive, it's their job to be able to handle disagreement without assuming that person has malicious intent.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:04 PM
7

I think part of the problem is the lack of reddiquette, whereas if I don't agree with the general beliefs of those in a discussion, I get downvoted, despite contributing to the discussion. Then I get told that by not agreeing with the general beliefs of those in the discussion, that I shouldn't BE in the discussion because I'm not contributing to it by not agreeing with them. Therefore, it's become slightly circlejerky around here, which reminds me of r/srs.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:59 PM
10

She attacked him. He called the police, she got removed from his property (and arrested). I remember him tweeting about it, saying his kids were "finally safe" and such. It's really depressing that he's basically paying for standing up for himself. I'm on mobile so I can't really search for the source efficiently but a quick google search of "DEION SANDER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TWEET" should suffice. The domestic violence issue happened months ago by the way. edit: Found some sources http://wblk.com/…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:48 PM
2

I used to like TYT. Then they should this video of a cop caught on camera having sex with a woman on duty. They weren't even mad, they were joking and saying good for him. The guy was getting paid tax payer dollars to have sex and they weren't even upset.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 09:10 PM
-2

A blind person can want vision, but they can't miss it if they never had it. In order to miss anything you have to have had it in the first place. Someone who's circumcised can want the increased sexual pleasure but can't miss it, because they never had it.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 08:12 AM
-1

Correct, but there are other factors other then the nerves that effect how much dopamine is released during sex. That's contributes to how sex is just "better" with certain people. If you have sex with your partner on your honeymoon, it's going to feel a lot better then some random person you had a fling with for a week. It can boil down to psychology for a lot of people. How much you trust the person your with, the amount of commitment, etc.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 06:27 AM
-4

If you never had it, you can't miss it. Sexual pleasure is also a bit subjective. How much dopamine your brain releases during sex varies on things other then how much feeling there is in your penis. Certainly helps to have a foreskin though. I figure sex on your honeymoon with the added nerves is the optimum feeling, but it's not like you can miss it if you never had it.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:20 PM
-1

All circumcised men suffer sequels from it that impair their sexual function. That's subjective. If what you're speaking of is that it prevents sexual pleasure, that's not entirely true. Sexual pleasure isn't just physical, it's psychological. Everyone has pleasure tolerance just like they have a pain tolerance. Some people feel pain with a slight stub of the toe that's beyond description, while some people also feel so little pleasure from sex that they have a very hard time reaching an orgasm.…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:03 AM
-2

Impaired function is a health issue. Not a big enough one to have any impact on a vast majority of males. So it really isn't a solid point as to why circumcision is "bad" for you. Oxymoron. You're using a different context of the world world "health." You could say that a man that has had a few fingers from each hand amputated is "healthy" if he has no infections and such afterwards. You made the statement that a penis is unhealthy because it is not whole due to circumcision. I replied with the …
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:51 AM
-2

Because it is. Mucous membranes are extremely fragile and vulnerable to dehydration. Penises have always been internal organs, even in animals where it has migrated outside the body it has maintained an internal/external arrangement. Then tell me why a vast, vast majority of men with circumcised penises have no health issues with their genitals? My point is circumcised men do not have considerably worse genital health then men with a foreskin, and you have no evidence presented to support the op…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:39 AM
-3

I just think it's sad and destructive. No different than someone that owns a beautiful vintage house driving into a trash compactor. Turning a beautiful set of healthy genitals into something that resembles a science experiment Yeah, a total science experiment. Do you realize that there's really very little difference in the health of a penis whether it has a foreskin or not? The only time it's ever even exposed is when you're urinating, bathing, or having sex without a condom. I never understoo…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:09 AM
-1

Any man that decides to have his foreskin removed though, I think it's fucked up and sad. Still within his rights and I'd never dream of stopping him but I pity them like I pity guys that castrate themselves, split their cocks in two etc And that's why you're egotistical. If something don't fit your cost/benefit balance, it's morally wrong. That's the same logic used by some to justify why abortion is wrong in their minds.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:44 AM
-1

Bullshit. This is a straw man. We firmly believe that people should be allowed to mutilate themselves however they see fit, we just don't see circumcision as a good thing. So you believe circumcision is universally a bad thing? There are no people out there who can logically see more benefits then a cost? That's very self-centered and egotistical. Other people see the costs of circumcision as much less then the benefits, and there's nothing wrong with that.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:33 AM
-2

Congratulations, this is your stupidest argument yet. You know what other organ you rarely use? Your testicles. Most men in developed countries will only "use" them (since we're discounting passive benefits) once or twice in their life. Are you kidding me? I use mine every day. They produce testosterone daily which contributes to how my entire body and face has shaped up to look masculine. They also produce Androgens which help with daily muscle growth and help your bones grow to fit your body i…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:29 AM
-4

the original argument has nothing to do with cosmetics, and is based solely around the advantages/disadvantages of getting the procedure done or not. your personal preference should have 0 bearing on whether the procedure should be done to others. My comments have strictly said "it should not be done to others without their consent." My personal preference has bearing on whether or not I want to get it done to myself, that's what my statement said. You are assuming why people are downvoting, and…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:17 AM
-2

Right, so why is that against the discussion? Why can't I point out that getting a circumcised penis isn't all bad, and for people such as myself, the benefits outweigh the costs? It's just that MRA tends to circlejerk instead of discussing things, so I like to point out contrasting views, not necessarily opposing views, as I agree that it's wrong for newborns to be circumcised. So far, this "discussion" is 100% anti-circumcision, even when you want it done to yourself. Anyone with a different v…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:57 PM
-3

It involves amputation of about 1/3 of an adult man's penile surface area. You're damn right it is radical. Look up how much of the surface area of the ear is lost from getting a double-zero gauging done on it. Then tell me it's radical. The foreskin is far from useless and if you think so you obviously are not well-enough informed to argue about it in the first place. The most fine-touch sensitive parts of the penis are in the foreskin as well as the most densely innervated and erogenous struct…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:27 PM
-5

Here is mine: A female's opinion about her penis preference has nothing to do with whether or not the procedure has any medical and health benefits, and therefore the procedure then becomes cosmetic. Why is the discussion soley about medical and health benefits? There are cosmetic benefits to either having a foreskin or not having a foreskin based on how you prefer it to look. you called me an asshole I do believe downvoting others for their opinion makes them an asshole. you then proceeded that…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:13 PM
-3

It can be. If you don't want it, you don't have to have it. Like I've said before, the total loss from getting a circumcision does not make it a radical procedure that should be frowned upon by society. If you didn't want it removed, it's wrong, and it shouldn't have been done. Newborn babies should not be circumcised ever. If you want it done, that's your choice, and nobody can control your body and tell you that you can't get it done.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:54 PM
-5

it's funny how often peple say that, when in fact, men who are intact rarely do so. Implying I'm lying. It's a cheap procedure. meanwhile, those of us who have it forced on us as infants and DO want to be whole, are mutilated for the rest of our lives and ridiculed when we speak out. to that, I call bullshit. I'm sorry you were mutilated. I'm completely against circumcision at birth, and it really is unfair. It doesn't really contribute to anything I said though.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:51 PM
-3

Did you even read my entire original comment? I am against circumcision from birth, completely. Circumcision should be an option, and no options can be picked as a new-born baby. It's really not a radical body modification. Saying a circumcision is a radical body modification is like saying gauging your ears is a radical body modification. It's radical to do it without someone's permission, but not radical to do it if you chose to do so. It's not like losing a finger, it's just a mostly useless …
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:27 PM
-5

Cultural programming? No, it's just a physical feature that I think looks unattractive and would not want it to be a physical feature that I have. It didn't require extensive expensive surgery like other procedures to modify physical appearance I feel like it would be a pain in the ass to pull it back when I need to, it would be annoying to keep it clean, especially for oral sex, and it overall just doesn't look appealing to me. If I said "I enjoy that I have blue eyes" would that be because of …
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:12 PM
-10

Hey everyone! Let's downvote the female with an opinion like a bunch of assholes! We're so different from r/feminism in the way we treat members of the opposite sex! I don't know many women that do prefer a penis without circumcision, grant it I live in America where it's more common. I know you pull it back for sex and everything, but yeah. Thanks for your input, sorry about the downvoting you got.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 09:43 PM
-3

I agree. African American civil rights interest groups still lobby and today because no matter what there will always be inequalities, but more importantly, to try to maintain the equality their parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, and so forth fought for. I still really don't like how the feminist movement is restricted to females for many groups. There's a lot of things such as the right getting into the military without tons of complications, not filling out a draft card when registerin…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:04 PM
-10

Not gonna lie, even if I hadn't been circumcised as baby, I still would have wanted to get it done. Not really because of health risks or anything, but just because it seems really excess and unattractive. With that being said, I do believe this picture was a bit of an exaggeration, since, as far as I know, most circumcision happens as a baby, and even with the label of "new born male" on the "victim's" shirt, it really wasn't necessary to crucify a grown man as if that's actually how MOST of ci…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 07:57 PM
12

Who cares what they call themselves? It's the message they're trying to send that matters. Feminist only became sort of a... inequality term because of people like r/srs and women who believe mothers shouldn't be able to be put into jail if they commit felonies, etc. MensRights isn't called equalitists, it's called MensRights because there a lack of mens rights is present in certain areas of society, feminists is the same thing, just with reversed gender. I would love it if men and women could c…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 08:14 PM
16

Remember, there's a difference between r/srs feminists and equality feminists.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:09 PM
7

I don't understand. This article points out a fact about the amount of women in jails, throws a few statistics about what emotional damage the separation does for the child...and then doesn't offer a solution? Oh that's right, because that writer would lose their job if they said "the solution is to not imprison women who belong there because women." which is the only solution possible to propose based off the context the article was giving.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 03:23 PM
4

I'm so happy to see this. But still sad that it makes me so happy because it's not a regular thing.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 07:13 PM
3

I think it's the common idea of "You can't handle this on your own, big brother will help you." You can't say no to their help though, you can't say I can handle this on my own, so this issue arises.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter