TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RealWitty Archive

View 0 posts and 82 comments by RealWitty on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

This article was already linked here by /u/proudfangirl 2 months ago, when the article was first published. Even though this is a repost, I'm going to echo /u/Trunk-Monkey's advice to use this archive.is link to avoid giving Buzzfeed any extra clicks.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 10:20 AM
–

The studio execs need to learn we aren't stupid and won't see a movie just because it has [insert your niche stereotype here] stamped on it. For sci-fi the target should be nerds in general, targeting male nerds exclusively can produce movies just as shitty as this. Think Barbarella vs Alien. Alien had a budget of $9-11 million in '79 and Barbarella had a budget of $4-9 million in '68 (equivalent to $8.3-18.7 million in '79 with inflation), yet Alien is a sci-fi classic and Barbarella was a comp…
/r/MensRights17/07/16 04:54 AM
0

Prior to this the last time I saw it was about a month ago.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 05:31 AM
11

It sounds like they get she's psychotic and the ex-husband was the victim of a ruthless attack. She had probably managed to rationalize killing him to stop him from taking their daughter, even though she'd likely never see her again regardless of whether or not she succeeded.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 04:09 AM
11

Shock doesn't usually include saying well thought out statements.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 04:03 AM
–

You can look it up That's what I did before I commented, when I said "it seems to be an American thing" I was referencing the information I read about it, which referred to it as "the most common batterer intervention program used in the United States". I'm not American, and I hadn't heard anyone refer to it here. There were some malicious, misandric, downright bigoted heartless elements. And, to this day, I am amazed and appalled that they found their way into the feminist movement Right, so my…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 05:57 AM
–

4th wave feminism is the real problem; it's by far the most aggressive movement. Alright, fair point, I didn't realize there was a fourth wave, though, from what I've now gathered, fourth wave feminism is largely centred around technology, primarily the internet, so wouldn't this more likely still be third wave activism; it doesn't seem to have been publicized outside of the homeowner's contacting the media.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 05:42 AM
3

So what is you're argument for MRAs? Also, according to the American Humanist Association humanism can be: the study of the humanities the general attitude of the renaissance the basic theory behind western science, political theory, ethics, and law a religious movement a secular movement Which part of Humanism are you talking about?
/r/MensRights22/06/16 05:33 AM
–

The implication you've made is that they intentionally minimized his gender while maximizing the girls' in order to focus attention on the potential of the girls being victims while ignoring the fact that the boy died, which would be a pretty malicious act, though that's not the point of the article. The point of the article is that an incredibly brave and kind 15 year old kid sacrificed his life to save two others. It shouldn't matter that he was a guy, it shouldn't matter that they were girls,…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 05:26 AM
–

I'd never heard of it before, it seems to be American thing, and you're correct, the first and second aren't perfect movements, there's no such thing. Though I didn't really say they were, only that being a feminist doesn't mean you support the current lens that's been shoved onto it. Third wave started in the 90's, this women could be from the second wave and could also be an awesome person, that's all I was really trying to say.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 05:09 AM
1

It's a shit post and OP is an asshole for not originally tagging this NSFW/NSFL.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 04:56 AM
2

That's why there are subdivisions; the third-wave, femininazis, etc. There are people in every movement who take things to far or use it as a guise for malicious attacks on those outside the movement, yet feminists fighting to keep female equality relevant isn't wrong, black lives do matter, many followers of Islam and Christianity and Judaism are peaceful and rational and respect people who have different opinions. Saying everyone in a group is bad is usually a really shitty mindset, and it's t…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 04:45 AM
–

Feminism is not a bad thing It certainly is. Overcoming women's suffrage was not at all a bad thing and was a cornerstone of early feminism. Women's rights and Feminism are not synonymous No they aren't, you're right, but there is an overlap. Also, I didn't say anything whatsoever about women's rights, so thanks for pulling that out of thin air. Anti-feminists can still support women's rights This is a grey area as, again, there is an overlap. This comes down to what you do and do not believe ar…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 04:45 AM
–

minimizing the fact that he was a boy and maximizing the fact that the girls were girls It certainly sounds like you're implying this was done maliciously, i.e. full of, characterized by, or showing malice; intentionally harmful; spiteful.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 05:05 PM
–

Thanks for not tagging this NFSW douche.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:56 PM
–

What would you have suggested in it's place? This doesn't at all malicious, just somebody trying to come up with a headline that rolls off the tongue.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:53 PM
–

the government engineered a crisis and men's rights [have been] taken away. So this doesn't highlight that exactly? The result ... was an "overcorrection," with schools adopting hearing processes that often lacked basic protections for accused students: The evidence had only to show that an assault was "more likely than not" to have occurred, and alleged perpetrators had no right to cross-examine the person who reported them ... Accused male students ... were not granted "any due process whatsoe…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:15 PM
1

Definitely, these people had their home vandalized for no good reason, it's a local landmark, and the message behind this piece of art is pretty important, too.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:58 PM
–

She said she is a feminist, not that she supports the third wave. Feminism is not a bad thing, women have and do face plenty of issues that require feminism. Third wave feminism is total bullshit, though, and doesn't do anything for anyone. And before some of you get pissy about me talking kindly about feminism, I never said it was a cure all or that the MRA movement isn't just as crucial to equality, if not more. EDIT: to clarify a little, there are feminists who were introduced to the movement…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:55 PM
4

They whole point of it being covered by the media is because people care, a lot of people.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:45 PM
–

It seemed to me most of the article actually wasn't too bad, for example: Digging into these cases, Ehrhart was appalled. Accused male students, he says, were not granted "any due process whatsoever," and were unable to face down student misconduct allegations with the same protections they'd have in the criminal justice system: a lawyer, a jury of peers, and the right to cross-examination. "The more I dug," he says, "the more I uncovered a culture of allegation equals conviction." But when he q…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 07:05 PM
1

This woman sounds like she's suffering from serious mental health issues, if that's the case there's no mens rea, jail is not the answer, and she instead needs proper psychological treatment.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 10:33 PM
3

How exactly do you think the 3rd wave started?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:10 PM
1

Well said
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:22 AM
–

Free in this case is not free, but government funded. As far as having a statist (I think they prefer statician) as a leader, they're usually pretty smart, although I'm not sure where you got your info, I can find anything that says he has a degree in statistics.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 02:10 AM
1

Ok, so your citing data for the US, with a population of 318.9 million as of 2014, where as the article here is specifically discussing Ontario, Canada, which has a population of 13.6 million, or ~1/23. So that'd be like 500 cases. Over 4 years. Thats 1 case for every 100000 people in Ontario which is like 120 dudes. 120. And most of them are likely outside of the target vaccination age range. So, to prevent 120 men from getting rare, pretty treatable cancer, the Ontario government is on the hoo…
/r/MensRights28/02/16 02:05 AM
–

Lol, Feel the Bern! As far as your politicians go, every Republican candidate is a clown, with Trump being Pennywise. And since you're subscribed here, I'm assuming you're not really a Hillary fan. So, unless you're a coulrophile or a masochist, Bernie seems like your only real choice at this point. Imo though you guys should just toss your whole system out the window and try again. Also, you keep using the words 'cuck' and 'cuckold', but I don't think you know what they mean. The only cuck I kn…
/r/MensRights28/02/16 01:49 AM
1

When the group everyone here is arguing should be vaccinated is males born after '93 with basic education, that's their reality for the most part.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 01:25 AM
–

I was just pointing out that what you were saying wasn't a valid argument. As for herd immunization, in this case there is a much wider coverage than just half; vaccinating all girls should cover virtually all straight people as well as any none straight women. So, if you're a straight dude and you don't get the vaccine, as long as you only have intimate relations with women who have had the vaccine (i.e. they were born after '93 and finished basic schooling), you should have about an equivalent…
/r/MensRights28/02/16 01:05 AM
2

Not once did I say that boys shouldn't get the vaccine, nor is it not allowed, I got it a few years ago, same with my younger brother. I was pointing out that it's stupid to say girls get hpv from boys as boys get it from girls too, and both can get it through same sex relationships; while vaccinating everyone is in the best interest of everyone, vaccinating anyone is also in the best interest of everyone. As for esophageal and colon cancer, esophagael cancer's primary risk factors are smoking, …
/r/MensRights28/02/16 12:43 AM
–

For the first '1.', what is the point your making, that we should intentionally infected women with hpv to lower their risk of oral cancer? Oral cancer isn't the main concern for any group when it comes to hpv related cancers as they aren't common to start and have a high survival rate. As for the second '1.' the statistic I used at the beginning of my comment is based on data that is independent from dob.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 12:26 AM
–

There's also the cost of the doctor consultation to get the prescription, the cost of the pharmacy workers who fill the prescription, and the cost of the health worker who administers the prescription, and that's just a few of the additional costs involved.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 10:48 PM
–

Where do you think the boys are getting it from? It can be spread by either sex, so focusing on one half of the population, the one who is at higher risk of complications after contracting the disease, should be the more generally effective (specifically more cost effective) method. Unless your gay, in which case no party would have the vaccine and both are equally at risk of things like cancer developing later.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 10:45 PM
–

Men have a risk of 0.02% of being diagnosed with oropharyngeal cancer, the 5-year survival rate for people with oral or oropharyngeal cancer is 63%, and the 10-year survival rate is 52%<sup>[1]. Comparatively, men have a 1 in 2 chance of being diagnosed with any type of cancer and a 1 in 4 chance of dying from cancer<sup>[2]. EDIT: These are general statistics, the numbers specifically related to hpv are much smaller, as they are with women and cervical cancer. Just wanted to point out oropharyn…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 10:33 PM
–

Have fun in Trumpland.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 10:20 PM
1

While not covered under OHIP, plenty of employee and student health care plans can cover a portion of the shots. When I got mine a few years ago we paid under $200 for all 3 shots because the rest was covered under my dads plan. I'd be nice if the government could cover it, but it really isn't that big a deal unless you don't have benefits or have a low household income (my dad's been a millwright for the last 20 years and, when I got the shot, my parents had 3 dependents and my mom was looking …
/r/MensRights27/02/16 10:19 PM
2

no Feminist has contributed anything of value to the world at all ever and never will Well hold on, the first-wave feminists certainly contributed to revolutionary changes for women, such as women's suffrage, and there are third-wave feminists today who are entirely necessary and have a positive and productive affect on society, running women's shelters and promoting higher education and positive self-esteem to young girls, etc., it's just that things have been in a downward spiral for a long ti…
/r/MensRights23/01/16 03:29 AM
9

The only reason this case was even entertained by the courts for so long was due to the inexperience of the judge with Twitter. He did his job well, taking the time to familiarize himself with the social media platform, while reviewing all the other information the was thrown at him, and he called these women out, saying that Twitter is an open, public online space where anyone can voice their opinion, regardless of whether or not you agree with them. I wouldn't blame Elliot if he chose to count…
/r/MensRights23/01/16 02:20 AM
0

First off, not 50/50. Not only are there slightly more men, but many positions held by female ministers were originally "junior minister" positions created for the target of gender equality in the cabinet. Even after these positions were changed to "senior" positions the ministers holding those position don't have nearly as much power as other members of his cabinet. So you're factually wrong if you believe he didn't give important roles to people with the qualifications to fill those roles. Sec…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:31 AM
-5

Not at all the same thing, you're talking about 0 response vs partial response, as far as I know the term 'family' do not exclude straight men. We're talking about single men being lower priority because they are less at risk and pose a greater risk. Not only that but you forget were talking about a plan for just the 1 month, not decades. Your argument is about as sound as the people saying we shouldn't help any of them.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:10 AM
–

You can't possibly say nonviolence hasn't worked in the past.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:05 AM
2

Being a radical isn't something that should be promoted, not matter what side your on. If you're not going to be an adult about things, it doesn't matter how long you've been here.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:55 AM
0

The case isn't about what he said it's about whether or not his role in this whole thing should be criminal harassment, i.e. stalking. You can compare yourself its definitions under American and Canadian law. Your 1st amendment wouldn't apply anyway, its meant to prevent the government from censoring what civilians say, with some exceptions.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:48 AM
–

No, the reason they still have any power is because individuals get mad and make stupid, unsubstantiated threats that they can point at and say, "see, we were right, they're all vicious animals that want to rape and kill us just because we're women and they hate women". If they build their arguments on these edge cases, taking that foundation away destabilizes their whole platform and they fall apart. Just because they kick and scream doesn't mean we have to kick and scream back, we aren't godda…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:07 AM
5

Open and shut cases can be dragged out for a long time if enough money is thrown at them. This case shouldn't have even made it to court, but it did.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:00 AM
–

I don't think BigOldNerd meant it that way, reading their post it sounds more like they were just trying to cheer up by_myself because, from their post, they seem to be struggling with depression.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:55 AM
0

I'll have to check this out now, I didn't realize he'd actually had that encounter I just thought someone had suggested it as a potential way to vilify him. Thanks for pointing this out.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:50 AM
–

Are we a left leaning country? Sure, our recent election should be enough evidence, but we've also got a long history of left-leaning policy. Are we feminist? No more than any other country I'd say; there are feminists yelling loudly all over the world, some because they actually have something to say and others because they don't but want to, that doesn't make every country a feminist country. By sheer volume America probably has more feminists than we have people, but that doesn't mean much in…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:43 AM
-2

Personally I don't believe it should even be made into an issue at all. Anyone Trudeau didn't appoint isn't automatically excluded from advising the him or his ministers, especially if they actually know hat they're talking about.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:17 AM
–

I don't know, I think that it's more of a grey area. There are millions of refugees and we're only taking in 10,000 by the end of the year (month now I guess), which is less than 1% of them. The reason women, families, and non-straight men have been given priority is because these groups pose the least security risk while simultaneously being the most at risk of violence committed by Daesh. If we could take more it would likely be less of an issue what groups we focus on, but we don't have unlim…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:04 AM
3

Sorry, don't know if you mean Elliot or OP? If it's Elliot, I fully agree with you that his actions were far from criminal harassment, this trial is a farce, and the women who have forced him into this situation are not victims, rather they are perpetrators of criminal behaviour towards him. The point of my post was to bring attention back to the case and provide productive ways to contribute to it instead of the digressional targeting of Canada; OP made the post as a call to action, those actio…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 07:24 AM
5

I'm sure when a judgement is made if it's not in Elliot's favour he, his family, and their legal counsel will immediately start looking into an appeal.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 10:25 PM
–

Hey, wtf buddy, lots of people here are confused and/or outraged that this is even a thing. If you want to help this guy out: Donate to his legal fund Sign a petition in his support Don't make threats towards these women, it'll just fuel their case and legitimize their 'victimization' like GG and similar fiascos Keep talking about this case, if the people involved know people are watching they'll put more thought into whether they should roll over for feminist censorship and stay in their good g…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 10:18 PM
–

It's a tragedy that this has taken so long, hopefully this ends up happening and the rest of the world takes a hint.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:27 PM
1

Everyone in the Harper Government<sup>©</sup> was his subordinate, and anyone who believe otherwise wasn't part of his party long.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 11:03 PM
-1

Trudeau's cabinet selections cover more than just gender equality. He's supposedly chosen MP's from across Canada, MP's from a wide variety of cultural and ideological backgrounds, and has apparently favoured the younger and less experienced over the better known veterans, I'm sure that he didn't make these decisions in haste and has assembled a well rounded team of qualified individuals. Afaik his cabinet hasn't even been made public, but the Huffington Post has a list of likely candidates; the…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 10:59 PM
–

Where is that quote in the title of this post from? Why would he be sued? If he's managed to put together a lean cabinet which has representatives from across Canada, from a multitude of backgrounds, and has an even number of men and women, thats great, I'm sure they'll all be well qualified for the positions they'll be given. So far I haven't even heard who he's selected, pretty sure it's a secret until he is officially given the PMO.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 10:43 PM
–

Wtf is all this now? Why is everyone bitching at each other about what it means to be liberal and the problems with a two party system? Go to a general politics sub if you want to do that. This episode was excellent (Steven Seagal's dancing put me into a full body laugh attack) and if you really look at what is said in the episode, both sides of the argument are made fun of; you could taking any group and put them into any of the roles. Personally I believe if someone is a douche, call them out …
/r/MensRights22/10/15 06:26 PM
1

And that's where you're wrong. Still haven't provided any justification for where you drew the conclusion. Everybody is free to do it again, whether they've been publicly named or not She could try, but had her name been released anyone she would have tried to do it to could avoid her. Without that knowledge they are vulnerable, and might not be as lucky as the guys in this case if she were to repeat this offence. My comment saying "Let's not name a juvenile just for revenge" is yelling First of…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 12:52 PM
2

Sorry? I'm saying your question is a loaded question as it contains the unjustified assumption that /u/cgwriter is try to make the point that we should all collectively punish [all] people regardless of their conviction , i.e. you're drawing this conclusion out of thin air and accusing them of trying to make it. These guys had their information released to the public and, had they been convicted, they would have likely been sentenced to a between 6 and 11 years, so this girl got away with 1/12 -…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 08:17 PM
1

they're a Radiant Dance Machine FTFY
/r/MensRights12/10/15 08:29 PM
1

A loaded question or complex question fallacy is a question that contains a controversial or unjustified assumption
/r/MensRights12/10/15 08:26 PM
–

It's not like there aren't some in favour of that route though, just sayin'...
/r/MensRights04/10/15 09:06 AM
1

While you are correct that her actions were not pedophiliac, they were at least ephebophiliac, and that is no worse than pedophilia when the person in question is pushing 30. The victim is still not an adult, neither mentally or physically, and isn't even considered one by the court in this case as the predator in question plead guilty to two counts of sexual activity with a child.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 03:54 AM
1

Not to derail you, but it's wrong for parents to sleep with their children because that's incest. This is still statutory rape and a gross abuse of authority, not to mention the emotional abuse when she lied about her pregnancy (NOT something a 15 year old should be dealing with).
/r/MensRights30/09/15 03:27 AM
–

While its horrible that you had to go through this it's good that you've at least begun the healing process, and your buddy sounds like a great friend who will help you get through this. Many don't/can't move on and their suffering manifests in the perpetuation of abuse; breaking that cycle is extremely hard. As others have said, you are certainly welcome here, this is meant to be a place to talk about this stuff and provide support to those who need it and I hope that we can help you work throu…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 08:50 AM
1

I didn't realize the man was homeless, he looked like he was in scrubs when they interviewed him, maybe I missed something.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 08:36 AM
–

I remember seeing this a while ago, but it was the original report, this is an update as far as I'm concerned and, while certainly disappointed in the outcome, glad to get some new info. (Again, prior to this I only knew she was charged and saw the video, this is the first I've seen of it since then, I very well could have missed this before though)
/r/MensRights22/09/15 08:30 AM
3

I remember reading the original report a while back, video was pretty brutal, but I never thought this would be the outcome. At the very least she was trying to take him hostage, either to then threaten to slit his throat in an effort to manipulate him, or do so to his colleagues, and afaik taken a civilian hostage isn't treated with a slap on the wrist, how is taking an officer hostage dealt with this way?
/r/MensRights22/09/15 08:26 AM
2

It's not impossible, but it's also not the point. We need to make it clear that we don't support extreme violence against feminists, all that does is delay mens rights. Whether or not it was a real threat is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:22 AM
2

Very true, but its still funny to think that this beat out every single one of the other definitions. So often are the odds stacked against MRAs due to feminist propaganda that demonizes us that this small triumph feels pretty good.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:10 AM
1

While I think that mra and feminism both work towards the same thing, men's rights is pretty far down on this list of feminism goals and needs people dedicated specifically to men's rights. Just like the LGBT community stands on its own even though feminism supports the movement, mra needs to be a separate and autonomous movement, even if feminism claims to support its goals. You just can't have one group cover such a wide area of issues.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 10:07 PM
–

I agree that down votes shouldn't be dolled out simply because one subscribes to a different philosophy, and it appears that this has been corrected now as /u/4nimal is currently sitting at +11. Which group we associate with shouldn't be taken into consideration here, but what we are saying should, and what has been said by you both is appropriate. People need to realize that it doesn't matter which you are, feminism and MRA are just two means to the same end (the protection of human rights, reg…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:04 PM
13

I agree, the focus here should be the total lack of empathy one person has for another who is the father of her (two?) children, is extremely disabled, and will never be able to work a day in his life in order to a) support himself after she takes all his money, and b) pay £1,500 a month in alimony (where the hell is he supposed to get that?). If we put the gender bias that usually takes precedent in these cases on the back burner we can see this for what it is, financial abuse of a disabled vet…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 04:54 PM
2

Is this just in general, or is there a specific video that comes to mind? If so, could you please link it? Thanks!
/r/MensRights20/09/15 03:01 AM
1

Thanks very much for adding this, very helpful. After reading through that article and the court transcript I'd have to say I agree that this judge has crossed the line, those kids, while defiant of a court order, do not deserve to be taken away from their mother, without visitation rights for her or her entire family, simply because they don't want anything to do with their dad. I would probably have done the same as these kids, even with the judges open hostility and threats; if faced with ess…
/r/MensRights18/09/15 04:00 AM
–

The original article has very limited information, check out the one /u/supersurfr provides below, it clears up some of the ambiguity. It's important that we discuss topics such as this, and really look into them, to make sure that justice is being done. In this particular case it would appear that the mother in question couldn't afford child care, brought her kids with her to work, left for an emergency under the assumption that her coworkers could watch the kids, and then the police came to in…
/r/MensRights18/09/15 02:55 AM
–

Was just gonna post a similar article, it does appear to be significantly less severe than the article here suggests. The kids really shouldn't be in an auto shop, its just not a very safe place for a 6 and 4 year old. They also should definitely have proper footwear and the 4 year old shouldn't have been eating dirty noodles, but it just sounds like a struggling single mom and a very unfortunate sequence of events.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 02:43 AM
12

Agreed, threats of extreme violence should never be a part of the argument. It makes everyone look like a bunch of lunatics when this kind of stuff happens and it's not productive at all. Hopefully it was just a few stupid high school trolls and nothing tragic comes of this, but if not I hope these assholes are caught. Either way this shouldn't define men's rights and hopefully things can get back to the normal chaos.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:54 AM
–

Hi, would you mind posting that article? I'm curious now about the background of this case.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:36 AM
2

I'm not going to debate any of the topics in your post, I have no experience and relatively little knowledge in the area. If that's what you were looking for I'm not the person to listen to. I read this post, as well as the comments made so far, in entirety and the only thing I feel I can say is that I'm deeply sorry for your loss. No one should ever have to feel what you've felt. I hope that one day you find someone to trust and you are able to have the family you wanted, not so that you can fo…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 10:03 AM
1

Yup, I might just have to move...
/r/MensRights15/07/15 06:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter