TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Reaper9999 Archive

View 0 posts and 121 comments by Reaper9999 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Fuck does politicians' gender have to do with it?
/r/MensRights28/07/26 11:44 PM
5

Men mostly didn't own property either. Also depends on the country, some had both male and female property owners at various time periods. Positions of power were likewise not attainable for most people, especially the position of a king/queen, which were typically inherited. I think comparing those in power to an entire gender is pointless, being male doesn't give you any sizable advantage for that.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 09:04 PM
2

I wouldn't be surprised if it comes from the same place as religious nutjobs/flat earthers/etc.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 08:50 PM
2

Drafts are enacted by politicians, and all the "right to vote" bs is very American-centric.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 08:44 PM
6

It's not false equivalency. Claiming that a man is solely responsible for a pregnancy is ignoring the fact that the woman has equal/higher choice in having that pregnancy. The same standard is not applied in both situations.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 03:42 PM
9

The thing I always find hilarious is how they simultaneously consider stealthing rape, and claim that a man is solely responsible for a woman's pregnancy, because he decided where to cum. Somehow, a man solely deciding where to cum is rape and not rape at the same time.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 02:47 PM
19

Placebo rape.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 02:38 PM
24

Can tall white guys feel intimidated by others too or do you reserve your prejudice for one group of people?
/r/MensRights26/07/26 12:08 AM
4

Dutch women are also taller than global average.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 12:05 AM
12

Intentionally and maliciously discriminate based on sex and skin color? That's not discrimination based on sex and skin color, according to discrimination experts, that's 'artistic expression.' Someone should remind them that a certain moustached dictator was also an artist.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 12:03 AM
13

It's not wrong though, women don't generally touch people they're creeped out by What does her being or not being creeped out matter when she's the one doing the touching? A bit sexist, yes and I think it used the word "girl" because the search used girl...instead of woman. Unless a minor is asking this question Boy/girl can refer to adults as well.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 08:42 PM
6

You might as well blame the cirucit boards. AI is inanimate, the blame is entirely on humans.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 07:55 PM
8

That's straight up even in reddit policy/rules, and I wouldn't be surprised if most of the website has seeped through with that rot.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 07:53 PM
7

You took away all accountability on the AI Wat. AI is not alive, it cannot have accountability. It's literally glorified gradient descent shitting out that which is more common. You could argue that it was fed biased data, but the world already is biased against men, nothing extra is required to produce that result.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 07:43 PM
1

It is not one word.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 07:00 PM
3

Lmao of course the feminist resorts to insults when asked to describe these male benefits. You can't even back up your own claims, hypocrite.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 06:43 PM
3

You still haven't described shit. What are these benefits towards men you keep talking about?
/r/MensRights25/07/26 06:36 PM
1

Where are your sources?
/r/MensRights25/07/26 06:23 PM
1

That's not a word...
/r/MensRights25/07/26 06:12 PM
1

Better yet, just give them some uninhabited island so they can build their society without men or whatever they bitch about, and leave the rest of us alone and not bothered by those lunatics.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 06:10 PM
2

It's not gendered but it does lean pretty heavy in one direction And your source is..?
/r/MensRights24/07/26 11:39 PM
4

It's the same as when they say "what has he done to make her cheat/abuse him/etc"
/r/MensRights22/07/26 01:57 PM
4

I don't think Australia counts as a country where women are believed to be oppressed (other than by feminists, but they believe women are oppressed everywhere...). It's basically misandry in the shape of a country.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 12:45 PM
2

Also, I wonder which inanimate objects? I sure as hell treat my material possessions well because they actually have value lol, unlike a man-hating woman that doesn't even see me as a person and whom I wouldn't lift a finger for.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 12:32 PM
8

Or just, you know, by not making a choice to have kids, do extra housework, or go for a lower paying job. It's female choices vs male slavery, it's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 11:59 AM
5

The post says " the vote got rejected 73% majority,75% of women and 71% of men voted no,yeah you heard it right it was women who voted to keep the male only conscription more than men". more than men, learn to read or stop being disingenuous. Even if women voted only 30% for conscription, or didn’t vote at all, the result would have been the same You're conveniently ignoring the option of voting against it. Likewise in the other vote if men had all voted in favor then conscription would be gende…
/r/MensRights21/07/26 11:54 AM
1

The funny part is thinking that what some dead people did to other dead people is at all relevant.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 11:44 AM
7

We know you're not oppressed & that you're bitching because your one brain cell can't figure out any better response than blaming half the world for random bullshit. Woman hate men because they are disgusting and had zero good experiences with them If all men disgust you then the issue is you lmao.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 10:30 AM
4

I don't see it because of the disparity in amounts of times women rape vs men There isn't a disparity and it's already been explained to you. If you are a normal sized male there is no scenario where an average sizedwoman should be raping you, as in forcibly beating to take it If a man starts beating her, the cops would be on her side. But it isn't the same as men physically dominating a woman and taking her pussy And that makes it not rape? And psychological damage is the same. Then someone is …
/r/MensRights21/07/26 10:23 AM
2

Your analogy is shit and I already told you why. Your reasoning amounts to "muh long dead women were oppressed by long dead men". You pretend that conscription/courts and laws severely biased against men/bias against men in hiring/bias against men in support programs/etc. are not a system. You showed zero evidence of women being oppressed. You pretend that "kill all men", "I hate all men" etc. are some sort of hate towards "patriarchy" (where is this patriarchy? Is it in the room with us right n…
/r/MensRights20/07/26 02:11 PM
2

What substantial claims did you make other than "it's okay to be racist/sexist towards the right people"? You see how that looks? That looks like your position being so indefensible that you're comparing racism and sexism to food preferences. How can I trust that vanilla ice cream is better when you give no evidence or more than two sentences on why it is. Are you so dumb that you need evidence for why sexism/racism is bad?
/r/MensRights20/07/26 01:48 PM
2

The point is calling out your bullshit. No wonder you don't see it, must be blind to your privilege or something.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 01:18 PM
3

Fair point.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 12:31 PM
9

What the fuck do women 25 years ago have to do with anything? Women still cant serve in certain infantry roles Oh wow, what an inconvenience to them 🙄 Its always very telling when people complain about one side of the coin but never mention the obvious other side You mean the other side that isn't forced into literal fucking military slavery? Men certainly were not complaining then I don't give a shit who was or wasn't complaining 25 years ago about anything. Its never the patriarchy that build …
/r/MensRights20/07/26 10:02 AM
16

They don't see men as human, plain and simple. UN declaration of human rights includes: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or internat…
/r/MensRights20/07/26 09:51 AM
5

Misandry is not systematic. Stop lying. Misandry is not systematic. Misandry is the direct response to systematic misogyny, the patriarchy and systems discriminating and oppressing women. Women aren't oppressed, stop lying. misogynistic speech is often more hateful towards women, whereas ‘misandrist speech’ targets the patriarchy and the systems that enable oppressive behaviours against women. It targets men, you liar. it’s similar to how some black people may say ‘I hate white people’, is comin…
/r/MensRights20/07/26 09:28 AM
1

The current situation is a real mess if one partner dies without a will. Let's not pretend it's about that when the rest of the proposal exists. and there’s also an opt out so no one is being forced into it That's literally being forced into it. That opt out will also cost a bunch of money, and presumably both would have to agree to it.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 08:50 AM
2

less vulnerable to assault Yet men comprise the vast majority of violent crime victims. i'm not saying biological advantages outweigh societal disadvantages, i'm saying that both genders "have it easy" in different ways. that men have an easier time with most things physical is undeniable, so why are those easier things excluded from your assessment of "easy mode"? You still refuse to answer whether someone should be discriminated against for biological differences not related to gender. why are…
/r/MensRights20/07/26 08:40 AM
13

Being able to lift or open jars justifies legal discrimination? That is some insane reasoning. If it actually comes down to tanks and bullets you still have a huge advantage just for being male... I'll assume that you're extremely ignorant on this matter. If you're not, then you're a massive piece of shit for saying this. You can run away much faster and for much longer than you could otherwise. I would be subject to conscription and/or imprisonment, unlike a woman that could just leave the fuck…
/r/MensRights18/07/26 06:12 PM
20

Mr. cave man, we've invented tools millennia ago. You aren't gonna tank bullets harder than a woman. How much strength, endurance and physicality would you give up for a legal advantage? That's just biology lmao. Are you gonna give privileges to average people because bodybuilders are stronger? Also, women have better immunity to diseases. Many of my girl friends who were more sporty than me were surprised how easily I could out wrestle them. It's pretty easy to pin a woman who is your size. Eac…
/r/MensRights18/07/26 03:24 PM
28

Women in the west and even many places outside of it literally have advantages codified into law, support programs etc. What do men have that's equivalent?
/r/MensRights18/07/26 02:36 PM
3

So shit funding rather than something based in hate. No wonder medical stuff at the NHS were protesting en masse not long ago.
/r/MensRights18/07/26 02:32 PM
7

Don't forget female politicians fail because men, somehow. No no, don't look at the proportion of female electorate, it totally definitely has nothing whatsoever to do with who gets votes.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 06:22 AM
2

Sure, why?
/r/MensRights16/07/26 11:27 PM
6

It's evident from women being more represented in lower paying jobs. There are studies that show that for specific countries (Chile - https://www.researchgate.net/figure/ncome-distribution-of-contributors-by-gender-September-2009_fig3_264854799; even misandry the country shows this regardless of how they try to frame it - https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/understanding-statistics/guide-labour-statistics/gender-pay-gap-guide), but I don't think any exist that involve multiple countries, especiall…
/r/MensRights16/07/26 09:14 PM
15

Income brackets. As in between x and y amounts. I'm sorry I figured you'd understand the basic concept without needing it made obvious, that was an assumption on my part. My bad. So you're saying that men tend to the upper part of any bracket - which are completely arbitrary - and women tend to the lower part? For one, your claim for "all brackets" is a lie, for two the rest of it is down to women's choices. The argument wasn't that all men are handed power No, you claimed men are the ruling cla…
/r/MensRights16/07/26 05:09 PM
17

You've jumped to an apex fallacy Fucking lmao, projecting much? among all social classes and wealth brackets globally, men hold more wealth then women. Among all levels of income, men make more money then women If they have the same level of income, then they're making the same amount of money, what the hell are you on about? Among postipns of elected or appointed power, men make up the majority Cool where do I sign up to have elected or appointed position of power? Since according to you being …
/r/MensRights16/07/26 04:33 PM
5

I bet it would also be used to silence anyone they don't like with those pretenses, i. e. fascism. measures to protect children Ah, there it is! Whenever a government says that, it just means they want to become more controlling.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 04:03 PM
2

Yeah, what the fuck is digital violence even supposed to mean? Can a person digitally die?
/r/MensRights16/07/26 03:59 PM
1

For this kind, all bets are off, everyone should fight. No. If the government that's leeching on you through taxes and corruption can't deal with a war, it's their problem. No one deserves to die because of some old retard with too much money. If anyone should fight - it's the positions; give them handguns so they can go duel each other or whatever.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 03:39 PM
5

Having children is a choice.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 03:35 PM
7

Apparently the rationale is that "Stay-at-home parents, 80 percent of whom are women, lose up to $295,000 in salary and retirement savings by pausing their careers to raise children." Translation: "Some stay-at-home parents, 80 percent of whom are women, decide not to work and live entirely off your money, now shut up and give $$$."
/r/MensRights16/07/26 03:23 PM
3

Not only that, it will worsen the housing crisis. Who's to say your female roommate won't claim she's in a relationship with you?
/r/MensRights16/07/26 03:16 PM
7

Don't prenups get thrown out all the time?
/r/MensRights16/07/26 02:59 PM
18

Not cutting out red meat, steak, jerky and pig bacon are masculine codded foods and some of the most fatty and hard foods on heart health. Replacing red meat with soy or turkey would be great for heart health and the planet but men often ignore their doctors advice to do so. Further "soyboy" has become an insult used mostly by men to shame other men for not being masculine enough. Men also need more calories etc. in general than women. Viewing meat as "masculine coded food" might just be an Amer…
/r/MensRights16/07/26 02:29 PM
8

It is telling that Benatar never considers the possibility that women and girls are being discriminated against by the noncorporal punishment that they, but not men and boys, receive Jesus Christ, what a bunch of fucking clowns. Sure as hell when you suggest women and girls should get the same punishments, these types froth at the mouth that it'd be discrimination or something (see also: efforts to abolish female prisons in some countries). They just bitch about literally anything, no matter if …
/r/MensRights16/07/26 01:42 PM
1

by listing statistics for the crime under the category “other victimization,” along with seemingly lesser offenses like “non-contact unwanted sexual experiences.” Wtf do they think PIV is if not contact?
/r/MensRights16/07/26 01:15 PM
1

A large amount of people what? Are capable of being evil? I already said that's almost everyone, learn to read.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 12:38 PM
3

Who dominates the violence statistics, though ? Why are people (men or women) more cautious when they encounter a random man in their surroundings ? Completely irrelevant to what I said. If you wanna go on about something random, then do it on some other comment thread.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 12:54 AM
5

You think paranoia is something that only women express ? Where did I say that?
/r/MensRights15/07/26 12:51 AM
2

There are literally men that are killing women because they are single, it's called incels Buy a dictionary. A man killing a woman is called a murderer. but it's not all feminists so don't come saying there is a war between genders wanted by women or that this is caused by feminism Not all feminists but always a feminist, ha! feminism : feminism isn't about fighting men or making their life a misery, it's about putting an end to every discrimination due to gender Then explain why feminists activ…
/r/MensRights14/07/26 02:20 PM
1

As far as I know, women don’t make up the majority of blue collar work? That’s what I’m saying, they should be able to if they want to They are already able to I think is the point.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 02:11 PM
2

Men have long treated them second class, excluded them from any meaningful decision making. Which men have treated them second class? Which men were and are still treated as second class themselves?
/r/MensRights14/07/26 02:09 PM
7

That and I think that when women try and shame men for their sexual urges/desires its more of an attempt to gain control than anything else Also see: porn and how much men get shamed for watching it.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:55 PM
18

" Do you think some women are genuinely ashamed of their own paranoia? I'm not going to pretend I'm basing this on anything scientific, but I still think I need to say this. You know how some women tend to get offended whenever a man exists in a public space, and act as if he's trying to make the overall situation more threatening than it actually is? Like, I've seen women act genuinely uncomfortable or scared when they saw a man minding his own business. Which makes me wonder... Do you think wo…
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:49 PM
11

Men have earned their crowd of haters. We're all capable of some pretty atrocious things Then everyone has earned being hated. Virtually everyone can kill another person.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:39 PM
5

Governments even fund venture capital for female only businesses. UK gov recently dropped half a billion pounds on it and wants to give them the same amount of money as male businesses, despite themselves admitting there're only 13% women in venture capital investment teams. In other words giving them 6x the money compared to men because vagina.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:35 PM
2

Won't somebody think of the shareholders?!
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:27 PM
4

Also jobs like STEM preferring female hires.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:24 PM
9

Also "involuntary manslaughter"? That piece of shit made all the decisions to smoke and to stab and murder.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:21 PM
2

Might well be the only way they see their husbands. That and bringing money.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:10 PM
3

Because the person in the post thinks about that every time they hear that men kill themselves ~4x as much as women. The implication is that something like 75% of male suicides are some sort of female hating action. No wonder the poster can't find any resources on it - yet is doubling down on that. To find out someone killed themselves and think it's because they hate women is fucked up in the head. Also, whoever said it's family annihilators is an idiot - family annihilation is murder or murder…
/r/MensRights14/07/26 12:37 PM
1

That's probably one of the reasons they're introducing laws that give cohabiting women marriage-level privileges after some time.
/r/MensRights12/07/26 06:08 PM
2

Yet at the same time holding a door is infantalising her lol.
/r/MensRights12/07/26 05:21 PM
2

Men watching porn doesn't take away atention from women. The average woman still have men in her DMs and watching porn just proves that you love women being sexy so no . You just make women feel even more desired The thing you're missing is once someone jerks off they're less likely to overlook issues the woman has. And it's just generally cheaper and less of hassle. Apparently, way more young people are single now in the west than before, which I think is evidence of that to some degree.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 11:20 AM
2

Like what?
/r/MensRights11/07/26 11:13 AM
1

I'm not seeing women get called that either. It's always a "yas queen", "how dare you care how many people she fucked???", etc. Not to mention how women reading smut apparently is "different" than men watching porn. Sexual stigma is bigger on women and we have to deal with real opression because of purity culture Lol everything's oppression nowadays. Pretty much all I see is making it all about women and some sort of female sexual empowerment. People hate us If we aren't virgins or we act "sluty…
/r/MensRights11/07/26 11:12 AM
2

since a lot of men use it to ‘gain knowledge’ about intimacy Do they? I haven't seen any statistics for or against that, but I assumed for most people it's just "big tiddy = dick go hard". can harm your sexual reproductive organs ...huh? W. r. t. ethical issues I think the problem is that many industries have them in some form. You'd have to not buy pretty much anything to avoid that. I also want to preface that many sites are a machine and do not give women their whole earnings. Unlike some sit…
/r/MensRights11/07/26 11:03 AM
2

According to her logic, women seek out rape. After all, things only happen to you when you seek them out. Thinking that a gunshot and groping have (sic) an equal threat of killing someone is just the braindead cherry on top.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 10:49 AM
1

Not to mention that most people are of a younger age, including women. She's focusing on a small subset of women to claim that it's some anti-female thing.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 10:05 AM
3

Murder is also illegal. Guess what, it still keeps happening.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 09:56 AM
16

It's the same "women are at the mercy of everything around them, and everything around men is at the mercy of men".
/r/MensRights11/07/26 12:28 AM
1

*the wife chose to be a SAHM, all while likely having access to husband's finances.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 12:06 AM
1

The outcome is there's virtually no difference for the same role/experience/etc.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 12:02 AM
1

It just goes to show what they're really after. They don't want more women to be good at those things (engineering, sports, whatever), they want easy money.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 11:56 PM
2

Evidently though most people in the US support Trump, and a large portion of the population are christians.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 11:02 AM
1

The thing that's not helping is that governments/corporations enforce the "my side is worst" thing. I. e. all their bullshit about how helping men is allegedly a detriment to women.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 10:57 AM
2

Mind you, some years ago, women didn’t open bank accounts or be accepted in universities. That's half a century+ ago, and for bank accounts only affected married women, because the man was in the hook to pay it off. men have always had access to these societal privileges That is just not true. Most people throughout history had no privileges. Especially these "rights to vote" that keep being brought up - most governments that existed were monarchies. Most men in US specifically didn't get any vo…
/r/MensRights07/07/26 10:16 AM
2

Forming a romantic relationship is not a life changing decision lmao. It especially does not entitle anyone to the other person's stuff, what is this insane bullshit
/r/MensRights03/07/26 02:22 PM
2

Imagine negligent discharge being dismissed with such bullshit argument. It would absolutely be ridiculous, and being negligent with a car should be treated no less seriously - probably even more seriously because getting a car is much easier than getting a firearm, especially in the UK.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 02:18 PM
3

Compared to everything else? Yes.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 01:00 PM
2

The first part is because they're considered illegal and get forced to allow women or shutdown. Of course, female organisations are not held to the same rules.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 12:54 PM
5

Yes, that's how economy works. What makes you think you're so special that your wants should be catered to?
/r/MensRights03/07/26 12:45 PM
2

You might not even get to go to prison in either of the countries mentioned in the post. Both have practices of kidnapping men and forcing them onto the frontline. And whenever men bring it up they always try to take the spotlight off men or dismiss it. Saying stuff like no one should be drafted, 'who set that system up' etc then wonder why people don't believe the lie feminism is for everyone. It's crazy that those morons cannot comprehend the answer staring them in the face - rich people. In b…
/r/MensRights03/07/26 12:05 PM
1

In Russia votes are just for show, its government is very much a dictatorship. Ukrainian and other post-soviet governments tend to be fairly corrupt too.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 11:50 AM
1

Are you able to read at all? The post talking about Russia and Ukraine. Russia and Ukraine don't have anything to do with the American Selective Service. Russia and Ukraine have not, ever, hinged "right to vote" on draft. You're not making life better for anyone with this "men made conscription male-only, so we're going to get back at women by taking away birth control!" shit Which the post never even mentioned or alleged to. Not only do you not fucking understand that most of the world is not t…
/r/MensRights03/07/26 11:41 AM
2

Are you genuinely that stupid? Do you not understand that men being drafted and people enforcing draft are not the same people? Fuck do you mean "self-inflicted"?
/r/MensRights03/07/26 11:33 AM
1

Equality benefits both men and women, you're not fighting for mens rights to subjugate women, you're fighting for equality You're missing that feminists by and large do want to subjugate men and have taken concrete action towards that. The analogy with the shelters would be more like if people from the cat shelter went over to the dog shelter, set parts of it on fire, shot a bunch of employees, then went back to the cat shelter to cry about how oppressed they are and how all dogs and anyone that…
/r/MensRights01/07/26 01:55 PM
1

They can very much claim child support from non-biological fathers. In France it's not even allowed, legally, to use DNA tests as proof of non-relation to avoid that. Alimony has nothing to do with children, so I don't know what you're trying to say about it.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 01:52 PM
1

It couldn't only be that, since feminist organizations and individuals do push for crazy shit in laws/policy, and succeed, it's not limited to media. Well, that or somehow the loudest voices have all the power, which seems unlikely if they'r e a minority.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 01:32 PM
3

"feminists who believe that men's problems are the fault of each man" and "feminists who hate men" They're the same picture.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 01:28 PM
2

Because they're supremacists, they don't give a shit about equality. If you have or experience thing X, they want you to give it to them because oppression or something. Of course, this only applies to that which is beneficial, they will never demand equal responsibilities and in fact do the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 01:22 PM
5

Someone opens shelters for men - "No, not like that!" And remember that they're mostly talking about what other people did for them, so they have no leg to stand on to speak to anyone else about not putting in effort.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 12:45 PM
8

They will also straight up deny that it happens. Some no doubt because it benefits/they can't fathom not being the victim.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 12:05 PM
1

Outcomes: Period huts, forced rape, forced sterilization, period stigma/isolation, anti-abortion, forced abortion, surrogacy, lack of maternity/leave, economic equality or poverty due to job discrimination around pregnancy and child rearing. None of these are a thing in the west, except the few places where you can't get abortion or can't get it easily, and rape - which happens everywhere to anyone and is NOT gendered. Don't know why you added "forced" either, it's forced by definition. Then the…
/r/MensRights01/07/26 09:21 AM
3

That's only survival of individuals, not survival of any significant portion of all people. It's not as though the people that were saved there are just gonna start fucking everyone. Which also makes the whole "1 man could impregnate 10 women" thing irrelevant. And humans - especially an international organisation - should use their damn brain instead of relying entirely on some basic instincts.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 09:51 PM
3

Slavery is as old as civilisation too, doesn't make it good.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 09:46 PM
3

Better fit in what way? Which positions are they not a better fit for?
/r/MensRights29/06/26 12:37 PM
28

Because it's typically meant as an insult.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 12:23 PM
32

It's also homophobic.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:02 AM
10

It's a desire to paint themselves as victims of oppression in every situation imaginable. No matter what argument, evidence of contradiction, etc. you present to them they'll try to twist it to blame men. With a good SO you'll be less susceptible to legal bullshit, but even someone you barely know could falsely accuse you.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:00 AM
6

" Or something like that, I'm not fucked in the head enough for this shit." is pretty clear in it being sarcasm.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:55 AM
1

The men in here are being led by men they elected, who are implementing "change" Those in leadership positions enforce change, and most subjected to their policies are not offered "choice"-- whether they elected them or not-- and regardless of political affiliation ("Leftie" is not even defined). So you think they're not offered choice unless they're men? Fuck you, you hypocritical piece of shit. As well, that the majority "in charge" of worldly affairs are male. Empirical-based evidence. You're…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:01 AM
1

we’re angry when people tell us we need to be the providers but that’s mostly men telling us this The vast majority of people I hear this from are women. We created a system that makes as miserable, what’s the harm in trying something different for once Who's "we"? If you had a hand in creating the current political/social/etc systems, then kindly proceed to the nearest Nuremberg for all the atrocities those systems manufacture.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:12 AM
1

Or maybe Professionalization. In the US we focus on helping victims with legal help instead of emotional or communal support. This in turn introduces the "professionals" in the treatment. Particularly lawyers. And navigating our legal system retrauamatizes victims, is expensive, and disincentivizes victims from feeling like they can choose to leave. Rape culture. Rape culture is victims getting legal help? And despite the view that rape is bad it simply isn't enough. We don't take accusations at…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 08:32 AM
1

That the rates of IPV for men are ridiculously high. As a man you should know that the rates of crime are still ridiculously high for men and in terms of severity men are more likely to engage in more severe forms of abuse including rape and eventually murder. You can't even stop contradicting yourself, can you? more likely to engage in more severe forms of abuse including rape Liar. Women rape at similar rates to men. deny fact!!!! That women are more likely to have been abused longer, and more…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 08:23 AM
5

Or called a liar. Every time I've seen someone on the recruiting side talk about being explicitly told to favour women, some idiot says "that didn't happen".
/r/MensRights29/06/26 07:41 AM
1

Women are not any more oppressed than men, neither is oppressed by the other. from local NGO? Firm? You mean those that not only spout misandric garbage, but also push it into policy and laws?
/r/MensRights29/06/26 06:38 AM
1

that’s what feminism is all about It's clearly not and feminist reactions to the topic of this post are telling. Men have had more protection than women (on average) for years, and the goal is just to get women to the same place so everyone has equal opportunity and rights and feels safe. ... and there it is with the braindead claims. The point of feminism is to lift women up to have the same opportunities that men have had for hundreds of years. So it’s weird for her to be against her own right…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 06:35 AM
5

Deaths by proxy (i.e. the woman employing a third party to do the dirty deed) are never mentioned. The fact that they'll also bend over backwards to argue that a female murderer was just doing what a man told her, is quite telling.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 10:52 AM
29

See also: draft. Not only does it affect only men in most countries implementing it, but those same men are blamed for it being a thing.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 10:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter