TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Reasonable-Analyst30 Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by Reasonable-Analyst30 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

I would also like to add that women ARE shamed for their sexual activities. We can’t run around rampant, sleeping with whoever we want. Not only is it risky and potentially dangerous, we are shamed for ‘sleeping around’. And the people who shame women the most are red pilled men. So I’m not sure where you are getting that women experience no shame in dating/sexual/romantic dynamics. Ime, we experience it the most. Men have way more freedom in that regard.
/r/ExRedPill11/06/24 04:35 AM
7

This is what I dislike about redpill. They are so eager to promote EvoPsych bullshit which they think is based on ‘biology’ and ‘natural selection’ while ignoring the fact that in nature it has always been the duty of the female species to select their mates. For almost all animal species, the female carries the risk or burden of providing and caring for offspring. This means that the male must prove their worth to the female. Females of almost all animal species are the ‘gatekeepers of reproduc…
/r/ExRedPill11/06/24 04:05 AM
13

Most of the surveys these articles are based on are anonymous self-reports. Your argument that women are more likely to lie when anonymously participating in a survey is invalid since their reputation isn’t at stake here. They were not asked for any identifiable information (only age and gender). I would agree that men and women probably lie at an equal rate while anonymously self-reporting. But I want to reiterate that their reputation plays no part in these anonymous surveys. There is no truth…
/r/ExRedPill10/06/24 07:04 PM
21

Your ‘quote’ can be applied to men as well. And statistically speaking, men cheat (slightly) more often than women, so I think one could argue that men need even fewer incentives to cheat than women. Under specific (‘right’) circumstances, anyone can cheat, man and woman.
/r/ExRedPill10/06/24 06:06 PM
5

I didn’t say you should make a Grindr profile. I said the comment comparing Grindr for men as Tinder for women has some merit. It’s filled with options you don’t want.
/r/ExRedPill28/05/24 08:37 AM
8

Sexuality is not a choice. Women can’t just decide to ‘turn lesbian’. That is such a porn trope. Believe me, if it were a choice, men’s options would dwindle even more. There’s a reason a lot of women are choosing to walk away from dating men. Here’s a hint: it’s not because they are ‘turning lesbian’. Are the MGTOW also ‘turning gay’? And honestly, comparing it to getting on Grindr is probably pretty accurate. Most women (and a lot of men for that matter) aren’t attracted to most men. And no, I…
/r/ExRedPill28/05/24 03:35 AM
7

Yeah, I feel OP is either disingenuous or delusional if he thinks he has the ‘emotional qualities that would make him a good partner’. His posts and comments (that he often deletes afterwards) are problematic and imo indicate that he would make a terrible partner. OP, you are in no way ‘doing everything right’. You should take time to mature and fix your misogynistic and sexist views before making such claims again.
/r/ExRedPill04/05/24 04:45 AM
3

I love that guy, but I hate the fact that more men will listen to this (albeit great) guy than to women. They’ll believe other men, but discount any woman‘s input.
/r/ExRedPill03/05/24 05:32 PM
8

Can you imagine what it feels like to be wary to go outside? To be scared if you will be assaulted, followed or groped again? I can understand that it can be frustrating to be slotted in with the actual perpetrators if you’ve never done anything to harm women yourself. But the ‘bad men’ in my life that have catcalled me (using lewd and inappropriate remarks, not just ‘complimenting’ me), followed me, cyberstalked me, harassed me, groped me, and yes, have assaulted me, have made a very large impa…
/r/ExRedPill03/05/24 05:15 PM
15

So to sum it up: ugly women are mainly chubby or fat women, and attractive men are either tall, fit or ‘handsome’? So a chubby girl is ‘punching up’ when she’s dating a tall man? Never mind the personality or other physical characteristics. A chubby or fat girl is always ugly, and should only - checks notes… date short or fat men? And you wonder why women don’t find you attractive? This whole mindset is pretty damn unattractive to most women.
/r/ExRedPill03/05/24 03:29 AM
21

Yes to all of this! Especially point 3. Conventionally unattractive men aren’t these magical good guys that treat every woman right. They can be just as shitty and dishonest.
/r/ExRedPill01/05/24 04:56 AM
8

That’s some fine hypocrisy and double standard. All women should ‘respect you for what’s inside’, but here you are, disrespecting women in every comment of yours.
/r/ExRedPill23/04/24 05:03 AM
5

Good for you. That’s also a legit reason. For me, it is a safety issue.
/r/ExRedPill05/04/24 06:03 PM
3

The underlying cause of catcalling and harassment is women not asking men out? Is this the argument you’re trying to make? The actual underlying cause of catcalling, harassment and sexual assault is misogyny, the desire for control/dominance, and the sexualization/objectification of women. It’s a societal issue that needs to be addressed by both women and men. I don’t think pushing women to ask out men will fix this underlying societal issue. It’s not about being ‘uncomfortable’ asking men out. …
/r/ExRedPill04/04/24 04:53 AM
3

Are you actually blaming women for getting catcalled and harassed? As an incentive to try to make women ask men out you’re really going for victim blaming? Again, women don’t often ask men out because of safety concerns. You can’t really read a personality from a quick glance across the grocery aisle, so why risk your safety by approaching random men? Moreover, looks are not the determining factor in partner choice for lots of women. Most women just don’t see men as a mere sex object to approach…
/r/ExRedPill03/04/24 06:47 PM
3

There is a double standard regarding asking the other gender out, I agree. However, it’s a double standard that is being kept alive by those men who make women feel unsafe. Honestly, someone who is respectful and polite could probably cold approach quite successfully, I think? Unfortunately, many women (myself included) have too many experiences with being catcalled, harassed, stalked, assaulted, and otherwise felt unsafe by lots of men. That’s why most women don’t respond well to cold approache…
/r/ExRedPill03/04/24 06:18 PM
4

“Non-male”? Who even talks like that? Seriously, who here has ever said that?
/r/ExRedPill03/04/24 06:08 PM
6

Thanks. That was my point, yes. The not dating coworkers policy is a rule for all genders, indeed. Relationships and dating can be messy. Including a work environment in them is often a recipe for disaster. Make sure to be respectful, to correctly read social cues, and take rejection or disinterest well. Get socially comfortable and get good at reading body language. These are all manageable goals, though they may take some time. Sometimes trial and error is all it takes.
/r/ExRedPill02/04/24 11:38 AM
14

What women specifically? Coworkers? I’d definitely advice against that. Friends? Would not recommend unless they give out signs of interest and have been flirty with you. But there’s many ways of risking or losing friendship. Acquaintances or friends-of-friends? Might be safer since there’s not much to lose. But again, it all depends on how and where you would ask them out and how well you deal with rejection. Or are you talking about other women?
/r/ExRedPill02/04/24 10:13 AM
29

This depends on a lot of factors. How and where you approach women and ask them out, how you deal with rejection, and how socially confident you are. Personally, I have never appreciated random men asking me out. Not while walking down the street, not at the supermarket, not at coffee bars, not at the gym, not at the movies. I don’t like random men disturbing my peace when I’m just going about my business or trying to have fun with friends. It doesn’t matter if I find them physically attractive …
/r/ExRedPill02/04/24 09:34 AM
5

I know you were not talking about OP or any other individual specifically, and I didn’t feel personally addressed. I just wanted to point out your hypocrisy. With your original comment, you yourself are trying to impose your own views and beliefs, while you claim to oppose anyone else who does that very thing.
/r/ExRedPill22/02/24 12:19 PM
15

Oh I just wanted to add: I would take a “short manchild” who actually respects me and other women over an insecure, misogynistic pill-believer any day.
/r/ExRedPill22/02/24 05:45 AM
15

No mic drop actually happened I’m afraid. You just seem to be spouting the same regurgitated, sexist, and pilled bullshit. The topic at hand is about women because y’all keep talking about women. Your (general you) main and often only focus are women. That’s what you all keep trying to discuss here: women, sex and relationships (and how all of it is always the woman’s fault). Your whole worlds seem to resolve around women or the lack of access to women. I suggest you try to look up who actually …
/r/ExRedPill22/02/24 05:42 AM
11

Calling someone “the town hoe” for sleeping with more people than you yourself are comfortable with is also imposing your values and beliefs on other people. The very thing you claim to oppose. It’s perfectly fine to not want to partake in hookup culture, but calling people names who do partake in it (and therefore implying they are doing something wrong or morally inferior in your opinion) is disingenuous and not okay.
/r/ExRedPill22/02/24 05:18 AM
35

If you’re not even sure about what you can or want to offer her, leave the poor girl alone, please. She might have picked up on your emotional disconnect and felt used because of it. Try to reflect on your behavior during or after sex that made her feel used or discarded. Learn from it and move on.
/r/ExRedPill31/01/24 11:41 AM
3

I think you watch way too much porn. The majority of women do not engage in gangbangs. That’s a porn trope. Also, generally speaking, a woman would not be sexually satisfied in a gangbang. More dicks does not (necessarily) result in better chances of orgasm. Quite the opposite, really. This is EXredpill, btw. Why are you trying to promote or argue redpill talking points?
/r/ExRedPill23/01/24 05:14 AM
5

Predators and abusers are very good at making you believe there is no other choice. They take choices away from their victims by isolating, manipulating, gaslighting, and installing fear through physical violence. Specifically during assaults or attacks, there is no other choice. Your body reacts by either fighting, fleeing, freezing or fawning. And unfortunately, many women’s response (mine included) is freeze or fawn. Comply or do nothing in self-preservation. This is not a choice, it’s an aut…
/r/ExRedPill19/01/24 04:16 AM
11

Honestly, OP sounds exhausting at best and infuriating at worst. No amount of money or sixpacks can make a red-pilled mindset attractive.
/r/ExRedPill15/01/24 12:44 PM
1

Thanks for replying. This just seems so wild to me. You actively created a problem in your marriage where there wasn’t one before. Have you tried reading up (F)ACTUAL peer-reviewed papers on ‘pair-bonding’? Cause the study pilled forums try to use, is a study done on birds and voles. Pair-bonding as it is described in those papers, does not exist in human nature. Your wife is perfectly capable of loving you and feeling ‘bonded’ to you, even if she had X amount of partners before you. Please, thi…
/r/ExRedPill08/01/24 07:32 AM
5

Genuine question: how did you still fall for the red pill beliefs while already being married?
/r/ExRedPill04/01/24 05:04 AM
7

I guess you missed the recent movement of men that tried to call Margot Robbie ‘mid’? The reason why incels exist is not women, but their own inability to critical thinking, lack of emotional self-regulation, and a patriarchal society that has always gravitated towards sexism/misogyny.
/r/ExRedPill09/12/23 07:07 AM
8

You’re not quoting what I actually said. You’re cherry-picking and putting down quotes to suit your own agenda. Feminism is about equality. Women are not inferior or superior. We should be equal. Equal in opportunity, education, pay, etc. There are misandrists just as there are misogynists. Both are equally wrong and hurtful. If you can’t see or admit that a women can face more struggles, you’re being deliberately obtuse. Society is still much designed and tailored to the average white male. I’m…
/r/ExRedPill10/09/23 04:35 PM
16

Again, there’s women who like a more androgynous or feminine looking guy. There’s nothing wrong with that. Look, no one is arguing that conventionally attractive people don’t have a bigger dating pool. They do. Pretty privilege is a thing in all aspects of life and genders. What is important to remember is that everybody CAN find love.
/r/ExRedPill10/09/23 04:18 PM
75

Your friend is no feminist. Calling all men trash and stating women are superior, is misandry, not feminism. Women in general do NOT have it easier. I would argue most women have it a lot harder than your average Joe, but there are exceptions obviously. Now, as to change your mindset: you should first of all go outside and actively look at ALL couples. You’ll quickly realize that men and women of all sizes, shapes and attractiveness are in relationships. Human attractiveness is a scale, and peop…
/r/ExRedPill10/09/23 11:39 AM
3

Jason Momoa, Ryan Reynolds, Henry Cavill, Benedict Cumberbatch, Ashton Kutcher, Eddie Redmayne, Barack Obama, John Legend, David Schwimmer, Mark Ruffalo, Terry Crews, Channing Tatum, Ryan Gosling,… I could go on, but these are some men you can look up to as role models.
/r/ExRedPill01/06/23 07:04 PM
2

No, just clarifying.
/r/ExRedPill30/05/23 08:28 PM
5

Ha, I don’t believe that for a second, love. Imaginary Trump academies don’t count. You spelled PhD wrong, by the way. Did you actually pass third grade?
/r/ExRedPill30/05/23 06:27 PM
18

I think you should open a book, read a scientific journal or at least do a quick google search, because it has definitely not been scientifically debunked. Single women, especially over 30, are by far the happiest demographic. But go on and cope. Try to find some outwards justification as to why most women value their own peace and autonomy more than giving misogynistic men like you the time of day. I truly hope you can one day find even an ounce of that peace.
/r/ExRedPill30/05/23 06:24 PM
2

lol, I’d like to see proof of your PhD, dear.
/r/ExRedPill30/05/23 06:16 PM
20

None of your claims are true. And even if they were, correlation is not causation. There’s plenty of women with multiple sex partners outside of a relationship that are loyal and monogamous when married. There is no guarantee that high BC women will cheat, and neither is there a guarantee that low BC or virginal women will never cheat. Also, for many years in a row, single women have been identified as a the most happy demographic. And with men like you, being single is definitely the better opt…
/r/ExRedPill30/05/23 06:14 PM
7

All of the articles you’ve provided don’t specifically talk about just women though. They make claims that ALL people, both men and women, with a greater number of sex partners could be more prone to infidelity in marriage. Men with higher body count should be avoided as well, then.
/r/ExRedPill30/05/23 06:04 PM
3

Are you referring to yourself here?
/r/ExRedPill30/05/23 05:59 PM
22

They also always fail to realize that they are actively contributing to the ‘baggage’ found in (older) women, that they hate so much. Many of us older women (aka 26+ yo), have been hurt or ‘damaged’ by those older guys that think they can groom and abuse younger girls into being their bangmaid. Freaking hypocrites.
/r/ExRedPill30/05/23 08:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter