| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | That's a lot of damage.Sure, I hear you. Assumptions are bad though, mmmkay? | /r/PussyPassDenied | 25/06/20 12:40 AM |
| 1 | That's a lot of damage.Why? Your post elaborated upon the reasoning and got a 'yes' from that guy. Seemed the best place to continue in a threaded environment such as this. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 24/06/20 11:41 PM |
| -1 | That's a lot of damage.That's just assumption. How do you know the mother here has her father's last name? And why wouldn't that be her own last name even if she were to make the argument that all children should have their mother's last name. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 24/06/20 11:26 PM |
| 0 | That's a lot of damage.Sure, but it was still in response to all mothers not being married. What name does a child born with an unknown father get? What name does a child with a known father who has no intention of being in the child's life get? The normal way to handle this since forever, in my part of the Old World at least, was that bastards got their mother's last name and then it might get fixed with a wedding later. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 24/06/20 10:51 PM |
| 1 | That's a lot of damage.Oh yeah? In Sweden the default for a long time was that a child gets its mother's last name. The lineage is pretty clear on that side you know. More modern rules include choosing either parents last name, a last name either parent has had earlier (unless acquired through marriage), both parent's name(!) or taking either parent's first name and adding -son or -daughter (but in Swedish) to it. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 24/06/20 10:33 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter