TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RecentDegree7990 Archive

View 0 posts and 141 comments by RecentDegree7990 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Sex is a right
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 04:43 PM
2

The only people who complain that men don’t have good male role models are women and blue pill men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 01:40 PM
8

Buddy are you okay, you said only people in nice areas tend to be mostly good, I told you as someone who comes from the Middle East a region which is not that good and yet most people here are nice so that means that most of the World is nice
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 11:43 PM
6

What troll? Lmaoo, you think people don’t exist outside of America?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 11:39 PM
3

You think most men cheat or hurt another person, maybe you should lay off the internet because cheating is extremely and I mean extremely rare and in regards to lying are you really saying that not every single human on Earth has told a lie at least once in their life
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 11:38 PM
0

I live in the middle east and most people are nice
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 11:35 PM
4

At a basic a good partner has to be two things, nice and be financially stable, which is what I said, every quality that needs to be to be a good partner is found between those two umbrella terms
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 11:25 PM
18

What do you consider as good? Because most human adults are nice people with jobs and what would be considered as bad are few
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 11:09 PM
-2

No, she doesn't marry for the money, she marries because they love each other and each performs their marital duty
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 03:30 PM
2

Yes, why would I want to date someone whom I view as evil
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 03:19 PM
1

What does that have to do with the fact that most of them don’t know or don’t care about the 4B movement
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:32 AM
-2

Except that they are not having significantly less sex, as a matter they are having more sex than men, it’s just that they are having sex with a select few men and those older than them
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 02:57 AM
–

Again, that’s bot true those things aren’t happening because “women are fed up”, they have other causes most of which societal, also most of these women are still dating men they didn’t stop interacting with men, rather they are dating the few top percent of men and those older than them, so again they are still with men
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 02:54 AM
1

I didn’t say that it was a common phenomenon rather what I said is that it is a small meaningless idea that is being pushed a by a small minority
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 02:49 AM
1

Just because you don’t know about it doesn’t mean it is there, as I said look at the outlets I provided and see that you will find a lot about it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 02:38 AM
1

The fact they are discussing it right now, lol, why do you think this post and many others were posted because it is a subject of discussion right now after Trump won the election go to two chromosomes and the feminists subreddit, go to feminists pages on tiktok, they are all discussing it as a method of boycott because of the election
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 02:36 AM
2

No, I learned this by looking into feminists spaces and actually what I said above I learned from south Korean women being asked questions about the 4 B movement and said that it’s not a big thing there and that most south korean women haven’t heard about but that for some reasons western feminists think it is big in Korea
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 02:31 AM
–

Except that the 4B movement is a direct political protest that is done intentionally to protest women’s right, while in those cases you cited the reasons behind those issues is not a political protest
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 02:27 AM
1

It is in a sense, they organizing themselves through social media and spreading awareness about it, and are copying the 4B movement from South Korea which was equally as much of a failure, actually most south Korean women never heard about it but for some reasons it is popular in the mind of western feminists who wrongly believe it is a large successful movement there
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 02:24 AM
-2

Yeah but not because of the 4B movement, these women did not stop to sleep or interact with men but rather are dating older men or the same few men, so again they are not cutting off men as a whole as a political message
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 02:15 AM
–

What does that have to do with the 4B movement
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 02:09 AM
2

Exactly they say the same thing every two years, remember when Roe v Wade was overturned and they said the same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 01:42 AM
–

we know from experience y'all say the same thing every two years, remember when you said the same thing when Roe V Wade was overturned?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 01:42 AM
–

It may have originated long ago, I don't deny that but for thousands of years at the minimum since the spread of Christianity it was not seen as such
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 12:03 PM
–

That’s not true it was not a crime against property stop spreading misinformation
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 11:46 AM
1

You’re the one who moved the goalpost we were discussing whether rape against women was seen as a property crime previously and you started talking about men raped by women and the definition of rape
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 10:06 AM
–

But the US did emerge from that same Christian civilization, also again if rape laws were only there because women were seen as property of men and that rape was an attack on men’s property why then wouldn’t they not protect men from rape since it is a crime against men and they only care about men?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 10:03 AM
–

You said it was only until recently when rape was seen as bad because it was a crime against a person and not a property crime, I showed that it is not the case and that rape was seen as a crime against a person since thousands of years
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 10:00 AM
–

Mmh no, that’s not true, at the very least since the emergence of Christianity, rape was illegal because it was seen as objectively bad and raping someone was against their immutable dignity and honor, that is why medieval Europe was the first to ban sexual slavery while all the cultures around it still practiced it
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 09:58 AM
–

well medieval law was established around sin, and actually in the medieval mindset they are kinda of the same
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 09:53 AM
–

That is not true, just because you heard a rumor doesn’t mean it’s true, rape was seen as a crime against actual victim since thousands of years, on top of my head the story of how Rome overthrew its monarchy was because a woman was raped by the king’s son, so she went to forum and exposed him and how he defiled her person and honor and then killed herself, while this story is likely a legend it shows the view of the time. Also, it was even more cemented when Christianity came, where according t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 09:49 AM
–

It’s funny when women say that if there was no laws men would rape women. Who put those laws? Men, women until few decades were inconsequential in politics and law making and according to feminists still are like this because we live in a Patriarchy, so it was men who put those laws, if most men were rapists they could just repeal those laws or ignore you can’t do anything about it, and yet we don’t do that because we see it as bad
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 09:22 AM
1

I said they have better sex lives, I didn’t say this study specifically discusses this, this study discusses my other points which are that those couples are less likely to breakup and are happier
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 12:21 PM
1

Where did I say that this study says that virgins have better sex lives, this studies shows that virgins have happier marriage and are less likely to divorce
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 12:13 PM
1

Serial cohabitations were overrepresented among economically disadvantaged groups, especially those with low income and education. They also were less likely than single-instance cohabiting unions to end in marriage rather than dissolve. If serial cohabitors married, divorce rates were very high—more than twice as high as for women who cohabited only with their eventual husbands.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 11:55 AM
1

Which is what I am saying, people used less protection during the 80s which lead to an increase in the AIDS crisis, but now people use more protection
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 10:17 PM
1

Unfair advantage of being based
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 10:08 PM
2

And these couples are more likely to seperate
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 09:13 PM
1

You know that men who sleep around and men who want modest wives are two different demographics, they are not hypocrites, they are two different groups
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 09:08 PM
2

It is for people that want modest women, because frankly this is the thing that a lot of women get wrong, they believe that men who want promiscuous experienced in bed women and men that want modest women are the same, that’s not true, it’s two different group of men
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 09:06 PM
4

AIDS spread more because they used less protection and knew less about it not because they were more open
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 08:58 PM
2

that's not necessarily true, if the findings are correct there is no reason for them to change unless there was a change in the variables. Also again the study you linked only addresses the frequency of sex not anything related to our discussion
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 08:57 PM
2

A study is not wrong because it is older, you have to look at other studies and see what a meta-analysis of multiple studies show. Also I just read your study, it talks about frequency of sex not whether couples are happier, last longer, or even have a greater sexual happiness. The article you linked extrapolate a lot than what the study itself found
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 08:55 PM
1

The younger generation is having less sex because they are unable to have not because they don't want to, are you really saying that people in the 80s were more open than people now. Even then use the people from the 1950-60s and see how it is even more pronounced
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 08:46 PM
1

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-15507-003
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 08:41 PM
2

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-15507-003
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 08:40 PM
3

No, studies from well established peer reviewed sociology journals
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 08:15 PM
1

Look at religious men who are more likely to want a modest woman and then look at non religious men. And look at the marriage statistics concerning both, show me who is more likely to be married
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 08:04 PM
1

we don't care about the woman being awesome in bed
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 08:03 PM
-2

Wrong, Studies show that couples that were virgin before marriage are happier, last longer and have a better sex life
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 08:02 PM
6

All of what you said is true except the last paragraph, if it was the case why does it seem that older women who are more likely to have been modest have a stronger personality than young women, who are supposed to be the one born in a freer more egalitarian society, where they are less indoctrinated by the patriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 08:01 PM
-10

Though, I find it ironic how the men who say they want a modest woman don't go for us because they find us boring at best and prudes at worst. Not true, I would never marry a non virgin woman
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 07:59 PM
6

yes, from the study but the study was retracted, the fact that your whole argument ranges on one retracted study shows that you are wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 12:25 PM
5

did you not read, the finding is not strong, it is statistically insignificant, which is why the study was retracted as a whole, while other studies that are actually accurate reported no significant differences
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 12:21 PM
9

https://retractionwatch.com/2015/07/21/to-our-horror-widely-reported-study-suggesting-divorce-is-more-likely-when-wives-fall-ill-gets-axed/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 12:13 PM
8

https://retractionwatch.com/2015/07/21/to-our-horror-widely-reported-study-suggesting-divorce-is-more-likely-when-wives-fall-ill-gets-axed/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 12:13 PM
8

This study was debunked
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 12:02 PM
7

What are you talking about, there are many
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 12:01 PM
10

Again this study turned out to be false
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 12:01 PM
17

the claim that more men drop their sick partners than women comes from a flawed study that the authors retracted, most studies shows no significant difference
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 11:37 AM
3

What if a woman is below the top 20% and wants to have a family and kids
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 04:29 PM
2

The problem is that you think that those High status men would want you
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 04:11 PM
2

Thanks, exactly the funniest one is the age question as if it is some kind of gotcha
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 10:55 PM
1

We use birth because it is easier to pin point. But again, if age is used to show when someone begins to exist, then why did people a century and even earlier who for the majority believed that life starts at conception didn't calculate age starting conception? It's because age has nothing to do with when someone becomes a person
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 10:05 PM
1

No, because again as I said, age is not about measuring when someone came to existence but when they were born, and once be into existence without being old, don't we after all measure unborn children age in the womb, don't we say 6 month old fetus
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:58 PM
1

here is the full definition using the dictionary you cited The duration of time a person has lived. Age is conventionally defined from the time of birth, which counts as zero, and is measured in completed years of life. For some purposes, age is measured from conception, and sometimes it may be convenient to use units shorter than a year. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095355563#:\~:text=The%20duration%20of%20time%20a,units%20shorter%20than%20a%20year.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:51 PM
2

btw this is the full definition using the same dictionary you used The duration of time a person has lived. Age is conventionally defined from the time of birth, which counts as zero, and is measured in completed years of life. For some purposes, age is measured from conception, and sometimes it may be convenient to use units shorter than a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:50 PM
1

it doesn't have a definition of spoon, because it is not something it needs to define, unlike words like age, genocide, country, agriculture, culture, ect.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:46 PM
1

yes it does, the fact that you think it's the dictionary that defines words and not rather records the definition of words, shows you should still be in second grade, people in dictionary companies do not brain storm in the office and come up with new words or definition, which the UN sometimes does, rather they just record definitions and most of those dictionary definitions are not authoritative you can see that from the fact that there are many and sometimes even in the same dictionary
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:43 PM
1

Not really, since the UN and national and international organizations set the definitions of the words, and the dictionaries are beholden to those definitions, dictionaries do not come up with definitions while in some cases organizations like the UN do, therefore they have more authority on the subject
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:38 PM
3

No, I don't care about your opinion in the sense that it does not affect my actions, it should be illegal regardless of what you think about it
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:36 PM
1

It does not matter in the sense that it will not affect my actions in the scenario, I will raise my child
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:35 PM
1

I wonder who has more authority the UN the prime international organization that has actual jurisdiction or some company that makes dictionaries? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:34 PM
3

I care about this topic, I don't care about your opinion
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:30 PM
2

cool you don't think it is murder but I think it is and I generally don't care what you think it is
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:17 PM
2

The UN recommendations define age as "the interval of time between the date of birth and the date of the census, expressed in completed solar years". This is equivalent to this standard's definition of age as "age at last birthday"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:16 PM
3

there is a difference between an unintentional miscarriage and murder, what kind of question is that
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:10 PM
-1

it is exactly the same, it seems you're the one who can't grasp science
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:09 PM
2

which is my point it is arbitrary and as it said it doesn't discuss when humans began to exist but rather when they were born
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 09:08 PM
3

if age is counted from the date birth, it doesn't mean an unborn child isn't alive, that's like saying humanity began 2024 years ago because we use the birth of Jesus as a starting point
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 08:58 PM
3

so you are ok with murder because it is a barrier to your life? So you think it is ok for a mom to kill her toddler if they are barrier to her life?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 08:57 PM
-4

nop they are exactly comparable as they are both humans of equal dignity
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 08:41 PM
2

Of course, all humans from all ages are equal
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 08:27 PM
3

what did I say that was stupid?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 08:10 PM
4

This is the same as saying your wife murdered your 3 year old toddler but it’s ok you can have another child
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 06:47 PM
11

"don't worry about your child getting murdered just get a new one"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 06:17 PM
-4

Whether I’m prepared or not doesn’t matter, I won’t allow someone to murder my child
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 04:32 PM
13

yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 04:08 PM
2

Pathetic according to who? You? Why should they care what you or other people think is pathetic if they can date a hot woman
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 04:29 PM
1

Yeah definitely a bot
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 09:33 PM
1

Yes, but God created human and infused the want for marriage in them, this is natural theology
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 08:01 PM
1

Are you a bot? Cause why do you talk like that
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 07:20 PM
1

that doesn't even make sense as a reply to what I said
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 07:19 PM
2

it is not a social construct it is a sacrament from God
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 07:16 PM
0

wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 07:15 PM
3

well, I don't believe in civil marriage, yes civil marriage is a useless piece of paper but marriage in Church is what makes it not only non-degrading but beautiful and holy
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 07:15 PM
0

I've had gfs but no premarital sex
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 04:27 PM
-6

She has to listen and do as her husband tell her and he has the final say in decisions
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 04:10 PM
-2

premarital sex is degrading to both men and women
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 04:08 PM
1

That may be so but it is the correct thing to do
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 09:29 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 07:43 PM
-1

They wouldn’t need an exit plan if divorce is banned
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 05:26 PM
3

You too
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 05:35 PM
2

I see, thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 04:09 PM
0

I see, thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 04:08 PM
1

I did get that, I thought red pill as more of an umbrella that ranges from incels to traditionalists
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 04:03 PM
3

it seemed to me that they have the same views, especially since red pill generally means to be right wing, so I assumed in this sub right wing in relation to gender issues
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 04:02 PM
0

I thought traditionalists were considered red pill
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 04:00 PM
-1

I thought traditionalists are considered redpillers
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 03:55 PM
-1

it is not old fashioned, it is the natural order of things
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 03:52 PM
-9

if that was the case one just have to look at the rate of fundamentalist christian marriages and fertility as opposed to liberals to see it is not the case
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 03:50 PM
-4

if that was the case one just have to look at the rate of fundamentalist christian marriages and fertility as opposed to liberals to see it is not the case
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 03:50 PM
54

You falsely assume that red pillers don’t get any dates which is not true
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 03:39 PM
0

I’ll give you one better get gov out of marriage and instead out it under the jurisdiction it belongs which is the Church
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/24 09:57 AM
–

This is one of the many reasons why divorce should be banned
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 03:29 PM
–

Most trads became trads later in life many even converted to their religion later, and decide to follow their rules because they saw them as true. As opposed to other people of society who are slaves to their desires, a religious person is a slave only to God, a non religious person is a slave to every vice he has
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 09:31 AM
–

Society today pushes non traditional marriage but somehow it is trads who are sheep
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 09:23 AM
–

Trads are people who want a relationship according to the natural order of things, red pills are degenerate losers who can’t complain they can’t get a girlfriend
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 09:18 AM
–

What are you talking about most who want a tradwife don’t want to have sex before marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 09:15 AM
2

Don’t worry dear, find me a link and I’ll open it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 09:05 PM
3

You can’t make a claim and then when I ask you to prove it you tell me look it up yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 01:05 PM
3

give me statistics, and also importantly, give me statistics about married couples not just dating
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 12:45 PM
3

But it’s not about experience it’s about mental faculty, I don’t need to have experience being abused to know whether someone is abusing me
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 10:50 AM
2

By 18-20 years old you should have enough life experience to not get taken advantage of, and if you don’t it’s not gonna get better for you at 30-40
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 10:30 AM
2

I disagree that an 18-20 year old is easier to manipulate than a 40-50 year old if anything they are more aware of that stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 10:20 AM
4

I dont believe that’s true, controlling people will control others regardless of age gap, also why would age gap have an influence on control in relationships, even if they are the same age, men tend to be wealthier and more physically powerful so they don’t need to be older to be controlling
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 10:16 AM
6

If other people can pressure you out of a relationship then you have bigger problems
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 10:11 AM
1

That’s not true, from personal observation I’ve seen that people with 10-15 years age gap tend to be the happiest and best couples and tend to have the least familial problems and their kids have the best future, whereas those with smaller age gap seems to always have the most problems, they always seem to argue with each other
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 10:06 AM
1

Sure it’s a problem and as I said needs to he fixed bit it hasn’t nothing to do with what I am talking about. Or it could be in the sense that in the same way women are ok to discriminate against men in general they specifically do so against unattractive men and it is bigoted in the same way it would he towards races
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 05:52 PM
2

What BS? I said that it is the sexist for women to be more cautious around men than women in the same way it is racist to be more cautious around people of races that commit more crimes, what is bs about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:45 PM
1

Because of prejudice, and I am telling you they should stop prejudice
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:43 PM
8

It’s not about biology it’s about culture, but that’s what the statistics show, also I never mentionnes black people you could be an asian and since you commit less crime than white view them this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:42 PM
0

No, I am saying the contrary
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:40 PM
0

They should
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:07 PM
4

Exactly and we should work so that it isn’t socially accepted anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 03:49 PM
31

As I said in the previous thread if you are cautious towards men because they are overrpresented in crime then how is it different than people that are cautious towards races that are overpresented in crimes?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 03:36 PM
-1

Yeah they would, every person I know that had strict parents has actually a closer relationship with them than those that didn’t. Even my parents that were somewhat strict as I became older I am grateful for their strict rules
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 06:38 PM
1

But it also has a big part to do in dating
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 11:21 PM
1

What about the whole “beauty standards for women are too high because of the patriarchy and the media@
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:52 PM
26

Why do you say men, why was your argument above gender specific, what about sexless women
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:35 PM
5

Not wanting to date a woman who has a husband is insecure
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 12:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter