TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RecreationalPorpoise Archive

View 0 posts and 367 comments by RecreationalPorpoise on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Awful idea. Masculinity and femininity are halves of humanity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 06:01 AM
126

1 in 6 men will kill you? Clearly some well researched and unbiased logic there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/25 09:41 PM
3

Conservation. It’s often a good idea to protect ideas that are working or mostly working.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/25 05:06 AM
-1

I’m denying it. 🤯
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 02:29 PM
2

Significant is subjective. Do the math yourself, prick.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 04:11 AM
-1

Me, and probably millions of others.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 03:37 AM
7

The right thinks for themselves and doesn’t cower to every single idiotic and dumbass impulse of Dump’s? Some do and some don’t. The right is tens of millions of people. The right lost credibility from 2016 onwards. Because you took them so seriously before. /s You all deserve everything you get. This is called a just world fallacy. votes left strictly out of a respect for a modicum of decency and morality That’s a common fantasy, but the left has plenty of their own hatred, bigotry, and hypocri…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 10:54 PM
3

I can’t think of politicians, only right wing streamers and the like.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 09:39 PM
7

The right =/= Donald Trump.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 08:15 PM
66

Have not watched that vid, but I’m finishing Adolescence right now and it’s easily amongst the worst shows I’ve ever seen. It adds nothing meaningful whatsoever to the discussion about young men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/25 01:00 AM
6

Because you advocated for women to be treated like men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/25 04:09 PM
-1

All three of those questions are vague and unclear, so I’m ignoring them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 06:38 PM
-1

I think those are both true. Women aren’t inferior, they’re just better at different things, like spreading joy. But that’s a role they’ve abandoned.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 02:57 PM
2

I have given up altogether. There’s too much against me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 10:37 PM
4

I realized most of this already. It doesn’t seem like people should have to force women to care about men when so many claim to want gender equality, but maybe they do. I think this reveals women are basically just psychopathic toward the opposite gender and may never help men willingly without reward the way so many men willingly help women without reward.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 08:54 PM
7

Nothing would ever convince people to support our cause. People are biologically disincentivized from helping men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 02:47 PM
14

I hate feminism because it pretends to fight for equality but creates a bunch of fake, bullshit problems for women and fake, bullshit privileges for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/25 03:05 PM
14

Delusional as always. Also love the guy showing off his virtue by submissively agreeing with everything she says. Being the same gender as congress isn’t a privilege. Women should stop choosing low paid jobs then. She ignored low paying male positions like police. Viagra and vasectomies are quite different from abortions. No, you are not forced to fuck people who buy you dinner. Nobody gives a fuck if something bad happens to me. There are tons of famous female athletes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/25 04:03 PM
2

Online, they’d be instantaneously banned at light speed. Offline, they’d probably be hit with a classic “something something Fox News.”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/25 02:29 PM
6

Those questions just sound condescending.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/25 05:42 AM
10

Scapegoat as old as time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/25 04:16 AM
2

A society that favors men. My earlier comment was the left wing definition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 11:29 AM
6

If any man has anything good, it’s a patriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 02:20 AM
0

Really, you’ve seen women smiling at me? What was the location? You remembered a scenario that happened to you and baselessly declared it also happens to me. You’re the delusional one, and I think you’re doing it intentionally.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/25 10:47 PM
0

There aren’t women smiling at me. That’s probably why your answer felt obvious. You can’t just create a fake scenario and depend on that being real.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/25 07:42 PM
3

Doesn’t answer my question
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/25 02:59 PM
2

Where in the universe would I find women who like men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/25 03:36 AM
18

I experienced this exact thing. My mom was abusive to me and my sister, which led to my sister’s suicide. I told my other relatives this shouldn’t be excused and they said things like “oh, her heart breaks every day because of it. Her childhood wasn’t easy.”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/24 04:40 PM
3

I’m not confusing jack shit. You’re confusing common sense with mind reading.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 01:42 AM
1

Of the two of us, you’re the one trying hard to look smart. But shamelessly strawmanning doesn’t achieve that. Do you imagine you gave an explanation of how the “historic development of culture” is relevant to this discussion? What’s your answer to OP’s simple question, given all the historic knowledge you claim to have?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 12:09 AM
2

This is a post about dating, on a subreddit about dating. It’s going to involve feelings, friends, and other social things. You’re continuously trying to hijack it and brag about reading books. Quit being a pseudointellectual cringelord and go to a different subreddit designated for those topics.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 11:40 PM
1

Thanks for perfectly proving my point. My experience with the left is just idiot yankee feels according to you, but your experience is somehow significant. And again, I was never talking about history. You’re trying really hard to shoehorn that into this conversation, but I’m talking about the present time, and have been throughout this conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 11:21 PM
2

My initial comment referred to “people on the left.” Why would automatically think I’m talking about guerilla wars from history books? You sound like you read two history books, then decided you know everything and have to force that knowledge into conversations where it doesn’t belong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 11:11 PM
1

I think you just use “feelings” and “lived experience” interchangeably based on what suits your argument. As in, people’s firsthand experience can’t contradict your argument because those facts are actually just feelings. But you read some books, so that makes it feel justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 11:03 PM
1

What makes the left you’ve read about in history books more valid than the left I’ve personally encountered throughout my life (in the present era)?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 10:49 PM
6

No one’s talking about risk. We’re talking about whether it’s appropriate to approach women at all. And yes, you do expect us to read minds to determine when it acceptable to approach women. You keep pretending it’s simple and can be understood with social awareness, but that’s not the case. Your logic always comes back to “probably” and “it depends.”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 10:43 PM
4

Claiming that fighting stereotypes isn’t adversity isn’t quite the same thing as saying there is no discrimination and we live in a just world. Since you’re not even trying to face my actual words, I’m done here.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 10:37 PM
3

“Depending on the woman?” How exactly is this different from mind reading?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 10:20 PM
3

Okay, so what’s a place where it’s okay for men to approach women?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 10:03 PM
1

There is no left-approved time to approach women. They’ve said to leave women alone in every public place. “Situational awareness” is code for mind reading.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 09:59 PM
3

None of those examples are what you were talking about. You were speaking of battling a patriarchy that doesn’t exist. And you can’t pretend you feel empathy for incels as a blue pill woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 09:44 PM
9

That would be using the same logic as you, so no. I don’t believe in Just World fallacies.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 09:37 PM
2

When I say adversity, I mean things that interfere with basic human needs, like not having food, a home, or a family. “Fighting against stereotypes” isn’t adversity. You seem to be supporting my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 09:28 PM
1

We’re not talking about “being wary,” and you know it. I’m talking about the left completely villainizing men for approaching women, and then denying that this happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 09:14 PM
6

Sounds like a No True Scotsman fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 09:11 PM
2

Who is vilifying men for ever approaching women? Already answered. when a woman is at a coffee shop or at the gym with her headphones on, she’s not putting out signals that she’s open and available to being approached. There are no approach signals. You can’t think of one that wouldn’t be called crazy if a man said it. “General scorn and disrespect” comes from scornful and disrespectful behavior. This is the head-in-ass Just World fallacy that’s become the standard on the left these days. It’s a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 09:10 PM
4

the Left has only ever been a coalition of largely oppressed groups Well that’s the most delusional thing I’ve heard in a while. All the leftists I know were born into stable middle class homes and have rarely ever experienced adversity in their lives. Where did you get this idea from? “The Left” didn’t decide that, all “the Left” has evidently largely stood for has been autonomy and egalitarian social relations Again, I don’t think you live in reality. The left constantly categorizes people by …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 09:04 PM
3

Giving people a choice in how to live their lives doesn’t require vilifying men for ever approaching women, or any of the other misandry spread by the left. And the general scorn and disrespect pedaled by the left has undoubtedly contributed to loneliness and lack of social skills for many.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 08:04 PM
6

…what? I asked you to explain your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:56 PM
2

As OP said, how do you know dating has gotten easier?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:49 PM
5

Because established gender roles used to exist. Men were expected to approach women by default. Then people on the left decided it would be fun to challenge that tradition just because, and now men aren’t approaching and people are saying they don’t know how to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:36 PM
7

People wouldn’t be so lonely if that was the case. Maybe it’s easier for hot women exclusively.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:31 PM
5

“True” feminists always downplay and excuse each other’s misbehavior. There aren’t decent feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:10 PM
4

And you’re worrying already about aging? Relax. Most women are in their sexual prime throughout their 20s. Either men will hit on you (especially on a college campus), or you can show initiative toward them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:46 AM
4

A little initiative from a woman can go a long way. I bet you could find someone. How old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:37 AM
3

By then you should have already found an emotionally intimate relationship with a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:08 AM

Terrific. It’s not what feminists believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 06:57 AM

I do, and he’s right. Being critical of feminism isn’t automatically dishonest or insincere.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 06:56 AM

Go to a feminist and try advocating for equal accountability for women, or equal responsibility, or anything else “equal” that isn’t strictly beneficial. You’ll just get shunned and called an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 06:55 AM

Yes. I won’t date a woman whose hobby is being angry at me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 06:31 AM

That’s not what feminists believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 06:29 AM

I’m anti feminist and I’ve formed my version of feminism from numerous interactions with them both online and in person. None of it is made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 06:27 AM
0

Yes. It would probably make him feel sexually inadequate. Either he needs to step it up, or she needs to calm down.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 10:36 PM
0

Women don’t need to hide how toxic they are. Their misbehavior is usually excused, in my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 03:51 PM
0

I’m saying there is no difference. I’ve known tons of toxic women in real life just like these women. Whether or not they specifically use pill language is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 03:42 PM
-2

What? “Pill language” has nothing to do with what I’m talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 02:37 PM
2

I’ve turned off my screen and interacted with women in real life. What are you saying is the difference between them and women on the internet?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 02:31 PM
9

Like taking revenge
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 02:30 PM
-3

You’re just choosing blissful ignorance
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 02:26 PM
-6

What’s the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 02:16 PM
0

Under “gender equality,” women have no expectation to check their privilege, and men are not compensated in any way for women’s privileges. Women stay in the spotlight and are eternal victims, including women who have never experienced adversity in her life.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 02:13 PM
-3

“To those accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.” This is just one of those excuses to be a bitch. This is up there with “if you can’t handle me at my worst, then you don’t deserve me at my best.” He doesn’t want equality between the sexes. Neither do people like you. You just want stuff for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 02:10 PM

I could see that being justification to end the relationship at some point. I think that would be preferable to cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 10:06 PM

Some naturally are that way. Many are upset after being mistreated or altogether cast out.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 02:17 AM
9

I’ve seen far worse be excused. You can talk openly about wanting to murder people on this site as long as you’re left wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 10:49 PM
3

I didn’t assume that. You showed it to me. Evidence matters, and I have some while you have none. When I so much as MENTIONED toxic women, you sprung into action trying to frame this as me complaining about women having standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 11:40 PM
3

You chose to assume my complaints are really just women“having standards that other men don't fit.” You have no place complaining about other people making assumptions when you do it immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 11:11 PM
3

If I list any examples, you’ll feel compelled to deny them, even if I’ve personally experienced them and have evidence. It’s so common that’s it’s like clockwork. No one who asks for evidence or examples of wrongdoing by women ever cares when they receive those examples of evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 09:05 PM
3

So you pretend to admit women have toxic traits, yet assume if I mention them, I’m just complaining about women having standards. Is this just cognitive dissonance?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 08:19 PM
3

You don’t need examples to know what toxic behavior is. There are billions of women. They are not completely free of toxic behavior. I didn’t insult you, just called out your feigned ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 07:14 PM
2

You can’t possibly be so sheltered you genuinely don’t know what toxic behavior is. You’re feigning ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 06:27 PM
3

Terrific, but not relevant to my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 06:13 PM
2

Because modern toxic women require such behavior in order to not be made a social outcast.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 03:18 PM
0

This is just another “men’s problem’s are automatically their own fault across the board” post. It’s an extremely oversimplistic view and not accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 03:16 PM
3

It’s true that it’s sometimes subjective opinion, but other times they’re just deliberately dissing to try and lower others’ value. Both genders do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:57 PM
49

Well yeah, because that’s what love means. But the claim was that women are there for men, not just men they love.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 01:14 AM
85

Women are there for men One of the most delusional fantasies I’ve ever read on this site.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 12:53 AM
5

If she’s kind and treats me well. I’ve finally found someone recently who fits this description. We’re only 3 dates in, and I’m trying not to jump to conclusions, but I at least feel optimistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 12:57 AM
8

Had an abusive mom who was excused by the women and liberals in our family Dated several women who were disrespectful or started arguments for no reason Have had several female coworkers who were openly misandrist or otherwise unfair to me, and always got excused by my liberal or female boss Generally, women are always exempt from the standards they hold men to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 01:31 PM
1

If you were truly looking for examples of misandry you wouldn’t be to eager to shut out other people from the conversation. You’re a misandrist troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 02:33 PM
1

Yes, misandry sure does resonate with misandrists. Just like racism resonates with racists. What point are you attempting to make?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 02:29 PM
1

So yes, you are going to just ignore the example that you asked for and promptly received. Typical of people on this site. I didn’t ask him to play. Uh, yes you did. You asked us to provide examples. Now you’re ignoring them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 02:19 PM
1

They are participating in the conversation. Nothing’s weird about replying. Also, you asked for an example and I gave you one. Are you just going to ignore it?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 02:13 PM
1

Then fucking learn how.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 03:08 AM
1

still just some woman Actually I said women. As in, many. And for the third fucking time, I know it’s subjective and varies from woman to woman. You either genuinely can’t read or you’re trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 03:00 AM
1

I’m listing things women have personally told me. I even specifically told you they’re not going to appeal to every single woman on the planet, yet you still feel the need to pick them apart and go Subjective!🤓 Subjective!🤓 Subjective!🤓 As I said, you really need to learn to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 02:54 AM
1

Reasons for women to date me are my career success, empathy, sense of humor, looks, creativity, kindness, and being great in bed. But not every woman wants those exact, specific things! I know. I actually read and understood the question. I’m able to answer it instead of sidestepping.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 02:06 AM
1

Nope, you just can’t read.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:46 AM
1

OP never said anything about being universally liked. He didn’t ask “what qualities do you have that ALL men want?” You just refuse to admit you can’t think of a reason for men to date you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 12:48 AM
2

OP is very simply asking what puts you above other women in the dating market, and only one woman I see gave a logical response.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 12:23 AM
1

Ah, so your entire being just transforms according to the man you’re with? You can’t just have “qualities,” like a normal person? If you asked me why women should choose me, I could give you a solid list of reasons why they should and reasons why they have. I could list positive traits I have that many women want. Not some mysterious sidestep. Even your mac and cheese example doesn't make sense. He may not care about that. Hence why I said That’s an actual reason, even if it’s a SMALL ONE.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 12:22 AM
2

You’re continuing to avoid actually answering the question. We’re asking what about you would make him choose you over other women and you can’t think of a single specific thing. One example given by another woman was because she makes good Mac n Cheese. That’s an actual reason, even if it’s a small one. That’s a valid answer, not some vague “I have what he wants more than the other women.”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 11:56 PM
2

…You can’t think of a reason for him to choose you over other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 11:43 PM
1

These women could have as much sex as they want within long term relationships. Their body count would remain low. Pretty simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 10:42 PM
2

What happened in that image is the standard response when men ever call out women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 09:40 PM
2

Somebody mentioned abuse committed by a woman and it was promptly shot down as misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 09:06 PM
2

You saw that with the whole recent Man vs Bear trend. Tons of women agreed a man breathing and minding his own business is endangering her more than a bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 09:04 PM
2

https://preview.redd.it/2zis5umsk05d1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=90801bb979717be7e1e2fb5901dfeb5eac90136c
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 08:49 PM
2

I just said that. Someone mentioned misandry and you felt the need to impulsively downplay it and frame it a different way.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 08:46 PM
2

“Attacking people orally” always includes literally any suggestion what women aren’t perfect. If any women have wronged me, talking about it ALWAYS automatically always qualifies as “attacking people orally.” It doesn’t matter how correct I am, or how civilized I’m being. There’s no acceptable way to men to call out women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 08:14 PM
7

This is exactly what always happens when people mention misandry. not “shitting on men for breathing.” That’s exactly what you just did. Someone called out misandry and you felt the need to impulsively downplay it and frame it a different way.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 08:06 PM
1

Some people like Jordan Peterson have plenty of reasonable advice for men, but he still gets lumped in with “incel rhetoric” because he criticizes the left.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 08:00 PM
5

Same. Clearly women need to listen to women more.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 03:00 AM
0

My evidence is because women say so. Check out Eliza Schlesinger’s War Paint routine. It’s the title joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 02:51 AM
2

You’re male and had standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 03:41 PM
2

I can probably cook better food anyway, so no.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 12:09 AM
3

B if she’ll actually be nice to me and put effort into our relationship. That means the traits like “confident” and “secure” can’t be code for “jk, she’s actually just a huge bitch.”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:27 PM
24

Yes, actually they can say it’s fertility.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:15 PM
2

I was thinking of right before the climax when Spongebob lists his achievements before whipping out the guitar. Believing in yourself is basically the same thing as confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 02:59 PM
5

I Am Legend. It’s a great depiction of male loss, crippling loneliness, and the primal urge to protect and save others. And this might be a silly example, but the first Spongebob movie. It shows that real confidence comes from achievement, not from being granted by others, and the enormous impact confidence has. And again the urge to protect others.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 09:49 PM
1

When individual women are criticized for misbehavior, they tend to get excused by people like you. That’s how you sow anti-woman attitudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:57 PM

Yes. Funny things is though, these women will totally date conservative men who they pretend are off limits. I’ve been messaged by numerous women on apps only to find something on their profile like “Conservatives, swipe left! 💅🏻” These aren’t the kind of women known for their chastity.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 03:52 PM
1

Yes, modern women should definitely be taken down a peg. They have way too much power and privilege and too little responsibility to go with it. DV is bad no matter who commits it. But any time I talk about a woman committing it, she’s excused, so yeah I might not rush to the rescue if a man is committing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:02 PM
2

Sometimes hot
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 01:57 PM
1

Nothing I’ve said could be logically interpreted as me believing I’m harmless.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 01:14 AM
2

It is just an issue with women, because nobody’s expected to believe a fantasy that men are perfect. Men are allowed to be criticized and distrusted. Men are allowed to be blamed. Men aren’t allowed to have a completely passive role in dating where they get their value for free. If you talk about abuse committed by men you’re not going to get vilified and blocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 06:05 PM
0

Letting women hurt others and just walking away doesn’t address the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 04:01 PM
-1

Avoiding blame and consequences for their own actions, either by just being a woman or also crying if necessary. I’ve encountered it multiple times.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 03:48 PM
1

Maybe true, but people keep pretending rejection is the worst thing men have to fear in dating, and it’s not. Women have a tremendous amount of freedom to hurt other people without consequences. That at least makes it hard to be confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 02:16 PM
6

Not socially constructed whatsoever. It’s necessary for our species to survive. Next you’ll be telling me hunger is a social construct.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 04:25 PM
17

My point was perfectly clear. Your logic means women should be considered far more dangerous than bears because they kill more people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 03:50 PM
19

Women still kill thousands of people per year, while bears kill far less. Sounds like women are “infinitely” more dangerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 02:35 PM

Fucking exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:40 PM

"The fact that you have to even ask that question shows how dire things are out here." Except you don’t have to ask. You’re choosing to. Women are yet again choosing to create victimhood where none exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:38 PM
3

Women’s behavior is not men’s fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 05:43 PM
7

That puts her above at least 95% of the women I’ve dated. I don’t want her to be a complete pushover, but even if she is that makes her better than 95% because she’s actually doing things for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 03:59 AM
2

My previous gf who I saw without makeup when we went swimming. She was hot. I don’t think she ever wore makeup.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 04:21 PM
7

🤯 I wanted to be the one to reveal this
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 03:24 PM
1

2, because my experiences with women have been overwhelmingly negative. That doesn’t mean I don’t want a healthy relationship with a woman who doesn’t treat me poorly. It’s not complex.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 04:18 AM
6

Maybe Gay
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 04:17 AM
1

The only data I see in these comments is a study of 600 British students. Usually, data doesn’t support the belief that women are in danger any time men are near.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 01:37 PM
1

Nope. No reason to. Women are supposed to hold their men to a reasonably high standard, and feminists don’t want to do this. They want to be angry at men. They want to believe that every disagreement is misogyny, or toxic masculinity, or some sort of inner evil on his part.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:16 AM
1

<image> It’s closer to the bottom than “men not existing.”
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:42 PM

You said men pose you a threat, and most women are near men most or all of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:40 PM
1

Mortal danger 24/7 isn’t something you “experience.” It’s something you imagine. Besides, I’m supposed to treat women as my equals, and that includes equal empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:11 PM

Those sound like two totally separate arguments. Women can be free to choose who they want to date based on love, and also have delusional standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 01:49 PM

Nope, I made a completely valid counterpoint and you just didn’t like it. You’re retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:08 PM

Fucking what? No, that’s actually completely random and unrelated to what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:58 PM

Do YOU have any preference between people viewing you as a “what” or a “who?”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:28 PM

You do control everything in your body, and you know it. A fetus isn’t a “what,” it’s a “who.”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:16 PM

Modern women: Ugh, my fetus isn’t ENTITLED to live and grow inside me! Frighteningly dystopian.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:02 PM

Actually women have the “rights to their own body” in every state. What you’re likely referring to is abortion, an entirely different thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:56 PM

Nope, men are very often interested in helping with the opposite gender’s issues. Both online and in real life. Women are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:40 PM
1

Having good sex is the same thing as getting something out of the sex. You’re fucking trolling. Go waste someone else’s time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:04 PM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 01:58 PM
1

They badger women because they hope for good sex, not just orgasm. You are not even attempting to read or understand what I’m saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 01:57 PM
1

I’ve had bad sex (including orgasm) and wasn’t happy with it. Your baseless fantasies about other peoples’ experience are just baseless fantasies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 01:52 PM
1

You’re once again treating orgasm like the be-all end-all. I don’t think there’s any point explaining it to you yet again.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 01:50 PM
1

Good sex is sex you enjoy. 🤯
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 01:48 PM
1

What statistics are you referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:55 AM
1

I don’t really care how likely it is. A huge portion of men have no chance at getting ANY sex, whereas women are usually given for free the things they need to find good sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:54 AM
1

So get 3rd party references. Not a huge requirement in order for you to get good sex for free. Men don’t get good sex for free. And yet again, orgasming doesn’t automatically make it good sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:38 AM
1

No one said anything about men failing to orgasm. You’re unashamedly making shit up because you know you can’t defeat my actual points.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:27 AM
1

You’re not supposed to be having sex with random people. You’re supposed to vet and have standards. And orgasm doesn’t automatically make bad sex somehow a good experience. Are you a virgin, or very inexperienced or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:20 AM
1

Well they are, therefore you’re wrong. You’re trying to invent a male privilege out of thin air.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:12 AM
1

Do you think there’s such thing as bad sex for men, even if he orgasms?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:18 AM
1

Few if any men are given that for free. Tons of women are. Check your privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 06:44 PM
1

That’s blatantly contradictory. If you’re given some good things and many bad things for free, that still means you were given some good things for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 05:31 PM
1

Thanks for admitting you’re given something for free that’s not trash. This is a privilege men do not have. How will I be compensated for this lack of privilege, or do you not believe in equality?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:21 PM
1

If you loved men, you’d respect my viewpoint and trust my experience as a man over your fantasies about the male experience. You’re baselessly claiming women use men for sex less. When only other R/BP people agree with you, and everyone else disagrees This is also a fantasy. Everyone is not disagreeing with me. This is a debate between two people. Yet again, I never suggested in any way that men don’t use women for sex. Since you willingly refuse to engage with what I’m actually saying, I’m not …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:18 PM
1

the sex WILL be trash it isn’t the only possibility These two things can’t be true. Which is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 03:37 PM
1

Sorry to hear you’re angry. I never said anything about your experience. I never suggested men don’t do the same thing. I said men and women both use each other for sex, contrary to your claim that women always have genuine intentions with men. You continue to intentionally misconstrue what I say because being angry at men is your hobby.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 03:02 PM
1

Yep, I’ve said that three or four times now. And I’m not answering again. Learn to read and absorb things the first time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 02:32 PM
1

No, it wasn’t. Read your first comment. Having an easier time finding a man to shove his dick in you for 2 minutes does not translate into any other benefit including quality sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 02:31 PM
1

has there been more times women approach you, just for sex and nothing more? Because in my experience, that isn’t the case. Already answered. Whether or not you experienced a thing is irrelevant when we’re talking about it happening to men. Women are typically open to a relationship when they seem interested. Again, baseless assumptions. “of the women you have slept with or who have approached you, how many have wanted a relationship with you?” Already answered. You intentionally ignored me beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 02:28 PM
2

I see, so you’re changing your argument from “only” to “a lot.”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 02:03 PM
2

You’re again choosing to completely ignore my question, so you must know you’re wrong. Women’s free sex appeal doesn’t somehow only attract men with low sexual endurance. Your claim is baseless and you’re downplaying women’s privilege like OP said.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 01:49 PM
1

That ignores my question completely. How is it possible they only receive attraction specifically from men who last 2 minutes?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 01:45 PM
1

Nope, his comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 01:39 PM
2

I didn’t suggest she can. Now answer my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 01:37 PM
1

Yeah, you’re just performing mental gymnastics to explain why the exact same behavior is totally different when a woman does it vs a man. You baselessly decided that men who approach are automatically just looking for sex and women who do EXACTLY THE SAME THING are automatically viewing me on a deeper level. You’re just another sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 01:37 PM
2

She should want a man who makes roughly the same. Women have spent decades claiming men and women are exactly equal, and that they want and do all the same things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 05:07 AM
2

He’s had valid responses this whole time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:55 AM
2

How is it possible they only receive attraction specifically from men who last 2 minutes?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:52 AM
2

And you dodged my question. “Having” to worry isn’t something that’s objective at all, so I can’t really answer. But I’ve been approached by women who know nothing about me besides what I look like, so it’s fair for me to assume they just want sex. Unless you feel the exact same behavior should be excused in women, which I suspect is the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 10:07 PM
2

You’ve made it sound like they somehow genuinely like me as a person after looking at me for just a few minutes. How is that the case? Telepathy?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 09:39 PM
2

Weird. How could they like “me” when all they know is what I look like?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 09:32 PM
2

…Are you serious right now? You think 100% of the time if I date a woman, she’s genuinely interested in dating me? Tell me you are not this far gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 09:26 PM
2

Your first paragraph is agreeing with me. I just said the same thing. If 1-2% of men are willing to date you, that’s a lot more than what men are offered. I would not believe all men get treated like your cousin, because most men are not super handsome, while tons of women are. Most pretty women could easily find thousands of men who want to fuck her. Too much attention from men is a constant complaint from women. The only delusional one here is you. Try listening to women more.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 09:18 PM
2

For like the sixth time, ONS isn’t the only thing available to women. Low value men, flings, etc are not the only thing given to women for free. Women receive for free the things that are necessary to attract good men. I get to date <1% of the men who want to fuck me. 1% of THOUSANDS of people is still a better selection than most men are offered. No matter how you try and spin this, you still have privilege. Quit downplaying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:13 PM
2

Because I don’t gain anything from being used for food. My ability to buy food doesn’t mean I get to date high value women. You straight up ignored me, so I’m going to just copy and paste. Once again, you’re acting like women’s free sex appeal only works on low value men. It doesn’t. Women have an easy time attracting both low value and high value members of the opposite sex, whereas men do not. Women don’t just have an easy time being used. Even if you were right, the top 20% of women having th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:49 PM
1

combined with charisma and confidence Thanks for supporting my argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:40 PM
2

No one suggested being good looking guaranteed orgasm. You’re intentionally straw manning.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:39 PM
1

Hmm, are there any women who aren’t strangers?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:37 PM
1

You keep ignoring or deliberately misinterpreting what I say. What exactly is the valuable thing? Read the title of the post. Men have to care that women have an orgasm in order to give her one I already told you through firsthand experience this isn’t true. I’ve given women orgasms without caring about their orgasm. Don’t know what else to tell you. Once again, you’re acting like women’s free sex appeal only works on low value men. It doesn’t. Women have an easy time attracting both low value a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:15 PM
1

You’re fighting to downplay your privilege. This entire post is filled with women insistently arguing it’s somehow not an advantage to be given a valuable thing for free. And I’ll repeat yet again, men don’t need to care about women’s orgasm to give her one. Claiming otherwise is once again downplaying your privilege. Women have a massively easier time attracting suitable people of the opposite sex, including guys who can cause orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 02:52 PM
1

Or you could talk to other women. Preselection exists. You’re not the only woman in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 02:20 PM
1

There was a viral TikTok recently of women talking about how ugly guys can be hot. I can find the exact one but here’s something similar. Attractiveness includes many things besides looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 02:19 PM
1

Miles off the mark. Probably intentionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 01:50 PM
1

Again, I’ve gotten women off without caring about their orgasm. And it wasn’t hard at all for women to find me. It’s not hard for women to orgasm, or to attract men that will give them orgasm. Stop downplaying women’s privileges.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 01:36 PM
2

You also have easy access to the men who will provide orgasm. Quit downplaying your privilege and pretending women’s free sex appeal somehow only works on men that are bad at sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 01:31 PM
1

Nope. Look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 01:30 PM

I just answered that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 01:06 AM

You’re talking about looks. I’m talking about attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 12:54 AM
2

I’m not talking about “men are simple,” the thing you randomly added. I’m talking about the topic we were discussing- women’s privilege of free sex appeal, and how you think it magically only attracts low quality men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 12:53 AM
2

Seems like you’ve given up even trying to defend your position?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 12:18 AM

No, we cannot.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 12:13 AM
3

Nope, you said men who can get women off are men who care. That’s a just world fallacy. Read your own words. The thing you listed isn’t even a just world fallacy. It’s not even coherent.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 12:12 AM
4

That’s not what confirmation bias is. That’s when you desire to believe new information automatically confirms what you already believed. There is no new information here. All that’s happening here is left leaning women trying to downplay their privilege, like always.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 12:02 AM
2

…what?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:49 PM
-3

Well, I can’t help you understand normal English.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:47 PM

Nope. You are. Women’s free sex appeal doesn’t magically only appeal to low quality men. It appeals to most straight men, and that means you have an easier time attracting quality partners. It’s not just “easy access to bad sex” as you pretend. Quit downplaying your privilege and learn some humility.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:45 PM

…yes, I do. Many of them. I’ve been to college and known dudes who could lay dozens of women in a semester. They’d bring women over to our room, give them multiple orgasms, and never see them again. Do you think these men cared? Your Just World fantasy isn’t real.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:40 PM

I’ve gotten women off without caring about them, and I don’t see why other men couldn’t do the same. You’re really stretching.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:35 PM

Attractiveness includes being good in bed. Attractiveness means YOU ARE ATTRACTED TO THEM. If they can’t get you off, they’re not as attractive, are they?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:33 PM

Family is pretty close to the bottom of the hierarchy of needs and should therefore take priority over women’s inconveniences.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:32 PM

I’m not talking about sex. I’m talking about family.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:31 PM

Nope. Please enlighten me of the different sexual standards held by men who are good at sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:36 PM

Yes, it is. Why do you keep acting like women’s free sex appeal ONLY attracts unattractive men? It doesn’t. You would have a far easier time finding a suitable partner than a man would. Quit downplaying your privilege and learn some humility.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:34 PM

Regardless, it’s incredibly naive to deny that women have privileges in dating, or expect billions of people to just change their human nature. Learn some humility.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:32 PM

Okay, can you explain to me how I would change the dating market?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:26 PM

You’re just intentionally wasting people’s time, so I’ll ignore you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:23 PM

Why would it only be bad sex you have access to?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:21 PM

I didn’t suggest the two privileges are somehow interchangeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:20 PM

I just did explain it. You even copied it into your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:14 PM

I didn’t say in the dating world. Sounds like you’re trying to avoid checking your privileges.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:13 PM

Yes, it is. Women are given a thing for free that’s valuable to other people. You sound like rich people complaining of others wanting to steal their money. It might be a concern, but it doesn’t nullify your privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:07 PM

Do any of women’s advantages count as “true advantages?”
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:05 PM

Why don’t men just stop wanting families? Basic human needs aren’t artificial. You can’t expect to forcibly change human nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:03 PM
0

Nope, shouldn’t have to. Women don’t have to sacrifice to not be considered dangerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 10:07 PM
4

It’s because they have lives that aren’t worth living. It’s pretty rational. Suicide doesn’t require mental illness.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:24 PM
1

I’ve had relationships before but am currently struggling. Confidence feels impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 02:05 PM
9

“Desirable” usually means confident, and lots of confident men are definitely not worthy of companionship, yet they get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 03:11 PM
-3

…Well, the women who have known me in real life disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 02:59 AM
0

Still has nothing to do with OP’s argument, even if your claim was true
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 02:51 AM
1

…what? Why would that be the case?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 01:37 AM
-2

Because power is supposed to come with responsibility, like Uncle Ben said.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 01:35 AM
-9

I’m attractive and agree with OP. Don’t really see why his attractiveness is important.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 01:33 AM
61

Red pill takes a somewhat bleak view of both men and women
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 08:24 PM
25

I don’t really care about rejection. I care about the rudeness and misandry which is far more common.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 05:05 AM
1

Yes, it did. Nothing more to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 08:50 PM
3

Doesn’t explain why men don’t have more male friendships
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 08:40 PM
-5

Really doesn’t matter which individuals he’s talking about. It’s a common, recurring trend in feminist circles.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 09:07 PM
15

Exactly. Just the latest insult-from-a-hat when men do things women don’t like, such as having basically any standards for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 02:22 PM
1

I’ve only been unmatched a few times. Ghosting is the standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 05:26 AM
1

I wasn’t aware you could “block” people on a dating app. I guess I don’t know.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 10:01 PM
32

I might be top 5%. I’ve gotten hundreds of matches and get dates relatively easily. I have rarely met any women I consider girlfriend material though, and have put up with tons of rudeness and misandry. Rejection is the least of my worries.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 05:09 PM
-1

I didn’t describe a larger pattern of bad behavior by women because I didn’t feel like typing up every instance where a woman has wronged me. That doesn’t make it reasonable for you to conclude I only have one anecdote. Women have been quite rude and sometimes hateful to me throughout my life, and have NEVER faced repercussions for it. It is a larger pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 02:40 PM
0

Got it, I’ll tell my sister the abuse didn’t happen in the context of dating and therefor isn’t valid for me to worry about. Again, I didn’t need to “dig up” anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 02:37 PM
-2

Digging up obscure horror stories to prove your dislike of them Obscure horror stories? My mom abused my sister to death and was defended by everyone she knows. Then people like you push this childish narrative that women are harmless. Really doesn’t make me comfortable being around women when so many people want to live in a fantasy land.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 02:35 AM
-2

I care. I want people to be happy and families to form.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 03:02 PM
0

I’ve never told any of my girlfriends that men are dogs and predators. Sounds like cringe white knight behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 01:19 AM
38

I don’t want more casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:09 AM
4

Doing very few of the chores and paying no rent (when we lived together), storing stuff in my apartment without asking, and getting upset over stupid things such as 1. Being asked to keep my half of the futon clear so I can sit down when I come home from work 2. Me commenting that skipping breakfast and eating twizzlers for lunch isn’t healthy 3. Me not always being able to find a 5 hour carpool home from college to see her
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 11:47 PM
7

That’s not what my last girlfriend of 4 years said when I broke up with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 11:38 PM
5

They show a lack of respect and are unappreciative. They take me for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 08:53 PM
21

I’ve found very few decent ones, and they either didn’t treat me well or weren’t interested in growing our relationship. Had two girlfriends. My online dating experience has been like 3% polite rejection, 97% rudeness and ghosting. That makes it extremely difficult to be confident and charming for the decent women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 06:19 PM
95

Correct, that’s why so many insults toward men are related to his sexual worth. See Tiny dick energy, incel, insecure, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 12:25 PM
0

Could have sworn the reason was because I broke up with my previous girlfriend
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 02:29 PM
2

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:42 PM
1

Ignores my question
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 03:41 PM
2

Women destroyed my confidence, and it’s not my responsibility to fix things women break. Thats not the job of women Literally nothing ever is, so that’s no surprise. If I want to date a woman, I’m expected to take her emotions and point of view into account. It’s time to start expecting the same from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 10:52 PM
1

I already gave clear examples of what women could do.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 10:47 PM
1

Not just because I’d like them to- because women have said they wanted to be equals with men. That means sometimes giving a shit about men and boys who’s problems are worse than yours. Instead, “gender equality” is always followed by a gigantic asterisk that says “as long as it’s only men helping women.” Women are lucky men don’t share this extreme aversion toward helping the opposite gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 10:20 PM
2

Didn’t Johnny Depp actually need to wear a wire when he dated an abusive woman? It shouldn’t take such lengths for people to not automatically defend women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 10:17 PM
4

I answered that in the comment you’re replying to.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 10:15 PM
2

Knew someone would say this, but sadly it needs to be said
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 10:15 PM
2

I already answered most of those questions. I’ve had therapy and it’s not the magic cure-all you wish it was. It can’t change reality. Why should women as a whole fix your mental problems Because again, the people I’m trying to date want confident men. I can’t be confident when women have the freedom to hurt other people without consequence. And also because they’re supposed to fight for equality, not just themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 10:14 PM
5

That’s not a real question, so I can’t answer it. It’s rhetorical.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 10:00 PM
1

Therapy isn’t the magic cure-all people like you wish it was. All the therapy in the world can’t change reality. Women have a tremendous amount of freedom to hurt other people without consequence, and that has to change. If there was an epidemic of men running around and kicking women, you wouldn’t just tell the women to all get therapy. You’d do something to stop the problem at the source.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 09:59 PM
3

But that would be her relying on someone else to help her with her problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 09:52 PM
3

I’ve had several girlfriends and lots of sexual attention from women before. I’m not a wimp, or always losing. Would you care to try again with another random insult?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 09:51 PM
6

Yes to the second one. But as for the first, the therapy itself needs to be changed, because therapy tends to be made for women. Therapy is often just used as a dumpster unwanted men are thrown into.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 09:49 PM
1

Because the people I’m trying to date want confident men. I can’t be confident when women have the freedom to hurt other people without consequence. When I talk about this, do you imagine anyone prosecutes our abusive mom? They don’t give a shit. She’s a woman. I just did specifically point it out. You said people’s problems are automatically their own responsibility to solve. That if a girl is being abused, it’s not on other people to help her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 09:47 PM
-2

Who is advocating that child abusers shouldnt be punished? You are. you shouldn’t be relying on other people to “help” you with your problems. That’s on you. Who do you imagine should solve this problem, exactly? What should happen when women abuse their daughters to death?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 09:34 PM
1

What do you fantasize I’m “telling” by not listing examples? I chose not to because no one on this site who asks for examples ever actually cares what the examples are, and now I’ll prove it. My mom abused my sister to death and no one cares in the slightest. Any time I talk about it, other women always excuse her. What will women (or anyone else) do about this CRIMINAL problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 09:16 PM
4

Sometimes someone’s problems actually are other people’s responsibility though. If I cause a problem for someone else, that problem is not their responsibility to solve. It’s mine. It’s really incredibly simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 09:09 PM
7

I see you immediately created a fake answer to your own question. It doesn’t matter what the problems are. You just declared that across the board, people’s problems are automatically their own responsibility to solve, not the responsibility of who caused them. That’s an insane take, so I created an example to show why you’re wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 09:05 PM
3

If I cause problems for women, is it their responsibility to deal with it? If I grab a phone out of a woman’s hand and smash it on the ground, is it her responsibility to pay for a replacement?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 08:53 PM
6

Help men and boys with their problems instead of always telling them to just deal with it somehow. And like I said in my second point, do something about misbehavior from other women. Women sometimes are able to ruin peoples lives without consequence. Knowing that makes it hard to be confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 08:45 PM
16

Women could play a part in helping men to be more confident instead of just telling men to be confident. Or actively destroying men’s confidence. Women could shame each other for being rude, hateful, or abusive. They could do away with the delusion that men have nothing to fear from women besides rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 08:20 PM
0

I went bald by choice and women say it looks great. And losing value at 60 isn’t quite the same as 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 02:38 AM
0

Wouldn’t really believe it, because I’ve already dated hot women and felt mutual attraction between us
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 10:23 PM
22

This is called a Just World fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 10:22 PM
3

I can compete naturally, and I have. That’s how I’ve gotten girlfriends. You’re continuing to make shit up instead of facing my actual argument, so now you can get blocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 07:00 PM
3

Now you’re just unashamedly making shit up. No one here is trying to ration out sex like food during wartime. No one complained about men having to compete with each other. Face peoples’ actual arguments or stop wasting their time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 06:27 PM
3

This is at least the third time you’ve asked me how to achieve other people’s goals. If you ask again I’m just blocking you. No one is complaining about men being attracted to women, and you know it. What I’m saying there is a problem with claiming to fight for gender equality, but then saying “women get to keep their enormous privileges because it’s conveniently impossible to account for them.”
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 05:58 PM
2

You’re really reaching with that first line. Nature gives women their sex appeal. Quit trying to deny or reduce women’s privileges. a lot of women already do take that blessing into account Not while fighting for so called gender equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 05:55 PM
6

I want the people who claim they fight for equality to fight for equality instead of only for themselves. I want them to check their own privilege. No, I do not have a clear idea how THEY would achieve THEIR goal of equality. You seem to think it’s crazy that I don’t help other people finish their half-baked ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 05:38 PM
9

You ignored me the first time, but I guess I’ll try again- I’m not the one claiming to fight for gender equality, so I don’t have an exact answer. Ask the women fighting for “””equality””” how they plan to account for their privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 04:56 PM
3

I’m not the one claiming to fight for gender equality, so I don’t have an exact answer. I’m saying all the women who want “””equality””” ought to stop overlooking their massive biological privileges from the equation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 04:45 PM
5

That doesn’t relate to what I said. I said nothing about restricting women’s dating options.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 03:16 PM
3

Men can’t deactivate their sex drives. There was just a very similar post. Women’s sex appeal is given to them for free AND they have lower sex drives. They need to take this enormous privilege into account.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 03:10 PM
-1

Because having a family is a basic human need, and having a family would make me much happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 05:01 AM
1

No, I’m not. Trust is different from not treating people like they’re murderers by default. Grow a fucking brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 09:20 PM
1

Once had a coworker snap creep shots of my ass while I was swimming and post them to her Facebook. And my mom was super abusive and neglectful to me and my sister. My sister even killed herself over it, but our mom cried her way out of accountability and no one really cared.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 04:35 AM

Right, because women’s choices are never their own fault. It’s always somehow someone else to blame for her personality problems. Why exactly am I supposed to want female friends again? And what exactly do you imagine I’m “vetting” differently in men? Do you picture I’m performing a multistage psychoanalysis of every person I interact with? I’m friends with people who are friendly to me, plain and simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:03 PM

Terrific, but I do have friends. Male friends who I’ve had for over a decade, and that’s because I do vet my social circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:18 PM

So essentially, you’re saying I should only associate with women who have good personalities? Golly, why didn’t I think of that? Unfortunately it’s certainly not a majority of women. I’ve never known a woman I could ask for emotional support.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:01 PM
4

In other words, “Find evidence of people saying this besides the people saying it.” There’s abundant evidence any time a left wing sub mentions men’s issues, but you’ll automatically rule out any evidence I provide as an unlikable Karen. Even if it’s thousands of them. How about you provide me evidence antisemitism exists, without citing anything antisemites have ever said or done?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 05:29 PM
4

Men should ask for help! asks for help Why do grown-ass men always expect others to solve their problems for them?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 04:48 PM
3

Because high body counts are less of a turnoff in men than they are in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 05:30 PM
5

We’re not talking about the dawn of civilization. I asked you a question in the present tense.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 11:48 AM
0

I’m male, and my serious issues have never received 1% of the attention women’s inconveniences receive. Maybe never will.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 05:39 AM
2

What area of society do men benefit from?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 05:37 AM
8

That doesn’t conflict with what he said.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 05:36 AM
11

Bootstraps
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 05:34 AM
2

Actually yes, I did just concisely define hypergamy. If that’s not good enough, check the dictionary. Age is a quality given to everyone for free. Everyone gets to be young at some point. But the hypergamous things women value are not usually given for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 04:39 AM
9

It’s not ambiguous at all. Women are attracted to men they view as their superior. That’s it. What changed is that women still want men they’re attracted to (ie superior than her) while somehow also being equal to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:21 AM
1

No one’s asking you for trust.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 02:01 AM
1

No shit. That doesn’t affect either of our arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 02:01 AM
1

You understand nothing whatsoever about statistics. What matters is the actual murder rate, which is extremely low in the US. Roughly 7 out of 100,000 people get murdered per year, and women have the privilege of being the minority of those victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 01:38 AM
1

I’m not inviting them to dark, secluded places. You made that up.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 01:32 AM
1

I’m genuinely not a danger, and it bothers me, so clearly you’re wrong. Thankfully some women aren’t insane like this and have no problem meeting up without paranoia.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 01:31 AM
5

He was an insane, violent manchild, the kind of man women are not supposed to have babies with.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:50 PM
12

Makes me think she still does hookups
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:01 AM
1

This was never a discussion of what men are “allowed” to do. It was a discussion about whether it’s justified for women to treat men as a threat by default. You said people who are physically stronger are automatically a danger to other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 07:56 PM
1

Yes, they should. Obviously. And no, I’m not misunderstanding anything. I’m following your logic to the letter. You said being physically stronger makes someone a danger.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 06:21 PM
1

You’re splitting hairs. Your original argument was You are a danger to half the population by default, because you are much more physically stronger. Why should we be putting children in danger by letting them near people who are much more physically strong? They should have no interaction at all with adults, according to your logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 02:39 PM
1

Yes, it clearly does. I’m just applying your simple logic to a different situation. You said being physically stronger than someone else automatically means you are a danger to them. How can we allow men OR women to teach children, if it will put the children in danger?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 05:08 AM

The women who have actually gotten into a relationship with me know that’s not true. That’s who.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 05:01 AM
1

Are women a danger to children by default, since they’re physically stronger? Should we prohibit women from being grade school teachers?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 05:00 AM
1

It’s factual data about the subject we were discussing. Grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:24 PM
2

…as you willfully ignore the data I presented
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 07:03 PM
1

Yes, that’s correct. But I’d still lock my car because it doesn’t send a message that I view my neighbors as thieves. I don’t chat up my neighbors and say “I’d better lock my car, with you around!”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 06:40 PM
0

Data’s not on your side. Fewer than 10 per 100,000 people get murdered per year in the US, with women being the minority of those victims. I’m not slow, you’re just a white knight.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 06:38 PM
1

Failing to prepare for murder still doesn’t mean you’re in danger of being murdered. Danger doesn’t automatically exist just because someone feels afraid, and these women are doing this to artificially lower men’s value.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 06:14 PM
-1

I’m a man, who’s considerably more likely to be murdered by a man in my lifetime, yet isn’t planning my life around avoiding men. Because men’s existence doesn’t endanger other people. Get a grip. It’s paranoia.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 06:11 PM
1

Translation: yes. You think deliberately preparing for an actual murder to take place is somehow just “being safe.”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 03:43 PM
1

Ah, so you can’t tell the difference between treating someone like a potential murderer and explicitly asking them “are you going to murder me.” Are you autistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 03:37 PM
1

Actually yes, I do think asking men if they’ll kill people is indeed equivalent to asking women if they’ll kill people. You’re trying to downplay that risk, just like tons of women who don’t want to accept they’re not inherently harmless.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 03:31 PM
-2

There are also plenty of shitty women. I personally know a woman who abused her daughter to death and got away with it. Does that mean I should open dates by asking women “if we have kids, will you abuse them till they kill themselves?”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 03:24 PM
-5

My existence isn’t a problem for women’s safety. That doesn’t make me a bitch boy, it means I have a spine and don’t date women who treat me like a murderer by default. I just watched the Super Bowl with a different woman who DIDNT ask if I’m going to kill her, so now she’s getting a second date.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 03:19 PM
-1

I also had a woman insist we meet in the secluded woods
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 03:13 PM
-1

No, I’m bothered by being treated like I’m a danger to other people by default.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 03:11 PM
-6

Several women on Hinge have straight up asked me if I’m going to kill them, or said they’d only meet up if it’s daytime and there are “witnesses.” Paranoia is widespread.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:10 PM
-5

Think of a new joke for the love of Christ
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 09:51 PM
6

Same. I’ve had several girlfriends and hookups yet every complaint I have about women is usually impulsively struck down as incel misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 05:02 AM
9

So being murdered massively more is less significant because it’s not because of their sex. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 04:58 AM
8

women are more likely to be raped, kidnapped, and trafficked. that is because of their sex. Could also possibly be because they do stuff like this <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 04:57 AM
-2

The break room isn’t a designated place to debate this kind of thing. They’d find a different forum.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 04:51 AM
6

Have you not met the entire feminist movement?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 04:42 AM
6

A lot of leftists shame men for ever complaining about ANY women, even individual ones. And they imply rejection is the worst thing men have to ever fear from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 04:38 AM
5

Radical feminist content is definitely allowed on Reddit. I see feminists wishing death upon men regularly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 01:50 AM
12

You’re continuing to try to reduce the severity of women’s wrongdoing to just rudeness and hurt feelings. You’re being intentionally disingenuous and I’m not going to let you waste more of my time. Get blocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 10:38 PM
11

Same thing as any other group of people- they sometimes commit rudeness, hatred, and abuse, even abusing people to death sometimes. The difference is, men don’t pretend hurt feelings are the worst thing we’re capable of inflicting, whereas abuse committed by women tends to be reduced or joked about, like you just did.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 09:29 PM
2

That women are perfect, because complaints about them are never valid or warranted.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 09:15 PM
9

That’s likely because women aren’t as harmless as you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 09:13 PM
2

Because they’re often hot, and because often times there isn’t much other choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 07:47 PM
8

Then you’ve had the good fortune of avoiding these women in real life. Others have not.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 07:13 PM
7

Real women aren’t much better. Misandrist online spaces spread laziness, entitlement and misandry among real women, who then try to date in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 06:14 PM
22

I feel like this post is a response to that question.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:08 PM
2

Of course. If you want an example, I once visited China for three months, where I’m considered George Clooney by women’s standards. I never cheated on my girlfriend even though women were regularly hitting on me, and I could have easily gotten away with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 10:09 PM
4

Women occasionally approach, but as others have said they usually give signals they want to be approached- something like smiling and making bedroom eyes, or sticking her butt out a little further, laughing harder at his jokes are some examples. And it’s hard to appear approachable as a man with women sowing murder paranoia like they do these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 08:27 PM
1

And that would be a big improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 08:22 PM

I didn’t realize we were talking about money. Yes, money helps a man tremendously.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 06:14 AM

His point still stands
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 06:06 AM

I’d argue that’s lower because it usually involves at least SOME amount of skill, whereas being a hot woman does not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 06:05 AM

I’m above average in many regards (like height, handsomeness, career success), but that only gets me attraction from women, not effort. I’ve gone through hundreds of matches and many dates, as well as some hookups, but almost never has a woman put effort into starting a real relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 04:54 PM
1

My ex girlfriend’s underwear would suffice
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 11:45 PM
34

I’m not resentful of women for being ahead of me, but I’m resentful when they continue to pretend it’s a man’s world and women don’t have a fair shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:59 PM
1

Sorry, I just feel like no women deserve any support so long as any of them ever commit murder
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:25 AM
1

Sort of sometimes, but still inferior to an actual relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:19 AM
2

I don’t, because women have intentionally caused me a tremendous amount of hardship, which they take no ownership of and don’t plan to address or alleviate.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:08 AM
0

That doesn’t conflict with what he said. Women still have more rights than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 04:20 AM
6

Because having a family is a basic human need, and some of us would like to have that need fulfilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 02:26 AM

<image> I actually made a meme explaining what I bring to the table. It’s on my Hinge.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 04:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter