RedBjorn Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Instapundit: If states are using DNA to verify paternity on births to underage women, why not use it to verify all births? This strange sort of communism you're espousing here seems very at odds with other posts you have made about anarchy and voluntarism. I've never had anything good to say about voluntarism, and the volume of reading through my comment history that would be required just to begin piecing together my particularly nuanced view of anarchism is probably quite vast. If you are confused, it would probably be easier to explain whats confusing so I can try to explain. The fact of the matter is that the de…	/r/MensRights	07/06/13 04:40 AM
0	Instapundit: If states are using DNA to verify paternity on births to underage women, why not use it to verify all births? I don't think any such thing. I just think that need is infinitely greater than want, and that anyone who would deny anyone else's needs for their own wants is behaving immorally. I think just as derogatorily of women who put their wants ahead of the needs of others. I should, however, apologize for the use of derogatory language. I'm trying to eliminate the habit, and the oldest habits seem to be the hardest to break. That is why you see nothing wrong with the situation. I never said I don't se…	/r/MensRights	07/06/13 02:49 AM
0	Instapundit: If states are using DNA to verify paternity on births to underage women, why not use it to verify all births? The only thing relevant in child care is that the child gets the best available, who provides it is irrelevant. But, for the sake of argument let's say that without any context I agree that it is absolutely wrong to trick someone into raising a child that they did not personally participate in spawning. So what? DNA testing is already almost as backed-up as the damn VA, further burdening that system just so some jack-offs can legally abandon children is hardly a moral action as it would only lea…	/r/MensRights	07/06/13 01:18 AM
0	Instapundit: If states are using DNA to verify paternity on births to underage women, why not use it to verify all births? Which is why I mentioned that it was neither illegal nor wrong. The OP's question is answered by the lack of both legal and moral reasons to compel paternity testing.	/r/MensRights	06/06/13 10:22 PM
3	Instapundit: If states are using DNA to verify paternity on births to underage women, why not use it to verify all births? Because not being medically certain of paternity is neither illegal nor wrong. Impregnating a child is both.	/r/MensRights	06/06/13 04:39 PM
3	Am I missing something about this anti-friendzone talk? What you are missing is that if you are behaving in a certain way because you think it will result in sex, then you are attempting rape by fraud. You are also missing the fact being nice for sex is a PUA tactic, it is impossible to shame one without shaming the other. And the point of shaming it isn't to encourage people to change tactics, its to encourage them to present themselves honestly, without expectation of reward, and to respect the other person's agency. The only reason people should a…	/r/MensRights	31/05/13 07:58 PM
0	Being a man is playing life on easy mode Sure, when you count the ones who signed up to do the killing. But that's why I said victims instead of casualties, because I don't count murderers along with their victims.	/r/MensRights	29/05/13 03:29 AM
-1	Being a man is playing life on easy mode So men send men out to murder men, women, and children, and you choose to sympathize with the murderers. I get it, its not like you could make this about testicles if you focused on the victims.	/r/MensRights	28/05/13 11:58 PM
1	My marxist-feminist rhetoric brings all the boys to the yard I have a pretty clear meaning of what I mean when I say 'oppressive'. Its in the dictionary if you want to look it up. But if you have some examples of language feminists call oppressive but you don't think are, please share. The other fellow couldn't, and it would go a long way toward understanding why MRA's get so wound up over it.	/r/MensRights	13/03/12 03:56 PM
3	My marxist-feminist rhetoric brings all the boys to the yard Well, its easy for me to dismiss things I have never witnessed. All the feminists I know only want equality.	/r/MensRights	13/03/12 01:43 AM
0	My marxist-feminist rhetoric brings all the boys to the yard Except that it isn't pseudoscience, its neuroscience.	/r/MensRights	13/03/12 01:13 AM
6	My marxist-feminist rhetoric brings all the boys to the yard The point is that what feminists call "oppressive language" is anything that runs counter to their views. It is a silencing/shaming tactic. Examples? I'm not denying, I'm well aware that the oppressed can become the oppressors I'm just curious what language feminists object to that you find unreasonable. It is like White Rhodesians and South Africans seeing violence or rebellion any time a black stood up for themselves. And yes I am equating most forms of feminism with Apartheid as that is the e…	/r/MensRights	13/03/12 01:09 AM
-1	My marxist-feminist rhetoric brings all the boys to the yard There is no such thing as a thought crimes. You can think whatever you want. But if you don't want to become an oppressor, then it would certainly be best to refrain from using oppressive language (or any other oppressive behavior) and correct any oppressive thoughts with their polar opposite. I have successfully used this approach to stop smoking and to stop being a racist. Obviously if you don't wish to stop or avoid a certain behavior, all you have to do is not correct it.	/r/MensRights	13/03/12 12:55 AM
-2	My marxist-feminist rhetoric brings all the boys to the yard That is scientific fact. Video games don't lead to violent behavior, but a person who identifies with either the violent behavior or the motives behind them portrayed in a game could easily become more violent by validating those tendencies through the rewarding behavior of gaming. Doesn't make it the games fault.	/r/MensRights	13/03/12 12:45 AM
-4	My marxist-feminist rhetoric brings all the boys to the yard It is a biological imperative that anyone who wishes to refrain from oppressive behavior should also refrain from oppressive language. The neurons in the brain involved in any particular activity grow closer together the more that behavior is performed, making the behavior more and more automatic as the electrical signals in the brain will behave like any electrical signal and take the path of least resistance. So using oppressive language causes oppressive language to become more and more autom…	/r/MensRights	12/03/12 10:00 PM
6	My marxist-feminist rhetoric brings all the boys to the yard Beards are always cool.	/r/MensRights	12/03/12 09:45 PM