RedCanada Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-1	No means no, Feminists. I'm going to assume that you cannot then.	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 11:00 PM
-2	No means no, Feminists. I've actually studied feminism at university, and I still haven't heard of any of these people. Can you cite anything they've written?	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 10:37 PM
-4	No means no, Feminists. Excellent article, thanks for posting this.	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 08:33 PM
-1	No means no, Feminists. Feminism doesn't speak for all women - not even the majority. Pretty sure there is a type of feminism out there for most, if not all, women. After all, feminism isn't one single monolithic philosophy, there are hundreds of types out there.	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 08:30 PM
-1	No means no, Feminists. Women are men's complimentary sex. I tend to think that women are their own people and can be whatever they want to be rather than defining them based on men.	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 08:28 PM
0	No means no, Feminists. I've never heard of any of these people.	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 08:25 PM
-3	No means no, Feminists. Many MRAs don't actually know what feminism is, as none have ever bothered to study feminism in any substantial way. In fact, I most often see vocal MRAs attacking what I would call a "straw feminist" of their own making using cherry picked quotes or people. I.e. Valerie Solanas represents all feminists without exception, or something they found on Tumblr is indicative of what every feminist ever thinks without exception. The truth is that feminism is incredibly varied and has many voices contri…	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 08:24 PM
0	No means no, Feminists. Lumping them all into one category is the same thing as saying that all MRA's are misogynists. It's lazy rhetoric. Especially considering that there are hundreds of different types of feminism alone.	/r/MensRights	26/07/14 08:16 PM