TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RedFlagsAreGood Archive

View 0 posts and 90 comments by RedFlagsAreGood on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Also, what's the difference between beta bucks and spending money for a woman that only wants to be around you because you're rich? The main difference is that there are no illusions about love. Also, they won't make you wait 3 dates for sex because they know you can send them away and get someone else. That they will go away afterwards, and keep quiet about it, is also important as most sugar daddies are married.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 07:41 PM
2

What's the running rate for these women? It's all over the map. There are college girls who just want some spending money and will be happy with 1000 or less. There are under-the-radar escorts who want a certain amount (250-500) per visit. There are divorced moms in their 40s who want to retire on your dime. There are former models who want 5 figures a month. There are also sub-5s who want the same thing.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/14 07:38 PM
12

They are useful in one sense: you can assume the real statistics are even worse.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 07:36 PM
18

Back in the late 80s I had a female roommate. There were 2 other guys as well in the apartment. We all tried to sleep with her at one time or other, but none of us had any game so it didn't happen. The next 2 male roommates did have game, however, and she slept with both.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 05:59 PM
21

Is anyone else wary of women who have male roommates?
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 05:35 PM
6

Wonder how many of the princesses guys are pledging half their future earnings to in Holy Matrimony have pro hookups in their past nowadays? I've seen girls I know on seekingarrangement. One of them has a boyfriend.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 03:39 PM
4

I've spent a bit of time on fetlife. This sort of thing is more common than anyone realizes, it's just not public yet.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 11:44 PM
1

I think I'm missing something here. If she wanted to do a "fifth chakra hug", wasn't she already attracted? More importantly, which art festivals have hot topless chicks?
/r/askTRP09/07/14 06:00 PM
1

I've had a chick ready to kiss me on the spot from just hugging her in the right way after I met her. Can you provide details on that?
/r/askTRP09/07/14 02:19 PM
9

For a woman above 30 dating online, just not being overweight puts her in the top 50% if not the top third (depending on location). Add high-value guys who don't know that they can date younger (because they pay attention to the requested age ranges listed in profiles) and there you have it.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 07:32 PM
1

She stated she hated it; it wasn't what she envisioned in her fantasy. I don't know if it was an errant text message or if he just was suspicious so he followed me or what, but one night as I was walking out on stage there stood my fiance at the bar. I didn't even see him at first but believe me he made eye contact with me. Key words bolded. She didn't quit until she got caught.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 05:42 PM
1

Giving up her sexuality for potentially hundreds of strange men ruined her life and her ex-fiance was right to cut ties. "Giving up her sexuality" could literally be true. Depending on the location and club, it's not uncommon for strippers to do extras.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 12:53 PM
1

They don't just do it because they need the money. A few months ago I was in a strip club talking to one of the dancers. She told me that she has a regular job, but used to strip before she got married and got back into after she divorced because she "missed the excitement".
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 12:47 PM
1

That makes sense.
/r/askTRP09/06/14 07:45 PM
1

Shouldn't the guy she cheated on her ex with be included in the number?
/r/askTRP09/06/14 07:43 PM
4

Next, the reason she won't see you is because she is committed to someone else at the moment. 100%. That plus the boyfriend/husband found out about the date.
/r/askTRP09/06/14 07:25 PM
5

Just look at any female online dating profile, and all you'll see are statements like "what I'm looking for" and "I need someone who is like this" or "you must be at least xyz height to pass go" - you'll never see anyone who has anything to offer or give. Actually, I see something to offer or give quite often....on scammer profiles.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 06:20 PM
1

The 'ultimate' provider is one who provides for nothing in return. A john gets a clearly delineated, explicitly agreed upon service in exchange for his resources. Agreed, and most sugar daddies wouldn't fall on this spectrum for the same reason, though in the case of a sugar daddy the agreement for service is more implicit than explicit.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 07:43 PM
2

There are exceptions to every rule, but keep in mind: The exceptions can be hard to accurately identify, because: Some AWALTs are good at pretending to be exceptions, at least for the near term, and you should care about this because: Marriage/LTR with an AWALT pretending to be an exception can be costly in more ways than one. Whether you believe the 50% divorce rate or think it's really more like 20%, consider that no one gets married thinking they have an AWALT, and that the odds of something …
/r/askTRP19/05/14 06:27 PM
3

Well, you said it baffled you, so I provided an explanation. Personally, I agree with you, and I'd go further to say that anyone who thinks freedom doesn't apply to things that are immoral understands neither freedom nor morality. But that's the way they think. It is what it is.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 11:39 PM
5

They expect free speech in order to voice their feminist views, but the second I try to voice any opinion that disagrees or opposes their views they call me a misogynist pig and browbeat me with insults rather then discuss the facts. This is really just an appropriation of the old conservative idea that freedom doesn't apply to immorality, so it's not a restriction of your freedom if they prevent you from doing something immoral. They just have a different view of what's moral.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 05:32 PM
1

It depends on the location and the club, but they do happen, even in some of the high-end clubs (they just cost more there). In the clubs where it doesn't happen, some strippers will agree to meet later when they're not working.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 06:32 PM
6

She told me she's a had a threesome with them before her and I started dating and that the male didn't touch her. That is her rationalization sales pitch. I can just imagine her thinking what would make it okay before retroactively hamstering that previous event. That plus some trickle truth.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:54 PM
4

in the US the stigma for having a stripper girlfriend is less than say in less progressive countries. This seems odd to me given how many strippers are willing to do extras.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:46 PM
6

Wait, this is actually true? I was assuming it was a gender reversal for didactic purposes.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:42 PM
-2

You'll have a better time here if you do more reading before making any more comments. The distinction I explained is actually pretty basic here and if you had spent more time reading the sidebar material I probably wouldn't have needed to explain it.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 08:20 PM
-1

The difference is that he would be OK with the woman taking him at his word and actually leaving. Generally, taking a shit test at face value means that you fail it.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 07:11 PM
5

I'm struggling to comprehend the steps in thinking required to come to this conclusion. Don't bother, there aren't any. Ok, there's one. The guy is always wrong. Seriously, though, people who use shaming tactics have no problem asserting things they have no way of knowing. It's almost as if they don't really care about the truth.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 05:36 PM
12

What you're saying is true, but you have to consider the Russian roulette analogy. Marriage could be something that enhances your life, or it could be something that makes your life hell before leaving you with considerably less of your stuff and an 18-year financial commitment to kids you may or may not be allowed to see. I know people on both sides of the gamble.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 08:15 PM
5

After being out last night, I'm beginning to understand the feminist rage: a thirty year old being engaged to a 50 year old has suddenly made it acceptable for 20 year olds to show interest in 40 year olds. If you're in your late 30s/early 40s, have a good career and are reasonably attractive, you're the exit strategy for carousel riders and it won't do to have you dating 20-year-olds. You're ruining their strategy!
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 08:30 PM
2

Assuming this isn't a troll post, you don't have to be an expert here to know that someone who cheats with you will also cheat on you.
/r/askTRP02/05/14 07:36 PM
1

Intelligent people tend to think for themselves and form their own ideas/opinions instead of just going along with the popular ones. No, in general they don't. Thinking for yourself is a skill that needs to be developed no matter how intelligent you are.
/r/askTRP01/05/14 06:00 AM
2

But if I walk away, does the punishment fit the crime? Is packing up and leaving an overreaction? One of the important RP lessons to learn is that there is no justice. This isn't about fairness; it's about doing what you need to do to be happy.
/r/askTRP29/04/14 01:23 PM
1

Maybe there should be a badge system where everyone who gets unplugged gets a "Dumbass" badge and then moderators hand out the other levels of badges as they see the knowledge. But then it'd be hard keeping up with 6K people in here and 48K in /r/TheRedPill[3] as to who should get what. It might be easiest to leave everyone at "Dumbass" until they have enough quality posts to earn "Endorsed Contributor" or have at least one delta'd post.
/r/askTRP25/04/14 03:04 PM
1

Provide one example of a secular, self-governing, unified thought-controlling tool as effective as religion. Progressivism.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 01:03 PM
1

I don't know, and I suspect most rank-and-file feminists don't either, given that they think feminism is only about gender equity, but the actual results of the policies they advocate would be a good starting point.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 08:39 PM
2

I cannot for the life of me, fathom feminism at a fundamental level. As far as I am aware their primary objective is to achieve gender equality, I agree with them within biological restraints. However the way feminists have tried to achieve this is nonsensical. Whenever a group continually advocates policies that fail to achieve their stated goals, you could conclude that they're crazy. Or you could conclude that their actual goals are not the same as their stated goals.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 07:49 PM
1

he is clearly still in love with her, but she only sees him as a really good friend You're worried about being cruel to someone who would string a guy along like that (assuming she's telling the truth about not sleeping with him any more)?
/r/askTRP24/04/14 02:45 PM
1

To be fair the one guy who told OP his wife was already fucking her boss was dismissed as a troll by OP.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 07:42 PM
18

I disagree. Judgybitch's commentary is valuable to those of us who are still learning how to see through the rationalizations.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 06:06 PM
1

There was a survey done on /r/OkCupid about dating preferences. The numbers came out almost identical to okcupid's stats. You'd think it would have been different given that redditors are more liberal than the general population.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 11:22 AM
1

In fact, many women are so delusional and narcissistic about their own worth that they believe, subconsciously or not, that they are too good for everyone. I'm guessing these would be the women who complain that there aren't any good men and about not getting laid in months.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 05:58 PM
7

Anyone who would call you a pedophile for dating 18-year-olds: doesn't really understand why pedophilia is wrong thinks they are more mature than an 18-year-old, which means that they don't understand what maturity is either
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 05:49 PM
2

It won't matter how coherent and logical you are. The fact that you reject feminism makes everything you have to say invalid according to them. You'd have better luck converting a fundamentalist Christian to atheism.
/r/askTRP16/04/14 05:31 PM
3

And the worst thing about doing that is it doesn't work. The hole is still there, but now you have your partner's shit to deal with.
/r/askTRP16/04/14 05:14 PM
0

I've met plenty of people in their 20s who listen to the same music I do (I'm 46).
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 02:51 PM
6

Did anyone else notice this honest question: A lot of women on this sub say they wouldn't date a guy who's been with a prostitute. Do you think that's any different? and completely hypocritical answer? I'm one of those women. It's a bit different, because it shows you viewed sex as transactional, broke the law, and potentially enabled sex trafficking or had sex with someone who wasn't completely consenting. I'm not an advocate of troll posts, but if someone were to go there claiming to be worrie…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/14 03:45 PM
1

And sometimes not even then.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 07:31 PM
5

And dead bedrooms where the wife makes an exception for the husband's birthday.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 08:51 PM
26

I'd like a feminist once and for all to define what "treating someone like an object" actually means. I think it's just powertalk. It's not meant to really mean anything, it's meant to get you to comply. Maybe feminists want to tell me how to behave while claiming that the reverse is patriarchal. Exactly.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 01:40 PM
1

That's solid advice. Thanks.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 12:06 AM
1

And there are good women out there, far and few and in between, like all good people are...but they're there, waiting to surround themselves with other good people. So where do we find these women and how do we distinguish them from women who are only on best behavior until the ring goes on?
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 03:18 PM
4

Here's a handy PoF translator: Thin: Skinny to average Athletic: A little overweight Average: Noticeably overweight A few extra pounds: A lot of extra pounds Big & Tall/BBW: Needs two airline seats
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 02:01 AM
1

The point is that people were told that macros did matter. Specifically, they were told that a high-carb/low-fat diet would help them lose weight. I was there when it happened. They were told "it's the fat that makes you fat."
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 06:52 PM
0

Remember, most American have no idea how to actually live a healthier lifestyle. There is so much information from so many "experts" out there that even someone who is trying to make a solid effort can get bogged down. What's more, much of the information is counterproductive. The "experts" are still pushing high-carb/low-fat diets. This is really another red pill situation in that it's the nutritional advice that people are given that caused them to get fat in the first place. Lack of activity …
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 03:14 PM
4

And single moms everywhere.
/r/askTRP28/02/14 07:12 PM
1

/u/bigb219 correctly describes it as a strategy for finding a unicorn. I would also describe it as a strategy for avoiding getting involved with women who are there for reasons other than genuine attraction and interest.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/14 09:36 PM
8

As well as Anti-Dump.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/14 07:02 PM
4

I'm reading the thread now. They seem to consistently miss the point when the fish analogy is used. That's why I recommended earlier using the luxury car salesman analogy instead.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 03:55 PM
1

Also, pay no attention to the female-male message distribution. Attractive women get plenty of messages, so they don't need to send any.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 02:16 PM
18

Don't concede her point just yet. She doesn't want to fuck your wisdom either.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 08:49 PM
1

There are certain "catch phrases" to look out for, especially in women nearing the wall or recently post-wall. When she says how she's looking for "a real man", or "I'm sick of guys who are playing games", or how she wants to find "the right man to settle down with", or "looking for someone to share my life with, etc etc.... So don't bother with PlentyOfFish, then?
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 02:08 PM
1

maybe if you checked out TRPW it could help narrow down and identify the women you seek? That's actually why I subscribed to RPW. I saw some of them post here and was impressed by their attitudes, honesty and general approach. If I met one of them IRL, I'd definitely consider a LTR (I'm only doing casual dating for now).
/r/askTRP21/01/14 04:45 PM
1

I've yet to find and identify a real man. TRP's target audience is men, so there won't be much help for you here. RPW is definitely where you want to go for help with that, and with the question you haven't asked: how do you get a quality man to stay with you when you find him? We don't believe here that dating is just a matter of finding the right person; there are behaviors that make us more attractive, and there are behaviors that do the opposite. Attraction makes a difference in how the rela…
/r/askTRP21/01/14 03:28 PM
4

I really think that once you find the right girl she won't hurt you like that, and that she will be just as loyal as you. One problem with that is that the wrong girl will pretend to be the right girl, and I guarantee you that every one of those guys that got cheated on thought they had the right girl. So what you've said isn't really helpful without useful advice on where to find and how to identify the right girl.
/r/askTRP21/01/14 02:22 PM
9

I especially liked this part, which should be required reading: It is your job to approach, your job to get the number, to make the call, to set up the date, and to lead her naturally and effortlessly into bed. The woman’s job is simply to show signs of interest and disinterest as well as to accept or reject your advances. However there is one part of the process that you can take a break from and leave entirely to the woman, a part that is strictly hers to lead. That part is the emotional conne…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/14 03:31 PM
1

From what I can tell, the graph you mention is just for first messages. There are other graphs that appear to be for message replies and overall messages received which show a distribution closer to what you would expect. So why does the graph you posted look so different? Attractive women who are getting attention from men they like don't send first messages because they don't need to. Those who aren't getting attention from men they like will find someone they think is in their league and send…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 03:39 PM
1

To be fair, her list of requirements isn't worth the paper it's not written on. A few months ago on the okcupid sub, there was one of those "why won't older men date women their own age" threads that happen every couple of months. The OP there posted a modest list of requirements. I fit all of the requirements, so I was that guy who said "we're out there". She posted a link to her profile and it turned out that I had already messaged her.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 10:13 PM
5

Walking away, or at least being willing to walk away, is part of how you deal with the problem. If you're willing to walk, that makes a difference in her behavior. If you're not willing to walk, that also makes a difference but in the opposite direction.
/r/askTRP27/12/13 03:04 PM
0

The problem is, you don't know if the person is ready to hear what you have to say. He could listen and learn, or you could end up in a pointless argument where he argues with what he thought you said, or he could post your PM publicly on the grounds that he thinks you're being a dick.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 05:10 PM
13

This analogy, while perfectly valid, is consistently misinterpreted by people who haven't taken the pill. They always focus on the fact that the fish doesn't want to be caught instead of the fact that the fish has no knowledge of what the fisherman is doing. A better analogy might be: don't ask a doctor how to sell luxury cars.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/13 04:52 PM
5

Exactly this. OP, If you're going to talk to feminists, or adherents of identity politics in general, you have to be very careful about what you say. If you say anything objectionable to them, they will ignore whatever else you had to say and focus on the objectionable bit and on whatever conclusions they drew as a result. Or better yet, just don't bother.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/13 04:43 PM
1

The red pill isnt some difficult thing to grasp Some time spent on /r/PurplePillDebate might change your mind about that.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/13 07:57 PM
3

One requirement of an effective debate is that each party understands the other's position. That definitely isn't the case on PPD. The blue pill side seems for the most part to have a very superficial understanding of TRP.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/13 04:50 PM
4

if the message was imparted through a different interlocutor they might be receptive to it I have seen red-pill precepts upvoted on other subs, but it only happens when the comment is from someone not known to be a red-piller and the commenter doesn't use any redpill terminology.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/13 07:25 PM
3

I think he may still be tearing it up.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/13 01:37 PM
19

Wouldn't you be pissed off if someone told you that in order to get rich, you have to take a $10 bill, burn it before you go to sleep, and in the morning the ashes under your pillow will have turned into $100? Minor nitpick: this probably isn't the best analogy because you'd have to be pretty stupid to try that more than once. This might be better: Wouldn't you be pissed off if you were overweight and you found out that the reason you were overweight was that you were following the advice everyo…
/r/TheRedPill22/11/13 03:31 PM
7

Some people here have a 0 tolerance policy for flakes I was one of those people even before I took the pill. If she doesn't offer an alternate day/time, it's an automatic next.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/13 09:10 PM
1

For the benefit of us newbies, do you have anything better?
/r/TheRedPill21/11/13 07:36 PM
146

If you keep giving terrible advice when you don't know jack shit, I might just make a new user flair: Continuous Blue Balls or something. Please do. It will help the newbies. It might also help with the problem of outsiders assuming the terrible advice is representative of TRP.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/13 02:54 PM
0

"red pill" = game and antifemimism I don't expect to change your mind about that, but I definitely don't see it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 04:07 PM
0

I haven't seen a lot of hand-wringing on TRP over the cause of the dysfunction. A lot more attention is paid to the fact that there is a dysfunction and what to do about it. In any case the two causes you mention don't necessarily contradict each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 01:18 PM
1

I still don't see how any of that makes the article compatible with TRP. The essential part of TRP is that the ways most men are taught to approach dating and relationships don't reliably work. Manson's article and book explicitly say that, so I would say both are definitely compatible. if you approach relationships with an adversarial attitude (which things like 'game' are), you're only going to find people with the same destructive attitudes TRP != game. Game is just one of several possible ap…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/13 02:37 PM
2

I really don't see how it's compatible with TRP at all. Getting a deeper understanding of what TRP is about will fix that. The essence of TRP as I see it is that the conventional paradigm of dating and relationships does not reliably produce in today's culture and society the kind of results its adherents want from it. That raises the question: what do we do about it? How can we in this culture and society get what we want? Game is an answer to this question but not the only answer. MGTOW is ano…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/13 12:28 PM
2

most of TRP does not recommend marriage at all as many are PUAs Minor nitpick: that's not the only reason marriage isn't recommended here. The main reason I've seen posted is that marriage is risky and doesn't provide enough benefit (to the man) to justify the risk.
/r/askTRP05/11/13 02:25 PM
0

A couple of posts so far have mentioned indoctrination, but I think the deeper issue is there's something about the indoctrination that changes the range of ideas the indoctrinee is able to comprehend. Over the years, I've gotten into a few arguments with people who seem to be incapable of accurately understanding what I've written, even though the majority of the other readers got the point I was trying to make. The common denominator? They were all adherents of feminism or some other form of i…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/13 01:34 AM
1

crude women hating betas who havent yet manned up and taken responsibility for their situation. They want to blame women for all their issues and project all kinds of nasty things onto them. I think that's at least partially because they have an incomplete understanding of responsibility. The only meaning they have for it is blame. To them, saying that they're responsible for their situation means it's their fault. What they're missing is that responsibility is response-ability: the ability to r…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/13 03:37 PM
1

Thanks for posting this thread. I found the sub today. The first few threads I read were filled with both sides talking past each other, and at least one side either unable or unwilling to understand the other. I was about to leave when I saw this post. From the comments here, it looks like people actually are learning from each other, so the sub is obviously not a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/13 06:57 PM
3

feminism irl exists 90% as an idea-cloud that hovers as bait to attract men willing to argue I've recently come to the conclusion that feminism (and identity politics in general) was created by The Powers That Be to give us something to fight about as part of the "Divide and Rule" strategy.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/13 01:25 PM
2

usually in order to press charges police will require physical evidence (but IANAL) I sat on the jury of a rape trial a few years ago. There was no DNA evidence partly because he wore a condom at her request. We ended up acquitting him on the rape count because there were some doubts about the lack of consent, but there was an additional count of carjacking that we found him guilty of. They were both in her car when he asked her to go get his beer from the side of the parking lot. He drove off i…
/r/askTRP10/10/13 03:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter