TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RedPillHorse Archive

View 1 posts and 31 comments by RedPillHorse on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

some random blog That random blog-post is well sourced throughout, I've provided sources for my claim, now show me studies which show that there is more muscle loss per calorie when you fast vs slight calorie deficit. That's all there is to it. Experienced bodybuilders bodybuilders aren't scientific research, and you're asking me to ask them? You gather the data and show me, the same that I did for you. You are delusional if you believe that water fasting is "an easy way out" because it's tremen…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/18 12:11 AM
2

https://idmprogram.com/fasting-and-muscle-mass-fasting-part-14/ Are you autistic? I'm telling you how it is, you don't lose muscle beyond normal diets when fasting. It's heavily researched. Being a med student has direct relevance over this topic because it's something that is taught. You're not taught about supplements and bodybuilding. There is no such thing as starvation mode. It doesn't exist. There is such a thing as adaptive thermogenesis, i.e. your body producing less heat and slowing dow…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/18 10:17 PM
2

Med student here, all of your cells contain protein, not just your muscles. People that do extended fasts tend to metabolize literally anything, including scar tissue. Read up autophagy. Though it sounds silly, what he says is true. Water fasting doesn't burn any more muscle than any other weightloss method, it fundamentally wouldn't make any sense for your body to discard its muscle during a time it needs it to gather food. I don't get why people argue otherwise since literally no one here has …
/r/TheRedPill12/04/18 03:32 PM
6

That has to do with genetics as well. Men are four times as likely to have autism and generally have a higher chance of genetic defects. It's largely due to women having a second backup X chromosome, or in other words, if a man's sex chromosome is damaged or mutated, that's it. It's not a pair so no second chances. Women's genome however is completely paired.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:33 PM
2

He's not saying that it is just, he's saying that it wouldn't happen.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 02:27 AM
1

The Democrats at this point are quite clearly just foreign agents doing whatever they can to destroy America. I don't disagree, but the same largely goes for republicans as well. Not to mention, I'm not from America, so while this methodology might be bad in your scenario, for me and my country it's very different.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 09:14 PM
19

This is ridiculous and shows your ineffectiveness at subverting and converting bluepill logic. Every red pill person was purple pill at some point, and the transition probably took years. There is no such thing as a straight jump from blue to red. To suggest banning purple pills is to suggest banning converts, which will choke the movement. An intelligent purple pill is a far more important asset than a retarded red pill.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/17 02:50 AM
10

What's with all the ugly-acceptance in this thread? So many anecdotes, "I know an ugly guy who did this and this, he gets laid all the time!" Have you seen dating statistics? Rule number one: be attractive Rule number two: don't be unattractive Those who try to deny the fact that these are the biggest individual factors are people in some sort of self delusion or denial. Sure there are people that manage without, but a whole is a sum of its parts, and physiological attractiveness is by far the b…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/16 11:14 AM
6

You have the exact same janky grammar as /u/bluedrygrass, I'm like 80% sure you're the same person shilling yourself on an alt account.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 01:12 PM
6

It wasn't that women make up 39% of infidelity, it was that 39% of all women cheat. Men can cheat in any amount completely unrelated to this one.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 01:11 PM
1

It has neurotoxic properties, but it's more of an "all over" toxin. One of very few that tax almost everything.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/16 10:33 AM
24

Well, it's sort of revolting to wake up and realize that society grooms up to be absolute needy failures when it comes to courting women. It's not even that society is deliberately lying. The qualities that women list as being positive qualities are all positive qualities for friends. It's just that the part of the brain that picks friends, and the part of the brain that picks mates is separate, and most women in addition to some men, believe that their brains only have the friendship part and t…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/16 08:12 AM
2

That's still very well navigated, and won't impact his living standards at all.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/16 02:24 PM
1

I was just making fun of her attractiveness and in no way trying to detract from her entrepreneurship.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/16 02:54 PM
1

You're close, but semantically I'd call it faith vs understanding. Religious individuals believe what they think reality is, rationalist individuals understand based on observation. Belief in absence of understanding is faith.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/16 07:58 AM
1

There are no good or bad carbs. This is wrong in the sense that you are far more likely to develop diabetes when eating candy than you are when eating slow releasing starches like potatoes et cetera. So there are good carbs as far as the 'beetus is concerned.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/16 07:15 PM
5

Some BS about albumin in urine. It didn't really mean anything from a research standpoint, since testicle injection doesn't really relate much to urine, but they shut down the research anyways. The research of Vasalgel was a result of the research ban being overturned, if I understand it correctly.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 10:11 PM
9

This is a woman?
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 08:35 PM
1

Summary: There is a new kind of divorce that has been emerging over the last few years: the Nuclear Divorce. Two recent victims of Nuclear Divorces are Silicon Valley venture capitalists Joe Lonsdale and Michael Goguen. The Nuclear Divorce is becoming an established pattern, following a predictable path. Don't put bait into your post. The summary is supposed to summarize the entire post, not just the premise, but the conclusion as well. This is supposed to be informative.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/16 09:45 AM
0

I mean it in the sense that if I am in a relationship with a woman, then there wouldn't not be sex on the day we meet unless there is something actively preventing it, being around people the whole time etc. When I am speaking of my relation ship, I'm speaking of it in the sense that only relationship affected days apply. So days spent camping or something don't apply. So to make my point more fully, in the big picture, there are no days where I spend time in privacy with an SO and don't have se…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/16 05:33 PM
0

I have never been in a relationship where I haven't had sex less one once per day on average, and it befuddles me how someone can. You're doing something wrong. Do you initiate sex through some formal line of discussion or something? To say something besides belittling you, don't actively seek to cheat on her, but act on the mindset that you're single. Hit one other women, and if you manage to get one to have sex with you, then do it. Just visualize yourself as being single and see how it goes f…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/16 02:25 PM
4

I find that this inadequately explains what I hoped it would. When you said hell, and I think you sort of meant it this way, it means that people aren't capable of wishing their problems away, only delaying them. You cannot wish hunger away, when you need to lose that fat it will come back for you. You can't wish poverty away, when the system comes to get its money back, it will come for you. You can't wish education away, when you eventually fail, all of that time you spend doing something othe…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/16 02:17 PM
1

Well, for one, forced marriages aren't that bad if the two people are about the same age. It's been done for centuries, and people didn't really have any problems with it until they discovered that there were alternatives. Plus, they are often just as forced on men as they are on women. Enslavement, stonings and public beatings are pretty much split down the middle. Wearing burqas being some crazy injustice is really just a figment of the west. There are a huge amount of associations with forced…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 04:10 AM
4

Where do burritos come into this?
/r/TheRedPill11/03/16 06:32 PM
2

There was birth control, but it wasn't real birth control. Not like the pill that became widespread in the 60s. No one would actively choose you use those methods. My point was that birth control wasn't something the layman relied on until the 60s. Sex meant getting pregnant, getting pregnant meant getting married or being a single mother, which was terrible. Therefore women put a lot more thought into what men to have sex with.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/16 08:31 AM
10

There was no birth control, which was like 90% of why people took abstinence seriously.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/16 05:43 AM
1

Blue pill Jerry I feel that Blue Pill Bill or Blue Pill Pete would have been a better name.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/16 09:00 AM
5

Yeah, too much space and furniture. Hate those.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 08:46 AM
5

Except if you're middle eastern royalty. Then you get to walk over anyone. It's rather that you can't increase the power given to you through inheritance without taking it.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 08:45 AM
17

Now, what I predict is that once the biggest wave of automation hits us, income disparity will soar. Who's going to be earning the most money? Nerds by a long shot. No, the wealthy people are going to still be the wealthy people, because regardless of the few pioneering nerds that get a cut, the majority will go to Wallmart etc. by automating the low skilled jobs. Industrial complexes like shipping, constructing, base line production like oil drilling, will all replace the low skilled jobs with …
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 08:43 PM
6

But merit can rule as a factor. Of course there is absolute nepotism and absolute merit in some facets, although rare. But functionally speaking nepotism is in a state of uncertainty and merit is in a state of certainty, so functionally, if you can't put nepotism under control by viewing it under merits, i.e working towards networking, then you have to ignore it, and deviate the realistic mindset of merit + nepotism into the stoic mindset of only merits.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/16 04:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter