TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RedSkiesatDawn Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by RedSkiesatDawn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Or older men date younger women because they have had more time to acquire resources and work their way up. Women tend to be more okay dating older men who have higher social or economic standing than men are.
/r/MGTOW15/02/15 08:30 AM
1

It's a trap. If it's banned it proves 'patriarchy'. If it's not banned it shows that women are standing up for themselves and seeing how patriarchy affects them. Either way it's a stupid poll for publicity and click bate that doesn't mean anything.
/r/MGTOW14/11/14 12:33 AM
1

33 year old male, that'd put his parents in the mid-late baby boomer generation. They'd likely have traditional views of masculinity, or at least he'd have been exposed to still very traditional masculine views of the 80's and 90's. Growing up in a culture that defines men heavily by their relationships with women, (had sex, dating, married), and then falling short of the norm and being so publicly creep shamed in high school. I'm not surprised he feels awful. He'd basically be considered a 'man…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:15 PM
8

Shaming language. MRAs get enough of that from radfems and the media. Improving himself could not have any physical change in his appearance. As a person who considers himself in the MGTOW community I think the best thing MRAs can do to distance themselves from TRP, MGTOW, and PUA communities is cut the shaming of men and women and focus on the systemic and social issues faced by men. All this judging on appearance just makes MRAs look petty.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:48 PM
1

Correct
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:05 PM
2

It was figurative.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 03:46 PM
2

If it hurts that bad, it makes the pill easier to swallow.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 04:54 PM
3

Don't objectify robots sexbots shitlord. They're more than their synthetic vaginas.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 08:39 PM
3

I'd be curious as to how many father's have/will lose all access to their children from this.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:56 AM
3

Best answer I've seen. Hope OP understands cause this really covered it.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 10:05 AM
3

Cheers. Thanks for taking the time.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 09:34 AM
1

Posting extremely radical views, that the vast majority of this sub disagrees with.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 09:31 AM
2

Clearly troll.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 09:27 AM
3

Mmm troll. 4/10.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 09:20 AM
5

No point in furthering a discussion if for every 12 line point you make they feel two lines is enough to refute. Just sort of a rule of thumb that you're being attacked not having a discussion.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 08:16 PM
2

Direct passive aggression... The least subtle of all aggression in both name and act. /s
/r/MensRights27/12/13 11:40 AM
1

I don't think its reading that much into it. Why post that at all. The article says nothing about him being afraid of heights. Its there for no other purpose than to make it appear as though its related to the story and results in the reader connecting that final message with the subject of the story, the man who almost fell.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 11:05 PM
6

I highly doubt it would have been considered just a joke if the genders were reversed. Edit: additionally the article implies the man was afraid off heights and blames him for sitting that high up.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 06:59 AM
3

Probably because feminism has a longer history. The layman will think of the more egalitarian parts of feminist history. Whereas masculism is a fairly new idea that isn't mainstream nor distinct from other more sexist appearing groups like TRP.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 07:21 AM
3

That was an overly intimate hug for a teacher and a student. Perhaps his lips brushed her by accident as he turned his head but that's not an okay to hug someone you're not intimate with. A side hug, as he first did, or a frontal hug would be acceptable but the additional wrap and head tuck crosses boundaries, and should know better being 17. That said the punishment was too harsh, a week or so two with community service or temporary suspension from sports would have been more reasonable.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 11:42 PM
0

After reading through the comments it sounds similar to particle-wave duality theory. I imagine it would be similar to basing a language off of quantum logic. I can't imagine a programming language like this would be very popular as I think it wouldn't be discrete and it would take an immense amount of effort to think about functions outside of classical logic. Although if things weren't discrete then tolerable error ranges would be greater and as a consequence programs would run faster.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 09:07 AM
8

I apologize for the cheap and tasteless joke: Switch cases won't work, all loops are infinite and all if else statements return the same thing. In seriousness, although my programming skills aren't very advanced so my knowledge of how object oriented programming plays a role in coding is limited, I think it would be interesting to see if anything could come of applying nonconventional ideas to programming language. Although the pairing of a socio-political ideology with programming was a bit fun…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 08:44 AM
-1

I remember the feeling as although the first part had some merit. But it was completely over shadowed by the blatant misogyny and terrible stereotypes in parts 2 & 3.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 07:07 AM
1

Catering and discrimination aren't the same. Hooters and strip clubs cater to men but that's not discriminating. Its exploiting a gender preference, or even you could say a stereotypical preference in men. Targeting your business to draw in a specific clientele isn't discrimination.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 09:10 PM
-1

Should all domestic violence shelters house both men and women together? Should all religious institutions be forced to perform marriages against their belief structure? Should all men's bathrooms have urinals removed? Should we have unisex bathrooms with many stalls instead? What about private gender specific schools? Companies and public institutions already discriminate for various reasons. I think this is very removed from men's rights and would only make the movement seem petty especially s…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 11:15 AM
-1

If we want men's only places then making arguments targeting gender exclusive businesses is just hypocritical. Better to let them pop-up and then use them as precedent to defend our own institutions. Its far better to be silent now and let feminists be the aggressors in this debate.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:56 AM
2

I'm curious about the discrepancies in sentencing between this case and the other recent post: Women can't rape. That's a man's job (on phone can't link) where the woman was sentenced to just under 4 years. Is it a because NZ is much more lenient or is it because this woman is a teacher?
/r/MensRights11/12/13 09:15 AM
0

Don't really see this as being a men's rights issue, its a private company.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 09:07 AM
1

Tests are being conducted on his cause of death.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:53 AM
1

There's an argument that I've seen thrown around recently that basically states that simply being a decent human being makes you complicit with rape culture. You have to actively shame people who act in a way that supports rape culture, otherwise you're supporting rape culture. It stems from the argument that being a morally neutral person (in this case not being sexist but not supporting the oppressed) doesn't make you a good person. The extension from this (through logical fallacy) is that bec…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 11:44 PM
2

The video cites a study conducted by the US Department of Justice that states there's been a 58% drop in sexual assault or rapes of women age 12 and older while over the same period there's been a 35% increase in reporting. Link: http://journalistsresource.org/studies/government/criminal-justice/female-victims-sexual-violence-1994-2010#
/r/MensRights25/11/13 09:40 PM
1

I feel like that wouldn't give an accurate representation. I suspect some allegations are ignored, some convictions are from false claims, not all true allegations result in convictions, multiple allegations for an offender etc.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 08:26 PM
-2

At around four minutes you seemed to imply that the increase in rape claims stemmed from an increase in false allegations, but I didn't see anything in your second link to suggest this was the case. I'd suspect, mind you I'm no authority on the subject, that the rise in allegations may be more due in part to women actually reporting rapes as opposed to making them up.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 07:43 PM
4

This article is blatantly sexist, and derides the character of men and women. Its intro and the subject is about as close as you can get to saying that men are sexual predators that would gladly abuse those with mental health problems just to get laid. Even if it has no association with MRA it makes all men look bad and we should be outraged on principle. If we're angry over women attacking men, we shouldn't allow ourselves to be trashed by men either. Edit: looked at article again and it blatan…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 10:34 PM
1

You feel obligated but you don't legally owe him access unless a court says otherwise. If he were to go to your place and demand to see your child you could have him forcefully removed from the premises and possibly place charges, they may or may not stick but he would atleast be arrested. But the point is these are all decisions you'd have the right to make as the mother, whereas his decisions don't have any legal backing. Perhaps a mans right to opt out doesn't fit perfectly with your situatio…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 06:45 PM
1

Consenting to sex should not necessarily mean consenting to fatherhood at the 'mercy' of the woman. If women didn't have the option to abort I would certainly agree with you. Limiting yourself is a choice you make on your own. A person should not be legally bound by the decisions of another person without consent. Women won the right to decide whether or not they follow through with a pregnancy. Shouldn't men also have that right? When you consent to sex you essentially sign a contract saying th…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 06:04 PM
2

This is basically the model for what people should do. Good for both of you!
/r/MensRights20/11/13 11:15 AM
3

Essentially attacking her character, despite the fact that she's doing everything by the book, hurts how people view men's rights and men's rights activists. She's made her intentions clear and he understands. While ideally the man shouldn't be held to her decisions they both understand the risks involved and accept them. By insulting her you also insult the man who is her partner.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 11:05 AM
1

Your decision to not abort is your own. He has no right to decide that you should the child. He may make it known to you that he thinks you should get an abortion, but its still your body and your decision. Because it is your decision however you cannot force him to take responsibility for the child just because you would ultimately choose to have the child. He should ideally be able to opt out. You have choices to opt out of the pregnancy, regardless of how you see them morally or ethically. He…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 10:52 AM
1

Women do not opt in by default? Sure they have choices about whether or not to proceed with the birth after consummation, but they still must take action if they decide they do not want the child. They can opt out through adoption or abortion but the ultimate decision falls on the woman and if she doesn't make a decision then she will have a child. By default a woman opts in. Therefore the man should also by default opt in. I agree the man should have the right to opt out in a timely manner afte…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 10:22 AM
1

You automatically opt in when you consent to intercourse. You accept any unintended consequences, pregnancy or STDs, and the failure rates of any protection you use. In an unintended pregnancy the woman doesn't get to choose to 'opt in'. If she does nothing by default she will have a child and be responsible for its welfare. Therefore by default the man should also be responsible. The burden of parenthood is an unintended consequence of the act and we accept those consequences when we proceed. T…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 01:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter