TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Red_Canuck Archive

View 0 posts and 113 comments by Red_Canuck on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You're going to have trouble finding numbers on this. Iran doesn't exactly disclose how much it sends to terrorist organisations. Regardless, Israel has used the foreign aid money for defense and improvements. Hamas has used foreign aid money to build tunnels to attack Israel. When Israel withdrew from Gaza, Hamas actually destroyed infrastructure which would have been a huge boost to their economy.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:19 AM
1

As opposed to the Palestinians who haven't received any foreign aid?
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:33 PM
1

You should read Mark Twain's account of his time here. Also, if you look at the UN partition plan, Jews got the shitty part, not the nice part.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 08:12 AM
1

I live here. I have Arab friends. I have never been to a single place in this country where I was allowed and they weren't. I have had the reverse happen (look up what rights Jews have to visit the Temple Mount vs. Muslims). Please, go ahead, I'll even accept anecdotal evidence.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 10:06 PM
1

a zionist fucking pig? Absolutely no antisemitism here people. Don't worry, this is a well thought out, civil disagreement with a government, the religion of the people of course has nothing to do with it. I'm sure that if the topic were Russians you would be saying the same thing, or Syrians, or Iranians, or Iraqis (hell, any Arab country actually). It's just a funny coincidence that Israel is always brought up.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 10:04 PM
1

What street is there in Israel where only Jews can walk down? And by imprisoning and gunning down children I assume you are talking about the kids who try (and oftentimes succeed) in stabbing people?
/r/MensRights22/07/16 10:01 PM
0

I can't wait for this wave of atheistic assholes to die off. There is historical (archaeological) evidence of Jews living here. We have always lived here, even after being driven out we remembered and we always came back. Where do you live? What's your ancestry? All this holier than thou can really go get fucked.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 08:53 PM
–

If Israel wanted to purge gaza of palestinians they would do it, it wouldn't take a day. Israel gave Gaza to the Palestinians, and part of the thought behind that was that if we were being attacked from Gaza we would finally have some international support for it. Instead they fire rockets at us and we're treated like the bad guys. If Hamas would put some of their fucking money into improving their infrastructure or establishing relationships with their neighbours (of which Israel is ONE of, no …
/r/MensRights22/07/16 08:49 PM
–

Arab Israelis have exactly the same rights as Jewish Israelis. True, they aren't drafted, but they can still volunteer. They also serve in the parliament. Nothing else you have said is true, where have you heard this?
/r/MensRights22/07/16 08:46 PM
1

I don't know what you were led to believe, and I will agree that Israel does things that definitely don't contribute to peace. The biggest point for me though, is that the Arab nations surrounding Israel (including the Palestinians) are completely transparent that they want to destroy Israel. The Israeli government is not trying to exterminate anyone (some people say they're trying to exterminate the Palestinians, but the Palestinian population has grown since the foundation of Israel, so it's p…
/r/MensRights22/07/16 03:19 PM
1

The thing was that since the bar kokbah rebellion Jews haven't had a place where they are welcome. They've been kicked out of or banned from pretty much every country. This came to a head during the Holocaust, look up the Voyage of the Damned. I don't blame them for being angry, I blame them for killing people (look at the terrorists in the current knife intifada, they tend to be relatively well off). Also, it's not like there haven't been opportunities for a two state solution, going all the wa…
/r/MensRights22/07/16 03:13 PM
–

Look at the history of the land. Jews didn't randomly pick Israel.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 03:07 PM
–

So Jews are fine as long as they know their place? If they think they should have their own land they 'can suck a cock'? Zionist is the word that antisemites use when they want to hate Jews but don't want to be called on it. Here you can see them not even trying to hide that it's literally find and replace with Zionist for Jew. Christians, Shinto's, and Zionists. Oh but wait, it's just criticising Israelis, the fact that they're Jewish has nothing to do with it, right? If it wasn't a race thing …
/r/MensRights22/07/16 08:54 AM
–

I would argue that the latest Start Trek movies have been geared towards Star Wars fans. Plenty of people went to see them.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 09:11 AM
–

So?
/r/MensRights19/06/16 05:10 AM
–

Not cool.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 03:11 PM
1

Any examples of this? To be clear, the example must be a case of unprovoked aggression against a Palestinian that was not charged or was excused under this 'law'.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:28 PM
–

This article is from 2011.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:26 PM
–

In that case this sounds pretty cut and dried. Be that as it may, I still prefer that rape refer to nonconcensual sex, but that's just me being a language presciptionist and neither here nor there
/r/MensRights29/02/16 09:35 PM
–

I'm not sure if I'd call that rape either. It's horrific, but if we define rape as nonconcensual sex than this hardly fits the bill.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 09:30 PM
1

This headline is ridiculous. All of their mothers have children. That's why they're MOTHERS.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 11:56 PM
14

Sure you can, 'f' 'e' 'm' 'i' 'n' 'i' 'double standard' 's' 't'. Holy shit, you're right!
/r/MensRights27/10/15 02:48 PM
0

As far as I can tell, she had public, drunken sex. This obviously wasn't a prudent choice, but to label her a 'bitch' over it seems very harsh. If the boyfriend hadn't passed out would you still label her this way? I reject the idea she's a rapist as well, because that would require a victim. Her boyfriend has made it clear that not only did he consent, but that she interpreted his consent correctly.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:55 PM
0

He says he consented. I disagree with the notion that drunk consent is not consent, I think it makes the line blurry, but in this case there is no confusion. I also do not believe that being unconscious automatically voids all consent, again it would make the line blurry. But take his word for it, he consented, she did nothing to him he found objectionable. Don't try to make this guy into a victim against his express wishes.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:11 PM
–

Why is she a bitch? That's ridiculous, let's not demonize sex between two consenting (yes, he consented) adults. Having sex with someone who is that drunk is absolutely a grey area, but that doesn't make it automatically rape.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 05:37 PM
0

Israel
/r/MensRights14/09/15 11:50 AM
–

Regarding Trump, first of all I don't think the president has that kind of power to make sweeping changes. Second of all, I think he would just see men being screwed over as "losers".
/r/MensRights10/08/15 03:44 PM
1

I'm not saying their pay or jobs are worse, I don't want to make this a case of who has the worst deal. I personally believe that parental leave should absolutely be mandatory nationally (and in my country it is). As long as they are capable of doing the job, there is no reason to say they can't do it. Arguing against a reasonable (in my opinion still too short) maternity leave should not be what the men's rights movement is about, instead we should be taking this opportunity to argue for an equ…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:56 PM
–

I don't want to make this ad hominem, but have you ever met a female soldier? These are people working pretty crap jobs for pretty crap pay (they could usually make more on the open market) and you're dismissing all of them because they're female. You're saying that simply because they can get pregnant they are incapable of being a soldier.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:42 PM
–

Are pregnant women eligible for combat jobs? No one is saying pregnant women should be in combat, instead the argument is that women in the military should be entitled to a reasonable maternity leave.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:39 PM
-8

You and I have very different ideas of what a soldiers job is. I believe it is about fulfilling your duties as given to you. True, a pregnant woman faces difficulties that would make her unsuitable for combat, however she would be fine in a JAG unit.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:17 PM
–

I don't think it's a problem either. That being said, if a woman wants to serve her country why put up barriers for her? Ignoring the biological differences between men and women is not the right path to take.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:14 PM
–

That's not what he said though. He said "soldiers having babies is one of the dumbest ideas ever". I admit, I used a reductio ad absurdum argument but that's not the same as a straw man.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:08 PM
–

Listen, you're saying soldiers shouldn't have kids. I assume you're not naive enough to suggest they all become celibate. What sort of solution are you offering?
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:03 PM
–

Why do you say that? Are you saying that all soldiers should be (maybe temporarily) sterilised? edit: the fact that this comment which is attempting to continue/start a conversation is downvoted while the response "facepalm" is upvoted, is quite frankly ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:18 PM
–

You're kidding, right? You want to get rid of maternity leave entirely? Are you aware of what childbirth entails? Instead of trying to lower entitlements for women to the level of men, we should be trying to raise men to the level of women. (And what the hell do you mean by previously planned? Pregnancy is a nine month process.)
/r/MensRights17/05/15 04:54 PM
–

Yes, I agree. I was pointing to your example for the rule of thumb.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:22 PM
–

Yes, I agree. I was pointing to your example for the rule of thumb.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:21 PM
–

Its time has come
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:26 PM
–

That rule of thumb fails nicely here. Both it's time and its time are correct (different meanings though)
/r/MensRights10/01/15 02:46 PM
–

I always found that a girl heavy mix is best. Girls try to live up to the stereotypes when there's a guy there. Single gendered always gave me the most problems.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 09:19 AM
2

In practice, most women do the military. It's also pretty easy to get out of if you're a guy.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 12:03 PM
–

What do you mean the women are let off? As far as I'm aware, most women in Israel serve in the military.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 11:45 AM
–

Anti Semite means Jew hater, in the same way homophobe is someone who hates homosexuals. It may not be literally accurate, but it is the accepted phrase.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 12:13 PM
6

Instead of complaining about this article (which among all of its other sins, was also lacking humour), why doesn't men's rights write our own article to submit to cracked?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:18 PM
–

There are many men I know who don't like sleeping with virgins. And more experience tends to correlate with better in bed. As far as number of sex partners correlates to value, it's not a simple formula.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 04:52 AM
1

A brick in water is harder than a person in terms of absolute mass. I have taken the course a couple of times when I weighed 80+ and when I was under 65.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:12 AM
–

Have you taken this course? I have and I did not find the equal weight test easier to pass. It's a brick, so it is helped significantly less by being in the water.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:28 AM
–

Every person in the test has to be able to rescue someone of their own size. That's it, that's all.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:08 AM
–

Alright, let's go with your example. To parallel this case they've all been tested on their hair cutting skills already on a mannequin. That part of the test was identical. This test is now about something else, say how well they can manoeuvre around the client. That's more accurate, and I don't see a lot of discrimination there.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:06 AM
–

Should is not the same as won't, and passing that gives confidence in dealing with a person the same size or smaller (most kids will be smaller, and they're a large segment of rescues). And the women also had to do this. The standard for this is to perform a Pia carry (or a carry of equivalent efficacy) with the subjects shoulders out of the water. That's it, no mention of weight, because that's tested somewhere else. Are you going to be willing to change your mind over this if presented with ev…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:59 AM
–

Here's basically how they do this particular portion of the test. The instructor pairs everyone off with the person closest in size to them. That's not sex discrimination. Is it always equal? No. Which is why the commission ruled he could be retested, but to think this is discrimination against men is taking the persecution complex a bit far.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:50 AM
–

Assuming the women passed the test they did see if they could do the job. Yes the tests weren't identical, but that's like complaining that you failed your road test because you had to drive standard while someone else could drive automatic. They test you on what you bring in with the materials they have. Certain skills are hit regardless. In the NLS test, that includes a minimum weight you must be able to carry and perform skills with.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:37 AM
–

I'm not saying part of the evaluation isn't needed, I'm saying part of the evaluation is measuring something apart from how much weight you can carry.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:33 AM
–

There is no assertion in this article that the female candidates couldn't meet the standards. The commission did agree that the guy had a point about it being unfair to him and said that he was required to be allowed to try again, this time with someone nearer his size (that being said, 15kg difference should not be too much if he's reasonably competent).
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:18 PM
–

They have a standard weight. That's a different part of the test. The part that he failed is about performing the actions on someone the same size as yourself. Furthermore, in real life on the job this should never happen. Standard procedure is multi guard rescues, and if there's only one guard on then a while different system is used. I've linked to the standards in a different part of this thread, but I'm on my phone now so I can't relink them here.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:13 PM
1

Canada uses a national certification. There are other certifications also but as far as I know those are only used for private pools and they aren't as good.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:30 PM
–

No problem. It has been a few years since I got certified and mine has since lapsed but it's one of the better standards out there. (This is what I gather from various conversations at a number of guard comps)
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:18 PM
–

As someone who has gone through this program I can say that from the facts mentioned in this article there was no discrimination. People are paired off with others in the class of the same size. There is also a component where everyone has to carry a certain weight, and that weight is standard. This guy was given reasonable accommodations in that he would have been allowed to redo the test with someone closer to his size but he refused.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:09 PM
–

This is in Canada so it would be under the NLS (National Lifeguarding Service) by the Lifesaving Society. Here's a link to the standards.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:05 PM
-2

How is this relevant?
/r/MensRights13/12/13 11:50 PM
2

I believe that the only statistics they should consider are ones that can be controlled. You can control how safe you drive and you can control where you live.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 05:41 AM
1

You shouldn't be able to do it for either health or car insurance. Health insurance is more important however as you don't need to have a car but you need your health.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 05:31 AM
1

I'm not saying that's the way it is, I'm saying that's the way it should be.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 05:30 AM
0

I disagree with this article. People should not be charged different premiums based upon factors they cannot control, in other words being born male or female should not change what insurance costs. That is different from charging more for someone who gets into lots of car accidents.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 05:21 AM
3

That's true, prescription drugs generally aren't covered. Unless of course you happen to be poor, in which case they're covered under pharmacare.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:26 PM
4

It's a tabloid.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 07:02 AM
1

The problem is it's usually not as cut and dried as that. Maybe the procedure has a chance of leaving the person disabled, and they might get better without it. Maybe the procedure probably won't work and is very painful. Maybe the procedure would only extend life for a short while while substantially decreasing the quality of life. Those are all very real possible complications which demonstrate the fallacy of any "one size fits all" type of argument.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:34 AM
0

It really is a complex question. I did a course in medical ethics where we discussed this in great depth. My personal stance on this issue is very libertarian, but there are defensible positions all across the spectrum.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:35 AM
0

I am still against intervention against the patients wishes. But I don't recognise the parents right to refuse medical procedures for their child. If the parent wants to refuse life saving treatment for themselves, they can go for it.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:23 AM
17

You shouldn't be able to force medical procedures on anyone, regardless of the circumstances. Court order or not, this is basically torture.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 11:42 PM
15

Canada is definitely doing better than the states, but just because many businesses are hiring does not mean there aren't a ton of applicants for each position. I'm not saying it's impossible to get a job, but it's not easy. Although that might change based upon province.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 06:20 AM
6

I wouldn't say employers are begging people to work. It can be very difficult to find jobs.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 05:59 AM
5

The effect was such that so-called pro-life Katholyc dems like Bart Stupak played – once again! – the decisive role in inflicting this disaster upon the unwilling people of the United States. I assume that the word is bold is meant to be Catholic, and I assume the misspelling is deliberate.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 03:21 AM
15

This article is ridiculous. Coming from someone who lives in a country with single payer health insurance, all this fear mongering is absolutely insane. And socialism? Does the author actually think that the US is a socialist nation now? That speaks to a profound misunderstanding of any number of issues. Also, the misspelling of Democrat and Catholic is juvenile. As a movement lets please not be associated with such infantile tactics.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:30 AM
2

This is the daily mail. It's not exactly a reliable paper. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Daily_Mail#Best_of_the_Daily_Fail
/r/MensRights02/11/13 08:27 AM
25

This is a Men's Rights issue because of the way the police reacted to the man. The gender of the 911 caller has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 07:14 PM
18

That's hardly fair at all. From this article we do not know the contents of the 911 call. The only information we have is that they "did not believe Ferrell had threatened the woman who had placed the 911 call". If I saw someone big and covered in blood (I'm speculating here, but considering what they say about the accident, injuries seem likely), I would also call 911 before letting them into my house. If they're injured, they need it anyway, and how do I know what caused the injury? Maybe they…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 07:12 PM
3

What do you mean that the majority of federal inmates are in for victimless crimes?
/r/MensRights31/07/13 07:52 PM
3

Can we get a mirror?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:19 PM
9

Be careful, this is the Daily Mail (Daily Fail). It's not really a bastion of journalistic integrity.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 06:39 PM
1

It is. This article mentions (although does not link to) a study done that says holding children back is not productive.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:13 AM
1

There is the school of thought that holding a child back to repeat a year does not end up helping them. They are more likely to 'catch up' or at least come close if they are in a class filled with people their age as opposed to those a year or two younger. Keep in mind the huge differences that exist between a 7 and a 9 year old.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:23 PM
1

Is this satire? I mean, they lead off with a morbidly obese stick woman, it must be, right?
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:36 PM
5

Did that happen? Link?
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:32 PM
1

The locker room of an NHL team is not collective male property. It is the property of the NHL team in question. The NHL chooses to allow reporters into the locker room. The gender of the reporter doesn't enter into the argument at all. Often times this sub will ask what will happen if you replace "men" with "blacks", as a way to determine whether something is actually sexist. In this case, I would ask you to do the same with women. Would it be reasonable to tell a black reporter that he has give…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 07:23 PM
1

That doesn't follow at all. I don't see where the logic in your statement is supposed to come from.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 05:26 PM
1

We have to agree to disagree there.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 10:33 PM
1

I think you misconstrued my comment. When I said Cherry was wrong about enforcers and visors that's two separate issues. His stance on enforcers is wrong, and his comments on visors are moronic.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 08:34 PM
0

I was always a lacrosse player.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 07:36 PM
0

As someone who thinks that concussions are a bad thing, easily preventable eye injuries are a bad thing, and that grown men can restrain their impulse to injure each other and fight in hockey as well as they can in every other major sports league, his stance is wrong.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 07:15 PM
0

Cherry is almost always right on matters of hockey fact, he is wrong on other things all the time. Look at his stance on enforcers and visors for example.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 07:00 PM
4

Male reporters are allowed in female locker rooms. There was another article on this topic where a link to an article stating this was the case in NCAA contests. I can't remember what thread it was, it might have been in /r/hockey or in /r/canada.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 06:58 PM
-5

Cherry is an idiot about most things, and this is no exception. Part of the job of being a sports reporter is going into the locker room after a game. Players are given a certain amount of time to shower and change in (relative) privacy, after which the room is fair game. I don't see why the gender of the reporter should matter at all. I believe this was in response to the Keith incident, and the real problem there was that the reporter was a bit of an idiot, and Keith called her out on it. Noth…
/r/MensRights28/04/13 04:08 PM
4

Hell, even men in video games. Nigh everyone in video games is a stereotype.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 07:25 AM
-1

Downvoted because it's the f*cking sun.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:19 PM
14

I could be wrong, but isn't he usually wearing prison garb?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 08:31 PM
3

I've always thought that was a horrible simile. A fish clearly needs a bicycle, how else will they get around on land? Obviously it needs to be a modified bicycle, and maybe it will be modified so much as to need a different name, but fish who wish to travel on land really needs some sort of mechanical conveyance.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 08:19 PM
3

Also because Judaism is a religion that anyone can convert to, regardless of race.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:30 AM
7

I don't think we need to change it to see how crazy it is. Also, many Jews are white.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:42 AM
5

You should meet my mother. Lovely lady, hyphenated last name.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:11 PM
2

In that case I don't see how Kellogg's quote has any bearing on the discussion.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 12:26 PM
4

Keep in mind, Kellogg also thought that plain food would prevent masturbation, and he didn't invent the concept of circumcision. Saying that his quote gives little room to misunderstand the real reason behind the practice is akin to saying that because James Bond took cold showers to invigorate himself, the purpose behind such showers is invigoration. (Clearly the purpose behind a cold shower is to get clean).
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:19 AM
3

That is very strange. One would think think there would also be a section outlining services for men. The whole act seems weird to me, but I was born in Canada after 1984 so I've never had to deal with a private health insurance system (excepting of course Blue Cross, but that's only for supplemental stuff).
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:23 PM
2

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the first link merely says that the potential harm outweighs the potential benefits of a PSA screening. According to the PDF on that site, these screenings have a high risk of false positives and over diagnosis. Isn't that a medical decision, not a political one? As well, this recommendation only applies to people with no other signs or symptoms (second last paragraph of the last page). As for the other link, I will admit to only reading the abstract; however it does…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:17 PM
2

Can you provide a source for me about this health care act banning prostate exams, as well as for European men not being treated? It seems like too insane of a claim to be true.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:32 PM
1

Since insurance isn't allowed to use gender as a criterion, doesn't that mean that checking and treating STIs is the same price for men and women?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:27 PM
5

Sorry, I'm not American. Could someone please clarify for me, does the Affordable Care Act specify that given the same disease, Men and Women have to pay different amounts for testing and treatment?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:54 PM
0

I also wouldn't object to another word to distinguish between plural and singular uses of you. It's definitely not a big deal, but there is some ambiguity there that I find aesthetically displeasing.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:32 PM
0

The example I was thinking of is: "...when they walk through the door"
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:30 PM
0

I mean ambiguous as it could be plural or singular.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:40 PM
0

I do like the idea of a genderless pronoun. In English if we want to avoid specifying the gender of a single person we generally have to use either the ambiguous 'they', or the pretentious 'one'.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:03 PM
18

It's important to note that a big reason why they win is because their opponents have a tendency to forfeit for various reasons.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter