TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Red_Lancia_Stratos Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by Red_Lancia_Stratos on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Where is Steve sailer?
/r/BlackPillScience04/07/22 04:25 AM
4

This is almost off topic as it’s never been denied
/r/BlackPillScience06/04/22 01:02 PM
1

Isn’t this pop-sci common knowledge
/r/BlackPillScience28/11/21 12:03 AM
1

Hello is that Philippe Rushton calling? You better answer…
/r/BlackPillScience11/11/21 08:15 PM
9

Not on topic.
/r/BlackPillScience10/11/21 02:26 AM
34

Water=wet. What’s more strange is that people don’t get it.
/r/BlackPillScience27/10/21 04:23 PM
1

That’s not at all what it says.
/r/BlackPillScience20/10/21 03:20 PM
6

Oh this should be good.
/r/BlackPillScience20/10/21 02:38 PM
68

I’m shocked! Shocked!
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/21 06:05 PM
5

Everyone there is taller on average and lower variance.
/r/BlackPillScience17/10/21 01:06 PM
14

Oh wow it’s peer reviewed. That’s really convincing. I suppose what one knows from first principles can be discarded because 59 female undergraduates wanted to date the more attractive men not merely engage in STM behavior.
/r/BlackPillScience11/10/21 11:19 PM
15

If she breathes…
/r/BlackPillScience11/10/21 09:44 PM
13

I don’t think it does because she didn’t make chad wait but there’s also a whole class of women who won’t make anyone wait. Everyone already knows this.
/r/BlackPillScience11/10/21 09:07 PM
10

I disagree. If anything it calls into question the male gaze narrative as meaningful. The women still knew the more attractive men were more attractive
/r/BlackPillScience11/10/21 09:06 PM
4

Gazing duration isn’t not the end all be all
/r/BlackPillScience11/10/21 09:02 PM
19

I still don’t think this disproves anything.
/r/BlackPillScience11/10/21 08:52 PM
27

Hasn’t this been understood from the inception.
/r/BlackPillScience08/09/21 02:03 AM
22

Big IQ shredder.
/r/BlackPillScience13/08/21 09:14 PM
1

I do not understand the relationship to this sub.
/r/BlackPillScience31/07/21 06:21 PM
1

I’m pretty sure the correlation between school performance and IQ is greater than .6. I shouldn’t have said they aren’t linked but that they would not have been necessary in an age when education was less formalized. The point is that they are linked and it is not a trade off which means there is mutual selection. It is not as the opposite would be that one is either smart and ugly or dim and attractive.
/r/BlackPillScience30/06/21 06:37 PM
3

Education levels really aren’t linked to intelligence particularly in the past. Looks and intelligence are correlated which is I think all the evidence that is necessary
/r/BlackPillScience30/06/21 10:37 AM
3

My point is your attempt to say people were not sexually selected is wrong. You can use a proxy but then it is still sexual selection not survival just one generation older. This is why we have nations and ethnicities they are structures for survival of our genes. Mortality played very little role.
/r/BlackPillScience30/06/21 01:52 AM
3

Man if only all of those things were highly heritable. The third cousin hypotheses supports this view and does general a priori reasoning.
/r/BlackPillScience29/06/21 11:05 PM
2

What does “we’re good” even mean in this context?
/r/BlackPillScience29/06/21 09:57 PM
8

Sexual selection has been the larger driver than survival selection for at least the last 10000 years.
/r/BlackPillScience29/06/21 10:30 AM
20

This raises evolutionary questions surly.
/r/BlackPillScience28/06/21 09:32 PM
15

Fair enough defense.
/r/BlackPillScience02/06/21 05:49 PM
36

Does this count as black pill? If this is a voluntary trait one decides to have?
/r/BlackPillScience02/06/21 11:35 AM
11

Oh I see so this is incredibly black pilled lol
/r/BlackPillScience20/05/21 01:25 PM
6

No quite the opposite. I just want to clarify what the point of the study is. Is it implying that more attractive men are better at martial arts?
/r/BlackPillScience20/05/21 01:05 PM
3

Considering mixed martial arts skills to be largely learned. Should this be considered black pill science?
/r/BlackPillScience20/05/21 11:54 AM
2

It’s not fine when A) it’s grossly unrealistic. B) it’s the basis for the conclusion of the study and is represented as though it’s practically applicable. For example in experiment one darkest skin but most Eurocentric features was rated most attractive. Or the all light highly African. Well that exists and they’re albinos not a mix. It’s treating the trait of color and phenotype as separate then an attempt to show horn it as mixed while also having cover of going “oh no no it’s just a hypothet…
/r/BlackPillScience13/04/21 10:17 PM
2

Look at the models they had for “very Eurocentric” and “very Afrocentric” and tell me honestly if they look even remotely like a representation that can be found in the real world.
/r/BlackPillScience13/04/21 09:34 PM
1

No all of these are valid criticisms that I don’t feel the need to repeat. I am not shifting the goal posts but expanding my critique. I get the idea that the deliberately have their way with the study by reading it. Look at the way they manipulate the faces in their modeling. To the extent that you’re right this is my most pertinent critique. All the other studies that this study cites as the reason for both why their study was necessary and superior are likely open to those criticism(sample si…
/r/BlackPillScience13/04/21 09:27 PM
1

Well let’s face it none of these are even remotely comparable in method or goal or controls so it is hard to say how any of them could be considered correct. It’s also wrong to say inconclusive as they aren’t measuring the same thing nor using comparable methods. Some control for race of assessors others don’t some are composite images others are slideshows. Again it is obvious not that mixed faces are least desired but it is obviously that the author of this study tried to deliberate present th…
/r/BlackPillScience13/04/21 09:00 PM
5

No the evidence is not contradictory it is usually of no effect or more accurately it tends to line up with the ethnicity of the participants. However this is actively saying that all people actively preferred the mixed race composites that they made which is in opposition to the existing consensus of the research.
/r/BlackPillScience13/04/21 05:00 PM
24

Another pro miscegenation study( says so in the abstract) based on 80 personal ratings of digitally created faces. Desperately trying to prove what they want to be true. Even when they say how this is largely at odds with the meta research.
/r/BlackPillScience13/04/21 03:22 AM
7

There’s more than just that.
/r/BlackPillScience13/04/21 03:16 AM
22

I did not enjoy reading this.
/r/BlackPillScience09/04/21 11:04 AM
4

Your username of giga sperg is certainly accurate
/r/BlackPillScience06/04/21 10:42 AM
3

Not as statistically significant doesn’t mean no preference. There was still a preference for more masculine faces in 2d images. Additionally the study ranked fertility mating success and offspring success equally which majorly skews results in the modern era.
/r/BlackPillScience05/04/21 12:27 PM
10

Cope
/r/BlackPillScience04/04/21 01:04 PM
2

Choice paralysis is a necessary but insufficient explanation as is mentioned in the study.
/r/BlackPillScience25/03/21 02:00 PM
10

Not to quibble but the mechanism at play here goes beyond mere choice paralysis
/r/BlackPillScience22/03/21 10:00 PM
1

Tie goes to the runner.
/r/BlackPillScience27/01/21 05:17 PM
1

Restricted video cringe.
/r/BlackPillScience30/12/20 05:51 PM
1

Which is what everyone’s been saying. It’s not a real asset it’s not a thing that can be attracted to. That’s just a Manlet cope.
/r/BlackPillScience30/12/20 05:28 PM
19

“height stereotypes of men encompassed six of the seven dimensions and suggested that shortness is more of a liability than tallness is an asset.”
/r/BlackPillScience30/12/20 04:25 PM
35

What everyone’s been saying for years. Tallness doesn’t attract anyone but shortness is a massive liability.
/r/BlackPillScience30/12/20 02:56 PM
1

They are good. But they are not fungible.
/r/BlackPillScience27/12/20 11:29 PM
1

There are components of being in a fraternity that are only found in a fraternity. Engaging in those things is good. Being unaffiliated is bad not just because one lacks the experiences and skills from those components but also because an unaffiliated has a reason to stay unaffiliated. These reasons are almost universally bad. This is to say nothing of the outcomes oriented approach.
/r/BlackPillScience27/12/20 12:35 PM
1

Non affiliation is bad. Fraternity membership is good.
/r/BlackPillScience27/12/20 01:54 AM
1

Because they are good things for themselves. And they produce good outcomes.
/r/BlackPillScience26/12/20 11:34 PM
1

Low inhib is very real
/r/BlackPillScience14/12/20 04:00 PM
24

Bs. The implication made by the authors that there is a casual relationship is nonsense and certainly not black pill science. But I guess we will add one more to the list. “just drink bro”
/r/BlackPillScience29/09/20 03:52 PM
2

Law actually so unfortunately have to start at the bottom. Many of my friends work in finance but it’s not the only way to make money! My girlfriend works for a reputable auction house with her art history and accounting degree and makes 160k. My brother works in media and just graduated making 120k. There’s lots of opportunity in all sorts of fields but you’re right FIRE and tech are big right now.
/r/BlackPillScience26/09/20 02:39 AM
2

I should’ve said my college roommate. We no longer live together. But no lol. I’m still in school but I have an offer for 260k. If I can stay in the industry for a few years I may be able to outpace him but it’s tough. We also share a fund that’s doing fine. It’s not a money thing just a general competitive thing.
/r/BlackPillScience26/09/20 02:09 AM
11

I suspect this is it. I am so sick of people who say that “umm well actually the us average wage is only 45k so you should be pretty pleased”. F those people I don’t care about them. I care about facing off against my roommate who made 480k for a big firm last year.
/r/BlackPillScience23/09/20 08:09 PM
17

Is it certain that this is a gender not urban effect?
/r/BlackPillScience07/09/20 05:47 PM
8

That’s true but irrelevant to the study. And what his behavior may manage.
/r/BlackPillScience07/09/20 10:54 AM
14

Don’t live in Sweden and it will be less competitive apparently. Then you won’t have to wear your beard
/r/BlackPillScience07/09/20 01:16 AM
12

“Differential interest in sexual activity with multiple desirable partners, differential oppor- tunities for sexual activities with multiple desirable partners, and differential social costs of engaging in sexual activi- ties with multiple partners.” Which one of these variables changed most?
/r/BlackPillScience06/09/20 10:13 PM
72

The “would other girls you know” is telling.
/r/BlackPillScience05/09/20 10:03 PM
8

JFL cope
/r/BlackPillScience14/08/20 03:28 PM
6

Black is correlated with more testosterone during development. And it makes people of the same size look bigger. Both of these likely contribute even in just the face. It is also a interesting way they classed the faces.
/r/BlackPillScience12/08/20 11:44 AM
0

Yes
/r/BlackPillScience12/08/20 11:40 AM
6

It’s a psyop 49% of middle class white women are homemakers.
/r/RedPillWomen07/08/20 03:10 AM
7

Is this just because adiposity this is a more narrowly defined component?
/r/BlackPillScience22/07/20 09:19 PM
12

Very good point. A question I would hope social scientists examine is how to encourage those types of inputs that produce good outputs. Rather than the constant blaming that is seen for something that within living memory would’ve been standard for all.
/r/BlackPillScience21/07/20 11:56 PM
24

Yeah that’s exactly what I mean by conventional wisdom being wrong. Most student-athletes have higher gpas. Fraternity members have higher gpas and better life outcomes. It’s so obvious that doing good things begets more good things. Obviously this sub believes it’s innate which is discouraging to some.
/r/BlackPillScience21/07/20 11:37 PM
51

This is unfortunately something too few people realize. Doing good things isn’t a distraction or a drain but results in increasing positive returns.
/r/BlackPillScience21/07/20 10:41 PM
3

Third to last sentence. “They were also more likely than attractive participants to select unattractive stimulus persons to compare themselves to”
/r/BlackPillScience15/07/20 05:41 PM
6

Sure fine but why does the same effect not present itself amongst the attractive.
/r/BlackPillScience14/07/20 11:12 PM
69

The real question left unanswered is why do the unattractive overrate their attractiveness? And yet knowingly compare themselves to the less attractive. Shows there must be a subconscious element that is able to accurately reflect on ones attractiveness.
/r/BlackPillScience14/07/20 10:36 PM
44

Zero surprises there. It’s well known that long term thinking and goal setting is correlated to greater satisfaction and happiness.
/r/BlackPillScience09/07/20 10:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter