TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Red_pill_junkie Archive

View 3 posts and 733 comments by Red_pill_junkie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Now we have to waste our time monitoring these type of guys within our own movement So, I was right. You were being a concern troll. Looks like I was right. Again. Fucking hell this place has turned to shit.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 10:28 AM
1

Thanks for assuming we "yearn for the days".
/r/MensRights29/08/16 10:26 AM
1

Perhaps you misunderstand, I was supporting a man's right to say his opinion. Maybe you were completely unable to understand that, then mixed it with a judgement assumption of my username, and imagined I hate women. Then you threw in the hint that if I think that hating on women is ok, then I'm following feminist thought (nice try to have that pathetic train of stupid, but no thanks) Next time, have an open mind, behave like an adult that can think critically, and we can all get along. Also, you…
/r/MensRights28/08/16 01:01 PM
1

/r/mensrights - now making sure women are treated nicely. In other news, keep reading and you'll see the insanity that unfolds.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 09:50 PM
1

I was completely clear and accurate from the start. I only had to clarify what happened because you're stupid, emotional, and leapt to the wrong conclusion like a gazelle on meth. The misunderstanding is entirely your fault. I still think you're a horrid human being for pandering to the need you have for approval from women, to the point that you think a man, in a men's rights setting, has to control what he says; lest you be lumped into the disapproval that you think may be fired his way. Also,…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 06:59 AM
5

Bingo!
/r/MensRights27/08/16 05:19 AM
1

If you don't think it's an insult to call an entire group of people, which includes my sisters, "extremely slutty" and "violent", what are you doing here? Serious question I didn't say that though, did I? Although, like an imbecile, you assume that I approve the other guys statement, because I support his right to say what he thinks. Do you understand how retarded it is to group one man with another because you disagree with them, while also saying that grouping a number of people together is wr…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 05:19 AM
5

Insulting your sisters? What the hell are you talking about? We aren't untitled to an opinion that isn't endorsed by you or women? Perhaps you are mocked for being an MRA because you're behaving like a feminist.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 04:03 AM
3

I don't think he's that out of line at all. And who's image of us are you referring to? The image women have of us? I think that the other guy is simply explaining the reasons he has for not wanting to engage so much with women. And, he has every right to say that. I don't think being a concern troll that your image will be tarnished with someone else interpretation of his situation is something that needs to be here.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 02:23 AM
1

See previous comment regarding your insinuation that dark triads and serial killers are interchangeable
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/16 06:00 AM
1

Have you tried asking their sub directly, seeing that this sub is clearly not giving you the answer you want to hear?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:51 PM
3

Dahmer was a gay serial killer, not someone who was a dark triad Red Piller. Take your terrible comparisons elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:45 PM
1

Surely the only reason you'd know the reason for the down vote, is if you are the one that broke the rule of no down voting. So are you guessing and pretending to know 100%, or did you break the moment down voting rule?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:42 PM
1

Shhhh. I'm not going around in illogical circles with you anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 01:21 PM
1

Ok. They should all become Muslims and join ISIS then. I can't join you on this hamster wheel anymore. Sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 12:01 PM
1

I would imagine that they don't think about that part. Like the women who choose a lesbian relationship might not think about the higher rates of domestic violence. Or the guys who go MGTOW, may not consider getting old alone. Some of the above people think about the consequences, some don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:55 AM
1

They are thinking that they find alpha trait guys attractive, and they want to date them. As I've already said.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:48 AM
1

I didn't say they're insane, I said their tactics are insane. Dating alpha men seems like suicide in TRP narrative, yet they encourage it. Still just sounds like you're botching and complaining about someone else's viewpoint, because they don't share your stance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:43 AM
1

That's why I said they should become Muslims, even if it was a stupid comparison No. You said that because (in your words) that's a "traditional world". It is insane, there's no way to win in a western society Only your way is the right way, yeah? Stop imposing your view, and saying everyone else that doesn't agree is insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:40 AM
1

But why do they date alpha men to become alpha widows? How is that not insane? What a completely disingenuous question. They don't date in order to become an alpha widow. They date for what they get from the relationship. Why does a gambling bet money to lose it? They don't, they bet money to try and win.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:35 AM
1

Oh my god, no offense but I think you're a troll. Dating alphas and assuming your relationships fails for whatever reason means you become an alpha widow. According to TRP it is untreatable and devastating, so why date at all? Ok, a few points for you. I'm not a troll, I even quoted the question from your post. Also, YOU are the one that went off on a bender about RP men and women should join ISIS. So don't go accusing me of being a troll, after that fucking insanity. My original answer agreed t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:32 AM
1

Here's what I don't get about RPWs. How can you date people and especially people with alpha qualities? Yes. It completely was. You wrote those exact words. But, there were a number of question marks in your OP, at least one seemed to be a rhetorical question. So, again, do you want to clarify your "question"?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:25 AM
1

The question being "how can women date men with alpha qualities?" Oh, I don't know, maybe that's what the women find attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:17 AM
1

You're the one that keeps bring it up. And considering that your assertion was that RPW should join ISIS, would you like to re-propose your statement you want me to answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:10 AM
1

I mean if I was a Red Piller and I actually cared about relationships, I would become a Muslim That's because you don't understand RP or, likely, Islam either.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:06 AM
1

Alright, I'm sorry. For fuck's sake. I didn't link TRP to that, I simply said it seems like the rational solution (it's not), I didn't say TRPillers do that. Take that however you like Yes. You did. You said that RP men and women should join ISIS because the Muslim way is "traditional". And you didn't just say it once, you said it multiple times. You should be fucking ashamed of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:03 AM
1

Linking a view of gender roles, to a terrorist group that claimed responsibility for running over innocent people (including children) with a truck, and not having much sleep is your excuse for that? I don't care how long you've not slept for, that shit shows your true colours. And then you want a respectable conversation and debate about an assertion you made? Jesus fucking christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 11:00 AM
1

sigh The point where they should go join ISIS? You'll have to reiterate the point you want an answer to, without likening red pill to a terrorist group that murders innocent people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 10:52 AM
1

Ok, maybe not ISIS, but you're missing the point. Are you going to answer to the original point or not? I did answer the original point. But you're so disingenuous, that you went off into saying RP people should all become Muslims and join a terrorist group. So forgive me if I don't give a shit if you understand my original answer or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 10:47 AM
1

Why? TRPillers clearly want a traditionalist society, so what is their problem with Muslims? Please tell me that you don't think "traditional" has the exact same specifics, regardless of culture?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 10:45 AM
1

Why not? I don't mean to offend anyone, but I think TRPillers would be happy with a society like that? Why would they not? No offense, I'm just asking. This, to me, shows that you have a warped view of what RP is. And you still didn't find a solution to the problem The problem being that you think RP men and women should join ISIS? You're a fucking lunatic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 10:40 AM
2

The unlisted option of a good wank whenever I want, without having to be annoyed at someone else not pleasing me properly. There is no way a woman could get me off as well, or as efficiently, as I can rub one out. EDIT: likely down voted by a woman who feels out competed by masturbation. Amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 10:36 AM
1

To not joining a group that stones women to death and murders all those who don't share their view of the world? Yeah, there probably is. But, as I've pointed out a number of times already, when you enter into the conversation with "ERMEHGERD RPW SHOULD JOIN ISIS" it's kind of hard to steer it back into an area that isn't lunatic-grade theories.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 10:28 AM
1

So your "reasonable" argument is that RPwomen should go to ISIS? Isn't that what I said that you said?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 10:22 AM
1

Yup. You wrote: Why the fuck do RPWs still date people? If they really want a traditional relationship, their best solution is to join ISIS Which, as I just fucking pointed out, is a ridiculous fringe view, that is so far "out there" that its near impossible to have a reasonable conversation with.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 10:16 AM
2

So you think that all they want is a Muslim man to beat the shit out of them? (A la ISIS) How is that even a reasonable approach to this conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 10:12 AM
2

Ok, but this doesn't answer the obvious question. Why the fuck do RPWs still date people? If they really want a traditional relationship, their best solution is to join ISIS, otherwise if they date in the west, they will only end up being alpha widows. It completely answers the question. Again, the results to any new information or situation, are on a scale. And it's more of those botching colourwheels in MS paint, than a slide rule. Some guys will take the RP and deny it. Some will see some tru…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 10:07 AM
3

Ok, specifics it is! When a person is exposed to a situation, or new information, they apply their previous experiences to that situation/information and work out how they interpret it. Upon that interpretation, they absorb the information, or the experience gain from the situation, into their personality. Due to the differing previous experiences in people's lives, and the different interpretations that can abound from the same moment in time, from all the people involved, the response that peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 09:49 AM
2

Sometimes results vary, when taking a pill. Nothing to be confused about.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 09:41 AM
7

Become a "WGTOW" and enjoy personal freedom like you've never seen in a relationship :)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 09:37 AM
1

But you implied that such a thing shouldn't be said. That's restricting speech.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 09:08 AM
3

How many times are you going to have a very about men saying it? You clicked on, posted a comment, and the best you could do was to say that men shouldn't say what OP posted. Sounds like regulating speech to meet your ideals. No thanks, I'm not a fan of that kind of behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 08:48 AM
2

I feel like you're agreeing with me
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 03:10 AM
2

Ok.. How much would you like to bet, that no woman ever had been upset at a guy being mgtow? Assuming that you aren't using expansive language in order to try and make a point that can be easily disproved.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 03:06 AM
3

The thread? Numerous women. Read more.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 03:05 AM
3

Because I enjoy reminding myself just how women react to me, when I don't give them the value that they consider themselves to have. I've not had one woman in this thread do anything other than take the piss after I said that women do that after a man says he's mgtow. Proving my point. Thanks for taking part in the affirmative camp
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 03:02 AM
2

I said women. Which is plural.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 03:00 AM
2

You want me to get every woman in the world into this sub to show that a generalisation can be true?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 02:59 AM
2

I don't live risk free. I enjoy calculated risk, when the reward outweighs the risk being faced. Women give me nothing that outweighs the risk they also come with. (In my opinion)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 01:23 AM
2

How does that add to the conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 01:22 AM
3

I love that you behave in a childish way, to try and be sarcastic about me pointing out that you're being childish. All while avoiding that I was correct in showing your strawmanning the fuck out of my points. Excellent response, thanks for showing any man reading these posts what the downside to having a woman in their life actually is. +1 internet to you!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 01:20 AM
4

My advice is more do what you want now because there might never be a chance tomorrow. Don't wait for magical stability that doesn't exist. You might do all the right things but still lose. Some people save save save and don't spend anything because they're super cautious. Where could they end up? 50 and dead instead of having endless memories of experiences That's working on the assumption that a man can't be happy unless he's with a woman. I have no one that I need to spend money on, I have in…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 01:18 AM
5

So your advice is: try it and you might lose everything, but hey, you're gonna die anyway, so what does it matter? I don't think that's going to be the tagging of OKCupid any time soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 01:11 AM
3

Lol! Intimacy delivers unto you loss of your property, freedom, social standing.... I said statistically more likely to do that, and I didn't mention death, war, or famine. You mentioned those things. Do numbers and statistics confuse you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 01:08 AM
2

Where did I say that it was apocalyptic? Strawman much?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 01:02 AM
1

Going away from men doesn't mean going your own way. A woman can go lesbian. Jesus christ you crack me up lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 01:01 AM
3

Most men aren't MGTOW. Most MILLENNIAL men are MGTOW. Solution? Date outside the Millennials. How is that comment even relevant to what I said? I say I want women to go their own way, and you give me advice on how to date men. Wtf.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 12:56 AM
4

Would you consider calling women sluts and hamsters a childish woman shaming tactic I say anyone with a train of thought that's going around in circles, a hamster. I don't gender stupidity. And women can open their legs for whoever they want, I don't give a fuck. (Pun intended)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 12:55 AM
5

Why? Because I pointed out that women cry like babies when a man says he's a MGTOW, and then women started jumping in and having goes, totally proving my point? You clearly don't understand what hyperbole means.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 12:54 AM
8

If you ask most women about a MGTOW, they'll probably just laugh and call them losers anyway. No one is worried about yall. And that would be the childish man shaming tactics I just said that you'd do. I love being right.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 12:50 AM
3

If I have you 10 M&Ms, and 3 of them were poisonous, you wouldn't eat any of them, right? Statistically speaking, I'm more likely to lose my property, freedom, and social standing, if I have any intimacy with a woman. All in the hope I get the percentage of women that aren't insane. So what do I want women to do? Go your own way, leave men alone, and stop having a tantrum, and switching to shaming tactics, when men say they are mgtow.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/16 12:42 AM
1

And I thought that women didn't judge on appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 02:48 PM
1

I disagree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 02:47 PM
1

You completely missed the point I made with the behaviour being the same, and brought in other variables that didn't counter what I said, and were super vague, to direct the conversation into a different path, because you couldn't refute my point. 3/7 for effort
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 02:18 PM
5

You appeared to completely miss the humour. Will done, at least we've found why people think you should smile more.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 02:15 PM
0

Good point.. That completely counters mine entirely, single mothers for everyone! PS. You knew what I was referring to..
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 01:30 PM
1

I just avoid interactions with women. Which is me also avoiding delusional messes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 01:28 PM
5

Having well adjusted kids is different to "having kids"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 01:26 PM
2

Didn't come across as pointing out irony. Came across as negative.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 01:24 PM
2

You're assuming that a guy doing something nice will them throw a tantrum. Not to mention assuming that you are sexually attractive. That's some serious entitlement, right there. Is also why I never do anything nice for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 01:23 PM
2

That you see the negatives in all of those scenarios, says that you're a negative person.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 01:20 PM
2

You should smile more then.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 01:15 PM
1

Apart from the parts of the sub that don't relate to pick up game.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 01:09 PM
1

I thought it was hilarious lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 01:07 PM
1

Creepy is a word that describes the feeling you have of someone, not the person that you are referring to. Therefore, it's subjective. I would say that a creepy guy is just a guy that the girl assesses is below the type of guy that she thinks she's worth. Ugly guy compliments her right dress - creep. Attractive millionaire gives the same compliment - assertive guy who is confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 01:01 PM
1

A relationship with one is insanity. Three means he may as well burn everything he owns and kill himself
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/16 12:56 PM
1

K bro
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 01:49 PM
0

I am. But now you are repeating the same thing to get a reaction. Which is trolling. Which is against your rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 01:41 PM
0

There really wasn't a need for you to put that. Nothing I said was against the rules. You're just being uncivil now. Also, nice down vote. That in the rules too? Pretty sure it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 01:38 PM
-2

You've had numerous comments removed in this thread for incivility, this is just the one I replied to. Follow the rules. I'll attempt to be as warm and civil as you are in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 01:29 PM
-2

Blunt doesn't mean uncivil. I would imagine that you agree with that, because your statement was also blunt, yet no doubt you would say you weren't being uncivil.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 01:18 PM
1

My argument, was that OP didn't say what you claimed he said. You just agreed to that. I quoted you. That's not hallucination.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 03:00 AM
1

So, if you believe that obesete is not OPs reasoning for self-control preference, you believe that he didnt provide any prove for this idea at all? That's not what I was arguing at all. You made that up. Also obesity is spelled, well, like that
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 02:59 AM
1

Ok, we can disagree in reasoning, but agree with the conclusion that there was no obesete arguement in OP. So OP never said what you claimed he said? Excellent. That's all I cared about :)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 02:56 AM
1

AFAIK no one has been "banned" from modeling so I don't know what you're talking about. The more you know Also the fat acceptance movement is now pushed to the fringe. So fat acceptance is no longer mainstream, but people accept fat men? I think you just countered your own point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 02:46 AM
1

It's not a prediction. It's an assumption based upon your behaviour and lack of ability to stay on point when pressed. Again, OP didn't say what you are saying. You misread it, and can't seem to understand that you are in error. This isn't opinion, this is simple. You misread a sentence, and are refusing to reassess your incorrect assumption. Usually, that kind of trait is found within Leftist ideology. Hence my assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 02:43 AM
1

Can you show us evidence for your claim? Also, are you completely disregarding the fat acceptance movement and the banning of skinny women in modelling?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 02:36 AM
1

Let's not assume you are hallucinating. Show me the line, where OP states that cavemen and cavewomen weren't fat due to self control.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 02:31 AM
1

This is all cool and I would gladly discuss every single point with you (not) Spoken like a true Leftist. Don't want to actually discuss things, just want others to agree with you. but none of these points were presented in OP. He also didn't say that cavewomen dieted to show that they had good self control. But that doesn't seem to have stopped you assuming that's what he said. The only two things he mentions in relation to self control are about weight and mate preference. Too simplified. He t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 02:28 AM
1

Flaws in OP arguements that self control is a desirable trait because it helped caveman to stay thin Again, OP didn't say that. You interpreted that, incorrectly, from what OP said.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 02:13 AM
0

So we all agreed that people today dont want fat mates(1+2). Agreed Then he states fat people dont have self control (3) Agreed and concludes from (1+2) and (3) that caveman valued self-control in the partner(4). No, he concluded it from 1 + 2. Point 3 was to show that fat people don't have self control. Therefore, due to that lack of self control, people usually don't find them attractive. Which means that self control somehow helped caveman to prevent obesety. Ummm, no. That's your conclusion.…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 02:10 AM
1

A benefit to something, doesn't mean that it's the only thing it's for. Self control also benefits not spending all your money on gambling. Or taking unnecessary risks with your life. As for "there were no evidence presented that it has something to do with mate selection", I would assume from that assertion, your other comments to me, and your terrible grammar, that you completely misread the OP post in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 01:39 AM
1

You've still not shown that he said that cavemen dieted. Unedited, it shows that he said that fat people have short lifespans (assertion 1), in caveman days, you would want to seek a mate that will last long (assertion 2). Then he combines those assertions by saying that due to assertion 2 being assumed correct (you want a mate to stay around to raise children), you would therefore want to avoid fat mates today, as assertion 1 states that fat people die sooner. Again, you're still showing that h…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 01:37 AM
1

Self control doesn't just relate to food, including in caveman days. So yes, I can completely assume that primate brains select for self control, without assuming that caveman had Weight Watchers.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 01:18 AM
2

Take this thing he said, combine it with this other thing he said, then assume that he said the thing that you made up by piecing together different sentences. Then using this bastardised sentence that you made up to say that is what the OP actually said, even though he didn't, and then point at the ridiculous concoction that you made, whilst chortling that the assumption is stupid and therefore everything else he said must also be redundant. Even though the "also" is irrelevant because OP never…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 01:13 AM
2

I think you missed the key part where he didn't actually say that caveman days included dieting.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 12:35 AM
2

Where did OP say that dieting was a thing in caveman days? I can see references to dieting, and references to caveman days, but nothing adding the two together. Perhaps I don't have my Strawman Filter engaged...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 12:34 AM
2

How exactly, does MGTOW require you to protect yourself from it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 11:47 PM
4

Well if women choose the wrong men, then the men they choose are bad for the women. It goes both ways But, as you said earlier, that's the fault of men. So is it mens' fault, or is it going both ways? (Also, you are showing one of the reasons that women play no part in my personal life whatsoever.. So thanks for that)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 11:37 PM
0

I'm going to be happy with the money I have, the life I lead, and doing whatever I want to do. I don't think you're understanding my point at all. Also, there's a difference between nihilism and what I'm suggesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 11:31 PM
3

You do understand that men can only choose bad mates, if the women that they choose are bad for the men, yet still agree to be with them? Take some responsibility yourself there, sweetheart.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 11:28 PM
0

I'd like to see more men of any kind, not persuing women at all. And having happy, successful lives, with more money, and less stress than they would have, if they were in a relationship that only serves to bleed them dry of their happiness, resources, and life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 11:17 PM
1

+1 for Izzard reference
/r/MensRights15/06/16 12:51 PM
1

You need to learn the difference between obvious and inserting emotional bias and adding words to give a misleading impression of intent.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 12:45 PM
3

Unfriend her. I've been dropping closet SJWs like a man possessed the last few days. It's been brilliant
/r/MensRights15/06/16 12:38 PM
1

Because penis size and eating so much food that someone is morbidly obese are totally the same thing. Do you mock people for other things that they can't control, like skin colour, or low IQ? You must be really popular at parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 10:42 AM
1

He talks against the hypocrisy of modern feminism, and does indeed do things for men's rights, but he's not an MRA. He even says how he doesn't overly like the MRM as it can sometimes just be the same as feminists at times..
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:49 AM
11

Milo isn't an MRA. Feminists assume he is an MRA with no basis in truth, simply because he points out feminist hypocrisy. You seem to think that because some men say that they don't support another man, that feminists will listen to that, and logically come to the conclusion that they should stop saying Milo is an MRA. I assume they do this while listening to all the other points we make, such as that the wage gap isn't actually real, and that there is a widening gap in education between males a…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:55 AM
1

Lesbians are, statistically speaking, more likely to be victims of domestic violence than a heterosexual woman. Perhaps they can have a campaign to the safer option?
/r/MensRights23/05/16 04:29 AM
1

black and white terms T R I G G E R E D
/r/MGTOW09/05/16 02:44 AM
1

The interest isn't usually allowed to be kept by the customer, due to the amount of money that it can sometimes be (I've seen an accidental deposit of over $300 million into a customer account). The bank's Terms and Conditions normally cover the lack of interest payable in the even of an accident. However, it's common that compensation is paid in some way or another.
/r/MGTOW09/05/16 02:39 AM
1

Yup to the $10k withdrawal. It's under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing Act (basically, large withdrawals/deposits need to be reported by the institution - this isn't limited to banks, and can be also at casinos, lotteries, etc). I believe that she bounced the cash into other bank's accounts, meaning the retrieval of funds is an absolute ball ache for the original financial institution, due to the interchange already taking place between the banks each working day (as in…
/r/MGTOW09/05/16 02:36 AM
11

Upon being asked to sign something, should the relationship not work out, she said that the relationship didn't work out. Sounds like his view of relationship (time together) didn't match her relationship (time together long enough for a fat payout after a few years)...
/r/MGTOW09/05/16 02:22 AM
2

The Australian gov/media narrative on Domestic Assault is something that men do to women. (Even the Prime Minister said that's what domestic violence is). If they charge this woman with a severe crime (eg, Murder) it would attract attention that women are violent too. The fact that I live in Australia, and this is the first I'm hearing of those story kind of says it all...
/r/MensRights09/05/16 01:41 AM
1

lol unfortunately, that one isn't mine... So, seeing as I stole it, go for it!
/r/MensRights09/05/16 01:33 AM
2

Most likely the same reason he releases photos of him doing yoga in a suit, and tries (and fails) to talk about quantum computing. He's trying to get support and keep voters on side. Also keeps the media from talking about the decimation of Canada's economy, because they're too busy fapping over Prime Minister Zoolander.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:03 AM
1

You're assuming that someone will see the Google search results, and then assuming that they'll give a shit to spin it to show that no one cares about men. Instead of that, just notice that even when it's international men's day, the media will put pictures of men crying, and saying how "every day is men's day". TL;DR, your plan falls apart, because no one is actually doing investigative journalism in favor of men. Sorry bro.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:59 AM
1

Surely people have reported her account for being so horrid. But, surprise, surprise, she's not banned from twitter. The world is fucking retarded in it's actual inequality
/r/MensRights07/05/16 11:56 AM
1

From the uk to Australia. Once I stopped shitting my pants about snakes, sharks, and spiders, settle in time was minimal. Lol
/r/MensRights25/04/16 09:02 PM
1

I can start to see why they do, to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 12:04 PM
1

Shit, you're an angry little girl, aren't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 11:18 AM
1

And now you go for the usual leftist approach of trying to upset me by saying I'm not living up to my values. (Swallowing blue pills in this case) You are still gendering the issue of help. After everything I've said. Pointing out that people should help people. And after all of that, you demand "men should help men". Ok, sure. Let's go with that. Let's talk about the things that men have done. Let's talk about government that is, as you've pointed out, just men; The government put into place an…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 10:59 AM
1

My sister got cut off too by me as she supported my mother. She realised after a while that I was right, and left the country too (I moved to another country as part of cutting my mother out of my life). Success is the best revenge, mate! :)
/r/MensRights25/04/16 07:08 AM
9

A person doesn't get to treat you like shit, just because you appeared from their vagina. My mother, through her controlling nature and constantly invading my privacy, ended up giving me a stomach ulcer. I cut her out of my life about 12 years ago. Haven't spoke to her since, and have zero regrets. (Unlike her, who is likely regretting being a total cunt and having her child stop talking to her, but hey, that's not my problem)
/r/MensRights25/04/16 06:08 AM
1

So the assumption there, would be that, any CMV is therefore correct, and OP is the bringer of knowledge?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 05:42 AM
2

I'll ask you then, how could someone provide answers to the question "Why do you hate women?" without sounding like you were trolling?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 05:06 AM
0

You don't think the original question was asking for trollish comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 04:30 AM
2

If you look at this dude's history, he is a troll. Engaging with him is pointless. He only says things to shock and offend If it's pointless, why did the other user try? Surely crying about someone being a troll is engaging? Surely that's giving them what they want? Of course, none of what you have said has alluded to h entire OP being a post to draw out the kinds of opinions he stated.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 03:39 AM
2

Q: Please give a reason why the answer was a troll answer. A: It's blatantly obvious But, you demand valid reasons from others. LiberalLogic
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 01:17 AM
2

I'm not defending him, I'm asking you a question. If you don't want to understand that, and are simply intent on screaming "troll!" At anyone that you can't provide a decent answer to, then I think you are clearly the one trolling here. Or, are you able to give a rational, mature, reasoning why he's trolling? An accusation isn't proof. For example, my reasoning that you are a troll is this: You have been given a few chances to explain why you don't consider the other person's post to be a reason…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 01:02 AM
4

That's the most redundant answer you've given so far. I'll ask again, how should a man, who hates women, explain why they hate women, without sounding (to you) like a troll, because you can't counter their logic?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 12:52 AM
8

But he directly answered the question OP posed. How, exactly, do you think someone who hates women is going to answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 12:47 AM
1

It fills me with a happy, warm, gooey, feeling.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/16 12:38 AM
1

Come back when the manosphere actually helps those who need them most, instead of behaving at that level You are still gendering helping people in need. What a horrible person you must be, to remain on such a rant.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 06:59 AM
1

I'm beginning to see why "Man" was a title boys had to earn This shows the level you're at. Come back when you are prepared to have a conversation without childish little insults.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 03:30 AM
2

Dose: 1-2 Red Pills to change your life. Caution: Results may vary
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 03:05 AM
1

There's no outrage from me. And now you're demanding results to counter your hypocrisy. Stamping your feet and demanding results. From what? Society not funding men's rights? (That's the fault of men) Feminists screaming abuse at men's rights conferences. (Must be men's fault). I'm not saying everything is one groups fault (unlike you), I'm saying that it's not popular to support men's rights, regardless of who is trying to support it. Stop gendering the help that humans should get.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 02:58 AM
1

Still with the cheap shots, "men don't help men".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 02:49 AM
1

Funny how you have a go at me for saying feminists don't help. But, you think it's fine to say that MRAs are to blame. You do realise you're being a hypocrite, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 02:24 AM
1

Well, I'm sure Canada has a load of men's shelters now a feminist is prime minister? Oh, that's right, they still don't have men's shelters. Maybe it's because it's a male feminist. Lol What a childish approach to think I'm blaming feminists, when I'm not. Hush now, your bias is showing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 02:06 AM
1

Oh I see. Men cause all problems. Glad we got that sorted. There's no point in a discussion with you. Have a great day.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 01:47 AM
3

I'm in a better place, now I don't allow women to play any significant or intimate part in my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 01:16 AM
3

giving a homeless guy a gameboy Giving a homeless man an electronic toy is better than telling men to take control of their lives? I used to want to be an MRA, before I saw they'd rather fund an anti-Anita movie than open a domestic violence shelter for men, or do anything to protect men from other men, ever. Ever. Ah huh. They never, ever, open them and get zero funding. Where as female shelters do get funding. Stop making sweeping statements that are false. Notice that the funding didn't come …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 01:13 AM
3

Have you ever been in a relationship with someone who reads the very worst in everything you do? That's what it was like for her Yes. My mother, sister, and later my wife (now ex). I had that for years. Not only that, but in society, I have to be told not to be a rapist. You say it like men don't have to deal with that too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 01:00 AM
1

You may not have coined the term. But you are continuing it. The term is what I disagree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 12:58 AM
2

Actual help shouldn't take so much effort to find in a place claiming to offer it to the desperate men who really need it I completely agree. Now, if you can also agree that men's support groups are heavily outnumbered by women's support groups? It's hard to find help in society for men (without having the support provided by women, who could be the cause of the problem for men) Their ban policy is exactly the same as any other safe place, except they make it safe to get pissed off about women a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 12:45 AM
1

I'm sorry, I'm at a loss here. I don't know what we're disagreeing on =/ Feels like we're mostly on the same page. We're disagreeing on the use of "masculinity" in a term that you keep using, as a description of something that harms men. Especially when some of those actions are carried out by women. It subconsciously transfers the blame to men. You can say it doesn't, but when I respond saying that thing a that hurt women are toxic femininity, you brush it off and go right back to blaming mascu…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 12:36 AM
1

I figured that you had to squeeze out more of a rant. And that's why I said I wasn't seeing a point in continuing the conversation. Have you got all that out your system now?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 12:05 AM
1

Ahhhhh. Ok, interesting way to say they are never to blame, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/16 12:03 AM
2

Did you hear the conspiracy theory about the birth control pill being a way for men to rape women? Nope. And you're not the only one who was helped. But my argument is it shouldn't require so much effort and pre-existing character traits to get the help out of it I'm not really sure what you're saying here? Help shouldn't be something that has a lot of effort? That doesn't really make sense. Not openly [advertised as a safe space] Sounds like a conspiracy theory to me. Do you have evidence of yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 11:55 PM
3

Anger and outrage can also become an addiction. It can create out group prejudices. And echo chambers tend to magnify the views of those inside them. I assume you have the same issue of the closed group radfem? That's even more of an echo chamber, in that no one can enter unless they allow it. And that's not healthy, for those who worry about their place in the world. The subreddit, or the RP way of seeing things as they are? I found the sub very helpful in changing my view to an angle that made…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 11:36 PM
1

Can you tell me what exactly you think is wrong with what I'm saying? If you don't understand my thoughts on that by now, you never will.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 11:20 PM
4

If you are correct, what does it matter? Radfem is a closed out safe space for radical feminists to (most likely) hate all over men, and it's closed to prevent anyone retaliating back. Would you prefer that there isnt a space men can go and vent? Perhaps you think men shouldn't show emotion? (Anger is an emotion)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 11:13 PM
1

Sounds like there is nothing I can say to make you consider what you are saying is flawed. Thanks for the chat.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 11:09 PM
2

That women are never at fault? Little bit white knight, don't you think? Maybe, women are sometimes at fault, because they are sometimes horrible people? Instead of; women are never to blame, because they never do anything wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 11:06 PM
1

So, if toxic masculinity is anyone upholding the "traditional" values of men, if I tell a woman to leave the workforce and stay at home, that's toxic femininity?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 11:16 AM
1

That's the most ridiculous reasoning I've heard in quite some time. Things that women do against men, are because they are upholding ideals that they hold men to, therefore, it's the fault of men. It's like if a man tried to uphold the traditional values women were meant to be (ie, stay at home cooking), that would be toxic femininity, according to your logic. There is no point continuing this conversation with you. You can only see masculinity as the cause, not that the women in the situations …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 09:27 AM
1

But the concept of what they are spreading is called "toxic masculinity" The problem with you calling it that, is that it subconsciously puts the blame of the action, onto men. Women that gave men a white feather to represent the man's cowardice during the World War, I suppose that was somehow toxic masculinity too? At what point is the behaviour of women, the responsibility of women? Calling something that they are doing toxic masculinity" is transferring the blame.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 09:11 AM
2

That's not circlejerking bias at all. 5/7 Would recommend.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 09:07 AM
1

Hang on. Women being nasty towards men, is actually the fault of masculinity? HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHHAAHAAHA LiberalLogic Also, those downvotes are wonderful. Shows me exactly what I'm dealing with.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 08:58 AM
0

But it's very clear that the ideas that men should "man up" and that mental health issues are "weak and unmanly" are harming men and preventing them from getting help that they need and deserve. That is toxic. Like when women say that men are babies for talking about how they feel? Or feminists drink out of cups with "Male Tears" written on the side? Or, perhaps, the times that men talking about male suicide in a men's meeting are harassed by feminists who scream that any man attending is a rape…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 02:40 AM
1

Circular logic. And citing personal experience doesn't counter the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/16 01:52 AM
0

Young girl, kardashian idiot, language. I picked it up from the Internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 09:50 PM
0

And who makes the distinction of what type of masculinity is toxic?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 09:49 PM
2

"Any". You asked one. But, anyway, I'm MGTOW so it's a bad question to ask. However, you asked if a man finding a woman attractive was rational. Being that rational means to have reason or logic, the man finds the woman attractive for the reason that it makes him want to have sex with her and reproduce. Therefore, yes, there is a rational reason behind a man finding a woman attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 11:03 AM
4

I'm more rational than most men, but I'm not entirely rational. Of course I'm not entirely rational. At least I'm rational enough to know that I'm not entirely rational. That's not only circular logic, it's also you saying "men must be irrational, because I'm irrational". Which is a crappy argument. Also, are you not rational, or just a bit irrational? You can't seem to make your mind up about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 10:15 AM
1

Maybe I did, when I was younger (most people embellish when they are younger, in all kinds of ways; I get more pocket money than you, my house is bigger than yours, I can lift more weight, my eyebrows are totes on fleek)... But, I can't think of a specific time where this happened, therefore, I would say that it's not happened for quite a few years. Also, I now avoid the topic of 'me and sex' with anyone. (This doesn't count as I'm just a username here)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 11:19 PM
1

No, the type that thinks that everything is someone else's fault and thinks that masculinity is toxic. (You can't say that "everything else is gender neutral" as if that counters your view that being a man, is toxic.)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 10:54 PM
1

I love how, with your types, if men succeed, it's because they are men, but if they fail, it's because of men. But if women fail, it's because of men, and if they succeed, they're a strong independent woman, something something, feminism. Why can't women own their failures like men do? It's pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 09:25 PM
1

So, just to clarify, If men are succeeding, it's because of the patriarchy, and if they fail, it's the patriarchy. Makes complete sense. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 10:31 AM
1

So men with mental illness don't want to be helped? So, going back to my other point that being homeless is their fault....
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 10:18 AM
1

But, doesn't the patriarchy mean that all men are privileged because they have the chance to fail. Or be mentally disabled. It's hard to keep up with all the bonuses male privilege gives men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 10:03 AM
1

No, /u/Red_pill_junkie, you definitely personally attacked the OP. I'm not going to go through one by one to point out each instance Because, I didn't. You're making things up. Everything I wrote about OP was a fact, either from normal reality, or a quote from them. You can't provide examples because you are lying. The quote you've given has been completely taken out of context. The comment I responded to was also a personal attack, as you've flat-out stated that only someone with low mental cap…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 09:56 AM
1

Referring to the mental capacity of the person you're talking to is considered a personal attack. As well as that, you have consistently attacked the OP in this thread. You need to follow the rules in the sidebar - be civil and keep your comments to the topic at hand, not the person you're speaking to No, /u/babyboomersanta, I consistently pointed out the holes in OPs story. Repeating thing a that the OP themselves have previously posted, isn't me attacking them. Also, the point I was making wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 09:24 AM
1

What personal attack? Please reread it in context, and then point where I personally attacked another user. Unless, you are saying that reading a post history IS the same as reading one side of an email conversation? At which point...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 08:54 AM
1

Well, yes. I'm not sure what your point is?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 06:55 AM
1

Get the book, highly recommended.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 06:15 AM
1

All things considered, I simply cannot agree that the story is plausible. Also, for reference, this
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 06:10 AM
1

I see you completely ignored where she admitted to being a person that isn't honest, and is a troll. But hey, I don't have the unconstrained view of society that you clearly have. Hence, I understand that humans are flawed, and some are full of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 06:05 AM
3

I'm for actually egalitarianism. Feminism isn't for egalitarianism (or it wouldn't be so for women and so against men), therefore, I am against feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 06:03 AM
1

So therefore men and women have equal chance at success and/or failure, and any woman that isn't as successful as men, only has herself to blame. \o/ Finally something we agree on
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 06:01 AM
1

You've not really shown any reasoning that displays any kind of normal logic. Meanwhile, further searching of this nutcase's posts, show that she's basically thinking that she's in 50 shades of grey. However, this post says three important points. She then claims she got surgery at 19 (before saying she was considering surgery only 4mths ago) She says that she's a troll. She admits that she isn't honest. She has also said that she was ugly when she started being a sugar baby, which doesn't match…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:55 AM
1

I think you've misunderstood; You seem to want to convert me to believing this insanity. But, I simply don't give a fuck if you do or not. Perhaps you should head back to NoFap, I think your circle jerk game is getting too strong ;) And it was only 4mths ago that she was considering surgery.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:42 AM
1

LOL Yeah bro, she's totally telling the truth
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:35 AM
1

Btw, that post says that she made $2.5k the month before the post, and the post was from 2mths ago. Thanks for showing her story is even more ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:27 AM
1

The only derailment here, is you having a whinge that I looked at the post history. My comments, that I put together from the post history, were on topic. You've gone completely off it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:09 AM
1

Plausible eh? Ready? 139 days ago, she posted that she was ugly and looks "sub human" without a lot of make up. Seeing that she also is saying how much she makes in a month, we can speculate that she has done this for at least a month. So, let's round down the 139 day history to 100 days. Leaving the more recent 39 days to find and bang her millionaire. So, in the space of 100 days, she has had a number of cosmetic surgeries to change her appearance completely so that millionaires want to fuck h…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:07 AM
1

Why is me looking at a post history so troubling to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 04:54 AM
1

You literally don't understand what the word literally means.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 04:53 AM
1

I'm not sure why me not believing this person is such a problem for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 04:51 AM
1

I'm not European. I still find it odd that the first two years are like a Masters, but you couldn't go through it, and instead....... did a masters. That makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 04:20 AM
1

You think looking at two pages of post titles to be stalking?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 04:19 AM
1

For someone that like Occam's Razor, there's a metric ton of assumptions in your theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 03:31 AM
4

So, you take offence to thinking men are catching women. And then you attempt to change the analogy of use to a "more reasonable" one of one gender buying the other. Perhaps you have misunderstood the point of an analogy; Which is, to provide a comparison. Not a literal alignment of situations. Do you also think that "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" is actually about people holding birds? Lol Edit: The liberal/leftie downvotes are happening thick and fast today!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 03:25 AM
0

Black men commit more murder than white men, per capita. Don't give me this BLA bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:49 PM
3

Nice facts, but I've got facts too! There's also evidence that (in the US, and UK, at least) black people commit way more murders per capita than white people. (In the US, over half the murders are by black people!) Black men are also (in the US at least) more likely to not support their children, and mothers of their children. Are we citing facts to just hate men here? Or shall we distill it down further so that the Lefties get uncomfortable? (ProTip: If your statement wasn't sexist against men…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:48 PM
3

I like how you put "good-looking" first, followed by "fit", and then, "feminine". It's like you know that RP theory is correct, men want those things in a woman, so you instinctively put them first. Followed by a few nonsense items, to try and reclaim your identity in the description of yourself. I'm betting that you go to the gym and do exercises to build the areas that you know men find arousing (squats, for example), you put on make up that accentuates the things that men want, and after all …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:43 PM
2

Leftie SJW spotted. Hush now little one, run back to tumblr.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:35 PM
1

This. Any tattoo bar, neck, face, and hands, doesn't matter in today's corporate world. If TRPers want to judge men on their tattoos, they have to seperate everything else they are. Which, in my mind, if unreasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 09:49 PM
1

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAAAA Do you actually think this shit through before you post? Holy crap lol
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 04:32 AM
1

Mate, you quoted me, when I said that socially constructed means post-birth. You then said the exact same thing. Which shows that you haven't the faintest clue what I was saying, but you still thought that you could correct me. But, instead of actually providing anything of educational value (something that I imagine you do extremely rarely) you are presenting yourself as all SJWs do - with a sense of self-superiority. I can tell this from the amount of times that you have used quote marks to tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/16 04:17 AM
1

Brilliant retort. Exactly what I expect from an SJW. Demand I see it your way, and when I offer a counter, along with some questions that poke holes in your theory, you selectively quote me to look unreasonable, and try to avoid the argument I made. Typical. Go back to your echo chamber, this is a sub for debate. If you aren't wanting to have your thoughts questions and discussed, perhaps you shouldn't be here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 03:50 AM
1

So, in your view, humans are not assigned a gender by nature? And everything that each gender does, is entirely learned through interactions? How do you suppose that humans are the only creature to have broke away from the inbuilt things nature gives us? (Also, don't assume I'm angry, just because I'm disagreeing with you.) Further to the above points, please also check out http://www.uncontactedtribes.org for some interesting information (which you can gain more by reading things that are poste…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 01:26 AM
1

Holy shit. You quoted me: the gender you are is constructed after you are born Then you said that society has constructed your gender. But, then you go against that completely, and say that the individual makes their gender based on social interactions: you have learned gender based on your interaction with others, starting from birth. So, just to clarify, you just said the same fucking thing that I said. Therefore, genius, either we are both misunderstanding, or, you haven't the faintest idea t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 01:07 AM
1

Well, you missed that point completely. If gender is a social construct, as you claim, you can't be "born the wrong gender", it's literally impossible as the gender you are is constructed after you are born. Either you can be transgender (meaning you changed the gender you were born as), therefore showing that gender is not a social construct. or You aren't born a gender, as gender is a social construct, and therefore, transgenderism isn't actually possible, as you are whatever gender you feel y…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 02:56 AM
1

So you disagree with someone who says that they are transsexual?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 03:37 AM
1

I think you missed my point, entirely
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 03:36 AM
1

So, just to confirm, you can bag out the MRM for not doing anything, but if I ask what feminism has done for me, you say something specific for women. Genius.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 03:34 AM
6

There's only two ways something is unexplainable. Either, we, as a society, haven't figured out the answer yet. Or... It's unexplainable because it's completely fictional.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 09:33 AM
2

So? This isn't about feminism. This is about MRA's...and they literally have done nothing thus far, except for fishing regulations annnnnnd this movie. Nice strawman. And while we are playing the game of "what have you done for me lately?", name one thing that feminism has done to benefit my life? I'll give you a clue, absolutely nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 08:52 AM
2

I'm going no to ahead and guess that was a joke :P Unless you're from Snowy River? Also, how do you know what an animal identifies as? Do you speak fluent horse?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 08:42 AM
2

Aaaaaaah sorry, I misunderstood you :) I went MGTOW a few months after that girl. They just aren't worth the hassle.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 08:42 AM
15

Thanks for the language policing. Might want to let Vets know, seeing as they "gender" animals into male or female. But nevertheless, there is a difference between the two. There wasn't, until SJW/feminists came into the scene. Also, quick question: if gender is a social construct, how do transgender people feels they are the wrong gender? If their gender isn't determined by their chromosomes, why do they then feel the need to change their physical appearance of their sex (as you put it) to alig…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 02:05 AM
2

Missed the last sentence where she came back? I think she was just trying to regain control over the situation, after realising that she was on a fast slippery slide to Cocktown. Once she threatened to get off the train, and was promptly shoved off, she realised that said tantrum didn't work. As for the advice about the status of my apartment at the time, she knew what I did for work already, so it wouldn't have been an issue that would come up at that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 02:00 AM
9

I had a girl rubbing her ass against my crotch after a date night. She was kissing me, groping me, the whole deal. I asked if she wanted to go back to my apartment to do more, she agreed. She drove us there (she didn't drink, and I had had a couple of drinks). Back to mine, she starts removing my clothes and we end up lying on the bed, touching and kissing. Then she says "I'm not ready for this". I say, "ok, no problem... please leave" I explained that, she came to my apartment for sex, she drov…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 01:33 AM
1

I have to compare income, disabilities, date of birth, and what gender the person wants to identify as before I defend myself? Nope. Person thinks that they are tough enough to hit me, they're getting a response - regardless of what society thinks. I gotta protect my purty face.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 12:44 PM
1

And the next day, ask if the dildo gave consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:31 AM
2

I clearly, clearly, said that your guess could indeed be correct (you just skipped right over that part). What I take issue with, is you claiming this isn't a court of law, yet you also spout something and claim its evidence of guilt. You can't have it both ways, son. Evidence also needs to be hard evidence, if it's going to be used as such. Or you're just misusing the word in an attempt to add weight to your claim of its validity. Common sense, is not evidence. A majority of one side over anoth…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 09:34 PM
1

Misread those as well. Brilliant. And all of my posts? Even the ones in AskReddit and the other subreddits? No, you exaggerated, and made up things to feel superior. Like all SJW lefties, truth never gets in the way of trying to win. My posts here, though, are pointing out people's hypocrisy, bad arguments, and I'll thought out ideas. If you think that is me being unable to make a point, then I'll add you to the list of leftie SJWs that lost. See ya chump. Edit: for Christ's sake, be an adult, l…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 08:54 AM
1

You aren't much for conversations. I can see that. You rest up. No worries. pat pat
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 08:01 AM
1

It doesn't actually answer the question at all. And you clearly do give a fuck. Because you won't give a straight answer. Instead, you disingenuously state "I support free speech". But, if that were the case, why are you here arguing the opposing side? Let me answer that for you, you're here, because you believe something to opposes the ideals of TRP. You may support free speech, but you don't agree with what they say. That would be a guess on my part, sure. But just repeating that you support f…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 07:02 AM
1

I think my question was extremely clear. It contained 8 words (including an acronym), and a question mark. But you ask it to be in the context of the thread? That would make sense, if you hadn't willingly answered what you thought I asked, which was your view on free speech (which has nothing to do with this thread).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 06:50 AM
1

No. I thought my question was quite clear. Apparently, some people find those words followed by a question mark to be confusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 06:30 AM
2

No. That would be you not understanding what I wrote. Let's try again, I'll try and simplify it for you: Just because there are more A than B, doesn't mean that only A are downvoting B. You attempted, stupidly, to insinuate that because there are more RPers, they must be the ones downvoting. Which is an assumption, that you tried to pass off as evidence. Regardless of being new or not (although, I am aware that you said that in a condescending way), I'm still able to understand what is evidence,…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 06:27 AM
1

Interesting. What are your views on what TRP say? Being that they are just words.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 03:46 AM
2

The "available evidence" of not many BPers come here, so it must be the RPers.? Brilliant detective work. That's you using a guess, and claiming it as evidence. It's also assuming that BPers only ever say things that ALL BPers would support (which is, frankly, absurd). Yes, that is, indeed, a plausible view. I'm not discounting that. But don't be so dumb as to say what you said is evidence. Kind of sad I had to spell all that out for you, but I'm a helpful guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 01:13 AM
2

The title of the thread is someone having a cry about being downvoted, and assuming the downvotes come from RP men, specifically. But then you mentioned how BPers are outnumbered by RPers. When you mentioned the inequality of BP vs RP representation, how is that talking about downvoting?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 11:48 PM
2

I'm unsure why rule number 5 is anything to do with "the mods doing something" about BPers being outnumbered by RPers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 11:31 PM
1

I like how you reason that the violent left protests are OK for a number of reasons. Greenpeace ramming another boat and boarding it? That's not piracy! That's activism! SJWs smashing up the Facebook office in Germany unless Facebook ban right wing speech? That's not break and enter, it's fighting for a safe space. The radical left is no better than the radical right. They both think that they are justified in their illegal activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 09:50 PM
2

Like force BPers to come here? Or ban RPers until the subreddit population is equal? Yay for mandated outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 09:46 PM
1

I already provided a quick and easy three sources for violent left protests. Even google search "violent left wing protest" and be amazed than more than just anti trump makes the list.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 09:38 PM
1

If you don't understand by now, you never will. Or, you actually get my point, and want to remove its emphasis, so you ask me in a flippant way to highlight the point you already understood.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 09:37 PM
1

Sure, here's just three from a quick Google search One Two Three
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 08:41 AM
1

Leftist protests aren't violent? What? Are you simply ignoring the protests from the left that are violent? Or are you putting the blame of the violence on the other side that returns the violence?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 06:43 AM
1

Offence isn't ever given, it's only ever taken. You find that you take the most offence from it, because that's your choice. It doesn't mean that "it's the most offensive". It means "YOU find it the most offensive".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/16 06:42 AM
1

So, if the thread is ridiculous, and my argument was also ridiculous, why did you feel the need to dive in?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 11:39 PM
1

Lefties in general are egalitarianists, but there's a lot of misandry, anti-christianity, anti-americanism, etc There's also language policing, making up statistics, violent radical left protests. The left isn't exactly a bastion on love and respect for others.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 11:04 PM
1

Nice selective bias. Yes, all heterosexual men attend Trump rallies. What a ridiculous argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 11:00 PM
-1

I don't think that being left wing is conducive to owning who you are (if you are a straight male). Lefties have no love for heterosexual men. EDIT: The downvotes actually prove exactly what I said. Lefties hate straight men. Point that out and they downvote.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 06:56 AM
9

blue pill isn't a thing But You don't understand what Blue Pill is all about So it's not a thing, but it's enough of a thing to be about something? Do you BPers even think things through before you start writing them?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 06:53 AM
2

I didn't claim to win, though. You completely made that up. And if the initial question is asking for evidence in its nature, then asking for evidence in the answer, isn't out of the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/16 06:45 AM
1

Let me rephrase, I hope that your legal issue goes well, should you be legally in the right.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 11:18 PM
3

came here to point out that I was wrong don't provide evidence don't care if I believe them or not I'll win, even if they provide evidence That makes no fucking sense at all. I asked a question, you've claimed one side, haven't provided evidence, don't think you should provide evidence, as you providing evidence means I'll think I won. What the...?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 11:15 PM
3

You'd explode in my line of work. iMessage is the least of my worries. Add in an average of 250 emails a day, Blackberry Messenger, iMessage, SMS pages, phone calls (I average about 7 hours of calls a day). Can we trade phones please? Lol Also, hope your legal thing works out ok
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 12:04 PM
5

vulnerable kids turn to a hate group to solve their problems A hate group? Really..? The men's rights section of TRP is a hate group, is it? I don't expect terpers to understand scientific papers, they're not educated or trained to do so. But there is really no excuse for their level of ignorance. That's just a bunch of insults thrown together. But, considering you have a love of science and research, would you be able to point out how you know that RPers aren't educated and are all ignorant? Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 12:02 PM
3

Rules of a Leftie/SJW/BPer: Make a claim If someone asks for evidence of claim, tell them the burden of proof is on them to disprove the claim If they aren't trawling through the Internet/a library/Reddit to disprove your made-up claim, they aren't able to disprove it. Claim must be true. Be smug.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 04:28 AM
1

MGTOW has become a quasi cult Yes, there's lots of things that can be described as a cult. And usually, they are called that in a way as to be insulting. Can you explain why guys wanting to not engage with women intimately, are a cult? MRM needs to not just be on the internet I'm assuming you haven't seen the many YouTube videos of what happens during talks on Mens Rights? MRM need to volunteer at homeless shelters This is you attempting to say that, because MRAs aren't at soup kitchens, they th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:54 AM
1

Stalker :P
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:48 AM
1

You want me, with my username, to ask a question in TBP and you think I'd get a reasonable answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:48 AM
1

This would be why I've wrote about 5 responses to each comment. Shit. Thanks for the heads up
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:34 AM
1

So you have previously posted in a satirical/mocking subreddit regarding feminism? Where is that subreddit? Are their many people from TBP there? What is your problem with MGTOW? Why is MRM something you feel should be satirised and mocked?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:33 AM
2

Well, clearly I don't. You've proposed a "how do you know this doesn't happen" as an answer. Clue: It's not an answer. It's a hypothetical question that has no citation to prove itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:29 AM
2

That's what I'm asking for. Obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:27 AM
2

Well, clearly you didn't read the initial post. I'm not asking for "other subreddits", I'm asking specifically about the BPers that post in TBP. Where is their shock and horror against the other subreddits that are around?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 12:54 AM
1

So, you don't find other subreddits wrong or dangerous? Just this one in particular?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 12:53 AM
2

So TBPers, and your boyfriend, need to constantly check on the things they dislike, simply so their anger is up to date? That sounds extremely stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 04:39 PM
2

Strawman from one single post, anyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 08:26 AM
3

So you agree that, if BPers stopped reading the material that is triggering them (hate that term) they wouldn't actually have an issue with what TRP says?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 08:23 AM
3

The users of TRP can get along just fine without reading anything from TBP. If they want to read it, that's another story. If it's a public sub, they have every right to read it if they so choose. And TBP can ignore TRP...?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 06:17 AM
4

A person or group that seeks out other groups (often passing off of one of them), and says things for the sole purpose to entice an angry reactions. If I made an alternative account and went to TRP, claimed to a dude who loves to rape women or something like that, it would be trolling. So, if a subreddit is saying things within its own boundaries, whatever they say in that sub, needn't be read by other parties? Doesn't that mean that TRP shouldn't be judged from outside TRP? It's seems like you …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 05:31 AM
3

If that is what you consider a troll sub, whatever. It's not what I consider a troll to be, but I don't really care to argue about what exactly constitutes a troll. Just understand us for what we are. We aren't there to harass TRP, but stand on the sidelines and laugh amongst ourselves. What's your definition of a troll, then?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 05:09 AM
3

87 up votes. Now, how does that represent a subreddit of over 145,000?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 04:59 AM
5

I wouldn't say we are trolls Oh, really? I would: This isn't something we do because we thing it is the moral thing to do [...] [w]e do it because TRP in particular we find funny to mock. [...] I could probably find some group to make fun of nazis with, but I don't really get much of a kick out of it. (Emphasis added) I'd say that you just told us all that you are the very definition of a troll subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 04:58 AM
4

So I just have to trust you...?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 04:53 AM
3

But, you said that the subreddit wants to take away your rights and abuse you. Linking to a search term shows me nothing specifically about TRP wanting to, as a whole, remove your rights and abuse you. Citation required that supports your initial assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 04:53 AM
6

This isn't something we do because we think it is the moral thing to do, like we have some kind of obligation to "fight evil". We do it because TRP in particular we find funny to mock, and we think that it is okay to do so because it says immoral/wrong things. I could probably find some group to make fun of nazis with, but I don't really get much of a kick out of it So, you choose TRP because you are trolls and enjoy mocking that group in particular, not because you want to oppose things that ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 04:41 AM
2

Hang on, you said that you know that they are going to the other counter-subreddits. Surely you would only know that if you knew of those that did so? I assume from your comment now, that you are guessing?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 04:40 AM
3

Excellent, can you link me to the TBPers that are posting against other subs and not just TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 04:34 AM
5

I'm not asking if there are other counter subs, I'm asking the members of TBP specifically, if they are opposed to subreddits that they consider immoral, are they countering other subreddits? If not, why TRP specifically?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 04:31 AM
3

They promote dark triad to control and abuse women. They always talk about taking women's rights and agency away. The entire subreddit (including the Men's Rights and MGTOW tags) want to take away your rights and agency and abuse you? Citation required. EDIT: For the sake of transparency, /u/questioningwoman, and because some people have a habit of deleting comments and claims they don't want to support, I've quoted your statements in my posts. Thanks. EDIT2: What a surprise, she deleted her com…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 04:26 AM
6

Because it wants to take away my rights and abuse me. Can you show me how an entire subreddit wants to take away your rights and abuse you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 04:23 AM
3

Because TRP is a danger to me in a way that none of those other groups are. How is TRP a danger to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 04:22 AM
1

I didn't say it was cheap escapism, you're just trying to get me to explain why someone else said it. Stop trying to assert that statement on me. I'm NOT moving the goal posts, the goal posts were never around me in the first place. YOU are moving them to me. So if you'd like to talk about the initial point of the thread, lets include ALL of the post that started this thread, shall we? The initial post stated that TBP onto exists because they want to criticise TRP. Your first rebuttal to this wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 04:02 AM
1

TBP don't have the intention to offend RPers? HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHHAAHAAHA That's the entire point of TBPs existence. Stop trying to sound to God damn moral. You keep bring up cheap escapism like a parrot, but it doesn't change that TBP was created as a subreddit to mock TRP. There's no getting around that. The reason it was created, is because BPers consider RP theory to be immoral. There's no discussion. No rebuttal. No counter. TBP exists on the premise that they are right and TRP is wrong. …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 07:59 PM
1

Lol there were no emotions in my comment that you said was emotional. You only said it to derail the conversation because I made a good point. Which is why you admitted that you had no counter or rebuttal. Have a great day!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 07:51 PM
3

yes, all wars are due to evil men wanting more land. Women would never be so evil as men. Also, I love the shade of green the sky is in this reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 11:26 AM
1

Do you not understand how the reddit comment structure works? Or are you suddenly confused at a pointless comment following a sweeping comment from yourself in accusing me of being emotional? Perhaps, instead of trying to belittle a point someone makes into an emotional little rant, you could behave like an adult and rebut or counter it, instead of being a condescending little douche? Or, we can carry on back and forth with pointless put downs that have zero bearing on the initial conversation t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 11:24 AM
1

So you agree that TBP say things that are to offend RPers. Therefore we exclude what they are saying from this conversation. Then we are talking about the things that TRP says, but are excluding the things that TBP says. We can't bring in what TBP says as a reason for what TRP says. Wow. Are you trying to set different rules for each side, or is that an accident?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 07:23 AM
1

Whether or not TBP claims are justified is not an entirely different conversation; It's part of this conversation. Unless, of course, we can also exclude the claims that TRP makes of TBP? If we do that, we can only have the facts in play: TRP is for men who want to "take the red pill" in many ways, there's PUAs, MGTOW, MRAs, etc. TBP exists solely (as per their sidebar) to mock and satirise TRP. So, excluding what each party says is kind of impossible, when one side specifically makes a point to…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:18 AM
7

The fact that the line "This subreddit stands against hate speech" is right above that post title, says it all. Hate is bad! Unless we disagree with you Bullying and harassment is wrong! Unless we disagree with you
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 03:50 AM
6

You think men start wars to be more masculine? You don't think that men fight in wars to protect their children and people back home in general?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 01:01 AM
3

We are now talking about whether it's justified? Oh, ok. I was sure that you just agreed that the retaliation is to be expected. If TBP is just "an echo chamber for cheap escapism", perhaps it would be better if they outright didn't say that their subreddit is solely to mock (sorry: be satirical) of TRP? If I got together a few friends, and we took the piss out of you, you would have every right to be offended and would likely choose to respond. Would that group be justified in existing solely t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 12:59 AM
2

And not everything that TBP emotionally assumes of RPers is true. Not all of us hate women, not all of us are misogynistic. But that's the narrative that BPers push.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 12:41 AM
1

Not emotional at all, dear. Just adding context to the situation. That's ok though, you just aren't as in touch with your emotional side as I am. Keep trying to progress with it though, I believe in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 12:26 AM
1

But having the choice of men doesn't count? What choice does Jack have? He MUST engage if he is to meet someone he likes. That's in the story as well. Jack must approach the women in turn, until he isn't shut down. Complaining because you consider Jill's agency to be insufficient, but completely ignoring the insufficient agency that Jack has over the situation, shows your bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:57 PM
4

I think that a subreddit that is created for the sole purpose of mocking another subreddit should expect the original sub to aggressively retaliate. That's just how things work in life. If TBP doesn't want to be attacked for its views, maybe it should exist solely to mock those that are doing the attacking. Kind of like pulling the pin on a grenade, and wondering why your arm is now missing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:54 PM
7

You need to read Thomas Sowell. Or research the difference between a Constrained vision and an Unconstrained vision of society
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:45 PM
8

Hang on, you think women wouldn't start wars? HAHAHAHAHAHAA Have you seen the levels women that hate each other go to? Jesus Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:42 PM
4

There's no RPers on the RadFem subreddit to defend things either. Because that subreddit is blocked to the public, unlike TRP who will engage.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:37 PM
5

Because people that scream tolerance the loudest, are usually the most intolerant of ideas that they don't agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:34 PM
3

Certainly not! Just like being paid to kill someone, isn't murder. (What the fuck are you people smoking?)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:32 PM
7

I think that most (if not all?) Red Pill people, would have likely started as Blue Pill, or at the very least and very Blue-tinged Purple. So, it's not a matter of RPers learning about BP and feeling empathy or sympathy towards them. The fact that the RPers converted to RP says that they don't agree with the way that the BP world functions (if we view it as opposing worlds).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:29 PM
1

She turned down 9 guys for multiple reasons... but she doesn't have a choice. Poor Jill.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 09:21 PM
1

Read the rest of my posts in the thread, to see where I was going with this. TL;DR - Women need to approach the dating scene from the level men are approaching it. Once women stop behaving like a queen at court, and seeing the men as jesters for her amusement, perhaps the dating scene could be two groups of adults, finding the one they want. There's a difference between approaching dating as a mature adult, and being masculine, aggressive, and slutty.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 09:21 PM
1

Why does she have to take the lead when she doesn’t have to? And how can it ever be Jill’s fault that she has a ton of Jacks coming on to her giving her plenty of options? Why do you set it up as a fault-game at all? ok, so let's say that Jack, the only guy in the hypothetical bar that she wouldn't turn down, goes his own way. What then? Then we have Jill complaining that all the men hitting on her aren't worth her time. Jill complains that men hit on her all the time (this complaint is only iss…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 09:20 PM
3

Cause and effect. If Jill isn't adult enough to harden the fuck up and take the lead, then she deserves to be left behind. Maybe, if Jill wasn't sat around waiting for guys to court her, and being picky as fuck, she could have decided that she could do her own thing, leaving Jack to be alone and desperate. You've looked at my comment all wrong, I believe in equal opportunity. If Jill isn't using her opportunity, she deserves no success.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 09:43 AM
5

I pity Jill too. What if Jack realises that this is a stupid path to happiness, and that Jill simply isn't worth his effort if she didn't come to him before he went to her? I personally hope that Jack just goes and does his own thing, and leaves Jill to weep into all the drinks that all the discarded men bought her.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 08:54 AM
1

The problem with socialism, is that you eventually run out of someone else's money. Also, side note. There is no "healthy balance of power" in socialism. For example, in a socialist world, a factory is owned by the public, but the workers choose to work in there. There is no ability for the government to raise or lower production from the factory, it's entirely up to the workers. However, the profits from the factory are given to all members of the public. There is an inherent problem with this …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 08:40 AM
0

From your aggressive nature with words, and demands to burn down an internet subreddit (not sure how that is even possible, but hey, I don't live in your version of reality), I'm going to go ahead and assume that you consider yourself liberal. You know, I've often found that the people that preach tolerance, are some of the most intolerant people, when it comes to ideas that they disagree with. Claiming I hate women, and am afraid of men, saying I'm inadequate, all because of a subreddit. But su…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 07:46 AM
3

That is in conflict with your earlier comment. Where you stated that it's easier for a guy to have sex, because they want to have sex. Are you now saying that the desire to fuck only relates to the ability to get laid, as long as the guy that is wanting to have sex, ticks off other boxes too? You seem to be slowly straying away from the assertion that a man just wanting to have sex, equals having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 10:48 PM
5

Which was exactly the point I was making.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 09:46 PM
4

Any person would happily win the lottery. Doesn't mean that they are actually going to win the lottery, does it? Willingness to fuck, doesn't equal frequency of sex. Or are you forgetting that the term "incel" literally disproves your point, they are involuntarily celibate. Meaning, they want sex, but can't get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 07:44 PM
3

On who's scale? Yours? Mine? Society's? Sounds like you think that you think you can assign values to things, and think that everyone else needs to follow along with the assigned value. No thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 09:28 AM
2

all the RP does is encourage you to turn that fear into hate So hate is bad. Gotcha. Burn it down. That sounds like you're hateful towards something. I thought hate was bad. How very ironic.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 09:26 AM
1

But, surely you would be in thee train of thought that anyone wants you specifically? You always talk about how you can have anyone, including straight men, but now you're all about caution in the approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:46 PM
1

its not really about his situation, there are spergs who are benign. but he willingly hangs out with rpers, which means he's of questionable character since rpers are generally sexist and therefore subhuman sacks of pig vomit who deserve to lose a slow painful battle with every terminal disease listed on webmd. the fact that he socializes with filth like that suggests he might not be too dissimiliar in his views. Says others are Asperger's sufferers and have no social skills. Then insults almost…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 09:39 AM
1

What are you even for?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 09:37 AM
5

It's really irritating the way autists swarm to the net like flies to shit. Yeah! Fuck those people with a disability! How dare they use normal people inventions! (Are you fucking serious? Jesus Christ, what the hell is wrong with you?)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 08:36 AM
4

Actual worst case scenario: Girls that know each other start talking about how you are always hitting on them, they then start rumours about how you are always after sex, and therefore, must be a pervert. One girl takes benefit from this, and accuses you of sexual assault and you end up facing a court case due to her lies. You end up going to jail and getting raped daily for the duration of your sentence. Upon release, you are flagged as a sex offender, and have to register your movements and li…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 09:40 PM
5

I think that, if it's"very easy to make out" with a guy, then that guy isn't straight. It would not go well for a guy attempting to force himself upon me. You can talk however much you want about your bullshit ideas, but if a guy is actually straight, he's not going to want another dude's tongue in his mouth. But to say that you are somehow able to turn any man on, shows just how up yourself you are. Kind of like the fat girl that dresses like a size 6; she's deluded, and can't actually get whoe…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 09:22 PM
1

That's the user's slang term for someone with Asperger's Syndrome.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 04:35 AM
3

no, i think the disproportionately high number of spergs in the MRM make having shared values and common goals unrealistic Straight into the insults and slurs as usual, I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 01:24 AM
-1

I've found that downvotes usually happen (at least to me) after a lengthy back and forth, when facts and logic have been applied to the situation, and the BPer has no other way to express their rage. I then get downvotes, and usually abuse and childish behaviour thrown at me. I just report offending comments to the mods. As for the downvotes, I find deep pleasure in knowing that someone actually thinks that clicking a downwards pointing arrow means that my argument has less value. When, in fact,…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 01:19 AM
6

Not circlejerking at all. 5/7
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 01:14 AM
2

Would never. I've done my time of sleeping with women (both while "enjoying being single" and when I was married). Experienced more sexual things a than most people would want to try, gangbangs, swingers parties, being a bull in a few cuckold scenarios, BDSM with submissive girls. I've done a lot. But after all that, I can safely say; Women just aren't worth the hassle. They bring up feelings when there wasn't meant to be any, try to guilt guys into relationships, lie about thugs and have no rem…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 08:17 PM
1

You're only doing a condescending little sigh because I'm right. Your views when you are involved in the situation are in conflict to the situation were you aren't. And you're unable to explain that conflict, while still aligning with your narrative that you spout when your children aren't in potential danger. But that's ok, because, you're the one that has to constantly manage to deal with your conflict daily. Not me. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/16 07:59 AM
1

What you're proposing is "thought crimes". That's a slippery slope indeed. But you want to move away, for his thought crime. Conflict in your views. He also said he viewed mu child in a sexual way The salon writer openly said he finds children sexually attractive. You said that he needs to be supported. Conflict of answer. I'd tell him that I support him but I'm helping him by removing a child who is too close to him. Who says how close is too close? You? Legal entities? At what point is control…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/16 12:34 AM
3

Without a doubt, yes. I've got female friends that are very attractive, but I'd never have sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 11:40 PM
3

You broke the rule of CMV posts though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 09:59 PM
3

And now you're falling to insults. Exactly as OP stated. So he was right after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 09:57 PM
3

I think you are looking for a reason to claim moral high ground, and not enter into a conversation. Also, you aren't changing his view. So your top level comment is breaching the rules. (If we are going to talk about being able to engage with someone, that someone should be able to follow the rules, yeah?)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 09:55 PM
1

I think you've took the analogy too far there, and tried to turn it into a strawman. But that's ok, you don't like MGTOW, I get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 09:51 PM
4

And a lot of AA members would have a whisky. Doesn't mean it's good for them, does it?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 12:03 PM
1

Love that answer. Thank you :)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 12:02 PM
4

Well, people that are in AA talk about how they aren't drinking alcohol. So.....
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 11:59 AM
1

I've always wanted to ask someone so open to men not playing the traditional role that their gender is "meant" to take; what is your view on "pure" MGTOW? (And by pure, I mean a guy just checking out of any intimate relationship with women)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 11:49 AM
1

If the guy was serious about not offending, he most probably wouldn't situate himself near kids, right? So they need to not be near children at all, yet they can't be persecuted, as that "causes children harm". Interesting Conflict of views you have there. I said the type of paed who'd made a conscious choice not to harm children wasn't the type who wouldn't leap at the chance to offend. But, such a person also wouldn't put themselves in a situation where they were tempted. Such a neighbour is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 08:47 AM
1

please see the hypothetical situation I wrote, and give your response. Then let's talk if supporting pedophiles is ok or not, once it's a personal situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 11:21 PM
1

That's exactly my point. You're all for supporting a pedophile, when they aren't around your child. But as soon as they (hypothetically) are, your normal human instinct comes through. You then reason away your reaction, as if you aren't going against what you said earlier. You even say that you'll move away because your child's safety is paramount, but, the hypothetical pedophile wouldn't leap at the chance to offend. And as for the alternate sexual preference, you actually say "maybe". Not that…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 11:20 PM
2

Men (and women) still believe that women's clothing choice impacts rape "decisions". Of course this is still an issue if its still a part of the general consciousness. Walking through a ghetto with a wad of cash on show is part of the decision for someone to mug you. But it doesn't mean that everyone will mug you. To say that clothing doesn't play a part in a rapist choosing to rape someone is terribly naive. Note: I'm using the common sense version of rape, which is a crime committed by a rapis…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 08:59 AM
-1

Being born a certain way does not make it genetic. Yeah. That's exactly what being born a way means. In that, you've had zero social input, only genetic input.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 06:04 AM
1

For reference, the initial claim I made was: It resulted that there isn't a genetic predisposition at all, it's decided (directly or indirectly) by the individual. What part of that do you disagree with, seeing that if genetics were playing a part, the amount of homosexual twins should be much higher than it is seen to be by that study, even if genetics were partly a cause. To claim heredity genetics as a cause doesn't counter my assertion, because the child from two parents shares their parents…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 05:55 AM
1

Oh christ. We weren't messaging back and forth. I made a statement. You responded to that statement. Why, if you agree with the assertion/statement that I made, did you decide to respond to my post to give a different view of homosexuality being heredity?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 05:42 AM
1

So if you agree with the original assertion, why did you jump in with a counter argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 05:38 AM
1

“Because they have identical DNA, it ought to be 100%,” Dr. Whitehead notes. But the studies reveal something else. “If an identical twin has same-sex attraction the chances the co-twin has it are only about 11% for men and 14% for women.” Do you even read?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 05:06 AM
1

If homosexuality had a significant genetic factor, then we would expect there to be a positive correlation and in fact this is what they found. No, they didn't. Please read the sources I posted earlier. Your source is about heredity and not the likelihood of identical twins sharing a sexual preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 05:02 AM
1

I would probably move house. That's dead creepy. You'd refuse to support the guy through his struggles and would just move house? You'd make him feel persecuted simply for admitting his alternative sexual preference? With support, they might be able to find coping skills to get through life without causing harm to kids. He already said that he won't actually have sex with your child, just that they are "hot as fuck". Isn't that admitting that he has those urges? Surely you moving away could mean…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 03:48 AM
1

But, wouldn't that mean that if there are identical twins, and one is gay, the other (with the exact same genetic code) should also be gay? The references I posted say otherwise. And while some things may be passed down from parents, the identical twins should BOTH have the resulting genetic code. Suggesting that being gay isn't actually genetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 02:25 AM
1

Still unable to use manners? Oh well... Let's say that a neighbour says to you, that he is sexually attracted to your young child (under 5yrs old). He also adds "but, I'd never actually have sex with them, but damn they're sexy". Now, he's a non-acting pedophile, so I'm guessing that you are totally fine with him hanging around your toddler... ...right? Because, as you said, acting upon what that pedophile just told you, puts children in danger.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 01:25 AM
1

Not with a one word demand. Use your manners!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/16 12:54 AM
1

Persecuting someone who can't help what they're attracted to sexually helps no one. And puts children in danger. I'm speechless at the amount of hamstering.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 11:52 PM
1

He says that pedophilia is an alternate sexuality. Are you of that same mindset?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 11:37 PM
2

How is it a red herring? You said X fits the classical definition of fascism. I pointed out that the opposite of X, Y, also fits the classical definition of fascism. By making the comparison, I'm highlighting that fascism (as a description), is basically meaningless now. (To paraphrase George Orwell). It's completely not off topic, as it's countering your assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 11:22 PM
1

Tell me you didn't just cite a website that glorifies pedophilia.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 11:18 PM
3

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 11:12 PM
2

Lots of things fit the classical definition of fascism. I'd love to tell you about how radical feminism fits it, but the radome subreddit is blocked to visitors. But I'm sure they have nothing fascist to hide, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 11:04 PM
1

MGTOW. Sour grapes and lazy people I respect as much as I respect sluts. Anger phase. Shouldnt exist and shouldnt be encouraged. Yeah the world doesnt work like you thought it did. Stop being a child and do something about it. You end your post (where you've bitterly attacked practically everyone in the RP sphere) with "end rant", showing you're just angry about everyone listed. Which is ironic, seeing as you claim that MGTOW are the angry ones. Brilliant hamstering, 5/7.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 10:29 PM
-1

Apparently not. There was a study regarding identical twins' disposition to being gay. It resulted that there isn't a genetic predisposition at all, it's decided (directly or indirectly) by the individual. Lemme dig out the report I read. Source 1 Source 2 Interesting stuff that counters the whole "I was born this way" argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 09:09 PM
1

I can't tell if the post is reinstated, or is forever deleted, (I'm on mobile).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 08:57 PM
1

I feel that I was actually changing the view. In that the view was "this is just a red pill subreddit". I explain that it wasn't, and only appears so due to lack of blue pill attendees. How can someone change their view in this case? It's impossible without highlighting what's happening. Your removal of my post was, I think, incorrect. How can someone change a view point that is, in effect, a circlejerk to start with? Not only that, but there are other top level posts remaining that are saying b…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 08:48 PM
1

Ah huh, sure you were.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 08:31 AM
1

See, now you are hoping I continue, so that I say something out of line, so you can go on a witch hunt. No thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 08:04 AM
1

The details are very important, because I think that it shows that women need men around them. Why else lie about being pleasured, when you aren't? Other than to keep the man around? (This is from a guy who no longer engages with women intimately at all)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 07:58 AM
1

Why does she want him to like her....?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 07:52 AM
1

So she lies for his pleasure to be complete?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 07:47 AM
1

And what is it that she wants, from lying about having an orgasm?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 07:32 AM
1

What on earth does that have to do with a woman faking orgasms?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 07:12 AM
1

......and that point is......?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 06:55 AM
5

So, what do you want? More BPers? Less RPers? Some sort of handicapping for those that are averse to insults, to enable special snowflakes to last longer before stopping returning?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 06:34 AM
8

So, they should force BPers to come here? Or perhaps they should ban a few RPers so that the numbers are more "equal"? How do you think that they should make it the debate sub that it used to be?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 06:26 AM
1

Remember when I said that you needed to pick a point and stick to it? Well, I'd like to refer to that again.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 06:24 AM
8

Then recruit BPers to come debate us. Not our problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 06:15 AM
7

I didn't say that you said it was anyone's fault, you assumed that I made that assumption. I proposed that the lack of BPers is due to BPers not coming here. I then reflected on your view that there is a negligible about of BPers, and with the likelihood that you would prefer more BPers (you reflected how, with a lack of them, it's "laughable to call it purple").
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 06:11 AM
1

Let's just assume that women are actually stupid cunts. Aren't RPers meant to be the ones hating women? Why are you so intent on calling women stupid cunts? I've not agreed to it once, and neither did the other RPer.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 06:04 AM
10

Change Your View that Blue Pillers aren't coming to the party and debating, therefore making this a majority of RPers? Wouldn't that be the fault of Blue Pillers? I've purposely not put this in reply to the Mod post, because you are asking a redundant question. You seem to think that it's the fault of RPers, that BPers choose not to come here. They all can, and thats because this subreddit is equal opportunity. What you're asking for, is similar to mandated outcome. Which is an entirely differen…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 05:51 AM
5

SWEET! Can you point me to where this law is written? There's a lot of women around dressed modestly, and I would like to call the police about it. EDIT: Guess not, seeing as you deleted your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 05:42 AM
2

......a crime? Where do I need to move to, to be embraced by this amazing patriarchal wonderland, where women legally have to over sexualise herself?!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 05:37 AM
1

Ok, so you agree then? Not with your statement, it excluded everyone outside of RP. Which, I would imagine means that you are created a loaded question. Especially as you followed it up with this request to agree. I am talking about the views expressed in TRP subreddit by TRP members. This is a belief expressed by several prominent members of the comnunity. I'm not saying that it is part of RP doctrine, only that it is a RP belief. Because it is. You really need to stick to using TRP or RP. You …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 05:10 AM
2

So women have the same capability to deal with people looking at them as disabled children? And all along, I thought RPers were meant to be the misogynists?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 04:00 AM
1

Red pillers in general are results-oriented in their ideology. Anyone not results oriented, is only going to be accidentally successful at any endeavour. Believing that women are stupid cunts works to get you laid is a RP belief. Nope. That would be your interpretation of what you think that the RP beliefs are. Unless you are now misconstruing Red Pill, to The Red Pill, which, as you said earlier, are two different things. I used one Red Mod as an explicit example of this belief, but this view i…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 01:05 AM
1

Every red piller Apart from that guy who said that he didn't think that, and you told him that he's not what you consider a "real" Red Piller. In that he's Red Pill, but not The Red Pill. So he's not included in your extremely specific focus group. And now, you are only giving half of the point you earlier made, in that you clearly said that Red Pillers think women are entitled dumb cunts. Then you said it was one guy thought that. Then it was that Red Pillers are just staunchly practical. Now a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 10:38 PM
1

A particular Red Piller? So, perhaps you should keep that person's opinion aligned to them, and not impose it on others? As well as that, the fact that you then went full "no true Scotsman" on the other guy for not thinking the same as a particular red piller, shows your bias in this situation. And as for being interesting in whatever that guy said to get laid, I couldn't care less. Sex, and intimacy has no draw for me anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 09:36 PM
1

And staunch practicality would result in thinking every woman is an entitled dumb cunt? (As you put it)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 07:07 PM
1

Haha ok, sure
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 11:21 AM
1

Someone didn't understand what I just said, did they? (That's a rhetorical question, it's obvious you didn't. Because you then said I was bitching about something).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 11:15 AM
1

Report a comment on a thread already removed from the chronological post page of the sub? What would be the point in that?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 11:09 AM
13

Sounds like you are fishing for a specific type of answer that you can point a finger at, and scream that TRPers are all misogynists. Which is nothing more than Blue Pill circle jerking.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 10:45 AM
1

You cannot just add a /s tag and claim that your rebuttal wasn't in bad faith. It was. For someone seems to care more about facts rather than feelings, you seem to not have Yeah. Actually, I completely can. And I did. And it was included in the quote. And, it wasn't in bad faith, it was in sarcasm. You see, not everything is good faith and bad faith, sometimes people say things that are sarcastic, because they can. That's how freedom works. As for not having facts; Nice try, but you've completel…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 07:06 AM
2

Women, as a generalisation, aren't as interested as men are, in electronics.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 03:27 AM
3

You see that "/s"? That means "sarcasm". Let's bring it back on track, shall we? What argument would you like me to rebut?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 03:22 AM
2

I think that I clearly said that women aren't as interested, curious, and inquisitive about electronics. It's been the other posters that have taken this as an insult, and widened that scope to thinking I said women aren't curious at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 03:14 AM
4

You addressed nothing I wrote. You wrote: "Do you have any rebuttal, or are you just going to call me names?" I wrote: "What names did I call you, exactly? [...] And, rebuttal to what?" That's a direct retort to your question. Your last two replies have put forth zero effort in addressing anything I have written. The 2nd to last reply was pointing out that you completely misconstrued everything I wrote, and pointed out that you are being irrational. The last reply was me asking you to elaborate …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 02:58 AM
4

But, I didn't put a financial value on it. Can you show where I did?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 02:51 AM
3

Do you see how that can be read? Around here, assuming good faith is a great way to get blindsided Victim complex. I didn't say that not being interested in electronics meant that someone was stupid. You insinuated that. Those who have a high intuitive/empathetic intelligence often need to make connections - syncing themselves up to other stories, perspectives, emotions, etc. Exploring our past is a great way to help grow that awareness. Didn't say that was bad. Did I? And actually seeing and to…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 02:45 AM
2

What names did I call you, exactly? (That would be you, again, claiming I said something that I didn't, and then taking offence at something that didn't happen.) And, rebuttal to what? Your unreasonable accusation that I believe in male superiority?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 02:40 AM
3

I didn't say one thing was superior over the other though, did I? I just pointed out reasons for a gender imbalance at an electronics show. Well done for playing the victim card. Have you been to an electronics show/fair? If not, why not? If yes, what's your reason for the imbalance? Must be the evil patriarchy stopping all those women at the door. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 02:09 AM
0

Electronics, gadgets, computers, etc... These are things that people get into when they have an inquisitive mind. I've heard of studies where male babies will stare longer at a machine than a person's face (that they don't know), while girls are the other way around. Therefore, boys get interested in electronics and the like from an early age due to wanting to work out how things work, or how to use a tool (in this case a gadget) in their lives. This carries on into adulthood. Girls (and obvious…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 11:15 PM
4

Sweet, thanks I did that now, all good :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 11:15 PM
2

TLDR: Some assholes, regardless of gender or pill, assume the opposite gender's fault in cases of infidelity regardless of who cheated. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 11:02 PM
1

Yeah, that's my point. Thanks for pointing out what I just said. You referenced articles. You asked for our views. For a view you don't like, you deflected to the writers of the articles. But for views that you do like, you circle jerk over it. Hence, you are breaking the rule of circle jerking. Which is why, I would imagine, your post no longer shows up in the timeline of the PPD history.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 10:43 PM
1

So you're posting a rhetorical question, in a debate subreddit? That seems, well, echochamber-y.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 05:16 AM
1

Did you just say that Red Pillers (meaning, one would guess, all red pillers), make an assumption on people that disagree with them? I'm also pretty sure that you also stated that you think all red pillers assume the same thing. I'm going to go out on a limb here, and guess that you haven't the first clue of how ironic your post is, and you think that making an assumption that it's bad that an entire group of people make assumptions? I'd usually come up with something with more depth than that, …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 05:15 AM
2

So much, this.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 05:08 AM
7

That joke seemed a bit.... forced.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 03:24 AM
2

611. And I've now been MGTOW for over three years. Fuck yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 03:14 AM
1

Removing emotion from the topic. If sexual intercourse has occurred, during the rape, then then rape included sex. Therefore, rape can be sex. Unless it was a different act (eg, digital rape (meaning the digits of the hand, not something online), or rape with an object other than a physical appendage. After that you start getting into attaching schematics and emotions into the concept, which turns the whole conversation into a rabbit hole. EDIT: I find it hilarious that a post that clearly answe…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 02:58 AM
0

And all of them aligned with Pythagoras' theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 02:44 AM
1

You deflected my view, and attempted to pass it to the writers of the article.. I'm not sure what kind of views you are seeking, if when you receive one that you don't accept, you just deflect it elsewhere. Also, if you are using articles as citation to your post (which I can no longer see in the main page), I would suggest that you cite articles that you agree with. Otherwise, you are going to have being respond to the statements that you chose to use, as if you chose the statements due to agre…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 02:33 AM
1

You asked for PPDs view, but you don't want my view. Can I ask what the reason is that you don't want my view specifically?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 02:14 AM
2

You asked for PPDs views. Now you don't want views that don't align with your view? Sounds like circle jerking.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 01:31 AM
1

No room to just be Unless, of course, their version of being doesn't involve lasting touch from other people. Because then they don't have room to just be. Or something. Please don't tell me how I should behave or deal with emotion, so that its online with your version of dealing with the same circumstances. And certainly don't try to insinuate that your version is correct and mine is wrong because it's different.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 01:01 AM
3

You're extrapolating that all wrong. Male murderers are more frequent than female murderers, sure. What is it about their psyche? Well, they are clearly not right, because they're murderers. But, that's not gender specific, like you're trying to make it. Instead, we should ask, why are murderers murderers? Ignoring the female ones, and focusing on the male ones, simply because of percentages is dumb, and shows your bias in wanting to gender the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 07:18 AM
7

But what does that prove? That more men kill? Awesome. Now what? What are you meaning to achieve by stating that? Also, this is a debate subreddit, if you are expecting to not have your points debated, you're in the wrong place.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 02:50 AM
7

OH YEAH! I stand corrected.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 02:48 AM
3

Hahaha I thought that came out hilariously
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 02:46 AM
3

I agree with this one. Years ago, I chased a girl that was not, by any stretch of the imagination, facially attractive. However, massive tits overrode that, and we successfully made the sex many times. Great success. I used to be so narrow-minded.. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 12:03 AM
5

Not in the slightest. About half (depending on the source of the data) of children murdered by one of their parents are murdered by their own mothers. If we talk about Husband/Wife murderers, then wives are massively more likely to kill their husbands than the other way around. You're stating a fact, but trying to attach an emotional context to it, to (I guess) insinuate that all men are capable of murder, simply because some men murder. By that logic, all women are capable of murdering their ow…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:14 PM
2

It's supposedly a sign of insanity for a person to repeat the same action, expecting a different result. However, you are talking about people as a collective. Who is to say that each man that attempts to ask a woman out, isn't asking for the first time, and upon being turned down, subsequently never asks a woman out ever again? Personally, I see a light at the end of the tunnel. The responses from women in the "bye felipe" meme is highlighting that men are being shut down often, and brutally sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:09 PM
7

Complete and utter strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:02 PM
8

Wait, what? Because men murder other men, women are.. What? Your post makes no sense. What are you trying to get across in your message?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 10:59 PM
1

That conclusion is based on a percentage of RPers believing a specific point. So, again, what is the percentage of RPers? You have even shown in your comment that percentages are needed for your conclusion, yet are unable to provide them. If RPers agree with you on "this fact", what is the fact? What is the percentage that you are inferring? Do you have any data at all? You are just asking my to believe your opinion as a fact, but you're then stating that the conclusion is comparable to one from…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/16 12:08 AM
1

So your presentation as if this was a factual comparison, is actually you presenting something you've heard on reddit, as fact. What's your baseline comparison? What men away from reddit have told you? Christ, I hope you don't work in research. Also, it seems the answer to my question should have been "a majority in the sense that you think it's a majority", as you don't have figures, but are claiming a majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 08:54 PM
1

Enjoy pissing off a group of people. Sounds like trolling. Which is against the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 11:12 AM
1

So, is that a majority in a statistical view, or majority in the sense of that you feel it's a majority? Because I can't help but notice that you didn't actually answer, and just appealed to the popular opinion in the thread. Surely you didn't pose the OP statement, knowing what the resulting comments would be?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 04:18 AM
1

Majority in a statistical view, or majority in the sense of that you feel it's a majority?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 01:28 AM
1

Stating water freezes at zero deg C may not need a citation, but, it can be cited. Your analogy is pointless. Stating that you don't need facts because some red pillars don't have facts, is childish. You could take advantage and cite arguments to silence their claims, but you aren't. Should I guess from your insistence to avoid citing for the claim, that you cannot provide citation, and are - in fact, just pointing the blame at RPers that don't use citations so you don't have to? Ask those RPers…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 12:06 AM
0

As my flair states, facts don't care about your feelings. The OP stated something as a fact, and wished it to be debated as such. But, the moment someone asks for the actual fact, the response is that it feels like the statement in OP is correct. You are now debating feelings over facts. This SHOULD have been the approach of OP, but it wasn't. If you feel that asking for evidence of a statement makes this debate subreddit to be useless, then, you need to question what you think a debate is. Feel…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 11:31 PM
1

That doesn't answer my point, whatsoever. The statement was a comparison stating that a disproportionate difference is observable. Such a difference can only be seen, if the base figure, and comparison figure, are both known. So, asking again, what percentage is average, and what is the TRP percentage, that shows a disproportionately large number?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 11:04 PM
14

An unemployed woman is more likely to be able to date than an unemployed man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 10:59 PM
1

Your question is full of varied statements, I can't give a right/wrong answer, because I have no idea what you are asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 10:56 PM
1

Did you just generalise the entirety of RP reasoning, from the minority of one part of it's reasoning? That's.... that's amazing...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 10:48 PM
2

What percentage is average, and what percentage does TRP have? Otherwise you are asking us to give a response against (literally) made up statistics. Which, strikes me as circlejerking.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/16 10:12 PM
1

That makes zero sense. Quote wasn't even me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 10:33 PM
1

Didn't have a tone of lighthearted and nice, whatsoever. But don't worry, we don't have to like each other. (And it's not a guy having a bad day, just because he doesn't like you.)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 08:12 PM
-2

You're more than welcome, consider it in response to you not reading the whole thing, but feeling right enough to jump in to point to it that I was wrong. Three days after the posts happened. Have a great day.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 08:02 AM
-1

I'd guess that too, because of the edit where she said that's what she was talking about, after I asked the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/16 06:35 AM
7

Take one Red Pill to change your life! (results may vary) Jokes aside, I think that the reason for the dramatically different responses to taking the red pill, is due to the two types of men that (generally) frequent the TRP sub and the MGTOW sub. Either you crave being seen as the alpha amongst other men, and will attempt to do the things that you believe will reenforce that position (banging girls), or, you want to improve your own life and cut out the shit bits. They (TRP) see that they are g…
/r/MGTOW25/02/16 05:30 AM
1

Sounds like you've already made your judgement as to whether or not someone can lose interest in sex, or cease to see the value in it. Therefore, I'm going to decline to answer the question, as I don't feel that there is any point to the effort
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 09:46 PM
1

That's a very odd question. Not sure how/why to answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 08:24 PM
1

Because, simply put, I lost interest in sex. There's no value in it to me. I'm a busy guy, and setting up sex and having sex, just doesn't fit my schedule.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 07:05 AM
1

The girls I know are in two brackets. Either they work in IT, and we can talk about that stuff. Or they are girls that I used to be FWB with, and just stopped sleeping with them years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 05:55 AM
1

Maybe 25% female. Not many of them are Tomboys.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 05:33 AM
1

I do whatever I want in life. My money is my own (no spending it on women). There is no room for intimacy in my life, intimacy only results in a woman taking advantage. I won't be having kids. I won't be dating anymore. I've got many friends (male and female), and am socially active. MGTOW is whatever the guy wants it to be, for me, its financial security, with zero chance of having a women fucking up my shit. I've been married, I've dated a lot, I've done all manner of sexual adventures, and in…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 08:05 PM
1

Not really. Women have no value to me, so my comment was to make me laugh. Not my problem that you didn't find it funny too :)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 10:38 AM
1

And I'm cool with women not being entitled little shits. But, we can't all have what we want.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 09:40 AM
1

I don't go to that subreddit. I have no interest in a subreddit for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 09:09 AM
5

10secs in, and I stopped. There's no fucking way that car would wheel spin with that amount of weight in the drivers seat, it'd be getting more traction than an Abrams.
/r/MGTOW23/02/16 05:18 AM
2

Oh, how rapidly changing this conversation is! So, I didn't actually outright say that the wall was gradual, I said that a woman's vagina doesn't implode and face doesn't turn to mush a particular moment. That being said, my view is that there is no defining moment of "the wall", despite your viewpoint on the matter. There is pre-wall, and there is post-wall. In between is a grey area that shifts the woman from a stage in her life where she can seduce men, into a stage where she can't achieve wh…
/r/MGTOW23/02/16 04:54 AM
1

hahahaa So just not wanting to commit to an answer then?
/r/MGTOW23/02/16 04:46 AM
1

I'm confused, are you saying that it is real, or it's not real?
/r/MGTOW23/02/16 04:43 AM
5

Do you actually think that The Wall(tm) is a moment in time that everything goes to shit? Of course not, it's gradual. The pics in the OP are pre- and post- wall. Pointing out that Bridgy's vagina didn't implode and her face didn't turn into mush in a fraction of a second at a mystical moment of "the wall" doesn't really change what she became.
/r/MGTOW23/02/16 04:38 AM
5

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST ON A POGO STICK I clicked the post-wall pic first, recoiled in horror. Then forgot which link I clicked, and immediately clicked the post wall picture again.. My eyeeeeees!
/r/MGTOW23/02/16 04:35 AM
2

Completely, it means actual equality is happening in that sense. No more hypergamy. Assuming, of course, equal opportunity, not mandated outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 04:26 AM
12

It amazes me that they don't actually think that shit through. Fermi rough maths incoming! Like, say a Uni has 2000 students in each year of induction, or thereabouts. Let's assume half are girls - 1000 per year join and then remain for 3 years. At the 1 in 3 figure, that's 333 rapes per class induction (let's round down to 300). Now, seeing that they are there for three years, that's 100 rapes, per year, for each class. Seeing that they take on a class every year, and each is about 3 years, tha…
/r/MGTOW23/02/16 03:59 AM
3

Increase your chances of getting a girlfriend that doesn't want you gaming. Sounds like a great tip to be in a relationship that the guy will resent and end up in arguments over him enjoying gaming. Brilliant plan.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 01:20 AM
5

How often do you tell others about cross fit? :P
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 11:55 PM
3

Why the hate on games? You want guys that enjoy gaming to stop it, and do something else that women find attractive, but the guy finds less enjoyable? That's not self improvement, that's changing who you are for someone else. Why not "find a girl who shares the same hobbies"?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 11:51 PM
1

Sure. And any woman that shows the least bit of hypergamous behaviour is always hypergamous. Equal judgement for all, I say.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 11:49 PM
1

They are called murderers, not men who had sex a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 10:04 PM
1

Absolute circle jerk post.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 10:03 PM
3

I think it would be fucking fantastic if all men just suddenly stopped desiring sex.. Maybe for 24 months or so, at least. It'd fucking decimate women who rely on hypergamy, with men only respecting those women who are capable of working on their own to a goal. All the hypergamous women would just be left at the side of the road; after all, they'd have zero value if the men didn't want to fuck them. No point in them being overly sexual and flirting.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 10:02 PM
1

I disregarded everything, because I consider your viewpoint to be irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 09:52 PM
2

There were also other situations in the OP which are there to stimulate conversation. Selecting specific parts and stitching them together out of the original order, doesn't mean that there was a strawman in the OP. Nice try, no cigar.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 09:51 PM
1

Yes, I was specifically only talking about hair dye, and not creating a completely different appearance. I'm glad that you managed to breakdown the (none extensive) list of things I wrote to create a discussion, and simplified it to the core issue of hair dye. Brilliant debating. Thanks for your input.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 07:45 PM
1

Yes, I clearly only wanted to talk about the morality of make up. Great breakdown. Not strawman at all. Thanks for disregarding everything else, and that I gave examples to provoke thought, and not an extensive list.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 07:42 PM
2

Did I directly say that lying about penis size is rape? No. I gave a much bigger list of considerations to try and invoke a conversation. The first thing blue Pillers do? They strawman, and now you're attempting to keep that strawman going.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 07:40 PM
1

I think it's pointless. Rub one out when you want to. Nofap is solely designed to stop men from experiencing orgasms unless they are given from women. It's what I would describe as militant blue pill
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 07:36 PM
2

Maybe. That's still not the point though. Let's shorten the point; If it is morally wrong for a man to get sex by deception, is it not also morally wrong for a woman to get sex by deception? The context is, I admit, relating to hypergamy. In that women may choose to have sex with the man due to the status/wealth he presents himself to have, and the man would choose to have sex with the woman on the sexual attractiveness of her, which she is presenting herself to have more of.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 11:49 AM
2

I don't sleep with anyone anyway. But, again, this post isn't about me. It's about a hypothetical situation and the views on morality resulting from the actions of the hypothetical people.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 11:26 AM
3

Do I agree with your quote? Not in the slightest. You over simplified the post I made, and reduced it to a one-sided view consisting of two items, instead of the comparison to the different genders approaching the same situation, and the resulting viewpoints of the morality of the actions taken by either gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 11:14 AM
6

You know that you've selected the least common stuff and represented it as "but women have thisssssss", right? Like, that's practically the definition of strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 10:43 AM
1

Quoted yourself. Brilliant. Thanks for your input.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 10:40 AM
2

That wasn't my point at all, in the words of some Blue Pillers: you appear to have very poor reading comprehension. But thanks for your input.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 10:30 AM
1

That's a new YouTuber to watch! thanks for the referral to them :)
/r/MGTOW22/02/16 09:16 AM
2

Hmmm petty shit. Thanks for your input.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 08:59 AM
1

I work because I love it. The (significant) disposable income I get from it it pretty epic and funds my addiction to buying/building gadgets. Also, I'm a mild control freak, and my work allows me to get that fix.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 05:46 AM
1

Work, for me, is being on call 24/7 (as well as working normal office hours). Outside of that, I ride bikes (motor and push), gym, design (creative answers to problems, or, pointless comedy value) creations that I install around my house. My current hobby is automating as much of my life as possible to free up some hours (at the end), so currently I've got: LinkedIn and professional-type Twitter accounts that source web stories (according to rules I set) and post automatically Robot vacuum clean…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 05:20 AM
1

Well, I think outside the box, and I work in IT. So, the first thing that I would look at is working out how to write apps for them. Ideas so far: Dish washing/house cleaning Ironing Laundry Ability to prepare small meals (sandwiches and the like) You give me a sex robot with a port that I can plug a computer into, and I'll make a PA that looks after my house while I'm at work, makes coffee for me when I'm due to get up, and hides in the cupboard when I'm home and awake. Basically, very interest…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 04:33 AM
1

As an Australian, I find you joking about our Prime Minister (the Honourable Reverend Dr Crocodile Dundee Phd) to be offensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 04:21 AM
1

Ba dum fork.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 04:17 AM
2

Bingo. The OP is just pill-baiting to entice a circle jerk on either side of the debate to clash.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 04:16 AM
1

Ba dum tish.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 04:08 AM
1

I'm not sure how this conclusion can be got to, when there is no specification about why the man is looking down on the woman. There's no clarification to say that it's hypocritical. The situation is far too broad to be able to achieve a conclusion of hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 04:01 AM
1

I'm not here to give you wank material.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 03:45 AM
3

looking down on her because he slept with her? Or because of another reason? You haven't really specified the situation. Basically, there isn't enough information to extrapolate from, anything that is answered from that is pure conjecture and will likely mean that people are responding from a viewpoint of their pill; Red will say it's not hypocritical Blue will say it is. You're just causing a circle jerk on either side.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 03:37 AM
6

Lol @ "tech support" Indian.. White guy, born in England, now living in Australia
/r/MGTOW22/02/16 03:30 AM
1

How do you come to that conclusion?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 02:25 AM
3

So deceiving is ok, as it's the fault of the person being deceived. I'll have to remember that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 02:24 AM
3

Brilliant. Case closed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 02:20 AM
1

Question: If a girl says she just wants a casual relationship, but actually tries to make it an LTR, would that come under the same ruling? It could be argued that she has mislead the guy on her feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 02:20 AM
0

Do period cramps often lead to female infertility? Got stats/citation on that? I've never heard that before.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 02:15 AM
1

ok, thanks for your input.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 02:10 AM
0

Thanks for your input.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 02:09 AM
1

True.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 02:09 AM
2

I've done many things in my life (public sex, groups, gangbangs, cheating [both directions], anonymous sex, casual/ONS, LTRs, open relationships).. But, in the end, I realised that there was no actual value in it all. I was spending time and energy into doing things that resulted in an orgasm for me, that I could achieve easier, and more reliably, through masturbation. Less complications by just removing the intimacy with women from my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 02:08 AM
1

I completely agree that some men also wear fake tan and lifters in shoes. Again, that's them misrepresenting who they are. A girl could want a guy taller than her, and only finds out he's shorter after the act has been completed. (Seeing that you normally don't stand shoeless to compare heights before sex). She could then say that he lied about his height by hiding his true height. This would mean that he managed to have sex with her under conditions that don't represent the "true him". Yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 02:01 AM
2

There was no point regarding making informed choices on sexual health in this thread. You've used a worst-case scenario in comparison to the points I was raising regarding sexual deception of lying about appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 01:58 AM
1

I didn't say that women do this for me. Asking if I'm self obsessed isn't called for. Personally, I don't engage intimately with women at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 01:49 AM
1

lemme ask then: Where is the attraction to improving your appearance coming from? I'm genuinely curious, if it's not to attract people (men, or women if gay), where is the drive to improve your outward appearance?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 01:48 AM
1

That's not the assertion I made. Unless you are agreeing that a woman changing her outward appearance is lying?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 01:46 AM
1

So I pretended that you said that women don't use these products mainly to attract men. And then you said that many women use these products for themselves and not to attract men. It's all very confusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 01:17 AM
1

Primarily doesn't mean exclusively. I never said that you said that they use those exclusively for themselves, I said that you said that they are primarily used for themselves. In that, you said that the women that used them to attract men are outliers. So, to repeat my question, that you've clearly misread. Are you saying that women use push up bras, fake nails, and hair extensions, primarily for the enjoyment of using them? If so, doesn't that mean that women enjoy using products that are desi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 01:00 AM
2

I actually don't have sex anymore, so not really. Thanks for your input
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 12:54 AM
1

It's a (shit) test? No, I was asking for clarification, responding with the same question I asked you isn't answering it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 12:53 AM
3

Calm down, there's no need to try to be insulting because I'm asking you a valid question. There is no "moral stance" on this, you are comparing two completely different things. You are comparing a person changing what their body looks like with effort, and dedication to the outcome, to someone sitting with their head in a sink, and changing their hair colour. Losing your mind and accusing me of having a below standard reading comprehension doesn't change that you are aligning two different thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 12:51 AM
1

Excellent. I don't actually chase sex anymore at all. Doesn't really change my view though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 12:43 AM
6

Because telling a woman to wash off her make up and fake tan prior to sex, to ensure you know what she looks like, isn't going to be a total mood killer for her. Most women would happily remove said make up to ensure that she is showing what she truely looks like. Excellent.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 12:39 AM
5

How is putting in effort at a gym, and actively training your body to change, the same as dying hair?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 12:34 AM
1

Are you trying to say that push up bras, fake nails, and hair extensions exist primarily for the enjoyment of the women that use them? I'll go along with that, with further questioning: Why does a woman find enjoyment in looking different in the ways that these products provide (if not because they find enjoyment in looking attractive to men)?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 12:31 AM
9

Make up and push up bras are the same as working out in a gym? Nope. A gym work out is changing the body to be bigger and stronger. Whacking on a push up bra is shoving your tits into a position that makes them appear larger. Totally different thing. But, thanks for your input that lying about appearance (because if a man falls for it, he's an idiot) doesn't mean the woman can't be trusted, but a man lying means he's dishonest (because women who believe a dishonest representation from a man, isn…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 12:28 AM
3

A woman changing her looks to attract men is an outlier. Holy. Shit. So, if men disappeared, women would still wear hair extensions, fake nails, fake tan, and push up bras.. Genius
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 12:17 AM
3

So, why do women enhance their appearance with all this fake shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 12:07 AM
3

Altering her physical appearance isn't changing who she is perceived to be. Holy. Shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 12:01 AM
6

lying about you feeling is way different than putting on mascara Let's be honest, we aren't just talking mascara here. I listed quite a few things that are fake that women do to attract a man. They are all false representations of who she actually is. How is lying about feelings different than making yourself look like someone that isn't you? unless she's actively asserting that all of those things are real, I don't think it really qualifies as a lie So, you think that women who have fake tan, h…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 11:35 PM
3

Where you've said that in the LTR scenario, the things don't stay secret - that's exactly my point. The lie by the woman is uncovered, and brushed off as something other than a lie. Fake eyelashes, bra lifters, fake tan; They are all things that can attract a man, but aren't really her. Why is this seen as OK, but a man lying during the same time, is seen as immoral?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 11:20 PM
3

So...... It's ok for men to lie to have sex with women, as women can misrepresent themselves to attract a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 11:17 PM
6

And, about the double standards that was the point of the post? Or, is it acceptable for a man to lie to a woman for sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 11:08 PM
8

Excellent strawman. I didn't say that directly. I gave examples on how a man might be lying before sex, and that some people say sex by deception is equivalent to rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 11:04 PM
2

I went through a stage where I was sex crazy and did a LOT of stuff. One guy was ok not being there, but preferred to watch if he could. Couple other husbands watched. And more than a handful were cucked by their wives without knowing (ie, wives were cheating)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 08:57 PM
10

You love linked the man being in control, to enjoying the situation. They aren't necessarily linked. I've been in the same situation a few times, and the husbands usually (in my experience) give the couple's control of the situation to the wife/gf. Then, the women chooses to give their control to the bull (the other man). This, the husband is dominated twice over, and if they want to be dominated, they are getting enjoyment from it
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 09:06 AM
12

Getting off on the wife fucking others, doesn't mean that the husband is, or isn't, in control of the situation. Doesn't mean they aren't enjoying it in some fashion, I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 08:56 AM
3

Of course it's perfectly possible. So the woman stays home in a shitty affordable suburb, with no car, and everything is secondhand. Not many women are going to want that though, are they?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/16 06:25 AM
1

It's not a debate. You're wrong. Empathy isn't feeling the other person's feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 08:56 AM
0

lol just cuz i don't agree with you doesn't mean i didn't grasp your shitty point mate! It's hard to tell with your grammar and spelling as to what you are grasping.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 08:53 AM
0

Empathy isn't feeling what they are feeling, you're thinking of Dianna Troy on Star Trek. Understanding the feelings in a knowing way is empathy That doesn't mean you feel the feeling as well, just that you have an understanding of what that feeling/emotion is.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 08:51 AM
1

You're still missing my point completely. Success is different thing to different people. However, success to a high EI person, usually isn't designing something that pushes technological advancement forwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 08:49 AM
0

understanding other people's IS empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 08:46 AM
1

And the women complaining about equality of genders in male-dominated industries fines actually want that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 08:45 AM
1

Success in life vs inventing, making things, pushing boundaries, is what I actually said. So no. Emotional "intelligence" doesn't actually assist in those ways. If you had read the following comments instead of being emotional at the first one, you would have seen that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 08:40 AM
0

Care to share with the class how it's not how well someone is able to relate to others in an empathic way, and is also that they are in touch with their own emotions? Or am I actually aware of what it means?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 08:39 AM
1

No. I don't. I work on call 24/7 in a high stress work environment. Thanks for the sweeping judgement.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/16 08:37 AM
1

Ok, maybe the poking tongue face wasn't clear enough. "Return salvo" didn't show enough sarcasm?
/r/MGTOW19/02/16 03:17 AM
2

whinging little child I expect that from women that are being countered in an argument. You aren't even coming up with points or arguments. All you are doing is trying to name call. You're the same as feminists, that's all they do as well.
/r/MGTOW19/02/16 12:02 AM
2

Junior, triggered. Come up with a new line.. These are as old as... Well.... you.
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 11:59 PM
2

Feminist shaming tactics from you. All. Fucking. Day. Head over to TwoX where you belong.
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 11:26 PM
1

I'm not sure how "people want to get into mining" means that it shouldn't have a 50/50 split at the coal face?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 11:25 PM
2

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAA How does the statement you quoted show any reason that I'm illiterate? You're not even making sense in your insults now
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 11:24 PM
2

Calling me a child, repeatedly... Want to know where I've seen that tactic before? https://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 11:22 PM
1

And mining, is 50/50 split too? Surely you must know this from your experience?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 11:02 PM
1

The same kind of split in genders that feminists demand in office work? And STEM campaigning IS a big thing in Australia. You just aren't in that field. I've seen first hand that gender outcome mandates stop men getting promotions over a woman that's incompetent. Equal outcome, is not equal opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 10:52 PM
1

I live in Australia too. And there are tens of thousands of men in the mining industry. Women are not "fairly represented" by hundreds. As for them being physical jobs, are you saying that women aren't capable of that? Are women weaker than men? God forbid, are there differences? On the subject of care-giving and admin, why aren't feminists (who say they are for equality) campaigning for more men in the female dominated fields? Easy answer: because feminism wants female advancement where it suit…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 10:35 PM
1

Diversity, equal job opportunity. And the reason that the male dominated industries such as sewage and mining isn't being talked about not having enough women is......?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 10:16 PM
1

So why the big push to have more women in STEM roles?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 10:08 PM
1

Here is a piece that discusses that people are normally strongly put in one or the other. Not strong in both. It also discusses the types of people that are strong in one or the other. And while high EQ (or EI) people are often successful in business, they normally don't actively invent or create new technologies. They are successful, instead, at being able to motivate others to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 09:29 PM
1

For the US? Even underestimating the population at 250m people, that still means $3trillion on that level alone. Where is the money coming from for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 09:01 PM
1

I said a number of claims, which did you feel is unfounded and you want a source for
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 08:59 PM
1

Why go to university and get a job which pays 60k when you could not go and get a job which pays 30k? So you can get 60k a year. But you forgot the third option with basic income: don't work at all, and receive enough money to live comfortably.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 08:47 PM
1

So, the guy could get paid a basic income. Where he doesn't need to work to survive. Where is the incentive to work in a dangerous job that is required, if he can still live comfortably with the basic income?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 08:22 PM
0

Emotional "intelligence" as a bragging right will normally mean that they don't have a high IQ. A high IQ is useful for life, it is something that scientists will have, engineers, professors, people that push scientific boundaries. A high emotional "intelligence" means that the person has a lot of emotions. Which has zero use in pushing the boundaries of anything that society needs. Other than using Twitter or tumblr.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 08:20 PM
2

So to not conform, he should do what your view is? You surely understand that that is your way? Are you just suffering from dementia?
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 08:17 PM
2

Apart from that whole "fucki get women" part that makes up most of theredpill subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 08:16 PM
1

Didn't realise that you wanted to channel your question to a specific area to prove that those in that specific area are in an echo chamber. Sounds circlejerky to me. But, ok
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 08:15 PM
2

SJW? Blue pill? Have you gone senile in your old age? Saying that you are judgemental cunt has nothing to do with RP, MGTOW or anything else, it was just to annoy you. Seems to have worked too, as you've tried to irritate with attempts to undermine my MGTOW resolve by (yet again) attacking with unfounded insults that you specifically chose to try and counter the beliefs that you think I have. That's why you chose "blue pill" because of my name, and you chose SJW because you think that I'd get wo…
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 08:13 PM
1

You requested get the fuck out. I feel a return salvo of fucktard was measured :P
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 08:06 PM
-1

Emotional intelligence is for people who think that feelings are more useful that intelligence.. Anyone who brags that they have a high emotional IQ should be avoided, as it means that they are, quite simply, an emotional idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 09:00 AM
2

Judgemental little cunt, aren't you?
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 08:57 AM
2

Bingo. Still have to take the red pill to get there.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 07:59 AM
1

The parts I disagree with/don't subscribe to, are around the whole PUA. I have zero interest in sexual relationships with, or seduction of, women. I have no requirement in my life to be intimate (sexually or emotionally) with a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 07:43 AM
2

I'm with you on that one, brother. People that judge someone, simply because they have tattoos, are dinosaurs in the modern world. It's a view that MGTOW should mean 1950s America. But it doesn't, it just means your own way. Fuck anyone who claims that their way is the correct way for you to go your way.
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 07:09 AM
1

I don't subscribe to theredpill subreddit, but I consider myself to have "taken the red pill". As in; I don't use the RP theory to turn into a PUA
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 07:01 AM
0

Red pill and theredpill subreddit are two different things
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 06:47 AM
2

Three reasons: To see if I can challenge my own views (so far, this hasn't occurred) To see if I can reinforce my views (so far, I've had my personal views towards left-leaning politics, feminism, and anti-RP (not anti-TRP), all confirmed) Because my job has a LOT of downtime in between moments of sheer chaos, so I like to engage here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 03:09 AM
3

Hahaha Yes, yes, everyone with tattoos is an idiot. The youth of the world don't respect old people. And will those people PLEASE get off your lawn You have zero argument, other than name calling. You are no different to women. Recap of insults: Idiot Idiotic Keep going with the theme of insults beginning with "i"... I'm pretty sure that word games are meant to fight the onset of dementia, so it's great for someone of advanced years like yourself.
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 01:30 AM
3

And yet again, claiming that I'm an idiot. Yes, yes, everyone young is terrible. Tattoos show the world is doomed. Yes, yes, the people on your lawn must get off it immediately. And now, you assert that your assumption that I'm stupid is somehow linked to my tattoos.. That is a logical fallacy. Seriously, it's like you're trying to be the stereotypical grumpy old man. This is too easy. Side note: your list of insults for that comment is; idiocy illiterate ignorant idiotic Were you going for a th…
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 01:08 AM
3

Nawwww. Junior. Thanks for the fallacy link, but, Dad, ad hominem isn't just a fallacy, is it? You see, sometimes personal attack is just a personal attack. To say it's a fallacy, or, more accurately, fallicious logic would be if someone attacked a person's character, and then made an argument using the aforementioned character attack. But, you think that everything needs to be a fallacy. As you didn't actually put in a conclusion, you just attacked my character, you didn't use a fallicious logi…
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 12:14 AM
3

Ad Hominem is Latin for against the person. This means, for the hard of understanding such as yourself, that it's a personal attack. That's what continually trying to say someone is an idiot is, whilst simultaneously, making zero argument. And now you want to say that I don't have a six figure income unless I include pennies and dimes. That would basically be a shit-test (implying that I don't have as much of an income as I do) that I would expect from a woman.
/r/MGTOW18/02/16 12:06 AM
3

Let's list the ad hominem attacks: Stupid Idiotic Neurotic trigger complex Idiocy Rank stupidity Triggering Do you actually put together a response that wouldn't come from a left wing feminist? Or is this what I should expect from an old man?
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 11:53 PM
6

Nowhere did I state anything at all about tattoos being some kind of a problem related to one's career But you did include it into a dumb decision. Therefore implying that people with tattoos are dumb. Dumb people have shitty jobs. That's not a factor of "alas VERY poor reading skills", it's called extrapolating from the information available. Also, please explain how stating my situation is a "vivid imagination and a neurotic complex".. That makes no sense at all. And as for being triggered, no…
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 11:42 PM
5

I've got full sleeves, and I don't cover them. I also work in the financial sector. I can do this because I don't work with people who think that a pigment put into my skin, reduces my ability to do my job well.
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 10:21 PM
1

It simply won't work. A person needs to be involved in the chain somewhere. Systems can have autorecovery, but that will fail at some point. Where would the drive be, to be such a person, if they don't get paid any more than a person who doesn't have to be on call 24/7?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 10:20 PM
2

Haha thanks man. Never keep your evidence on your person, but keep it secure and able to be retrieved easily. Can't recommend Evernote enough.
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 10:17 PM
2

I don't recall my tattoos stopping me having a six figure job, two houses, and a stock portfolio. You're just old. Tattoos aren't a blocker to success, not trying is.
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 10:16 PM
1

Google is developing cars. Yes. And who maintains them? You are ignoring the background parts of life that you have no understanding or experience of. You can say that I don't have "the skills", but that's clearly not the problem. The problem, is you've been dreaming about a utopia where everyone has the same amount of money, and you've ignored the people you have been ignoring all your life. The people who keep the world going.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 09:27 PM
1

Would you like to try and rebut my other statements before we get into that? Or are you ignoring the points I made that show your fictional future wouldn't work?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 09:18 PM
2

Actually there are a LOT of things "wrong" (foolish, inane, idiotic) with tattoos. ah. You're one of those people. EDIT: Your 90% figure of regret is completely made up. And then you go off on that made up figure, and make up that those made up people will suddenly want healthcare to cover the removal.. That's not actually happening, is it? Complaining about spending your tax dollars on something that isn't actually happening, based on a statistic that you made up, is just dumb. Also, minors can…
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 09:03 PM
1

"It isn't a plant" "It's a stupid broad who wanted to be offended" Again, you're an idiot who is trying to change what you said after being caught out. Head over to twoX, something tells me you'll fit right in.
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 09:01 PM
4

I use Evernote, and also used another iPhone app called Workflow. I just take screenshots and run a script I wrote, which then stitches all the screenshots together, creates a note in Evernote, adds in the date in an easily searchable format (eg 20160218), puts in the screenshots, and files the note away. Evernote also has a wicked audio recording feature for notes. The benefit of using a cloud based system for such evidence is that, should you need to retrieve the images, or the conversations, …
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 08:59 PM
1

Heyyyyyyy! There's nothing wrong with tattoos
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 08:53 PM
2

Huh?
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 08:48 PM
1

Socialism doesn't work. Who maintains the machines that run? People who think that technology will do everything" are in another plane of reality: you still need to make and maintain the technology. I work in a job which is solely for running automated systems in a bank. Daily, daily, shit goes wrong and we all scramble around to fix it. If I was paid the same as everyone else, I wouldn't work in such a stressful job. What about the work that is dangerous? Repairing the "technology" that operate…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 08:39 PM
1

Easy. You said she wasn't a plant. You said she wanted to be offended. She was a plant. She didn't "want to be offended." You're an idiot. And now you are back peddling to try and regain your stance. You can't say in a comment that she wanted to be offended, and then follow up with "she isn't a heckler", that kind of hamstering doublespeak would have you welcomed over at twoX.
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 08:34 PM
4

It completely negates what you said, you fucking idiot. Here they are at the end of the set http://sp2011davidhalliday.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/2012/03/10/brendan-burns-plants-a-heckler/ Geeeeee Mr T9, you sure are retarded.
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 08:34 AM
2

Watch the whole set fucktard. They come out onto the stage an he explains why they are there as actors. http://sp2011davidhalliday.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/2012/03/10/brendan-burns-plants-a-heckler/
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 08:33 AM
1

It is a plant. At the end of the gig, they come out onto the stage and he explains that the point was to see how the audience reacts.
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 08:32 AM
1

Usually, it would mean that the woman saying it wants the man to be "more emotional". But not just emotions. Specifically emotions that she identifies with. It could also be code for "tell me some shit that I can use on you at a later date when we are having an argument and I'm not doing well". (Because, I can't remember a time that I have, in the past, told something deep about myself, that hasn't been used in some nutcase gaslighting attempt or thrown in my face during a spat)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 01:40 AM
3

"The problem with socialism, is that, at some point, you run out of other people's money." Why should my wages be less, so that a company can afford to pay someone else to reproduce?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 01:34 AM
1

You have sides? Any bisexual person I know is completely bisexual, not split into two seperate halves.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 01:29 AM
4

But it's usually not the looks [...] that make him stand out, but [...] his body (muscles, bulge, posture) How his body looks has nothing to do with his looks? That's monumentally dumb. What's next: a woman's body isn't anything to do with her appearance? Also, side note, being attracted to both genders isn't gay, it's bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 07:53 PM
1

My phone is my conduit to the office. I work on call 24/7, so having my phone in my hand is pretty much a prerequisite for my life. Plus, all my friends are in my line of work, so they have their phones out all the time too. Maybe I'm a shitty example for your point.
/r/MGTOW16/02/16 09:15 AM
1

I feel like you intend a building crescendo on orchestral music be played while reading that. But, it didn't really say anything that hasn't been said.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 11:28 AM
5

GitHub also has pull requests occurring due to the use of the words "slave" and "master" because racism, or something. Also, good luck if there's an issue in Production and you need to put pressure on a female coder to write a patch fast. I've been in positions to need a push to Prod urgently, with male coders, and female coders. Women (usually) can't take the pressure. (Side note, the Production environment I'm referring to is a financial institution)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 10:40 PM
1

I'm not saying it should, I'm just saying that MRAs who complain about how much rejection they're facing compared to feminism should have some perspective and get informed of how "smoothy" it went for feminism when it first appeared. There's a difference between "complaining about rejection" and being called a rape apologist when you aren't. Or having people scream that you're privileged and don't need a rights movement. Or when people actually think that your life is easier because you have a p…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 08:28 PM
1

Short answer (while I have Sunday coffee); I'm not MRM either. I get that you think that a movement needs to/will face adversity in its founding, but that kind of view is somewhat closed to understanding that sometimes opposition is due to a movement being batshit insane. Sometimes though, yes, it's because it's challenging the status quo. And this is where I was meandering to; the MRM does face adversity. Its proponents are accused of being rape apologists, it has been listed as a hate group by…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 10:29 PM
1

You're comparing the legal system of centuries ago to today's? You think that a movement starting today should face the adversity of that of centuries ago?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 10:18 PM
1

Which started with Question for RP Not "question for TRPers".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 08:26 AM
1

Gonna be honest here, that's too much text to bother reading on a weekend. Sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 08:25 AM
1

You're making this way more complicated than it needs to be. MRM is seen as a hate group, even listed as a hate group by some left wing groups. That's not adversity. That's an attempt of discrediting the MRM. Saying that they aren't a group worthy of being heard "because they haven't faced conflict" is stupid. Let me explain why: If a group with demands doesn't face conflict in the opposite direction, then they have all their demands met immediately, this, according to your definition, isn't a g…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 03:03 AM
1

I'm saying that the judgement of who has what privileges, seems to be determined by those who say that they have none of the privilege that they assign to others.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 02:57 AM
1

At what point is the decision made by feminism to "allow" the MRM to progress? Why are they the ones that get to decide the worthiness of the movement? Is it because feminism opposes the MRM? Which, frankly, is what I'm getting at. This has zero to do with a movement "earning it's right" to exist, and everything to do with feminists not wanting to be opposed.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 10:21 PM
1

Sounds like complete pseudoscience, and a way for people that didn't try to get somewhere, to blame others that did try. I mean, who is the arbitrator to decide if someone earned something, or if their privilege got them there? It seems like the arbiters are the ones who didn't get anything. Therefore, biased, lefty, nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 10:19 PM
2

What do you actually think privilege is, that all men have it?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 09:04 AM
5

On YouTube, search for "Feminism LOL" It's a MRA called Diana Davison. Canadian. Very good stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 09:03 AM
6

All the MRA that I've seen were like the crazies and I've never seen a moderate one. I think you've been looking in the wrong places. Or you have a skewed view of what "moderate" means.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 08:39 AM
5

If there was a feminist talk that included rape apology, it would be absolutely correct to protest it. The talk I'm referring to, was discussing male suicide. But feminists screamed that the men attending were rape apologists.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 08:38 AM
3

shows that not all men are privileged all the time in all areas of life. Doesn't mix with back when men literally controlled every aspect of society, there were no men's problems as far as society in general was concerned. either men are always privileged or they don't control every aspect of society. Or, the third option, women now control part of society, and are still giving the privileged to the men anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 08:37 AM
2

Sounds a bit weird. :/
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 08:34 AM
1

Aaaaah. Not a different pill as such, more just the title of the blog
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 06:18 AM
1

What the hell is black pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 06:10 AM
1

I'm very confused by it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 05:54 AM
2

Ah, well... In the spirit of the topic, maybe incels can get vouchers for local prostitutes?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 04:59 AM
1

Apologies, hard to keep track who's commenting on what on a mobile device! And as for wanting to know about what that person thought about this, the OP could have asked him, in that thread. But, they didn't, they took it elsewhere to reframe the conversation into an incel rambling about wanting the government to assign a woman to tug his wang.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 04:22 AM
6

So, just to confirm; Men that are campaigning for Men's Rights are still privileged, in that they have things that they don't need to fight for, but they are allowed to ask for things they don't have (despite the privilege they have), but in asking they aren't entitled to get such things, because they haven't asked for a long enough time? TL;DR Men are all privileged and have things due to being men, but anything they don't have, they still can't have because they haven't not had them for long e…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 04:17 AM
2

I get the impression that he was asking why it's not a conversation topic, when other things that are seen as unequal, are. (Mainly because, that was the title of his post) Whilst I may not agree that it even needs to be a conversation topic, I agree less with your approach of (quite simply) starting a ridiculous discussion point on an extremely cherry picked post by another user.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 04:13 AM
6

That post also includes the paragraph: Of course, it wouldn't be realistic for the government to set up a committee or force people to date each other, but you can redistribute wealth without having a command economy, and there are plenty of ways to tackle the issue without literal totalitarianism. Which, I believe, counters your assertion that they want the government to "do something". The post you cited is asking why it's not a discussion point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 04:04 AM
6

Can we get further information? Who has said that the government needs to do something in that situation? I've never heard that before.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:56 AM
1

Right? As in, right that you think that people that you don't respect aren't human?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:41 AM
4

So, you agree that Men's Rights is not in a position of strength? Isn't that at odds with the feminist concept that men are privileged? Edit: Downvoted because of a comment. Typical response to a man making a point against feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:40 AM
1

Q: Is respect a basic human right? A: Absolutely. Addendum: you will praise/respect/disrespect those who deserve it. Deserving it is not a human right. Unless you consider those that aren't worthy of your respect to no longer be human?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:38 AM
1

That's totally different to your first comment, though...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:31 AM
7

That's not what the pursuit of happiness means. But, otherwise, I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:27 AM
3

Why do you think that everyone should be respected without earning it?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:26 AM
2

That depends; If you believe that respect isn't earned, and means that you think that you are entitled to respect, then you're going to say yes. However, if you are like me, and think that respect is valuable, and needs to be earned through your actions, then no.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:25 AM
3

This is the first time the piece has been rebutted against. Which is what I was getting at. Just because an arguement is assumed to be illogical by someone, doesn't mean that it shouldn't (or can't) be rebutted. You started by saying that it's impossible to argue against it, and then successfully put together an argument. Someone can't just say "MRAs are bitching about women" and then "you can't argue against it", because they are then no better than the person who wrote a badly put together pie…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:20 AM
5

So, if the issue is that society is holding women back, why are so many feminist narrative points about how bad men are? Surely they should be about the society that is holding women back, yet is 50% women? Also, the irony of saying "feminism is a broad term and therefore we are all different" along with "MRAs just blame women for everything" is not lost on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 12:10 AM
3

Well, you compared them to start with, so no, I don't think it's unfair at all. And I'm not sure what you are talking about bring in the Westboro Baptist Church? That line made zero sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 12:00 AM
5

Equal outcome, yes. Not equal opportunity. EDIT: Nawww, angry white knight downvoted me for pointing out his bad quoting and theory. However will I cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 11:26 PM
8

You didn't, in any way, shape, or form, argue against the points in that post. You just say that it's bitching about women. This is why feminism has a bad view by so many people. This is why the percentage of women who identify as feminists is declining, year on year. This is why it's impossible to debate with a feminist - you refuse to be logical, and debate the facts. Instead, you say that men are bitching, and then, when you have no facts about a point, complain when we ask for facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 11:25 PM
13

What feminists have lost their jobs for being a feminist? What feminist protests have had men outside, screaming at the attendees that they are rape apologists for attending a feminist talk?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 11:21 PM
5

Please post all the things feminism does for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 11:17 PM
9

Nice move, excluding the first part of that sentence. Brilliant.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 11:16 PM
17

Don't feminists blame men/"the patriarchy" for everything, though? Take some agency and blame for yourself, because our culture is partly your fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 11:14 PM
1

Well, to say that all the group accept extreme views, and that only the TRP subreddit accepts extreme views is, by definition, a different thing
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 10:07 PM
1

I'm confused. You've said that the extreme views are accepted by the whole RP world. But, also that there's rational RPers and the extreme views are contained within TRP subreddit. Which are we going with?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:51 PM
1

You haven't even addressed the point at hand! Somebody else even brought up a similar thought in this thread. You just downvoted my comment and went for a personal attack. I never said I exclude the rational RPers outside of the subreddit. Please just try to use your brain. your point was that all men in the RP world take all extreme RP views seriously. Yet, not all feminists take extreme radfem views seriously. That's an opinion, not a fact. I say I'm not arguing it, and suddenly, you blame me …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:31 PM
1

Yeah but if you hit your wife/gf you'll immediately break up with her right? Pretty sure OP meant the "it's your fault I hit you now keep being my slave". I was responding to the concept that "there's never a reason to hit a woman". I wasn't playing Dr Phil.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:05 PM
1

Didn't I literally just say that an equal income is valued? And if they can't add an equal income, what else are they bringing? Pretty sure I actually said that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:04 PM
1

My point is that the opinions of the extreme RPs are taken seriously in RP circles, whereas radfems are demonized in feminist circles. There's no arguing with someone so wound up in a circlejerk like yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:02 PM
0

And if you could now also point out where he has a discussion point? Or shall we disregard everything else he says, on the grounds on one sentence?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 09:34 AM
1

Well, not really. Quite the opposite, in fact. "I see you punched your gf" "Yes" "Why did you do that?" "She looked at another guy" "You're a fucking nutcase, into jail you go" There was a reason he punched her, but it was a shitty, invalid reason. To say there's never a reason is taking away from the situation that the guy chose to punch someone for a reason that a normal person would have restrained from violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 07:06 AM
1

Well, to be fair, if I'm hitting anyone (which is extremely rare in the first place) there's a reason I'm hitting them (most likely, they've hit me first). There are reasons to hit a woman (or anyone), and all of the valid ones are self defence. Implying that there's never a reason is stupid, there's always a reason. It's whether or not the reason is sane and valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 06:58 AM
0

Can you point me to where he said that in the OP please?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 06:23 AM
2

You're referring to the PUA theory of TRP as a movement, not the whole scope of Red Pill. I identify as Red Pill (obviously), but I don't frequent TRP very often at all; I can't even remember the last time I was there. Just like someone tarring everyone that is a woman with the brush of "tumblrina", tarring every Red Pill man with the brush of TRP/PUA isn't really fair. To reflect on your last sentence (with a bit of changed context); Believe it or not, there are some tolerable Red Pill Men, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 05:13 AM
4

Red Pillers are all different people, and some people are dicks. You can't say that RP are all wankers because some demand (what some can say are) unreasonable things. Otherwise, you need to say that all women demand unreasonable things, simply because some of them do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 05:03 AM
3

If someone is attacking a persons looks, because they aren't winning an argument, I would guess that common sense is lacking in that person to understand that opinions and looks aren't related ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 04:55 AM
7

And this is what I mean! You've proved that the reverse can be true and acceptable; Your husband can't bring an equivalent cooking ability to the relationship, but, he makes up for that with his ambition and (possibly) smarter. And you demand a fit body in him, and you bring a fit body in return. You've proved my point completely! :) If you met your husband today, and he said "I can't cook for shit" you could have replied with "ok, what can you bring to the relationship instead?" (I mean, obviou…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 04:45 AM
7

I understand the vast majority don't have fake asses, I was making a point. You say men consistently say that they disregard everything, but my post doesn't say that at all. I clearly say if the women is bringing what they demand from the man. If they aren't bring the same, why not? What else are they bringing in place of that equality? There's no anger is me asking those questions. Only a request of equality. Lemme ask you, (assuming you are female), what is your perfect man? Describe him for u…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 04:36 AM
7

I think it's more about the inconsistencies of the demands of women, when I say "what are you bringing to the table". Examples: Man needs to have a good job/income Is the woman bringing an equal amount of money to the relationship, if not, what are they bringing instead? Man needs to hit the gym daily Is the woman bringing a gym-fit body to the relationship, if not, what are they bringing instead? Man needs to be honest in everything he does Is the woman bringing an appearance made up of fake ey…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 04:28 AM
2

Conversation doesn't involve looks Person A realises that Person B is making a good point Person A knows that they, themselves, see looks as important in getting laid. They then transfer this belief onto Person B, thinking that they must think the same way. Person A wishes to make Person B feel bad, and detract from the argument they made. Person A then says that Person B is; too fat, too low a SMV rating, too old, not built enough, a neckbeard, too ugly to have sex with the lights on, etc etc. …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 04:24 AM
2

Speak for yourself! 1/12th of the world are always having the exact same day as me!
/r/MGTOW11/02/16 04:07 AM
1

I, personally, do that all the time?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 03:54 AM
4

I find it curious that the women polled actually have a minimum figure in mind, when having casual sex with a guy. But that casual sex baby-trap? That's toooooootally not a real thing.. No sir.. lol
/r/MGTOW11/02/16 03:09 AM
2

If a woman wants a guy to always dress well, and never dress casually, she better be damn certain that she is dressed how he wants her dressed all the time too. Of course, there's nothing that says that a man in jeans and a tshirt (which I'm currently wearing), isn't better than a man in a suit. Well, that's wrong, there is something that says that; It's the woman with dyed hair, fake boobs, fake nails, fake tan, etc etc. Because women (generally) think that the outward appearance is who you are…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 02:57 AM
1

He didn't mention a single thing about "women won't go out with me". Stop seeing things that aren't there, just in order to insult people. It's pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 02:51 AM
1

I can answer from a MGTOW perspective (at least, my interpretation of MGTOW). Do whatever you like with your life. It has no relevance to me what career you choose, how you want your appearance to be, what kind of man you prefer to be intimate with, or how you choose to be intimate. Your life has no bearing whatsoever on how I live my life. I do, however, believe in RP theory (which is what brought me here), and I know of women who have strived for career progression, and for qualifications (a P…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 02:07 AM
1

Feminism is more than the radicals, but Red Pill can't possibly be more that just TRP? You're intentionally reducing the scope of the Red Pill world, to exclude the ones who aren't in TRP. I'm not excluding the feminists outside of radfem, please don't do the same to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 09:04 PM
3

They did this time too :) I figure that, instead of arguing with trolling/rule breaking BPers, we (as RPers) just start reporting such violations. Maybe then, we can start to actually debate here, instead of the ridiculous, unfounded, claims of some people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 04:55 AM
2

While the attractive = good socially idea has a basis in truth (I agree with it), you've used the logic and then applied it to TRP in a fallacious way. Also, this comment form you: and i was agreeing, about trp types are more likely to be mass shooters, rapists, child molesters, etc. Is absolute, unfounded, biased, nonsense. You are entitled to that opinion, but saying that they are "more likely" denotes a fact. And you cannot have a source document that shows that your opinion is fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 01:00 AM
2

Here, you said that a number of RP men are 'unhinged' and here, you said that attractive people are better socially. Unhinged is suggestive of being removed from normal reality, not just an "undesirable" personality trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 12:46 AM
1

I think that, if examined, a lot of Left-leaning arguments to support the specific view are made up, or at least altered from including all the facts. This is done often enough, and with the right media approach, to make it the common narrative. This is why the actual facts of women being successful pre-suffragettes is quashed by the common narrative of feminism; It would disprove their argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 12:41 AM
2

You're clearly a troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 12:25 AM
2

Unpleasant and psychopathy are different things. Get a dictionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 12:25 AM
3

Because psychopathy results in an unattractive appearance. Complete bullshit. Your opinions are terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 11:29 PM
5

you're right, a lot TRP readers seem like the mass shooter / rapist / child molester type. maybe TBP should be more careful. not all, but a lot of them are unattractive poorly socialized losers, similar to the demographic of mass shooters. there is also crossover between that demographic and suicidal people, so isn't it just as likely that some of those unhinged people will try to kill themselves (without going on a mass shooting first)? some would say thats a good trade off for the mass shootin…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 11:27 PM
4

30-40% are rapists or child molesters? What the fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 11:26 PM
1

To be fair though, in rational feminist discussions the radfems that go "men should be exterminated" usually have their comments deleted or downvoted to hell, whereas an equally extreme statement on TRP is seen as totally acceptable. If TRP wants to be taken more seriously as a core ideology with a central hub on reddit, they need to weed out the idiots. You've missed my point completely. A Red Pill man, like myself, doesn't necessarily frequent the TRP subreddit. Nor does the RP PUA concept ent…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 10:48 PM
1

Male, MGTOW/RP Maybe a few less than normal as I am happy with my own company when I'm alone Leaning towards introvert in personal life, extrovert in work 90% 0%
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 08:28 PM
4

As a few others have said, there's a huge potential difference between Red Pill and theredpill subreddit. Huge difference. Just because a guy has "taken the red pill" doesn't mean that they frequent TRP. This seems to be something that TBPers can't understand. I'd guess that TBPers would agree that not all feminists want to exterminate men, but the radfems do. Why don't you shut them up? Same deal here - TRP is a group of guys with an ideology that is based upon having taken the red pill, but, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 08:25 PM
5

You're disregarding the two most important aspects that the DA is paying more attention to. Her tits.
/r/MGTOW09/02/16 05:19 AM
2

Are you meaning to clarify the position in general, or specific to you? Also, there's a few different results to "taking the red pill" from Pick Up Artists who use RP theory to get laid, all the way to MGTOWs who use the RP as a reason to not have any intimate relationships with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 05:12 AM
1

Man and woman have casual sex. Woman is accidentally pregnant. They didn't use a condom. The woman chooses to keep the baby that the man gave her. - Man's fault. But Man and woman have casual sex. Woman is accidentally pregnant. They didn't use a condom. The woman chose to abort the baby. - Woman's choice being exercised. I feel those two outcomes and the associated blame/praise model is fucked. So, what about the children left behind is a question for BOTH the genders, not just TRP specifically…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 02:23 AM
1

Excellent question though John, unfortunately, I don't think that we can get an honest answer, due to the likelihood that the answer you proposed is correct.
/r/MGTOW09/02/16 01:27 AM
1

That guy is a god damned ninja!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 08:04 PM
1

To say that men only want the visual act and therefore the actors should just wave hello to the camera and start fucking, would be like someone in RP saying that porn for women would her be at home all day and the guy arrives home from work, and hands her a pile of cash. You've used flawed logic. While most guys don't watch porn for a plot, and let's face it, these aren't exactly Oscar-nominated actors here, there does need to be an element of scene-setting for some porn. Lots of porn genres req…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 08:02 PM
1

I'm not sure why bringing in a bullet calibre has anything to do with a woman aborting a pregnancy. Especially as you are talking about a specific circumstance, and not the "whoops" factor that make up most unplanned single person pregnancies.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 08:37 AM
5

Guys don't watch porn for a storyline. At least, certainly most people don't watch porn for the storyline. That there is a storyline sometimes doesn't mean that the viewers want the storyline. Correlation and causality are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 05:33 AM
1

Cull the weak! Lol Just replace airbags with claymore mines and after about a month or so, all the people who have no common sense will be wiped out. Or, you know, humans stop existing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 02:03 AM
1

There's some people that think the "dark side of the moon" is so called because "it doesn't get sunlight". Fuck, people are shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 01:44 AM
0

Interestingly, it was used as an insult in the 16th century in England (way before it was for gay man). And was a slur for (usually) old women. Source ) Edit: the URL got fucked up due to the use of a bracket in the URL.. Sorry about that, just click it and then the "did you mean" link) Edit2: what's that? Someone just added information and wasn't actually giving a usual RP view, or was giving a RP view? QUICK, DOWNVOTE HIM! Yeah, that'll show that guy for telling us the source of the word!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 01:37 AM
1

That's completely different to "they need to rally around one if they want to defeat him" (paraphrasing) Still not agreeing with your earlier statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 12:31 AM
1

What restrictions might they be?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 12:29 AM
1

I didn't give a political opinion, so I'm not agreeing with that. I just looked at the data. And more women are supporting Trump than any of the other candidates.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 02:21 PM
1

More than every other option. The most supported candidate by women. Most republican women support Trump. No other option comes close. Better?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 02:14 PM
1

Personally, I have wistful hopes that the genders can have equal opportunity (note: This isn't equal outcome). However, there are two main issues with that. The genders aren't equal in a physical, or emotional sense. There are many variables that some people simply can't understand aren't a mystical "patriarchy" holding them back. We are, at our cores, animals. We may have higher planes of intelligence than the rest of the animal kingdom, but we still have basic reactions and emotional responses…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 10:54 AM
2

How very overly sexualised. However, back to the point - the report that OP linked to, shows that woman overly prefer Trump. Which, seeing as OP then tried to misrepresent that, shows that TBP is the retarded one in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 09:20 AM
2

Is that your rebuttal to the fact that woman prefer Trump? Or is it your rebuttal to me not biting when you said that TRP is retarded?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 09:04 AM
4

But OP was trying to say that women don't prefer him. They do.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 09:02 AM
3

And BP only ever has facts and considered opinion? I take it you didn't read the report that OP posted? It clearly shows that the majority of women polled that are republican, actually prefer Trump over all other options in the republican field.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 08:57 AM
2

Er..... ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 08:55 AM
5

Q10: The question asking republican voters who they prefer as the candidate, the majority of women (30%) selected Trump. Seems to me like the women prefer him over the others on offer. Did you even read the report yourself? Edit I find it telling that when I read and reflect on the report that was provided, and it shows something that doesn't assist the Blue Pill circlejerk, I get downvoted to silence the comment. Typical Blue Pill/Left Wing nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 08:40 AM
9

Republican people are still right/left, within that zone. Trump is rather Right. Women are, even republicans, still usually Left leaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 07:48 AM
13

Because women are, as a generalisation, left leaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 07:33 AM
7

Excellent, well thought out, unbiased rebuttal. 5/7
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 07:31 AM
1

Baaaahahahhhahahaa Alpha male!
/r/MGTOW06/02/16 06:26 AM
1

I already did the "look everyone" joke. You look retarded using it immediately afterwards.
/r/MGTOW06/02/16 06:07 AM
1

look everyone! It's Super Jock!
/r/MGTOW06/02/16 04:28 AM
1

Ah, gotcha. Sorry lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 03:09 AM
1

Why are you even here?
/r/MGTOW06/02/16 02:57 AM
1

You can't abort a car accident though. You can abort a reproductive accident.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 02:53 AM
1

This is assuming that both parties want, or can deal with,equal custody. You're assuming that the names on a house are reflective of those that paid for the house. Title deed doesn't always reflect the purchasing balance of the property.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 02:50 AM
1

True, you can abort a baby, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 02:43 AM
1

You can't abort a car accident after its happened though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 01:34 AM
1

Here you state that "biology happened". Which is the point I was making.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 01:05 AM
7

So, crazy idea, how about they fucking think of that. Realise that the baby is going to have a hard life. And abort it instead of taking into the plan "well, we both made a mistake, but I can just have him pay for it"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 01:01 AM
3

Wait, biology happened? Didn't you also say that "women make babies"? Do they do it, or does it just happen? You can't have both. Either she is responsible for the child having made it. Or. It was an accident that she chose to allow to continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:57 AM
0

Calling all white knights! Calling all white knights! Woman is being questioned by a man, please report!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:47 AM
6

Excuse me. I'm not fucking anyone, thankyouverymuch. Something tells me that you wouldn't trust any man. Period.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 04:02 PM
3

You said you don't need him, but you need him, but you don't need him, but then you asked if you aren't "allowed" to need him. You seem conflicted.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 04:00 PM
4

So, women are forgetful. Don't remember to take the pill. And they still have sex without a condom? How is this entirely the guy's fault, again? Sounds like these women are just plain stupid. (Or, you know, tricking men into fathering a baby)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 03:58 PM
5

Because women can lie about BC, it's safer to assume that they are lying about everything (my personal approach)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 03:55 PM
4

(HurrDurr you don't understand biology, herpderp) She doesn't MAKE the baby. The baby grows inside her. Making insinuates that she actively and consciously does something
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 03:49 PM
14

Not always responsible though, are you? Sometimes someone ignores all previous guidelines and fucks your shit up
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 03:47 PM
7

No, the woman doesn't MAKE the baby. Let's be honest, a retarded woman and retarded guy can reproduce. They just need him to not pull out. Stop making out that the woman does something. Granted, she's huge for 9mths, but, then childbirth happens due to nature. Everything is due to nature. Please don't make out like women are actively engaged in the process of pregnancy
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 03:44 PM
14

When you are poor, you go left. When you own stuff, you want to keep it you go right Jesus Christ, +100 internets. I never thought about what made my shift from leftie to rightie before.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 03:37 PM
11

What if he doesn't want a child? You seem to be disregarding this part completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 03:32 PM
15

I consented to driving mid snowstorm because my employer was a bitch and requested attendance. I did not consent to the accident. So, kinda like a guy that consents to sex, but not fatherhood?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 03:31 PM
4

Left wing says (basically) "everyone can love each other and just get along, OMG GUISE THIS IS AWESOME" Right wing says "People are fucked, also, there's no reason why I have to like you" (Unless you are talking about the extremes of either side, which are, basically, the same thing; Both militant, violent, and unable to be negotiated with)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 03:28 PM
1

MRA is useless because there's a risk of pregnancy when a woman is on the pill...? What?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 09:05 AM
4

Apology accepted.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 08:43 AM
2

There is no need to debate it. They are confused, they dislike men. Leave them to their own devices. Not our problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 08:28 AM
1

I don't care if they are in a state of confusion; There's no reason that people should be "saved" from a self-imposed condition. It's literally not my (or your) problem. Let them stay confused and struggling with the paradox.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 08:23 AM
6

I was asking the other person, I'm sure that they don't need someone jumping in to save them. They are, after all, a strong independent woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 08:19 AM
2

Excellent, men offer nothing either. Best relationships stop happening then, right? Also, because you completely ignored the question; When did I say that RP was a great ideology in that comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 08:18 AM
5

So, if you don't need men for protection or for survival, why do you need your husband? What could you possibly need him in your life for that you can't do yourself as a strong independent woman? You can't need him simply because he wants you, as that would mean that you need to be wanted which is, frankly, shows you as extremely insecure. Unless, of course, you're extremely insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 07:42 AM
5

When did I say that RP was a great ideology in that comment? I simply implied that women has nothing positive to bring to a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 07:35 AM
8

I was being specific. She doesn't need men. She's also married.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 07:33 AM
5

Have we met before? You seem overly hurt by a single comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 07:32 AM
1

Hey guise, go your own way by doing strictly what this other guy says to do. How could I not have realised that my own way was actually someone else's?!
/r/MGTOW05/02/16 04:37 AM
5

Strong independent women don't need no men. Until the roads crumble, and bridges collapse, and the fuel pumps run dry, and the car breaks down, and the water stops pumping to their house, and the sewage stops being treated, and the garbage piles up in the streets, and all the fucking lids are stuck on the jars.
/r/MGTOW05/02/16 04:35 AM
10

Don't need men in your life? Then stop bothering us.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 04:30 AM
28

You want a guy to be confident (alpha trait), professional (career driven/has money), a "go getter" (high up in his field/more money), doesn't have people standing in his way (alpha trait), breaks the rules (bad boy). But if he realised that those traits he has are part of red pill theory, then he's a depressed, hateful guy, who never gets female attention. What, exactly, are you planning on bringing to the table for this "perfect man" besides your vagina?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 03:12 AM
3

So they are in the middle of nowhere to afford such a house, and need to commute to a job that pays US$1000 a week. Exactly how much time do you think it's acceptable to commute for a day?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 01:27 AM
4

Do such places have many careers going that pay almost US$1000 a week?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 01:25 AM
5

Alpha doesn't necessarily mean "good person". He definitely shows traits of an alpha male; That doesn't mean he's not a complete cunt.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 01:23 AM
1

Which brings us to the point I was making. Women go for money and assets as the trump card when selecting a man.
/r/MGTOW20/09/15 08:45 PM
2

I don't. You're never going to see a women chase a man who has nothing but looks. She'll fuck him and move on. But, an attractive woman with nothing will be looked after for many years by a man (until he finds the next attractive girl he can spend his money on)
/r/MGTOW20/09/15 08:43 PM
1

Bud could you imagine a woman dating an attractive man who had no money or assets?
/r/MGTOW20/09/15 06:42 AM
5

Imagine the apps! -CockSucker 4000 -AnalDemon 2 -Do The Dishes Without Moaning Haha
/r/MGTOW20/09/15 02:57 AM
6

Instructions unclear. Going to zoo tomorrow. Please assist.
/r/MGTOW18/09/15 12:16 PM
2

I'm guessing you didn't actually read the link he posted.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 08:27 AM
1

I think the "victim" is actually upset because she's now been outed as NEVER GIVING A BLOWJOB. No man is getting conned into that shit now. Wall: Slammed into at about 400kph.
/r/MGTOW17/09/15 11:56 AM
2

Wonderful article, the weighting style is great and the points well put. I am looking forward to banging a lifelike hot slit - that I can put away afterwards, and doesn't complain when I fart. Extra thought: Imagine the AppStore for them! AnalTurbo 3000 new app available that will almost fuck your balls clean off! Not for beginners
/r/MGTOW17/09/15 11:44 AM
1

Wow. I stand corrected!
/r/askTRP16/09/15 09:08 AM
2

For consideration: You may need a little sign near the entrance, disclaiming that conversations and actions may be recorded. That was you can defend against illegal recording of someone (otherwise the evidence isn't admissible in court).
/r/askTRP16/09/15 01:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter