TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Reddit-person-321 Archive

View 1 post and 560 comments by Reddit-person-321 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

That wasn't generalization
/r/MensRights15/02/26 01:45 AM
3

It is women it's just not JUST women. Anyone can be a misandrist regardless of gender
/r/MensRights14/01/26 05:36 PM
5

I don't know what gave you that idea, women were never mentioned once in the OP. Misandry on the other hand was, and yeah that is definitely to blame here. Also the answer to your first question is in the first sentence of the post.
/r/MensRights14/01/26 05:36 AM
1

By "laugh at" they obviously meant make fun of and mock. Nervous or not, you would never blatantly mock someone in their face if you were actually scared for your life. At least most certainly wouldn't
/r/MensRights27/12/25 08:41 PM
9

"Pick me" is usually the term they would use
/r/MensRights20/12/25 07:36 AM
4

There are many male feminists. Not sure why you felt the need to point that.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 02:25 AM
3

Those are usually banned on Reddit
/r/MensRights22/11/25 01:49 AM
3

" but given the context of the sentence I think the “good in bed” comment was a joke, that may have fallen flat. " Joke or no joke this would not be tolerated either way with the genders reversed. It would still be viewed as "objectification" Also if you are going to call out the specific verbiage that you find "vile" on this sub the least you can do is link it or quote it to get a better context to what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 02:56 PM
2

It could have been "Are We There Yet" aswell
/r/MensRights01/11/25 07:11 PM
4

Love how you only addressed the first sentence while ignoring the rest of that paragraph. "Feminists will call men paranoid, autistic Incels for being afraid to approach women or interact with women." absolutely contradicts "women can't magically know which men are good or bad, therefore they must be cautious with their safety, and assume all men are potential threats" Why in the world wouldn't a person be cautious about approaching someone who views them as a potential threat?
/r/MensRights31/10/25 06:19 PM
4

That's going to take a while to explain and I don't really have the time to do that right now so for now I'll just give you the tldr version. Because I believe in actual gender equality I do indeed oppose feminism because, simply put, feminism tends to have a massive bias for women and against men which naturally leads to misandry and discrimination / abuse of men by feminists in power. When you have (or at least claim to have) the world view that men hold all the power, while woman have none of…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 04:00 PM
6

In the US, women were the majority of voters for 44 years straight. Most Left leaning people, political parties, and organizations in the entire world identify as feminists. Most western media is pro feminism. Women hold far more power than you give them credit for.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 03:10 PM
1

Pretty much everyone here agrees with the first word in your comment It's everything else people disagree with due to it being blatantly false and can easily be proven false by simply scrolling up the page and looking at the comments with the most upvotes and mearly every other comment aswell.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 02:06 AM
1

The argument was rather or not he put the blame on to women. Obviously the blame wasn't on women even in your rephrase
/r/MensRights13/08/25 02:03 AM
1

Bruh the word women didn't even show up in that post until he said that both men and women worked hard together. That's hardly an example of someone blaming all women. Also the person you replied to in that other comment didn't either. "men were perpetrating that violence ON BEHALF of their tribes/for the benefit of THEIR women and children" Is not an example of blaming women because he never said that men were forced by women to commit the violence. He said that their motivation was to protect …
/r/MensRights12/08/25 05:01 PM
1

Sure buddy copy and paste the exact quotes and the url to those quotes. They are usually blaming feminism not women
/r/MensRights12/08/25 02:56 PM
1

Feminists yes, but usually not women
/r/MensRights12/08/25 02:51 PM
3

I agree with you completely. There are other parties in the US other than the big 2 but almost no one votes for them. It would be really cool to have a genuinely egalitarian 3rd party gain enough power and popularity to win an election.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 12:38 AM
7

she's litterally doing it in this post
/r/MensRights28/05/25 04:36 AM
9

Why is this here and not a dating advice sub? This is completly off-topic.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 03:48 AM
1

Let's put it this way. If it was deemed perfectly legal and fine for a rapist to not only not receive any punishment but get straight up rewarded with money anually for 18 years by the woman who got raped, would you not see this as an example of women's rights being rolled back?
/r/MensRights26/05/25 01:41 AM
2

Citation needed. What post or comment are you specifially referring to? Please copy and paste the URL to it for clarification.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 05:50 PM
6

How is asking for an example of what you meant for clarification weird?
/r/MensRights28/04/25 04:56 PM
2

Give me an example. For each of the 3. I could argue that what you said sounds dismisive and therefore can be very off putting and that you should probably communicate better yourself.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 04:53 PM
6

Have you ever defended men in general when they get vilainized or negatively generalized? Have you ever explained to someone who is not an MRA the disadvantages many men have in society without putting the blame solely on men? Have you ever pointed out why a bad person who just so happens to be a woman is bad? If not that's probably why you have never been called an incel.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 04:17 PM
1

Only 1% of people with prostate cancer are men so this excuse doesn't really make sense
/r/MensRights08/04/25 07:48 AM
5

All? No. But there is a lot of men who definitely hate men in general (in general does not mean all it means most).
/r/MensRights01/04/25 02:31 AM
7

A: You can be for women's rights without being a feminist. It's called being an egalitarian. B: Which misogynistic comments are you referring to specifically. Also many guys are misandric so I'm not sure why you felt the need to mention that you're a guy
/r/MensRights31/03/25 05:41 AM
2

Don't think you understand what a preference is. Men with that description are rare so obviously most would settle for those who don't fit that description if they are still attracted to men. Doesn't mean they don't prefer that though
/r/MensRights30/03/25 04:48 PM
5

I'm talking about standards alot of women have in real life but are more likely to express online. There's a difference
/r/MensRights30/03/25 05:11 AM
4

That explains it. Obviously most women wouldn't flat out tell you that irl even if they did feel that way since it would make them look bad. It's alot easier to do this in an online setting where you can just block anyone who disagrees than to do so irl
/r/MensRights29/03/25 11:08 PM
4

It's a minority but there are definitely many women who put that in their profile during in online dating and have this as their standard irl Just like there are many horrible men who date same applies with women
/r/MensRights29/03/25 10:34 PM
20

The comment you replied to already told you but I guess I'll elaborate. Disadvantages of Circumcision: Pain and discomfort:. Circumcision is a surgical procedure and can cause pain during and after the procedure. Bleeding: Bleeding is a common complication of circumcision, which can range from mild to severe. Infection: Infection is another potential complication, although it is rare when the procedure is performed properly. Meatal stenosis: This is a narrowing of the urinary opening, which can …
/r/MensRights29/03/25 10:29 PM
11

Male circumcision at birth is very legal and pretty common world wide. Especially US, Middle East and Africa
/r/MensRights29/03/25 10:07 PM
3

I'm just going to ignore the fact that this completely contradicts the previous response you made to me and ask what exactly do you view as hate? Which posts and comments on this sub are you referring to specifically?
/r/MensRights28/03/25 11:17 PM
5

The difference is you would have been called an incel and instantly banned instead of simply having some people disagreeing with you and getting some downvotes. If you don't believe me you can try it out for yourself.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 10:43 PM
6

Imagine if someone made a post called "Why do women hate men/MRAs?" on a feminist sub
/r/MensRights28/03/25 10:32 PM
2

That person said feminists not women. You do realize male feminists exist right? The only one vilainizing and bashing a sex here is you.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 01:43 PM
1

Guess you never saw the animated show Avatar: Last Air bender huh? The meme is about A kingdom lying and denying in order to gaslight and escape accountability. "There is no war in ba sing se"
/r/MensRights26/03/25 07:03 AM
3

It's pretty rare for a democrat to not be a feminist so I'm guessing that's why they were mentioned.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 03:49 AM
31

Men are killed at a higher rate than women in the UK and most of the world. Let me guess your next reply is "but who did the killing?" It doesn't matter who did the killing, either way men are obviously more likely to be victimized by violent crimes so it's absurd to villainize all men in general and bunch the innocent victims with the evil perpetrators just because of a minority of said men.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 04:06 PM
3

This isn't a feminist sub. You're not going to get banned for having an opposing opinion just downvoted alot.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 05:17 AM
10

I hate to say it but men need to flee from the UK in droves if they can. It's the only way the government will start taking the issue seriously
/r/MensRights16/03/25 08:54 PM
3

The root cause of the problem is not due to incompetency it is due to perception. Men are just as good as women when it comes to banding together to send a message if they are passionate enough about the cause, the problem is that most men, just like women, are brainwashed into believing that men have much more power and privilege in society than women and therefore advocating for their gender is a waste of time at best and down right evil at worst.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 04:18 PM
6

Often times many feminists go against that definition when it comes to action but even with that definition the emphasis is still on advocacy for women specifically and NOT for women and men equally as you originally implied. Consider this scenario. A person has the mindset/belief that men are inherently at the top of society while women are inherently at the bottom of society and the only way to equalize the genders is by being a misandrist that endlessly bashes and opresses men at every opport…
/r/MensRights09/03/25 04:55 AM
32

"Feminism is the fight for equality for both genders." That's egalitarianism. Feminism has always focused solely on women. Hence the Fem prefix.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 12:26 AM
5

Being apart of a supremecy movement isn't exactly something to brag about but you do you boo. That being said I disagree with the person you're replying to. It's not women in general It's a certain type of women.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 02:58 PM
4

both are definitely a thing in the US. Especially International womens day, I guess neither are celibrated much in the specific place you live
/r/MensRights08/03/25 05:47 AM
1

"Yes but not really, because both men and women do this to men... It's not only men having these expectations, it's everyone, the whole society." I know that. I'm saying it should be misandry when women do it and internal misandry when men do it. Just like how it is called misogyny and internal misogyny when the genders are reversed. Even better if you don't gender it at all by simply saying "toxic gender roles" because the term "toxic masculinity" is often used as a way to villainize men. "beca…
/r/MensRights08/03/25 12:18 AM
1

You could call it internal misandry in the same way the genderbent version of this is usually called internal misogyny and not toxic feminity. Or better yet, not gender it all and simply say toxic gender roles
/r/MensRights07/03/25 12:26 AM
3

True but No one said nor implied that it was
/r/MensRights05/03/25 05:34 PM
2

Caused by misandry. Crazy how you can't tell the difference.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 03:20 PM
12

Doesn't matter as long as it's equal but I'd say raise standards for woman to equal men for harsher crimes, lower standards for men to equal women in minor crimes and do both for mid crimes
/r/MensRights04/03/25 07:23 AM
6

"The fact that it 'pleases women' keeps being repeated here" It keeps getting repeated because most people who continues the practice in modern times don't do it for religious reasons. They do it either A: because they believe it will be viewed as unattractive when the child grows up or B: They are misinformed and think it's better for the child's health
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:37 AM
5

Bruh I think you should re read the comment you are replying to. That person never said nor implied that women in general created the problem.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:13 AM
3

Men rights movement
/r/MensRights21/02/25 10:56 PM
12

I agree but there should still be a male only variant just like there is a female only variant
/r/MensRights20/02/25 05:26 PM
2

(Many) "Women love to say, “Not all men, but always men.” So, I did the same, in reverse" Re read this please
/r/MensRights14/02/25 05:42 PM
6

I guess you forgot about the safe haven laws huh
/r/MensRights31/01/25 08:34 PM
3

Thanks to safe haven laws. Yes
/r/MensRights23/01/25 01:21 PM
11

"honestly don't even know why men get married in the first place when hatred of women is this widespread." You implied that men in general hate women. How exactly is that not anti -male? If someone said "Don't know why women get married when hatred against men is so wide-spread" would you not see this sentiment as anti-female?
/r/MensRights20/01/25 09:40 PM
4

You don't have to be Republican to disagree with your take. You do know neutral independents who don't care for either party exists right?
/r/MensRights18/12/24 04:29 AM
2

Beauty is subjective on an individual level but there are general patterns in what people find attractive in terms of looks
/r/MensRights20/11/24 01:26 AM
3

Males are men and boys in this context
/r/MensRights19/11/24 02:38 PM
3

When you just say men it means men in general or most men by default. You could have and should have said some men.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 07:50 AM
2

Men use to be completely gender neutral and essentially meant humans or people in old English. Male adult humans were Wermen and female adult humans were Wifmen. The English language evolved and eventually Wifmen became women and Wermen got shortened to men since human already works as a gender neutral term and I suppose the people at the time couldn't come up with anything better that sticked.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 02:55 AM
1

So you're telling me that if a woman sent a letter to to a male friend apologizing that women are trash because a minority of women as a whole did something bad you would %100 be ok with it
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:21 PM
9

Copy and place the link to the comments please
/r/MensRights13/11/24 12:59 PM
5

Um what? The women who voted are in the wrong but so are the men who voted as well obviously. This point is about calling out the hypocrisy of the women who voted for this while at the same time many of these same women are mad about a few lunatics saying "your body my choice" when it comes to women.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:53 PM
1

What's delusional is believing that it's impossible for a crazy person with anger issues to harm you.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:58 PM
-1

More importantly who said men didn't? Certainly wasn't anyone here so I fail to see how your comment is relevant to the conversation
/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:34 PM
2

He's talking about the hypocrisy of banning MGTOW from most platforms while leaving 4B alone and in some cases out right promoting it. Either both should be villainized and banned or neither should
/r/MensRights11/11/24 03:32 AM
14

You are literally defending abusers so obviously you don't
/r/MensRights11/11/24 02:35 AM
-1

Pretty much
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:06 PM
2

You're going to have to wait a long time because this isn't a feminist sub. You're not going to get banned for having an opposing opinion. Down voted sure but not banned.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:29 AM
4

It's pretty obvious his reason wasn't that she's a woman or that he's feeling "manly". It's because she and most (if not all) of her party are blatant misandrists. I wouldn't vote for either party personally.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 12:57 AM
3

How is misandry being normalized not a men's rights issue? Normalization of misandry is literally how laws that discriminate against men get passed which of course affects men's rights in a negative way.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:50 PM
4

"It's just a joke bro." Let's be real, even if that is true if the roles were reversed and men were joking about the woman dieng brutally by her boyfriend they would be labeled as incels by the vast majority of everyone. In fact I'm willing to bet most of these people would be the main ones upset and calling them evil incels and would not take "it's just satire" as a good excuse.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 03:01 AM
2

Gender equality is egalitarianism. Feminism is and always was primarily avacocy for women with men being a very distant afterthought (if considered at all). Hence the name of the movement.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 01:10 AM
2

I don't think you realize how little sense you are making right now. With fathers they are held by the law to at least pay for the child through child support and if they don't they risk going to jail. Dead beat fathers exist but they exist with the risk of jail time.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 10:13 PM
2

Single mothers exist because usually they choose to be single mothers or did you forget the fact that safe haven laws exist? To clarify, safe haven laws allow women to legally abandon their newborn babies
/r/MensRights21/09/24 08:27 PM
2

You should have prefaced with a disclaimer. Example: These are not my views this is the views of the mod of ask feminists
/r/MensRights06/09/24 05:06 PM
1

Girl is simply faster to say and write. If we stuck with the old word for men, weremen most people would probably say boy instead.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 06:15 PM
5

Except the main victims of physical violence is usually men. Also I sincerely hope you meant the majority of the offenders are men and not the majority of men are offenders. Like that other person said only a tiny minority of men are doing those crimes most men aren't.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 11:33 PM
1

You still can as long as you identify as a woman
/r/MensRights25/08/24 02:05 PM
11

Men are also usually more likely to be targets of physical violence in general than women. It's not just robbery.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 01:53 PM
4

That was actually genuinely funny. I'm starting to see why so many people are afraid of losing their jobs to AI.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 06:52 PM
2

Saying if someone wants to commit suicide they probably deserve it is hardly "mild"
/r/MensRights31/07/24 05:01 PM
5

Either both should be allowed to go in the other changing room or neither should and they should stay completely segregated. I don't get why this concept is confusing you so much.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:45 PM
12

Who said anything about Trump other than you? You accused people of being Trump supporters and Andrew Tate stooges when pretty much no one brought those guys up other than you and you really expected to not be down voted? "you'd rather stick to your political affiliation than actually support or listen to other mens point of view" This is literally word for word what you are doing. People vare trying to inform you of the misandry that exists in both the left and the right but instead of listenin…
/r/MensRights16/06/24 04:32 PM
8

You're right there are more female than male voters in the US so both sides cater to them to a certain extent. There are more male Republican voters than female Republican voters but only by a small margin.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 07:30 PM
1

2 x chromosomes
/r/MensRights14/06/24 03:57 PM
4

"Why would people be harsh to shut someone up?" Because just like you assume it is unlikely for someone to treat you harshly unless you did something to deserve it, they assume it is unlikely for you to get consistently rejected unless you are a bad person and deserve it. A common response to people a person views as bad is to treat them harshly.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 02:14 PM
3

It's both
/r/MensRights10/06/24 08:39 PM
5

"I do agree that there should either be draft for all or draft for none though but that was the point of the OP. It was just to showcase how messed up the draft truly is. I also agree that the scenario he made up and the draft aren't exactly comparable but to act as if his post is supposed to be pro rape is ridiculous." I guess you didn't read my edit. Literally no one here believes that this is something that should happen. Again, the point is to simply showcase the equivalent of the draft of t…
/r/MensRights31/05/24 06:49 AM
5

You do know women can get impregnated without sex right? Have you not heard of sperm banks and artificial insemination? I do agree that there should either be draft for all or draft for none though but that was the point of the OP. It was just to showcase how messed up the draft truly is. I also agree that the scenario he made up and the draft aren't exactly comparable but to act as if his post is supposed to be pro rape is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 06:25 AM
1

Read the PS. It's satire against those that disagree with you.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 02:04 PM
5

I am a birds of prey fan so it being about Harley is precisely why I didn't like it. The actual BoP got shafted hard in that movie. Harley was apart of the BoP in the comics but it was always brief. She never was a core member.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 01:03 PM
2

"males and females should all be able to access the same opportunities BASED ON THEIR SKILLS AND CAPABILITIES (e.g a woman with a IT degree, good work ethic and punctuality should get a job as easily as a man with one in the same position), and males and females should all feel safe and empowered in public, and have equal punishments for equal crime" That's egalitarianism not feminism
/r/MensRights09/05/24 04:02 PM
1

Happy husband happy life span
/r/MensRights05/05/24 11:59 AM
10

Well there you go you basically proved that the hypocrisy is real. The same person saying that men should only be allowed to go to gender neutral gyms and not have male exclusive gyms is indeed the same person that either believes or justifies the belief that women should be allowed woman only gyms while men shouldn't have men only gyms. That person is clearly you buddy.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 11:05 PM
7

Where exactly is the proof that people here send pics of their genitals? Wtf?
/r/MensRights19/04/24 09:02 PM
6

2 x chromosomes sub.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 09:00 PM
9

You can hate someone and choose to be with that person anyways due to an ulterior motive. Even if it actually was a lie that's no excuse to be a sexist
/r/MensRights16/04/24 10:41 PM
1

That complaint isn't in the OP so I have no idea why you even said that
/r/MensRights14/04/24 02:56 PM
6

Notice how DrewYetti said feminists and you said women instead. Notice how they didn't say it was them that has trouble dating but you interpreted it as that anyways. Notice how you changed their argument from being, feminists tend to bully men which creates the very men they hate so much and refuse to take accountability for it, to women should be forced against their will to date men they aren't attracted to. Instead of arguing against what they actually said you made up a strawman version of …
/r/MensRights05/04/24 11:42 PM
13

A: Who said I'm a man? B: where exactly is your proof that all posts are about hating women. If you look at the top 20 posts right now not a single one of them will say anything about hating women
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:32 AM
15

Question: What do you call someone who villainizes and looks down upon a sex? Answer: A sexist
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:23 AM
7

Please show evidence of anyone here "idolizing" Ben Shapiro and Andrew Tate. While you're at it also show evidence of people here saying that all women hate them because of the media as well. No I am not going to just look it up myself. You made the claim so the burden of proof is on you.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:16 PM
5

Yeah I agree. The people in the post getting mad about men getting more wins and prize money for piano competitions while being totally fine with the genders reversed when it comes to violin competitions definitely give off that "energy" for sure. Especially Fiona Sinclair the CEO Of Leeds International Piano Competition.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 03:22 PM
3

Due to safe haven laws it is perfectly legal for a mother to abandon their babies at a safe haven facility (one of which is usually a fire station).
/r/MensRights21/03/24 11:33 PM
1

Not good more like less bad
/r/MensRights20/03/24 01:16 AM
5

Not playing at all is having self respect and putting up boundaries.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 10:09 PM
24

I think it starts with a p. Push pass I think
/r/MensRights17/03/24 06:03 AM
2

So basically it's exactly what he said it is. As long as it's done with the claim that it would equalize the sexes.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 04:47 PM
7

If they hate men. Yeah it is
/r/MensRights15/03/24 02:45 PM
2

Think of it like this. I can not win an NFL championship. But I also do not want to. Can not and do not want to are two different things but they are not mutually exclusive. You absolutely can be both. There is no problem with giving him advice on how to get into a relationship but there is no need to ridicule, mock or bully him because of his struggles. Especially since he isn't acting cruel against others.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 06:13 PM
4

"something is wrong with you because you cannot attract a mate" Cannot attract a mate and do not want to attract a mate aren't mutually exclusive. Anyways you didn't address the other half of my comment so I'll repeat it. "Also OP didn't blame society or women for not being able to get into a relationship. He criticized society for how it tends to treat men who have a struggle when it comes getting romantic or sexual relationships. There is nothing wrong with not wanting to date someone but ther…
/r/MensRights14/03/24 05:25 PM
6

It depends honestly. It could be that they do get women attracted to them but they are being selective and only want the right woman. If that's the case then it's voluntary. Or it could mean that every time they try to ask a girl out they get rejected and no one shows romantic or sexual interest towards them. That's involuntary.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 04:57 PM
6

Lmao. It's inherently a bad thing because the person wants a mate but can't get one but there's nothing wrong with not being able to get one as long as you don't want one. Also OP didn't blame society or women for not being able to get tinto a relationship. He criticized society for how it tends to treat men who have a struggle when it comes getting romantic or sexual relationships. There is nothing wrong with not wanting to date someone but there is something wrong with bullying that person for…
/r/MensRights14/03/24 04:11 PM
6

It's supposed to be simply short for Involuntarily celibate. Now It's usually used as an insult that means evil misogynist
/r/MensRights14/03/24 02:30 PM
3

Citation very much needed. Where is this well known evidence of most men in general claiming pregnancy is very easy? From what I can tell the general consensus regardless of gender is that pregnancy is difficult. At worst you might get some men saying that the level of pain women feel from pregnancy depends on the woman but that's a far cry from straight up claiming that pregnancy is generally "easy".
/r/MensRights14/03/24 04:03 AM
8

Because safe haven laws already exist for women (it allows the mother to legally abandon her baby after it is born).So there is no reason why men shouldn't be able to do the same for equality.
/r/MensRights03/03/24 07:03 PM
6

They believe rape has nothing to do with your sexuality and. 100% to do with your desire to harm/control others.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 07:54 AM
1

"Women should not be hired as much as men because they are risk!" Do you have evidence of people saying that here
/r/MensRights24/02/24 08:14 AM
4

Could you copy and paste a link to the comments you are referring to
/r/MensRights16/02/24 11:22 PM
3

"I believe that feminism is about the equality of the sexes in a sense that we have to look at both sides of the problem and find a happy medium" That's egilitarianism. Feminism is about looking at and fixing mostly female problems hence why it is called FEMinism. It is and has always been primarily about advocating for women over men. As for if this sub has more subscribers. I highly doubt it. Feminism is a much bigger movement with far more power. It does have a decent amount though.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 11:17 PM
4

Absolutely yes
/r/MensRights15/02/24 11:13 PM
17

They literally said the word patriarchy in the movie multiple times. There is no way in the world you're being serious right now
/r/MensRights01/01/24 10:59 AM
1

I think they exist but most who get called that as an insult don't actually fit that category. Either because they never claimed to be nice or good and are simply jerks or bad people in general or because they are genuinely good people but the accuser didn't like what the accused said or did so they call them one anyways.
/r/MensRights01/01/24 06:00 AM
2

Probably did it on women who were simply different than you
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/23 07:21 AM
3

You're the one making the claim that isn't discrimination so you have to prove it. Like I said in another comment people at least gave you examples of what they believe discrimination is while you didn't put in a lick of effort to show what you believe discrimination is and how this isn't discrimination. All you do is just say it's not over and over again without elaboration to prove your point. By saying that you don't have to prove yourself but constantly telling everyone else to prove their s…
/r/MensRights05/12/23 03:08 AM
5

You call out others for not proving their point yet you refuse to prove your point by elaborating and showing evidence of your claims and you wonder why people here believe that you're a troll
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:42 AM
6

How is it not discrimination?
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:24 AM
5

Multiple people have already explained to you how it exists and you have yet to explain how it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:20 AM
7

Citation needed
/r/MensRights21/11/23 02:40 PM
3

Citation needed. Keep in mind that feminism =/= women in general
/r/MensRights20/11/23 08:03 PM
14

There were still more males than females watching it.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 01:32 AM
2

Defeminization
/r/MensRights07/11/23 03:31 PM
1

I don't think you understand what equal investment is. And of course both sides should do nice things for their partner but I'm mostly referring to the beginning of the relationship. You know the part where neither side knows each other well. At that point, paying equally is the only way to know rather both sides are invested equally because both sides don't know each other all that welland there is no guarantee there will be other dates. At that point you don't really know if the other person i…
/r/MensRights07/11/23 02:33 PM
1

If one side is paying 100% while the other side is paying 0% how in the world are both sides contributing to the relationship equally? Why are you claiming that's not where you're coming from and then immediately proving that that IS where you're coming from by villainizing equal financial investment in a relationship?
/r/MensRights07/11/23 02:53 AM
2

Both sides agreed to the date. If both sides are equals or want to be treated as equals then both sides should contribute equally. What you're saying sounds like an excuse to uphold traditional gender roles while at the same time having the wiggle room to claim that you're against them.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 11:09 PM
8

Precisely what I'm saying. What part of equal fights do you not understand? If someone is not overpowering you and you are stomping or kicking them then you're not fighting equally obviously. The point of my reply was to tell you what equal fights equal rights means most of the time. You were claiming it is mostly used to mock women who want gender equality when in reality it's usually used to enforce gender equality. Gender equality is all about equal treatment of the genders. If you're not for…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 11:28 PM
12

Equal rights equal fight means that if someone hits you, you should be able to hit back in self defense regardless of their gender. So in a way you're right it is about being able to hit women but it's also about hitting men aswell and anyone in general who is physically harming you regardless of your gender or their gender. If all she does is slaps you once then yeah I agree try to talk things out and get away without things getting too violent BUT if she is wailing on you over and over again a…
/r/MensRights31/10/23 11:11 PM
1

Not being romantically or sexually desirable and not being desirable in general are also completely different things. Just because you struggle romantically or sexually doesn't automatically mean you're undesirable when it comes to platonic relationships aswell.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 02:07 PM
1

Link the exact comment you are referring to. If
/r/MensRights30/10/23 08:12 PM
2

Men beating their wives is illegal women using child support on things that aren't the child isn't. That's the difference here. No one here even implied that all women do this other than you btw.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 08:49 PM
1

Citation needed
/r/MensRights29/10/23 07:42 PM
3

Got banned most likely
/r/MensRights23/10/23 01:47 PM
4

They are with the very common anti boomer rheteric.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 01:59 PM
4

"Remind you that millions of women support men's rights causes - and those women are liberal & left leaning" No one said anything about women in general or left leaning women not supporting men's rights. "Banning any and all disagreement is how you end up in an echo chamber. I'm not the problem here." Hence why most feminist subs are echo chambers. I actually agree with you on this one.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 08:53 PM
26

Sounds like gender roles. Didn't they claim that they are against those and are getting rid of them?
/r/MensRights04/10/23 12:22 PM
6

Them: If you mock men for expressing their emotions by calling them weak you are evil and have toxic masculinity. Also them: If a man is angry/upset about male bashing or simply disagrees with it then he is fragile and has fragile masculinity / male ego.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 11:34 PM
2

Citation needed
/r/MensRights25/09/23 08:54 PM
4

How in the world is that hate? Setting boundaries in a workplace doesn't automatically mean "hatred"
/r/MensRights20/09/23 02:47 PM
5

Feminists
/r/MensRights20/09/23 05:00 AM
1

"Yea... thing is, as a man, anger is the only emotion you are supposed to show. Its very traditionally masculine to show anger. This is toxic masculinity." It's quite the opposite actually. Men's anger was the main reason why stoicism in men was encouraged due to fear that they would automatically harm others whenever they get mad. Right now usually whenever a man gets mad he is mocked and called fragile or butt hurt. Only in a minority of cases is anger seen as positive in men
/r/MensRights20/09/23 04:34 AM
2

Copy and paste links here
/r/MensRights20/09/23 04:17 AM
1

It's a meme way of saying incels
/r/MensRights03/09/23 02:23 PM
1

No it's a meme way of saying incels
/r/MensRights03/09/23 02:22 PM
6

He's talking about feminist subs. The "you" is feminists in general
/r/MensRights15/08/23 08:50 PM
5

That's the opposite of control. Control Is trying to force someone to stay in the relationship or not allowing someone to leave the relationship.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 04:09 PM
1

What comments are you talking about specifically? Please link them. I looked at the top comments and none of them even mentioned women.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 01:53 PM
11

I read and reread op and nowhere did it imply that if you support women you are automatically a feminist. You can support women by being an egalitarian instead of a feminist. You don't need that label in order to support women because that label comes with a specific ideology that you don't necessarily have to believe in order to support women.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 10:08 PM
3

'It’s a sample of people who have seen the Barbie movie, not all women" So essentially it's exactly what I said it was. A view of some women and not women in general. Let me explain why I made my reply because I don't think you're getting it. "The article is LITERALLY about women’s perspective and dating" When you said women without any indicator on how many it automatically means women in general. I was simply saying that women in general do not have that view only some do. That's it. It's not …
/r/MensRights31/07/23 05:21 AM
5

Women are not a hive mind. This is only the opinion and mindset of SOME women and not all women in general.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 08:02 PM
33

If it's ok to break up with someone for not liking the movie it should be ok the other way around. By your logic every woman who used this limitus test to break up with their boyfriend must not be comfortable with themselves.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 05:22 PM
14

Way farther back than that but yeah I agree
/r/MensRights29/07/23 10:28 PM
3

Yeah but we're talking about the feminist's version of the patriarchy
/r/MensRights29/07/23 02:45 PM
0

What movie did you watch because in the movie I watched, everything went back to being a matriarchy except slightly better. They straight up said that they could make everything completely equal but they won't until the real world is completely equal so no the Kens did not get "equality". "people who think its making fun of the mrm are obviously misogynists who hide under a cleaner term." The cleaner term is "feminist" right because last time I checked the person who made this article and has th…
/r/MensRights29/07/23 05:23 AM
3

Except the director is a feminist.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 04:38 AM
6

It's about Ken bringing patriarchy (yes they literally call it that) to Barbie land in retaliation for getting treated poorly by the Barbirs, and Barbie saving the Barbies with a feminist lecture/ debate. At the end Barbie land goes back to being a matriarchy with Kens having it very slightly better than they did before.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 10:24 PM
4

It's both
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:56 PM
1

Are you joking? Being a male feminist is incredibly common. Feminism would not become anywhere near as powerful and influential as it is without men backing them up. When talking about the US most men who identify as "liberal" or "democrat" also identify as a feminist including the president. How many people in power do you know who would self identify as an mra, much less a female mra?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:28 PM
5

If someone made the GI Joe movie about how women deserve to be opressed would you mock anyone calling it misogynistic just because it's based off of a toy for little boys?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:53 AM
11

I love the fact that that "small handful of movies that are mostly many years old" is way more than the amount of men centered movies that reduced women to nothing that you provided. You wrote a 4 paragraph essay and not once did you mention the specific movies you were referring to when you made that statement. According to you there are literally millions of them so it shouldn't be that difficult to say at least some of the specific movies you're referring to. You don't have to name them all j…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 07:13 PM
10

I don't know about you but personally I would much rather be portrayed as someone who is kind but helpless and needs to be saved by a powerful person than to be viewed as an idiotic horrible monster that deserves to be enslaved so I don't harm and enslave others first chance I get.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:45 AM
3

Bruh the entire plot was about Kens (men) vs Barbies (women). You sure you saw the movie?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:24 AM
18

She was never dumb. Women being portrayed as stupid was never common. Even in the 20s most women on television and movies were portrayed as of average intelligence or wise far more often than they were portrayed as dumb
/r/MensRights23/07/23 04:42 PM
11

"neither was the movie" That we can agree on hence my confusion. I'd go a step further and say that it wasn't about personal relationships in general. To be clear by relationship I meant realtionships in general. Platonic or otherwise. The women already weren't tied down to men in a way that was toxic to them. They were already far more tied down to other women than to the men from the very beginning so to say that this movie is about women breaking free from being tied down to men makes no sens…
/r/MensRights22/07/23 11:28 PM
23

Two people being in a relationship is not inherrintly bad. Being "tied to someone" (aka being loyal) is only bad if that person is incompatible with you or toxic/abusive. You can be in a relationship without being co dependant. The only one who was co dependant was Ken. Honestly could you elaborate on what your point even is because it honestly make no sense to me. It was less about relationships and more about the treatment of the genders as a whole.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 10:54 PM
18

What movie did you see because in the movie I watched, everything went back to being a matriarchy except slightly better. They straight up said that they could make everything completely equal but they won't until the real world is completely equal
/r/MensRights22/07/23 10:27 PM
1

You forgot to add "nothing ever happens"
/r/MensRights22/07/23 10:13 PM
2

Very much so
/r/MensRights22/07/23 09:57 PM
1

The word patriarchy is mentioned many times in the movie and the climax is literally a feminist lecture.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 09:42 PM
1

Some do. It honestly depends on the woman. Your statement could only possibly be true if women were a hive mind which they obviously aren't
/r/MensRights22/07/23 09:37 PM
11

At the end once ken and his "patriarchy" (yes they do use the word patriarchy many times) is defeated they have the chance to make things equal but Barbie purposefully made it so the kens go back to being oppressed second class citizens. Her excuse was that things will only get equal in Doll world once things are equal in the real world.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:08 AM
1

The specific class is gender studies.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 04:48 PM
3

Being against misandric propaganda doesn't mean you hate women just like being against misogynistic propaganda doesn't mean you hate men. Are you joking?
/r/MensRights20/07/23 03:39 PM
2

Reverse racism isn't real because racism is racism regardless of what race you are racist against. Misandry on the other hand is just as real as misogyny
/r/MensRights20/07/23 04:05 AM
2

Do you have links to people defending him?
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:48 AM
3

"Only false accusation works everywhere." This is is the context that you left out. He's talking about false accusation of rape and not actual rape. Actual rape was already illegal. They just made false accusation of rape easier. That's the draconian part. I do believe he should have phrased it better though. Op definitely should have been phrased better as well.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:39 AM
1

Happy husband happy lifespan
/r/MensRights04/07/23 11:16 PM
1

Who tf said it was women's fault? He certainly didn't. Why exactly do you feel the need to villainize anyone who struggles with dating that simply points out their struggles? Please don't tell me you are one of those people that non ironically believes that shaming men for expressing their emotions is "toxic masculinity" because if you are then you are being a massive hypocrite.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 02:15 PM
15

"that's any woman that believes that she has the right to work a job she's qualified for or to vote as a citizen LOL" LOL indeed. It absolutely is not. You don't have to be a feminist to have that belief. You can be egalitarian without being a feminist.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 04:19 AM
8

Lmao . Go to a feminist sub and tell them that if a man is being abusive towards her, she has legs, she should just walk away. See how well that will pan out. I'm sure no one will believe that abusive most likely means physically abusive and you will definitely not get insta banned.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 04:29 AM
5

This is very sureal and feels like stepping into an alternate universe. I sincerely hope we see more activism like this
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:55 PM
11

It means not having sex
/r/MensRights15/06/23 04:00 AM
0

No one said anything about a bread winner. Reread what I replied to for context. "No boys shouldn't get an education, only women should have the right to get education so that women can do most comfortable jobs by sitting in cubicle and men should be the ones doing hard work like working in mines and building." Women's role of being in a comfy sit in job with air conditioning while men's role being in a manual labor based job oftentimes outside in unforgiving weather ARE gender based roles rathe…
/r/MensRights13/06/23 08:56 PM
9

Sounds like gender roles to me. Weren't they supposed to abolish those? Funny how gender roles are only bad to many of these people when men benefit from them and/or women are disadvantaged from them otherwise they are either ignored or out right encouraged
/r/MensRights13/06/23 04:56 PM
7

I'm pro trans but that person does make a good point. A social construct is a concept that exists not in objective reality, but as a result of human interaction. It exists because humans agree that it exists. Last time I checked biology is objective reality. So if there is a biological component to it then it isn't actually a social construct
/r/MensRights13/06/23 08:15 AM
29

Every internal and external problem in existence is the fault of men
/r/MensRights07/06/23 03:14 PM
1

There is no such thing as love without respect. If your partner doesn't respect you they don't love you either
/r/MensRights06/06/23 02:30 PM
8

Little to no one is saying it is a good thing.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 04:41 AM
1

"Unless you're suggesting men & women can't be sexist? Never heard of sexism?" Lol stop moving the goal post this is what you said. "You also find views such as "women should do the cooking and cleaning" across mra." Notice how it said MRA and not men and women in general. "next time I see something, which I'm sure won't be too long, I'll share it here" Please do and good luck with that
/r/MensRights05/06/23 02:01 PM
2

"And also could be misogyny mixed in as well with the belief that young girls can do no wrong simply because they are girls." Sounds more like misandry but yeah overall I agree
/r/MensRights03/06/23 02:40 PM
52

I am 100% certain that Jordan Peterson does not identify as an incel. Even if he was he does not have the general mainstream backing him up like feminism is backed up.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 09:06 PM
3

I don't see how going your own way and fighting for your rights are mutually exclusive. The guy is simply going his own way when it comes to relationships that doesn't automatically mean excluding himself from society or anything.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 12:54 PM
1

You know that safe haven laws exists right? It is perfectly legal for a woman to abandon the baby without facing legal consequences. Why exactly shouldn't men be able to do the same?
/r/MensRights30/05/23 11:45 PM
3

People in general being horrible on both sides is precisely why we should not believe all woman or men. This sentence, "Do you think there are no good women?", is why this person is getting down voted. This sentence implies that anyone against the phrase "believe all women" automatically thinks that there are no good women.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 02:12 PM
0

I apologize for the misunderstanding but A: men's rights advocacy isn't exclusive to men. Just like there are many male feminists there also plenty of female mras. B: even if all MRAs were male there are obviously women who come here to either agree or disagree. Now that I know the the subject is men and not women that comment made even less sense. Men are far less likely to get pregnant or have periods so why in the world would anyone believe that all men or even most men in general absolutely …
/r/MensRights28/05/23 09:22 PM
-1

"Yes we absolutely have to go thru periods and pregnancy." I'm assuming we = women. This translates to Women have to go through periods and pregnancy. Have to implies that it is completely mandatory and not optional. Either you were trying to say it is impossible to not be pregnant while being a woman or you were claiming that someone or some thing was forcing all women to be pregnant rather they want to or not. Either way the idea that a woman can't go their entire life without being pregnant w…
/r/MensRights28/05/23 08:47 PM
0

What does being married and having kids have to do with this subject? You do know that just because you got pregnant that doesn't mean every other woman on the planet got pregnant as well right? What other team? What teams? Even if I was a virgin (which I'm not), what exactly does that have to do with this argument? Most importantly when are you going to prove that it is impossible for a woman to not be pregnant?
/r/MensRights28/05/23 07:35 PM
0

Did you know that abstenence from sex (or at least vaginal penetration sex) is a form of pregnancy prevention that will not cause any hormonal imbalances in women what so ever? When exactly did anyone say anything about catering to women's hormones? I just argued that women don't have to go through pregnancy. You still never disputed the fact that many women have gone their entire lives without getting pregnant and many more will in the future as well. Also it doesn't matter what percentage of w…
/r/MensRights28/05/23 06:53 PM
0

There are many women who never got pregnant and probably never will. What do you mean they HAVE to go through pregnancy? You do know that A: pregnancy prevention exists and works the vast majority of the time and B: there are some women who biologically can't get pregnant even if they want to right? There are also some women/girls who have amenorrhea and don't get periods either
/r/MensRights28/05/23 03:47 PM
1

Imagine telling a woman "Listen buddy, in an event you wake up with a man inside of you, (highly unlikely) thank him, and don't call the police... you'll be fine."
/r/MensRights28/05/23 03:28 AM
19

Literally no one here even brought up women choosing to be alone and making their own money other than you much less are "upset" about it
/r/MensRights28/05/23 02:44 AM
2

That's called being a volcel. Voluntarily celibate
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:14 PM
4

Citation please. Copy and paste the exact comments and posts you are referring to.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 05:01 AM
1

You do know liars exist right?
/r/MensRights19/05/23 01:30 PM
26

"Stop being boys be human" implies that boys aren't human. Dehumanizing a sex is sexist. I shouldn't have to explain this to you
/r/MensRights15/05/23 03:28 PM
2

The title doesn't imply that they are. That why the word or is there.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 01:11 PM
5

The slash is used to indicate the word or. Or indicates alternate options obviously. Option A is AND while option B is OR So basically the question translates to "Members of this sub, how did you become an MRA and or or anti feminist? General" Having 2 ors together sounds strange so it makes sense to replace one of them with / The word "correlation" is different from the word "means". Correlation implies that the two subjects could be different but they have a lot in common or are often together…
/r/MensRights12/05/23 11:48 PM
1

The title said and /or. Do you not know what or means?
/r/MensRights12/05/23 11:17 PM
2

Are you an mra though?
/r/MensRights12/05/23 11:13 PM
5

Man power was a completely gender neutral term when it was invetented because the word man itself was a completely gender neutral term at the time as well. There was another word that was used for male human adults at the time (wermen). So yeah it doesn't really count.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 04:00 AM
2

"Parsons was convicted of having a relationship with the pupil and sentenced to 12-months' imprisonment, suspended for two years, at Maidstone Crown Court in March 2021." "Parsons, 35, avoided jail but admits her actions as a teacher were 'dangerous'" "Female science teacher, 35, who was spared jail for having sex with a 16-year-old" She was convicted to a year in jail but was spared from the conviction and was instead got a 2 year long prison suspinsion. It means that she has to see a probation…
/r/MensRights11/05/23 02:36 PM
1

"We don't believe men are at the top and women are at the bottom" For goodness sakes. Look at the definition of patriarchy again. "a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it." The vast majority of all feminists (including you apparently) believe that the patriarchy exists and that pretty much everyone lives in one. How in the world is believing that men have practically all the power while women have practically none of it not viewing men…
/r/MensRights10/05/23 01:55 PM
1

You do know Bill Gates is a feminist right? "Also, biased feminism doesn't exist. Feminism fights for equality for all, not for females being superior to men." Feminism fights for rights and privileges for women. What you're talking about is egalitarianism not feminism. Even by the typical dictionary definition, (which is advocacy for female rights on the basis of gender equality) as long as a feminist believes that men are on the top of society while women are at the bottom of society, if that …
/r/MensRights09/05/23 01:33 PM
19

Men getting killed was far more popular (and still is) and women being the final survivers after many of the men were killed was very popular as well
/r/MensRights06/05/23 01:52 PM
2

100 percent agree. I personally don't care for either party and I'm politically neutral. I only used democrats as an example because most people are aware of them being very pro feminism. Many republicans (especially women) are feminists as well.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 12:51 PM
3

Reread the second sentence of the comment you are replying to and you will get your answer. "There is no such thing as toxic masculinity, only toxic personality." Andrew Tate has a toxic personality there is no need to to gender it by calling it toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 07:07 PM
3

"nice"
/r/MensRights04/05/23 02:25 PM
5

If we're talking about the US. The president and his female vice president are both self identified feminists and nearly every other democrat self identifies as a feminist as well
/r/MensRights04/05/23 01:13 PM
3

Source please
/r/MensRights03/05/23 12:53 PM
0

Don't tell others to do something you aren't willing to do yourself. I already elaborated on what my point was and it is now your turn to do the same.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 09:10 PM
0

You should be able to explain it. Especially since it's not complex. You accused me of proving your point. The burden of proof of your accusation is on you
/r/MensRights01/05/23 07:42 PM
0

Could you elaborate on what your point is then and how you believe I proved it?
/r/MensRights01/05/23 06:51 PM
-1

You claimed that you thought you were going to get banned. I disagreed with that notion. In fact you have at least 2 or 3 upvotes right now further proving that your opinion isn't as hated as you thought it would be. I was just saying that even if many people did disagree with you, you still wouldn't have gotten banned.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 06:45 PM
2

Lol this isn't a feminist sub. You're not going to get banned just for having a dissenting opinion
/r/MensRights01/05/23 06:38 PM
1

Feminism is about advocacy for rights of women. Egilitarianism is about rights of men and women.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 06:32 PM
1

I did re read it. "I get that people on both subreddits hate men and hate women" This is what I was referring to. What evidence do you have that this sub hates women?
/r/MensRights01/05/23 05:30 PM
1

Someone already gave proof that, that sub hates men. Where is the proof that this sub hates women? Where is the post here that says "I hate women" with thousands of upvotes? Please post a link to it
/r/MensRights01/05/23 02:35 PM
4

It's only a good way to get the message of hiiting your partner is wrong across if you also have just as much respect men messages or you don't do either and make it completely gender neutral with respect people or humans.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 10:27 PM
2

He's not just talking about women asking for equal treatment though. He's talking about women asking for equal treatment while refusing to treat men as their equals. He's talking specifically about those who are being hypocritical about their beliefs. There is nothing wrong with calling out hypocrites and holding them to the same standards they set for others. Especially when those hypocrites claim to be for equality.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 09:43 PM
5

"You do not get the expect the benefits of traditional womanhood (ie chivalrous treatment) if you’re not traditional, because it makes no sense. Why would you give “special concern” for the people who participate in society just as much as you, to same degree and manner as you do?" This is referring to whoever has this mindset .Nothing in this paragraph indicated that is about women in general or all women "Giving women special respect and consideration back when they were mainly preoccupied wit…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 09:28 PM
2

Nice try. The opening statement is saying that women in general are more independent, aggressive, masculine, and independent than ever. That's not treating women as of they are a hive mind any more than saying that humans are more technologically advanced than ever before is treating humans like a hive mind. That opening statement is not what either of us are referring to (or at least definitely not me). The topic is about the negative thing he said about some women later on in the comment not t…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 08:59 PM
3

How is that a dick move? That person is not entitled to a snack from you. You have every right to say no if you do not want to give them something. Especially since it is most likely not a life or death situation. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here but it seems to be in direct contrast to everything you have said in this comment section so far when it comes to consent.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 08:49 PM
2

He said a bunch of women. Not all, not most, not in general. A bunch which very well could be a minority. Your second point completely contradicts your entire argument because logically speaking if women have a wide variety of beliefs and aditudes (which they absolutely do by the way) then it isn't crazy or absurd to believe that at least some absolutely do act exactly like he claimed a bunch of women act. The idea that absolutely no woman at all would act like this is what is truly nonsense on …
/r/MensRights28/04/23 08:30 PM
3

"There's people claiming that men and women always had equal rights throughout history which is absurd, just check my comment history." How exactly is that an example of male supremacy?
/r/MensRights28/04/23 03:26 PM
1

Better =/= well
/r/MensRights24/04/23 04:13 PM
3

Only if men are digimon
/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:15 AM
1

Being sexless isn't inherently bad though.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 05:00 AM
2

When did he say anything about taking away choice of women?
/r/MensRights10/04/23 12:23 PM
9

Almost any place can be argued as a place where she is just trying to live her life and not looking for a date including the bar or a night club. The exceptions being online dating and dating events like speed dating or blind dating.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 04:51 PM
2

"No one is owed sex, no matter their gender" I agree with that completely but believing you are entitled to sex doesn't automatically mean you are involuntarily celibate. Also believing you are entitled to sex doesn't automatically make you a "nice guy" either because that person might not necessarily be pretending to be nice
/r/MensRights03/04/23 05:01 AM
3

Reverse the genders. Imagine saying "Sounds like you got your ass kicked by a man and now you’re crying about it 😂" to a woman and not realizing how cruel and sexist that sounds.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 04:37 AM
2

"Maybe if men weren’t the aggressors these laws wouldn’t exist" How exactly is that not "ascribing" blame to men?
/r/MensRights03/04/23 02:40 AM
8

That subreddit got banned ages ago
/r/MensRights30/03/23 12:40 PM
1

It's a trans man actually
/r/MensRights28/03/23 08:07 PM
2

OP is not an example of this because he never claimed to be celibate involitarily or otherwise and there is no way to know for sure if he is or not unless you know him irl and spend almost every waking moment with him.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 06:28 PM
20

Every trait they claim is "toxic masculinity" when men have them is praised by many of those same people when women have them.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:06 PM
3

Do you have proof of that?
/r/MensRights17/03/23 12:35 AM
3

"I do have one very anti-male female friend though who makes it hard for me unfortunately." No offense but why exactly are you friends with a sexist?
/r/MensRights16/03/23 01:49 PM
4

The word man was strictly gender neutral back then
/r/MensRights12/03/23 11:25 PM
2

Why even bring up "men are more likely to be assaulted by other men." If the goal isn't to vilainize men or lump male victims with male perpetrators simply because they have the same gender? .
/r/MensRights11/03/23 03:13 PM
2

No one said it was the everyday woman's fault though
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:26 AM
7

The main difference here is that even by all of these groups' main enemies they were generally viewed as underdogs. Not a single one of the groups you mentioned that were sucessful with their advocacy were generally viewed as an uber powerful oppressor class like men are. It is much more difficult to convince someone to help advocate for someone they view as being (overly) privileged and powerful by default than it is to convince someone to advocate for someone they view as an underdog. Not sayi…
/r/MensRights05/03/23 10:36 PM
7

What misogyny? That person didn't say anything remotely negative about women in general
/r/MensRights04/03/23 09:10 PM
1

I'll take that as a no 🙄
/r/MensRights28/02/23 08:00 PM
3

It all boils down to an overly simplistic black and white worldview of men = bad and women = good
/r/MensRights28/02/23 07:52 PM
1

Do you have proof or statistics to back up this claim?
/r/MensRights28/02/23 04:07 PM
9

Their view is that toxic masculinity is being mean while toxic feminity is being too nice
/r/MensRights28/02/23 02:35 PM
3

I can understand disagreeing with him but I don't see how it's "misogyny". He never said it doesn't apply to men too.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 05:35 PM
2

OnLine Dating
/r/MensRights22/02/23 03:17 PM
5

I think OP makes somewhat of a point. If she doesn't actually want to be friends with him she's still being misleading and lying. Either way she had a right to say it and at least not being overtly rude when she rejected him
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:54 PM
3

Proof of anyone here calling someone autistic as an insult please. Also just put /s at the end of your comment if you're being sarcastic. People say exactly what your comment said non ironically all the time.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 03:30 PM
10

No OP is not an example of this because OP is criticizing feminism not women. Feminism =/= women. Many men are feminists and many women are not feminists
/r/MensRights12/02/23 02:29 PM
1

Just in case you're not just trolling the answer is simple. It's because the term was created in a time when the word man was completely gender neutral. The word woman didn't even exist back then either so naming it womankind wouldn't make sense. As for why people don't say man and woman kind now it's because it's a mouthful. Why say man and woman kind when you can just say humans? Meanwhile not only was the term man child invented in a time where the word man is usually not used in a gender neu…
/r/MensRights10/02/23 12:43 AM
3

Usually it's one or the other (to a certain extent) for both men AND women. Either you sacrifice time with your family by working more or you sacrifice the amount of money you make by spending more time with family. Only a tiny percentage of rich people (male and female) don't have to worry about sacrificing either. You can balance both to a certain extent but having a job will inevitably take away from the time you could be spending with your kids/ family members even if you have a stay at home…
/r/MensRights05/02/23 10:04 PM
4

The other problem is the fact that they aren't handling misandry the exact same way they are handling misogyny
/r/MensRights04/02/23 08:42 PM
1

"There are groups who advocate for the mass lynching of women and call themselves MRA." Do you have any evidence to back this claim up?
/r/MensRights03/02/23 04:17 AM
1

Just put /s at the end. It really isn't that difficult. People come here and say things just as ridiculous unironically to go against the people commenting here all the time.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 02:45 AM
3

Many of them aren't even celibate and still get called that anyways
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:49 PM
4

It's short for involuntarily celibate.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 04:56 AM
2

I agree to a certain extent but I wouldn't blame women in general for this. I blame the legal system that allows some women to do this.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 06:34 PM
1

Yep I never even knew the sub existed until this post. I went to the sub to check it out and found out I was banned as well. I think they just auto ban anyone who joins this sub
/r/MensRights27/01/23 03:01 AM
8

Many transgender women never got surgery to get rid of their penis or castrate themselves so no it doesn't go without saying
/r/MensRights22/01/23 02:36 PM
3

Very good point
/r/MensRights22/01/23 02:22 AM
1

Some women manipulate their partners just like some men manipulate their partners. You don't have to go to some exclusive website to find people like this. They really are not that uncommon.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 01:29 AM
3

It means the person who made the quora post and the person who made this post are two completely separate people. The person who made this post simply made a screenshot of the quora post so people can discuss about it on this sub
/r/MensRights18/01/23 08:12 PM
10

Copy and paste the url to the posts please
/r/MensRights16/01/23 04:23 PM
1

She already has that option through safe haven laws but is she knows that the man would be a good father and she trust him then yeah you do make a pretty good point
/r/MensRights11/01/23 03:26 AM
1

Because you asked if that person was a scientist 🙄
/r/MensRights11/01/23 02:49 AM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 11:21 PM
1

"Too" sensitive is relative. I'm sure most men accused of being "toxicly masculine" for shaming men for being sensitive believed that those men they shamed were TOO sensitive as well and not just sensitive. "And about generalizing women yeah I would. If there was an article talking about how women aren't assertive enough or focus too much appearance then someone said this does not apply to me and got upset I'd tell em to stfu good for them." I'm sure you would but not being assertive enough or c…
/r/MensRights05/01/23 11:47 PM
3

You are a hypocrite. Do you not know what that word means? How about sexist?
/r/MensRights05/01/23 10:48 PM
6

So I'm guessing you wouldn't tell that to a woman and you are being a hypocrital sexist that believes that men = bad and women = good. Just as expected.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 10:44 PM
3

"Simple way to not be a "walking fleshlight" is to value other things and not base your level of control on how much sex you have." I'm sure you tell this or at least would tell this to women who are upset about being sexually objectified right?
/r/MensRights05/01/23 10:36 PM
1

I'm guessing you tell women who are upset about negative generalizations against women the same thing as well right. Any woman who gets upset about something telling them not to be a toxic woman as if it isn't already something the majority already isn't clearly has nothing more than a persecution fetish. Also isn't shaming someone for being sensitive suppose to be so called "toxic masculinity" in and of itself?
/r/MensRights05/01/23 10:14 PM
6

"True feminism means equal rights for men AND women." That's egalitarianism not feminism. Feminism is advocacy for women's rights ""on the basis of gender equality"".Not women and men's rights. Women's rights ONLY. If you believe that women are at the bottom of society while men are at the top then tearing down men while lifting up women is trying to make things equal in a twisted way therefore a person doing this IS a true feminist. "Don’t speak for the “crowd” (which are voices in your head)" …
/r/MensRights22/12/22 07:06 PM
5

The only one saying anything about the gender of the person who made the article is you. At most all he did to acknowledge the gender of the person who made the article was use her proper pronouns. That's it. Not really sure why you made all of those baseless assumptions about him. There is absolutely nothing indicating that he wouldn't have the exact same opinions about this person if said person was male.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 06:10 PM
4

It doesn't matter if they can't prove you are a rapist you can still lose your job over it. Being convicted of rape and losing your job over the accusation of rape are 2 different things.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 02:56 PM
1

2x chromosomes
/r/MensRights21/12/22 03:56 AM
4

So why exactly can't the man sign away his rights to the child while the baby is in the mother's womb? By the time the kid "exists" as you put it he would have just as much rights to the kid as a random stranger on the streets. The mother already has the right to legally abandon the child once it's born due to safe haven laws so why exactly can't men do the same?
/r/MensRights14/12/22 05:55 PM
3

Which comments? Be specific please. Copy and paste them or better yet the specific the url to the comments.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 10:50 PM
3

"Women aren't spoiled if they have a certain number of penises in them" True but no one said that they are. Waiting for sex until marriage doesn't automatically imply that AT ALL. He never even said anything about the woman's body count or how much sex the woman had. Why exactly are you making these baseless assumptions?
/r/MensRights13/12/22 10:36 PM
2

I doubt you would reply or "give charity" to me if you didn't care a little. Also what concrete evidence do you have that I "fail at life" or don't "touch grass". Do you know me personally?
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:37 PM
2

Who said I was a man?
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:25 PM
3

I'm pretty sure we already established that my argument is not about comparing women to money it's about comparing sex to money. We can both agree that women and money are indeed not comparible.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:24 PM
4

Apparently he can considering the fact that you replied to him once
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:18 PM
2

I already said my point "I will agree with you that they are not a 1 for 1 comparison but they are alot more similar than you let on." If you can agree that they have similarities as well as differences then that's essentially the end of my argument. My only problem was that you acted as if there is no similarity between the two subjects whatsoever.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 04:49 PM
4

That we can agree on. Sex really isn't that big of a deal. Even if it was you don't HAVE to have it with others
/r/MensRights13/12/22 04:42 PM
5

"except when it comes to womens bodily autonomy apparently." AND men's bodily autonomy or did you forget that the person above said "Sexless people of whatever gender would have access." Why exactly are you making this solely about women? I agree that it shouldn't solely be about the left or the right though
/r/MensRights13/12/22 04:37 PM
5

That money doesn't pop out of thin air. Someone used their body to get the money you have at some point in time even if it wasn't you.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:53 PM
-2

The comparison is sex/romance to money. Not women to money. Sex is an act not a human being just like money is an object not a human being. The similarities lies in that it takes a human being to use their body to get both of those things. I will agree with you that they are not a 1 for 1 comparison but they are alot more similar than you let on.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:26 PM
2

It is because the female soldiers are soldiers by choice and not because they were forced to by the government due to a draft.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 12:48 AM
4

I'm sure if a man (for sexual reasons) licked a woman's nipple AFTER she already rejected his advances you wouldn't call it sexual assault either, correct?
/r/MensRights29/11/22 02:56 AM
2

Key difference here is that blacks were always seen as underdogs while men are generally seen as overly privileged oppressors. I agree that we should not loose hope though
/r/MensRights18/11/22 03:34 PM
13

"these days "incel" and "virgin" isn't related to actual sexual experience. " That's like saying the n word isn't related to race at all and when it is used as an insult it's simply because the person being called that is a bad person. "And it all comes from the idea that a man has to mate with as much females as he can." Yes that is indeed why some people enjoy calling men incels and virgins as an insult.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 09:54 PM
10

Every able bodied adult should be eligible for the draft. Either that or get rid of it entirely.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 12:34 AM
5

You don't have to be entitled to something to not want to pay the price for that thing. If I go to a store and something I want is too expensive for my budget and I decide to simply not pay for that thing and do something else with my time and money that doesn't mean that I think that I am "entitled" to that thing. It just means that I don't believe the price is worth it. If someone actually believed they were "entitled" to it they would simply steal it because in their head it's already theirs.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 09:52 PM
1

My point is that patronizing behavior is not exclusive to men
/r/MensRights08/11/22 01:28 PM
1

Many women explain things to people in a condensing fashion all the time. Just because you have never experienced it doesn't mean it doesn't happen. I have definitely had some women hack like this to me and no men act like this to me personally. I believe it's less of a gender thing and more of a personality thing
/r/MensRights07/11/22 11:51 PM
5

I believe it's a reference to that
/r/MensRights30/10/22 08:07 PM
1

It should be either don't have ladies night or have both ladies and gentlemen night. Given what the owners of the pub were saying it is very unlikely that they would be ok with gentlemens night so if they're not going to have that then they should not have lady's night either. That's how gender equality works
/r/MensRights26/10/22 01:13 PM
3

Could you please explain why they can't give this exact same benefit to men? Why get your girlfriend to buy you some drinks when you can buy the drinks yourself with that exact same discount?
/r/MensRights26/10/22 01:06 AM
1

Yes. Family friendly show that's not exactly family friendly. The creator of the show that she wanted the show to be "sex positive" for kids
/r/MensRights25/10/22 01:17 PM
1

She's the one exception
/r/MensRights25/10/22 01:07 PM
1

Have you? And even if he was how exactly is that relevant?
/r/MensRights25/10/22 02:32 AM
3

They still have this as an option though. Just because they usually don't do that doesn't mean they can't.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 06:54 PM
4

Have you not heard of artificial insemination?
/r/MensRights24/10/22 03:30 PM
1

It was always a negative term. The woman who invented the term and self identified as an incel viewed being an incel as a negative thing and so does the vast majority of everyone else that identifies as one. Past and present. Also you're right that they do exist but the vast majority of the time when someone is called that they aren't actually an incel they are just called that because they said or did something the person who accused them of being that disagreed with.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 11:08 PM
1

Men going their own way
/r/MensRights22/10/22 08:31 PM
5

What part of feminist =/= woman do you not understand? Many feminists are men. Feminism is an ideology / movement not a sex/gender
/r/MensRights22/10/22 08:00 PM
4

It's very debatable rather or not feminists are "half of the population". Or did you forget that feminists does not automatically equal women?
/r/MensRights22/10/22 07:20 PM
2

Re read that fourth bullet point. It didn't say anything about rather or not males can be victims of rape. Not really sure why you would come to the conclusion you did
/r/MensRights20/10/22 01:08 AM
2

Feminists =/= women
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:58 AM
1

No offense but why would you be married to someone who hates your gender/sex?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 04:20 PM
2

You're right they probably will be single in short order because most relationships are not this idealistic. There is almost always bound to be some sort of flaw that your partner has that you don't like because people are not perfect. It still doesn't mean that you are automatically an evil serial killer if you adhere to it though. Again being picky when it comes to relationships is NOT a crime, nor should be a crime, and it does NOT make you a murderer by default.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:37 AM
3

"He said to leave your SO immediately when they show any undesirable trait." Yes. And? When someone in a relationship does something you disagree with you have two choices. Either keep trying to make things work or simply break up with them. There is nothing wrong with doing either option. Just like there is nothing wrong with rejecting someone for whatever reason, there is also nothing wrong with breaking up with someone for whatever reason as long as you are respectful about it. Even if it was…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:12 AM
3

Ok so I'm assuming that if you were married to someone and they started acting the way you believe OP acts then you wouldn't divorce them because if you did then by your own logic you would be an evil psyocopath. By your logic you would also be an evil psyocopath if you didn't tolerate your romantic partner abusing you just because you had kids with them. Seriously everyone should break up with their partner if they are not compatible or if their partner is verbally or physically abusive. There …
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:37 AM
6

So let me get this straight, you legitimately believe that someone who A:lives in Kentucky or purposefully moves to Kentucky B: doesn't marry And/or C: breaks up with someone when they have undesirable behavior or is incompatible with them (which is something nearly everyone in a relationship would do if they have self respect btw) is automatically a serial killer. And you have the nerve to accuse someone else of having a "cold and negative outlook". Please tell me you're just joking/ trolling.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:12 AM
6

Everyone should protect themselves if their own well being is important to them. There's nothing evil, dumb or wrong about it. You do know it's possible to care for others as well as yourself at the same time right? Seriously by your logic anyone going to self defense classes is insane, moronic, and deserves to be disrespected.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 01:10 AM
5

Think of it this way. If someone put the blame of society's problems solely on women would you not see it as misogyny?
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:21 PM
3

I know it's hard to believe but most people are not mind readers.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 09:51 PM
1

I agree with you to a certain extent it just seems as if you are trying to claim that what OP said never happens or could happen. It is possible that some women legitimately did say those things to him and that's why he feels the way he does. I definitely agree that there is no point in hating yourself over it though
/r/MensRights10/10/22 01:19 PM
1

"I have heard them say it when men said crass things about others, though… and that was justified because the person was being rude." Depends. Did they use that as an excuse to make negative generalizations against men or did they simply criticise that particular person without villainizing men in general? If it's the former then no I don't believe it was justifiable. Also some women legitimately do say those types of things just like some men legitimately do make negative generalizations agains…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 02:50 AM
2

Men going their own way.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 10:29 PM
6

Disliking feminism =/= disliking women
/r/MensRights27/09/22 03:27 AM
15

If you knew men can be groped by women why would you call bs on the story? Just because you have personally never seen it happen doesn't mean it never happens or it never could happen.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 03:06 AM
7

I wouldn't call that out on the other side. There's nothing wrong with getting mad about misandry or misogyny. Just don't be a hypocrite about it.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 09:16 PM
1

What are the statistics when it comes to this?
/r/MensRights22/09/22 06:29 PM
9

It's statistically safer to go out at night as a woman than as a man. What do you mean by "our"? Unless this is your way of confessing that you phisically harm women at night it doesn't make sense to take credit for bad deeds just because you happen to share the same pronouns and genitals as those who do said bad deeds.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 05:16 PM
3

"Women and POC being given a chance to catch up..." The company can and should do so without purposefully putting anyone at a disadvantage based on their race or gender. How hard is it to hire the best person for the job without paying heed to that person's skin color, gender, or any other superficial aspect of that person?
/r/MensRights22/09/22 04:23 AM
2

It absolutely is depending on how they do it. If they are just saying that those particular men are bad but thankfully most men aren't like them then no there's nothing wrong with that. If however they are using their experiences to try to paint all men or most in men in general in a negative light then yes it is spreading hate.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 07:28 PM
15

It shouldn't exist but if it does it should at least be for both sexes
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:20 PM
1

I believe he's not talking about voluntary military service he's talking about involuntary military service otherwise known as the draft. Only men are required to be drafted. https://www.usa.gov/selective-service
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:22 AM
1

I didn't say she committed violence. Reread your comment again. "let’s not encourage violence towards women" Implies that being violent towards a woman is never justifiable regardless of the situation. In reality if the woman is a violent agressor and you are in a life or death situation in which you either fight back in order to flee or die then it absolutely is justifiable to be violent against her as self defense.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 09:02 PM
5

Speak for yourself
/r/MensRights19/09/22 12:21 AM
5

They disagree because they believe that violence against a violent agressor is justifiable regardless of the gender of said agressor.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 12:01 AM
2

Proof please
/r/MensRights15/09/22 11:06 PM
1

"If she reacts negatively to those things and calls it “being a pest” than she’s not into you" This doesn't mean no means yes or no means something other than no. If anything it double downs on the concept of no means no.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 09:33 PM
1

When did I say or imply that Peterson's fanbase having 'insufferable virgins" in it wasn't relevant to the discussion? Also keep in mind that you originally didn't say "insufferable virgins". You just said virgins. Implying that being a virgin in and of itself is bad. Also when are you going to answer my other questions?
/r/MensRights03/09/22 08:49 PM
3

A: If there's nothing wrong with being a virgin why did you use the word as an insult or at least in a negative way? B: Being a virgin means that you never had sex. You do realize that it's possible to be someone that never had sex and still talk to women right? In fact I think it's safe to say that most people who never had sex have definitely talked to women. You can even enter a romantic relationship with some women and be a virgin. It's also possible to never have talked to a woman and also …
/r/MensRights03/09/22 06:34 PM
1

Men definitely do get shamed for not being masculine enough but they also get shamed for being too masculine as well.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 05:44 PM
2

What's wrong with being a virgin?
/r/MensRights03/09/22 05:13 PM
6

I agree that many are like that but if you're going to be against negative generalizations it would help your argument if you didn't make them yourself.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 08:02 PM
2

The criticism isn't about the character in the comics it's about how the character in the show is portrayed. Rather or not the character is comic accurate isn't really the debate here. The argument is about rather or not the character in the show was hypocritical. The character's 40 years of history is completely irrelevant in this conversation.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:00 PM
3

He just pointed a double standard the character made. What in the world are you talking about? Also what do you mean by 30 years? No complaint about what for 30 years and how exactly would you even know what this person has been doing in 30 years?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:59 PM
0

Jane became Mighty Thor in 2014. Which of course was years after Disney took control of Marvel. I don't really agree with the person you replied to but I do know that the character was not the Mighty Thor for decades. It's almost been one decade since her debut but we're not there yet.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:43 PM
7

Most actually. Don't forget that for many men it is often assumed that they are automatically going to harm others if they have those emotions.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:02 PM
28

He's saying the right to vote is attached to being forced to sign up for the draft for men but not women. Either both men and women should be drafted equally in order to vote, neither should have to be drafted to vote or if neither of them are an option then the side that doesn't get drafted by force shouldn't be able to vote.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:00 AM
1

Not in Spain
/r/MensRights26/08/22 01:20 PM
0

This isn't a feminist sub. No one's going to ban you for simply disagreeing with the overall narrative of this sub. Nice try though
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:21 AM
10

Fair enough. At least you are consistent with your logic
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:16 AM
17

Last time I checked sexual harassment doesn't have to be something that happens to you irl. Or do you seriously not consider someone sending a sexually related DM to a female stranger sexual harassment if said stranger doesn't want it?
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:05 AM
5

No I said that no one said that this sub believes in patriarchy theory. People who hate this sub definitely have said that this sub is full of "patriarchal comments". But even those people never said that this sub believes in the exact same patriarchy theory that feminists believe in. You should have rephrased it as misogynistic comments instead. Also re read what I said. The reason why the burden of proof is on you and you alone is because you made the claim that the two x chromosomes sub goes …
/r/MensRights22/08/22 12:38 AM
11

The difference is that no one here claimed that this sub believes in patriarchy theory while you just claimed that 2xchromosones calls out misandry. Sorry but the burden of proof is on you and you alone
/r/MensRights21/08/22 10:43 PM
6

What double standard? Male Circumcision is already legal and seen as perfectly acceptable in society while female circumcision isn't. Maybe that's the double standard she was referring to but if it was she's not going against it she's doubling down on it. Also forcing a surgery on someone and not allowing someone to have a surgery are two different things. The comparison would work better if she said that it should be illegal for men to have vasectomies if abortion was to remain illegal if her g…
/r/MensRights20/08/22 11:05 PM
1

I'm going to have to disagree. There is no such thing as being good at reading hints because hints are very subjective. A hint that one person likes you can and often does mean something completely different to another person. For example, for one person if they look at you while rubbing their elbows it means that they like you while for another person it means that they are socially anxious and want to get out of the conversation asap. Both could do the same action in the same exact ways and ye…
/r/MensRights19/08/22 11:52 PM
6

Pleas copy an paste the comments or posts on here that claim that women in general are trash, rapists, or stupid and please make sure that these comments are heavily upvoted
/r/MensRights18/08/22 04:00 AM
9

That person asked how is feminism succeeding not how women is succeeding. Women =/= feminism. You then bragged about ways in which women are doing better than men and claimed that it's a good thing. If feminism's main goal was actually gender equality then you would be saying that this is a bad thing because the goal is to make the genders equal and not to have one gender do better than the other.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:08 AM
2

You said that the men who are single must only be single because they are undatable. This could only be true in a world where the man's preferred gender to date (most likely women due to the fact that straight men are the majority) all shared the exact same preferences and tastes in men and they are outside of these preferences. Hence a hive mind at least in regards to what they like and don't like in a man when it comes to romantic relationships. If you can acknowledge that neither men nor wome…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 11:57 PM
3

"Dateable" is subjective. Again I have to remind you that women are NOT a hive mind. They do not all share the exact same standards of what is and isn't dateable to them. Same goes for men or anyone else really.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 11:38 PM
9

No offense but I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. It's true that many women refuse to date or be in a relationship with people who are mean but there are also plenty of other women who don't mind going for mean or mysoginstic men just like there definitely is many men out there that don't mind dating or even getting married to mean or misandric women. It all depends on how much self respect the person has or rather or not they have a personal fetish for people with cruel behavio…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:25 PM
2

"Women still either have to decide to be single mothers or undergo a medical procedure to abort the fetus." There is a third option you are forgetting which is giving the baby up for adoption or legally abandoning it due to safe haven laws
/r/MensRights15/08/22 03:22 AM
1

When he said "they" that's who he's referring to. People who use incel as an insult against those they disagree with. That's why I'm confused as to why you're acting as if it's nothing more than a myth or a "theory" that only crazy people believe.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 10:02 PM
1

Not really sure what sure what you're talking about. Are you really trying to deny that some people use the word incel as an insult against those they disagree with when you literally just did that 8 hours ago?
/r/MensRights14/08/22 09:36 PM
4

A few men being partnered with multiple women either by polygamy, serial cheating, or partnering up and breaking up frequently. Also lesbian partnerships are becoming alot more common.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 04:00 PM
1

Most aren't calling themselves nice though. They are usually just saying something the poster disagrees with. As for the ones that are actually calling themselves nice in order to prove that they are nice guy TMs you have to prove that they are secretly mean or evil and are only pretending to be nice for a selfish agenda. Them simply saying that they are nice isn't enough to prove that they are nice guy TMs. You have to prove that them being nice or kind was nothing more than an act most likely …
/r/MensRights10/08/22 07:51 PM
6

Feminists =/= women. Many men are feminists and many women are not feminists.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 12:32 AM
2

Now copy and paste the title. Where in the title does it specifically say "women"?
/r/MensRights09/08/22 11:10 PM
6

Reread the title again please.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 08:39 PM
6

Who said anything about being harmless? I'm just saying that if the fear of murder is the only reason you can think of for why men who have been single for a long time deserve to be discriminated against them it honestly makes no sense (especially sense most aren't murderers). Unless of course you simply are a misandrist that discriminates against all men for the actions of the minority. If that's the case why not say men in general instead of honing in on single men who usually for the most par…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 05:09 PM
4

Bruh you do know that more men with romantic or sexual relationships murdered women than ones that never had those right? This sentiment doesn't even make sense.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 04:45 PM
1

"I refer you to r/niceguys where the self proclaimed nice guys show exactly how nice they are." Most of the posts there aren't even about self proclaimed nice guys though.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 04:41 AM
13

No but he wasn't saying this in response to the shirt in the OP. He was saying this in response to the shirts that say "boys are stupid, throw rocks at them". https://printerval.com/boys-are-stupid-throw-rocks-at-them-t-shirt-p5503547?spid=159668008&keyword=&msclkid=371b26fa61d11a4daaee440a144d5007&utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=POD_US_Bing_ROAS%2026.06.2021&utm_term=4581802403030812&utm_content=Ad%20group%20%231 It isn't on the same level as that either because that is way worse. I…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 02:35 AM
5

Most people would view it as misogynistic unless the shirt implied that that's a bad thing
/r/MensRights08/08/22 02:28 AM
3

It's most likely not even MRAs saying that though.I believe It's mostly lurkers who happen to stumble upon the sub. Notice how pretty much all of them are getting down voted heavily. We can agree that it is disgusting behavior.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:48 PM
9

Which leads right back to my original question. If plenty of girls thought a grown man was "hot" would you say that the 13 year old girl was "lucky" that she had sex with him?
/r/MensRights05/08/22 03:38 PM
10

Some girls find older men attractive. That doesn't mean you should allow the adult to take advantage of the child. Also just because you have never seen it personally doesn't mean it never happens. Alot of girls tend to be more private about their personal sexual feelings and only discuss them with their close friends or relatives. Just because they aren't as obvious about their sexual feelings doesn't mean they don't have them.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:44 PM
16

I'm sure if a grown man had sex with a 13 year old girl you would say "lucky girl" right? Either way I'm honestly disgusted.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 02:26 PM
14

Not the wrong sub. Identify as whatever gender you want
/r/MensRights04/08/22 05:04 AM
1

Unless you got raped you chose to consent to sex. The vast majority of all pregnancies are due to consensual sex and the subject really isn't about non consensual sex AKA rape. In the case of rape of course child support is warrented if she chooses to keep the child but this isn't about that. This is about 2 consenting adults that decided to have sex together. Like you said it takes two to tango.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 03:40 AM
6

Misandrists
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:46 AM
4

Are you going to address the second half of my comment? If someone here said that women have always believed that they are entitled to men's money would you seriously say that they are just stating their experience with women? Also she didn't restrict it to just men in her life she said men as in most men. Like I said it doesn't matter if it's most men instead of all men either way it's sexist.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 05:18 AM
7

He was replying to this comment that got over a hundred upvotes. https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/wcrzgo/looks\_like\_you\_could\_feed\_em\_holding\_a\_not\_my/iif1reu/?context=8&depth=9 "Men have always had this idea in their head that they are entitled to women's bodies" Notice how this person didn't say some men but instead she simply said men. This implies that she is refering to men in general as in (maybe) not all but the majority of men. No offense but I highly doubt if s…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 11:24 PM
5

1: No one upvoted and 2 people downvoted. Not exactly a good example of the whole sub's views but ok. 2: It has negative 4 or 5 downvotes so clearly the sub disagrees with this view. 3: same as 1 4: same as 1 sensing a pattern here 5: All he said was that its selfish for either partner to withhold something the other wants in a relationship. He never said what to do about it. Don't get me wrong I disagree with him but this is not a good example of someone telling the woman to cheat or force her …
/r/MensRights30/07/22 07:10 PM
6

And even then, have you seem the comments? It's a whole lot of people telling OP to cheat on his wife, force her to have sex with him, etc after she jsut had a child. She's rightfully disgusted to see that to be quite honest. Citation please. I made sure to read all the comments (or at least most of them) but as far as I know, no one is telling him to cheat or force her to have sex with him they are just encouraging him to break up with her. Please copy and paste the exact comments you are refer…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:08 PM
6

I agree if it was just adressed at the OP but it wasn't it was adressed to the people replying to the OP. She knows that the OP has a wife and kids but she doesn't know that about the people replying to the OP and giving him advice. "I honestly can’t even believe that humans with brains actually wrote most of these comments. They are saying they’re not selfish for wanting sex but are they helping their wives?"
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:53 PM
8

How exactly do you even know if they have wives or kids? No offense but it seems like you are making alot of baseless assumptions simply because you disagree with their opinions. Also both men and the women should be able to breakup for whatever reason they want at any given time. No one is entitled to sex but no one is entitled to a romantic relationship either.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:11 PM
1

Self-defence is subjective, hazardous driving is subjective, public disturbance is subjective, noise Absolutely none of those things are subjective though (for the most part at least). With self defense it is very possible to prove that the other person attacked first and you used the appropriate amount of force in order to get out of the situation and protect yourself. With hazardous driving, again nothing subjective about it. There are already clear guidelines and rules on what is safe driving…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 03:06 PM
2

Intrusive staring is subjective though. Think about it. How long is the staring? For some people 5 seconds is too long while for others that isn't too long but 20 seconds is. Then there is the fact that the guy could have simply been staring at her general direction but not actually staring at her specifically. How exactly can the man prove his innocence?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:31 AM
10

"Now I have been going to the gym for years. Never have I had this happen to me. 99% of the women I have seen at the gym just want to get their workout in and GTFO with no drama." OP clearly never said it was common
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:43 AM
14

Got any proof of that? Where exactly are the posts and comments demonizing blacks? If it's as common as you act like it is it shouldn't be too hard to copy and paste proof of it.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 04:25 AM
1

I wouldn't be dating someone who hates my entire gender/sex if I were you but to each their own I suppose.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 09:57 PM
3

It's sexual assault
/r/MensRights28/07/22 05:43 AM
6

I'm gonna have to hard disagree with you. Growing a beard and having short hair is not "ruining men's looks". Beauty is subjective for the most part and is in the eyes of the beholder. Just because it looks bad to you doesn't mean it looks bad to everyone else. Feminine beauty is not nor should be the only form of beauty. Masculine beauty is just as valid as feminine beauty and no one should be shamed for either of these forms of beauty.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 12:06 AM
2

Could you post links to those posts? Since their very common they shouldn't be that difficult to find
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:18 PM
8

Is a real man anyone who identifies as a man or is it someone who supports his woman and is proud of her achievements? The former contradicts the latter and since you already said the latter by your own logic you were being a tool.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 03:34 PM
3

You are beyond stupid, deny science becuase it doesn't fit into your narrative that you are superioir physically and mentally I never said men are mentally superior to women I said they are mentally equal to women. The only one claiming that one sex is mentally superior to the other is you. By your own logic you are clearly the one being sexist.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 02:25 PM
13

You literally said "as for the female brain being smarter....no" so everything ypu just said about me is utter horseshit Not being smarter does not mean being dumber. You left out the part where he said that men and women are more less equal in terms of intelligence. He was saying that both the smartest and the dumbest of people tend to be men but overall men are no more or less smarter or dumber than women. Now that I think about it since you believed that him simply saying that women aren't sm…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:53 AM
3

It's not socially acceptable (generally speaking) to call women any of those things as an insult. The mainstream views calling women all of those things negatively.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 08:48 PM
37

Why is it when it comes to those who can be impregnated it's gender nuetral but when it comes to those who can impregnate they simply call them men?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:11 PM
1

They were talking about those who don't identify as incels. Many feminists call men who never identified as incels, as incels as an insult. Honestly I'm willing to bet most people who get called incels as an incel aren't actually incels.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:28 PM
2

It's understandable to not have casual sex but to do so in order to strike is ridiculous due to the fact that it won't change the minds of the people who have actual power to change the situation.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 06:14 AM
4

How exactly could a sex strike possibly "help" in any significant way? . The people who are against abortions usually want women to not have sex until they are ready to marry or have kids so it doesn't really affect them negatively (if anything they would see it as a positive thing). Especially since most of them have pro life sexual / romantic partners and usually have no desire to be with someone who is pro choice anyways. The only ones these protests would affect negatively would be the women…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 06:07 AM
1

If penis energy is based on pure personality and not body parts like people who use the term tend to claim then you absolutely can change it.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:30 PM
3

Look at it this way. If you have the belief that men are at the top of society while women are at the bottom of society (which most feminists do btw) then tearing down men while boosting up women would technically be for "the equality of women". So even by your definition most of these misandrists are real feminists.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:00 AM
2

Anger is actually the least safe emotion for men to show. Most people are afraid that if a man shows anger then he is automatically going to cause physical harm towards others which leads people to shame men or punish them for showing anger.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 05:20 PM
1

He was obviously being sarcastic, he wasn't saying that incel means someone you disagrees with. He was saying that's the way many feminists and people who love to use the word as an insult use the word. He didn't call anyone an incel so there was absolutely no hypocrisy in his statement.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 08:51 PM
4

He's right though. Believe it or not, many people change. Just because they are 1 way when you met them doesn't mean they will stay that way forever. Many times you have to either take a shot in the dark and give that person a chance or just not bother to interact with them in the first place. This applies to all forms of relationships btw.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 08:23 PM
6

Depends on the woman honestly. Instead of implying that men who aren't stay at home dads are automatically man babies you should have just said that in the first place.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 05:12 PM
9

not end up taking care of some woman’s man baby that they didn’t teach to do laundry. What exactly does that have to do with his comment and how in the world is that suppose to prove him wrong? He's saying that women generally don't want to be in a relationship with a stay at home dad and your response is to say that women don't want to date a man that can't take care of themselves. Of course most don't, but that's not even what he said. What exactly are you even trying to imply here? That men w…
/r/MensRights19/01/22 04:59 PM
2

You do know that safe haven laws exist right? https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/safehaven.pdf ​ As soon as the baby is born she can legally abandon her baby without getting into any legal trouble.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 05:16 PM
4

The "logic" behind most people who think this way is this: All or at least most men are evil/bad while the vast majority of women are good. The ones that are bad are only bad because men made them that way so it's mostly the fault of the men. Therefore, negatively generalizing women is wrong while negatively generalizing men is fine/ good because generalizations are only bad if they are not true. Tldr: They are misandrists that believe that women = good and men= bad
/r/MensRights02/01/22 09:34 PM
2

Just because someone never had sex doesn't mean that they will automatically turn into an evil misogynist. Honestly this assumption sounds like border line virgin shaming.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 06:16 PM
2

He "retired" his doctorate license so he's technically not even a doctor.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 07:02 PM
3

Idk but I really hope it's not what I think it is. Wtf?
/r/MensRights28/12/21 06:43 PM
1

Yeah I know you didn't my first sentence was just to make it clear that it makes no sense to gender the word to just men. Most (or at least many) people who use the word "mansplaining" would never use the word "womansplain" and believe that it shouldn't exist so why in the world would they do so unless they believe that being condescending towards a gender because of their gender is exclusive to men? In hind sight I probably should have phrased it better so I honestly apologise for that. What I …
/r/MensRights27/12/21 02:43 PM
2

By saying OR he implied that it was a possibility but not the only possibility. I can't stand it when people try to shame men by claiming that the only reason they did a certain action was because they wanted to bang a woman too but that's not what happened.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:06 PM
2

I didn't say you said that. I was just saying that in general it is wrong for someone to say that. Since the other person never said that, I have no idea why you disagreed with him. It seems like your argument is that even implying that the possibility of a guy only defending a woman to get laid is wrong and that's what I disagree with. It may not be the only possibility but it could potentially be a very real possibility depending on the guy.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 04:06 PM
7

Some people would most likely call you an incel because you are implying that you don't like women. And most people believe that anyone who doesn't like women is an "incel" or a misogynist. Doesn't matter if it's "just a joke" or not.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 03:40 PM
2

Yes and? It's wrong to say that's the only possibility but it definitely is at least one of the possibilities so there's nothing wrong with that. Let me re-correct what you said earlier. a man defending a woman is doing so, according to you, COULD be doing so to get laid. Many men wouldn't but there are definitely at least some that would.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 03:28 PM
2

Being condescending is not exclusive to men alone. Just because a man is being condescending towards a woman doesn't mean he is being condescending towards her BECAUSE she is a woman. The only way to know for sure is if you read his mind or if he just straight up admitted it (which most people wouldn't for obvious reasons). Any term that requires you to mind read in order to accurately describe someone shouldn't exist unless mind reading exists and most people can do it.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 02:58 PM
3

The key word there was OR. It means that although it is a possibility it's not the only possibility.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 05:20 PM
7

The word condescend already exists. There is no need for the word "mansplain".
/r/MensRights24/12/21 01:34 PM
1

In this hypothetical scenario the only difference between this scenario and the OP scenario is that she is saying everything she did in the original scenario WHILE holding the mace and pointing it at him. I already said this multiple times including the very comment you are replying to. So basically, the timeline is this, the guy asks her if she could help him and then she immediately pulls out the mace, points it at him and THEN warns him that if he tries anything she will mace him. I already s…
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:23 PM
1

I was on one scenario the entire time. The only one flip flopping between the two scenarios is you. The only times I mentioned the OP scenario is simply to say that what she did was not illegal but IF she were to say what she said while brandishing the mace then it would be. That is what my entire argument has boiled down to from the very beginning you simply misinterpreted what I said. At first it was completely my fault but after I established in my 5th reply that I am arguing solely about the…
/r/MensRights21/12/21 01:24 AM
1

I already decided remember. In my 3rd reply I agreed with you that what she did wasn't illegal but it would be if she did so while pointing mace at him. In my 5th reply I made it perfectly clear that I'm talking strictly about the hypothetical of her pointing mace at him and even apologized for not making that clear earlier. I can definitely understand why you would get confused earlier because I didn't phrase it correctly but it makes no sense for you to be confused now. If you can admit that i…
/r/MensRights20/12/21 11:21 PM
1

Mace is a self defense weapon. Any law that applies to using weapons with self defense under the law applies to mace. Assault with self defense spray ​ Nothing in your link would suggest she did anything wrong. You're right but the argument isn't if she did anything illegal the argument is IF she preemptively pulled out the mace while threatening to use it against him would it be illegal. I'm saying that it would be classified as assault and therefore illegal while you're saying that it wouldn't…
/r/MensRights20/12/21 09:44 PM
2

I didn't say it was irrational to fear harm. Anyone could potentially harm you at any time. The irrational and unreasonable part would have been if she got trigger happy and pulled out the mace and aimed it at him. I already explained why. He didn't threaten, harass, or physically harm her so therefore it wouldn't warrant self defense. This is literally the 3rd time I said that. Also you're right she didn't do that, the argument is about a hypothetical so I concede that I definitely should have …
/r/MensRights20/12/21 07:23 PM
2

Look up self defense laws. Self defense is only legal if the fear of harm is reasonable. In this situation the fear of harm was blatantly irrational and therefore there was no reason for her to defend herself making what she did illegal. It doesn't just apply to her spraying it but pointing it at someone as is if she were going to spray them as well. This is called assault. Look up the criminal law definition of assault as well. Like I said earlier, if he threatened, harassed, or physically harm…
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:55 PM
3

I seriously doubt that too but there is a part that you're purposely leaving out with that statement. Telling someone (screaming at someone really but I digress) that if they get close to you, you will mace them may not be illegal but doing that while pointing the mace at them is. Just like telling someone if they try to harm you, you will defend yourself with a knife isn't illegal but doing so while pointing a knife at them even if they are 20 ft away from you is. The thing that makes this espe…
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:10 PM
4

You seriously doubt that threatening someone with a knife is illegal? Are you serious? Where exactly do you live where that wouldn't be seen as blatantly illegal?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 05:53 PM
3

It is a similar situation because for many men, a woman being a "slut" is not a bad thing it's a good thing and they actively look for women who self identify as that to date or have sex with because that's their type.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 05:36 PM
3

Radius doesn't matter she is still pointing a weapon at him and threatening him with it, which is illegal. ​ If a man pulled out a knife and pointed it at someone 20 or even 30 ft away from them and threatened to harm them with it that would still warrant his arrest regardless of how short the radius was.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 04:27 PM
1

Very good advice but what makes you think they are posing as the opposite gender and what evidence do you have of that?
/r/MensRights15/12/21 08:26 PM
6

down voted? sure banned? lol no
/r/MensRights15/12/21 12:59 AM
2

You do know that many women ask men to have sex with them as well right? Sex is a two way street. Both the man and the woman are equally responsible for the creation of the child.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 06:10 PM
5

I'm pretty sure the "woke" part is referring to the fact that it's only boys that are being targeting and not boys AND girls.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:22 PM
1

I don't believe that's what he was saying. You simply interpreted it that way. What I'm saying is that there is nothing "disgusting" about believing that many people dress well in order to impress others as well as themselves. Also there is no need to insult me by calling me nasty names when I never did the same to you.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 09:05 PM
1

Many women AND men dress as well as possible to impress themselves as well as others. There's nothing "disgusting" about that. Women are not a hive mind. Just because you personally wouldn't try to impress others doesn't mean other women wouldn't. I personally see sex as overrated and not that being of a deal and know plenty of other guys who feel the same way but I have enough common sense to know that not every man thinks and feels the exact same way I do.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 06:08 PM
2

It's not called "reverse male gaze". It's female gaze.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 08:15 PM
8

Dating people based on how "hot" they are to you is fine. Shaming people for not fitting your standards however is not.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 07:56 PM
2

Ok so I assume you wouldn't see it as abuse if it was a man beating the daylights out his girlfried right.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 06:08 PM
1

The word for that is simply misogyny. Absolutely no need to call it "toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights22/11/21 09:12 PM
1

It's a platonic relationship
/r/MensRights22/11/21 07:24 PM
7

The argument isn't that feminism created these problems, the argument is that feminism makes these problems worse. ​ Think of it this way. Racism against blacks is a problem that existed way before the KKK and other white nationilist groups. Does that mean that these groups are not to blame at all for racism against blacks? By your logic, yes.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 08:48 PM
4

People are commenting on this like it's not ok to discriminate against anyone based on their race or sex ... because it isn't.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 05:28 PM
10

This would only be true in a world where lies don't exist. Needless to say, we don't live in that world.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 03:31 PM
7

That's pretty rare honestly but it's good to know some do that for men as well. ​ It would be even better if all companies didn't make either sex a main priority though
/r/MensRights05/11/21 04:26 PM
2

Egalitarianism was needed in the past not feminism. You can advocate for female rights (and equal rights when it comes to sex/gender) without being a feminist.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 06:26 PM
7

You do know lying exists right? Of course the first thing you should do is ask and hope that she's telling the truth.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 04:03 PM
1

Ok and what if someone literally has a physical disability and literally can't have sex. Is he not an incel? Also last time I checked having a mental disability is not a choice. If said mental disability is severe and it is indeed blocking him then isn't he involuntarily celibate?
/r/MensRights02/11/21 03:26 AM
13

True but the main difference is that being a "slut" is seen as a good thing to alot of people while being an incel is not seen as a good thing to nearly anyone. Not even most self proclaimed incels see being an incel as a good thing.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 06:23 PM
1

Not everyone has that. For the ones that don't they are more likely to do an action they obviously shouldn't if there are little to no negative consequences for that action.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 01:56 PM
1

equality for all sexes That's the definition of egalitarianism. The definition of feminism is the advocacy for female rights on the basis of gender equality. That's why it is called FEMinism. It is and has always been mostly for female/ women's rights just like the MRA is mostly for male/ mens rights
/r/MensRights31/10/21 03:48 AM
3

My personal experience is that I have definitely met some who mentioned penis size and most preferred it to be medium to big and some were making fun of a guy for having a small penis and only one or 2 said that they wouldn't mind having a boyfriend with a small penis as long as he's good with his hands or toungue. I believe you are right that most women wouldn't bring up penis size though but like I said earlier it might just be to be polite. And yeah I don't think there is a way to know if it'…
/r/MensRights24/10/21 01:58 AM
3

There are plenty of women who actually do care you most likely just don't know them personally or if you do they might not tell you in fear of looking like a superficial jerk because for some reason alot of people have it in their minds that having physical standards automatically makes you a bad person. Generally speaking when women have certain fetishes they tend to be less vocal or obvious about it but there are plenty of women who don't mind stating their preferences when it comes to this so…
/r/MensRights24/10/21 01:39 AM
1

Obviously. MRAs want men (and everyone in general really) to be seen as innocent or at least neutral (neither innocent nor guilty) by default until proven guilty in the court of law. In no way shape or form is that incompatible with the belief that rape is sex without consent. The man should prove that she said yes and the woman should prove that she said no while the judge should have little to no biases whatsoever when making the decision. That is how most MRAs view it. The main problem MRAs t…
/r/MensRights23/10/21 11:37 PM
1

By who? Also if it's online do you have links to the conversation?
/r/MensRights23/10/21 11:22 PM
1

I don't agree with feminism itself but if a feminist genuinely does believe that then yes I agree with them on that issue. This is of course when it comes to sex and not physical contact in general.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 11:03 PM
1

You do realize people can change right? Just because they are one way now doesn't mean they will stay that way in the future. The only 2 options you have is to take a leap of faith and hope for the best or avoid the scenario all together.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 09:57 PM
3

Practically never because it's nuetral, not positive or negative. It's not worthy of praise nor ridicule so it's usually not brought up. What exactly is your point? Also I thought we were talking about actual penises and not "penis energy". According to people who love using "small penis energy" as an insult and "big penis energy" as a compliment that is completely different from actual penises.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 08:59 PM
1

Definitely. That's why one of the main goals of MRAs (men rights activists) is to get the laws changed so that will become the legal definition of rape. As it is right now you can only be considered a rapist under the law if you penetrate the victim.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 07:33 PM
5

He never even said anything about women being emotional nor implied that women can't feel emotions other than excitement. What in the world are you talking about?
/r/MensRights23/10/21 02:20 AM
4

small penis usually being seen as tolerable/ meh at best =/= all men in relationships have big penises. You do know medium size exists right?
/r/MensRights23/10/21 02:15 AM
11

In my opinion it's just as toxic to believe that a man is automatically evil if he doesn't show emotions (or even worse emotions you want him to feel) as it is to believe that a man shouldn't show emotions at all. Everyone is different and some people just aren't as emotional as others naturally. In reality I think it's better just let people show emotions if they feel like it and don't show it if they don't feel like it.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 07:46 PM
1

I agree with you on that. I just don't think it's "unrealistic" to live a life style where you never have sex.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 04:08 PM
2

No one railed against abstinence. The problem is when the sex education kids get is abstinence only because that's not realistic at all an I agree that it's not the only choice but I don't see how it's "not realistic".
/r/MensRights14/09/21 06:26 PM
2

The problem is that sex really isn't that big of a deal. Withholding sex isn't going to do much of anything. Especially since theres so many alternatives. Plus many of the people who are the biggest supporters of this bill don't even care about having sex with women and see abstinence as the best solution for women who don't want babies anyways.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 06:15 PM
3

Good idea but it could be illegal depending on where you live.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 07:00 PM
5

By that logic saying that a woman has tiny tit energy or fat whale energy is 100% not body shaming at all. After all you're just shaming her energy and not her body. It's not like you're implying that having small boobs or a fat body is a bad thing by naming something negative after them or anything.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 03:52 PM
1

Someone opposed to feminism could simply be against it due to the fact they don't agree with how feminists go about addressing gender equality. Same with the other 2 movements I mentioned. Just because you don't agree with how a movement goes about handling gender equality doesn't mean you are automatically opposed to gender equality itself.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 03:36 PM
1

Yes. And? The point is you can be opposed to feminism without being opposed to equal rights between the sexes. Egalitarianism is about the advocacy of men and women's rights equally. Feminism is about the advocacy of mostly just women's rights. MRA is about the the advocacy of mostly just mens rights. All 3 are technically about equal rights between the sexes just done in different ways.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 03:19 PM
3

That's anti egalitarianism not anti-feminism. egalitarianism and feminism are not the same things. Feminism: "Belief in or advocacy of women's social, political, and economic rights, especially with regard to equality of the sexes." Egalitarianism is: "Belief in or advocacy of all genders' social, political, and economic rights equally, especially with regard to equality of the sexes." Feminism is mostly for women's rights while egalitarianism is for everyone's rights equally.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 02:42 PM
6

Feminism is about women's rights while MRA is about men's rights. Egalitarianism is for both equally. ​ The difference between MRAs and feminism is while feminists tends to say that they are for both men and women equally, in reality they are mostly for women. MRAs are usually honest about the fact that it's mostly focused on men's rights.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 02:31 PM
3

What do you think anti feminism is then?
/r/MensRights06/09/21 01:59 PM
4

I'm well aware that women are less physically strong than men, but men should still not be allowed to hit women. (As a woman, it really hurts me that everyone thinks men should be allowed to hit women for frivolous reasons like women accident Little to no one believes that men should hit women at all, especially not for something as minor as spilling water on accident. Only misogynists think that and they are a minority not a majority. I don't see how egalitarianism is incompatible with your bel…
/r/MensRights30/08/21 07:34 PM
5

I agree with you completely but I'm curious as to why you would call yourself a feminist. You do know you don't have to be a feminist to be for women's rights or equal rights in general right (it's called being an egalitarian)?
/r/MensRights30/08/21 04:49 PM
6

Wrong. Egilitarianism is "just the belief in gender equality". This is the definition of feminism: "Belief in or advocacy of women's social, political, and economic rights, especially with regard to equality of the sexes." The only way you can be for the "equality of the sexes" and mostly advocating for one sex over the other is if you have the belief that one sex has more power and privilege than the sex you are advocating for and the sexes are NOT equal due to this. With this belief the only w…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 08:51 PM
3

"But they sure as heck do it a lot less than men." True but only because there are more men than feminists. "There's also a physical disadvantage between women and men you're ignoring. " Women=/= feminists. Plus I never ignored that generally speaking men are physically stronger than women. The thing is that weapons can easily close that gap. It doesn't matter how physically strong a man is, he can still be killed or severely harmed if the person he is going against has a weapon. Even a small ch…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 04:21 PM
4

Do you actually believe feminists are completely incapable of killing or raping? Even if you actually believe that only men can rape or kill, you do know that many feminists are men right?
/r/MensRights23/08/21 03:02 PM
1

He never said that women shouldn't be in construction. He said that if men and women should be in all forms of jobs rather they be traditionally male jobs or not then the same should apply to the military. You are the one implying that women shouldn't be in those type of jobs due to their biology. I disagree with the way he's making his argument but his main argument isn't wrong. He's saying that either the draft be completely abolished and no one should be forced to join a war they don't want t…
/r/MensRights17/08/21 09:03 PM
2

Once again citation please. My guess is that he was most likely just talking about the double standards society has. He was probably saying that it isn't fair to enforce male gender roles while not enforcing female gender roles. If you're going to get rid of gender roles then get rid of gender roles for both women AND men and not just women otherwise it's just pure hypocrisy. I doubt he was actually advocating for women to be traditional wives. Feel free to prove me wrong with a link though.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 07:43 PM
3

That comment has about 10 downvotes. Pretty much no one agrees with him. I'm not sure how that proves your point. You made it seem like that is a common consensus on this sub and most people would agree with that.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 07:25 PM
1

"But actually, yes, it's not rare to find MRAs who blame men's problemson women not being extremely traditional anymore, and on gender rolesnot being enforced." ​ If it's not rare than surely you can easily prove it by sending a link to a single comment that says that strict gender roles should be enforced. Citation please.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 06:55 PM
4

No offense but the whole male code thing simply sounds like an excuse to have double standards. If you believe it's wrong for men to be shamed for being emotional then don't shame men for being emotional just because they disagree with your opinion or world view. It doesn't matter if the man is traditional or not, that's no excuse to be hypocritical. There are better ways to disagree with them than stooping down to their level by doing the exact same thing they do that you claim to hate so much.…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 05:11 AM
4

Very often the same person joking about drinking male tears is the same person using the term "fragile masculinity" to shut down a man for being offended by something they said or did (or something they support said or did). It all depends on the person though like you said.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 03:27 AM
2

No you're not completely wrong but it's a bit more broad than that. Fragile masculinity is when a man is offended by something male related being mocked or criticized. This could range from a man being mad at another man for not conforming to gender roles to a man being rightfully offended by discrimination of men.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 02:42 AM
2

When a man is offended by something male related being mocked or criticized. It's a term invented by feminism to effectively attack male dissenters
/r/MensRights15/08/21 02:28 AM
3

It is seen as terrible to feminists and the majority of the west is pro feminism. As said earlier the gender bent equivalent is women being gold diggers and many women praise other women for being gold diggers. Most people in general see women being gold diggers and men being horn dogs who use women for sex as a bad thing. Both of these things are constantly criticized all the time, especially men being users and abusers when it comes to sex. That criticism isn't going to magically stop bad peop…
/r/MensRights14/08/21 03:17 AM
5

Bullying happens all the time too that doesn't mean it's widely accepted as ok. Same with stealing, assaulting, and many crimes.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 02:57 AM
4

That's the point. Many women use men for money. All the time. Men using women for sex and women using men for money are essentially equivalents in terms of how often they happen. He's saying that if women using men for money is perfectly acceptable then the gender reversed equivalent should be just as acceptable. In reality both are abhorrent and should not be acceptable but if you're fine with one you should be fine with the other, otherwise you're being hypocritical.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 01:53 AM
7

That changed as soon as MGTOW joined.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 03:26 PM
2

Neither.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 08:07 PM
1

I explained to you why the dictionary definition actively disproves your point. If you still don't get it...🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights06/08/21 04:39 AM
2

"Masculinity doesn't refer to a group of people" Yes, yes it does let's go by the definition you provided. "qualities or attributes regarded as characteristic of men" Are men not a group of people? Yes men and women can be masculine but at the end of the day it's not a gender nuetral term and you know it isn't.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 03:39 AM
7

what do you call those who want full equality? egalitarians or equalists.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:41 AM
1

Please point to where he mentioned MGTOW because I honestly don't see it.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:33 PM
7

Yes. Although calling it "logic" is kind of debatable.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 03:59 PM
1

​ A movement that fights to protect female rapists of male victims? A movement that literally seeks to enshrine female privilege into law? It is a hate movement, but I'm pretty sure that his point is that most people don't see it as that. I agree that the MRA shouldn't stoop to their level but at the same time I definitely see his point too.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 05:33 PM
1

How in the world was her crimes not nearly as bad as his? She started the fight, punched someone in the back of his head, head butted and bit people while all he did was kick one person and punch one other person.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 01:40 PM
1

So you would be ok with someone saying "girls be like [insert negative stereotype here] right?
/r/MensRights13/07/21 08:03 PM
3

Same with Sarah Conner until they ruined her in Dark Fate (in my opinion)
/r/MensRights11/07/21 04:16 PM
1

I know why he was in the time loop, I was just explaining why he got kicked in the balls. Still a messed up scene either way.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 12:30 AM
1

I was done with Loki when they decided it was a good idea to have him get his balls bashed in a time loop for snipping a woman's hair as a prank.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 10:47 PM
3

Kill all women was never a popular trending hashtag kill all men was
/r/MensRights10/07/21 03:24 PM
1

I wasn't asking for a comparison of feminist subs and MRA subs. This topic is about a specific book called I Hate Men. The proof I asked for was for you to link a single comment or post here where someone said that they hate women. You still haven't done that yet. If you can put all of that effort into providing links that have nothing to do with someone saying specifically that they hate women (and not simply someone assuming that they hate women due to an MRA criticizing feminism or complainin…
/r/MensRights09/07/21 05:04 PM
1

Are you talking about the book that this is satire of? If so it's called I Hate Men by Pauline Harmange
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:45 PM
6

What exactly are you talking about? Read the last slide. This is a gender bent version of a book by called Pauline Harmange called "I hate Men" The whole point of this post is that this way of thinking is wrong and unacceptable and should not be tolerated. Granted it's not exactly the most popular book in the world but the fact that it got green lit in the first place is pretty telling.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:42 PM
6

If it is nearly as common as you say it is then it shouldn't be too hard to prove. Just post a link to a comment or post in this sub where the person straight up said that they hate women. Not feminism but women. ​ Also mind explaining why you sent me that link? Seems pretty off topic.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:30 PM
5

Little to no one says that they hate women here. Feminism? Yes, but not women. If you have proof please post a a link to it.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:05 PM
6

I hate men by Pauline Harmange
/r/MensRights08/07/21 07:57 PM
2

I agree with you but the term MGTOW fits him, not incel. Incel is short for involuntarily celibate. An incel wants to get into a romantic or sexual relation but can't while he is saying that you shouldn't want to get into one at all. Yes he's wrong but there is a difference. ​ Also ... "If you aren't willing to put effort into a relationship you will be alone forever. You made your bed. Now lie in it." Not everyone wants to be in a relationship with others or needs to for that matter. I'm not de…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 12:55 PM
1

This ^
/r/MensRights06/07/21 12:52 PM
4

What guy regularly walks around in a speedo?
/r/MensRights05/07/21 10:30 AM
10

​ Fighting back physically will get you arrested and if you are argumentative with them you will be brandished as an incel and little to no one will take you seriously. You will be the villain in most people's eyes. Until society as a whole gets rid of the notion that men in general are too privileged and powerful to earn a strand of mercy or empathy these problems will unfortunately never be solved.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 04:49 PM
2

tldr: gamer = game enthusiast. What you probably meant was toxic gamer and not just gamer. It doesn't fit in this context because the topic is movies and not games. Also no one here said nor implied that women being gamers was a bad thing (other than you of course), if you have proof then show it by quoting the comment word for word.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 05:06 PM
2

Earlier you said gamer = person who gets mad about stupid things. He was just trying to say that there are women who identify as gamers and by your logic those women are horrible people due to the definition you gave for the word gamer. Since you believe that anyone who believes that a female gamer is a bad thing is an incel then by your own logic you are an incel. In reality you and I both know that gamer doesn't mean what you said it meant and that all it really means is someone who enjoys pla…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 04:29 PM
2

ruqqus but it's way smaller
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:50 PM
2

It's a miracle got that tbh.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 07:42 PM
12

It's a miracle she even got that tbh
/r/MensRights23/06/21 07:41 PM
2

Boobs are a sexual reproductive organ. A penis is also a sexual reproductive organ. If you assault a sexual reproductive organ it is sexual abuse. How is this hard for you to understand?
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:41 AM
6

"Patriarchy and systemic racism are explanations for observed phenomena" And you can't visually view and document exactly what feminism does as a group? Are you serious? He's clearly talking about the political movement and not every women on the planet. That's just something you're saying to straw man him. Anyone male or female can identify as a feminist. But not everyone does. He's just talking about the people who choose to identify as feminists.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 01:54 AM
1

Mind if I copy this?
/r/MensRights02/05/21 04:20 AM
2

Except many men are turned on by women they call "whores" and want to be in a romantic or sexual relationship with them while little to no one wants to be in a romantic or sexual relationship with actual incels. If they use the word against you it doesn't necessarily mean that you actually are one (most of the time it's just used as an insult to shut people down and they don't actually believe you are one) but it does mean that they most likely have no attraction towards you whatsoever. The same…
/r/MensRights01/05/21 08:22 PM
3

They may look all they want but if they touch you without your consent you can get them thrown into jail or prison. If a woman touches a man without consent (rather it be sexual harassment, any form of assault, or even something as drastic as full on rape) then he will most likely just be laughed at and told it's not a big deal by the authorities. That's the main difference here.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 05:15 PM
3

Maybe not, but I certainly would considering the fact that rape being very illegal makes it so she can make it so others won't get raped by this person like she did by reporting him to the authorities and getting him locked up. I believe his point is to only avoid a person if you know that, that person can do an evil deed against you without reprocusion. I wouldn't take it to the extreme like he is but I can definitely understand being cautious.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 04:53 PM
4

She litterally grabbed his junk. Are you kidding me? Do you really believe a male officer would be able to get away with groping a woman's private area? It doesn't really matter if the officer is getting turned on or not it's still sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 04:49 AM
5

Classic virgin shaming tactic
/r/MensRights01/05/21 04:43 AM
2

I'm black. If I said all blacks are lazy and stupid don't you think that would be racist against blacks? I believe the term is "internal racism". If I said something like that I imagine a ton of people would probably call me an Uncle Tom. I can not for the life of me understand why you can't understand why it's wrong for anyone to discriminate against anyone based on the color of their skin regardless of their own skin color.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 02:01 AM
1

It's to convince the people on the fence watching the argument.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 12:52 AM
18

That's mysoginistic because you're assuming women are too weak to be a threat and misandric because you're assuming men are dangerous monsters. Anyone can be dangerous if they have a hidden weapon. If she were to attack you and the police were to get involved who do you think they are more likely to believe? The man who is often seen as dangerous by default because he is a man or the woman who is seen as non threatening by default because she is a woman? The most likely scenario of what would ha…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 10:37 PM
17

Does anyone who feels unsafe when being approached by a man need a therapist or is it just common sense to be at least a little cautious of strangers?
/r/MensRights29/04/21 09:39 PM
1

Creating social circles is just about the only logical way to go about it. It's not even remotely easy and it takes a lot of time but all other alternatives are mostly dead ends that could potentially lead up to you being in danger. Rather it be cold approach with an insanely low success rate and a decent chance of being charged with sexual harassment or online dating with an extremely low success rate and a decent chance of getting cat fished and possibly harmed in the process.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 08:32 PM
16

Just because you got banned for being an incel doesn't mean you actually are one. If you make a comment about how you disagree about the ocean being dry and then get called a nazi for it and then banned because of that opinion, does that really make you a nazi? That's an extreme example but you should get my point. People who ban others are not infallible and not everything they say is actually true.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 07:42 PM
36

Maybe but calling someone an incel just because you disagree with them is still wrong. Just because someone gets banned for being an incel doesn't mean they actually are one. Most of the time they aren't because incels are a very tiny minority.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 07:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter