TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RedditIsCensorship2 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,100 comments by RedditIsCensorship2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,100 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Jesus lady, what's up with all the oversharing? Nobody cares, get a grip.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 06:09 AM
-1

I'm sorry, please excuse me for not caring about your opinion whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 05:05 AM
3

If you rather have sex with an object than a human being, go for it. To each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 04:54 AM
-4

It's still pointless because no Chad would want a sexless woman or one that is too ugly to get excited about. So, you wanting to be or not wanting to be a sex slave for a Chad is not relevant. and some men may try to change asexual women. Nah, if there's no fucking to be had, being with a woman becomes pointless. The only men who still would stick around are men who were tricked into believing that she is not sexless by her putting out in the beginning of the relationship, who are hoping to get …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 12:35 AM
-6

What the relevance of you mentioning that you are not interested in any Chads, when no Chad would want to date you in the first place? That's the relevance of my comment, pointing out that you mentioning that you are not interested in any Chads is not relevant at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 12:23 AM
1

Women changing their behaviour would imply that women are capable of accountability. Since women aren't capable of being accountable for things they do, we cannot expect them to change their behaviour. Ever. There's a reason why redpill says that women are "the most responsible teenagers of the house", not being able to act with accountability is that reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 12:17 AM
5

Men on average also work more at work, so seems fair to me...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 12:09 AM
4

If that was the case, then they would only go for the lowest economic class of women. Why put in ridiculous work to impress women who already have money? What? Such a ridiculous and flawed logic. Men don't want to fuck poor, men want to fuck pretty. You seem to have absolutely no clue how men operate.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 12:07 AM
-8

If you are a woman who hasn't dated in 10 years, you are either asexual or so ugly that nobody would want to actually date you. Whatever it is you definitely do not need to worry about any Chads...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 11:59 PM
1

Most ironic username I saw all week...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:26 PM
–

Because the women who say stuff like that are frustrated women, who are just here to shit on men. This is not a debate sub, don't let the name of this subreddit fool you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:20 PM
2

If I can read your lips without looking up to your face, then you are definitely wearing a slutty outfit. If it's impossible for you to sit without the whole world finding out what colour of underwear you are wearing, then you definitely are wearing a slutty outfit. If everytime you breath there's a strong possibility one of your tits falls out of the skimpy outfit you're wearing, then you are definitely wearing a slutty outfit. Nothing against slutty outfits by the way, but don't pretend like t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:18 PM
–

tldr you're mad Yep, you are definitely incapable of figuring out other people. anything else? Yes, you are not only so dumb that you can't even figure out the obvious. You are also arrogant. And that combination makes you insufferable. Therefore I take back that you should be busy apologizing to that poor man. You would be doing him a solid if you stay out of his life altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 02:29 PM
–

This upset? Girl you are too dumb to figure out the obvious, so don't even try to figure out other people. I'm enjoying a nice cup of Ethiopian coffee, while I'm listening to the new Pearl Jam record, that's how "upset" I am. You shouldn't even be waisting my time, you should be busy apologizing to the man who's heart you broke with your stupidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 02:18 PM
–

I just feel sad for the man that got his heart broken because you were to dumb to figure out the obvious on your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 02:03 PM
0

it's really not obvious to a lot of the men here. Said the hypocrite who is a woman and who couldn't figure it out without doing a silly experiment that broke someone's heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 01:56 PM
-2

You actually had to fuck up someone with a silly experiment to reach that conclusion? Isn't obvious that attraction is required to be with someone? Damn, people can be so dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 01:41 PM
5

Sure can. If you are older and really drunk then it might not happen. But 18 year old me would be so drunk I didn't even know what side was up anymore and still be able to have an erection easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 11:33 PM
3

You know that people sometimes get high or drunk, do you? It wouldn't be hard for others regardless of gender to take advantage of such a situation. Use your imagination for the practical details.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 10:15 PM
0

You would not be giving up your career if you did not feel like spending time with your child and being a SAHM. You would just return to work at the earliest moment possible in that case. And rightfully so. But then let's not pretend you are doing this for "him". You are a woman you have the luxury of choosing to be a SAHM or to keep your career. If you pick SAHM, you automatically fall back on your partner who has to take care of you. Men do not even have this luxury of choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 06:54 PM
3

If you are no simp, why do you pick people who are, to be your friend? What's the logic here? There's truth in the saying "you become who you surround yourself with". And that friend of yours clearly has demonstrated that he has no self-respect. Willing objectifying himself and letting himself get used as a walking ATM. That's just sad. Not on the spectrum, definitely not psycho. Anger? Yeah maybe, if men aren't standing up for themselves how can we expect things to ever get better? And yes, tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:31 PM
1

You don't think your friend is a dumbass for marrying someone who gives "so I can own half your house when we separate" as a reason for marriage? Lol, maybe that explains the friendship then.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:11 PM
1

I never claimed you were not doing your part. But while you take care of the kid, you expect a man to take care of you. One does not exclude the other. And maternity leave is typically paid, at no point would he be the sole earner. Depends how long you decide to be a SAHM. I'm not claiming there's anything wrong with being a SAHM. I'm just saying that if you want to be a SAHM, you are by definition expecting your partner to be the one who brings in the money. Therefore you do expect to be taken …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:07 PM
4

Lol, it's pointless trying to explain anything to a disingenuous wanker like yourself. You have your mind already made up and you are so arrogant that you really believe that the thoughts that pop up in your head are nothing but eternal truths. So, thanks very much, but I'd rather not have the taste of vomit in my mouth, which is unavoidable if I have to listen to you wank yourself off to the sound of your own voice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:58 PM
0

Your friend is a dumbass and he deserves that the golddigging cunt he married takes him to the cleaners. I would find it real hard to still see someone as a friend of mine, if they have so little self-respect that they knowingly sign up for a marriage to a golddigger.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:38 PM
8

And that dumbass put a ring on her finger? Jesus, guys are marrying golddiggers like they taste of strawberries nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:51 PM
-3

You want to be a SAHM (at least temporary) so by definition you'll need someone else to bring home the bacon. And when someone else is bringing home the bacon, they are taking care of you...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:47 PM
1

Very disingenuous way of asking that question. Women don't want men that earn the same salary, women are hypergamous and want men that earn more than them. And a lot more is even better than a little more.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:41 PM
3

Firstly any man using physical force on a woman is playing a very dangerous game. He is very likely to end up in jail and it isn't even relevant if the man was defending himself or not. This causes a lot of men to not see physically defending themselves against a woman as an actual option to consider. Secondly a woman doesn't need physical force to be able to force a man to do whatever she wants. She can always claim that the man assaulted her or raped her, if he doesn't give her what she wants.…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:38 PM
8

Don't think I ever met a more disingenuous person than you. Just incredible how pathetic you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:20 PM
2

Cool that you did, but that still makes you nothing more than an exception. A refreshing exception, but an exception nevertheless. Where is that expected? Let's be honest about it, the vast majority of women do not ask men out on first dates. And they also don't pay for first dates. There have been threads in r/askreddit and subs like that about this subject, and a lot of women even admit that if they have to pay on a first date, there won't be a second one.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:19 PM
2

And how many first dates have you been on? Just a rough estimate is fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:14 PM
1

I think that whoever does the asking should offer to pay How convenient when it's still expected that men take the initiative.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:11 PM
2

How many first rates did you pay for. Not just your part of the bill, the whole thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:10 PM
1

but I, and the women I know, don’t expect that at all. So, you don't let men pay for the first dates then?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:01 PM
1

Ok, question for you: do you think it's equal when only one gender is expected to take the initiative, set up the date and then also pay for it? If you think that's equal then we might as well switch it up and start letting women do these things. And no, I wasn't referring to first dates only. Men financially giving more than they receiving starts from the first date. But it doesn't end there. That first date merely sets the tone for the rest that follows.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 10:57 PM
1

Since I was talking about men having to pay for the first dates and you responded with "men should just get raises then, teehee", what do you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 10:34 PM
1

Why do you expect men to financially spoil you, when you are a grown-up who is allowed to work and earn her own money? Men don't need raises, they need women to actually mean what they say when they claim to want equality...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 09:48 PM
–

It doesn't really matter how we got there, the result is the same But it does matter how we got there. You are literally rejecting everyone unless they are your ex. Can't you see how ridiculous that is? Accept that whatever you had with your ex is over and done with. Be angry at him for not standing up to his family and choosing you. And use that anger to move the fuck on. but some wounds can't be fully healed You are being overdramatic. You got dumped by a guy without a backbone. And you are gi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 09:01 PM
–

So I don't know... Imagine obese, deformed face, imagine absolutely repulsive... Would you choose it? No, I would not choose that. But here's the thing, the men you don't want are not all deformed, absolutely repulsive monsters. You are just not attracted to anything that isn't as "perfect" as the image you created in your head from your ex. You -> anything not perfect gets rejected. Me -> obese, deformed absolutely repulsive gets rejected. All others are options. His family basicaly made him br…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:46 PM
5

It's called earth, the planet were men pay more than they receive, starting from paying for the first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:38 PM
1

Your title explains a lot about the dynamics between men and women on this sub. A lot of women are very aggressive here, while a lot of men act like their balls never dropped.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:33 PM
–

Would you choose it? I can't answer that question because I'm a man. I'm attracted to every woman that's not absolutely repulsive. And very few women are absolutely repulsive. While you are attracted to no man unless he is your ex. noone compares to him... Classic alpha widow syndrome. How did it end if I may ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:30 PM
–

One of the few movies I started watching but never finished.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:26 PM
–

I call it like I see it. Lol, that's what every Karen says.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:24 PM
–

Same can be said about having to scroll down to find a Karen calling a man a beta or an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:15 PM
–

But it's still lesser evil than a man I'm not attracted to. You do realise you choose to be alone, don't you? Unless you are one of the ten most repulsive women on the planet, there are guys out there who would gladly want to be with you. That's the big difference between men and women. A man in your position isn't rejecting the women who still want to be with him. There isn't anyone to reject. He isn't alone by choice. Loneliness is forced upon him. Basically any woman that's alone is rejecting…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:06 PM
–

A man who is alone for two years will probably not have had any physical contact with another person -except maybe a handshake here and there- during that period. No hugs, no kisses, no sex. Complete touch starvation during those years. When a woman is "alone" for two years, that just means she hasn't been officially dating anyone during that period. She usually still has a few orbiters to fall back on whenever she feels the desire for intimacy. And can turn to her friends for hugs and contact. …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:58 PM
–

That 'most dramatic' tag line really suits you...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:44 PM
–

Get over yourself. Jesus, the level of arrogance you display, it's almost palpable.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:39 PM
0

I thought the exact same thing the comment was talking about. Of course you did. You are also a woman and "group think" is something that women are really good at. Furthermore you are of course not going to disagree when someone of your gender is virtue signalling about your gender. When I was getting myself through college by working in bars, plenty of older women were the creeps that were trying to take me home or were touching me inappropriately. So, to hear one of you disingenuous vagina peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 09:09 PM
0

I didn't know men had to make a case for themselves. Maybe you should stop treating men like they are the accused in a trial that only exists in your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 07:35 PM
1

getting wrinkles without some hardcore drug use. Everyone gets wrinkles, you nutter. It's caused by the sun and by flexing the muscles in our face. I don't know why you claim that they aren't getting wrinkles without hardcore drug use, but maybe my previous comment went over your head. Which would explain why you are making this weird connection between drug use and wrinkles.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 07:03 PM
-1

they're just freaked out and don't want a shitty relationship. Aha, sure that must be it. /s a 1mm "hang" is too much now. A one mm "hang" already significantly transforms the overal look of breasts. They loose their youthful appearance, just like some small wrinkles do the same thing for someone's face.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 06:52 PM
2

Good for you. One of my best friends is ugly. I love him to death and he is a friendly, funny dude and very good company, but there is no other way to describe him than being physically ugly. Never even kissed a girl until he was around almost 30. Around 30 was the time that his career really started to kick in. I mean the guy is making so much money he bought his parents a house because he felt like it. Suddenly the guy is drowning in pussy. He is still just as ugly (maybe even more so because …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 06:28 PM
-3

Did I say they were? You suggested as much when you turned on the virtue signalling instead of being honest about the real reasons. Your tits don't even sag at thirty lol. As a lover of tits, I can tell you that around 30 is the age that you can see female breasts starting to loose their shape and beginning to hang. Is it the same for every woman? Of course not. Sometimes it starts earlier, sometimes it starts later. 30 is a good rule of thumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 06:01 PM
1

But I think women are more able to see the value in a person beyond their looks. Which is the virtue signalling way of saying that women also care about money to the point that they will date an ugly man for his resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 05:51 PM
0

Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 05:45 PM
-12

Yeah sure, because women are so moral and ethical all the time. /s It's more likely that she's worried that her tits beginning to sag will turn of a young dude, who is used to nipples still pointing to the sky, than that she's worried about being a creep.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 05:44 PM
3

Pop a pimple probably.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/24 01:49 PM
–

Women finally getting a taste of their own medicine: "Why are men so mean????"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 12:12 PM
0

Did she piss on that fan without taking her clothes off? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 04:25 PM
0

If only one woman could get away with this, while 99.9% could not, it forces us to accept that gender is not what allowed her to get away with it. If only one woman got away with it, but no man can, then it still is a gendered issue. And we already have one woman who got away with it and we know that a man would not have been so lucky would he have done the same. If you are going to pretend and claim that a man would have been able to get away with this too, then I'm going to claim you are a big…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 04:23 PM
1

The fact that she wasn't doesn't allow us to conclude that any other woman could do this/ similar and get away with it. It's completely not relevant if one or many women would be able to get away with this behaviour. What is relevant is that no man would be able to get away with doing the same thing. And we already know that a woman got away with doing it. Therefore gender is definitely a determining factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 04:07 PM
1

Still searching for a female stand-up comedian that's actually funny. I'm open for suggestions...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 03:56 PM
-4

No we don't know that. We do know that any male artist who would ask a fan on stage during a concert, take his dick out and piss on her and then kick her to get her of the stage, would be finished. He would not be giving anymore concerts after that. His record company would drop him and Clearchannel, who has a monopoly on concert venues, would blacklist him. Since we know that any male artist who does this would get cancelled real quick, we don't even have to ask ourselves what the reason was wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 03:42 PM
1

Women always make me laugh. Sometimes because they are adorable, sometimes because they are stupid and sometimes because they are funny. Unfortunately women are only funny when they aren't trying to be funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 03:34 PM
-6

We all know that a male artist doing exactly the same thing (pissing on a consenting audience member) with a female fan, would get charged with indecent exposure and also get his career and himself cancelled. So, you are just being disenginous when you claim that it's "not all clear that gender is a reason". When a woman can do something without consequences that would end a man's career and probably end with a charge for indecent exposure and jail time, then of course gender is a determining fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 03:28 PM
2

You definitely never saw a really attractive guy go about life. The stories in this thread aren't exaggerated, if anything they are minimising what life is like for a real attractive guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 03:17 PM
-13

idk why she wasn't charged with indecent exposure Sure you do. It was because she is a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 03:05 PM
–

just for acknowledging that he wasn't the best she's ever had You are dishonest as fuck. He broke up with her not because she acknowledged something, but because she broke trust and decided to gossip about intimate details to people outside of the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 01:54 PM
–

This guy is the biggest femnazi you can find on this subreddit and he doesn't even have a vagina. I can understand women being femnazis, but men? And to such an extreme degree? Makes you wonder what kind of trauma he has experienced to get so fucked up in the head...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 01:45 PM
1

To whom? The economy?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:51 AM
1

The reason why you suggested that men always have the option to go the beta bucks route has nothing to do with dating either.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:37 AM
0

Same reason why you suggested that men always have the option to simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:52 AM
-2

So is rape...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:15 AM
0

I am on a debate forum misinterpreting other people's statements on purpose, why isn't there any real debate happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 11:39 AM
–

You are 100% correct. I'm not an incel, so I can't answer questions addressed at incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 11:17 AM
1

Yeah sure, everytime a woman changes her mind because the guy was wearing the wrong coloured socks or because he chewed his food the wrong way, she wasn't being fickle. Of course not, women are never responsible for things they do. It was abuse and toxicity that made her do it...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 11:23 AM
8

Your experience is an experience of 1. Of course I have more experience than you. Two would already be more experience than you, genius.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:20 PM
9

So, your defense is basically that women are not fickle, they are disingenuous instead and pretend to care for people they don't actually care for. That's even worse than being fickle.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:16 PM
8

having many failed relationships You don't know how many relationships I've had, so I don't know why you are talking like you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:09 PM
6

Look at you, trying to make it make sense while you ignore the obvious answer: women are fickle by nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:07 PM
6

Although true, not relevant to the discussion at hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 04:52 PM
8

I don't need to read minds to know a person changed their mind, now do I? That's all pretty obvious from a person's behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 04:48 PM
10

Sure, your limited experience of 1 is right and people with more experience are wrong. Makes perfect sense /s Most answers here agree with me. I didn't know that the truth was a democratic principle...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 04:45 PM
12

Sharing personal experience is fine, but unless you are a lesbian, you aren't dating women. Which limits your personal experience to 1. Therefore you should realise that most men have more experience on this matter. You might be the exception to the rule, that doesn't change the fact that most women are fickle as fuck. Coming from someone who's personal experience isn't limited to 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 04:33 PM
17

Women are known for their fickle nature, but of course all the lovely ladies of PPD are going to deny that women are fickle at all. Why am I not surprised?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 03:56 PM
1

I did read your response and reacted to the things that weren't to ridiculous to even validate with a response. If you think I ignored your main point, now you know why it got ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:46 AM
5

They are definitely not. What we call "romance" is things that men do for women. It's men buying flowers. It's men getting down on one knee and proposing. It's men buying a ring. Valentine's day is about men buying gifts for their women. Anything "romance" is done my men for women. Which makes men the people who do romantic stuff, while women don't do anything romantic back, they just receive. If women are the "romantic ones" like you claim they are, what do women do that is supposed to be roman…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 03:19 PM
1

I think we should definitely define promiscuity as bad overall Why? and that a promiscuous man "slut shaming" women is undoubtedly hypocrisy. No, it isn't. Male promiscuity is not the same thing as female promiscuity, as is obvious from the fact that for men it's hard to be promiscuous, while for women this is an easy thing to do. If they were the same thing, then both men and women would experience the same level of difficulty. But they don't... So, when we talk about promiscuity, we are talkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 10:37 AM
-5

You are making perfect sense and it's making me all confused. Are you sure you are a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 03:42 PM
1

Wouldn't be able to answer your questions even if I wanted to, because they don't apply to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 10:23 AM
1

There's a difference between threatening and warning. Men aren't saying they are going to hurt women, a lot of men are just bugging out of society, which means they will stop doing things that society benefits from. And since women are a part of society, this means those men will also stop doing things that women benefit from. Women today may hype themselves up and tell themselves they are "strong and independent" queens, but they still drive roads that men built, get their power from an infrast…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 09:55 AM
5

You think that countries that use this system of garbage disposal are "third world nations"? Ignorant and arrogant at the same time. Great. You live in a country were they need to teach school kids how to deal with school shootings. And you are all one health problem away from financial ruin. I would say that makes your country more of a third world nation than countries where kids are not worried about getting shot, people are protected against bankruptcy by a good social security system and ye…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 05:23 PM
3

This is how it's done in a lot of countries. You probably are American, so can't really fault your ignorance. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 05:05 PM
0

What? Most men have not given up on women and dating. They are still competing with other men. Of course they will be doing garbage collection. It unskilled labor that still pays very well. There aren't that many unskilled jobs that pay at the same level.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:50 PM
2

As if you can compare a woman from 1940 with the entitled Karen's of today. Lol, thanks for the laughs.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:34 PM
5

You keep ignoring things already explained to you. So, I'll keep copy/pasting myself back to you. I'm not going to try to say the same thing with different words over and over again. If men stopped doing all the physical hard jobs, all the dirty jobs, all the smelly jobs, then women aren't going to start doing them. They will just not get done. You know how I know this will happen? Because you yourself did not imagine yourself on a garbage truck, slaving away collecting all the garbage. You imag…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:28 PM
2

by the tiny minority of men Look at the numbers for men who are single and men who did not had sex in the past year. To call it a "tiny minority" is wishful thinking or ignorance. And the number is only growing. Once that number achieves critical mass, what you think can never turn into an actual problem, has become a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:26 PM
2

You’re delulu if you think women can’t do men’s jobs. Like I already explained to you: I never said women couldn't do those things. It's not a problem of ability, it's a problem of willingness.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:21 PM
8

I’m pretty sure that there are plenty of Becky’s slinging garbage Really? Find me some then. I never ever saw a female garbage worker. And I have seen plenty of people working that job. And lived in several different countries and continents. So, it's not like I "didn't see because I never looked around". I have looked around and I'm pretty sure there are not plenty of Becky's working in garbage disposal. Also you’ve never seen a woman truck driver or mechanic with long nails? Sad! Never saw a f…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:14 PM
-1

I see men still chasing women (almost never see women actively chasing men) and men do not have a long list of demands for their potential partners. While most women these days have a list of demands that is so unrealistic that they eliminate more than 99% of men. Seems pretty obvious which gender is actually enthousiastic about the other gender and which gender seems to be motivated only by the practical benefits that a relationship could bring.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:56 PM
2

You don't need to do a job that makes you smell and handle garbage all day. Jobs like that are jobs that men are willing to do when they are in competition with other men for women, because these jobs pay a little extra to compensate for the inconvenience. Men who take themselves out of the dating game are no longer going to do those dirty jobs. They'll find a nice cosy job and settle for a pay cut. Same goes for all the jobs that are backbreaking, truly dangerous or high stress. Ever seen a man…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:41 PM
7

I never said women couldn't do those things. It's not a problem of ability, it's a problem of willingness. Becky isn't going to sacrifice herself and ruin her fake nails by dragging garbage around, if Vanessa can keep her nice cosy office job and never has to smell garbage all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:32 PM
7

The women are wonderful effect, the rise in female entitlement and the fact that women truly do not like men. They only like men for what men can provide. And women no longer need men to provide anything to them, that's a job the state has taken over. Only women who like sex and women who want to be mothers still find a use for men. While almost all men still like women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:17 PM
1

Last time it happened to me was at my local sports club. 15 year age gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:11 PM
22

You understand what these women can't seem to understand. Yeah, you might not give a fuck about men not wanting to date anymore. But you will give a fuck when those men also do not care enough anymore to keep your lights on or your garbage collected. Society is meaningless concept to men that are no longer interested in women or dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:02 PM
2

What's toxic is expecting other human beings to not have emotions and to break up with them, when they show that they do in fact have emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 07:12 AM
1

I'm sorry, do you need help understanding my comments? Just ask if you do, love, there are no stupid questions here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:09 PM
4

You can't win as a man. If you don't open up then you are a robot or scared of emotions. When you do open up you get accused of being a dishonest, manipulative little coward. Might as well not listen to what women say and just do what you think is best.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:04 PM
3

They weren't acting like jerks. They were opening up, like women always say they want, but actually respond negatively when it happens. This is so common knowledge, there's even another guy in this thread here, who says he uses the same tactic to break up when friends with benefits become to attached and want more.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 03:22 PM
3

I love it when people try to use fake apologies. It always lets you know just how much of a prick that person is. I hope your life gets better.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 02:11 PM
1

It's not just 3 men. It's all men. Your disingenuous ass has just invented a new word and it isn't even a good one. Pretending like this is a known term. Yeah, right.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 01:34 PM
3

Perhaps it’s more to do with the women you seek out. Fine example of victim blaming you got there son. Real fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 01:24 PM
4

Not true. I have seen this actually work in reality. Guys using displaying emotions to get their woman turned off and break up with them. It avoids all the drama and possible revenge that could happen if they would initiate the break up themselves. Better let her do it. Remember: hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. Sometimes opening up can be a safer way to end a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 01:13 PM
1

It's not that uncommon. We all know guys who get approached. If a man doesn't need to do the approaching himself, then he is already in they unicorn category you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 01:58 PM
4

Seems like those men are still winning. Most men are perfectly fine fucking woman after woman without ever being expected to commit. I don't see the downsides. Get it, have fun, get out before the nagging starts. Perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 01:55 PM
-1

Solution is simple. Modern day women don't offer anything but some holes to fuck. So, men should just limit their dating life to fucking. No commitment, no cohabitation and no problems. Easy peasy. Problems solved. Bonus points if you "date" more than one woman at a time, because then you also have eliminated the problem of dry spells. Get out your popcorn and enjoy the decline. Women are getting exactly what they have been asking for. And I think it's hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 12:58 AM
15

Those men don't even register to most women unless the qualities you describe are accompanied with being tall, fit, handsome and rich and/or famous. So no, a man who helps around the house is not considered "above average". He is still invisible just like the rest of the 80% who are not Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 12:00 AM
6

You mean rich men, who compensate for being fat with money, get women all the time...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 11:44 PM
17

If she's attractive I would still fuck her. But you can't turn a hoe into a housewife. So, no, I would not date her.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 04:15 PM
1

and are being appreciated for showing emotion more than ever. This is only going to grow. Women still get the "ick" when men display vulnerability. Because it's ingrained in them by thousands of years of needing to rely on their partners being strong and able to protect them and their children. Just like men get the "ick" when women display promiscuous behaviors. Because it's ingrained in them by thousands of years of needing to rely on their partners not being whores who sleep with other men an…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 03:52 PM
6

So we also should start shaming women for letting their emotions show, just like men are shamed for doing the same? You are crazy. Things are the way they are, because men and women are different. Since you can't change the fact that men and women are different, it's no use trying to change the difference in treatment that is a direct consequence of men and women being different.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 02:39 PM
12

as long as you hold yourself to the same standard. That's not how to world works. For example: women get sympathy when they express their emotions, men get ridiculed for doing the same thing. Just like men get a high five for being promiscuous, while women get ridiculed for doing the same thing. Men and women are different, it makes no sense to hold them to the "same standards".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 02:31 PM
2

A younger and hotter woman has a higher social status than an older and poorer woman. Yes, and water is wet. Men who want younger and thinner women are wanting women with higher social status whether they realize it or not. Of course these younger women have a higher status than old wrinkled women with gravity affected tits and cellulite assess. Again, water is wet. But what's your point? I fail to understand why you keep talking about what men want, when you reacted to my claim that women are h…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 04:17 AM
1

How does that make women not hypergamous? That's right it doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 04:03 AM
2

That women prefer a man who's around their own income bracket, is the biggest BS I heard all week. And I have spent a lot of time on Reddit this week, so that's saying a lot. Present any woman on this planet with two identical men, who only differ in the amount of money they make. One man makes the same as the woman does. The other man makes significantly more than her. In this example almost all women will pick the guy who makes more than her. And you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 04:00 AM
2

and aren’t hypergamous Come on now, I understand it's supposed to be a thought experiment, but expecting men to imagine women not being hypergamous is asking for too much...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 03:09 AM
3

Also, your statement is false. Men have less varied taste than women. All men, regardless of class and economical status, want a Barbie. If this was even half true then porn would only feature Barbies. Which isn't the case. There's old, young, fat, skinny, curvy, bodybuilder, dark hair, blonde hair, redhead, etc... porn. Look at the body types on the cover of magazines. Even BBW's can be models. Now compare that with the men who are in movies, on the cover of magazines or in porn. All the same f…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 12:23 AM
4

it’s become a trend for sure. I am seriously doubting this when half of women's dating profiles explicitly mention that a man needs to be at least some kind of height to even qualify for a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 06:47 PM
3

I'm not saying women who are into short men don't exist. I'm pointing out that men's taste in women are far more diverse than women's taste in men. Which they are. If your man is really short, he can attest to this fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 06:43 PM
2

I never said women can't be smart. I pointed out that you will find more men at the extremities of the curve. So, if you take the 100 smartest people in the world, then the majority of them will be men. If you take the 100 most dumb people in the world, the majority will also be men. You are trying to argue a point I never made. I never claimed women are dumb. I pointed out the distribution of intelligence. And you saying that 30% at the top are women, is corroborating with what I said. So, what…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 06:38 PM
7

Porn was an example to demonstrate my point. This isn't something that's limited to porn. Men just have a far more diverse taste when it comes to women, then women have when it comes to men. That's exactly why some short men are so desperate. They can't seem to find any women to give them a chance. The equivalent does not exist for women. Short women will have men that are into them. Tall women too. For any female body type, there are men who are into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 06:32 PM
7

Calling me too stupid while you can't read or are to dumb to notice that I already pointed out that these men have to compensate with money or other attributes for their shortcomings. While women are not required to compensate for their shortcomings..A fat chick doesn't need to be rich or charismatic to get a man. Simply because there will be a man who genuinely is into fat chicks and finds her attractive. The same can't be said about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 06:23 PM
11

BS, if you look at what men like then you'll find that they are attracted to every kind of woman. Fat, short, slim, tall, chubby, obese.... it doesn't matter. There really is a man for any type of woman. When you look at what women like, the picture is totally different. Almost all women seem to want tall men with a fit physique. BBW for example is a populair porn category for men. Women aren't into fat guys. Women aren't into short guys. The only way a "Big Beautiful Man" can get a woman, is if…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 04:47 PM
1

Don't understand what point you are trying to make. One female chess player getting into the top ten is evidence that men are better at chess (because all others in the top ten are men and other women don't even come close to Judith. She's an exception). 30% of Mensa being women still means that 70% are men. Again corroborating that more men are found at the extremities of the IQ scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 02:14 PM
1

Strongest female player ever. She was and still is a great player. But she never became world champion (she became female world champion, but never champion when competing with men) and number 8 was her highest ranking. And let's not forget, she is an exception. Far stronger than any other woman. Polgár is the only woman to have been a serious candidate for the World Chess Championship, in which she participated in 2005; she had previously participated in large, 100-player-plus knockout tourname…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:56 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 12:27 PM
0

And virtue signaling, because telling the truth would demonstrate that women are just as shallow as men, is typical for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 12:26 PM
2

When it comes to IQ men are also the outliers. Both at the top and at the bottom. This explains why women can't compete with the top male chess players. Women are allowed to participate in the (men's) world championship of chess, but they don't stand a chance. Which is why there is also a separate female world championship.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 05:24 AM
1

Thanks for your contribution and get lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 02:51 AM
2

if you're tired of bad faith arguments then I'm tired of every moment of levity being met with these dramatic replies. Simple solution: don't start with the bad faith arguments and there won't be any dramatic replies. What makes THIS something men and women should be treated differently on? There are a lot of things men and women are treated differently on. This is just one of those things. A promiscuous man comes with the "guarantee" that that man has a lot of qualities that society deems desir…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 09:33 PM
1

There's no other way to treat the sexuality of men and women differently than by having the judgements on their use of their sexuality be opposite? Lmao Okay. I really am sick and tired of people like you, who debate in this dishonest manner. Nowhere did I claim what you say here. But you act like I did, then laugh and pretend like I'm an idiot for saying it. Which frankly is a toddler level of debating. I never claimed "there's no other way" or "judgment on their sexuality should be opposite". …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 06:10 PM
6

Become rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 05:36 PM
1

If one of my friends has slept with her, then she is no longer an option. There are enough women in the world to not get involved with the sloppy seconds of your friends. Having sex with a woman is still a very self-affirming thing for a man. This is no longer the case if your mates also had a go with her. Then it becomes an affirmation that you are nothing special, she is just sleeping with anything that crosses her path. In fact it can be an affirmation that you are "less", because she was fir…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 02:54 PM
0

Also, women are whores but men are kings when having sex with more people Which is perfectly understandable since men and women aren't the same. It would be rather weird if humans who are not the same, would be treated like they are exactly the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 02:41 PM
-2

As if being inconsiderate can only manifest itself by forgetting someone's birthday...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 08:13 PM
-2

Yeah sure, when women are shitty partners, it must be caused by their men. It is absolutely unthinkable that the women might be inconsiderate themselves. The "women are wonderful" effect strikes again. Women can be absolute pieces of shit. Do you tell an abused woman that she probably came across as someone who asked for some good ol' abuse too?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 07:19 PM
-1

Bananas are cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 07:13 PM
1

Doesn't really matter where the cut off is. When a man (usually the one with the higher libido) knows that there is a very high probability that he will end up sexually frustrated, why go through with it? If you don't cohabitate, the risk is much lower. So, don't cohabitate.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 07:06 PM
0

The comment you responded to said "almost inexorably".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 06:50 PM
1

Almost half are having sex at least once a week. Once a weak isn't much, especially since you are probably living together. And what about the other half? Yeah, that's right.... I know plenty of men whose yearly birthday present is "getting lucky". So incredibly sad. The best thing a man can do to have his needs met on a regular basis, is to not cohabitate with his partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 06:36 PM
–

If men wear the mean ones, then the saying would have been: Hell hath no fury like a man. But it isn't, the saying recognises that you better not make a woman angry, because they are mean as fuck: Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 03:17 PM
7

Strange you would say that, it definitely worked for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 02:13 PM
–

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 04:30 AM
–

That's a "you" problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 04:27 AM
–

Sure it was.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 04:24 AM
–

You realise that unless you want children, women have nothing to offer but sex. And sex in itself isn't worth the hassle of getting in a relationship. So, why worry about it all? If you really need to get your rocks off, find a drunk woman or a professional streetwalker. If you're lonely, get a dog. Focus on yourself and the nice life you can have without a woman wearing you down. Have hobbies, travel the world, eat nice food,... Women ain't shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 03:48 AM
4

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 03:35 AM
1

doesn't mean there is some kind of magical formula explaining attraction from either gender. I know and never claimed there was, so I wonder why you are sharing this information with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 02:29 AM
0

Woah, impressive! I don't work at McDonald's so I am a person who likes nice things. Guess what, half priced Sherlock Holmes, people who work at McDonald's still like nice things. And people who don't work at McDonald's might not care about luxury, but could just hate smelling like fries all the time. You can tell a lot more from a person's looks than from that thing they do to pay their bills. People's looks are a reflection of their personality, their jobs are a reflection of their desire not …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:53 AM
10

All your buddy has to do to have women trying to date him like his sperm is guaranteed to produce super kids, is get more money and more status. He already has the looks. For casual dating, your looks are everything. For serious relationships money and status becomes more important. Your succes with women is always determined by the whole trifecta: money, status, looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:34 AM
2

Your job says more about you than your looks do No, it doesn't. The only thing my job says about me, is that I need money so I don't starve. My looks are an integral part of who I am. So, they definitely say more about me than "that thing I do to not starve".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:27 AM
-2

but many won't and they move on to be with some bluepill dude or reasonable purplepill dude... ... who they consequently start resenting because he isn't exiting them like the men they were dating before. That blue pill guy isn't winning like you seem to think. He'll will get cucked, presented with a dead bedroom and basically just used as a walking ATM. I'd rather be the redpill dude they use for sex but do not actually want to date. Then the blue pill dude they who gets the woman once she is t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 11:41 PM
–

Get in line and wait your turn.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 10:30 PM
–

Aha, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 07:08 PM
–

I like fruit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:15 PM
–

Not wanting to give up on the financial benefits of the relationship is based on feelings? What feeling is that exactly? The feeling of being scared of becoming homeless? Lol, what a bunch of horse shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:50 PM
–

Since when are women having babies "for society"? Her body, her choice. They are having babies because they want babies. Not for some kind of higher purpose like the sake of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:14 PM
–

That’s why they stay with shitty, abusive, indifferent, messed-up partners all the time That's not love. That's not wanting to give up on the financial benefits the relationship offers, trauma bonding or dependency issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:11 PM
-7

. These "half women" are still doing the majority of the housework No they are not. Women today don't even know how to do the housework anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 07:28 AM
-1

The main people creating those standards are other men telling men No, you are being absolutely ridiculous. Men don't expect other men to be six feet tall before they are datable. That is something that women expect. So are having to earn a 6 figure salary or a six pack. If you don’t looksmax youll never date up Women are hypergamous. They are the ones who date up. Which means men are the ones dating down. Stop inventing BS. That way men technically aren’t working harder than their forefathers Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 07:26 AM
-1

We get to live such longer healthier lives yet we’re working harder than our grandfathers? I didn't say that we have to work harder then our grandfathers. Learn how to read. Our grandfathers had less expectations to live up too (didn't need to be 6 feet tall, 6 figure income with a six pack, didn't need to be able to open up or do half of the housework on top of bringing home the bacon) and still got better partners in return (women who could cook, took care of the home, the children and the hus…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 05:41 AM
6

You are still making deductions that have just as much chance of being wrong as being right. But since you are convinced of women having some kind of supernatural intuition, you also think that your deductions are 100% correct. You are basically going to dump a guy, because his shoes getting wet make him a too disorganised person to share your life with. And that's absurd. He wore nice luxury sneakers so he values his material possessions. Or he's superstitious and these are his lucky sneakers. …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 04:44 AM
11

It also tells me he doesn’t check the weather app before he gets dressed which means he’s not much of a planner, now that’s fine for a lot of people, personally I wouldn’t have a very successful relationship with someone like that so I would’ve passed as well. This is exactly why men say that women will drop a guy over a minor detail. Not checking the weather app before he goes on a date, does not mean that the guy isn't a planner. If I ever saw an example of jumping to conclusions, then it's th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 04:14 AM
2

We can take in a lot of sensory details subconsciously and navigate off of vibes. He wore the wrong shoes. So, I'm not going to see him again. mankind’s kind of survived this long thanks to female intuition. Lol, yep, men killing the dangerous animals and hunting for food had nothing to do with it. It's female intuition that saved the human race. And don't forget it's female intuition that discovered new continents, built the railroads, the nuclear plants, etc.... I just wish it was less belittl…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 03:11 AM
-6

women will be subservient and attend to the majority or all of the domestic duties'. We are not living in the fifties of the previous century anymore. Women today can barely cook, clean or do anything else but doomscroll on Instagram. The only expectation I have left for a woman I date, is that she is attractive enough to get me turned on and isn't annoying to be around. All other things are a very welcome, but more and more a very unexpected bonus. It's really true what they say. Today's men ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 03:02 AM
4

y’all literally get out masculined by a transsexual Too much machismo in that comment. More estrogen needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 11:43 PM
–

lol, yeah right, sure you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 07:37 PM
–

Stop worrying about "your brand" and go live your life. Having an interesting life away from social media and the BS of trying to sell an image can be your "brand".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 10:48 PM
–

Humans are not brands. Do you hear yourself? You are commodifying yourself and think it's a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 10:01 PM
–

Social media is cancer. It's one of the worst things humans did to themselves. Society is seriously regressing since the advent of social media. Young people today have no idea. Look up pictures from people out in public before and after social media was invented. Before social media was a thing people would talk to each other, when out in public. Nowadays you can walk into a bar or restaurant and see a bunch of zombies stare at a screen almost unaware that they are surrounded by other people. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:58 PM
6

I like it when a woman tells me "we aren't going to have sex". Because that's womanese for "we are definitely screwing". At least that's my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:50 PM
1

Lol, I'm starting to enjoy living up to women's expectations of men. They think that men are pigs? Fine, better not disappoint them then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:48 PM
2

Sending ambiguous and unclear signals is not "initiating" anything It is to women. They believe they did their "best" with a sideways glance and a hair flip. And I have been around long enough to not expect anything more of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:35 PM
3

they could have YouTubed how to replace the garbage disposal. Sure, but it was easier to make you do it. So...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:25 PM
1

Thanks for your contribution. You have elevated this debate enormously. And I think your point of view is really refreshing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:23 PM
–

That was actually funny. Good one. (not being sarcastic).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 02:22 PM
–

I rather think bitching feels like a release to them. Then again, having to listen to you, that would definitely cause some suffering.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 11:05 PM
–

And then we have you, here listing to the men who are bitching.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 10:29 PM
–

Oh please shut up. I'm middle aged myself. I'm not very knowledgeable about quakerism, but what does your religion say about arrogance, oh wise experienced one?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 10:09 PM
–

Saving souls for God. As an atheist I cannot relate. But I understand now why you approach others as if they are all waiting to be saved by you. That's usually the way religious people engage with others. I still think it's arrogant, but at least it's not coming from you wanting to feel superior, but from a place of religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 09:06 PM
–

You are talking about "kids, "young person", etc. Why do you assume that you are older and wiser than others here? Handing out advice as if you are some kind of guru. Boy, you really don't realise how arrogant you come across. You approach others here from a position of authority, that is based on nothing but your own assumptions. You have no idea how old the people here are. If you really want to "help" like you claim you do, then you wouldn't assume that others are less knowledgeable or less e…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 08:43 PM
2

Men did 25% of the work by paying half the bills and doing no housework etc. While women did 75% of the work by paying half the bills and doing all the housework, etc. but the men were “breaking their backs to pay for it all”, according to you. Your math isn’t mathing there bud. Really? You write down a bunch of made up percentages and then turn around and tell me that my math isn't mathing? Show me some evidence for your numbers, bud because this seriously smells like BS, which isn't any wonder…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:56 PM
0

paying half the bills If they were paying half the bills, then they weren't exactly doing it all, now are they? Then there's someone else paying the other half. Which was exactly the point I was making.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:33 PM
–

it's very rare for a kid to show disrespect to me,and when they do I'm well aware it's their mental illness showing. Anyone who disrespects me is mentally ill. Lol, ok, if you says so. I think people who think like you do here, are the ones who are mentally ill. What a weird way of thinking. You probably also think that anyone who disagrees with you is dumb. And anyone who doesn't like the same things you like, has bad taste. Just reading the first few comments in your profile demonstrates that …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:26 PM
-1

Yeah, sure women were "doing it all" while their men were out in the real world breaking their backs to pay for it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:03 PM
1

I think you have nailed his modus operandi perfectly. That guy rarely makes any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:00 PM
1

I was just saying they could still path themselves on the back, if they are the type of man who would not cheat once they get the opportunity. The fact that they never had much opportunities before, does not automatically mean that they will cheat once the get opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:33 PM
–

My life vastly improved when I decided I didn't deserve to be mocked. And then you came to PPD, where both genders are basically not doing anything else but mocking each other? Lol, ok, seems contradictory and like you are still cruising for a bruising.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:18 PM
1

Sure, you can. Not having any options doesn't mean those guys would automatically cheat if they suddenly did get options. Although I will admit that a lot of men would cheat ones the doors of opportunity are opened up to them. It's only human to do so. Look how modern day women, who's doors of opportunity never were more open than they are today, are behaving. Any woman who's been on the apps, basically has been engaging in casual sex with random men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:13 PM
1

I don't make the rules and no it isn't convenient. I hate it that we can't call out people on this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:56 PM
–

they are attracted to Are we sure they are attracted to them? There are guys who think that fat chicks are just an easy mark. Someone that is desperate and therefore would be easy to fuck. And men can fuck anything, attraction isn't even a requirement. I know several heavier women who are hit on all the time but away from public view by various types of men, some of whom would be married or otherwise attached. Yeah, this definitely points in the direction of what I said above. Seems to me those …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:55 PM
2

I would love to give you those names, but it is against the subreddit rules to "single out' people. At least that was the reason they gave me when they banned me for calling out another user for her behaviour on this sub, the last time I did that. Not trying to get banned again. It doesn't make any sense to me, why someone would go on a subreddit like this and constantly shit on a gender they aren't even into in the first place. Maybe lesbians see heterosexual men as competition or something? I …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:33 PM
3

I personally am attracted to anything from fit to chubby. I don't like obese. But this is purely sexual attraction that I'm talking about. For me to love a woman, I not only need to be attracted physically, but also need to like her as a person. So, no I don't fetishize them. If this is a fetish then women being attracted to taller men is also a fetish.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 08:12 AM
1

Nice try, butt (pun intended). But I'm comfortable in my skin and with my sexuality. If it makes you feel better to insinuate I am gay, knock yourself out. Water off a duck's back...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 07:54 AM
2

I like women from fit to chubby. I don't go into obese territory. But there are definitely men who are into obese. Men are weird like that. Our dicks have the most diverse tastes when it comes to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 07:36 AM
1

I must say I have neither experienced one or the other. Tell me, which one hurts more?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 07:22 AM
1

Yes, please, do join us. I'm sure we both have much to learn from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 07:02 AM
4

From an evolutionary point of view women have indeed more value than men. All throughout history more women have procreated than men. I believe the numbers are 80% of women have passed their genes on, while 40% of men managed to do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:47 AM
2

Evolution doesn't give you bonus points for being moral. So, high value is someone who has a lot of options. but still remain loyal
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:41 AM
-1

Just checking if your weird mental state was a temporary thing or something more permanent. It's the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:39 AM
3

Should have said heterosexual man. You've got a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:36 AM
3

Just thought it is relevant to know if you are dating a man or a woman. You are always handing out advice without mentioning that your experience might be different from the norm, which might be confusing to others. Sort of like lesbians who talk about men. Their experience is also different from the experience of a heterosexual woman, but they are handing out advice and opinions here without mentioning the reality of their situation. It makes a difference. But ok, you were talking about actual …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:38 AM
-5

True, as soon as a man looses his ability to provide, the clock starts ticking. It won't be long before he's single.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:32 AM
4

Is that male or female girlfriends you are talking about? Context is relevant, you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:28 AM
2

There's more to attraction that just looks you know. I'm very aware of that. Thank you very much.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:55 AM
2

What's the problem with some men being attracted to for instance curvy women? All men have their "thing". Some are into dimples, others like big breasts, for others it's blue eyes or curly hair. I don't really see the issue. These all still belong to the physical realm. It's what makes a man feel sexual attracted to a woman. Men still need a compatible personality for them to actually want to date a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:51 AM
2

joining the army it’s not more dangerous than the civil life nowdays. Perhaps you don't live in a country that is engaging in a war somewhere, but many men do. And for those men joining the army means getting shot at. And seeing people die. That's definitely not "a good experience". Nobody becomes a better human being from engaging in a war.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:43 AM
2

You are right that to men looks are very important, but you also need to factor in that men's "looks requirements" are very easy to fulfil. Yes, men want to be attracted to their woman. But for most guys a woman that is just average, but has a nice pair of tits, already qualifies as being good looking enough. While women are much harder to please. Men will not pass the looks barrier, simply by having one redeeming quality. An unremarkable man with nice legs, is still an unremarkable man to a wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:36 AM
8

You are asking a leading question. I was talking about value. You are talking about "value in a romantic relationship". Which is a different matter. I don't say that people can't have value in other ways. I just claim that your objective value lies in how much opportunity you can create to spread your genes. Because that's the most valuable/long lasting thing a human being can do. All other forms of value are social constructs. Today we respect and value Roger Federer for his ability to play ten…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 10:00 PM
3

My point is that no one is going to describe a mass murderer as a "high value" man. I don't know if he was honest, loyal and honored his commitments. And neither do you, since historians do not agree on what kind of man he was. Some think he was a bloodthirsty animal. Others say he was an enlightened man. So, what's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:49 PM
10

Finally someone who understands.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:41 PM
0

Possible, but when you look around you in the real world, men aren't fatter than their women. At least not over here in Europe. Maybe in the USA, but it definitely would surprise me. Since it would go against hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:32 PM
8

Are your kids dead? If not, they are the living testimony of your value. Nothing else you will do in your life is more valuable, when you look at it through the perception of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:29 PM
7

It's not your relationship status. It's how much opportunity you can generate to reproduce and spread your genes. The only lasting thing that humans can do is have children. Your genes could live on for hundreds or even thousands of years. All other things you do will be gone and forgotten as soon as you die.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:14 PM
-9

most of the time the man is chubby or fatter than the woman. The fact that women are hypergamous contradicts this notion. Men are usually not fatter than their women. Because women don't go for men who are "less" than they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:11 PM
10

That is low value no matter how you try to spin it. We are still just monkeys who are just very briefly alive, before we all just die and fade away. The most impactful thing that a human being can do, is reproduce. All other things will be gone in a generation of two at most. Your genes could live on for hundreds even thousands of years. Therefore men who can attract lots of women are high value. Because they have more chances to do the one truly lasting thing that humans can do. Namely have chi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:09 PM
8

Maybe you don't realize value is more than looks? Already acknowledged in my comment that you can have a different definition of high value. But when it comes down to it, getting selected by women is the only objective way of measuring a man's value. All other ways are just social constructs and highly subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:54 PM
7

High value men are men that are wanted by lots of women. At least from an evolutionary point of view. Which is basically the only point of view that matters, since all others are just social constructs. And these men are known to not be loyal and do gooders.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:51 PM
21

No, it isn't. Thick, chubby, BBW, etc. are all porn categories that are popular with men. There's no equivalent when it comes to what women enjoy. There's only one male body type that is popular. And it is 'fit'. The only variance is how fit exactly. While men appreciate fat, fit, small, tall, weird,.. you name it. When they said there's a partner for everyone, they meant there's a man for every woman. They weren't saying there is a woman for every man.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:37 PM
21

High value men are honest, loyal, and honor their commitments. That's just some kind of variation on a "just world" fallacy. High Value men are men that are wanted by lots of women. From an evolutionary point of view that's the only thing that determines if a man is high value. And we all know that those men, who are the most successful at this, definitely aren't the most honest, loyal and honorable. If you define "high value" as men who are the most honest, loyal and honorable, then I can point…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:26 PM
1

Making someone wait definitely isn't the truest form of burning sexual desire. That's for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:16 PM
–

No, that's not what I'm saying. Informing your partner is not a required step in a divorce, filing the paperwork is. Therefore I'm saying that those who file the paperwork are also those who initiate the divorce. Because it's the first required step if you want to divorce. You can tell someone you are going to divorce them, but as long as you don't file, that has no meaning. And you can file the paperwork without telling them, you will still be divorced after that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 06:46 PM
1

You are worried about 18 year old women, who might not be mature enough to realise the negative consequences of having an onlyfans? What about all the young men, who are not mature enough to realise the consequences of enlisting in the army? Enlisting is possible from the age of 17. Men are also known to mature later, so they definitely aren't ready the comprehend what signing their life away to the government can do to them. And I would say that getting killed, mutilated or fucked up in the hea…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 02:40 PM
1

It doesn’t come from some pro-female bias - much of the time, mothers are more involved in childcare. They are more involved not because men aren't capable of being involved, but because there's still an expectation on men to be the primary breadwinner of the family. Men are fucked twice. Not only are they the ones who are expected to go work their asses off to secure the bag for the family (no matter what women claim, being a stay at home parent is an easier job than having to do a daily commut…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 02:19 PM
2

Most men don’t fight for more than this because they don’t need or want it. You got that all wrong. They don't try because they know it would be pointless anyway. The courts still assume that children are better off with the mother. If a man wants more, he'll have to prove the mother is a drug addicted, mentally unstable, physical abusive psychopath. Otherwise he can forget about it. If men don’t get as much custody of their kids as they want, they can fight for more and when they do - they usua…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 12:07 PM
0

And what argument would that be?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 12:03 PM
2

It will be. I'll have 3 copies ready on your desk. Signed and ready to be filed.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 05:06 AM
2

I have noted your objection to the way I perceive the division of the assets.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 04:59 AM
–

You don't need permission to divorce. Who would you ask? Step 1: File the Divorce Petition The divorce process starts with a divorce petition. Whether or not both parties agree to the divorce, one spouse—the petitioner—must file a legal petition asking the court to terminate the marriage. The petition must include: A statement that at least one spouse meets the state's residency requirements for divorce: In general, states require at least one spouse to live in the state for three to 12 months a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 04:51 AM
–

It keeps amazing me, how this sub can turn any interaction between two people, into a toxic cluster fuck of aggression after a comment or two.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 01:49 AM
1

Ok, can't help you with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 01:36 AM
-7

Look them up. I implore you to do your own research. On a different computer I don't have all my studies on this one. Nah, that's not how this works. You can't slap me in the face with a bunch of statistics and then tell me to go and find the evidence to make them true. I will gladly believe your numbers, if you substantiate them. I'm not going to do that for you. I'm not debating myself. I'm debating you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 01:35 AM
-7

Women who are in a divorce get their income reduced by 45% in comparison to men who lose 21% on average. Alimony almost always is paid by a man to a woman. It's exceptional when a woman has to pay her ex-husband alimony. So, how can these numbers be true? Majority of women will be placed in abject poverty within 3 years of a divorce. What stops these women from going to work just like the rest of us? If 3 years after a divorce a woman ends up in poverty, how is this the fault of the divorce or t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 12:40 AM
-2

Housewives usually don't have the money to buy out the other party. And no matter how much women here deny it, in most cases the mother gets appointed custody of the children. Which places the man in a situation were he almost always will give up the house to the wife, because he doesn't want his kids living out in the streets. So, the man lost his wife (since women initiate 70-90% of the divorces), no longer has a house (wife can't pay him out and he doesn't want to put his children out in the …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 12:12 AM
1

Maybe you are asking the wrong person here. I explained what I think he meant. If my explanation is unsatisfactory to you, maybe you should ask the person who originally wrote the words.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 11:52 PM
4

Oh so now they are connected just not in the way I said they were, in a totally different, completely unspecified way. They were always connected. I never said they weren't. YOU are the one who assumed they weren't connected. And I explained exactly in which way they are connected in my comment above. So, what's up with the "unspecified way"? Do I need to specify that connection more than once before you get it or what? There's those red pill lies. "I can't actually address your argument so I'm …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 11:48 PM
-5

When dads fight for custody, they get it. You are contradicting yourself here. If men could easily get custody whenever they want it, then they don't need to fight for it. The fact that you connected 'fight' to men wanting custody, points to it not being something that's easily achieved.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 11:07 PM
2

I know a lot of men who basically had to start over from zero after a divorce. And the reason they had to start over was because their ex-wife kept the children, the house, the car and the dog. I don't know any woman who experienced anything even remotely comparable in a divorce. divorce is worse for women in every objective statistic other than suicide and substance abuse. Really? What are those objective statistics then and in which way are women worse of compared to men when it comes to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 11:03 PM
1

Love and romance are intertwined, but they are not the exact same thing. I would say that romance is an expression of love. Because people usually only do romantic things for those they love. That's why the poster above said he is sometimes jealous of gay men. Gay men are basically the only men who are the receivers of romance. Heterosexual men usually only experience romance when they give it. They don't receive it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:48 PM
7

I don't hate anyone for their sexual orientation. I have gay friends, bi friends and heterosexual friends. They are all just people to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:42 PM
4

Lol so you were just making two completely disconnected statements. Sure thing bud. Where did I say that my statements aren't connected? Again, you make a wrong assumption and then you laugh because the assumptions is illogical. My statements were definitely connected only not in the way you are assuming they are. The way you are routinely putting the (mostly) heterosexual men on this subreddit down and shitting on them, doesn't make any sense if you would be a heterosexual man yourself. Almost …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:38 PM
5

Where you said me being bi "explains a lot" as to why I'm supposedly a man hater. You should read my comment again. I said that you being bi explains a lot. That's were my sentence ended. You are still making connections I didn't make, and then blaming me for the connections not making sense. If the connections you made don't make sense, you should blame yourself. I never said you fuck men or take it up the bum because you hate men. That indeed would be completely illogical.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:57 PM
5

Don't really care about your opinion, but I'm sure the rest of the world is very grateful that you decided to share it with us.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:49 PM
10

I hate men so much I fool around with them is certainly a take Where did I say that you fool around with men because you hate them? That's a take you made, not me. It's intellectually dishonest to make a take, next blame it on me and then critisize that take for it not making sense. It's your take, you are criticising yourself here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:42 PM
3

Bullshit, some of the loudest female voices on this subreddit are hardcore lesbians. Then there's also a group of heterosexual women, who are here because they are bottom of the barrel and don't get any play in real life. Then there are the bisexual and the women who hate men so much that they have given up on dating them. The majority of the women on this subreddit are not normal heterosexual women who are interested in dating men. There's a reason why the female users of this subreddit have a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:36 PM
13

I kind of had the same Eureka moment when I found out that a large percentage of the women on this subreddit are actually lesbians.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:08 PM
1

Sure you do, but you are too much of a contrarian, who's hellbent on disagreeing with men, to admit to it. Filing the paperwork = the first step in a divorce = initiating the divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:06 PM
15

If you think about it, everything that we define as "romantic" is behaviour that men do for women. Men buy flowers. Men drop down on one knee and propose. Valentine's day is mostly men buying gifts for their women and taking them out for dinner. Men slay the dragon to win the heart of the princess... What are romantic behaviours that we associate with women? When it comes to romance men are the ones who give, women are the ones who receive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:54 PM
9

I never understood why a man would try his damned best to outdo a bunch of rabiate feminists in being a feminist and a man hater like you are doing on this subreddit all the time. You being bi explains a lot. (by the way no hate on your sexual orientation. You do you. But you not being straight is definitely a key element in trying to understand your behaviour).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:46 PM
0

we have no data on who "initiates" divorce, we have data on who does the paperwork Tomato - tometo. If you want a divorce, then doing the paperwork is the first step in getting it done. You are just arguing semantics here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:28 PM
3

Equal rights, equal lefts.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:12 PM
0

Still can't believe you are being serious. It's infinitely much harder to find a woman on here who isn't a hardcore man-hating militant feminist, than it is to find one who is. It isn't even close.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 07:30 AM
5

I'm sure he isn't giving them an allowance. Because I know the guy since he was 15. He is too conservative, traditional to "rent" a woman or "pay her for her services". He is a smart dude. I'm sure he can make the connection between no money -> no woman and a lot of money -> suddenly women. But he still needs some kind of connection. Straight up paying for access to their bodies is not something he would do. He probably sees it more like: they like the fact that I'm a successful guy. In stead of…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 07:24 AM
1

I must say, I've never seen a misandrist in this sub myself Don't know if you are joking or are being serious. But I will assume that it's the former.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:22 AM
3

If you're paying someone an allowance or buying them things, with the understanding that they will sleep with you in exchange ; then it's escorting. This never is the situation with my friend. Does he spoils these women and takes them out on fancy dates? I'm sure he does. Do they have an agreement that she will repay his generosity with her body? Definitely not. That doesn't count man That's why I asked were you draw the line. Technically you are still paying when you pay for the flowers or for …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:09 AM
3

Absolutes don't exist. Therefore when I say men always pay, you should read: men in general always pay. Just like when somebody says "men don't paint there nails", you aren't supposed to go: "Not true, I paint my nails and I'm a man". You should hear: men in general don't paint their nails. This is a debate sub. You can't debate without generalising. This doesn't change the fact that exceptions will always exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:59 AM
5

Let me ask you, dude, where do you draw the line? When is it "using escorts" and when is it genuine? Because no matter how you look at it, we all pay. You pay too. I'm doing ok but I would not call myself rich, so I don't have to worry about women coming for my wallet. But I still have to pay for the first date. I still have to pay for some romantic gestures now and then (flowers or something like that). Women will also pay things for me, but it's almost never equal. There's still an expectation…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:39 AM
4

You should read people's whole comment before you start to react. I already acknowledged the following in my previous comment: You could say that these women probably are golddiggers and that this doesn't count as "genuine" dating. But this makes no difference for my buddy. He is a lot happier now that he has access to women and a sex life. Those women benefit and he benefits. It's just a win - win.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:19 AM
2

there is still some type of underlying motivation for what they are doing that is meeting their needs in some way. It's possible that they are getting their needs met, but this doesn't make what they are doing logical behavior. It makes their behavior understandable, but it is still illogical behavior. For example, maybe someone is complaining that they have bad grades even though they aren’t studying. By complaining, it doesn’t seem like they are behaving in a way that is logical, but complaini…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:09 AM
11

One of my best mates is a really good guy. Nice to talk to, kind, funny, knowledgeable. He is very pleasant company. But he is also just ugly. There's no other way to describe him. Lookswize he really isn't lucky. He couldn't score a woman for the life of him. Was still a kissless virgin when he was nearing 30 years of age. But his career took off like a rocket. The guy is making so much money, he even bought his parents a house because he could. Nowadays he has zero trouble scoring women. And t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 03:58 AM
1

That wasn't a biased take Of course it's a biased take. This sub is overrun with misandrists, but he only notices and mentions that there are misogynists. It takes a lot of bias to only see one side of the equation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 03:44 AM
0

I’m not sure why you think that there are some moderators here who let other moderators get away with doing whatever they want. Why? Because this isn't my first rodeo on this subreddit. Last time I received a ban that I did protest, you and one other mod decided to maintain it. And that decision was made in like 2 minutes. I'm pretty sure that once you guys have handed out ban and "deliberated" over the protest, others mod aren't going to reverse the decision. It's done and dusted at that point.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 09:45 PM
1

You can't pretend like your system, where the mods who happen to be around and are willing to take a look are the only mods who vote, is a system of "checks & balances". If a user protesting a ban is unlucky with the moment his protest gets reviewed, then it's possible that the only mods who vote are mods who all have the same biases. Basically, they either agree with the decision and can’t be bothered to comment, or they don’t care enough to comment. Or they aren't even aware at all that there …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 07:42 PM
2

So, you can be as biased and unfair as you want, as long as another moderator agrees with you, its all a-ok? Because I have seen how those checks and balances work. It was just one moderator and another one who agreed with him/you. It isn't like you gather together with all the mods and have a vote about it. The last time I protested a ban, your whole system of checks and balances consisted of only 2 mods. What is stopping you from asking that second opinion from another moderator who has exactl…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 06:11 PM
1

But this is a sub full of misogynists who will criticize women about anything. I already knew you have clear and obvious biases against men, since you hand out bans left and right for things that aren't even breaking the rules. But it's still shocking to see a mod just showing his biases so openly in a subreddit he is supposed to moderate. I always assumed that you need a certain amount of neutrality to be able to be a good moderator. Neutrality you are clearly lacking, judging from this comment…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 05:53 PM
1

No problem. I have done the same. Reacted like I was attacked when a woman was being sincere. It's this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 05:32 PM
–

You have to understand there are several women here who do not want to debate at all. They are here to shit on men... There's even a certain female who's name rhymes with "Kilith", who almost daily makes a post that is nothing but a thinly veiled insult directed at men. She just slabs the "debate" label on her post, so she can use plausible deniability and get away with the shit stirring. The mods just let her do it, as if it isn't obvious what she is doing. Here's small selection of some of her…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 05:27 PM
2

You are way too uptight. It's Friday and I was just having a laugh. Didn't even try to attack or "gotcha" you. Enjoy the weekend!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 04:51 PM
1

My comment didn't stop at the first sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 04:13 PM
0

Then you are missing the point. And I already explained in the comment just above what the actual point was. So, you can use your eyes and go read it there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:57 PM
1

thats patriarchal masculinity, that gender is fungible. Not sure what your point is here. What is "patriarchal masculinity" supposed to mean? Which gender are you referring to and in what sense is it fungible? so what's the difference? Difference between what? You are being very vague and abstract. In your head this all makes sense, because you know what you are hinting at. But I cannot read your mind and missing the necessary context to get what you are trying to ask me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:48 PM
-3

I didn't bring transgender people into this. I brought other ridiculous claims into this, because they are compatible with your ridiculous claim. You are being the opposite of nuanced. Just like men and women are opposites to each other. And my take is definitely nuance, it seems to be attracting a lot of traffic, such as yourself Traffic is proof of nuance? Cool, explain how that logic is supposed to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:27 PM
–

Lol, guess she deserved that, she wasn't exactly subtle...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:07 PM
4

Equality!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:04 PM
2

Your best comment in this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:04 PM
-3

This is the only correct explanation. Women are just bored faster than men, when they are in a monogamous relationship. Maybe we men should just never commit and pass women around like they are a joint: hit it two times and pass it on to the homie. We wouldn't even be doing it for ourselves, we would protect all the lovely ladies from getting bored.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:56 PM
-5

Just the way you speak about women, and their vial behavior, makes me wonder whose behavior you are referring to. He's referring to women's behaviour of course, silly. It doesn't have to be any specific woman when the vast majority of women act exactly as he has described.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:51 PM
-7

a nuanced look Yeah, sure why not? If in these woke times men can be women. And women can also be men. Then surely a highly opinionated take could also be sold as a "nuanced look".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:32 PM
–

but facts need to be measurable. Feminism made it so that women could work and have jobs. Which is a good thing. But you can't deny that this shift, from being housewives to career women, did have an impact on the birth rate. Which would also not be hard to measure.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 08:53 PM
–

A didn't say feminism is the cause. I said feminism is a cause. Any objection to that would get dismissed, because it's factually correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 08:46 PM
–

True. But when it comes to feminism, you could only argue about how much it attributed to the lower birthrate. You can't argue that it has nothing to do with that decline.That would be disagreeing with a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 05:50 PM
–

What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 05:33 PM
–

You can't disagree with facts. If you disagree with facts then you are living in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 04:40 PM
–

"Stop selling them lies" isn't handholding at all. Handholding means guiding people to a solution. Telling people lies is leading people away from a solution. They are literally opposites.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:59 AM
–

That would mean no one would get the joke. I got the joke, so he definitely didn't jump the gun. She is just to autistic to get a joke is therefore a more plausible explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:53 AM
–

So what? You are still a disenginous clown.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:50 AM
4

You shouldn't argue with her. She is known to always disagree with men, even if it means she has to contradict herself. She literally has no own opinion. If you say A -> she will say B to disagree with you. If you say B -> she will say A. She isn't here to debate. She is only here to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:48 AM
–

You disingenuous sad waste of human skin, the fact that women are willing to share a man is in itself already a sign that the man is high value. Losers can't find a woman to be with, even though they are willing to commit to these women. And then we have men unwilling to commit who have multiple women wanting to be with them. Of course they are high value. They are being selected by multiple women at the same time. From an evolutionary point of view, that's as high value as you can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:45 AM
3

An average girl could easily sleep with 100s of cute guys, they don’t. I don't know what you are on about. I know several women with a triple digit body count. Are all women behaving like whores? No, of course not, that would be silly to assume. Just as silly as what you are doing, namely assuming that women just don't whore it up at all. Plenty of women sleep around like dick is an essential vitamin needed to survive...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:16 AM
2

What self improvement feature actually converts to a better success rate in dating? Going to the gym.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:07 AM
8

I'm a bit sick and tired of having to explain the obvious to a bunch of autists who don't realise they have autism. Anyways here it goes. EricSec just points out that women usually go for men better than they are themselves (hypergamy). Which leads to those women getting pumped and dumped. He suggested women who don't like to be used as cum buckets, to not only go for the chadiests of Chads, but to also try out other men. You, being the person you are, of course disagrees. Which leads to RipGeor…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:38 PM
1

I thought you were done engaging with me? Sometimes my annoyance wins from my better judgement. The comment I responded to said "there are no steps." There are. No, there are not. Redpill isn't some kind of course where you have to take class A, before you can start class B. Redpill is just advice by men for men. I would love to hear you teach me those famous "redpill steps" of yours. In order of course... "iT's A tOoLbOx" is a meaningless platitude. It isn't. If you are looking for advice to le…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:17 PM
0

Grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 05:36 PM
-2

You women are such disingenuous clowns. You give men, who clearly have not figured things out, because they wouldn't be asking for advice if they had things figured out, useless advice. And then you say that those men should have used their common sense with these situations? Why don't you give actionable advice to men who clearly don't have it figured out? Or why even give advice at all? Why not tell these men: "Yo dudes, use your own common sense"? and leave it at that. That would be more prod…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 05:33 PM
–

Killing and casual sex are comparable in the sense that in both cases you have crossed something that is a moral border for a lot of other people, who will judge you for crossing that moral border. And you can't undo crossing a border. Once you kill, you will always be seen as a killer. Once you start banging randoms, you will always be seen as a hoe. Your banker/photographer example is the incorrect example here. Neither being a banker or being a photographer is considered as morally wrong. So,…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 05:20 PM
2

There are grifters who use redpill as a cover to sell stuff. Redpill itself is available completely for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 05:06 PM
5

A woman lying? Never. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 05:00 PM
–

I could explain it to you and make this "word salad" magically transform into a normal sentence with meaning. Then again, it isn't exactly science and someone with two brain cells should be able to figure it out themselves. So, in this case I don't feel the effort to try and explain it is justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:51 PM
–

How predictable. Man says something a woman doesn't like. Woman accuses the man of being an incel. Not that it's any of your business, but I always did fine with women. The reason I found redpill isn't because I couldn't get women, but because I was utterly disappointed in what women have to offer once you get them. Unless a man wants to have children, most women truly have nothing to offer but a hole.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:34 PM
1

If you are asking for advice I am not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 03:12 PM
6

I want backstage passes if you ever make it big.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 03:08 PM
0

Men who call other men cucks are undatable to a large segment of women. I have no problems with dating, so this isn't useful information to me. There is some solid advice. You won't take it, You are wrongfully assuming that I'm looking for advice. I'm not. And if I was, this subreddit would be the last place I would look.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:21 PM
–

You know what this sub is also full of? Women. And women are known for their solipsistic nature. Try wrangling some empathy out of a solipsistic creature. It won't go well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:10 PM
0

I think you are responding to the wrong comment. I never claimed there are no blue pill success stories.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:50 PM
5

I'm not interested in you giving a TED talk on advice. I'm only here because you claimed to be surprised by men saying this: I never understand how some can say"but nobody told me you have to look good🥺" I explained to you why some men react this way. The reason is that they were given bad advice. If someone told you that all you have to do to get rich, is work. Then you would feel cheated too when after years of hard works you are still poor. Especially if you then find out that the correct adv…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:42 PM
6

Being nice comes on top of other things. Maybe blue pill cucks and disenginous women should not hand out the advice to "just be nice" then. Or to "be yourself". If they actually want to be helpful their advice should be: these are the "other things" that are important. You need these "other things" first. "Being nice" without these other things will not get you anywhere. You are blaming men for listening to bad advice. You should be blaming those who pretend to be helpful while handing out bad a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:24 PM
7

They don't need any hand holding. They just need blue pill cucks and disenginous women to stop selling them lies...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:08 PM
–

If there ever was a quote that adequately describes how women behave, then it's this one: we'll never get a genuine answer Women are disingenuous by nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:07 PM
–

Of course nobody chooses friends for their attractiveness but it's true that groups of guys are also looksmatched. You are contradicting yourself. If nobody chooses friends based on their attractiveness, then it would be a coincidence that a group of friends is looks matched. But if it is a coincidence, then groups of guys will rarely be looks matched like you claim they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:02 PM
–

No, he isn't and he isn't alone in what he is seeing. Women are mostly in friends groups that are of comparable level when it comes to looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:58 PM
8

Yeah, but nobody is telling those tourist to just stay home and be yourself and the nice foreign waterfalls will magically appear...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:54 PM
1

Ok, know it all. Just look into it yourself if you don't believe me. Brains have different structures depending on gender. And this different structure also means a different functioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:39 PM
0

If the red pill could stop advocating for the subjugation of women Redpill didn't even start with advocating for the subjugation of women. You clearly have no idea what redpill actually is. It's advice for men, by men. That's all it is. Subjugation of women isn't even a part of it at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:12 PM
1

That could not happen. The contrary of reality only happens in dreams.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:07 PM
0

I'm amused by your attempt to completely dismiss a source I provided directly from r/TheRedPill sidebar. Which is not the gotcha you so arrogantly think it is. Redpill will be the first to acknowledge that it is a toolbox. You are free to use the tools you need or find useful. And you are also free to dismiss tools you have no need for. Do you find negging helpful? Good, use it. You don't find it useful? ok, don't use it. Redpill is just advice by men for men. It's not all or nothing. It's "pick…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:06 PM
-1

Where exactly is this framework you are talking about? It's everywhere were aware men give advice to other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:58 AM
9

Why do you need the obvious explained to you? Are you being disingenuous or is this really too hard to figure out for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:37 AM
1

which every medical doctor and psychologist would agree with. They would not. Our similarities are only superficial. When you zoom in on the details, all you see are differences. For instance you would say: men and women both have brains. See! We are the same! While I would counter that with: yeah, we both have brains, but their structure is different and they also function differently. The only thing that is the same is the word we use to call the gray matter that is in somebody's head regardle…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:25 AM
0

Monolith -> more similarities than differences. Not a monolith -> more differences than similarities.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:16 AM
-1

There's nothing in the rules that says you can't bi here (pun intended). But you are like a rich person on a forum where poor people come to discuss money issues. You can't relate to us, we can't relate to you. You don't have to date women, you could also date men. The rest of us don't have that luxury. We are condemned to like the vagina people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:10 AM
-3

Moreover nature doesn’t give a fuck You sad reality denier. Nature definitely gives a fuck. That's why it becomes harder to get pregnant with age. And that's why the risks to both the mother and the child also go up with age. Sorry, the facts don't agree with your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:07 AM
-2

Yeah, what the previous guy said. Why are you even on PPD? As a bi guy, your experiences are completely not comparable to anything most people here are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:01 AM
–

He is being kind. We all know that appartements are more valuable...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 10:33 AM
–

Clearly she now does. If you kill someone then you are a killer. Even if you don't kill anymore, you did it in the past, so you will always be a killer. Same thing for hoes. You had casual sex? You are a hoe. You change your mind and decide to stop having casual sex? You are still a hoe. Your past can't be changed. Only now you have become a useless hoe. Because the fact that you did casual sex makes you not relationship material and the fact that you have decided to no longer have casual sex ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 10:31 AM
–

What matters is who she is now, the woman sitting across from you, not the woman she was 5 years ago. Wrong, your past shapes your present. Therefore your past is still very relevant no matter how much women like to pretend it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 10:10 AM
-4

Then they are completely wrong. Men and women are completely different. I'm not claiming one is better than the other. Men and women are complementary but definitely different.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 05:07 PM
0

Listen to people who have already achieved where you're trying to go. That exactly what I am doing. That's why I don't listen to women are blue pillers giving advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 05:06 PM
-1

They sure are.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 05:04 PM
4

Women are human beings and we all have more similarities than differences. Women are not a monolith. Make up your mind, will ya?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 03:58 PM
0

Or yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 03:53 PM
1

I doubt Noted.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 10:33 AM
5

I don't know why it happens really, I just know that it happens. It's like a bullet in the head for my feelings. Just shows that you are normal. Men had no way of protecting themselves from paternity fraud during most of human existence. And since reproduction is very important to any living being, men tried their best to avoid being turned into a cuckold. And the only way they could do that, is by avoiding women who displayed signs of promiscuity. This behavior has become instinctual for men. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 10:29 AM
–

butting into First Grindr and now this? I don't know if you have accepted it yet, but your subconscious is definitely trying to get a message across...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:15 PM
–

What's that again? Don't feed the trolls? Ok, got ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:04 PM
–

Why would a heterosexual guy even think to propose Grindr as a solution to other heterosexual guys, unless he was thinking about Grindr in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:38 PM
–

I'm not the one so obsessed with Grindr that I'm advising heterosexual men to make an account. That's all you. I don't blame you, having seen pictures of your girlfriend it's understandable that you are thinking about fucking men...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:19 PM
–

Hierarchy of love: men -> women -> children -> pets. Women don't even love men, why would they want to be beter for men? Men are more like useful objects to women than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 02:56 PM
–

Go sign up for Grindr and you can have a dude over to your house to blow you with no reciprocation within hours Stop projecting your desires onto others. Not everyone likes to take it up the ass...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 02:51 PM
4

lol dude, many men talk about their girl friend, especially if she’s great in bed, or the exact opposite. Men are in competition with other men. Therefore they only vaguely share things about their love life. The most I ever learned from a man was: "Yes, the sex was great". While women have informed me of the dick size, the stamina, the specific things a partner did to them, etc... There's no comparing the two. Men will share only some vague outlines, while women will give you the close and pers…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 04:18 PM
4

It isn't really relevant what exactly is being discussed when women overshare and don't respect their partner's privacy. What's relevant is that a majority of women engage in the behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 03:58 PM
1

Lol, lol and again fucking lol (I wish the trent of adding fake laughing to everything, would just die. It's so fucking childish), no he isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 02:08 PM
6

It's not just one woman. Every woman I have ever met "shares". The closer they are to someone, the more they share. Good for you if you are actually discreet (I highly doubt it though, your best friends knows some stuff, I'm sure of it.), but that would make you an exception. Not the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 12:42 PM
3

They sure do. Women are much more group oriented than men. They want to belong. And they belong by sharing. No, I got my impressions of female social groups by having female friends and partners and hearing them interact with their friends. Hell, if you are close enough to a woman, they'll sometimes even do the same sharing behavior with you. When I realized that I knew a lot about the sexual ins and outs of the guys my partner's friends were dating, I realized also that her friends probably kno…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 12:30 PM
6

We shouldn't pretend it's not common, after all the majority of women do it. Women bond by sharing. Those who don't share ostracize themselves from the group. So, there's actually peer pressure on women to share.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 12:05 PM
7

I have several female friends who admitted that women do talk, and yes they talk about everything. If you have a dick, your woman's friends will know about it. Women who don't talk are the exception. Women bond with other women by "sharing". So, women who don't share are ostracicing themselves from the group.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 12:00 PM
2

Do you hate your own body that much, that imagining yourself as some random naked woman you don't know anything about, turns you on?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 02:58 PM
2

Should have been obvious that someone with plusplus in her reddit name, is going to use food as a (bad) analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 02:48 PM
2

Wait what? They show you a picture of a naked woman and you are not attracted by the woman, but by imagining you were her you do get turned on? How does that work? You don't know her. It's just a picture of a naked woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 02:38 PM
2

You are overthinking it. Stop worrying about what might happen and just pay attention to what's actually happening in the moment. Be mindful of her, but don't overdo it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 09:46 AM
3

there's no desire, nothing happens in the brain. That part of the brain that is responsible for arousal becomes active when women are shown naked bodies. Regardless of the gender of those naked bodies. Sorry the facts don't agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 03:02 PM
1

You need to learn how to read the room. I would never grab a woman's throat unless she is giving hints that she needs to be dominated more. And even then you start easy, see what her reaction is and only proceed when her reaction is positive. It's good that you are mindful for consent, but I think you took it to far. By demanding permission for anything you want to do, you are killing the magic. This is not a business deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 02:58 PM
3

Physical responses in women aren't linked to attraction so much as seeing anything sexual. What does they aren't linked to attraction so much as seeing anything sexual even mean? This is a nonsensical sentence. Saying "it's not attraction, they are just seeing sexual things" might count as impressive conversation when you and the rest of your knitting gang come together, but you should keep it there. It won't work anytime making sense is required. When women see those pictures the center that re…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 12:51 PM
6

Straight women have the same or even a stronger response to being shown pictures of naked women as their response to pictures of naked men. Most women don't act on this, but most women are definitely not completely straight. As usual you are arrogantly wrong. Gender differences were also found for ratings of picture-induced arousal. While females rated male and female nudes as equally arousing, males attributed more arousal to opposite-sex nudes. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10768304…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 11:29 AM
4

I can hear pussy dry up just from reading this. If she was scared or feared for her wellbeing, she wouldn't be in your bed in the first place. There's treating women with respect and there's being overly cautious to the point it becomes cringe and a turn off.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 11:13 AM
4

In my experience women that like to be dominated get turned of by a man asking permission for the dominant things he wants to do. Being dominant and asking permission are opposing things. You'll have to learn to 'read the room" and figure it out without asking for permission.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 11:08 AM
13

Not one woman I hooked up with has ever asked me to wear a condom. And some have even made a big deal out of me insisting on wearing one. More reasons to always wear condoms. We have lifted all restrictions on female sexuality, letting them roam free. And now we can see the results. If female sexuality is left unchecked, women just behave like whores. Any woman who has been an a dating app has basically let complete strangers hit it. And probably hit it without asking him to wear any protection.…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 10:58 AM
7

Yeah, but coming out is still allowed. It might make things harder, but nobody is saying that women are no longer allowed to report SA. OP was talking about situation where men are no longer allowed to be somewhere or do something because some men did bad things. Your example is not comparable since women are still allowed to report SA.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 01:19 PM
5

Did you... did you just claim that men take more physically taxing, riskier and higher paying jobs to impress women? That's exactly what I am claiming. Men get a lot of their drive to achieve things from the fact that their sex drive is pushing them to get with women. If a man is no longer chasing women, he is still going to work, but he definitely will stop working himself to an early grave in a high stress environment with insane hours. Do men even exist for themselves, or do they work out, ea…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:29 PM
5

Men simply tend to make more money for all kinds of reasons It's smacking you right in the face and still you fail to see it. Those reasons are because women are attracted to men who have more money than they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:14 PM
2

Lol no, "beta bux" obviously isn't referring to the woman in that situation, but to the man. He is the beta bux. So, a woman who is only with a man for his money isn't what "beta bux" means. A man who thinks a woman is with him for him, while she is only with him for material reasons, is what "beta bux" means. If a man walks into that situation well aware that he is buying/renting a woman and not really looking for anything serious with her, then he isn't a "beta" handing over his "bux" in a mis…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:18 PM
2

This wouldn't really be beta buxing. This is more like a sugar baby situation. The man here isn't under the illusion that this is a real relationship with serious potential. He just wants some arm candy and she wants some cash.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:02 PM
3

but he has to be damn near Hollywood hot for that to happen Or he can take the easy route and just be rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:51 PM
3

His receding hairline helps him accept that his woman's tits are now touching her knees... Isn't nature great?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:49 PM
1

To be fair, if women would only take it up the ass, their STD rates would be much higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:28 PM
2

Men and women have the same drives and want the same thing - each other. If they want each other then they want different things, not the same thing. A man wants a woman. A woman wants a man. And men and women are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:26 PM
0

Did you really just use the words "intellectually honest argument" to defend u/apresonly???? She isn't even here for the debate. She responds with comments that don't even relate to what was said in the comment before. She is here for the attention and to shit on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:22 PM
–

Love is just oxytocin.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:03 PM
1

Most men work a lot harder than they should if they only need to pay for hobbies, food and a roof over their head. You don't need a highly stressful job working 60+ hours a week to pay for those things. Yet a lot of men bury themselves in a career that leaves them very little time to actually live. It's clear that they are competing with other men for women. And therefore are trying to earn a lot more than they would need for just their own lives. Men will always need to work, but it's these ext…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 11:47 AM
3

Seems like the majority of the women here aren't here to have a debate, but just like to shit on men. It's pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:15 AM
0

That depends on where you live. Where I live being a university professor is a job that's highly regarded and well payed. And top researchers can always go work in the chemical industry. Which is one of the higher paying industries that we have.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:13 AM
3

I will do whatever it takes to have air conditioning. If I have to ride on a garbage truck to do so because men let their weakness consume them.. I will. It’s not difficult. So you think that you are that bitch that can overcome her solipsistic nature and go drag around other women's garbage all day long? And you even think that it's not difficult? LOL, if you need air conditioning that much, you won't stand a chance working behind a garbage truck in the summer heat. I don't think you have thoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:03 AM
5

and women will simply throw up their hands and accept it. Stick your sarcasm where the sun doesn't shine, dumbass. Can you see yourself standing on a stinking garbage truck, lifting heavy bags of garbage all day long? Of course not, you assume one of the other women will do that job. Just like all the other women assume that they won't be the ones who have to work with stinking garbage all day long. If you are lucky enough to find a woman that can rise above her solipsism and be willing to drag …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:22 AM
6

Yeah, to be precise we should change that into women aren't intentionally funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 08:51 PM
4

Really? Cool, put your money where that big mouth of yours is and bring me some evidence to go along with your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 08:02 PM
14

You are in for a rude awakening if the amount of men checking out of society ever reach critical mass. You really are clueless just how sheltered and pampered women are in today's society where men do everything that women can't do or won't do.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 07:30 PM
–

I know what she is saying. She is deliberately "misunderstanding" the following sentence, because she likes to shit on men. Even when there's no reason for it: I see some women who have boyfriends post nudes to Reddit for compliments
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:45 PM
–

What about the following sentence is hard for you to understand? I see some women who have boyfriends post nudes to Reddit for compliments
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:43 PM
–

Ignore her. She is one of those insufferable people who is here not for an actual debate, but just to shit on men. Just look at some of her comments, realize engaging her is pointless and move on with life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:30 PM
–

Cool, then men can also have paternity tests without women giving us BS. It's not about the woman, it's about the situation and being vulnerable when not knowing if your kids are actually yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:25 PM
–

I see some women who have boyfriends post nudes to Reddit for compliments sounds like men doing revenge porn You are just awful. Women post nudes -> still it must be men that are doing revenge porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:17 PM
10

Yeah, but they won't be the people collecting the garbage, or the men laying roof on a hot summer day or the people running the nuclear plant or.... Basically anything infrastructure wise is build and kept functioning by men. Do you think men will continue to do the hard physical labor, to collect that fat paycheck that comes with it, when they no longer want to impress women? Hell, no. You'll have to cure cancer and collect the garbage, lay roof in the middle of summer..... You guys are just ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:10 PM
15

Men no longer contributing to society. You would be surprised if you knew how much of a man's drive comes from the fact that his sex drive is pushing him to get with women. If a man no longer wants to get with women, he isn't going to work himself to the bone to buy a fancy car and a nice place. He will rent a small apartment. Use some lawn chairs as furniture and just do the bare minimum to get buy. No more trying to be the best scientist ever, so he can become rich enough to get pussy, while h…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:01 PM
1

I'm sorry of it comes across as condescending. It definitely was not my intention to be condescending. I don't have any context for the dates you have been on, but you did gave me some context in saying that you only been on two dates in six years. If you think about how many dates it can take to actually find a compatible person, you should realize that at your current speed of 0.333333 dates per year there's a good chance things will not work out in a timely matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 09:54 AM
2

If you are actively trying to date and you only had two dates in six years, you have to either quit dating all together or completely change what you are doing. Because what you are currently doing isn't working.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 09:47 AM
1

Ok, so you are complaining about dating, but aren't actively dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 09:42 AM
2

Why the hell would you do a dinner date if you are going on a first date? You don't know them yet. If they are awful or a catfish, you are going to be stuck with them until the dinner is finished. Make it a coffee date (easier to cut short, added bonus you avoid "foodie calls" and they are cheaper). If you had a nice time chatting over a coffee, you can still turn that into a dinner date if you want. At least by then you know what they look like and that they are fun to talk to. But I would sugg…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 09:41 AM
0

This is just sad and doesn't sound healthy at all. If this is what dating is like for you, why do you even bother with it? I would quit doing this if I was you, it can't be healthy for your self esteem. Use a different approach to your dating. Change it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 09:31 AM
–

I always have been a fan of: if you got nothing to say, don't open your mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 11:36 AM
3

How many desperate or damaged women are there? I think the damaged ones are clearly a majority. And social media makes sure that this group only becomes bigger by the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 11:02 AM
–

Who says any of them wants to date these OnlyFans girls? I think most of them just would like to fuck the OnlyFans girls they are following. And giving money to whores still seems like an effective way to get your dick wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 10:25 AM
–

Was this: Oh boy lol really the best you could do? What does it attribute to a debate?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 10:21 AM
–

I don't know any mortal woman that's not a celebrity that has that many men interested in her sexually, nevermind romantically. Just take a look at any average woman's tinder profile. Hundreds of matches...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 10:17 AM
1

Oh, you just wanted an excuse to shit on men again. Too bad for you that struggling doesn't equal desperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 09:07 AM
0

As if men aren't send to war when a woman is leading a country.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 08:49 AM
2

lol, I see what you did there.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:48 PM
–

Also how do you know how much dick we had? We shout loudly into your vagina. If our own voice is echoing back at us, we know you had too much dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:24 PM
–

What did you expect? When women treat relationships and men as transactional, did you think men would still be into some kind of romantic BS? No, fuck that. I learned my lesson. Quid pro quo.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 09:01 AM
0

You don't really need a draft anymore. You have implemented a system where often poor people only can escape their poverty by signing up to the military.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 08:50 AM
5

Anything else?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 08:45 AM
2

It isn't even an insecurity, it's a survival tactic. Men had no way of knowing their kids where their kids. Avoiding promiscuous women was the only thing men could do to have a better chance at spreading their genes. It has become instinctively.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 02:22 PM
–

I can answer that one. She is capable, but not willing. Just like 99% of the other women on this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 01:58 PM
-3

We weren't talking about the value of a man's life in comparison to another man's life. That they are both equally disposable isn't the issue. The issue is that their lives are treated as disposable while women's are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 01:22 PM
-4

Our lives matter equally That's such blue pill BS. In a just world they would. But we don't live in a just world. The fact that it's almost exclusively men that are forced to lay down their lives on the battlefield, clearly shows that men's lives matter less than female lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:55 PM
1

Not an issue. Become the 20% or -since women aren't the brightest when it comes to sniffing out fake men- fake being the 20%.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:47 PM
–

Gently down the stream
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:42 PM
2

You are not supposed to make yourself 'worthy', you strange man. You are just leveling yourself up for the benefits that leveling up bring to yourself. The women are just a nice bonus along the way. You clearly have women on some kind of pedestal, that you think you need to make yourself "worthy". Women are nothing special. If they didn't have vaginas and weren't nice to fuck, we wouldn't even bother with them. Most of them are quite boring. It would benefit you to see women for the insignifican…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:41 PM
–

Like I said very naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:31 PM
3

Efficient in making yourself completely miserable. Keep the hope and start working on yourself. There's always room for improvements.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:12 PM
–

Notice the signs, simple. Wow, victim blaming at is finest. And very naive of you to assume all cheaters display clear sings of cheating behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:07 PM
–

you can’t expect a woman to just be fine with such an accusation And you can't expect people to sacrifice at least 18 years or their life and a very serious amount of money, on kids they aren't even sure are theirs. You women are all completely lacking in empathy when it comes to men. You would not be raising kids yourself, if you don't even know if they are your kids in the first place. But you still expect men to do exactly that. Why? If you weren't sure, you would test the kids before sacrifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:03 PM
–

You say this: in a way they haven't indicated whatsoever they're capable of doing And that is such a incredibly naive take on the situation. Cheaters don't announce that they are cheaters. Most people who get cheated on did not see any indication that their partners were capable of cheating on them. Receiving no indication that you are about to get into a car crash, doesn't stop us from still fastening our seatbelts anytime we drive. If you start close relationships with people you feel are lyin…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 11:36 AM
–

There is a legitimate reason to suspect beyond "well it could happen". It has confirmed to have happened, and the only thing that has not been confirmed is if you have been effected Strange you don't realize how completely equivalent this is to cheating and paternity fraud. We know that paternity fraud has happened, is happening now and will happen in the future. Therefore paternity is confirmed to have happened, and the only thing that has not been confirmed, is if a particular man has also bee…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 10:59 AM
–

If you have 0 reason to suspect that your wife/partner is cheating then a paternity test isnt needed. And what did we learn today? We learned that if you do not suspect your wife is cheating on you, then it is impossible for her to actually cheat on you. So, never suspect anything and you can't get cuckolded. Paternity test are no longer needed! Just never suspect anything and you are safe from raising your cheating whore's bastard child! Easy peasy /s
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 10:50 AM
6

Being hopeless saves you from the despair Really? I think most people would agree that when there's no more hope, despair is all that remains.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 10:30 AM
3

What do you expect? Fish should not be handing out fishing advice...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 10:26 AM
1

I don't get offended when that happens. It's crystal clear to me that women treat relationships as a transaction. Women don't even have to explicitly say it anymore. It's obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 09:55 AM
1

Looks are only temporary. So, if you think about it, the only thing women offer is sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 06:18 PM
0

He assumes that the child survives the birth as well He doesn't assume. He recognizes that the child might not survive when he added the (if the child was saved) to his comment. There is no reason a man going to war might not already have offspring. There's a real good reason that a man going to war might not already have offspring. And that reason is the fact that men as young as 18 years are already shipped off to war. And people that young usually aren't parents yet. By selectively ignoring t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:39 PM
9

I’d say being raped is worse than having your reputation tarnished. No one will shun you from society because you happened to be raped. You will be an outcast to society if your reputation is tarnished, even if the accusations against you are not truthful. If you are raped and you can prove it, the perpetrator will receive jail time. If you are falsy accused and you can prove it, the perpetrator will receive no jail time, probably not even a fine when it was a female perpetrator. And even worse,…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:57 PM
-3

It isn't a false dichotomy and even if it was you are still ignoring his other arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:43 PM
–

Whish it wasn't so, but I can relate the hell out of this. It made me realize women are indeed more like children than like adults. If you can't be accountable, you just aren't an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:33 PM
–

So in other words I’m right and you can’t debate further, No, he is saying you are so absurdly wrong, that it becomes pointless to talk to you any further because you seem to be delusional. Which you are demonstrating here quite nicely by taking him saying "you are wrong" and pretending like he is saying "you are right".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:30 PM
–

This female therapist came to the same conclusion as OP did And this all lines up with what I and a lot of other men have experienced in their relationships. Addressing female bad behavior always turns into a discussion about why the person criticizing has to be "such an asshole". It never gets around to addressing the fact that the criticism is warranted and what will be done about the bad behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:26 PM
–

You can always count on her to be a good representation of toxic femininity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:23 PM
–

And what he is describing is something that a lot of men, who definitely are NOT him, have also experienced. Women have, not being able to handle criticism and accountability, in common with other women. This female therapist came to the same conclusion as OP did
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:21 PM
–

And what he is describing is something that a lot of men, who definitely are NOT him, have also experienced. Women have, not being able to handle criticism and accountability, in common with other women. This female therapist came to the same conclusion as OP
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:18 PM
–

And what he is describing is something that a lot of men, who definitely are NOT him, have also experienced. Women have not being able to handle criticism and accountability in common with other women. This female therapist came to the same conclusion as OP did
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:17 PM
–

Helpful Oh boy, when you want to be hurtful at least don't be a coward and admit to it when you are being called out. Your comment wasn't helpful at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:11 PM
–

Punctuation please.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:05 PM
1

Are you implying that because women actually listen to each other, they are a hivemind? No, I'm not implying anything. You don't have to "go look for the hidden meaning" in what I wrote.I wrote exactly what I meant. Men have to compete with other men to get noticed. Therefore we are not a group, we are competition. Women will get attention without being "the best" among their peers, therefore they are much more a group than men are. Women can't listen to men until men start listening to each oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:01 PM
–

I understood you immediately when I started to read your post. I too have gone down the same path as you. Trying to address some blatant bad behavior from otherwise perfectly fine female partners of mine. I got the same results as you and came to the same conclusions. Women cannot handle criticism or accountability. They always feel attacked and completely ignore the fact that the criticism was warranted by their own behavior. The conversation always shifts from their blatantly bad behavior, to …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:47 AM
1

Relevance?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:03 AM
–

This female therapist came to the same conclusion as you OP And I know exactly what you are talking about. Women aren't used to being held responsible or to deal with criticism, so they respond negatively when they are faced with this. It is definitely a gendered issue. Men need to put themselves out there when they want to date, opening themselves up to all the criticism in the world in the process. They are used to it. And men are held accountable by other men. We know that if we cross a line …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:01 AM
1

Men are fine with most women that provide milk. While women only want those men that provide the best milk they can get. It al comes down to women having a lot of options in dating, while most men struggle to get options at all. Men are not hypergamous. Starving people will eat anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 06:45 AM
1

We just got that recently, and we got it from women advocating for themselves. You got it from women advocating for themselves and from men listening to and cooperating with women. Meaning for men to get the same, men need to advocate for themselves (without punching down at women). Men don't have these movements because men aren't moving. Men aren't a hive mind like women are. We men naturally are in competition with other men. Women will get attention from men without having to "win" the game …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 04:34 AM
–

No, I admit I misstated the number. It's 50%, not 100%. First of all, you can call it a mistake or misstated numbers or whatever, fact remains that your claim that "men are twice as likely to cheat", is an incorrect claim. Which was the reason why I reacted to your comment in the first place. Second of all, even your 50% number is incorrect. Young women cheat more than young men. Older men cheat more than older women. So, how can you now claim that men are 50% more likely to cheat? Your own rese…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 03:00 AM
–

That was a mistake on my part. Wait what? You admit that your claim was a mistake, but you are still arguing with me that you can prove your claim? How does that logic even work? "I haven't personally seen the evidence" is not the same as "unsubstantiated." True, if I have seen or not have seen the evidence you provide for your claim, will not change the fact that you provided evidence and therefore made a substantiated claim. The thing is: you did not provide any evidence for the claim you made…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 02:03 AM
–

It's not unsubstantiated at all. You claimed that men are twice as likely to cheat. And you provided no evidence for that claim. So, that is as unsubstantiated as you can get. r/agedlikemilk Lol, really? Nothing you said proved that men are twice as likely to cheat. In other words: you haven't proved your claim yet. So, me saying that you won't be able to, isn't aged at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 01:35 AM
–

I don't understand people like you. Did you fail to realise that your own claim is unsubstantiated? Or did you realise you yourself did not provide evidence, but are you so arrogant that you think evidence is something only others should provide? So, first put your money where your mouth is and provide evidence for the claim you made, then you can go ask for evidence from people who disagree with you. Tell you a secret, you won't be asking anybody to disprove your claim, once you have given up o…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 01:21 AM
–

God red pillers are so fragile. Melt snowflake.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 12:46 AM
–

Are you seriously asking for sources when people respond to your claim, when your claim was unsubstantiated and did not provide any sources itself? That's some "rules for thee but not for me" bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 11:06 PM
–

Men are twice as likely to cheat compared to women. No, they aren't. Modern research points to the differences being very small between the genders when it comes to cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 10:56 PM
3

That smiley face could indicate that what you said is a joke. Or it could mean that what you said is serious, but you are laughing with how stupid the people were that did the serious thing you just described. So, not "made obvious", you left plenty of ambiguity.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 06:05 PM
1

Are you sure both your parents were speaking mammals?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:06 PM
–

True. In the same realm: Women would rather date Brad Pitt the world famous dude, than Brad Pitt who is just a regular guy. While men would rather date an unknown version of Salma Hayek, than a world famous version of her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 11:45 AM
-2

Lol, Reddit isn’t social media. Goes to show how little you know about it. This is the definition of social media: the means of interactions among people in which they create, share, and/or exchange information and ideas in virtual communities and networks. PPD is part of reddit. And PPD is obviously a "virtual community" that's used to "create, share, and/or exchange information and ideas". Since Reddit conforms to the definition of social media, it IS social media. Even Google agrees. Go searc…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 10:41 AM
4

For all intents and purposes, when the baby is conceived, you both are responsible for the child. If what you claim here is true, then you are making men responsible for a choice that was made by a woman, and only a woman. In the past there also was the believe that women couldn't be responsible for their own choices. And men were therefore made responsible for the decisions of their women. But that was back in the good ol' days, when women were treated as property. We have come a long way since…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 10:15 AM
4

do not have autonomy over their bodies and this is something men will never have to deal with. Try to fight your solipsism. This is getting ridiculous. There are plenty men in jail (=no autonomy over their bodies) because they couldn't carry the financial burden of a child THEY NEVER CHOSE TO HAVE IN THE FIRST PLACE. Women decide unilaterally that men will become fathers or not. Next, these men are forced for at least 18 years, to use their bodies to make money to pay for those kids. And if they…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 09:50 AM
0

The baby is not responsible for being born, the parents are. This is incorrect. The parents are both responsible for the conception. But only the mother is responsible for a child being born. Since the mother (and only the mother) can opt for an abortion or decide to not abort.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 09:39 AM
0

You claimed it was idiotic for men to approach women based of the appearance of the women, and for these men to expect the women to overlook the man's appearance. I point out that it isn't idiotic, because there is no equivalence. What goes for men doesn't automatically go for women. And vice versa. Men and women are different. Expecting exactly the same rules to apply for both genders would be the idiotic thing. Expecting different rules to apply, isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 09:10 AM
-5

"Deborah and Janice" did some research and found that women are talking less than men. Wanna bet that Janice and Deborah are not only researchers, but also "proud feminists"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 08:33 AM
-3

You are a woman and reddit is social media. The lack of self-awareness is shocking.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 08:06 AM
6

PPD is entertainment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 08:21 PM
7

I agree. My life would be hell if I was forced to do anything more than casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 08:08 PM
1

Being willing to have sex with somebody means nothing. That men are indiscriminate in who they sleep with does mean something. It means men aren't hypergamous. You are obviously not here for the debate. You are just talking to yourself while ignoring everything that is being said to you by others. Fucking waste of my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 08:01 PM
1

It definitely is for me. Who cares about you. We already established that you have no opinion of your own. Your opinion is just whatever disagrees with men. Even if you have to contradict yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:53 PM
4

I wouldn't have too much faith. Women are hypergamous by nature. And hypergamy and loyalty aren't compatible with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:39 PM
7

Make up your mind. If men are vile beasts that are willing to fuck anything with a heartbeat, like you men-hating feminist here constantly claim, then men can't be hypergamous. Because being "willing to fuck anything with a heartbeat", isn't exactly "only wanting the best you can get". It's obvious that men are NOT the hypergamous ones. Women have a list of requirements for men, men only want women to not be hideous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:31 PM
7

I expect loyalty from a partner. And women are hypergamous. Hypergamy and loyalty do not go together. If it's in your nature to want the best you can get, then you aren't going to be loyal to a partner when you think something better comes along. And the grass always seems greener at first glance, even when it maybe isn't actually greener. 5 things? I think a relationship without loyalty already isn't worth the effort. I don't need four more reasons to reach that conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:13 PM
9

I came to the same conclusion. So, I began to experiment with my dating habits. I changed it all up and was dating women I would normally not date, to see if it made any difference. It did not. Unless you want children, there's nothing modern day women have to offer that's worth commiting to them. That's why I only date casually anymore. Don't want to get treated like a hole to fuck? Be more than just a hole to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:00 PM
14

Boy, are you reaching here. The text in your pic describes hypergamy. Dating the best you can get. Where partners get dumped as soon as a better option comes along. And hypergamous is what women are, not men. Dating “what they can get” does far more damage and destroys far more lives than simply dating nobody. Oh, men should just "date nobody", do they? As if men aren't humans with a drive to procreate and to have partners to share their lives with.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 05:50 PM
13

My problem with women isn't that I can't get them, my problem is that women have almost nothing to offer once you get them. My standards will never be so low that I would accept a partner who has nothing to offer but a hole. And "offer nothing but a hole" is the current reality of modern day women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 05:38 PM
16

Men already did. Men are already dating "what they can get". Opposed to women, who are dating "the best they can get".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 05:12 PM
0

I don't know what you are on about. Some dumb woman in this thread was claiming "misogyny" because men and women play by different rules. I just pointed out that men and women are not the same (we don't even have brains that are the same), so therefore different rules are nothing to have a hissy fit about.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 04:28 PM
2

No it's not What's not? If you want to hire a prostitute, you will have to pay many times more if you want that prostitute to be a virgin. Virginity therefore is definitely more valuable. plenty of non virgin women who make way more than any virgin woman could make with selling sex once What a dumb way of comparing virginity to non-virginity. If you want a fair comparison then you compare things at the same quantity. Sex with a virgin prostitute once, is more expensive than sex with a non-virgin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 04:22 PM
3

If everything is equally valuable then it's not really valuable. What a weird leap to make? I never said everything is equally valuable. I said if you can sell something, then by definition it is valuable. You can sell your virginity for x price but you can also sell normal sex for the same price. Since the price for a virgin prostitute is a multiple of the price of a non-virgin prostitute, economic reality is disagreeing with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 03:51 PM
4

I don't think "you can sell" is a good argument to say that something is valuable Sigh, women and logic, it will never be a good match. Things people are willing to give money for, are by definition valuable. So yes, "I can sell it" is a very good argument to say that something is valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 03:17 PM
2

Is it a double standard? Absolutely. It isn't even a double standard. A double standard requires the same thing to be judged differently based on who is doing that thing. Male promiscuity cannot be the same thing as female promiscuity, since being promiscuous is something that's trivially easy for women. While being promiscuous is very hard for men and requires a man to elevate himself to be a top percenter amongst his gender. If male promiscuity was the same thing as female promiscuity, then me…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:52 PM
-1

Men and women aren't the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:39 PM
-1

Lol, I knew this level of outrage was going to happen. Outrage? I'm having a coffee and smoking a joint while I type this. Couldn't be more relaxed. into a defense for why I should have to be a low-N count/virgin into my thirties unless I'm married. Weirdo. Where did you see me tell you the above? Slut it up as much as you want. I don't give a f about you. I don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 08:19 PM
-1

this is all literally just your opinion Yeah right. It's my "opinion" that men and women have different brains. Females had greater volume in the prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, superior temporal cortex, lateral parietal cortex, and insula. Males, on average, had greater volume in the ventral temporal and occipital regions. Each of these regions is responsible for processing different types of information. It's my "opinion" that men and women have different bodies. Try pissing your name…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 07:23 PM
2

They like to pretend there are different rules for men and women to play by. Of course there are different rules. Men and women aren't the same. We have different brains, different bodies, different sexual strategies, different requirements, different goals,.... It would be ridiculous to expect them to adhere to the same rules with all those differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 05:17 PM
–

Affects feelings, doesn't make you do any actions. Of course it has an influence on your actions. You aren't going to date a man, if you think he smells unpleasant = Dating or not dating decided by your instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 03:17 PM
1

You didn't look up the sweaty t-shirt experiment yet, did you? Our subconscious stears our actions a lot more than you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 02:40 PM
1

If you feel seduced you can still decide to not cheat. If it was all as simple as you claim here, why do such a vast number of people cheat? Humans aren't as rational as you think we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 11:53 AM
2

You know women are in control of their own actions, right? And just like men, they are still a lot more controlled by their instincts than they know. You should look up the "sweaty t-shirt" experiment. Our nose already knows if we are compatible with a person, before we realize that we are attracted to that person. And I bet none of us is going to date someone who we think smells bad either. So, we may think we select our own partners completely by our own free will, while in reality our instinc…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 09:36 AM
5

Helping animals is a way better decision than not being alive anymore. Hope you keep going, man. All the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 06:11 AM
2

it's misogynistic. Don't you mean misandristic ???
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 06:07 AM
–

If you ask yourself if we should ban starving people from discussing food/nutrition, it becomes very obvious that EXPERIENCING starvation is experiencing a food issue so the implied logic of the question makes little sense. Lack of food can never be a food issue. Because there isn't any food at all. That is a resources issue. A food issue would require you to have food in the first place. If you had meat and it became rotten, then you can talk about a food issue. Without food, there are no food …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 04:00 AM
–

Lol, you really are using some mental gymnastics here. The analogy(aka the part that's supposed to be similar/equivalent) is between food ISSUES and dating ISSUES. That's it.. Since I already demonstrated that there is no equivalence between the FOOD issues and the DATING issues, you now are claiming that it's about ISSUES. I am using that analogy to better illustrate MY point which is different from what OP was saying...but It's not a false equivalence because it's not supposed to be equivalent…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 11:34 PM
–

if you aren't a mindreader and ask the wrong guy, hes going to tell everyone you're clingy and crazy for wanting to talk about it. You really have weird ideas about men. Anyways, don't be an autist and learn how to read the room and none of this will be an issue. just like women Don't know anything about that. I have no idea what standards women have for the women they fuck or commit to. nice try but people talk lol, so its easy to find out this is common for women who are prettier, thinner, you…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 10:47 PM
2

Ok, didn't watch the usernames. My bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 09:55 PM
2

You just demonstrated my point that female promiscuity and male promiscuity aren't the same thing. This is how you described a promiscuous man. These physical attributes alone already put your promiscuous man in the top percentages: 6'2+, lean, handsome, full head of hair, white or white passing And this is how you described a promiscuous woman: extremely mentally unstable and awful partners outside the bedroom. Therefore, there's no hypocrisy, no double standard when it comes to the different t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 09:36 PM
2

You do realise that you did not attribute anything to the discussion, don't you? I provided my opinion and explained why. You respond with "nah". Not even an attempt at refuting my reasoning. As long as you don't show me that my reasoning is wrong. As long as you don't even attempt to debate, why would I spend time on you? I was gracious enough to explain. If you want to debate me, you will have to debate my reasoning. Saying "nah" won't cut it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 09:14 PM
1

So which is it? You need to be hot to get laid or you need to be successful? Hot can get you some action. Successful can get you some action too. Both are required for a man if he wants to come anywhere close to the level of promiscuity an average woman can achieve by just the fact of being alive. By the way, I love how you were disagreeing with female promiscuity =/= male promiscuity before. And how you are now completely ignoring that part of our discussion. Facts sure are hard to disagree wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 09:07 PM
-2

And yet you haven't provided a source sweetie! I didn't provide a source? What source do you still need when logic already demonstrated that I'm right? Two things cannot be the same thing, when one them is hard to achieve and one of them is easy to achieve. Because the definition of "being the same" requires that everything is equal. Which definitely isn't the case when talking about male and female promiscuity. In stead of being intellectual disingenuous and asking for sources when the logic is…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 08:57 PM
–

you're telling me you don't think men respond negatively to defining the relationship talks? No, that's not what I think. I already told you what I do think: men have no problem committing to the right woman. which is to say you understand that men have a problem with commitment with lots of women they are dating They don't have a "problem with committing with lots of the women they are dating". Men are by nature supposed to have low standards for women they only fuck and high standards for wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 08:42 PM
5

This sounds like your opinion and not facts Sure honey, men who are not successful in the eyes of society, are racking up triple body counts like there is no tomorrow. /s Disagree but you're entitled to your hypocrisy Disagree? Lol, this isn't a matter of personal opinion. It's easy to prove that male promiscuity =/= female promiscuity. If male and female promiscuity was the same thing, then it would be just as hard for a woman to be promiscuous, as it is hard for a man to be promiscuous. Since …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 08:24 PM
–

I got to admit that you thinking men would respond negatively when you asked for commitment, is a factor? Ok. Apparently it was a factor in your life, because this thought influenced your behaviour. I don't think men have a problem with commitment when the right woman comes along. You thinking men have a problem with commitment says more about the men you picked and what they thought of you, then that it is a reflection on men in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 08:02 PM
3

No hypocrisy. Men and women are different and have different sexual strategies. A man can only be very promiscuous if he is a high value man according to the expectations of society. A woman can be promiscuous if she isn't hideous. What do you know when someone tells you about a man you have never met, and they tell you that he has a triple digit body count? You know that guy will be tall, have a great body, probably rich, maybe even famous too. He will be socially very adapt, not shy and know w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 07:49 PM
–

Lucky for you and me not all men do that shit. And you can work out for yourself too, doesn't have to be for women. Do it for your health.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 02:37 PM
1

Lol and I did, read my response again No, you didn't. You need to read the question again, because nowhere in your answer did you addressed my question. If there is any part of your comment that demonstrates how women being against age gaps -but not wealth gaps- isn't hypocrisy, then just quote that part of your answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:49 AM
1

prob why men prefer younger women Men prefer younger women because they prefer youth and beauty over gravity and stretch marks. You having some weird ideas about men in your twenties has nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:29 AM
1

She's not putting blame on men specifically. Are you reading the same thing I am reading? I quoted her (only added the "she is still talking about men" bits). That’s how I feel, I was so busy in college and grad school I didn’t pay attention. And I grew up in a mostly male household so I was sympathetic to the first few older male clients who complained about the state of their marriage. I made sympathetic noises and listened and nodded politely and tried to redirect the topic to work and wonder…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:29 AM
2

Question is: Please demonstrate how women being against age gaps, but not wealth gaps, is not hypocrisy. Please answer the question or don't reply at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:23 AM
-1

You said this: People who vent to opposite-sex coworkers about their relationship problems are a combination of stupid, naive, and trashy. And I agree with you. But what Indigenous_Engineering did, wasn't talking about people being indiscreet to coworkers. She was specifically complaining about men being such pigs that they use complaining to try to get with other women. Which is something completely else.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 08:12 PM
-1

You are correct but the brutal reality is that most men will never get choosing signals. True, but only because most men aren't prepared to work on themselves. Men who go to the gym, find a good barber, fix their wardrobe and get more money, do get choosing signals.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 07:01 PM
2

People who vent to opposite-sex coworkers about their relationship problems are a combination of stupid, naive, and trashy. I agree with what YOU say here, however it isn't exactly what Disingenuous_Engineering was saying. She was just bashing on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 06:44 PM
3

And how is 70-90% of women filing at the courthouse not contradicting this: Women’s preferences don’t hinder their ability to love when they settle. Seems to me that 70-90% of women doing the filling isn't exactly pointing to women's impressive ability to love. It rather points to the logical conclusion that women aren't happy when they have to settle. And they will leave their relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 06:36 PM
2

They are always trying to find some gotcha hypocrisy on women that doesn’t exist, mostly it’s cooked up by their own imaginations. If women being against age gap relationships is based on the fact that they are against power imbalances in relationships, then they should also be against wealth imbalances in relationships. But they are not. So, it's obvious that women don't give a fuck about power imbalances in relationships and their motivation to be against age gaps (but not financial gaps) has …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 06:14 PM
1

Women’s preferences don’t hinder their ability to love when they settle. The fact that women initiate 70-90% of divorces, is contradicting you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 05:35 PM
3

Maybe its the wall compared to their younger versions? You're correct. The wall to a woman means going from a situation where she has seemingly unlimited options -one even better than the next- to a situation where she still has options, but they aren't limitless anymore and they are less quality than they used to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 05:25 PM
1

Men are not committing to pornstars and onlyfans models. Wanting to fuck =/= committing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 05:04 PM
3

Objectively the best: Chad. Subjectively the best: the poor bastard, who is willing to commit, since Chad was only willing to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 04:49 PM
3

The day one reached out and honked a boob was the day I realized they were all full of shit and not unhappy at all, but exploiting female sympathy so they could make a move. Since we already established that you will do whatever to disagree with men, even if it means being untruthful and insincere, I seriously doubt anything you are saying here isn't just another lie. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/wkDnFnt5bU
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 04:40 PM
–

Probably the mods deleting comments they don't like again. Can't really tell myself, from my side everything looks normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 03:40 PM
–

Thanks for coming to your senses.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 03:38 PM
2

True, but there ARE differences in structure. And there IS difference in functioning. You reacted to the other guy saying that men and women clearly think differently, by saying that he hasn't shown any evidence of that. This study both confirms that our brains work differently and are structured differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 05:12 AM
–

Did you stop reading at "common sense"? The arguments are directly beneath that line. Promiscuous people have a higher chance of cheating than non promiscuous people. Just like violent people have higher chance of killing someone than non violent people. Just like depressed people have a higher chance of killing themselves than non depressed people. I call my arguments common sense, because you don't need to be a genius to understand them. You pretend that I have no arguments, instead of debatin…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 05:05 AM
0

Causality means the link between the cause and the consequence. They can see that male and female brains have differences. And they also found areas where male and female brains perform differently in cognitive tasks. Like facial recognition for instance. It is therefore probable that the difference in structure is causing (causality) the difference in functioning. Probable, but not scientifically proven. And that's what they are struggling with, the causality between the difference in structure…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 04:50 AM
-1

They can't fully prove causality yet, but they do have evidence that we do not think the same. Which is what you were doubting. From the same study: Studies have also shown sex differences in certain cognitive tasks, like the ability to recognize faces. But what underlies these differences isn’t fully understood. Of 50 cognitive categories, five were associated with anatomical differences: visual object recognition, face processing, cognitive control, inhibition, and conflict. Facial processing …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 04:19 AM
-3

Clearly? You haven't provided any examples Men and women have brains that are not the same. With what we know about the brain today, we know that this also means that they don't function the same. Females had greater volume in the prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, superior temporal cortex, lateral parietal cortex, and insula. Males, on average, had greater volume in the ventral temporal and occipital regions. Each of these regions is responsible for processing different types of informati…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 04:06 AM
–

No, it is just common sense. People who are more promiscuous, cheat more often. Partners of cheating spouses get cucked more often.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 04:00 AM
–

This a vectorstock image. You are using graphic design to base your "diagnosis" on. This is as scientific as a Mickey Mouse drawing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 03:58 AM
–

How many people do you think actually have triple digit sex partners? I already know 3 women with triple digits and they are not professional sex workers or something like that. They got to triple digits from recreational sex only. So, definitely not that uncommon. Professional sex workers probably get to triple digits in a year or two. and to my point, if people talk that much wouldn’t you already know before you get serious with this person? People aren't walking around warning other people ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 08:41 PM
–

You are reaching. This is chubby at best. For obese you will have to add at least another 10-15 kg.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 08:29 PM
–

This is just bad reasoning. Men don’t slut shame today because women get pregnant and men don’t. Yes, they do. But you need to look a bit further. Women get pregnant -> women are sure that a child is their child. Men do not get pregnant -> men have uncertainty about their offspring. For the most part of human history, the only way to protect themselves from getting cucked, was for men to select partners that did not display signs of promiscuity. The more promiscuous a woman, the bigger the chanc…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 07:12 PM
–

How would anyone know about your partners sex life? If you have a triple digit body count, then there are at least 100 men who know you are easy to fuck. And people talk...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 07:07 PM
–

Relationships are hard work. Staying with the same partner for a prolonged period of time is a sign of discipline not lack thereof.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 07:04 PM
1

I said: a man on their arm that other women want. You can add things to what I said, but then you are debating with yourself and not with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 06:57 PM
–

Replying to you here, because the mods have closed the actual thread one hour after it was created. And I did not write out this whole reply just to read "the comments are locked" and not be able to post it. You are calling this obese. Which it clearly is not. I can understand you hating Pearl her guts, she's one of "your club", who is siding with the "enemy" and that makes you want to punish her and insult her. That's all good and dandy. But she is definitely not obese. While 41% of American wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 06:53 PM
–

If you are talking about that Pearly Things woman, why is her rating herself as a 6 so funny? She has an average face and an average body. Average is the middle of the pack, so a 5 would be appropriate. But she's American and around 40% of American women are obese. Which Pearl is not. So, that would raise her worth with a least a point. 6 seems to be a good assesment of her own beauty.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 05:35 PM
5

You can't. Women are naturally sooner bored with their partners. If you stay together long enough, there will be a time that you still want her while she is through with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 05:24 AM
1

Aha, that's why Melinda Gates is worth 10.5 billion USD today. While it is Bill's company.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:17 PM
1

Half of HIS stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:09 PM
3

I already explained that in the previous comment: because I don't personally know them. If no man on this planet is good enough, then it's obvious that you are overly demanding. That doesn't mean that I know the specifics. They could be rejecting men because they aren't tall enough, rich enough, too assertive, not assertive enough, no social proof enough, drive the wrong car, too much hair, not enough hair,..... Take your pick. It could be any reason. But if you literally think that no other per…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 08:43 PM
2

No idea, I don't personally know her. But if you think that no man is good enough for you, then it is clear that you are overly demanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 08:36 PM
1

An 38% chance to loose half of your stuff, is still a big risk. Especially when marriage can be avoided and isn't required to be in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:27 PM
1

You take a risk of losing your life each time you get inside a vehicle. A risk that is unavoidable. You need to get to your destination. Entering a vehicle therefore can't be avoided. This is completely different to being with a woman. You don't need to marry, to be with a woman. Therefore marriage is an avoidable risk and completely not comparable to entering vehicles. Since marriage is an avoidable risk, only a dumb man, who trusts a woman, would take the risk and marry her.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:23 PM
8

If she already thought at twenty that men aren't good enough for her, do you really think the men still interested in the 50 year old version of her will be able to satisfy her list of demands? She just regrets all the loneliness. That doesn't mean that she is self-aware enough to drop all the entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:08 PM
8

You are just a contrarian. You don't have a opinion, your opinion is whatever disagrees with men. It’s wild to see men admit they believe that sex is a thing women give to men rather than a mutually enjoyable activity. 99.9% of offered sex is either gross or guaranteed to be dehumanizing and disappointing If you can disagree with men, by calling sex a "mutually enjoyable activity", you will do so. If you can disagree with men, by calling sex "gross and dehumanizing", you will do so. Contradictin…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 06:47 PM
1

You would believe the same, if sex wasn't freely offered to you on a plate. Men have to "qualify" to get sex. We have to be tall enough, rich enough, have enough social proof, have to approach, don't say the wrong things, have the 6pack, the 6 inch dick, the 6 figure salary,.... So yeah, when a woman wants to sleep with a man, it does feel like "winning something" or "passing an exam". It's only logic that you can't fathom how that feels. A woman who isn't repulsive gets sex offered to her on a …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 04:38 PM
1

I know you all like playing the victim, but look around you, lady, there haven't been any boots on any necks, since women received equal rights. But of course, even when women expect men to carry the burden, it's still men's fault. I should have known... Accountability and children don't go well together.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 07:07 PM
-1

Cool, so women are indeed like little children. Expecting daddy to carry the responsibility for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 07:00 PM
1

It’s a temporary method of releasing the lifelong shame foisted upon women by others. Yeah, so? That doesn't change anything about this: absolves her of the responsibility for displaying sinful sexual urges. It's still an adult expecting another adult to take over responsibility. Which is closer to a child/parent relationship than a relationship between two equal adults. It never keeps amazing me how this subreddit is basically a bunch of feminists claiming that the redpill is wrong. But everyti…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 06:51 PM
-2

absolves her of the responsibility And then women get angry when the redpill says that women are like children... You are admitting here that women expect men to carry responsibility for women's (sinful) urges. Just like an adult would carry the responsibility over a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 06:30 PM
1

With the emphasis on "Seems".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 11:42 AM
2

Single dads are usually more annoying than single moms Aha, of course you would think that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 11:05 AM
0

They usually won't tell it straight to your face when they are turned off by you being open and emotional. So, it is possible that you don't connect the dots. It could be that she is turned off by your display of emotion and dumps you three weeks later because "it just isn't working" or some other excuse. She isn't going to say: "you cried and now my pussy is dryer than the Sahara, so I'm breaking up with you." So, maybe you have been lucky. Or maybe you should reexamine times in your life when …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 10:50 AM
2

You are still using a false equivalence. Starving people are still people who have experienced food in the past. They just have no food right now. While OP was talking about excluding people who have no experience. OP -> people who have no experience with dating or sex should be excluded. You -> should we also exclude starving people from discussing food? Starving people are still people who have experience with food. If they didn't have experience they would already be dead. Because a human can…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 10:34 AM
1

Yep.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 11:03 AM
3

Nah, if his paycheck is big enough, children aren't an obstacle for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:45 AM
–

In debate, always match your level of sincerity to that of the opposition.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:27 AM
–

I gladly isolate myself from people like you. That's a blessing, not a curse.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:25 AM
2

You hypocrite, you posted close to 70 comments on Reddit in the past two days. You should be the last person to call others "chronically online".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:18 AM
3

Circle jerking is against the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:12 AM
4

Thats not true, never has been true, and never will be true. I will take the personal experience of hundreds of redditors over the words of one. Go to the askmen subreddit. Do a search on "opening up" or "sharing emotions" or some similar search terms. You will see hundreds and hundreds of men share their negative experiences with opening up to women. OP isn't making up anything. It's what a lot of men have experienced. Myself included.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:10 AM
-7

You are completely right. It is a very stupid game to play, to try and date modern day women. If you win, she will divorce you, fuck your life over and take half your shit. If you lose, she ain't never leaving and you are stuck with her forever, begging for death to come and finally end your misery.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 09:59 AM
–

What you are is no longer entitled to do is think you are superior by being born with a dick We are no longer entitled to think? Lol, yeah right, people are still free to think what they want. And it isn't even relevant if you like what others think or not think. You are just an entitled person online, who deluded herself into thinking she can tell others what they can think. Well you can't. I will keep on thinking that men are superior for being born with a dick. Have you ever seen a woman try …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 09:18 AM
4

False equivalence. Starving people still have experience with food. They just have no food at the moment. OP is talking about people who have no experience with the subject they are willing to discuss. Like virgins discussing sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 04:14 PM
2

Hear hear!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 03:43 PM
2

Mods are the self-appointed janitors of the internet. A person with a fullfilling real life isn't going to volunteer to clean up shit online. A person with a fullfilling real life doesn't need an online power trip to feel better about themselves. Mods definitely are mods because they have unmet needs. Just a shame that they need to harass others, to get those needs fulfilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 03:38 PM
–

You aren't debating. You are having a conversation with yourself. You ignore or misunderstand everything that I say, or even invent new things that I didn't say. I assume you do these things deliberately. It would be hard to imagine it isn't deliberate, because it would be very unlikely that you can keep yourself alive without any external assistance, if it wasn't deliberate. What you need is a nice mirror. So you can watch yourself when you are wanking yourself off under the pretense of "having…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 07:07 PM
-6

Zero acknowledgement of the role women have played in all this. Not unexpected of course, but it never stops amazing me how women just can't deal with anything that even resembles accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 06:32 PM
2

<image> Me, it reminded me of this: Drag by the hair, otherwise you are getting sand inside.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 04:55 PM
2

We don't have suicide help lines. That would be weird. We have suicide prevention lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 04:46 PM
3

But I hard time believing that men wouldn’t be uncomfortable with the idea that people are sexually abusing something that looks exactly like them. Are you living on the same planet as the rest of us humans? Men would love to be sexually desired. Catcall men. Let men know that you are horny for them. Hell, most men would love to live in a world were men are sexually desired to such a degree, that male sex robots are selling like hot cakes. It would be an improvement to men not getting any attent…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 04:38 PM
1

I'm painting with "broad strokes", because we are discussing men and women in general. I'm very well aware that absolutes don't exist and everything has exceptions. So no, my perspective isn't black and white. I know gray exist. But you can't have a discussion about men in general and women in general, without there being any generalisations going on. Your broad negative claims about men supposedly having no standards basically, along with your belief that women are overly selective, highlight y…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 04:10 PM
1

And I’m telling you, this notion that a ladies cheating generally has a root cause in dissatisfaction, and that a man’s pretty much never does isn’t it. Agree to disagree. people cheat when they fail to empathize with the partner that they love. You are skipping a step. What is causing women to stop empathizing with their men in the first place? That's right, not being happy in their relationships is what makes them not care anymore. You don't stop empathizing for no reason. There is something c…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 03:48 PM
-2

Women are hypergamous and are looking for the best they can get. Which usually means they are looking for a partner that is stronger, taller and who makes more money than they do. This puts men in a position where they are going to end up with partners that are less tall, less strong and earn less money than they do. So no, there's no "equality" in dating. You know damn well that men are happy with almost anything that has a hole. While women have a long list of requirements. That's not a situat…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 02:44 PM
2

If you’re unwilling to adjust your expectations I'm doing fine, no need to adjust anything. I'm a man and therefore not hypergamous. My expectations aren't that I'm going to get the best I can get. That's something that women expect. My standard is there's nothing wrong with good enough. Also, it’s insanely hypocritical to demand others lower their standards to accept you I'm not asking anyone to lower their standards. I'm fine with women being hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 06:48 AM
3

Men and women can't be both hypergamous. There wouldn't be enough procreating happening. Women are hypergamous and have more options than men (Chad excluded). Therefore they hold the stronger cards when it comes to picking their partners. Of course men would date the super hot smoke show if they could. That doesn't mean that they are hypergamous. Men are perfectly happy with a hole, a cute face and some curves. Hell, most guys don't even need the cute face and the curves. If men are hypergamous …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:34 AM
3

Most men only know Betty. So they all get the same treatment. We aren't the hypergamous gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:05 AM
1

so i should never want to date a man bc if he wants to date me, he's dating down? You should do what you want. It's your life. But yeah, most men date women that they are happy and content with, but are not the best they can get. people should give their best to every partner Exactly. That's the point. When women get to 30 years of age and decide to give up on chasing Chad, they settle with a man who will not get what Chad got. And they ask more in return as well. Ask any man to choose between h…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 04:15 AM
0

If both men and women were hypergamous, then humans would already have gone extinct. Women want the best they can get and have a lot more options, therefore men have to settle for "good enough" if they want to pair off.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 03:54 AM
1

The Pareto principle states that for many outcomes, roughly 80% of consequences come from 20% of causes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 03:05 AM
3

low body count =/= low interest in sex. You can have a lot of sex in a long-term monogamous relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 02:57 AM
9

I don't know what nonsense you are trying to sell. Women are hypergamous and therefore date up. As a consequence men date down. Both genders can't be dating up at the same time. Therefore this right here is utter BS: they’ll reject the idea of lowering their standards and dating someone they feel superior to. Men ARE already dating down. The should not lower their standards any further.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 08:24 PM
8

True, but there are no consequences attached to that. Men don't date up, we date down. That's why we almost always settle. And that's why a man settling for a woman comes without the negative effects that a woman settling for a man brings. We don't give less of ourselves to a woman we settle for. We almost always settle. She'll get the same treatment as the woman who came before. While women give their best to Chad, in a vain attempt to make him settle for her. And when they reach 30 and realise…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 08:19 PM
-1

this narrative of trying to escape a bad relationship I didn't say they are trying to escape a bad relationship. I am saying that there usually is a connection between the relationship that these women are in and the cheating they decide to do. It could be a real good relationship, but too boring for her so she decided to cheat. Women cheat for the affirmation that it brings. If her relationship beings her enough affirmation, they usually don't feel the need to cheat. (not all men/not all women,…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 08:03 PM
3

As a man, you will learn quickly that the things you think are private and intimate, will get shared by your woman to her friends. Women don't do privacy when they come together with other women. Nothing is off limits. It is as if women bond together by sharing the private stuff between them. The more private the stuff they share is, the more they bond. I hate that women do this. It devaluates the bond between a man and a woman and reduces it to stupid gossip. Men will never share intimate detai…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 06:16 PM
3

The reasons for cheating are very gendered. Men and women do not cheat for the same reasons. Cheating for men usually has nothing to do with the relationship they are in. They are just horny dogs and find attractive women irresistible. They can love their wives and cheat. The cheating in itself isn't connected to their actual relationship or their actual partner. Cheating for women usually is connected to the relationship they are in. They have less of a sex drive and don't even find most men ph…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 05:19 PM
3

When lube doesn't solve the problem, throw some cash at it....
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 05:01 PM
-1

Women are exceeding men more and more in most measures as the years go by. Women tend to be less in-your-face about their successfulness. A woman bragging about women being better than men, while simultaneously bragging that women are more modest? Oh, the fucking irony. And of course, every claim is completely unsubstantiated....
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 03:50 PM
2

No, I would expect women to get support on a support group. Not bash on another gender in a hateful manner. I fail to see how hating on others is helping people who need support.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 09:08 PM
1

The two remarks you made add to the discussion, but they do nothing to show that women aren't more susceptible to marketing. Lots of advertising and trends targeted at what appeals to men is just as effective, hell, appeal to a man’s psychology and he will fall over just as eaisly. I didn't deny that men are susceptible to marketing. I said that women are more susceptible to it than men. When they need to target a couple, they will target the woman. Because it's more effective than targeting the…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:52 PM
1

You’re not seen as a “real man” if you show emotion in front it women, if you can’t provide for your woman, if you can’t sexually satisfy your woman. How is this putting social pressure on a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:47 PM
-1

Of course women are going to be less susceptible to cultural expectations of masculinity. Hello? the pressure of conformity to gender norms Who says that men conform more to gender norms than women do?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 07:33 PM
4

No they aren't. There's a reason that marketing/commercials focus more on women than on men. They are more susceptible to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 07:25 PM
7

"Support" sub, yeah right. It's a hate sub. There's a lot more man bashing going on in the that sub, than supporting of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 07:22 PM
7

True, but nothing you said disproves that women are more susceptible to social pressure than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 07:18 PM
1

roll verb (MOVE): to (cause something to) move somewhere by turning over and over or from side to side. Examples: The vase rolled off the edge of the table and smashed. The dog rolled over onto its back. I rolled the wheel along the side of the road back to the car.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 05:36 PM
1

then why do they get so mad when women also have shallow preferences? Because women don't came out and honestly say it. It's always: nice, good personality, a man that takes care of me,.... Don't understand how you go from: I'm happy with her, she satisfies my criteria and therefore is good enough. To: dating someone you don't like and not treating them well. this is also how women operate? Nope. Women want the best they can get. A man that satisfies her minimum requirements, probably isn't the …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:16 AM
2

Capable of rolling or being rolled.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:06 AM
3

So, a special hole then?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 07:01 AM
1

What I said never implied this is only a male tactic. You didn't say it is only a male tactic. But that is implied when you only mention men doing it. You could have used the more general "people" instead of "guys": All feminism is, is just allowing rights and the power of choice to our fellow ladies. That's a strangely positive view of feminism. Feminism nowadays is about female privilege at the expense of men. Like wanting more women in CEO positions, but not caring about the percentage of wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 06:23 PM
2

Sugar babies do the same thing prostitutes do. They exchange their body and time for money. Therefore sugar babies are prostitutes, just with a slightly more trendy label. Just like a garbage man is sometimes called a "sanitation manager". Buying people would not make me happy, but do whatever you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 05:55 PM
1

As if this is an exclusive male tactic. Exaggeration is usually the first weapon the die hard feminists here go to, when they want to derail the discussion and ridicule the point a man has made. Some women are promiscuous -> LOL, ROTFL, THIS INCEL THINKS ALL WOMEN ARE WHORES.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 05:22 PM
2

Everyone knows men care about youth and beauty. And men don't hide that fact. You are getting confused by men not being hypergamous, while women are. Men date on a "good enough" basis. Which doesn't mean they don't care about looks. It means that if the woman passes his minimum requirements, then the man is good to go. Women date on a "best I can get basis". Passing the woman's minimum requirements isn't enough, she want the best she can get. So even though she will date a man who passes her min…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 03:55 PM
3

Not being into rollable women =/= wanting the best you can get. So, definitely not hypergamy. There's a difference between refusing to date the lowest of the low and only wanting to date the best there is...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 03:42 PM
2

Sounds like your life could do with some extra spice, if making out by the water is in your top ten.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 03:38 PM
–

However either gender can be held accountable for their children once said children are born. If only one gender has the power to decide if a child is born or not, it's obviously not fair two hold both genders responsible for a child being born. This is unfair in two cases. Man wants the child and the woman doesn't. The woman gets to abort the child that the man would like to care for. Man doesn't want the child, the woman does. Now he is forced to financially take care of a child he never wante…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:18 PM
–

who fucked to make the kid Yeah, but a man, who's getting baby trapped wasn't fucking to "make the kid". He assumed the opposite, she says she is on the pill, therefore we are definitely not fucking to make a kid. And an accidental pregnancy is also not fucking to "make a kid". Once the accident happens the woman can choose to have a kid or abort a kid. The man can choose nothing. Currently the woman has the power to choose for the both of them. Which clearly is not an equal situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:10 PM
2

Agree with you. People have a hard time dealing with hypersexuality, especially when it is caused by sexual trauma. It does seem contradictory at first glance. You were raped so know you start fucking a lot of men? Is probably something that goes through a lot of people's minds when they hear of such a case.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:04 PM
1

Yeah, that one is less obvious. There probably has been research done on this. I seriously doubt we are the only two, who have noticed that women seem to deal with trauma by becoming hypersexsual.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:53 PM
3

There are so many other sports you could try. I have tried Judo, Karate, tennis, table tennis, football, running, ice skating, squash and gym. Gym, running and squash are my current ones. There is a sport for you. Something that you genuinely will enjoy. The haircut. You pay attention to the men in your live. If one of them has a haircut that makes you go:"Damn, that is a nice haircut", you go ask him who his hairdresser is. You make an appointment and you let the professional do his thing. Talk…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:43 PM
4

Seems obvious in the cases I mentioned, no? Rape = feeling powerless. That is probably a feeling that is constant since the rape happened. Everytime she has sex on her own conditions, she is the one in control. It's probably the only time that she is able to suppress the feeling of powerlessness. So, she keeps looking for that. Again and again. Same thing with the other one. Feeling of worthlessness. Male attention = not feeling worthless anymore. I'm not a trained mental professional. But I kno…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:35 PM
6

You don't have to go to the gym if you don't want to. Muscles help, but they aren't as important to women as we men think. However being athletic is definitely something you must do (just for your own health is already reason enough). Don't like the gym? Find something else. I like squash for instance (and gym too). Join a sport club you like. Benefits = you get fit while having fun and you meet new people (women as well) in a relaxed casual environment. I was always skinny. Going to the gym and…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:20 PM
8

Opposite experience here. I must be too nice to them or something. Every hook-up eventually ends with them giving me the talk (what are we/I want more). Even if we both established that casual is all that we want. I wish I was in your shoes. It usually ends when they realise I was serious about not being interested in non-casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:10 PM
5

Yep, can corroborate. I know some very promiscuous women. The ones I know are all doing it because of some kind of trauma. One woman was raped when she was 14. That trauma caused her to become hypersexsual (triple digit body count). I think she feels like taking control back or something, by initiating sex. Cheats on all her boyfriends too. Other one was neglected at home when young. Started to steal and go out party at an early age. Obvious cries for attention from a young neglected teenage gir…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:05 PM
2

I think I need to lose about 30lbs ish and maybe I’ll get a chance to experience hookup culture. It's in your own hands. If you still get matches (like you indicated) while being 30lbs overweight, then you definitely will do well with women, once you loose the extra weight and replace it with muscle. You got this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 05:52 PM
0

Yes, and still women won't admit to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 02:29 PM
–

We aren't debating women on their preferences. We are hoping that they stop with the silly virtue signaling and admit to what their preferences are. Women are at least as shallow as men. They just deny it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:22 AM
-2

Sir, they prefer younger women because they have less experience and a lesser ability to discern appropriate behaviors in a relationship. So they require less of everything. They don’t know any better. They prefer younger women because they are more beautiful and youthful. No stretch marks. No drooping tits. Less bagage. No previous kids, etc...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 07:33 PM
1

I'm 100% sure, you don't have any evidence. And now you are just going to make up an excuse, as to why you will not present the evidence that doesn't exist. Lol, you couldn't even bother to make up an excuse, but it seems I was right about the rest. Do you accept tears of laughter?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 07:18 PM
–

They went after me and my friends because they thought that we would be more willing to deal with their bullshit. So, you really do think that those men were rejected by the "old women", who were "less willing to deal with their bs". And that this is the reason they tried with the younger ones. You are delusional. Men who go for younger women, don't do this because they were rejected by the women their own age. If you can't cut it with the less desirable older women, than you definitely don't ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 05:29 PM
–

We are in agreement. And you are lucky your life has been unaffected by cheating. All the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 05:12 PM
–

for old men who couldn’t compete in the dating world. You think old men who manage to date young women are the ones who "can't compete in the dating world"? It's not like these men first went for older women, with their hanging tits and echo producing pussies, got denied and then had no choice but to reluctantly go date younger women. Men prefer youth and beauty in women. And those are two things that diminish the older a woman gets.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 04:25 PM
1

I know there are women who don't vet. I have had one night stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 04:02 PM
–

How is the link now?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 03:54 PM
–

And I'm not doubting your experience. It's however a lot more probable that you are missing the sings, than that you are actually only surrounded by people who don't cheat. People have always been cheating. They did in the past, they do now and they will in the future. It's not something to be proud of, but it is in human nature to cheat. It happens too much and we have been doing it for too long, for it to be not part of human nature. I'm 100% sure that if you have a normal social life and aren…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 03:40 PM
0

to make sure their offsprings are taken care of while banging another woman for actual mating. Show some evidence then, miss arrogant. Men usually try everything they can to NOT knock up the side piece. If you have evidence to the contrary, now is a good time to show it. I'm 100% sure, you don't have any evidence. And now you are just going to make up an excuse, as to why you will not present the evidence that doesn't exist. now that women have more freedom to do the same suddenly it's wrong. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 03:19 PM
2

Nobody but you made the claim that sleeping with people is "the biggest achievement". You don't seem to understand cause and effect. Men first have to achieve/become successful and only when they have become successful will women notice and show interest. So no, sleeping with people isn't the "achievement". The achievement came before. Lots of women wanting to sleep with a man is just confirmation that he has become successful. You are probably confused, because women don't have to achieve anyth…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 03:08 PM
1

If you want to write a whole paragraph of unrelated stuff, at least make it funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 02:45 PM
0

Men don't have a dual mating strategy. Women often find one man to provide financially for the offspring and another (genetically superior) man to provide the genetic material for the offspring. That's a dual strategy. She uses two (dual) men to make sure her genes will survive. Men only use one woman at a time to make sure their genes survive, while women use two men at a time. Therefore one is a DUAL strategy and the other is not. p.s.: humans, more particularly females, are the only mammals t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 06:21 AM
2

You do vet? Cool, so you shitting on relationships was just because you needed some sweet internet attention. Noted.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:19 PM
1

No it isn't. I'm not going to take credit for a link someone else posted, so I linked to his comment. He shared a link to a website that has "campaignagainstsexrobots" in its webaddress. And it's a website that a bunch of feminist have created to.... ....can you guess? Accept you were arrogantly wrong when you were laughing away the possibility that sex robots are upsetting women. These feminists were upset enough to start a campaign against something that has nothing to do with them. I think fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:15 PM
1

That's why you vet your partner before you commit. You should try it, next time a guy is willing to shoot himself in the foot and date a contrarian like yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:02 PM
1

Didn't even bother to actually read all that, you are trying too hard with that wall of text. I must have hit a nerve...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 05:29 PM
1

Yes, they are. Oh, I almost forgot: lol, rofl, .... https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/pfnuen9xcr
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 10:07 AM
3

I thought intellectual conversation would be too painful for you, so I tried to save you from it. Jeez, people are so ungrateful these days...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:33 AM
1

Never said such a thing. You need a woman's ability to put feels before reals, to be able to discount sexual acts as "not sex". Men lack this ability. Men cannot convince themselves that putting their dick in another woman, isn't cheating or sex.Their brain would go: "Your dick was in another woman. Therefore it was definitely sex/cheating." And claiming something else would make their brains explode. Women seem to have no problems with claiming things that seem contradictory, like a blowjob not…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:20 AM
1

A woman talking about accountability. That's like a virgin talking about sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:54 AM
1

HV woman require effort So do entitled women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:50 AM
3

Also, high value according to who? Men can only be manwhores if a lot of women want to sleep with them. Assuming that women aren't lining up to sleep with losers, it seems that it's these women who put the high value on the men, by the act of sleeping with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:48 AM
0

Men don't have a dual mating strategy. Their wife is for mating, anything on the side would just be physical pleasure. While women do have a dual mating strategy. The hubby is the loyal, trusty ATM and Chad Thundercock is the one with the good genes who is allowed to impregnate her. I don't see any men deceiving their partners into raising another woman's child. So no, men don't have a dual mating strategy. Men do cheat however, but the consequences are far less damaging. Maternity fraud isn't a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:42 AM
1

This part: cognitive dissonance relating to past sexual encounters is very factual. For instance "It doesn't count because it was only a blowjob" is something that only a woman would say. A man realizes that his dick was in someone else's mouth and will classify it as sex/cheating. While what qualifies as sex/cheating is completely subjective to women. At least when they do it. Talking with past girlfriends has learned me this.They have a body count of whatever number and then you find out later…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:32 AM
2

Because life is better with two than alone. And why would you want to be with someone who doesn't appreciate you or someone you don't appreciate?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:15 AM
4

Because the juice ain't worth the squeeze anymore. Next question.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:01 AM
6

He is talking about facts. Men don't discount sexual experiences like women do. Men don't go: it doesn't count because it happened in Vegas. Or my partner made me angry, so it's his fault, so it doesn't count that I got some strange. If a woman feels like it was wasn't cheating, then the train that was just run on her, was definitely not cheating. That sort of cognitive dissonance, where having another man's dick in your mouth does not qualify as cheating because your feelings disagree with the …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:50 AM
2

lying to themselves about whether something was or wasn’t cheating. It was just the tip, so it doesn't count....
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:37 AM
2

Fact is self-reported data is useless for scientific research about subjects like adultery.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:35 AM
11

What does betraying your partner and property have to do with each other?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:22 AM
11

I know 3 women who cheat on every boyfriend they have ever been with. Know a guy who was bragging about never having been faithful in any of his relationships. And I got myself through uni working in bars. As a bartender you get to know a lot of people and you see a lot of people getting drunk and do things they would not be doing if their husband/wife was present. Cheating is everywhere that humans are. I have seen too much to believe any relationship is secure.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:15 AM
8

What I don't love is hypocrites, users, and manipulators. None of these are exclusive to men. Would even go as far as to say that women do these things a lot more than men, since men's preferred tactic is physical violence while women use psychological violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 09:52 PM
1

Aha.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 09:38 PM
6

Judging from the way you speak about men, you have a very twisted idea about love.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:23 PM
5

Because sex is a need to men. You are basically asking why a partner would feel neglected, when their partner neglects their needs. You would also feel neglected if your needs would be ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:19 PM
9

You all think any type of man is disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:17 PM
4

We don't. It's women who show through their actions that they think it's weak. Not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 05:13 PM
1

Cheers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 04:19 AM
1

Oh, forgot what thread I'm in. Multitasking and wine.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 04:14 AM
1

What are you on about? I said a man that's desired by other women, that doesn't mean he is going to cheat. It just means that other women find him attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 04:10 AM
-1

Nope, but that's where men and women are different. If you take two men, who look exactly the same, but one is world famous and the other one is a regular guy, then women will go for the famous guy. If you offer men the same, two identical women, but one is world famous and the other is just a regular person, then men would prefer the regular person.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 03:54 AM
0

to treat them as well as possible to ensure they want to come back. Don't be an asshole to women, but also avoid treating them too well. There's definitely a point, where if you go beyond that point and keep treating women even better, it becomes counterproductive and a bad idea. Women showed me that treating them too well, will end in heartbreak. Don't be nicer to a woman, even if she is your partner, than you would be to one of your male friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 08:49 AM
0

Being with a man is not a badge of honor, Being with a desired man is. That's why I mentioned the "making other women jealous" part.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 08:28 AM
9

Only poking it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 08:14 AM
-2

But he is, at least while you parade him around to make the other women jealous. Which is something women seem to be very keen on.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 08:12 AM
3

i just can't see what a woman would get out of this. Something that's like catnip to women: a man on their arm that other women want.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 08:08 AM
1

You might as well be a bear of a Moldavian man with back hair and a walrus moustache. No way to know on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 07:08 AM
2

let's say we agree the bible is completely fictional. my point stands. No, it doesn't. That there are fictional stories about men crying, says zero about how it was perceived in real life. Or if it even happened. For all we know the writer could have been using expressions like "tears of joy" or "tears of sadness" to emphasize to the reader that the person in the story was really sad or happy. In that sense mentioning tears would be an easy way to convey emotions to the reader and not an accurat…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 06:32 AM
1

Is the Bible Historically Accurate? While some events in the Bible can be verified, historians do not consider the Bible as a historical reference text. Instead, they look for primary documents and archaeological evidence as better sources of historical events than the Bible.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 05:47 AM
16

Yep, it's like a rite of passage. Before the "never again" moment, you might still believe in some kind of soulmates/us against the world crap where you both got each others backs. Then that never again moment happens and you realize that whatever life throws at you, you'll have to face it alone. Can't even blame them for it. It's how nature has intended things to be. Women aren't supposed to be attracted to signs of weakness in men. It is what it is. Get yourself good male friends. They will of…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 05:32 AM
7

You did the poking, when does the fun part start?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 05:13 AM
–

Interesting... ....but how do you explain all the: "Honey, I tripped and fell and landed on his dick by accident", if you all have lids?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 05:50 PM
–

Is it a detachable lid?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 05:43 PM
–

It stays the same size as the babies head!! Gone are the days of riding a bicycle.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 05:34 PM
–

I'll have to take your word for it. Never tried a two holes person.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 05:29 PM
–

Honestly, if all women are evil, manipulative, bitches- why don’t you just date men? With women you get 3 holes, with men just 2. It's just simple math.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 05:06 PM
–

Yeah in reality.. those guys suck. You have no way of knowing. They might be the nicest guys you ever met or the biggest assholes, but you cannot tell by looking from a distance. But no guy is a once in a lifetime guy. That’s not how anything works. If a rich,gorgeous,world famous moviestar wants to date you, that is in fact a once in a lifetime guy. Or do you trip over those kind of guys left and right?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 08:21 PM
–

You never swooned over some Brad Pitt, George Clooney type of guy? The gorgeous, rich, all the other women want him type? Highly unlikely.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 08:11 PM
–

You never swooned over some Brad Pitt, George Clooney type of guy? The gorgeous, rich, all the other women want him type? Highly unlikely.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 07:31 PM
13

It has changed for the worse. The feminists who visit PPD are unintentionally reinforcing redpill ideas every time they open their mouths. Before visiting this sub, I was still willing to give commited relationships a chance. They never lived up to the hype in the past, but I still thought that if I dated a "better" woman, then a commited relationship would be worth it. Now, I realise "better" doesn't exist. I only date casual now. I am a human dildo, she is just a hole. Welcome to post-feminism…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 07:15 PM
–

The moment the guy of your dreams actually pays attention to you, you are going to swallow those words faster than you'd drop down on your knees to swallow him.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 06:56 PM
–

I lost count, but you are woman number five or six, who responds to me without answering the actual question. Which is kind of funny, because I already pointed out that women never seem to want to answer that question in my previous comment. But from the look of it, you just want to power trip by convincing women that they are worthless. If I wanted to convince women that they are worthless, asking them a question would be a stupid way to go about things. Anyone of the 5 or 6 women who reacted, …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 05:37 PM
–

you should probably keep things very casual. Don't worry, I have come to the same conclusion. Unless you want to have children commiting has become a fool's errand. And I don't want kids. So, casual it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 05:22 PM
–

How is this hard to understand? It isn't hard to understand. You think that I think in absolutes. Well, I don't. We are on a debate sub. It gets very tiring to have to add "not all men" or "not all women" every time you make a generalisation about a gender. So, most people on this sub know that we aren't talking in absolutes when we say "women this... " or "men that....". We aren't talking about every woman who has ever lived, is living now or will live in the future. We are talking about women …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 05:14 PM
–

Look bro, I'm not your bro. We have never met. Women who make 6 figures expect men to earn more than they do. Just like women who don't earn 6 figures, expect their potential male partners to also earn more than them. If there are two things most women look for in a man: it's height and good finances. And since women are hypergamous, "good finances" means better finances than the woman herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 03:49 PM
–

Aha, that's why women want a man who earns six figures or at least a lot more than they do themselves, because they expect their partners to have jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:58 PM
–

I can appreciate women for what they are, while I shit on them for what they fail to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:56 PM
–

No one is putting a knot down there, I don't know what that vasectomy remark was about. I don't want kids, that's what condoms are for. Not answering the question asked, but still feeling the need to be pedantic and mingle yourself into the conversation, would classify as contempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:54 PM
–

We all have our instincts and our natural drives. In that sense there definitely is a gun to our heads. Nobody is forcing you to eat, but you do anyway. And don't worry. I no longer do relationships. Only casual. I have seen too many times just how little loyalty means to women (both from getting cheated on, as from women trying to cheat on their men with me) to hold relationships in high regard. You can't expect loyalty from someone who's hypergamous. And a relationship without loyalty isn't fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:50 PM
–

I do like women. I just think everything has it's purpose in life. And a woman's purpose isn't to be a good loyal companion to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:42 PM
–

You are the fifth woman who responds to me without answering the question asked. Just like I said it always goes when that question is asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:40 PM
–

You are the fourth woman who responds with contempt and does not actually answer the question asked. Just like I said it would.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:38 PM
–

Apologies, I only want something from a relationship, which is in addition to what I can achieve on my own, It's ok. You seem to be sincere in your previous comment. I'm so used to women trying to derail the debate by moving the goalposts, that I thought you were doing the same thing. It seems that was not your intention. And if it wasn't, then you have nothing to apologize about. We are good. It seems that what you offer to men, is what you also appreciate in men. But men do not care as much ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:37 PM
–

Cups, napkins, sometimes chips ánd a sense of humour? You definitely have the most convincing arguments up untill now ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:26 PM
–

Women as a monolith don't bring a set agenda of things to the table for men as a monolith. Individuals have specific things that may or may not be attractive to specific other individuals. Strange then that money seems to be a specific thing, that all women expect from their men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:21 PM
0

Thanks for not answering the question and showing me right: Everytime this question is brought up, it is met with indignation and contempt, never with any real answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 06:14 PM
1

We’re specifically talking about people who refuse to share their income. No we aren't. You apparently are. But definitely not me. As a man, you almost always share your money in relationships. You can be disingenuous about this fact, but there are plenty of women who admit to not even giving a guy a second date, if he didn't pay everything on the first date. For the vast majority of couples the man will contribute more financially (which is exactly why women want their partners to earn more tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 05:53 PM
-11

Love, devotion, friendship, intimacy, attachment, emotional support, personal development, etc. Love? Women are hypergamous and fickle. A woman's love is therefore sooner lost than it is gained. And a lot of women aren't even dating men out of love. It's often money or settling. Not love. Devotion? Are you out of your fucking mind? Modern day women are not devoted to their men. At best they have devotion for their children. At worst only for themselves. But almost never for their men. Women thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 05:46 PM
-1

what do you bring to the table that I can't achieve myself. You women really can't have an open honest discussion, can you? A man asked you what you bring to the table. I did not ask you what you bring to the table that I can't achieve myself. Because the answer to that question would be: absolutely nothing. Which is precisely why you turned my "what do you bring to the table?" into your "what do you bring to the table that I can't achieve myself?" You are moving the goalposts by adding "that I …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 05:10 PM
-2

if it in no way benefits them. What are you on about? In a couple, the man's money is "their" money and the woman's money is her money. And this already starts before there even is a couple. Men are still expected to pay for the first dates (his money is used to pay for both of them. Her money stays her money). And this only continues when a relationship is established. There are reasons why most women still want a man that makes more than them and equally sharing their salaries ain't one of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 04:29 PM
-4

Would be nice to hear from you feeble women what you actually do bring to the table. Everytime this question is brought up, it is met with indignation and contempt, never with any real answers. If a man doesn't want children, is there any benefit at all in deciding to share his life with a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 04:21 PM
1

It isn't even the same action. Sleeping with men isn't the same action as sleeping with women. Sleeping with people is the same action as sleeping with people, but now you have generalized things so much, that you aren't able to assess if sleeping with men is the same thing as sleeping with women, because you generalized it to "people".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 04:44 PM
0

You are unintentionally funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 02:43 PM
0

You got it the wrong way around. Men meet awful women -> look for answers -> find redpill. You seem to think that the order is: find redpill -> start to think women are awful.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 07:21 PM
0

Don't blame his "attitude about women". He is just describing the current state of affairs. It's not his fault that modern day women are a complete shit show.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 01:55 PM
3

I’ve already won this argument ✌️ No one has ever won an argument by declaring themselves the winner. Are you 5?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 04:13 PM
-1

Smart enough to make you look silly in this discussion at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 04:10 PM
1

I don't think that sleeping around is immoral. It's not immoral when a woman does it and it's not immoral when a man does it. There's nothing immoral about two adults deciding to sleep with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 03:45 PM
1

Men are absolutely are hypergamous. No, they aren't. It would have had catastrophic consequences for human reproduction, if both men and women were hypergamous. Something you would have known, if you had used your brain before opening your mouth. If both men and women "only want the best" then a lot of people aren't going to partner up. This would work against people reproducing and makes no sense in the context of evolution. That's why we have one gender that only wants the best (women) and one…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 03:35 PM
-1

Older women are never going to be happier. Once the beauty fades away, their lives also stop being on easy mode.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 09:29 PM
5

Another woman claiming that sleeping with men is the same thing as sleeping with women? What's wrong with you people? There are biological differences between a man and a woman. That in itself already makes it ridiculous to claim that it's the same thing to sleep with a woman as to it is to sleep with a man. The prerequisites for a man to sleep with a woman are completely different to the prerequisites for a woman to sleep with a man. Again, this makes it ridiculously to say they are the same th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 09:04 PM
2

So then how are they being disloyal if they’re not monkeybranching? Monkeybranching is keeping a man around, while you try to get with another man. You only let go of one branch when you are sure the next branch will cary your weight. Hypergamous is always wanting the best you can get. They can partially overlap, but they aren't the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 07:47 PM
2

I didn't mention monkeybranching I said hypergamous. And yes almost all women are hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 07:30 PM
8

"Sheer lack of logic' is a woman's middle name. This particular women is an extreme example though. I can understand how you feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 07:29 PM
5

It’s not a different action, and it’s completely asinine to claim that it is. Sleeping with men can only be the same action as sleeping with women, if men and women are the same. Since there are clearly visible physiological differences between men and women, we have to conclude that men and women are different and not the same. Therefore sleeping with men cannot be the same thing as sleeping with women. You do not understand basic biology or basic logic or both.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 07:24 PM
–

There’s no noticeable difference I know that's not true. You topless at 20 will not look like you topless at 40. You might still look good, but claiming that you (and your breasts) haven't aged in 20 years is just weird. Everyone ages, if you didn't then we should study and disect you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 07:12 PM
6

Most men aren't married to more than one woman at a time, so don't really understand what you are getting at.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 07:08 PM
12

How is this not the exact same action? Are you seriously asking how sleeping with men isn't the same thing as sleeping with women? You do realise that society makes a distinction between the two, don't you? For instance men who like to sleep with men are called homosexuals. And men who like to sleep with women are called heterosexuals. Do you know why? Because it's a different action to sleep with a woman than it is to sleep with a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 06:31 PM
–

If you claim that your breast are JUST AS PERKY at 40 as they were at 20, then yes you are lying. 20 years of gravitational pull has its effects even on smaller breasts. If you claim your breast are still reasonably firm, that's a different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 06:21 PM
13

Can she come up with some quality arguments to show me that a man sleeping around is doing the same thing as a woman sleeping around? Idk, you seem pretty low value to me :) I guess, she cannot...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 06:15 PM
–

Not really. The force of gravity does not discriminate. Human skin will stretch when pulled with enough force or duration. Science says you are wrong. It's also a bit funny how this sub treats the age of 30 as if that's being old lol. 30s is still peak of your life. 30 is treated that way, because although 30 is indeed still young, it is the age at which women really start to show that they are aging. They start to show crow's feet around the eyes, their bellies become softer and more pronounced…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 06:04 PM
–

You are never going to beat gravity. Around the age of 30 all women's breasts start to hang. Some more than others, but no pair of breast are spared. If she is 30+ and her breast do not hang even the slightest, than they have been "enhanced".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 05:43 PM
24

Being successful at promiscuity is a hallmark of quality for men. Because men who are losers can't get women to sleep with them. But the same can't be said for women. They don't need any talent, skill or hard work to be promiscuous. What do you know when someone is talking about a woman you have never met and they tell you she is very promiscuous? You know that the woman isn't hideous. You don't even know if she is actually pretty. You just know that's she isn't repulsive. What do you know when …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 05:11 PM
–

I don't have to cope. I'm way past my prime and still have all my hair. So, it looks like I lucked out. Meanwhile the score between gravity and tits is 11735826224727282539 - 0 in favor of gravity.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 04:20 PM
7

My logic? You know very well that the fact that you are a woman, is all you need to be as promiscuous as you want (unless you have visible birth defects of course). Your goose/gander logic wouldn't even convince an actual bird. It's ridiculous to say that what is good for men is also good for women and vice versa. Women don't need prostate exams and men don't need mammograms, you biology denier. Being successful at promiscuity is a hallmark of quality for men. Because men who are losers can't ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 04:13 PM
6

Male promiscuity: you need to be a successful man in order to be able to be promiscuous. Which requires you to have money, looks, be good with other people, have preselection, be an initiative taker, have game, .... Female promiscuity: you need the absence of visible birth defects and not say no. Yeah, sure love, promiscuity is the same thing for the goose and the gander /s
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:39 PM
6

Big difference is women are hypergamous. Men aren't. This means that you can't expect any loyalty from a woman. If she thinks a better option is available, she will be driven by her hypergamous nature to go for it. At least with men loyalty isn't against their nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:33 PM
6

If it’s good for the goose it’s good for the gander. This is such a stupid thing to say. Men and women are completely different. What's good for one gender can be a terrible idea for the other. There's a reason why peeing standing up is good for the gander, but not for the goose.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:28 PM
–

A little hairloss is easily compensated. Women are golddiggers, so just throw some extra money at them. And problem solved. Women on the other hand can't compensate for saggy tits and becoming fat. Men don't care about your money, men care about beauty.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:20 PM
–

Here is the face of a truck driver. One side of his face got a lot more exposure to sun (windowside) than the other side. Makes him look twenty years older on one side of his face. Sun really ages skin. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trucker-accumulates-skin-damage-on-left-side-of-his-face-after-28-years-on-the-road/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:14 PM
–

Sure, it's called a boob job.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:08 PM
25

Women and relationships aren't worth the effort anymore that they require to bloom. So, I only do casual anymore. And that's not difficult to do, since modern day women are of such low quality, that they will sleep with men without even expecting any commitment. If the women themselves can't even respect themselves enough to make sure a man is serious about them, why would I?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 02:52 PM
–

So, now you are here taking it out on other men. Guess we can call it therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 02:32 AM
–

I'm starting to understand where all the male distrust comes from. Daddy wasn't a very nice guy...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 02:22 AM
2

You don't have to misinterpret what I said and then "explain" it to me. I already know what I mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 02:17 AM
0

It's a possibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 06:23 PM
-2

Depends on just how much age has affected that woman. If she is still pretty, I would warn him not to catch feelings and would indeed high five him. But then again, if a young woman is into older men and smart enough to date one who can spoil her, I would give her a high five too. It's not the age gap that is problematic to me. It's young women dating broke old men, that I have a problem with.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:48 PM
2

No, it isn't. It's a leading question meant to be insulting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:12 PM
–

Sigh, this again. If she's attracted to you, then your cold approach is wanted. If she isn't attracted, nothing you do will be wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:10 PM
6

We removed all restrictions on female sexuality and we believed feminists when they said they just wanted equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 04:07 PM
4

You need some Patrice in your life: Patrice talking about women in fish terms If I loose my ability to catch fish, then you are not going to find me sexy no more. So, you got the smell fish on me, so that you know that I can catch fish, so that you can.... ACT RIGHT. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KzCfIYArmQ As a man, your relationship with your woman will be some much better, if she knows that you can replace her easily. It's not something you tell your woman. It's something that you show her…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 03:41 PM
-4

I don't know why you think that changes anything. When I was 19, I was already smart enough not to get in situations like that with women much older than me. And most young women are smart enough to not date older guys unless these older guys have something to offer to them. And then we have you, dating an old hobo (your own words). Which means you are apparently not smart enough to not get involved with much older people and not smart enough that when you do date an old guy, to at least find a …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 03:04 PM
0

Sounds like you got outsmarted by an old hobo.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 02:00 PM
-3

I dated a 30 year old hobo when I was 19. Isn't something you should proudly share about yourself. I assumed that women are smart enough to not date old guys, unless these guys have something to offer, like their resources or their fame. And then you come along.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 01:07 PM
1

Any 40 year old who manages to date a 22 year old definitely isn't a loser. He needs to be a winner to be able to date with such an age gap. Such an age gap suggests that he is wealthy or famous or both. Or did you think a 22 year old is going to date a 40 year old hobo?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 12:29 PM
2

...and so will men. What you repeatedly fail to recognize is that the behavior that makes women think that a man is a loser, is just being a full human being with emotions. Once you see the loser in a woman/realize she's for the streets/she's LV/has a high body count (I know this isn't a deal breaker for some but for a lot it is)/has kids... you can never unsee it. You failed to recognize it here. In your comparison the woman get rejected because she is a hoe and has a high body count or already…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 12:11 PM
3

what's going on in your head that's so bad? lol. Ok, have a nice one.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 11:58 AM
2

Equality is a given. Nobody is better than anyone else. You are saying the words, but your actions are contradicting your words: I and many believe that the man should step up in certain ways for a woman even if there is no modern reason. This is not equality. This is one "lesser gender", that has to "step up" to reach the level of the other gender. You talk about equality, but expect inequality. Don't you feel like a hypocrite when you say that "equality is a given"? Where's the equality when o…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 05:43 PM
9

I don't care about your nuance. You can't be truly vulnerable and at the same time worry about "needing to be masculine or at least be strong". That's exactly why the advice is to not open up to women. Men are only allowed to open up within the confines, of what the woman he opens up to, considers to be acceptable and still masculine behaviour. And these confines are different for each woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 05:08 PM
3

I think that’s where we differ in ideology Ideology has nothing to do with it. We both think that equality is a good idea. The only difference is, you only want "equality" when it benefits women. Which ironically isn't equality at all. as I and many believe that the man should step up in certain ways for a woman even if there is no modern reason. Step up in certain ways for a woman. If a man is expected to step up, you are per definition talking about inequality. Because one gender needs to "ste…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 04:55 PM
10

You are missing the point. It isn't about how many times a man has texted. Or about texting at all. The point is this: once you see the loser in a man, you can never unsee it lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 04:35 PM
0

You couldn't be more wrong. I always make sure the women I go on dates with pay their share. I don't like entitled bitches. If I pay the food, then she is getting the drinks after. But it definitely isn't something that comes naturally to women. And plenty of women do not appreciate being treated as equals, that's for sure. I have had push back, had women walking out when they realised I wasn't going to be their ATM and had women tell me that they would not go for a second date specifically beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 04:32 PM
2

in India I'm talking about the Western world. We aren't "pawning off" women, so why make the comparison? If we are allowed to "pawn off" women, then you have deserved you free food & drinks on dates. We aren't, so what's your point? Eastern European women also expect men to provide naturally. There; women are able to work as well. Do Eastern European women also expect equality? If so, then they are hypocrites for expecting the absence of equality, when it's time to pay for the date. Western wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 04:20 PM
–

She isn't broken and sad. That's just how women are wired. It's just nature. Women aren't supposed to be getting with weak men. That would be bad for humanity as a whole. They are supposed to find the best genes they can. I don't blame women for wanting a strong mate. I do however point out their hypocrisy in denying that this is exactly what they do. Maybe it isn't even hypocrisy, maybe women just lack the awareness necessary to realise that's what they are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 04:04 PM
4

I don't disagree with you. But "no double texting" isn't the main lesson to be learned from her comment. This golden nugget is: once you see the loser in a man, you can never unsee it lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 03:58 PM
-1

Good for you. That makes you a complete outlier amongst your gender. Most women never pay. Some even don't actually date, but go on dates for the freebies.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 03:51 PM
7

why shouldn’t he cover hers as well? Two people go on a date to find out if they like each other. There's no reason why one of them should have to pay for the other. I am confused that you are confused by this. Are some people intrinsically more valuable or better than others? If you think they are, than you are thinking dangerously close to the way nazis were thinking. If you think they don't, then there is no reason why one should be paying for the privilege of being in the company of the othe…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 03:49 PM
2

all the time. Isn't the same as every time. If you even have been on one date where a man paid for you because you are a woman, then your previous comment was a lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 03:40 PM
7

Are you telling me that double texting is the only thing that will make a woman think a man is a loser? once you see the loser in a man, you can never unsee it lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 03:36 PM
10

Good for you. I am responding to this golden nugget of female wisdom: once you see the loser in a man, you can never unsee it lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 03:28 PM
3

What is your source on this? The millions of women on dating apps stating that height and money are key metrics to them for accepting a man for a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 03:19 PM
8

Better be very hush then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 03:14 PM
15

What women find "loser behaviour" is anything that turns them off. You just can't be a full human with fears and emotions and everything that comes with being human, around a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 03:12 PM
3

What you think and what you do aren't necessarily the same thing. If you are a heterosexual women and you have been on dates, then you definitely have exploited men. Unless you went 50/50 on every date. Which, let's be honest, you definitely didn't do. There's no reason anymore why men should be the ones paying for women. Women are allowed to work and have money.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 03:08 PM
2

Imagine being the outlier and being convinced you are the norm. Definitely issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 02:57 PM
3

This sub gets too wrapped up with height and money. You reap what you sow. Women out there in the real world, are rejecting all men who do not live up to their height and financial demands. So, of course this sub will complain about it. Women are the ones, who force height and money into the limelight in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 02:54 PM
-1

it's weird and a bit lonely.. I'm sure Leonardo is thinking to himself: "Damn, I am weird and lonely", while he is banging another new, young, hot supermodel.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 02:47 PM
0

Why would you even do that? It's like loving the company you work for. That company doesn't give a shit. They will replace you the moment someone who's economically better (prepared to work for less) comes along. Women are the same. They can't even help it, it's their hypergamous nature. Love is just increased levels of oxytocin, dopamine and serotonin. And she's not yours, it's just your turn.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 02:42 PM
4

This isn't even a smackdown anymore. This is a straight up execution. Beautiful!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 02:23 PM
14

If you compare the female numbers to the male numbers, the female numbers become statistically insignificant. And that number becomes even more insignificant, when you look at how many of these women are involved in actual combat. Why do you think men aren't allowed to leave the country, while women are?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 02:21 PM
51

once you see the loser in a man, you can never unsee it lol. There we have it, boys, straight from the horse's mouth. Remember this comment the next time some hypocritical feminist tries to convince you that opening up and being vulnerable is a good idea. Women can't deal with a man being human. You have to be a rock for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 02:10 PM
–

This IS groundhog day. We had the same conversation yesterday. She has a whole profile full of misandry. You either take a look at it or you don't. It isn't exactly like you need to search for the misandry, it's her reason for posting here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 02:03 PM
–

If you are the one in need of proof, why do you think it is "my" research?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 09:24 PM
–

If I had done a song and dance for you and presented to proof you are asking for, I would still be reading the exact same comment from you. I just skipped the song and dance part.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 09:23 PM
–

Aren't you the person who said he isn't going to do "my" research, while he is the one asking for proof? You know where it is, you just have to read some of her posts. It will not take you long to get some gold nuggets. This is starting to feel like Groundhog Day. Different day, same people, same conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 09:13 PM
–

You should have, because that's exactly what you are doing right now by not admitting that you would indeed reject everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 09:08 PM
3

And you’re not gonna present them. You are going to reject everything that is presented to you. Why pretend like me not bringing the evidence is the issue, when you are the reason nobody bothers anymore in the first place? Thanks for proving me right. Lol, if you think someone saying that you make disingenuous posts, is proving you right, then I'm definitely not going to argue with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 05:36 PM
5

There is plenty of proof. You just reject the validity of any proof that isn't corroborating your story. And then make disingenuous posts about "sexism claims without proof". If it walks and talks like a duck.... You already walk and talk like a duck, so just accept that people will call you a duck.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 04:58 PM
1

I think for me our interaction highlights just how toxic this subreddit is. I would not automatically assume sarcasm in most of the other subreddits I visit. But here, apparently I do. Anyway, thank you for the compliment.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 04:01 PM
2

It's hard to distinguish between an actual compliment and one that's meant to be sarcastic. I am a man, you are a woman, so I assumed you were being sarcastic. Because that's what happens in 99% of cases on this subreddit. If I misinterpreted your comment, my apologies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 03:04 PM
–

Depends. If they want to be more than just a hole that gets fucked, then they do in fact need a personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 02:26 PM
–

I don't even have to prove that Ronaldo gets away with saying stuff that will get a lesser man a sexual harassment conviction. The world is full of examples of the exact same thing happening, to the point that no one, except maybe some crazy person, is going to argue it's validity.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 02:21 PM
3

Funny that you are directing yourself at me and not at OP. I didn't write an inflammatory post meant to insult, while hiding behind "let's discuss".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 02:05 PM
–

Heard is physically attractive. But Grimes? She is very much below average. And calling these women talented? Lol, they literally had to date men who could have been their fathers, to keep themselves relevant and in the public eye. That's how "talented" these women are. Or do you think they chose men, who were 23 and 17 years older out of "love"?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 02:02 PM
–

Danny is 4 feet 10 inches tall (1,47m), without the money and the fame, he would definitely not be banging 5/10's (and 7/10's is even more delusional). You are saying that a man, who's considerably shorter than the average woman, will have no problems dating average (5/10) and even well above average (7/10) women. Which is just factually not true. Women aren't to keen on having to look down when they want to kiss their man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 01:42 PM
0

Good for you. At least you can admit to what you are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 07:56 PM
–

Please read. He isn't dismissing Danny "the celebrity". He admits that being a celebrity and the money that comes with it, are what allows mr. Devito to be successful with women. What he dismisses is Danny Devito being evidence that short men can be just as successful with women. Because Danny Devito would not be successful without the fame/money.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 07:47 PM
1

You are surprised that a man you are debating with, is put off by the fact that your comments are unrelated to the things that are being discussed? Ok, whatever you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 07:38 PM
0

I think it a tactic. She has done the same to me where her comments are not making sense in relation to what she is responding to. I'll quote from one of my last interactions with her: Did you even read the comment you are answering to? Seriously, your answer does not even make sense in relation to the question I asked you. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/lSpVrva4KX Maybe best to just ignore her.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 06:35 PM
83

It always comes down to the same thing. If she's attracted, then what you do will be seen in a positive light. If she isn't, everything you do will be seen as negative. Christiano Ronaldo has been known to have had succes with approaching women with the sentence: "Wanna fuck?" That's all you need to know on men being "creeps" in the eyes of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 06:26 PM
2

Crispy fries.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 06:16 PM
3

It may not be empowering but it’s smart. Yeah, sure, let start handing out Nobel prizes to OnlyFans hoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 05:40 PM
9

No, we don't like to be treated as walking ATM's. There's a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 05:37 PM
0

I once had a coach when I was young. He trained me and others in a sport, but looking back he probably was also redpill. One of the things he used to say is: A man can understand women or he can love them. But he'll have to choose.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 05:32 PM
10

Lol, ok. So, the tactics are: make an unsubstantiated claim. Make sure that claim is insulting to men (men are insecure and are just projecting). Enjoy the shit you stirred, while hiding behind the fact that you "asked to debate".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 05:30 PM
0

The point is that this is a banal observation about human beings in general which will be more or less applicable to individual men or women. No it isn't. If you take a group of male friends, they wil not all be into the same music, sports, movies, etc... While this is much more the case with a group of female friends. Hell, women are so adaptive to their social environment, that women who live together for long enough, even start to menstruate at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 05:08 PM
0

The only people who think that women think alike and are all Taylor swift fans (wtf?) Oh, another one who is lacking in reading comprehension. Great. Quote me where I said that all women are Taylor Swift fans. Go on, I'll wait... Or admit that I did not actually say that. Because I didn't. So, you lied to make it seem like I made a ridiculous claim or you don't know how to read. Which is it? You’re not thinking for yourself when you’re parroting the same bs claims all the other RP dudes do. I do…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/23 02:45 PM
0

The guys who fucked ugly girls were usually average looking guys or a little below average trying to break their dry spell. You contradict yourself. Average guys are still better looking than ugly girls. So these guys are fucking women below their own level. Most guys were after looksmatched girls or better. They can shoot for the moon, but will take what's available. While women shoot for the moon and are not accepting anything less. We aren't going to keep arguing about scientifically accepted…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 05:10 PM
1

Sigh, you still assume that experiencing emotions automatically means becoming more emotionally intelligent. Like I already pointed out, you need the ability to self-reflection and social awareness if you want to become more emotionally intelligent. People who lack these abilities can experience a million emotions and still be just as emotionally dumb as the day they were born. This the second time I have to point out to you that experiencing emotions does not equal to learning from them and bei…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 04:44 PM
9

The only people who think that redpill men think alike and are all fans of the people you mentioned, are people who don't actually know the redpill. Redpill is advice by men, for men. That's all it is. If you find advice that's useful to your life, apply it. If not, ignore it. There's no consensus among redpill men. There's no cult, no uniform, no obligation to take it all in. You can reject what you do not need or agree with. It's exactly the opposite, redpill encourages you to think for yourse…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 04:19 PM
1

no, it's people having a preference for women over the other available option Could you please start making sense? I feel like talking to chatGTP or something. The women are wonderful effect has nothing to do with other people having preferences, it's not the "people prefer women" effect. Here educate yourself: The women-are-wonderful effect is the phenomenon found in psychological and sociological research which suggests that people associate more positive attributes with women when compared to…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 04:09 PM
1

most women are not drama queens It's all subjective. Compared to other women, of course most women aren't going to be drama queens. The level of drama will still follow a bell curve if you look at only women. If you compare women to men, then yes, most women are drama queens.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 03:13 PM
9

That's not what I said, I said that women lack personality (good or bad). If a woman's friends think Taylor Swift is the shit, she will think Taylor Swift is the shit. Woman are such social creatures that they adapt to the consensus of the group they are currently in. And those opinions will change if she moves to a different group. Which shows a great proclivity for adaptation, but a lack of personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 03:09 PM
4

Their instincts are satisfied and what is there to complain about? It's not like you could be with a woman and not get exposed to increased levels of drama and crazyness anyway. The options are to be alone or take all that comes with being with a woman. Maybe if men saw their friends date drama free women, they would start to become dissatisfied with their own relationships. But you cannot see what doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 03:04 PM
7

That's an easy one. They do so with an utter lack of disregard for what is healthy, wise and a good idea, driven by their natural instincts to procreate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 02:43 PM
15

I have no problems with chubby girls. Just wish more women had a personality, it doesn't even have to be a good one, just any semblance of personality will do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 02:35 PM
-1

They weren't tricking her. She is tricking herself. It's not hard to realize you are nothing but a hole to someone, when the only calls you get from them, are booty calls. But I guess expecting women to be accountable, is once again too much to ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 02:03 PM
5

You realize that women are nothing special. They are just humans. And you live by the redpill wisdom that: "she is not yours, it's just your turn". Respect yourself, realize women are nothing out of the ordinary and know that there always will be another one, when the current one is gone. In fact these forums are very helpful. The fastest way to knock the whole gender of women off their pedestal, is to spent time on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 01:31 PM
1

the women is wonderful effect is just men *aspiring on purpose* to be more aggressive/selfish/dominant Never thought you were going to win the nobel prize, but this is a bit much, even for you. The women are wonderful effect has nothing to do with men, silly. It's the believe that women are intrinsically good, just, empathic, nice, .... (fill in a bunch of other positive qualities). Which women of course aren't, they are humans just like men and therefore also lie, cheat, rape, kill, .... women …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 01:10 PM
1

Being emotional and having emotional experience improves your emotional intelligence You are just saying whatever, aren't you? How do you even explain that experiencing emotions will make you emotionally intelligent? The guy who gets angry all the time, has plenty of emotional experience but everyone will still think he is complete wack job with his outbursts and lack of emotional intelligence. Experiencing emotions =/= becoming emotional intelligent. To become emotional intelligent you need sel…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 12:44 PM
0

If someone is genuinely punching too high.. no one will date them, and they'll figure it out, and lower their standards. Again virtue signaling. Suggesting that women don't go for men out of their league and it they do it will be self-corrected. Reality is women do go for men out of their league and this isn't self-correcting, because women keep thinking that the Chad, who is only using her as a cum receptible, will realize just how special she is, fall in love and commit to her. It's only when …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 12:18 PM
-1

Attractive guys only want girls on their level or higher in my experience. This is pure projection. It is well established that women are hypergamous and want the best they can get, while men go by the principle of "take what's available". This subreddit is a complete joke. Women here demonstrate on a daily basis that feelings, virtue signaling and their in-group bias, all take precedence over logic and the truth. Making debate impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 12:05 PM
-1

Idk why wanting a peaceful home and a non combative partner is seen as something exclusive to men. Because women need drama in their life to feel like they are alive. I also have no interest in a partner that stresses me out and gives me a headache, isn’t that just a given for everyone? You would think so, but in reality it's a different story. Men can attest to this: if you provide women with too much of a smooth dating experience, they will bail on you. It's boring to women if the relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 04:58 PM
1

Agree with you. If a man does it, it's a dumpable offence. While the woman who dumps him can't even manage enough self-awareness to realize she is doing the exact same thing herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 04:47 PM
1

Better, but still a long way from proving what you said. Research proves that women tend to show greater knowledge of emotional experiences, "greater knowledge of emotional experiences"? A depressed person will have greater knowledge of emotional experiences, than a normal person. A hysteric will have greater knowledge of emotional experiences than a more balanced person. Not because they are more emotionally intelligent, but because they are constantly dealing with their emotions. Therefore all…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 04:36 PM
1

Women are generally better at it and there was a research study done that found women were signficantly more emotionally intelligent than men. Men are generally better at it and there was a research study done that found men were signficantly more emotionally intelligent than women. Voila, now we both have made unsubstantiated claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 02:53 PM
1

Couldn't agree more. It's so obvious that most women here only know redpill from hearsay and have no first hand experience with it. I stopped correcting them when they once again start blurting out the points you have mentioned. It's pointless. They have made up their minds, thís is what redpill is, and when you bring up that redpill isn't actually anything like that, they just assume you are lying. They are like Don Quixote and his windmills.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 02:46 PM
1

and other women would not defend them Another example of the "women are wonderful" effect. As if women only act in righteous ways and the female in-group bias does not exist. Well it does: Four experiments confirmed that women's automatic in-group bias is remarkably stronger than men's https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 02:18 PM
2

A lot of prostitutes sell their time and the possibility of sex. A surprising big part of their customers pay for the time and don't use the option for sex. Those encounters are still prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 01:07 PM
0

Reality and facts take precedence here. Which is very funny coming from someone who has not used both in several of her last comments. You don't seem to realize that repeating "no, it's not", does nothing to prove your point or to show that what the other side is saying isn't true, because it's all you are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 12:54 PM
–

Oh, so a woman who needs all 3 holes filled at the same time to be able to cum, is not a degenerate/deviant? The only thing I can take from that is that you seem to think that triple penetrations are normal sexual behaviour. While the fact that most people never engage it that activity, points to it being something that clearly deviates from the normal. Which would make people who engage in such an activity deviants. No judgement from me, lady, if triple penetrations are what is common sexual be…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 04:11 PM
–

Men are overall more inclined to participate in sexual degeneracy, that’s just reality. This is factually untrue. Men have a higher sex drive that much is true. But women are a lot kinkier than men. Men just want to fuck, while it's women who long for CNC (rape play), gangbangs, double penetration, getting slapped, getting choked, getting spit on,...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 03:52 PM
0

If you want to catch men in some kind of gotcha, you have to be better than that, missy. You can be a sexual deviant without rape, sex crimes or praying on kids. And let's be honest, it's not like women don't also do these things. By the way, while we are on the subject, do you know the difference between a male teacher fucking one of his underaged students and a female teacher doing the same? When it's a male teacher doing it, it's called rape and he goes to jail and the students is a victim an…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 10:59 AM
1

That's no true. I'm giving one while writing this.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 07:44 AM
-1

Obviously to people who are sexually attracted to each other are going to interact with each other differently, you don’t have some magical sixth sense because you can figure that out 😂 You PPD women, always trying to get some kind of gotcha on the men here. I wouldn't call it sixth sense, because it already has a name, it's called autism, but it might as well be some kind of magic trick. I'm not just talking about two people in love, that's something everyone can see. I'm talking about people w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 07:15 AM
0

No virtue signalling necessary. This is not "women's nature bursting to the surface in a unhealthy way". This is just female nature. Pure and unadulterated. Women are naturally filthy degenerates. All sexual limitations are lifted and you all start behaving like whores. Take some accountability for once and do not blame this one on men. Without all the previous limitations on female nature, you women would have been behaving exactly like you are doing now, ages ago. Damn, I think I have spoken t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 06:56 AM
0

I'm autistic (but functioning). One blessing or one curse, depends on how you look at it, is that I pick up on behavioral cues and unspoken communication easily. People think they are so sneaky, while I'm always surprised when others are surprised when they learn that two people are boning each other. I sometimes even know people are going to sleep with each other, before they themselves have realised that they like each other. They already behave differently to each other than to other people.T…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 06:43 AM
3

Not realistic for most men, my friend. Even hearing you speak about how you share your women, makes my skin crawl and my heart rate go faster. I have a negative physical reaction to it. It's not even a conscious decision, because when I think about it logically I can agree there being benefits to everyone fucking everyone (still staying within heterosexual parameters). But in practice, I just couldn't do it. There's some kind of instinct in me that goes nuts at even the thought of sharing a woma…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 06:32 AM
-3

Men really have no idea it’s crazy… Oh, but we do, we just pretend that we don't, because it's already hard enough as it is to not completely lose all respect for modern day women. If women want to behave like sluts and sleep around with multiple men, then that's all good and dandy, but you should not expect that be treated as anything else but a hole to fuck. You behave like it, you get treated like it. It isn't even malicious from the men. Most men just do not feel any real connection to a wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 06:15 AM
-2

Couldn't agree more with you. Women have always been the promiscuous sluts they are today. Only in the past there were still limitations on female sexuality, so we didn't see the full extent of women's natural behaviour. Today those limitations are lifted and women are even encouraged to be complete whores. They are celebrated for it. Women have no problem admitting that OnlyFans is their "job". It's all stunning and brave, you go girl! Redpill is right on this. Men shouldn't get attached to one…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 06:05 AM
0

I have a theory about this. Women date more for the attention than for sex. Men date more for sex than for the attention. That's why men have less problems with emotional cheating as long as there's not been anything sexual going on. While women have less problems with sexual cheating as long as it was just sexual and their men aren't showing signs of actually emotionally caring for the other woman. So, it's obvious that men and women use relationships to satisfy different needs. Most women in r…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 05:48 AM
-2

Then he is a lot friendlier than most. I would have given you the crickets you were asking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 05:24 AM
0

No sarcasm. I was scrolling reddit sipping some wine, read your comment, found it so funny that you made me spit my wine out :-)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 05:07 AM
1

Of course crickets. What did you expect? You ask a question with a very aggressive tone and the question itself is more insult than question. Did you seriously expect a response? Now, that would be weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 05:02 AM
2

Lol. You have a way with words.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 04:50 AM
1

What are two things you bring to the table? Deez nuts.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 04:40 AM
–

I know it's not either/or. That exactly the point. That's why you can't mention one without mentioning the other, like you did. If you just say "personality is important" and don't mention that you need looks to be able to show off that personality, then you are the one who insinuates that all you need is personality. When you do a bungee jump, they put a towel around your ankles to protect them from rope burn. And then a elastic rope over the towel to keep you from falling to your death. What y…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 01:50 AM
1

Yep, that sounds pretty much like winning to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 12:53 AM
1

Yep, it's a good one, I can't take credit for it. It's from VasiliyZaitzev. He always has gold nuggets like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 12:46 AM
1

I understood that children's movie perfectly fine. It isn't exactly a documentary on quantum physics. And I liked that movie. It's telling that you are trying to shift the discussion into one about the movie, when I wasn't talking about the movie, but about the incorrect lesson you presented from that movie. After all, it's not the movie who claimed that it's winning when you loose yourself so much in a relationship that you are completely lost when it ends. Only you made that claim. And now you…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 12:25 AM
–

"personality is important" Personality is important, is still very misleading. Personality is only important when your looks have gotten you into the door. You can have the best personality in the world, if you look like a troll, you won't even get a chance to show off that wonderful personality. Therefore saying personality is important is bad advice. It's skipping an all important prior step.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 11:33 PM
–

Oh they do, but I guess strangers don't count. Just like it was only a blowjob, anything that happens in Vegas, anything that happens at girls night out and I was drunk and don't even remember if I liked it, don't count.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 11:20 PM
–

What exactly did he lose?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 11:12 PM
–

Probably just one of the first comments. And then it gets upvoted and stays on top before anything better gets posted.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 11:07 PM
2

"Assessment" is a very generous word for what you did. I don't think you would call it an assessment if for instance a man started to explain to you how it feels for a woman to give birth. Just another case of when a man does it, it's "mansplaining" despicable and evidence that the patriarchy is real. When a woman does it it becomes an "assessment", it's completely fine and still evidence that the patriarchy is real.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 10:52 PM
1

I'm not aware of what mainstream morality dictates. I you chose betrayal, you have become irredeemable. It's not hard. Make a mistake and I probably forgive you. Chose betrayal and you are dead to me. I could never trust you again and without trust what's the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 10:38 PM
1

Given enough time most everyone close to you in some way betray you or fuck up at some point. There's a big difference between betraying someone and fucking up. Fucking up can happen by accident, betrayal is a conscious decision. People who made a conscious decision to betray you, are not worth keeping in your life. People who made a mistake, can be forgiven (depending on the mistake). Cheating is always a conscious decision. Before the actual act of sex happens, a million other decision were ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 10:01 PM
1

Maybe his actions are consistent with loving someone else, but they are definitely not consistent with loving himself. You don't keep loving a person who betrays your trust, you show them to door out of self-respect and love for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 06:51 PM
1

Yeah that's completely crazy coming from a man who said this: He loved her so much he didn’t even know what the point of anything was after because his life was THIER life. That’s how you WIN. And who is now backpedalling, because someone pointed out that it's absolutely not winning to loose yourself so much in a relationship that "you don't even know what the point of anything is after anymore."
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 06:24 PM
-1

Maybe you should remind yourself of that lesson, before you start claiming that winning is not having a life outside of your relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 06:00 PM
2

And his price for winning is a cheating whore as a partner. Damn, those sweet, sweet spoils of victory.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 05:55 PM
-1

He loved her so much he didn’t even know what the point of anything was after because his life was THIER life. That’s how you WIN. Having no existence outside of the relationship you are in, is not winning at life. That's just sad and hopelessly romantic. You are not your relationship. You aren't even supposed to be just your relationship. You are supposed to have a full life, where your relationship is a part of a much bigger picture. If a relationship ends and this causes you to feel like you …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 05:52 PM
–

Once again female hypocrisy at work. 30+ women, telling a 25 year old how much of a predator he is for sleeping with a 19 year old. But when they sleep with the 25 year old themselves, suddenly the same age gap is no longer predatory. Let's face it, complaints about age gaps only come from older women. And predatory has absolutely nothing to with it. It's how these older women try to shame men into choosing hanging tits and a wrinkled pussy, when firm tits and fresh pussy are also available.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 05:38 PM
1

no one with healthy self-esteem is full of themselves Oh, you are one of those. When someone points out your BS, you just start playing the "let's move the goalposts" game. Cute. You said that Jared Leto doesn't like himself, I'll quote you to fresh up your memory, and I'll even include the fake laughing to be authentic: no way he likes himself lol When I demonstrate that he clearly likes himself very much, suddenly it's not about liking himself anymore but about "healthy self-esteem"? Ok, sure …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 04:23 PM
–

We do? Why did noone inform me of this? All the while I'm here waiting for that damn war to finally start, when I just could have been raping women all along. /s I added the /s, because with your sick, twisted ideas about men, you are probably going to assume men are actually praying for war so they can go rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 04:07 PM
–

Don't expect logic from women. It will only end in disappointment.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 03:58 PM
2

Anyone who says the wall doesn't exist, should go from the Dating sub, to the Datingoverthirty sub, to the Datingoverforty sub. The women who post in these subs go from entitled and carefree (dating) to desperate, bitter and even giving up on dating while they cry where have all the good men gone? (datingoverthirty and even more desperate in datingoverforty). Best proof that the wall does in fact exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 03:52 PM
3

A man was asked why he is fucking and not commiting. You are answering in his place. While you, a woman, have no clue why he, a man, is doing what he is doing. Don't explain to men why men are doing what they are doing. You are not a man. You couldn't possibly give a sincere answer to the question. You would be womansplaining. At best, you are projecting your female experience on men. At worst you are just making stuff up for shit and giggles.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 03:17 PM
2

narcissists don't like themselves, they hate themselves Again you speak of things you have no knowledge about. You should stop doing that. You are embarrassing yourself. Better educate yourself. The definition of narcissist: /ˈnɑːsɪsɪst/noun a person who has an excessive interest in or admiration of themselves. "narcissists who think the world revolves around them"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 02:59 PM
1

no way he likes himself lol You couldn't possibly be more wrong. He is the prototype of the guy who's full of himself. He even has his own cult. He takes a bunch of delusional females to some island to share his greatness with them. And to give them the honour of worshipping him. That's the opposite of a guy who doesn't like himself. That's grade A narcissists level. What reasons would Jared Leto even have to not like himself? He is 51, but looks like a very fit thirty something. He is a famous …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 02:54 PM
2

What an accurate take.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 02:30 PM
2

A famous redpill contributor used to say that almost any problem a man has with women, could be solved by not having just one woman. I think your example is a nice demonstration of that principle.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 02:26 PM
9

You are "womansplaining".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 02:21 PM
2

I agree. As long as you don't insinuate that personality without looks will get you somewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 09:04 PM
–

In this day and age, we aren't savages anymore. Security, safety and comfort can all be provided when there is money. Providing security, safety, and comfort therefore can be seen as providing money. Women who love men who can provide them with money, are the definition of golddiggers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 09:02 PM
–

Resources, money, gold. They all seem very interchangeable to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:59 PM
1

Oh, "emotionally attracted" to money and comfort. You are really selling it to me, aren't you? Jeezes, lady, men don't want "emotionally attracted" in exchange for money and comfort. They want to be desired. I think you just explained why a beta bux only gets starfish sex. While she was enthusiastically doing anal with her alpha fucks lovers. She's only feels emotionally attracted to the beta guy and only in exchange for money and comfort.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:37 PM
–

Agreed, so I do not need to feel guilty about calling women golddiggers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:28 PM
6

Everything you said is dependent on a woman finding a man attractive first. Confidence is creepy, maybe even pushy coming from a man you think looks like a troll. Doesn't matter how genuine his confidence is. And no woman is going to find out you are funny, if she rejects talking to you because she thinks you are ugly. I don't even know if you are trying to gaslight or if you are just very naive about how this whole attraction thing works. Your looks get you in the door. All the rest only matter…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:26 PM
5

Women routinely go for men lacking in the looks department because they possess other traits. True. It's called money. Lots and lots of money. Men virtually never do. Really? You do know that fat women, even women so fat you can literally roll them, still have men that desire them? You can't say the same about fat men. A morbidly obese man isn't getting any (unless again the money thing). You see women with ugly men WAY MORE OFTEN than an attractive man with an ugly woman. I'M RICH, FILTHY RICH!…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:19 PM
1

I'm pretty sure that's the final goal for TRP men as well. TRP is not a cult. There's no TRP bible. No uniforms. No houses of worship. TRP is advice for men by men. As such, TRP men as one uniform group, don't exist. They are a diverse group who have embraced some, maybe one or a lot of TRP ideas, depending on the individual. Thé final goal also doesn't exist. Some men use TRP to better understand women. Some to have more sex. Some to find a woman who's worthy of commitment. I hope your anime kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 08:10 PM
7

Nice and charming are of absolutely no consequence unless a woman finds you attractive. Nice and charming without looks will get you used, not loved. At least men admit that we are attracted to a woman's beauty. All this gaslighting about nice and charming is just virtue signalling.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 07:32 PM
1

You are just making up shit, to stir some shit, aren't you? There's nothing redpill about anime.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 07:28 PM
5

They marry men who can provide them with the security they need to build a family. In other words beta bux. And they fuck men who can provide them with the pussy tingles they need to feel desired. Alpha fucks
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 07:26 PM
10

But for a long term relationship being nice and charming is a great asset. Here, let me translate that for you: If we want to use you for your resources and money, we also find it important that you do not have a strong character. We need you nice and agreeable. So we can extract resources and get away with the bare minimum in the bedroom, since we aren't dating you out of desire, but only for the comfort. Hope you understand just how much of an asset being nice is. Beta Bucks are the real winne…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 07:23 PM
4

Guys don’t date ugly women solely for their personality either True, but nobody is gaslighting women into believing that their personalities are more important than their looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 07:14 PM
2

Seems like we are in agreement on everything but maybe some little details. Rare occurrence between women and men on this forum. I'm going to use this as an excuse to celebrate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 06:40 PM
1

If you agree with me that men have a higher sex drive. And you think women and men cheat at the same rates. Then that proves that women have more opportunity. Because there's only two factors: the drive to cheat and the opportunity to cheat. I don't think you fixed my analogy for the better. People who don't like sugar, aren't going to be tempted by sugary cookies. So, in your analogy it doesn't matter that there's a lot of opportunity, you aren't going to be tempted by things you don't like to …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 06:25 PM
5

Then how can you dismiss this data? Any data that is collected by self-reporting of the participants, is not going to be accurate. For instance you can't find the actual average penis size by asking men to report on their own size. People will lie even when it's anonymous. They lie to protect their ego (hard to admit to yourself you have a small dick) or their reputation (is this as anonymous as I think it is? What if it's not? Everyone will know. Better lie a bit). Self-reporting is not scienti…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 06:04 PM
6

There are two forces at work: the drive to cheat and the opportunity to cheat. Drive to cheat. Men have more testosterone, therefore a higher sex drive. Therefore men have more drive to cheat. Opportunity to cheat. Men can't cheat unless they approach and seduce women. Cheating requires action to be even possible for a man. While for women it's the opposite. Men offer them sex/cheating opportunities. It requires no action from the woman. Trying not to cheat can require more work from a woman tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 05:55 PM
1

This one is pretty hard to believe. You are saying that men have a higher sex drive, are programed to be polyamorous but its women that cheat more? I don't know dude. I agree on the higher sex drive part and do not agree on men being programmed to be poly part. If you look at who has the most opportunity to cheat with the least effort, it's definitely women. Men have to work to make cheating even possible for them. If they don't go out of their way and try to seduce a woman, no cheating will tak…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 05:24 PM
1

Lots of women have emotional intelligence and maturity. Compared with children? Sure, most women are emotional more mature than children. That's why redpill calls women the most responsible teenagers in the house. But not when you compare them to men. There are reasons why women are called the emotional gender, why people say that women are fickle. I have seen women cry, who couldn't tell why they were crying, because they didn't actually know. They just felt emotional and tears came out. Does t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 01:25 PM
2

Why do you assume that I think physical punishment is the only way to discipline children? And why do you, once again, misinterpret what I said? A love tap meant to startle not to hurt, is obviously not physical punishment nor abuse. Kids hit each other harder than what you as a parent do when you discipline them. The disciplining comes from the fact that they are caught by surprise that you are physically enforcing a rule. You aren't meant to inflict physical pain. Just in case you feel like ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 11:05 PM
1

It is racism when you attribute their higher jail time numbers to their race, genius. Just like you connected being emotionally crippled to men who are engineers.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 09:34 PM
1

I'm so glad that it's you, a person who's pure of hart and morally upstanding, who is calling me ugly on the inside. Imagine the same judgement coming from a man-hating radical feminists of a Karen. What a let down that would be and what a big hypocrite that Karen would be.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 06:47 PM
1

Don't put yourself down like that. I know I'm basing this all on my personal experience, but everytime I thought a woman was a real friend, it turned out she wanted more than friendship. 100%.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 06:10 PM
1

I read your comment. Don't understand what you are referring to. Assuming you were meant to reply to someone else, but accidentally sent it to me, which would explain why it sounds like gibberish to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 06:07 PM
1

Oh, I have no doubt that people who are friends with you will not want to be friends with me. It's mutual. I just object to you calling them "good women". Isn't "good women" an oxymoron anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 06:04 PM
2

Who says I entertain those approaches? I didn't say you entertain those approaches. I said: Unless you immediately turn away the guy that is trying to hit on you, you are entertaining the approach and entertaining the approach is the same thing as a guy hitting on a woman. You're basically using your assumption to try and justify being a shitty partner. No, that's not what I'm doing. I pointed out, correctly I might add, that women's main imperative for dating is receiving attention. Men main im…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:58 PM
1

Welcome to the wonderful world of "figure of speech". I see it's your first time with us. Don't be afraid. It may all seem confusing, but you'll get used to it all soon enough. Enjoy your stay and if you learn something don't forget to share it with your friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:47 PM
1

You could follow the same rational and say: you pick ten white people and then black people. Your odds of finding a person who has been to jail is much higher in the black people's group. You could find them in the white people's group, just more unlikely. This is still racism. And you are still discriminating people based on your prejudices. You just have a prejudice against people's professions instead of their race. Or maybe it's both. And you think that black engineers are even more incapabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:43 PM
2

Men are stronger, therefore it's ok for women to use men's bodies as their personal moving mules? Don't you think that this comes dangerously close to: Women are softer, therefore it's ok for men to use women's bodies as their personal humping pillow? and friendship being a two way street doesn’t mean the same tasks being reciprocated at a 1:1 ratio I never claimed it has to be 1:1. Again, the moving example was an example to point out that there's no reciprocation. I could have used anything to…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:35 PM
3

Possibly. But that would mean that I always pick good male friends. And I never pick good female friends. Which would be strange because the demands I have for friendship stay the same and have nothing to do with gender. Therefore it seems more logical to me that women suck at being actual friends to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:21 PM
2

The moving example is just the first one that came to mind. Because every man with female friends who moved, has been moving their heavy stuff for them. The example itself is not relevant. The point is male/female friendship is a one way street.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:11 PM
0

You are justifying generalisations with more generalisations. I know life is simpler if you just put everything in neat little boxes. But that doesn't make it right. What you are doing is no different from a racist calling all black people thieves. You just do it with engineers instead of black people. And you don't call them thieves but emotionally intelligent.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:08 PM
2

Good for you. For me, the only female friends who behaved like rides or dies, turned out to all want more than platonic friendship. And the other's were just in it for the benefits they could receive and never willing to reciprocate. That's why I have women I fuck and female acquaintances. Wouldn't mind having female friends, but it's my experience that women just don't do friendship with men. And I'm not going to simp for a woman and let her gaslight me into thinking we are friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 04:57 PM
2

You don't have to do anything in this life. Which is my way of pointing out that you are completely missing my point. Of course you don't need to help them move. But lending a helping hand is what friends do for each other. Therefore my point was not that you need to help them move. My point was that women don't behave like real friends to men. They will take, but not give back. Women think that being in their presence is a reward in itself. They are doing you a favor by letting you move their h…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 04:45 PM
-2

That best friend of yours, is not your friend but your orbiter. She want more than platonic. Women don't do friendship with men. If it feels like they are actually being a friend, it's usually because they have feelings for a man. Normal "friendship" for a woman is her counting on her male friend for everything she needs. And in return the male friend has the honor to be in her presence while he is moving her heavy furniture.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 04:35 PM
4

Friendship with women is you helping them move all their heavy stuff when they move. And you moving all your heavy stuff when you move.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 04:27 PM
-5

But I do. I spank them. I give them my own personal pacifier to suck on. I don't take what they say seriously and occasionally I feed them to.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 04:22 PM
1

Thanks, feels good to be appreciated.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 03:07 PM
-1

But the real science says that hitting your kids, even without drawing blood or bruising, has a negative and lasting impact on emotional regulation and healthy attachments. The "real" science? You could have just said science, dear. Unreal science is not science, so no need for the distinction. You probably think that saying "real" science gives your argument more weight, but it makes you sound like you don't know the meaning of words. Well, don't know about what the science says, but even kids …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 02:52 PM
0

Broad generalisations based on the observations of one person suffering from observation bias. Most women have an absolutely terrible time accepting accountability and communicate like toddlers. They also have an entitlement complex, so pass. IRONICALLY the one woman I know not like this complains about being called a pick-me by other women a lot. I bet when it's done to you, it feels just as stupid as when you do it to men...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 02:13 PM
-2

Please don't procreate. The undisciplined kid of today, is the next entitled Karen of tomorrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 01:59 PM
0

Always these exaggerations to make what the other party said sound like it is ridiculous, when it's not. He wasn't talking about hitting kids. He was talking about disciplining. There's no blood involved, no bruising. You don't hurt them, but you make it physical just enough that they are surprised. And it is this surprise that will snap the kid out of their disobedient state of mind. I can recall getting hit maybe twice in my life by my parents. Both times the shock of surprise was the worst th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 01:55 PM
2

Letting the crazy out for all to see, in order to score some sweet online attention points.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 12:58 PM
-3

Me minding my business and some dude coming up to try and hit on me isn't the same as my partner going up to someone and hitting on them. Unless you immediately turn away the guy that is trying to hit on you, it is the same. You know damn well that women get approached. Telling your partners that they cannot approach while you entertain men that approach you, is just another way for women to keep the upper hand in the relationship. It goes even further than that. Women date more for the attentio…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 12:48 PM
3

Men hate to be pursued and feel uncomfortable with a woman thirsting after him This feels like "womansplaining" to me. A woman, who obviously has no idea what she is talking about, telling men when they are supposed to feel uncomfortable. Men almost never get pursued. To men it is refreshing to feel wanted for once. So, no you have this completely wrong. Do women on PPD ever talk with men out there in the real world? Or are you all just sitting at home staring at redpill content on YouTube, unti…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 12:13 PM
0

Unless you start dating men, you will always be dating someone who has the emotional capacity of a child. Might as well date one that is attractive to make up for all the BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 11:54 AM
5

Oh, you are one of those "water is wet people".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 11:47 AM
5

Yep, nothing wrong with a woman realising she has impossible demands. Wish more women were capable of that level of self-reflection.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 06:56 PM
1

On TRP and PPD, men with physical, social, cultural, and religious inhibitions about sex far outnumber men who have a typical sex drive. Haven't noticed what you claim here. Unless you can bring something else to stake your claim, besides your own opinion, I'm just going to dismiss this as the delusions of a man-hating female. Please don't pretend you haven't seen the prudish, inhibited comments from men which make up the vast majority of PPD and TRP posts. I don't have to pretend. I really have…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 06:54 PM
2

I think it's hard to argue with logic as strong as yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 06:45 PM
1

Hey, you're the one who needs an imaginary sky daddy to be able to behave morally. I try to behave morally, because I recognize the humanity in others and therefore don't need to rely on a religion for that. Being a whore is absolutely moral under the atheist paradigm. You tried to sound smart and edgy, but ended up with mumbo-jumbo. No need to panic. I will cut away all the nonsense and give you your sentence back at the end. Absolutes don't exist. 'Absolutely moral' therefore is a meaningless …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 06:31 PM
1

You don't need to tell me. I'm pretty strict about keeping my food and the holes I fuck separated.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 04:59 PM
5

Women are cruel and egoistic to use another human being to settle with. They should just forget about men and get cats, if they are not enthusiastic about the men they are dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 04:56 PM
3

And that's fine, since sex really isn't all that important to them anyway. A woman who has only a fraction of the testosterone a man has, telling men that sex isn't important to men anyway? How would you even know, unless you inject yourself with male quantities of testosterone during a prolonged period, what the importance is of sex to men? You don't. So why are you behaving like you do? What those men should do is avoid TRP with extreme prejudice and avoid peer pressure from other men who live…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 04:53 PM
2

If they are attracted by the money (= susceptible to the influence) then by definition they are golddiggers.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 04:40 PM
2

If men had actually cracked the code to being genuinely attractive to women, women would be fucking happy but guess what, you haven't. You're not even kinda close. What difference does that make when I'm able to have the relationships that I want, with the kind of women that I like? Maybe you are right and there's more to discover, but I already have the results that I want, so why would I search further? There's more to life than just women, you know. And I feel like I already got the women par…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 04:07 PM
2

Nope. Since red pill has been around nothing has been fixed. Gender relations have gotten worse. Women are less trusting and men are more single than ever. You blame gender relations getting worse on redpill? As if social media has nothing to do with it. Maybe you should prove the causality between redpill and gender relationships first, before you can make the claim that redpill is causing the deterioration of those relationships. Absolutely. It gives them emotional comfort, a right to act like…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 03:20 PM
1

The truth is the genders are much more similar than they are different There's nothing similar about men and women. For instance you could say both genders have a brain and count this as a similarity between the genders. But is them both having a brain a similarity when those brains are built differently and function differently? Or is the fact that men and women have different brains who function differently evidence of the genders being different? (https://stanmed.stanford.edu/how-mens-and-wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 02:54 PM
2

I had biases about women. Positive ones, caused by some good ol' indoctrination with the "women are wonderful" effect. I found that my biases often left me confused when dealing with women and often had me looking for answers. The biases I had made some of my interactions with women less than pleasant to say the least. So, looking for answers I stumbled on the redpill. And redpill gave me the tools to make all those questions disappear. I'm never confused by women's behaviour anymore. In fact mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 02:29 PM
1

Lol, you are the one lacking in understanding here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 01:42 PM
1

Not that unusual since I have seen women do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 01:40 PM
3

That's why it's a romance scam, sillly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 01:40 PM
1

Believing or not has nothing to do with morality, you genius. Or did you never hear of Catholic priest molesting little boys? Or did you think molesting was the moral option? I'm a humanist, I do not need to believe in an imaginary Santa Claus in the sky in order to have morals.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 11:01 AM
2

If you have enough character to put down junk food instead of stuffing it into your mouth, not getting fat is still preferable to needing skin removal therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 12:39 PM
1

How about you step foot in a church for once? I'm an atheist. Churches only interest me from an architectural point of view.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 12:35 PM
–

Everyone I ever met happened to be an outlier or those rapports are seriously underestimating the real numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 05:13 PM
–

Or you could actually discuss it at length, get to the root of the issue and work on resolving that. Terrible advice. You can't talk a woman into wanting to sleep with you. A woman who desires you isn't going to put up barriers between you and her and sexy times. On the other hand, a woman who lost her desire for you will always find new reasons why sexy times are not going to happen. Once the "you need to do more around the house if you want me to sleep with you" starts, it's over. You could be…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 03:16 PM
–

The lifetime average for both men and women is 4-7 partners. 4-7 lifetime average? Lol, over here anyone graduating college has a body count higher than what you claim is a lifetime average. And they are only 22-23 years old.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 02:43 PM
3

Yes they can. You can have all the extra skin removed. But you will have scars all over where the extra skin was.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 12:38 PM
1

You are making sweeping false statements about “manosphere guys” like they’re a hive mind every single day. So….
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 12:15 PM
2

any normal man cares only that hes going to be the last , and not the ones before Any normal man will be disgusted to find out, that the woman he is calling his wife, has had 100 different dicks inside of her.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 12:06 PM
-1

You don't see the similarities between a woman "taking because she can" and a man doing the same? Why doesn't that surprise me?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 07:30 PM
2

Must be your charming personality and your "I take because I can" mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 07:01 PM
3

Because they can be. Does your logic of "they are, because they can" only apply to you being an entitled person when it comes to getting free food, or should it also apply to a men raping you because he can? You basically have no problem with being a user and taking from others, with the only justification being "that you can". And you fail to realize just how horrible your life would become if everyone started acting in the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 06:05 PM
0

It's not like it is an achievement to be pretty. And being pretty is also very temporary. So why should they be entitled?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 05:35 PM
1

You asked me a question that can’t be answered due to being subjective. There is nothing subjective about the question I asked you. In fact asking one person a question, any question, is not subjective at all. The answer to a question becomes subjective when you start asking different people what the answer is. But asking one person a question is completely not subjective. You are free to give your objective answer to the question. You admitted that your partners bring more money to a relationsh…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 05:16 PM
0

Double standard. NOT a double standard. A double standard requires the same thing to be judged differently. And a man being promiscuous is not doing the same thing as a woman being promiscuous. Which is pretty obvious when you look at how difficult it is for a man to be promiscuous and how easy it is for a woman to be promiscuous. If they were doing the same thing, they would both find it difficult or both find it hard. Since they do not experience the same difficulty, it's obvious that being pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 03:18 PM
–

No, because if they are really redpill, then they would know what to do to get pussy and actually do the work to get pussy. If they don't get pussy they are not redpill or at least not long enough to get actual results.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:52 PM
10

The woman they want to date expect nice dates (hot entitled women). FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:47 PM
1

Confirmation bias is when you only notice the things that are confirming your believes and ignore the things that contradict those believes. This is not a confirmation bias. I'm not ignoring all the women who have no financial expectations for their partners. Because I've never actually met a woman who did not have financial expectations for their partners. I met women like you before, who claim to have no financial expectations, only to see that their actions contradict their words. I can't see…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:26 PM
0

Since I first started probably a year or two and felt totally fine about myself . My self worth and esteem arent determinant on whether I presently have a sexual partner. Two things: 1) women have less testosterone. Therefore a lower sex drive. A man who goes two years without sex is bursting out of his skin from being horny all the time. 2) And women also have other ways to feel appreciated except sex. Women received compliments. Women receive hugs. Men give attention and time and money to wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:15 PM
0

If you really are one of those Yeti level rare women who don't have financial expectations for their partners, good for you. You can go and join the big majority of men, who also don't have financial expectations for their partners. But untill I see you actually demonstrate your non demanding financial nature in the real world, I will assume you are just like most women and are only pretending to be different from the norm for reasons of virtue signalling.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 11:57 AM
1

Sex is a basic need. To live a complete life, people, who are healthy, need sex. What is the longest you went without it, if it is so optional? And how good were you feeling in your own skin during that period of not getting any?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 11:51 AM
0

Oxygen isn't a right. You aren't entitled to it just because you want it. But you sure as hell need it to live. Just like people need sex to not live a life of frustration.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 11:47 AM
0

Not really sure the point you are making. You say, you having sex with a man is not reciprocal to him paying for your food. But men who don't pay for your food will never have sex with you. Therefore when you do have sex with a man, it can be viewed as compensation for him paying for you, because without him paying there would not be any sex in the first place. Basically, if you have a requirement (pay for food or sex will never happen) and someone fulfils the requirement (paid for the food) the…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:50 AM
0

I asked you a simple question and you aren't able to answer it. Your partners bring more money to the relationship than you do. You are not able to answer what you do to balance things out. Therefore I will assume that there's no actual balance in your relationships. The men give more than you give. I can understand that you don't want to openly admit to using your partners, that's why you wrote that whole esoteric rant above, instead of just answering an easy question. but here I am on Reddit t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:25 AM
1

Yes I did. And yes I know in what kind of society she published this. Relationships between men and women today, are still based on the same principles and expectations as they were in 1971. That's precisely why you should not ask for a handout and should read her book yourself. It's not outdated.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:15 AM
0

There's no point in resenting. We all know the rules. Pay or go home and jerk off. Still doesn't mean we are happy about it. Men pay because if we don't, we will be perpetually alone. We pay out of necessity. Only simps find happiness in being someone else's ATM.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:09 AM
3

I should clarify, it is not reciprocal. If someone buys me dinner, that doesn’t mean I’m sleeping with them in return. That's just how you look at it. There are other ways to look at this situation as well. Men who don't pay will never sleep with you. Therefore one could assume that "paying for you" is a requirement to be able to sleep with you. And when there are requirements to be fullfilled, there will be expectations from people who did fullfill the requirements.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:00 AM
1

So the “equality” of a relationship becomes something much more complex, the sum of all money AND things of value contributed by each person. If relationships are the sum of money AND things of value contributed. And if your partners bring more money to the table than you do. This would mean that in order to keep a balanced relationship, you should have to bring more of those "things of value" to the table than your partners do. Can you explain what those "things of value" are that you bring to …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 09:54 AM
0

My words where 'as good as non existent'. Which (if you can read) means that women who don't have financial expectations can exist. They are just Yeti level rare. In fact they are so rare that any woman who claims to have "no financial expectations" is probably only virtue signalling online. And virtue signalling online is not how they act out in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 09:47 AM
-1

I already gave you a hint. I'll repeat it here for your convenience: don't be lazy and entitled and expect others to do your reading for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 09:30 AM
1

His way of thinking is definitely representable for the majority of men. Men know that women have financial expectations. And men who don't know get nowhere in dating, so they learn real quick.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 09:22 AM
3

It’s not payback for taking me out to dinner. Oh yes it is. You talked about how the bar is set by other men. And how men who don't pay are not living up to that bar. Therefore men who pay are not going to get discarded for not being generous enough. Men who don't pay will. Conclusion: Only men who aren't discarded have a chance of seeing you naked. And men who don't pay are getting discarded. Therefore there's a direct correlation between paying for your food and having a chance to see you nake…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 09:17 AM
2

If a guy dates me, he will probably end up giving me financially more than I ever give him. If you ever wonder what women mean when they talk about equality, the above quote is it. Straight from the horse's mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 09:05 AM
–

You should actually read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 08:58 AM
-2

It's good then that these women did already think about how much they are going to charge for the use of their time and vaginas.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 08:56 AM
-2

that he could have avoided had he just put on his big boy pants and used his words No he couldn't. A man who doesn't give financial means in exchange for her time, is a man who is going to be single. Women who don't have financial expectations are as good as non existent.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 08:54 AM
-4

Just like I have accepted that most women are whores, who charge money to get to know another person. I don't complain about parasites like that..... I just pump and dump them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 08:51 AM
2

Nope, for me too any woman who uses dating apps is also not fit for a relationship. Almost all of them are into casual sex. And I can't respect a woman who doesn't respect herself. The apps are where you find the women you pump and dump. Apps = easy meat market.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 05:10 PM
5

Until he finds out she was whoring herself around while they were simultaneously starting their relationship. You are a fool these days if you commit to a woman. It's not in women's nature to be loyal since they are hypergamous. So, don't be a simp and commit to someone who isn't capable of loyalty. Stay safe out there, boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 05:05 PM
3

women don't. Do you really believe men fall for that virtue signalling of yours? We actually meet real women and know how they behave, you know. You can't just gaslight us anymore. So, why do you still do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 04:59 PM
4

What women like you think about promiscuous men, will be irrelevant to those men when being a promiscuous man gets a man more pussy, than it disqualifies him from more pussy. It's not hard to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 04:52 PM
2

Is it the complementing and fucking you can't compete with or is it the cheap price?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 04:10 PM
7

Don't you know? Women are incapable of accountability. You are completely right, but you will have a hard time finding any vagina-owner that is going to admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 04:01 PM
4

Why text someone who doesn’t seem like you’re type or someone who might not be initially attracted to? Apparently I am her type, because as OP described the situation, she wants to date me. She was just too superficial to realise that when she was using the app. All that being said, don’t hate the player, hate the game - apps are designed to be superficial as pictures and a bio don’t really mean shit and say absolutely nothing as a person. I already pointed out that you can use the apps in a sup…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 03:37 PM
5

Dating apps can be as superficial or not superficial as you want them to be. You can reject people based on one goofy picture on their profile or you can take a chance, ignore the goofy picture and have a conversation with them to see if there's something there. Therefore it's not the dating app that's superficial, it's the way a person uses that dating app that can be superficial. And yes, I reserve the right to reject a superficial person for being superficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 03:07 PM
6

Men are the biggest hypocrites in the universe when they claim the risk of being accused of pedophilia is the reason they refuse to help children in need. Good thing then that it isn't men, but just plain old you, who is claiming men refuse to help children in need. And a hypocrite calling a whole gender hypocrites? The insult is completely meaningless when it comes from someone who's a hypocrite themselves. But hey, at least you speak from experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 02:59 PM
1

Using their own weapons against them, I see. And doing it very effectively as well. I applaud you, sir.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 02:51 PM
2

Not really important what you think, when the vast majority of women seem to be attracted to guys who do rack up an impressive body count. Or in other words: being a promiscuous man gets a man more pussy, than it disqualifies him from more pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 02:46 PM
7

It's called courage which for all their testosterone, so many men seem to be lacking. It's easy to pretend like you are "brave" and others "cowards" when your risks are non-existing compared to the risks those others face. A man can't even take his own daughter to a playground without the risk that someone will call the cops on him for being a pedophile. Hypocrite fits you a lot better than brave does.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 02:37 PM
1

If you want a woman to feel genuine empathy for you, you have to hope she is a good mother and you have to be her son. Otherwise there's absolutely no chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 02:29 PM
4

I would use her for sex, because she has clearly demonstrated to be too much of a superficial b*tch to be taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 02:09 PM
–

My bet is on large farm animals. The other options you mentioned are probably too intelligent to actually bother with modern day women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 01:59 PM
1

The iPhone is the result of men's need to be liked by women. Steve Jobs never was a ladies man. His whole drive came from the fact that women did not like guys like him. So, he created a multi-million dollar company to combat him feeling inadequate. And that company was responsible for creating the iPhone. So, yeah, without young Steve Jobs getting rejected by women and him deciding to do something about it, there would not have been an iPhone. As a smart man, you never chase women. If you chase…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 02:55 PM
5

Hat off to you. This is one of the first times I have read something on this subreddit that made me pause and think. I guess you are right about being able to offer real love or real loyalty, but not both.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 02:21 PM
0

How would freezing sperm cure our society from an epidemic of whores? I fail to see the connection. But you probably have some weird female logic how it all is going to work, so why don't you enlighten me, dear?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 02:16 PM
6

You could have just said that women are less loyal than men. It would be just as accurate of a message, while using less words.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 01:36 PM
-1

I would love for the "big government" to open re-education camps for disloyal and adulterous women. There's an epidemic going on and it should get stopped.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 01:28 PM
–

For the last time: THERE IS NO DOUBLE STANDARD. You only have a double standard when the SAME situation is treated differently depending on who is involved. There is no same situation when you talk about male and female promiscuity. The fact that for women promiscuity is as easy as breathing, while it is something very difficult for men, is clear evidence that they are not the same thing. If they were the same thing, then both men and women would experience the same level of difficulty. They cle…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 01:19 PM
1

Castrated men do not exactly go and conquer worlds.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 12:21 PM
1

Once the instinct subsides you’d be amazed at what you can accomplish. Exactly the opposite would happen. If the instincts subsides, everything comes to a grinding halt. Almost anything productive done by men, is done because in one way or another men want to impress women. You would be taking away men's drive. Society would come to a halt.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 12:17 PM
–

Someone should really stop and protect you from yourself. These post of yours are becoming more and more unhinged and embarrassing to read. Of course people on medication are a red flag. Being healthy and of sound mind has always been what people look for in other people. We don't go looking for the worst choice to date, people look for the best. It's obvious shit like this, that make your post come across as completely unhinged. Maybe you should look into getting medicated yourself. You know, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 12:11 PM
2

Yes, they are. Don’t be obtuse. They are not. They are pointing to a problem that if neglected can have serious consequences. They are not threatening women or women's rights. They are trying to make you aware of an issue. So society as a whole, men and women together, could tackle that problem. They are saying we need to fix the roof because the holes that are currently in it, while make the whole structure rot and eventually collapse. You read this as there are holes in the roof, we will beat …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 03:07 AM
1

It's just as much not my business to tell other men not to get married, as it is not your business to tell me not to do so. You should be following your own advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 03:00 AM
3

No, women are not participating in harems. They definitely are. There is zero evidence that this is happening. None whatsoever. It’s a myth pushed through red pill spaces. There's not one man on this planet, who gets to the age of 25, that hasn't seen a man with a harem. We all know or met a guy, who was dating multiple women at a time. Guys like this usually get a reputation for being players and untrustworthy horn dogs, but still women flock to these guys. There's literally a Chad on every Uni…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 02:44 AM
4

Society is not anyone's problem to fix. Sure, it is. It's society as a whole that has to fix problems that might cause society to malfunction. The only societal issue that needs to be solves is to allow people enough resources to travel to places that provide them more opportunities. I seriously doubt that there is only one issue in society that needs solving. And if there was only one issue, it definitely wouldn't be "making sure everyone has a big enough travel budget."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 08:15 PM
0

I'm not trying to sway your opinion. Although I do believe getting married is a mistake. You don't have to many to get hot, funny and a touchable butt. There are too many downsides to getting married as a man. If the marriage ends (which is what? a one in two chance?) you could lose it all. There's plenty of men who had to restart form zero in their forties, because somewhere along the way the decided that marriage is a good idea. But whatever you do, best wishes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 08:08 PM
0

Anyone getting married and not having a vagina, should get his head checked out, no matter how low the divorce rates are. They still agreed to sign a contract, that's definitely not beneficial to them if the deal ever falls apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 07:25 PM
2

I don't live in the US of metoo A. You are not getting cancelled for complementing a woman's appearance over here. Even if she is a colleague.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 07:06 PM
23

I find it disgusting how men demand to be sexed or they'll go on a rampage. That's not what men are saying. They are saying that if men are left out, then there's no reason for them to be a part of society. And society needs men, just as much as it needs women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 07:04 PM
5

Could be, but society still has a problem on its hands.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 07:00 PM
12

The only issue is other people exercising their right to chose. Which still can cause a ruptured society. If your right to chose, causes a substantial part of society to feel left out, than society still has a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 06:56 PM
8

The divorce rate is at a 50 year low Not so hard when people aren't marrying left and right like they used to.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 06:53 PM
2

I'm not worried of being accused of harassment. I got lucky with my genes. Which is exactly my point, it is harassment if she doesn't like you, it's cute if she does. No need to stress about it as man, it's completely subjective and out of your hands anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 06:24 PM
1

I will, but that's not the case here. It feels silly to copy/paste the exact same answer to you, when you can just use your own eyes to read it in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 06:21 PM
2

Could be, doesn't change what I was saying one bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 05:28 PM
2

True, he can't decide over her body, but he can decide to be or not be with her. They are a couple. She can't decide that "the couple" will have a baby, that requires constant care because the kid will mentally always be a five year old. She can only decide for herself that she wants to have such a hard life. Not for both of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 04:59 PM
-1

You have been lucky then. Sometimes life will force you into an either/or situation, where compromise isn't possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 04:53 PM
-1

why should the one who only makes slightly more get the final say? You contribute more, therefore it would be logic the have more of a say. arguably as the “mother” she will be the one who deals with the fallout of the decision Why would the mother be the one dealing with the fallout? It's precisely the opposite. Men contribute more financially, so financial consequences will fall on them more. Men are expected to be the physical protectors, so if a decision would cause the family being physical…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 04:30 PM
2

Yep, "that dress looks good on you" is a cheeky compliment or straight up harassment depending on if she likes or not likes the physical presence of the person giving it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 04:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter