TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RedditIsCensorship2 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,652 comments by RedditIsCensorship2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,652 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Jesus lady, what's up with all the oversharing? Nobody cares, get a grip.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 06:09 AM
-1

I'm sorry, please excuse me for not caring about your opinion whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 05:05 AM
2

do y’all read what you write sometimes? Christ. Can't write something without reading it as well, genius. Anymore stupid question to ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 05:00 AM
3

If you rather have sex with an object than a human being, go for it. To each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 04:54 AM
-4

It's still pointless because no Chad would want a sexless woman or one that is too ugly to get excited about. So, you wanting to be or not wanting to be a sex slave for a Chad is not relevant. and some men may try to change asexual women. Nah, if there's no fucking to be had, being with a woman becomes pointless. The only men who still would stick around are men who were tricked into believing that she is not sexless by her putting out in the beginning of the relationship, who are hoping to get …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 12:35 AM
-6

What the relevance of you mentioning that you are not interested in any Chads, when no Chad would want to date you in the first place? That's the relevance of my comment, pointing out that you mentioning that you are not interested in any Chads is not relevant at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 12:23 AM
1

Women changing their behaviour would imply that women are capable of accountability. Since women aren't capable of being accountable for things they do, we cannot expect them to change their behaviour. Ever. There's a reason why redpill says that women are "the most responsible teenagers of the house", not being able to act with accountability is that reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 12:17 AM
5

Men on average also work more at work, so seems fair to me...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 12:09 AM
4

If that was the case, then they would only go for the lowest economic class of women. Why put in ridiculous work to impress women who already have money? What? Such a ridiculous and flawed logic. Men don't want to fuck poor, men want to fuck pretty. You seem to have absolutely no clue how men operate.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 12:07 AM
-8

If you are a woman who hasn't dated in 10 years, you are either asexual or so ugly that nobody would want to actually date you. Whatever it is you definitely do not need to worry about any Chads...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 11:59 PM
1

Not your bro, peabrain.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:38 PM
–

And were did I not acknowledge that, you peabrain? If you are going to accuse someone of doing something, at least make sure they actually did what you accuse them off. But that is probably already excepting too much from your "intellect".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 07:03 PM
1

Most ironic username I saw all week...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:26 PM
–

Because the women who say stuff like that are frustrated women, who are just here to shit on men. This is not a debate sub, don't let the name of this subreddit fool you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:20 PM
2

If I can read your lips without looking up to your face, then you are definitely wearing a slutty outfit. If it's impossible for you to sit without the whole world finding out what colour of underwear you are wearing, then you definitely are wearing a slutty outfit. If everytime you breath there's a strong possibility one of your tits falls out of the skimpy outfit you're wearing, then you are definitely wearing a slutty outfit. Nothing against slutty outfits by the way, but don't pretend like t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:18 PM
1

they still put the female collective above their own male children Nah, man. That's just not true. The bond between a mother and a child is stronger than the whatever ties she has to the "female collective". sure? lol Yeah, I'm sure. by default, they have a dislike of men while men by default like women Dislike is something completely different than hate, which is what you were claiming before.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 06:29 PM
1

if women got their way men would be in concentration camps, women hate men Women love their children (which can include men) and they love what men can do for them. So, I think you are exaggerating here. I don't think that women are capable of loving men that are not their children, but that doesn't mean they hate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 06:03 PM
1

They should still be able to vote, because there's no accountability necessary when you choose someone else to be in power and accountable. They should however not be in a position where they can get elected. Because once elected accountability is very necessary. The female posters here are the worst of what the female gender has to offer. It's good sometimes to realise women in the real world are a lot more fun, intelligent and agreeable than the witches that frequent this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 03:30 PM
1

It truly is. The words: "It's my fault" have never crossed a woman's lips. They just can't, which is precisely why the redpill is correct when they claim that women are the "most responsible children of the house". Women are not kids, but they are not exactly adults either. Because being an adult means being accountable for your actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 02:56 PM
1

Lol, keep your head tilted, maybe it will function better that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 02:47 PM
1

I'll take this real slow, so you can actually follow along. You lack the mental capacity to figure out the obvious. As you have admitted yourself when you couldn't figure out that a baseline of attraction is required to date someone. If you are not capable of figuring out the obvious, how are you going to be able to figuring out people you don't know through one or two comments? That's right, you aren't going to be able to. So, please stop. It's getting embarrassing to see you try.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 02:44 PM
–

tldr you're mad Yep, you are definitely incapable of figuring out other people. anything else? Yes, you are not only so dumb that you can't even figure out the obvious. You are also arrogant. And that combination makes you insufferable. Therefore I take back that you should be busy apologizing to that poor man. You would be doing him a solid if you stay out of his life altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 02:29 PM
–

This upset? Girl you are too dumb to figure out the obvious, so don't even try to figure out other people. I'm enjoying a nice cup of Ethiopian coffee, while I'm listening to the new Pearl Jam record, that's how "upset" I am. You shouldn't even be waisting my time, you should be busy apologizing to the man who's heart you broke with your stupidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 02:18 PM
–

I just feel sad for the man that got his heart broken because you were to dumb to figure out the obvious on your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 02:03 PM
0

it's really not obvious to a lot of the men here. Said the hypocrite who is a woman and who couldn't figure it out without doing a silly experiment that broke someone's heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 01:56 PM
-2

You actually had to fuck up someone with a silly experiment to reach that conclusion? Isn't obvious that attraction is required to be with someone? Damn, people can be so dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 01:41 PM
1

So impressive, how you use emojis like a pathetic 13 year old edgelord. Must have took you a lot of hard work to be able to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 01:22 PM
1

And you mine, still going strong those assumptions of yours. At least we agree in the going in circles bit. Hope you manage to avoid open windows today.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 12:37 PM
1

You are talking out of your ass and making assumptions about me that couldn't be further from the truth even if they tried. But hey, if that's the way you need to behave to feel good about yourself, just carry on. I don't give a fuck about you or your opinions anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 12:32 PM
1

Maybe you should be more clear...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 11:52 AM
5

Sure can. If you are older and really drunk then it might not happen. But 18 year old me would be so drunk I didn't even know what side was up anymore and still be able to have an erection easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 11:33 PM
2

Yep, you are pretty much talking gibberish to my ears.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 10:17 PM
3

You know that people sometimes get high or drunk, do you? It wouldn't be hard for others regardless of gender to take advantage of such a situation. Use your imagination for the practical details.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 10:15 PM
2

I didn't even look at your question, disingenuous wanker extraordinaire that you are. We have "communicated" before. I know exactly how you behave in a discussion and how completely pointless it is to engage you. The only reason I did, is because I had the realization that you truly are the most pathetic person I have met on this subreddit. A realization I felt like sharing with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 07:28 PM
1

My comment was referring people that cannot even get people to date them. Fail to see what this has to do with anything we were discussing. If what you’re craving is some sexy time, you’ll have to pay for it. And that’s just how it is. Huh? What are you on about? My relationships are always "quid pro quo". I don't simp for my partner and I don't expect her to simp for me. You know you can attract women that actually like the human and not his wallet, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 07:18 PM
2

Nah, we are not brothers. I understand now why a guy without a backbone is one of your best friends. Anyone who says something like you did here, is equally missing a backbone: If it’s a good time, men or women, can pay for it. In a relationship both partners are each other's "good times". Therefore it's completely ridiculous to expect one of the beneficiaries to pay for the privileged of dating the other. If you are fine with paying for a woman's company, they by all means, you do you. But that…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 07:02 PM
0

You would not be giving up your career if you did not feel like spending time with your child and being a SAHM. You would just return to work at the earliest moment possible in that case. And rightfully so. But then let's not pretend you are doing this for "him". You are a woman you have the luxury of choosing to be a SAHM or to keep your career. If you pick SAHM, you automatically fall back on your partner who has to take care of you. Men do not even have this luxury of choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 06:54 PM
1

Maybe you should look out for him then and make sure he doesn't end up in a situation where he is a walking ATM for a golddigger. I'm messed up? Lol, buddy, you are the one who thinks that people without self-respect make good friends. The day that his girlfriend decides you are a bad influence on her hubby, is the day that the guy, who has been a brother since he was 14, calls you up to tell you he can't hang out with you anymore, cause his woman doesn't approve. You and your buddy deserve each…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:53 PM
3

If you are no simp, why do you pick people who are, to be your friend? What's the logic here? There's truth in the saying "you become who you surround yourself with". And that friend of yours clearly has demonstrated that he has no self-respect. Willing objectifying himself and letting himself get used as a walking ATM. That's just sad. Not on the spectrum, definitely not psycho. Anger? Yeah maybe, if men aren't standing up for themselves how can we expect things to ever get better? And yes, tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:31 PM
2

Your comment does nothing but reinforce that women have no understanding of the effects that massive amounts of testosterone have on the human body.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:16 PM
4

You are never going to get a woman to admit that things are stacked in their favor. Women enjoy playing the victim too much for that. So, don't waste your time trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:13 PM
1

You don't think your friend is a dumbass for marrying someone who gives "so I can own half your house when we separate" as a reason for marriage? Lol, maybe that explains the friendship then.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:11 PM
1

I never claimed you were not doing your part. But while you take care of the kid, you expect a man to take care of you. One does not exclude the other. And maternity leave is typically paid, at no point would he be the sole earner. Depends how long you decide to be a SAHM. I'm not claiming there's anything wrong with being a SAHM. I'm just saying that if you want to be a SAHM, you are by definition expecting your partner to be the one who brings in the money. Therefore you do expect to be taken …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 05:07 PM
4

Lol, it's pointless trying to explain anything to a disingenuous wanker like yourself. You have your mind already made up and you are so arrogant that you really believe that the thoughts that pop up in your head are nothing but eternal truths. So, thanks very much, but I'd rather not have the taste of vomit in my mouth, which is unavoidable if I have to listen to you wank yourself off to the sound of your own voice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:58 PM
0

Your friend is a dumbass and he deserves that the golddigging cunt he married takes him to the cleaners. I would find it real hard to still see someone as a friend of mine, if they have so little self-respect that they knowingly sign up for a marriage to a golddigger.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:38 PM
8

And that dumbass put a ring on her finger? Jesus, guys are marrying golddiggers like they taste of strawberries nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:51 PM
-3

You want to be a SAHM (at least temporary) so by definition you'll need someone else to bring home the bacon. And when someone else is bringing home the bacon, they are taking care of you...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:47 PM
1

Very disingenuous way of asking that question. Women don't want men that earn the same salary, women are hypergamous and want men that earn more than them. And a lot more is even better than a little more.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:41 PM
3

Firstly any man using physical force on a woman is playing a very dangerous game. He is very likely to end up in jail and it isn't even relevant if the man was defending himself or not. This causes a lot of men to not see physically defending themselves against a woman as an actual option to consider. Secondly a woman doesn't need physical force to be able to force a man to do whatever she wants. She can always claim that the man assaulted her or raped her, if he doesn't give her what she wants.…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:38 PM
5

Don't waste your breath. This guy is the most pathetic hunan being that visits this subreddit. Ignoring is the best option. He is too disingenuous for anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:23 PM
8

Don't think I ever met a more disingenuous person than you. Just incredible how pathetic you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:20 PM
1

Oh boy, I don't even know what you are on about? Is it the "nutter"? That's not even a personal attack. That's like saying silly goose. Guess you are going to ban me again for saying something back. But you should get a life, you silly goose.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 02:37 AM
1

You are idolizing a man into something so big that no other man can ever top it. And you are doing that with a man who has shown you that he doesn't even have the backbone to stand up to his family and pick you. Or didn't even love you enough to pick you. Sorry, but you are truly doing this to yourself. And I'm getting a bit worried about your mental wellbeing, because you do not seem to grasp how crazy it is to make some kind of "superior being" out of your ex. How long ago was the break-up?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 12:32 AM
2

Patriarchy absolutely exists. What is patriarchy according to you? Who told you that men are supposed to pay and why? Nobody told me. Women showed me by not going on second dates if I didn't pay on the first. And that's not just my experience. That's pretty much a universal experience as far as I can tell. At least never met a man who did not share the same experience. It’s clearly hurt you and other men like you. I'm not hurt by this. It's not a disaster to pay for a date. But if we are discuss…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 12:21 AM
2

No point (definitely not looking for a sugar momma). You are either very different from the others of your gender (asking out men as much as men ask you out) or you are good at virtue signalling about yourself (look at me being a shining example of equality). But whatever it is, it makes talking about equality in dating really hard with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 12:09 AM
1

I think childhood issues are overrated. I believe our youth influences us more than we think. But not going to go further down this path with you since you don't think so. Well I was deeply in denial, I wasn't avare of it. I believe you were. But that also means you never started trying, actually trying to get over the ex. You can't try to get over someone when you still want them back (especially not when you are still so infatuated that other men basically don't even register).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:59 PM
2

Lol, exactly 24 and you paid at least 12 of them. Hmmmmm, such coincidence. Perfect equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:54 PM
2

I usually (99,99999%) pay for the first date, because not doing so makes going on that first date pointless (tried it, never had a second date this way). I know you pay for first dates, but it just doesn't work that way according to my experience. Hence why I said you are an exception. But I'm not looking for a relationship were I am used as a walking ATM, so I usually say something like: "I'll take this one, you can get the next" while I pay for the check. And this works out fine. Always get a …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:52 PM
1

You should read again what you wrote here. You start of by saying you didn't want him back. And then you start to describe your dating after the break-up and from everything you write it is obvious that you did in fact wanted him back. You even sound a bit obsessed. Like he is the only man that you are even capable of noticing. You do realise he also farts, do you? I was probably in denial You don't say. But I hated him, I was angry at him and didn't want him back Yes, you did. You couldn't even…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:27 PM
2

Cool that you did, but that still makes you nothing more than an exception. A refreshing exception, but an exception nevertheless. Where is that expected? Let's be honest about it, the vast majority of women do not ask men out on first dates. And they also don't pay for first dates. There have been threads in r/askreddit and subs like that about this subject, and a lot of women even admit that if they have to pay on a first date, there won't be a second one.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:19 PM
2

And how many first dates have you been on? Just a rough estimate is fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:14 PM
1

I think that whoever does the asking should offer to pay How convenient when it's still expected that men take the initiative.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:11 PM
2

How many first rates did you pay for. Not just your part of the bill, the whole thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:10 PM
1

What do you mean when you say "tries". As long as you want him back, there's no try possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:08 PM
1

You do realise that this means that you do not actually want to move on, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:02 PM
1

but I, and the women I know, don’t expect that at all. So, you don't let men pay for the first dates then?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:01 PM
1

Ok, question, if tomorrow your ex with the lacking backbone would be knocking on your door, would you take him back?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 10:59 PM
1

Ok, question for you: do you think it's equal when only one gender is expected to take the initiative, set up the date and then also pay for it? If you think that's equal then we might as well switch it up and start letting women do these things. And no, I wasn't referring to first dates only. Men financially giving more than they receiving starts from the first date. But it doesn't end there. That first date merely sets the tone for the rest that follows.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 10:57 PM
1

Sure, you are the first person in history to fall victim to the insurmountable breakup. "Patient zero" so to say. I'm really sorry that this is happening to you. Hope this isn't a contagious thing. /s If you were one of my buddies I would smack you in the head and tell you to
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 10:40 PM
1

Since I was talking about men having to pay for the first dates and you responded with "men should just get raises then, teehee", what do you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 10:34 PM
1

Sorry, but did you really just compared yourself not getting over a breakup with people in a wheelchair never being able to walk again? Get over yourself and your massive victim complex. Think about this, if you can't even handle a breakup, how are you going to handle it when life really start fucking with you? When things really go wrong? I can't feel sorry for you, because you are doing this to yourself. Everyone experiences heartbreak in their lives. And we all hurt when that happens. And the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 10:29 PM
1

I'm not going to sugarcoat it. To me you don't come across as someone who can't. You come across as someone who just won't. Getting over a breakup is something we all have to learn how to do and it isn't even a big deal if you compare it to some of the other things that life can throw at you. But you clearly have given up, so I'll leave you to it. Best of luck, hope you find it within you to pick yourself back up.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 09:54 PM
1

Why do you expect men to financially spoil you, when you are a grown-up who is allowed to work and earn her own money? Men don't need raises, they need women to actually mean what they say when they claim to want equality...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 09:48 PM
2

Time heals emotional wounds IF you let it. If parents can go on in life after they had to burry their own child, you can learn how to go on after a breakup. You keep holding on to your ex because it makes you feel like the two of you are somehow still connected. Do you really want to move on or do you want to keep holding on to the memory of a past lover? If you want to move on you have to stop dwelling on the past. You have to stop thinking about the ex, so there is space created in your head f…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 09:39 PM
2

Put "I call it like I see it" on a t-shirt and wear the hell out of it, so people can know what they are dealing with before you actually open your mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 09:22 PM
–

It doesn't really matter how we got there, the result is the same But it does matter how we got there. You are literally rejecting everyone unless they are your ex. Can't you see how ridiculous that is? Accept that whatever you had with your ex is over and done with. Be angry at him for not standing up to his family and choosing you. And use that anger to move the fuck on. but some wounds can't be fully healed You are being overdramatic. You got dumped by a guy without a backbone. And you are gi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 09:01 PM
2

You are making this too easy. That fact that you are ordering another grown-up around, like they are your dancing monkey, isn't evidence enough for you? If you want a definition, Karen, you'll have to do your own googling....
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:53 PM
–

So I don't know... Imagine obese, deformed face, imagine absolutely repulsive... Would you choose it? No, I would not choose that. But here's the thing, the men you don't want are not all deformed, absolutely repulsive monsters. You are just not attracted to anything that isn't as "perfect" as the image you created in your head from your ex. You -> anything not perfect gets rejected. Me -> obese, deformed absolutely repulsive gets rejected. All others are options. His family basicaly made him br…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:46 PM
5

It's called earth, the planet were men pay more than they receive, starting from paying for the first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:38 PM
1

Your title explains a lot about the dynamics between men and women on this sub. A lot of women are very aggressive here, while a lot of men act like their balls never dropped.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:33 PM
–

Would you choose it? I can't answer that question because I'm a man. I'm attracted to every woman that's not absolutely repulsive. And very few women are absolutely repulsive. While you are attracted to no man unless he is your ex. noone compares to him... Classic alpha widow syndrome. How did it end if I may ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:30 PM
–

One of the few movies I started watching but never finished.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:26 PM
–

I call it like I see it. Lol, that's what every Karen says.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:24 PM
–

Same can be said about having to scroll down to find a Karen calling a man a beta or an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:15 PM
–

But it's still lesser evil than a man I'm not attracted to. You do realise you choose to be alone, don't you? Unless you are one of the ten most repulsive women on the planet, there are guys out there who would gladly want to be with you. That's the big difference between men and women. A man in your position isn't rejecting the women who still want to be with him. There isn't anyone to reject. He isn't alone by choice. Loneliness is forced upon him. Basically any woman that's alone is rejecting…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 08:06 PM
–

A man who is alone for two years will probably not have had any physical contact with another person -except maybe a handshake here and there- during that period. No hugs, no kisses, no sex. Complete touch starvation during those years. When a woman is "alone" for two years, that just means she hasn't been officially dating anyone during that period. She usually still has a few orbiters to fall back on whenever she feels the desire for intimacy. And can turn to her friends for hugs and contact. …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:58 PM
–

That 'most dramatic' tag line really suits you...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:44 PM
1

Sex is a two way street. When two consenting adults are fucking, there is no person using the other as an object. Or in case you don't get it: if a man is supposedly using a woman as a sock then she is also using him as a dildo.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:42 PM
–

Get over yourself. Jesus, the level of arrogance you display, it's almost palpable.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:39 PM
2

Yeah, we can agree to disagree. That's always a possibility. And also thank you for the verbal sparring session.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 11:00 PM
1

My physical features are not “me” anymore than a man’s height or abs or jawline or money is “him.” If you think that your physical features are not "you", do you think that "you" consist of only a personality? And what about personality traits that are connected to your physical form? Like how they say that ugly people usually have more interesting personalities, because their physical form made it a necessity for them to develop an interesting character? Both your physical form and your persona…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 10:02 PM
0

I thought the exact same thing the comment was talking about. Of course you did. You are also a woman and "group think" is something that women are really good at. Furthermore you are of course not going to disagree when someone of your gender is virtue signalling about your gender. When I was getting myself through college by working in bars, plenty of older women were the creeps that were trying to take me home or were touching me inappropriately. So, to hear one of you disingenuous vagina peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 09:09 PM
1

Most people have at least some lines in their face by the time they hit 30. Is this the same thing again as with the breasts? First you claim that women's breast don't sag at 30, then you concede they might but... but.... but... it's only a millimetre. Are you going to do the same thing with wrinkles? But.... but .... but.... it's only a small laughter line?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 08:39 PM
1

Youth is a stage of life that has nothing to do with who I am as a person Lol, do you actually believe that or are you just saying whatever because you feel like disagreeing? Ever heard the following quote?: "At twenty, if you are not an idealist, then you don't have a heart. And if you continue being an idealist at forty, then you don't have a brain". So, yeah, youth definitely has to do with who you are as a person. Almost all of us were more enthusiastic, naive, energetic, idealistic... when …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 08:31 PM
0

I didn't know men had to make a case for themselves. Maybe you should stop treating men like they are the accused in a trial that only exists in your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 07:35 PM
1

getting wrinkles without some hardcore drug use. Everyone gets wrinkles, you nutter. It's caused by the sun and by flexing the muscles in our face. I don't know why you claim that they aren't getting wrinkles without hardcore drug use, but maybe my previous comment went over your head. Which would explain why you are making this weird connection between drug use and wrinkles.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 07:03 PM
-1

they're just freaked out and don't want a shitty relationship. Aha, sure that must be it. /s a 1mm "hang" is too much now. A one mm "hang" already significantly transforms the overal look of breasts. They loose their youthful appearance, just like some small wrinkles do the same thing for someone's face.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 06:52 PM
1

Yeah, but youth is at least a real part of the actual person, while material possessions are not. So, on that basis you could still claim that men are less shallow than women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 06:44 PM
2

Good for you. One of my best friends is ugly. I love him to death and he is a friendly, funny dude and very good company, but there is no other way to describe him than being physically ugly. Never even kissed a girl until he was around almost 30. Around 30 was the time that his career really started to kick in. I mean the guy is making so much money he bought his parents a house because he felt like it. Suddenly the guy is drowning in pussy. He is still just as ugly (maybe even more so because …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 06:28 PM
1

can give us an honest assessment of where they fucked up and what needs to be done instead of putting their heads in the sand There's one thing that women just can't do and that's accountability. I never heard a woman say these simple words: it's my fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 06:10 PM
-3

Did I say they were? You suggested as much when you turned on the virtue signalling instead of being honest about the real reasons. Your tits don't even sag at thirty lol. As a lover of tits, I can tell you that around 30 is the age that you can see female breasts starting to loose their shape and beginning to hang. Is it the same for every woman? Of course not. Sometimes it starts earlier, sometimes it starts later. 30 is a good rule of thumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 06:01 PM
1

But I think women are more able to see the value in a person beyond their looks. Which is the virtue signalling way of saying that women also care about money to the point that they will date an ugly man for his resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 05:51 PM
0

Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 05:45 PM
-12

Yeah sure, because women are so moral and ethical all the time. /s It's more likely that she's worried that her tits beginning to sag will turn of a young dude, who is used to nipples still pointing to the sky, than that she's worried about being a creep.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 05:44 PM
3

Pop a pimple probably.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/24 01:49 PM
5

lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 01:38 PM
1

We don't know that no man can get away with it. Lol, that's a good one, funny and disingenuous at the same time....
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 12:16 PM
–

Women finally getting a taste of their own medicine: "Why are men so mean????"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 12:12 PM
0

Did she piss on that fan without taking her clothes off? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 04:25 PM
0

If only one woman could get away with this, while 99.9% could not, it forces us to accept that gender is not what allowed her to get away with it. If only one woman got away with it, but no man can, then it still is a gendered issue. And we already have one woman who got away with it and we know that a man would not have been so lucky would he have done the same. If you are going to pretend and claim that a man would have been able to get away with this too, then I'm going to claim you are a big…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 04:23 PM
1

The fact that she wasn't doesn't allow us to conclude that any other woman could do this/ similar and get away with it. It's completely not relevant if one or many women would be able to get away with this behaviour. What is relevant is that no man would be able to get away with doing the same thing. And we already know that a woman got away with doing it. Therefore gender is definitely a determining factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 04:07 PM
1

Still searching for a female stand-up comedian that's actually funny. I'm open for suggestions...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 03:56 PM
-4

No we don't know that. We do know that any male artist who would ask a fan on stage during a concert, take his dick out and piss on her and then kick her to get her of the stage, would be finished. He would not be giving anymore concerts after that. His record company would drop him and Clearchannel, who has a monopoly on concert venues, would blacklist him. Since we know that any male artist who does this would get cancelled real quick, we don't even have to ask ourselves what the reason was wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 03:42 PM
1

Women always make me laugh. Sometimes because they are adorable, sometimes because they are stupid and sometimes because they are funny. Unfortunately women are only funny when they aren't trying to be funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 03:34 PM
-6

We all know that a male artist doing exactly the same thing (pissing on a consenting audience member) with a female fan, would get charged with indecent exposure and also get his career and himself cancelled. So, you are just being disenginous when you claim that it's "not all clear that gender is a reason". When a woman can do something without consequences that would end a man's career and probably end with a charge for indecent exposure and jail time, then of course gender is a determining fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 03:28 PM
2

You definitely never saw a really attractive guy go about life. The stories in this thread aren't exaggerated, if anything they are minimising what life is like for a real attractive guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 03:17 PM
-13

idk why she wasn't charged with indecent exposure Sure you do. It was because she is a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 03:05 PM
1

Bud, you admitted to stalking me, maybe I'm not the one with the problem here. Stalking you? Lol, yeah I did. And I went to the redpill headquarters to add my notes to the report the other redpill men have made about you. Next we all did a redpill dance, wearing our redpill uniform while we sang the redpill song. You are delusional. Please point out the arrogance. The fact that you feel the need to correct someone when they can speak your language way better than you can speak theirs, is arrogan…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 07:17 PM
2

Nah, it does confirm that red pillers are unhinged, though. The fact that no one is keeping records on you is confirmation that those who do not keep records on you are unhinged? Damn, your one crazy SOB, cupcake. It's time to come back to reality. No worries, just letting you know. I'm not apologizing to you, cupcake. So you are being weird (again) by saying 'no worries' as if I did. Don't arrogantly correct my English when I can speak more languages than you. Yet you specifically called out my…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 06:30 PM
1

Do you have an actual question or is this your desperate need of attention doing the talking again?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:24 PM
2

so no one can not be a contrarian? Of course you can be not a contrarian, but you won't prove that by making a disagreeing statement. Which brings me to my second point: Still waiting on a comment from you demonstrating that your mind can be changed by men. I'm sure a contrarian as yourself isn't going to be able to show me any evidence from that happening on this sub. But you claimed that it has happened, so show me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:19 PM
2

You're not the first red piller to tell me that they are documenting me on this sub. Also, the word is "tabs." I bet it makes you feel real important to think that the "big bad redpill organisation" is tracking you. Unfortunately for you, redpill is just advice for men by men. That's all it is. There is no redpill organisation. There is no headquarters and there definitely isn't a filling system in that headquarters where people are keeping reports on you. Lol, weirdo. Also, the word is "tabs." …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:12 PM
2

Lol, trying to prove you are not a contrarian by telling me I'm wrong. Yeah, that won't cut it. I'll believe you if you show me a comment of yours where you admit that you were wrong before and now your mind has changed. Don't worry, I won't be holding my breath waiting for that comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:18 PM
3

Don't flatter yourself too much, cupcake. Redpill doesn't exist as an organisation. So the "firm" isn't keeping taps on you. However when you are trying real hard to outdo even the most vile femnazis in being a femnazi, then you are definitely standing out. Which will make individuals wonder what the hell is wrong with you. Like I did. I first was convinced that you were a blue haired lesbian pretending to be a man to get away with some of the nasty things you say about men. So I googled you to …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:11 PM
3

I had the same reaction initially. I was pretty sure that it was one of those accounts where a woman pretends to be a man to get away with saying more negative things about men. I have encountered several of those accounts on PPD. But I used some good old google magic on this person and think I have found his Facebook page. If I googled correctly then he unfortunately is definitely a man. A very fucked up one at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:00 PM
4

Good for you if you manage to keep intimate details inside your own relationship. Unfortunately a lot of women do share these details with their friends. It's apparently how a lot of women bond with their friends. It has happened to me and I have had female friends share intimate details (that I definitely didn't want to hear) with me. I once found out a guy was impotent because his girlfriend (an acquaintance of mine) decided to share that information unprompted. I was completely shocked. First…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 02:52 PM
6

According to his own admission he is bi. Which makes this whole thing even weirder. Why simp so much for women and hate on men, when you are sexually attracted to both? This guy is just too fucked up to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 02:04 PM
2

This happens to both genders and id argue that men tend to talk about their sexual endeavors more often than women. When men talk about their partners to their friends it's limited to: "Yes we had sex. Yes it was good." Men don't go sharing details with their friends. Meanwhile most women share every little detail with their friends. If you have a girlfriend that you have been with for say at least a year, then you can bet your girlfriend's friends know exactly how big your dick is, if you like …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 02:02 PM
–

just for acknowledging that he wasn't the best she's ever had You are dishonest as fuck. He broke up with her not because she acknowledged something, but because she broke trust and decided to gossip about intimate details to people outside of the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 01:54 PM
–

This guy is the biggest femnazi you can find on this subreddit and he doesn't even have a vagina. I can understand women being femnazis, but men? And to such an extreme degree? Makes you wonder what kind of trauma he has experienced to get so fucked up in the head...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 01:45 PM
1

Beta bucks means you have to provide in order to get some. With 'providing' meaning you hand over money, gifts or other material possessions. Which is something that an alpha fucks does not have to do to get some. I love it when women on this sub try to explain redpill concepts to redpill men. Sort of like me explaining to women what periods are...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 06:30 AM
1

Telling men to lose their self-respect and use their material possessions to pay for a woman, is both insulting to the men and the women you are talking about. It makes walking ATM's out of the men and whores out of the women. You hide behind ignorance now (it's not working) but telling men that they can always beta bux is the same kind of "honest" dating advice as telling men they can always get sex by using Grindr.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 06:18 AM
1

That's not a relationship, that's a business deal. And your intentions were not to disperse dating advice, but to be obnoxious and try to piss off a whole gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 05:19 AM
1

To whom? The economy?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:51 AM
1

The reason why you suggested that men always have the option to go the beta bucks route has nothing to do with dating either.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:37 AM
0

Same reason why you suggested that men always have the option to simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:52 AM
2

You don't have to buy it for it to be true, you are here just here to be a contrarian, so you aren't going to "buy" anything any man says anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:26 AM
-2

So is rape...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:15 AM
0

I am on a debate forum misinterpreting other people's statements on purpose, why isn't there any real debate happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 11:39 AM
–

You are 100% correct. I'm not an incel, so I can't answer questions addressed at incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 11:17 AM
1

Yeah sure, everytime a woman changes her mind because the guy was wearing the wrong coloured socks or because he chewed his food the wrong way, she wasn't being fickle. Of course not, women are never responsible for things they do. It was abuse and toxicity that made her do it...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 11:23 AM
2

I didn't really lie Women and logic, it will never be a winning team. You lied or you did not lie. "Not really lying" doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 06:17 PM
8

Your experience is an experience of 1. Of course I have more experience than you. Two would already be more experience than you, genius.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:20 PM
9

So, your defense is basically that women are not fickle, they are disingenuous instead and pretend to care for people they don't actually care for. That's even worse than being fickle.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:16 PM
8

having many failed relationships You don't know how many relationships I've had, so I don't know why you are talking like you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:09 PM
6

Look at you, trying to make it make sense while you ignore the obvious answer: women are fickle by nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:07 PM
6

Although true, not relevant to the discussion at hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 04:52 PM
8

I don't need to read minds to know a person changed their mind, now do I? That's all pretty obvious from a person's behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 04:48 PM
10

Sure, your limited experience of 1 is right and people with more experience are wrong. Makes perfect sense /s Most answers here agree with me. I didn't know that the truth was a democratic principle...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 04:45 PM
12

Sharing personal experience is fine, but unless you are a lesbian, you aren't dating women. Which limits your personal experience to 1. Therefore you should realise that most men have more experience on this matter. You might be the exception to the rule, that doesn't change the fact that most women are fickle as fuck. Coming from someone who's personal experience isn't limited to 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 04:33 PM
17

Women are known for their fickle nature, but of course all the lovely ladies of PPD are going to deny that women are fickle at all. Why am I not surprised?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 03:56 PM
1

I did read your response and reacted to the things that weren't to ridiculous to even validate with a response. If you think I ignored your main point, now you know why it got ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:46 AM
5

They are definitely not. What we call "romance" is things that men do for women. It's men buying flowers. It's men getting down on one knee and proposing. It's men buying a ring. Valentine's day is about men buying gifts for their women. Anything "romance" is done my men for women. Which makes men the people who do romantic stuff, while women don't do anything romantic back, they just receive. If women are the "romantic ones" like you claim they are, what do women do that is supposed to be roman…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 03:19 PM
1

I think we should definitely define promiscuity as bad overall Why? and that a promiscuous man "slut shaming" women is undoubtedly hypocrisy. No, it isn't. Male promiscuity is not the same thing as female promiscuity, as is obvious from the fact that for men it's hard to be promiscuous, while for women this is an easy thing to do. If they were the same thing, then both men and women would experience the same level of difficulty. But they don't... So, when we talk about promiscuity, we are talkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 10:37 AM
-5

You are making perfect sense and it's making me all confused. Are you sure you are a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 03:42 PM
1

Lol, didn't make it past your first sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/24 11:49 AM
1

This is the dumbest bad faith argument I have ever wasted my time on. If you had any intellectual capacity you would demonstrate why what I said was wrong. But, you don't. Since you can't explain why I was wrong, I will just shut you up and explain why I am right. I have two doctors in my immediate family. They are the first to admit that studying medicine requires a good memory and not much else. Medicine isn't about a person's intelligence. You don't need to be able to come up with new ideas o…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 12:54 PM
1

Since when is surgical work related to a person's intelligence? You need a steady hand and a good memory to be a successful surgeon. You don't need to have the problem solving skills of an engineer or a high IQ. Did it ever occur to you that having smaller hands is a benefit when you need to be precise with a blade in a small space, like for instance inside a human's body? You bring a practical skill issue (doing surgery) to a discussion about intelligence and still have the arrogance to call me…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 11:56 AM
1

Lol, what about chess? Is chess also a "myopic western creation that favors the prevailing hegemony"? The world championship chess is open to both men and women. Can you guess why they still organize a separate woman only world chess championship, where men are not allowed to participate?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 11:34 AM
1

Nice try. IQ isn't about education. IQ is about a person's ability to reason and solve problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 11:15 AM
1

And they could easily pay those same bills by doing another job that doesn't include having to smell garbage all day long. So, why would some men be willing to endure all the smell and all the dirt? The answer is simple. Men who are willing to do backbreaking work, dangerous work or dirty work, aren't doing those kind of jobs because they need to "pay the bills". Because plenty of jobs that aren't that hard, dangerous or dirty would pay the bills just the same. No, they are doing those jobs beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 10:55 AM
1

Not to burst your bubble but when you look at the extremities of the intelligence curve, then most of the outliers are men. Which means that both the smartest people and the dumbest people alive are men. Which means that if you wish for men to be even smarter, you are only widening the gap that already exists at the top between the smartest men and the smartest women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 10:33 AM
1

Wouldn't be able to answer your questions even if I wanted to, because they don't apply to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 10:23 AM
1

There's a difference between threatening and warning. Men aren't saying they are going to hurt women, a lot of men are just bugging out of society, which means they will stop doing things that society benefits from. And since women are a part of society, this means those men will also stop doing things that women benefit from. Women today may hype themselves up and tell themselves they are "strong and independent" queens, but they still drive roads that men built, get their power from an infrast…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 09:55 AM
4

Sigh, I wish women were better at being funny. There's a reason why almost all famous stand-up comedy comes from men. Can you at least make an effort? Or was a Meryl Streep meme really the best you could manage?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 05:26 PM
5

You think that countries that use this system of garbage disposal are "third world nations"? Ignorant and arrogant at the same time. Great. You live in a country were they need to teach school kids how to deal with school shootings. And you are all one health problem away from financial ruin. I would say that makes your country more of a third world nation than countries where kids are not worried about getting shot, people are protected against bankruptcy by a good social security system and ye…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 05:23 PM
3

you think women are gonna just let garbage fill up like a bunch of babies? Exactly this. None of you women have a reason to volunteer for that job, when another woman could also be volunteering to do it. Men are only willing to do the awful jobs because they are competing with other men. Take away that element of competition and they would also be saying: "Let another sucker do that job. It's not going to be me".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 05:12 PM
3

This is how it's done in a lot of countries. You probably are American, so can't really fault your ignorance. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 05:05 PM
5

You should stop putting words in my mouth. It makes you appear disingenuous or like you are not able to read. I said men are competing with other men over women and that's why they are willing to do jobs that are dangerous, backbreaking or dirty. I did not say they are doing those jobs so they can pay for dates with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:57 PM
2

There are plenty of easier ways for a woman to earn that kind of pay. So, no money will not make women handle garbage all day, bruh.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:53 PM
0

What? Most men have not given up on women and dating. They are still competing with other men. Of course they will be doing garbage collection. It unskilled labor that still pays very well. There aren't that many unskilled jobs that pay at the same level.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:50 PM
3

Ok, why would a particular woman stand up and say: "Ok, sisters you can all keep your nice clean lives. I will sacrifice myself and stand on a stinking garbage truck all day long to collect all your garage for you. So, that you won't have to do that job. My life and my career will be spent smelling garbage". There's no woman who's willing to do that. At least not enough of them to replace all the men. Men only do that job because they are in competition with other men for women. And this is such…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:44 PM
2

As if you can compare a woman from 1940 with the entitled Karen's of today. Lol, thanks for the laughs.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:34 PM
–

Did using your brain hurt today? Why would you ask a woman if alpha males often regret cheating? She is no male. She is no alpha. And she already made up the fact that alpha males are always cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:32 PM
5

You keep ignoring things already explained to you. So, I'll keep copy/pasting myself back to you. I'm not going to try to say the same thing with different words over and over again. If men stopped doing all the physical hard jobs, all the dirty jobs, all the smelly jobs, then women aren't going to start doing them. They will just not get done. You know how I know this will happen? Because you yourself did not imagine yourself on a garbage truck, slaving away collecting all the garbage. You imag…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:28 PM
2

by the tiny minority of men Look at the numbers for men who are single and men who did not had sex in the past year. To call it a "tiny minority" is wishful thinking or ignorance. And the number is only growing. Once that number achieves critical mass, what you think can never turn into an actual problem, has become a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:26 PM
2

You’re delulu if you think women can’t do men’s jobs. Like I already explained to you: I never said women couldn't do those things. It's not a problem of ability, it's a problem of willingness.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:21 PM
8

I’m pretty sure that there are plenty of Becky’s slinging garbage Really? Find me some then. I never ever saw a female garbage worker. And I have seen plenty of people working that job. And lived in several different countries and continents. So, it's not like I "didn't see because I never looked around". I have looked around and I'm pretty sure there are not plenty of Becky's working in garbage disposal. Also you’ve never seen a woman truck driver or mechanic with long nails? Sad! Never saw a f…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:14 PM
-1

I see men still chasing women (almost never see women actively chasing men) and men do not have a long list of demands for their potential partners. While most women these days have a list of demands that is so unrealistic that they eliminate more than 99% of men. Seems pretty obvious which gender is actually enthousiastic about the other gender and which gender seems to be motivated only by the practical benefits that a relationship could bring.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:56 PM
2

You don't need to do a job that makes you smell and handle garbage all day. Jobs like that are jobs that men are willing to do when they are in competition with other men for women, because these jobs pay a little extra to compensate for the inconvenience. Men who take themselves out of the dating game are no longer going to do those dirty jobs. They'll find a nice cosy job and settle for a pay cut. Same goes for all the jobs that are backbreaking, truly dangerous or high stress. Ever seen a man…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:41 PM
7

I never said women couldn't do those things. It's not a problem of ability, it's a problem of willingness. Becky isn't going to sacrifice herself and ruin her fake nails by dragging garbage around, if Vanessa can keep her nice cosy office job and never has to smell garbage all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:32 PM
7

The women are wonderful effect, the rise in female entitlement and the fact that women truly do not like men. They only like men for what men can provide. And women no longer need men to provide anything to them, that's a job the state has taken over. Only women who like sex and women who want to be mothers still find a use for men. While almost all men still like women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:17 PM
1

Last time it happened to me was at my local sports club. 15 year age gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:11 PM
22

You understand what these women can't seem to understand. Yeah, you might not give a fuck about men not wanting to date anymore. But you will give a fuck when those men also do not care enough anymore to keep your lights on or your garbage collected. Society is meaningless concept to men that are no longer interested in women or dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:02 PM
10

Dismissive and condescending is that person's main way of communication. Maybe even their only way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 11:00 AM
1

It sounds like you just hear what you want to hear.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 07:27 AM
2

What's toxic is expecting other human beings to not have emotions and to break up with them, when they show that they do in fact have emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 07:12 AM
1

I'm sorry, do you need help understanding my comments? Just ask if you do, love, there are no stupid questions here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:09 PM
4

You can't win as a man. If you don't open up then you are a robot or scared of emotions. When you do open up you get accused of being a dishonest, manipulative little coward. Might as well not listen to what women say and just do what you think is best.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:04 PM
3

They weren't acting like jerks. They were opening up, like women always say they want, but actually respond negatively when it happens. This is so common knowledge, there's even another guy in this thread here, who says he uses the same tactic to break up when friends with benefits become to attached and want more.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 03:22 PM
2

Keep spreading the love.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 02:29 PM
3

I love it when people try to use fake apologies. It always lets you know just how much of a prick that person is. I hope your life gets better.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 02:11 PM
1

It's not just 3 men. It's all men. Your disingenuous ass has just invented a new word and it isn't even a good one. Pretending like this is a known term. Yeah, right.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 01:34 PM
3

Perhaps it’s more to do with the women you seek out. Fine example of victim blaming you got there son. Real fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 01:24 PM
4

Not true. I have seen this actually work in reality. Guys using displaying emotions to get their woman turned off and break up with them. It avoids all the drama and possible revenge that could happen if they would initiate the break up themselves. Better let her do it. Remember: hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. Sometimes opening up can be a safer way to end a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 01:13 PM
1

It's not that uncommon. We all know guys who get approached. If a man doesn't need to do the approaching himself, then he is already in they unicorn category you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 01:58 PM
4

Seems like those men are still winning. Most men are perfectly fine fucking woman after woman without ever being expected to commit. I don't see the downsides. Get it, have fun, get out before the nagging starts. Perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 01:55 PM
-1

Solution is simple. Modern day women don't offer anything but some holes to fuck. So, men should just limit their dating life to fucking. No commitment, no cohabitation and no problems. Easy peasy. Problems solved. Bonus points if you "date" more than one woman at a time, because then you also have eliminated the problem of dry spells. Get out your popcorn and enjoy the decline. Women are getting exactly what they have been asking for. And I think it's hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 12:58 AM
15

Those men don't even register to most women unless the qualities you describe are accompanied with being tall, fit, handsome and rich and/or famous. So no, a man who helps around the house is not considered "above average". He is still invisible just like the rest of the 80% who are not Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 12:00 AM
6

You mean rich men, who compensate for being fat with money, get women all the time...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 11:44 PM
2

I got halfway through your reply and just can't be bothered anymore to even read the rest. I get the same feeling from you, as I would get from discussing with a flatearther. You are denying human instincts and you are even smug about it. As if all these testimonials from people describing exactly what I said, are made up. How do you discuss with someone who is convinced that the earth is flat? I have no idea, it's probably completely pointless. And so is talking to you. Have a good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 09:01 PM
2

We are not attracting each other at first by pheromones. So, you didn't bother to look into the "smelly t-shirt" experiment. Ok, got you. Why bother discussing with you, if you already have made up your mind and don't even bother to look at the argument I made? Do humans use perfume/deodorant? Yeah, they do. But if you are sleeping with someone, you are going to smell their natural scent regardless. We are not utilizing our pheromones to any comparable level that we would in our natural setting.…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 08:34 PM
2

You vastly underestimate how humans are still driven by our instincts. Let me ask you the following: would you date someone who you think stinks? I mean a person who literally smells bad to you? Most people will not do this. You can't ignore smell. It would be an awful experience. Especially at times that things turn sexual, a bad smell would be very off-putting. The things is, people who smell bad to us, are people who have genes that are more similar to our own genes. This is nature's way of m…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 06:17 PM
17

If she's attractive I would still fuck her. But you can't turn a hoe into a housewife. So, no, I would not date her.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 04:15 PM
1

and are being appreciated for showing emotion more than ever. This is only going to grow. Women still get the "ick" when men display vulnerability. Because it's ingrained in them by thousands of years of needing to rely on their partners being strong and able to protect them and their children. Just like men get the "ick" when women display promiscuous behaviors. Because it's ingrained in them by thousands of years of needing to rely on their partners not being whores who sleep with other men an…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 03:52 PM
3

You are the one who pointed out that men will treat promiscuous women differently, when you made your remark. Now you pretend as if this isn't a thing in the real world? Ok, miss disingenuous, have a good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 03:42 PM
2

Yeah sure, all those hundreds of threads are made up and you made this remark because men don't thread promiscuous women negatively: as long as you hold yourself to the same standard Nice try.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 03:33 PM
7

Women aren’t fucking your maturity or responsibility But they are fucking our money and our social influence...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 03:28 PM
4

Maybe you need to get your eyes checked then. Just go to the relationship_advice subreddit. Search for the word 'promiscuous' and find hundreds of threads discussing this exact situation that you claim doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 03:25 PM
3

We aren't talking about non-virgins. We are talking about women who had casual sex with random men. There's a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 03:17 PM
3

In the real world different people are treated differently. You would not have made this remark, if people weren't treating men and women differently when it comes to being promiscuous: as long as you hold yourself to the same standard
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 03:09 PM
3

And you can keep complaining about the way things are, it won't change a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 02:58 PM
2

This isn't an argument. What you personally do isn't relevant. You are not society. I don't shame women for being promiscuous either. I just won't date them. Which also doesn't change the fact that society shames women for being promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 02:49 PM
6

So we also should start shaming women for letting their emotions show, just like men are shamed for doing the same? You are crazy. Things are the way they are, because men and women are different. Since you can't change the fact that men and women are different, it's no use trying to change the difference in treatment that is a direct consequence of men and women being different.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 02:39 PM
12

as long as you hold yourself to the same standard. That's not how to world works. For example: women get sympathy when they express their emotions, men get ridiculed for doing the same thing. Just like men get a high five for being promiscuous, while women get ridiculed for doing the same thing. Men and women are different, it makes no sense to hold them to the "same standards".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 02:31 PM
2

A younger and hotter woman has a higher social status than an older and poorer woman. Yes, and water is wet. Men who want younger and thinner women are wanting women with higher social status whether they realize it or not. Of course these younger women have a higher status than old wrinkled women with gravity affected tits and cellulite assess. Again, water is wet. But what's your point? I fail to understand why you keep talking about what men want, when you reacted to my claim that women are h…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 04:17 AM
1

How does that make women not hypergamous? That's right it doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 04:03 AM
2

That women prefer a man who's around their own income bracket, is the biggest BS I heard all week. And I have spent a lot of time on Reddit this week, so that's saying a lot. Present any woman on this planet with two identical men, who only differ in the amount of money they make. One man makes the same as the woman does. The other man makes significantly more than her. In this example almost all women will pick the guy who makes more than her. And you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 04:00 AM
2

and aren’t hypergamous Come on now, I understand it's supposed to be a thought experiment, but expecting men to imagine women not being hypergamous is asking for too much...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 03:09 AM
1

That women are not shallow and therefore are open to dating men that are not attractive (or not as attractive as they are). You are basically doing what women here are constantly doing when they say that women are not hypergamous. He was in a motorbike "gang" There you go. She wasn't dating a fat dude, she was dating a "dangerous biker who could fuck up other men because he's part of a gang". I bet if this guy spend his free time playing tennis instead of being in a biker gang, that she would no…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 04:21 PM
1

I smell virtue signaling all over your comment. I never have seen a fat dude with a good looking woman by his side, unless he was rich or famous. Women are hypergamous. They aren't dating fat guys while they themselves are good looking, unless that man has something to offer that can compensate his looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 04:07 PM
1

That's only possible if women are diverse Of course all women don't look the same. The vast majority of them just go for the same type of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 12:27 AM
1

You mean rich dudes with a gut...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 12:25 AM
3

Also, your statement is false. Men have less varied taste than women. All men, regardless of class and economical status, want a Barbie. If this was even half true then porn would only feature Barbies. Which isn't the case. There's old, young, fat, skinny, curvy, bodybuilder, dark hair, blonde hair, redhead, etc... porn. Look at the body types on the cover of magazines. Even BBW's can be models. Now compare that with the men who are in movies, on the cover of magazines or in porn. All the same f…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 12:23 AM
4

it’s become a trend for sure. I am seriously doubting this when half of women's dating profiles explicitly mention that a man needs to be at least some kind of height to even qualify for a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 06:47 PM
3

I'm not saying women who are into short men don't exist. I'm pointing out that men's taste in women are far more diverse than women's taste in men. Which they are. If your man is really short, he can attest to this fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 06:43 PM
2

I never said women can't be smart. I pointed out that you will find more men at the extremities of the curve. So, if you take the 100 smartest people in the world, then the majority of them will be men. If you take the 100 most dumb people in the world, the majority will also be men. You are trying to argue a point I never made. I never claimed women are dumb. I pointed out the distribution of intelligence. And you saying that 30% at the top are women, is corroborating with what I said. So, what…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 06:38 PM
7

Porn was an example to demonstrate my point. This isn't something that's limited to porn. Men just have a far more diverse taste when it comes to women, then women have when it comes to men. That's exactly why some short men are so desperate. They can't seem to find any women to give them a chance. The equivalent does not exist for women. Short women will have men that are into them. Tall women too. For any female body type, there are men who are into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 06:32 PM
7

Calling me too stupid while you can't read or are to dumb to notice that I already pointed out that these men have to compensate with money or other attributes for their shortcomings. While women are not required to compensate for their shortcomings..A fat chick doesn't need to be rich or charismatic to get a man. Simply because there will be a man who genuinely is into fat chicks and finds her attractive. The same can't be said about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 06:23 PM
11

BS, if you look at what men like then you'll find that they are attracted to every kind of woman. Fat, short, slim, tall, chubby, obese.... it doesn't matter. There really is a man for any type of woman. When you look at what women like, the picture is totally different. Almost all women seem to want tall men with a fit physique. BBW for example is a populair porn category for men. Women aren't into fat guys. Women aren't into short guys. The only way a "Big Beautiful Man" can get a woman, is if…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 04:47 PM
1

Don't understand what point you are trying to make. One female chess player getting into the top ten is evidence that men are better at chess (because all others in the top ten are men and other women don't even come close to Judith. She's an exception). 30% of Mensa being women still means that 70% are men. Again corroborating that more men are found at the extremities of the IQ scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 02:14 PM
1

Strongest female player ever. She was and still is a great player. But she never became world champion (she became female world champion, but never champion when competing with men) and number 8 was her highest ranking. And let's not forget, she is an exception. Far stronger than any other woman. Polgár is the only woman to have been a serious candidate for the World Chess Championship, in which she participated in 2005; she had previously participated in large, 100-player-plus knockout tourname…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:56 PM
–

Yep, most women aren't here for the debate, they are here because they like to shit on men. Hell, a large percentage of the women here aren't even into men or have stopped dating at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:14 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 12:27 PM
0

And virtue signaling, because telling the truth would demonstrate that women are just as shallow as men, is typical for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 12:26 PM
–

Any man capable of reading between the lines knows the real answer is: he was tall, very handsome, fit and had money. All the rest is just virtue signaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 12:21 PM
2

When it comes to IQ men are also the outliers. Both at the top and at the bottom. This explains why women can't compete with the top male chess players. Women are allowed to participate in the (men's) world championship of chess, but they don't stand a chance. Which is why there is also a separate female world championship.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 05:24 AM
1

Thanks for your contribution and get lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 02:51 AM
2

if you're tired of bad faith arguments then I'm tired of every moment of levity being met with these dramatic replies. Simple solution: don't start with the bad faith arguments and there won't be any dramatic replies. What makes THIS something men and women should be treated differently on? There are a lot of things men and women are treated differently on. This is just one of those things. A promiscuous man comes with the "guarantee" that that man has a lot of qualities that society deems desir…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 09:33 PM
1

There's no other way to treat the sexuality of men and women differently than by having the judgements on their use of their sexuality be opposite? Lmao Okay. I really am sick and tired of people like you, who debate in this dishonest manner. Nowhere did I claim what you say here. But you act like I did, then laugh and pretend like I'm an idiot for saying it. Which frankly is a toddler level of debating. I never claimed "there's no other way" or "judgment on their sexuality should be opposite". …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 06:10 PM
6

Become rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 05:36 PM
1

If one of my friends has slept with her, then she is no longer an option. There are enough women in the world to not get involved with the sloppy seconds of your friends. Having sex with a woman is still a very self-affirming thing for a man. This is no longer the case if your mates also had a go with her. Then it becomes an affirmation that you are nothing special, she is just sleeping with anything that crosses her path. In fact it can be an affirmation that you are "less", because she was fir…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 02:54 PM
0

Also, women are whores but men are kings when having sex with more people Which is perfectly understandable since men and women aren't the same. It would be rather weird if humans who are not the same, would be treated like they are exactly the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 02:41 PM
3

Lol, is this the best you can do? Claim that beets turn me on? This is almost as weak as your libido.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 10:27 PM
2

Ok, mister "not even once a weak" isn't frustratingly low. I would suggest oysters, salmon, nuts, beets and red wine. They are all good for the libido....
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 08:26 PM
2

At least this monkey doesn't have the libido of a deflated balloon. Not even once a week isn't exactly what I would call a good sex life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 08:18 PM
-2

As if being inconsiderate can only manifest itself by forgetting someone's birthday...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 08:13 PM
1

Almost half are having sex at least once a week. You provided statistics that illustrate my point, you genius. More than half aren't even having sex once a week. Don't know if your libido is still working correctly, but to most men this frequency would lead to sexual frustration.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 08:05 PM
3

Lets see those statistics that tell you that there isn't a "very high probability", seeing as you seem to think I'm a dancing monkey. And you are the one who says "dance".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 07:37 PM
1

No the cut off is not important. It's completely irrelevant if it is 70, 80 or 90%. Fact is there is a very high probability that a man will end up in a relationship that will leave him sexually frustrated. And that's no bueno.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 07:22 PM
-2

Yeah sure, when women are shitty partners, it must be caused by their men. It is absolutely unthinkable that the women might be inconsiderate themselves. The "women are wonderful" effect strikes again. Women can be absolute pieces of shit. Do you tell an abused woman that she probably came across as someone who asked for some good ol' abuse too?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 07:19 PM
-1

Bananas are cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 07:13 PM
1

Doesn't really matter where the cut off is. When a man (usually the one with the higher libido) knows that there is a very high probability that he will end up sexually frustrated, why go through with it? If you don't cohabitate, the risk is much lower. So, don't cohabitate.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 07:06 PM
0

The comment you responded to said "almost inexorably".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 06:50 PM
1

Almost half are having sex at least once a week. Once a weak isn't much, especially since you are probably living together. And what about the other half? Yeah, that's right.... I know plenty of men whose yearly birthday present is "getting lucky". So incredibly sad. The best thing a man can do to have his needs met on a regular basis, is to not cohabitate with his partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 06:36 PM
–

If men wear the mean ones, then the saying would have been: Hell hath no fury like a man. But it isn't, the saying recognises that you better not make a woman angry, because they are mean as fuck: Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 03:17 PM
7

Strange you would say that, it definitely worked for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 02:13 PM
–

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 04:30 AM
–

That's a "you" problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 04:27 AM
–

Sure it was.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 04:24 AM
–

You realise that unless you want children, women have nothing to offer but sex. And sex in itself isn't worth the hassle of getting in a relationship. So, why worry about it all? If you really need to get your rocks off, find a drunk woman or a professional streetwalker. If you're lonely, get a dog. Focus on yourself and the nice life you can have without a woman wearing you down. Have hobbies, travel the world, eat nice food,... Women ain't shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 03:48 AM
4

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 03:35 AM
1

Hey, those are a lot of words for "I do me". Good for you. I just explained why men respond to promiscuity the way they do. It's not something that men do consciously. It sometimes gets tiring for men too, to always be strong because we know how women react of we don't. Both genders have those unsubconscious expectations for each other. You don't have to like it, it just how nature has made us to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 08:55 PM
2

Like I said, show me were my reasoning is not correct then. If I made an error, it will be easy to point out what it is. Since my reasoning uses only a few facts to reach it's conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 07:31 AM
1

No, it isn't. It's not my opinion that assumption based on a person's job, don't reflect that all people are different. That's a fact. 5 doctors will lead you to assume they are all the same kind of person. While if you look at their looks, you will come to the conclusion that they are 5 different people. Since the latter is accurate (they are 5 different people in reality) and the former isn't, I have demonstrated that you can tell more about a person based on their looks than their jobs. Since…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 07:09 AM
2

This is not a subjective matter. I have demonstrate that using a person's job is less accurate than using their looks. Therefore your claim that a job tells you more about a person than their look would do, is categorically wrong. Looks reflect that all people are different. Jobs don't do this. Based on this fact alone, it's already easy to see that a person's looks will give you a better idea of who they are, then their job would give you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 06:06 AM
3

I’m not personally seeing the issue. Which is understandable. You are not a man. There's no risk for you to be a victim of paternity fraud. So, your internal "danger radar" doesn't go off when you are confronted with promiscuous behavior in the gender you are trying to date. Look, for 99% of the time that humans were alive, the only defense men had against being turned into a cuckold, was to not select partners who displayed promiscuous behaviors. Since reproduction is basically the reason why a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 05:31 AM
2

If you are comparing 5 people in the same jobs then of course you move on to things like dress, hobbies etc I used the example of 5 people who do the same job, to demonstrate that jobs are less accurate than looks are to get an idea about a person. You can't form an idea about 5 doctors with your approach. You would think they are all the same kind of person. Which is of course silly, because 5 doctors will be 5 very different people, with very different personalities. If you try to get an idea …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 05:10 AM
2

You spend most your life working a job you think your personality plays no role in what you do? Stop with the absolutes. Absolutes do not exist. So, it's silly to say that a personality plays no role in what you do. Your job will definitely tell things about you. But that isn't the discussion we are having. The question is what tells more about you? The job you do to not starve or the way you dress and present yourself to the world? It's pretty obvious what is a better reflection of who you are …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 03:37 AM
1

There are times that I can agree to disagree, some things are clearly highly subjective and don't have an objective truth. This is not one if those times. People work to have money. Most people don't work because they like, love or even relate to the job they do. Therefore a job tells almost nothing about the person who does the job. You only know how much money they make more or less. That's it. Now, I know that a lot of women are golddiggers and therefore care only about the financial part of …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 03:14 AM
1

You can absolutely make assumptions True, but anyone who makes assumptions based on a person's job, is more likely to make wrong than right assumptions. You can try to talk circles all you like but anyone would make base assumptions and likely be correct when comparing a 30 year old McDonald’s employee vs a 30 year old lawyer. And you can move the goalposts all you want, it doesn't make your claim that a job tells more about a person than his look does, anymore right. We weren't talking about co…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 02:52 AM
2

So, basically you can't assume what a person considers to be nice things. And if that person does his job because he wants to have nice things or if there are other reasons for doing that job. Seems to me, assuming why a person does the job that they do, will lead to wrong assumptions about that person more often then not.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 02:35 AM
1

doesn't mean there is some kind of magical formula explaining attraction from either gender. I know and never claimed there was, so I wonder why you are sharing this information with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 02:29 AM
0

Woah, impressive! I don't work at McDonald's so I am a person who likes nice things. Guess what, half priced Sherlock Holmes, people who work at McDonald's still like nice things. And people who don't work at McDonald's might not care about luxury, but could just hate smelling like fries all the time. You can tell a lot more from a person's looks than from that thing they do to pay their bills. People's looks are a reflection of their personality, their jobs are a reflection of their desire not …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:53 AM
10

All your buddy has to do to have women trying to date him like his sperm is guaranteed to produce super kids, is get more money and more status. He already has the looks. For casual dating, your looks are everything. For serious relationships money and status becomes more important. Your succes with women is always determined by the whole trifecta: money, status, looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:34 AM
2

Your job says more about you than your looks do No, it doesn't. The only thing my job says about me, is that I need money so I don't starve. My looks are an integral part of who I am. So, they definitely say more about me than "that thing I do to not starve".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:27 AM
2

Women have freedom now = / = having copious amounts of sex. Don't know about that. I personally know 3 women with a triple digit body count. And almost every woman I know who has used Tinder, has been participating in casual sex with randoms. Because that's basically what Tinder is, an online meat market where people find bodies to fuck. Situationships, FWB, fuck buddies, we are seeing each other but aren't official (so we are also seeing others at the same time), etc... These are all common typ…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 11:58 PM
-2

but many won't and they move on to be with some bluepill dude or reasonable purplepill dude... ... who they consequently start resenting because he isn't exiting them like the men they were dating before. That blue pill guy isn't winning like you seem to think. He'll will get cucked, presented with a dead bedroom and basically just used as a walking ATM. I'd rather be the redpill dude they use for sex but do not actually want to date. Then the blue pill dude they who gets the woman once she is t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 11:41 PM
–

Get in line and wait your turn.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 10:30 PM
1

And there we go again. Women are never accountable for their own decisions. You are trying to claim that society is the reason why women have children. Which honestly, is just ridiculous when EVERY LIVING THINGS HAS A DRIVE TO PROCREATE.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 07:39 PM
–

Aha, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 07:08 PM
1

Get over yourself. Women aren't some mindless drones that society can push around. They are having babies because they have a drive to procreate, just like every other living thing in existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 07:07 PM
1

People who are delusional also think they are living in reality. Just saying ...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:40 PM
–

I like fruit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:15 PM
1

🎵 You are reaching... 🎵 .. reaching for the stars 🎵
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:15 PM
–

Not wanting to give up on the financial benefits of the relationship is based on feelings? What feeling is that exactly? The feeling of being scared of becoming homeless? Lol, what a bunch of horse shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:50 PM
1

I can't take anyone serious who actually says things like women are having babies for society. As if women are these selfless beings, sacrificing themselves for the greater good by getting pregnant and giving birth. Any living thing as a drive to reproduce. Society has nothing to do with that drive. And it's that drive that makes any living thing (yep, that includes women) "have babies".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:46 PM
–

Since when are women having babies "for society"? Her body, her choice. They are having babies because they want babies. Not for some kind of higher purpose like the sake of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:14 PM
–

That’s why they stay with shitty, abusive, indifferent, messed-up partners all the time That's not love. That's not wanting to give up on the financial benefits the relationship offers, trauma bonding or dependency issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:11 PM
-7

. These "half women" are still doing the majority of the housework No they are not. Women today don't even know how to do the housework anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 07:28 AM
-1

The main people creating those standards are other men telling men No, you are being absolutely ridiculous. Men don't expect other men to be six feet tall before they are datable. That is something that women expect. So are having to earn a 6 figure salary or a six pack. If you don’t looksmax youll never date up Women are hypergamous. They are the ones who date up. Which means men are the ones dating down. Stop inventing BS. That way men technically aren’t working harder than their forefathers Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 07:26 AM
-1

We get to live such longer healthier lives yet we’re working harder than our grandfathers? I didn't say that we have to work harder then our grandfathers. Learn how to read. Our grandfathers had less expectations to live up too (didn't need to be 6 feet tall, 6 figure income with a six pack, didn't need to be able to open up or do half of the housework on top of bringing home the bacon) and still got better partners in return (women who could cook, took care of the home, the children and the hus…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 05:41 AM
6

You are still making deductions that have just as much chance of being wrong as being right. But since you are convinced of women having some kind of supernatural intuition, you also think that your deductions are 100% correct. You are basically going to dump a guy, because his shoes getting wet make him a too disorganised person to share your life with. And that's absurd. He wore nice luxury sneakers so he values his material possessions. Or he's superstitious and these are his lucky sneakers. …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 04:44 AM
11

It also tells me he doesn’t check the weather app before he gets dressed which means he’s not much of a planner, now that’s fine for a lot of people, personally I wouldn’t have a very successful relationship with someone like that so I would’ve passed as well. This is exactly why men say that women will drop a guy over a minor detail. Not checking the weather app before he goes on a date, does not mean that the guy isn't a planner. If I ever saw an example of jumping to conclusions, then it's th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 04:14 AM
2

We can take in a lot of sensory details subconsciously and navigate off of vibes. He wore the wrong shoes. So, I'm not going to see him again. mankind’s kind of survived this long thanks to female intuition. Lol, yep, men killing the dangerous animals and hunting for food had nothing to do with it. It's female intuition that saved the human race. And don't forget it's female intuition that discovered new continents, built the railroads, the nuclear plants, etc.... I just wish it was less belittl…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 03:11 AM
-6

women will be subservient and attend to the majority or all of the domestic duties'. We are not living in the fifties of the previous century anymore. Women today can barely cook, clean or do anything else but doomscroll on Instagram. The only expectation I have left for a woman I date, is that she is attractive enough to get me turned on and isn't annoying to be around. All other things are a very welcome, but more and more a very unexpected bonus. It's really true what they say. Today's men ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 03:02 AM
4

y’all literally get out masculined by a transsexual Too much machismo in that comment. More estrogen needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 11:43 PM
1

he said "if you do this, i will break up with you" holding up his relationship as a threat with the intention of changing (controlling) her behavior It's the same thing. I'm not going to inform you that something you do makes me uncomfortable and then just take it if you keep doing that hing that makes me uncomfortable. I'm telling you so you are informed. If you know that you are making your partner uncomfortable and keep on doing it, what do you think will happen? I thought women were good at …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 08:10 PM
–

lol, yeah right, sure you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 07:37 PM
1

you got the definition wrong. I didn't invent anything new, I just used the definition that's in the dictionary. i use what professionals in the field use No, you don't. You just picked a very extensive definition of abuse, so that you can claim that men are abusive when they express their boundaries. why would the definition of abuse not be negative? abuse isn't positive or neutral You focus on the wrong thing of what I said. Of course abuse is negative, that doesn't mean that you can mix 3 oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 07:03 PM
1

and that's why its not possible for people to avoid abusive relationships. we cannot agree on what is abuse. Of course we can agree on what abuse is. Abuse is a word and it has a definition. You can just google 'abuse meaning' to find it's definition. It's not hard, you just need to stop trying to redefine words and agreement is already achieved. Abuse: treat with cruelty or violence. we literally don't tho That's because you are not accepting the already established definition of the word 'abus…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 12:36 AM
–

Stop worrying about "your brand" and go live your life. Having an interesting life away from social media and the BS of trying to sell an image can be your "brand".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 10:48 PM
–

Humans are not brands. Do you hear yourself? You are commodifying yourself and think it's a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 10:01 PM
–

Social media is cancer. It's one of the worst things humans did to themselves. Society is seriously regressing since the advent of social media. Young people today have no idea. Look up pictures from people out in public before and after social media was invented. Before social media was a thing people would talk to each other, when out in public. Nowadays you can walk into a bar or restaurant and see a bunch of zombies stare at a screen almost unaware that they are surrounded by other people. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:58 PM
6

I like it when a woman tells me "we aren't going to have sex". Because that's womanese for "we are definitely screwing". At least that's my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:50 PM
1

Lol, I'm starting to enjoy living up to women's expectations of men. They think that men are pigs? Fine, better not disappoint them then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:48 PM
2

Sending ambiguous and unclear signals is not "initiating" anything It is to women. They believe they did their "best" with a sideways glance and a hair flip. And I have been around long enough to not expect anything more of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:35 PM
3

they could have YouTubed how to replace the garbage disposal. Sure, but it was easier to make you do it. So...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:25 PM
1

Thanks for your contribution. You have elevated this debate enormously. And I think your point of view is really refreshing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:23 PM
1

It's not arrogant to be an atheist. It would be arrogant to think I know better and to try and force my atheism onto others. Which I'm not doing by the way. You are the one who thinks others here are "kids" and "young ones". And you think of yourself as the old, wise and experienced one. Which makes you the authority figure. That way of thinking is in fact arrogant. Try again, with your silly attempt of turning being an atheist into something that's arrogant.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 02:40 PM
–

That was actually funny. Good one. (not being sarcastic).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 02:22 PM
1

Please stop being an arrogant know-it-all, who thinks the world is waiting to be saved by you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 01:58 PM
1

society is literally collapsing We have found common ground, I agree with you here. jonah hill was abusive in those texts No, a man informing a woman that he isn't comfortable with something she does, is not abuse. He didn't say "stop walking around half naked or I will beat the living shit out of you". He asked for her consideration. She wasn't willing to do that. So, they broke up. Nothing in this whole affair has been abusive. yet many, many men say those texts are perfectly healthy and not a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 01:55 PM
–

I rather think bitching feels like a release to them. Then again, having to listen to you, that would definitely cause some suffering.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 11:05 PM
1

You are here because you are angry your life didn't turn out as you wanted it to And bam, there it is, another portion of misguided arrogance. Is being arrogant the way for Quakers to earn their place in heaven or something? Must be, you are really leaning into it. While I hope you will mature, Get down from that high horse you're riding on. You are in no place to judge others. Being arrogant is not a sign of maturity. And you are very, very arrogant. I have nothing to offer you. You damn sure g…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 11:02 PM
1

And there you go again. An arrogant assumption based on nothing. I'm not here to recruit anyone (are you one of those fools who believe redpill is some kind of cult or something?). I am here because I find it entertaining to piss off man-hating feminists. And arrogant Quakers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 10:33 PM
–

And then we have you, here listing to the men who are bitching.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 10:29 PM
–

Oh please shut up. I'm middle aged myself. I'm not very knowledgeable about quakerism, but what does your religion say about arrogance, oh wise experienced one?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 10:09 PM
–

Saving souls for God. As an atheist I cannot relate. But I understand now why you approach others as if they are all waiting to be saved by you. That's usually the way religious people engage with others. I still think it's arrogant, but at least it's not coming from you wanting to feel superior, but from a place of religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 09:06 PM
–

You are talking about "kids, "young person", etc. Why do you assume that you are older and wiser than others here? Handing out advice as if you are some kind of guru. Boy, you really don't realise how arrogant you come across. You approach others here from a position of authority, that is based on nothing but your own assumptions. You have no idea how old the people here are. If you really want to "help" like you claim you do, then you wouldn't assume that others are less knowledgeable or less e…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 08:43 PM
2

I am not reading all that, there's no link to any evidence that could corroborate your claims. Learn how to debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 08:16 PM
2

And more numbers pulled straight out of your ass. I don't know if you are able to understand this, but you claiming that women work 16 hours a day, is as much evidence as me claiming pigs can fly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:23 PM
2

Men did 25% of the work by paying half the bills and doing no housework etc. While women did 75% of the work by paying half the bills and doing all the housework, etc. but the men were “breaking their backs to pay for it all”, according to you. Your math isn’t mathing there bud. Really? You write down a bunch of made up percentages and then turn around and tell me that my math isn't mathing? Show me some evidence for your numbers, bud because this seriously smells like BS, which isn't any wonder…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:56 PM
0

paying half the bills If they were paying half the bills, then they weren't exactly doing it all, now are they? Then there's someone else paying the other half. Which was exactly the point I was making.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:33 PM
–

it's very rare for a kid to show disrespect to me,and when they do I'm well aware it's their mental illness showing. Anyone who disrespects me is mentally ill. Lol, ok, if you says so. I think people who think like you do here, are the ones who are mentally ill. What a weird way of thinking. You probably also think that anyone who disagrees with you is dumb. And anyone who doesn't like the same things you like, has bad taste. Just reading the first few comments in your profile demonstrates that …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:26 PM
-1

Yeah, sure women were "doing it all" while their men were out in the real world breaking their backs to pay for it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:03 PM
1

I think you have nailed his modus operandi perfectly. That guy rarely makes any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:00 PM
1

I was just saying they could still path themselves on the back, if they are the type of man who would not cheat once they get the opportunity. The fact that they never had much opportunities before, does not automatically mean that they will cheat once the get opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:33 PM
–

My life vastly improved when I decided I didn't deserve to be mocked. And then you came to PPD, where both genders are basically not doing anything else but mocking each other? Lol, ok, seems contradictory and like you are still cruising for a bruising.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:18 PM
1

Sure, you can. Not having any options doesn't mean those guys would automatically cheat if they suddenly did get options. Although I will admit that a lot of men would cheat ones the doors of opportunity are opened up to them. It's only human to do so. Look how modern day women, who's doors of opportunity never were more open than they are today, are behaving. Any woman who's been on the apps, basically has been engaging in casual sex with random men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:13 PM
2

I just mean that you really, really have to be a hideous woman before there isn't a man who is willing to either fuck you or date you. While you have to fit in a certain stereotype as man to get attention from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:08 PM
1

Context, my weird bisexual friend, context is everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:04 PM
1

there are men who have sex with chickens Really, lol that's a new one to me. Do chickens even fit? So many questions.... Being an object of lust does nothing for women who are not sex workers. Oh please, plenty of regular non-sex working women have used being an "object of lust" to their benefit. How do you think half of Hollywood ended up on top of Harvey Weinstein's dick? Have you ever seen what female students wear when they have to go and take an exam in person with their professors? How do …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:03 PM
1

I don't make the rules and no it isn't convenient. I hate it that we can't call out people on this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:56 PM
–

they are attracted to Are we sure they are attracted to them? There are guys who think that fat chicks are just an easy mark. Someone that is desperate and therefore would be easy to fuck. And men can fuck anything, attraction isn't even a requirement. I know several heavier women who are hit on all the time but away from public view by various types of men, some of whom would be married or otherwise attached. Yeah, this definitely points in the direction of what I said above. Seems to me those …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:55 PM
2

I don't either. My preferences go from athletic to chubby. I draw the line at obese. But that's not really what you wanted to hear is it? You thought to get a quick jab in by insinuating that I'm desperate. Right, lol? There are more than one reason to arrive at the redpill. Some guys get there because they can't get any women.. Others get there because they do get women and are utterly disappointed in just how little women actually have to offer. I don't care what category you think I fall into…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:45 PM
2

I would love to give you those names, but it is against the subreddit rules to "single out' people. At least that was the reason they gave me when they banned me for calling out another user for her behaviour on this sub, the last time I did that. Not trying to get banned again. It doesn't make any sense to me, why someone would go on a subreddit like this and constantly shit on a gender they aren't even into in the first place. Maybe lesbians see heterosexual men as competition or something? I …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:33 PM
1

Yep, I brought up possible reasons why a bisexual man would behave like an absolute femnazi. And I did that in an effort to explain your behaviour on this subreddit. Since you are trying real hard to outdo even the biggest man-hating feminists on this sub: As to why exactly you feel compelled to shit on heterosexual men, I couldn't say. Maybe you don't like them because they aren't into dick like you are. Maybe a bunch of machos gave you a beating once because they saw you doing something gay. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:21 PM
3

I personally am attracted to anything from fit to chubby. I don't like obese. But this is purely sexual attraction that I'm talking about. For me to love a woman, I not only need to be attracted physically, but also need to like her as a person. So, no I don't fetishize them. If this is a fetish then women being attracted to taller men is also a fetish.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 08:12 AM
2

Yeah it all depends. proportions arguably matter more than the actual amount of fat up to a point imo This is very true. A woman can be a bit chubby, as long as her overall figure is still hourglass shaped, then she's most of the time still attractive to me. While a woman that is fitter, but has no hips is a turn off to me. I need curves.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 08:03 AM
1

Nice try, butt (pun intended). But I'm comfortable in my skin and with my sexuality. If it makes you feel better to insinuate I am gay, knock yourself out. Water off a duck's back...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 07:54 AM
2

I like women from fit to chubby. I don't go into obese territory. But there are definitely men who are into obese. Men are weird like that. Our dicks have the most diverse tastes when it comes to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 07:36 AM
1

I must say I have neither experienced one or the other. Tell me, which one hurts more?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 07:22 AM
1

Yes, please, do join us. I'm sure we both have much to learn from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 07:02 AM
2

My cousin and his wife are a good match. I'll take your word for it since I don't know them. It seems mostly her family that wanted the big wedding - it is simply a tradition and expectation. Ok, but in that case they aren't compensating for anything. What I meant was when the bride and groom are the ones the want a really flashy wending, then it is my experience that the marriage don't last. This doesn't seem to apply to your cousin. And it also isn't a law of nature. Just something I noticed. …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:59 AM
4

From an evolutionary point of view women have indeed more value than men. All throughout history more women have procreated than men. I believe the numbers are 80% of women have passed their genes on, while 40% of men managed to do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:47 AM
2

Evolution doesn't give you bonus points for being moral. So, high value is someone who has a lot of options. but still remain loyal
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:41 AM
-1

Just checking if your weird mental state was a temporary thing or something more permanent. It's the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:39 AM
3

Should have said heterosexual man. You've got a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:36 AM
3

Just thought it is relevant to know if you are dating a man or a woman. You are always handing out advice without mentioning that your experience might be different from the norm, which might be confusing to others. Sort of like lesbians who talk about men. Their experience is also different from the experience of a heterosexual woman, but they are handing out advice and opinions here without mentioning the reality of their situation. It makes a difference. But ok, you were talking about actual …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:38 AM
-5

True, as soon as a man looses his ability to provide, the clock starts ticking. It won't be long before he's single.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:32 AM
4

Is that male or female girlfriends you are talking about? Context is relevant, you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:28 AM
1

Surely adherence to the vows and fear of the consequences of divorce have kept many people in line over the years? It probably did, but I'm not sure that is a good thing. If a partner of mine is no longer happy in the relationship, I'd much rather she leave than stay with me for some external reason. I have not once in my life dreamed of a wedding. I know this is atypical for women It sure is. I was convinced almost every woman has a dream about how her perfect marriage would go. My cousin got m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:11 AM
3

Yep, you definitely are just a tease.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:54 AM
2

It’s just different. I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:52 AM
1

young men that dont have discipline and is struggling finding his meaning in life some discipline and experiences can help him become a better person. I agree with you here. But there are much better ways to become a man than joining the army. They could start doing a martial art. Or go outdoor rock climbing. Or anything else that is a challenge and requires some commitment. What I don't like about the army is that it replaces critical thinking with learning to obey orders. And that's not a good…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:51 AM
1

There is nothing stopping people who are not legally married from using the terms for one another anyway. Yeah, but you probably aren't going to do that unless you are married. And if you did, I probably will not feel the same. I guess I can also look at it this way, in a “lizard brain” kind of sense: Yeah, it's definitely connected to the "lizard brain", because if you look at it pure rationally then a marriage isn't really a protection against a man walking out (nor a woman turning a man into …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:29 AM
2

There's more to attraction that just looks you know. I'm very aware of that. Thank you very much.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:55 AM
2

What's the problem with some men being attracted to for instance curvy women? All men have their "thing". Some are into dimples, others like big breasts, for others it's blue eyes or curly hair. I don't really see the issue. These all still belong to the physical realm. It's what makes a man feel sexual attracted to a woman. Men still need a compatible personality for them to actually want to date a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:51 AM
2

joining the army it’s not more dangerous than the civil life nowdays. Perhaps you don't live in a country that is engaging in a war somewhere, but many men do. And for those men joining the army means getting shot at. And seeing people die. That's definitely not "a good experience". Nobody becomes a better human being from engaging in a war.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:43 AM
2

You are right that to men looks are very important, but you also need to factor in that men's "looks requirements" are very easy to fulfil. Yes, men want to be attracted to their woman. But for most guys a woman that is just average, but has a nice pair of tits, already qualifies as being good looking enough. While women are much harder to please. Men will not pass the looks barrier, simply by having one redeeming quality. An unremarkable man with nice legs, is still an unremarkable man to a wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:36 AM
1

I suppose I have not really met men who have been screwed in divorces. Though I have heard of one rich friend of my boss and he has twice married and divorced and the women were given very generous settlements and seem to make seeing his kids hard. Although you haven't met this rich friend personally, you still know about a guy who is paying generous settlements and has trouble seeing his kids. If you were a man that would already be quite disheartening. One nasty divorce can be enough to ruin t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:21 AM
1

I agree with everything you say. Was nodding along the whole time when reading your comment. Which unfortunately doesn't happen often on this subreddit. The only thing I don't agree with is this: ...men saying that marriage is just a trap for men and in a divorce men will inevitably get screwed are being paranoid. I still have seen this happen too much to just label men who believe marriage is just a trap, as men who are being paranoid. Paranoid would be if it almost never happens. The fact that…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 12:25 AM
2

That will never be a medical reality. You never know. Have you seen the 'food replicators' in the TV-series Star Trek? It's a machine sort of like a microwave, but it just builds any food or drink that you want to have. You just say: "Make me a dirty Martini" and a few seconds later it has created a dirty Martini for you. Sounds completely not realistic and just as silly SciFi, right? But the thing is, we are already capable of building such a machine (in theory). You just need to know the molec…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 12:09 AM
2

Why follow tenets of something you don't respect? I wouldn't follow the advice of anything or anyone I don't respect. Redpill is just advice by men for men. Some of it isn't useful to me, so I ignore it. Some of it is useful to me, so I apply it. Does that mean that I respect the advice? Or does that mean that I don't respect the advice? It's just hard to talk about respecting something that is so abstracts as redpill. It's almost like respecting a table. Do you respect the table you are sitting…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 11:30 PM
2

You said a man's value is in being chosen by a woman to spread his genes. The flip side of that would be what I said. For some men your value in romantic relationship will indeed be gone, if you do not want to have anymore kids and he still does. For some it will be gone because you already had kids and he wants to be childfree. But now we are talking about value in a more subjective manner, depending on what a potential partner would want from you. Are they though? I think they are. But that's …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 10:42 PM
4

You don't have much respect for red pill if you think it's something that you inherently I understand better simply by being a man. Redpill is just advice for men, by men. That's all it is. It's not something to "respect", like you would respect a religion or a person. How much do you respect beauty advice? Or how much do you respect tips on being smart with money? Respect is kind of a weird term to use when it comes to redpill. And yes, men are probably better equipped to understand redpill, si…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 10:16 PM
8

You are asking a leading question. I was talking about value. You are talking about "value in a romantic relationship". Which is a different matter. I don't say that people can't have value in other ways. I just claim that your objective value lies in how much opportunity you can create to spread your genes. Because that's the most valuable/long lasting thing a human being can do. All other forms of value are social constructs. Today we respect and value Roger Federer for his ability to play ten…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 10:00 PM
1

No, I don't. But I love it when women lecture men about redpill. So, I'm certainly open to hearing your stance on the matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:50 PM
3

My point is that no one is going to describe a mass murderer as a "high value" man. I don't know if he was honest, loyal and honored his commitments. And neither do you, since historians do not agree on what kind of man he was. Some think he was a bloodthirsty animal. Others say he was an enlightened man. So, what's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:49 PM
10

Finally someone who understands.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:41 PM
0

Possible, but when you look around you in the real world, men aren't fatter than their women. At least not over here in Europe. Maybe in the USA, but it definitely would surprise me. Since it would go against hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:32 PM
8

Are your kids dead? If not, they are the living testimony of your value. Nothing else you will do in your life is more valuable, when you look at it through the perception of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:29 PM
1

It takes team work and both roles are important and have their pros and cons. I agree. The beauty of men and women can be found in the fact that they are different but complimentary. Making it a competition and telling women it’s much easier to be a SAHM is disrespectful and counterproductive. I didn't mean to offend. But it truly is less stressful to be a stay at home parent, than to secure the bag in a career. Just my opinion. You can be a father who is involved with your children about as muc…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:26 PM
7

It's not your relationship status. It's how much opportunity you can generate to reproduce and spread your genes. The only lasting thing that humans can do is have children. Your genes could live on for hundreds or even thousands of years. All other things you do will be gone and forgotten as soon as you die.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:14 PM
-9

most of the time the man is chubby or fatter than the woman. The fact that women are hypergamous contradicts this notion. Men are usually not fatter than their women. Because women don't go for men who are "less" than they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:11 PM
10

That is low value no matter how you try to spin it. We are still just monkeys who are just very briefly alive, before we all just die and fade away. The most impactful thing that a human being can do, is reproduce. All other things will be gone in a generation of two at most. Your genes could live on for hundreds even thousands of years. Therefore men who can attract lots of women are high value. Because they have more chances to do the one truly lasting thing that humans can do. Namely have chi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 09:09 PM
8

Maybe you don't realize value is more than looks? Already acknowledged in my comment that you can have a different definition of high value. But when it comes down to it, getting selected by women is the only objective way of measuring a man's value. All other ways are just social constructs and highly subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:54 PM
7

High value men are men that are wanted by lots of women. At least from an evolutionary point of view. Which is basically the only point of view that matters, since all others are just social constructs. And these men are known to not be loyal and do gooders.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:51 PM
21

No, it isn't. Thick, chubby, BBW, etc. are all porn categories that are popular with men. There's no equivalent when it comes to what women enjoy. There's only one male body type that is popular. And it is 'fit'. The only variance is how fit exactly. While men appreciate fat, fit, small, tall, weird,.. you name it. When they said there's a partner for everyone, they meant there's a man for every woman. They weren't saying there is a woman for every man.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:37 PM
21

High value men are honest, loyal, and honor their commitments. That's just some kind of variation on a "just world" fallacy. High Value men are men that are wanted by lots of women. From an evolutionary point of view that's the only thing that determines if a man is high value. And we all know that those men, who are the most successful at this, definitely aren't the most honest, loyal and honorable. If you define "high value" as men who are the most honest, loyal and honorable, then I can point…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:26 PM
1

Making someone wait definitely isn't the truest form of burning sexual desire. That's for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:16 PM
1

no So, in the majority of cases the fact that women file for divorce can be explained by the fact that their partner was a cheater, an abuser or an addict? Lol, come on get real. That would mean that the vast majority of men are addicts, cheaters and abusers. And it would also mean that women are selecting and marrying these men. That's completely unrealistic. Society would collapse if that was true. The real explanation is much simpler and less sensational. Humans aren't wired for long term com…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:05 PM
1

I agree with you that those who actually ruin the relationship are those who initiate. But you are talking about the exceptions here. Let's be honest, when in 70-90 % of the cases it's a woman who files the papers, then you aren't going to tell me that all these women had chosen drug addicts or abuser as their partners. They have been doing research into this. Women get bored faster than men when dating the same person. That's just how humans are wired. And apparently the cutoff point is somewhe…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 07:33 PM
–

No, that's not what I'm saying. Informing your partner is not a required step in a divorce, filing the paperwork is. Therefore I'm saying that those who file the paperwork are also those who initiate the divorce. Because it's the first required step if you want to divorce. You can tell someone you are going to divorce them, but as long as you don't file, that has no meaning. And you can file the paperwork without telling them, you will still be divorced after that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 06:46 PM
1

You are worried about 18 year old women, who might not be mature enough to realise the negative consequences of having an onlyfans? What about all the young men, who are not mature enough to realise the consequences of enlisting in the army? Enlisting is possible from the age of 17. Men are also known to mature later, so they definitely aren't ready the comprehend what signing their life away to the government can do to them. And I would say that getting killed, mutilated or fucked up in the hea…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 02:40 PM
1

It doesn’t come from some pro-female bias - much of the time, mothers are more involved in childcare. They are more involved not because men aren't capable of being involved, but because there's still an expectation on men to be the primary breadwinner of the family. Men are fucked twice. Not only are they the ones who are expected to go work their asses off to secure the bag for the family (no matter what women claim, being a stay at home parent is an easier job than having to do a daily commut…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 02:19 PM
2

Most men don’t fight for more than this because they don’t need or want it. You got that all wrong. They don't try because they know it would be pointless anyway. The courts still assume that children are better off with the mother. If a man wants more, he'll have to prove the mother is a drug addicted, mentally unstable, physical abusive psychopath. Otherwise he can forget about it. If men don’t get as much custody of their kids as they want, they can fight for more and when they do - they usua…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 12:07 PM
0

And what argument would that be?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 12:03 PM
3

No, this isn't that. I did respond to your argument, but the communication gets lost in all the craziness you got going on. And the more I try to get through to you, to more you become weird and unhinged. This made me realise that it would be pointless to keep on trying. You really are not normal. And I'm not qualified to deal with whatever it is that you've got going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 05:25 AM
2

It will be. I'll have 3 copies ready on your desk. Signed and ready to be filed.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 05:06 AM
2

I have noted your objection to the way I perceive the division of the assets.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 04:59 AM
–

You don't need permission to divorce. Who would you ask? Step 1: File the Divorce Petition The divorce process starts with a divorce petition. Whether or not both parties agree to the divorce, one spouse—the petitioner—must file a legal petition asking the court to terminate the marriage. The petition must include: A statement that at least one spouse meets the state's residency requirements for divorce: In general, states require at least one spouse to live in the state for three to 12 months a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 04:51 AM
3

I like to debate, but you are really creeping me out. The things you say, the way you interpreted things, the weird connections you make, the way you ignore what I actually say and hyper focus on inconsequential details. This isn't normal anymore. I think you are completely unhinged. And I'm not saying that to insult you. This really feels like having a conversation with an alien lifeform. And it's creepy, uncanny valley type of shit. I'm going to wish you the best. If I ever find out were the "…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 04:40 AM
–

It keeps amazing me, how this sub can turn any interaction between two people, into a toxic cluster fuck of aggression after a comment or two.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 01:49 AM
1

Ok, can't help you with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 01:36 AM
-7

Look them up. I implore you to do your own research. On a different computer I don't have all my studies on this one. Nah, that's not how this works. You can't slap me in the face with a bunch of statistics and then tell me to go and find the evidence to make them true. I will gladly believe your numbers, if you substantiate them. I'm not going to do that for you. I'm not debating myself. I'm debating you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 01:35 AM
3

Because that's exactly what red pill does, they completely invent arguments and accuse other people of making them. See also, "Blue pillers say looks don't matter!" You said I lied. You said I invent arguments. But you still didn't say what my lie was or what I have invented. For the second time: what was the lie? No, I'm putting down red pillers I understand that you are putting down "red pillers" (whatever that is supposed to mean, it's not like you can get a certification that makes someone a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 01:18 AM
-7

Women who are in a divorce get their income reduced by 45% in comparison to men who lose 21% on average. Alimony almost always is paid by a man to a woman. It's exceptional when a woman has to pay her ex-husband alimony. So, how can these numbers be true? Majority of women will be placed in abject poverty within 3 years of a divorce. What stops these women from going to work just like the rest of us? If 3 years after a divorce a woman ends up in poverty, how is this the fault of the divorce or t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 12:40 AM
-2

Housewives usually don't have the money to buy out the other party. And no matter how much women here deny it, in most cases the mother gets appointed custody of the children. Which places the man in a situation were he almost always will give up the house to the wife, because he doesn't want his kids living out in the streets. So, the man lost his wife (since women initiate 70-90% of the divorces), no longer has a house (wife can't pay him out and he doesn't want to put his children out in the …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 12:12 AM
1

Maybe you are asking the wrong person here. I explained what I think he meant. If my explanation is unsatisfactory to you, maybe you should ask the person who originally wrote the words.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 11:52 PM
4

Oh so now they are connected just not in the way I said they were, in a totally different, completely unspecified way. They were always connected. I never said they weren't. YOU are the one who assumed they weren't connected. And I explained exactly in which way they are connected in my comment above. So, what's up with the "unspecified way"? Do I need to specify that connection more than once before you get it or what? There's those red pill lies. "I can't actually address your argument so I'm …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 11:48 PM
-5

When dads fight for custody, they get it. You are contradicting yourself here. If men could easily get custody whenever they want it, then they don't need to fight for it. The fact that you connected 'fight' to men wanting custody, points to it not being something that's easily achieved.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 11:07 PM
2

I know a lot of men who basically had to start over from zero after a divorce. And the reason they had to start over was because their ex-wife kept the children, the house, the car and the dog. I don't know any woman who experienced anything even remotely comparable in a divorce. divorce is worse for women in every objective statistic other than suicide and substance abuse. Really? What are those objective statistics then and in which way are women worse of compared to men when it comes to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 11:03 PM
1

Love and romance are intertwined, but they are not the exact same thing. I would say that romance is an expression of love. Because people usually only do romantic things for those they love. That's why the poster above said he is sometimes jealous of gay men. Gay men are basically the only men who are the receivers of romance. Heterosexual men usually only experience romance when they give it. They don't receive it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:48 PM
7

I don't hate anyone for their sexual orientation. I have gay friends, bi friends and heterosexual friends. They are all just people to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:42 PM
4

Lol so you were just making two completely disconnected statements. Sure thing bud. Where did I say that my statements aren't connected? Again, you make a wrong assumption and then you laugh because the assumptions is illogical. My statements were definitely connected only not in the way you are assuming they are. The way you are routinely putting the (mostly) heterosexual men on this subreddit down and shitting on them, doesn't make any sense if you would be a heterosexual man yourself. Almost …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:38 PM
5

Where you said me being bi "explains a lot" as to why I'm supposedly a man hater. You should read my comment again. I said that you being bi explains a lot. That's were my sentence ended. You are still making connections I didn't make, and then blaming me for the connections not making sense. If the connections you made don't make sense, you should blame yourself. I never said you fuck men or take it up the bum because you hate men. That indeed would be completely illogical.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:57 PM
5

Don't really care about your opinion, but I'm sure the rest of the world is very grateful that you decided to share it with us.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:49 PM
10

I hate men so much I fool around with them is certainly a take Where did I say that you fool around with men because you hate them? That's a take you made, not me. It's intellectually dishonest to make a take, next blame it on me and then critisize that take for it not making sense. It's your take, you are criticising yourself here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:42 PM
3

Bullshit, some of the loudest female voices on this subreddit are hardcore lesbians. Then there's also a group of heterosexual women, who are here because they are bottom of the barrel and don't get any play in real life. Then there are the bisexual and the women who hate men so much that they have given up on dating them. The majority of the women on this subreddit are not normal heterosexual women who are interested in dating men. There's a reason why the female users of this subreddit have a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:36 PM
13

I kind of had the same Eureka moment when I found out that a large percentage of the women on this subreddit are actually lesbians.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:08 PM
1

Sure you do, but you are too much of a contrarian, who's hellbent on disagreeing with men, to admit to it. Filing the paperwork = the first step in a divorce = initiating the divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:06 PM
15

If you think about it, everything that we define as "romantic" is behaviour that men do for women. Men buy flowers. Men drop down on one knee and propose. Valentine's day is mostly men buying gifts for their women and taking them out for dinner. Men slay the dragon to win the heart of the princess... What are romantic behaviours that we associate with women? When it comes to romance men are the ones who give, women are the ones who receive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:54 PM
9

I never understood why a man would try his damned best to outdo a bunch of rabiate feminists in being a feminist and a man hater like you are doing on this subreddit all the time. You being bi explains a lot. (by the way no hate on your sexual orientation. You do you. But you not being straight is definitely a key element in trying to understand your behaviour).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:46 PM
0

we have no data on who "initiates" divorce, we have data on who does the paperwork Tomato - tometo. If you want a divorce, then doing the paperwork is the first step in getting it done. You are just arguing semantics here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:28 PM
1

Aha
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:05 PM
1

There is 0 chance this person isn't a sugar daddy. You need to remember how common sugar daddies are in the first place. Are you lecturing me on one of my best friends? I can guarantee you that he is not a sugar daddy. Frankly, it's very arrogant for you to assume you know him better than I do. You never met him. I have known him for most if my life. Does he attract women through his succes and money? I'm sure he does. Before he was successful, he never had a girlfriend. And a lot of women like …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:03 PM
3

Equal rights, equal lefts.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:12 PM
0

Still can't believe you are being serious. It's infinitely much harder to find a woman on here who isn't a hardcore man-hating militant feminist, than it is to find one who is. It isn't even close.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 07:30 AM
5

I'm sure he isn't giving them an allowance. Because I know the guy since he was 15. He is too conservative, traditional to "rent" a woman or "pay her for her services". He is a smart dude. I'm sure he can make the connection between no money -> no woman and a lot of money -> suddenly women. But he still needs some kind of connection. Straight up paying for access to their bodies is not something he would do. He probably sees it more like: they like the fact that I'm a successful guy. In stead of…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 07:24 AM
1

I must say, I've never seen a misandrist in this sub myself Don't know if you are joking or are being serious. But I will assume that it's the former.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:22 AM
3

If you're paying someone an allowance or buying them things, with the understanding that they will sleep with you in exchange ; then it's escorting. This never is the situation with my friend. Does he spoils these women and takes them out on fancy dates? I'm sure he does. Do they have an agreement that she will repay his generosity with her body? Definitely not. That doesn't count man That's why I asked were you draw the line. Technically you are still paying when you pay for the flowers or for …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:09 AM
3

Absolutes don't exist. Therefore when I say men always pay, you should read: men in general always pay. Just like when somebody says "men don't paint there nails", you aren't supposed to go: "Not true, I paint my nails and I'm a man". You should hear: men in general don't paint their nails. This is a debate sub. You can't debate without generalising. This doesn't change the fact that exceptions will always exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:59 AM
5

Let me ask you, dude, where do you draw the line? When is it "using escorts" and when is it genuine? Because no matter how you look at it, we all pay. You pay too. I'm doing ok but I would not call myself rich, so I don't have to worry about women coming for my wallet. But I still have to pay for the first date. I still have to pay for some romantic gestures now and then (flowers or something like that). Women will also pay things for me, but it's almost never equal. There's still an expectation…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:39 AM
4

You should read people's whole comment before you start to react. I already acknowledged the following in my previous comment: You could say that these women probably are golddiggers and that this doesn't count as "genuine" dating. But this makes no difference for my buddy. He is a lot happier now that he has access to women and a sex life. Those women benefit and he benefits. It's just a win - win.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:19 AM
2

there is still some type of underlying motivation for what they are doing that is meeting their needs in some way. It's possible that they are getting their needs met, but this doesn't make what they are doing logical behavior. It makes their behavior understandable, but it is still illogical behavior. For example, maybe someone is complaining that they have bad grades even though they aren’t studying. By complaining, it doesn’t seem like they are behaving in a way that is logical, but complaini…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:09 AM
11

One of my best mates is a really good guy. Nice to talk to, kind, funny, knowledgeable. He is very pleasant company. But he is also just ugly. There's no other way to describe him. Lookswize he really isn't lucky. He couldn't score a woman for the life of him. Was still a kissless virgin when he was nearing 30 years of age. But his career took off like a rocket. The guy is making so much money, he even bought his parents a house because he could. Nowadays he has zero trouble scoring women. And t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 03:58 AM
1

That wasn't a biased take Of course it's a biased take. This sub is overrun with misandrists, but he only notices and mentions that there are misogynists. It takes a lot of bias to only see one side of the equation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 03:44 AM
1

That's a pity. Your comments could use a little spicing up with some humor.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 09:48 PM
0

I’m not sure why you think that there are some moderators here who let other moderators get away with doing whatever they want. Why? Because this isn't my first rodeo on this subreddit. Last time I received a ban that I did protest, you and one other mod decided to maintain it. And that decision was made in like 2 minutes. I'm pretty sure that once you guys have handed out ban and "deliberated" over the protest, others mod aren't going to reverse the decision. It's done and dusted at that point.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 09:45 PM
1

Can't say the same about your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 08:25 PM
1

You can't pretend like your system, where the mods who happen to be around and are willing to take a look are the only mods who vote, is a system of "checks & balances". If a user protesting a ban is unlucky with the moment his protest gets reviewed, then it's possible that the only mods who vote are mods who all have the same biases. Basically, they either agree with the decision and can’t be bothered to comment, or they don’t care enough to comment. Or they aren't even aware at all that there …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 07:42 PM
2

So, you can be as biased and unfair as you want, as long as another moderator agrees with you, its all a-ok? Because I have seen how those checks and balances work. It was just one moderator and another one who agreed with him/you. It isn't like you gather together with all the mods and have a vote about it. The last time I protested a ban, your whole system of checks and balances consisted of only 2 mods. What is stopping you from asking that second opinion from another moderator who has exactl…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 06:11 PM
1

But this is a sub full of misogynists who will criticize women about anything. I already knew you have clear and obvious biases against men, since you hand out bans left and right for things that aren't even breaking the rules. But it's still shocking to see a mod just showing his biases so openly in a subreddit he is supposed to moderate. I always assumed that you need a certain amount of neutrality to be able to be a good moderator. Neutrality you are clearly lacking, judging from this comment…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 05:53 PM
1

No problem. I have done the same. Reacted like I was attacked when a woman was being sincere. It's this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 05:32 PM
–

You have to understand there are several women here who do not want to debate at all. They are here to shit on men... There's even a certain female who's name rhymes with "Kilith", who almost daily makes a post that is nothing but a thinly veiled insult directed at men. She just slabs the "debate" label on her post, so she can use plausible deniability and get away with the shit stirring. The mods just let her do it, as if it isn't obvious what she is doing. Here's small selection of some of her…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 05:27 PM
2

You are way too uptight. It's Friday and I was just having a laugh. Didn't even try to attack or "gotcha" you. Enjoy the weekend!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 04:51 PM
1

My comment didn't stop at the first sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 04:13 PM
0

Then you are missing the point. And I already explained in the comment just above what the actual point was. So, you can use your eyes and go read it there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:57 PM
1

thats patriarchal masculinity, that gender is fungible. Not sure what your point is here. What is "patriarchal masculinity" supposed to mean? Which gender are you referring to and in what sense is it fungible? so what's the difference? Difference between what? You are being very vague and abstract. In your head this all makes sense, because you know what you are hinting at. But I cannot read your mind and missing the necessary context to get what you are trying to ask me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:48 PM
1

Cute
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:18 PM
1

Oh boy, sigh.... Both are so obvious that they don't require an actual answer. That's why they are both rethorical questions... Come on now, you could have figured that one out yourself. This wasn't even a hard one.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:04 PM
-3

I didn't bring transgender people into this. I brought other ridiculous claims into this, because they are compatible with your ridiculous claim. You are being the opposite of nuanced. Just like men and women are opposites to each other. And my take is definitely nuance, it seems to be attracting a lot of traffic, such as yourself Traffic is proof of nuance? Cool, explain how that logic is supposed to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:27 PM
1

I don't think there's anything that could be given to you to make you smarter. You are already at your limits.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:15 PM
1

What's sad is that he has a point and your only reply is calling it sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:12 PM
–

Lol, guess she deserved that, she wasn't exactly subtle...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:07 PM
4

Equality!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:04 PM
2

Your best comment in this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:04 PM
-3

This is the only correct explanation. Women are just bored faster than men, when they are in a monogamous relationship. Maybe we men should just never commit and pass women around like they are a joint: hit it two times and pass it on to the homie. We wouldn't even be doing it for ourselves, we would protect all the lovely ladies from getting bored.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:56 PM
-5

Just the way you speak about women, and their vial behavior, makes me wonder whose behavior you are referring to. He's referring to women's behaviour of course, silly. It doesn't have to be any specific woman when the vast majority of women act exactly as he has described.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:51 PM
-7

a nuanced look Yeah, sure why not? If in these woke times men can be women. And women can also be men. Then surely a highly opinionated take could also be sold as a "nuanced look".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:32 PM
–

but facts need to be measurable. Feminism made it so that women could work and have jobs. Which is a good thing. But you can't deny that this shift, from being housewives to career women, did have an impact on the birth rate. Which would also not be hard to measure.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 08:53 PM
–

A didn't say feminism is the cause. I said feminism is a cause. Any objection to that would get dismissed, because it's factually correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 08:46 PM
–

True. But when it comes to feminism, you could only argue about how much it attributed to the lower birthrate. You can't argue that it has nothing to do with that decline.That would be disagreeing with a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 05:50 PM
–

What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 05:33 PM
–

You can't disagree with facts. If you disagree with facts then you are living in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 04:40 PM
1

What you don't realise is that I have been on this subreddit for some time. If you spent some time here, you get to know who is actually crazy, who is open to a debate and yes, also who is a bit autistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 11:08 AM
–

"Stop selling them lies" isn't handholding at all. Handholding means guiding people to a solution. Telling people lies is leading people away from a solution. They are literally opposites.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:59 AM
1

i’m arguing that casual sex is not comparable to murder. And I already explained in what sense these two are comparable. Killing and casual sex are comparable in the sense that in both cases you have crossed something that is a moral border for a lot of other people, who will judge you for crossing that moral border.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:56 AM
–

That would mean no one would get the joke. I got the joke, so he definitely didn't jump the gun. She is just to autistic to get a joke is therefore a more plausible explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:53 AM
–

So what? You are still a disenginous clown.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:50 AM
4

You shouldn't argue with her. She is known to always disagree with men, even if it means she has to contradict herself. She literally has no own opinion. If you say A -> she will say B to disagree with you. If you say B -> she will say A. She isn't here to debate. She is only here to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:48 AM
–

You disingenuous sad waste of human skin, the fact that women are willing to share a man is in itself already a sign that the man is high value. Losers can't find a woman to be with, even though they are willing to commit to these women. And then we have men unwilling to commit who have multiple women wanting to be with them. Of course they are high value. They are being selected by multiple women at the same time. From an evolutionary point of view, that's as high value as you can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:45 AM
2

You shouldn't argue with her. She is known to always disagree with men, even if it means she has to contradict herself. She literally has no own opinion. If you say A -> she will say B to disagree with you. If you say B -> she will say A. She literally isn't here to debate. She is only here to disagree with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:26 AM
3

An average girl could easily sleep with 100s of cute guys, they don’t. I don't know what you are on about. I know several women with a triple digit body count. Are all women behaving like whores? No, of course not, that would be silly to assume. Just as silly as what you are doing, namely assuming that women just don't whore it up at all. Plenty of women sleep around like dick is an essential vitamin needed to survive...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:16 AM
2

What self improvement feature actually converts to a better success rate in dating? Going to the gym.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 10:07 AM
1

What are you asking me?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:44 PM
1

I am not complaining. I was pointing out that men don't need any hand holding. And also don't need any disenginous advice. Anything else I can do for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:42 PM
8

I'm a bit sick and tired of having to explain the obvious to a bunch of autists who don't realise they have autism. Anyways here it goes. EricSec just points out that women usually go for men better than they are themselves (hypergamy). Which leads to those women getting pumped and dumped. He suggested women who don't like to be used as cum buckets, to not only go for the chadiests of Chads, but to also try out other men. You, being the person you are, of course disagrees. Which leads to RipGeor…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:38 PM
1

I thought you were done engaging with me? Sometimes my annoyance wins from my better judgement. The comment I responded to said "there are no steps." There are. No, there are not. Redpill isn't some kind of course where you have to take class A, before you can start class B. Redpill is just advice by men for men. I would love to hear you teach me those famous "redpill steps" of yours. In order of course... "iT's A tOoLbOx" is a meaningless platitude. It isn't. If you are looking for advice to le…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:17 PM
1

So you accuse me of jumping to conclusions I did. You did jump to a conclusion about men based on what one dude did. then repeat the same point he was making Don't know what you are talking about here. Who was making what point?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:04 PM
1

you can’t condemn hoes with the same public backing that you can condemn killers Who said it has to be the same backing? I'm pretty sure there are a lot more people who have a moral problem with killing than with casual sex with randoms. Doesn't change the fact that there still are a lot of people who have moral issues with having sex with randoms. What you don't understand is that men had no other way to protect themselves from paternity fraud except to NOT select a partner who displays promisc…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:00 PM
0

Grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 05:36 PM
-2

You women are such disingenuous clowns. You give men, who clearly have not figured things out, because they wouldn't be asking for advice if they had things figured out, useless advice. And then you say that those men should have used their common sense with these situations? Why don't you give actionable advice to men who clearly don't have it figured out? Or why even give advice at all? Why not tell these men: "Yo dudes, use your own common sense"? and leave it at that. That would be more prod…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 05:33 PM
–

Killing and casual sex are comparable in the sense that in both cases you have crossed something that is a moral border for a lot of other people, who will judge you for crossing that moral border. And you can't undo crossing a border. Once you kill, you will always be seen as a killer. Once you start banging randoms, you will always be seen as a hoe. Your banker/photographer example is the incorrect example here. Neither being a banker or being a photographer is considered as morally wrong. So,…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 05:20 PM
2

There are grifters who use redpill as a cover to sell stuff. Redpill itself is available completely for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 05:06 PM
5

A woman lying? Never. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 05:00 PM
3

One dude -> so clearly men Someone is jumping to conclusions... are jealous of casual sex and consider it a luxury, high value experience. Women have turned casual sex into a high value experience for men, because women only have casual sex with men they are really attracted to. And everyone wants to feel desired. Even men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:55 PM
–

I could explain it to you and make this "word salad" magically transform into a normal sentence with meaning. Then again, it isn't exactly science and someone with two brain cells should be able to figure it out themselves. So, in this case I don't feel the effort to try and explain it is justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:51 PM
1

I'm not lieing to anyone. I make the impardonable mistake to think they have heads over their shoulders for other reasons than to not have rain fall in their necks. They wouldn't need advice if they had it figured out in the first place. So, I don't understand why you would give men advice that is completely useless advice in itself and assume that they have all the other details, that are needed to make your advice actionable, worked out. If you are one of the disenginous people who's dating ad…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:46 PM
1

I agreed with another poster that we have more similarities than differences. And I don't agree with you and explained that our similarities are only surface level deep. Once you start looking at the details, you realise that there are more differences than similarities.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:36 PM
–

How predictable. Man says something a woman doesn't like. Woman accuses the man of being an incel. Not that it's any of your business, but I always did fine with women. The reason I found redpill isn't because I couldn't get women, but because I was utterly disappointed in what women have to offer once you get them. Unless a man wants to have children, most women truly have nothing to offer but a hole.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:34 PM
1

Most of the protest I see is coming from men who feel like they have been fed lies. Telling men to "just be themselves" is lying to them by omission. Stop being surprised when men respond negatively to you feeding them lies. Or stop feeding them lies. Both would work.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:11 PM
2

I'm not religious, you genius. Of course nature doesn't "care" in the same sense a living person "cares". Are you on the spectrum that this even has to be explained to you? Nature isn't an objective living thing that you can talk to, or ask what it's feeling are when it comes to procreating. Nature is the totality of all living things. And all living things have a drive to procreate. In that sense nature does care that we (and all other living things) procreate. Getting sick and tired of having …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:00 PM
1

Maybe you should explain that context then in stead of telling others to "just be themselves".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 03:27 PM
2

Cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 03:16 PM
1

If you are asking for advice I am not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 03:12 PM
6

I want backstage passes if you ever make it big.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 03:08 PM
1

Nature doesn’t give a fuck whether or when we procreate If nature didn't care about us procreating, then it wouldn't have given us a sex drive. If it didn't care about the age we procreate at, it wouldn't have made it harder to procreate at an older age and it wouldn't have made the risks bigger for procreating at an older age. You are disagreeing with objective facts, but still telling others that they are the ones with a "dumb take". As is usual for the people with vaginas that visit this subr…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:56 PM
0

Men who call other men cucks are undatable to a large segment of women. I have no problems with dating, so this isn't useful information to me. There is some solid advice. You won't take it, You are wrongfully assuming that I'm looking for advice. I'm not. And if I was, this subreddit would be the last place I would look.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:21 PM
–

You know what this sub is also full of? Women. And women are known for their solipsistic nature. Try wrangling some empathy out of a solipsistic creature. It won't go well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:10 PM
0

I think you are responding to the wrong comment. I never claimed there are no blue pill success stories.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:50 PM
5

I'm not interested in you giving a TED talk on advice. I'm only here because you claimed to be surprised by men saying this: I never understand how some can say"but nobody told me you have to look good🥺" I explained to you why some men react this way. The reason is that they were given bad advice. If someone told you that all you have to do to get rich, is work. Then you would feel cheated too when after years of hard works you are still poor. Especially if you then find out that the correct adv…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:42 PM
1

I didn't say nature cares about us. That is you accidentally or deliberately misinterpreting what I said. I said nature does care and I was talking about pregnancies. Nature cares about us procreation at a younger age. That's why the risks for both the mother and the child go up with every year that passes. And that's why both men and women have a harder time procreating when they get older. Don't twist my words into something I didn't say because you can't refute what I actually said.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:32 PM
6

Being nice comes on top of other things. Maybe blue pill cucks and disenginous women should not hand out the advice to "just be nice" then. Or to "be yourself". If they actually want to be helpful their advice should be: these are the "other things" that are important. You need these "other things" first. "Being nice" without these other things will not get you anywhere. You are blaming men for listening to bad advice. You should be blaming those who pretend to be helpful while handing out bad a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:24 PM
7

They don't need any hand holding. They just need blue pill cucks and disenginous women to stop selling them lies...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:08 PM
–

If there ever was a quote that adequately describes how women behave, then it's this one: we'll never get a genuine answer Women are disingenuous by nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:07 PM
–

Of course nobody chooses friends for their attractiveness but it's true that groups of guys are also looksmatched. You are contradicting yourself. If nobody chooses friends based on their attractiveness, then it would be a coincidence that a group of friends is looks matched. But if it is a coincidence, then groups of guys will rarely be looks matched like you claim they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:02 PM
–

No, he isn't and he isn't alone in what he is seeing. Women are mostly in friends groups that are of comparable level when it comes to looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:58 PM
8

Yeah, but nobody is telling those tourist to just stay home and be yourself and the nice foreign waterfalls will magically appear...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:54 PM
1

Ok, know it all. Just look into it yourself if you don't believe me. Brains have different structures depending on gender. And this different structure also means a different functioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:39 PM
0

If the red pill could stop advocating for the subjugation of women Redpill didn't even start with advocating for the subjugation of women. You clearly have no idea what redpill actually is. It's advice for men, by men. That's all it is. Subjugation of women isn't even a part of it at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:12 PM
1

That could not happen. The contrary of reality only happens in dreams.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:07 PM
0

I'm amused by your attempt to completely dismiss a source I provided directly from r/TheRedPill sidebar. Which is not the gotcha you so arrogantly think it is. Redpill will be the first to acknowledge that it is a toolbox. You are free to use the tools you need or find useful. And you are also free to dismiss tools you have no need for. Do you find negging helpful? Good, use it. You don't find it useful? ok, don't use it. Redpill is just advice by men for men. It's not all or nothing. It's "pick…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:06 PM
-1

Where exactly is this framework you are talking about? It's everywhere were aware men give advice to other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:58 AM
9

Why do you need the obvious explained to you? Are you being disingenuous or is this really too hard to figure out for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:37 AM
1

which every medical doctor and psychologist would agree with. They would not. Our similarities are only superficial. When you zoom in on the details, all you see are differences. For instance you would say: men and women both have brains. See! We are the same! While I would counter that with: yeah, we both have brains, but their structure is different and they also function differently. The only thing that is the same is the word we use to call the gray matter that is in somebody's head regardle…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:25 AM
0

Monolith -> more similarities than differences. Not a monolith -> more differences than similarities.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:16 AM
-1

There's nothing in the rules that says you can't bi here (pun intended). But you are like a rich person on a forum where poor people come to discuss money issues. You can't relate to us, we can't relate to you. You don't have to date women, you could also date men. The rest of us don't have that luxury. We are condemned to like the vagina people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:10 AM
-3

Moreover nature doesn’t give a fuck You sad reality denier. Nature definitely gives a fuck. That's why it becomes harder to get pregnant with age. And that's why the risks to both the mother and the child also go up with age. Sorry, the facts don't agree with your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:07 AM
-2

Yeah, what the previous guy said. Why are you even on PPD? As a bi guy, your experiences are completely not comparable to anything most people here are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 11:01 AM
1

So funny to still see you writing down your opinions, even after we already have established that you have no own opinion. You just say whatever that is disagreeing with men, even if you have to contradict yourself to do so. You are just a sad waste of human skin.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 10:53 AM
–

He is being kind. We all know that appartements are more valuable...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 10:33 AM
–

Clearly she now does. If you kill someone then you are a killer. Even if you don't kill anymore, you did it in the past, so you will always be a killer. Same thing for hoes. You had casual sex? You are a hoe. You change your mind and decide to stop having casual sex? You are still a hoe. Your past can't be changed. Only now you have become a useless hoe. Because the fact that you did casual sex makes you not relationship material and the fact that you have decided to no longer have casual sex ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 10:31 AM
–

What matters is who she is now, the woman sitting across from you, not the woman she was 5 years ago. Wrong, your past shapes your present. Therefore your past is still very relevant no matter how much women like to pretend it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 10:10 AM
-4

Then they are completely wrong. Men and women are completely different. I'm not claiming one is better than the other. Men and women are complementary but definitely different.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 05:07 PM
0

Listen to people who have already achieved where you're trying to go. That exactly what I am doing. That's why I don't listen to women are blue pillers giving advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 05:06 PM
-1

They sure are.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 05:04 PM
4

Women are human beings and we all have more similarities than differences. Women are not a monolith. Make up your mind, will ya?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 03:58 PM
0

Or yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 03:53 PM
1

I doubt Noted.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 10:33 AM
5

I don't know why it happens really, I just know that it happens. It's like a bullet in the head for my feelings. Just shows that you are normal. Men had no way of protecting themselves from paternity fraud during most of human existence. And since reproduction is very important to any living being, men tried their best to avoid being turned into a cuckold. And the only way they could do that, is by avoiding women who displayed signs of promiscuity. This behavior has become instinctual for men. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 10:29 AM
2

Put it on a poster!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 06:11 PM
3

Sure...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:18 PM
–

butting into First Grindr and now this? I don't know if you have accepted it yet, but your subconscious is definitely trying to get a message across...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:15 PM
–

What's that again? Don't feed the trolls? Ok, got ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:04 PM
–

Why would a heterosexual guy even think to propose Grindr as a solution to other heterosexual guys, unless he was thinking about Grindr in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:38 PM
–

I'm not the one so obsessed with Grindr that I'm advising heterosexual men to make an account. That's all you. I don't blame you, having seen pictures of your girlfriend it's understandable that you are thinking about fucking men...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:19 PM
–

Hierarchy of love: men -> women -> children -> pets. Women don't even love men, why would they want to be beter for men? Men are more like useful objects to women than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 02:56 PM
–

Go sign up for Grindr and you can have a dude over to your house to blow you with no reciprocation within hours Stop projecting your desires onto others. Not everyone likes to take it up the ass...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 02:51 PM
2

No, it not very rare. I have been a bartender during my college years. I have been in a "fly on the wall" situation many times. Where I had women seated at my bar, talking to each other like they didn't realize or care that I was standings there able to hear everything they said to each other. At first I was shocked at the level of details that got shared. But you can't stay shocked for long, when this type of behavior is something you experience time and time again. That's what you fail to unde…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 04:42 PM
2

I agree that dick sizes shouldn't be normal to discuss. Women wouldn't like it either, if men were handing out graphic descriptions of those women's labia to their friends and aquintances. But what can we do? The majority of women engage in oversharing behavior. And women cannot be held accountable in any way. So, it is what it is. Women not respecting the privacy of their partners is just a minor thing anyway compared to other shitty things women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 04:28 PM
4

lol dude, many men talk about their girl friend, especially if she’s great in bed, or the exact opposite. Men are in competition with other men. Therefore they only vaguely share things about their love life. The most I ever learned from a man was: "Yes, the sex was great". While women have informed me of the dick size, the stamina, the specific things a partner did to them, etc... There's no comparing the two. Men will share only some vague outlines, while women will give you the close and pers…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 04:18 PM
4

It isn't really relevant what exactly is being discussed when women overshare and don't respect their partner's privacy. What's relevant is that a majority of women engage in the behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 03:58 PM
2

Yes, I have female coworkers that overshare, just like the women I have met in a non-professional environment have a tendency to overshare. If you have a vagina and you don't gossip, then you are definitely the exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 02:54 PM
1

Lol, lol and again fucking lol (I wish the trent of adding fake laughing to everything, would just die. It's so fucking childish), no he isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 02:08 PM
1

In short, clean up your act. Lol, you are like a blind person telling someone who can see, that they should use their eyes more. You have been entertaining, but it's time to move on. Have a nice day.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 01:52 PM
1

I don’t underestimate the ignorance of this sub and people in general You should start doing the same with your own ignorance...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 01:30 PM
3

You're generalising based on a few weird people, if you even know them. That would mean that every female person I have ever encountered is weird. Even in a professional setting with female colleagues, women will (over)share. Maybe you are an exception, but I highly doubt it. If I was in your social group, so your two female best friends would know that I also know you and I have a drunken night out with those two friends of yours, then by the end of the evening I would know intimate details abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 01:20 PM
1

I didn't feign ignorance, you are the idiot who thinks that "plusplus" in a username is an obvious reference to a programming language. When a human associates themselves with "plusplus" I think about overweight people, or people who think they are "extra" somehow. I don't think about someone who wants to start to learn C++. By the way there's no such thing as "wanting to start to learn C++". Nothing is stopping you from learning. The information is all available for free. So, you either have en…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 01:09 PM
2

it just is not a normal conversation to have ...for you. For most women it however is. Put a group of female friends together, give them some wine and before the evening is through you will know a lot of personal details about people who are not present that evening.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 01:00 PM
6

It's not just one woman. Every woman I have ever met "shares". The closer they are to someone, the more they share. Good for you if you are actually discreet (I highly doubt it though, your best friends knows some stuff, I'm sure of it.), but that would make you an exception. Not the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 12:42 PM
3

They sure do. Women are much more group oriented than men. They want to belong. And they belong by sharing. No, I got my impressions of female social groups by having female friends and partners and hearing them interact with their friends. Hell, if you are close enough to a woman, they'll sometimes even do the same sharing behavior with you. When I realized that I knew a lot about the sexual ins and outs of the guys my partner's friends were dating, I realized also that her friends probably kno…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 12:30 PM
1

not knowing what C++ is, You dumb cunt. IT is my profession. I know perfectly well what C++ is, I can write it. You are here to stir some shit, and I'm not interested in watching you do it. Have fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 12:09 PM
6

We shouldn't pretend it's not common, after all the majority of women do it. Women bond by sharing. Those who don't share ostracize themselves from the group. So, there's actually peer pressure on women to share.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 12:05 PM
7

I have several female friends who admitted that women do talk, and yes they talk about everything. If you have a dick, your woman's friends will know about it. Women who don't talk are the exception. Women bond with other women by "sharing". So, women who don't share are ostracicing themselves from the group.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 12:00 PM
1

All you are doing by affirming that naked female bodies turn you on, is that women are not completely straight. Thanks for playing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 04:04 PM
1

Again using a comparison that doesn't work. Horror movies are made intentionally scary. The intent is already in the images. While there's nothing sexual about a picture of a body that I'm not attracted to. You could show me a thousand pictures of naked men, my arousal center in the brain won't activate.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 04:02 PM
1

You are just here to stir some shit. Why don't you explain the BS you are trying to sell me, instead of riding that high horse of yours? more about mirroring and empathy? How do you mirror a picture of a naked woman you have never met and don't know anything about? How do you feel empathy for such a picture? And how do you get aroused from imagining yourself as this unknown person in a picture? You tell me I'm wrong, but your arguments are not very impressive (I'm being very generous here) to sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 03:26 PM
1

First of all, foods you don't like will not be deliciously looking to you. So, you are forcing reality to make it fit your point. Second of all food is just food. It makes sense for food to make you think about food and maybe being hungry. Because food is just food to us and nothing else. Humans are not just sex to us. It would make no sense for the arousal part of your brain to activate if you are not attracted to a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 03:17 PM
2

Do you hate your own body that much, that imagining yourself as some random naked woman you don't know anything about, turns you on?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 02:58 PM
2

Should have been obvious that someone with plusplus in her reddit name, is going to use food as a (bad) analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 02:48 PM
2

I didn't say it was...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 02:46 PM
2

Wait what? They show you a picture of a naked woman and you are not attracted by the woman, but by imagining you were her you do get turned on? How does that work? You don't know her. It's just a picture of a naked woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 02:38 PM
2

You are overthinking it. Stop worrying about what might happen and just pay attention to what's actually happening in the moment. Be mindful of her, but don't overdo it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 09:46 AM
3

there's no desire, nothing happens in the brain. That part of the brain that is responsible for arousal becomes active when women are shown naked bodies. Regardless of the gender of those naked bodies. Sorry the facts don't agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 03:02 PM
1

You need to learn how to read the room. I would never grab a woman's throat unless she is giving hints that she needs to be dominated more. And even then you start easy, see what her reaction is and only proceed when her reaction is positive. It's good that you are mindful for consent, but I think you took it to far. By demanding permission for anything you want to do, you are killing the magic. This is not a business deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 02:58 PM
3

Physical responses in women aren't linked to attraction so much as seeing anything sexual. What does they aren't linked to attraction so much as seeing anything sexual even mean? This is a nonsensical sentence. Saying "it's not attraction, they are just seeing sexual things" might count as impressive conversation when you and the rest of your knitting gang come together, but you should keep it there. It won't work anytime making sense is required. When women see those pictures the center that re…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 12:51 PM
6

Straight women have the same or even a stronger response to being shown pictures of naked women as their response to pictures of naked men. Most women don't act on this, but most women are definitely not completely straight. As usual you are arrogantly wrong. Gender differences were also found for ratings of picture-induced arousal. While females rated male and female nudes as equally arousing, males attributed more arousal to opposite-sex nudes. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10768304…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 11:29 AM
4

I can hear pussy dry up just from reading this. If she was scared or feared for her wellbeing, she wouldn't be in your bed in the first place. There's treating women with respect and there's being overly cautious to the point it becomes cringe and a turn off.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 11:13 AM
4

In my experience women that like to be dominated get turned of by a man asking permission for the dominant things he wants to do. Being dominant and asking permission are opposing things. You'll have to learn to 'read the room" and figure it out without asking for permission.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 11:08 AM
13

Not one woman I hooked up with has ever asked me to wear a condom. And some have even made a big deal out of me insisting on wearing one. More reasons to always wear condoms. We have lifted all restrictions on female sexuality, letting them roam free. And now we can see the results. If female sexuality is left unchecked, women just behave like whores. Any woman who has been an a dating app has basically let complete strangers hit it. And probably hit it without asking him to wear any protection.…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 10:58 AM
7

Yeah, but coming out is still allowed. It might make things harder, but nobody is saying that women are no longer allowed to report SA. OP was talking about situation where men are no longer allowed to be somewhere or do something because some men did bad things. Your example is not comparable since women are still allowed to report SA.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 01:19 PM
2

You seen to be laboring under the impression that I’m stupid. Hey, if it walks like a duck...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 12:12 PM
1

That's fine. Just letting you know that you are defending someone that is not "intellectually honest" because someone else has not been "intellectually honest" back to them. Seems like they do not need your defence, but could do with someone reminding them, that they can't expect honesty when they aren't willing to be honest themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 10:07 AM
5

Did you... did you just claim that men take more physically taxing, riskier and higher paying jobs to impress women? That's exactly what I am claiming. Men get a lot of their drive to achieve things from the fact that their sex drive is pushing them to get with women. If a man is no longer chasing women, he is still going to work, but he definitely will stop working himself to an early grave in a high stress environment with insane hours. Do men even exist for themselves, or do they work out, ea…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:29 PM
5

Men simply tend to make more money for all kinds of reasons It's smacking you right in the face and still you fail to see it. Those reasons are because women are attracted to men who have more money than they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:14 PM
2

You don't have to see the difference for yourself when somebody is pointing it out to you. If it gets pointed out and you still fail to see it, then you are just not willing to see it. A sugar daddy is not a beta bux. And the difference between those two is how aware the man is about the whole situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 04:48 PM
3

You can call him stupid. Or mislead. Or abused. Or the victim of toxic femininity. Or blinded by blue pill romantic ideas. Or... Fact of the matter is that you were wrong. Beta bux is used for men who are not aware of the situation they are in. If they are well aware and are willingly paying for the return they are getting, then they can't be beta bux.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:34 PM
2

No, it isn't the same thing. The difference is that a "beta bux" isn't aware that she is only with him for material reasons. Most rich guys who date women considerably younger than they are themselves, are perfectly aware why these hot young women are dating them. In both cases the woman isn't with the man out of physical attraction. In one case the man is unaware of this fact (beta bux) and in the other case the man is well aware (sugar daddy).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:27 PM
2

Lol no, "beta bux" obviously isn't referring to the woman in that situation, but to the man. He is the beta bux. So, a woman who is only with a man for his money isn't what "beta bux" means. A man who thinks a woman is with him for him, while she is only with him for material reasons, is what "beta bux" means. If a man walks into that situation well aware that he is buying/renting a woman and not really looking for anything serious with her, then he isn't a "beta" handing over his "bux" in a mis…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:18 PM
2

This wouldn't really be beta buxing. This is more like a sugar baby situation. The man here isn't under the illusion that this is a real relationship with serious potential. He just wants some arm candy and she wants some cash.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:02 PM
3

but he has to be damn near Hollywood hot for that to happen Or he can take the easy route and just be rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:51 PM
3

His receding hairline helps him accept that his woman's tits are now touching her knees... Isn't nature great?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:49 PM
1

To be fair, if women would only take it up the ass, their STD rates would be much higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:28 PM
2

Men and women have the same drives and want the same thing - each other. If they want each other then they want different things, not the same thing. A man wants a woman. A woman wants a man. And men and women are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:26 PM
0

Did you really just use the words "intellectually honest argument" to defend u/apresonly???? She isn't even here for the debate. She responds with comments that don't even relate to what was said in the comment before. She is here for the attention and to shit on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:22 PM
8

It's obvious she isn't here for a debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:13 PM
–

Love is just oxytocin.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:03 PM
1

So, why would you automatically assume that women behaving badly online, are men larping as women?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 11:51 AM
1

Most men work a lot harder than they should if they only need to pay for hobbies, food and a roof over their head. You don't need a highly stressful job working 60+ hours a week to pay for those things. Yet a lot of men bury themselves in a career that leaves them very little time to actually live. It's clear that they are competing with other men for women. And therefore are trying to earn a lot more than they would need for just their own lives. Men will always need to work, but it's these ext…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 11:47 AM
1

Really? Women behave as cunts here and you suggest it could be men larping as women? What's wrong with this sub? Earlier someone talked about women posting their own nudes for validation and the first thing one of the femnazis here said, is that it was probably men posting those pictures as revenge porn. Even when women are the ones doing something bad, it's still men who are to blame. It's just ridiculous. Women can be cunts. Let's not pretend like they are all saints. So sick of the "women are…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:44 AM
3

Seems like the majority of the women here aren't here to have a debate, but just like to shit on men. It's pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:15 AM
0

That depends on where you live. Where I live being a university professor is a job that's highly regarded and well payed. And top researchers can always go work in the chemical industry. Which is one of the higher paying industries that we have.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:13 AM
3

I will do whatever it takes to have air conditioning. If I have to ride on a garbage truck to do so because men let their weakness consume them.. I will. It’s not difficult. So you think that you are that bitch that can overcome her solipsistic nature and go drag around other women's garbage all day long? And you even think that it's not difficult? LOL, if you need air conditioning that much, you won't stand a chance working behind a garbage truck in the summer heat. I don't think you have thoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:03 AM
5

and women will simply throw up their hands and accept it. Stick your sarcasm where the sun doesn't shine, dumbass. Can you see yourself standing on a stinking garbage truck, lifting heavy bags of garbage all day long? Of course not, you assume one of the other women will do that job. Just like all the other women assume that they won't be the ones who have to work with stinking garbage all day long. If you are lucky enough to find a woman that can rise above her solipsism and be willing to drag …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:22 AM
6

Yeah, to be precise we should change that into women aren't intentionally funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 08:51 PM
1

Don't tell me what to do. If you don't like my response, stop being disingenuous and using "debate" as an excuse to shit on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 08:47 PM
4

Really? Cool, put your money where that big mouth of yours is and bring me some evidence to go along with your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 08:02 PM
1

Like I said you are awful. You belong to a small but select group of insufferable women on this subreddit, who are here not for any debate, but to just shit on men. Women post nudes -> must be their boyfriends doing it. I guess you are feeling kind today, you didn't even claim the boyfriends raped their girlfriends before the pictures were taken...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 07:58 PM
14

You are in for a rude awakening if the amount of men checking out of society ever reach critical mass. You really are clueless just how sheltered and pampered women are in today's society where men do everything that women can't do or won't do.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 07:30 PM
–

I know what she is saying. She is deliberately "misunderstanding" the following sentence, because she likes to shit on men. Even when there's no reason for it: I see some women who have boyfriends post nudes to Reddit for compliments
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:45 PM
–

What about the following sentence is hard for you to understand? I see some women who have boyfriends post nudes to Reddit for compliments
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:43 PM
–

Ignore her. She is one of those insufferable people who is here not for an actual debate, but just to shit on men. Just look at some of her comments, realize engaging her is pointless and move on with life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:30 PM
–

Cool, then men can also have paternity tests without women giving us BS. It's not about the woman, it's about the situation and being vulnerable when not knowing if your kids are actually yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:25 PM
–

I see some women who have boyfriends post nudes to Reddit for compliments sounds like men doing revenge porn You are just awful. Women post nudes -> still it must be men that are doing revenge porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:17 PM
10

Yeah, but they won't be the people collecting the garbage, or the men laying roof on a hot summer day or the people running the nuclear plant or.... Basically anything infrastructure wise is build and kept functioning by men. Do you think men will continue to do the hard physical labor, to collect that fat paycheck that comes with it, when they no longer want to impress women? Hell, no. You'll have to cure cancer and collect the garbage, lay roof in the middle of summer..... You guys are just ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:10 PM
15

Men no longer contributing to society. You would be surprised if you knew how much of a man's drive comes from the fact that his sex drive is pushing him to get with women. If a man no longer wants to get with women, he isn't going to work himself to the bone to buy a fancy car and a nice place. He will rent a small apartment. Use some lawn chairs as furniture and just do the bare minimum to get buy. No more trying to be the best scientist ever, so he can become rich enough to get pussy, while h…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 06:01 PM
1

Another silly goose declaring herself the winner in some kind of imaginary contest? I hate to break it to you, but declaring yourself the winner isn't how winning actually works.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 06:19 PM
1

Still rambling.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 05:49 PM
1

I'm sorry of it comes across as condescending. It definitely was not my intention to be condescending. I don't have any context for the dates you have been on, but you did gave me some context in saying that you only been on two dates in six years. If you think about how many dates it can take to actually find a compatible person, you should realize that at your current speed of 0.333333 dates per year there's a good chance things will not work out in a timely matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 09:54 AM
2

If you are actively trying to date and you only had two dates in six years, you have to either quit dating all together or completely change what you are doing. Because what you are currently doing isn't working.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 09:47 AM
1

Ok, so you are complaining about dating, but aren't actively dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 09:42 AM
2

Why the hell would you do a dinner date if you are going on a first date? You don't know them yet. If they are awful or a catfish, you are going to be stuck with them until the dinner is finished. Make it a coffee date (easier to cut short, added bonus you avoid "foodie calls" and they are cheaper). If you had a nice time chatting over a coffee, you can still turn that into a dinner date if you want. At least by then you know what they look like and that they are fun to talk to. But I would sugg…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 09:41 AM
0

This is just sad and doesn't sound healthy at all. If this is what dating is like for you, why do you even bother with it? I would quit doing this if I was you, it can't be healthy for your self esteem. Use a different approach to your dating. Change it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 09:31 AM
1

You are rambling.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 09:24 AM
1

Look at any situation were a woman is in a position of power. It will still be men that are sent of to war. If a man is calling the shots or if a woman is calling the shots, it makes no difference. So, no it's not thanks to other men. Society deems men's lives as less valuable (which they also are from a biological point of view) and therefore they are the ones sent off to die. I have no problem with the reality of this situation. But don't give me any BS that men's lives are just as valuable as…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 03:14 PM
1

Pointing out that society treats men as disposable are "awful colours"? Lol, ok. It's not like I made anything up. Men lives are the only lives we throw away on the battlefield.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 02:57 PM
1

Judging from women's list of demands on dating apps, men have to offer a lot more than "just money" to even be considered.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 02:55 PM
1

I don't. I rather have a (physically stronger) man fighting next to me, than a woman. I only mentioned this, because some disingenuous women here claimed that men's lives are just as valuable as women's lives. Which clearly is blue pill BS, when the only lives we deem insignificant enough to be sacrificed on the battlefield, are men's lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 02:40 PM
1

Look up the numbers of people dying in your army (and it doesn't even matter that I have no idea what country you are from). It will be 95% or more men. Are there women in the army? Yes, there are, but 99% of them will be far away from the battlefield in a supporting role.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 02:36 PM
1

Women are solipsistic. They are incapable of putting themselves into another person's shoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 12:50 PM
–

I always have been a fan of: if you got nothing to say, don't open your mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 11:36 AM
3

How many desperate or damaged women are there? I think the damaged ones are clearly a majority. And social media makes sure that this group only becomes bigger by the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 11:02 AM
–

Who says any of them wants to date these OnlyFans girls? I think most of them just would like to fuck the OnlyFans girls they are following. And giving money to whores still seems like an effective way to get your dick wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 10:25 AM
–

Was this: Oh boy lol really the best you could do? What does it attribute to a debate?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 10:21 AM
–

I don't know any mortal woman that's not a celebrity that has that many men interested in her sexually, nevermind romantically. Just take a look at any average woman's tinder profile. Hundreds of matches...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 10:17 AM
1

Oh, you just wanted an excuse to shit on men again. Too bad for you that struggling doesn't equal desperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 09:07 AM
0

As if men aren't send to war when a woman is leading a country.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 08:49 AM
1

Once again, don't whine about objectification when the only thing you offer is a body.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 08:26 AM
1

My previous comment was a joke. I hope you realize that men don't actually shout into vaginas to see if they can hear an echo. But even though you seem to take my joke way too serious, I'll answer your question. I prefer women who have demonstrated that they can handle being with one man. And I don't prefer women who have issues and need the validation of lots of different men to be able to handle their issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:02 PM
1

Lol, bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:58 PM
2

lol, I see what you did there.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:48 PM
1

You trying to convince me that I don't value myself, is gaslighting. I know myself better than you do and do value myself. It isn't me who doesn't believe that men are valuable. It's society that treads men as less valuable. Which is why you saying that men have "the same intrinsic value" is such BS. It's just empty words. Men are not treated as if they are just as valuable as women or children are. So telling men that they are just as valuable, is again gaslighting men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:43 PM
–

Also how do you know how much dick we had? We shout loudly into your vagina. If our own voice is echoing back at us, we know you had too much dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:24 PM
1

I do value myself. I ignored you trying to gaslight me into thinking that I don't value myself, because I find it a bit of a pathetic attempt at derailing the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:18 PM
1

Men are the ones who treat relationships as transactional. And women demand that their partners earn more than they do, because they are such big romantics, right? Lol. Most men would not be with a woman if she was unattractive or gained weight or didn’t want to have sex. Of course not. Most women only bring sex to the table. And now you are surprised that men wouldn't be with a woman if she took sex of the table? You can't offer nothing and still expect a man to commit to you...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 02:03 PM
1

Western world = first world countries. Google "western world", you ignoramus. Here, I did it for you: In practical terms, this means the Western World typically includes most countries of the European Union as well as the U.K., Norway, Iceland, Switzerland, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. I don't think you know what gaslighting means Oh, but I do. Gaslighting is convincing people that things that are actually true, aren't true or that things that aren't actually true, are …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 01:55 PM
1

Ukraine isn't in the western world Ukraine is part of Europe. Europe is part of the western world. You keep repeating the "same intrinsic value". You are gaslighting men by saying they have the "same intrinsic value", while they are the only ones deemed insignificant enough to get slaughtered on the battlefield. Can you explain what "same intrinsic value" even means when there aren't any real life consequences attached to it?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 01:31 PM
1

No man is going to battle unwillingly in the western world. This is a lie. The men in Ukraine weren't allowed to leave the country when the war started. There is plenty of them who are fighting in that war against their wishes. Our intrinsic values are the same. You, on the other hand, want consequences, something palpable. Such a load of bollocks. What does it even mean to have the "same intrinsic value", if there are no consequences attached to this? It means absolutely nothing. It's becomes a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 12:16 PM
1

It might be only words for you. You are funny. YOU aren't going to protest and demand to take the place of a man who is supposed to go to battle. It is therefore also nothing but words to you. Words without consequences are meaningless. In theory men have the same "intrinsic value" as women, but in reality men are sent of to get slaughtered while women, who have the same "intrinsic value" can stay home and sip some thee. The intrinsic value you talk about is just a theoretical concept with no ap…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 11:16 AM
1

You keep throwing around that we all have the same "intrinsic value". And it sure sounds nice. But it is also completely meaningless when our "same intrinsic value" has no consequences in real life. Our same intrinsic value is only words, it doesn't get applied in actions. If our boat sinks, you together with other women and children will be in the lifeboats. While I will get to find out how long a man can survive in freezing cold water.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 09:54 AM
1

But as Ukraine teaches us, women go to war as well. In smaller numbers, but they have their contribution as well. Disingenuous much? When the war started in Ukraine, men weren't allowed to leave the country. While women were free to leave. That a very small group of women made the choice to also fight, isn't really something you should brag about, because they had the freedom of choice. While men have the obligation to fight. Who do you think feels more valuable? People who are offered a choice …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 09:38 AM
1

It isn't really relevant what word you want to put in front of the word 'value', it can be 'intrinsic' or it can be 'society'. When only one gender is sacrificed to go die on the battlefield, it's obvious that the other gender is treated as more valuable. Go tell all the young men wearing a uniform and getting shipped out to the slaughter, that they have the same "intrinsic" value as the women who get to stay safely at home. I'm sure they will appreciate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 09:22 AM
–

What did you expect? When women treat relationships and men as transactional, did you think men would still be into some kind of romantic BS? No, fuck that. I learned my lesson. Quid pro quo.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 09:01 AM
0

You don't really need a draft anymore. You have implemented a system where often poor people only can escape their poverty by signing up to the military.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 08:50 AM
5

Anything else?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 08:45 AM
1

You are the last person who should speak for other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 03:41 PM
1

Hmm, not sure about that one. Women who live by the no bra rule, usually also live by the no shaving rule. And I don't want a bunch of hairy hippies on the boat.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 02:31 PM
2

It isn't even an insecurity, it's a survival tactic. Men had no way of knowing their kids where their kids. Avoiding promiscuous women was the only thing men could do to have a better chance at spreading their genes. It has become instinctively.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 02:22 PM
1

Are their any women with big chestickles on board? If so, then please crush some fish and go for the bouncy bouncy...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 02:13 PM
1

For me, everyone has the same intrinsic value. Those are just words... When you see that only men are being shipping off to war, are you going to volunteer to take the place of one of those men? I don't think you will. Because when it comes down to it, you will value your own life more than that of another person. Women's lives are more valuable to society than men's lives. And we all value our own lives more than the lives of other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 02:10 PM
–

I can answer that one. She is capable, but not willing. Just like 99% of the other women on this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 01:58 PM
1

Good idea, soft landings are more fish friendly. And we don't like crushed fish anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 01:44 PM
1

Those numbers are apparently still not simple enough for you, since you keep using them incorrectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 01:40 PM
-3

We weren't talking about the value of a man's life in comparison to another man's life. That they are both equally disposable isn't the issue. The issue is that their lives are treated as disposable while women's are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 01:22 PM
1

If there's a waterfall you just charge more money and call it canyoning...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 01:17 PM
1

They sure are, because I understand how statistics work. Lol, your forefathers are tossing around in their graves. If they knew that they would produce a pathetic cuck like yourself, who shits on his own gender to score browny points with a bunch of online lesbian feminists, they would have cut of their own balls. Add your lacking understanding of statistics on top of that and they would have cut of their own balls, even if a blunt spoon was the only tool available to them. I have to disappoint …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 01:15 PM
-4

Our lives matter equally That's such blue pill BS. In a just world they would. But we don't live in a just world. The fact that it's almost exclusively men that are forced to lay down their lives on the battlefield, clearly shows that men's lives matter less than female lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:55 PM
1

Not an issue. Become the 20% or -since women aren't the brightest when it comes to sniffing out fake men- fake being the 20%.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:47 PM
–

Gently down the stream
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:42 PM
2

You are not supposed to make yourself 'worthy', you strange man. You are just leveling yourself up for the benefits that leveling up bring to yourself. The women are just a nice bonus along the way. You clearly have women on some kind of pedestal, that you think you need to make yourself "worthy". Women are nothing special. If they didn't have vaginas and weren't nice to fuck, we wouldn't even bother with them. Most of them are quite boring. It would benefit you to see women for the insignifican…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:41 PM
–

Like I said very naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:31 PM
3

Efficient in making yourself completely miserable. Keep the hope and start working on yourself. There's always room for improvements.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:12 PM
–

Notice the signs, simple. Wow, victim blaming at is finest. And very naive of you to assume all cheaters display clear sings of cheating behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:07 PM
–

you can’t expect a woman to just be fine with such an accusation And you can't expect people to sacrifice at least 18 years or their life and a very serious amount of money, on kids they aren't even sure are theirs. You women are all completely lacking in empathy when it comes to men. You would not be raising kids yourself, if you don't even know if they are your kids in the first place. But you still expect men to do exactly that. Why? If you weren't sure, you would test the kids before sacrifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 12:03 PM
–

You say this: in a way they haven't indicated whatsoever they're capable of doing And that is such a incredibly naive take on the situation. Cheaters don't announce that they are cheaters. Most people who get cheated on did not see any indication that their partners were capable of cheating on them. Receiving no indication that you are about to get into a car crash, doesn't stop us from still fastening our seatbelts anytime we drive. If you start close relationships with people you feel are lyin…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 11:36 AM
1

They are completely analogous. In both cases there is no particular reason to suspect that you yourself might be effected. And in both cases there's a 2% chance that you actually are effected. Smart thing would be to test in both cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 11:04 AM
–

There is a legitimate reason to suspect beyond "well it could happen". It has confirmed to have happened, and the only thing that has not been confirmed is if you have been effected Strange you don't realize how completely equivalent this is to cheating and paternity fraud. We know that paternity fraud has happened, is happening now and will happen in the future. Therefore paternity is confirmed to have happened, and the only thing that has not been confirmed, is if a particular man has also bee…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 10:59 AM
–

If you have 0 reason to suspect that your wife/partner is cheating then a paternity test isnt needed. And what did we learn today? We learned that if you do not suspect your wife is cheating on you, then it is impossible for her to actually cheat on you. So, never suspect anything and you can't get cuckolded. Paternity test are no longer needed! Just never suspect anything and you are safe from raising your cheating whore's bastard child! Easy peasy /s
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 10:50 AM
6

Being hopeless saves you from the despair Really? I think most people would agree that when there's no more hope, despair is all that remains.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 10:30 AM
3

What do you expect? Fish should not be handing out fishing advice...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 10:26 AM
1

I don't get offended when that happens. It's crystal clear to me that women treat relationships as a transaction. Women don't even have to explicitly say it anymore. It's obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 09:55 AM
1

Good thing I didn't say "men 18-29 are 50% more likely to cheat than women" I'm going to copy/paste myself, since you are just repeating yourself. I can't be bothered anymore to be creative enough to refute the same claim of yours, with different words of mine: You really don't get it, do you? That's exactly what you did do when you said "men are 50% more likely to cheat". Because "men" also includes men between the ages of 18-29. I am perfectly capable, however, of being realistic about my gend…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 09:51 AM
1

I don’t even know what to say other than that yes, war orphans are a thing. They’ve always been a thing. So because some men already had children, that means that men too young to have had children aren't shipped of to war? What is your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 08:56 AM
1

Looks are only temporary. So, if you think about it, the only thing women offer is sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 06:18 PM
1

Bro, I have the evidence. You do not. We are both referencing the same study, you genius. The study you provided. The study that clearly states that women do more cheating than men between the ages of 18-29. The study that therefore makes a blanket statement like 'men are more likely to cheat than women' factually incorrect. Lol yeah you're totally here for good faith discussion. Still would love to know why a man hates his own gender so much, that he feels the need to go online and shit all ove…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:50 PM
0

He assumes that the child survives the birth as well He doesn't assume. He recognizes that the child might not survive when he added the (if the child was saved) to his comment. There is no reason a man going to war might not already have offspring. There's a real good reason that a man going to war might not already have offspring. And that reason is the fact that men as young as 18 years are already shipped off to war. And people that young usually aren't parents yet. By selectively ignoring t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:39 PM
1

pedantic shit You can call it pedantic but it just makes you look like a sore loser. "Men" aren't more likely to cheat than women. Because there are whole age groups where women do more of the cheating. Men older than 29 however are. It's not my fault that you made an incorrect claim in your haste to paint all men worse than they are. Words have a meaning and nuance exist for a reason. Men aren't more likely to cheat, only men above the age of 29 are. Deal with it. aren't the only voice being he…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:28 PM
1

Men are 50% more likely to cheat than women. You'll have to learn to deal with it. And... .... you did it again. Even though it was just explained to you how it makes your claim incorrect. Incredible. And once again you didn't engage with my explanation. You just say that I'm wrong. Why I am wrong or where the fault is in my logic? No idea... Why do you even hang out in a debate sub? Debating means using arguments to demonstrate that the other is wrong. Just saying that someone is wrong isn't a …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 03:55 PM
1

Good thing I didn't say "men 18-29 are 50% more likely to cheat" then. You really don't get it, do you? That's exactly what you did do when you said "men are 50% more likely to cheat". Because "men" also includes men between the ages of 18-29. It's precisely because you did not make a distinction and used a blanket statement that also includes those age groups that actually cheat less than women, that your claim is incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 03:35 PM
9

I’d say being raped is worse than having your reputation tarnished. No one will shun you from society because you happened to be raped. You will be an outcast to society if your reputation is tarnished, even if the accusations against you are not truthful. If you are raped and you can prove it, the perpetrator will receive jail time. If you are falsy accused and you can prove it, the perpetrator will receive no jail time, probably not even a fine when it was a female perpetrator. And even worse,…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:57 PM
-3

It isn't a false dichotomy and even if it was you are still ignoring his other arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:43 PM
1

You didn't. Yes I did: When you say "men are more likely to cheat", you do not recognize that there are age groups for which this statement is untrue. Men between the ages of 18-29 DO NOT CHEAT MORE THAN WOMEN. Take any random 20 year old man and any random 20 year old woman. There's a bigger chance that the woman will cheat, than that the man will cheat (according to your own evidence). So, you claiming that "men are more likely to cheat" does not apply to this example. Nor does it apply to any…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:33 PM
1

No it's not. I did not just say that it is, I also explained why it is. It's very telling to you choose not to engage with the arguments I brought forward and choose to debate like a toddler. Would you like me to stoop down to your level? I could shout "it is" at you, you can shout back "it isn't". Refute the arguments if you can. If you can't refute them, acknowledge that you are incorrect. Or you continue to act like a toddler and keep repeating "it's not", but don't expect me to keep playing …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 01:58 PM
–

Whish it wasn't so, but I can relate the hell out of this. It made me realize women are indeed more like children than like adults. If you can't be accountable, you just aren't an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:33 PM
–

So in other words I’m right and you can’t debate further, No, he is saying you are so absurdly wrong, that it becomes pointless to talk to you any further because you seem to be delusional. Which you are demonstrating here quite nicely by taking him saying "you are wrong" and pretending like he is saying "you are right".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:30 PM
–

This female therapist came to the same conclusion as OP did And this all lines up with what I and a lot of other men have experienced in their relationships. Addressing female bad behavior always turns into a discussion about why the person criticizing has to be "such an asshole". It never gets around to addressing the fact that the criticism is warranted and what will be done about the bad behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:26 PM
–

You can always count on her to be a good representation of toxic femininity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:23 PM
–

And what he is describing is something that a lot of men, who definitely are NOT him, have also experienced. Women have, not being able to handle criticism and accountability, in common with other women. This female therapist came to the same conclusion as OP did
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:21 PM
–

And what he is describing is something that a lot of men, who definitely are NOT him, have also experienced. Women have, not being able to handle criticism and accountability, in common with other women. This female therapist came to the same conclusion as OP
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:18 PM
–

And what he is describing is something that a lot of men, who definitely are NOT him, have also experienced. Women have not being able to handle criticism and accountability in common with other women. This female therapist came to the same conclusion as OP did
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:17 PM
–

Helpful Oh boy, when you want to be hurtful at least don't be a coward and admit to it when you are being called out. Your comment wasn't helpful at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:11 PM
–

Punctuation please.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:05 PM
1

Are you implying that because women actually listen to each other, they are a hivemind? No, I'm not implying anything. You don't have to "go look for the hidden meaning" in what I wrote.I wrote exactly what I meant. Men have to compete with other men to get noticed. Therefore we are not a group, we are competition. Women will get attention without being "the best" among their peers, therefore they are much more a group than men are. Women can't listen to men until men start listening to each oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 12:01 PM
–

I understood you immediately when I started to read your post. I too have gone down the same path as you. Trying to address some blatant bad behavior from otherwise perfectly fine female partners of mine. I got the same results as you and came to the same conclusions. Women cannot handle criticism or accountability. They always feel attacked and completely ignore the fact that the criticism was warranted by their own behavior. The conversation always shifts from their blatantly bad behavior, to …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:47 AM
1

No, it's not. Yes it is, but somehow your brain can't understand the difference between men in general are more likely to cheat and men are more likely to cheat. One is correct. The other is not. When you say "men are more likely to cheat", you do not recognize that there are age groups for which this statement is untrue. Men between the ages of 18-29 DO NOT CHEAT MORE THAN WOMEN. Therefore saying men in general are more likely to cheat is correct. And saying men are more likely to cheat isn't. …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:31 AM
1

Relevance?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:03 AM
–

This female therapist came to the same conclusion as you OP And I know exactly what you are talking about. Women aren't used to being held responsible or to deal with criticism, so they respond negatively when they are faced with this. It is definitely a gendered issue. Men need to put themselves out there when they want to date, opening themselves up to all the criticism in the world in the process. They are used to it. And men are held accountable by other men. We know that if we cross a line …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 11:01 AM
1

Men are fine with most women that provide milk. While women only want those men that provide the best milk they can get. It al comes down to women having a lot of options in dating, while most men struggle to get options at all. Men are not hypergamous. Starving people will eat anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 06:45 AM
1

From your own research: In general, men are more likely than women to cheat, but the gender gap in infidelity varies by age. Claiming that men are more likely to cheat is incorrect. Women between the ages of 18-29 are more likely to cheat than men. Therefore you can't just generalise and claim that men cheat more. Old men do, while young men don't. Why do you extrapolate the fact that old men cheat more to include all men regardless of their age? And why do you ignore the fact that young women c…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 06:06 AM
1

We just got that recently, and we got it from women advocating for themselves. You got it from women advocating for themselves and from men listening to and cooperating with women. Meaning for men to get the same, men need to advocate for themselves (without punching down at women). Men don't have these movements because men aren't moving. Men aren't a hive mind like women are. We men naturally are in competition with other men. Women will get attention from men without having to "win" the game …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 04:34 AM
1

So then you acknowledge the correct number is 50%? You must, because how else would you know 100% was wrong? Your logic doesn't work. I know 100% is wrong, just like I know 50% is wrong. Men and women both cheat in quantities that are very close to each other. Overall, men are 50% more likely to cheat than women. I see YOU make this claim. However the only evidence you provided does not corroborated your claim. "If I ignore the data I don't like, it says something different!" Don't even know wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 04:06 AM
–

No, I admit I misstated the number. It's 50%, not 100%. First of all, you can call it a mistake or misstated numbers or whatever, fact remains that your claim that "men are twice as likely to cheat", is an incorrect claim. Which was the reason why I reacted to your comment in the first place. Second of all, even your 50% number is incorrect. Young women cheat more than young men. Older men cheat more than older women. So, how can you now claim that men are 50% more likely to cheat? Your own rese…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 03:00 AM
–

That was a mistake on my part. Wait what? You admit that your claim was a mistake, but you are still arguing with me that you can prove your claim? How does that logic even work? "I haven't personally seen the evidence" is not the same as "unsubstantiated." True, if I have seen or not have seen the evidence you provide for your claim, will not change the fact that you provided evidence and therefore made a substantiated claim. The thing is: you did not provide any evidence for the claim you made…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 02:03 AM
–

It's not unsubstantiated at all. You claimed that men are twice as likely to cheat. And you provided no evidence for that claim. So, that is as unsubstantiated as you can get. r/agedlikemilk Lol, really? Nothing you said proved that men are twice as likely to cheat. In other words: you haven't proved your claim yet. So, me saying that you won't be able to, isn't aged at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 01:35 AM
–

I don't understand people like you. Did you fail to realise that your own claim is unsubstantiated? Or did you realise you yourself did not provide evidence, but are you so arrogant that you think evidence is something only others should provide? So, first put your money where your mouth is and provide evidence for the claim you made, then you can go ask for evidence from people who disagree with you. Tell you a secret, you won't be asking anybody to disprove your claim, once you have given up o…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 01:21 AM
–

God red pillers are so fragile. Melt snowflake.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 12:46 AM
–

Are you seriously asking for sources when people respond to your claim, when your claim was unsubstantiated and did not provide any sources itself? That's some "rules for thee but not for me" bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 11:06 PM
–

Men are twice as likely to cheat compared to women. No, they aren't. Modern research points to the differences being very small between the genders when it comes to cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 10:56 PM
3

That smiley face could indicate that what you said is a joke. Or it could mean that what you said is serious, but you are laughing with how stupid the people were that did the serious thing you just described. So, not "made obvious", you left plenty of ambiguity.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 06:05 PM
2

You having sex is the action that led to a baby For maybe the fifth time, there are 9 months between conception and birth, so no, the sex didn't lead to the baby. The sex led to the conception. The man is completely not involved from conception to birth. That's all on the woman. Why do you pretend as if those 9 months do not exist? Did they fuck up when they explained sex to you during sex education class? Abortion isn't just something you choose to do very lightly. And who is the one that gets …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:47 PM
2

It's the woman who decides not to abort = not my action. It's a woman who decides to grow the child inside of her = not my action. It's the woman who decides to actually birth the child = not my action. You seem to have trouble understanding basic concepts. An action cannot be attributed to a person, unless they participate in that action. Men's participation ended with the conception. From then until the child is born, all the action belongs to the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:28 PM
1

Interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:16 PM
2

The conception resulted from your decision to have sex. True. And the baby being born is the result of a woman's decision and her decision alone. So that baby is a direct result of your choice. Untrue. That baby is the direct result of a woman's decision to keep the fetus in her body and let it grow into a human baby. How can you even try to blame men for babies getting born, when even women themselves admit that it is their decision and their decision alone. It never was "her body and men also …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:13 PM
1

Are you sure both your parents were speaking mammals?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:06 PM
1

You have a choice to not have sex Again we the disingenuous BS. Choosing to have sex does not equal to choosing to have a kid. There are two things standing between sex and the birth of a child: the conception and the power of choice that a woman has after conception. You cannot expect another person to go trough a traumatic expererience, because you regret your choice I probably don't regret fucking her (unless she really, really was a bad fuck) and I never made the choice to put a kid on this …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:04 PM
1

When you have concetual sex, the baby is a mutual choise. Explain how can it be a mutual choice when only the woman has to power to decide if a kid will be born or if a kid will not be born, you genius.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 12:57 PM
1

You accept the risks. You take a risk knowgly that it could end up in a conception and a baby. You take a risk knowing it could end up in conception. The having a baby part is not a "risk". That is a conscious decision from the woman who is carrying the fetus. Since it is her decision and her decision alone, she should also bear the consequences alone. You made an input when you had sex.´The result of that sex was a baby. Again, you are either disingenuous or your brain isn't fully functional. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 12:52 PM
2

Sex is a reproductive act, when you have sex, you agree to the possibility of having a baby. Lol, says who? I had plenty of sex, but always bring up protection beforehand. I never agreed to having a baby. None of the sex I had was reproductive in nature. Why do you expect someone to go trough a traumatic experience, just because you chose afterwards that you arent okay with babies anymore? I chose beforehand, during and afterwards to not be ok with babies. That's why I always bring up protection…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 12:35 PM
2

YOU MADE A CHOISE TO HAVE A BABY, WHEN YOU CHOSE TO NOT GET A VASECTOMY AND BY HAVING SEX. YOU HAVE NOBODY ELSE TO BLAME. Factually not true. Choosing to have sex =/= choosing to have a baby. Sex is an activity that under certain conditions can lead to the conception of a baby. But sex isn't equal to having babies. Sex isn't equal to birth. Conception isn't equal to birth. And the step between conception and birth is one that only women are allowed to take. Women's decision, therefore women's re…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 12:18 PM
1

Why would I be supporting insane deadbeat dads avoiding child support? Why would you not hold the person responsible who made the actual decision? Or why would you hold a person responsible for a choice another person made? If you force parenthood upon men against their wishes, then they are not insane nor deadbeats for wanting to avoid the financial burden. Men are not slaves. People should not have the power to condemn other people to parenthood against their wishes. The only time a man is a "…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 11:59 AM
–

True. In the same realm: Women would rather date Brad Pitt the world famous dude, than Brad Pitt who is just a regular guy. While men would rather date an unknown version of Salma Hayek, than a world famous version of her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 11:45 AM
2

So you are solely responsible for the conception, because you chose to not get a vasectomy? No, men are solely responsible for the conception, because women are the only ones who have the power of decisions in the period from conception to birth. Vasectomies have nothing to do with it. I am a man If you are supposed to be a man, why in God's name are you advocating for women to not take responsibility over something that was their choice and their choice alone? Are you some kind of white knight …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 11:37 AM
1

You don't choose to not abort. Of course you do. Anyone who has the power to choose to abort, also has the power to choose for not aborting. One cannot exist without the other. Plenty of women choose to abort. Plenty of women never doubt. And plenty of women doubt but choose to not abort. If a woman chooses to abort or decides to keep the child, isn't what is relevant to the discussion. What is relevant is that the woman is the ONLY ONE who has the choosing power. Therefore she should also be th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 11:22 AM
1

There is 1 choice, and it is to get an abortion, not having an abortion is not a choice, its the baseline. I know women aren't very good at logic, but this isn't hard to understand, so try to follow along: If you have the choice to do something, then you automatically also have the choice to not do that something. Because if you do not have the choice to not do that something, then you are automatically forced to do that something. Which would mean that actually do not have the choice to do some…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 11:00 AM
-2

Lol, Reddit isn’t social media. Goes to show how little you know about it. This is the definition of social media: the means of interactions among people in which they create, share, and/or exchange information and ideas in virtual communities and networks. PPD is part of reddit. And PPD is obviously a "virtual community" that's used to "create, share, and/or exchange information and ideas". Since Reddit conforms to the definition of social media, it IS social media. Even Google agrees. Go searc…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 10:41 AM
4

For all intents and purposes, when the baby is conceived, you both are responsible for the child. If what you claim here is true, then you are making men responsible for a choice that was made by a woman, and only a woman. In the past there also was the believe that women couldn't be responsible for their own choices. And men were therefore made responsible for the decisions of their women. But that was back in the good ol' days, when women were treated as property. We have come a long way since…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 10:15 AM
4

do not have autonomy over their bodies and this is something men will never have to deal with. Try to fight your solipsism. This is getting ridiculous. There are plenty men in jail (=no autonomy over their bodies) because they couldn't carry the financial burden of a child THEY NEVER CHOSE TO HAVE IN THE FIRST PLACE. Women decide unilaterally that men will become fathers or not. Next, these men are forced for at least 18 years, to use their bodies to make money to pay for those kids. And if they…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 09:50 AM
0

The baby is not responsible for being born, the parents are. This is incorrect. The parents are both responsible for the conception. But only the mother is responsible for a child being born. Since the mother (and only the mother) can opt for an abortion or decide to not abort.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 09:39 AM
3

It’s a personal story from TikTok. It doesn't get less scientific than a "personal story from TikTok".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 09:22 AM
0

You claimed it was idiotic for men to approach women based of the appearance of the women, and for these men to expect the women to overlook the man's appearance. I point out that it isn't idiotic, because there is no equivalence. What goes for men doesn't automatically go for women. And vice versa. Men and women are different. Expecting exactly the same rules to apply for both genders would be the idiotic thing. Expecting different rules to apply, isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 09:10 AM
-5

"Deborah and Janice" did some research and found that women are talking less than men. Wanna bet that Janice and Deborah are not only researchers, but also "proud feminists"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 08:33 AM
-3

You are a woman and reddit is social media. The lack of self-awareness is shocking.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 08:06 AM
6

PPD is entertainment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 08:21 PM
1

Better than being a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 08:09 PM
7

I agree. My life would be hell if I was forced to do anything more than casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 08:08 PM
1

Being willing to have sex with somebody means nothing. That men are indiscriminate in who they sleep with does mean something. It means men aren't hypergamous. You are obviously not here for the debate. You are just talking to yourself while ignoring everything that is being said to you by others. Fucking waste of my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 08:01 PM
1

It definitely is for me. Who cares about you. We already established that you have no opinion of your own. Your opinion is just whatever disagrees with men. Even if you have to contradict yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:53 PM
1

I'm not mad. I just don't let bitches like you get away with insults. Not even when they try to justify their behavior after the fact, with some kind of BS excuse, like you just tried to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:50 PM
4

I wouldn't have too much faith. Women are hypergamous by nature. And hypergamy and loyalty aren't compatible with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:39 PM
1

"when women disagree with men, they're insulting them" You really are a hypocrite, aren't you? So, this is disagreeing with people according to you?: you sound like that average hypocritical rural/trump dude bro who takes selfies in his truck wearing pit vipers and women try to stay away from.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:36 PM
7

Make up your mind. If men are vile beasts that are willing to fuck anything with a heartbeat, like you men-hating feminist here constantly claim, then men can't be hypergamous. Because being "willing to fuck anything with a heartbeat", isn't exactly "only wanting the best you can get". It's obvious that men are NOT the hypergamous ones. Women have a list of requirements for men, men only want women to not be hideous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:31 PM
1

whatever shall I do You could stop trying to insult people, if you don't want them to do the same thing to you. You fucking hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:25 PM
1

Men are disgusting Nobody made those WOMEN sell their virginity. That's their own choice. But men are the ones disgusting for buying what these women are selling, right? The fact that you know all this is.... ...nothing special. I never paid for sex myself. It's just not my thing. But I do know that virginity is valued more than non virginity. Because I'm not some weirdo like you, who has apparently no idea of what's going on in the actual real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:19 PM
7

I expect loyalty from a partner. And women are hypergamous. Hypergamy and loyalty do not go together. If it's in your nature to want the best you can get, then you aren't going to be loyal to a partner when you think something better comes along. And the grass always seems greener at first glance, even when it maybe isn't actually greener. 5 things? I think a relationship without loyalty already isn't worth the effort. I don't need four more reasons to reach that conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:13 PM
9

I came to the same conclusion. So, I began to experiment with my dating habits. I changed it all up and was dating women I would normally not date, to see if it made any difference. It did not. Unless you want children, there's nothing modern day women have to offer that's worth commiting to them. That's why I only date casually anymore. Don't want to get treated like a hole to fuck? Be more than just a hole to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:00 PM
14

Boy, are you reaching here. The text in your pic describes hypergamy. Dating the best you can get. Where partners get dumped as soon as a better option comes along. And hypergamous is what women are, not men. Dating “what they can get” does far more damage and destroys far more lives than simply dating nobody. Oh, men should just "date nobody", do they? As if men aren't humans with a drive to procreate and to have partners to share their lives with.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 05:50 PM
13

My problem with women isn't that I can't get them, my problem is that women have almost nothing to offer once you get them. My standards will never be so low that I would accept a partner who has nothing to offer but a hole. And "offer nothing but a hole" is the current reality of modern day women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 05:38 PM
16

Men already did. Men are already dating "what they can get". Opposed to women, who are dating "the best they can get".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 05:12 PM
2

And you know this how? You don't know this? How is that even possible? Is there a market of virgin prostitutes (outside sex trafficking)? Yes, there is. There even is a Wikipedia article about "virginity auctions". https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginity_auction Do you think the women in these next examples would also get millions if they sold their bodies without them still being a virgin? Of course not. Therefore virginity is definitely seen as more valuable than non-virginity. -website/news…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 04:39 PM
0

I don't know what you are on about. Some dumb woman in this thread was claiming "misogyny" because men and women play by different rules. I just pointed out that men and women are not the same (we don't even have brains that are the same), so therefore different rules are nothing to have a hissy fit about.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 04:28 PM
2

No it's not What's not? If you want to hire a prostitute, you will have to pay many times more if you want that prostitute to be a virgin. Virginity therefore is definitely more valuable. plenty of non virgin women who make way more than any virgin woman could make with selling sex once What a dumb way of comparing virginity to non-virginity. If you want a fair comparison then you compare things at the same quantity. Sex with a virgin prostitute once, is more expensive than sex with a non-virgin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 04:22 PM
1

Don't you have some carpet munching to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 04:10 PM
3

If everything is equally valuable then it's not really valuable. What a weird leap to make? I never said everything is equally valuable. I said if you can sell something, then by definition it is valuable. You can sell your virginity for x price but you can also sell normal sex for the same price. Since the price for a virgin prostitute is a multiple of the price of a non-virgin prostitute, economic reality is disagreeing with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 03:51 PM
1

they can choose to do it. Not really. Here's the thing, people will date people they think aren't very pretty (you can make up for not being pretty, by being other things like rich, kind, funny, etc...), but people don't date other people who they think smell bad. Humans can ignore visual cues much easier than they can ignore smell. If you don't like how something looks, the solution is easy: you don't look. If you don't like how something smells, you have a problem. Because you still need to br…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 03:43 PM
4

I don't think "you can sell" is a good argument to say that something is valuable Sigh, women and logic, it will never be a good match. Things people are willing to give money for, are by definition valuable. So yes, "I can sell it" is a very good argument to say that something is valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 03:17 PM
2

Is it a double standard? Absolutely. It isn't even a double standard. A double standard requires the same thing to be judged differently based on who is doing that thing. Male promiscuity cannot be the same thing as female promiscuity, since being promiscuous is something that's trivially easy for women. While being promiscuous is very hard for men and requires a man to elevate himself to be a top percenter amongst his gender. If male promiscuity was the same thing as female promiscuity, then me…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:52 PM
-1

Men and women aren't the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:39 PM
-1

Lol, I knew this level of outrage was going to happen. Outrage? I'm having a coffee and smoking a joint while I type this. Couldn't be more relaxed. into a defense for why I should have to be a low-N count/virgin into my thirties unless I'm married. Weirdo. Where did you see me tell you the above? Slut it up as much as you want. I don't give a f about you. I don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 08:19 PM
1

Are you really arguing that people are fine dating other people they think smell bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 07:27 PM
-1

this is all literally just your opinion Yeah right. It's my "opinion" that men and women have different brains. Females had greater volume in the prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, superior temporal cortex, lateral parietal cortex, and insula. Males, on average, had greater volume in the ventral temporal and occipital regions. Each of these regions is responsible for processing different types of information. It's my "opinion" that men and women have different bodies. Try pissing your name…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 07:23 PM
2

They like to pretend there are different rules for men and women to play by. Of course there are different rules. Men and women aren't the same. We have different brains, different bodies, different sexual strategies, different requirements, different goals,.... It would be ridiculous to expect them to adhere to the same rules with all those differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 05:17 PM
1

Dating a person who is kind, funny, maybe wealthy but not good looking, is one thing. It is something completely different to date a person that smells bad. That you have dated unattractive people, is therefore not really relevant. An unpleasant smells is something a lot more visceral. 99,99% of people aren't going to date a person that smells bad. And if a person smells bad or not, is something that is decided by your own genetic disposition. You didn't choose to not like the smell. That choice…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 05:07 PM
1

Not going to miss you, pathetic pos.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 04:29 PM
1

It is in fact a conscious choice No, it isn't. You consciously didn't know that the man is genetically incompatible with you. You think you reject the man because he "smells bad". But that same man will smell good to another woman. His smelling good or bad, is depending on your own genetic disposition. So, just like your own genetic disposition isn't a conscious choice of yourself, the smelling good or bad of that man (which is a consequence of your own genetic disposition) is also not a conscio…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 04:22 PM
1

If your nose tells you that a man smell unpleasant, because you instinctively know that the man is genetically not compatible with you, then the choice to reject him has been made unconsciously. And the reasoning comes after the fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 03:43 PM
1

Get a life, you weirdo. I was busy with mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 03:20 PM
–

Affects feelings, doesn't make you do any actions. Of course it has an influence on your actions. You aren't going to date a man, if you think he smells unpleasant = Dating or not dating decided by your instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 03:17 PM
1

Can't you just leave me alone now little boy? Why reply if you want to be left alone? Oh yeah, I almost forgot. Logic isn't your strong suit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 04:36 PM
1

There was no logic provided. I gave you a logic reasoning. Starting from a premisse and ending at the conclusion. Not my fault you don't recognise logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 04:24 PM
1

I provided logic reasoning to back up my claim. You refused to try to disprove the reasoning. I provided a study, you claimed that the study wasn't good enough. Never understood why women just can't admit to what they are doing. You are never going to admit that you are wrong. Why hide behind the silly games? Just say that you can't refute my logic and therefore are falling back on being a contrarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 04:18 PM
1

Ok. Wish you were better at this. I'm starting to feel bored.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 04:11 PM
1

You keep your clowns, I like my emojis better 👉👌
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 04:06 PM
1

Now that you mention it, yes you did. I'm devastated. Lord, have mercy. The psychological pain is just unbearable. How will I ever survive this? Help. 😁🖕
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 04:04 PM
1

👉👌
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 04:01 PM
1

You admit it lacks punctuation, but it's still up to me to "read better"? Put the damn punctuation were it belongs, missy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:59 PM
1

Good victim complex tho You don't even recognise a joke when it's pissing against your leg...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:56 PM
1

starting to seem like you have nothing better to do 🥺 You really aren't good at insults. This again is just as applicable on yourself as it is on me. Maybe next time try to insult me without insulting yourself in the process. Radfem? If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck.... and it's getting so sad even my husband is laughing I'm glad I could bring some joy in that poor bastards life. He needs it being with you and all. everyone is different The little details maybe, but the broad stroke…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:54 PM
1

Must be so hard to function when you constantly think about sex Not at all. It's a myth that men can't do two things at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:44 PM
1

Using emojis like a good little feminist snowflake. Good on you, son.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:42 PM
1

....and fucks like a duck! Sorry, but you aren't going to get under my skin by calling me an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:40 PM
1

sounds like schrodingers commitment I'll take this as a win. You also could have said something negative like "men are vile animals and they are unable to commit". At least now commitment is still a possibility. everything you say contradicts this Maybe you should try to disable your observation bias and listen without prejudice then.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:36 PM
1

Wow, it really is getting serious now, doesn't it? You are starting to capitalise your fake laughing. I better watch out ...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:32 PM
1

A “made up reason” is your study is utter horse shit. This isn't a correct English sentence. And to be honest, I don't even know what you are trying to communicate here. Maybe rewrite it in English and try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:30 PM
1

I guess you are definitely a bigger bitch than I am, because I don't even know what a powder puff hairstyle is supposed to be. Or what my avatar has to do with anything. I just picked something at random.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:25 PM
1

Incel is an insult that only works on actual incels. It's a bit like if I would call you fat. If you are actually fat, then that insult will sting. If you aren't actually fat, it's a worthless insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:20 PM
1

I’m clearly a man. Lol, if you say so. You had me fooled with your bitch act.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:14 PM
1

And he doesn't even have a response for you. He does, but you guys will just pretend that it doesn't count for some made up reason. So he doesn't bother anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:12 PM
1

Lol, why don't you two get a room. It's much easier to get each other off when you have some privacy to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:11 PM
1

Implode? Poor little lady, I'm having a break with a delicious coffee and a nice smoke, not a nervous breakdown.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:09 PM
1

But you didn't, cuz those studies don't exist 😂 Unsurprisingly you are completely missing the point. It isn't about what I did or didn't do. Because no matter what I would have done, you are never going to admit that you are wrong. You're not a psychic hun but good try I don't have to be a psychic. Do you think you are the first radfem I encounter? Or that you are somehow any different from the other vagina wearers on this subreddit? Wel, you ain't the first and you aren't any different than the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 03:07 PM
1

this is why i said you are suggesting that women have to be mindreaders And I already refuted that and explained why you don't have to be a mindreader. You keep on repeating the same thing. And I'm not going to keep repeating the same answers back to you. wrong. many men are happy to pretend to treat you well until they fuck you. If they are pretending, then they aren't men who are willing to commit. So no, I wasn't wrong. A man that is willing to commit, will treat you much better than a man wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 02:55 PM
1

I could have given you a study with 100k participants. And I could have given you 100 other studies. Your reaction would have been the same. You are pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 02:46 PM
1

You didn't look up the sweaty t-shirt experiment yet, did you? Our subconscious stears our actions a lot more than you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 02:40 PM
1

You haven't provided any sources proving that it's harder for men to be promiscuous or easier for women tho😂 Really? Do you want me to also prove that fire burns and water is wet? You are some special kind of disingenuous. And the worst thing is, even if I provide the evidence, you will continue to behave like that shitting pigeon and not admit that female promiscuity isn't the same as male promiscuity. Because that is the kind of person you are. Anyway, a study were men and women are being cold…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 12:11 PM
1

If you feel seduced you can still decide to not cheat. If it was all as simple as you claim here, why do such a vast number of people cheat? Humans aren't as rational as you think we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 11:53 AM
2

You know women are in control of their own actions, right? And just like men, they are still a lot more controlled by their instincts than they know. You should look up the "sweaty t-shirt" experiment. Our nose already knows if we are compatible with a person, before we realize that we are attracted to that person. And I bet none of us is going to date someone who we think smells bad either. So, we may think we select our own partners completely by our own free will, while in reality our instinc…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 09:36 AM
1

I wish you respected others enough to use some goddamn punctuation. That shit is hard to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 09:02 AM
1

And I explained why it’s not hypocritical because the age gap debate involves minors were even the state is clear that it is abusive That's something completely else. I'm not talking about paedophilia when I'm talking about age gaps. When I say age gaps, I'm talking about two adults who have a considerable age difference. Not about a minor and an adult. Wealth gap is not by itself abusive Age gap isn't either. If it’s just an age gap without a minor that is being criticised then it is hypocritic…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 08:22 AM
5

Helping animals is a way better decision than not being alive anymore. Hope you keep going, man. All the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 06:11 AM
2

it's misogynistic. Don't you mean misandristic ???
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 06:07 AM
1

In the same vein, OP can criticize some male clients, but not be attacking all men. That could have been a possibility if the words weren't coming from her. She definitely is aiming at men. All men. The fact that you take it that way is a bit problematic. Lol, I take it that way? We are talking about a woman, who has such negative feelings towards men, that she will say just about anything just as long as she can disagree with a man. She managed to say this: It’s wild to see men admit they belie…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 04:29 AM
–

If you ask yourself if we should ban starving people from discussing food/nutrition, it becomes very obvious that EXPERIENCING starvation is experiencing a food issue so the implied logic of the question makes little sense. Lack of food can never be a food issue. Because there isn't any food at all. That is a resources issue. A food issue would require you to have food in the first place. If you had meat and it became rotten, then you can talk about a food issue. Without food, there are no food …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 04:00 AM
1

And...... ......the pigeon keeps on shitting all over the board and pretending it won at chess. You also failed to provide any sources for any claims and decided to use your personal feelings as a "logical argument" You are lying. Again. This is not my "feelings". This a logical argument. It starts with a premise. And draws it's conclusion through logic reasoning from this premise. You are just salty because you can't refute the logic. If male and female promiscuity was the same thing, then it w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 02:05 AM
2

If it was BS you would have capitalized on it and disproved what I said for an easy win. But, you didn't... Instead you send me emojis and avoid debating my explanation. You really are like that pigeon, shitting all over the chessboard instead of actually playing the game.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 12:34 AM
–

Lol, you really are using some mental gymnastics here. The analogy(aka the part that's supposed to be similar/equivalent) is between food ISSUES and dating ISSUES. That's it.. Since I already demonstrated that there is no equivalence between the FOOD issues and the DATING issues, you now are claiming that it's about ISSUES. I am using that analogy to better illustrate MY point which is different from what OP was saying...but It's not a false equivalence because it's not supposed to be equivalent…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 11:34 PM
1

so deny that this happens and tell women to mindread You not only have weird ideas, you also should learn how to read. I didn't deny that men aren't always committing. I explained that they have no problem committing to the right woman. Not every woman is going to be the right woman. And no, you don't have to do any mind-reading. A man that is willing to commit, will treat you much better than a man who sees you as just a hole to fuck. The difference is night and day and obvious. yeah but i'm no…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 11:17 PM
2

Incredible, not even one attempt at debate. When I provide you with a logic reasoning why male and female promiscuity cannot be the same thing, all I got in return were emojis. Not once did you try to disprove my reasoning. You remind me of this: There’s a saying about trying to use reason and logic to argue with a stupid person: “Never play chess with a pigeon. The pigeon just knocks all the pieces over. Then shits all over the board. Then struts around like it won.”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 11:03 PM
–

if you aren't a mindreader and ask the wrong guy, hes going to tell everyone you're clingy and crazy for wanting to talk about it. You really have weird ideas about men. Anyways, don't be an autist and learn how to read the room and none of this will be an issue. just like women Don't know anything about that. I have no idea what standards women have for the women they fuck or commit to. nice try but people talk lol, so its easy to find out this is common for women who are prettier, thinner, you…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 10:47 PM
2

You didn't speak to me. You spoke at me. Speaking to me would have required listing and trying to debate. Which is clearly asking too much of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 10:03 PM
2

Ok, didn't watch the usernames. My bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 09:55 PM
3

Why do men insist that their feelings are logical facts and throw a temper tantrum like a child when called out 😂 You didn't call me out. You didn't even attempt to refute my reasoning. Which is exactly as expected. When woman can't win a debate, they will never admit to having lost. They will just throw a bunch of feelings and apparently a lot of emojis at you and call it a "debate".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 09:54 PM
1

So why does having sex easier make having sex bad? Never said it does. Sex in itself isn't good or bad. The sex isn't judged. The judgement is reserved for the people who engage in the sex. Since men need to be top percent men to be able to be successful at promiscuity, those men are seen in a positive light by society. Their promiscuity is accepted, because it required those men to be what society wants men to be (successful, tall, rich, socially adept,...) Since women do not need to qualify as…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 09:49 PM
2

You just demonstrated my point that female promiscuity and male promiscuity aren't the same thing. This is how you described a promiscuous man. These physical attributes alone already put your promiscuous man in the top percentages: 6'2+, lean, handsome, full head of hair, white or white passing And this is how you described a promiscuous woman: extremely mentally unstable and awful partners outside the bedroom. Therefore, there's no hypocrisy, no double standard when it comes to the different t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 09:36 PM
1

Lmao I'm not ignoring it Yes, you are.You said you disagreed with male promiscuity being different from female promiscuity. I showed you that you are disagreeing with a fact. You changed the subject after that. You still are changing the subject, because there are zero attempts of you to try and demonstrate that male and female promiscuity are the same thing. But we both know why you are not attempting to demonstrate that you are correct. You know you will make a fool of yourself if you do. It w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 09:27 PM
2

You do realise that you did not attribute anything to the discussion, don't you? I provided my opinion and explained why. You respond with "nah". Not even an attempt at refuting my reasoning. As long as you don't show me that my reasoning is wrong. As long as you don't even attempt to debate, why would I spend time on you? I was gracious enough to explain. If you want to debate me, you will have to debate my reasoning. Saying "nah" won't cut it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 09:14 PM
1

So which is it? You need to be hot to get laid or you need to be successful? Hot can get you some action. Successful can get you some action too. Both are required for a man if he wants to come anywhere close to the level of promiscuity an average woman can achieve by just the fact of being alive. By the way, I love how you were disagreeing with female promiscuity =/= male promiscuity before. And how you are now completely ignoring that part of our discussion. Facts sure are hard to disagree wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 09:07 PM
-2

And yet you haven't provided a source sweetie! I didn't provide a source? What source do you still need when logic already demonstrated that I'm right? Two things cannot be the same thing, when one them is hard to achieve and one of them is easy to achieve. Because the definition of "being the same" requires that everything is equal. Which definitely isn't the case when talking about male and female promiscuity. In stead of being intellectual disingenuous and asking for sources when the logic is…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 08:57 PM
–

you're telling me you don't think men respond negatively to defining the relationship talks? No, that's not what I think. I already told you what I do think: men have no problem committing to the right woman. which is to say you understand that men have a problem with commitment with lots of women they are dating They don't have a "problem with committing with lots of the women they are dating". Men are by nature supposed to have low standards for women they only fuck and high standards for wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 08:42 PM
5

This sounds like your opinion and not facts Sure honey, men who are not successful in the eyes of society, are racking up triple body counts like there is no tomorrow. /s Disagree but you're entitled to your hypocrisy Disagree? Lol, this isn't a matter of personal opinion. It's easy to prove that male promiscuity =/= female promiscuity. If male and female promiscuity was the same thing, then it would be just as hard for a woman to be promiscuous, as it is hard for a man to be promiscuous. Since …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 08:24 PM
–

I got to admit that you thinking men would respond negatively when you asked for commitment, is a factor? Ok. Apparently it was a factor in your life, because this thought influenced your behaviour. I don't think men have a problem with commitment when the right woman comes along. You thinking men have a problem with commitment says more about the men you picked and what they thought of you, then that it is a reflection on men in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 08:02 PM
3

No hypocrisy. Men and women are different and have different sexual strategies. A man can only be very promiscuous if he is a high value man according to the expectations of society. A woman can be promiscuous if she isn't hideous. What do you know when someone tells you about a man you have never met, and they tell you that he has a triple digit body count? You know that guy will be tall, have a great body, probably rich, maybe even famous too. He will be socially very adapt, not shy and know w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 07:49 PM
–

Lucky for you and me not all men do that shit. And you can work out for yourself too, doesn't have to be for women. Do it for your health.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 02:37 PM
1

Oh, I see, she is only blaming the "bad men". All the good men are not to blame. /s You are really naive if you think a woman, who is willing to contradict herself just as long as she can disagree with any man that crosses her path, is making a distinction between good and bad when it comes to men. If I were to attack Nazi Germany, you wouldn't accuse me of attacking All german people, would you? Bad example. Back in the day when Nazi Germany was still a thing, Nazi Germany was the only Germany.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 06:01 AM
1

Lol and I did, read my response again No, you didn't. You need to read the question again, because nowhere in your answer did you addressed my question. If there is any part of your comment that demonstrates how women being against age gaps -but not wealth gaps- isn't hypocrisy, then just quote that part of your answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:49 AM
1

prob why men prefer younger women Men prefer younger women because they prefer youth and beauty over gravity and stretch marks. You having some weird ideas about men in your twenties has nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:29 AM
1

She's not putting blame on men specifically. Are you reading the same thing I am reading? I quoted her (only added the "she is still talking about men" bits). That’s how I feel, I was so busy in college and grad school I didn’t pay attention. And I grew up in a mostly male household so I was sympathetic to the first few older male clients who complained about the state of their marriage. I made sympathetic noises and listened and nodded politely and tried to redirect the topic to work and wonder…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:35 AM
1

She's not putting blame on men specifically. Are you reading the same thing I am reading? I quoted her (only added the "she is still talking about men" bits). That’s how I feel, I was so busy in college and grad school I didn’t pay attention. And I grew up in a mostly male household so I was sympathetic to the first few older male clients who complained about the state of their marriage. I made sympathetic noises and listened and nodded politely and tried to redirect the topic to work and wonder…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:29 AM
2

Question is: Please demonstrate how women being against age gaps, but not wealth gaps, is not hypocrisy. Please answer the question or don't reply at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:23 AM
-1

You said this: People who vent to opposite-sex coworkers about their relationship problems are a combination of stupid, naive, and trashy. And I agree with you. But what Indigenous_Engineering did, wasn't talking about people being indiscreet to coworkers. She was specifically complaining about men being such pigs that they use complaining to try to get with other women. Which is something completely else.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 08:12 PM
1

So many words and still failing to answer the question that was asked. I'll ask again: And how is 70-90% of women filing at the courthouse not contradicting this: Women’s preferences don’t hinder their ability to love when they settle.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 08:06 PM
-1

You are correct but the brutal reality is that most men will never get choosing signals. True, but only because most men aren't prepared to work on themselves. Men who go to the gym, find a good barber, fix their wardrobe and get more money, do get choosing signals.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 07:01 PM
2

People who vent to opposite-sex coworkers about their relationship problems are a combination of stupid, naive, and trashy. I agree with what YOU say here, however it isn't exactly what Disingenuous_Engineering was saying. She was just bashing on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 06:44 PM
3

And how is 70-90% of women filing at the courthouse not contradicting this: Women’s preferences don’t hinder their ability to love when they settle. Seems to me that 70-90% of women doing the filling isn't exactly pointing to women's impressive ability to love. It rather points to the logical conclusion that women aren't happy when they have to settle. And they will leave their relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 06:36 PM
2

They are always trying to find some gotcha hypocrisy on women that doesn’t exist, mostly it’s cooked up by their own imaginations. If women being against age gap relationships is based on the fact that they are against power imbalances in relationships, then they should also be against wealth imbalances in relationships. But they are not. So, it's obvious that women don't give a fuck about power imbalances in relationships and their motivation to be against age gaps (but not financial gaps) has …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 06:14 PM
1

Women’s preferences don’t hinder their ability to love when they settle. The fact that women initiate 70-90% of divorces, is contradicting you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 05:35 PM
3

Maybe its the wall compared to their younger versions? You're correct. The wall to a woman means going from a situation where she has seemingly unlimited options -one even better than the next- to a situation where she still has options, but they aren't limitless anymore and they are less quality than they used to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 05:25 PM
1

Men are not committing to pornstars and onlyfans models. Wanting to fuck =/= committing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 05:04 PM
3

Objectively the best: Chad. Subjectively the best: the poor bastard, who is willing to commit, since Chad was only willing to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 04:49 PM
3

The day one reached out and honked a boob was the day I realized they were all full of shit and not unhappy at all, but exploiting female sympathy so they could make a move. Since we already established that you will do whatever to disagree with men, even if it means being untruthful and insincere, I seriously doubt anything you are saying here isn't just another lie. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/wkDnFnt5bU
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 04:40 PM
–

Probably the mods deleting comments they don't like again. Can't really tell myself, from my side everything looks normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 03:40 PM
–

Thanks for coming to your senses.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 03:38 PM
2

And he didn't. That's why I commented this study. Meanwhile More research is needed to determine whether these anatomical distinctions play any role in sex differences in cognition and behavior. You are getting confused by this sentence. They are just pointing out that they need more research to demonstrate the causality between the anatomical distinctions and the sex differences in cognition and behavioral. The study doesn't doubt that there are differences in both the structure and in the cogn…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 05:38 AM
2

True, but there ARE differences in structure. And there IS difference in functioning. You reacted to the other guy saying that men and women clearly think differently, by saying that he hasn't shown any evidence of that. This study both confirms that our brains work differently and are structured differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 05:12 AM
–

Did you stop reading at "common sense"? The arguments are directly beneath that line. Promiscuous people have a higher chance of cheating than non promiscuous people. Just like violent people have higher chance of killing someone than non violent people. Just like depressed people have a higher chance of killing themselves than non depressed people. I call my arguments common sense, because you don't need to be a genius to understand them. You pretend that I have no arguments, instead of debatin…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 05:05 AM
0

Causality means the link between the cause and the consequence. They can see that male and female brains have differences. And they also found areas where male and female brains perform differently in cognitive tasks. Like facial recognition for instance. It is therefore probable that the difference in structure is causing (causality) the difference in functioning. Probable, but not scientifically proven. And that's what they are struggling with, the causality between the difference in structure…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 04:50 AM
-1

They can't fully prove causality yet, but they do have evidence that we do not think the same. Which is what you were doubting. From the same study: Studies have also shown sex differences in certain cognitive tasks, like the ability to recognize faces. But what underlies these differences isn’t fully understood. Of 50 cognitive categories, five were associated with anatomical differences: visual object recognition, face processing, cognitive control, inhibition, and conflict. Facial processing …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 04:19 AM
-3

Clearly? You haven't provided any examples Men and women have brains that are not the same. With what we know about the brain today, we know that this also means that they don't function the same. Females had greater volume in the prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, superior temporal cortex, lateral parietal cortex, and insula. Males, on average, had greater volume in the ventral temporal and occipital regions. Each of these regions is responsible for processing different types of informati…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 04:06 AM
–

No, it is just common sense. People who are more promiscuous, cheat more often. Partners of cheating spouses get cucked more often.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 04:00 AM
–

This a vectorstock image. You are using graphic design to base your "diagnosis" on. This is as scientific as a Mickey Mouse drawing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 03:58 AM
–

How many people do you think actually have triple digit sex partners? I already know 3 women with triple digits and they are not professional sex workers or something like that. They got to triple digits from recreational sex only. So, definitely not that uncommon. Professional sex workers probably get to triple digits in a year or two. and to my point, if people talk that much wouldn’t you already know before you get serious with this person? People aren't walking around warning other people ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 08:41 PM
–

You are reaching. This is chubby at best. For obese you will have to add at least another 10-15 kg.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 08:29 PM
–

This is just bad reasoning. Men don’t slut shame today because women get pregnant and men don’t. Yes, they do. But you need to look a bit further. Women get pregnant -> women are sure that a child is their child. Men do not get pregnant -> men have uncertainty about their offspring. For the most part of human history, the only way to protect themselves from getting cucked, was for men to select partners that did not display signs of promiscuity. The more promiscuous a woman, the bigger the chanc…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 07:12 PM
–

How would anyone know about your partners sex life? If you have a triple digit body count, then there are at least 100 men who know you are easy to fuck. And people talk...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 07:07 PM
–

Relationships are hard work. Staying with the same partner for a prolonged period of time is a sign of discipline not lack thereof.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 07:04 PM
1

I said: a man on their arm that other women want. You can add things to what I said, but then you are debating with yourself and not with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 06:57 PM
–

Replying to you here, because the mods have closed the actual thread one hour after it was created. And I did not write out this whole reply just to read "the comments are locked" and not be able to post it. You are calling this obese. Which it clearly is not. I can understand you hating Pearl her guts, she's one of "your club", who is siding with the "enemy" and that makes you want to punish her and insult her. That's all good and dandy. But she is definitely not obese. While 41% of American wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 06:53 PM
–

If you are talking about that Pearly Things woman, why is her rating herself as a 6 so funny? She has an average face and an average body. Average is the middle of the pack, so a 5 would be appropriate. But she's American and around 40% of American women are obese. Which Pearl is not. So, that would raise her worth with a least a point. 6 seems to be a good assesment of her own beauty.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 05:35 PM
1

But you can come up with your own examples of what you think. Why? What is the purpose of me imagining the reasons that others use to reject people?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 12:56 PM
1

lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 12:53 PM
5

You can't. Women are naturally sooner bored with their partners. If you stay together long enough, there will be a time that you still want her while she is through with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 05:24 AM
1

Aha, that's why Melinda Gates is worth 10.5 billion USD today. While it is Bill's company.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:17 PM
1

Half of HIS stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:09 PM
3

I already explained that in the previous comment: because I don't personally know them. If no man on this planet is good enough, then it's obvious that you are overly demanding. That doesn't mean that I know the specifics. They could be rejecting men because they aren't tall enough, rich enough, too assertive, not assertive enough, no social proof enough, drive the wrong car, too much hair, not enough hair,..... Take your pick. It could be any reason. But if you literally think that no other per…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 08:43 PM
2

No idea, I don't personally know her. But if you think that no man is good enough for you, then it is clear that you are overly demanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 08:36 PM
1

An 38% chance to loose half of your stuff, is still a big risk. Especially when marriage can be avoided and isn't required to be in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:27 PM
1

You take a risk of losing your life each time you get inside a vehicle. A risk that is unavoidable. You need to get to your destination. Entering a vehicle therefore can't be avoided. This is completely different to being with a woman. You don't need to marry, to be with a woman. Therefore marriage is an avoidable risk and completely not comparable to entering vehicles. Since marriage is an avoidable risk, only a dumb man, who trusts a woman, would take the risk and marry her.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:23 PM
8

If she already thought at twenty that men aren't good enough for her, do you really think the men still interested in the 50 year old version of her will be able to satisfy her list of demands? She just regrets all the loneliness. That doesn't mean that she is self-aware enough to drop all the entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:08 PM
8

You are just a contrarian. You don't have a opinion, your opinion is whatever disagrees with men. It’s wild to see men admit they believe that sex is a thing women give to men rather than a mutually enjoyable activity. 99.9% of offered sex is either gross or guaranteed to be dehumanizing and disappointing If you can disagree with men, by calling sex a "mutually enjoyable activity", you will do so. If you can disagree with men, by calling sex "gross and dehumanizing", you will do so. Contradictin…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 06:47 PM
1

You would believe the same, if sex wasn't freely offered to you on a plate. Men have to "qualify" to get sex. We have to be tall enough, rich enough, have enough social proof, have to approach, don't say the wrong things, have the 6pack, the 6 inch dick, the 6 figure salary,.... So yeah, when a woman wants to sleep with a man, it does feel like "winning something" or "passing an exam". It's only logic that you can't fathom how that feels. A woman who isn't repulsive gets sex offered to her on a …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 04:38 PM
1

I know you all like playing the victim, but look around you, lady, there haven't been any boots on any necks, since women received equal rights. But of course, even when women expect men to carry the burden, it's still men's fault. I should have known... Accountability and children don't go well together.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 07:07 PM
-1

Cool, so women are indeed like little children. Expecting daddy to carry the responsibility for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 07:00 PM
1

It’s a temporary method of releasing the lifelong shame foisted upon women by others. Yeah, so? That doesn't change anything about this: absolves her of the responsibility for displaying sinful sexual urges. It's still an adult expecting another adult to take over responsibility. Which is closer to a child/parent relationship than a relationship between two equal adults. It never keeps amazing me how this subreddit is basically a bunch of feminists claiming that the redpill is wrong. But everyti…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 06:51 PM
-2

absolves her of the responsibility And then women get angry when the redpill says that women are like children... You are admitting here that women expect men to carry responsibility for women's (sinful) urges. Just like an adult would carry the responsibility over a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 06:30 PM
1

With the emphasis on "Seems".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 11:42 AM
2

Single dads are usually more annoying than single moms Aha, of course you would think that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 11:05 AM
0

They usually won't tell it straight to your face when they are turned off by you being open and emotional. So, it is possible that you don't connect the dots. It could be that she is turned off by your display of emotion and dumps you three weeks later because "it just isn't working" or some other excuse. She isn't going to say: "you cried and now my pussy is dryer than the Sahara, so I'm breaking up with you." So, maybe you have been lucky. Or maybe you should reexamine times in your life when …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 10:50 AM
2

You are still using a false equivalence. Starving people are still people who have experienced food in the past. They just have no food right now. While OP was talking about excluding people who have no experience. OP -> people who have no experience with dating or sex should be excluded. You -> should we also exclude starving people from discussing food? Starving people are still people who have experience with food. If they didn't have experience they would already be dead. Because a human can…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 10:34 AM
1

Yep.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 11:03 AM
3

Nah, if his paycheck is big enough, children aren't an obstacle for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:45 AM
–

In debate, always match your level of sincerity to that of the opposition.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:27 AM
–

I gladly isolate myself from people like you. That's a blessing, not a curse.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:25 AM
2

You hypocrite, you posted close to 70 comments on Reddit in the past two days. You should be the last person to call others "chronically online".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:18 AM
3

Circle jerking is against the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:12 AM
4

Thats not true, never has been true, and never will be true. I will take the personal experience of hundreds of redditors over the words of one. Go to the askmen subreddit. Do a search on "opening up" or "sharing emotions" or some similar search terms. You will see hundreds and hundreds of men share their negative experiences with opening up to women. OP isn't making up anything. It's what a lot of men have experienced. Myself included.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:10 AM
-7

You are completely right. It is a very stupid game to play, to try and date modern day women. If you win, she will divorce you, fuck your life over and take half your shit. If you lose, she ain't never leaving and you are stuck with her forever, begging for death to come and finally end your misery.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 09:59 AM
-3

I just want to know how you managed to shut her the hell up. Whatever the trick is, I want to know what it is. If it works on her, there's a good chance it works on the rest of the feminist hive mind here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 09:42 AM
–

What you are is no longer entitled to do is think you are superior by being born with a dick We are no longer entitled to think? Lol, yeah right, people are still free to think what they want. And it isn't even relevant if you like what others think or not think. You are just an entitled person online, who deluded herself into thinking she can tell others what they can think. Well you can't. I will keep on thinking that men are superior for being born with a dick. Have you ever seen a woman try …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 09:18 AM
4

False equivalence. Starving people still have experience with food. They just have no food at the moment. OP is talking about people who have no experience with the subject they are willing to discuss. Like virgins discussing sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 04:14 PM
2

Hear hear!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 03:43 PM
2

Mods are the self-appointed janitors of the internet. A person with a fullfilling real life isn't going to volunteer to clean up shit online. A person with a fullfilling real life doesn't need an online power trip to feel better about themselves. Mods definitely are mods because they have unmet needs. Just a shame that they need to harass others, to get those needs fulfilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 03:38 PM
–

You aren't debating. You are having a conversation with yourself. You ignore or misunderstand everything that I say, or even invent new things that I didn't say. I assume you do these things deliberately. It would be hard to imagine it isn't deliberate, because it would be very unlikely that you can keep yourself alive without any external assistance, if it wasn't deliberate. What you need is a nice mirror. So you can watch yourself when you are wanking yourself off under the pretense of "having…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 07:07 PM
-6

Zero acknowledgement of the role women have played in all this. Not unexpected of course, but it never stops amazing me how women just can't deal with anything that even resembles accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 06:32 PM
2

<image> Me, it reminded me of this: Drag by the hair, otherwise you are getting sand inside.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 04:55 PM
2

We don't have suicide help lines. That would be weird. We have suicide prevention lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 04:46 PM
3

But I hard time believing that men wouldn’t be uncomfortable with the idea that people are sexually abusing something that looks exactly like them. Are you living on the same planet as the rest of us humans? Men would love to be sexually desired. Catcall men. Let men know that you are horny for them. Hell, most men would love to live in a world were men are sexually desired to such a degree, that male sex robots are selling like hot cakes. It would be an improvement to men not getting any attent…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 04:38 PM
1

Looking autistic, is the same as looking beautiful. In the sense that it's all in the eye of the beholder. That you don't understand generalisations and are confusing them with autism, is your problem, not mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 04:28 PM
1

I'm painting with "broad strokes", because we are discussing men and women in general. I'm very well aware that absolutes don't exist and everything has exceptions. So no, my perspective isn't black and white. I know gray exist. But you can't have a discussion about men in general and women in general, without there being any generalisations going on. Your broad negative claims about men supposedly having no standards basically, along with your belief that women are overly selective, highlight y…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 04:10 PM
1

And I’m telling you, this notion that a ladies cheating generally has a root cause in dissatisfaction, and that a man’s pretty much never does isn’t it. Agree to disagree. people cheat when they fail to empathize with the partner that they love. You are skipping a step. What is causing women to stop empathizing with their men in the first place? That's right, not being happy in their relationships is what makes them not care anymore. You don't stop empathizing for no reason. There is something c…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 03:48 PM
-2

Women are hypergamous and are looking for the best they can get. Which usually means they are looking for a partner that is stronger, taller and who makes more money than they do. This puts men in a position where they are going to end up with partners that are less tall, less strong and earn less money than they do. So no, there's no "equality" in dating. You know damn well that men are happy with almost anything that has a hole. While women have a long list of requirements. That's not a situat…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 02:44 PM
2

If you’re unwilling to adjust your expectations I'm doing fine, no need to adjust anything. I'm a man and therefore not hypergamous. My expectations aren't that I'm going to get the best I can get. That's something that women expect. My standard is there's nothing wrong with good enough. Also, it’s insanely hypocritical to demand others lower their standards to accept you I'm not asking anyone to lower their standards. I'm fine with women being hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 06:48 AM
3

Men and women can't be both hypergamous. There wouldn't be enough procreating happening. Women are hypergamous and have more options than men (Chad excluded). Therefore they hold the stronger cards when it comes to picking their partners. Of course men would date the super hot smoke show if they could. That doesn't mean that they are hypergamous. Men are perfectly happy with a hole, a cute face and some curves. Hell, most guys don't even need the cute face and the curves. If men are hypergamous …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:34 AM
3

Most men only know Betty. So they all get the same treatment. We aren't the hypergamous gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:05 AM
1

so i should never want to date a man bc if he wants to date me, he's dating down? You should do what you want. It's your life. But yeah, most men date women that they are happy and content with, but are not the best they can get. people should give their best to every partner Exactly. That's the point. When women get to 30 years of age and decide to give up on chasing Chad, they settle with a man who will not get what Chad got. And they ask more in return as well. Ask any man to choose between h…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 04:15 AM
0

If both men and women were hypergamous, then humans would already have gone extinct. Women want the best they can get and have a lot more options, therefore men have to settle for "good enough" if they want to pair off.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 03:54 AM
1

The Pareto principle states that for many outcomes, roughly 80% of consequences come from 20% of causes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 03:05 AM
3

low body count =/= low interest in sex. You can have a lot of sex in a long-term monogamous relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 02:57 AM
9

I don't know what nonsense you are trying to sell. Women are hypergamous and therefore date up. As a consequence men date down. Both genders can't be dating up at the same time. Therefore this right here is utter BS: they’ll reject the idea of lowering their standards and dating someone they feel superior to. Men ARE already dating down. The should not lower their standards any further.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 08:24 PM
8

True, but there are no consequences attached to that. Men don't date up, we date down. That's why we almost always settle. And that's why a man settling for a woman comes without the negative effects that a woman settling for a man brings. We don't give less of ourselves to a woman we settle for. We almost always settle. She'll get the same treatment as the woman who came before. While women give their best to Chad, in a vain attempt to make him settle for her. And when they reach 30 and realise…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 08:19 PM
-1

this narrative of trying to escape a bad relationship I didn't say they are trying to escape a bad relationship. I am saying that there usually is a connection between the relationship that these women are in and the cheating they decide to do. It could be a real good relationship, but too boring for her so she decided to cheat. Women cheat for the affirmation that it brings. If her relationship beings her enough affirmation, they usually don't feel the need to cheat. (not all men/not all women,…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 08:03 PM
3

As a man, you will learn quickly that the things you think are private and intimate, will get shared by your woman to her friends. Women don't do privacy when they come together with other women. Nothing is off limits. It is as if women bond together by sharing the private stuff between them. The more private the stuff they share is, the more they bond. I hate that women do this. It devaluates the bond between a man and a woman and reduces it to stupid gossip. Men will never share intimate detai…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 06:16 PM
3

The reasons for cheating are very gendered. Men and women do not cheat for the same reasons. Cheating for men usually has nothing to do with the relationship they are in. They are just horny dogs and find attractive women irresistible. They can love their wives and cheat. The cheating in itself isn't connected to their actual relationship or their actual partner. Cheating for women usually is connected to the relationship they are in. They have less of a sex drive and don't even find most men ph…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 05:19 PM
3

When lube doesn't solve the problem, throw some cash at it....
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 05:01 PM
-1

Women are exceeding men more and more in most measures as the years go by. Women tend to be less in-your-face about their successfulness. A woman bragging about women being better than men, while simultaneously bragging that women are more modest? Oh, the fucking irony. And of course, every claim is completely unsubstantiated....
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 03:50 PM
1

Backtracking? Lady, I made a simple word joke. There isn't even anything to back track on. You failed to understand the difference between rolling and getting rolled by others. And somehow you really think that a word joke you misunderstood, is a hill you need to die on. Well, good for you. Have at it. Misandry pisses me off, so that is something I'm prepared to debate against. A silly word joke is not worthy of my time or a debate. You really are a contrarian. The subject isn't the goal for you…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 09:14 PM
2

No, I would expect women to get support on a support group. Not bash on another gender in a hateful manner. I fail to see how hating on others is helping people who need support.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 09:08 PM
1

I never claimed that skinny people can't roll. Being rollable isn't an action you do, it's what someone else does to you. I can roll, but I am very unrollable. Pick your battles, lady. We are on a debate sub were gender is usually the subject. You are starting an argument over a word joke. Is this really what you would like to do with your time?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:58 PM
1

The two remarks you made add to the discussion, but they do nothing to show that women aren't more susceptible to marketing. Lots of advertising and trends targeted at what appeals to men is just as effective, hell, appeal to a man’s psychology and he will fall over just as eaisly. I didn't deny that men are susceptible to marketing. I said that women are more susceptible to it than men. When they need to target a couple, they will target the woman. Because it's more effective than targeting the…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:52 PM
1

You’re not seen as a “real man” if you show emotion in front it women, if you can’t provide for your woman, if you can’t sexually satisfy your woman. How is this putting social pressure on a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:47 PM
1

You are blowing this way out of proportion. I used a more creative way to say "fat people", that's all. Being rollable means you are the subject of someone else's action, not your own. So, that most people can perform a roll is all nice and dandy, but not really important when someone else has to roll their bodies. Do you love being a contrarian or what? Do you feed of disagreeing with people? You are starting an argument over a word play I did. What's the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:45 PM
1

I didn't say able to roll, I said rollable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:15 PM
-1

Of course women are going to be less susceptible to cultural expectations of masculinity. Hello? the pressure of conformity to gender norms Who says that men conform more to gender norms than women do?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 07:33 PM
4

No they aren't. There's a reason that marketing/commercials focus more on women than on men. They are more susceptible to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 07:25 PM
7

"Support" sub, yeah right. It's a hate sub. There's a lot more man bashing going on in the that sub, than supporting of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 07:22 PM
7

True, but nothing you said disproves that women are more susceptible to social pressure than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 07:18 PM
2

People who aren't as wide as they are tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 06:49 PM
1

roll verb (MOVE): to (cause something to) move somewhere by turning over and over or from side to side. Examples: The vase rolled off the edge of the table and smashed. The dog rolled over onto its back. I rolled the wheel along the side of the road back to the car.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 05:36 PM
1

then why do they get so mad when women also have shallow preferences? Because women don't came out and honestly say it. It's always: nice, good personality, a man that takes care of me,.... Don't understand how you go from: I'm happy with her, she satisfies my criteria and therefore is good enough. To: dating someone you don't like and not treating them well. this is also how women operate? Nope. Women want the best they can get. A man that satisfies her minimum requirements, probably isn't the …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:16 AM
2

Capable of rolling or being rolled.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 08:06 AM
3

So, a special hole then?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 07:01 AM
1

What I said never implied this is only a male tactic. You didn't say it is only a male tactic. But that is implied when you only mention men doing it. You could have used the more general "people" instead of "guys": All feminism is, is just allowing rights and the power of choice to our fellow ladies. That's a strangely positive view of feminism. Feminism nowadays is about female privilege at the expense of men. Like wanting more women in CEO positions, but not caring about the percentage of wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 06:23 PM
2

Sugar babies do the same thing prostitutes do. They exchange their body and time for money. Therefore sugar babies are prostitutes, just with a slightly more trendy label. Just like a garbage man is sometimes called a "sanitation manager". Buying people would not make me happy, but do whatever you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 05:55 PM
1

As if this is an exclusive male tactic. Exaggeration is usually the first weapon the die hard feminists here go to, when they want to derail the discussion and ridicule the point a man has made. Some women are promiscuous -> LOL, ROTFL, THIS INCEL THINKS ALL WOMEN ARE WHORES.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 05:22 PM
2

Everyone knows men care about youth and beauty. And men don't hide that fact. You are getting confused by men not being hypergamous, while women are. Men date on a "good enough" basis. Which doesn't mean they don't care about looks. It means that if the woman passes his minimum requirements, then the man is good to go. Women date on a "best I can get basis". Passing the woman's minimum requirements isn't enough, she want the best she can get. So even though she will date a man who passes her min…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 03:55 PM
3

Not being into rollable women =/= wanting the best you can get. So, definitely not hypergamy. There's a difference between refusing to date the lowest of the low and only wanting to date the best there is...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 03:42 PM
2

Sounds like your life could do with some extra spice, if making out by the water is in your top ten.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 03:38 PM
2

They’re both being held responsible for their choices. She can’t decide that only one of you will be a parent. Two are responsible for the existence of a foetus. Only one person has the power to decide if a foetus becomes a child or not. Because only one person gets to decide to abort or to keep the child. Therefore only one is responsible for a child. You want to hold a man responsible for a decision made by a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 10:05 PM
2

Um they are fair. No one is responsible for fetuses everyone is responsible for children who are born. You are wrong here.Two are responsible for the existence of a foetus. Only one person has the power to decide if a foetus becomes a child or not. Therefore only one is responsible for a child. You can't be responsible if you didn't get a say. That's is making a man responsible for a decision made by a woman. No it doesn’t. Because the duties of the parent exist as result of the vulnerability of…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 09:59 PM
1

And only one who decides if a foetus turns into a child. Therefore only one caries the responsibility if the other is not on board.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 09:45 PM
2

Considering she's the only one who had the power to decide if she wanted to become a parent or not, trapped isn't the right word. Being held responsible for her own choices, is a better way of putting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 08:38 PM
2

You want to talk about what’s fair? Lol how the hell is it fair that women risk their lives giving birth in the first place? What’s fair about that?? It isn't fair, but we can't change nature. Nature already made it unfair that’s neither here nor there. So, because nature made it unfair, now we aren't going to make things as fair as we can make them? That is a daft way of thinking. We can't change the unfairness of only one gender getting pregnant. We can make other things concerning parenthood …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 08:35 PM
1

You should blame the mother. She is the one condemning the child to a live a poverty. She is the one deciding to have a child she financially cannot care for. Children deserve TWO loving parents. That means forcing a child on a parent is always wrong. We don't do it to women, because obviously they have bodily autonomy and can go for an abortion. Equality and fairness and the interest of the child dictates who also shouldn't be doing it to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 08:25 PM
–

However either gender can be held accountable for their children once said children are born. If only one gender has the power to decide if a child is born or not, it's obviously not fair two hold both genders responsible for a child being born. This is unfair in two cases. Man wants the child and the woman doesn't. The woman gets to abort the child that the man would like to care for. Man doesn't want the child, the woman does. Now he is forced to financially take care of a child he never wante…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:18 PM
–

who fucked to make the kid Yeah, but a man, who's getting baby trapped wasn't fucking to "make the kid". He assumed the opposite, she says she is on the pill, therefore we are definitely not fucking to make a kid. And an accidental pregnancy is also not fucking to "make a kid". Once the accident happens the woman can choose to have a kid or abort a kid. The man can choose nothing. Currently the woman has the power to choose for the both of them. Which clearly is not an equal situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:10 PM
2

Agree with you. People have a hard time dealing with hypersexuality, especially when it is caused by sexual trauma. It does seem contradictory at first glance. You were raped so know you start fucking a lot of men? Is probably something that goes through a lot of people's minds when they hear of such a case.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:04 PM
1

Yeah, that one is less obvious. There probably has been research done on this. I seriously doubt we are the only two, who have noticed that women seem to deal with trauma by becoming hypersexsual.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:53 PM
3

There are so many other sports you could try. I have tried Judo, Karate, tennis, table tennis, football, running, ice skating, squash and gym. Gym, running and squash are my current ones. There is a sport for you. Something that you genuinely will enjoy. The haircut. You pay attention to the men in your live. If one of them has a haircut that makes you go:"Damn, that is a nice haircut", you go ask him who his hairdresser is. You make an appointment and you let the professional do his thing. Talk…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:43 PM
4

Seems obvious in the cases I mentioned, no? Rape = feeling powerless. That is probably a feeling that is constant since the rape happened. Everytime she has sex on her own conditions, she is the one in control. It's probably the only time that she is able to suppress the feeling of powerlessness. So, she keeps looking for that. Again and again. Same thing with the other one. Feeling of worthlessness. Male attention = not feeling worthless anymore. I'm not a trained mental professional. But I kno…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:35 PM
6

You don't have to go to the gym if you don't want to. Muscles help, but they aren't as important to women as we men think. However being athletic is definitely something you must do (just for your own health is already reason enough). Don't like the gym? Find something else. I like squash for instance (and gym too). Join a sport club you like. Benefits = you get fit while having fun and you meet new people (women as well) in a relaxed casual environment. I was always skinny. Going to the gym and…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:20 PM
8

Opposite experience here. I must be too nice to them or something. Every hook-up eventually ends with them giving me the talk (what are we/I want more). Even if we both established that casual is all that we want. I wish I was in your shoes. It usually ends when they realise I was serious about not being interested in non-casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:10 PM
5

Yep, can corroborate. I know some very promiscuous women. The ones I know are all doing it because of some kind of trauma. One woman was raped when she was 14. That trauma caused her to become hypersexsual (triple digit body count). I think she feels like taking control back or something, by initiating sex. Cheats on all her boyfriends too. Other one was neglected at home when young. Started to steal and go out party at an early age. Obvious cries for attention from a young neglected teenage gir…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:05 PM
2

I think I need to lose about 30lbs ish and maybe I’ll get a chance to experience hookup culture. It's in your own hands. If you still get matches (like you indicated) while being 30lbs overweight, then you definitely will do well with women, once you loose the extra weight and replace it with muscle. You got this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 05:52 PM
0

Yes, and still women won't admit to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 02:29 PM
1

"It's true because of my feelings and anecdotes." You need glasses. So that you can start reading what I wrote, so I don't have to constantly repeat myself. I'll quote myself: my feelings have nothing to do with it. Anecdotal evidence isn't meaningless. And I have seen far more anecdotal evidence that women do this, than I have seem for men doing it. I'm pointing out what you've done. This is proof. I don't need prove things that have happened. And you are a hypocrite. My words in this thread ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 07:06 AM
–

We aren't debating women on their preferences. We are hoping that they stop with the silly virtue signaling and admit to what their preferences are. Women are at least as shallow as men. They just deny it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:22 AM
1

You can ignore anecdotal evidence all you want. Doesn't make it meaningless. If you're going to respond with anything other than actual proof of this, you can save your time and energy. The only woman who tells me what to do and has a chance of being listened to, is my mother. I respond to you when and with what I damn wel please. ironically proof that you - a man - have just been "putting feelings over facts." First of all, this isn't proof. Someone very close to your heart, told me the "only a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:17 AM
1

Evidence is an actual peer-reviewed study. If the only acceptable evidence is a peer reviewed study, then neither of us provided any evidence of anything. And - as a reminder - it is you who insisted on speaking in absolutes. Of course I speak in absolutes. It is impossible to make a generalization about a gender without speaking in absolutes. And we are on a fucking debate sub, where we do nothing but talk about gender. If we don't want to speak in absolutes, we would be saying "not all men/"no…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 06:02 AM
1

Your dream example has nothing to do with anything. You just made it up. The girlfriend getting mad because she dreamed her boyfriend cheated on her, is a recurring theme on reddit. There are plenty more examples. Just let me know and I'll smack your in the head with examples untill you acknowledge that I'm not making this up. First few links I grabbed: https://www.reddit.com/r/britishproblems/s/S8mBOhg5Yv https://www.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestions/s/WukZVLbdn1 https://www.reddit.com/r/relations…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 04:24 AM
1

I didn't add the word real to move any goalposts. I added the "real" because two horny people, who are half drunk in a noisy bar, aren't exactly in a good position to vet each other. And that is true if you use your version of vetting or if you use my version of vetting.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 03:03 AM
1

Like I said, it's clear that we have a different view on vetting. Let's face it, the casual nature of a one night stand excludes any real vetting. Basically you both decide to sleep with each other based on looks and a base level of compatibility when it comes to flirting. Any real red flags aren't going to show themselves untill you get to know each other better than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 02:42 AM
1

What vetting do you think happens when people are under influence and in a crowded bar? How wel can you know a person from an encounter like that? You basically know their name (first name, their last name you usually don't even know) and if you find them attractive. You have a superficial conversation, try to peak each other's interested, flirt a bit and you leave together to find a more private place. I can tell you that I certainly didn't think I knew them well. But then again I am a man. I d…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/24 01:56 AM
1

You asked me if I think there are women who don't vet. If a woman skips on vetting a man, even if this is only one time, she becomes a woman who did not vet. She qualifies as an answer to your question. Do I know women who don't vet? Yes, every women who I had a one night stand with, did not vet me. Therefore the statement, that they are women who don't vet, becomes true. This doesn't mean that they never vet. This only means that they don't always vet. she vetted you bc she went home w you and …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 09:13 PM
-2

Sir, they prefer younger women because they have less experience and a lesser ability to discern appropriate behaviors in a relationship. So they require less of everything. They don’t know any better. They prefer younger women because they are more beautiful and youthful. No stretch marks. No drooping tits. Less bagage. No previous kids, etc...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 07:33 PM
1

I'm 100% sure, you don't have any evidence. And now you are just going to make up an excuse, as to why you will not present the evidence that doesn't exist. Lol, you couldn't even bother to make up an excuse, but it seems I was right about the rest. Do you accept tears of laughter?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 07:18 PM
1

if she wasn't vetting she would go home with anyone all the time If she was NEVER vetting she would go home with anyone all the time time. You are moving the goalposts. 'Not vetting' isn't the same as 'never vetting'. Not vetting is applicable from the moment one man isn't vetted by a woman. Because she literally "did not vet" that one guy. Never vetting is only applicable when no man ever gets vetted by a woman. A woman who goes home with a stranger, obviously did not vet that stranger. This do…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 07:11 PM
–

They went after me and my friends because they thought that we would be more willing to deal with their bullshit. So, you really do think that those men were rejected by the "old women", who were "less willing to deal with their bs". And that this is the reason they tried with the younger ones. You are delusional. Men who go for younger women, don't do this because they were rejected by the women their own age. If you can't cut it with the less desirable older women, than you definitely don't ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 05:29 PM
–

We are in agreement. And you are lucky your life has been unaffected by cheating. All the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 05:12 PM
1

If your question is: you're telling me you think there are women who never ever vet? Not even once? then don't ask me: you're telling me you think there are women who don't vet? Because a woman who goes home with what is essential a stranger, is obviously a woman who did not vet.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 04:32 PM
–

for old men who couldn’t compete in the dating world. You think old men who manage to date young women are the ones who "can't compete in the dating world"? It's not like these men first went for older women, with their hanging tits and echo producing pussies, got denied and then had no choice but to reluctantly go date younger women. Men prefer youth and beauty in women. And those are two things that diminish the older a woman gets.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 04:25 PM
1

I know there are women who don't vet. I have had one night stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 04:02 PM
–

How is the link now?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 03:54 PM
1

My "wall" comment stands. Wouldn't know. Didn't bother to read your "wall".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 03:52 PM
–

And I'm not doubting your experience. It's however a lot more probable that you are missing the sings, than that you are actually only surrounded by people who don't cheat. People have always been cheating. They did in the past, they do now and they will in the future. It's not something to be proud of, but it is in human nature to cheat. It happens too much and we have been doing it for too long, for it to be not part of human nature. I'm 100% sure that if you have a normal social life and aren…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 03:40 PM
0

to make sure their offsprings are taken care of while banging another woman for actual mating. Show some evidence then, miss arrogant. Men usually try everything they can to NOT knock up the side piece. If you have evidence to the contrary, now is a good time to show it. I'm 100% sure, you don't have any evidence. And now you are just going to make up an excuse, as to why you will not present the evidence that doesn't exist. now that women have more freedom to do the same suddenly it's wrong. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 03:19 PM
2

Nobody but you made the claim that sleeping with people is "the biggest achievement". You don't seem to understand cause and effect. Men first have to achieve/become successful and only when they have become successful will women notice and show interest. So no, sleeping with people isn't the "achievement". The achievement came before. Lots of women wanting to sleep with a man is just confirmation that he has become successful. You are probably confused, because women don't have to achieve anyth…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 03:08 PM
1

Being entitled is not a positive character trait. A Karen is per definition NOT a HV woman. Don't care what else she brings to the table, if she is entitled, she isn't HV.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 02:47 PM
1

If you want to write a whole paragraph of unrelated stuff, at least make it funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 02:45 PM
0

Men don't have a dual mating strategy. Women often find one man to provide financially for the offspring and another (genetically superior) man to provide the genetic material for the offspring. That's a dual strategy. She uses two (dual) men to make sure her genes will survive. Men only use one woman at a time to make sure their genes survive, while women use two men at a time. Therefore one is a DUAL strategy and the other is not. p.s.: humans, more particularly females, are the only mammals t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 06:21 AM
2

You do vet? Cool, so you shitting on relationships was just because you needed some sweet internet attention. Noted.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:19 PM
1

Shorter, better and has actually been read.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:16 PM
1

No it isn't. I'm not going to take credit for a link someone else posted, so I linked to his comment. He shared a link to a website that has "campaignagainstsexrobots" in its webaddress. And it's a website that a bunch of feminist have created to.... ....can you guess? Accept you were arrogantly wrong when you were laughing away the possibility that sex robots are upsetting women. These feminists were upset enough to start a campaign against something that has nothing to do with them. I think fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:15 PM
1

That's why you vet your partner before you commit. You should try it, next time a guy is willing to shoot himself in the foot and date a contrarian like yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:02 PM
1

Didn't even bother to actually read all that, you are trying too hard with that wall of text. I must have hit a nerve...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 05:29 PM
–

Yep, it's a sad reality. If you are honest and open with a woman, she'll put you in the "he's to nice, probably doesn't have any other options" category and you will be treated like something disposable. Be more mysterious, play with her emotions a bit and suddenly she is treating you like you are the best thing since sliced bread. Women truly are their own worst enemies. I have to treat women worse than I actually would prefer, because I like getting results and I don't like her loosing interes…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 05:24 PM
1

So since we don’t have to have the parts to actually know anything about them.. What kind of infant level of logic is this? You probably know better than I do how a dick tastes. While I'm the one with a dick attached to my body. Weird, isn't it, how you can know things about body parts that you don't actually have?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 10:15 AM
1

Yes, they are. Oh, I almost forgot: lol, rofl, .... https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/pfnuen9xcr
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 10:07 AM
1

You don't need to have a pussy to fuck pussy. I know that it's possible for women to come from penetration alone (obligatory "not all"). Since I have experienced it. And therefore also know that you are full of shit when you claim that penetration has fuck all to do with women's orgasms. I am no psychic, who can make women come with the power of his mind. If there's nothing else going on but penetration and a woman orgasms, then it's safe to assume that penetration did in fact have something to …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 09:59 AM
1

If penetration "adds to the sensation" (your own words), then it definitely has something to do with it. Because something that has "fuck all to with it", isn't adding anything to the sensation. Dont need it. Not really relevant if you do or don't need penetration to orgasm. We weren't discussing you, we were discussing women. And it may be hard to grasp for you, but there are other women on this planet besides you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 09:46 AM
1

I never said men don't lie. I already explained that. Men do lie about sex. But they realise they are lying. Bill Clinton was trying to save his job. There's no cognitive dissonance in his head. He doesn't feel like he didn't cheat (while he did). He knows he cheated, he feels like he cheated and he is just lying to save his ass. Women also lie. Both genders are no different when it comes to that. But what men don't do is actually believing that they didn't cheat (when they actually did), becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 09:38 AM
1

Can penetration add to the sensation? Yes. Cool, than we are in agreement now. Which we weren't when you made this claim: penetration has fuck all to do with orgasms for most women. Something that has "fuck all to with it", isn't adding anything to the sensation. And something that adds to the sensation definitely has something to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 09:04 AM
1

Also men: "it doesn't count if it's in another area/zip code." A man will say this jokingly, but when it comes to his actual body count, those encounters will not be dismissed. While a woman doesn't count those encounters, because she truly feels that sex on holiday does not count. Fact is women can actually get angry for something they dreamed their boyfriend did wrong. Which is evidence that women are capable of putting their feelings above reality. Men don't do this. A man would feel silly if…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:55 AM
3

I thought intellectual conversation would be too painful for you, so I tried to save you from it. Jeez, people are so ungrateful these days...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:33 AM
1

I rather smoke my grass, thank you very much.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:22 AM
1

Never said such a thing. You need a woman's ability to put feels before reals, to be able to discount sexual acts as "not sex". Men lack this ability. Men cannot convince themselves that putting their dick in another woman, isn't cheating or sex.Their brain would go: "Your dick was in another woman. Therefore it was definitely sex/cheating." And claiming something else would make their brains explode. Women seem to have no problems with claiming things that seem contradictory, like a blowjob not…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:20 AM
1

A woman talking about accountability. That's like a virgin talking about sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:54 AM
1

HV woman require effort So do entitled women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:50 AM
3

Also, high value according to who? Men can only be manwhores if a lot of women want to sleep with them. Assuming that women aren't lining up to sleep with losers, it seems that it's these women who put the high value on the men, by the act of sleeping with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:48 AM
0

Men don't have a dual mating strategy. Their wife is for mating, anything on the side would just be physical pleasure. While women do have a dual mating strategy. The hubby is the loyal, trusty ATM and Chad Thundercock is the one with the good genes who is allowed to impregnate her. I don't see any men deceiving their partners into raising another woman's child. So no, men don't have a dual mating strategy. Men do cheat however, but the consequences are far less damaging. Maternity fraud isn't a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:42 AM
1

This part: cognitive dissonance relating to past sexual encounters is very factual. For instance "It doesn't count because it was only a blowjob" is something that only a woman would say. A man realizes that his dick was in someone else's mouth and will classify it as sex/cheating. While what qualifies as sex/cheating is completely subjective to women. At least when they do it. Talking with past girlfriends has learned me this.They have a body count of whatever number and then you find out later…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:32 AM
2

Because life is better with two than alone. And why would you want to be with someone who doesn't appreciate you or someone you don't appreciate?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:15 AM
4

Because the juice ain't worth the squeeze anymore. Next question.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:01 AM
6

He is talking about facts. Men don't discount sexual experiences like women do. Men don't go: it doesn't count because it happened in Vegas. Or my partner made me angry, so it's his fault, so it doesn't count that I got some strange. If a woman feels like it was wasn't cheating, then the train that was just run on her, was definitely not cheating. That sort of cognitive dissonance, where having another man's dick in your mouth does not qualify as cheating because your feelings disagree with the …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:50 AM
2

lying to themselves about whether something was or wasn’t cheating. It was just the tip, so it doesn't count....
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:37 AM
2

Fact is self-reported data is useless for scientific research about subjects like adultery.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:35 AM
11

What does betraying your partner and property have to do with each other?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:22 AM
11

I know 3 women who cheat on every boyfriend they have ever been with. Know a guy who was bragging about never having been faithful in any of his relationships. And I got myself through uni working in bars. As a bartender you get to know a lot of people and you see a lot of people getting drunk and do things they would not be doing if their husband/wife was present. Cheating is everywhere that humans are. I have seen too much to believe any relationship is secure.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:15 AM
1

And you draw conclusions from that fictional story that you can't justify.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 10:09 PM
1

I don't need 95 or even 5 to show you that this reasoning of yours is plain stupid: women fight being raped all the time. You really think that would be traumatic and awful if it was so pleasurable. One percent would already have been sufficient.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 10:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter