| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What do you when a girl identifies red pill behavior and calls you manipulative/abusive/narcissistic?This has upvotes? | /r/askTRP | 16/08/20 12:22 AM |
| 0 | Is there a way I can avoid hiring women?How is this a bad thing? | /r/MGTOW | 14/06/20 08:26 AM |
| 1 | Most RPillers conveniently ignore the obvious conclusions of their narratives, because they're still too moralizingDo you need me to explain what you just did here? You wish to pretend that I'm saying mainstream scientific opinion denies that what we inherit biologically can influence a person's IQ, and can be a statistically significant influence on levels we see within a group. This is clearly not at all what was under discussion, nor does the above provide any evidence to support that heritable factors have a statistically significant impact on differing results between groups. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/08/16 11:31 AM |
| 1 | Most RPillers conveniently ignore the obvious conclusions of their narratives, because they're still too moralizingThis is exactly what I hear from creationists and global warming deniers: nobody is stopping you from publishing research that demonstrates such views: yet you guys think academics who won't censor research that conflicts with your world view are being unfair. Not all views have equal evidence. That's the whole point of... evidence. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/08/16 05:55 PM |
| 1 | Most RPillers conveniently ignore the obvious conclusions of their narratives, because they're still too moralizingThe 'race/genes determine IQ' view isn't 100% impossible, but claiming that the data support it means playing a little fast and loose with the facts. Unfortunately if you bother to actually review whether the data fits the conclusion, coming to any realistic conclusion will get you called a Marxist radical, who wants to censor the "realists" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/08/16 01:32 PM |
| 1 | Most RPillers conveniently ignore the obvious conclusions of their narratives, because they're still too moralizingAre you really denying race is a social construct? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/08/16 01:24 PM |
| 1 | Most RPillers conveniently ignore the obvious conclusions of their narratives, because they're still too moralizingUm What? You've never studied history huh? The East Asians who came in the late 19th century were blue collar and almost entirely male... People like you were saying the same exact shit as this about them. However, only some of them had children with women of the same race that form a major part of today's communities. (largely because there were not a lot of women at the time) I don't want to go into a million years detail, but by and large, the US had a huge backlash against the huge Asian pop… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/08/16 01:18 PM |
| 1 | Most RPillers conveniently ignore the obvious conclusions of their narratives, because they're still too moralizingSo then shouldn't it be more difficult to teach aborigines calculus? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 11/08/16 01:00 PM |
| 0 | My controversial and old school rules for LTRsOk I'm misreading this right? Please tell me that Red Pillers don't think it's okay to molest dogs for pleasure? That is unnatural and so wrong. I really hope I'm just being a tired dumbfuck here. edit: You have to mean like just get a dog and date girls right? | /r/TheRedPill | 11/08/16 12:38 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter