TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Redfox1972 Archive

View 0 posts and 67 comments by Redfox1972 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you agree that the problems of the world are not just a "female" thing, than why is Reddit in general sexist? Your whole post on feminism resonates with a malovent contempt toward women even though you sugar-coated the end with "Jesus." As a woman myself I would never be interested in any man who has such contempt for women as a whole and uses them as a scapegoat to all their problems. That's why I said don't get married and stop whining about them, otherwise your negative attitude will conti…
/r/RPChristians27/11/18 04:42 PM
0

You don't gather here to complain? Wow that's funny when I see the same posts about all the negatives of women over and over and all the men here agree in their echo chamber. You know that's true as it is in all these sub-reddit's. And you get banned if you don't play politics (Liberal politics). God forbid you should have a difference of opinion or not buy into the herd mentality of Reddit pills (red, blue, purple, green, orange, and all the other rainbow colors)! You get vilified and attacked …
/r/RPChristians26/11/18 02:09 PM
1

Because you are complaining about something that you have no control over, namely feminism and all the other crap that's wrong with the world. Just as you complain about feminism, I complain about all the evil and gross injustices and unrighteousness that I see everyday from both men and women and am affected by. Unfortunately the world is not going to change because we are complaining about it. Unrighteousness and evil comes out of the whole human race, not just women. And my advice to you beca…
/r/RPChristians26/11/18 02:34 AM
0

Is not God's Word enough for you? Read a commentary (Matthew Henry) on those specific scriptures and you will grow in your maturity and hopefully you will gain more insight into God's Word
/r/RPChristians26/11/18 12:43 AM
0

1 John 2:14-17
/r/RPChristians25/11/18 03:19 PM
-1

This disdain of yours for feminism.....did you want me to play the violin for you, to ease your feelings....would that make you feel better? I thought women were all about drama and feels? Here's the solution......read 1Timothy 6:20 and 2 Timothy 2:16
/r/RPChristians25/11/18 05:39 AM
2

I choose not to reason with a fool.
/r/RPChristians14/11/18 12:06 AM
2

I am not criticizing you, I am telling you the Truth in God's word. Galatians 1:9-12: As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ. But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by …
/r/RPChristians13/11/18 06:59 PM
3

This is hypocritical how you use scripture to justify insulting women posters and "putting them in their place" when first of all TRP is amoral, godless, and has nothing to do with Biblical Christianity. Integrating a man made philisophy with scripture is another gospel that Paul spoke about in Galatians 1:6-12. Christ is sufficient to meet all your needs. You either believe all God's counsel in His word or you don't. TRP is also the wisdom of the world that Paul spoke about in I Corinthians 2. …
/r/RPChristians13/11/18 04:04 PM
1

Do you have a source on that or is that just your opinion because you must be talking about different religions/denominations other than Biblical Christianity that deny male headship and male leadership in the church. The reason I ask is because I am using the word as it applies to its meaning. I have yet to see any Biblical based church deny male headship and/or leadership even as they acknowledge the equal worth and status of women.
/r/RPChristians12/11/18 06:40 AM
1

Yeah it is the truth isn't it, that inherent sin nature that we (male and female) all have......that's exactly why I wasn't ignorant when I knew early in my life (at 23) that I never wanted to marry. I have no complaints about being single all my life, even now at 46 and I certainly have no issues with or complaints about dying alone either. what I find perplexing is the very same men that complain incessantly about women still want to marry them.
/r/RPChristians12/11/18 06:22 AM
1

I'm not against leadership provided the male leadership is sound and trustworthy and not infiltrated by man made philosophies that corrupt the simplicity of Christ, which is another gospel...(Galatians 1:6-12). Man made philosophies and psychologies of behavior are a part of the "wisdom of the world" taught by "the spirit of the world" which Paul rejected in I Corinthians 2:5-16. As I said before, I'm not arguing the chain of command that God designed for marriage. What I am arguing against is t…
/r/RPChristians10/11/18 01:13 PM
1

I think you misunderstand egalitarian which means equal. The whole idea of submission is humility towards one another. Gods specific order as you pointed out: Christ - man- woman, is His design and order, like a chain of command. To this I agree because the God I personally know is a God of order and beautiful design. But this is no way suggests that a woman is inferior to the man. Woman are just as valuable and significant as men are to God. I've seen too many Christian men throw the scripture,…
/r/RPChristians10/11/18 03:21 AM
1

I don't agree that under Christ, egalitarians are wrong. We are all under grace which makes it pretty darn equal. Gods method for this is to prevent abuses and tyrants. The whole purpose of the Exodus was not only to glorify God and His power, but it was to give a powerful narrative to the freedom from tyranny and to set apart an automous people for God. The Bible says, "submit to one another out of love for each other"....as brothers and sisters in Christ...that makes us equal. Our God is also …
/r/RPChristians09/11/18 11:44 PM
1

Best of luck looking for empirical data. Is it any reason why you haven't found it yet? Btw, I did a psy 101 course just recently and we had an assignment to do. I chose MHC class I and II molecules and mate choice (do we choose mates based on "smelling" their immune system)? Who doesn't want a healthy mate? Unfortunately, there is no hard empirical data to confirm this theory. P.S. please don't read into my comment as tho I wanted to mate with the male species, especially those who think they c…
/r/askTRP04/11/18 09:54 PM
1

Sorry to burst your bubble. You are young, eventually you will learn as you get older. But I would advise you to really consider what science is and what it is not. Too much looney tune nonsense claims to be scientific and bc the masses believe it, it is legitimized, even tho it was never proven. Read my blog. I left a link in my previous comment. Read especially my post on "Considering this matter of science."
/r/askTRP04/11/18 09:39 PM
0

There is no science in behavior. If you think there is, you have no idea what science is and you are believing in a lie. Psychology is not science, but it is the study of behaviors. A man made philosophy is just that. It's philosophy, not science. Most should know the difference between psychology, philosophy, and science. www.sundayperspectives.blogspot.com
/r/askTRP04/11/18 01:00 AM
1

Following Jesus is not a complicated thing. Jesus said, My sheep hear my voice. The sheep know how to recognize the voice of God over all the other voices competing for their attention. The Christian, as they mature, should be learning how to recognize the voice of God. It really isn't complicated. If a Christian is in a difficult situation and they are praying for deliverance and God tells them clearly to stay and wait, they must do that, even tho their flesh is feverish and wants to leave stat…
/r/RPChristians30/10/18 10:44 PM
3

I agree people need the Truth that will save their soul from damnation in Hell for all Eternity. Jonathan Edwards preached a fire and brimstone message and several repented of their sins. I have it on DVD, "Sinners in the hands of an angry God." Unfortunately today if anyone preached that message amongst unbelievers (and even some believers), they would more than likely be accused of terrorism and then placed immediately under watch because of all the political correctness and progressive libera…
/r/RPChristians30/10/18 04:39 PM
3

I think you mean Solomon who wrote the Song of Solomon about lovers in the vineyard. Gods grace enabled Paul to remain single as he served the Lord. Also Paul encourages the reader to NOT get married if they are single, not because God commands it but rather bc it is a BETTER choice over marriage for marriage brings trouble into one's life and it keeps a person concerned with worldly affairs....how the married party must be first concerned with pleasing their spouse (both the male and the female…
/r/RPChristians24/10/18 03:59 AM
1

Because I lean towards a Calvinistic view in my convictions and believe in predestination and election, I don't worry about some Believer's eternal salvation who has clearly shown evidence of their faith but may not be sanctified to some areas. Sanctification is a process, justification is not. I personally am not afraid to share my faith because I am not ashamed of the gospel. God has never failed me and has brought me through many trials, hardships, and sufferings and unto victory and success …
/r/RPChristians22/10/18 05:10 AM
1

I agree. God's Truth is self-explanatory. Church is filled with many hypocrites and charlatans. A preacher once said: "Hell is gonna be filled with more church goers their feet are gonna be sticking out!" On the other hand, there are blood bought Believers who either are back slidden and not walking with God or they haven't gone deep with God (getting out of the boat) bc of overwhelming fear and so they stagnate but I believe those Believers are still saved. We all struggle with purity (Romans 7…
/r/RPChristians22/10/18 02:46 AM
1

Those scripture examples are for unrepentant sinners outside of Christ and yes I agree that there are degrees of punishment in Hell based on the severity of such egregious sin for unbelievers. For Believers whose names are written in the Lamb's Book of Life, there is no condemnation.....Romans 8. However, they may be limited by God. For example, King David was not allowed to build the temple bc blood was on his hands after he had Uriah, Bathsheba's husband, killed in battle (David ordered his me…
/r/RPChristians21/10/18 07:51 PM
1

He does have a sin hierarchy but God does not. Certainly hope the op understands that. Some young Believers haven't matured in their hermeneutics. He needs a full comprehension of Galatians
/r/RPChristians21/10/18 02:03 PM
2

I would also add that if you want God to bless you with a virtuous woman, you need to get your own house in order: cut porn out of your life....the lust in your heart is a sin before God that has consequences for future relationships. Watching porn cultivates the sin of lust which increases the desire to have sex with many women or in the case with a woman watching porn, it increases her desire to have sex with many men. Porn engages the mind and keeps it preoccupied with fantasy, not reality. R…
/r/RPChristians21/10/18 01:55 PM
1

This is correct. Christ died for past, present, and future sin. It was a one time act of justification....forensic justification that positioned a believer in God's kingdom. No one under grace is in a position to say they are better than another because they didn't sleep around or do some other such wanton sin. If that were the case than we could boast but the Apostle Paul clearly said, "God forbid I should glory, save only in the cross of Jesus Christ." It's similar to the publican praying, "I …
/r/RPChristians20/10/18 09:54 PM
1

Yeah no, I don't subscribe to red pill theory because I'm not an atheist...the point of the post...comparing satanism with red pill. Like all theories, there are holes. Best of luck to you my friend. Thanks for responding though.
/r/MarriedRedPill31/08/18 08:01 PM
1

My comments are not intended to be rants. They are meant to get people to critically think. Karl Marx focused on the collective so that there would be a classless society that would result in utopia. The idea being that all would share the same vision for the future in a collective manner. Socialism is collectivism. ​
/r/MarriedRedPill31/08/18 01:58 PM
1

Their source meaning God? Why is that a problem for an atheist when take for example that very same atheist expects his wife to submit to his authority. Whose authority is the atheistic husband submitting to? Who is holding him accountable? And what justifies rules according to an atheist? Do not think that rules should be universal to which all are held accountable to including both men and women? I always found it interesting that some men hold women to rules (morals) that they don't hold them…
/r/MarriedRedPill31/08/18 01:34 PM
1

My whole post is rhetorical but is aimed at those who belief in philosophies that have no rules or morals. If one doesn't believe in a civil law or rules that they are required to obey, than why do they promote ideologies that are devoid of moral laws to be obeyed? If one expects to be treated kindly (you don't want your neighbor stealing from you), than why would you believe a philosophy that does not included morality (TRP)? Most people will say murder is wrong. God's law says, "thou shalt not…
/r/MarriedRedPill30/08/18 02:29 PM
1

If men love "rules," then why do they espouse philosophies that have no rules and yet expect others to abide by their "rules?" Their rules are conjured up in their minds (they make them up as they go) and expect others to follow their rules. Men who do this are nothing short of a tyrant. Collectivism is just Marxism. Social Darwinism is just dog eat dog. Freudianism is just getting laid. Kierkegaard's existentialism is just humanism that's nihilistic. Nazism is just satanic occultism. All these …
/r/MarriedRedPill30/08/18 06:01 AM
1

Not sure if you put a post up to actually respond to the comments or to just confirm your biases. Either way, you not being satisfied with your woman with small breasts would be tantamount to a woman feeling jipped bc her man has a small penis or worst ED. She should either not marry him or divorce him for lack of performance. Sounds so ancillary now doesn't it? Now consider Ecclesiastes. King Solomon had everything a man could desire.....wisdom, wealth, land, livestock, concubines, mistresses, …
/r/RPChristians25/08/18 11:20 PM
2

Single people do not need life insurance. It's a waste of money. A better use of money is disability ins. Should you get injured and can not work bc we all know that UC, WC (Black Death), and SSDI doesn't pay shit!
/r/askTRP08/08/18 10:11 PM
1

Those who respect you less over time never really learned how to respect people in general. They were just hiding their inability to respect others and eventually their true "flare" or colors came to the surface. Conversely, those who were taught how to respect others will increase their respect over time as they get to know you. Respect doesn't mean false flattery. Those who respect you will tell you the truth even if it isn't pleasant to hear but they tell you the truth because they respect yo…
/r/askTRP08/08/18 08:22 PM
1

Yeah, just like wgtow have an antibugging device from Brick House Security.
/r/RedPillWomen03/08/18 12:45 AM
1

Do her a favor and leave. Go find another woman that suits your preference. You constantly micromanaging her weight is making you and probably her very unhappy. And we don't want our partners to be unhappy now do we? Because you are not happy with her. The more you nag the less you get and maybe she is purposely not loosing the extra weight just to piss you off. Who knows, in ten years your weight might need to be micromanaged.
/r/askTRP31/07/18 09:55 PM
6

I'm not a red pill, blue pill, green pill, purple pill, or whatever anything. I just post on these forums. I don't buy into any philosophy that elevates man or woman to a god of some sort. People (men/women) will fail you, disappoint you, hurt you, betray you in one way or another. This is life 101 and the only way to successfully navigate it is to FORGIVE and move on. Does that mean you take abuse and mistreatment? Of course not. But the only response and behavior you can control is yours. Life…
/r/RedPillWomen25/07/18 02:36 AM
6

That's just it: divides both genders. I don't think anyone seems interested in resolving differences or understanding the opposite sex in a conciliatory effort. It's tantamount to politics, spinning it left or right and it only leads to constant polarization. As a two party country, we are so divided; as left to right and man to woman. No wonder there is one impasse after another. I don't think many people are interested in solving problems and moving the fuck on in their personal lives. Instead…
/r/RedPillWomen24/07/18 03:04 PM
1

Your comments are usually very biased, that is biased against women. I'm sorry some woman scared you, but every human being who has ever loved has been hurt. Holding onto resentment may give you the illusion of a moral high ground but in reality, woman may stray because her needs are not getting met within the marriage....just like a man who strays. Both men and women are capable of making mistakes, having moral failings, and deeply disappointing another. This is precisely why no one should be p…
/r/RedPillWomen24/07/18 02:37 AM
7

It's not that they are idiots but rather they get sucked in slowly and before they realize, the reality is that they have idealized the man to the point of forgetting who they are...hence the controlling relationship. Unfortunately, statistics speak volumes to the many cases of domestic abuse.
/r/RedPillWomen23/07/18 02:36 AM
13

Do you see the irony in your post? Woman are precisely the victims of abuse (Stockholm syndrome) bc they do just what you have advocated, "adapting her focus towards him and his goals," "transform herself in a manner that allows her to enter his life," and "the woman's malleability." This passivity of femininity and compliance towards men attracts more self-centered and controlling men, which is the very foundation of abuse. Submission is fine provided the man cares enough about her hobbies, her…
/r/RedPillWomen23/07/18 02:13 AM
3

You should never assume responsibility for someone else's emotions or happiness, unless you actually did something wrong to cause offended feelings. If you assume responsibility for someone else's happiness and/or emotions, you are co-dependent.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/18 02:19 AM
2

"Looser values and hookup culture"......you can thank the Progressive Liberals for that. They have progressed haven't they? But if you possess values, believe in commitment to goals/hard work, and don't hook-up, by gosh you are "boring"...god forbid. Even dressing classy and sophisticated makes you stand out bc most people put very little effort into anything and that includes their physical appearance.
/r/RedPillWomen14/07/18 09:54 PM
1

Hot and cold.... Hot when manipulating you and when he is cold, that is the real him. So if you really want to know a man and who is really is, observe him when he is cold.
/r/RedPillWomen07/07/18 01:42 PM
3

Put all your stuff in storage and go hike the Appalachian Trail to get away from the rat race so you can find your humanity again and return to simplicity.
/r/askTRP06/06/18 03:08 AM
1

Oh you mean marry Adolf Hitler? Yeah I think you should. He liked stupid women who didn't challenge his authority. Just look what he did to the world...purged about 70 million people. Many people love to abdicate their responsibility onto someone else so they won't be responsible. Stanley Milgram found that out in his psychological studies....at what cost are you willing to follow authority? You'd be surprised how quickly peole will obey "authority" even under conditions hardly severe.
/r/RedPillWomen26/03/18 09:07 PM
1

If he is in love with you like you say, he would have walked you to the bus stop instead of partying till 3am (he could partying with anyone). My age is 45 so it may be that I just have a different perspective or a different value system. You were the one who made great gestures by flying to see him. The least he could have done was walk you to the bus stop and gave you a kiss goodbye....least you never see each other again because of death...we take things for granted. I think you feel anxiety …
/r/RedPillWomen25/03/18 04:11 PM
0

Clearly that's not what I'm saying....I didn't even mention crying. It sounds more like the guy simply doesn't have time for a relationship, especially since the OP said that they had not spoken in 4 days and in a LDR if he can't walk her to the bus stop when they hardly spend together to begin with is a simple thing....sounds more like he's manipulating her. Keeping her at arms length but not fully giving himself to her. Her being emotional 2 times a month just sounds like she's being a woman..…
/r/RedPillWomen25/03/18 01:57 PM
0

There is a fundamentation difference between time and attention. If a man does not devote enough time to nuture the relationship that will eventually lead to the demise of the relationship. Couples who genuinely love each other should be growing closely together not further apart. Many a divorce led to this very problem......not making each other a priority. This is training ground for this young lady to understand a successful marriage...if that's what she wants. Similarly, if you want a lovely…
/r/RedPillWomen25/03/18 11:28 AM
1

This is precisely why these kinds of men suck in real life and real relationships. For getting laid it might work on a desperate woman who is desperate for any dick even though it's ugly. But on a good woman, she'll lose interest quickly because without direct communication she won't be able to trust you with anything, let alone sex. These kinds of strategies cultivate pseudo interactions only. So if your looking to get laid by garbage....well, garbage attracts garbage.
/r/askTRP24/03/18 06:09 AM
1

No bc this world is a pile of shit. Do you eat a plate of shit everyday? That's what it's like communing with most people these days. So your gf would rather not commune with people (eat a plate of shit). I think she's a keeper...she's one very Bright girl! Those with higher than average IQs tend to be loners.
/r/askTRP19/03/18 07:05 PM
2

Aspergers spectrum bc a woman is oblivious to being hit on? Some women would be better off not encouraging certain men because of their distasteful approaches and serious lack of filter.
/r/RedPillWomen16/03/18 05:01 PM
3

Because everybody is so paranoid today that no matter what you do, they WILL read into it! Fun isn't it? Sometimes you are better off ignoring just about everyone so you don't have to deal with such drama and nonsense.
/r/askTRP16/03/18 12:58 AM
1

You are better off because let me tell you, if you get a male stalker, they will NEVER leave you alone. They will keep track of EVERYTHING you do because they believe you are their property. So which would you rather have? An obsessed jealous, possessive stalker or no crazies in your life?
/r/RedPillWomen15/03/18 12:02 PM
2

A false narrative is those who seek refuge in lies.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/18 04:18 AM
1

Why do post this cognitive dissonance? You want her heart and soul to be with you but is your heart and soul with her when you talk behind her back on a forum to have your buddies confirm your biases towards her? Sounds to me that you have a betraying heart yourself.....why be with her if you are just going to call her a falsifying emotional idiot. You betray your own thoughts. Look in the mirror my friend.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/18 03:42 AM
2

Stop being a pussy
/r/askTRP26/02/18 06:54 PM
-16

What kind of pansie, pussy whipped shit is this? Do you men really peddle such nonsensical shit. Take it from the words of General Patton....."No bastard won a war by dying for his country, he the war by making the other poor dumb bastard did for his." Now take it like a man and stop being a pussy
/r/TheRedPill26/02/18 08:52 AM
5

Well alright then, I know some married couples that are still married and love each other, regardless of physical perfection. The celebrity couples were examples I used because most people know them because of fame. The couples I know, you don't know personally, so that's why I used the celebrities as an example. People who fall in love, not in lust, love the person's soul; their mind (how they think), their emotions (how they feel), and their volition (how they choose). People who fall in lust,…
/r/RedPillWomen14/02/18 01:59 AM
6

Being slim is no guarantee of fidelity or love from a spouse. If that were the case, that beautiful Swedish model married to Tiger Woods would not be divorced. Look at Pierce Bronson and his wife....still going strong!
/r/RedPillWomen13/02/18 09:54 PM
3

The same way a woman gets rid of a male orbiter......act needy, clingy, puppy dog eyes, lots of lovey dovey eye contact. Give gifts, talk about marrying them, show up on their doorstep.....you get the picture. Sometimes however that may backfire. The other solution is move 1000 miles away from them
/r/askTRP06/02/18 04:51 AM
1

This is not helpful advise simply because it's a long list of attributes that frankly even the top tier are not going to achieve. If anyone, man or woman, achieved these attributes, there would be far less divorce in our world. Even if she met a man to love and he loved her, the chances of them succeeded is 50% and those 50% of marriages still glued together, how many of those are truly in love with a deep love and respect towards one another? Are they staying together for convenience or for the…
/r/RedPillWomen05/02/18 01:11 PM
1

The whole idea of alpha widowed or whatever it is sounds more like fantasy, like some sort of ridiculous romance novel. People either want to be with you or they don't. That's life.....a little perspective would help. Perhaps your ego is more offended because he didn't choose you. Life is too short to worry about frivolous things. Ask Florence Nightingale who left her British royalty to serve the wounded men of the Crymean War. I bet she wouldn't be concerned with such nonsense, rather she would…
/r/RedPillWomen04/02/18 08:53 PM
1

Yes, it is at least to a quality woman with character. Character is forged on the anvil of suffering and it is only through adversity does one develop perseverance, patience, and hope. It is these virtues that add maturity to your character and in our world, maturity is so hard to come by. Any smart woman should deeply desire a good man who allowed patience to have its perfect work in him. A man who has never been through anything difficult will lack maturity (sound character) and so not ready t…
/r/askTRP01/02/18 08:54 PM
1

Move on, find another girl who will fit your standards. Just be sure you don't fail the standards of the new girl you find because after all she has standards of physical attraction too.
/r/askTRP30/01/18 08:17 PM
0

I think you should analyze it for the next 20 years, but by that time she'll be too old for you to want to "bang her" and then you'll have to find another option to analyze for the next 20 years, but by that time you'll be too old to ambulate, let alone "get it up." Hopefully you'll have it figured out before you "push up daisies."
/r/askTRP15/01/18 02:45 AM
1

Maybe she just sometimes "doesn't give a fuck when you're around," just like you. Perhaps she is mirroring your behavior? These kinds of games no one wins....there are only degrees of losing....move on and find someone that is not afraid to show affection and someone to whom you are not afraid to show affection.
/r/askTRP10/01/18 05:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter