TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Redintegrate Archive

View 0 posts and 8 comments by Redintegrate on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Yes! Because what I should also mention is that sentences of about 6 minutes in prison are commonly given out to those convicted. You could take the newspaper to court and say that they printed that you raped someone, but actually you were only ever convicted of sexual assault. Because that's all the law allows you to be guilty of without a penis. The law is 21 years old and horrifically outdated. It also seems that whenever they try to amend anything, they mess that up as well - for example the…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/08/24 07:12 PM
5

It wouldn't be legally accurate wording where I live, as the legislation specifically requires a penis to be used to be guilty of rape. So maybe the media don't use it for fear of being sued? idk
/r/PussyPassDenied31/08/24 10:02 AM
3

In my country, the legislation for the offence of rape specially says that the offender must use their penis. So no penis means you can never rape someone, it would just be classified as a sexual assault.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/22 08:55 AM
27

It’s nearly 20 year old laws that for some reason no one has thought necessary to amend. The legislation (s 1 Sexual Offences Act 2003) explicitly uses the term penis for the offence of rape - so if you don’t have a penis, you can’t commit that particular offence.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/21 09:58 AM
2

Thank you, I’m glad someone understood
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/21 02:45 PM
-3

The first return slap yes, completely. I just don’t think the additional 3 are proportionate, is all. I do get your point though
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/21 01:02 PM
-4

I respectfully disagree - self defence under UK common law has to be both proportionate and necessary. It -might- take no further action based on her escalating the situation first, but I wouldn’t immediately dismiss it as a ‘she hit first so he can do whatever he wants’ scenario.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/21 12:22 PM
-16

In the UK, I suspect a magistrate would view that footage and say that his level of violence, whilst in response to her initiating it, was disproportionate and exceeded what could be seen as necessary. It looks like he stepped over the mark of needing to defend himself, when the only thing stopping him from just leaving was anger and an emotional response, causing him to want to strike back. Especially because I don’t think he has any injuries at all, and she starts bleeding quite freely. Take i…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/21 05:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter