TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Redz0ne Archive

View 1 post and 41 comments by Redz0ne on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

DiscussionRedz0ne/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:18 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Investor confidence is probably already in the shitter considering this site constantly finds itself in the middle of controversy after controversy (usually because of the social justice bullies on the site or the aftermath of one of their many, many tantrums.)
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 05:39 PM
1

Won't happen. If you've been following the Yishan situation close enough, you'll know that they're never penalized because they've got the admins over the coals through similar threats and intimidation. Makes you wonder what exactly they've been holding over staff's heads to make the admins so scared of them.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 02:22 PM
1

And here are more overgeneralizations and assumptions. Go back to the kid's table please and let the adults discuss things without having to entertain your childish tantrums.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:42 PM
1

Just trying to be civilized. ... But I understand how you aren't really grasping the concept of the word.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:40 PM
1

And I find the "I'm the meanest" thing HIGH-larious... You aren't even six months here according to your account and you want to say you're the meanest? EL-oh-fuckin'-EL! You're aiming for the "Badass" because you're trying to impress... Newsflash, that don't count for anything and your attempts to be seen as this "bad-ass-bitch" only betrays either you being too young to have actually experienced any of the real world or so mentally sheltered and undeveloped that you think that one-dimensional …
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:36 PM
1

Feminists hate us, and they make life worse for men. Why should I stoop so low as to reply to a strawman argument that is both incredibly shallow and devoid of any reasonable merit? You say "Feminists hate us" and I say "you're overgeneralizing." So give me a point that's worth rebutting rather than the rantings of an entitled little boy who was teased one too many times by the "mean ol feminazis." I am almost certainly the testiest, nastiest son of a bitch who frequents this sub, OOOooooooh! I'…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:33 PM
–

concern troll piece Aaaah, lovely... I was half-expecting tumblr-logic to come rolling in. Thank you for confirming my (rather pessimistic) expectations.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 05:03 AM
–

Tell me now, how many hits per day do you think the nice, polite and moderate men's issues sites out there get? Given that a good deal of traffic to AVFM comes from the rabid radicals... I'm not sure this is the angle you should be aiming for (unless, of course, you want to find some weak justification for being an uncouth clod.)
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:59 AM
1

Okay, and thank you for clearing that up. Still... I think the best way is that we need to keep ourselves from falling into the same trap that the radicals have fallen into. Because you are correct, they will likely still villify the MRM... But this is a long-game strategy, really. And even if it's one person a week that comes here and sees that the radicals are simply spouting bullshit, they are likely to see that the cause is just... And they may tell a couple of their friends... they will com…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 05:23 PM
–

If this sub was free entirely of the sort of posts you outline the MRM would still be attacked on a regular basis. And I still stand by the view that if we simply remove our inhibitions and start to behave in the way that they want of us, we'd still be serving the over-all cause negatively. Besides... This seems like it's bordering on the "But they started it" excuse to which all I can really ask in response to it is: Are we children? Because I'm going to say it... If this sub IS just a sub for …
/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:57 PM
1

The bad reputation is there anyways. Whether the movement will be hated regardless, how many times have you seen a post pop up here with a title like "I used to be an Anti-MRA Feminist... Then I found this sub." So, even if it is only one heart and one mind at a time, we are still able to get people to see that the Men's rights movement is a just movement and that the hyperbole that's being spread around is false. Do you think we'd get anyone coming in here saying something to the effect of what…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:54 PM
–

So fuck off. We don't have to be nice to feminists. This is exactly what I was talking about. If you can't say it with some measure of civility... Then kindly STFU. Edit: To add, Can we not give these kinds of posts justification for existing by at the very least trying to behave in a civil manner?
/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:50 PM
11

To be fair, that first one that was deleted I do think was warranted... If you can't say what you want to say without resorting to insults then maybe it doesn't need to be said... And to be honest as much as some women CAN be raging hormonal monsters when Aunt Flow is visiting, there are just as many women that have the self-awareness and understanding of their own bodies to at the very least try not to let their hormonal roller-coaster take over. If we alienate potential allies because we canno…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:26 PM
18

but false accusation, libel and slander really shouldn't be taken so lightly Exactly... And in this case OP's boyfriend can go after her for both slander (malicious and untrue spoken allegations) and libel (malicious and untrue written allegations.) I do hope that OP and OP's partner continue with the suit against her. Because this seems like a clear-cut case of libel and slander and afaik there are laws against those kinds of things in most of the western world.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:32 PM
4

In the US the term has been co-opted by the authoritarian left. Much like "Republican" has been co-opted by the hard-line neo-conservative movement.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 09:43 PM
11

"... and pedophiles..." ... I don't care if it's a woman or a man but if anyone calls me a god-damned pedophile they're going to get punched. Them's fightin' words, essentially.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 09:24 PM
4

Every argument she makes is saying that women are incapable of finding fault with feminism unless a man helps them. I guess it's because feminism is infallible and women are so smart that they could only be made wrong by a man. Or it's more likely that the blog author has fallen into the trap that so many new-wave feminists have fallen into by conflating feminism with femininity... Essentially suggesting that the battle for equal rights isn't a battle of equal rights anymore but an outright batt…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:59 PM
7

'Women are not suited to prison, there should be alternative forms of punishment' Oh, so then it's going to be that angle then? Here's something... If you aren't the kind of person that would deal well with prison then don't fucking become a criminal in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 06:40 PM
2

many media watchers say the distinction is blurring fast And when that line is gone we will be back to the darker ages. We need to be informed and as much as opinion can be a valid form of disseminating information, it is not accurate because it is essentially the polar opposite of factual journalism (Facts vs opinion.) So, simply don't call blogs or other things like that reputable as journalism... Call them what they are, opinion. And as we all know, everyone has an opinion but that doesn't me…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 12:40 AM
18

No... A blog is not an article. A Blog is a blog. Conflating it with an article suggests news organization and that's not the kind of thing you want to have happen. It's why sites like Gawker/Jezebel/HuffingtonPostBlogs are not reliable sources of newsworthy information. They are only blogs and at their absolute best the most they can hope to be are op-ed columns.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 09:50 PM
1

Why does it feel like you're taking it way too personally that I don't think you're correct on this being a pussy-pass? People disagree all the time, bro... That's part of life. There's no shame, no embarrassment, no criticism... It's just something that happens.
/r/PussyPass17/07/14 10:44 AM
4

Have you lived a sheltered life or something? Nope... And I still think you're reaching a little too hard to justify this as a case of the pussy-pass. Just let it go.
/r/PussyPass16/07/14 11:28 PM
11

... Dude, you're reaching.
/r/PussyPass16/07/14 09:59 PM
28

I don't think that's really the case... This seems more an issue of her position more than her sex.
/r/PussyPass16/07/14 07:47 PM
1

Oh for the love of... This is just silliness. ... I'm half-expecting a Python to walk in and declare the usual statement about silliness and there being too much of it.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:10 PM
5

Cruel and very unusual. I get wanting to make the punishment fit the crime but really, this is going overboard.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 07:38 PM
1

He doesn't want to get nasty and I and his lawyer are telling him he may have to. Pretty much... If it helps, maybe remind him that this isn't about him or his ex but about doing what needs to be done to ensure that his son's best interests are being represented. So, yeah... Maybe tell him that this isn't about him or the mother at all... This is about making sure that his son is given the best chance at a good life. Maybe push that "protective parent" button a little bit. That might get him to …
/r/PussyPass28/06/14 12:47 AM
2

Protip to all the guys reading this and playing the field: Even if she says she's on the pill, wrap yer dick up anyway (besides, the pill doesn't protect you from STIs.) Is it possible for the guy to maybe hire a P.I. to get enough dirt on her that would show the courts that she's unfit-parent-material?
/r/PussyPass28/06/14 12:01 AM
2

It's evolved form is "Rapologina." edit: It's ability would probably be "justification" and it's signature move would likely be "Snowflake screech."
/r/MensRights27/06/14 08:00 PM
7

Statistics can be framed to say whatever you want them to say... And representing an absence of statistical data is just as valuable as the actual raw data sometimes. But then again whenever a social-justice warrior is asked to cite their statistics they would rather accuse the asker of being a part of the problem for not believing them at face value.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 04:37 PM
7

That and there's the emotional investment involved in things like this. Sure, rapists are horrible people but they're an easy target because of their crimes being such horrible things. So, when you get people investing the emotional capital in riling themselves up, it's almost as if people want the accused to be a rapist because to have it revealed that they aren't means that the person getting all bent out of shape has done a terrible wrong in trying to assassinate someone's character and depri…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 04:34 PM
5

Given the nature of her job and how she has to be the rule for keeping discipline maintained in the class-room, this strikes me as a weak justification to excuse her behaviour. And if the kid was nagging her for sex... Isn't that why they have parent-teacher nights/interventions? If a child is so out of control that they simply do not obey the mandate of discipline in the class-room or at school, those are usually signs that the child has some serious issues going on (or that is my personal view…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 06:02 PM
2

That sounds like she was coached into a particular statement... Isn't coaching a witness or whatever considered "contempt of court?" Isn't that also a crime?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:57 PM
1

Granted, but libel/slander tends to need a specific individual or organization that's being attacked and the claims have to result in actual harm either in reputation, business or interpersonal afaik.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:33 PM
0

Agreed... It may be disgusting but if we strive to censor dissenting opinions we're no better than the radicals that made that entry in the first place. Though, UD does have an upvote/downvote system... And pretty much anyone can add in an entry. Maybe a concerted effort to downvote the horrible ones and upvote the sensible ones?
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:16 PM
2

I think you took a wrong-turn at Albuquerque. This is /r/theredpill material, not /r/MensRights material.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:13 PM
3

Ugh... It's like "the rules" bullshit all over again.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 02:23 PM
1

Aaah, well, then, no... Only thing we're required to do is sign up for a draft for jury duty (and most times the average citizen won't ever be called. It's part of when we do our taxes.) That said, if there ever was a draft I suspect they'll just call us in but personally I'm invalid for that (mental disability and asthma.)
/r/PussyPass21/05/14 09:43 PM
1

selective service Not sure what that even is... Could you elaborate please?
/r/PussyPass21/05/14 08:43 PM
2

Hmm... I'm unsure if this represents an example of a pussy-pass as opposed to a set of legal hoops that aren't just overly punitive. That said, the issue of the draft isn't really relevant in a good deal of nations... At least here in Canada military service is (AFAIK) voluntary (and not misandric since we do have women who serve.) Still, might be worth discussing for other countries.
/r/PussyPass21/05/14 08:13 PM
40

To be fair the initial premise could be a positive thing... Three women discover they're being cheated on and decide to do something. Where it fails, however, is turning it into yet one more exercise in mistreating people for revenge. The empowering potential could be "Yeah, he's a jerk... But don't stoop to that level, take the high road." a sort of "You don't need to be in a relationship to be valued" kind of message.
/r/PussyPass12/05/14 06:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter