TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Reejis99 Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by Reejis99 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

You care more about your little internet culture war than you do about actual men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 12:24 AM
1

This is such painfully biased and baseless speculation that it comes off as parody.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 12:21 AM
1

I mean, you're kind of taking AnCap "all taxation is theft" thinking as a given here. That's a hell of a thing to gloss over. Obviously an AnCap/hard libertarian is going to look at this issue differently. I think the majority do not see social safety nets as a "failed social experiment", and to argue whether it is it not drifts far from this corner situation into much broader political philosophy territory.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 06:25 AM
1

That's gonna be a tough sell to people who hold compassionate views of those 2% of children.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 05:56 AM
0

We don't do it for the mothers, we do it for the innocent children
/r/MensRights19/06/18 05:16 AM
1

Not every member of the taxpaying public is interested in the whole breeding thing in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 05:31 PM
-1

Taxpayers pay for single poor fathers too, I think that a false equivalency.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:49 PM
4

It’s not unfair to taxpayers because the taxpayers are made up of both male and female one of which already has a choice. Here's where you lost me. It's unfair to the taxpayers cause they didn't have the kid. Not every issue comes down to gender.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:37 PM
-9

Women can't put a child up for adoption alone. The father has to sign off on that too. Which kind of invalidates your point.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 08:14 AM
13

Sounds good on paper, but it's completely nonviable. An incredible amount of fathers would take this route, and since we are a country that takes care of children who's parents can't provide for them, that cost would be absorbed by the state. In other words, we can be "unfair" to fathers, or unfair to taxpayers. Which choice do you think voters will go with?
/r/MensRights18/06/18 08:13 AM
1

It's not about sympathy, it's about seeing your blind spots
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:02 PM
1

That's why it may not have been the best weird to choose to use this academic idea.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 11:16 AM
1

Lmao but I'm on mobile! How could you embarrass me like this Apple?
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:58 AM
-1

It also misunderstands what is meant by priveledge. I saw someone recently sat white priveledge isn't so much "white people have better lives", even on average, but more "there are obstacles for minorites in America that white people do not need to worry about". The same is probably true for "male priveledge". Sure we can suffer, and it can be unfairly disproportionate, but women have to worry about some societal obstacles that we will never have to, and that priveledge might distort our worldvi…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:56 AM
1

It feels good to bitch
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:47 PM
-43

Come on, like no one did this with Michelle Jenneke. Is r/ohlympics not a subreddit?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:17 PM
0

Just as much as everything else posted by this sub
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:59 PM
1

Is this in /MensRights simply because a man was smart and a woman was stupid once? It's literally the only reason I can fathom
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:34 AM
7

Of course, either of then being prosecuted is stupid... right?
/r/MensRights20/01/17 02:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter