TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ReflexionSolutions Archive

View 1 posts and 329 comments by ReflexionSolutions on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Social IssuesReflexionSolutions/r/MensRights27/04/23 07:57 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Or maybe we just are not around men like that. I have certain interests and values, so it's normal my friends and acquaintances will most probably share many of those interests and values, and with those comes character traits too.
/r/RedPillWomen18/02/25 05:16 PM
1

I would question how come there's so many people around her that are like that. I'm a man, so maybe I sometimes miss things because I'm not as sensitive to them as I'm not directly concerned, but I'm pretty sure I very, very rarely heard things like the examples she gave. I actually think the only rare times I've heard something like that was on Reddit or YouTube comments. Never ever in real life.
/r/RedPillWomen18/02/25 02:57 PM
1

Yes, but a handful of friends in not much as a support network, especially when half are now out of the country and only one is in my city.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 07:10 PM
3

Not exactly. What I meant was that you can be empathetic when you interact with someone all the time. But that if it's energetically draining for you, instead of being less empathetic when interacting, just interact less often.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 06:16 AM
10

Empathy is empathy. It doesn't need anything else, and you don't need a boundary to be empathetic. Sometimes, someone can become to much draining your energy, and you have to spend less time and less often with them, but you can still be very empathetic during the times you're with them.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 05:54 PM
4

That's just stupidly blind. It's not because you're part of a group with shared hobbies that suddenly people won't leave you when you're not useful anymore. I participated in so many different hobby groups. People are nice and friendly, they will do activities together, but the reality is that almost no one will show up when you're in need. I made a bunch of acquaintances and friends in those groups, but as soon I either don't participate in the group anymore, or need something outside of the ho…
/r/MensRights26/01/25 05:50 PM
6

You don't always have a choice who you interact with. Either at school/university, work, or in any public settings. And avoiding to disagree to avoid confrontation is very common. I remember a lot of times where someone would say something that made me cringe, but didn't say anything because I knew it would turn in an argument there's no way to win as they won't even look at rational facts.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 05:40 PM
1

I think she meant there's a nuance in the sense that it's not all black or all white, and depending on the family and friend group, it's not always as difficult as he was saying. Some guys can complain about things and not be told to not complain.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 05:37 PM
2

Yes, intelligence is partly passed genetically. However, most of it, as well as success and abilities in specific fields like music are mainly a question of the environment in which the child is raised. Take the child of the smartest people in the world but have it raised in a family of dumb people where he will spend his time listening to commercial music and watching commercial cartoons and adds on the tv and you will most likely not get a smart adult in the end.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 03:10 PM
2

If they are ignorant, isn't it that they don't know full well? They don't realize it because they grow up not seeing it and hearing the opposite quite often
/r/MensRights09/01/25 03:18 AM
8

One true point is that women have higher neuroticism. The rest is questionable.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 08:36 AM
9

I haven't seen the post in the sub, byt in a way, it might be a good thing if it wakes up some women to the troubles guys can be facing but generally don't talk about. Those that said "I didn't know men had feelings before seeing this sub" sound crazy, but they might start to pay more attention and care more about their actions and the mental health of men around them.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 08:24 AM
1

I would like to add a thought. Depending on the field, high earners spend even more time working each week, thus, they get to know colleagues even more intimately, which has even more chances of resulting in an emotional affair. Also, again depending on the field, they might be more often required to go on business travel, which gives an easier possibility for infidelity, combined with loneliness while away from home. Finally, those jobs are often more stressful, which might lead to a conscious …
/r/RedPillWomen02/12/24 05:02 AM
2

Great answer that brings a lot to think about. Also helps to give ideas on how to approach talking about certain topics in order to be really heard.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:23 PM
4

Maybe realize the if he organized that weekend, then it's because he wanted it and it makes him happy. Did he knew that you wouldn't be able to pay for anything much? If so, he still organized it knowing he would have to pay for almost everything. It was his choice, there's nothing for you to feel bad about. I'm in a similar situation with my girlfriend. We are long distance and I went to visit her. She hasn't come to visit me yet because she's still a student and doesn't have the money yet to p…
/r/RedPillWomen12/11/24 04:07 PM
3

I think there are different levels to that. 1. Are you making a risky action to save someone, in that case you're risking your life, not sacrificing it. 2. It's one thing to have that instinct in us from evolution, it's another thing to try to "indoctrinate" people into thinking guys have to do that. Seeing examples of brave men can be inspiring, but it's not the same as showing books in school and saying this is what a man has to do (implying you're not a man if you don't do that).
/r/MensRights11/11/24 08:58 PM
1

As a guy who's new to yue RP community I never really comment anything in this sub, but her we're talking more about biology so I'm going to tell you my experience. So, it could happen that in a few years the frequency of sex drops even more, but it could also stay the same or increase. It really depends on what causes that "low" frequency. When I was 25 I wanted sex every day, sometimes twice a day unless I was caught in one of those passionating projects of mine that would keep my mind busy. M…
/r/RedPillWomen11/11/24 07:35 AM
2

Why is this being downvoted??
/r/MensRights28/10/24 06:32 AM
1

OMG 🤦🤦 I'd say file a police complaint so the university will have to release the footage. And on top they will learn that they can't just make false accusations without consequences.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 12:30 PM
5

How do they explain the fact that the university has video footage and didn't took any actions against you? If you had done something they would have expelled you.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 04:21 AM
1

Exactly. I don't have kids yet, but I know that when I'll have some, I won't have much nights out anymore. Maybe once or twice a month at least the first one or two years.
/r/RedPillWomen17/06/23 08:25 PM
7

Very good information, Alo g with the references. I'll keep this for the next time someone tries to argue about the topic.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 08:24 PM
1

That's not the same as being convicted. I have no idea what he did or didn't do, but him being in jail or on house arrest while the police has an investigation does not mean that he's guilty of anything.
/r/RedPillWomen14/06/23 06:55 AM
2

You could even go further and (if you believe those theories) say that when you think a lot about something, it manifests in your life. So if you really think men are against you and want to control and abuse of you, maybe you will unconsciously put yourself in situations where it will happen. If you believe that men are against you, or dangerous as a whole group, then you won't be attentive and learn to recognize and avoid the men that are indeed like that.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 04:54 PM
-3

There are so many stories of men being victims of false allegations, I wouldn't be so sure about what you said.
/r/RedPillWomen01/06/23 08:22 PM
2

I think we kind of agree. As you can get MeToo'd for almost whatever you do unless you stop doing anything, I'd rather live life and risk it. That doesn't mean letting them win. On the contrary, it's making them lose as the intimidation intended is ineffective.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 05:19 PM
-4

I'd rather be #MeToo'd than be the last generation. I can support people calling me names and rejecting me, I just have to go live happily in the countryside where nobody will disturb me.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 04:11 PM
3

Did you read the last paragraph? If men get out of that "patriarchal" mindset and change, they become less attractive to women. It's a no win game.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 05:08 PM
2

If I recall the story right, "The war of the worlds" had a good father figure.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 09:34 AM
21

Make people realize that what they call toxic isn't actually toxic, and that toxic suddenly isn't toxic when it suits them
/r/MensRights28/05/23 12:26 AM
1

One thing though, a nurse generally has a much harder job than a doctor (at least where I live), so in my opinion the pay gap between nurse and doctor should be less.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 09:53 PM
10

First, there's a difference between discussing and sharing chores, and using a monitoring app. Second, when you live at two, you probably have more expenses (bigger apartment, higher electricity bill, more food, etc.) If that means he has to work more hours, maybe he's better of doing a little more housework by himself.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 09:00 PM
9

This will lead directly to what the elite want. Why do you think LGBTQ movements are so supported by governments, just as feminist groups? Because they both lead to reduced fertility rate (and in the case of LGBTQ, to the idea that we can go against nature and choose and modify our gender) This is a paved way towards transhumanism and a dystopian society where everyone will be controlled (we've already seen the reduction of free speech), where couples will be created by an AI algorithm (dating a…
/r/MensRights16/05/23 12:28 PM
18

Troll account made specifically to discredit this sub
/r/MensRights16/05/23 04:37 AM
1

How is it simp dip shits? They said I breached a rule, I check the rule and find it doesn't apply to my comment, so I tell them why I think my comment actually didn't breach the rules.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 11:04 PM
3

Same here, I got banned from the subreddit sex for simply stating my opinion (which wasn't at all discriminatory or sexist in any way). They said I breached one of the rules. I checked the specific rule and didn't thought it applied to my comment. Wrote to the mods who just ignored me.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 10:34 PM
3

Of course it is correlated. But it doesn't mean it's equal between genders. A woman can be slightly less smart and still get the same academic achievement as a man. I've studied at university, my father is professor and I have friends, both men and women studying at all levels from Bachelor to PhD. I hear a lot of stuff and can see women often have it easier. Also, you have to factor the fact that not all fields have the same difficulty. If more women go in the "easy" fields, then they will have…
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:41 PM
3

That's very interesting. Could you add sources to your various statements? I'd really like to share it with other people but I would need sources.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 07:26 PM
4

It's not that women can't be smart, it's that many women who get a degree are not very smart. Some men who get a degree are also not very smart, but in less amount. Why? Because if you're a man and not smart enough, you will fail your degree much more easily then if you're a woman. Remember, Masters and PhDs have to publish research and face a jury of professors. The fact is, there is a bias of lowering the bar when it's a woman. So even if she's not smart she will get her degree (unless of cour…
/r/MensRights15/05/23 07:20 PM
1

I feel you. That's so frustrating when it happens.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 07:06 PM
-4

I never said there was a third gender, I was just showing there's a psychology of gender and a biology of gender
/r/MensRights15/05/23 07:06 PM
-7

And what about intersex people? They clearly feel being a certain gender (psychology), but have physical organs of the other gender (biology).
/r/MensRights15/05/23 05:36 PM
2

Is getting laid your only goal in life? I mean, I too want to get laid and have a relationship, but I also have other life goals and hobbies that I enjoy and work toward with some friends, some of them being girls. Let's say you play music, you can be friend with a girl who also plays music. Same if you both love almost any other activities.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 06:57 PM
2

That's great! Where does it come from? Or did you compose it yourself?
/r/MensRights12/05/23 09:24 PM
1

I don't know about other guys, but I would assume most guys who would strike a conversation are just regular dudes that found you attractive and assembled enough courage to come to you. At least that would be the case for me. Yes, it might sound funny that I qualify myself as a regular guy, as it should be others to say how I am, but I'm clearly not a pick up artist. I could enter the incel "group" with zero game, as it's always been hard for me to have a relationship with someone, but I think t…
/r/RedPillWomen30/04/23 09:38 PM
6

THIS. You pointed the essential point here. The idea is to create zizanie and make people alone and vulnerable. And what better way than to make men and women so distant that they don't form couples anymore, or when they do it's only short term or without a lot of trust between eachother? The more people are single the better.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 04:11 PM
4

"#internalizedmisandry" "#misandristculture"
/r/MensRights30/04/23 07:36 AM
1

I didn't see that comment box
/r/MensRights29/04/23 07:34 PM
15

Get rid of the toilet altogether, problem solved. Just install a squat toilet instead. It's good for getting muscular thighs too.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 10:42 PM
10

Was about to say the same.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 10:39 PM
28

And her point about if there's even one woman in a household, it's one too many the men are subjecting to having to put the seat down. She never thought it might be 2 or 4 too many guys that are being subjected to having to put the seat up and then down.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 10:38 PM
18

What I hate about those articles is that they conveniently eliminated the comment section.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 10:34 PM
4

I don't know what other guys think, but if I think about my friends and myself, I would say we mostly care about the intellectual aspect. We like a woman that will be able to have deep and meaningful conversations on various topics, someone who loves to learn. I never talked with my friends about other aspects of what they look for, but personally I know I don't mind the education level (as long as she can be intellectually "challenging"). Also, I wouldn't really mind about her income. I would l…
/r/RedPillWomen28/04/23 04:05 PM
4

Everyone has different wants and needs. It's good to have others opinions, but the most important is what YOU feel. Take time for introspection and feel, deep inside you, how do YOU want your man to treat you. Also, if you meet someone that doesn't correspond to what you're looking for, maybe try to communicate what you like. Sometimes us guys don't know how to act because everyone has different views and we don't want to upset someone, or we just don't have a certain habit but would be happy to…
/r/RedPillWomen28/04/23 09:37 AM
-1

She doesn't know if he would want to know or not. If he never brought up the subject, maybe it's because he doesn't want and is not interested by any of that.
/r/RedPillWomen28/04/23 07:15 AM
1

I honestly don't think that's a problem. I was 22 when I first kissed someone, and in the year afterwards I thought it could have waited more. Moreover, I know I personally (and I think most guys too) would love to meet a woman who waited until she felt ready for dating, instead of having dated for years just because "everyone else does it" and she felt she had too to not be "too late to the game".
/r/RedPillWomen28/04/23 04:56 AM
5

Implying you need to get out of the house while you're gardening out and speaking to people is such a blindness 😂
/r/MensRights25/04/23 02:21 PM
6

It wants to achieve power, just like communism became. The basic idea was the freedom of the working class, but we got countries where the working class was and is still more oppressed then in capitalist regimes. Feminism was about freedoms for women, but women will end up as oppressed as before, because only a handful of people will benefit from the power (and will make sure to keep it between themselves).
/r/MensRights25/04/23 02:13 PM
1

What I say is you can't act differently. That's a double standard. If you don't help women because they are feminist, then those who are not should be helped, and the guys who support feminists should also not be helped. Otherwise you're not helping a woman that might have nothing to do with feminism, but help a guy that has been supporting and spreading feminism himself.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 12:07 PM
1

And what about the men who are actively supporting them (feminists)?
/r/MensRights22/04/23 11:20 PM
2

Well you won't be his secretary, he doesn't need one as he already knows what he's talking about. But if you have a doubt about what he says, you have to search for yourself. And it's not like he referenced something that you wouldn't even know where to search, googling "age of consent x country" is pretty straightforward.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 10:01 PM
5

That's great of you. I'm in my mid-twenties and am realizing how I had been manipulated (I've always seen the extreme feminist positions, but now I see more subtle things and how it affected me). I'm currently working on freeing myself from that, but I'm old now and able to reflect and do it myself. I often can't imagine how it can be for younger ones in schools or out of school, and I want to be a model that can show them that there is something else possible and that they are not the problem.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 07:37 PM
1

Many men are silent too. But when a man has some trouble and post here, we don't ask if he's been silent or not, we just help.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 05:43 PM
14

I'd say keep the data she shows (falsified), put it with the real research, and go to the university administration. They should do something about it. If they don't seem interested att all, remind them that falsifying data is against the scientific method and is a shame for the university (and send all the proofs to media). Universities are pretty fast to move on things when they realize their image is on the line
/r/MensRights22/04/23 11:20 AM
5

That's the mental attitude you need!
/r/MensRights22/04/23 08:30 AM
10

Fuck them. Not that I'm against women's rights, but I highly doubt that on international women's day they tweeted a similar “happy international women’s day to all the women that support mens rights!”
/r/MensRights21/04/23 08:30 PM
8

They aren't willing to take the needed time to properly get something done, or to care for another when it's just easier to break up with them and find someone else until they show a trait that isn't ideal. Then the person leaves again. Real truth just here and said in a simple way.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 08:17 PM
1

I'm curious about your opinion if the girl was another age. What if she was only 17? Or 15? Or what if it was a similar situation, but she's older, closer to OP's age, like 30, or 35? (Of course in that situation in order to be crying it would need to be something else than getting off the wrong train, but you get the idea).
/r/MensRights21/04/23 08:01 PM
-22

Who knows what she was living. She says she had panic attacks and talks about having to use lots of medication. Maybe if you're at that point it's better to get away. The real problem is that she, and many others, haven't learned to deal with stress properly, so whenever something happens, they're left relying on meds and/or quitting instead staying strong and dealing with the situation.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 07:30 PM
10

Same for me, I would feel so bad leaving a partner. And especially as they are already going through a lot. But I always think, well I have no idea what would be the mental toll of such a situation on me, so who knows 🤷
/r/MensRights21/04/23 07:16 PM
2

Where did he made something up? Can't anybody read and UNDERSTAND the meaning of words anymore??? He said he bet. That means he doesn't know (aka not a fact, aka not made up), but is sure enough it's the case that he's ready to bet on that. Hell, he didn't even say how much he would bet, so we don't know how sure he is himself.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 07:47 AM
2

Ok I see. I don't know what to think about Tate, some things he says are great, but others I really don't think like him. And yes, I see a lot of hating women and it's really annoying. Sometimes I feel the sub I'm left with the most level headed people is r/RedPillWomen 😄 Edit: sub name
/r/MensRights20/04/23 10:41 PM
3

What's the point of your reply exactly? I don't really understand the link with what I said
/r/MensRights20/04/23 10:12 PM
-10

What are the consequences of being on the sexual offenders list? I think I'd rather take that than die. Most people will never know about you and your story, so not everyone will avoid you like the plague. Maybe in your circle of false friends (because the true ones will believe you), maybe in your town, but not in your entire country.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 07:48 PM
8

You're right, but I think it's not exactly the attractiveness, but rather how "safe" you look. I say "safe", because the thing is, there's a cognitive bias that makes you feel more secure with an attractive person, but the reality is that it false. But that means an unattractive guy that would look safe would be okay too. Think about the image of a debonair gentleman, he might not be super attractive, but you immediately feel the warmth and candor that he gives off.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 07:19 PM
0

So fucking true. I loved this sub when I discovered it (and it helped me open my eyes on some things, although I was already a bit aware to get here in the first place), but I feel it's getting more and more extreme as the men-hater feminists, so basically doing exactly what we criticize of them.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 07:06 PM
0

They're not all silent.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 07:03 PM
6

I would do the same. Maybe just ask "do you need help?". She can then decide if she trust you or not. If she doesn't want help, she can't really accuse me as I didn't yet offered to take her in my car. If she accepts help, she has to tell me what's the problem and what she needs. By doing so, she has some time to calm down and to feel better knowing there's someone to help her. So once we get to the solution part, either I can orient her to the best bus line, or offer her a ride, but she won't o…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 07:00 PM
1

False accusations are a thing. It's strange for someone on a men's right sub to not know that.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 12:01 AM
3

No arguments, proof your just another troll
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:44 PM
1

You are mixing things. We where talking about the difference, or similarity, between women not being able to approach men at the time, and men now finding it difficult to approach women. I think you are the one unable to understand what I wrote. Free spirited and witch hunt is a whole other thing (and also included men by the way) Edit: I'd also like to point out that I've always avoided some points I raised. You've never talked about the false accusations, or the fact that women still expect me…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:39 PM
3

That was painful to read If I divorce my wife, I will lose my family, but if I don't, my life will be hell Would loosing your family be the same hell? I guess you would still have your brother, and sometimes our real family is not the blood related one.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 09:37 PM
4

It has nothing to do with women's rights. Of course women have rights, and it's great that they don't have to wait living with their parents until some men ask them in marriage. And they can also have their own bank accounts, or own property, etc. But criticizing men when they approach them at a time or place they didn't want, or worse, making false rape accusations, IS NOT a right.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 06:34 PM
5

Well, if women where in the same situation a 100 years ago as men today today, and it was a problematic situation, how is it not a problematic situation now? Also, you totally skipped my point that women still expect the man to do the first move. And it's not because men don't like it, most men will tell you they would love to see some women do the first step and approach them. Edit: I want to add two things: First you say The blame has been transferred, but it was not caused by a woman How is i…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 06:15 PM
1

Well, if women where in the same situation a 100 years ago as men today today, and it was a problematic situation, how is it not a problematic situation now? Also, you totally skipped my point that women still expect the man to do the first move. And it's not because men don't like it, most men will tell you they would love to see some women do the first step and approach them.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 06:14 PM
2

Well, if women where in the same situation a 100 years ago as men today today, and it was a problematic situation, how is it not a problematic situation now? Also, you totally skipped my point that women still expect the man to do the first move. And it's not because men don't like it, most men will tell you they would love to see some women do the first step and approach them.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 06:14 PM
10

You're right about the original idea of feminism, but how does So, I don't see feminism as a problem why men approach women less and less because, in Western societies, women are no longer limited by traditional forms of behavior. Certainly, a modern woman no longer has a problem approaching a man as he once approached her. explains the fact that many men are now scared of approaching a woman by fear of being accused of being a creep, or worse. Also, the reality is that most women still expect t…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 12:58 PM
22

It will be like a pendulum. It's easy for the majority of them to date as they want and if they are doing OLD they can be very picky and not put any effort. At one point, they will be the ones chasing us and trying to impress us.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 12:32 PM
5

It's pretty understandable that those who steal custody are the worst parents. Those who really care about their kids know they need both parents in a shared custody (unless the other parent is really awful).
/r/MensRights18/04/23 05:51 PM
3

You do realize people on an exmuslim/atheist forum have bias against Islam? If they are exmuslims, it's because something bad happened to them. You don't see all the person who have an interfaith couple and where it works perfectly fine.
/r/RedPillWomen17/04/23 10:14 PM
2

Depends on the situation, like where they live (if he's an immigrant and his family still lives 5 to 12 hours of plane away).
/r/RedPillWomen17/04/23 10:06 PM
1

As I said somewhere here, the title states that "Men and women where equal" says scientists". Saying there where no gender roles is an interpretation that shouldn't be made, especially because those scientists base their claim on observations of hunter-gatherer societies, which DO have gender roles (I would even say they have strong gender roles).
/r/MensRights17/04/23 08:58 PM
1

Yes I know that, but you don't answer my point on the balance of power. Edit: by the way I come from a more progressive family, where for a long time I considered myself almost on the far left of the spectrum. I don't anymore as the left took a tangent that I don't identify with. I now don't use any qualificatives other than "my own views and values".
/r/MensRights17/04/23 08:22 PM
2

It doesn't have to create power imbalances detrimental to women. In fact, one could argue that the fact the women are in charge of raising children creates a huge power imbalance benefiting women, that is counterbalanced by the "dependency" towards the men.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 05:01 PM
1

What do you mean? I'm not sure to understand.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 09:54 AM
2

Note how it goes from "operates on an egalitarian basis", to an extrapolation that there where no gender difference. But it's to completely different things. There can be gender differences and gender roles, yet both genders are considered equals.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 08:16 AM
6

Right, civilians are targeted, but civilians of which gender. Also, it is surprising to me that civilians are targeted the most, usually you'd mainly target soldiers no? Finally, this part is just so ridiculous: "civilians are harmed the most and are targeted, and civilians are mostly female,". Didn't they wonder why civilians are mostly women? Maybe because most of the men are getting killed and injured on the frontlines as soldiers (thanks conscription)?
/r/MensRights16/04/23 09:55 PM
1

See it like this: Most guys won't cheat and if a guy cheat, he will find a way to do it. The only thing you can control is yourself, how you react to someone cheating and if you let this have an impact on your life (a guy cheated on you, and you still leave him impact your life after you breakup, that isn't right). I think you should first force yourself to stop looking at his whereabouts. This would be part of the process the get over your fear. Monitoring him is only unconsciously reinforcing …
/r/RedPillWomen14/04/23 08:05 AM
3

I've never been told that. For me, I say it to myself when I feel I need some extra energy or support if I face something difficult. I look at my vision of an ideal man, or of men heros, and how I can be more like them. I see it as more positive than negative.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 12:38 AM
2

Not necessarily. They can ask not because they relate it to danger but because he's a colleague and she didn't know he has a kid, or knew he had one but now sees two. It all depends on the tone and attitude, we can't know from the wording. I would ask a woman colleague "is that your child" if I met her with a kid I never met before.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:52 PM
1

Maybe I'm wrong but I understand it as a way to balance how he's put on a pedestal by some people how will never criticize anything if it's coming from him.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 01:59 PM
2

It's funny because I was having the same reflections. He's pretty much "blue (or red tinted) pill", but is famed by people that are on a complete other spectrum of color.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 01:57 PM
0

Being downvoted is a perfect prof of what you say. Tf is wrong with some people?? Of course women divorce more, and the current lifestyle and having a job contributes to it, but the opposite, have women "prisoners" of a relationship because they otherwise can't feed themselves is just as bad, if not even worse. I think it's mostly the values that are failing, and not the fact that women can provide for themselves. We now have a society that almost encourages casual sex and banalise divorce, even…
/r/MensRights13/04/23 12:52 PM
6

Also the formulation of the questions, you're right
/r/MensRights13/04/23 11:21 AM
1

Exactly, it doesn't mean they are doomed, or that they will always remain like that. People can change and break bad habits they had. But statistically there is more chance the relationship won't last, so not every guy wants to risk it. My views might also be a bit influenced by the fact that the first girl I dated dumped me after a few weeks (she told me after the first week that she had had six previous relationships that didn't last more than six months). And the second girl I dated (and firs…
/r/RedPillWomen13/04/23 12:55 AM
46

Or we should look at how was the study done. How big was the sample? How was it selected?
/r/MensRights13/04/23 12:06 AM
2

I think many women with a high body count can well maintain a long term relationship if they are now mature enough, however, for the man getting with them, the odds are lower as you can't know if they really have changed or not (if someone is a double murderer, would you trust that they changed and won't kill you, or will you skip and build a relationship with someone else?). Also, there is an important distinction to make between body count types. Was it ONS, friend with benefits, or was it mul…
/r/RedPillWomen12/04/23 11:54 PM
-2

You're right, it's quite frequent and I developed a great awareness of how I act when women are present. However, in this particular case, except the part about attraction to pigtails being disgusting (which by the way could be meant as attraction to young women/teenagers, which is in fact disgusting depending on the age of the client), most of what she said was about tipping based on the appearance and not based on the service, nothing about men being physically attracted.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 10:31 PM
2

We should ask that they force mothers to take care of children that are not theirs, because it's in the best interest of the child to have a mother
/r/MensRights12/04/23 10:25 PM
2

If I have to pay support, I need to be regarded as the father, so have a say in every and all decisions concerning the child, would the mom accept that?
/r/MensRights12/04/23 05:14 PM
3

I'm sorry for you. I hope you will heal one day, I'm pretty sure anything can heal if given the right conditions and time
/r/MensRights12/04/23 05:11 PM
-2

I think what she says is extreme, however we should be careful not to do the same. She is NOT saying men shouldn't be attracted to physical appearance, but only that they shouldn't tip based on that and rather based on the quality of the service.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 05:03 PM
6

Never heard about that
/r/MensRights12/04/23 01:10 AM
1

I see. I was thinking about SAHMs as the second category only.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 12:12 AM
0

If this is the situation then yes, I totally agree with you. The way I understand it is that she has the habit of breaking things before the relationship develops and that this time she realized she doesn't want that. In that eventuality the intent is very different from breaking things in order to sleep with other men.
/r/RedPillWomen09/04/23 01:08 PM
0

I think you're misguided on many of your assumptions. First, finances are more complex than 100-150 years ago for median income households, so it requires more time and thinking. Second, the data about screen use doesn't tell you if the mother is a SAHM or not. Given there are many couples both working, and many single mothers working one or two jobs, it can greatly skew the data. Third, (and I hope you put a lot of money on it 😉) I'm sure most mothers who decide to homeschool do it for the educ…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 08:17 AM
1

But the fact that men suffer from all this shouldn't stop us from helping a woman too. As an individual, she might suffer more than many men, you never know.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 08:04 AM
0

I see your distinction between BP and RP. But further than that, we are all humans so we shouldn't make a difference. Of course, there also a difference between doing something to please a woman and doing something just to help her and I think that's where sometimes things get mixed up and people go on extremes. For example, I have a woman friend who's preparing for an endurance sport challenge. I have experience in that so I give her tips on how to train, and without her asking me, I think abou…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 08:00 AM
0

I'm not sure about that. Many men criticize the fact that women dating nowadays are not serious about it and only do it for the ego boost and to have free meals. So being ready to pay can be seen as a sign of real interest, which should be attractive to a man (if he's looking for a serious relationship)
/r/RedPillWomen09/04/23 06:02 AM
2

I think what you're pointing at is balance. Not chivalry to the point where you're weak, but also not assertive and macho to the point you're a cold rock. I think the ideal is being able to combine and go from one to the other. Being strong, but chivalrous on top of it. Think about a knight following his honor code.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 05:33 AM
1

Same here.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 05:24 AM
2

It's more NSFL than NSFE
/r/MensRights09/04/23 05:23 AM
2

Why would you not assist a woman? I understand not giving special treatment and favours, but giving less than to other men? At the core, what many people seem to forget is that before gender, she's a human first. And this is also true for women's towards men. See people as humans first, then as men or women.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 05:19 AM
1

What about doing it not to please a woman, but to feel stronger as a man, and considered by those around you?
/r/MensRights09/04/23 05:13 AM
1

I think of chivalry as more than simple politeness like that
/r/MensRights09/04/23 05:05 AM
2

I'll have to disagree with you on the conclusion you have. Yes, modern living makes chores faster and easier, but there are more chores and more complex ones. Take finances for example, before it was simply maintaining a count of expenses and revenues and planning savings for larger expenses to come. Nowadays you have complex tax forms, a ton of investment possibilities, etc. As for the cleaning and taking car of the house, we have on average much larger houses than before. And finally, if a wom…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 05:03 AM
3

This doesn't make any sense. Why would men acting like men be bad?
/r/MensRights09/04/23 04:37 AM
1

Yes totally. To each their views and values. My point is that if he has those values, then he has the right to ask. She then has the right to refuse to answer his question, but should be clear about it and not "evade" it. But many people seem to say that he shouldn't be asking this at all, which I don't agree with that.
/r/RedPillWomen08/04/23 12:48 AM
3

You're right. Teachers can observe warning signs in the school setting, but what about psychological violence between adults? It often happens behind closed doors and the person suffering from it might not show signs as much as a child. On top of that work environment is not like school, it's harder to observe signals of abuse. Not that I say it's impossible, just that currently it is not as visible in my opinion. Edit: For example, I lived one year of relationship where my partner could be seen…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 03:58 PM
6

Sadly (or not), it's a line similar to that one that I heard many times said by my ex-girlfriend (when we were having arguments).
/r/MensRights07/04/23 07:43 AM
3

The fact that psychological violence is JUST AS BAD doesn't mean it's as visible and as easy quantifiable. Which leads to the saying that men are more violent than women. It's easy to count the number of homicides, much less the number of emotional violence events.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 07:36 AM
3

Well I do know from a visit in Guatemala that it's a woman, one of the Mayan queen of the city of Tikal, that has been the most warlike of all Mayan rulers in history
/r/MensRights07/04/23 07:24 AM
1

I think the problem here is in the "lying", which chattered the trust he could have. She could have answered honestly and straightforwardly and he would have to choose if that answer is good with his boundaries or not (maybe it would have been ok for him), or she could have stated her boundary and said she wasn't willing to talk and disclose information about that, again he would have to choose if it was ok for him or if he wants to breakup. In both cases she would have been truthful and he woul…
/r/RedPillWomen07/04/23 07:09 AM
2

At the same time, when starting a relationship with someone, you have to be ready to disclose your past, and he has every right to know her history and who she kissed. Also, why did she didn't want to tell him, if it's not because she suspected that he might not like the answer?
/r/RedPillWomen07/04/23 06:50 AM
1

But basing you reaction to a whole group of people on how some of them act is discrimination. Are we going to discriminate people from arabic origins because some of them are terrorist? Well... yes it's done, but we shouldn't. If I see an Arab man walking down the street, I won't start to scream "stay away", although he could be preparing a knife or gun or bomb and about to take my life. And I won't ask the Muslim community to hold those islamist terrorists accountable.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:30 AM
1

Although it's true that studies makes them able to deal with various issues, I find that real lived experience is usually way more conducive to making someone good at something. When you experienced something yourself, you can give tips in a way that no amount of study will give you the ability .
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:09 AM
2

Well I'd say the gender might not really matter. Therapists in general probably never have experienced the real world
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:01 AM
2

That's funny, I usually find it easier to open to a woman. Well, depends opening about what but, in general.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 05:58 AM
1

Yeah I totally get (and know from experience) that the desire can be there. But I also think it's amplified by our hypersexualized society and the banalisation of sex. Also, to get back to the original message, I think there's a difference between having sex young with someone your age or with someone older.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 05:40 AM
3

Exactly, that's what should be taught in schools in sex ed. That sex is like an exchange of energy and creates a connection between two person, and that it has to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 12:34 PM
0

I think something more important than the age is the age difference. Yes having sex at 15 is young, but having sex at 15 with someone your age is not the same as with someone who's 17-18 or even 20
/r/MensRights05/04/23 08:28 AM
6

But how can it be the boys fault? What are the consequences? Because usually when you're at fault you did something harmful to someone else. I don't see how a boy could be considered to have harmed an older woman 😄
/r/MensRights05/04/23 08:26 AM
4

Go ask her parents 😂 Well, in a way, if people where not taking sex so lightly and casually, it wouldn't be a problem as you would have met the parents a few times before getting to having sex. There's a whole dating period to get to know the person, including their age.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 08:22 AM
5

I lost it at 22 or 25 depending on what you consider losing virginity, and although it might ave been the same earlier, I'm pretty happy to have waited. I actually sometimes regret not waiting longer for the good person, but I guess I thought it was the good person in the moment and it's through this that I now know what is the type of good person I'm looking for.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 08:06 AM
1

Well I guess I'm far more conservative, it can't be that I already lost touch with those years 😄 I lost my virginity at 22 or 25 (depending on what you consider losing virginity). I know I was ready before, maybe around 17-18, but I have a hard time with the idea of sex at 14 or 15 when I remember myself at that age. There's so much you don't know at that age that I feel it's better to keep your first time for later, when you know more about yourself and sexuality (although it seems like we neve…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 08:02 AM
5

But people where considered adults way younger. Girls and boys getting married at 14-16. That being said, having sex with your partner because you're married at 16 is way different then the crazily liberalized sexuality we have nowadays.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 07:55 AM
6

Technically speaking, if one group can handle it and the other can't, it's not really a double standard anymore
/r/MensRights19/12/22 06:49 AM
0

I would make them tell the real truth. For that you only have to tell them they will both get a hard sentence if they continue to say it's the other person who did it. But that of they say who really did it, the person will get an easy sentence.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 07:46 AM
1

How old was she when she made those false accusations, and how old was she when you started dating? In my experience people can mature drastically in their late teenage years, even early twenties. Of course, it's hard to know if she could repeat the same or similar stuff. However if she never showed any strange behaviour in two years of relationship, I would think it's quite probable that she matured and won't do it again. Otherwise you would already know it by now.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 03:04 AM
-2

I wouldn't be so straightforward. People mature. That's why you get prosecuted as an adult or junior. If she did that in highschool, she probably was around 16 years old. OP didn't gave us her age now, but he's 21. If they are together since 2 years, and she had another boyfriend in between, we can suppose she's around 19 or more now.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 03:00 AM
1

You're totally right. Most educated people know that historical standards of living where less than those of today. However, what you fail to realize is that most happy people know that happiness isn't about standards of living. Otherwise why would people in third world countries be generally happier than those of developed countries?
/r/MensRights18/12/22 01:22 AM
1

Do you honestly believe people are happier nowadays? Wherever I go, I only see people (men and women) who aren't really happy. Something is lacking in them and in their relationship dynamics. They rely on external stimulation in order to be "happy" (alcohol, drugs, bars and music, videogames, etc.). The amount of anti-depressant use is skyrocketing, suicide rates are quite high, people are surrounded by "friends" yet most are feeling a deep loneliness. Also, it's quite funny you think men only h…
/r/MensRights18/12/22 01:15 AM
3

As a guy who grew up in a non religious family, I might be able to give some advice. The only thing that always appealed to me was the party. When I was a young teenager I had this idea of a wedding in a field, with tents, food, music, a bit like the image you could have of a medieval feast 😅. Growing up and being adult now, I still have this interest in a big feast to bring together all my friends and relatives, albeit it doesn't matter as much now. I can also conceive the importance of having …
/r/RedPillWomen18/12/22 12:04 AM
1

Yes, but it's not asking for sexual favors. So why did she lie?
/r/MensRights16/12/22 09:28 PM
17

She traded the adventure for security, the security of having rent paid by him
/r/MensRights15/12/22 08:04 PM
0

I agree for the team and league spendings. And I also know marketing is not just about pumping more money. And yes, I know that people might not want to pay to look at something as entertaining as their local high school team (although they probably are technically better, which could be seen as more entertaining). However, as I said, there are a lot of other spenders involved (host country like Qatar, private companies using the event for marketing, etc.). All of them makes for a sort of ecosys…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 04:57 PM
1

You're right, I was just adding a point that people sometimes forget. It wasn't directed at the specific example we had
/r/MensRights15/12/22 04:38 PM
1

If you're married or know the person since quite some time it's probably the case. However many relationships are not long enough to get to that level, so the woman do develop a skewed perception of what she think is reality
/r/MensRights15/12/22 10:10 AM
-4

The sport is not important, it's how they manage to have both genders, yet it can't become a competition about who gets the most male players as they are required a minimum number of women on the field.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 09:52 AM
3

In that case it should be two separate jobs, with different salaries, and anyone can apply anywhere. If a woman want's to spend her day in the fridge lifting juice boxes that's her choice and she will get paid the same. My point is that salary shouldn't be based on the gender.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 08:25 AM
1

Yeah. I don't know why younger generations seem to forget that. Now everything is about race and gender, while in reality it's about the dominants and the masses.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 08:16 AM
-2

That's your view. My view is that there are two jobs to be done and we need two people to do it, so we'll give the heaviest job to the strongest and the lightest to the weakest. If it was another guy who would do the job instead of a girl, you would still do the same job and be paid the same. Or just give a different salary depending on the job and not on the gender.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 08:10 AM
1

The thing is it's always showed as "men in Iran oppress women, and now women are fighting for their rights and dying as martyrs" yet in reality men also oppose the oppression of women (while they could just be bystanders) and they also die, in even higher numbers. But no, we don't recognize their sacrifice, only the women's one
/r/MensRights15/12/22 08:00 AM
7

Nah, I watched the video, she didn't have a gun, she said something that meant she got a gun pointed on her. Anyways how could she have a gun while she's in the terminal, past the security check?
/r/MensRights15/12/22 07:45 AM
3

I have no idea how it could play legally, but having hidden cameras could give video proof of when she's physically violent (is it legal to have them without her knowing she's recorded? I know it's been used in retirement home in Canada to document abuses by nurses. They where installed by the family of the resident). There's so many of those nowadays, hidden in clocks, pens, fire alarm, etc.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 07:27 AM
9

u/Jmh1881 You could add a bodycam to that list. Just like people who record with a dashcam. That way you can prove what you where doing wherever you go. It could be just a real dashcam you take with you (you can give as explanation to people that your doing a project).
/r/MensRights15/12/22 07:13 AM
124

And live in the same building. How does she want him to go home? 🤣 🤣
/r/MensRights15/12/22 07:00 AM
-4

Yes you're able to do both works. However you can only be at a single place at a time, so someone else has to do the other job. Why not a weaker woman if she's able to do it?
/r/MensRights15/12/22 06:56 AM
3

One thing you're not considering when talking about not paying a woman the same as her male counterparts in a job where men are more productive is that it's based on a generalization. How do you know if that specific woman isn't more productive then other male employees? And what about male employees to that might be slightly less productive then others? Are they paid less? Of course, a company could start hiring with a new salary scale based on strength. If you can deadlift x pounds you get tha…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 06:54 AM
-10

You had the heavier stuff in absolute weight, but what about relative to strength? Did you have to make a bigger effort to lift a box? Did you have to use 100% of your strength while the girls would only use 40%, or did you both use 70% of your respective strength?
/r/MensRights15/12/22 06:22 AM
-8

While I find the revenue making argument good, I always have a feeling it's not showing the whole picture. Here's where I got after some thinking. I'd love to have your thoughts on it. Yes women sports generally brings less views and revenue, but why? Might it be because it's less advertised? If so, we're turning in rounds. Let me explain. Women sports bring less views, so sponsors and advertisers invest less. Because there are less sponsors and advertisers, players and events are less known. An…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 06:16 AM
-4

Some sports like ultimate frisbee require each team to have at least two female players on the field. That's one way to solve the problem, both teams being equals.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 05:37 AM
1

Maybe for some, but also what is not expressed or showed is not seen.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 05:31 AM
2

I totally agree with you about the commercialization of holidays. However having a celebration time is something great and nice for the kids. Having some decorations, a special meal, receiving visit from relatives, bringing the big family together, etc. In my family we didn't give gifts to everyone like in some other families. Only the kids until about 12-14 years old would receive gifts (sometime toys or book, music CDs, sport gear).
/r/MensRights15/12/22 12:42 AM
2

Maybe it's the case for you, but it isn't for me and most of the people I know. 1. My dad works and my mom is at home 2. My mom do the grocery, but if something is missing it's my dad who goes to get it before grocery store closes 3. My mom cooks and my dad helps with some parts, and me and my brother also do some parts 4. My dad does the dishes 5 and 6. My mom will think about the presents, but both my parents will do the actual shopping I don't know, I was a kid so I wasn't there when they did…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 12:27 AM
0

Yes and no. Who's going to suffer most from this? If nobody does anything there will be no celebrations, and it's the kids who will be affected. Both parents have already lived the holiday magic when they where young.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 12:14 AM
1

Right, it amounts to many days of full-time work, depending on salary.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 12:12 AM
0

However, for a celebration to be enjoyed by everyone, everyone has to participate.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 12:09 AM
1

Or maybe he was working. My mother would generally do the groceries and more than half of the cooking. But it's because she was a stay at home mom while my dad worked until the 22th or 23th.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 12:00 AM
0

Yes, because it's not visible
/r/MensRights14/12/22 11:54 PM
1

Wow, I was about to make a similar post soon. If you need a label, I'd suggest to pick Humanist. That's what I picked since about two years. Or let's create a new group, the BRHP movement (Between Rock and Hard Place) 😄 I think there are extremists on both sides. A middle ground would be something like the medieval chivalry. With some saying you're sexist and others criticizing you for being a white knight. My new theory is that if I'm being criticized by both sides, I'm probably on the right pa…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 08:33 AM
1

Yes, as I said everyone interpret things differently. It could be understood as "Thanks for your post, it made me laugh and remember a friend..." (goes on to explain the link between the post and his friend). That said, I would never have said something like that myself 😂
/r/MensRights12/12/22 07:33 PM
1

I have no idea about the difference in viewership, but I know the few times I watched porn I liked lesbian porn. It's more realistic and sensual.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 08:18 AM
3

I thought the same. However, if not being male centric means showing more of the man (for hetero women viewers), why would they start looking at lesbian porn? There's even less men visible.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 07:38 AM
1

I know, but I don't see it as refering to the pictures she shared as being semen, but rather giving an explanation as to why it made him think about his friend. I see your point, but that's not how I understand it. We all constantly perceive and interpret different things in the same situations. I see more the funny "talking to much" type of personality, that doesn't realize it's not really appropriate, rather then someone intentionally trying to harass with sexually suggestive comments. And bel…
/r/MensRights12/12/22 04:55 AM
1

Right, maybe she waited before going to HR. His story was more complex than that. The post didn't make him think of semen directly, but of his friend who would not eat white sauces. Also, I never said what he did was ok, just that considering all elements of what happened, it seems more than just sanctioning him for harassment. He never asked for sexual favors, but that's what his colleagues where led to think. Also, his manager saying he can't get back to the same position because he wants to p…
/r/MensRights12/12/22 12:40 AM
1

This doesn't address my point at all. I never said he was a t home.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 06:11 PM
1

Maybe you're right, but I personally never had such clauses where I've worked. But anyway, the Facebook part is not that important. My central point was that they spread false rumors among his colleagues, and that his manager would not reintegrate him in his position because he wanted to please the girl with her having that position. Those are facts you can't ignore, and it doesn't matter if he was creepy in other ways or not. If they don't want to reintegrate him because of the atmosphere he cr…
/r/MensRights11/12/22 05:54 PM
-1

Facebook is Facebook, wherever you are when you log in. It's a private profile sending a message to another private profile. It wasn't used as part of their work, but as a personal social platform.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 10:38 AM
1

From what I understand it happened on FB. They are friends on FB so does it count as "at work" or as " personal communication?
/r/MensRights11/12/22 09:43 AM
1

Well, if we base our analysis on what he says he said and what happened, it was not asking her for sexual favors. And that's the reason HR called him and what his coworkers have been led to believe. Maybe it can be considered sexual harassment, but not asking for sexual favors. Now if he did something bad, why would he be accused of something else? Also, he did point out to the fact she responded positively to his first message and got called by HR two weeks later. If it really was harassment, s…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 11:16 PM
1

I would never send a message like that to someone I don't know closely. However, that's no justification for the way you got treated. Maybe it was bad judgment of yours, but spreading rumors that you asked for sexual favors is totally wrong. On top of that HR didn't do it's job correctly. Finally, your manager saying he "wants to make her happy" proves that it's not about you but about her. If you could have a recording of him saying such thing I would go to corporate and get him and the girl mu…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 07:43 PM
-13

But maybe it kind of portrays the reality of the world, and of the word...
/r/MensRights10/12/22 05:01 PM
1

I think there's nothing wrong about it. The basics of creating a good long term relationship is finding a partner who shares similar views and values. If such a person is one in ten thousand in you home country, but one in a hundred in another country, it makes sense to go where it's going to be easier to find that person.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 04:37 PM
2

Four things. Focus on endurance, not strength (less weight and more reps). Try to do more core/glute exercises and less upper body. Less weightlifting and more whole body, bodyweight and cardio exercises (Pilates, calisthenics, trainer bike/spinning) Go out of the gym and do more overall active activities. Hiking, cycling, circus (aerial silks would be my preferred choice, but also headstands and acrobatics) martial arts. Cycling outside is completely different than a trainer bike as it is not f…
/r/RedPillWomen08/12/22 02:28 PM
2

You're mixing up two things. The AI that wrote those texts is learning (or training) from texts that are fed to it, and are mostly coming from web pages. The AI that looks at numbers is used in the field of big data, among others, and is able to analyze lots of data to find what's the best way to get a certain result (like your example of improving salaries). However, the results it will give will depend on the parameters that have been given to it (could be improve salaries while having gender …
/r/MensRights08/12/22 05:55 AM
2

Well for me that's the reason why the results are so shocking. Because they represent the general societal views.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 04:55 AM
2

No judgment here, but why her dating your mate is breaking your friendship?
/r/MensRights08/12/22 04:40 AM
3

I have a very happy life thank you! What about you?
/r/MensRights07/12/22 05:46 AM
0

The girl states that she did not feel threatened. But how the employees are supposed to know that? They gave her a way to ask for help should she be feeling threatened, it's at her discretion. Edit: You also have to take into account that the man who approached her is of untold age (maybe 30+, who knows) and she's only 18.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:57 AM
-1

Totally, that's why it was good from them to give her the tool to ask for help or not, at her discretion
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:55 AM
1

I gave OP information that can help her analyse the situation better and to determine if what bothered her is valid or not for her.
/r/RedPillWomen06/12/22 03:53 AM
1

I would say I would naturally tend towards sharing flight costs. However, there might be other financial aspects that have been forgotten. For example, if you take the total budget that is spent for having a good time together, how much do you contribute compared to him (flight tickets, restaurants, groceries, various activities, etc )? Also, what are your financial situation for both of you? If someone's making more it would seem normal to me that they contribute more. To give you an example, I…
/r/RedPillWomen05/12/22 01:23 PM
-27

I don't understand why y'all reacting like this. Yes, women do get harassed by men. Yes, generally men will be stronger than women. And yes, one should be aware of their surroundings and act if they see someone that might need help. In this case I think they handled it quite well. Observe, than come in close contact and give to the potential victim a way to signal if things are ok or not. Then continue being aware while continuing your own business. It gives her the choice. She can signal if she…
/r/MensRights05/12/22 12:23 PM
1

You're wrong in your assumptions. Of course you're totally right in the case of a guy that "stick around" hoping he'll get to sleep with the woman, that for sure is friend zone and not genuine friendship. But it's not necessarily that. He could very well appreciate the person and the friendship, yet also find the woman attractive. And he might sleep with her if she does the first move. That doesn't mean he's there for that, waiting for the off-chance it happens. For example, I can think of a fri…
/r/RedPillWomen05/12/22 04:50 AM
1

That's really different. A woman puts someone in the friend zone while she knows the guy is romantically interested in her but doesn't want to turn him down brutally. And the guy in the friend zone is hoping that the situation will change and that he'll get with the woman. On the contrary, what I say is that the man might be attracted to the woman, but is not hoping for anything. He appreciates the friendship and it's enough for him. For the woman, she sees him as a real friend and there's even …
/r/RedPillWomen04/12/22 03:25 PM
-1

You really can't read more than one sentence at a time do you? I gave you a real world example of why cooperation is effective. I also told you it should not be about hiring measures, and still you come back with a hiring example to try to prove your point.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 11:33 PM
1

I'm not sure if you're looking for advice about what to do against those that did that to you, or advice to heal psychologically and move on with your life without having an emotional weight in you.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 07:37 AM
1

I know what you feel. I have the same preoccupation currently. Do I tell people what I think, and object with arguments when they say something I don't agree with, but then I might get enemies and lose friendships, or do I keep my mouth shut but then contribute to the progression of those views by not opposing them? For now I kept my mouth relatively shut, just letting some of what I think filter through. That's because of once you in decide to speak up there is no coming back. So I actually did…
/r/RedPillWomen03/12/22 07:20 AM
0

First of all, there are three ways to look at life. Either we compete for limited resources, or we share these resources and get less each, or, third option, we cooperate and maybe we'll get more resources. The third option is what brought our civilization to thrive, otherwise we would still be competing over who gets to gather the few raspberries from the bush, instead of cultivating and harvesting enough for everyone. Second point, that's why I talked about equity "in theory". Because most of …
/r/MensRights03/12/22 05:39 AM
2

My comment wasn't related to less sex drive. I was going back at the original point (by u/aspiengineer and u/pearl_harbour1941) of men having more sex with men than women with women, and it was about number of partner, not frequency of sex. Thus my point about lesbians having sex inside a long term relationship, while gays might have more hookup sex (multiple partners). Edit: typos
/r/MensRights03/12/22 03:51 AM
1

I didn't know that saying! Well I love blue cheese 😂
/r/MensRights02/12/22 05:31 PM
1

Well, not me. I'm 26 and I see women in their mid-thirties early forties that are incredibly attractive! I just know I can't plan a long term relationship with them as I want kids someday.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 11:51 AM
0

But why friend and attraction can't be together?
/r/RedPillWomen02/12/22 11:46 AM
2

I'm conflicted in what to tell you. Part of me (the idealist), believe it's possible to make things work. You first have to forgive yourself for what you did. Also, he can do some personal reflection so your past won't matter anymore to him. However, another part of me (the experience) tells me that if they constantly break up and come back and they haven't fixed the problem yet, it's never going to be ok (that's true for all partners). My ex girlfriend was like that. She literally broke up with…
/r/RedPillWomen02/12/22 11:26 AM
3

I'm a man and this is exactly what I feel. Yes I have some attraction towards some of my female friends, yet I wouldn't act upon it. I have a deep respect for them and wouldn't want to break their relationships. I like spending time and discussing with them, but I would never be flirty with them. I even believe (unless I'm totally unaware) that they never even suspected my attraction to them.
/r/RedPillWomen02/12/22 11:07 AM
-1

Why would the fact that a male friend be willing to sleep with you if you suggested it, make you not want to be friends with him? As long as you don't suggest that, and if you make it clear there is nothing more than friendship in your relationship, I don't see the problem about it.
/r/RedPillWomen02/12/22 10:53 AM
1

But how many men do the same? Study, change field of study, work, change of career, go back to study, etc. And while they study they already contribute towards society with their research (graduate levels).
/r/MensRights02/12/22 10:06 AM
1

Depends what cheese you're talking about. Cottage or parmesan?
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:06 AM
1

It all depends if he wants kids or not.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:04 AM
1

I don't think equity is that (in theory). It's about equal opportunity BUT while taking into account difference of capacity. It should not be used to cover for difference in effort. There's a good image I like. Three people are looking at a sport match in front of a fence. One is tall, and can see o er the fence, the other is short and can't see. Equality would say they all have the same fence height in front of the them, while equity would use a box so the short person can also see on the other…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 07:55 AM
2

Your comment reminds me of that survival reality show where they put a group of men and a group of women on two island and had to survive for x days. Well, yeah, it wasn't that beautiful on the woman's island. Conflict, bullies, division in competing groups, etc. On the men's island, by the end of their time on the island, they had cooperated enough to almost be living there and not only surviving.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 07:40 AM
2

English being a second language, I wasn't aware of the implied relationship of makeup sex. Also, my point was that they can have sex 7 days a week but as they have the same partner it only counts as 1 body count
/r/MensRights02/12/22 06:29 AM
-5

Right. Or favouring should be done on other basis than gender alone. But it also depends on what we're talking about by favouring. By the way, I'm usually against measures that favours one group and not another, except in cases where it's clear one group is disfavored and the measure adopted is really though out to end the problem.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 06:17 AM
1

Yeah, sex workers might not be many (I was saying that more as a joke and also real afterthought of my initial idea), but women who could beat the 15 or 20 body count may well be enough to skew the average body count higher than what the majority of women have
/r/MensRights02/12/22 06:12 AM
4

Perfectly said.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 06:08 AM
2

Yes, you have to fit right in the middle, not too much not too little.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 06:05 AM
3

But maybe lesbians, in general, are more inclined to having a long term partner, while gay men will have more hookups. And so lesbians who are single will have hookups only once a week. Just saying. I have no idea if this is in fact true or not.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 05:16 AM
2

Don't forget it's an average. So maybe most women have even less but a few have had far more. Thinking about that, what's the ratio of male/female sex workers?
/r/MensRights02/12/22 05:04 AM
13

Education should be for everyone, whether or not they are as productive as other.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 04:27 AM
1

My feeling is that proportionally, the difference in prize that men and women get is bigger than the actual difference in their popularity and viewership. Also, at the beginning, the point was that it was deemed unfair that men had to share a part of their prize money. However, if women win a prize they will share too, it's just that the prize is quite smaller. So it's not a measure exclusively at the advantage of women, it's equal for all. Only the actual circumstances make it advantageous for …
/r/MensRights02/12/22 04:10 AM
1

The problem is that the women who play at that level are doing the same work as their male counterparts, putting the same amount of time, energy and commitment for their country to win, and yet when they win they get almost nothing. One can say they are not as good as the men, yet they still are the best of the best amongst the women.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 02:35 AM
1

I never said it was US soccer's fault. For sure they don't really have a say in what FIFA does (although I'm pretty sure there's a lot of politics behind closed doors). The point is women teams (wether US or another country) get a way smaller prize for winning the cup, although they are both FIFA World Cups. Again, maybe it brings in less money, but we can question why it's the case and can something be done about it.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 12:34 AM
1

I think you misunderstood my point. Nike's USWNT jersey being sold out and being their best seller is an indication there more interest in women's soccer than we might think. Concerning the viewership data, I forgot to mention it was data from FOX, for their own broadcasting, which explains why it's quite lower than your number. To go back to the original point, I get the argument that if it brings in less money they can't give the same prize amount. That's basic maths and business 101 if you do…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 12:10 AM
1

What's the point with what I said? I was talking about child support if he gets kids from multiple women. Yes he may have done that (I don't know, didn't research about it), but one cannot use one thing someone did, to criticize everything that person says or does. Or if we do, let's apply this principle to everyone, not just some selected individuals while a bunch of others continue to be admired while they also did pretty nasty things.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 08:22 PM
1

It's difficult to find data on advertising amounts. However, it's pretty evident which is more advertised. How many ads do you see in the months leading to the men's world cup compared to the women's? I did find data on finals average viewership though, and it's pretty impressive. 2018 men's final - 12 million viewers 2019 women's final - 14.5 million viewers That's around 20% more views, yet they got a prize that was only 7.5% that of the men's. Add to that that Nike's USWNT jersey sold out alm…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 08:16 PM
3

First of all, bees don't sting if they don't feel threatened, so you might wanna change your example before someone says that women should stop threatening men if they want to stop being scared of them 🙂 Now I don't agree with you that being celibate because of women is inherently bad. Why would it be? Women, in general, not all of them, seem to have almost impossible standards for their partners. This means that it leaves a lot of men without a partner not because they are bad persons (which wo…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 05:06 PM
1

Yeah he's a multi millionaire. But that's not the point. Her net worth is higher than his, so why would he even pay child support? I don't know for the US, but here where I live it's the wealthiest partner that pays child support to the other, whatever the gender.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 04:53 PM
1

True but not true at the same time. If you play soccer in a men's team and are good, some pro team will want you. The better you are = the more wins you can bring to them, and so the more they will offer you. But here we're talking about a woman. Yes she will not perform as the men, but she is good amongst the women, so she is an advantage for the team and will bring wins. I think the amount of the prize you get should depend on the category level you're playing and not on the pure performance. …
/r/MensRights01/12/22 04:46 PM
1

I see you didn't even took into account my point about the amount of advertising.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 04:31 PM
1

What is your official job contract? Does it include an amount of hours per week on average ? If so I'd say stick mostly to it and don't overload if it wasn't expressly stated in your contact. Also, they might have to be reminded that having an employee on sick leave because of a burn out will make things harder for them too. Finally, and most importantly, take the time to think about what life you want to live. Is having 100k a year to sustain a certain lifestyle worth the te and stress of worki…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 08:38 AM
28

I've never been opposed to child support (in Canada, I don't know how it works in the US), but sometimes it reaches an insufferable level of nonsense.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 07:53 AM
2

Please keep us updated about your novel!
/r/MensRights01/12/22 07:28 AM
3

Very good way of addressing the situation. That's what I'm aiming for when I'll feel knowledgeable enough about a few topics. Also, for everyone, a perfect strategy here is addressing the crowd of the "open non-believers", those who are not aware of men's issues but are not extreme feminists either. This is where the battle happens, with each side trying to convince the most people until they get a majority that approves their ideas.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 07:19 AM
1

What do you consider soyboy and simp? As everyone might have a different idea, it's good to make it clear.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 07:10 AM
-2

I think the argument of the women's team been less good and been destroyed by the men's team is fallacious. Soccer is a physical sport, of course men will have the upper hand. They will run faster and kick harder. Is that a reason to being paid more? Did they train harder? Did they put more hours in preparing for the competition? Take another sport, triathlon for example. A woman could train more, sacrifice more, and will still lose tho a man who did less. Does that mean her winning the women's …
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:55 AM
6

I'm surprised to see such a question in this sub. I mean, aren't we saying to feminists that because some men rape doesn't mean all men are sexist and bad people? If so, why would it be different for incels? You see a few incels have extremists positions, and then conclude that incels are bad and shouldn't be "supported" by MRMs.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:24 AM
1

I've heard some feminist talk about that and say they "really" won't need men at that point. I have a few arguments against them and their ideas. Anyone promoting such procedures is knowingly or unknowingly supporting and advancing the global agenda of transhumanism, and I don't think most people really want that. Would a woman doing that choose to have a boy? Probably not, as she thinks women are better and she doesn't need men, so she'll have a girl. Choosing "positive" characteristics like th…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:16 AM
1

No it's not. Your kids and Real Madrid players are not at the same level, while in the case we're talking about, they are both national team level and both prizes are World Cup.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 05:40 AM
5

Also
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:00 AM
1

So in reality, the root of the problem is having team prizes of different values for men and women teams. Not giving a cut to the other gender team.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 10:09 PM
3

Underrated comment
/r/MensRights30/11/22 07:09 AM
1

The way you explain it now seems to me very rational and logical. It's also quite close to what I believe, although I'm quite new and not that knowledgeable about this whole topic, and I do like to exchange ideas and learn what others think. I think you may just have expressed yourself differently in your previous messages and your views where misunderstood. You're totally right to point at the individualist culture of North America. I remember reading something along those lines a few weeks ago…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 05:14 PM
1

You and u/Amazing-Bit6140 are both right and wrong. Yes, in a sense, nobody OWES any support to anyone. Yet at the same time we could say that we all have a duty to support our fellow humans when they are in need of help. Also, yes, maybe a woman feels less equipped to help and deal with men issues. But does that mean it's ok for her to step back instead of learning and developing skills to actually become equipped and able to help? Moreover, women do indeed have the tools and capacity to help e…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 08:48 AM
1

Yeah, but I would take the risk for people that are important to me.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:51 PM
1

Oh yes, I totally agree with you that we need to be able to distinguish between every level of sexism. I only disagree on the approach. I believe if a word is commonly used with a certain generalist acception, it makes no sense to try to change it or not us it in its general acception. We should rather create new words so that it's not confusing for anybody.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 07:28 PM
1

Ok, I see the misunderstanding. He in fact talks about women in general and not his wife.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 07:12 PM
1

I know it's crazy and laughable, but yet with all the stories posted here and elsewhere, it just can't be something I don't think about 😄
/r/MensRights28/11/22 04:24 PM
2

You changed the subject. Being each other's property through marriage has nothing to do with considering someone as a status trophy, thus as an object. It's two different things.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 04:20 PM
1

I maybe could be a sperm donor, but only for people I know I can trust, not with random people like OP did.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 04:18 PM
2

As u/Trashyrocksyarr said, showing they planned it knowingly and the they are unfit for parenting is probably going to be your way to win custody in court.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 04:15 PM
1

Right, you never know until they start acting crazy. But how long does it take before they start? I got some crazy in a past relationship, nothing too crazy but still. It was a woman I knew for 5 years before dating her, and it's only after a few months of dating that the crazy started showing up.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 09:04 AM
2

I would clearly give you the award for best comment here. I love your open mindedness and rational thinking.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 06:35 AM
3

Or push the competition further: "but Iranians have it worse, what are you complaining about?".
/r/MensRights28/11/22 06:29 AM
1

Look, you say she's not part of the extremist ones, but she's probably lying towards the extreme if she hasn't learned anything after 5 years. However, unlike other commenters, I'm not as pessimistic, but changing her mind will be tough. You will first have to get her to take a step back, out of her echo chamber. Then she might be more receptive to the men's issues you're talking about to her. I don't know her personality. Maybe try to be upfront with her and ask her directly to stop reading abo…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 06:24 AM
1

It might not change her mind but explain to her that just as she thinks men need to get deconstructed but we don't realize it, maybe she doesn't realize that her and other women might have to get deconstructed. Also, next time a "Men are..." happens, point to her that when men say "Women are..." it's the same thing, yet we are told "not all women" and that we are sexist if we don't say "some women...".
/r/MensRights28/11/22 06:06 AM
0

I see your point. I honestly don't know the history and origins of the word "misogynist". For me it was applied to someone who showed at least a medium level of sexism towards women, whereas misandrist was sexism towards men. Of course, "criminal" is quite vague, that's why we also have the terms thief, pickpocket, burglar, murderer, etc. But we also convey meaning by assembling words. For example we have "bank robber" that doesn't have a specific single word for it, so we could have "misogyn mu…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 03:59 AM
1

You'd only keep a six month record? You have even more faith then I have. If I take the hassle of recording everything, I will keep it for years! And yes, it does show who extreme the issue is becoming.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 12:54 AM
2

And I didn't say it was right. Someone could make the point that this behaviour is misandrist.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 12:50 AM
4

In my opinion, considering someone as an object is misogynistic or misandristic, whatever world you want to live in. You might accept it or even appreciate it, but it doesn't change something's core essence.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 12:48 AM
0

There's Jordan Peterson. He doesn't talk exactly about the same things, but he's not extreme as Tate and is quite articulated and respectful.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 12:42 AM
0

I don't really agree with what he says, but in his defense, I would say that, being a multi multimillionaire, he can easily "provide" for his wife and still pay huge child support for 2 or even 10 kids. On the psychology aspect, his claim is that having sexual attraction and having sex doesn't imply love for that person (which I think everyone can agree on that), thus, he can love a woman and still be attracted by other women.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 12:26 AM
0

I'd say one is just a misogynist while the other is a criminal and misogynist. Because "chauvinist" isn't clearer. That term can be used in many contexts that don't even have to do with men and women.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 12:18 AM
2

He did say he considers women as a status symbol. This is like considering women as objects that are there for your use and advantages. It's pretty much misogynistic. It doesn't mean that Tate doesn't have some good points about society and gender dynamics, but he does say some misogynistic stuff.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 12:14 AM
1

Well, considering women as a status symbol is like considering women as objects that are there for your use and advantages. It's pretty much misogynistic. It doesn't mean that Tate doesn't have some good points about society and gender dynamics, but he does say some misogynistic stuff.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 12:11 AM
3

The way I see it is two fold. First, OP is 16, he should focus on being healthy, educating himself (so he can better fight), and have fun while he's still young (psychological health). Ignoring them will also be good for his mental health. You say they don't "tell eachother to disengage", but see how crazy this leads them, that's mental health issues level. So yes, disengage before it has impacts on your mental health. If OP was older, 20 or more, I wouldn't give the same advice. We, as adults, …
/r/MensRights27/11/22 11:55 PM
1

Yeah, I thought I might make it clearer for some people who read the conversations.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 11:22 PM
3

Depending on their previous relationships or their upbringing, some people might feel that shouting is the only way to express their frustration as otherwise people will ignore them. If you start listening they will be astounded and will stop shouting. After a while they might even realize (consciously or not) that they can be listened too when the just openly expresse what's annoying them and they will get to shout less and less often.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:45 PM
2

Maybe that's the reason. It's something I thought about and made me feel better. Oh yes. Hopefully I would never have slept with her that night, even if she hadn't said no to a kiss. The kiss is my limit for a for a first time. But I seriously started to think about what can happen when people lie about your real actions. Now I'm much more careful about what I do. People might find me reserved at first, but I rather have them say I'm reserved than say I abused them 😄 Sometimes I even wonder if m…
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:35 PM
4

Exactly. I think it it's a question of proportion. Not to much but not too little. Not letting someone be aggressive towards you, yet not shouting back or getting angry yourself as it's only going to make things worse. I like the point they make about listening. Often we get caught up, angry and don't listen, while, even if shouting is not a good way to do it, the person might express what is the cause of their frustration. In the end, its not a matter of who was right or wrong to start shouting…
/r/MensRights27/11/22 09:26 PM
0

Maybe guys should do like some police services and start to wear bodycams. 😂 Joking but half serious at the same time 😅
/r/MensRights27/11/22 08:37 PM
2

Totally. In my case she was a good friend and even my confident. I could talk about anything to her, even matters of the heart (I had had a huge heartbreak months before and she was the one who helped me get better). I was 22 at the time and she was around 34. I started having feelings for her, but didn't really realize it. One evening I'm at her place and she tells me she has feelings for me, so I tell her I have too. We just spent time hugging eachother and I once showed I wanted to kiss her. …
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:04 AM
1

I meant what does income tax percentage and freedom of speech have to do with having a judicial system that punishes and investigate differently if it's a man or woman?
/r/MensRights27/11/22 09:32 AM
76

What is said on the first picture is true (in case of conflict, not abusive relationship), but it should be applied be men and women.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 09:22 AM
2

Well, that's probably part of the global agenda being pushed
/r/MensRights27/11/22 09:10 AM
1

First lesson you should learn in life: Don't commit suicide because of some crazy people saying stupid comments. Just ignore them and live your life.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 09:04 AM
1

Yep I lived part of that. Had a high sex drive, my girlfriend didn't. And she always made it like I was at fault for wanting sex. I managed to make her try to understand why she had a low sex drive (but she never really believed me anyway). I also started to reduce my sex drive in order to "meet in the middle". However, our relationship wasn't going so well (maybe partly because of that) and I started to feel I wasn't myself anymore. I always had to refrain my desire and not to show I wanted to …
/r/MensRights27/11/22 08:58 AM
2

Well I've seen many occasions where a man handed help to someone in need while women where passing straight by without a single look. Moreover, when there's a dispute between a man and a woman, it's often the man who will forgive first. Finally, how many girls mock people they don't like and do everything they can to break someone when they are angry at them, while men will generally just walk away.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 08:31 AM
1

So crazy how people can change what they say. I'm now very careful with women since one made false accusations about me. Hopefully she didn't try to take it in court but only sent me an accusative email and stopped talking to me. In a way it's nothing compared to what you lived, but it's still so heartbreaking and disgusting and it gives such a weird feeling. And it always stays somewhere in your mind, still often reminded of it two and a half years after.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 08:02 AM
2

You're just reminding me of another important thing to look at before going in another country is the judicial system. Are you guilty until proven innocent or are you innocent until proven guilty?
/r/MensRights27/11/22 07:50 AM
1

I see your point. But how does it relates to the judicial system doing the job right?
/r/MensRights27/11/22 07:41 AM
1

You're totally right. Believe... But investigate. Because when you don't believe what someone says, you don't even need to investigate. By the way, it's highly impressive and respectable of you to still say "believe people" after what happened to you.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 07:38 AM
1

Well, it might be true the unborn child thinks that. "You're such a sucking father for giving me life with such a crazy mother!" But yeah, joke aside, the craziness was well hidden.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 05:25 PM
1

Maybe it's someone else stepping in and controlling her, and maybe not. I'd say get out of this a stealthy as possible, but call child services so they can assess the situation for the kids (they might at the same time discover she's being manipulated if it's the case). Other than that, on a practical level I'd say there are low chances that you made her pregnant, so why is she asking you to pay for abortion anyway? Seems to me like a way to get the abortion without having her "friends" pay for …
/r/MensRights26/11/22 05:19 PM
1

I exactly thought the same!
/r/MensRights26/11/22 09:13 AM
1

Well they are basically contradicting themselves as it ultimately means men are different then women. They have more control over their sexual desires and will refrain from sex, while the woman can't control herself and will have sex with whomever seduces her with their attractiveness.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 09:10 AM
1

Well... I didn't have penetrative sex until I was 25, so yeah we could say I "kept it iny pants".
/r/MensRights26/11/22 09:03 AM
1

I can't believe you've been downvoted. People nowadays are so scared of obligations and are avoiding any responsibility. They want freedom and think they are more free acting like that. (Although most of them accepted the breach on freedoms we lived in the last two years (maybe because they don't see it their responsibility to preserve freedoms for the next generation)).
/r/MensRights26/11/22 08:41 AM
1

Ok, and what's your point? If you decided by yourself that's what you wanted, good for you. It's like tattoos, you can get some if you want, but don't go tattooing kids.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 05:03 AM
2

Advantages to circumcision?
/r/MensRights24/11/22 11:52 PM
6

So if I understand right, if we're fragile they want to shatter us, and if we're strong we are toxic. Great! Guess this gives me another reason to just be myself and don't give a fuck about what they think.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 12:55 AM
4

Yeah, and female mutilation is also based on culture, so why the double standard?
/r/MensRights23/11/22 07:20 AM
6

I don't know the ideas of the quote author, but maybe she meant superior as social standing, because they where treated well by men but didn't have to reciprocate, just like a noble would over the peasants.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 04:24 AM
7

I don't think it's the attention taken away. It's that it literally could break their narrative. If men have mental health issues just like women, then women can't say they are suffering while men have the good life.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 06:39 PM
1

Have a good night as well! 🙂
/r/MensRights21/11/22 06:31 AM
2

Oh, sorry for the misunderstanding. I wasn't debating that women "planned" on divorcing in order to screw the man and get his money. I don't believe most women would do such a thing. I'm pretty sure women get a divorce when they emotionally lose interest in their partners or when there are to much divergence of views in whatever matters of the relationship, just as men would do. However, my point is that one of those matters is financial. A woman might expect the man to pay more, and is confirme…
/r/MensRights21/11/22 06:23 AM
1

You only said women spent more then men when they had a child. It doesn't mean they pay all the costs of daycare, diapers, food, etc... So there is no way to know if it balances or not with what the man paid before. Also you say a woman is not as costly, but it depends what are the expenses made by the man. If he pays for rent on a bigger appartement then if he was alone it can easily become quite costly. Same for vacation with plane tickets.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 05:40 AM
1

Well, I think it's relevant because if men spend quite more during the first few years, then women spending more when the get a family makes it equal in the end. Thus, if someone divorce when they are finally rebalancing the financial contribution in the couple, it makes it look quite like they divorce because of money.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 02:41 AM
4

You're saying then women spend more money when they become parent. Maybe, I haven't checked the source. But did you know that men spend quite a lot more than women during the first years of a couple?
/r/MensRights20/11/22 04:57 AM
1

Having empathy doesn't mean ignoring and not doing anything. You can have empathy for someone and still fight their ideas. Even on a physical level, one could do self defense and still have empathy and not hate for the person they just punched in the face. You do what needs to be done to assure your physical integrity, so you defend yourself, but you don't need to hate the person who's attacking you.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 04:25 AM
-5

You shouldn't let a minority's actions have the better on you. Empathy is important and should be cultivated and valued. Who cares if they hate us, they are the ones feeling those bad emotions, they are the ones hurting themselves. And they'll hate us even more when they will see we care for them anyways 😄 I can in most cases love those women anyway. Because the more love you give the more love you have inside you. And I have enough love to love almost everybody.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 08:13 AM
0

You're totally right. It's putting every divorced person in the same basket while in reality there are so much differences between cases. Being divorced doesn't mean you're a loser, and you ex might not be either. Sometimes life makes your paths go on different ways.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 03:42 AM
1

You can say whatever you want about allegations made by others in order to shut down his channel. But that doesn't answer to my point about his views of relationships being detrimental to people who would be influenced by him.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 11:42 PM
1

Well first of all, extreme tactics doesn't equates to extremism of their ideas. Now, obviously, extremists have took over the feminist movement. But that doesn't mean the feminist movement in itself is extreme. In the same way, saying that extremist are taking over the MRM doesn't mean the MRM is extreme. Both movements have extreme elements and they are the most vocal, which means they are the ones how make the movements image in the public's minds. It doesn't matter what the movement really is…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 09:08 PM
1

Unless she is really outearning him, she will receive allocations for kids even if they both share half of the time spent with them.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 01:19 PM
2

It's not false allegations. I listened to him. Not just those short videos. I watched his own videos on his own channel. Some where 15 minutes updates, others where his hour long "emergency meeting" (which I honestly skipped some parts), finally some where him being invited on other shows. And I'm not saying everything is bad about him. His drive for business can be very inspiring (and that's why I started and continue to watch him), but the points I mentioned about relationships yes they do are…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:16 AM
1

That's each couples decision, but I think that working and contributing towards bills doesn't change much for men. Think about it: 1. Women fought to work and not stay at home. Not men. Having a career and earning a good salary is something the woman wants, supposedly to achieve her dreams and to flourish and be happy (supposedly because I'm not sure it really makes them feel happier). 2. In practice, when the two partners work, they will have more expenses and in the end, the extra salary only …
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:30 AM
1

I really don't understand your point here. Could you rephrase it so I can better answer it?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:15 AM
1

I can't find back that original person's comment, but if I recall well it was about the fact that there are extremist elements in the movement and that they are bringing the movement down in terms of public opinion.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 05:57 PM
1

Men are not hurt by hearing his words. He hurts (men and women) by the twisted ideas and visions of relationships he instills in the younger generation. They will be the one with fucked minds about relationships. And I'm not saying he's the only one. A lot of people, men and women, are guilty of hurting the young generation view of a healthy relationship.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 05:50 PM
1

The way I understand it is that was the terms of marriage back then. If you change the terms, I cannot only change them for men as it's actually the case. Men sacrificed something and got something else in exchange. Now they sacrifice the same but don't get the same in exchange.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 05:41 PM
2

It's been some time so I would have to listen again to him. But from what I remember there's for example the way he sees women as objects. Like a woman just have to be beautiful and sexy. And considers women only as a way to have sex. This is detrimental to men because they will miss a lot of pleasure that comes from a deeper relationship, whether friendly or romantic. It's detrimental to women because it tells them that the only important thing is for them to be beautiful and sexy. And finally …
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:52 PM
0

It was not extreme in the sense that asking for the right to vote is not such an extreme agenda. The point was that modern feminism is extreme in its agenda, but that the "first wave" of feminism was not. It doesn't mean you cannot be extreme in your tactics of you have a moderate agenda.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 06:02 AM
-2

I'm not sure to understand your point. Maybe it's because it's quite late, but what are you talking about "only the result matters, even if it was won by lying"? My point is if people associate him with the MRM, even if he's not, the result is still the same : people associate him and the MRM. Saying that he's not part of it doesn't change anything.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 05:55 AM
2

Honestly I would just quit the app. What's the point of venting out to people who do that to you? I'd rather talk to a few close friends or just vent out by myself by walking in nature. Be careful in the short future, they seem to really have something after you.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 03:00 AM
5

I know I might sound delusional but I would say keep faith in humans (men and women). You had a bad experience with one woman, but some women are not like that. Trust that with your experience you'll be able to detect the bad ones from the good ones. When you'll meet the good ones you will then be able to recover and heal completely.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:48 AM
-1

I don't know if he himself associate specifically to the movement (for sure he says things that relate to red pill theories), but even if he doesn't, if people associate him with the movement it's the same result. And what matters is the result.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:31 AM
-1

The use of extreme tactics cannot be considered as a way to determine if the agenda was extremist.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:25 AM
4

I think most people can agree his views about women and relationships are quite sexist and detrimental to both sexes to say the least.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter