TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Reflexiver Archive

View 1 post and 64 comments by Reflexiver on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
106

Red Pill TheoryReflexiver/r/TheRedPill06/09/15 04:43 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

people usually want a joke to be explained so they can laugh better
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 09:00 AM
1

We still need a guide on how to convey sarcasm through text-only interactions
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 08:08 AM
5

Oh, now I see. It's just a small hobby
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 01:12 AM
-9

Not saying it to discourage you, but how much can one improve with twelve books in a year? By the length of the books in your list, you can actually read them in a month. And reading is only a small fraction of the whole process. Taking active notes on them and implementing with actions are the meat of it.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 11:22 PM
1

Two things can be accomplished by not providing correcting commentaries to those who are not willing to put to right amount of work on something. You save time. You retain your advantage by not letting them improve (but really, if someone needs someone else to improve, the someone is already doomed). You can only help them by letting them think you're helping them, whilst retaining your advantage (shades of law 31 can be seen here) and acquiring the resources you ask them in exchange for your he…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 07:46 PM
8

We become ignorant because we have short attention spans. How much they like delicious ready-to-eat little cookies. Few know how to be cooks. Even fewer are Chefs. Not much I can do about it... but I try my best at least. You only benefit by selling cookies to cookies-eaters, and talking about cuisine with other Chefs.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 07:09 PM
0

Nethier do I. People want money. People pay other people to teach them how to make money. I don't get who make the money
/r/TheRedPill28/12/15 09:55 AM
-7

Why don't just make money selling tickets to tell other people how to make money?
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 07:08 PM
0

Be careful about asking others for resources that will help increase power. For if they give it to you, they will actually decrease their own. Related: when everybody knows the same things, nobody has an advantage.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/15 09:32 AM
0

Applause. Very well put. Especially this: Your reproductive drive is an impersonal force programmed into your brain by evolution. When you make it the centre of your identity you allow your instincts to control you. Funny how it could be said that for most people, the difference between the usage of their intellect in respect of the animals' one is that to mere be extremely skilled to always find rationalizations for their instinctive behaviors. They are not even plugged, they are the plug.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/15 08:09 PM
1

There is no right answer Absolutely. Only results count. the idea is to not take her serious and be unaffected by her drama I would add: once you've done to incorporate that idea, you can go further. The sentence "the idea is to not take her serious and be unaffected by her drama" may come from a "defending" thinking, and it is OK because she will always find ways to attack you. I'd add that you can also incorporate the idea of attacking her yourself, but only when you decide it is suitable to d…
/r/TheRedPill16/12/15 04:39 PM
2

I agree. Some seems still don't get that meta-talk is counterproductive. If OP "does not kiss and tell", or whatever behavior, then OP cannot meta-speak and just say it. He must behave as a person who does not kiss and tell. "Behave" in this case also includes spoken words, but they cannot be meta; words and overall body language must just portrait a person who "does not kiss and tell", or whatever other things you want to let her think you are. This is actually how the human mind works: you can…
/r/TheRedPill16/12/15 04:28 PM
1

Her: "Are you fucking other women?" You: "Women always told me they can somehow sense it [by themselves]. [Why do you need to ask then?]" The sentences in the square bracket are optional (things are not only said with words). One can say the first sentence and just see her reaction/what she responds and then continuing from there, deciding whether to attack of just to ignore, never being in her frame. The less is said, the more space is left for interpretation. The more space for interpretation,…
/r/TheRedPill16/12/15 04:06 PM
2

This DT guide is the reminder that if the situation calls for it... you have to be the bad guy. No ifs or buts. The fun fact is that you can act in certain ways such that you create indirect influence in the opponent's behavior, so that they will attack you. At that point you will need to fully defend yourself using your bad-guy-behavior, but only because "the situation called for it". You are never the attacker. You are always defending yourself from these monsters that want to hurt you.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/15 07:46 PM
1

In this way I am also free to decide if I satisfy her own needs in sex. This is what is preventing you from achieving maximum success. You shouldn't care about her needs or wants. We agree on this. I said that: I am also lazy in the way that I try to obtain what I want using the fewest energies and resources, and essentially I cannot care about satisfying her sexual needs (but I make sure that in the initial encounters the sex is the best, in the case I decide to prolong the number of encounters…
/r/AlreadyRed06/12/15 05:15 PM
-1

It's interesting, and at the same time disgusting, to see how they are always capable to formulate some reasons/excuses for their own shortcomings. The first thing a valuable man knows he must do before seeking advice is to do his own homeworks so that he doesn't waste other people's time, which in turn will also higher the chances to actually receive the advice.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/15 04:43 PM
7

Dropping off completely the second temp ban may produce more efficient results. Treat them with docile manners and you know what happens.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/15 03:57 PM
3

Once a man acknowledges that women cannot ever respect him, the man can start to use that knowledge for his own benefits. One of the main problem with men seems to be that they do not just want sex from a woman but they also want to be respected (and these are only two of them, of course we can find more to talk about). And what happens when more and more constrains are in "AND" between them? The overlaying part becomes the objective to achieve and it is easily understandable that it will be mor…
/r/AlreadyRed06/12/15 01:05 PM
2

Men, however, also have a drive to become the alpha male, which is the #1 spot in the hierarchy. The Game is played in the following manner: create (or take property of) an hierarchy let people fight each other for the #1 spot then create (or take property of) other hierarchies let the hierarchies fight each other you profit whomever part wins after the fight if hierarchies don't feel the need to fight each other, create fictitious enemy let them fight again profits for you The main difference b…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/15 05:51 PM
1

With great power comes only greater power. Responsibility is a cookie for the good obedients.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 07:58 PM
7

I see being polite as it is related to power and to power talk too. You see, when you have real power you just don't need to be impolite. You just need to act. If you are a government, you don't need to be impolite in you talks and writings. It actually benefits you to be polite, even super-polite (power talk, double talk, it all boils down to expansion of power: increase yours while not letting others decreasing yours, and of course actually decreasing others' one). You then just need to act an…
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 01:25 PM
2

How would you drain all the "energy" from a person? (Supposing the drain has been decided to actualize.) Defining "energy" as "any kind of resource you have decided you need from that person".
/r/askTRP22/10/15 01:30 PM
1

Put together your studies in what you like: biology, chemistry, military (strategy perhaps), finances, management and whatever else you might like. Study what's out there, see what lacks. Ponder on all your studies. and then 1+2+3 = create a monopoly and enjoy your mental sweats. And to whomever may consider to ask "how" to do it, the answer has been already written.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/15 10:36 AM
2

Labels all over the places. Sometimes usefulness can be found in their existence, for those who live by them are indeed bounded by their created definitions. Freedom of expansion starts from inner choices of it. For the man with the hammer everything looks like a nail.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 09:23 PM
2

Life is a game of chess, and if you plan on being a king, you're going to need a few pawns. No, you don't plan on being a king. You set the board on which others play in. And who sets the board for the board-setter? Who cares, it's none of your matter.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 08:12 PM
3

Have you ever thought on the reasons people write posts (for instance)? You know it of course, when a person write a post and then other persons kind of praise that post, do you think that this is a good valid reason for the poster to continue to write? Many people spread the knowledge and maybe the main reason for it is to been considered, to feel important, dopamine all the way it seems to be. What do you think? It is worth to share the knowledge just for some chemical shots? Of course, ration…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 08:57 PM
5

think about the concepts in the article and apply them All they want are effortless step-by-step solutions (great pools of money can be made with small ponds of concepts). For those who already know, don't need to be told. Your posts are about the consequences of chemical substances on every brain, statistically-averagely speaking. Gotta be interesting examining those consequences also taking in consideration every underlying statistical-worth-category brain structure; if that would be possible …
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 05:53 PM
1

From the video: "When I saw their intentions behind it [...] I saw the evil behind what I though was a noble venture." From ancient sayings: To win 100 victories in 100 battles is not the highest excellence; the highest excellence is to subdue the enemy without fighting at all. And the 4 is there. If you are directly fighting you are already losing. You play games making believe others beneath you that wars exist and they are worthy to fight. And people think women are highly Machiavellian.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 09:58 PM
2

Someone on the internet once said: 'Just be yourself' is good advice to probably 5% of people. But it's arguably 2%. Don't bother be someone you cannot be. Many people tend to believe they can change everything about their mind. They just can't remember a mind is a physical entity like bones are. But they surely remember they cannot change their height. Memory is a strange entity too.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/15 08:35 PM
10

Finally, something well-thought and well-written about feminism. Most men here who post articles about feminism come from the losing position. They are scared of feminism. Most men come here because they don't want to lose anymore. And just like all human minds, a mind must make a huge effort in order to see how other minds in others group see. Human mind tends to believe other humans mind see the world similarly. Thus they tend to not see that before they understood they were losing, there were…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/15 07:23 AM
3

I think the problem I have is not with guilt or remorse, but fear of being exposed. What if the person I'm lying to is gonna find out and expose me? What if the interviewer is gonna find out that I lied about my experience/whatever and same again - exposes me? That damages my reputation and limits my options. There are some alternatives. I believe you already do a cost/benefit analysis before any action. You, thus, put exposure in the costs. Or you can learn to use some aggressive powertalk and …
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 07:30 PM
1

Perhaps this: after you answered me I reread what I wrote to you and I admit my tone could have been a little bit too harsh maybe. I guess I wanted to shake you a bit. (The tendency to stress people out just to see where their limits are). The fact is: you are indeed very keen into self-obervation and you have a healthy attitude and a good mind. But this: "I am filled with empathy and it is difficult to act like I am not." is the reason for I cannot give you much help. We don't see the world in …
/r/askTRP07/09/15 04:44 PM
4

I'm not convinced women want to dominate you or they want to try and fail. You are using the semantic of the word "dominate" -which is to a man a very specific semantic- into the feminine world. Of course women don't want to dominate men like men want to dominate women. It is a different kind of "domination". The mind of a man rewards the man for the physical act of dominating a woman. That reward is lacking into the woman's mind. But woman somehow know this fact subconsciously and they exploit …
/r/TheRedPill07/09/15 01:00 PM
1

To kill himself for the Greater Good of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 09:44 PM
1

I know this to be my ultimate path You will be able to choose your own path only after you find the light. By the way you talk it is clear you have not decided your main purposes. You think, you read, you lift, you meditate, you "hermit" yourself, you channel energies towards self-improvement. I'd say you should try to think of way to channel them to create something. Self-improvement is about changing (improving) oneself, I'd argue in favor of actions that improve the state of things in the wor…
/r/askTRP02/09/15 08:57 PM
1

If two people want different resources but need one another to get them, then there can never be satisfaction for satisfaction is a state where both parts get the maximum amount of resources. But this state, where both get the maximum, is impossible to reach for the initial requirement, so fight for resources happens. If they are equally powerful, then fight can only continue ad infinitum. If there is imbalance in power, then the less powerful one shall succumb to the more powerful one. Life is …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 06:41 PM
1

How much weak people fear to be betrayed? If one knows and act upon the knowledge, one will never need to worry. Weakness is even pathetic to look at.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/15 06:05 PM
-1

Those are good advises, but most people here are blind and just want quick solutions. I think less than one percent here will ever understand and read a book about Game Theory or dig deep in the OODA, and even less will ever see the conjunctions with what is overly repeated and preached in this sub. And the beauty of all of it is that for those who knows about them, seeing the behavior and reason's skill of the majority is just pure fun.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/15 08:29 AM
1

you have decided she no longer merits a place in your life. That is the core assumption of the OP's post. My assumption has just another little constrain in (logical) AND with that. To have my [own definition of] fun. Breaking up with someone is not grounds for fun or emotional experimentation. I understand what you're saying and the motives for that. I'm just saying, if you can, just why not? be done You will be certainly done. In the case one also wants to retain a certain amount of efficient …
/r/TheRedPill29/08/15 08:14 AM
-1

Why waste productive time? Until ones has accurate prove of one course of action being the most efficient one, one should dedicate between 4% and 18% of his time stochastically searching and implementing new courses of action which in time being can boost productivity (seen as an economic term). Perhaps "Whatever." would have been a much more efficient answer to your post, since the utility of the actual mine clearly approaches zero. Let's just be stoics.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 06:47 PM
-2

Be stoic, and have unshakable frame. That is easy, but in the long run also boring. Why don't shake up things just for the sake of it? (It is assumed you can do it, meaning you know what you're doing and how to do it so you cannot be ever back attacked). The purpose of the post is clear. If one has also some urge for funniness, just why not? Being mean, but talk sweet could be actually even a little bit more secure. At the end, in every social situation which can turn in a conflict situation, it…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 06:07 PM
-1

Don't try to be polite, don't try to be a good guy. But how much fun it is to be mean, but talk sweet? Infinite. Acting cruel, but exposing compassion. Divine gloriousness.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 05:01 PM
1

If you need to ask, you can't afford it. One can try to ask "how to become more machiavellian", but this question is just really similar to "how I make huge money". If someone is making money, he has some kind of leverage. Why should he need to tell you? If one wants to make money, one studies and make his own conclusions and acts. Machiavellism won't be ever "learnable" by asking those who are really Machiavellian. But there exist people like the actual Machiavelli, and IM, that will try to pas…
/r/askTRP27/08/15 01:14 PM
1

Create and obtain power but don't blast it around. Use it only when you need it. Do not let others see it, your behavior will be such that they will feel it. A potent person is relaxed because he knows he has the ability to do what he thinks best to do, without any restriction.
/r/askTRP27/08/15 01:08 PM
1

In the case of the exact example, the guy is already screwed. Unrecovering beta. In other cases, if she says it just to tease, you can say something to imply this message (you don't say exactly these words, you invent your own sentences to convey the message): "then, why you're such a fool to be with me?" and this next could be only done by deeds, not words: "I don't care about satisfying your needs, but only about you satisfying mines." It is assumed you are not attached to her, you have or can…
/r/askTRP26/08/15 01:16 PM
1

He should be around thirty.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 12:53 PM
18

What do you expect from the average person except averageness? TRP is about acknowledging the real state of things and then exploit them to fit your purposes. Can you perhaps change this state of things you are describing in your post? You know what the stoics say about control. One of the motives for the firs rule (mouth-closing) is that you should be happy to be in and you should be also happy that the majority of others are out. Otherwise your leverage won't exists. (But you can make them thi…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/15 03:56 PM
-1

No.
/r/askTRP18/08/15 05:38 PM
3

Never. Make her say it, then find excuses for her behaviour (or whatever) to not say it yourself. She then will feel the need to satisfy the uneasiness you have created through prolonged and continuous sex intercourses.
/r/askTRP17/08/15 08:44 PM
3

(1) You create so much extensive value for others that others will only gain with being with you and only lose for not being with you. (2) Once you achieve that state, you are the only one who decides who will or will not stay with you, and the others won't be capable of interfere with your decision, because of point (1). Think big.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 05:07 PM
3

Everyone has his own objectives. You marry because its suits yours. If money is your primary and mostly objective then the first rule is to not lose money, supposing you are compounding them. As /u/vengefully_yours describes, it took him 19 years to just get back to a "normal" situation. As the well known story goes, 10 straight years of 16% compound are far ahead of 9 straight years at 20% and one heavy loss at the tenth year. Never lose money. But it is clear you also value other things which …
/r/TheRedPill15/08/15 05:45 PM
0

What is the relationship between your definition of value (which I agree with) and power? And, what do you think will be an adequate definition of power? Does Game Theory concepts somehow blend in your argumentation? Maybe too much of a broad questions.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/15 11:29 AM
1

Tomorrow I'll make another thread focusing on the 5 main tenets that are discussed in the book, dissecting each one. Tomorrow, tomorrow. So easy to say that word. I have just finished to read the book. For those who are accustomed in this kind of writings there is nothing new to learn. But obviously, repetita always iuvant.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/15 07:17 AM
-4

It is our end goal. No. The end goal is to heighten the expansion of power. Dominance is a tool you use to achieve that.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/15 10:11 PM
7

A friend of mine (Dr in psychology) proposes that psychopaths are the next step in human evolution. They are the apex human so to say. It would be interesting to ask your friend on what he thinks to be the correlations between "psychopaths are the apex and the next step in human evolution" and the common concepts explained by the mathematical model of Game Theory. Your friends surely knows that one of the main characteristics of psychopaths is that they have the drive for controlling everything,…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/15 06:59 PM
2

"Create your own corporate empire" is an absurd morsel of advice for the vast majority of people. Tautology. Of course is not for everyone. Just consider the state of things since the beginning of humanity. There are those of control and those who are being controlled. Unless you have a killer idea that you know has potential, it is much wiser to make stacks climbing the ladder. I must disagree. Yes, "killer" ideas exist, but you can do without them. The only mindset one needs is to create/have …
/r/TheRedPill02/08/15 09:27 AM
1

There is nothing wrong with being an employee. Not everyone is going to be Trump. And having a steady paycheck without all the worry about cashflow, is a fucking stellar situation. Indeed, I agree. Our ways of thinking are not the way for everyone. It only depends on what a person wants. If someone wants peace of mind and secure paychecks every month, then he definitely should consider to follow your suggestions. The thrill of risk is not for everybody.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/15 09:19 AM
3

Rule 0: Create your own corporate empire and make other people beneath you follow these stupid rules. As rules are only to make the weak weaker and the strong stronger.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 01:18 PM
2

Yes. (But it depends on how much she already know about you.) Lovebomb her. Make her believe your her best thing happened in life. When you ask make it casual, as it is nothing important "just a sign here, my dear". Make her see how this can also benefit her.
/r/askTRP27/07/15 07:12 PM
2

Some time ago I had some curiosities similar to your second concern. My simple question was: can psychopathy (dt in general) be teachable? Specifically: can I teach it? I tried both online and in my real life. In real life I would try to teach a normal person how to have a predator framework (this is an essential way of thinking of a psychopath). I saw that they could appreciate the advantages by taking some psychopath-like decisions, but I could also see that this was not their inherent way of …
/r/askTRP10/07/15 09:19 PM
–

then maybe i would not be able to learn new ones, either because my mind would be filled with all the instructions of the other ones or because i would feel the need i would NOT need new ones. Yes, kind of consciously "training" one's own unconscious mind so that it can be of help when it is needed, and even when it is not thought of it can be needed. Did you invent the nomenclature? Interesting. If you have some reference that you somehow used to have your inspiration, it'd be glad if you could…
/r/askTRP
–

because it will be nothing new for you so you won't be able to help me with maybe another tactic of your own. Even if it could be true, I don't ever despise repetition. Apart from that, you cannot be sure about my state of knowledge; you are assuming I know it. actually if i think about it, if i become too aware of it, it might lose it's power. Absolutely. I found out the same. One should not meta-think about an act while one is "acting" it. But I also found out this: if one wants to improve in …
/r/askTRP
–

sadly i'm sure you already know this Kind of. But still curios to see another point of view. [Why using "sadly" btw?] Why do you say you don't have the theory? EDIT: that DarkEly sub. Don't know, it seems they like to just talk a little bit too much sometimes.
/r/askTRP
–

Sorry, but your response is not very clear. How are those four words related to one another and then how do they answer the question? consider vampires = dt Ye, that was the premise I was also making. But premises are the starting point, they don't answer questions.
/r/askTRP
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter