TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Regular-Loser-569 Archive

View 0 posts and 139 comments by Regular-Loser-569 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Eh...this is wrong? Not sure why this is tagged "debate".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 07:15 PM
7

if you go down on your girlfriend you're gonna taste all these guys anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 10:36 AM
8

I would not be surprised to learn that she is considered above average by some people.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:21 PM
3

then continue to do what you are already doing! your behavior mat not be the limiting factor anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 04:29 PM
2

because men pursue women a lot harder than the other way around. Either step up your efforts to match what other guy's do or become so attractive that women pursue you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 04:21 PM
62

In my experience either side doesn't change their opinions on abortion until they actually have an abortion.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 10:27 AM
0

I don't think that would be a big problem unless they ban the world cup, NBA etc.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 12:19 AM
5

I wouldn't call it a labour market because neither gender is the "employer" exclusively. It's a barter economy except we trade ourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 09:44 AM
8

you can do it once. more than once become complicated
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 09:34 PM
12

Boob size is pretty genetic unless you have surgery.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 07:59 PM
1

How many is "most"? How many sexual partners is "extremely high"? You can probably try to look up some surveys.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 07:45 PM

what's sol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 04:49 PM
27

I think women do make the first move or at least hint heavily when they meet someone they are interested in. The other thing is that a lot of then don't NEED to make the first move because men usually do that antway
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 01:10 PM
25

The closest man equivalent I can imagine is if a man secretly get vasectomy. Which may not anger feminists too much
/r/MensRights16/10/22 12:49 PM
1

That's why I use median, because with arithmetic mean you can estimate any kind of results by assuming very skewed distributions.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 04:10 AM
16

Many theories can be proposed. marriage benefits men more than women, so men are less likely to initiate divorce divorce benefits women more than men men are more tolerant to abuse men are more likely to abuse their wife women are more likely to be encouraged to divorce whether these are true or not requires more evidences and research.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 01:56 AM
0

Now most men are aware of it, seems like we need a new pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 01:02 AM
34

If red pill works, why are they still frustrated?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 12:50 AM
4

Neither man or woman needs to pay for their partner. Also, how many is "many"?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 11:47 PM
2

I think guys focus more on body because it is perceived to be easier to change (I disagree, hitting the gym regularly is hard work). Regarding the face, I can't change my jaw line without surgery. I also can't grow a beard - that's genetic. If someone is balding, they can't do much about their hair other than shaving it completely. Other than brushing my teeth regularly, other works on teeth requires visiting the dentist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 11:40 PM
3

I think your view is the same as my top comment? We just said it in the opposite way. Mine: Someone who exceed average across the board is not average, but better than average. Yours: an average guy wouldn't be average across the board, he would be strong/above average in some areas and weak/below average in other areas.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 11:27 PM
3

Check my other comment: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/y4nyt9/youre_not_good_enough_to_be_average/isfugcy/?context=3 The chance of being exactly the 50th percentile is actually very small (if we are talking about a continuous variable, then it is 0 by definition) So all the probability calculations consider P(being median and above), which is 50% for a single attribute.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 11:21 PM
3

OK, please tell me the right answer, ideally with some explanation, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 11:12 PM
4

having 100 iq alone is not above average. having 100 iq, average look and average income at the same time is above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 10:31 PM
8

OP said people who claim to be average guys are not actually average guys because they don't reach average in all categories. However, if someone reach average in all categories (and probably exceed in some), then this guy is better than more than half of all guys. *Median and average are used here interchangeably assuming all these attributes don't follow a very skewed distribution
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 05:53 PM
22

probability of having median looks and above is 50%. probability of having median income and above is also 50%. what's the probability of both of them happening? If they are mutually exclusive, then 0% if they are independent events, then 25% if they always happen together, then 50% Reality is probably somewhere between 25 to 50%. Now extend that to more attributes. The probability of being median and above in all categories is very likely to be less than 50% I.e. you are better than half of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 05:37 PM
61

if you are average in all departments then you are not an average man, you are better than average.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 01:42 PM
6

do you know any?
/r/MensRights15/10/22 01:17 AM
21

just make sure that both parties agree that these roasts are actually playful
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 02:36 AM
1

I understand that part. My question is that befriending top percent man is harder than expected. They are also rarer than normal women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 10:15 PM
1

But that's the similar to the prison stats. What proportion of men students are disciplined for free speech? Is it across the board, or only a tiny portion of men who probably hold the most extreme views? This key number is missing.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 08:21 PM
5

Here's another very biased figure: 95% of prisoners are men. Now, do we have a very flawed law system, or men are more criminal in nature? On the other hand, only 0.7% of men are in prison. Can we conclude anything about men's criminal nature based on a small portion of men prisoners?
/r/MensRights13/10/22 08:11 PM
4

Wow that's eye opening
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 08:03 PM
6

The key is what they said to get disciplined, and whether these are deserved.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 07:49 PM
7

I was on another post that suggests men to copy chimpanzees' strategy to get laid because human and chipmanzees are 99% similar in terms of DNA. Guess whose DNA is the most similar to men? Women...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 07:45 PM
6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimpanzee%E2%80%93human_last_common_ancestor No, human and Chimps have common ancestors. The split occurs between 13 millions and 4 millions years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 07:27 PM
2

Well we are talking about two different things, and both contribute to success. How easy it is to execute strategy A (befriending alpha male) and strategy B (befriending normal woman) How effective is strategy A and strategy B My assumption is that there are more normal women than alpha males, so executing strategy B is easier. This would be voided if a guy is much better at making friends with a man than with a woman. But if a guy is very bad at befriending a woman, would we expect him to be su…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 05:41 PM
52

let's forget for a moment that despite human and chimpanzee shares 99% of DNA but human society and chimpanzee society are not 99% similar. What makes you think befriending high ranking alpha males are easier then befriending normal women?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 02:42 PM
2

what's the big difference between porn and onlyfans then?
/r/MensRights13/10/22 10:39 AM
2

thank you that's a very clear explanation
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 09:09 AM
3

Could you explain a bit more on why they are different and why the former is acceptable but not the latter?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 09:00 AM
5

what's your view on prostitution and porn?
/r/MensRights13/10/22 08:52 AM
8

if your target customer is the gay community, maybe?
/r/MensRights13/10/22 08:50 AM
4

I never quite get the "your brain doesn't mature until 25 so if you are old don't date anyone younger than that" coz aging doesn't always lead to maturing. A 21 year old can totally be more mature than a 30 year old. As for low body count, some people use it as a proxy to how a person view romantic relationships. It would be rather unlikely for someone who is serious about getting married to have a extremely high body count - or they are very bad at it, which is also a red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 01:56 PM
1

I mean online dating is just a start, you'll eventually meet irl right (at least that's the plan)?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:20 AM
1

Probably. Is that a bad thing though
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 07:58 PM
1

my experience tells me that 99% is incorrect, it should be 78.36% /s
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 02:14 AM
18

This sperm bank is going to be bankrupt😂
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 01:21 PM
5

I'm talking about unattractive women and photos of gross private parts. the keyword is unwanted
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 01:46 AM
8

you don't get bombarded by unwanted DMs and dick pics.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 01:39 AM
8

If a woman reply saying no that didn't happen with me, OP will respond by: Are you even attractive? (it may turn into a circular argument like "you aren't attractive if you don't have lots of people wanting to have sex with you" bla bla bla) Your personal experience/observation is an outlier. Only way to change OP's mind is for OP to conduct a survey themselves (otherwise we'll have endless debate about surveyor's bias, sample size, geographical bias and how to define attractiveness) But OP choo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 12:30 AM
9

Attractiveness is indeed in the eyes of the beholder. One person can have a strong preference about height, another could have care less if their partner is 5'6 or 6'. If I have to describe the "dating market" like economics (I'm expert in neither), then: Let's say we can parameterize a person i.e. A person is just an essemble of traits like height, income, personality etc. We would probably end of with thousands if not millions of parameters. So a person, a product, is a huge bundle that you ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 06:24 PM
31

If a woman tell me about the dating market during a date it would have been a red flag too. I don't think a lot of women deny that being tall and rich is more attractive in general. But they know that this is not a nice topic to discuss, at least to a date. Why would a man bring it up during a date anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 05:56 PM
1

your social-economic argument doesn't really stand. You can always find someone richer unless you are the richest person.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 12:30 AM
1

If women become adult at 25 and men become adult at 18/21, then a 22 year old man dating a 24 year old women would be...predatory? Also, considering women as adults only after 25 would take more power away from women. How many women would be unable to go to college if they can't take a student loan? Or are they forced to go to college at 25?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 09:21 PM
4

By that logic, anyone asking anyone else anything and expecting a response is entitled. That doesn't seem to be the case.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 07:18 PM
1

So are you fine with men being sex workers but not women, or you are against all kinds of sex work? Do you still disagree with sex work if such sex worker is completely voluntary? Do you still disagree with sex work if such sex worker is infertile?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/22 07:16 PM
3

Fight feminism with feminism. Find studies and materials of the genre of feminism that believes the patriarchy hurts both men and women. Use researches and sources that they can't defame e.g. studies from liberal universities over studies done by conservative think tank. So many things are lumped under the feminist umbrella so there must be something to use against a particular feminist.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 01:42 AM
8

Masturbate!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/22 01:21 AM
8

Not an expert, but she is seeing the therapist because she miscarried, so it makes sense that she is the only one to meet this therapist. If you want a session where both of you talk to a therapist you would need another therapist that does marriage/relationship counselling?
/r/MensRights04/10/22 11:32 PM
239

Pay wall. Also this is from 2005, would be nice to have more recent figures.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:22 PM
7

meet more people in real life (dating app doesn't work well for most men). It is almost impossible to make someone who didn't fall in love with you to suddenly change their mind, so you have better luck to meet more people and hopefully runs into someone that like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 06:53 PM
10

You can have whatever preference you want. I just find that sharing accommodations suck and would rather live with my parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 01:04 AM
4

Or they want multiple things that cannot be fulfilled by one person at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 09:40 PM
1

If I want to be with someone similar to myself, I will rather be on my own. I want to meet other people because I want different things/perspectives. Meeting someone very similar to me seems redundant.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 04:06 PM
6

I wouldn't want to date someone like me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 04:03 PM
1

It matters when you try to maintain a long term relationship. Less so when you are just asking women out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 12:53 AM
16

If they bring this up they will have to realize that the biggest enemy of men is other men (surprise!), then the whole manosphere falls apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 12:45 AM
64

It wouldn't work because they will still be jealous of guys who can get casual sex for 'free'.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 02:16 AM
-1

Nothing wrong with wanting a high pay job. That's why most people work anyway.
/r/AntiFeminists26/09/22 11:21 PM
19

Well now you can read the sub and learn about their strategy! That's better than not knowing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 08:17 PM
31

适度健身吸引异性,过度健身吸引同性 It's a popular saying on Chinese internet: working out appropriately will attract the opposite sex, working out excessively will attract the same sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 07:58 PM
15

First we need a way to accurately rate looks, which is highly subjective. Then we need to know how "look score" distributes; it may not be a normal distribution. After that we may decide if a couple is look matched. Then you need to repeat for lots of couple to see if couples are look matched in general This process would be easier if we consider personal income as economical status (big assumption), but I doubt anyone who reply would have sufficient data on that. At most you get anecdotal evide…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 12:36 AM
5

I did not say hentai is the cause. But it is a media that can spread these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 10:13 PM
9

rape fantasy, pedophilia etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 10:10 PM
15

It can be spreading harmful ideas even if no people is exploited during the process, like hentai (Japanese erotic manga).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 08:37 PM
2

Because people want more than just sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 07:04 PM
0

Well this is BLM v.s. ALM all again.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:50 PM
3

Gender politics makes ordinary women believe they are allies with Kamala Harris. But the reality is ordinary women are more similar to ordinary men. Same story with race.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:05 PM
10

There are girls dating guys at the same age, there are girls dating guys older than them. Some of these relationships are genuine, some of them are transactional. Stop generalising.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 08:23 PM
2

where is your wife from?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 08:06 PM
18

they have literally zero cultural, religious, or economic incentive to keep their families together and leave whenever they feel they'll get a better deal elsewhere Conservative Christian women sound like a good choice for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 06:37 PM
20

Good luck finding women that believe their values are lowered.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 12:59 AM
12

For me it depends on whether people are up front and honest about it. If both parties agree that they are only going to have sex and not getting serious, then no one is being a jerk.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 04:35 PM
84

Maybe I've missed it but you didn't mention divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 10:38 AM
342

You need allies at the debate, don't get outnumbered (too much)
/r/MensRights14/09/22 06:11 PM
0

Disagree with the arguments agree with the conclusion
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 01:59 PM
9

Society believes men want sex more than women. Men would have to get hard for sex to happen. That is often seen as "consent".
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:55 PM
12

SA on underage girl is perceived as more frequent, whether that is true or not is unknown, partly because SA are generally under-reported. Your interpretation on the 2nd point is correct.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:34 PM
24

frequency of the two events, although there are severe underreporting so we don't know the real numbers. It is difficult to compare psychological trauma, but it is easier to see that one may get pregnant but the other does not.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:08 PM
14

there are many of these people but OP wouldn't want to date any of them
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 01:52 AM
8

Because they are not just looking for a virgin. They are looking for someone they want to date, and still a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 03:13 PM
404

do they believe the reverse? If not that's sexist. If they do they are delusional.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 01:17 PM
1

One possible explanation is because the shift in economics. When human starts farming, it favors men because on average they are physically stronger, which leads to more men dominated societies. Nowadays a lot of jobs physical strength doesn't matter anymore, so the balance changed. there are probably other factors and theories.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 08:08 PM
1

What do you mean by the same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 08:00 PM
1

No I did not imply that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 07:58 PM
3

where have I said that
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 07:56 PM
2

The number of women you know in real life is unlikely to be a statistically significant sample of all women (approximately 3 billions scattered across the globe; if you are in the states then around 1-2 hundred million). So you may not draw any valid conclusion for all women from your personal observation. Avoiding responsibility is a human flaw, not something monopolized by women. The difference in average physical strength is a better explanation why women didn't have as much right in the past…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 07:50 PM
12

always wear a condom if you don't want kids. or get vasectomy. birth pill can fail even if your partner takes it religiously
/r/MensRights05/09/22 06:13 PM
6

No, I don't want to go back in time or sacrifice for women despite how much respect I will get. And by the way, men aren't really the last out of sinking ships https://www.australiangeographic.com.au/news/2012/07/shipwrecks-every-man-for-himself-says-study/
/r/MensRights04/09/22 01:36 AM
4

what are you talking about? Who said they aren't fully human
/r/MensRights02/09/22 12:50 AM
4

Feminists themselves are split on this. There are sex work exclusionary radical feminists (SWERF) who are against any kind of sex work. Other feminists think it is no different from other work which is also selling your body/labour for money.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:41 PM
-7

what action are you against
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:37 PM
34

People have all sorts of preferences. Just meet somewhere else?
/r/MensRights27/08/22 10:53 PM
10

NAL, but why would they test the mother unless there is doubt that the child isn't genetically related to the mother, for example a mix up in the hospital?
/r/MensRights26/08/22 09:34 PM
11

It is possible. Older men lived in a time where women have far less right than men, so they would view feminism over a few decades and think "overall it's done more good than harm". Whereas younger men grow up in a world where women and men are much closer in terms of rights and social status, so they are more likely to think "why still bother with feminism? we are already equal!"
/r/MensRights24/08/22 02:05 AM
6

what did he say
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:06 AM
11

you'd probably get more responses at r/askfeminists if you haven't been banned there yet.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 01:29 AM
16

You can self defense regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 11:36 AM
4

We cannot be 100% sure. It is a compromise between: Preventing true victims to get abortions Allowing false victims to get abortions
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 11:32 PM
-4

Condoms is 98% effective when used correctly.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 09:12 PM
3

rape exception?
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 08:32 PM
1

Bottom line: no abortion if fetus is >50% viable, barring major birth defect (Down syndrome etc.), result of rape etc. Top line: Roe v.s. Wade fashion e.g. limitless abortion at first trimester
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 07:44 PM
5

which sub gets you banned and which sub bans you?
/r/MensRights13/08/22 12:10 AM
15

Do they?
/r/MensRights12/08/22 03:53 PM
15

I wonder how long this post will exist.
/r/AntiFeminists10/08/22 09:25 PM
85

Japanese men's sex toy seems to be pretty good.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 11:40 PM
5

Ok point taken. There are many countries on the world that still suppress woman. I think the report I read is about the US only and I don't expect that to apply globally.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/22 12:29 PM
80

The education access argument may be true a century ago but not now. I have no sources but I recalled seeing reports showing more woman attends universities than man now.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/22 10:48 AM
1

Well I definitely have heard it from both sides. There are people saying men are biologically wired to mate with as many women as possible. There are also guys that use cheesy "lock and key" model. I believe human are capable of controlling their biological urges, even if these theory are true (which I doubt). And if you want to sleep around, find like minded people to have an open relationship.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 02:31 AM
30

You mean woboy.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:00 PM
12

You can't legislate to stop people being greedy and arrogant, so option A is doesn't really exist. Marriage should not be abolished IMO because of some legal rights e.g. the spouse signing off emergency medical procedures. My opinion is E. Marriage should still exist, but needs reform. Treating both spouses equally during divorce and custody decision for a start. Prenup should voluntary unless they come up with a good standard prenup that suits most people well, which I can't think of yet.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 11:12 PM
47

Yes, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 05:34 PM
2

Generally speaking they advocate for women right. A more modern definition would be that feminists advocate for equality between genders. But that sounds like egalitarian to me.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 12:02 AM
8

From a financial perspective, I do not agree with mandatory DNA test. On the other hand, I support that either parent is allowed to conduct a DNA test without the other's approval.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 05:07 PM
17

I believe the body positivity movement is an agenda pushed by the fashion industry to increase sales of overpriced clothing to a wider audiences. Since most men are not their target customers anyway they don't give a shit.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 12:22 AM
1

I mean women can have more severe side effects than man if they receive certain cancer treatment. Check this link for example: https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/cancer-currents-blog/2022/cancer-treatment-women-severe-side-effects On the other hand, I have no medical training, it is possible that man are still worse off in terms of health if we also consider whether man or woman is more likely to get cancer.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 08:36 PM
4

You mean the media.
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 12:19 PM
0

risk with some cancer treatments.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 04:47 AM
1

Lower medical risk in lots of scenarios.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 12:43 AM
7

NAL, but IMO the self defense cannot exceed the potential harm. It doesn't have to be the minimum needed to stop the crime, because that put the self defender in a dilemma that they should not be in. Just because their life is not at risk, does not mean that they cannot be irreparably harmed (e.g. being raped). So if the attacker intends to rape, biting their d*ck off seems non-excessive.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:32 PM
1

technically they did, that's why they avoid OP's fiance.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/22 07:03 PM
1

I can imagine that is a deal-breaker for quite a few "soft" pro-choice people.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/22 06:10 PM
2

How pro-life are you and your fiance?
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/22 05:50 PM
2

"Take that, Patriarchy!" /s
/r/MensRights07/05/22 04:01 PM
3

If medival woman can survive you can survive this too. Just focus and work on yourself.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 07:14 PM
3

It is possible that the pregnancy causes significant health implication on the mother which in some occasion is unforeseeable.
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/21 12:44 AM
2

I don't really see how this is anti-feminist...
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 08:17 PM
0

If a user is interested in gender issues, it is not unusual that they join subs that focus on gender issues. For example I follow FDS just to see how they think about certain things. Doesn't necessarily mean I agree with them.
/r/AntiFeminists04/09/21 03:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter