TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Remmy700P Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by Remmy700P on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Wait. So you ad hominem him, tell him to "get lost", he responds by snapping back at you, and you have the gall to cry about his "name-calling"? WTF?
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:56 AM
6

It isn't her prior ignorance. It's 1. her abject failure to listen openly to new information -- from her supposed "best friend" no less! -- and be accepting to incorporating that information even if it means having to do the uncomfortable work of self-reflecting on her current position as potentially flawed, and 2. throwing your entire relationship under the bus like a sack of garbage rather than take an honest look at her own ideology and worldview.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:04 AM
-1

That's EXACTLY what he's doing. This isn't the only thread he's doing this in either.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 04:58 AM
10

Hate to say it, but she was never truly your "best friend" if this is how she has chosen to act as a result of your conversation. Best friends are there for you when things are at their worst. She failed miserably.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 01:21 AM
2

Not common. Very specific. And apropos.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 12:59 AM
2

I'm pointing out his pathological, combative and antisocial personal attacks on this sub. Not sure what your irritating, Socratic and off-topic mental musings are meant to accomplish.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 12:02 AM
1

Then why is the focus on men? If it is a function of BOTH sexes and their interactions, expectations, etc that result of harm to BOTH sexes, then the nomenclature should describe the problems as something more accurately akin to "toxic gender role expectations".
/r/MensRights16/12/20 11:36 PM
2

I don't think the 'labelling' aspect has any part that is a solution-oriented protocol. I think it is the preferred method of carving out a certain group into a specific 'identity' and then attacking that identity as a whole. Marxists have been using that playbook for decades.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 11:31 PM
3

The OP acts like a sociopath. Read his other posts. He immediately resorts to name-calling and ad hominem attacks if he doesn't get pure validation of his viewpoint. He's seriously not right in the head.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 11:17 PM
-4

You've been the only one insulting anyone on this thread. Grow up. You sound like a petulant child.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 10:28 PM
2

ZERO idea why this post was downvoted. It is a great message. The OP sounds like a egocentric crybaby who wallows in self-created victimhood. He either surrounds himself with like-minded, weak-willed people with the very same mentality or he has mental health issues that can probably be addressed with some therapy. His self loathing statement is a HUGE red flag. And his lashing out and ad hominem attacking at anyone who dares to fail to coddle him is another gigantic red flag.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 10:27 PM
1

Q: "How do you write women so well?" A: " I start with a man. Then I take away reason and accountability."
/r/MensRights14/12/20 11:43 PM
4

And that WRA bitch attempts to conflate the proper reporting and prosecuting of false accusers with some sort of amorphous barrier to women reporting actual rapes. It's that kind of thinking that needs to be excoriated in the media.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 09:37 AM
4

BLM's core founders' political ideology is Marxism. They state it openly. And BLM's ideological scope is much much broader than the status of Blacks in America. Have you read their manifesto page? The "old" Marxism used socio-economic status (i.e. class) as the 'great divider'. That was tried in the U.S back in the 60s and 70s. It didn't work because we have such a large and dynamic middle class. They got no traction with that message. So, they pivoted to what they COULD divide us with, and that…
/r/MensRights13/12/20 11:24 AM
2

That's a garbage answer. Either you ascribe to Marxist ideology wrapped in a Critical Race Theory delivery mechanism or you don't. Which is it?
/r/MensRights13/12/20 07:34 AM
4

Ask them how they would feel if their 14yo son was raped by a man. Then you get to call them out not only for their ignorance and moral turpitude, but also for their blatant sexism and willingness to accept double standards in the application of the rule of law.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 10:43 AM
3

The reports didn't indicate who made the decision or why. It implied that it was an internal OnlyFans review of the "appropriateness" of the account.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 10:40 AM
1

When someone starts calling you names you know you've just won the argument. Take your bows and move on. It ain't gonna get better from there.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 05:58 AM
2

Do you think Girl A is going to continue this rant, and/or extend it into filing a formal complaint against you with your school? If she does, it's going to get REAL ugly for you. You might consider preempting her on this. Your school, I'm sure, has a very specific protocol for handling these incidents. In particular, have Girl B go with you when you do the report so her testimony is on the record as well. You are the victim here. But you have to tread carefully. Be VERY careful that Girl B does…
/r/MensRights11/12/20 05:54 AM
2

And these behaviors manifest insidiously in abusive-female-against-male relationships. The fact that they don't result in physical injury doesn't make them less abusive.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 05:25 AM
24

It looks like the account was "suspended". https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13436320/mum-only-fans-cleared-sex-boy-account-suspended/
/r/MensRights11/12/20 03:22 AM
1

You said "spend more". More than whom exactly?
/r/MensRights10/12/20 09:27 PM
1

There's a cultural support structure underpinning it for sure, but I think it is simply, at its core, a male/female thing.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 07:10 AM
1

It isn't going to slam-dunk a pretrial dismissal but it sure as hell is going to help in front of a jury.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 07:03 AM
3

Today, the acusation is all that is required. Proof be damned. Once the accusation is made, the damage is done. He dodged a serious bullet. Huge kudos for keeping the right head making the decisions.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 06:53 AM
3

You have the discernment of a forest fire and the apparent intellectual depth of a parking lot puddle. Well done. Try rereading it again... with a little self-reflection and nuance this time.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 06:16 AM
2

Your version of 'Married At First Sight' was very interesting. Quite a contrast to the US version. My wife and I talked at length about the differences in male-female relationship dynamics between the US and AUS (at least what was portrayed in the show's segments). We wondered how accurately it reflected the interpersonal dating/relationship realities of your culture.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 05:55 AM
1

Well stated.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 05:42 AM
1

Source for that assertion?
/r/MensRights10/12/20 05:39 AM
1

Unfortunately, it has been made readily apparent that it isn't specific to subs covering the Manosphere. It is a pervasive character flaw within the entire Redditverse itself, mostly excepting those that are very narrowly focused with a "tech support" kinda vibe. The rest? Pure garbage rhetoric, ad hominems, piling on, and certainly only accepting of a particular end of the political spectrum.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 05:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter