TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ren_Yi Archive

View 13 posts and 115 comments by Ren_Yi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
490

DiscriminationRen_Yi/r/MensRights19/12/21 09:23 AM
382

False AccusationRen_Yi/r/MensRights12/01/21 11:01 PM
209

DiscriminationRen_Yi/r/MensRights29/03/21 02:12 PM
67

False AccusationRen_Yi/r/MensRights21/08/22 07:20 AM
41

DiscriminationRen_Yi/r/MensRights13/05/21 03:25 PM
21

DiscriminationRen_Yi/r/MensRights25/03/22 06:19 AM
9

Ren_Yi/r/MGTOW201/02/21 07:41 AM
1

DiscriminationRen_Yi/r/MensRights19/12/21 09:21 AM
1

DiscriminationRen_Yi/r/MensRights19/12/21 09:19 AM
1

DiscriminationRen_Yi/r/MensRights28/01/21 08:34 AM
1

FeminismRen_Yi/r/MensRights28/12/20 11:51 AM
1

DiscriminationRen_Yi/r/MensRights14/01/21 02:48 PM
1

Ren_Yi/r/MGTOW212/02/21 06:01 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

What she did, and then what the judge did were both insane!
/r/MensRights25/06/26 07:19 PM
1

In the UK, the father either needs to be there to sign it himself with the mother, or whichever parent is not present they need to sign a "statutory declaration of parentage form" which the other parent can take to register the child. For actual Gov.UK details see the below link. Which inculdes the actual form a father would need to sign if he is not present at the registration. So, a mother can't just add a random man... unless she deliberately fraudulently fakes that form. But, that would open…
/r/MensRights27/04/26 12:08 PM
2

Yes, in some US state, they demand a "father's" name from the mother so she can get child support from the state, and the state then goes after the man for reimbursement! Look up term "dad by default"! Such as husbands who are deemed the father because they were married to the mother at the time... even though her cheating ends the married! Other men never get served a court summons so can't challenge the women's lies... so the judge just rubber stamps him as the father. Then, because he knows n…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 12:23 PM
1

The way it works in the UK. Anyone who has, what is called "parental responsibility" under UK law, can authorise the child's DNA test. So, basically if the guy is down as dad on the birth certificate... then he can do a DNA test of the child. Then, he can go to the courts to remove that "parental responsibility" and correct the birth certificate if the DNA proves he is not the father. But, if a women just tells a guy he is the father, there is nothing that gives him the right to the child's DNA.…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 10:32 AM
22

In the UK, DNA is all that counts. If you are not the biological father then you can't be held responsible for the child in any way. We can even buy simple DNA paternity tests from local pharmacies like Boots. Also, some men have even successfully sued women who they lived with, who lied about a child's paternity. Because, claiming a child is a guy's offspring and taking money from him when she knows he is not the father - is fruad. Edit: One thing I forgot is that you pretty much need a mother'…
/r/MensRights12/04/26 08:45 PM
1

100% agree with you over this. When the 13 year old contacts her mother on the new number then her mother will respond to her. If she doesn't then she's being petty and willing to destroy her own relationship with her daughter! Make sure you document everything, screenshot of text messages you sent to her mother, and the responses etc. so her mother can't claim she was deliberately cut off without contact! As you say contact is what the court order requires and a new number on a better phone isn…
/r/MensRights08/01/26 08:39 PM
32

So true! In the UK they have prosecuted a couple of.woman for making up false rape allegations using "perjury" and "perverting the course of justice" law. But, it has to be an extreme case such as Jemma Beale... She was jailed for 10 years in August 2017 after claiming she was sexually assaulted by six men and raped by nine others over the space of three years! One of the men falsely convicted based on her testimony even spent a couple of years in prison! The fact it has to be that extreme is in…
/r/MensRights20/12/25 03:47 PM
14

That's insane... imagine in the highly unlikely event they get into government, they would make this law. Literally, it would be a crime for a man to correct a women when she is wrong!
/r/MensRights14/12/25 12:23 AM
8

No that's does not seam fair at all. Child support should be pro rata based on custody. So a parent who has the child 50% of the time and therefore pays for 50% of the child's life... should pay zero to the other parent!
/r/MensRights01/07/25 02:59 PM
57

The sexist bias of society... if a man cheats its his fault, if a women cheats its her husbands fault...
/r/MensRights18/02/24 07:24 PM

You are right... I wonder how long before the mods remove this discussion!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 09:00 PM
5

Looks like the case was registered by so-called "victim’s mother." So her family are probably also looking to abuse the law to punish the boy after the two eloped! Insane!
/r/MensRights04/02/24 09:00 AM
2

From the article: A case was registered in the matter on the complaint of the victim’s mother. So they eloped together and now the women's family are using the law to punish him with a false accusation! Insane the way the law is written!
/r/MensRights04/02/24 08:55 AM
3

It makes no sense! Even if the government didn't want to put the women on the front line fighting, they could still have utilised the women in auxiliary roles like the UK did in WW2! Freeing up more men for the front!
/r/MensRights09/01/24 10:51 PM
13

From the article: Later in her career she argued that women were more likely to commit domestic violence than men, which prompted a backlash from the feminist community. Does she? "...more likely..."? I never seen her say that. I can only remember her either saying women can be perpetrators, or that in many case domestic violence is often actually reciprocal between both male and female abusers. I've never seen her saying women are "more likely" to be the abuser. Is this the article's writer tal…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:27 PM
42

It's not even like they would have to put the women on the front line if they don't want to. Plenty of women could be drafted to serve in auxiliary units like they did in England during WW2. Which would free up able bodied men for the front! I find it odd they don't even take this option, instead they call up the men and let the women leave the country all together!
/r/MensRights20/12/23 10:37 PM
3

Most things called "right wing" online is labelled as such by left wingers. It the classic 2D world of good v evil! They say 'I don’t agree with you, therefore you are evil (namely racist/misogynist/sexist etc.)... I am left therefore you must be right wing". It's pathetic and laughable.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 04:16 PM
22

From the article: Williams' trial heard that police believed she inflicted the injuries on herself with a hammer. Just look at her black eye, just imagine the pain of inflicting that type of damage on yourself with a hammer! Crazy!
/r/MensRights13/03/23 09:10 PM
28

From the article: any move away from a macho culture needs to be very subtle' to not dissuade men from joining a firm. 'Otherwise men might surmise quite sensibly that the environment won't be good for their careers,' she said. On one hand they are admitting to needing men but at the same time admitting they'll deliberately discriminate against those men. Because otherwise it wouldn't be "quite sensible" for it to be detrimental to the men's careers.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 08:59 PM
49

Yeah the "surmise quite sensibly"... in other words we need to pull the wool over idiot men's eyes because it's sensible for them to not want to work for our organisation.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 08:43 PM
14

Sadly that's true. Funny how the judge said "there's no distinction between male and female rape"... ignoring the fact one is actually called "rape" and the other offence is just "sexual activity". There is a big distinction btween those and how the public perceived them.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 09:40 AM
2

You should secretly record each lesson and when she says stuff like that post it online with details of the school. It's the only way to stop such vile abuses.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 10:13 PM
18

From the article: According to police, Melton was returning to where he was sleeping when the woman left her vehicle and fired two shots at him So the argument had ended and he was walking away. How is that not attempted murder?
/r/MensRights10/11/22 12:54 PM
2

You can tell its a biased and worthless peace of work when they use words like heteronormative as if its a real thing, yet put speech marks around gynocentric as if to dismiss it as an other word...
/r/MensRights12/10/22 12:42 PM
2

So two woman who are sexuality attracted to females wants only a female child! Imagine is it was a male who was sexual attracted to females and only wanted a female child. Without caring to know anything more, people would be calling him a paedophile!
/r/MensRights09/10/22 01:40 PM
3

I agree, however... why should a man have to do that just to be treated equally, just to be treated as a human being?
/r/MensRights26/09/22 06:03 PM
2

Get a group of mates and all book in. Make sure you use the woman's changing rooms... they won't dare say anything. If they do you just accuse them of transphobia!
/r/MensRights23/09/22 06:52 PM
3

From the article: but the central themes are consistent: It is men, not women, who are oppressed. Why do they always pretend it's a zero sum game... the idea that its an all or nothing. All woman or all men!
/r/MensRights20/09/22 07:45 PM
1

Oh yeah so it does. Sorry hadn't noticed that line. You are right it does say 'life' under section 4 if it involves penetration. And you are correct there are differences in the sentencing guidelines for sexual offences as life doesn't mean the same thing. With Rape a man would be punished with life, meaning between 4 to 19 years in prison. However, a woman charged under section 4 'sexual activity' involving penetration, life means between just a 'community order' and 19 years.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:49 PM
1

Section 4 does not have the same punishment as rape. It only has an absolute maximum of 10 years. See section 4 subsection 5 b. Whereas rape is a maximum of life. See section 1 subsection 4. This is why woman only ever get a fraction of the punishment a man would, even when the victim is a child under 12. The law does not recognise a woman forcing a man as equal to a man forcing a woman. Not just the sentencing but also the name of each offence. If you are a man you are a rapist charged with "ra…
/r/MensRights16/09/22 11:32 AM
5

Will I be judged differently by women? No, if they know there is a child and the mother is refusing a DNA test they won't judge you differently. Every woman I know acknowledge that when women refuses a test then she is probably lying about you being the dad due to the fact there is no other reason for her to refuse. As you have said you are in the UK then she can't really stop you demanding a DNA test. The courts and Child Maintenance Service will all want a test before she can force you to pay …
/r/MensRights15/09/22 06:32 PM
2

You're 100% right... if the government does anything for men then feminists organisations will complain. Even the UK government minister admits it. https://twitter.com/DeboraMontesoro/status/1534856561104912385
/r/MensRights08/09/22 02:32 PM
52

So, the old "eyes meeting across a crowded room" romance story will end with the bouncers jumping on the guy to drag him away and kick him out of the club.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 02:04 PM
4

Classic example of a left wing political organisation seeing the world in 2 dimensions, just good and evil. They call anyone they disagree with "extremist" and "far right" because though their broken lens everyone else must be evil if they themselves are the good guys.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 01:31 PM
15

The UK law for "rape" says that the perpetrator must "use his penis",see section 1 or the Sexual Offences Act 2003 even when when it's a child victim under 12.see section 5 The other law I assume you refer to, is just "assault by penetration"... section 2 as it is also about penetration of the victim it therefore excludes woman forcing a man to have sex... A woman forcing sex on a man would just be the lessor crime of 'sexual assault', Section 3 as its not really covered by the law. When the vic…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 06:12 AM
26

True, and the fact it says, "...who HE says lied about her age." Ignoring the fact she admitted in court that she lied, it wasn't just him claiming it. She admitted it herself.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 03:55 PM
33

From the image: "who HE says lied about her age." Hang on... the girl even admitted in the orginal trial that she had lied about her aged. Even this article saying that he being removed from the register is written in such a way as to make him seam like he could be guilty.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 03:50 PM
20

they'd find out about the abuse between me and my mom That's insane... why not just make the complaint against the mother to start with? As soon as she made that type of allegation against her own father the police wouldn't care about any abuse by the mother, all they would be focused on is nailing the dad.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 08:50 PM
120

I'd never heard of it so I've just checked it out. OMG some of those stories are ridiculous. There is one where a couple of boys just made "inappropriate jokes" behind a girl whist she was in her PE kit. So she told her mum and her mum complained to the teacher, "the Head of Year". The girl ends it by saying that because the teacher left the school she "still have to see them everyday". In other words she wanted the teacher to suspend the boys from school over a joke! That mindset is mind blowin…
/r/MensRights29/07/22 08:50 AM
134

From the article: In late 2021, one of the girls decided to call the police and accuse my son of sexual assault. I have no idea why, but my son was told by an acquaintance that it was because she was ‘feeling bored’. Wow just wow! The problem is there is no punishment for the girl making a false allegation like that. The police never arrested the girl for 'wasting police time' or 'perverting the course of justice' so they are free do it again. Worse for the boy (who is the real victim here), the…
/r/MensRights29/07/22 07:47 AM
10

Not robotics but that reminds me of the 1985 film Weird Science. Haven't seen that since I was a kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 04:51 PM
18

Congrats on getting them to correct it and admit the omission. Hopefully they'll issue their next version soon.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 05:15 PM
20

Extremely unlikely a man-hating feminist is a conservative. Feminism comes out of the Marxist view of society. Destroy the family, demonise the "oppressor" narrative.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 05:03 PM
32

She wasn't arrested and changed because she was a woman. Not because she was white. All the white men were arrested and found not guilty. The reason the state is able to go after her now is because she was never charged originally.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 08:03 PM
7

It's the UK, we have a very liberal justice system with short sentences that cares more about the rights of the offender than the impact on the victim.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:38 AM
68

That's insane! So his life is lost for the price of a £1 sausage roll leading to a horrendous error by police. Yet feminists claim there is no adverse repercussions for man who suffer false allegations, so woman shouldn't be punished for making them. This proves conclusively that they are wrong, that false allegations need to be taken seriously and prosecuted. The part that reads, his "then girlfriend began telling people of the incorrect information," with a girlfriend like that who needs enemi…
/r/MensRights21/06/22 08:47 PM
3

You mum is right. That's the law in the UK at the moment and it needs changing. At most the rapist would get charged with the lessor crime of "sexual activity" or at best "sexual assault". Back in 2003 when the law was last reviewed, the Labour government of Tony Blair chose to support the feminists who lobbied ministers to prevent the change to remove the "his penis" restriction as they didn't want woman to be able to be charged with rape. Incidentally it's the same when the male victim is a ch…
/r/MensRights20/06/22 07:18 PM
1

As a witch she is therefore a helpless victim controlled by the devil...
/r/MensRights13/06/22 09:16 AM
1

If anyone wants a link. Here is an article about her allegation when she was convicted. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-41037826 Note at least 1 man was convicted and sentenced to 7 years for a rape he was innocent of doing.
/r/PussyPass10/06/22 10:02 PM
289

a feminist utopia where women are completely free.There’s no sexism... So to end sexism these feminists fantasists kill off all the males. That's like ending racism by killing off all the black people. It sounds good, "ending sexism"/"ending racism" etc. but its fundamentally based in bigotry.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 06:00 PM
3

I think it's the same mentality as women who have orbiters. I dated a girl at university who had two guys that orbited her, they both wanted her yet she would never sleep with them. Whenever the guys gave attention to a different girl, my ex would flirt to get their attention back. She'd never date them but I think she liked to know she still had the option. When one those guys got a girlfriend my ex got upset and tried to break them up. I asked her once why she cared so much if she would never …
/r/MensRights12/05/22 04:20 PM
3

That's the way article seems to hint at, but there has got to be a lot more left out.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 09:37 AM
3

Probably because most woman don't approach guys for dates, especially hot girls. Therefore if an average guy gets a hot girl approach them and suddenly they are being very over the top it's a massive red flag. Look at online dating for example, create two accounts, one average female and one average male. The only girls who approach the average guy will be scammers... the guy has to make all the first moves as the girls sit back like Queens with the power of the veto.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:50 AM
4

Why would an article encouraging violence against women be proof we DONT live in a violent patriarchy. Firstly a woman told him to do it and secondly he needed permission from his wife before he could do it. That's not a patriarchy, the power dynamic there is a matriarchy.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 04:08 PM
42

Schools are not a safe place for boys anymore!
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:54 PM
3

In my opinion there is only one way haters who target subs like this can find that one random comment they use to justify their hatred. I assume they post it themselves, only then can they grab a screenshot before the mods remove it.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 02:36 PM
1

Activists never stop... they achieve a goal and look for the next thing to attack. They'll keep doing this until they have to make up fake injustices (like the wage gap) to campaign against! They always act like their current focused perceived injustice is the worst of them all. This is why some feminists say western woman are more oppressed today then any time in history. They won't believe that they have succeeded and just keep pushing the pendulum to oppress the other side. This is where femi…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:27 AM
1

It's an Oscar Wilde quote and its BS! It shows us more about his issues and his relationships than about men in general and our relationships.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 04:47 PM
1

It's all about attractiveness. If she/her friends finds a guy unattractive then no amount of confidence will change her mind. In fact if she find him unattractive and he is being confident then she'll usually see him as creepy or arrogant.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 08:07 AM
3

The headline should read... "What is the point of a sex robot that says no?"
/r/MensRights25/03/22 06:25 AM
2

I married as I've always wanted to be a Dad. In the end it cost me a fortune and the kid wasn't even mine. I wish I had done what this guy did. It would have been a lot cheaper and I'd at least have my own child.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 07:16 PM
7

When you ignore men and only look for female victims then every issue is a feminist issue as only woman suffer.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:50 AM
9

You can try and they'll revert you. Look at the list of 'evidence' they have listed under the [1]. 10+ sources they say prove the one sentence. If anyone can change wikipedia, then anyone can change it back. It's a full time job maintaining the political position they maintain on those pages. I wasted my time trying to fix issues before and you just get into arguments on the talk pages with people who refused to listen. They know they'll be there long after others give up. It's the same issues A…
/r/MensRights20/02/22 08:42 PM
15

If someone change it, it'll be changed back very quickly. Wikipedia's pages are controlled by groups of 'vested interests'. A page like that is controlled by feminists and they clearly use feminist sources which dismiss sexism against men.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 06:33 PM
1

Yes they can rape a guy, but no, a lot of countries give woman the privilege of never being able to be arrested for rape. The UK being a case in post where a rapist has to use "his penis" to penetrate for it to be considered rape even when the victim is a child of any age.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 02:42 PM
2

She's clearly crazy, stay well way from her. If normal behaviour like yours can get that type of reaction out of her, then God help anyone if they tap her shoulder when she's drunk or she's just pissed off.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 09:06 AM
2

In your example as a strap-on is used then they would be arrested for "assault by penetration" instead of rape. The OP definition of rape is from the UK so see Section 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 for "assault by penetration" and rape being Section 1. However you are right it all needs to be looked at again especially as this "penis" definition BS even exists whether victim is a helpless child under 12. See Section 5 which means a woman is privileged to never be arrested for rape even when …
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:11 PM
2

Yes it is, its the UK definition under Section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. The worse part is, even when the rape victim is a child under 12 (see section 5) the rapist still can only be male using "his penis".
/r/MensRights04/12/21 04:43 PM
3

Its specifically the UK definition under Section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. The worse part is, even when the rape victim is a child under 12 (see section 5) the rapist still can only be male using "his penis". Which is why woman always get such lenient sentences as they only ever get arrested for a lesser crime of "sexual activity"
/r/MensRights04/12/21 04:41 PM
1

TV and films today either shows a man as abusive, or as a fool in the shadow of his more successful and higher intelligent wife. Neither modern TV nor modern films have any positive male role models.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 09:32 PM
5

Detectives investigated the mother-of-two's allegations against the magistrate but took no further action against him. So he goes to the police because someone is trying to blackmail him and the first thing they do is investigate the blackmailer's claims against him to try and get him convicted. This BS will just embolden blackmailers and scare victims from going to the police!
/r/MensRights09/11/21 09:13 PM
20

So instead of giving it to the best of the best as nominated by their peers, none will get it, and because of that next time everyone will know there's no point nominating a white man. So it'll be engineered just give it to a woman! Candidates, typically middle- or senior-level scientists, are first nominated by peers. Next year there will be a lot of low level scientists who just happened to be the right sex and colour irrespective of their actual qualifications for the award. "One of the reaso…
/r/MensRights29/10/21 07:14 AM
9

Patriarchy is an ideology created in the 1970s by radical feminists and which has grown into a mythology which pretends all man are part of a conspiracy to subjugate woman. They took the old discredited Marxist ideas of class warfare and applied them to sex. So the Marxist stereotypical view of the upper class as all powerful and controlling became men, and the Marxist view of the workers as poor oppressed and victimised became woman. Its BS, but feminist push it as if its fact. Now they claim e…
/r/MensRights28/10/21 07:33 PM
12

Interesting that the article doesn't say that in Liam's case the womans 40,000 messages proved his innocence. It reads like the case just collapsed due to the disclosure issues. Those messages actually proved that she had pestered him for sex, not the other way around as she claimed. They showed that she had told him that she wanted violent sex and even spoke about wanting to be raped. They even showed that she had made it clear to a friend that no crime had been committed. All that was why the …
/r/MensRights28/10/21 05:29 AM
1

Why don't men just accept hypergamy and look to date down? For example, if you are a college educated man with a regular job, don't try to date a college educated woman with a job! Men do date down in this scenario. Most men don't care if a woman has the same education or even no education. Its woman who want to date up with seeing things like a man's career or income level as important. Men usually always date down. Once you become a millionaire businessman you can look to date a woman with a d…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/21 03:58 AM
3

I hope the other senior white men who were also replaced now individually sue for their $10 million each...
/r/MensRights27/10/21 08:58 PM
7

That's not sexual assault! That's her leading him on and then rejecting him when he kisses her! What did she think would happen when you go back to his place alone after an event and agree to go in when he offers you a drink! To call that sexual assault is insane and undermines real crimes and real victims.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 07:14 AM
1

Because men are expendable. Society is trained that we are willing to send men off to die in wars to protect women and children. You can't do that if you also care about men as much as woman.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 11:26 PM
7

Feminists say that men and woman are so different, thay the only way a men can understand women is for men to 'shut up' and listen to woman... yet at the same time feminists only ever project what they think it's like to be a man. They refuse to believe anything they are told about men and only accept what fits with their narrative. Seeing women as scared victims and men as powerful violence monsters is the feminist way.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 10:31 PM
6

All the ridiculous filters woman use on photos which make them look fake and plastic. Yet they think it makes them more attractive! God only know why?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/21 05:16 PM
8

Ridiculing and labelling without caring to understand groups is how haters dismiss the arguments. They don't have to listen or accept an unpleasant truth if they can just dismiss the people saying it as racists, misogynists or any of the long list of phobias they've created. It's also a quick way of getting casual observers to not look at an argument if they just say... MRAs are just a hate group. How to stop it is the question. Focusing on the issues and making people listen to the truth is the…
/r/MensRights20/10/21 09:07 PM
32

When you look at the line: I am very much in favour of them to protect the woman's financial interests. V When a man mentions a prenup however, it's a red flag Its classic sexist hypocrisy... everything about this smacks of a female supremacy mindset where she want the rules to favour woman and be structured to disadvantaged men. The fact she used the word "however" on the sentence about men mentioning prenups shows us she knows she is a hypocrite and doesn't care.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 10:38 PM
17

It's the classic "Ignorance leads to fear, fear leads to hate..." There have been a minority of extremist people out there which have done evil things and the media claims they are incels. The problem is people who don't know what an incel is then equate those actions to respect the whole community. They ignore the fact that every movement has a minority of extremists. The Canadian government has even gone as far as to declare all incels an actual threat... These same people wouldn't dream of sa…
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:43 PM
31

"Ignorance leads to fear, fear leads to hate, and hate leads to violence." - Ibn Rushd These crazy people are already at the fear and hated of men... how long before they get to violence?
/r/MensRights17/10/21 05:45 PM
1

I'm a man so an "attractive man", as my sex is a fundamental part of who I am.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 07:37 AM
14

So the actually discussed ignoring whoever is the best person for a Nobel prize and instead opting to just give them to a woman... because vagina! Wow how sexist can you get... Imagine if that was the other way around. You can't have a Nobel prize unless you have a dick! The feminists would go loopy and rightfully so! But yet when its active discrimination against men they call it equality!
/r/MensRights13/10/21 12:56 AM
161

Yet whenever the story is publicised it focuses on female victims... as usual!
/r/MensRights05/10/21 09:05 PM
2

Its classic sexism... imagine if men were defining what a "real woman" was. They would go crazy...
/r/MensRights26/09/21 08:30 PM
17

What about those who don't identify as creatures... Storm clearly identifies as bad whether! Lol
/r/MensRights25/09/21 07:01 PM
32

Haters will using anything as an insult...
/r/MensRights19/09/21 05:20 PM
8

It's a Catholic school... do they not realise even Jesus had a beard!
/r/MensRights18/09/21 07:56 PM
13

Also note how the headline doesn't mention that their own mother killed them. Only that two children are found in a house fire. Yet when a father does it that's the main point being shouted at readers. "Father kills own children in house fire"...
/r/MensRights09/09/21 08:26 PM
124

Its funny how they pretend that men and boys will be allowed to get an education, as if it'll be anything we would recognise as a real education! All they'll be allowed to learn is how to recite the Qur'an! That's not an education in the 21st century!
/r/MensRights24/08/21 07:14 PM
11

It's the UK, it's not legally rape. She would have only been charged with the lesser crime of "Sexual Actively with a Child" or "sexual assault". The newspaper needs to follow the legal definition or she could sue for liable and win. Even when the child is under 13 the UK law requires a man to use "his penis" before it's called rape. In the UK a woman cannot be arrested for rape unless she is literally holding a victim down whilst a man penetrates. The law was rewritten in 2003 by Tony Blair's g…
/r/MensRights22/08/21 07:45 AM
9

What are they going to do... teach the boys how to get a girlfriend? Or just use it to demonize any boy who is awkward around girls.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 03:27 PM
11

It's the same with a lot of stuff... for example when people say the Taliban stop girls getting an education. They always forgot that the boys "education" is actually just reading the Koran! Nothing else. So in reality nobody is getting an education but they only focus on girls victimhood.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 12:25 AM
0

At the point when the sex was happening it was consented to. You can't withdraw consent after the event which is what would be happening in that situation. Lying to get someone into bed is a shitty thing to do but it does happen. Both man and woman do it and even worse in the cultured tradtions in India! Should he be punished... well in India if and ONLY if he deliberately lied without any intention of marrying her then probably, but it would be very hard to prove it and it shouldn't be for rape…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 01:50 AM
6

A patriarch is male, whereas a matriarch is female. So the female equivalent to a patriarchy is a matriarchy.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 02:33 PM
42

Really odd that she didn't give any explanation and I'm surprised she didn't just lie, claim he was abusive to take advantage of the gynocentric courts system. Plenty of people would have believed her on just her word alone!
/r/MensRights08/08/21 05:05 PM
12

It'll gets taken out again... wikipedia pages are controlled by groups who want to ensure only the message they like is kept there. It's why I stopped editing it after I realised there is no point as it so corrupted.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:31 AM
1

If she's lying then he is no rapist... what she means is she would rather believe a lying woman than a male victim... she would rather believe a woman that a man! She's just a sexist misandrist - a classic man hater!
/r/MensRights28/07/21 09:37 PM
2

Why do all these woman think they can tell men what it is to be a man! I bet she'd be the first to complain if a man told her what it is to be a woman!
/r/MGTOW228/07/21 07:07 PM
7

Years ago my old manager left and I went for promotion to fill the roll. Yet I didn't get it, the HR guy chairing the panel had a reputation for always choosing a female. After my interview I noticed a woman sitting waiting for her interview and went back to my desk telling my friend and colleague "she'll get it". I was right she did, although she didn't last long as she was incapable of doing the role. 6 months later she had left and I applied again for the role and again he chaired the panel. …
/r/MensRights18/07/21 09:39 PM
3

Teachers like her need to be fired!
/r/MensRights16/05/21 06:41 PM
5

I choked when read this bit... We call for feminist approaches – expansively interpreted – to challenge these stereotypes, making room to consider women who are abusive, power seeking, and sexually aggressive, while taking into account the troubled background many such women possess,” the researchers concluded. So they want to look at this issue thought a feminist lens which we know assumes man can only be perpetrators and never victims. They want to look at the "troubled background" of the woma…
/r/MensRights25/04/21 08:01 PM
5

The researchers stress that while they are in no way intending to minimise the impact of sexual violence perpetrated by men The fact they had to stress that just shows the level of hate they know they'll get from feminists who'll do anything to keep the discredited stereotype in place.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 07:44 PM
5

In the UK to be arrested for rape you can only be male as the law say the perpetrator has to use "his penis"... therefore feminists say 100% of all rapists are male!
/r/MensRights20/03/21 09:36 PM
3

A fool and his money are easily parted... as the old saying goes. Don't give OnlyFans whores any money. If you want sex pay a real prostitute, it'll be cheaper in the long run and you actually get to touch the girl!
/r/MGTOW206/03/21 07:29 AM
1

Woke is a disease that destroys everything it infects! Its needs to be purged!
/r/MensRights16/02/21 10:09 PM
3

No as I wouldn't want her to move in.
/r/MGTOW212/02/21 06:24 PM
2

If anyone needed a reason to go all in on MGTOW and not even have one -night stands then this is it...
/r/MGTOW201/02/21 01:40 PM
9

Funny how its always from the point of view of the poor single woman not being able to fine a man with the same level qualification and never about the fact boys and men are falling behind in every level of school and university. They care about protecting female hypergamy and ignore the real issue affecting men and boys.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 03:37 PM
24

I had an account on wikipedia but then quickly fell foal of the political groups that control articles like that one. They use the pages to pushes their narrative and gang up on anyone who turns up and tries correcting their BS. Luckily I didn't waste to much time on it.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 08:25 PM
12

This is insane... imagine how these woman would feel if a man told a female applicant they didn't get the job because they had a child! These feminist would hit the roof! Yet they thought it acceptable to do it to him. Why are gender obsessed feminists for all their talk of equality the most sexist people?
/r/MensRights13/01/21 11:58 PM
59

I hate this double standard, it's as if they just can't bring themselves to admit a woman can be guilty of a crime. You see it in court as well where woman get a slap on the wrist in comparison to a man who does the same thing.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 11:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter