TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Rentun Archive

View 0 posts and 46 comments by Rentun on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

But if you found a woman who didn't have a lot of sex when she was younger, you wouldn't have found someone similar to you. You ostensibly wanted to have a lot of sex but couldn't, because of how women treated you I guess. A woman who didn't have lots of sex when she was younger almost certainly didn't want to have a lot of sex. It's not hard for an even halfway decent looking woman to have as much sex as she wants to. Most women aren't interested in having a ton of sex with average looking guys…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:53 PM
1

If you get 1000 Joes you can clearly see that ones who are single and are posting how happy they are alone are, in fact, frequently in severe depression, have lot of health issues, frequently drink and smoke. Assuming that were true (big assumption, because stuff like this is extremely difficult to study due to subjectivity and sample bias), the conclusion wouldn't be that humans need relationships to be happy. It would mean that being in a relationship is more likely to make you happy, or that …
/r/ExRedPill10/01/25 01:45 PM
1

What science are you talking about? I've been single for extended periods of time and I've been extremely happy during many of those periods. If I think back to times where I was least happy, most of those times I was in a romantic relationship, not alone, so that kind of disproves that theory. There's no one that needs a relationship to be happy. Happiness has far more to do about your own mindset and feeling like you have agency and control of your life than it is about external circumstances …
/r/ExRedPill09/01/25 10:07 PM
1

I didn't come up with it Virtually every time it's been studied there are at least twice as many gay men as there are lesbian women. And no, bisexual women, just like all bisexual people, experience varying degrees of attraction towards different genders. Some are mostly homosexual, but are still attracted to the opposite sex at times, and some are mostly heterosexual, but attracted to the same sex at times. Others are a roughly even split. Women are mostly pursued in heterosexual relationships.…
/r/ExRedPill03/01/25 03:55 PM
1

Your take is that not only are the movie and romance industries artificially funded to convince women to be attracted to men, the porn industry exists to convince men that they like women? So without those industries, most people would be gay or asexual? That's your take?
/r/ExRedPill03/01/25 03:46 PM
1

First off, bisexual women are attracted to men. That's what the word means. Secondly, there are far more gay men than there are lesbian women, which kind of refutes your whole point. Thirdly, human sexuality is so ridiculously complex that attempting to explain some sort of human sexual behavior with a single variable is almost 100% guaranteed to be wrong. There's no evidence at all that women have lower desire for men than men have for women. It wouldn't even make sense from the evolutionary ar…
/r/ExRedPill02/01/25 05:51 PM
1

So the entire romance novel, and romance movie industries are an elaborate multi billion dollar ruse that women collectively participate in to convince men that they're attracted to them?
/r/ExRedPill02/01/25 05:44 PM
2

Divorce rates are at an all time high because the stigma against divorce has become far less prevalent in the last half century. Human relationships haven't somehow magically changed and made marriages worse. People, and especially women, are now just aware that they don't have to put up with abusive partners, partners they're not actually in love with, infidelity and so on. Just as there are shitty men, there are shitty women in the world. Not one person would argue against that. Some of them a…
/r/ExRedPill02/01/25 05:25 PM
12

You kind of explained it yourself. Neediness isn't only unhealthy, it's counterproductive. Being needy won't help you get a relationship. Wanting a relationship will. The difference there is that a needy person thinks that they must be in a relationship to be happy. A partner is the one missing puzzle piece in their life, and in their view, once they have that, all of their other problems will melt away. You can probably spot the problems here. One, needing a relationship to be happy is an issue…
/r/ExRedPill02/01/25 03:28 PM
8

What you’re saying doesn’t make any sense. It’s like saying to someone who just got robbed by someone they were friends with, “well, maybe you shouldn’t be friends with thieves” They didn’t know they were a thief until they got stolen from. Do you think women are complaining about guys that they knew beforehand were going to lie to them? No, that doesn’t make any sense. Obviously they were under the impression that this hypothetical guy was telling the truth. That’s how getting fooled works.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 01:30 PM
2

This is true in literally every situation. You’re incentivized to act unethically in business deals because you get more favorable terms that way, you’re incentivized to act unethically at your job because it lets you do less work. You’re incentivized to act unethically in sports because it makes you more likely to win. Like yes, ignoring ethics will put you ahead in terms of personal rewards. That’s why people act unethically in the first place. Most people don’t because of… you know… ethics. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 01:25 PM
1

Oh you should just do exercises to get taller instead of the ones that make you more muscular then. Oh wait, those don’t exist, so what was the point of even posting this?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 12:39 AM
1

First off, stop listening to random ass women on the internet about you should and shouldn’t do. Women aren’t some kind of hive mind with chosen representatives that speak for them on Reddit. Some women would like it if a guy they thought was attractive approached them in a grocery aisle. Some even dream about it. Some don’t. Some are terrified of it. You have no idea of knowing which one she is unless you try, and unfortunately for the ones with social anxiety so bad that they’re legitimately t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 12:30 AM
0

Yeah except literally no one says that dude
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/23 12:25 AM
1

The pure irony of this comment is great
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 08:48 PM
-1

“Supposed to do?” Wtf are you talking about? Life’s not fair. Some people get lucky and are born beautiful into rich families and heathy bodies, some people are unlucky and are born poor as dirt, with severe physical and mental disabilities and deformities. Most people are somewhere in the middle. The only thing you can do is try to improve yourself and make due the best you can with what you have. That’s all there is to do. The world isn’t laid out in such a way where everyone is guaranteed to …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 08:47 PM
1

So? That doesn’t really seem like a big deal
/r/seduction06/02/22 02:35 AM
1

Why would it have been a disaster?
/r/seduction05/02/22 12:11 PM
1

Guys do have it easier than girls in most aspects of life, but not really when it comes to working out. You’re right that guys lose fat and gain muscle more easily than women, the issue is that To be attractive, a guy needs to have a lot of muscle mass and a low body fat percentage. Those things are ridiculously hard if not impossible to improve at the same time. Unless you’re very fat, you can gain muscle or lose fat, you can’t do both at once. All women need to focus on is lowering their body …
/r/seduction23/01/22 01:10 AM
3

Are you so desperate for sex that you’re willing to be a complete slimeball and throw any sort of morality in the toilet to get it? Be a man, just find someone who isn’t committed. I don’t know why you’d want to sleep with a trashball woman who’s willing to cheat on her boyfriend anyway.
/r/seduction01/07/21 09:28 PM
1

Yes, they are part of the conversation, especially because most women are marrying men with more money than them, which essentially confirms that they are looking for that exact situation they said wanted to be free from. How? Men earn more than women on average, so assuming most women get married, they would have a pretty hard time marrying men who make less than them. Also, how does wanting someone with money translate to not wanting a career? Because women weren't slaves Uh, okay? Who said th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 09:39 PM
1

continue to be deadbeat women who do nothing but marry men who make more than them throughout history. I never said there weren't, but again, I fail to see how that's relevant at all. The conversation is specifically about comparing men who decide to sit at home all day while their partners work, and who are unhappy about it to women before women's lib. Women who decide to be a bum are not part of the conversation, because that's not who you brought up. The wives of wealthy slave owners who own …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 08:11 PM
2

Because men do more dangerous jobs on average than women do. Again, totally irrelevant to the conversation. Why do you keep derailing this? Do you want to talk about the difference between a man taking advantage of a woman with a good job and centuries of strict gender roles? Do you want to talk about the role wealth and standing take in partner selection? Do you want to talk about the wage gap? You're jumping all over the place here. Women being forced to stay at home and unable to get a job fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 07:52 PM
3

Men on average make more money than women, so that's sort of unavoidable. Regardless, I don't see how that's relevant to whether women want to be forced into domestic servitude or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 07:40 PM
1

That's literally not possible
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 07:39 PM
4

They apparently did, hence the whole women's suffrage and women's liberation movements.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 07:34 PM
3

Men forced women to do that for centuries. Kind of a big difference there.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 04:20 PM
1

They don't. Your premise is flawed. Ignoring gays, lesbians, and polygamists (all of which put together are a negligible percentage of the overall population), for every relationship, there is a single man and a single woman. Since attractiveness is a relative measure, there are as many equally attractive people among both sexes. That means that for every woman that's "dating up", there is a man that's dating up as well. There are only so many 10/10 men in the world. If all of them were dating w…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 04:17 PM
5

The planes you've touched are props though, have you ever actually been on the outside of a plane taking off? When you go into a plane, they play videos on the windows and rock the whole thing like in the back to the future ride. In reality, you're just taking a really fast train. Human beings never actually achieved flight. You really think a 1,000,000 lbs 747 can fly through the air? Get real.
/r/MGTOW14/02/17 02:23 AM
5

By that standard, why aren't you concerned that literally everything you can see is a fabrication? Are clouds real? Airplanes? The sun? Birds?
/r/MGTOW14/02/17 12:28 AM
3

I... what? You can go outside and look at it with a telescope RIGHT NOW dude https://www.google.com/search?q=ISS+amatuer+telescope&biw=837&bih=616&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi2n8qfp47SAhUC82MKHSS8BMcQ_AUIBygC
/r/MGTOW14/02/17 12:15 AM
13

Yeah, good luck with that.
/r/PussyPass22/03/14 12:14 AM
8

I'm just saying you're a person who knows nothing about law school or the legal system. Because yes, it is very complicated and very hard. The fact that you don't think it is means that you don't know much about it. If it were easy, law schools wouldn't exist, and top lawyers wouldn't be pulling in multiple millions of dollars per year, because everyone would do it.
/r/PussyPass21/03/14 02:26 PM
1

I'm arguing that there's zero evidence that women are worse at 'rational thinking', (whatever you want to define that as), and any flaky anecdotal evidence you could provide to show that could be countered by equally flaky anecdotal evidence against males. This is all directed at OPs comment that I'd almost go as far as to say women shouldn't be jurors. Too emotional, not enough logic. Which, of course, isn't supported by anything ever.
/r/PussyPass21/03/14 01:41 PM
2

Absolute bullshit. It's been shown time and time again that men and women are neck and neck when it comes to intelligence, and something like "rationality" is a nebulous attribute that doesn't get measured. As long as we're citing irrelevant emotional evidence based on anecdotes, the majority of stalkers are men, men are responsible for the overwhelming majority of emotional crimes of passion like rape and murder, fatal auto accidents where speed is a factor, suicides. So careful before you go a…
/r/PussyPass21/03/14 12:22 PM
7

Yeah, same with black people. So sick of them being able to vote and stuff. eyeroll
/r/PussyPass20/03/14 06:44 PM
1

I'm not saying that he should gift it to her in a box with a bow, or even that he's in any way obligated to leave it in her house. I'm just saying that it's a little bit nutty to wash it out with alcohol and put it in your bag to bring home with her, and it's totally understandable why she'd be offended by that. If I were a woman and I were dating a guy that did that, I'd be offended too, and I'd probably seriously consider leaving him for a guy with fewer trust issues.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 02:41 PM
1

He wants to secure his reproductive rights in the same way people who walk around with tinfoil on their heads want to secure their privacy. So yeah, he's nuts.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 01:55 PM
1

Er... no. That logic doesn't follow at all. There are tons of reasons people have sex other than to have a kid. There are very few reasons to point loaded guns at people other than to kill them. If someone offered my girlfriend and I a billion bucks for her to point a loaded gun at my head though, yeah, of course I'd trust her to do it and not kill me. Why would I be dating someone I couldn't trust not to willingly kill me?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 01:45 PM
1

It's happened though, so regardless of whether or not you think it should happen, it's as legitimate a risk for a woman as "spermjacking" is for a man; which is to say, not very legitimate.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 01:40 PM
1

I'm curious to what you think one of those situations where you can expect someone to trust you is, if not a committed, months long romantic relationship?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:35 AM
6

The downside is that you know for sure that in your some part of your girlfriend's mind, you're a lunatic who wants to impregnate her against her will.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:10 AM
8

No one anywhere said it's not his right. Who would argue that? Of course it's his right. He's still a paranoid nut for doing it, and it's totally understandable why she'd be insulted by it.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:05 AM
3

You can wear bacon on your head as a bacon hat for a week if you want, which is totally fine and within your rights, after all, it's your bacon and it's your head. Doesn't mean you're not nuts though.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:03 AM
4

If a woman you were dating hid her birth control tabs because she didn't trust you to not tamper with them, that wouldn't bother you in the slightest?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:01 AM
2

In the beginning of the video, she says that "the girl cell" which I guess is her word for femininity, is strength, but then she goes on to illustrate that girls are strong because of their MASCULINE attributes (being good at self defense, logical reasoning). It seems like she just missed her own point here. Why wouldn't she point out the power of femininity by selfless service to others, the trait most aligned with the emotional angle she's going for here? Also, that poem at the end was the exa…
/r/MensRights12/02/10 08:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter