TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Responsible-Wait-427 Archive

View 1 post and 47 comments by Responsible-Wait-427 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
116

discussionResponsible-Wait-427/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 04:01 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Who do you think bi men tend to lust after?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/24 02:44 PM
5

That's so interesting! I know a few bi guys who are open about it but only want to date women and they pretty universally have a pretty hard time with dating, while scoring with guys very easily.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 11:38 PM
-2

One of the tales that's prevalent through gay culture is a warning about becoming close friends with straight men; if you get drunk with them while they're feeling lonely, e.g. if their inhibitions are lowered, they'll often initiate sex because their curiosity gets the better of them and the touch of a warm body is the touch of a warm body. While the sex usually goes just fine, it's when they sober up later that the friendship more often than not goes up in flames - the straight man has been su…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 02:11 PM
2

An essay that I wrote..? Obsidian is software for managing and synthesizing your own knowledge over time. r/PKMS Edit: also, I didn't 'train' myself to be bisexual, I just had an experience that showed me how I could lean into moments of being attracted to the opposite sex which I had been subconsciously ignoring previously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 09:59 AM
1

Heteronormativity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 09:55 AM
3

Sure gay men are more accepted for being feminine. That's not because gay men don't face stigma. It's because gay men are expected to be feminine, compare to straight men. Hence why masculine gay men are erased. Since masculinity is only associated with straight men, not gay men in society. Masculine gay men are erased? What do you mean by this? And... cooking is a feminine hobby? Have you met a chef? A baker?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 09:53 AM
1

I mostly just copy pasted a tiny essay I had cached in my Obsidian vault and modified it very slightly, I am chill lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 09:48 AM
6

If you start a discussion about how hookup culture is making it difficult to find a monogamous relationship you get called an incel but then the same gays who called you an incel will complain themselves that bisexual guys only use you for hookups and don’t want a relationship. The things that work best for pairings between men and women are not the things that work best for pairings between men and men or women and women. It would be very weird if they were, considering how different men and wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 09:25 AM
8

Yes, but going from 2% to 7% for men is not such a giant leap, when women went from ~5% to 21% in the same span of time, and we can point to historical societies where the rate would have been much higher.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 07:11 AM
19

Well, first, this question was asked of women of all age groups, so the answers might play out a little bit differently if you select for young women specifically. It's also not a safe assumption to be made here that the women being polled are the very political kind you're talking about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 06:59 AM
6

Do you have any evidence for this?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 06:59 AM
150

To start the discussion and to point to one possible cause - 63 percent of women report that they wouldn't consider dating a man who has had sex with another man, and only 19% reported they would consider dating one who actually identified as bisexual.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/24 04:03 AM
8

feministas You use this word fourteen times in your post. This is a fnord, the same thing as when Donald Trump says 'Crooked Joe' or 'Radical Left Democrats' or 'Kung Flu'; that is, what you are trying to do here is not to explain, but to manipulate. You can do better. Respect your opponents.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/24 12:58 AM
10

Women as prizes to be won Coming from a culturally queer perspective, every man is raised with a woman shaped hole in his heart and life. That's part of heteronormativity. Every Disney movie, every relationship you grew up around, every story your parents read you before bed or your teacher read to you in elementary school. All of it to educate you into heteronormative masculinity, to teach you that possessing the affection of a woman is the be-all-end-all cultural prize and sign that you've 'ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/24 03:37 AM
15

This all happened, of course, before Mr. Doe knew that the school’s Committee on Discipline (COD) had convicted 98% of all students who have come before their kangaroo court according to recent data. [...] And what might the schools be investigating? They don’t refer to things as “crimes”, only as categories. Over 700 people were found responsible for “health and safety” violations, and 29 students found guilty of theft. Most infractions are so small that the student doesn’t even have a real con…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/24 03:26 PM
2

"The shit we say here is more elevated." The sixth word in your comment is 'feministas.' Your content is not elevated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 04:20 AM
0

There's dozens of us!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 04:09 AM
0

yooooo
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 04:05 AM
-2

Deleuze often said that people don't take action to improve their lot because they secretly enjoy getting to feel bad for themselves. I personally am on this sub to expose myself to it's ideas and to refine my own. Sometimes I'll chip in with some observations. I'm not here to write a manifesto, start a revolution, or drive a movement that most people may see as threatening. Enjoy letting yourself feel victimized, buddy. Luxuriate in it, because that's all this sub is without an orientation towa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 12:01 AM
1

Yes, they are. The empathy gap is part of patriarchy, once you exit the structure of heteronormativity you leave the empathy gap behind. My life is full of emotionally intimate and caring friendships and connections with other men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 05:07 PM
2

No. Gay men care for themselves just fine in their own communities.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 02:18 PM
-2

they spread, with full social and institutional support, harmful ideas about maleness. Okay? Why should that matter to you? You can see through it. Develop your own ideas about masculinity. Write them down. Talk about them with those who matter to you. Exchange of ideas does not need to result in new ideas and solutions, new ideologies will be initially exploratory. Well, yes, actually, any theory that is not immediately useful and impactful to your life is a dead one. The philosophy collective …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 01:47 PM
-13

While this sub is still trying to glue together why exactly feminism is not a good way forward for men. Stop giving a shit what feminists are doing. What feminists are doing is about as relevant to this sub as what animal rights activists are doing. feminism is currently taking up all that space. Yeah, it's taking up all the space in this sub people could dedicate towards actual constructive theorizing about changing their lives. It also proactively shuts down any attempts to start pushing in ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/24 02:58 AM
-19

Do you see the irony in you saying this, while this sub, which is supposedly for the purpose of advocating for men, spends all of its time being in hysterics about feminism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 11:53 PM
0

Or, is it to stop trying to compete with feminism entirely, and make personal changes that will eventually grow into societal shifts? That's the winner. If societal structures aren't to your liking, build a life where you don't have to adhere to them. I am a queer man; I while away my days at naked pool parties, gay rodeos, clothing optional campgrounds, having massive orgies at the bathhouse, doing profane rituals with other gay occultists, running a weekly intellectual salon with my friends, m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 01:51 PM
-8

You all are missing the point. Solutions here should look personal, not political, they should be about transforming your own life into a radically transformative praxis for the liberation of men - talking about how you can build structures to support yourself and other men in your life. Feminism centers women's voices. It always will. It won't care about you. Get over it. You have to care about you. Go do your own thing. The more you attack a much stronger social movement and the more hostility…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 06:59 PM
34

most level 1 autistics are women or non binary people As an autistic man who fits within the provided description of level 1, I'd put [citation needed] all over this post. It also doesn't reflect that these categories are somewhat porous; I would have been classified as level 2 for most of my childhood and adolescence, but I leveraged my intelligence towards analyzing and developing social and conversational ability as an adult to a large degree of success. And, no, the reason autistic people ar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/24 08:33 PM
3

Well, I am a gay man, and I still identify as non-binary. I also accept any pronouns - most people use he/him, but some use they/them and I've even had a couple of people use she/her and it felt deliciously subversive. But when I consider myself as non-binary, I don't think of it as moving myself along the gender spectrum from man to somewhere in the middle, I consider it as breaking down the walls of the binary and claiming everything within it and more as grounds to build my identity from.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/24 04:56 PM
3

I demonstrated the human predilection for manipulation from almost first principles in that series of comments I linked to you. I will not respond to your strawman. I have a very poor view of the average person's understanding of epistemology and the foundational role manipulation plays in social relations, society, and civilization broadly. I am not impressed by yours. I am being broadly abusive towards you here because I'm on extremely high doses of steroids (not the fun kind) for the next fiv…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/24 09:54 AM
1

www.lesswrong.com This is a two decade old community I have been involved with for a decade dedicated to analyzing cognitive bias in humans and how we all constantly manipulate and deceive ourselves and others. You're not knowledgeable enough to both engaging with, because you're so mistaken about a critical aspect of cognition, the human experience, and the nature of the social. I'll just tell you to educate yourself and maybe come back later and we can have a better discussion. I'll debate how…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/24 09:15 AM
7

Sorry, are most politicians men or women? Cult leaders? Snake oil salesmen, CEOs, and marketing executives? Spies? All of our professional manipulaters and deceivers? Women and men are both manipulative. In the ancestral environment, who you knew and how you knew them determined whether you lived or died in times of scarcity, so we are all very adept at manipulating the social landscape for material benefit without thinking about it. But no, for you, men are from Mars, women are from Venus.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/24 08:42 AM
2

So are men. Don't be so essentialist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/24 08:10 AM
9

Well, yes. to create crime, create law; to create sin, create religion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 03:15 PM
2

(2/3) But, Stirner was much influenced by Taoism, and he does not stop there. He says, the final phantasm is the self. Selfhood, identity, is another ethereal concept, one that each person uses to subjugate ourselves. He says, you are no-thing, I am no-thing; we perceive the world as ideas, concepts, words, and none of these are capable of encompassing or describing what you and I are. They will always fall short. We are a gestalt. We exist before concepts, we are non-conceptual, and we create o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 06:26 PM
2

(1/3 sorry I did not mean to write a book it just came out that way) Yeah I deleted that other one I had made edits to when I saw that you had replied to this one instead, to keep things clean. As for this one, how is an individual supposed to find grounding outside ideology by asking whether they "enjoy life" or are "getting what they want" when those inclinations will be shaped by whatever ideology they've been inculcated with? This is where Stirner comes in, this is Stirner's whole thing. And…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 06:25 PM
2

You're talking about a denial of the influence of ideology in the context of a piece that fuses Stirner with the Situationists. The entire thing is about the influence of ideology. For Ourselves, the authoring body, was a collective directly adjacent to the Situationist International. There are several sentences in this that are directly pulled from Debord's Society & the Spectacle and Vaneigem's Revolution of Everyday Life. Again, a more comprehensive response tomorrow but you are giving me mor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 04:35 AM
-3

You are confusing individualist with liberal or capitalist, they are not the same. Anarchism is individualist and self-centered, it regards the only legitimate authority as the self. This text is hosted on the anarchist library for a reason. I will try to reply more comprehensively tomorrow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 04:17 AM
-5

Feminists concerned with toxic masculinity and women who want their boyfriend to be suspicious and controlling are generally not the same people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 01:26 AM
-6

Although I'm chopping it up and only copying bits and pieces here, one of my favorite pieces of writing, The Minimum Definition of Intelligence, says: Theory will be either a practical theory — a theory of revolutionary practice — or it will be nothing... nothing but an aquarium of ideas, a contemplative interpretation of the world. The realm of ideals is the eternal waiting-room of unrealised desire. [...] We get rid of the blinders of ideology by constantly asking ourselves... How do I feel? A…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 12:47 AM
-51

Because you focus it on complaining about women and feminism instead of deconstructing or attacking patriarchy lol. Most of this sub is barely better than r/TwoXChromosomes or r/AskFeminists. It's just rage porn in the gender wars genre. Actually write something about liberation praxis and organizing, analyze how to reconstruct male solidarity in the modern day, examine homosocial spaces like the communal shower. Anything but complaining about feminism, please.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 11:43 PM
-1

Holy shit. I condemn you wholeheartedly. Everything you say is wrong. You can still see men's oppression of women in most places on Earth outside of the first world. Muslim theocracies like Saudi Arabia come to mind. Who granted these gains? Overwhelmingly, it was men, as the gains were theirs to give. It was male politicians, judges and business leaders - as well as millions of ordinary men - who moved over and granted women new freedoms. You debunk your own source you cite with this statement.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 12:34 AM
2

I'm a man and I love being fetishized, speak for yourself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 09:32 PM
3

That means men likely aren't a minority in all age demographics except old age. And even then, only a minority by technicality. It's like saying Republicans are a minority in America.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 09:28 PM
5

No, different people have different erogenous zones. Read what OP said, and then read what I said. OP said that, 'as a male,' they have very few erogenous zones. The latter may be true, but it's not because they're male. You once again when you say going through the motions are talking about something in a very limited point of view, as well as a lack of understanding about how other people operate. I do not, actually, have a very limited point of view, I have the expansive view of sexuality hel…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/24 03:03 PM
17

And don't get me started about Erogenous zones. As a male, I don't have many. It is my brain, my ass, and my penis. That's about it. Speaking as a gay man with well over a hundred previous sexual partners, that's balls. You've got erogenous zones all over your body. Your earlobes, your neck, your nipples, your armpits, taint, hands, feet and toes, etc. I've turned guys into goo by just hogging out on their armpit for 5 minutes straight. I think the script of PIV intercourse has really fucked up …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/24 03:18 PM
2

Everything you've linked to is a youtube video. For someone who is eager to criticize those who have not 'read theory,' you have not linked to any essays or readable works by critical theorists. I am a critical theorist and a queer theorist, to the extent that those labels have meaning. The idea that a foundational component of queer theory is that patriarchy is a nonexistent phenomenon, a claim advanced by your thread title, is completely false. The smaller claim that you advance in the essay, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 08:24 PM
4

I said this is no different from a man saying a woman should be a lesbian instead after seeing a "men are trash" post. Since women are also complaining about men too. There is a very strong tradition of political lesbianism, though. Lesbians who are heterosexual but only form intimate connections with women because they regard men as incapable of not oppressing women/think penetrative sex is necessarily rape/refuse to have sex with men as a form of protest against patriarchy. It is, I think, wor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/24 05:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter