TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Responsible_MiniMe Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by Responsible_MiniMe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

This is very motivational 🥹
/r/MensRights22/05/26 07:07 PM
–

This is 100% crap. 😑
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 11:22 AM
7

I'm not chopped. 😢
/r/MensRights03/04/26 05:08 PM
2

Hmm, I think you’re conflating legal/cultural changes with systemic oppression. The Boy Scouts thing isn’t about "feminists" having power to block men, it’s about institutions evolving under social and legal pressure. Equality isn’t about pointing fingers at women or feminists; it’s about changing structures and expectations that limit everyone. Framing it as "men vs women" just makes it harder to actually solve the problems men face.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 02:05 PM
1

Survivorship and social-desirability bias probably do skew orgasm data somewhat. Men with ED or performance anxiety are more likely to self-select out of surveys or overreport success, while their partners still report dissatisfaction. That matters...but it doesn’t make the orgasm gap an illusion. Even in your example, the woman is still reporting "rarely orgasm", which is exactly what the gap measures. Bias affects who gets counted, not the underlying pattern. The real takeaway isn’t "women exa…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 06:33 PM
-2

I disagree with that framing. Equality for men isn’t blocked because women benefit from men suffering, it’s blocked because rigid gender roles and economic expectations are baked into society and enforced by institutions, not individual women. Men are absolutely allowed to feel resentment and have opinions, but resentment by itself doesn’t create equality or partnership. If anything, it makes it easier for people to dismiss legitimate issues autistic and vulnerable men face. Real equality comes …
/r/MensRights21/12/25 06:10 PM
0

This passage isn’t saying men are obsolete, it’s analyzing why male sexual ego is so tied to female pleasure. Historically, masculinity has been linked to penetration, penis size, and performance, so men naturally feel threatened when women can orgasm without them or rely on clitoral stimulation. Practices like clitoridectomy and social double standards show that controlling female sexuality was a way to protect male dominance, not a reflection of biological necessity. The key takeaway is descri…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 03:02 PM
1

This makes a lot of sense when you look at it closely. A lot of studies that show "men in relationships are healthier sexually" probably don’t capture the full picture, they’re missing men who have sexual dysfunction and either get divorced, aren’t in relationships, or self-select out of dating entirely. So the apparent health advantage of partnered men is likely survivorship bias. At the same time, men in relationships do experience scrutiny, like with PE, where dissatisfaction is more likely t…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 03:00 PM
1

I get what you’re saying, and honestly, there’s truth to it: men are often judged by performance because cultural scripts tie male sexual worth to being able to make a partner orgasm. That’s why some men feel replaced or blamed when women use toys, they’re not imagining it. At the same time, that doesn’t mean men are objectively "obsolete" or that women using a vibrator is inherently about rejecting men. The core issue is that society still equates male value with orgasm delivery, which is what …
/r/MensRights21/12/25 02:51 PM
0

Yeah, a fleshlight is technically closer to the male side of the analogy, but the underlying point still holds. The comparison isn’t about the exact shape or realism of the device, it’s about emotional stakes and perceived replaceability. A fleshlight doesn’t simulate a partner, desire, or intimacy either. Men might still feel weird knowing a device can reliably provide pleasure in ways they’re culturally conditioned to see as their "job". That’s the heart of the argument: it’s not the toy itsel…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 02:46 PM
-1

I think you’re reading a lot of zero-sum gender messaging into Koedt and second-wave feminism that isn’t actually there. Koedt wasn’t saying men are obsolete or that women should only have sex with women. She was critiquing male-centered sexual scripts, specifically, the expectation that women must fake or shape their orgasms to protect male ego. The passages you quoted about men fearing expendability are descriptive, not prescriptive: she’s explaining why men feel threatened if female pleasure …
/r/MensRights21/12/25 02:41 PM
1

Thanks for posting the actual passage. I think this quote actually proves a narrower point than the one you’re drawing from it. Koedt isn’t arguing that men are obsolete or that penises are inherently unnecessary. She’s criticizing a sexual script where women feel pressured to perform vaginal orgasms to protect male ego or to manage men’s expectations. The target is deception and ignorance about anatomy, not male existence or male intimacy. What she’s really saying is: when men tie their self-wo…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 02:08 PM
1

Hi, I'm a woman commenting in good faith. I think there’s a real emotional truth here, but the framing overshoots the mark. Men’s discomfort around vibrators isn’t imaginary or "toxic". If you’re raised to believe your sexual value = erection + performance, then a device that never gets tired will obviously poke that wound. Shaming men for reacting to that is lazy and unhelpful. That said, comparing vibrators to sex dolls isn’t actually symmetrical. A vibrator doesn’t simulate a man, replace int…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 01:53 PM
5

I agree. Male and female autism are different lived experiences because the expectations placed on men and women are different to begin with. I also get why comparison feels unavoidable, since society itself compares and treats people differently. The key, for me, is keeping the focus on how rigid gender roles turn autistic traits into penalties for men, especially around confidence, initiation, and independence. Acknowledging that doesn’t take anything away from women. It just means we stop pre…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 01:45 PM
3

Hi, I'm a woman commenting in good faith. I agree that autistic men face intense social punishment, especially around dating, employment, and being perceived as "threatening" rather than awkward. The suicide rates alone show that this is a real crisis and not something that can be dismissed as whining. Where I disagree is framing this as autistic women "having it easier" or as a zero-sum gender issue. Autistic women aren’t protected so much as they’re tolerated conditionally. Many mask heavily, …
/r/MensRights21/12/25 12:52 PM
1

A need is something your body can’t survive without, like food, water, air, shelter, medical care. Sex doesn’t fit that category. It can improve well-being for people who want it, but you don’t die, collapse, or lose basic function without it. Calling it a "need" confuses biology with desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 07:49 AM
3

Your experience sounds painful, I’m not going to dismiss that. But the issue here isn’t the lack of sex, it’s the meaning you attached to it. Sex doesn’t define your worth. When self-esteem collapses over something you’re not owed by anyone, that’s a sign of deeper emotional wounds, not a biological crisis. Intimacy can matter, but mental health can’t hinge on whether someone else chooses you...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 10:38 AM
7

I get that physical intimacy can feel important for some people and impact mental health. But no one else’s body is a solution for that. Mental health, coping skills, and social support are ways to handle frustration without making sex an obligation. People don’t owe anyone intimacy just because they feel deprived, that line has to stay clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 08:34 AM
3

Cool, we’re on the same page then. Libido exists, but boundaries exist too, that’s all that matters. Nice debating with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 08:12 AM
3

Yes, men on average have higher libido. But that doesn’t make sex an entitlement or a societal duty people get to demand. People aren’t vending machines built to meet others hormonal demand, they’re humans, with their own drives, boundaries, and choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:44 AM
1

Low sexual interest isn’t some tiny anomaly. Libido exists on a spectrum, and population studies consistently show a wide range of sex drive among all genders. There’s no biological rule saying men must have high libido. Variation is normal, and acting like men are a monolith just isn’t accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:39 AM
0

Libido isn’t a gender divide. Variation exists within genders, not just between them. And saying it’s "alright" for men not to have sex isn’t denying that many men want sex, it’s just acknowledging that lack of sex isn’t automatically a crisis. Men aren’t biologically doomed if they aren’t sexually active.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:33 AM
0

Low sexual interest isn’t always caused by porn. Correlation isn’t causation. Plenty of people have naturally low libido, and plenty with high libido also avoid dating. Socialization depends on personality and circumstance, not on how strong someone’s sex drive is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:29 AM
4

Libido isn’t a gendered superpower. It varies from person to person, not "men vs women". And not everyone wants a partner, that’s preference, not pathology. Everyones experience is valid even if it doesn’t match yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:27 AM
1

Not everyone who isn’t dating is "depriving" themselves. Some people just don’t feel the drive, or they prioritize other parts of life. And dating isn’t the only form of socialization, people can build skills and connections in tons of ways. Low libido or low interest doesn’t automatically equal social decline.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 05:06 AM
10

Your personal experience is valid, but it’s not universal. Lack of sex isn’t automatically a mental-health crisis or a "catastrophe". The real issue is the stigma and pressure placed on men, not the sex itself. If society stopped treating virginity like a moral failure, fewer people would suffer in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 04:55 AM
4

Low sex rates don’t automatically mean "declining socialization". Some people just don’t want hookups, drama, or pressure. That’s not antisocial, that’s preference. And incel behavior comes from entitlement, not from everyone else having less sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 04:54 AM
9

I see nothing wrong with younger generations having less or no sex. Less unwanted pregnancies and bad hookups. Reduced chances of getting STDs and STIs. I don't understand why it's concerning from a logical standpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:49 AM
4

I agree. I've never been in a romantic or sexual relationship before. But from what I've seen on the Internet, it's not worth the hardship and compromise. I rather reap the benefits of being single, celibate, and childfree in this modern day and age. Because, I never want to be tied down and controlled by a relationship. I don't want anyone to slow me down, hold me back, or stop me from focusing on my career, hobbies, goals, aspirations, health, wellness, happiness, and personal growth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 02:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter