TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Retrospring Archive

View 0 posts and 216 comments by Retrospring on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

tumbleweed rolls past
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 03:18 AM
2

I mean, I'm not in the habit of deceiving myself... Unless it's for good reason (I'm the man tbh). How can I categorize something I've literally felt before as a lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 10:43 PM
1

Pfft.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 09:56 PM
2

The average woman can be better than the average man but there are more exceptional men than there are women ...something like that anyway, don't quote me on that
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 09:17 PM
10

At this point I almost wish I was gay
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 05:11 AM
1

At this point I wish I was gay
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 05:10 AM
1

🎯
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 09:50 AM
–

Hardest whiteboy song ever🔥
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:45 AM
-2

"hahaha I'm poor and will never do anything about it"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 04:31 AM
-4

Western women are literal trash lol. Imagine if a guy said he didn't want to provide that's not his thing: categorically trash. That's fine. Everyone who feels this way should make this explicitly understandable. There are women in the world who still prefer not to waste their lives working a dumb job, who would rather look back on a life of being pampered and chilling with their kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 02:55 AM
1

^ this I fully agree, but at the same time, the acceptance of the of the fact that women are hypergamous is an important part (there are many parts) to understanding a lot of red pill views (i.e., truth). Also, it's almost frustrating to see women be completely oblivious to this thing that they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 11:42 AM
1

1) Lol. Men's smv/attractiveness level isn't defined by age because women don't value youth in the same way that men do (ergo, men's smv doesn't plummet in the same way that women's smv does due to age) 2) what about the men crossing the seas, falling in love, that are poor immigrants? Do they just...not exist -- your points do not diminish the original point: men are not inherently hypergamous 2.1) men are always dating whatever their attractiveness level gets them, yes (men's attractiveness le…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 11:22 AM
1

Well yeah, but it's the type of delulu. The essence of the complaint about hypergamy is the same as the typical feminist complaint about men incessantly objectifying women: 'why can't they like us for us first'.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:46 AM
1

That's all good and well. But if that's how life is, then why does all this reasoning no longer make sense when someone with a networth of, say, +100m thinks himself worthy of, say, four wives. 😮‍💨 Makes sense when women have the upperhand but when they don't have the upperhand they do what the incels do:
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 06:09 AM
1

Funny how "noThiNg is tRuLy 50/50" makes sense in this context but not--where are all the feminists. They need to understand this shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 03:47 PM
–

Yep. Men value respect & status, yes (how dare they?). Almost seems like common sense or something
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:31 AM
1

They're a westerner
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:08 AM
1

Pretty much. Such is life... I think this is probably my blackpillest belief/understanding...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 07:24 PM
1

Men who make these specific complaints need to get a hobby
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 07:35 AM
2

🙂 I'm sorry for laughing lol... Your reasoning is likely just beyond me 🫵👍👊🤝
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:39 AM
3

I just reread your post and laughed again
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:34 AM
2

Lol, what a creep
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:11 AM
1

Uncontrollably
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:07 PM
–

Maybe in highschool
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 07:37 AM
1

^
/r/RedPillWomen21/02/24 11:54 AM
–

Nobody said anything about this being women's fault. Jeez, you even argue like your masters--straight to off topic and ad hominem subjects 😮‍💨
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 07:17 AM
–

Nobody: Blue pill guy: it's not women's fault!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 07:11 AM
–

Yeah, I get that you feel that way. I feel the same way about your views.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 06:10 PM
–

Red pill and blue pill aren't even a thing. There is only truth and falsehood. "Red pill" teachings are rarely false--which means opposing views are.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 06:09 PM
–

Truth matters to me. I can't join a bunch of people who are doing things I like yet spreading messages I consider to be untrue.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 06:02 PM
1

Regarding point a) solely: it's possible to be nice because of no reason other than because you have a big heart and the love therein just can't help but overflow -- manifesting itself in the form of altruism, niceness for niceness' sake etc. Your points are all very logical but they forget that the realm of emotion exists
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 08:10 AM
1

Of course you would think that that would work😂 I imagine you imagine all men are as weak as you 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 07:16 AM
1

I'm a savage warlord at heart. I have a natural urge to answer any kind of challenge that comes my way with complete annihilation, it's something I have to control often. It bothers me when people whom I can one-punch the life out of think that they can do anything around me except be cordial. Saying they hate a group that I am part of is perceived as opposition, and sparks a competitive (destructive) energy within me. I can't and don't want to actually hurt women (I actually can hurt them, fact…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 07:02 AM
-7

ROFL if all women decided to kill men, men would catch on and stop that shit asap. What a joke 🤣 won't even need most of us involved just the regular police forces would do. Ok maybe a little bit of us would be necessary. We'd stop you guys and save the economy from collapse the very next day. "If all women decided to sterilize.."-- we just need one of y'all. Just one. For a start. There's already plenty in jail that can't sterilize themselves, for instance. Tl;Dr if men decided to favour a.i ov…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 06:41 AM
1

Women don't care about truth dude
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 06:32 AM
–

Tl;Dr men only care about sex!!!!!! ...and I guess we do too......
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 02:28 AM
0

Yeah, I think op categorizes all women as hypergamous because he views things from the male "lens" A woman can't be hypergamous if her standards are low to reasonable. low to reasonable relative to the standards of her female peers, sure, but not relative to males -- males don't exclusively seek out partners that are superior to themselves. Relative to men -- especially the providing/traditional/normal kind -- women in general are hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 07:15 AM
1

I wish there was like a third sex/gender or something. I can't wait for a.i gfs. I can't wait for a.i gfs to be the norm and for men to evolve to prefer a.i over females. I can't wait for ungrateful females to experience what happens when they lose men's inherent pity/adoration.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 06:02 AM
–

Look at you acting like you would give a damn if you were given data
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 05:47 AM
1

The fact that o.p's assertion went right over your feminine head adds weight to the argument that women aren't actively cognisant of their hypergamous nature (and, by extension, aren't cognisant of the frustration it causes them - especially when they adopt a more non-traditional stance when dating) most of them are unaware of hypergamy "running [in] the background" Quote from o.p pertaining to hypergamy and how it always existed in women and is just "running in the background", as opposed to so…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 05:26 AM
2

What are you even talking about. Women don't become hypergamous -- they are hypergamous. O.p was saying that it is because of women's hypergamous nature that they ruin dating for themselves (create frustration) by being nontraditional/over-dating (relative to women of the past/traditional women) You saying that that's not the case they're just more particular after dating lots of men disproves absolutely nothing op said, and is just you paraphrasing o.p while presenting ur comment as a counterar…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 03:26 AM
5

If it is a causation issue then why didn't she just settle in the beginning of her dating journey? A) Because the guys who were there (at the beginning stages) didn't want to settle, ultimately, or they messed up (same thing) -- it takes two to settle. (Furthermore, guys with options, who are more likely to be involved with women, aren't exactly known for settling asap ..or settling in general) B) because women are more opportunistic than we give them credit for.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:41 AM
2

The baseline: $$,$$$,$$$
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 09:45 PM
1

Sigh, women always reduce perfectly sensible debates to insult hurling 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 09:42 PM
–

They are the more romantic sex; they experience emotions more intensely than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 09:16 PM
7

🔥🔥Forklift🔥certifieddd🔥🔥😮👌😫💦💦💦
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 11:39 AM
–

It was a figure of speech, relax; my statement was hyperbolic and allegorical in nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 01:59 AM
-1

almost hoping haha They can all go to hell who cares: i'm not biologically driven to worry about hoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 12:35 AM
0

Yeah. Women want traditional partners but deny their partners of the very thing they themselves desire: a traditional partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 12:21 AM
1

Oh, right. Bye 👋
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 10:15 PM
1

But I have. Give me realer examples than what i provided if you want to genuinely dismiss my worldview (I'm genuinely interested in truth and would listen). But you won't, because you can't, because reality doesn't operate the way you think. Let us put this convo to rest now.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 10:14 PM
1

Is that supposed to offend me 😂 women have easy access to sex, always have. I'm supposed to have a problem with that? It's like me taking pride in the fact that I can lift more than you -- I'm not that pathetic of a creature 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 10:12 PM
2

Even if i was single, i wouldn't adopt a philosophy of groveling at women's feet for their attention (I don't need to do that).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 10:10 PM
2

We're literally anatomically identical to cavemen, retard.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 09:57 PM
1

Again have nothing valid to say. Again contradictory statements with no real life example.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 09:55 PM
1

Let me join u in ur level: lmfaaaao of course you're a fucking undesirable lesbian I fell like most angry women on this sub are hideous societal rejects that men wouldn't look twice at 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 09:51 PM
1

What you are talking about never happened for most of human existence ✅ borderline fictional ✅ you exist in a temporary artificial environment, I.e., not the natural world ✅ cities are here today and nuked tomorrow then back to normal ✅ We are anatomically identical with humans from 200,000 years ago ✅ only thing different is our bullshit modern culture that will drive us to extinction ✅ Evolution is real ✅ evolution shaped us 200,000 years ago ✅ evolution doesn't happen in a span of 40 years ✅ …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 09:49 PM
1

I could almost effortlessly end u where u stand if we were conversing irl: real life example ✅ The only way you wouldn't die is if you had a man: real life example✅ That man would leave you if you were disloyal: real life example✅ You wouldn't be incentivised to be disloyal to Ur man otherwise I would end u: real life example.✅ Obviously I'm wasting my time talking to you so I will disengage from this waste-of-time interaction now -- enjoy the rest of ur day.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 09:40 PM
1

Everything I've said is true. You just give statements without real life examples. There's a word for that, it's called fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 09:31 PM
0

Modern women are something else... I almost wish the apocalypse was here already juuust so women can get a system reset
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 09:29 PM
1

Of course you have nothing mature to say in response.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 09:23 PM
0

Good for you dude
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 08:56 PM
1

All women are permanently 12
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 08:54 PM
1

If men want to fuck they fuck. Natural. If women want to fuck they pause and reconsider because disloyalty has always been akin to a death sentence for women. Losing their man has always been akin to a death sentence for women (women can't fight enemy men). Losing their women has never been a death sentence for men. Men, being self-sufficient creatures, have always been able to afford to not control themselves sexually --it bore virtually no negative ramifications (in fact it aided humanity in p…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 08:52 PM
1

K
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 03:24 PM
1

It's not beyond a man to be competent. We're judged for more than just our faces - we can work on our physique, work on our careers; fatten our wallets, we can work on our self defense, we can work on new start up ideas or our investment portfolios... We can work on our personalities. It takes effort. Men whom women don't find attractive aren't trying hard enough, and so they deserve to be lonely -- to hell with their feelings on the matter. Mens feelings never mattered all the times they were t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 03:13 PM
0

If u so much smarter and better u can figure it out The guy I responded to insinuated that women are considerably less retarded than men I merely pointed to facets of reality that disagree with his dumb point
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:57 PM
1

👍 I can't even argue with that
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:52 PM
1

Someone who doesn't whiteknight for women who don't give a fuck about them? Someone less pathetic than you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:48 PM
1

Not all men get to reproduce. Only something like 40% of men that ever lived got to pass on their genes. Not all men get their wants and needs catered to, that's female-thinking. Men live shit lives. Really shit lives (generally). A lot of men suffer and a lot of men never get a break. But that's how it should be. If women catered to all men, if women preferred anything other than competence first, we might not be here today. We are not the only humanoid species that ever existed, but we are the…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:46 PM
0

Yeah I'll bet you are glad they exist. In the natural world, men like you would be slaves, or dead. I know you're happy they exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:36 PM
-1

You wrote a comment addressing absolutely nothing relevant. Yet you feel like you achieved something because you responded. Typical purplepill woman. Must be funny to a loser of a human whose genes aren't meant to be here long-term. "We all" includes you, evidenced by your instinctual use of the term "hoe", dumbass. Be gone now and stop thinking that because you respond, that your views were never blatantly invalidated.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:33 PM
-2

Men are better than women at literally everything, including being dumb, so yeah, something like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:24 PM
-1

You're not part of the so-called patriarchy and even you used a term reserved for promiscuous women as an insult. Women who didn't have men defending them from other vicious men didn't fare so well. We all have an in-built biological understanding that women cheating is taboo. Women suffer for 9 months after 1 sex -- they have biological incentive to be loyal to someone who would help them. Men aren't punished for fucking, biologically speaking -- men have a biological drive to spread their seed…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:23 PM
0

If that was the case then feminism wouldn't be necessary and history would be a long list of women's achievements.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:09 PM
-2

That thoughtlessness that many men have is a huge contributor to our lack of extinction. You likely owe your very existence to your male ancestors' mindless fucking.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:04 PM
-3

We aren't equals -- what's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:02 PM
-1

The relationship being binned because of guys doing what they've always done to preserve our species is a modern phenomenon. It wasn't uncommon for most of history for men to have multiple women -- sexual exclusivity has always been a feminine expression of love. Women don't care about men's body count in the same way that men care because sexual exclusivity has always been a feminine expression of love. Men were expected to show their love by providing and protecting -- women couldn't care less…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:00 PM
1

Attraction is conditional. Love, not necessarily. Men are capable of entering a state of infatuation so unbelievably dumb that love overrides even self-preservation (women could never be so daft/romantic, I presume)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:45 PM
2

Cheating after a lot of thought as opposed to emotionless instinctual fucking is infinitely more offensive, dumbass One is akin to scratching an itch, and the other is akin to 1st degree (premeditated) murder
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 01:41 PM
–

I've always wondered about that It's really only something women can verify, meaning we'll never get a genuine answer as women would gladly not pick up on certain distasteful truths if it means preserving their image
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:03 PM
2

Men want to fuck but they can also love women. Women want to fuck men too, just very specific men. Women csn also love. Men wanting to fuck + men loving women are both reasons why a lot of us exist. There were other humanoid species that used to exist -- all gone. Being here today is no easy feat, and it was done doing specific things The men that don't need women in the sense that you're talking about existed, lived their women-less life, and now their genes aren't here. The genes that contribu…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:41 PM
1

Women who had sex as much as us were not favoured for commitment, and so their offspring weren't protected by their fathers, and so a lot of them died/were murdered. The women whose genes passed on were the ones favoured and protected by men, and those were the pretty, fertile, loyal ones, originally..... And so yeah eventually natural selection took out women who might've genuinely matched our libido
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:18 PM
2

Men being happier has to do with the fact that men are more romantic, and so romance and it's trappings would please men more than non-men whom are concerned with other things
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:04 PM
1

Whether you agree with me or not is irrelevant, but yeah, they do. Or not. They do what they want. Women have a hard time leaving self-sufficient men alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 12:39 PM
1

Men don't need women.They love women. It's kind of the same as need except it's not. Their love, appreciation and desire for women is one of many reasons why we are not extinct as a species. If men could reproduce asexually, and men didn't like women, women would be extinct right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 12:29 PM
2

if something were to happen to creatures that men don't like, they wouldn't go out of their (en masse) way to save said creature
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 12:19 PM
2

Men don't need chickens. Have you seen what happens to chickens...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 12:03 PM
1

Down voted and reported but no counter argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 07:06 AM
–

Women should be listened to in the same way that children are listened to. Women don't have a history of practicing critical thinking If, say, ghengis khan said to do x, you do x. If he says 1+1 = 7, then you nod your head and agree. In order to have a differing opinion for most of human history, you had to have had the ability to fight, first, before you could truly have opinions of your own. Women never really had the ability to fight men, so they never had experience or a history of having in…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 12:28 PM
–

Yeah, what she said. asexuals are nothing if not fun--to the point that "here for a good time but not a long time" is literally their genes' motto
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 09:07 AM
1

I stopped reading after the cancer part. It's not the most romantic way to handle things, but at least we throw the towel when you're virtually dead -- you heartless witches throw the towel when we run out of money -- that's your gender's version of virtually dead. Disgusting. Borderline sociopathic. Compared to this, men are infinitely more romantic. You keep arguing and arguing but it doesn't change the fact that you'd rather not love a broke guy--stop arguing with me and argue with yourself b…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 07:19 AM
1

No one ever argued that women don't pay their half, so everything you said was irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 11:34 PM
1

They still can't date who they want to date, generally speaking
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 09:47 AM
1

I would respond but it's not worth it. Just know, if you care about truth, that there is a response (containing truer -- and more relevant-to-the-discussion -- truths: e.g.,no one was ever talking about women playing half or halves shoulder all the bills No context was giving so general context is to be assumed, as opposed to the context you're trying to squeeze my argument into: are you paying all of it, in general? Talking about halves is an automatic no to that, so any points that follows is …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 09:41 AM
2

Your mom
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 06:01 AM
3

So... Women arent built to sleep around, but men are? 🤯
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 04:04 PM
1

So... Women weren't built to sleep around, but men are? 🤯
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 04:03 PM
1

Yet when you come here you are again faced with idiots asserting the just world fallacy that most couples are evenly matched in every department - age, socioeconomic standing and appearance. op always knew attractiveness had to do with more than just looks. I did too. The other guy was talking about looks. Well, attractiveness. I was letting him know that women don't value looks into the same way that men do, so men's value/attractiveness aren't defined strictly by looks. E.g., most women would …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 02:58 PM
–

Mens value aren't defined strictly by looks, my guy. And yeah, some men cheat -- men are wired to spread their seed far and wide, surprise surprise The fact that women cheat, alone, proves the point being made by the other guy: women date men that they aren't satisfied with, i.e., women date men that are "beneath them" for x reason
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 02:37 PM
–

People on Reddit amaze me with how obtuse they can be, especially in order to win an argument. E.g., are you sure men have a biological drive to be protective of women they love???? Have you ever seen this in real life? Do you have any evidence to support this claim???? (Literally happened to me yesterday) It's like asking me: are you sure men breathe oxygen? You've seen this irl??? Evidence????
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 02:32 PM
–

Beyonce's partner is literally a billionaire, hardly a simp, and hardly inferior relative to Beyonce I think the other guy was talking about women dating men with less dating options than themselves -- if you can get Beyonce and Rihanna, obviously that description doesn't apply to you In other news: Imagine talking about real life scenarios and then referring to Beyonce and Rihanna lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 02:27 PM
–

Something neurotypical people have.......
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 02:01 PM
–

Does everyone on Reddit live under a rock or something
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 02:00 PM
1

Your point doesn't disprove mine -- men love differently. Women are the fairer sex; we love y'all because y'all are wonderful, (but most importantly) beautiful creatures. If a woman loses her fairness... Then it follows that... ...I mean, men aren't fair... We couldn't care less about other men, romantically speaking. That's just how we are... It's like women leaving when her husband goes bankrupt, or when their bf lost his job and has been unemployed for X months now (not uncommon). You guys lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 05:36 AM
1

A based-on-real-life story that disrupts your understanding of how the world works and has always worked. Completely normal for you to reject based on no basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 12:46 AM
1

You can't engage any further because you have nothing to say to the truths I've mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 12:35 AM
1

How are you even a teacher lol I could end you where you stand: not fictitious Even if you had a feminine bf I'd end him too: not fictitious Story is based on real life things You have nothing to contribute so you resort to talking nonsense/focus on irrelevant talking points
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 12:34 AM
1

You don't need evidence for that? Just envision it: Fact: societies went to war. Constantly. Society A values traditional values and fosters strong masculine men, and supportive women. Society B is a cesspit of non-traditional feminine men and masculine females Despite their masculine females, the masculine males from society A absolutely destroys society B, enslaves their women and slay their soy boys. This is why non-traditional ways of living do not have a history of being successful. There's…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 12:13 AM
1

Like I said, if I wanted to I could end you where you stand.... Where does your theory fit into that reality.... (It doesn't) Your theory is only true if men were always nice... As a man, who regularly experiences the unfettered nature of men, i find that hard to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 11:38 PM
1

I don't understand a word if what you just said. Women didn't get better at dying lol - we wouldn't be here if that was the case. They got better at choosing bfs (chose strong protective ones), that makes more sense - that's why we're still here. I don't understand what you were saying... Were you saying I'm wrong because women evolved to be strong instead? Because they didn't? The lowest rank MMA fighter would easily destroy the best woman MMA fighter?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 06:47 PM
1

Traditional way of doing things have a proven track record of helping us not become extinct, by the way -- whereas nontraditional new age garbage does not! What matters more than survival...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 06:42 PM
1

I wrote on the other comment why it matters
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 06:37 PM
1

Right now, yes. But our bodies were shaped back then, so when we're talking about us, i.e., our bodies, back then matters more than right now. The problem here I think is that you don't see your body as having anything to do with your preferences, probably Our bodies have been shaped Females were shaped (back then) to prefer strong bfs, and females today are no different, anatomically speaking, from females back then
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 06:36 PM
7

Fair point. I would like to add that it's not common for men to go for the low hanging fruit, but yeah that does happen, I'd imagine, but not as frequently as you insinuate: you're assuming that men need to be providers so badly that they would, say, go out of their way to prefer an average-looking woman with no money over a drop dead beautiful gal who comes from money. Yeah, no. Men need to provide, yes, but they're not built the way you're insinuating. Men do what you say, sure, but not most m…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 06:32 PM
1

Not anymore. Not in the temporary artificial environment we've created. But in the natural state of the world? Yes, yes they do. Non-traditional people only exist in privileged settings. Privileged settings are hardly natural, and definitely not permanent. When the shit hits the fan, and a ship crashes on an island, all the fancy modern ideologies go out the window, and women quickly start doing women shit, and men start doing men shit, and the importance of traditional gender roles becomes glar…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 06:30 PM
1

See, that's the thing. "Normal", for humans, is defined by our time on earth. What has been normal on earth, for humans, is not what you've experienced in life. Normal, for humans, is a lawless free-for-all where people do what they want/can get away with. If men around you have never made you get the impression that men are protective creatures, especially around their loved ones, then ... You've been around some pretty pathetic people, probably. Or you're.. potentially not that observant. How …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 06:24 PM
1

Threat exists in the real world; your views don't factor in threat/danger into the equation, hence why they are erroneous. Also, I apologise 😔
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 06:13 PM
9

Another woman speaking for men... Men prefer love. If the woman is broke, so what, we still love. Women put love second - if the man is broke, then they'll check out the next guy in line.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 06:11 PM
1

I find it odd that you avoid all other valid arguments to focus on irrelevant details that are backed by naturally occuring/observable phenomenons. Their woman got in front of altercations and made herself subject to assault. Guy I knew fought the other guys. I've seen women get their phones snatched, and their bfs reciprocate. These things happen - do you live under a rock?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 06:08 PM
1

Yeah I'm sure that's the case 🙄 if this was back in the day I could literally end you where you stand. There would be nothing to stop me. Unless you happened to prefer competent men and had a strong man fighting me. Buuut I'm sure that doesn't make aaaaany sense whatsoever, ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 06:01 PM
1

They stopped their women from getting assaulted and robbed Are you 12? Do you live under a rock? Sigh The few women I've known that were molested as kids didn't have fathers ... How is it so hard to imagine a world where a loving adult male is beneficial to a family's wellbeing and to humanity's survival
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:58 PM
1

😂😂😂 you're telling me men weren't out there conquering all this time? That women never needed a man's protection... sigh This discussion is pointless
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:55 PM
3

Well yeah, who wants to date a gold digger? Poor women aren't gold diggers; gold diggers would leave you for someone richer. You're assuming that men would assume that all poor women are like this -- we don't. Yeah but those who do that (correctly) actually have a convincing basis, whereas you don't. Not this time.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:41 PM
5

You keep...speaking for men... It's like...you knowing me better than I know myself... I can totally date a broke girl; being poor isn't an automatic red flag nor an automatic deal breaker for guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:35 PM
1

In other words, men don't view women through the "quality" lenses, but women... --ok, even if they don't view men with "quality" lenses, that doesn't change the fact that they're not looking at you unless you had "quality" to begin with I'd argue that men view life permanently through the "horny" glasses...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:21 PM
10

It's not even a fact, we haven't established that it's a fact yet. It's a non issue to a man who has more than enough resources -- it can only be an issue in the sense that it could cause him to doubt her intentions, but not because it genuinely lowers her overall attractiveness rating
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:14 PM
13

Yeah, but you're still a woman. A bisexual man might date a broke woman or a broke man, if they're attractive and interesting enough (and if he's well-off enough)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:11 PM
10

Says you? A woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:10 PM
14

Women say they want xyz but they rarely date a penniless man with xyz... Never heard of it being normal for women to shoulder all the bills if she were in a position to -- whereas it's not unheard of for men to do that. Women want xyz, yes, but omit the fact that abc comes first...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:06 PM
1

1) It's inborn because people who didn't have these inborn attributes were less likely to survive and reproduce. Those who did, survived and reproduced. And passed on the preferences/attributes. 2) those are not men. Men never really did that, and most men don't do that. It's like saying I know some racist white guys so all white guys are racist...no. most men don't enjoy not providing and not protecting. 3)no I'm not. I'm saying women date up and it's normal/obvious, and men date whomever they …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 04:51 PM
1

Attempted robbery. General assault.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 04:41 PM
1

Reasoning: history of humans History: No law Man kill men Man rape/kill women Man too powerful for women Women with inherent romantic preference for strong (competent) providing man get protected and live Those who don't die from enemy man Fast forward thousands of years People populating the earth came from competent men who like to protect, and women who preferred protectors Fun fact: anatomically speaking, we're the same as these people from 200,000 years ago. To be bkunt...compared to this, …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 04:09 PM
1

I've known some stay at home dads that haven't been employed for over a decade -- they all hate their lives. Their lives are fine - the only thing missing is that they, the man, are not providing. And it kills them. They don't feel like men (not something they openly admit). Men have an inborn need to provide and protect. Women have an inborn need to seek the best mate that can provide and protect Men don't have an inborn need to seek protection from a woman -- they (in the context of all humans…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:50 PM
1

Yeah, I do know men that have protected their women. As a man myself i can attest to the existence of the male urge to protect loved ones - it's crazy to me that I have to provide evidence for such a natural phenomenon. It's not as common nowadays because we live in civilized settings with law enforcement etc., but before we reached this stage we had to live through ~200,000 years of savagery (those years shaped us - our preferences included) and during those years there were no police and plent…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 03:39 PM
1

Oh really I never said it was a bad thing. I even hinted that it was a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:57 PM
1

Wow. Have a good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:27 PM
1

Thank you for your input.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:26 PM
1

The day women truly date across, as per your standards (equal in all aspects/stats), is the day women start defending their man from public threats (they can take turns). Men have been doing that for women for over 200 millennia. Men have always been favoured for their competence. Women have always preferred competence; women have always dated up.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 12:13 PM
1

... you're doing all this mental gymnastics just to avoid admitting that women naturally date up / would prefer not to date losers Reminds me of this other guy I came across the other day doing mental gymnastics to avoid admitting that horniness is important to men... No shame in women preferring competent men, it's the most natural thing ever... And with good reason But men don't have a strong preference for competent women (some losers do). They prefer beauty, youth, loyalty...among other thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 11:53 AM
1

What the genders define as "better" and "worse" differs. Men can love women that aren't making anywhere near the same money as them. Women have a hard time preferring unemployed men over successful ones. For men it's about cuteness and other things. For women it's about competence and other things of that nature. I get that they may not always date up per se, but they'd usually always prefer to, if possible. Men being equally as picky as women doesn't make sense, evolutionarily speaking. We're n…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 11:25 AM
1

Oh ok
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 09:44 AM
-3

Lol how can it be true of everyone? If women usually date up then that means whoever's dating them is usually dating down? Or am I missing something 😂 It's funny that women think that we men value the same things.... We couldn't care less if we're dating up or down or sideways or interdimensionally.... A lot of us would just be happy to date..... Women have guys lining up to date them, they can afford to pick and so go for the best, I e., dating up is normal for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 08:45 AM
-2

Those who can't date up date across. But if given the choice they would date up.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 08:25 AM
1

This assumes that men value what women value. We may be similar in all aspects but we, men, don't value those aspects, necessarily. So while we might be of equal worth in your feminine eyes, you're not our equal per se in our eyes. As a young man, I view other females my age - similar in all other aspects - to be equal to me. They don't think so; they think they can find better men. And they'd be right. But why is it wrong when men take the same stance against the same chick years later? Why are…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 08:15 AM
3

Since when did we start putting maybes before definitelys
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 09:51 PM
1

So women can do anything men can do except overcome uncomfortability? Gotcha
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/24 09:10 AM
–

Even when we're not horny, we're still catering to horny agendas/agendas that would benefit us when we "finally" are horny. You may not be actively horny when you're deeming someone worthy of romantic attention, but if they were categorically incapable of catering to your horniness (at a later stage, ofc, we're gentlemen, after all)--if you were unable to fuck them, ever, you'd be categorically uninterested. Well, most men would be, anyway. It's why sexuality is sexuality. It's why we don't fuck…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 11:57 AM
–

While I don't disagree entirely, I must disagree that horniness is entirely irrelevant.........as a man, even when horniness isn't present, it's still present 😆 You gonna sit there and tell me that you're capable of loving someone, as a man, if you can't fuck them? Ever??? Well, that's you... And a lot of other men, sure. But I must insist that men are wired to fuck... And so it follows that the capacity for fucking must be present first in order for men to even pursue love etc. Sure, it can wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 09:23 AM
–

I can one-up that: I'm counting the title of this post as a personal compliment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 08:51 AM
-2

😆What the fuck kind of comment is that It's like defending billionaires if this post was about billionaire privilege: yEaH bUt tHeY cAn eAsiLy lOse iT alL No. Shit. Sherlock 🤯 There is nothing to defend here yet you're still defending... To me, it hints at the possibility that chicks, even with all these privileges--wont see themselves as being especially privileged unless they are fail proof-- which is the most female-esque response ever (because only chicks, who don't live in the real (man's) …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 05:19 AM
4

I thought they were discussing black pill...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 08:52 PM
7

You: anything men can do, women can do NBA: Yeah idk about that bud
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 01:51 AM
1

In a democratic setting, being a woman is only hard if you weren't born pretty. Being a woman is hard in that you can't do what males can, sure, but you still have access to a chosen male's competence, as a female. Actually being competent is what I think is truly hard--and apparently females don't disagree because they left that side of the equation up to men, in most cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 09:43 AM
4

Sounds like something a sociopath would agree with (Not saying you're wrong...)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 12:33 AM
1

Man strong Man do what he want Weak opponents oppose man Man strong, man defeat weaklings Man do what he want Man want fuck Man fuck New baby man here Man help baby man be man if man like mother. If no like man go and do what he wants (fuck) Man die Repeat x12,000 History in a nutshell.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 08:47 AM
1

Yeah... Seems bad, huh Except Men have a history of ...reigning supreme Given that the threat at hand (women) isn't a novel one (the strategy/nature of the attack is novel, probably, but not the opponents themselves)... It's all fun and games till men pull the plug ...on the game..and all the fun that came with it You can easily win against t-rex in a game that he wasn't even playing with you... But he can... Turn around and stop... Your game... Anytime he wants to, really....
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 08:29 AM
1

Dude, your opinion on this is literally the mainstream opinion of virtually all modern women? Are you crazy lol. Anything you said about my opinions' originality or whatever--which is utterly irrelevant to the discussion at hand as it has nothing to do with veracity--is also applicable to any stance you hold, too? It's actually just you, a woman, trying to get an emotional reaction 🙄 good example of why we shouldn't ever be vulnerable around women. They can't hurt you so they'll use your emotion…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 06:16 PM
1

Do I really have to read all that when your opening line is an ad hominem type statement 🙄 I caught a glimpse of a statement towards the end "vulnerable guys are the best for relationships"--aaaand that's exactly why we have differing opinions. Being in a relationship is the last thing on my mind, and it should be the last thing on every other males' minds, too. Guys who spend their lives aligning themselves with the preferences of women are living life wrong 😴 Is your bf or whatever a self-made…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 06:10 AM
1

1) zzz 1.1) if you pay attention, you'll come to the realisation that I am not the one who has trouble "understanding" here 2.1) you responded to me so you don't have to have said that. It's what I was always saying, so it's not irrelevant. 2.2) I never said men shouldn't be vulnerable. I literally said they can be but to people who love them unconditionally. Always being emotional and vulnerable can open men up to sabotage from ill-intentioned people. Men have things to do. They should adopt mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 04:44 AM
1

You're concerned with slapping on the correct labels, I understand. My point is: allowing men to indulge in emotions to the same extent that women do is counterproductive and dangerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:12 AM
1

True or false: People who dwell on emotions (more) are likely to experience vulnerability more than those who have better things to focus on Vulnerability, when just merely experienced without guidance (how it usually happens), can sometimes lead to ...undesirable outcomes I literally said you can be vulnerable to your parents, i.e., to people who truly, genuinely love you. Mastering emotions or emotional regulation is important. Basking in a neverending stream of emotions is counterproductive. …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 02:42 AM
1

Men who are more prone to being emotional are more prone to lashing out Men who are proficient in the skill of regulating emotions and prioritising things other than dwelling on emotions are less likely to blow up
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 01:25 AM
1

Normalising men being emotional opens up a Pandora's box wherefrom school shooters and extremists etc. come out guns blazing It's ok to be vulnerable to your parents ...and other family members. Men have things to do. Things that need to be done irrespective of how they feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 07:56 AM
0

Lol Women will say all the things you need to do in order to please them (being the nice guy, or blue pill guy, whatever) but at the end of the day, this does not guarantee sexual attraction, as that is controlled by biological drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 10:08 PM
1

You could be on to something there. Very insightful. There's definitely more to the "why" The economy plays a part, too, in my opinion. Yesterday, men could afford to support a family on his earnings alone. Yesterday, he was a king in his own home--as he should be, as he always has been for all of history (and we survived as a species under this model). For whatever reason (elites don't want to share power and or understand that men, especially united, can be a threat) it's extremely hard to sin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 08:34 PM
2

...I probably overreacted there, but it truly irks me that women try to shame men for merely having preferences. We're already disposable enough as it is--now we're not even allowed to have preferences on top of everything else we do/sacrifice? Smh 😒 Anyway, sorry. What i said probably isn't even applicable to you... Sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 12:38 AM
3

They prefer it in the same way that they'd prefer a brand new car (if at all possible) over one with over 100 miles usage. It's disgusting that women try to shame men for their preferences. You guys have your preferences (tall, rich, strong), and we have ours 😒 you don't see men shaming women for preferring competent men--we work on ourselves and rise to meet your dumb standards. Enjoy your youth if you really can't live without getting used by every other guy that sweet talks you, but don't tur…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 12:35 AM
2

Virgin women will always have value; men today are no different from men 200,000 years ago, anatomically speaking. We value loyalty and reservation--always have, always will. Any guy that disagrees, feel free to let me come fuck your wife/gf/crush in front of you and see if you don't try to stab me in the process 😴 Modern women/media have managed to convince a large part of the male population that they should settle for whatever they can get (the town bike), and average men, being the beggars t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 12:21 AM
1

Nothing more dangerous than men who can't regulate their emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 03:36 PM
1

1) Yeah. I know you didn't talk about biological drive, hence why your views have less credibility in my eyes. I understand your views, though. They're just irrelevant in the context of supremacy--i.e., people that are free to live true to their nature. Also irrelevant in the face of biological drive + human existence/history-- men, historically, have either had to be competent men (providers, protectors) or die/be enslaved, more or less. Obviously we survived for 200,00+ years so obviously men …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 10:24 PM
1

I agree that men from high class gravitate towards high class women--because they're on the same page about a lot of things (worldviews & values included), not because men are biologically driven to seek women with the most status. Men like good looks, for one. Invariably, they will always put looks before status. Whereas women can overlook physical appearance to an unbelievable degree if a man's status is high enough. I believe this is because status is indicative of a man's ability to provide …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 08:11 PM
1

I see. Interesting. I did not know that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 11:45 AM
1

Yeah. I'm saying I have the reasons. I'm saying I binned your argument on the basis that it is untrue. I'm just refusing to go through the trouble of trying to convince you that I have the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 11:44 AM
1

I get what you're saying. Say what you want-- I like my standards. It applicable across the board. Since the beginning of history, the guys with most status could usually do what they wanted. In most contexts, respected people with status aren't...bound... subservient....etc Even in the animal kingdom my definition makes sense: alphas are usually able to do what they want. Wanna know who has most status in a pack of predators? It's probably the one most free to do what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 11:43 AM
1

Not a concern? Every fictional character in the story would disagree with you, I imagine 🤔 but ok--yeah, like I said, I haven't read the book 😅 my point is still valid, though... Not that it matters...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 11:38 AM
1

The reason I do so is because I'm primarily interested in collecting truth (+testing veracity if existing truths in collection) and I've got it I've explained that I'm not especially interested in convincing you I keep trying to say bye but you keep responding... Maybe...you like talking to me? 😀
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 11:36 AM
1

I agree. Except, we're discussing men at the top--who aren't fettered by plebian concerns. Men at the top, specifically, who are free to live true to their nature. What is status if not the liberty to do as you please? Think of hierarchies in a corporate setting: "high status" people therein are free to do whatever they please, more or less--within the boundaries of laws, ofc. The higher up the ladder a person is, the more he can do what he wants. What is status if not the liberty to do as you p…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 11:32 AM
1

Well yeah, but the guy was like rich rich
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 11:28 AM
1

Of course not And I don't have to It's the archetypal love story ...probably Wherein my argument is validated: rich man date not rich girl Not as abnormal as you assert, perhaps Who knows Bye
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 08:31 AM
1

They're not thaaat high in status if they can't afford to flip every one off Like how Elon told his advertisers to go fuck themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 08:29 AM
1

I didn't say that we can't establish causality Just because you wrote a comment in response, it doesn't mean your argument is now valid again. You point to correlation as justification but correlation doesn't imply causation Meaning your argument isn't as robust as you initially thought. ..that's enough for me, I know I can't change your mind, and I'm not interested in doing so. Have a good day
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 08:27 AM
1

See: pride and prejudice Men dating down has been happening since forever Women rarely if ever do that, though. This discussion is getting tiring now. Have a good day 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 07:17 AM
1

Embarrassing for women, absolutely. Men with more money than brain cells can afford to not care what the entire world thinks of their lover.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 07:15 AM
1

.....sigh. correlation =/= causation There. And with that, your arguments is in the bin. Bye
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 07:13 AM
1

I don't understand what could possibly compel someone with over 30 million dollars to desire a high status woman???? What can the woman's status do for thisnl kind of man???? Please explain it to me lol Women's conception of men is comical
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 12:10 AM
1

I don't understand what could possibly compel someone with over 30 million dollars to desire a high status woman???? What can the woman's status do for thisnl kind of man???? Please explain it to me lol Women's conception of men is comical
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 12:06 AM
1

They choose those women cause they're good women. Not because of their social class per se. Let's put it this way: if all high class women behaved like lower class women tomorrow, high class men won't be interested. They aren't attracted to women for class per se--whereas women get off to class. All high class men could start acting like buffoons tomorrow and women will still desire them 😑 cause they seek providers. Men don't! Especially self sufficient high class men. Idk what's so hard to unde…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 12:00 AM
1

A high status man with 30million+ net worth would marry a McDonalds worker if he desired to do so. Cuz he man and do man things, like not carrying about status. A Dr would prefer another Dr to help pay the bills.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 07:54 AM
1

I would like to add that, yes, a lot of ppl in great professions prefer women who are close to them financially, cuz they can help with bills bla bla bla, yes--these ppl are not high status.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 07:53 AM
0

We're talking about men here. Men with status, to be specific, but men nonetheless. You're saying men are concerned with social class when considering a mate? I'm saying, as man myself, that if a man likes a woman, and he, say, came to find out that she works at MC Donalds--he would still like her. This is not true for women, though, so I get how you'd think that a man would also value status among women...but it's not a deal breaker for most men. We value different things. We don't seek provide…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 07:40 AM
-1

Lol Imagine being a woman and arguing with men about the nature of men...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 01:52 AM
65

1) Get your money right 2) date whichever consenting adult you desire No need to complicate things
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 11:15 PM
1

Women, actually, don't complain about such things. They don't. Problem is, simply being a man doesn't make someone a man anymore, not in this economy. The modern-day equivalent of yesterday's traditional man--whom women would gladly support/clean for --is today's deca-millionaire.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 05:58 PM
1

I can respect this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 05:53 PM
4

Interesting take... Though I find that hard to believe. 1) how does it benefit the ruling elite, exactly? I get that disunity in general is a pro for them, but men leaving behind masculinity in favour of wearing dresses? That can only be good for the rulers. Women embracing quasi-masculinity, making themselves undesirable (marriage-wise), that can only be good for them? Men won't fight to the death for these "women", or anything else. Less masculinity = less fighting/resistance. Gender roles exi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 11:36 PM
1

I'm not sure I understand.. but yeah..the world is the world.. It sucks and could be better.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 07:30 AM
1

Shit.. My bad. I'm an insufferable, socially inept loser. Don't mind me. Have a good day~
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 07:10 AM
1

I wasn't gonna reply... but it annoys me so much seeing all these retarded firstworlders prancing around thinking they're so fucking smart. I'm not here to convince you. Everything I said is so self-evident that to even debate it is asinine! Existing for 200,000+ years is such a collosal challenge that we are the only homo-species left!!! And how is it do you think that we survived so long? I.e not die? I.e, saved??? (Men weren't saved, though). Modern day humans have it so easy now. And it's mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 05:42 AM
3

Men are so pivotal to the continued existence of women, are you crazy??? Lol. Even if you have data of women being killed by males, your statement is still invalid: men haven't killed more women than they've saved. You couldn't possible quantify/gather all the data for all the good that men have done, and continue to do. All the protection they have provided, all the technology they've invented, all the research, all the books, all the cities, all the roads, all the marines keeping enemies away,…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 06:12 AM
2

Yeah, no. Speak for women, not men. I speak for men because I understand what it's like to be one. You don't, so your statements mean very little. It's basically fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 06:01 AM
2

You can lmfao all you want but manly men would die for their women. I understand that that is incomprehensible to you, a female.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 05:56 AM
2

I would. I thought of that. Women turn down men for looks, too. So yeah, men are not alone in that. -10 romance points for men but -10 for women, too. But women are alone in the whole $$$tatus>crush thing
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 05:54 AM
3

It's funny that women are always giving men a hard time about how insensitive we are to their humanity... In my experience, women tend to be the more, er, psychopathic gender... For instance, I could never dream of turning down a crush because of their job/financial status, whereas women do that shit regularly. They'd actually reject or demote a crush based on his financial status. A CRUSH! As in she already likes the guy! Men could never disapprove of a crush because she works at Mcdo alds--men…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 05:50 AM
1

You're an unnecessarily yuge threat to the prospect of a happy, loyal relationship is what your are. Bisexuality and the likes of it isn't a sexuality, but rather, it is an abomination: a palpable epitomisation of the vulgarity inherent to sodomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 02:38 AM
1

That's how You view yourself. I was just letting you know how everyone else does: so you're bi The energies & ramifications described in this post pertaining to bisexuality is applicable to you ...because you're bi
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 02:14 AM
-1

So you're bi
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 02:10 AM
3

Of course. Can we also stop shaming broke guys while we're at it. Short guys need love, too. Short, broke guys, especially. How can you think that you can ask an entire sex to just casually rewire their inherent, installed-by-evolution, rooted-in-their-anatomical-build urges & preferences?....as if they had any say in their making in the first place..... ...you're funny. Women prefer the things they prefer cause that's just how they are. And that's just how they are because, a long time ago, tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 06:14 AM
1

I mean, THERES LITERALLY A SONG CALLLED "SCRUB" BY TLC, WHEREIN THE ARTISTS STIPULATE: "I DON'T WANT NO SCRUB! A SCRUB IS A MAN THAT CANT GET NO KOVE FROM ME" -- IT WAS A FRICKEN CHART-TOPPING HIT!!! and you come along and say, on a Reddit post, "men shouldn't like hoes", and everybody loses their minds. What a time to be alive...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 05:57 AM
1

It's seriously hideously ridiculous that the concept of men watching out for themselves is being challenged--how is it not already the norm.....
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 02:18 AM
3

It's seriously hideously ridiculous that the concept of men watching out for themselves is being challenged--how is it not already the norm.....
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 02:18 AM
5

Yeah, no. We're horny all the time because we are the descendants of horny people. The prude cavemen didn't get to propagate their seeds as much as the hornier ones ...naturally.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 05:16 AM
4

Paying for sex is like women using their sexiness to get what they want. Which they do all. The. Time. Money makes men valuable to women. Pussy makes women valuable to men. Women use pussy to get what they want. Men use money. Why shame men????? Because men paying for pussy disrupts women's pussy power, and they don't like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/23 03:49 PM
–

Haha. "Phase"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 01:12 PM
1

I don't know about "more artistic", but I think I get the gist...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/23 12:57 PM
1

Are you a girl? Asking if this is an insecurity that men have? Yeah. It is. Seems pretty accurate. Doesn't apply to dumb newage young men, though -- not necessarily. I was once one of them. Then I grew up, had some shit life experiences, and came to realise the importance of tradition and a traditional woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 11:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter