TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ReversedGif Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by ReversedGif on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think you missed my point. Fulfilling one aspect of a each box (e.g. platonic friends ... and carbohydrates) isn't necessarily sufficient to happy (or even alive). You have to view it a bit more holistically.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 12:39 PM
3

Food isn't broken down on the hierarchy into each vitamin/mineral/macronutrient you need, yet you will literally die if completely deprived of some of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 09:15 AM
5

Tall men were quickly pulled off the dating market by women their own age in high school and never had a chance to date women much younger than themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 04:36 AM
0

Is it just me, or does reading the word "privilege" here make others irrationally annoyed too?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 04:56 PM
24

Toxic masculinity seems to be defined as "anything bad males do", so surely the same should be true of toxic femininity?
/r/MensRights03/02/22 06:31 AM
9

the girl monkey probably thinks the doll is real and has instincts to take care of it Yes..? And that's probably why human girls like dolls too, at some semi-conscious level. How is that a flaw?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 01:46 AM
5

adjective: normal conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 05:52 AM
4

Can anyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 04:28 PM

Why is it so hard to fathom that social norms have not yet adjusted to the drastic change that the rise of social media created? Saying "women as a group are being dumb" is not misogyny, any more than saying "men in early WW2 Japan were being dumb" is misandry. Average behavior of the group is determined by social norms. Humans aren't too different from lemmings. The point being, an attack on the group has very little overlap with an attack on an individual, and so calling it misogyny is a non s…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 02:46 AM
10

The way you change yourself is by pretending until it's a habit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/21 08:39 PM
5

If blowjobs and money aren't care and investment, what is?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 08:31 PM
3

Ultimately, the only person you can control is yourself. Blaming others is just mental masturbation. If there's a third party, sure, they should blame and punish the perpetrator. However, they shouldn't encourage learned helplessness in the victim. As usual, society (being primarily guided by slogans) gets this nuance wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 07:41 PM
2

That doesn't conflict with the previous post.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 07:32 PM
1

As someone who can relate on a physical level (thin, big breasts) I'm confused; since when are these unattractive characteristics..?
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/21 10:28 PM
3

The sperm don't somehow know where to go... they're equally present everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/21 07:18 PM
2

Because it's nice when people are intellectually honest rather than Machiavellian? And we should encourage that?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 10:38 PM
1

Is that wrong/evil for them to do? You make it sound kind of evil, but I don't see why it would be. And why would he necessarily move on?
/r/RedPillWomen02/01/21 11:00 PM
6

The species would die if nobody had sex. Try a little broader of a perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 06:11 AM
4

Kaguya-sama: Love is War (anime). It has pretty much all of what you asked for and is painfully good.
/r/RedPillWomen25/11/20 08:51 PM
4

Nobody is remembered because of genes. Genghis Khan begs to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 01:22 PM
3

3 times more often = "not so true anymore"??
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 05:00 PM
2

50% of women victims of homicide are killed by their partners vs 6% of men. That stat is very misleading. Men are murdered much more often in general. That stat could be true if men and women were killed by partners at the same rate, and if men were killed for other reasons much more often than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 03:35 PM
15

Sounds like a great way to encourage mediocrity...
/r/MensRights20/10/20 11:31 PM
13

Well, COVID showed us that the majority of workers are nonessential and that society can limp along when everyone in non-essential service industries is put on leave...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:54 PM
1

Is this a woke left-wing subreddit or just a normal left-wing subreddit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/20 02:42 AM
5

For reference, the grandparent comment said: How ridiculous. I love taking care of my fiance and my home and I thoroughly enjoy being feminine. How dark and extreme of me. Not sure why they deleted it.
/r/RedPillWomen07/09/20 09:33 PM
-3

You're basically arguing it's racist to brutalize them because are black but ok brutalize them because they are male You're strawmanning. Nobody is saying both of those things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/20 08:50 PM
4

Regarding your first point: Whatever happens after the police are done (so sentencing and jail time) is completely irrelevant when we're talking about police brutality. The following stat - "Men accounted for 80.4 percent of persons arrested for violent crime" (from the wiki article I linked) - is completely independent of post-arrest events and supports my initial argument, namely that males interact with police more. Your linked study only covers post-arrest events. Regarding your second point…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/20 06:11 PM
-3

Men commit the majority of crime, so why do you think think this is an issue of bias? If you look at the "United States" section, the crime categories that I would imagine police get involved in (e.g. robbery, burgery) are committed by males at a rate of 85-90%. This doesn't completely explain why 96% (your stat) of killings by police are male, but the remaining difference could easily be explained by how males are stronger and are more likely to require more force to apprehend.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/20 05:09 PM
6

Reversing these sorts of things forces people to confront the hypocrisy of them both.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/20 09:53 PM
3

Is this satire? Almost got me.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/20 06:48 PM
4

Yes, but I found nearly all of it to be irrelevant. The bans meet the colloquial definition of "censorship", and any language lawyering over it is just masturbatory.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 12:08 PM
7

Nobody said anything about the legality of censorship, free speech, or the First Amendment. Nobody said anything about the government stepping in. OP said "censorship is wrong," which is an opinion and therefore not really refutable. You jumped in, seemingly trying to argue that it wasn't technically censorship, but then I showed that censorship is indeed an applicable term here. Now, you're continuing to strawman.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 10:36 AM
3

Maybe /r/futanari.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 07:49 AM
4

When a company has a monopoly (e.g. as Reddit does due to network effects), their power approaches that of the government. Then, the word censorship applies. Imagine if your internet service provider cancelled your internet plan due to something you said online, and that there was no other service provider in your area to switch to. How does that differ from the government preventing you from speaking? The ISP would have nearly as much power as the government. Therefore it qualifies as censorshi…
/r/MensRights01/07/20 07:43 AM
3

Get a divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 03:37 PM
2

And yet women were happier back then... assuming we can extrapolate from this, which only studied the past 50 years. The point being that, yes, "sexism" did exist, but nobody called it that and women weren't very mad about it; in fact, they were probably happier on the whole than they are now. So, any desire for revenge is, at best, misplaced.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 01:18 AM
6

Because that's what it means (in English) ... https://www.lexico.com/definition/entree
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/20 03:54 PM
1

An app would be much less obtrusive and annoying than having to remember to send texts every few hours...
/r/RedPillWomen12/01/20 01:15 AM
7

Not being out-bred, conquered, and killed by your neighboring countries is stability...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 05:43 PM
1

Source? Who does this/what is this practice called?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/19 06:19 PM
1

You're missing my point, which is that there is an objective amount control one has on a situation irrespective of his particular views on the situation. You're missing my point, which is that your control is only limited by your intelligence and knowledge. An infinitely intelligent person could simulate the universe à la Laplace's demon and figure out what they need to do to get exactly what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 11:38 PM
1

People aren't random number generators. Nobody is going to punch you for literally no reason. A (perhaps impossibly) sufficiently aware, intelligent person could have foreseen the possibility if it ended up, in fact, happening. In any case, I don't think basing your theory around an event that has a likelihood on par with being hit by a meteorite is very sound.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 11:24 PM
1

On the flipside, if someone just punches me in the face for no reason, then the harm could not have been avoided by me regardless of how internal my locus of control is. Why were you near someone who was likely to punch you in the face?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 09:59 PM
1

Well I don't know which part of the sum was spousal support and child support. Child support should be repaid. Why wouldn't spousal support be repaid? She had an affair, which often invalidates alimony.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/19 03:58 AM
8

from above: https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/Woman-Sentenced-to-Jail-for-False-Rape-Accusation-Rolls-Eyes-in-Court-491565291.html
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/19 03:10 AM
1

in general the female reproductive system is messed up. What does that mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/18 01:40 AM
10

One of those rapey centrists. What? Are "rapey centrists" a thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 01:52 AM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clothing_fetish Depending on the exact circumstances, the situation described could definitely qualify.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 04:52 PM
1

I'd wear a kilt during sex if she was into that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 04:25 PM
2

commit to a relationship with me How do you define that?
/r/RedPillWomen31/05/18 05:03 PM
1

OP said "flamboyantly homosexual and feminine," which is not the same thing as "flamboyant." Flamboyantly is acting as an adverb to modify the rest, not an adjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/18 12:02 AM
2

Sex has the potential to create new human life, which is quite unique, as far as activities go. It is a peak, on at least some axis.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/18 12:12 AM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/17 06:40 AM
3

Ugh, capitalize please.
/r/RedPillWomen12/08/17 02:46 AM
0

1) They meant: False. I'd say it affects their sexual attraction if you're a horrible shallow person. 2) No, they're not saying that. They're saying that a man meeting a horribly shallow woman might lose some sexual attraction.
/r/RedPillWomen08/03/17 07:37 AM
2

From Wikipedia, Coitus interruptus Failure rates (first year) Perfect use 4% Typical use 22% Basically, it's pretty good, not much worse than condoms (2%, 18%). But the male needs to have sufficient control and self-restraint... also it doesn't prevent any STIs, which can be (IMHO) a bigger deal than pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 02:19 PM
2

[citation needed] AFAIK, this is just a common myth.
/r/RedPillWomen01/02/16 01:27 PM
2

FYI, you can edit comments after the fact.
/r/RedPillWomen18/12/15 10:15 AM
19

Git is just as distributed as Mercurial, FYI.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 02:50 PM
9

respected her need for boundary Are we talking about the same Edward "watches-you-while-you-sleep" Cullen?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 11:17 AM
2

I think you meant "WHEN not IF."
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 04:28 AM
-4

Apparently this defines "plate:" http://therationalmale.com/2011/08/19/plate-theory-2/ The quoted part retells the story from the "plate"'s perspective. Good luck from there.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 05:18 PM
-1

No, not quite... and you're stupid.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 02:30 AM
-2

What kind of "obvious physical differences" are there in reproductive organs?
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 07:10 PM
1

Sexist!
/r/TheRedPill15/06/13 03:36 AM
1

Beautiful. Though too long for the other TRPers, apparently.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/13 02:31 AM
-2

Oops, didn't notice which subreddit I was on. But for the sake of argument: I'm assuming you paid for those video games, right?
/r/TheRedPill04/06/13 02:29 AM
0

Low value? You don't value women who put out?
/r/TheRedPill04/06/13 12:22 AM
1

faeces*
/r/TheRedPill23/05/13 10:07 PM
3

fazes*
/r/TheRedPill23/05/13 02:05 AM
7

but [chasing women] is just such a time and money sink, I can't justify getting a [girlfriend] or something.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/13 02:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter