TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Reverserer Archive

View 0 posts and 79 comments by Reverserer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

IDK I have an ex that I still talk to. I had a very serious medical condition and he took care of in a way that proved he is a very very HVM - TMI - this man wiped my ass when I couldn't. I will never cut him out of my life for that. Maybe this is a extraordinary situation.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy16/09/20 11:14 AM
1

They have the choice because they are not forced by necessity or law to do one or the other. They have social pressure. Everybody is influenced by society in everything they do. But being pressured does not remove the choice. But men have that same choice - why is it 'pressure' when talking about men but a 'choice' when talking about women. Men are not forced by law to work to support their families. I literally said men are pressured into working, I am not sure how that is inferring they don't.…
/r/MensRights26/11/18 02:17 AM
2

I have to ask: why do you view raising children and working as 2 equal decisions? Do you feel that children would be better raised by their parents or by strangers in daycare? Why do you think that women have the choice and don't feel/have any social pressures when it comes to child rearing? Just as men have social pressures women do too. To infer they don't is pretty ignorant. Why must we put one gender down to raise the other? why must we cast doubt upon societal influences and pressures of on…
/r/MensRights25/11/18 06:09 PM
1

girl here - you're right. I don't feel there is a difference - it's preference. Perhaps it is seen as more acceptable due to the fact that breasts are sexualized and it is maybe being seen as appreciating women only for her sexual attribute - but if we are going to say that then wouldn't we say that the man's height is being sexualized as well? I would say, all things being equal, that there are probably more women who would not date a man due to his height than men that would not date a woman b…
/r/MensRights26/10/18 11:55 PM
5

the comment section is an overall cesspool of hate of every kind - from race to gender.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:16 AM
1

Right. So I'll take this entire blurb as well as all your other posts as you simply being aggressive and not really looking for true dialogue. Accusatory and nasty is all I read in your words. thanks but no thanks.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:22 AM
0

So a little analogy - the recent presidential elections here in the US. Why did Trump win? He promised jobs to the states that usually are blue and easily flipped them red with this promise. Those people didn't care about his dog whistles to the white supremacists, they didn't care that he bragged about sexually assaulting women - and children for that matter with his pageant comment, they had no interest in who he actually was as a person or businessman with 13 bankruptcies; they wanted jobs. p…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:50 PM
-3

I disagree feminism isn't the enemy....misguided individuals and/or those individuals who choose to run their shit under the feminist flag are the enemy. An idea cannot be inherently bad
/r/MensRights10/12/17 05:48 AM
-2

I don't have more or even anywhere near equal power to a lot of people in a lot of different spheres that doesn't make powerless. You know who propagates racism? Parents and peers. You know who propagates inequality, parents and peers. In that sphere I have a plentiful supply of power. I get what your saying but my point was that not all women are like this and as soon as we stop calling the women who say it's ok to grope men or that men can't be victimized feminists perhaps those you do have po…
/r/MensRights10/12/17 05:43 AM
-1

First off, not my tent. Like any movement you take the good with the bad. The women who fight for xyz and are on the side of right also fight for abc which is the side of wrong. Do you throw the bath water out with the baby?
/r/MensRights10/12/17 05:38 AM
-4

No that's exactly my point. You can call yourself whatever you want that doesn't make it so. As stated in my first post. Whether they are cited, quoted, held in high regard ....it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 05:35 AM
-10

you are absolutely ridiculous. so, me, some random person on the internet cannot be a true feminist? No, I am not any of those people you listed - I am the random person on the internet who said groping someone, anyone, without their consent is assault. Regardless of if you are male or female. I'm not even sure what point you are trying to make with your rant other than to drop names. Further, whatever you want to call mainstream feminism - if it doesn't treat everyone equally and claims that me…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 10:29 PM
-9

I think what people have to understand is that there is a clear definition of what feminist means - if you grope someone without their consent and then claim that it's ok for whatever reason, you are not a femenist you are just an asshole who sexually assaults people. As a woman i recognize that fact. as a feminist i recognize that fact. to say anything other is just naming yourself....i can call myself whatever i want it doesn't mean it is so.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 06:27 PM
0

The man's body is affected you just don't get it - women can die in pregnancy as well as get a host of other issues never you mind the other normal stuff that pregnancy brings. that is what i mean by equal consequence and equal consideration -these are things a man does not even have to deal with. ever. You don't want to engage in labor for 18 years don't have sex? You cannot force your ideological views upon a woman and make her choose between financial and lifetime ruin by carrying the baby an…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 10:03 PM
-7

So if a man wants to keep the baby he should have that choice as well and make her carry it to full-term? That is the problem, you can't have one without the other. This issue will never be equal between the sexes bc the mans body is not effected. There are not equal considerations and consequence weights on both sides. This fight needs to die.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 06:31 AM
3

As a woman, this was a huge point of contention for me with her. This and the woman card. Both disgusting examples of sexism
/r/MensRights22/01/17 06:11 AM
1

While maybe not explicitly sexist, his, at best stance on Not stopping the defunding of planned parenthood - which handles many a mans health issues as well - and not just sexual - is toeing the line. This targets low income women (and men but largely women) who get more than just birth control from PP. all for what? To stop a woman from having bodily autonomy...aka abortion - which one could argue is explicitly sexist toward women. His first repeal of the ACA was mainly about insurance carriers…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 06:07 AM
1

oh pardon me i didn't see where i was posting - i should have known better- carry on.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 05:03 PM
1

This is not feminism. I don't even know what this is but it ain't feminism.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 05:13 AM
0

But a woman is considered raped even if there is no penetration yes? She is what I like to call a cunt.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 07:28 PM
1

While there aren't a lot of false rape accusations, i can't disagree with you on this - if this guy hadn't been in jail his life would of been fucked forever...not just 2 years....i am a firm believer in stiffer penalties all around...
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/15 09:25 PM
6

"Loving biological mother". /sarcasm
/r/MensRights24/11/15 09:49 PM
1

your position is inconsistent and hypocritical- you say life is sacred yet ok to discard under certain circumstances. it is either sacred or it isn't. Furthermore, I clearly believe life deserves protection (even in the womb). further reiterates my assertment of your hypocrisy. i was being sarcastic re: the 21st century and i do apologize if i offended it wasnt meant to be offensive is what meant to prove a point - that sex for procreation is an out dated thought. I never said i have no issue wi…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:17 PM
1

First, If I can't force my morals on you, does that mean you get to force your morals on me? I'm not forcing my morals on you - no where did i say the woman has to have an abortion - she can give the baby up for adoption or keep it - completely her choice. I treated you neither poorly nor condescendingly. i simply did not agree with you. the conversation is not about pro-life or pro-choice - and that was point all along - the question is about consequence. The women potentially has none whereas …
/r/MensRights28/08/15 06:23 PM
1

this is not reality though and further leaning toward a pro-life position. For those of us that are pro-choice - abortion means nothing in terms of morality. You cannot force your morals on me or anyone else. Reality is that sex is had for pleasure much much much more than it is for procreation - this is the 21st century - join us in it. there are many procedures that are done as 'mere convenience' that come with just as many risks and are allowed, the only point of contention here is your belie…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:18 PM
1

I think again you're missing the point - the main point being both know the consequences but only the women gets to decide how those consequences play out - the social implications of this are staggering to say the least...the potential for abuse of an opt out right is overwhelming...i am not saying that this is the answer - what i am saying is that as it stands it is not a fair system. All things are completely equal until conception -then the man has no say in anything that happens even though…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 04:29 PM
1

well to pull the point further - it's saying that society is not taking responsibility for it's actions - specifically women aren't bc, simply put, they potentially have no responsibility (abortion or adoption) whereas the man doesn't even have options. again, i don't know what the answer is, but i can admit that it's not fair. 2 made the decision to have sex, but only 1 gets to change both their lives forever? Further, it's a long ugly road to think about how this will actually play out in real…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:59 PM
1

or give the child up for adoption - this is always an option. there are many issues that would need to be factored into this...scary complicated issues... I think by nature of having sex that makes you half responsible why? you mutually decide to have sex. You mutually decide to either use or not use birth control. why would you not mutually decide if you want the kid? and why, if the man does not want the kid does the woman get to singularly decide that he's going to have it anyway. the point i…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:54 PM
1

you missed the entire point - the female has the option to either choose to give her resources to the child or abort it or give it up for adoption. the father does not have that choice. People want to throw around the 'it takes 2 to tango' until conception then it's 2 to tango 1 to decide the fate of both.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:50 PM
1

technicalities - yes, she was referring to abortion, but that is not the only means a woman has to not raise a child. she can give the child up for adoption. The quote in no way/shape/form infers, implies, states or otherwise means that a woman either has to abort as the only solution to an unwanted pregnancy.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:45 PM
1

woman here, this is my thoughts as well. It truly is not fair that the man has no options....but i can fully see the implications of a law like this could lead to. I don't even want to go down this road, however, women have been repressed and oppressed so severely in the past, something like this kind of feels like a loss - a give back - even though it truly is not. Both sides need to put a lot of thought into this issue - the issue of sex and societal consequences as a whole. for so long we, wo…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:42 PM
1

How is this fair? Sex is how we procreate. If a man doesn't want a kid, then his choice should be to not have sex, or to get a vasectomy, or to be in control of the birth control himself. Men have lots of choice. the woman had this same choice AND gets the choice to abort / give up for adoption / keep the kid. So a man should be able to make a woman have an abortion if he doesn't want a kid? Because of the nature of biology, women naturally have more control over reproduction, because it happens…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:09 PM
1

I think the resounding thought process here is that if the woman does not want to keep the baby she is free to abort, if the woman wants to keep the baby she is free to keep it and raise it giving the man the option to 'opt out' or give birth and give it up for adoption if abortion is not an option. So the man is not saying she has to carry or abort, he but he does get an option to opt out, just as currently females have that option through either abortion or adoption.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 07:38 PM
1

i think that the point is that in cases where this discussion, men's right to refuse (i can't think of a better term for it) is about the mother potentially keeping the kid even though she doesn't have the means. Look, I know how this is going to sound but i'm going to say it anyway, there should be financial and competence qualifiers on parents to begin with. Most every other thing we do in this country requires a license or "check-in" (think taxes as basically a 'hey how much are you making an…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 05:12 PM
1

it's hard yes, but happens all the time and again, if you cannot afford it solo the choice is there to abort or give the baby up for adoption if abortion is not an option for the woman - that's the point - there are options for the woman...there are none for the man. I don't profess to know any answers - i can simply admit that in this situation the woman has all the power and the man has none in a situation where both should have equal power. They both had a choice to not to have sex - they bot…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:32 PM
1

I have been through an abortion - and would do it again with no shame. i don't necessarily want children - my want of children could potentially be borne of my partners want - it's not entirely inconceivable that people change their minds based on other peoples wants /needs - it's a staple of the human race actually. You say 'he decided' like i had no decision in it...i am perfectly capable of weighing all my options and making an informed decision. Your statement assumes that i do not or am inc…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:24 PM
1

When men agree to pay out of sympathy, women turn around and try to grab their entire paycheck. and this is why people don't take men's rights seriously - statements like this. Situations like this are outliers....making blatantly hateful, unfounded, broad comments. You want to make your argument valid, leave the fanatical extreme ideology out of it...it just makes you look crazy and offers nothing productive to the conversation. You want to do men's rights a favor? speak in truths, arguable def…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:32 PM
1

right..... my 'position' which has been, throughout the entire thread, on multiple replies, the same as yours - things as they stand now are fundamentally unfair for men.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:15 PM
1

it's not a modern concept however, i find it hard pressed to believe that it even comes close to the number of accidental pregnancies, if it's anything, it's an outlier. If we are going to have a constructive productive discussion on a subject, it's best to not bring in the fringe fanatical ideology. All it does is turn people off to your argument and throw you into the 'crazy' category. Similarly with fowl language, angry outbursts and citing statistics with no back up - oh and referring people…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:09 PM
1

indeed...all tough options no doubt.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:56 PM
1

I get what you're saying, however, the basis of this argument is that the woman has the choice at all- whether it be to abort/keep or keep and give it up for adoption - whereas the man does not. The only option the man does have is to not have sex - that is the only sure way to not get a woman pregnant. So really, all things, as they stand, are not equal. The problem is that the woman shares the brunt of the issue regardless of what path is taken. I take issue with the 'it takes 2 to tango' theo…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:54 PM
1

You're not suggesting that men should dictate that choice - to impose an abortion on a pregnant woman by their vote to not have a baby? ABSOLUTELY NOT! i am opening discussion on the unfair point that the woman at least has a choice after the fact whereas the man does not. So that woman can choose to keep / keep and adopt / abort - a man has no choice. his only choice is not to have sex - i make no claim to an answer to this issue - i only recognize that it is fundamentally unfair.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:07 PM
1

i take issue with this as well - bc in an ideal world we would make decisions based on logic - but this is a world of religious views etc...and women are not keeping babies even though they can't afford them, they are keeping babies bc they can't bare to kill their baby (as a pro-life would see it not nec my view)
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:42 PM
2

i don't think you are reading this correctly -the woman does not have to abort. She has the option to abort / keep / keep and give up for adoption. the point of this quote is 'where is the man's option?' he has none.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:40 PM
-1

please, can we have an honest no crazy discussion here - please cite research of the number of times this has happened vs. the number of pregnancies that are pure accidental....this rhetoric makes you seems radical and brings no productive conversation to the issue. a better counterpoint would have been to say " what if the man wants to keep the baby?" - the point is woman can choose men cannot and it's not fair.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:36 PM
0

this is an entirely different discussion that does not belong here. That has nothing to do with the woman's choice and man's lack of - that is the man making the decision to bust his nut ignoring all other facts just to get laid and a wife who is a manipulative cunt for putting him in that situation.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:35 PM
2

i wouldn't call that radical for the simple fact that i am a woman and don't consider myself radical in anyway and absolutely agree with this. But then again, i am pro-choice and don't take issue with abortion. I've had this discussion with my SO - we take precautions but accidents happen - i know he is on the fence about children - i don't really want children but know that he would be a good provider and father and if he wanted to have the baby i would strongly take that into consideration and…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:33 PM
-1

i think it's pretty safe to say, even without a research study to back me up - that most pregnancies do not happen in a forced way but are more of an accidental nature. this kind of rhetoric only brings negative attention to a very important issue. Quite frankly it makes you sound a little bit extreme and that is exactly the kind of feminists that are today's poster children for women above all fuck men campaigns.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:29 PM
1

so a man can force a woman to have an abortion or keep the baby if he decides he wants to keep it? You're missing the mark - bodily autonomy is the important factor here - the woman can keep or abort or keep and put up for adoption - this is her choice and her choice alone. The point of this quote is that the woman can have her choices - all of them - but the man gets a choice too. i can see the social consequences of increased taxes etc. i can at least, admit, as a woman, that as it stands now,…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:05 PM
2

Paternal obligations have nothing to do with the mother's choice. it actually 100% does - if there is no baby there is no parental obligation.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:02 PM
1

i think the main point is that women at least have the choice - men do not even have the choice. What if the man wants to keep the child and the women doesn't - is that not traumatic for the pro-life man? It's a tough problem to address and i claim to have no answers.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:54 PM
2

well this is similar to the new consent laws - you have to verbally consent to have sex - you have to verbally (or more substantially in written form) consent or not...which would take care of another issue - the fact that most couples do not even discuss this issue prior to having sex.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:46 PM
2

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/17/us-usa-women-abortion-idUSKCN0PR1KP20150717
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:44 PM
2

if only it were so easy - the point is you cannot make anyone do anything they don't want to do and just like in sexual encounters - you can change your mind at anytime and decide to not go through with it. I think an issue many women fear is that with all the rhetoric today and the fact that other people already have so much control over our bodies as it is - what happens if the man wants to keep the baby? I think a big fear is that will be put up for debate with the whole 'both involved both d…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:58 PM
3

well i think the main issues is that BOTH parties are involved in the process of making the pregnancy- why are both parties not involved in what happens to that pregnancy. In most cases, pregnancy is not entrapment...let's put that out there...it's accidental....a woman has a choice - she can abort / carry & keep / Carry & adopt - a man's option is - what ever the women chooses. So while abortion may not be easy - i think a key component we are missing is that if you are going to have sex then y…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:54 PM
2

i read that study and completely agree - I had an abortion when i was 17 - haven't regretted it a day in my life.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:49 PM
2

well that's the point - i'm not denying the man's right - i clearly stated that i don't think it's fair- i believe that something needs to be done on the male side of this - as stated, the woman has all the choices - men have none - so just as we cannot force a woman to have an abortion - how can we force a man to be a father? It's a life altering decision for 2 people where 1 person has all the decision making power and other person is just stuck with it. The only issue i take with any of this …
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:48 PM
3

Honestly I don't but I don't think that means men should not be afforded the same right. As another responder posted, the onus of the decision and the hardships that follow would be on the mother. While society would have to find a way to deal with it - we've found a way to deal with our elderly and sick (U.S. Title 19) why would we not find a way to help these mothers And give our men the same freedom of choice woman have... I guess I am wrapping the two issues together bc in my mind one natura…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:29 AM
2

I don't disagree with what you're saying....but in reality even if we get a law like this passed, we still have to deal with mothers who made bad decisions and now can't care for their kids. Not that that concern should be the mans....but it's someone's....and that someone is everyone by way of taxes. It's two fold in my mind I guess which I have to agree isn't fair to men ....it is either equal or it isn't and continues the same pitiful path....I'm just trying to reconcile it all into a nice ev…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:15 AM
1

I completely agree I just foresee the child suffering in the end. Edit: I'm not completely convinced that even if women were faced with financial hardship knowing that they should they choose to keep this kid they are on their own would dissuade the majority. I think the issue goes a bit deeper than that. Being a very logical person myself, I weigh the pros and cons of my decisions and am capable of doing the "hard" things...like not spending money I don't have, not having xhildren I can't affor…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:12 AM
1

I understand what your saying, but this conversation isn't a prolife/choice one. It's whether or not the father has the same choice the mother does. The mother may decide,to,keep the kid...why doesn't the father have the same choice? Doesn't means he has to abort, it simply means the father would be able to,chose to relinquish parental rights.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:10 AM
2

Unfortunately the feminists that get the most attention are more for equality when it's convenient to them...like this specif issue, how is a father saying he cannot afford, want, have time for a baby any worse than a mother who says that and aborts? At least she has the option.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:07 AM
1

I think he (tar green) was making the point that if the mother cannot make a good rational decision, like most other instances in life, she is stuck with the consequences. If you don't have money to afford a kid, don't have it (I use finances bc that's the issue at hand even though there are many other factors in deciding whether to have a child). This is a 'clinical' discussion and I think his question was valid....your going on about child support, which is exactly this issue...if a father can…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:04 AM
2

While I agree with what you've said...in an ideal world every woman would take into consideration financial, time availability, etc..of taking care of said child and make the logical choice...but that's not what happens is it? Finances don't stop people from not having kids...time availability for,raising (or lack thereof) doesn't stop women...so now you have a kid with a poor mother...the kid suffers...not that it should be on the fathers head, bc again, I don't disagree with the whole father a…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:56 AM
1

Also agree
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:51 AM
1

Well let's say that we pass a law ...fathers choice...the right to refuse parental rights and the mother still has the baby....in the end, if that mother has the baby, while financial viability SHOULD be a factor I her decision...it usually is not...now the baby is here and needs food, supplies etc...while I agree it was her choice...the child will suffer. As I noted in another response, if there was a lobby for social programs to help these woman enabling men to have this choice...I would be th…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:48 AM
1

This would be the ideal, I agree
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:40 AM
4

I'm not saying that men are not attached to their unborn children I'm saying it's definitely another level of attachment for the woman who has it growing inside her. You can empathize with someone about anything but you cannot truly feel something you yourself have not been through or experienced...like pregnancy. I was trying to find a male equivalent but can't think of one ...I'd say infertility but women can feel/experience that too...a man will never feel a baby kick in his stomach ...again …
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:34 AM
16

Woman here. Pro-choice. Concerned about men getting a fair shake. Having said that I have to ask you guys how you feel about abortion? That is, how do you think it feels to go through with an abortion? On both the psychological and physical level? I don't really even disagree with what this woman says, but then again, I don't want children and would abort In a heart beat. I am a woman though , and as such I can understand on a level that a man cannot, that feeling of a growing life inside me - i…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 11:56 PM
7

That is the most retarded definition of deadbeat i've ever heard - and incorrect. Not sure if this is a troll or you truly believe this. Yes i know some deadbeat moms as well. It's a universal term - can be applied to anyone.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 01:15 PM
2

yes i believe i did =)
/r/MensRights28/07/11 12:59 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 12:05 AM
3

You're not taking into consideration the ramifications on the mother. As i said in a previous post, some jobs would require manditory leave - what if the mother can't afford that? she doesn't have a choice tho bc SHE IS CARRYING THE BABY. That is the heart of this debate - the woman carries the baby, not the man, thus the initial burden lies on her. Also, the end result burden - be it emotional or financial or both - emotional for giving up the baby - financial for possible loss of pay - and bot…
/r/MensRights28/07/11 12:03 AM
1

People will always have sex but. shit, take responsibility - i kind of agree that if you don't want a kid there are ways to avoid it - and those in that situation should take advantage of those ways. Although i don't believe anyone but the woman in question should make the decision to abort or conceive - it is a sticky situation. Perhaps if men could legally relinquish responsibility if the woman decides to conceive in an unwanted pregnancy...but even then issues crop up. i can foresee countless…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 11:57 PM
1

I understand your point but how do you put value on a human life? Now that isnt to say we dont already put value on our fetus' - that's obvious, but to openly admit we do? that's a whole different ball game. I'm honestly torn on the subject - in 1 respect, it's true, a man does pay a heavy burden for an unwanted pregnancy - just bc the woman is willing to bare that burden doesn't mean the man is and/or should - especially when the woman has a choice to not bare it when a man doesn't. On the othe…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 11:49 PM
1

LOL seems you can put a price on everything these days.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 08:54 PM
2

In regards to 'womb rent' the only issue i take with this is that birthing a child can cause issues you cannot put a price tag on. It is such an emotional thing - i see issues on both sides - the mother wanting to then keep the kid or the mother not wanting to but being emotionally scarred for the rest of her life. Oh the complications. I hear your point, i really do, it is just so much more complicated than that - i know i keep repeating this.... I also understand that in this world of 'someone…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 08:43 PM
2

As a woman I'm not entirely sure how i feel about the whole situation - i understand why and can't say i don't agree that men should have a say in the pregnancy process. I see the solution you are suggesting not being viable in a multitude of situations. I don't claim to have a better one, that's for sure, but this is such a complicated issues. The problem is this - both men and woman know the risks of sex - but it's the woman has to carry that child for 9 months - when doing so there is an emot…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 07:45 PM
1

I would first check the rules of your state - what are alimony laws? 3 years does not seem like much. I will say this - any financial processes you have NOW stay in place for the divorce - so start making changes...like separate account for household expenses etc...make it so you are in complete control of your finances. I cannot see 3 years being as a valid timeline for courts to rake you over the coals. I was with my husband for 6 years and could have asked for alimony in my state and i think …
/r/MensRights30/06/11 04:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter