TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Revet-ment Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by Revet-ment on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

What do you mean? They've been doing it on the scale of thousands for years.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 03:32 PM
10

It's kind of funny how it's touted as basically an accepted, rational theory, yet "the patriarchy" is just the latest in a long line of boogeymen used by authoritarians: the quintessential looming enemy that is simultaneously strong and weak, that controls everything from the shadows yet can be defeated easily by blind allegiance to the cause; whose members are simultaneously cowardly, weak idiots and cunning, violent aggressors. Any enemy of the cause is either part of this grand conspiracy, be…
/r/MensRights29/11/24 07:13 PM
7

It isnt “hateful rhetoric” to explain that society doesnt teach specifically black people to steal. If the point you are trying to make is that society teaches men that rape is acceptable then you're completely out of touch with observable reality. The only situation in which people go out of their way to justify rape and sexual assault is when the perpertrator is female, assuming they even acknowledge the ability of women to commit one of the worst-viewed crimes possible. Dont even go there wit…
/r/MensRights26/01/22 03:12 PM
16

They're absolutely comparable. Black people and men are both more likely to be criminals than the general population. If it is wrong to characterise all blacks as dangerous based on that fact, then it is likewise wrong to characterise all men as dangerous. You are okay with one generalisation and not the other not because of some fundamental difference in the statements being made, but because modern society has taught you that hateful rhetoric is acceptable when aimed at certain groups. Why is …
/r/MensRights26/01/22 05:35 AM
4

Re-read your own post, replacing 'women' with 'whites' and 'men' with 'blacks', and you might gain some insight into why people are not comfortable using crime statistics and anecdotal paranoia to justify discrimination against large groups of people. Or maybe you won't, considering you apparently just created this account so you could talk about how awful men are.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 02:26 AM
9

The assumption that women are naturally better caregivers is part of patriarchy All you need to know about this particular lie is that before feminist movements really got going primary custody was usually awarded to the father since he usually made more money. Women's groups lobbied to change that, and were incredibly successful.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:49 AM
10

Didn't New York recently change this to accommodate their abortion laws? Might not apply everywhere.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 12:09 AM
13

That's not why they do it but that is its only purpose. The reason that people perform circumcisions in the US is usually 'because it's cleaner': however, there is no credible evidence that it does any such thing, and in fact having an open wound so close to the anus is just asking for an infection on a baby. The original popularisation of circumcision in America was as a way to make masturbation less enjoyable. Just puritanical moralising, pushed by Dr. Kellogg - he also wanted to introduce FGM…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 05:06 AM
24

politicians police female bodily autonomy in a way they wouldn’t ever men. Indeed. That's why it's illegal to cut off parts of women's genitalia, but cutting off bits of men's genitals is fine and so normalised that almost all American men have it done when they're babies so they can't even complain about it. If you're pro-choice that's fine, but don't try and pretend that this is somehow a rights imbalance.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 03:46 AM
2

It's definitely the case. The modern left (especially the US Democratic party) tends not to differ overmuch from their right-wing counterparts on economic policy, for whatever reason. What's more, most of the social issues they successfully leveraged in the Obama era are now gone, so they need something to hold their coalition together, and that thing is identity politics. Most of them probably don't actually believe in it, they just see it as a useful political tool. I'm left-leaning on a numbe…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 01:05 AM
5

Most of my knowledge on this comes secondhand, from a comic artist who I don't actually follow myself but occasionally stumble across called Kukuruyo. Their post about this topic is here. Fair warning; while I don't believe there's anything NSFW on that page, I think there is on other parts of the site. Also, while it's pretty well-sourced, most of the sources are in Spanish, plus it is still basically just some guy's blog post so it's not going to pass academic muster. Edit: also, I made a mist…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 07:15 AM
5

Isn't this the same country that invented a category of 'gender violence' which basically means any crime involving a male perpetrator and female victim, set up kangaroo courts outside the regular justice system that require little or no evidence, then incentivised reporting by giving cash payouts to any woman who reports a case of 'gender violence' with no penalty for making a false accusation? If this is a country with a 'macho culture' I really want to see what they call countries where women…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 06:02 AM
15

Don't forget Queen Victoria, who was head of state of the UK during the period that it was indisputably the most powerful nation on the planet.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 05:31 AM
14

But if there was more than a two-thirds reduction in the number of cases, shouldn't we expect the percentage of false cases to more than triple even if the actual number was the same?
/r/MensRights31/12/15 04:35 PM
3

Creating squads of girls who go around reporting 'sexist' speech from other students based on nothing but their own word? I honestly can't see how consciously emulating the methods used in the USSR and fascist regimes to control the populace ever passed muster, unless in like 6 months a history teacher comes out to reveal it's all one big interactive lesson on why this is a terrible way to do things. Give it a little while and these kids will be corrupt as hell and pushing everyone else around.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:58 PM
6

When Norah Vincent lived as a man for six months she said afterwards that females are basically clueless about the male experience. I suspect that this has something to do with how attitudes about the other gender are commonly portrayed. How many times have you heard on tv or in movies 'I'll never understand women'? Whereas in media women are usually perplexed not by men themselves, but how men are so simple, and they don't understand how men can enjoy 'dumb' activities like sports (Women get th…
/r/MensRights23/09/15 09:03 AM
35

This doesn't actually surprise me at all. When you take one group and tell them from birth that doing something is morally wrong and members of that group are regularly criminally prosecuted for doing that thing, as well as being looked down upon by society at large, they're obviously less likely to do that thing than a group that doesn't have those values instilled to the same extent. Not that women aren't taught that sexual assault is wrong, or that they don't know it's wrong, but the reaction…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 04:37 PM
1

I'd literally never heard of her before and her feminism isn't brought up in the article, nor is there any obvious male-bashing, so how was I supposed to know? Your title is plural so I didn't think you meant the author.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:06 AM
1

No arguments on that front. It's not a good article by any means. I'm just noting that getting all defensive about something that's barely even relevant is pointless.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:09 PM
0

Oh, right. Yeah, probably.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:07 PM
2

If you take out the 'feminists', sure.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 02:33 PM
35

Not only is your title thoroughly misleading - feminism isn't mentioned anywhere in the article - the question being asked was not 'why do we need men to have kids' but more 'why bother with two genders at all instead of having every member of the species be able to reproduce' and the question was being applied to every animal species. It's got nothing to do with gender issues; this is science.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:48 PM
2

Look, I was just pointing out that their analogy makes no sense. Don't read too much into it.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 05:54 PM
2

They aren't, but it's still true that if all diseases that we vaccinate for were eradicated, we would stop vaccinating completely.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 12:01 PM
3

"So I can stop taking vaccines because no one is sick anymore" Well....yes, actually. You might note that generally, we do not vaccinate people for smallpox any more.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 01:01 AM
3

You don't have to, but if you treat others with disdain you'll be treated the same way, and that treatment will be entirely justified; so don't complain about the reception you receive.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 10:04 AM
20

Look, I understand where you're coming from on the Redpillers. I don't have any particular fondness for them myself, and they're not a group I would at all associate myself with. Attacking them with ad-hominems liks 'insecure, sheltered, inferior losers', however, is showing a shocking lack of self-awareness. The attitude you're expressing here is the same one that you're complaining about SJWs expressing towards you for your beliefs. Even if your attitude towards Redpillers is justified, this s…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:41 PM
12

Look. I don't think what you've said is necessarily wrong. Most of the initiatives aimed at pushing this stuff has come from liberal parties. But you cannot win by making this a partisan issue. You need those liberals who support innocent until proven guilty and freedom of speech on your side from within the Democrats, because if they switch sides and turn GOP all they'll be doing is 'proving' that they aren't actually liberals. If they DO switch their votes, you may get the Republican party to …
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:00 PM
2

That's a print link, you may wish to edit it.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 03:16 PM
0

So what I'm taking from this is that I shouldn't go to Scotland because they believe the appropriate punishment for multiple murders is councilling and group therapy. I'm all for rehabilitation, but some people cannot be or refuse to be rehabilitated, and not having anywhere to put those people is dangerously irresponsible.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 03:13 PM
5

The way I always saw it, we perceive rape as being worse because of intent. Murder is the crime with the worse outcome, unquestionably. However, in some cases murder can be justified. The intent behind it is variable. Rape, on the other hand, while having a less severe result, cannot be justified outside of very specific and unlikely instances (being forced to rape at gunpoint, for example). You can't rape in self-defence. That's why we see it as a worse crime; it might have a better outcome, bu…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:12 PM
7

I'm not entirely sure this falls under men's rights, to be honest. That said, you should demand to see the manager and ask what exactly you were accused of, then if they have any proof, which they won't if what you're saying is true. If they still suspend you, ask for a refund of your remaining membership time and find another gym. If they don't want you as a customer, then they'll surely be happy to not take your money.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:33 AM
1

Nope, not even once. I did once have a lot of people that I counted as friends tell me that a woman was entitled to me, though, and deceive me in order to get me to hook up with her.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:58 PM
3

But if the press listens to you but the representative doesn't, you can tell the press that. Plus, if there's something that makes a better story than women being victims, it's children being victims. And I'd like to believe that at least some politicians will draw attention to someone in trouble, if only to boost their own careers.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:05 PM
2

My advice to you would be to make it a public issue. Contact your representative and tell them this story. Let them know that Child Protection is actively ignoring abuse in their...constituency? I don't know the correct term. If your ex's area has a different representative contact them too. Get your story out to the press. Try and find other fathers who have been through this sort of thing (there are probably some on this very subreddit) and have them give their stories too. If you can influenc…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 03:46 PM
2

As far as I can tell, this article can be summed up as 'Male-dominated hobbies have lots of men: therefore patriarchy'. No, that's not how it works. It's not some patriarchal conspiracy. Things that men like to do are overwhelmingly done by men because men like to do those things. Some women like to do those things too, and that's great! But they're always going to be a minority because you can't force people to like things, and by and large women do not have interest in these things. If they di…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 11:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter