ReyosBlackwood Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	So many of us grew up indoctrinated that domestic abuse done by women is somehow ok First, does that matter, and second, not always. Lets take the example of Piggy from the original post, she's canonically a black belt in karate, you don't really shrug off attacked from a trained fighter. And even if you do, domestic abuse is domestic abuse, and wen almost 3/4 of all one directional IPV is committed by women (generally because men are afraid they'll get the abuser label and the ride in the back of the cop car if they defend themselves) making it normal is the problem.	/r/MensRights	03/07/19 07:43 PM
5	Too right And to some point there has to be some admission that they weren't innocent in things when they were seeking out sex. Reminds me of a recent story of a teenage boy "raped" by 21 older men he met on Grindr (gay hookup app) There's no way you can not know what you're doing after the first 2 or 3, he was looking for it, he wanted what he got but he's a little angel and the adults are rapists (I know this isn't quite MRM here, since it was gay, but still goes to the point, when someone's seeking out…	/r/MensRights	03/07/19 07:39 PM
13	Too right If they have a fake ID, not knowing they were underage needs to be a defence. If they were in an age restricted place, a bar or nightclub and age was assumed because of that, not knowing they were underage needs to be a defence. Seriously I know guys in their 20s that could pass for underage if they shaved or did makeup differently, and I am betting the reverse is true, early bloomers who look like they're probably 21 while they're 15 do exist.	/r/MensRights	03/07/19 07:36 PM
3	Too right True but a drunken hookup is different from taking advantage of someone who's drunk. Two drunk people making a bad choice are equally responsible for that choice, one sober person taking advantage of one drunk person is different.	/r/MensRights	03/07/19 07:32 PM
4	UK: Husband sues his wife for 'every penny' he spent on the eight-year-old son he discovered was actually fathered by another man. But that wouldn't be suing the man who she thought was the father, it would be suing the fertility clinic, a bit of a difference there, and honestly, she should be able to sue over that. So should the one who was supposed to be the father, but again suing the clinic.	/r/MensRights	03/07/19 07:28 PM
3	UK: Husband sues his wife for 'every penny' he spent on the eight-year-old son he discovered was actually fathered by another man. Yeah but that's suing the hospital, not suing the father. My grandmother always said (and there was a mix up in the hospital with one of her children, it was fixed as she insisted the kid wasn't hers that they brought her) "Mama's baby, papa's maybe"	/r/MensRights	03/07/19 07:27 PM
2	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated Well decreased risk of phimosis and paraphimosis is decreased 100%, since phimosis is a foreskin too tight to pull over the glans, and paraphimosis is a foreskin that was forced over the glans and is too tight to push back. Cutting off the foreskin guarantees you won't have tight foreskin issues. Phimosis affects less than 1 in 100 men as adults and paraphimosis is just phimosis that someone handled wrong. less than 0.5% of phimosis cases need circumcision to fix, more than 4/5 of cases can be f…	/r/MensRights	11/05/19 04:31 PM
1	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated No that 117 estimate is deaths from hospital circumcisions, using hospital records of the operations and deaths from haemorrhage or sepsis (blood loss and infection) within a certain time frame after the cut to connect the too. Officially there's no deaths from hospital circumcision because THEY DO NOT REPORT CIRCUMCISION AS THE CAUSE ever. There's no system for reporting of any circumcision complications, part of why they don't actually KNOW the complication rate, the other reason is different …	/r/MensRights	11/05/19 04:20 PM
2	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated It should be added that phimosis is the natural state of all boys. The glans is actually fused to the foreskin by a membrane at birth, and until this breaks down (naturally usually around the start of puberty, but it can be at the end of puberty or in some cases earlier) the foreskin is naturally held tight to the penis. This means any diagnosis of phimosis in an infant or young child is BULLSHIT take a look at what happened to David's brother: The doctors chose not to operate on Brian, whose ph…	/r/MensRights	11/05/19 04:17 PM
3	Men, specifically, being tortured in Yemen; why is this not received with international cries of sexism the way mass crimes against women are? Heh yeah right, the "Bring back our girls" campaign was one of the biggest pieces of proof that boys don't matter. Before they started to kidnap the girls they were letting them go home WHILE THEY BURNED THE BOYS ALIVE! They were still killing the boys, but people started to care when the girls were being taken.	/r/MensRights	27/04/19 01:09 AM
1	Debunking some myths about men's issues 1: every country except China. It's the one country where women commit more suicides, and the number is like 0.7:1, globally men commit suicide almost twice as much, though in the USA it's more than double that, access to guns might cut that down, but that doesn't solve the causes, just makes it harder to do. 3: Pizzey started shelters that were open to all, she was kicked out of the organisation she started and the shelters turned into women's shelters. Statistically 70% of the perpetrators of …	/r/MensRights	27/04/19 12:56 AM
1	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated Over the past year alone I've had over 20 separate partners, about 40% intact and 60% cut, in the last 365 alone, I definitely know the difference in look between a cut and intact penis when erect.	/r/MensRights	27/03/19 07:19 PM
3	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated Except it DOES harm the child in the long run, there are men who committed suicide for this issue alone, like Jonathon Conte, it's been well known that the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis for thousands of years, that's why the puritans started cutting them off, it's why Jews in ancient Greece started foreskin restoration, because they wanted to hide among the Greeks that thought them insane for cutting off the best parts when baths and sports were all dune public and nude. Hell …	/r/MensRights	22/03/19 12:18 AM
3	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated Okay go ahead and read the rest of my position posts on this topic, then perhaps you should apologise for grabbing this from the wrong end and running with it into personal attacks. Shoving your foot so far into your mouth.... There is a GIGANTIC difference between pointing out that this happens, that a single foreskin can be lab grown into $100,000 of tissue, or cells used in facials at $650 an appointment, sold for I don't know exactly what a mL I know it's over $400. There is a huge differenc…	/r/MensRights	22/03/19 12:03 AM
6	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated It's not abuse because what, you say it is? Because it's happened for a long time? Because some god that as far as I am concerned doesn't exist demanded it? None of that makes it any less abuse, it fits the definitions of mutilation, and most parents who've beaten their children, or done many other forms of child abuse say it's better for them too. Being legal or popular is not a measure of what's right, it never has been, slavery, rape, domestic abuse, other forms of child abuse, all things tha…	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 05:07 AM
4	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated It is infact one of the worst forms of child abuse, cutting off a healthy and sensitive part of the body usually without any kind of pain management, because your beliefs tell you to when there is no medical need. At least other forms of child abuse will heal and you can come back from fully, this never grows back.	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 02:43 AM
6	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated Islam also does, which is why 70% of the world's circumcised men are Muslims. That's based on their secondary religious texts, the hadiths, it is not mentioned in the quran.	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 02:40 AM
2	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated But that makes no sense at all, the cut itself back then would have caused even more infections. It was a loyalty test for the parents, prove your loyalty to the faith by risking the life of your child and cutting off a part of hsi body.	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 02:39 AM
5	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated Not days, months, it was May when the court case happened and I believe December when Merkel changed the laws to bring it back.	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 02:38 AM
2	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated yeah but Poe's Law, some one would have believed he meant it.	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 02:35 AM
5	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated That's the myth pushed by western feminism yes, but it's not true at all. L. Catania's study into FGM victims showed 98%+ still able to orgasm and enjoy a sex life, though orgasm was harder to reach because yes they lost pleasure, the same happens to cut men. Women in those cultures are much like men in the USA, "I was cut and I am fine" or "It didn't do me any harm" because they know no different, just like most cut American men, in fact only 1 in 5 women in Egypt support ending the practice, t…	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 02:34 AM
4	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated The foreskin is attached to the glans at birth by a membrane called the balanopreputial lamina, forcing it back rips this off both, a very painful thing (they do this during every circumcision) and doing damage to both sides, the damage it does to the foreskin, little tears that will scar, can lead to what is called pathological phimosis, scar tissue doesn't grow right so the foreskin stays too tight when it should release and loosen at puberty.	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 02:22 AM
2	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated I'd be considered left of center.	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 02:18 AM
2	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated Not always, some states that have lax laws on it, the tissue is sold, and it's very valuable.	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 02:18 AM
5	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated Dan Bollinger estimated 117 infant boys die each year, this was done by going through medical records and tying deaths to the surgery based on what they died of (usually haemorrhage or sepsis) to the cause, circumcision, based on how long after the death was. Thing is they don't actually list circumcision as a cause of death, only the complication from the circumcision, blood loss or infection. And that's in US hospitals, the most dangerous genital cutting practice done today is the Xhosa male c…	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 02:15 AM
6	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated They don't actually, that's a myth that I keep hearing, but as a gay man I can tell you they very definitely don't, and I much prefer those that have all their parts still attached, unlike my own.	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 02:07 AM
4	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated It was the ADL that killed the Iceland ban, it was a Rabbi that had new laws made in Germany to reverse the decision in 2012 that found circumcision was a violation of a boys human rights and thus was illegal.	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 02:06 AM
13	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated This is actually not true. It's false for a few reasons: Infants cannot be given proper anaesthetic, a general like they give adults would damage or kill them, so they are given locals, if they are given any at all because: This comes partly out of a belief that infants cannot feel pain - it seems shocking but until 30-40 years ago or so it was believed that infants in fact couldn't feel pain. New science has shown that not only do they feel pain, they feel it about 4 times as intensely as adult…	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 02:03 AM
6	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated Not so, the practice changed about 2000 years ago, give or take 200 years, to the modern practice. Jewish men in ancient greek and roman times were practising forms of foreskin restoration like epispasm, after all baths were public and nude, sports and gyms were nude, and those cultures valued the foreskin, jewish men didn't want to be singled out, they did what they could to recover what had been taken. Jewish leaders did not like this so they made the practice more invasive, requiring much mor…	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 01:54 AM
12	Mother laughs while her son gets mutilated In Islam circumcision of either gender is not mentioned in the Qu'ran, but both are mentioned in the hadiths. Different sects believe different hadiths are authentic, FGC is covered in the Diam al Islam, which sects like the Dawoodi Bohra follow, requiring them, for religious reasons, to practice FGC just like the practice MGC. No parent however has the right to mutilate their child for their own beliefs, after all millions of people abandon faiths every year now, you're carving a belief into yo…	/r/MensRights	21/03/19 01:50 AM
1	r/offmychest mod claims that “false rape accusations don’t happen often.” Those still rely on a probability assessment by the police, are you insisting that they are able to determine with complete accuracy what cases are false? I don't have quite the faith in them that you do and I am because of that fairly sure that that 8% is a low number because of it. And that yes some people ARE just good liars.	/r/MensRights	01/03/19 02:05 PM
1	r/offmychest mod claims that “false rape accusations don’t happen often.” which gives us a MASSIVE ambiguous amount in the middle that don't result in conviction for one reason or another, but people, at least those with certain agendas are very comfortable with that I guess now it's 89.75% based on the 8% found to be "unfouded" (since when has false meant anything other than the opposite of true?) and the 2.25% that that 2.2% of not unfounded cases is of the whole. Are you insisting that none of those 9/10 cases are also "unfounded"?	/r/MensRights	01/03/19 02:02 PM
3	r/offmychest mod claims that “false rape accusations don’t happen often.” We get back to the difference between proven false and actually false, the number proven false is going to be lower than the number that are actually false and with such a low rate of cases going even to trial, there's a massive, massive number of cases that are never proven either way. You also run into the issue if there's no punishment for false accusations of the incentive for making such accusations. It's literally how the crime of blackmail works, a way to destroy someone's life if you don…	/r/MensRights	01/03/19 04:42 AM
2	r/offmychest mod claims that “false rape accusations don’t happen often.” I take that back, I did find something. I found a prosecution rate, and that was (estimating a massive underreporting rate) 384/1000 are reported to police and of those 11 go to prosecution. so 11/384 is less than 3% that even go to trial. I am starting to feel way, way too generous giving you 1/4 as proven when less even make it to trial than are proven false. They further say that of those 7 result in conviction, so 7/11 that go to trial, is 2/3, out of the number reported it's less than 2%. T…	/r/MensRights	01/03/19 04:32 AM
1	r/offmychest mod claims that “false rape accusations don’t happen often.” I did google it, I could find nothing at all, anywhere. but if you have numbers, actual numbers on the amount of rape allegations that are proven true, I would absolutely love to see them. In 1994, Eugene Kanin gave numbers as high as 50% of all rape allegations are false, that research has been discredited, and I think rightly so. I don't think the numbers are that high, his sample size was small and there were issues in it, but acting like 92% of rape accusations are true because only 8% are p…	/r/MensRights	01/03/19 04:27 AM
3	r/offmychest mod claims that “false rape accusations don’t happen often.” That's the problem, I've never actually seen a number. it's easy to find that 2-8% statistic, but to actually find the percent that result in conviction, or the percent that never go to court? I've never seen those numbers, they are unknown but what is commonly cited is that most never get proven either way, either not going to trial, or a hung jury, numbers are nowhere to be found, yet people are comfortable repeating the 2-8% or 5% or often just the low end 2% as if that's all encompassing, as…	/r/MensRights	01/03/19 03:52 AM
3	r/offmychest mod claims that “false rape accusations don’t happen often.” I've only ever had a safeword called on me once, I stopped, if you don't use the safeword though I go until I am satisfied, or in some cases we run out of time, like that hour I had before work once. I know it happens that a woman regrets sex and it becomes rape, because she says it is, and that Jack and Josie poster, bad drunk decisions when they're both drunk isn't rape.	/r/MensRights	01/03/19 02:54 AM
3	r/offmychest mod claims that “false rape accusations don’t happen often.” We don't know how rare it is, statistically speaking 8% are proven false, but when only about double that are proven true, the other 4/5 could go either way, no one knows, and yes some of those proven true are eventually overturned as false. The numbers are even worse when you look at colleges, title 9 isn't a judicial system, and most rape cases that go through it are overturned. I remember one case where a girl and her boyfirend were just kinky, but her roommate reported him for rape, no one w…	/r/MensRights	01/03/19 02:20 AM
3	r/offmychest mod claims that “false rape accusations don’t happen often.” The stat says up to 85%, and that's close to accurate, saying that 15% are proven true, the other 85%, including the 8% that are proven false, could actually go either way. I don't think anyone actually believes the number is as high as 85% false, but it's also not 92% true either, reality is somewhere in the middle. The problem with not prosecuting false accusers is that the mere accusation of a sexual crime is enough to destroy someone's life. The media publishes the accusations instantly, the…	/r/MensRights	01/03/19 02:15 AM
12	r/offmychest mod claims that “false rape accusations don’t happen often.” that's 8% PROVEN false. the VAST majority of rape accusations are not proven one way or the other, so 3/4 or so more could still be false, or those 3/4 could all be true, no one actually knows. The claim that it's only 2%-8% is pushing a story by assuming all those that aren't proven false are true.	/r/MensRights	01/03/19 01:58 AM
1	I watched the documentary 'American Circumcision' a couple days ago. Here are my thoughts. It didn't become a federal crime, only the Female Genital Mutilation Act of 1996 not 1997 was really focused on by those who make that claim, a law which should never have been passed because it is indeed federal overreach into areas of law enforcement that the constitution gives to the states (or rather that the constitution does not give to the federal government and this gives "all others" to the states) As for 1977 that was the year that it stopped being covered by insurance as a routine pro…	/r/MensRights	28/02/19 11:44 PM
6	Woman prefers a “tight” circumcision... Essentially, she is saying she prefers a penis that has no mobile skin system. No movable tissue on the shaft. Does anyone else understand the depth to this perversion? Though there is a clear 6/7 preference in that study, on top of the 74.6% higher likelihood of female orgasm reported in that study and a ~1.3 points lower discomfort during sex rating on a 4 point likert scale. None of which matters to a gay guy like me of course, circumcision has it's own issues when MSM is involved.	/r/MensRights	23/02/19 07:05 AM
4	I watched the documentary 'American Circumcision' a couple days ago. Here are my thoughts. Edgar Schoen, head of the AAP circumcision taskforce that in 1989 reversed their position on circumcision from "There are no valid medical indications for circumcision in the neonatal period." to "Newborn circumcision has potential medical benefits and advantages as well as disadvantages and risks."	/r/MensRights	20/02/19 11:41 PM
3	I watched the documentary 'American Circumcision' a couple days ago. Here are my thoughts. From Treatment for Self-Abuse and Its Effects, Plain Facts for Old and Young by John Harvey Kellogg: A remedy which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment, as it may well be in some cases. The soreness wh…	/r/MensRights	20/02/19 10:51 PM
5	I watched the documentary 'American Circumcision' a couple days ago. Here are my thoughts. He's not the only cereal guy involved, C. W. Post and Rev. Sylvester Graham were also very pro circumcision, though they didn't push it as hard as Kellogg.	/r/MensRights	20/02/19 10:48 PM
8	I watched the documentary 'American Circumcision' a couple days ago. Here are my thoughts. Actually, belief that the glans is the most sensitive part of the penis is one of those myths that tend to be believed by people in the USA. The most sensitive parts of the penis are on the inner side of the foreskin, cut off during circumcision.	/r/MensRights	20/02/19 10:46 PM
3	I watched the documentary 'American Circumcision' a couple days ago. Here are my thoughts. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination. Circumcised infants showed a stronger pain response to subsequent routine vaccination than uncircumcised infants. Among the circumcised group, preoperative treatment with Emla attenuated the pain response to vaccination. We recommend treatment to prevent neonatal circumcision pain. Can adverse neonatal experiences alter brain development and subsequent behavior? Models of early experience, such as repetitiv…	/r/MensRights	20/02/19 10:45 PM
5	I watched the documentary 'American Circumcision' a couple days ago. Here are my thoughts. Would it make you feel better to know he died two years ago? Unless you're talking the other old doctor, Morris, he's unfortunately still pushing his bullshit.	/r/MensRights	20/02/19 10:38 PM
3	I watched the documentary 'American Circumcision' a couple days ago. Here are my thoughts. Beyond that, FGM is still done all the time in the USA, things that fall under the definition at least, done to adult women who consent to it. Part of the issue is people assume the worst of FGM and don't realize labiaplasty counts, or getting a clit ring, or vaginoplasty, all done in the USA and other developed nations of the world.	/r/MensRights	20/02/19 10:37 PM
5	I watched the documentary 'American Circumcision' a couple days ago. Here are my thoughts. Except that's really not true of how the world, not the US but the world, is. In Singapore FGM is done in clinics, using sterile tools, just like US circumcision. And the genital cutting done with the highest rate of complication, it's not a form of FGM, it's the Xhosa tribal male circumcision, a group from South Africa. Assuming circumcision of boys as babies in hospitals is the norm and that cutting preteen girls in huts in africa is how it always is is just wrong. The average circumcision wor…	/r/MensRights	20/02/19 10:34 PM
7	I watched the documentary 'American Circumcision' a couple days ago. Here are my thoughts. Though he is a doctor, one of the men from the 2012 taskforce on circumcision admits to circumcising his own son on their kitchen table. He's Jewish. In fact half the whole taskforce had obvious conflicts of interest, to say nothing of the less obvious cultural bias rampant in the USA. This one was Jewish, one was part of the group that recommended less invasive forms of FGM be allowed, one was the doctor who refused to crack down on metzitzah b'peh (sucking the bleeding wound during a bris) aft…	/r/MensRights	20/02/19 10:31 PM
4	I watched the documentary 'American Circumcision' a couple days ago. Here are my thoughts. I'd always been aware of female genital mutilation as well, and thought it was only in countries very far away from here (correct me if it's never been done in the states) Then let me correct you, until 1977 forms of FGM were covered by heath insurance, a century before that it was recommended just like circumcision of boys to control masturbation. There are women alive in the USA today who were legally subjected to FGM procedures as girls like Patricia Robinett. The very same doctor who is mo…	/r/MensRights	20/02/19 10:27 PM
2	Paper published in the British Journal of Urology concludes circumcision "ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis" There are some issues with the biblical stance: First and the biggest being those being cut don't actually believe in the reason for it. Infants don't have a faith, and while their parents will teach them their beliefs, and many will follow those beliefs as adults, people are leaving the faith of their parents in record numbers. Someone shouldn't have to bear a mark of a faith that is not theirs, particularly when they aren't actually descendants of Abraham, this was a covenant based on blood, n…	/r/MensRights	14/02/19 02:14 AM
3	Paper published in the British Journal of Urology concludes circumcision "ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis" Fetuses get erections still in the womb.	/r/MensRights	14/02/19 01:57 AM
2	Paper published in the British Journal of Urology concludes circumcision "ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis" Here's that part of Maimon's same Guide in full: Similarly with regard to circumcision, one of the reasons for it is, in my opinion, the wish to bring about a decrease in sexual intercourse and a weakening of the organ in question, so that this activity be diminished and the organ be in as quiet a state as possible. It has been thought that circumcision perfects what is defective congenitally. This gave the possibility to everyone to raise an objection and to say: How can natural things be defec…	/r/MensRights	14/02/19 01:55 AM
3	Paper published in the British Journal of Urology concludes circumcision "ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis" Actually I found a Jewish scholar who gave three reasons, we're both right all across the board, from Moses ben Maimon's work "The Guide of the Perplexed": The perfection and perpetuation of this Law can only be achieved if circumcision is performed in childhood. For this there are three wise reasons. The first is that if the child were let alone until he grew up, he would sometimes not perform it. The second is that a child does not suffer as much pain as a grown-up man because his membrane is …	/r/MensRights	12/02/19 01:45 PM
5	Paper published in the British Journal of Urology concludes circumcision "ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis" I can definitely confirm it as a gay man too, the only cut man I have ever had as a sexual partner that came close to the sensitivity of my intact partners had been circumcised half a year, not decades like the rest, before that, and I bet that's going downhill sensitivity wise slowly now.	/r/MensRights	12/02/19 08:00 AM
9	Paper published in the British Journal of Urology concludes circumcision "ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis" There are a few reasons why this happens, depending on the parts of the penis, the most obvious is the parts that would normally be covered and protected are now uncovered and take more damage over time from that. Another reason is the blood system of the foreskin is cut off unnaturally, blood does not flow through it as it would normally, and reduced blood flow to the nerves can damage them. Another possible reason is the stress and pain underwent during circumcision permanently change the brai…	/r/MensRights	12/02/19 07:50 AM
5	Paper published in the British Journal of Urology concludes circumcision "ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis" Maybe if they made you do it after a few years, that's part of the reason behind the 8 day timeframe, before parent and child bonding has really set in. It is far easier to sacrifice someone else than yourself, and it's not a sacrifice at all because you do not value it. If they were made to sacrifice their own foreskins, after having it as children and into adulthood, they'd tell the mohels to f*ck off.	/r/MensRights	12/02/19 07:40 AM
9	Paper published in the British Journal of Urology concludes circumcision "ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis" Neither can I yeah.	/r/MensRights	12/02/19 01:05 AM
22	Paper published in the British Journal of Urology concludes circumcision "ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis" If the cut guys you're sucking ere even able to orgasm at all from oral they should consider themselves lucky, though not as lucky as those who were left intact of course. I can't and most I know can't.	/r/MensRights	11/02/19 07:45 PM
2	Paper published in the British Journal of Urology concludes circumcision "ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis" Well considering how circumcision was made medical to prevent boys from masturbating back when disease was believed to be caused by nervous imbalances, does it really surprise anyone? They knew the foreskin was the most sensitive part of the penis for thousands of years, they knew it in ancient Rome and Greece, the ancient Jewish people knew it and admitted to circumcision as a sacrifice because of the value of foreskin. (Maimonides and Philo of Alexandria)	/r/MensRights	11/02/19 07:44 PM